Russian poisoning false flag?

[TomKat]

Is it just me, or does this have all the earmarks of a false flag?

1) A dastardly deed is perpetrated by persons unknown
2) The supposed perpetrator is almost immediately named
3) A massive media campaign supporting the official story supplies no evidence against said perpetrator
4) Broad actions are taken based on the "fact" of the perpetrator's guilt

Sound familiar?
JFK
RFK
Gulf of Tonkin
OK City bombing
9/11
Putin/Trump election conspiracy

That's just off the top of my head

[Nasu]

I agree. There was a very quick rush to judgement. Both the UK and US are not without guilt when it comes to both chemical and biological weapons. My thoughts were that this could have been done by a third player to blame Russia and foment bad blood. But after seeing it play out as it has, it seems obvious to me that the UK government and their allies have made their own minds up. The question as always is who gains most from this? Time will tell... N

[Joe from the Carolinas]

The question of whether this is orchestrated or not is moot, in my view... I don’t mean to sound dismissive or brash - I just mean that if it is presented to us in the press a certain way, I think it is clear that this thing has ugly written all over it

The thing that puzzles me: what are the benefits to both sides? What do both sides get out of it?

[apokalypse]

weird stuff on media right now..seems like they pushing for war.

[Satori]

Posted by JoefromtheCarolinas (here)
The question of whether this is orchestrated or not is moot, in my view... I don’t mean to sound dismissive or brash - I just mean that if it is presented to us in the press a certain way, I think it is clear that this thing has ugly written all over it

The thing that puzzles me: what are the benefits to both sides? What do both sides get out of it?

If I may be permitted to say: There is no "both sides." This apparent duality is an illusion, contrived by those who hold the levers of power and control. Basically, global central bankers and their handlers.

It's the same program they always employ. They create "wedge issues" to divide people into two, sometimes more, groups. They control the information, most of which is false, all of which is confusing and ambiguous, if not contradictory (cognitive dissonance), to then control the debate and push results in the direction and to the ends and outcomes they desire.

The benefit is to the puppet masters, who sit astride the illuminated all seeing eye on top of the pyramid representing the hierarchical global structure. They are "both sides" and that is how both sides benefit.

[Jad]

Posted by JoefromtheCarolinas (here)
The question of whether this is orchestrated or not is moot, in my view... I don’t mean to sound dismissive or brash - I just mean that if it is presented to us in the press a certain way, I think it is clear that this thing has ugly written all over it

The thing that puzzles me: what are the benefits to both sides? What do both sides get out of it?

It’s basically to keep imprinting the “fear factor” on everyone’s subconscious.. plus I read somewhere that this was maybe a distraction to bury the story about the large ring of pedos that was uncovered in England.

[amor]

The Rothschilds??!

[Did You See Them]

Posted by apokalypse (here)
weird stuff on media right now..seems like they pushing for war.

I agree - maybe not war itself but a revisiting to cold war "defense" spending.

[Foxie Loxie]

It's good to revisit the old David Icke videos to put all this in perspective!

[Sunny-side-up]

Posted by Satori (here)

Posted by JoefromtheCarolinas (here)
The question of whether this is orchestrated or not is moot, in my view... I don’t mean to sound dismissive or brash - I just mean that if it is presented to us in the press a certain way, I think it is clear that this thing has ugly written all over it

The thing that puzzles me: what are the benefits to both sides? What do both sides get out of it?

If I may be permitted to say: There is no "both sides." This apparent duality is an illusion, contrived by those who hold the levers of power and control. Basically, global central bankers and their handlers.

It's the same program they always employ. They create "wedge issues" to divide people into two, sometimes more, groups. They control the information, most of which is false, all of which is confusing and ambiguous, if not contradictory (cognitive dissonance), to then control the debate and push results in the direction and to the ends and outcomes they desire.

The benefit is to the puppet masters, who sit astride the illuminated all seeing eye on top of the pyramid representing the hierarchical global structure. They are "both sides" and that is how both sides benefit.

Yes no both sides, all one game and we live the consequences.

[ghostrider]

the American intelligence agencies are good at killing a person and making it appear Russia or whomever did it...

[TomKat]

Posted by JoefromtheCarolinas (here)
The question of whether this is orchestrated or not is moot, in my view... I don’t mean to sound dismissive or brash - I just mean that if it is presented to us in the press a certain way, I think it is clear that this thing has ugly written all over it

The thing that puzzles me: what are the benefits to both sides? What do both sides get out of it?

People in Obama's administration were pushing for war with Russia over Ukraine, though Obama dragged his heels. Hillary Clinton was signalling she would take us to war with Russia after she won the election, but she lost. It's the same agenda, but with an absurd pretext and it won't work. Heather Nauert was on TV, like Theresa May, treating it as a certified fact that Russia was behind the poisoning, saying Russia should admit it, that it's the "adult thing to do."

https://youtu.be/PFMlSQb1rTY

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by ghostrider (here)
the American intelligence agencies are good at killing a person and making it appear Russia or whomever did it...

Yes, and this was even in an episode of Madam Secretary, where Ukraine used polonium on a US asset to make the US think it was Russia and bring the US into their civil war!

[Wind]

Putin and FSB are no strangers to poisoning and murdering people, but I do doubt if they were this dumb to do it again openly like this. Probably there are some larger issues at play and the intelligence agencies are having clashes, the official narrative is always to be suspected.

[bojancan]

Posted by JoefromtheCarolinas (here)
The thing that puzzles me: what are the benefits to both sides?

In “Brexit” situation, UK elite needs a strong enemy to help convince people to stay in EU. (...If we stay in EU, we will be stronger facing this gruesome enemy Russia...) Obviously a false flag...

[Cardillac]

the minute the MSM points a finger at a certain perpetrater we can be sure that entity is a patsy/false flag op- has always been that way- no exceptions-

I wouldn't rule out the MOSSAD on this one-

Larry

[xion]

Has any of you watched last episode of Homeland?
The whole show is great as there are nice correlations with real world events, just portrayed subtly.
Here is the link for that last episode and go to 7:45.
It's quite funny to see in a show how US is handling situations similar like we have here.

https://tornadomovies.to/series/home...-watching.html

[downliner]

It's not just you.

Almost like these elite scumbags are the same scumbags prior to all those events and they are just recycling the old tactics because the young are not aware of them meaning they may well work again.