Search:

Type: Posts; User: edina; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Search: Search took 0.10 seconds.

  1. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    Reference: (David Bohm was a world-class quantum physicist, and here he is writing about how humans talk with one another)


    David Bohm - on Dialogue...
  2. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    No, it's not — I just don't read everything on the forum.

    Neither do you.

    Neither does anyone here.

    It's impossible.

    For me personally, these discussions have become so unpleasant, and...
  3. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    It's NOTHING like that. Why on earth do you think it is?

    It's genuinely nice to see you here again, but that was (a) really unintelligent, and (b) does show clearly that you don't know me or my...
  4. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    No, it's not — I just don't read everything on the forum.

    Neither do you.

    Neither does anyone here.

    It's impossible.

    For me personally, these discussions have become so unpleasant, and...
  5. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    Correct me if I've misunderstood, but from your various comments in this thread, you got what you wanted, the first Q thread removed from view.
    And I figured that's why you're not complaining.
    ...
  6. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    I agree with you, I think the difference in how people are interpreting those memes contribute to break downs in communication and understanding.
  7. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    The Q movement takes group think to a whole new level

    WWG1WGA
    Trust the plan
    I could list more

    The Q movement is particularly top-down, blind faith and group think. There's great strength in...
  8. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    Yes, in talking about Q-anon I am generalizing. The people who follow Q-anon are all individuals, with different critical thinking skills, and different social skills, and abilities to be kind and...
  9. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    The crazy thing about this is that I don't consider myself a conservative.

    I'm independent and have been for a couple of decades.

    I used to consider myself progressive, but lately, I've moved...
  10. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    This is a very important conversation.

    I also agree with Gracy May's observation, this isn't just happening to conservative voices, alternative health is highly censored as are many of the...
  11. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    It still doesn't make it "On-topic," does it?


    :focus:[/QUOTE]

    The context in which it was originally shared did, "censorship"
    But you corrected JM.
    However, the fact that he didn't know...
  12. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    Probably as rude as inviting pro-Q posters into an anti-Q thread to answer an "innocent" question.

    So, the first scoop of 22 posts was to remove the pro-Q "explanations" (AKA proselytizing) from...
  13. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    Just to clarify, the decision to move the threads was unanimous between all the existing moderators. Not just Bill.

    To date the moderators, admin and Bill have absolutely no regrets about the...
  14. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    Nor do the people on this thread :)[/QUOTE]

    it was sort of like heaping abuse on top of abuse.

    I think they should be soft-deleted.

    Most of us are deleting the texts.

    They really were...
  15. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    I do not agree, that is NOT the most appropriate booth.

    People in that thread ought not to be subjected to that crap.

    Please move them somewhere else.

    Geez...
  16. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    I am talking about the recent breaking news of the investigation.
    We have a thread now on Avalon, that started with the breaking news.

    And much of the information shared on that thread, was...
  17. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    Before I begin let me address an earlier comment. I had not intended my comments to “shame” you, Dennis. That thought never occurred to me.

    If you felt hurt, or shamed, I apologize.

    Also,...
  18. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    I have a question for Bill, regarding this thread.

    When you started this thread, what was your intent, and what did you hope to accomplish?

    Thanks
  19. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    Thanks for this Dennis,

    There is good grounds for a positive constructive conversation in these comments.

    I want to come back to them and expand on them, it will take some time, as I'm...
  20. Replies
    345
    Views
    35,870

    Re: The 'censorship' discussion

    Correct me if I've misunderstood, but from your various comments in this thread, you got what you wanted, the first Q thread removed from view.
    And I figured that's why you're not complaining.
    ...
Results 1 to 20 of 46
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3