Hollyweird GreatAwakening

[raregem]

I just checked his IG out and all it has is a long page of photos only. I am not seeing replies at 2@:43 central time.

[Melinda]

Posted by raregem (here)
I just checked his IG out and all it has is a long page of photos only. I am not seeing replies at 2@:43 central time.

Not trying to derail the thread into a Gates fest, but in case this helps...

I've been checking it out on a PC (yet to get a smartphone.)

I don't have an Instagram account. But if I click on any of the individual photos / posts, the individual post comes up on the screen with comments at the side that I can scroll down. When I checked a couple of days ago, if I refreshed the page on a post every few seconds a whole new set of comments would come up on the same post. None of them friendly. Comment after comment, on and on, unrelenting, calling out his hypocrisy.

I just took screenshots from two posts which I looked at minutes ago, included below for you and anyone else to see. The comments on his posts recently have ranged from sharp and witty to highly articulate and informed, to downright angered and aggressive.





This next comment from someone on one of his posts was too long to fit in a screenshot, but I've copy-pasted it. I think this individual sums it up pretty well :

“Why is it that when there is a new illness or disesase we turn to unnatural medicines like vaccines and not natural remedies?? Again, big pharma and people like you want to control the masses. You are okay with shoving man made medicines down our throats, but have an issue with the natural remedies being legalized. As someone who personally knows someone who has been on medications his whole life, the medications have drained this person into being a soulless zombie walking around easier to be manipulated and controlled. I am not saying that medicines cannot be beneficial, but how about making them the last resort?? How about we take a closer look at the foods we eat and the poison they put in processed foods?? Oh yeah, no one wants to talk about that nor the issues of sugar because you thrive on people being sick so you can keep pumping different drugs and keep pharma happy and rich. At the end of the day it is about money and having control, not saving lives.”

And in case anyone needs reminding of the connection to Hollywood, here's a video of a sketch at an awards show where the audience of Hollywood 'stars' was offered vaccinations...

Golden Globes FLU Shot Skit :

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Nw83gN7JCrw

Posted by Bullseye (here)

Posted by The Moss Trooper (here)
You need to check out Bill Gates's Instagram feed right now....... His Instagram has exploded with negative comments.

His Twitter account comments look like an absolute train wreck.

This is outstanding. Well done humanity!

Indeed. It's quite something to watch.

[Bluegreen]

Know your narrative controllers

[muxfolder]

Oh yeah, they tried and they failed.



CDaN

[Ratszinger]

Posted by muxfolder (here)
Oh yeah, they tried and they failed.



CDaN

Beyonce! Has to be her!

[Tintin]

Posted by ahamkara (here)
Sloan Bella, on her nightly YouTube broadcasts, has repeatedly referenced the pedophilia rampant in the Movie/music industries. She has had first hand experience as a counselor of street kids and speaks convincingly of the dark Blood Cult ruling the entertainment (entrainment) industries. She also claims to have connected with the psychic energies of Issac Kappy (sp?) and several others silenced for attempting to blow the whistle. She is colorful, profane, and does not position herself as an “expert” by any means!! I find her highly convincing and wonder how much longer she will be permitted to speak.

Sloan Bella Yes, I agree. I have found what I have seen from her to demonstrate a very high degree of authenticity - it's a sense one gets. Her work does more than stand up to close scrutiny. I was more than impressed with her work with 'Madeleine McCann'.

[Bluegreen]

[Valerie Villars]

You first Bill. Then Melinda.

[Bluegreen]

We Old Hollywood


Delores del Rio


María de los Dolores Asúnsolo López-Negrete, better known as Delores del Rio, was one of the first Latin American stars in Hollywood, and good friends with the husband and wife artists Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo. It is said her affairs with both caused her first divorce, although she did keep Jaime Martinez del Rio's poetic last name. The freewheeling Kahlo had a habit of befriending and charming her husband's girlfriends.



Marlene Dietrich - Delores del Rio


Diego Rivera - Frida Kahlo - Delores del Rio

In 1939, Kahlo presented del Rio with a gift, her painting of Two Nudes in the Forest.




Sources
https://www.biography.com/news/frida...airs-men-women
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2...hollywood.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolores_del_R%C3%ADo

[Bluegreen]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gMMTvsU-YW4

"All the world's a stage
And all the men and women merely players
They have their exits and their entrances
And one man in his time plays many parts"

[Bluegreen]

..

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=m-H0uIH5HHQ

[mountain_jim]

This makes at least 3 recent videos that appear (at least on initial analysis) to be faking reality for the masses - Joe Biden speaking, the pope disapearing from leaving the balcony, and now this (and all 3 available in this thread)

Thread claiming to show that Tom Hanks on SNL last weekend was a 'deep fake'.

Thread is from

TOMMY G
@TommyG
·
Apr 14

3/ Why am I so hell bent on Tom Hanks? Cause we did a whole show about him being a pedo & murderer of Isaac Kappy on my podcast 3 days before he “got Coronavirus” so I feel he is the Canary in a Coal Mine. He seems to be the key to a lot

https://twitter.com/TommyG/status/1249919818293272583

One post

https://twitter.com/TommyG/status/12...293272583?s=20

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Heard similar claims that the video of Obama endorsing Biden was a deep fake as well. Don't buy that. The Hanks clip was definitely Hanks, and the Pope vanishing has not stood up to any scrutiny at all. Be wary of less than careful speculation. It tends (perhaps by design, by the shills) to discredit this research.

Calling out something as fake (like this) when it clearly isn't is a method of muddying the waters. It's social engineering. Because when the chorus gets loud, shouting fake, fake, fake all the time, it makes it complicated for the rest of us to call something out, when the time comes, as actually real. Like the boy-that-called-wolf in reverse. That may indeed happen, and is being set up to happen, when real and very important (perhaps sensational) video or photographic evidence emerges, which it may.

[mountain_jim]

Clearly isn't?

I understand your point but I thought the thread and contributors to it made a lot of points supporting the possibility that Tom's brother's voice could have been used, that there were anomalies in the video supporting the tampering possibility, and even if it is Tom the background has possible evidence of being green-screened and is not from his home, making his location an open question.

https://twitter.com/TommyG/status/12...998591488?s=20

https://twitter.com/LivesVives/statu...002460674?s=20

[Ratszinger]

Having worked in dentistry all my life and specializing from the neck up in anatomy and physiology I can assure you that is Tom Hanks and that this does nothing to help the movement for those of you that follow Q.

[wegge]

Can anyone point by point debunk the claims that it´s fake? What makes it so obvious? We need to start using logic and mapping things out and not using generalities or appeal to authority (being an expert because of...)

Ratszinger:
Can you explain your POV re. dentistry closer? What are your anatomical and physiological markers? And from where do you reference your real Tom Hanks knowledge, from TV etc. appearances or having met in Person?

But yes, always calling fake doesn´t help, that´s a good observation.

[Ratszinger]

Posted by wegge (here)
Can anyone point by point debunk the claims that it´s fake? What makes it so obvious? We need to start using logic and mapping things out and not using generalities or appeal to authority (being an expert because of...)

Ratszinger:
Can you explain your POV re. dentistry closer? What are your anatomical and physiological markers? And from where do you reference your real Tom Hanks knowledge, from TV etc. appearances or having met in Person?

But yes, always calling fake doesn´t help, that´s a good observation.

I have almost all of Hanks films. I have the ones that even flopped. His ear anatomy doesn't change. The angle does but his ear won't although some grow bigger but the patterning is the same. Some things this person claims simply don't seem to be present in my opinion. And the argument for photoshop may or may not be real but if so they still are using the real Hanks face based on what I see comparing it to the same guy in The Man With One Red Shoe, The Money Pit, Volunteers which has his wife in it also. I do agree that the one picture appears to be the same with Rita missing but even that is just suspicion. I don't see any difference other than age wrinkles to his face. The mandible, the zygoma, and his eye set are all congruent with his past films. It's Hanks. The same Hanks in the Burbs with Corey Feldman. It's always tricky trying to use stars real hands, real feet and so on because so many stunt doubles are used and at any time you could be looking at his double if it's movie shots but there are plenty of real face shots to zero in on his eye brows, his hair line and so on and other than age it's the same guy.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Just chipping in again on the deep fake thing. I'm not convinced, but I am...curious.

Fresh eyes now. Does Obama's Endorsement video look 100%, I repeat 100%, normal and natural?

Screenshot below (original vid here)





Then consider this, below, which IS deep fake.




Here's the vid.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gLoI9hAX9dw

If some basement dwelling mush can create that almost two years, what could them behind-the-scenes-with-their-state-of-the-art (maybe secret) gagetry-and-resources truly accomplish today? Could they actually really pull off a deep fake of Obama talking to us and convince us all that it's real?

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Now Hillary throwing in her lot.



Her face looks almost...grafted on. But could be seeing things. If these are deep fakes I'd be astonished.