+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30

Thread: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    3,471
    Thanks
    18,960
    Thanked 20,024 times in 3,158 posts

    Default The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Of course could never confirm this but heard it second hand from someone that discussed UFOs with Jacques and met him personally for lunch etc a few times. He told me Jacques Vallee was working with Bob Bigelow and quess where that work would take him, the skinwalker ranch would be on the list.. I wish the secrecy would end and let scientists tell of the unusual happenings.



    Quote There exists a “ranch” so strange, so bizarre, that the National Institute for Discovery Science (owned by Las Vegas businessman and billionaire Bob Bigelow) purchased it solely for scientific research purposes. Skinwalker Ranch located in the Uintah Basin near the town of Fort Duchesne, paranormal phenomenon such as strange creatures, bizarre objects, flying black triangles, animal mutilations, and telepathic messages, have been reported on the 480 acre Skinwalker Ranch for hundreds of years.

    It is estimated that over half the population in the area surrounding the ranch have witnessed unusual paranormal activity on, or near what became known as the “Strangest Place on Earth”. Even the local Ute Indians believe the land to be cursed – and tribe members are strictly forbidden to enter the property.

  2. The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), BMJ (3rd November 2017), boja (2nd November 2017), Bruno (3rd November 2017), Cidersomerset (2nd November 2017), Debra (3rd November 2017), DNA (2nd November 2017), Fellow Aspirant (2nd November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (2nd November 2017), Foxie Loxie (2nd November 2017), gaiagirl (5th November 2017), genevieve (5th November 2017), Inaiá (4th November 2017), JoefromtheCarolinas (3rd November 2017), KiwiElf (5th November 2017), LadyM (3rd November 2017), Loren (4th November 2017), Mercedes (2nd November 2017), Nasu (2nd November 2017), Ol' Roy (3rd November 2017), Omnisense (3rd November 2017), sigma6 (5th November 2017), Star Mariner (4th November 2017), toppy (2nd November 2017), Woody (2nd November 2017)

  3. Link to Post #2
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    3,471
    Thanks
    18,960
    Thanked 20,024 times in 3,158 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    A few years ago while unemployed and called my friend Garry to ask if he could help make a connection for a job. Since he knew Jacques and how UFO research might be a connection between us I asked if there might be any work unpaid or otherwise in paranormal with Jacques and hopefully at the skinwalker ranch under his area of research. Even filled out an job app on Bigelows aerospace website which is based in Nevada for any possible work. Unfortunately was totally unqualified and there was no job openings for paranormal work at skinwalker. But honestly why not have people that would volunteer to help on the work at skinwalker? Also sure wouldnt be the only one asking.

  4. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), BMJ (3rd November 2017), boja (3rd November 2017), Bruno (3rd November 2017), DNA (2nd November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (2nd November 2017), Foxie Loxie (2nd November 2017), gaiagirl (5th November 2017), KiwiElf (5th November 2017), LadyM (3rd November 2017), Mercedes (2nd November 2017), toppy (2nd November 2017), Woody (2nd November 2017)

  5. Link to Post #3
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    14,917
    Thanks
    44,461
    Thanked 189,049 times in 13,332 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    For anyone who doesn't know (or know much!) about the saga of the Skinwalker Ranch, this June 2008 presentation by George Knapp is the best I've personally come across. (And some of the information is so off-the-wall ridiculous, even Knapp himself is reluctant to recount it...)


  6. The Following 33 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    avid (3rd November 2017), BMJ (3rd November 2017), boja (2nd November 2017), Bruno (3rd November 2017), ChristianSky (3rd November 2017), Debra (3rd November 2017), ditting (3rd November 2017), DNA (2nd November 2017), Fellow Aspirant (4th November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (3rd November 2017), Foxie Loxie (4th November 2017), gaiagirl (5th November 2017), genevieve (5th November 2017), Hervé (4th November 2017), Iancorgi (3rd November 2017), JoefromtheCarolinas (3rd November 2017), justntime2learn (2nd November 2017), KiwiElf (5th November 2017), Kryztian (2nd November 2017), LadyM (3rd November 2017), Libico (7th November 2017), Lifebringer (3rd November 2017), Loren (4th November 2017), Mercedes (2nd November 2017), mojo (2nd November 2017), Sarahlou (5th November 2017), sigma6 (5th November 2017), silverfish (3rd November 2017), Star Mariner (4th November 2017), toppy (2nd November 2017), Woody (2nd November 2017), YoYoYo (3rd November 2017), Zampano (3rd November 2017)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member DNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    Snowflake, Arizona
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,290
    Thanks
    18,201
    Thanked 15,568 times in 2,998 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Not to sound like Woody Harrelson in his trailer outside of Yellowstone in the movie 2012 but the Government absolutely knows and understands these portal zones.
    In Sedona the Federal Government bought the Bradshaw Ranch and it is now off limits to the public.
    For those of you who know about Skinwalker Ranch and you do not know about the Bradshaw Ranch I suggest you watch this Tom Dongo video I'm about to share.
    Just for the record, if I could pick one guy for Bill to do a Skype Project Avalon Interview with, it would be Tom Dongo.


    Do yourself a favor and watch this amazing Tom Dongo speaking presentation of the Bradshaw Ranch and the high strangeness in the surrounding Sedona area.
    Dongo has and shares absolutely incredible pictures during this presentation.
    Pictures of large rectangle shaped portals in the air, and beings who appear to be using the portals appear in some of these pictures as well.
    Absolutely fascinating on so many levels.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW70x8xd3T0&t=1477s
    The conquering of self is truly greater than were one to conquer many worlds.
    Edgar Cayce

  8. The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    Amenjo (4th November 2017), Axman (5th November 2017), BMJ (3rd November 2017), Bruno (3rd November 2017), ChristianSky (3rd November 2017), Debra (8th November 2017), Ewan (3rd November 2017), Fellow Aspirant (4th November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (3rd November 2017), fourty-two (2nd November 2017), Foxie Loxie (4th November 2017), gaiagirl (5th November 2017), genevieve (5th November 2017), Hervé (4th November 2017), JoefromtheCarolinas (3rd November 2017), Kevan (3rd November 2017), KiwiElf (5th November 2017), Libico (8th November 2017), Lifebringer (3rd November 2017), Loren (4th November 2017), Mercedes (4th November 2017), Mike (3rd November 2017), mojo (2nd November 2017), Sarahlou (5th November 2017), sigma6 (5th November 2017), Slobbe (3rd November 2017), Star Mariner (4th November 2017), YoYoYo (3rd November 2017)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member JoefromtheCarolinas's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th July 2017
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    368
    Thanked 1,546 times in 185 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    I’ve always wondered what people have been talking about, thanks for the intro videos. There’s got to be other points similar elsewhere, but these are pretty bizarre reports.

  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to JoefromtheCarolinas For This Post:

    Bruno (3rd November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (5th November 2017), Foxie Loxie (4th November 2017), Mercedes (4th November 2017), mojo (3rd November 2017), sigma6 (10th November 2017)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th September 2016
    Posts
    137
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 735 times in 126 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Quote Posted by JoefromtheCarolinas (here)
    I’ve always wondered what people have been talking about, thanks for the intro videos. There’s got to be other points similar elsewhere, but these are pretty bizarre reports.
    I am sure that there are other areas. Perhaps not as "busy" a spot as Skinwalker ranch is. Considering that there are a lot of things that occur at the ranch that are paranormal, perhaps certain types of paranormal occurrences require a portal entry of some sort. Ghost investigators use EMF detectors (Electronic Magnetic Field devices).

  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Patient For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), Bruno (3rd November 2017), DNA (4th November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (5th November 2017), Foxie Loxie (4th November 2017), mojo (3rd November 2017)

  13. Link to Post #7
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    3,471
    Thanks
    18,960
    Thanked 20,024 times in 3,158 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Hi all,

    According to the Bigelow sound bite the researchers filmed and observed the paranormal events. That is pretty amazing and why haven't we heard or seen the evidence? Layers and layers of secrecy and how will the human race ever advance if we keep secrets?

  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), DNA (4th November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (5th November 2017), Foxie Loxie (4th November 2017), Inaiá (4th November 2017), Mercedes (4th November 2017), sigma6 (10th November 2017)

  15. Link to Post #8
    UK Avalon Member Flowerpunkchip's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th February 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    225
    Thanks
    2,341
    Thanked 941 times in 197 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Great posts. Thank you. Watched all the videos. Makes me want to one day visit the Sedona area the day I visit the USA. (Maybe that's a crazy idea)

    Do you remember the Stardust Ranch which Kerry visited twice?
    I would love to hear another update.

  16. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Flowerpunkchip For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), BMJ (5th November 2017), DNA (4th November 2017), Foxie Loxie (4th November 2017), mojo (4th November 2017), sigma6 (10th November 2017)

  17. Link to Post #9
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    14,917
    Thanks
    44,461
    Thanked 189,049 times in 13,332 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Quote Posted by DNA (here)
    In Sedona the Federal Government bought the Bradshaw Ranch and it is now off limits to the public.
    For those of you who know about Skinwalker Ranch and you do not know about the Bradshaw Ranch I suggest you watch this Tom Dongo video I'm about to share.
    Just for the record, if I could pick one guy for Bill to do a Skype Project Avalon Interview with, it would be Tom Dongo.

    Do yourself a favor and watch this amazing Tom Dongo speaking presentation of the Bradshaw Ranch and the high strangeness in the surrounding Sedona area.
    Dongo has and shares absolutely incredible pictures during this presentation.
    Pictures of large rectangle shaped portals in the air, and beings who appear to be using the portals appear in some of these pictures as well.
    Absolutely fascinating on so many levels.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW70x8xd3T0&t=1477s


    Yes, there's some imagery here that's literally almost impossible to believe. (Except, it all actually happened. )

    At 46:23, we see this:



    Easy to identify! a guy's balding forehead, just in front of the camera. (So close, in fact, it's out of focus.)

    But, there was no-one there. The person who took the random photo into the darkness never saw a thing.

    And this, at 46:44 — similarly, there was no-one there.


  18. The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    avid (4th November 2017), Axman (5th November 2017), BMJ (5th November 2017), Debra (8th November 2017), DNA (4th November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (5th November 2017), Foxie Loxie (4th November 2017), gaiagirl (5th November 2017), Hervé (4th November 2017), JoefromtheCarolinas (4th November 2017), KiwiElf (5th November 2017), LadyM (4th November 2017), Mercedes (4th November 2017), mojo (4th November 2017), sigma6 (10th November 2017), Star Mariner (4th November 2017), sunwings (4th November 2017), YoYoYo (5th November 2017)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Mexico Avalon Member Mercedes's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th January 2012
    Posts
    304
    Thanks
    8,231
    Thanked 1,353 times in 279 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Hi there, it's odd, but I remember seeing the second image the first time with the man's ear being pointy. Do I remember it wrong? Mmmm...

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mercedes For This Post:

    LadyM (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017), sigma6 (10th November 2017)

  21. Link to Post #11
    New Zealand Avalon Member KiwiElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st September 2011
    Posts
    3,850
    Thanks
    22,084
    Thanked 18,089 times in 3,562 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    The movie, Skinwalker Ranch (2013) was darned scary, and when "it" finally showed up, it looked like a very large (were?)wolf. The movie itself didn't fare that well (5.1/10) and was done as a docu-drama. If you enjoy creepy, tense, scary movies, it's quite watchable IMO.

    Quote A scientific research team investigates and documents the supernatural phenomena surrounding the disappearance of a cattle ranchers 10 year old son. Inspired by true events that shocked the paranormal community around the world.
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2881698/?ref_=nv_sr_1

  22. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to KiwiElf For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), BMJ (5th November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (5th November 2017), LadyM (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017), YoYoYo (5th November 2017)

  23. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    3,471
    Thanks
    18,960
    Thanked 20,024 times in 3,158 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    There should be some serious field work in the valley to be done by some group of researchers other than those that locked the gate on people that would wish to be a part of understanding skinwalker paranormal events. It doesnt have to be at Skinwalker perhaps some location nearby?

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (5th November 2017), KiwiElf (5th November 2017), LadyM (5th November 2017)

  25. Link to Post #13
    United States Avalon Member LadyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th December 2016
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    904
    Thanks
    7,265
    Thanked 4,871 times in 874 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    The movie screen in the sky photo, beginning at around the 37 min. mark in the Dongo video, is incredible -- a big window into another dimension. I've taken some photos of human faces and bodies formed from clouds, and I have seriously considered these beings are in another dimension.

    And the image shown at 37.16 min., one of the cloud beings that I took a photo of is very similar, with some sort of shoulder pads or ornaments and holding some kind of tool or weapon.

    I hope it's ok to post my photos: the first a blowup of the original and the second with some adjustments made using LunaPic to bring out the details. It was taken in 2016.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	CG002.jpg
Views:	7
Size:	166.7 KB
ID:	36424  
    Attached Images  

  26. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to LadyM For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), BMJ (5th November 2017), DNA (5th November 2017), genevieve (5th November 2017), KiwiElf (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017)

  27. Link to Post #14
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    14,917
    Thanks
    44,461
    Thanked 189,049 times in 13,332 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Quote Posted by KiwiElf (here)
    The movie, Skinwalker Ranch (2013) was darned scary, and when "it" finally showed up, it looked like a very large (were?)wolf. The movie itself didn't fare that well (5.1/10) and was done as a docu-drama. If you enjoy creepy, tense, scary movies, it's quite watchable IMO.

    Quote A scientific research team investigates and documents the supernatural phenomena surrounding the disappearance of a cattle ranchers 10 year old son. Inspired by true events that shocked the paranormal community around the world.
    http://imdb.com/title/tt2881698
    Here, in the Avalon Library:

  28. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), BMJ (5th November 2017), DNA (5th November 2017), Flowerpunkchip (5th November 2017), Kevan (5th November 2017), KiwiElf (5th November 2017), LadyM (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017), muxfolder (5th November 2017), Sunny-side-up (9th November 2017)

  29. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Member Whiskey_Mystic's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pale Blue Dot
    Age
    48
    Posts
    1,101
    Thanks
    1,873
    Thanked 8,021 times in 1,016 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Looking at these photographs, I'm curious to know if there is a difference when using digital or film.
    "We sit together, the mountain and me, until only the mountain remains." -Li Po

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Whiskey_Mystic For This Post:

    KiwiElf (5th November 2017), LadyM (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017), Sunny-side-up (9th November 2017)

  31. Link to Post #16
    New Zealand Avalon Member KiwiElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st September 2011
    Posts
    3,850
    Thanks
    22,084
    Thanked 18,089 times in 3,562 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Quote Posted by Whiskey_Mystic (here)
    Looking at these photographs, I'm curious to know if there is a difference when using digital or film.
    Oh yes, HUGE difference (literally). (Gahhhh,... Photoshop takes a whole chapter to explain this, so I'll try to condense):

    Film is continuous tone which means put simply, it's not made up of dots or pixels, so an enlargement can be enormous before you see the "grain". Digital images are made up of tiny squares or pixels & are resolution dependent. As you enlarge them, the pixels become easy to see. But it also depends on whether you are referring to images which are printed in a magazine versus an original photograph, or pixels in a digital format (like DVD, BluRay or the digital movies on YouTube, or photos you take with a digital camera or see on the internet - these are relatively low resolution on a website to match your computer monitor or TV, ie 72 - 96 ppi or pixels per inch) versus an actual film reel or old style photograph.

    In printed format, we use a different method of measurement: dpi (dots per inch) or dpc (dots per centimeter). The original photograph (conventional or digital), is converted to geometrically spaced round dots of varying size to create light and dark/colour mixtures known as a halftone - these are very noticeable in a newspaper; the dots are quite large. In a magazine, the dots are very fine (you'll need a magnifying glass). With inkjet printing or stochastic printing, the dots are very small and are randomly spaced, almost photographic. The printing method we are used to seeing is an optical illusion using (usually) 4 x process colours - Magenta (a dark pinky red), Cyan (a dark sky blue), Yellow & Black (often referred to as CMYK (K=Black) - which are the same as the little containers on an ink jet printer). The "dots" in a colour image are geometrically rotated and overlap, creating the illusion of thousands of colours.

    With inkjet printing, you get a much finer result because of the random patterning and incredibly fine dots which are randomly "sprayed" (& mixed on the paper), again, creating the illusion of thousands of colours.

    Likewise, an image printed off the internet will look quite pixellated - we need a higher resolution (roughly 4 x the size) to get a good print as a digital photograph or an image we will print in a magazine, although it looks fine on your computer or TV.

    A single frame image produced from a standard basic digital camera is enormous compared to video.

    Digital Image resolution is a different colour process (RGB for Red Green & Blue) measured by the number of vertical lines times the number of horizontal lines of light in a picture. It is represented by the number of horizontal lines going across the screen like 480, 720 or 1080. The higher the number the higher the resolution and more detailed the picture.

    For example: DVD vs BluRay
    DVD- Almost all DVDs have a standard definition resolution of 480 or enhanced definition resolution of 520. These resolutions look great on a standard “tube” TV utilizing all available pixels on the screen. (The actual dimensions of such an image are about the size of a pkt of cigarettes or, your typical YouTube size video). However, if blown up to accommodate a widescreen HDTV the picture may look grainy or "pixellated" - you will actually notice the the pixels. Although a DVD can store high definition data it would only fit about 30 minutes maximum.

    Blu-ray- Blu-ray was designed for high definition 1080 display. Since they can store 25 GB of data you can fit an entire HD movie on a single layer disc. Blu-ray currently has the best image resolution on the market and looks great on HDTVs. Blu-ray discs are one of the few signal sources that displays in 1080, not even HD cable or satellite companies can claim that yet.

    If you enlarged Bill's images (above) or any image off the internet, to say double size, the (square) pixels would become easy to see. With film, it would just appear a little more grainy but still "smooth".

    Computer paint programs such as Photoshop, use a method called interpolation to enlarge a digital image by adding or "inventing" pixels in between. (This is used in digital video as well). The enlargement result is OK to a point but will look quite blurry.

    This also affects the resolution an image is scanned at to convert it for either print, web or video.

    As an example, a scanning resolution for the following if we assume the actual size dimensions of the finished image are constant:
    Newspaper = 150 - 200 ppi
    Magazine/digital photograph = 225 - 400 ppi
    Web page = 72 - 96 ppi

    OK... bit more to it than that - it's complicated! . If you want the real detail, you can go to Adobe & download one of their PDF Help manuals for Photoshop and delve into the chapter on resolution.

    https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/archive.html

    Last edited by KiwiElf; 5th November 2017 at 10:44.

  32. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to KiwiElf For This Post:

    Axman (5th November 2017), Bill Ryan (5th November 2017), BMJ (5th November 2017), chrysocolla (7th November 2017), DNA (5th November 2017), genevieve (5th November 2017), LadyM (5th November 2017), Mercedes (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017), Sunny-side-up (9th November 2017)

  33. Link to Post #17
    Finland Avalon Member muxfolder's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th April 2010
    Location
    jossain
    Age
    41
    Posts
    281
    Thanks
    1,588
    Thanked 659 times in 205 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Dogs smoking cigarettes.. That's my favorite.



    Quote In this episode Ryan and I talk with Chris O'brien about his personal experience and knowledge regarding the Sherman ranch (also known as Skinwalker .

    In this episode Ryan and I talk with Chris O'brien about his personal experience and knowledge regarding the Sherman ranch (also known as Skinwalker .

