Corey Feldman Says he Plans to Name Pedophiles in Hollywood

[waves]

I find this atmosphere of 'just finding out' and/or 'finally finding out' the pervasiveness of so many perverts and sell-out wannabes in Hollywood very disingenuous.

IT'S BEEN THE RULE NOT THE EXCEPTION ALL ALONG!!

By the way, I have first hand experience from spending my 18-24th year in the thick of Hollywood. I shot to the top of my field (radio/audio production) purely from a lot of right place right time opportunity and ability to hold my own, but sure got exposed to the underbelly and denizens before and during success. Talk about a swamp. By 24 I walked away from a well underway career because I couldn't stomach that the price of success was having to be surrounded by those people for the rest of my life.

I bet there are hardly NO kid/teen/female/boy actors you've ever seen on the screen that didn't pay some sexual price at some time in their wannabe days to get their career starts. All the exposes you can find from the 30's thru now were always just the tip of the iceberg.

Hollywood is a vile, deviant, ego and pervert mecca and always has been.

Nearly everybody there either does it, did it, had it done to them or all three.

Everybody knows who is who and who has done/is doing what. But they turn a blind eye, still work with each other, cover for each other and it's known that's it's just the way it is.

To some degree however, I have a hard time seeing most 'victims' as victims. I said no to many advances in the same paragraphs as offers when I was young and naive and was made to feel I was throwing away some opportunity. Yes the pervs are there because of this advantage (not talent! just connections or money), but I also think most 'victims' know better and choose to sell out in the name of that starry reward in the sky.

Consent to be used is pretty pervasive too.

[Hervé]

How corruption state USA came about:

COMPROMISED: Sex-abuser Congressmen are open to massive blackmail

by Jon Rappoport Nov 23, 2017

Most people are naïve about how intelligence operations are run. Holding damaging secrets on public figures equals the opportunity for blackmail. This strategy was probably discovered by cave men.

—Sex-abuse claims filed against members of Congress—beyond Al Franken and John Conyers—

Where are all the names of these Congressmen? We’re now told that, in the past 10 years, $17 million has been paid out to accusers in small sums. An unknown part of that money was compensation explicitly for sexual offenses.

There are more cases where the accusers simply gave up and refused to pursue claims. They’re potentially waiting in the wings.

Not only are the Congressmen guilty, they’re open to blackmail. As they vote on bills; as they decide which lobbyists to favor; as they decide what advice to follow from intelligence agencies; as they decide whether to take meetings with agents from other countries; they’re always looking over their shoulders, wondering: HOW MUCH DO THESE PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT ME? WHAT SHOULD I DO TO STAY SAFE?

And in some hotel room, late at night, when a person slips them a folder with details of their sexual misdemeanors or felonies, what are they going to do? How are they going to resist whatever is being asked for?

COMPROMISED.

This is the political elephant in the room the mainstream press isn’t talking about.

What about the NSA and the CIA and other spying agencies in the US (and other countries)? How much devastating information about sexual abuse have they gathered on these Congressmen?

How much covert control have the agencies chosen to exercise?

WE OWN YOU.

The levels of complexity can be dizzying. Suppose a guilty Congressman learns actual secrets about another politician? His impulse is to blow the whistle. But can he? What will he bring down on his own head?

Suppose he knows vital secrets about Monsanto, Dow, Exxon, Eli Lilly?

I’LL KEEP YOUR SECRETS IF YOU KEEP MINE.

A BROTHERHOOD OF SECRET-KEEPERS.

An awareness, over the years, spreads through Congress: “Many of us are guilty and we need to protect each other.”

Because it isn’t just the sexual secrets anymore. It’s the subsequent immoral actions taken and not taken, based on being compromised. Based on being controlled.

“Appreciate your committee vote to kill the bill yesterday, Senator. I assure you that thing in Miami last summer…”

“When does our deal end? When are we even? This is worse than prison.”

“It’s not worse. And it never ends. But don’t worry, be happy. Keep playing the game. It’s no skin off your nose.”

“What about honor?”

“Please. You gave that away a long time ago. In Miami. But we also know about the hotel rooms in New York, Washington, Chicago, LA…”

The Congressman can’t believe the bind he’s in. He’s having the above conversation with a man from the CIA. He and the CIA are supposed to be on the same team. And they are, if he’ll understand who is higher in the pecking order, who gives the commands.

One day, he’ll wake up and realize that, among the four women he abused, three were innocent, but one was sent in by the Agency with the task of seducing him. If necessary, at a later date, she could use their night together as blackmail. (For a rough variation on this theme, see numerous accounts of NY Governor Eliot Spitzer’s 2008 hooker scandal, which caused his resignation from office. Spitzer was attacking Wall Street and Big Pharma.)

Then we come to the issue of reporters, who themselves could be compromised, because they’re secretly guilty of sexual abuse.

For example, long-time political reporter, Glenn Thrush (Politico, NY Times, MSNBC), has just been accused of kissing and groping four women. The Times has suspended him from his position covering the White House.

If Thrush, at any time, has been aware of politicians’ misdeeds, did he cover them and expose them fully—or was he “under the gun” to play ball because of his own secrets?

One could reasonably ask this question about Thrush’s relations with the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign.

Case in point. WikiLeaks (October 2016) released an email from Thrush to John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign manager. Thrush was writing an article that referred to Podesta. He emailed Podesta part of the draft, asking him to “fact-check” it. Astonishingly, Thrush remarked in the email:

“No worries Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u. Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this. Tell me if I ****ed up anything.”

Podesta replied: “no problems here.”

Politico’s vice president of communications, Brad Dayspring, made an impassioned and transparently moronic defense of his reporter:

“Glenn is one of the top political reporters in the country [!], in no small part because he understands that it is his job to get inside information, not appear perfect when someone illegally hacks email [!]…I can speak with firsthand knowledge and experience that Glenn checks the validity of often complex reporting with everybody, on both sides of the aisle.”

So who is Brad Dayspring, the ardent defender of his “top political reporter?”

Years earlier, on October 25, 2011, while Dayspring was working as Communications Director for House Majority Leader, Eric Cantor, ADWEEK reported (link here):

“Turns out Dayspring’s personal Twitter feed, @BDayspring… follows 1,007 accounts, one of which is SexyTwitPics… Description: ‘We RT [retweet] only the HOTTEST Pics DIRECTLY from Sexy Ladies’ Twitter Accts! (No random girls, xxx, guys) Ladies Mention us w your pics! 18+’”

Maybe it’s a stretch, but I’d say the level of intelligence Dayspring exhibited in defending Glenn Thrush is matched by his interest in SexyTwitPics.

One of the elephants in the room is, of course, Bill Clinton. For several decades, people having been writing about his sexual predations. It’s assumed that he and his allies (including his wife) have been able to avoid final excommunication from politics because of their power—but it would be foolish to assume he has been free from blackmail.

We wouldn’t be talking about some reporter with a damning file on Bill Clinton. We would be talking about an agency like the CIA and their file. No one who is a serial abuser simply shrugs off the CIA and blithely walks away.

In other words, the Clintons may have nine lives precisely BECAUSE they made a deal with the devil…

Jon Rappoport

===========================================

Some of you may remember having read this (from here):

How the blackmailing occurs (from here <---):

A History of Skull and Bones Rituals Recalled From their Own Archives

They practice Christianity with their lips, and Satanism by their deeds. Some of them are mind controlled into amnesia by the trauma and drugs at the initial ceremony and do not even know later that they are Satanists. Others do know. I would say that about 20 percent are fully aware that what they are doing is evil and wrong and just don't know how to stop it. About 50% know what they are doing but deny that it is evil. They excuse it as their right to be pagan and uninhibited. Then about 10 percent are full multiples and are clueless in their overt personality as to what they are doing in their covert personalities. Then about another 20 percent are too lazy and apathetic to think about what they are doing. They are just doing it because others do it. (See the last section below “Protecting yourself from blackmail”, if you have fallen into one of these traps).

The CIA did find methods to make over 90% of people criminals without a discernible conscience. They started with the basic Skull and Bone’s ritual and had already made some improvements in it by the time Rodman Rockefeller tasked me to look into the issue. He was not happy with the almost 10% failure rate. Ops were run on Congressmen, CEO’s, and foreign dignitaries. Having to kill 10% of them soon after inviting them to a “DC Party” was a high security risk--- someone might notice and leak that to a part of the press which was not well controlled. So, Rodman was very anxious that the “failure rate”gets below 5%.

Rodman brought me the historical records from the Skull and Bone’s Crypt. That included a blood smear on paper for each of the major rituals, and also financial records, and diaries. There was also an official registry of deaths, the names of the victims was occasionally listed as unknown. In the 1830’s, the basic Skull and Bone’s ritual was to rape/sodomize and then kill a victim with a knife, in no particular order....

[...]

-------------------------------------------------

So... DC "parties"... Lolita Island "gatherings"... Marta's Vineyard "happenings"... never mind the Bohemian Grove collections...

========================================

Here is the preamble to the above quote:

[...]

Now let's talk a little bit about the babies coming out of war zones because I strayed too far into the American children in talking about the escorts for foreign and domestic dignitaries.

Women are raped in war and often abandon the babies at birth. The CIA helps fund orphanages in the war zones so that it can skim off the kids it wants. The children under 2 usually are too neglected to survive - failure to thrive syndrome.

The cute ones are bought up by the CIA for the cabal bosses and sold as part of the $100,000 a month club.

Rich people like fine wines to show up monthly and this is a variation of that. They are signed up for it almost automatically without any choice in the matter if they attend certain high class estate ceremonies around the world hosted by people like the Rockefellers.

Getting in the door means that you can't get out of it again when the ceremony starts unless you are a very good spy. The ceremony will involve the human sacrifice of some person - often a toddler or young virgin.

After that initiation in the fine art of human sacrifice the guest is expected to carry on that tradition of entrapping others just the same way. Failure to do so is associated with death and blackmail threats. Death can be the result of "accidents".

Few people are sophisticated enough to know not to get into one of these traps or how to get out of them. They have families and they cave in to the pressure. It then perpetuates itself. They get a baby a month to ritually kill and entrap all the politicians and police chiefs that might try to stop their rise to fame.

[...]

=================================================

Accordingly, stealthily, steadily and following a similar climb of psychopaths up social, corporate and military ladders; any kind of influential power positions, whether governments, agencies, corporations, academia, controlling bodies (AMA, APA, FDA, CDC, WHO, UN, etc...) etc..., have been filled with remotely controllable puppets...

-----------------------------------------------------------

Then there is the psyop that's raging around the world to "normalize" pedophilia:

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
[...]

From Sue Arrigo:

[...]

The third piece of disinformation that the CIA fed therapists in journals to fool them and the parents is a bit subtler. The disinformation said "There is no normal age at which children should be told about sex. Sex education can occur at any age — it is up to the parents to decide. And sex education may be bad for kids so maybe we shouldn’t have it in our schools..."

The CIA spent a lot of money to convince parents, churches, and schools not to have real sex education classes. The reason was that when kids were allowed to freely talk in a group about their sexual experiences or fantasies or theories of sex, the kids themselves could see that some of them had very different levels of exposure to - and sophistication in - these matters.

So if sex education had to be taught the CIA wanted canned talks in which the kids were not allowed to talk. It thus trained sex educators to control the amount kids could talk and tried to make it taboo for the kids to talk to each other afterwards.

The CIA also found out that there was a best age for sex education –about the start of puberty. So then they fostered some campaigns to force the education to be earlier. The reason for that was that some young child whose native curiosity would not lead to sophisticated knowledge of sexual action, were coming out with it in front of parents and therapists.

It was better for the CIA if they could say that the kid learned it in a sex education class than from CIA prostitution of them. So although it sounds contradictory, the CIA’s bottom line on sex education disinformation was—don’t have sex education classes, but if you must have them have them very early and don’t let kids talk at them. Make it a more taboo subject by the way you skirt it or only allow it to be taught in a very short segment and never referred to again.

The CIA sponsored conferences for sex educators under a front company call “First Dating Experiences” if I remember correctly. Or maybe just “First Experiences”. When the abstinence only people objected the name of the front company was called something like “Wait for Marriage, Inc."

It was the same front. The same staff, address etc. The CIA also pushes abstinence and marital fidelity fronts while not practicing these things themselves. It does that to increase the effectiveness of its blackmail ops.

Sexual blackmail only works when the society is condemning towards others. It is not the abstinence or fidelity that the CIA is after, it is the condemning of others it is after.

Condemning is a form of hate and the CIA provokes hate and condemning as a way of controlling others. It is a mind control technique that can then be used to get people to fight wars, etc., against their best interests.

[...]

The actual results were that the CIA training was not adequate in amount or quality to do anything to train a kid in pushing. So the experiment was not a test of that at all. The experiment was a cover story for how to get the kids into one’s hands.

[...]

Related:

Speaking of "Street Crimes," Riots, etc...

While you were out… business as usual

POLICE STATE? How it came about in the US of A

[Noelle]

I found this article today: Keanu Reeves - Hollywood Elites Use ‘Blood Of Babies’ To Get High It was published 11/19/17 by ExposingGovernment.com, a site that I am not at all familiar with. If it is legit, then Reeves uses some pretty damning words to describe what's happening to children in Hollywood.

A snippet from the article:

“Some of these guys carry around bottles of blood. They call it ‘red wine.’ But they don’t hide it.“

“From what I understand there is a supply chain that delivers young children on the regular. I’ve heard them refer to times of famine, times of feast.“

“For a long time I thought it was a joke, or coded language. I didn’t think it could be what it seemed to be,” said Reeves, who explained “but then I got invited to a well-known mogul’s mansion and he had two dead babies in his fridge. A white one and a brown one. I freaked out, I broke this guy’s things, I broke his nose."

***UPDATE***

Sorry. I should have dug a little deeper before posting this. It appears the story originated from YourNewswire, and, apparently, the site has deleted the story. Probably disinformation.

[DNA]

Posted by waves (here)
I find this atmosphere of 'just finding out' and/or 'finally finding out' the pervasiveness of so many perverts and sell-out wannabes in Hollywood very disingenuous.

IT'S BEEN THE RULE NOT THE EXCEPTION ALL ALONG!!

By the way, I have first hand experience from spending my 18-24th year in the thick of Hollywood. I shot to the top of my field (radio/audio production) purely from a lot of right place right time opportunity and ability to hold my own, but sure got exposed to the underbelly and denizens before and during success. Talk about a swamp. By 24 I walked away from a well underway career because I couldn't stomach that the price of success was having to be surrounded by those people for the rest of my life.

I bet there are hardly NO kid/teen/female/boy actors you've ever seen on the screen that didn't pay some sexual price at some time in their wannabe days to get their career starts. All the exposes you can find from the 30's thru now were always just the tip of the iceberg.

Hollywood is a vile, deviant, ego and pervert mecca and always has been.

Nearly everybody there either does it, did it, had it done to them or all three.

Everybody knows who is who and who has done/is doing what. But they turn a blind eye, still work with each other, cover for each other and it's known that's it's just the way it is.

To some degree however, I have a hard time seeing most 'victims' as victims. I said no to many advances in the same paragraphs as offers when I was young and naive and was made to feel I was throwing away some opportunity. Yes the pervs are there because of this advantage (not talent! just connections or money), but I also think most 'victims' know better and choose to sell out in the name of that starry reward in the sky.

Consent to be used is pretty pervasive too.

Great post!!
I've been of the opinion that this is how it is in Hollywood but it's very confirming to hear this from someone who has seen and witnessed this activity.
I agree most with your point that there isn't an actor or actress with any sort of success who hasn't paid the price by allowing themselves to be used.


This is the testimony that is missing in my opinion with everyone coming forward with their sexual misconduct accounts.
Jennifer Lawrence isn't coming forward and talking about the directors, producers and talent managers she's allowed herself to be bedded by because it takes away from the idea that she got to where she is through talent.
Jennifer Lawrence and her ilk shouldn't be thought of as glamorous or talented they should be viewed as folks with low ethical standards and little regard for their person, they are in every way the opposite of what they stand for in regards to liberal feminists.
And when you boil it down to it's most basic common denominator, what we are talking about here is prostitution.
The knowledge of what is really going on reduces the glammer, fame and prestige into something not to be admired, but to feel abhorred by.
The station of the actor, singer and performer becomes synonymous with prostitution to such an extent that the cult of personality loses influence and that is why this information needs to be known.
People with such little regard for themselves should not have an elevated voice on National and World matters in my opinion.
Once we know you will sell your body for fame we know you will sell or rent your opinion shaping it to best boost your role with powers controlling your career's destiny.
We know now that if your body is for sale then your opinion is for sale and as such your opinion should lose all it's credibility and influence.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FKv5QLa8q8

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=7FKv5QLa8q8

[Hervé]

Mod note from Hervé:

I have moved 9 posts out of this thread - being off-topic for the thread - to this new thread:

Pedophilia outside USA's Hollywood centered world

... where pedophilia outside Hollywood and the US can be documented and discussed.

[waves]

Posted by DNA (here)
.....
We know now that if your body is for sale then your opinion is for sale and as such your opinion should lose all it's credibility and influence.

EXACTLY.

Too bad the Hollywood side and the political side of this subject need to be separated because some aspects may be separate but much is the same. You especially nailed it for both sides of the coin - that the bottom line for both Hollywood Icons or Political Office Holders is that both soul selling and opinion selling is prostitution and the sellouts "should lose all credibility and influence" because of it.

Possibly the only bigger difference between the two is the child trafficking aspect. I really hate having to even type those words.

[Cidersomerset]

#Pedowood Is Freaking Out: Corey Feldman's 1993
Smoking Gun Files Naming Pedophiles "Found" by Cops

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=K3GE1wz-Xjk

Published on 7 Dec 2017
Corey Feldman has been vindicated. All rise! The former child actor claimed
in October that he had given the names of sexual predators in Hollywood to
the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office in 1993 during their investigation
into Michael Jackson's molestation charges. The Sheriff’s Office denied those
claims, saying they had no records of Feldman revealing such information,
until now. Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office public information officer
Kelly Hoover told Fox News on Tuesday night in an emailed statement,
“Following the recent inquiries into the Sheriff’s Office interview of Mr.
Feldman in 1993, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office conducted an
additional review for any stored items remaining from the Michael Jackson
investigation. In a container which included the original reports from the
investigation, the Sheriff’s Office located some detective working copies of
audio recordings made during the investigation. A copy of Mr. Feldman’s
interview was located. The recording is being turned over to the Los Angeles
Police Department. Due to the fact that this case involves the alleged sexual
abuse of a child, we are unable to comment further and any documentation
or evidence related to this case is exempt from release.”

Fox News had originally reached out to the Sheriff’s Office in October at which
time they responded, “We are aware of the statements that Mr. Feldman is
making regarding an investigation in 1993. Our records do not indicate that
he named any suspects."

Feldman's rep told us, "[Feldman] is in possession of the tapes and justice will be served."

Feldman, 46, had claimed in a Today show interview with Matt Lauer that he
“sat down and I gave them names. They're on record. They have all this information.”

The "Stand By Me" star has launched a campaign to raise $10 million in order to
make a movie about sexual misconduct in the entertainment industry.

Since the LAPD made its recent findings public, the star feels vindicated tweeting,
"TIME 2 REOPEN THAT CASE @LAPD I DID REPORT IT WITHIN THE STATUTE, SO
NOW IT SHOULD B ADMISSIBLE RIGHT?"

Hollyweird and Pedowood are freaking out.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/...

[bluestflame]

Posted by Cidersomerset (here)
#Pedowood Is Freaking Out: Corey Feldman's 1993
Smoking Gun Files Naming Pedophiles "Found" by Cops

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=K3GE1wz-Xjk

Published on 7 Dec 2017
Corey Feldman has been vindicated. All rise! The former child actor claimed
in October that he had given the names of sexual predators in Hollywood to
the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office in 1993 during their investigation
into Michael Jackson's molestation charges. The Sheriff’s Office denied those
claims, saying they had no records of Feldman revealing such information,
until now. Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office public information officer
Kelly Hoover told Fox News on Tuesday night in an emailed statement,
“Following the recent inquiries into the Sheriff’s Office interview of Mr.
Feldman in 1993, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office conducted an
additional review for any stored items remaining from the Michael Jackson
investigation. In a container which included the original reports from the
investigation, the Sheriff’s Office located some detective working copies of
audio recordings made during the investigation. A copy of Mr. Feldman’s
interview was located. The recording is being turned over to the Los Angeles
Police Department. Due to the fact that this case involves the alleged sexual
abuse of a child, we are unable to comment further and any documentation
or evidence related to this case is exempt from release.”

Fox News had originally reached out to the Sheriff’s Office in October at which
time they responded, “We are aware of the statements that Mr. Feldman is
making regarding an investigation in 1993. Our records do not indicate that
he named any suspects."

Feldman's rep told us, "[Feldman] is in possession of the tapes and justice will be served."

Feldman, 46, had claimed in a Today show interview with Matt Lauer that he
“sat down and I gave them names. They're on record. They have all this information.”

The "Stand By Me" star has launched a campaign to raise $10 million in order to
make a movie about sexual misconduct in the entertainment industry.

Since the LAPD made its recent findings public, the star feels vindicated tweeting,
"TIME 2 REOPEN THAT CASE @LAPD I DID REPORT IT WITHIN THE STATUTE, SO
NOW IT SHOULD B ADMISSIBLE RIGHT?"

Hollyweird and Pedowood are freaking out.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/...

i don't agree with thier explaination of how they found the missing tapes but it's awesome news it may just change the whole scope of his case

[Cidersomerset]

This is how part of the abuse works....

Corey Feldman Reveals the Name of an Alleged Abuser

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6jFmjad37s
Published on 13 Nov 2017
In an exclusive video with Dr. Oz, Corey Feldman reveals that Alphy Hoffman
allegedly sexually abused him when he was a minor.
Watch Feldman on The Dr. Oz Show: http://bit.ly/2zTTm8S

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jason Lively and Corey Feldman Talk to Dr. Oz About Alphy's Soda Pop Club

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0CTZM_4zyA
Published on 13 Nov 2017
Actors Jason Lively and Corey Feldman sit down with Dr. Oz exclusively to discuss
what it was like to hang out at Alphy's Soda Pop Club. Feldman named Alphy
Hoffman, the host of the club, as one of his alleged abusers.

====================================================

PEDOWOOD - Exposing Hollywood pt1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1TAE_inW-0
Published on 18 Oct 2017
PEDOWOOD - Exposing Hollywood pt1

====================================================

This is as old as Hollywood and beyond, Charlie Chaplin , Elvis ,Roman Polanski
and many others have all been involved or suspected of underage sex whether
with groupies, inspiring actors , drug related or other reasons...The Charles Manson
case is tied into all this....

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/c...ust-15-5448940

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1192558

[uzn]

Attempted murder! Corey Feldman stabbed with a knife

Bad attack on Corey Feldman (46)! The US actor fell victim to a knife attack last night. Three men are said to have surprised him and attacked in Los Angeles. He was treated immediately in the hospital. Corey had suffered severe puncture wounds, but he was doing relatively well in the circumstances. However, he is seriously worried: the "Goonies" actor taps revenge as a motive!
Out of nowhere, three men are said to have come to the car of the erstwhile children's star. "A man opened my door and stabbed me with something," Corey reported on Twitter. For this purpose, the American published two photos showing him in medical treatment. In another post he addressed himself to the police. I've already received many threats and this robbery results from it - I think it all goes together, "speculated the 46-year-old.

He alleged that the attack had to do with his allegations against a variety of Hollywood men: Corey accused them of sexually abusing him and his fellow actor Corey Haim (✝38) in childhood. "Enough is enough, how sick are these people?" He tweeted in shock.