Search:

This article (written in 2014) has significant markers for this discussion.

Thanks Billy for this clarification. I wrongly interpreted otherwise and this has been reflected in my posts e.g. calling for a vote.

I will ensure my future posts do not resound this error again.

Well, it's wonderful that you want to continue riffing off of your initial attack on me, but I'm not interested. I'm not trying to win an argument with you. I'm tired of being engaged by you in...

Thank you Dennis. Now we are getting somewhere. I am grateful for your post as it reveals much.

The biggest misunderstanding is in your assumptions e.g. I am not as well read as you; I need...

Thanks Mike for another reminder that backstage there is much more going on than what we are discussing on this and other threads.

So I’m going to make a hypothesis. DISCLAIMER: “a proposition...

:bump:

I think this is an excellent suggestion. Even to just open up a level playing field for people to gain a perspective from an informed neutral point as it is impossible to expect members...

WOW so sorry the Q debate appears, perhaps in your mind, to be all about you because some people don’t agree with your political perspectives and don’t take your article links as gospel evidence to...

Not true. Q was a catalyst and at this point in time continues to contribute. The movement has evolved and gained a life of its own. The awakening and investment in time and research from that...

This is my observation also. And it isn’t isolated to the Q Social Movement. There are critical vocalizations about other thread topics getting attention that are made by people having no qualms...