My go to guys. Linda Howe and Richard Dolan

[WhiteFeather]

With all the disinfo on the internet with respect to ET, SSP, False Flags, etc, I find so much trustworthiness and extreme comfort within the likes of Linda Moulton Howe and Richard Dolan. So so much great stuff by these two, I use them as my safety blankets especially when I want to listen to my favorite topics, The ET component . Awesome Speakers. There conversations never get dull. Any one else. Kudos to both of you. Great Stuff!

[Valerie Villars]

I don't have a single bad thing to say about Linda Moulton Howes. Every single thing she does is classy. There is a real truthfulness that I feel coming from her. A great, great lady.

Honestly, I feel the same way about Bill. A class act.

I don't know enough about Richard Dolan, but from what I have heard, I like him.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Valerie Villars (here)
I don't know enough about Richard Dolan, but from what I have heard, I like him.

Do see this thread.

• Live: Richard Dolan's Feeds of Interest

He usually addresses 4 different half-hour issues in each show, and some of them are of the very highest quality. The best I've ever heard on live radio. How he does this so consistently, I have no idea. He's head and shoulders above any other live presenter on the net.

There's one here that's staggering in its depth — and simplicity. Listen to this. HIGHLY HIGHLY recommended, and just 25 mins. Pure, solid gold.

• http://projectavalon.net/Richard_Dol...al_segment.mp3

[Cardillac]

yes, I truly believe Linda Moulton Howe and Richard Dolan are on on the cutting edge of things-

Larry

[WhiteFeather]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Valerie Villars (here)
I don't know enough about Richard Dolan, but from what I have heard, I like him.

Do see this thread.

• Live: Richard Dolan's Feeds of Interest

He usually addresses 4 different half-hour issues in each show, and some of them are of the very highest quality. The best I've ever heard on live radio. How he does this so consistently, I have no idea. He's head and shoulders above any other live presenter on the net.

There's one here that's staggering in its depth — and simplicity. Listen to this. HIGHLY HIGHLY recommended, and just 25 mins. Pure, solid gold.

• http://projectavalon.net/Richard_Dol...al_segment.mp3

And let's not leave out Bill Ryan either, Kudos to you Bill. Great Great Stuff. A Big Thank You.

[WhiteFeather]

Posted by Valerie Villars (here)
I don't have a single bad thing to say about Linda Moulton Howes. Every single thing she does is classy. There is a real truthfulness that I feel coming from her. A great, great lady.

Honestly, I feel the same way about Bill. A class act.

I don't know enough about Richard Dolan, but from what I have heard, I like him.

Well said, a very natural and to the heart speaker is she. My spidey senses dont tingle when they both speak, and thats a good thing.

When u can, Listen to some of Richard Dolans stuff too. Bill Ryan posted an MP3 on this thread. Very good MP3 to listen too. A very intelligent man in Richard Dolan, in my opinion.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by WhiteFeather (here)
Bill Ryan posted an MP3 on this thread. Very good MP3 to listen too. A very intelligent man in Richard Dolan, in my opinion.

Yes, here it is again. Everyone should hear this. It's a 25 minute masterclass, all on live radio.

• http://projectavalon.net/Richard_Dol...al_segment.mp3

[WhiteFeather]

And if I may include this guy as well. RIP Jim. Great Stuff.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ijIPiJbRpBE

[Nick Matkin]

Yup, I follow both Linda and Richard because they seem to have more original material than most other 'researchers'.

The trouble with Linda is that she's not scientifically trained - and neither does she pretend to be - and she's a bit too keen to just repeat sciencey-sounding stuff uncritically.

For example, she muddles stuff about the earth's magnetism, about 'hearing' microwave pulses (nothing new as any radar engineer will know). She also bangs on about 'sinister' THz frequencies without realising or acknowledging most of that is just light.

Alternative-media journalists have the responsibility more than anyone to really get to the facts and explain them to those who are not technical. Linda is usually good at researching and multi-sourcing other material, but just parrots techie stuff she obviously doesn't understand, which is a shame and can be misleading.

Something we should all be aware of;

If you're not familiar with the subject, how can you tell fact from fiction?

That particularly applies to all researchers and journalists.

[Matt P]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by WhiteFeather (here)
Bill Ryan posted an MP3 on this thread. Very good MP3 to listen too. A very intelligent man in Richard Dolan, in my opinion.

Yes, here it is again. Everyone should hear this. It's a 25 minute masterclass, all on live radio.

• http://projectavalon.net/Richard_Dol...al_segment.mp3

Hello Bill. I just wanted to make sure you posted the Dolan audio you meant to. The one you shared is only 19 plus minutes and you wrote twice it was 25 min. Also it’s just about telling the truth and free speech (no grand truths revealed). Just thought I’d make sure.