  34. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to muxfolder For This Post:

    BMJ (5th November 2017), KiwiElf (5th November 2017), LadyM (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017)

  35. Link to Post #18
    United States Avalon Member Whiskey_Mystic's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pale Blue Dot
    Age
    48
    Posts
    1,101
    Thanks
    1,873
    Thanked 8,021 times in 1,016 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Quote Posted by KiwiElf (here)
    Quote Posted by Whiskey_Mystic (here)
    Looking at these photographs, I'm curious to know if there is a difference when using digital or film.
    Oh yes, HUGE difference (literally). (Gahhhh,... Photoshop takes a whole chapter to explain this, so I'll try to condense):

    Film is continuous tone which means put simply, it's not made up of dots or pixels, so an enlargement can be enormous before you see the "grain".
    What I meant was, I am curious as to whether entities or phenomenon that are outside the visible spectrum, or for whatever reason cannot be seen with the eye, show up the same on digital or film.
    "We sit together, the mountain and me, until only the mountain remains." -Li Po

  36. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Whiskey_Mystic For This Post:

    KiwiElf (5th November 2017), LadyM (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017), Sunny-side-up (9th November 2017)

  37. Link to Post #19
    New Zealand Avalon Member KiwiElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st September 2011
    Posts
    3,850
    Thanks
    22,084
    Thanked 18,089 times in 3,562 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Quote Posted by Whiskey_Mystic (here)
    Quote Posted by KiwiElf (here)
    Quote Posted by Whiskey_Mystic (here)
    Looking at these photographs, I'm curious to know if there is a difference when using digital or film.
    Oh yes, HUGE difference (literally). (Gahhhh,... Photoshop takes a whole chapter to explain this, so I'll try to condense):

    Film is continuous tone which means put simply, it's not made up of dots or pixels, so an enlargement can be enormous before you see the "grain".
    What I meant was, I am curious as to whether entities or phenomenon that are outside the visible spectrum, or for whatever reason cannot be seen with the eye, show up the same on digital or film.
    Whoops - please forgive the misunderstanding - in my own experience yes, they can on digital. I have nothing to compare with on film myself but others have reported strange "anomalies" & "entities" showing up on film which could not be seen with the naked eye.
    Last edited by KiwiElf; 5th November 2017 at 15:39.

  38. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KiwiElf For This Post:

    LadyM (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017), Sunny-side-up (9th November 2017)

  39. Link to Post #20
    United States Avalon Member Whiskey_Mystic's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pale Blue Dot
    Age
    48
    Posts
    1,101
    Thanks
    1,873
    Thanked 8,021 times in 1,016 posts

    Default Re: The Skinwalker ranch is off-limits to us

    Quote Posted by KiwiElf (here)
    Quote Posted by Whiskey_Mystic (here)
    Quote Posted by KiwiElf (here)
    Quote Posted by Whiskey_Mystic (here)
    Looking at these photographs, I'm curious to know if there is a difference when using digital or film.
    Oh yes, HUGE difference (literally). (Gahhhh,... Photoshop takes a whole chapter to explain this, so I'll try to condense):

    Film is continuous tone which means put simply, it's not made up of dots or pixels, so an enlargement can be enormous before you see the "grain".
    What I meant was, I am curious as to whether entities or phenomenon that are outside the visible spectrum, or for whatever reason cannot be seen with the eye, show up the same on digital or film.
    Whoops - please forgive the misunderstanding - in my own experience yes, they can on digital. I have nothing to compare with on film myself but others have reported strange "anomalies" showing up on film which could not be seen with the naked eye.
    Thanks. I'm surprised that Dongo has not tried, or at least has not mentioned, other forms of multispectral recording such as infrared. Could be interesting.
    "We sit together, the mountain and me, until only the mountain remains." -Li Po

  40. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Whiskey_Mystic For This Post:

    KiwiElf (5th November 2017), LadyM (5th November 2017), mojo (5th November 2017), Sunny-side-up (9th November 2017)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts