Re: Questions and Answers about the Gulf Oil Catastrophe
Hi , I am living in Costa Rica and am trying to figure out what is going on as well.. Most people here are unaware of all of this but those who are, pretty much think that the US is getting ready to pounce on Venezuela.
Here is an article in english
http://www.welovecostarica.com/publi...Costa_Rica.cfm
And another one claiming Nato has sent these troops because of fears about a catastrophic quake happening along the North American and Caribean plates as a result of the oil gusher:
http://www.eutimes.net/2010/07/nato-...ke-fears-grow/
This article has been reposted many times over but I cannot find any other source for the same information and so it smells a bit like a hoax. On the other hand, with the media black out that has been happening, it is hard to know what to believe.Is there anyone who can shed some light on this for me?
Re: Questions and Answers about the Gulf Oil Catastrophe
Question: This came up yesterday, a well connected researcher has brought up a question as they ran into a snag in this whole story.
"Can anyone PROVE to me that they are spraying Corexit 9500 in the GULF??? Can you PROVE to me at it is 435 ppm (highly toxic) poison. ?"
I was told today that they had No actual proof to date.
Anyone have anything on this?
Re: Questions and Answers about the Gulf Oil Catastrophe
Re: Questions and Answers about the Gulf Oil Catastrophe
Quote:
Posted by
nomadguy
I so hope this is not true...
This and your previous post in this thread raise good questions ... "Vomiting blood" sounds serious and one would expect that YouTube would be plastered
with videos because it would be much easier to 'prove' then the spraying of corexit or anything else BP did in the Gulf. And if true lots of attention should be
drawn to it ... and yet nothing popped up. Where is James Fox now with his camera ?
I am not saying it is not true (one can only hope it is not true) but so far there has been lots of dramatic and sensational news that we are 'expected'
to believe while 'hard' convincing evidence seems to be missing. We have to be very careful not to be abused by 'exaggerated' news.
Again ... even in the case of one person this would be serious enough but raise your guards if words like 'Communities' are used while material or
events that should go along with it seems to be missing.
Re: Questions and Answers about the Gulf Oil Catastrophe
not sure where to put this, but i think it speaks volumes that they want to give money back to the source (bp). there are a lot of families that lost a lot of money, and they should get something for this mess.
US to oil spill claims czar: loosen purse strings
By HARRY R. WEBER - Associated Press
ATLANTA -- The Justice Department is telling the administrator of the $20 billion fund for Gulf oil spill victims that his job is not to preserve money or return it to BP, and is insisting he loosen the purse strings to help people who are still suffering from last year's disaster.
In a letter Friday to Kenneth Feinberg that was obtained by The Associated Press, Associate Attorney General Thomas J. Perrelli alluded to the fact that only roughly $3.5 billion of the $20 billion fund has been spent. Any money not spent goes back to BP.
Perrelli also says that Feinberg needs to be more transparent, and he should take a second look at the emergency advance payments the fund paid to victims to determine if the process was fair.