Matt

[Valerie Villars]

Posted by Nick Matkin (here)
Yup, I follow both Linda and Richard because they seem to have more original material than most other 'researchers'.

The trouble with Linda is that she's not scientifically trained - and neither does she pretend to be - and she's a bit too keen to just repeat sciencey-sounding stuff uncritically.

For example, she muddles stuff about the earth's magnetism, about 'hearing' microwave pulses (nothing new as any radar engineer will know). She also bangs on about 'sinister' THz frequencies without realising or acknowledging most of that is just light.

Alternative-media journalists have the responsibility more than anyone to really get to the facts and explain them to those who are not technical. Linda is usually good at researching and multi-sourcing other material, but just parrots techie stuff she obviously doesn't understand, which is a shame and can be misleading.

Something we should all be aware of;

If you're not familiar with the subject, how can you tell fact from fiction?

That particularly applies to all researchers and journalists.

Thanks Nick. I've had way too many of my own experiences to carte blanch accept what anyone says as THE answer. Even Linda. However, she speaks as I think; generally and with some knowledge of many subjects. If I want to go deeper I can. I'm not a very good parrot.

I also didn't realize or catch until recently the fact that Jim Marrs had done the forward on the book "Dr. Mary's Monkey" by Ed Haslam. I kept hearing his name bandied about and didn't realize I had "run across" him years ago, via that book. Small conspiracy world.

I did really love that interview with Richard Dolan about synchronicity and the owl connections. There's just so many things to hear, watch, listen to and learn, I could never understand how anyone could be bored in this world. I will pay more attention to his videos and audios because Bill thinks highly of him.

[Foxie Loxie]

Hey Val! You might sink you teeth into his last book...I believe it's called "UFO's for the Twenty First Century?" He definitely has a very logical mind when it comes to putting down what he has researched.

I also agree with you that there is SO MUCH to review, listen to & learn! I know I am SO thankful I was "led" to Avalon!

[Valerie Villars]

Posted by Foxie Loxie (here)
Hey Val! You might sink you teeth into his last book...I believe it's called "UFO's for the Twenty First Century?" He definitely has a very logical mind when it comes to putting down what he has researched.

I also agree with you that there is SO MUCH to review, listen to & learn! I know I am SO thankful I was "led" to Avalon!

I'll have a look. Inquiring minds need to know. (I majored in Journalism)

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by mpennery (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by WhiteFeather (here)
Bill Ryan posted an MP3 on this thread. Very good MP3 to listen too. A very intelligent man in Richard Dolan, in my opinion.

Yes, here it is again. Everyone should hear this. It's a 25 minute masterclass, all on live radio.

• http://projectavalon.net/Richard_Dol...al_segment.mp3

Hello Bill. I just wanted to make sure you posted the Dolan audio you meant to. The one you shared is only 19 plus minutes and you wrote twice it was 25 min. Also it’s just about telling the truth and free speech (no grand truths revealed). Just thought I’d make sure.

Matt

Yes, that's the one. (Apologies, it's 22 mins, not 25. ) Different strokes for different folks, of course. Nothing about UFOs in there (or similar 'grand truths'!), but my point is that Richard is FAR more than a leading-edge UFO researcher, or even a very knowledgeable academic historian.

He's a Teacher, with a profound understanding of human nature, and he's a very big soul indeed. I know of one person who was brought to tears by that segment, and I was so struck by it that I listened to it myself several times. Even now, it has an impact.

[WhiteFeather]

Posted by Nick Matkin (here)
Yup, I follow both Linda and Richard because they seem to have more original material than most other 'researchers'.

The trouble with Linda is that she's not scientifically trained - and neither does she pretend to be - and she's a bit too keen to just repeat sciencey-sounding stuff uncritically.

For example, she muddles stuff about the earth's magnetism, about 'hearing' microwave pulses (nothing new as any radar engineer will know). She also bangs on about 'sinister' THz frequencies without realising or acknowledging most of that is just light.

Alternative-media journalists have the responsibility more than anyone to really get to the facts and explain them to those who are not technical. Linda is usually good at researching and multi-sourcing other material, but just parrots techie stuff she obviously doesn't understand, which is a shame and can be misleading.

Something we should all be aware of;

If you're not familiar with the subject, how can you tell fact from fiction?

That particularly applies to all researchers and journalists.

Thanks for your response, But if you must excuse me, I'm sorry and not really quite sure, but many of the interviews and speeches I have listened to in the past several years by Linda, with regards to earth magnetism, frequency microwave pulses etc. I have not come across yet. When u get a chance can you please post some material to this thread. Perhaps some youtube videos if so. Thanks

[WhiteFeather]

A good favorite of mine with Art Bell. Speaks of many topics, she starts off with cattle mutilations, alien abduction and genetic harvesting, soul removal and container swapping technology with re: Linda Porter.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UfPA3hUD_kU

[WhiteFeather]

If you will, here is one of my favorites, and I have many by Richard Dolan. So Many topics and very lengthy, too much to list. But I'm sure you'll agree after 4 hours. Lol
Enjoy

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wTzFVOVioR4

This is Richard Dolan's (USA) first presentation in Australia on UFOs at Ryde Eastwood Leagues Club, NSW on the 5 November 2016.

Richard is a UFO researcher, historian and author. He has been featured on Ancient Aliens, Hangar One, and as a guest, on Coast to Coast (USA).

UFOs are a global reality affecting nations and people everywhere. Richard presents a geopolitical analysis of the UFO phenomenon including the international dimensions of the cover-up. Particularly the role of the United States and its relationships to key allies (such as the EU), as well as to Russia and China.

He discusses the true structure of power behind the scenes (as best as we can currently understand it), and will attempt to look into how the UFO cover-up may develop, or end.

Topics covered are, government cover-up, false-flag events, breakaway civilisations, life after UFO disclosure and extra-terrestrial abductions.

Richard Dolan’s website: www.richarddolanpress.com

[Mike]

Right, the people I'm willing to listen to have dwindled down to a very small group. The older I get, the more conservative I get, and I just refuse to waste my time on some 3Hour video of some strange man purporting to be channelling a reptile being named Orthon, or Zeon, or some other name that sounds like synthetic fabric.

I've got more than a decade of time doing that stuff under my belt. I think I'm done.

I will always love high strangeness and bizarre paranormal stuff...that will never change. But the people I listen to that discuss this stuff have to be good and solid and clear...and preferably credentialed in some way.

In no particular order:

1) Dolan
2) Linda Howe
3) Catherine Austin Gifts
4) Joseph Farrell
5) Bill
6) David Icke (his stuff is a little wild but rooted in history)
7) Dark Journalist
8) John Keel (rip)
9) Jaques Vallee
10) Graham Hancock

Of course I'm forgetting a few, but the club is getting smaller and smaller.

[Spellbound]

Posted by Mike (here)
Right, the people I'm willing to listen to have dwindled down to a very small group. The older I get, the more conservative I get, and I just refuse to waste my time on some 3Hour video of some strange man purporting to be channelling a reptile being named Orthon, or Zeon, or some other name that sounds like synthetic fabric.

I've got more than a decade of time doing that stuff under my belt. I think I'm done.

I will always love high strangeness and bizarre paranormal stuff...that will never change. But the people I listen to that discuss this stuff have to be good and solid and clear...and preferably credentialed in some way.

In no particular order:

1) Dolan
2) Linda Howe
3) Catherine Austin Gifts
4) Joseph Farrell
5) Bill
6) David Icke (his stuff is a little wild but rooted in history)
7) Dark Journalist
8) John Keel (rip)
9) Jaques Vallee
10) Graham Hancock

Of course I'm forgetting a few, but the club is getting smaller and smaller.

Nice list. I'd throw Jim Marrs, Timothy Good, and Dr. David Jacobs in there.

Dave - Toronto

[WhiteFeather]

Posted by Mike (here)
Right, the people I'm willing to listen to have dwindled down to a very small group. The older I get, the more conservative I get, and I just refuse to waste my time on some 3Hour video of some strange man purporting to be channelling a reptile being named Orthon, or Zeon, or some other name that sounds like synthetic fabric.

I've got more than a decade of time doing that stuff under my belt. I think I'm done.

I will always love high strangeness and bizarre paranormal stuff...that will never change. But the people I listen to that discuss this stuff have to be good and solid and clear...and preferably credentialed in some way.

In no particular order:

1) Dolan
2) Linda Howe
3) Catherine Austin Gifts
4) Joseph Farrell
5) Bill
6) David Icke (his stuff is a little wild but rooted in history)
7) Dark Journalist
8) John Keel (rip)
9) Jaques Vallee
10) Graham Hancock

Of course I'm forgetting a few, but the club is getting smaller and smaller.

Great List Mike. Graham Hancock Wow, yes. Love his work. Fingerprints of the gods was a staggering read. A very warm resonant speaker is he.

And can add in Mike Clellund into the mix, Ive truly been liking his stuff. Owl, Owl, Owl. I May check out his book, The Messengers one of these days, looks good.