YouTube, Facebook, Apple and Spotify all ban Alex Jones & Infowars

[ExomatrixTV]

Alex Jones : Twitter just shut down my @realalexjones account!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=o6NQBzY-2PU

Source video link: Tech News

[norman]

The truth IS . . . .



Alex Jones is full of Hate Speech. There, I said it, it's true.


But, what's going on here is exactly the same thing as the Fake Russia collusion narrative. They constructed that Russia story to deflect away from their own collusion and their illegal operations to stop Trump getting elected.


Everybody with any sense knows Alex Jones puts a voice to hatred every single day. He hates the crooks that are running the human race into the ground.


Most people can relate to that very well. But, hey, "let's relabel that hatred and make it into a divisive hatred that we can use our well embedded PC values against". Make it look like his hatred is against hurting and vulnerable people, instead of the crooks who hurt and terrorise those hurting and vulnerable people.


Same trick as RussiaGate, same sickness.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by norman (here)
Same trick as RussiaGate, same sickness.

Sure is.

I've not listened to Alex since he was taken down everywhere, but what I strongly suspect is that his lawyers will already be on to all this like hounds on a rabbit. And he'll not be short of wealthy celebrity sponsors to support him financially while he does that.

Alex knows he's not going to get anywhere to reverse this just by making videos or posting his strong opinion. So, we're likely to see this being fought out in the courts. If so, that'll be mighty, mighty interesting.

[norman]

A nice little Youtube friendly Kitty Kitty video . . . .




Published on 6 Sep 2017

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=IARczUg4JwI

[James Newell]

Alex Jones never said that the Sandy Hook incident was all actors, Others did. The Msm and media matters said he said it. If you can find a video where he said such a thing I will be happy to change my opinion of Jones.

[Valerie Villars]

An interesting quote from the linked article, regarding censorship. //https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2018/08/15/duhhh-stop-defending-alex-jones-this-will-never-hurt-the-left-derp-duh/

The plutocratic empire is held together by sheer narrative control, by the ability of ruling oligarchs to control the stories people tell each other about what’s going on in the world. The fact that trust in plutocrat-owned media is at an all-time low and people’s ability to network and share information is at an all-time high has not escaped the attention of our rulers, and they are doing everything in their power to stop us from sharing unauthorized ideas and information with each other.

This isn’t a game. We have no time to be playing around cheering for the silencing of political opponents while the noose gets tighter and tighter. In a corporate system of government, corporate censorship is state censorship, and censorship is never a friend of the left. Ever. The reality of our situation is that online dialogue has been funneled into platforms owned by billionaires with clear, demonstrable ties to government agencies, and now they’re beginning to censor that dialogue. The longer we wait to fight this, the weaker we become and the more tightly constricted our voices get.

Act now.

[norman]

Posted by James Newell (here)
Alex Jones never said that the Sandy Hook incident was all actors, Others did. The Msm and media matters said he said it. If you can find a video where he said such a thing I will be happy to change my opinion of Jones.

It's a coordinated operation. They have been ramping up the rhetoric against Alex Jones with all they have. That includes creating fictitious versions of him in TV drama that ridicules him in a role he doesn't even occupy in real life and sidelines everything he stands for.

Then just as the first big court case comes up, charging him with a dubious concept of a felony, they remove all the actual evidence he could point to in his defence, leaving the world to make it's mind up solely on the hacked and misrepresentative versions concocted by his media enemies.


edit:


Alex Jones is currently convinced that there is a false flag event on the brink of happening that will be some kind of attack on main stream media. I think he's calling it right. It's perfect for the cabal. They will blame Alex Jones and especially Trump.

[norman]

If you only listen to Alex Jones very occasionally, let this show be one of those occasions. It's special and important. Mike Adams joins him in the studio later on.


The 'writing on the wall' is very serious.


Alex Jones - 2018-Aug-16, Thursday


LISTEN:
https://www.mixcloud.com/TheAlexJone...m_content=html

[arwen]

Alex Jones’ flagship radio station shut down by Federal Communications Commission

RT
Published time: 16 Aug, 2018 09:50
Edited time: 16 Aug, 2018 16:27

The US communications regulator has shut down Alex Jones’ flagship radio station and slapped it with a $15,000 fine. The news comes after the controversial commentator was banned from a range of social media outlets.

A lawsuit filed in the US District Court in Austin this week accuses Liberty Radio of operating without federal consent since at least 2013, the Austin American-Statesman reports.

The rest of the article is here.

Alex is denying that radio show was his in the link posted by norman above.

[KiwiElf]

Posted by arwen (here)
Alex Jones’ flagship radio station shut down by Federal Communications Commission

RT
Published time: 16 Aug, 2018 09:50
Edited time: 16 Aug, 2018 16:27

The US communications regulator has shut down Alex Jones’ flagship radio station and slapped it with a $15,000 fine. The news comes after the controversial commentator was banned from a range of social media outlets.

A lawsuit filed in the US District Court in Austin this week accuses Liberty Radio of operating without federal consent since at least 2013, the Austin American-Statesman reports.

The rest of the article is here.

Alex is denying that radio show was his in the link posted by norman above.

Infowars has continued to operate and has even experienced a surge in popularity in the wake of the restrictions.

Hmmmm, "Streisand Effect" - go Alex!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

The Streisand effect is a phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet. It is an example of psychological reactance, wherein once people are aware that some information is being kept from them, their motivation to access and spread it is increased."

Babs is not just famous for her songs ...

[Ernie Nemeth]

When I read that I laughed, it was so ridiculous. Flagship station - in the basement of a libertarian bookstore. I guess they want to make it seem like Alex Jones is merely a fringe voice with only a few followers, not the actual millions that link to or listen to or watch his show.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
When I read that I laughed, it was so ridiculous. Flagship station - in the basement of a libertarian bookstore. I guess they want to make it seem like Alex Jones is merely a fringe voice with only a few followers, not the actual millions that link to or listen to or watch his show.

Correct. It's NOT his radio station. It's tiny, and he doesn't even know the guys.

This is yet more spun fake news, which RT picked up from Associated Press.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
... Associated Press.

They need to change their name: Associated Press Propaganda

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
...but because he [Alex Jones] has incited violence in his deranged rants.

[Folks, I met Brian personally back in 2014 when he visited Ecuador: he's a very nice man.]

But Brian, here and now, I'm calling you out. Directly.

Please document what you're so glibly claiming.

I'm asking you do that, because I don't believe you can.

I don't know whether this is the case or not, but my guess is that you've never actually listened to him in context. Only edited segments fed to you by CBC.

CBC is not always accurate. I wonder what they say about 9/11. About the Oklahoma City bombing. About JFK. Please let us know!

While you're at it, please tell us what Snopes says, too.

And, then, finally, let us know what you think. (And why. That might be a useful process.)

Now, if you discover you can't document that Alex Jones has incited violence — then, as with all ethical journalistic protocol, please post a retraction.

Try considering the possibility that you may be quite wrong — maybe in quite a large number of your views. It's liberating.

[arwen]

Not to detract from Bill's very relevant questions to Fellow Aspirant above, but wanted to leave this short 20 minute video here, from one of his former colleagues who left Alex Jones's show a few years ago, and who now broadcasts with her partner as Truthstream Media:

Meet the Strawman to Erase Our First Amendment Online (Published August 8, 2018, before the latest developments, but with very valid points)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tFlOzNfYzRY

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
...but because he [Alex Jones] has incited violence in his deranged rants.

[Folks, I met Brian personally back in 2014 when he visited Ecuador: he's a very nice man.]

But Brian, here and now, I'm calling you out. Directly.

Please document what you're so glibly claiming.

Also, Fellow Aspirant, please listen to the Alex Jones show posted above in Post #268. Alex is quite specific in denouncing and denying these charges.

I do NOT like this forum being used for what, as best as I can currently tell, is false "news" that risks being used to setup a major false flag against some main stream media installation, to be blamed on Trump and the alternative media.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
...but because he [Alex Jones] has incited violence in his deranged rants.

[Folks, I met Brian personally back in 2014 when he visited Ecuador: he's a very nice man.]

But Brian, here and now, I'm calling you out. Directly.

Please document what you're so glibly claiming.

Also, Fellow Aspirant, please listen to the Alex Jones show posted above in Post #268. Alex is quite specific in denouncing and denying these charges.

I do NOT like this forum being used for what, as best as I can currently tell, is false "news" that risks being used to setup a major false flag against some main stream media installation, to be blamed on Trump and the alternative media.

Yes. I recorded the core part of what is a short interview of Alex Jones by Mike Adams, to put on record Alex's views on violence.

It's a definitive statement, to counter the edited false narrative promoted by the mainstream.

Here. It's 13:45 mins long, and starts at 1:23. Most of the key statements are in the first few minutes. It's 8 Mb, easy to attach to any e-mail. Download it and listen carefully. Send it to others, too.

• Alex Jones' on record statement about never inciting violence, with Mike Adams, 16 August 2018
  http://projectavalon.net/Alex_Jones_...ugust_2018.mp3

Fellow Aspirant/Brian, I ask you to kindly listen to this and respond clearly before you post another thing on the forum. Really.

You're not doing this for us. You're doing this for yourself.

You've been a career teacher, committed to enabling learning. So, here you go.

In a strange way, we should all thank you as a beautiful case study about how easily someone who is intelligent and well-meaning can be so deceived by a false story in the mainstream. If it can happen to you, it can happen to many — and has.

[Valerie Villars]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lEOOZDbMrgE

Perhaps a little inspiration is in order.

I am in no way advocating physical violence or aggression. We must stand up.

[James Newell]

What you are watching with Jones is an attempted take down of all freethinkers right to speak.

They are doing a technique Called "3rd partying", which says he did or said this or that; and when you review exactly what he said or did you find they are trying to convict him with lies and distortions of what he said. They take one lie(s) and forward them to "create" the reality he did wrong. Most people don't do the research and go along with it.

It is difficult to have a defense against the lies of this magnitude but I have a feeling what we are seeing is the desperateness of the deep state, they are too late in putting the genie back into the bottle, sooner or later there will be laws busting up google and facebook and others because with these acts that they have done to Jones and others they have violated Rico laws and antitrust laws quite clearly. They are counting on stupid people going along with it. Maybe they think they can win the elections in a few months if they stop the conservative, rational and enlightened voices. And then impeach Trump, I doubt it!

It is a great time to be alive to watch and join the battle against the deep state and their mouthpieces and cronies. It is either going to be a free world or an enslaved one,( a totally controlled internet) which side do you join in on??

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by James Newell (here)
They are doing a technique Called "3rd partying", which says he did or said this or that; and when you review exactly what he said or did you find they are trying to convict him with lies and distortions of what he said. They take one lie(s) and forward them to "create" the reality he did wrong. Most people don't do the research and go along with it.

Right. The origin of this term is like this:

Imagine that your husband, wife, or partner is being very critical of you and giving you a really hard time, or maybe even saying unkind and untrue things about you to others.

Then you discover that a THIRD PARTY — a separate person (or group!) from the two of you — is whispering in your partner's ear a whole bunch of lies about you. If they believe the whispering lies, then it's a perfect recipe for conflict.

Like with Fellow Aspirant/Brian. He's a good guy, but believes the Third Party whispering, which in his case is [probably] in the guise of TV programs on CBC.

So the lies in one person's ear, which they're faithfully believing, then whip up conflict between folks who would otherwise be friends.

Simple stuff. But if it didn't often work so well, it wouldn't be deployed as the weapon it frequently is. And it's not trivial, either: marriages, and longstanding friendships, really can break because of third party operations like this.