Posted by Gemma13
(here)
For sure, nothing new invented by way of hypnosis/mind control. The newness is the NON human-to-human hypnosis platform being rolled out and tested for public acceptability.
Incidently we already have bio neuro tech on the table to erase memories which is marketed as being great for soldiers with PTSD, individuals with trauma experiences, etc. Fast track a decade and those that can't afford medical treatments may just opt in for an easy to use computer App to do the job. The elephant in this room is defining what constitutes significant individual trauma in the general population to warrant memory removal.
(Disclaimer: This is not about being for or against selective memory deletion, it is about the exploitation of infant methods of medical application.)
Which is why, to me, the nefarious "future" applications of this are staggering. Getting citizens to opt in and CHOOSE memory loss with resulting subsequent passivity is not going to help civilizations stand up to tyranny.
The controversial "safe space" movement flooding our educational institutions and communities is a wonderful primer for this ideology which could well see our younger generations latching onto it as a tool for solving "questionable" mental health issues.
Example: The "safe space" movement is complex and I don't want to simplify it, but for the purpose of explaining why I am connecting bigger picture dots I will say that, very basically, advocates are gaining significant traction in educational institutions by creating and demanding laws that allow students to opt out of being delivered information in their lectures that they find offensive because it is distressing and upsets them e.g. rape, child abuse, genocide, etc.
And yes, rape victims, for example, do need a disclaimer so they can filter their exposure and manage information in a selective environment; and this has always been acknowledged in these institutions. But advocates are now applying the burden of selectivity onto lecturers to filter their deliveries to avoid upsetting everyone. In some cases lecturers have been banned because their content is deemed to be potentially too distressing for students and others have lost their jobs for not complying as they believe university students should not be protected, unchallenged, and treated like primary school students.
What this means is that while individuals are continually provided tools to wrap themselves up in fluffy bubbles of ignorance the oligarchs have continual free reign to make decisions for society and individuals - without being challenged.
The internet is proving to be our greatest tool for sharing real information to support accountability and change. It only makes sense to me to watch for signs of countering programs designed with potential to dampen the rise of awareness.
Imagine this: University student is confronted with graphic material that is upsetting. Lets say a tutorial on the 100+ children recently rescued from child abuse and slavery. They cry and have trouble sleeping that night.
Normal response for genuine caring individuals.
To remove the discomfort they can now opt into a hypnosis app before going to bed to remove the distressing data, get a good night sleep, and wake up back in the comfort zone of apathy.
Memory removal hypnosis Apps will take soothing waterfall Apps to a whole new dimension. And if I can see this potential within 5 minutes of reading the op I can guarantee a team of enthusiast marketing gurus are already mapping this on their cutting floor probably with encouraging innovation and funding from a supposed humanitarian NGO. (This would be right up Soro's alley especially as he has his fingers all over the "safe space" movement.)
SAMSUNG - Erase your memories so you can rewatch your favorite shows as if for the first time.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks