I was simply pursuing what interested me, personally, and pouring that out to the world, in the best way I knew how. And in a weird way, I suppose I was searching for some kind of hope for the future. Anyone who read my book knows that, frankly, I didn’t have much at the time. I, like so many others, was swept up in the cultural drama – looking for a solution, a way out.
And the more I began to dive into what Q was saying, I realized that Q offered that, in some sense – or at least, in a greater degree than anything else. In my mind, if the world was going to come crumbling down all around us, I at least owed it to myself and everyone else to give what Q was saying a shot. Nothing to lose, right? Things at the end of the Obama era had gotten so bad, I figured either we all die in the Great Boogaloo, or we can give Q a shot. If this whole Q-thing works, all the better. And if it doesn’t, well… at least we gave it the old college try. Or so spirals the logic.
But – I almost hate to admit this, and undoubtedly this will be used by naysayers against me – I’m not sure I’m really interested in Q any more.
Okay, let me qualify what I mean by that radical statement, before this goes off the rails.
…
But beyond all that, I’m at a point now where, personally, t
he enormity of the questions presented by QAnon VASTLY outweigh my interest in the individual, granular drops we’re receiving about the day-to-day political drama we’re witnessing play out – and I’m in a place, personally, emotionally, spiritually – where I feel quite alone, and part of it is because I’m not quite sure if the broader movement has quite wrestled with the implications of some of the “bigger” drops just yet.
Call ’em “hang-ups” if you need to, but the questions I have are so massive – I’ve actually been surprised more aren’t asking them. So it occurs to me that… maybe people haven’t properly grokked the implications of all Q is saying. (Or maybe they have, and I’m just being extra spergy about this).
In either case, that’s the topic I want to tackle today – and hopefully, you’ll find some value in it.
…
To get back to the topic at hand, the implications of Q’s drops right now are so immense that – just logically speaking – it would be easier for me to walk away from the table entirely at this point and dismiss QAnon as the most effective and engaging LARP to have ever existed on the planet, than to admit he’s telling the truth… (And a big part of me hopes he’s not telling the truth, as the unreliable narrator he may be at times).
So that’s the level of #disclosure we’re talking about here. Which leads me to the obvious question:
Why haven’t I just walked away and dismissed it all at this point?
Frankly, it’s because the #Qcoincidences and the #Qconfirmations keep piling up. Why, just a couple days ago, we had two big confirmations from #POTUS himself, where he retweeted out a big QAnon account on Twitter (and long-time reader of this site, I might add), CJTruth. (The #Quisling reaction was about what you’d expect – complete with the rehashed lies about being “targeted” when the meme merely listed him and others, accurately describing the treasonous, coordinated nature of their disinfo efforts):
But if that wasn’t enough, POTUS then went the extra step and retweeted out a tweet loaded with Q-related hashtags:
And then again, today, POTUS links two more Q-related accounts in his Twitter feed:
And recall that this was all on top of a recent, prescient Q-post, wherein Q predicted the timing of Durham’s statements disagreeing with the findings of the #IGReport:
..
Because, let’s get one thing clear here:
while “disclosure” is part of this whole Q operation, the real goal of Q (as far as I can see) is to gather a critical mass of people large enough to effectively countersignal the media apparatus of the existing worldwide power structure.
There was also the bit about Laura Ingraham dropping in on the boards and posting:
And Q confirming, a couple days later:
So, we all understand now what Q means when he says “You are the News now” and to handle this responsibility with care.
And l
ike the Watters’ report says, we’re over 10% of the population of the US now (and personally, I feel that’s a very conservative estimate). 10% doesn’t sound like much, but that’s THIRTY-FIVE MILLION PEOPLE when you do the math.
This isn’t some obscure, estranged thing any more.
…
With all the drops we’ve seen – it really, finally feels like we’re at that tipping point. And frankly – though this is only anecdotal – I’m seeing it everywhere. From people on the street to conversations I’ve had in my local barbershop – the Great Awakening we’ve been building up to is imminent.
And this is especially remarkable – given some of the more extraordinary elements of Q’s message which – again – can’t be ignored, and can’t be understated (though I think, for many, they have chosen to ignore these aspects which we shall talk about shortly).
This is a critical mass.
And then there’s this:
Indictments.
PLURAL.
T-minus 10 days (MAX!!) until “mass pop awakening,” guys. In reality, it may be much sooner than that.
The threat towards Obama is obvious: change we can believe in was his campaign slogan, after all. And look at how wonderful all that “change” turned out to be. So I find this to be delicious – especially when you consider that Durham is going through all of John Brennan’s private records and communications right now, to find any disparities between his private communications and his Congressional testimony.
And Q already told us this leads back to Obama. The orders to spy on Trump (and Cruz, and others) came from the Oval Office. So, like a kid who already snooped out what his parents bought him for Christmas, I’ll pretend to be shocked when I find out that Obama was the one who authorized it all, and that Brennan’s own records will prove this beyond a shadow-of-a-doubt.
Q has been getting us ready for this to go public in a big way for some time now:
..
(As a sidenote – do you see how it’s easier for me to thread the narrative needle after having several weeks to process the themes in all the drops?)
So it’s looking more like our collective impending Q-Day is almost upon us…
And as I alluded to earlier, I’m not quite sure the broader community has quite grasped the epistemological implications of what that means for the human race just yet.
Because if you read Q long enough, a few fundamental propositions about the nature of reality emerge. What are these propositions?
Put simply:
Reality itself is a simulation
Alien life exists
Q can see across space and time
Many in the Qmovement are profoundly religious, and profoundly Christian, and as someone who at least tried to be one myself (though, am often not very good at it), I don’t think it should be a surprise that I’ve struggled to reconcile these three tenets with my Christian faith. And this is what I mean when I say I don’t think the broader community has quite grasped the full implications of Q just yet. Many, I dare say, probably think the Lord is going to return in the next 50-100 or so years, and that we’re living in the much fabled “end times.”
At the same time, they’ll whole-heartedly believe Q (given the evidence we’ve all seen) – while ignoring that Q says we’re basically hooked up to a giant machine, and other entities inside the machine exist on other worlds, and he can also see the future (which is, itself, a god-like power).
So… how do you reconcile all this?
Well, let’s look at the drops where Q makes these claims and see what we can glean from them.
But before we do, I want to address one thing.
There’s a famous “New Atheist” by the name of Richard Dawkins who was all the rage on Plebbit about a decade ago or so. The so-called “New atheists” are all deterministic materialists and empiricists. Dawkins, in particular, is famous for a line where he says:
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
But he’s wrong about this.
See, “extraordinary” isn’t an empirical term. It’s a subject term. What’s extraordinary to us is ordinary to the next generation.
When electricity was discovered and harnessed, and you could suddenly produce light at the flip of a switch – that was extraordinary… at least until it became mundane.
Before the Wright brothers, man was earthbound. In fact, some “religious” folks of the day thought it was evil for man to try and harness the power of flight, because if God wanted man to fly, he would have – in His wisdom and prudence – given man wings.
And yet here we are, in the 21st century, where human flight is common – and even mundane. Heck, it’s turned into a job like any other job. And one that’s not all that pleasant.
No, the reality is there are only claims, and there are only evidence. Our subjective reaction to a phenomenon has no bearing on whether something is true, or false.
In fact, “extraordinary” claims can be validated by quite ordinary evidence. The mundane would suffice to prove the “extraordinary” claim.
So Dawkins makes a categorical error, but unfortunately, that pithy turn of phrase has somewhat penetrated the collective consciousness and lead people to some incorrect conclusions.
So let’s dive into where Q makes these claims, and what kind of evidence we see for them:
..
what Q proposes here is actually just an extrapolation of Cartesian philosophy. That you and I and every human being on planet earth truly exists somewhere else, outside of this world – and that this world itself is some kind of neutral simulation – in essence a “server” where all the active (read: living) “players” congregate all at once.
Alien life exists
(Q for Q: Highest classification: COSMIC-MAJIC?)
I’m surprised more didn’t just up and leave Q when he dropped this tidbit on the boards. I know I almost did. I was only the experience of seeing (and recording) a TR-3b “Black Manta” with my own two eyes that opened me up to the possibility that Q was telling the truth here. You might remember the article I wrote at the time, where I posted the clip I had recorded showing the triangular craft performing a hovering maneuver:
Many of my readers will recall, earlier in the year, my dive into the topics presented by the likes of Bob Lazar, William Tompkins, and later Dan Burisch. I even asked Q directly on Gab, I want to say it was six, or maybe eight months ago about Project Looking Glass (which we’ll talk about in the next section) – though I can’t check because the search feature is intentionally broken on Gab right now in order to keep vindictive “journalists” looking to harm Gab from dredging up posts they don’t like to defame the whole thing. My long time readers, however, will recall my posts from when I was plumbing the depths of this rabbit hole, and coming back with… well again, we’ll talk about it shortly.
But even if you’re not ready to look at the evidence for intelligent extraterrestrial life, there are a number of publicly available documents and events which have occurred which demand consideration and explanation.
….
Admittedly, I shouldn’t have called it a “time machine” as that paints a picture of people sitting in something, going to different eras. I was just kind of freaking out that Q actually confirmed this, and wasn’t thinking of the best way to communicate the reality of what was going on. In fact, I had no real idea how to even approach the subject – which is why you didn’t really see an article on this at the time. There was just… too much to unpack – at least, for me, at the time (which was during the launch week of my book, remember).
That said, there’s been considerable work done since then.
Where We Go One We Go All on Youtube had an excellent video summarizing the main points of the subject which most following this will be familiar with now. Basically, the central claim is that there’s a device in Area 51 that basically creates a “lens” through which different potential timelines are displayed. And as the video says, this certainly puts a new spin on Q’s refrain of “They never thought she would lose.”
I recommend you watch this before continuing with the article, if you haven’t already:
But there’s something that’s bugged me about all of this – and that’s that the main video that got passed around at the time – the one featuring that Navy Seal, Bill Wood – was actually something of a fraud/disinfo operation. Bill (and admittedly, I haven’t looked into this nearly as much as I should have) was supposedly forced to admit later in court that he never was a seal to begin with… which is kind of critical to his whole backstory.
That interview is here, but the part that concerns Project Looking Glass starts at 1:38:00:
But I was struck by how quickly that video propagated across various social networks – and not Dan Burisch’s videos – which are not only older, but again – verify so many of the things that Bill Cooper said about groups like #Majestic12, and correlated Bob Lazar’s testimony about #S4 at #Area51. Most of the central claims have been documented by the same channel, Project Camelot, in their documentary series “Out from Under Majestic.”
That said, Dan’s testimony is not without its own problems, and his credibility has been called into question, too (see:
http://www.ufowatchdog.com/burischdirtbag.htm). And George Napp – who is a big proponent of Lazar – doesn’t like Dan. Lazar himself has supposedly said Dan has the “biggest bull***t story I have ever heard in my life.” Make of that what you may.
But it just struck me how one side of the story (Bill Wood’s side) was being propagated and shared, while Dan’s was being ignored.
Now, who knows who’s telling the complete truth here? It’s hard to say. Perhaps Q will provide some insight on this point. There are, however, a number of consistencies between both versions of the story.
The Looking Glass functions by manipulating spacetime to create worm holes in spacetime.
That the Looking Glass itself was built based on very singular, ancient Sumerian cylinder seals.
The device itself is probabalistic, showing possible futures.
In the end, those using the device were only ultimately able to see two potential timelines that humanity could choose, T1 (which included mass disasters which killed billions) and T2 (which is, supposedly, what we’re in now).
So… maybe the first question you have is – what on earth were the Sumerians doing with plans for such a device?
Burisch offers an answer, and frankly – it’s not for everyone.
See, much of Burisch’s testimony revolved around his friend with someone he calls “The J-Rod” (If you’re going “Where have I read this name before?” it was a bit of an inside joke I made a while back when dissecting the FBI field agent’s fraudulent report on 8chan. I was hoping Q would pick up on the reference, at the time, and maybe spill some beans).
In Burisch’s testimony, he says that the J-Rod was actually a human being from the year 52,000, who had evolved quite a bit, and resembled what we would stereotypically think of as a “grey.” The J-Rod suffered from a degenerative neural disease, but could also communicate through “entrainment,” as Burisch calls is. J-Rod was from the T1 timeline – which lead to the deaths of 3/4ths of the planet.
And as Burisch tells is, other J-Rods from the year 42,000 were the ones who planted the Sumerian seals with the plans for the Looking Glass, so that future generations would find it, create the device, use it, and create the cataclysm found on T1, which would eventually have humans evolve into J-Rods.
In other words, the J-Rods were trying to create themselves.
And the “Illumined” of the world were fine with this scenario, because it allowed them to plan things out and retain power for themselves.
(Starting to see shades of the “16 year plan to destroy America” here?)
(Bonus round: You know who Dan claims was holding the cylinder seals in the years before the Looking Glass devices were assembled? Ghadaffi and Saddam Hussein. In the words of Q, “bake your noodle).”
Burisch would even go on to say that time-travel by the J-Rods have created paradoxes; what Burisch calls “Newtonian superimpositions” – which lead to paradoxes such that we’re starting to take notice of it all. I note this because it might be a possible explanation for some of the “Mandela effect” phenomenon we observe in reality – such as the who Shazaam/Kazaam debate. If what Burisch says is all true, I can definitely say I know for a fact there was a Shazaam movie! (At least, in the timeline I was in, before the “superimposition” occurred – if such a thing actually did occur).
So… Where does that leave us? Well, for one, I’m not saying I’m committing to any one of these “whistleblowers” interpretations. I’m really just presenting the information in as succinct and relevant form as I can, and trying to help the community weigh it out and dig more. I’d love for more clarification on all these topics from Q.
(In a “strange loop,” potentially. But that’s a talk for another time).
Which brings us back to… a conundrum.
See, we know President Trump isn’t just creating the Space Force from scratch here. No, he’s actually disclosing much of what was already in place.
Why?
What is out there, in space, that we would need to confront it with “force?”
Could it possibly be that J-Rods from 45,000 and beyond are coming to try and instigate the destruction which would create them, themselves?
(And I completely realize how far into Sci-Fi territory that sounds, but remember what Q said:
Now comes the ‘conspiracy’ label.
Deeper we go, the more unrealistic it all becomes.
Oh, you thought you were getting a regular drop dissection article from me today, didn’t you! LOL!
But I think you’re beginning to see why I had a very difficult time trying to compose an article about the Qdrops when topics of such enormity were on the table. Like I said earlier, I’ve been diving into these subject for quite some time now – so when Q confirmed Project Looking Glass during within a week of my book being released – well, on top of the burnout, the exhaustion, the sickness, the general difficulties that come with running a large Q forum, and the holidays – my brain just kind of said…
“Nah. Nah, bruh. Come back later.”
If ever there was a moment I wanted to walk away from Q, it was that moment. And yet, I couldn’t. I’ve seen too much of it which convinces me Q is still true otherwise. I may not be able to sort through all the specifics. I may be dealing with a near insurmountable amount of disinfo to sort through as well. But I’m still buckled in for the ride and wanting to see what comes next.
(Which, again, supposedly are indictments. Indictments – plural – in 2019, remember? If that doesn’t happen, and the can gets kicked down the road again – I may just walk away then – because I think that’s going to be a real moment of truth. If it doesn’t happen – absent a really frickin’ good explanation – I’ll probably be done, because I’m certainly not sticking around for video posts of convulsing grandmas).
All this is a bit overwhelming, and frankly, more than a bit loony-sounding, but I had to compile it all here to show the enormity of the information I’m grappling with. I’m completely aware of Its not just one extraordinary claim we’re talking about here, but multiple extraordinary claims layered on top of each other, in one nearly-unbelievable sandwich.
Because – just to recount and summarize all we’ve been through – Q is basically insinuating that:
We live in a simulation built by a massive intelligence, which is potentially one of many parallel simulations, which can overlap, collide, merge, and perhaps even tear apart with each other, and these simulations are populated by intelligent entities which are entirely other from us and which have deeply affected our history (and possibly even our evolution), and there are entities outside the simulation which affect us, and we now have the power to fundamentally control one of the most defining aspects of the simulation; spacetime.
Got all that?
Or put otherwise, it’s like playing Rust with admin privileges and extra NPCs… if God was running the Rust server.
…
And now, hopefully you see why I had to refute Dawkins in the beginning of this article.
Because even though these are extraordinary claims, to believe them would only ever actually require ordinary evidence. And while we don’t have nearly as much evidence as I would like right now, we do still have reason to believe Q, and judge Q as accurate.
For now.
(Again, if those indictments don’t land in 2019 like Q said… I’m going to have SEVERE issues moving forward following all this).
But what keeps me going, what keeps me pressing in to all this, I suppose, is honestly my desire to know more. I want to know the absolute truth about the reality of our universe. I want to shake an alien’s hand (assuming it’s friendly). I want to bend the laws of the universe. I want to see the face of God.
The end won’t be for everyone.
That choice, to know, will be yours.
Show me everything you’ve got, Q! Cause I want to know!
Re: The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks