Examples of Trump Administration Dismantling Deep State’s Agenda 21 Blueprint!

Quote:

---

Posted by Jayke

New article on infowars. I don’t know enough about Pompeo to know which part of the deep state factions he’s aligned with, but as one of the main proponents for the UN’s agenda of global regime change, the firing of known neocon puppet Rex Tillerson can only be a good thing.

---

I didn't vote for Trump because some of his associations to 'deep state' made me nervous. Had I lived in a swing state I would have voted for him as anything is better than Hillary. I believe part of his strategy is to work with 'deep state' supporting individuals to see how they 'tick' which in turn helps him learn how to break down their systems. As the saying goes, 'keep your friends close, and your enemies closer'.

I was pleased to wake up this morning to the news Trump had appointed another woman and to the CIA! Let's hope she's 'balanced'. I don't know much about Pompeo either, need to see how or if he's got ties to any 'deep state' factions.

EDIT TO ADD:
More proof Trump isn't a 'globalist'? From the article you posted Jayke https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...92#post1213992

"The change will energize Trump’s base as it reflects another move away from establishment figures being in control of the administration.

Back in August, it was revealed that Trump had not only called economic adviser Gary Cohn a “globalist” to his face, but that he thought Tillerson was “totally establishment in his thinking.”

Quote:

---

Posted by we-R-one

I've spent many of nights pondering myself Turiya...I don't get it either, it's appalling and I'm speechless at how many so called 'educated' people can't seem to process the information. I've thought the same as you, trying to find any way to justify their mindset....

---

Denial is a very powerful mindset.

Cognitive dissonance plays a part I'm sure.

Very much appreciate your thread we-R-one.

Last night, the tv was on after the news ended and that Colbert show came on. Usually I get the tv off before I have to listen to him, but I noticed in the opening minute, where they were doing a run down of the content for that evening's program, they mentioned there was going to be some Stormy Daniels material. Not a surprise, the evening news at 6pm gave her some air time too.

But they used the phrase, "the calm before the Stormy". It definitely made me pause and consider. How many people in the comedy world even know that Trump made such a comment last fall? Was that comment by Trump even given any airtime on shows like the CBS evening news, or MSNBC? Makes me really wish I knew what was really going on.

Looks like, based on lots of stuff you've dug up here in this thread, and in another post of yours that I saw, it looks like there is still room for hope. I know what I "hope" is going on behind the scenes; but most of the time it's hard to tell, and we'll probably never know. I don't like that at all. It also bugs me to know that all this Agenda 21 work went on virtually in secret for the last 8 years because all we got on the news about Obama was, "Today the president went where they told him to and he said what they told him to say, and here's a soundbite from that."

Thanks for all the digging you've been doing!
Joe

It doesn't seem likely we'll ever know exactly what's going on. All I can do is watch their policy making which shows intent, hence the point of this thread. Trump likes women, a trait that's been with him apparently for eons. I really don't care at this point as long as he's not abusing them, we have bigger fish to fry. I do care about AGENDA 21, so as long as I see movement towards its destruction I can afford a hall pass on the other. His wife might feel otherwise, but that's between her and Trump.

Exactly, we-R-one!! :bigsmile:

Maybe you guys didn't catch what I was referring to. The calm before stormy reference they made on the Colbert show was absolutely a jab back at Trump for this:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ght=calm+storm

The thing that I was pausing to consider was, what should I take for the connotation?

On one hand you have a guy using that phrase to say, "I'm about to start taking you down."
Now you have someone on the receiving end using the same phrase to... what, mock him for not taking them down yet?
It definitely came across as a taunt to me, but the question is, is it real. Are they indeed pleased that their friends with all the tv cameras are working as hard as they can to make Trump's presidency as difficult as they possibly can? Could be.

Or are they really getting spooked by everything that's going on behind the scenes and stunts like this are just an attempt to show what we call "false bravado"...

Heh heh.

Quote:

---

I was pleased to wake up this morning to the news Trump had appointed another woman and to the CIA! Let's hope she's 'balanced'. I don't know much about Pompeo either, need to see how or if he's got ties to any 'deep state' factions.

---

She was involved in TORTURE program -- and this is likely a reward for it.

Pompeo seems to be close to Koch Bros./John Birch Society.

Koch Family has been involved for more than 100 years in trying to overturn
democracy in US.

Quote:

---

Posted by Curious77

Quote:

---

Posted by we-R-one

"UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world." INVENTORY AND CONTROL.----Rosa Koire

---

What's being recited there is, of course, a right wing/fascist agenda.

Trump is the epitome of fascism -- therefore, it's rather difficult to figure out
how you think his corrupt, criminal administration will correct anything -- leave
alone reform government.

---

Everything that Trump does is anti-democracy, with no respect for our laws either on any issue.

This is fascism in the White House and it is unlikely to be engaged in overturning any fascist program.

Where is there any evidence of Trump is doing any thing anti-fascist?

You've presented no evidence of that.

Deregulation of capitalism -- if that is what you mean -- is an assault on democracy.

Capitalism is fascism -- and it is suicidal.

Trump -- like many other corporate-fascist presidents before him -- has followed
the Nixon model of putting corporation affiliated appointees in charge of the
agencies meant to supervise their activities and who stand against those activities
and the agenda of the agency.

Maybe you've missed it, but clearly Trump is serving the needs of Koch Bros. and Murray Energy and their submitted "wish lists."

This makes no sense where right now the Wild Card in all of our futures is Global Warming and the reality that we need to STOP using fossil fuels. That reality has been known since the 1880's at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and in the late 1950's when the Global Warming model was presented to Americans. That's how long ago our scientists have know that this 'busy ness" is destroying nature. Not only do all of our scientists agree with the danger to nature and the planet, they also make very clear that no one can say how all of this will compound. And, of course, while they were predicting damage from melting glaciers in the far distant future, they found that at that very time the glaciers were melting below their feet.

Trump can deny Global Warming all he wants, but it carries no water -- and is disproven by the reality that his "politics" follow the money trail from those who own and control him.

Reply continues below ---

Second part of reply ....

What we do see very clearly is Trump's personal outlook in his efforts to turn back advancements of women and AA's and other minorities based in his own sexist and racist attitudes.


Only Bernie Sanders was an acceptable candidate. Both the GOP and the Dem Party are owned by Elites/corporations. Trump is there is to further corrupt our government and likely to bankrupt it.

Trump is far from perfect -- except as an example of someone committed to sexist and racist policies, personally -- and for corporations which profit from them.

We are already on our way to the right wing's dream of a "third world America."

I'm not a proponent of 'the sky is falling' or victimhood arguments.

Global Warming isn't about "the sky is falling" -- it's about reality.

And your next right wing slogan -- "victimhood arguments" -- sounds a bit like professional anti-feminism.

One of the last things I'd associate with Trump is any kind of spirituality. This is someone who'd better be described as a psychopath or sociopath acting only in his own self-interest and usually criminally.

Quote:

---

You can't be a victim of anything when the reality you're in isn't what's real(study reincarnation for deeper understanding).

---

That's an interesting jumble of nonsense.
You may recall that it is the right wing -- often bragged about by Cheney and Rove -- that THEY create our reality ... and that while we're trying to figure out what's going on ... they're creating a new reality.

REINCARNATION isn't a science. What we know about it rests only in the memories of those who think they have experienced it. And I tend to favor the theory and don't disbelieve the stories of those who have related prior histories.
Imo, it's a very welcome theory of an afterlife of 100's or possibly a 1000's of new lives. (Eternal life)

Reincarnation used to be taught by the world's major religions, but no longer because it became "inconvenient" for Elites.


Every day -- there is news of Trump's sexist and racist personal beliefs and attacks on existing laws to protect minorities.

His own appointment of Gorsuch makes that cleaR --

Trump's Supreme Court appointee Gorsuch plots rightward course
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1EE0IJ

And, kindly explain to me what relevance you see in connecting Mr. Rogers to this discussion?




EDIT TO ADD:
Love you Mr. Rogers, thanks for all those years!

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/226...ES-2085065.JPG[/QUOTE]

Quote:

---

Posted by Curious77

She was involved in TORTURE program -- and this is likely a reward for it...

...Capitalism is fascism -- and it is suicidal...

...Every day -- there is news of Trump's sexist and racist personal beliefs and attacks on existing laws to protect minorities...

Global Warming isn't about "the sky is falling" -- it's about reality.

---

Ok mod team, hands up! Who let this nationalist socialist justice warrior onto the forum. :Party:

You were saying in a different thread Curios77 that men were the instigators of violence, now you’re accusing a woman of being a torturer. Way to go for standing up for your feminine sisters. Thought as a feminist you’d be pleased to see a woman in a position of influence at the head of the CIA. Or do you only push feminism when it suits your agenda? And if Trump was sexist, then why would he appoint a woman to that position to begin with? Your logic is full of absurd contradictions.

Take this one for example:

Quote:

---

Capitalism is fascism—and it is suicidal

---

I’ve honestly never heard anything so preposterous. Capitalism isn’t fascism at all. That’s nonsense. Capitalism is based on a system of meritocracy, where people who put the effort into building things that other people find useful, end up with the resources, influence and power in society. It’s only suicidal in the fact that it’s easily corrupted by socialists, ideologues, kleptocrats and despots.

But fascism is fascism, everything other than fascism (that you happen to disagree with) is not fascism.

Do you even know the definition of fascism? If you did you’d realise fascism falls under the organisational structure of communism and socialism, hence why Hitlers Nazi party were called “the nationalist, SOCIALIST party”. In its true definition then, the socialism that Bernie Sanders was promoting leads to the same fascist society that you proclaim to be fighting against.

Part of that fascist society is the global warming hoax that is deeply entwined with agenda 21. Global warming is a fraud in the sense that climate change has been ongoing since long before man started burning fossil fuels. And astrophysicists who genuinely understand how climate change works (solar-lunar modulation in planetary cycles) are actually predicting a 20 year mini ice age to begin by 2020.

If you’re going to accuse trump of serving the needs of the Koch brothers, then by all means, start a new thread on it and detail it out with articles, reports and evidence—that’s something I’d be very interested in learning more about.

Okay, cool. So there are some people on this forum who don't believe there's anything interesting going on behind the scenes, and Trump is our enemy. Opinion has been noted.

Since this thread is more intended to keep tabs on interesting things that are going on behind the scenes, maybe take a break from posting if you don't have something to add to the topic? Fascism, sexism, racism... wow, I've never heard anyone say something like that about Trump before.

Where's that Back To Topic icon?? :- )

Year One List: 81 major Trump achievements, 11 Obama legacy items repealed
by Paul Bedard
| December 21, 2017 01:04 PM
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/y...items-repealed

With the passage of the GOP tax bill this week, the Trump administration has scored 81 major achievements in its first year, making good on campaign promises to provide significant tax cuts, boost U.S. energy production, and restore respect to the United States, according to the White House.

And along the way, President Trump even outdid his own expectations and slashed at least 11 major legacy items of former President Barack Obama, including cracking down on the open border, slowing recognition of communist Cuba and effectively killing Obamacare by ending the mandate that everyone have health insurance or face a tax.

According to the White House, the 81 accomplishments are in 12 major categories and include well over 100 other minor achievements.

The unofficial list helps to counter the impression in the mainstream media and among congressional Democrats that outside the approval of Supreme Court Neil Gorsuch and passage of the tax reform bill little was done.

Administrations typically tout their achievements broadly at the end of each year, but Trump plans to list jobs added, regulations killed, foreign policy victories won, and moves to help veterans and even drug addicts.

And in a sign of support for conservatives, the White House also is highlighting achievements for the pro-life community.

Below are the 12 categories and 81 wins cited by the White House.

Jobs and the economy

Passage of the tax reform bill providing $5.5 billion in cuts and repealing the Obamacare mandate.
Increase of the GDP above 3 percent.
Creation of 1.7 million new jobs, cutting unemployment to 4.1 percent.
Saw the Dow Jones reach record highs.
A rebound in economic confidence to a 17-year high.
A new executive order to boost apprenticeships.
A move to boost computer sciences in Education Department programs.
Prioritizing women-owned businesses for some $500 million in SBA loans.

Killing job-stifling regulations

Signed an Executive Order demanding that two regulations be killed for every new one creates. He beat that big and cut 16 rules and regulations for every one created, saving $8.1 billion.
Signed 15 congressional regulatory cuts.
Withdrew from the Obama-era Paris Climate Agreement, ending the threat of environmental regulations.
Signed an Executive Order cutting the time for infrastructure permit approvals.
Eliminated an Obama rule on streams that Trump felt unfairly targeted the coal industry.

Fair trade

Made good on his campaign promise to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Opened up the North American Free Trade Agreement for talks to better the deal for the U.S.
Worked to bring companies back to the U.S., and companies like Toyota, Mazda, Broadcom Limited, and Foxconn announced plans to open U.S. plants.
Worked to promote the sale of U.S products abroad.
Made enforcement of U.S. trade laws, especially those that involve national security, a priority.
Ended Obama’s deal with Cuba.

Boosting U.S. energy dominance

The Department of Interior, which has led the way in cutting regulations, opened plans to lease 77 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico for oil and gas drilling.
Trump traveled the world to promote the sale and use of U.S. energy.
Expanded energy infrastructure projects like the Keystone XL Pipeline snubbed by Obama.
Ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to kill Obama’s Clean Power Plan.
EPA is reconsidering Obama rules on methane emissions.

Protecting the U.S. homeland

Laid out new principles for reforming immigration and announced plan to end "chain migration," which lets one legal immigrant to bring in dozens of family members.
Made progress to build the border wall with Mexico.
Ended the Obama-era “catch and release” of illegal immigrants.
Boosted the arrests of illegals inside the U.S.
Doubled the number of counties participating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement charged with deporting illegals.
Removed 36 percent more criminal gang members than in fiscal 2016.
Started the end of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival program.
Ditto for other amnesty programs like Deferred Action for Parents of Americans.
Cracking down on some 300 sanctuary cities that defy ICE but still get federal dollars.
Added some 100 new immigration judges.

Protecting communities

Justice announced grants of $98 million to fund 802 new cops.
Justice worked with Central American nations to arrest and charge 4,000 MS-13 members.
Homeland rounded up nearly 800 MS-13 members, an 83 percent one-year increase.
Signed three executive orders aimed at cracking down on international criminal organizations.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions created new National Public Safety Partnership, a cooperative initiative with cities to reduce violent crimes.

Accountability

Trump has nominated 73 federal judges and won his nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.
Ordered ethical standards including a lobbying ban.
Called for a comprehensive plan to reorganize the executive branch.
Ordered an overhaul to modernize the digital government.
Called for a full audit of the Pentagon and its spending.

Combatting opioids

First, the president declared a Nationwide Public Health Emergency on opioids.
His Council of Economic Advisors played a role in determining that overdoses are underreported by as much as 24 percent.
The Department of Health and Human Services laid out a new five-point strategy to fight the crisis.
Justice announced it was scheduling fentanyl substances as a drug class under the Controlled Substances Act.
Justice started a fraud crackdown, arresting more than 400.
The administration added $500 million to fight the crisis.
On National Drug Take Back Day, the Drug Enforcement Agency collected 456 tons.

Protecting life

In his first week, Trump reinstated and expanded the Mexico City Policy that blocks some $9 billion in foreign aid being used for abortions.
Worked with Congress on a bill overturning an Obama regulation that blocked states from defunding abortion providers.
Published guidance to block Obamacare money from supporting abortion.

Helping veterans

Signed the Veterans Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act to allow senior officials in the Department of Veterans Affairs to fire failing employees and establish safeguards to protect whistleblowers.
Signed the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act.
Signed the Harry W. Colmery Veterans Educational Assistance Act, to provide support.
Signed the VA Choice and Quality Employment Act of 2017 to authorize $2.1 billion in additional funds for the Veterans Choice Program.
Created a VA hotline.
Had the VA launch an online “Access and Quality Tool,” providing veterans with a way to access wait time and quality of care data.
With VA Secretary Dr. David Shulkin, announced three initiatives to expand access to healthcare for veterans using telehealth technology.

Promoting peace through strength

Directed the rebuilding of the military and ordered a new national strategy and nuclear posture review.
Worked to increase defense spending.
Empowered military leaders to “seize the initiative and win,” reducing the need for a White House sign off on every mission.
Directed the revival of the National Space Council to develop space war strategies.
Elevated U.S. Cyber Command into a major warfighting command.
Withdrew from the U.N. Global Compact on Migration, which Trump saw as a threat to borders.
Imposed a travel ban on nations that lack border and anti-terrorism security.
Saw ISIS lose virtually all of its territory.
Pushed for strong action against global outlaw North Korea and its development of nuclear weapons.
Announced a new Afghanistan strategy that strengthens support for U.S. forces at war with terrorism.
NATO increased support for the war in Afghanistan.
Approved a new Iran strategy plan focused on neutralizing the country’s influence in the region.
Ordered missile strikes against a Syrian airbase used in a chemical weapons attack.
Prevented subsequent chemical attacks by announcing a plan to detect them better and warned of future strikes if they were used.
Ordered new sanctions on the dictatorship in Venezuela.

Restoring confidence in and respect for America

Trump won the release of Americans held abroad, often using his personal relationships with world leaders.
Made good on a campaign promise to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Conducted a historic 12-day trip through Asia, winning new cooperative deals. On the trip, he attended three regional summits to promote American interests.
He traveled to the Middle East and Europe to build new relationships with leaders.
Traveled to Poland and on to Germany for the G-20 meeting where he pushed again for funding of women entrepreneurs.

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com

President Trump is pragmatic.

This means he doesn't adhere to one ideology over another. He focuses on what works. He makes the extremes of each party uncomfortable. And he is driven by principles as laid out by the Constitution. He's not easily distracted from these principles by the Mockingbird Media.

We are a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy. There's a difference and it's important to remember this. Historically, democracies degenerate into mob-acrocies which give way to tyranny as people cry out for someone to bring the chaos to order.

Historically, governments have been on a pendulum affect, swinging from one extreme to the other. Which wreaks havoc on the lives of the common people

Jefferson knew this and he and a few key other people had thought about what sort of government would offset this pendulum affect for about 10 to 15 years. The Constitutional Republic was their answer to this problem, a counterbalance to the pendulum swinging to the extremes.

I didn't vote for Trump. I did a write in for Rand Paul, because he was running on the campaign of Audit the Fed. In my opinion, there is no dismantling of the control system, without addressing the noose of the "debt as wealth" system.

I wanted to put out to the creative forces an intent on this issue being addressed.

I've been looking at the Trump presidency from many angles.

It was watching how the Mockingbird Media acts in regard to Trump that let me know how he stands. As we know all factions are owned by the same people at the top. They have mastered playing the extremes against the middle.

When essentially ALL factions of the Mockingbird Media went after Trump, I took this as an indicator that whatever he is doing... they want him to stop. It's not according to their plan.

Essentially, they've been doing character assassination, almost non-stop, from day one.

The Mockingbird Media is one of the main ways that administrations have been controlled by the controllers. They are not controlling Trump.


One of the unique aspects of his presidency is how much he listens to what the elitists call, "the little people", that would be people like me and you. Well, some of them call us leaves. We are nothing to them.

However, we are important to Trump. He values the us, holds us in high regard.

He's very organized with how he approaches the issues of our nation.

He will take a particular issue and schedule a block of time to intently focus on that issue. When he does this, one of the first tasks scheduled, regardless of the issue, is to have a "listening" session where he listens to the people affected from across all walks of life. He even went to the military men on the ground to listen to them over his generals in charge when it came time to make a decision about Afghanistan. He immediately went to the students in Florida and listened to them. His immigration reform ideas come from a listening to all sides of the issue.

Trump holds himself accountable to the American people. It what drives him. If you listen to his words, and then watch his actions, you can see this over and over and over. It irks the Mockingbird Media that he communicates directly with the people, and that he listens to them. It takes them out of the control loop. It irks the establishment, too.

As I mentioned, he is under near-constant character assassination by the Mockingbird Media. Usually, this sort of managed public propaganda will reign a president under establishment control. The fact that is doesn't reign in President Trump is a huge indicator to me.

One of the developments I'm watching closely is discussed in this article:

Quote:

---

President Trump: Replace The Dollar With Gold As The Global Currency To Make America Great Again
Inside President Trump’s otherwise “standard Trump stump speech” at CPAC was nestled what might be a most intriguing observation:

Global cooperation, dealing with other countries, getting along with other countries is good, it’s very important. But there is no such thing as a global anthem, a global currency or a global flag. This is the United States of America that I’m representing.

There's a keen insight in there that could, just maybe, transform our lives, America, and the world. No "global currency?"  Was this, with the poetic observation that “there is no such thing as a global anthem…or a global flag,” just a trope? Or could it contain a political portent with potential high impact on world financial markets?  Let’s drill down. ...

---

If true, this is huge. And it was something similar that got Lincoln and JFK assassinated.

Excellent post, edina!! :highfive: Think about it....there was no personal reason for him to have to run for President. Is it so hard for us to imagine a person who actually LOVES this country enough to want to take on the Globalist System?!! This has been "in the works" for years, I imagine! He seems to know his own place in history as he is working it out. Can we say he was "prepared" for this?

At the bottom of this pile of bones is the human trafficking & things going on that the normal, everyday person will have a hard time even realizing.....because they, themselves would not even THINK of doing such things! All one need do is listen to the videos of the Dutch banker, Ronald Bernard, to get a good grasp on how the Elite rule! Maybe we should ask these incredulous people, "What is your opinion of a person who would buy & sell little children for nefarious purposes?"!! :confused:

:sherlock:

Quote:

---

Posted by Jayke

I’ve honestly never heard anything so preposterous. Capitalism isn’t fascism at all. That’s nonsense.

---

Very much agreed. People are so free to cry "fascism" these days, without any idea of what fascism really IS. It's socialism. The very ideology these people inhabit. I will never understand them.

I do understand that the social welfare has to change, has to improve. Poverty has never been greater than it is now, and the rich have never been richer. But socialism isn't the answer. Socialism is in fact the culprit. Or its other name, Globalism.

Yes, this may come as an ugly surprise for those on the left, but they desperately need to understand what the left has become under this globalist charter. What the elites are trying to do. And maybe, I do believe, what Trump is here to counter and turn around. I think - and there are good signs - that he's here to restore the true Republic [democracy, without the deep state] that we in the West once took for granted. Kennedy tried to do the same (and he was a Democrat).

Attachment 37363

I'm not going to waste time answering Curious, it's obvious they're misinformed and misguided. I politely responded to their first post in good faith asking to stay on topic. What was posted after in their subsequent posts, is exactly why I started this thread...too much conjecture, no facts to back statements, hysteria and sky is falling reactions, inability to deal with facts to stay on topic.

I appreciate the responses and love that so many are interested in an agenda that will affect us all and that you care enough to respond. I do have more material, but as mentioned before it takes time because I have to weed through articles to build posts and I'm working on top of it. Sometimes it's confusing to see what's going on because it depends who's written the article, as you get different slants which aren't necessarily what's true. It's almost as if you have to psycho analyze every article based on its origination! :mmph:

Until actual policy is written into law we can only focus on the intent of said proposals. Some of the info is difficult to find and keep track of.

http://forevergreen.shorelinewa.gov/...-graphic_m.jpg

AGENDA 21 encompasses the 3 E’s known as Environment, Economy, and Social Equity.
Equity establishes the illusion that by following the ‘said’ plan, you’ll then have a balanced world. It paves the path by enabling total takeover of our resources by supporting the individuals who want to control the earth. Economy is the use and management of resources in order to meet community and household needs. And lastly, protection of the Environment through conservation and management of resources. Sustainable development is the integration of all three. You may find different spins or variations of the three depending on where you source your information.

Agenda 21 uses corporations and NGO’s(Non Governmental Organizations) to assist covertly in the creation of its framework. There are thousands upon thousands, too many to list; it’s overwhelming. It’s important to be able to identify who some of them are, how they’re being run, and not be fooled by their false mission statements. The link below provides a handful you’re likely to come across when researching sustainable NGO’s.

The 14 Most Influential Sustainability NGO's
https://www.sustainabilitydegrees.co...nability-ngos/

These are organizations being used to support the AGENDA 21 Sustainability movements. One listed, The Sierra Club promotes the false ‘green’ narrative by hiding under the guise their mission is about ‘protecting the environment.’

"Sierra Club: Founded in 1892 by conservationist John Muir, the Sierra Club is one of the oldest and largest environmental organizations in the U.S. It has protected millions of acres of wilderness and has helped to pass key environmental legislation, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act. It’s also leading efforts to move away from the use of fossil fuels."

You’ll notice they tout helping to pass the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act. These are all mandates(the infrastructure) put in place as part of the Agenda 21 blueprint. This legislation was being used by Sierra Club with the assistance of the federal agency Environment Protection Agency to help establish the pathway for implanting the ridiculous Wildlands Map in the name of protecting Biodiversity.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/b_q8bGPnL50/hqdefault.jpg

Land-trust Missions Conform To United Nations “Agenda 21”
“A key component of protecting biodiversity was to set huge areas of land aside for nature,” Coffman said. “These are essentially de facto wilderness areas interconnected with wilderness corridors. The United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment, the heart of Agenda 21 to protect biodiversity, calls for nearly a half of the nation to be put into these reserves and corridors. The federal government cooperated with states to implement the GAP program that uses geographic information layering to define where ecological sensitive areas needed protection.”

Source: http://www.themainewire.com/2012/08/...ons-agenda-21/


I was extremely excited to see all 3 of these policies (underlined above) under fire and my excitement continues to build as the Trump Administration appears to be attempting to pull the plug on every single one. This is the core of Agenda 21 under attack! In the next few posts I’ll see what I can dig up on each mandate to demonstrate this administrations intent to revoke and/or revise.

INFRASTRUCTURE OF AGENDA 21

CLEAN WATER ACT(CWA)
What is it?

“The Clean Water Act (CWA) establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters. The basis of the CWA was enacted in 1948 and was called the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, but the Act was significantly reorganized and expanded in 1972. "Clean Water Act" became the Act's common name with amendments in 1972.

Under the CWA, EPA has implemented pollution control programs such as setting wastewater standards for industry. We have also set water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters.”

Source: https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations...lean-water-act


The Clean Water Act and the Clean Water Rule are two different policies. The Clean Water Rule is a provision under the Clean Water Act.


CLEAN WATER RULE (CWR)
What is it?

“The Clean Water Rule is a 2015 regulation published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to clarify water resource management in the United States under a provision of the Clean Water Act of 1972.”

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Water_Rule

WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES(WOTUS)
What is it?

“1986/1988 Regulatory Definition of "Waters of the United States"
40 CFR 230.3(s) The term waters of the United States means:
1. All waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;
2. All interstate waters including interstate wetlands;
3. All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, the use, degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such waters:
1. Which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes; or
2. (From which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce; or
3. Which are used or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce;
4. All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this definition;
5. Tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (s)(1) through (4) of this section;
6. The territorial sea;
7. Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in paragraphs (s)(1) through (6) of this section; waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the requirements of CWA (other than cooling ponds as defined in 40 CFR 423.11(m) which also meet the criteria of this definition) are not waters of the United States.

Waters of the United States do not include prior converted cropland. Notwithstanding the determination of an area’s status as prior converted cropland by any other federal agency, for the purposes of the Clean Water Act, the final authority regarding Clean Water Act jurisdiction remains with EPA.

“The definition of "waters of the United States" currently in effect is the definition promulgated in 1986/1988, implemented consistent with subsequent Supreme Court decisions and guidance documents. The 2015 revised regulatory definition of "waters of the United States" has been stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. In response to this stay, EPA, Department of Army, and Army Corps of Engineers resumed nationwide use of the agencies’ prior regulations defining the term “waters of the United States.” On February 28, 2017, the President of the United States issued an Executive Order directing EPA and Department of the Army to review and rescind or revise the 2015 Rule. EPA, Department of Army, and the Army Corps of Engineers are in the process of reviewing the 2015 rule and considering a revised definition of "waters of the United States" consistent with the Executive Order.”

Source: https://www.epa.gov/cwa-404/definiti...lean-water-act

REVIEW AND RESCIND OR REVISE!

Executive Order 13778 signed on February 28, 2017
Presidential Executive Order on Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the “Waters of the United States” Rule

“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy. It is in the national interest to ensure that the Nation’s navigable waters are kept free from pollution, while at the same time promoting economic growth, minimizing regulatory uncertainty, and showing due regard for the roles of the Congress and the States under the Constitution.

Sec. 2. Review of the Waters of the United States Rule. (a) The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (Administrator) and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works (Assistant Secretary) shall review the final rule entitled “Clean Water Rule: Definition of ‘Waters of the United States,'” 80 Fed. Reg. 37054 (June 29, 2015), for consistency with the policy set forth in section 1 of this order and publish for notice and comment a proposed rule rescinding or revising the rule, as appropriate and consistent with law.

(b) The Administrator, the Assistant Secretary, and the heads of all executive departments and agencies shall review all orders, rules, regulations, guidelines, or policies implementing or enforcing the final rule listed in subsection (a) of this section for consistency with the policy set forth in section 1 of this order and shall rescind or revise, or publish for notice and comment proposed rules rescinding or revising, those issuances, as appropriate and consistent with law and with any changes made as a result of a rulemaking proceeding undertaken pursuant to subsection (a) of this section.
(c) With respect to any litigation before the Federal courts related to the final rule listed in subsection (a) of this section, the Administrator and the Assistant Secretary shall promptly notify the Attorney General of the pending review under subsection (b) of this section so that the Attorney General may, as he deems appropriate, inform any court of such review and take such measures as he deems appropriate concerning any such litigation pending the completion of further administrative proceedings related to the rule.
Sec. 3. Definition of “Navigable Waters” in Future Rulemaking. In connection with the proposed rule described in section 2(a) of this order, the Administrator and the Assistant Secretary shall consider interpreting the term “navigable waters,” as defined in 33 U.S.C. 1362(7), in a manner consistent with the opinion of Justice Antonin Scalia in Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006).
Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.”
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
February 28, 2017.

Source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/president...d-states-rule/


Friday, 03 March 2017

Trump Orders EPA Review of “Horrible” Obama Water Decree
“President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday ordering the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to review and reconsider the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) regulation, a radical decree issued by the Obama administration purporting to regulate virtually all water and much of the land across America. While stopping short of quashing the controversial rule altogether, analysts described Trump's executive order as a first step in that process. One prominent activist, Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, called the decision “the most pro-property rights move out of D.C. in two decades.” But there may be more to come; the latest order came amid reports that Trump is readying another executive order to dismantle Obama's “climate” regulations purporting to limit emissions of the “gas of life” carbon dioxide.

Speaking at a signing ceremony flanked by other top executive and legislative branch officials, Trump used strong language to describe the previous administration's lawless power grab. “It's a horrible, horrible rule,” Trump said at a White House signing ceremony surrounded by farmers, ranchers, lawmakers, and officials at all levels of government. “Has sort of a nice name, but everything else is bad.” The EPA's “so-called Waters of the United States rule,” Trump continued, “is one of the worst examples of federal regulation, and it has truly run amok, and is one of the rules most strongly opposed by farmers, ranchers and agricultural workers all across our land. It's prohibiting them from being allowed to do what they're supposed to be doing. It's been a disaster.”

Indeed, some analyses showed that the rule was so expansive and intrusive that it purported to give the EPA authority to regulate 99 percent or more of the land in states like Montana and Missouri. The regulation drew furious outrage from Americans across the country and all along the political spectrum. Even a Democrat lawmaker who attended the signing ceremony declared that the EPA rule was “unworkable” and that Trump's actions had shown that concerns among ranchers and farmers were being heard “loud and clear.” Indeed, from Democrats and establishment-minded Republicans to conservative and constitutionalist members of the GOP, Trump's action won applause from all but the most extreme “environmentalist” fringe groups hoping to regulate Americans and the U.S. economy into oblivion.”

SOURCE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...a-water-decree

Quote:

---

Posted by we-R-one

Quote:

---

Posted by WhatTha'

"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

I can't be sure but it looks like there might be some text missing. It's also possible that it might completely distort the meaning of the entire statement. Just suggesting it as a possibility.

---

The Gates are well known for being committed to the depopulation agenda so I don't think there's any distortion. Just Google and you can find plenty of discussion on the topic. Not to mention it's clear vaccines are both killing and injuring people, not sure how that can be over-looked? Google Mike Adams and vaccines and I'm sure you'll find plenty of articles.

Wednesday, 19 July 2017
Melinda Gates Commits $375 Million for Population Control, Abortion
https://www.thenewamerican.com/cultu...ntrol-abortion

‘Philanthropist’ Bill Gates Openly Admits Support For “Death Panels” And Depopulation

Read More: http://www.trueactivist.com/philanth...-depopulation/

http://www.trueactivist.com/philanth...-depopulation/

---

This article was the 1st one that popped up on Adams:

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/goo...-of-fake-news/

Mike Adams does not promote fake news. Many of us on Avalon have been reading his work for years.


EDIT TO ADD:

Quote:

---

Posted by WhatTha'

This article was the 1st one that popped up on Adams:

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/goo...-of-fake-news/

---

Please read this article and it will give you an idea of what's going on:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-03-...o-channel.html