Hi:
I have been having a PM exchange on ancient civilizations and their relevance to my work. Were there ancient civilizations that had advanced energy technology? Are some of their technological feats unrecognized today because scientists cannot wrap their heads around the energy technologies and resultant artifacts? Some of that may be the case. Is there anything that we can learn from studying those ancient civilizations that can make our situation today more comprehensible?
Around megalithic structures, there is a lot of, “How did they do it?” The denial of mainstream science on the energy issue may help fuel their skepticism about ancient civilizations, but it is not all misplaced skepticism. Virtually all the ancient artifacts that I know of have been made of stone. I doubt that they could have been too advanced, particularly on the energy issue, if they could not smelt metal.
I have read up plenty on disappeared ancient civilizations, and have had people close to me tell tales of archeological discoveries being covered up. I write about a defrocked archeologist on my site:
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/columbus.htm#mcintyre
and cite works such as Forbidden Archeology on my site and a few other fringe sources like that. I have plenty of Childress books at home, and channeled and past-life regression books on stuff like Atlantis. My first love was archeology, and I helped scout for a dig when I was about twelve. I had a fossil collection from what I found as a kid, and so on. I have been on the fringes of the Velikovsky controversy since about 1996.
One pal is convinced that some Mesoamerican pyramids have evidence of being configured and built for energy reasons (mica sheets are his primary evidence), but my reply is if there was all of that energy somehow generated by means that we would consider esoteric (I have been familiar with pyramid power for nearly forty years, and I know there is something real there), what did they use it for? Surely not to run appliances. If all that energy was generated, what was it used for? There are plenty of fringe theories on that score, too, but the evidence is thin.
I also have been reading a great deal of anthropology in boning up for my energy essay.
This is where I stand on the issue….
I respect the people who have sifted through ancient middens, braved Arctic and Outback weather in search of fossil layers, and so on. There is a great deal of important work that has been done, and it has helped inform and enlighten me on many issues related to the history of Earth and humanity. Their toolset is impressive and keeps getting better, such as gas chromatographs and mass spectrometers. There is fraud and cover-ups, fabricated findings, internecine wars and the rest, which you can find in any discipline, in this world of scarcity, I am sad to say.
However, professional anthropology compared to fringe anthropology can be like comparing a Ferrari to a skateboard. Most fringe findings do not hold up to scrutiny. I am not saying that orthodoxy is always right or even on the right track, but the fringe findings are often so flimsy that they cannot withstand much scrutiny. Studying the fringe findings usually arrive at a big fat “maybe” of a conclusion, at best.
You have seen me refer to it plenty, but Rife’s and Naessens’s microscopes demonstrate very clearly that not only is orthodox optical theory found wanting, but the findings of those microscopes upend a lot of what microbiology (and orthodox theories of life itself) is based on:
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#rife
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#naessens
Have one remote viewing after taking the Silva class, and the materialistic conceits of mainstream science collapse, never to be rehabilitated.
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#silva
My technical pals who saw that UFO light up with me were never the same:
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/ufo.htm#visit2005
I am reading a book right now on how much of a political undertaking Darwin’s efforts were. It was a highly conscious attempt to replace theism with materialism, but it was performed rather sneakily.
So, not all is well in the halls of orthodoxy and never has been, but that does not lend much credibility to the fringes, either.
And this is where is can get tricky, and I write about it plenty:
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/orthodox.htm
My interest in all of that orthodox and fringe anthropology is in how important it is in understanding our past to the extent that it can help us understand the present better, and what it can mean for our future. It is obvious, whether it is orthodox or fringe, that energy has always been the name of the game, going back to the beginnings of life on Earth.
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/upcoming.htm#revolutions
If an area of study helps improve my understanding on those subjects, I am game, and it is rarely easy study.
While there may be fruitful learning to be had in fringe archeology, there is so much wacky stuff, too, that you can dive into those rabbit holes and not come up for air for several years, and end up with nothing but fool’s gold in your hands (but the experience can be educational, and all fringe seekers probably need to have at least one of those experiences). And when I looked into the moon landings and other fringe topics, it was sobering to continually go deep on evidence that fringe voices touted as air-tight, to only see it disintegrate upon further inspection. When you have enough episodes like that under your belt, you begin to grow highly skeptical toward fringe claims. The “skeptics” are often fraudulent in their stance, and can be incredibly narrow-minded:
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#friends
but that does not make the fringes right, either. People are constantly trying to enlist my interest or effort in their fringe project. Most, even if valid, is not going to solve the world’s energy problems and boost humanity into the quantum leap to abundance, which is where my interest is. I consider it possible that some technologically-advanced civilizations nuked themselves or had some other kind of meltdown. If so, their extinctions were likely related to misusing energy technologies. What would that mean for us? The misuse and abuse of energy technologies is the biggest threat to humanity today, from nuclear fission to burning fossil fuels, not to mention the West’s genocidal invasions of Asia’s hydrocarbon country. For two years in a row, we had manmade energy catastrophes in the Fukushima meltdowns and the BP Gulf Spill. So, the peril is obvious, but how many more do we need before we begin to get it? The current situations are likely more instructive than what may have happened with Atlantis. Until Atlantis rises or we get unequivocal evidence (if the good stuff can survive the organized suppression), investigating evidence of technologically-advanced vanished civilizations is a highly speculative affair.
I see our predicament as more of an issue of sentience than anything else, and that short-circuited awareness is because people have dug in for survival and won’t budge from their niche, and the scientifically-trained can be the most obtuse of all:
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#naive
People are choosing their semi-sentience out of fear. Love is the only way out that I know of, and is the crux of the conundrum, IMO.
I don’t need to belabor how uninterested I am in looking into the next FE aspirant who is chasing patents, money, and fame. I don’t get to see efforts such as the 70% plan very often, or Dennis’s The Reset Button. That I see more of those happening is encouraging, especially as the energy situation is increasingly being seen as the central issue, and on that subject, orthodoxy may be the least reliable source (because of the tremendous stakes of the game).
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/risk.htm#quadrillion
What Billyji and Dennis are doing are choir-like behaviors, and long overdue in this world. As I have written, a Level 10 approach has so far been easy to derail. I am seeking a smaller, more committed, more aware audience than the kinds of people that Level 10 efforts fish for. I don't seek the hundred heroes or ten million gawkers, but thousands of sentient lambs. :)
Best,
Wade