-
24th May 2019 15:47
Link to Post #201
Avalon Member
Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares
Greetings Snoop,
Thank you! Pardon me for not adhering to your efficient method of quoting and response, I don’t quite have the technique and knowledge to assure an accurate outcome within the response time allotment.
The reimbursement factor concerning the Ernst and Young hoax makes my head spin. Tavares continues to include this topic as a talking point in the general script. I’ve listened to her for almost a year and each time I think I’ve heard it all, a new revealation comes up which reminds me of the depths she’s willing to sink to. Understanding that the accounting firm’s function is to make sure cities are reimbursed is huge. Thanks for revealing this and I will absolutely post a link to this page of the thread in her “Accounting Firms Bankrupting Cities” youtube post. Also valuable is the link to the article in the Santa Rosa area newspaper that she uses as the foundation for “discovering” aka “creating” this hoax. Of note in your response above is the name of the city which i think you’ve mistakenly typed as Santa Monica instead of Santa Rosa which is an understandable error as the former is more commonly known (or perhaps I misunderstand). Regardless, the name of the city does not change the value of this critical point and again, thank you, Snoop.
As an observastion just for GP, even though there are more commenters who are calling Tavares on her unbridled fear mongering, and people tend to mellow and improve with age, I was reminded by listening to one of her recent presentations that she seems to be insatiable. She was invited to speak as a guest on an internet radio program which is run by Pastor for his Church. This congregation is a new audience who know nothing of her. I felt bad for this crowd. The pastor gave her full reign to speak, with a request to address 2 subjects submitted by the congregation. She started speaking in her normal patronizing way (step one in her control method), briefly addressed the first subject but didn’t stay focused long enough to really provide any useful information, instead ramping up into the most shameless, overly dramatized screed of fear-inducing conjecture I’ve heard from her yet. Even I, as a seasoned Tavares cynic, was astounded. As usual the host could not get a word or question in edgewise without considerable effort, but with persistence he eventually succeeded at which point she granted him permission (to speak on his own program) briefly, before she started talking over him so as not to lose the momentum of her delivery. Everything is prefaced with “now I want to talk about” instead of “to address your question.” An almost unbelievable display of weaponized content and delivery, overly dramatized, it would be laughable were it not so abusive of the listener who has naïvely invested their trust in her as an “expert.” And, it works. The comments reflect sentiments of gratitude from listeners for having been given the “information.” Yet once the dust settles, it’s readily apparent there has been little conveyance of information. Just tidbits of sensationalism which, altogether, serve the purpose of putting the listener in a state of stunned desperation and fear. Clearly, she feeds off of this, it’s what sustains her. Even I, who study her and have heard it all at least twice, came away in an emotionally traumatized state. It took me a few hours to get grounded again, and I realized that even studying her from an informed POV can be damaging. Her intention seems to be the establishment of a form of ego-driven mind control. In my opinion, it’s sociopathic and malicious.
Thanks for reading and allowing me to vent in my process of recovery, and I will remind all with the same conclusion and advice I’ve mentioned before. Be VERY CAREFUL about who and what you allow into your head. Take good care of your vibrational consistancy. This stuff is no joke.
Much gratitude, peace and goodwill,
xylo
Last edited by xylo; 24th May 2019 at 20:17.
Reason: Grammar
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to xylo For This Post:
Gemma13 (25th May 2019), Pam (6th June 2019)
-
25th May 2019 16:58
Link to Post #202