Posted by Dennis Leahy
(here)
Posted by Bill Ryan
(here)
Posted by Dennis Leahy
(here)
Posted by Cidersomerset
(here)
... including how the
atheist dirt bag purchased four guns going back to 2014...
haha You've gotta watch out quoting back Alex Jones without using quotation marks. There are probably quite a few atheists on this forum that wouldn't like being called "dirt bag" - especially by a selfish pseudo-Christian who is brainwashed against atheism.
Here's a quote from Alex Jones from today's show — with quotation marks, too:
"A lot of nice people are atheists, a lot of intellectuals, a lot of folks that don’t like fake churches and fake religion."
Alex's description of Kelley as a "dirt bag" might have been more than entirely reasonable (and maybe just a little mild), considering that he cold-bloodedly murdered 26 people, including tiny children and senior citizens.
Yes, surely "dirt bag" is a mild epithet for a mass murderer, and there are no cuss words that can be strung together into a compound adjective that would describe a mass murderer adequately. But that's not what I was pointing out. I was pointing out Jones' prejudice against atheists (let's add Muslims too) that comes seething out in his rhetoric. As researchers and people seeking the truth, we need to do our research without deliberately or inadvertently accepting or repeating or even promoting the prejudices of the people that we use for our research. It's part of discernment. Cidersomerset's post caught my eye when it appeared to me, at first blush - due to the lack of quotation marks, that those were Cider's words. I quickly realized that they were Jones' words, but that made me realize that one of Jones' prejudices was being repeated (unchallenged), which is tantamount to acceptance.
A major project of the CIA/Deep State - using their control over mainstream media - has been to demonize Islam and Muslims, to associate Muslims with terror. We KNOW this is true - we (as a community) have done the due diligence and we know that this is a ploy by the CIA to get people to blindly accept the official narrative of 9/11 and the bombing and takeover of Arab countries that is the US federal government (mobster) geopolitical policy. We don't need to defend Islam (or Catholicism, or Christianity, or Hinduism, or Judaism, etc.) My own view is that all of those religions are tools of control over the population, and I would love it if all religions were abandoned. My own views, however, clash with most people who hold religion as a 'sacred' milieu,
and for me the only logical remedy is tolerance. I tolerate Christianity. I tolerate Islam. More importantly, I refuse to help the CIA/Deep State carry out their mission which includes making Muslims the latest boogeymen that we all need to fear and to allow the State to "protect us" from.
Another way of looking at this is like one of those mathematical word problems that we had to solve in school, where we are given the pertinent data along with gobs of worthless data - and we are tasked with finding the important data to solve the problem (or understand the situation.) Discernment. We throw out/ignore all the worthless data - the same way that as researchers, we MUST also throw out the worthless data and innuendo and prejudices that are packed along with the pertinent data.
Re: Mass shooting in Texas Church, 26 dead
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks