+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 19 FirstFirst 1 10 19 LastLast
Results 181 to 200 of 380

Thread: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

  1. Link to Post #181
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Posts
    626
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3,231 times in 562 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    I’m sorry to see divisiveness within this thread. Perhaps it’s more useful to focus on the simple and obvious in order to evaluate Deborah Tavares’s motive. Whether it’s simply attention seeking or something far more sinister (decide for yourself) it’s about control. Anyone who has spent even a small amount of time listening to Deborah Tavares understands that she uses fear as a primary method for drawing the listener into her world. Here’s a good quote from someone who knows the drill:

    “People are being controlled mentally through fear, and they use fear to fragment our consciousness, and get us emotional, so that we will accept their tyrannical schemes. This is a fight between the forces of darkness and the forces of light.” - Cody Snodgres, former US black ops/CIA, turned whistleblower. https://youtu.be/2iC5h8wDBDM

    xylo, your long summary of the evolution of your thinking regarding DT was really well written and a valuable insight. Thank you.

    The question that this DT exposing brings up for me regarding more and more 'names' in the truther world who slowly reveal themselves to not be the altruistic player they sell themselves as... is who are lone wolfs and who are plants and playing a role.

    I'm suspecting there are a lot more hired guns, role players and gatekeepers than we all might guess, and in many cases playing very long term roles for 5, 10 even 20, 30 years.

    It's a powerful tool that of course is being used prolifically right now. Of course many big names right now are fakers and social engineering has long been in full swing with very long planned ahead agendas and groomed players.

    The payoff of planting truthers supposedly on a crusade to expose and reveal both helps acclimate a society to lots of dark, intimidating and/or future agendas and is an ever flowing reinforcement of fear and danger......"you are powerless against the Rothschilds.... or this technology... or....".

    Who to trust these days is nearly impossible. I have lots of empathy for vulnerable newbies with so much to discern starting from scratch.

    Re DT, she seems very busy in non-money making efforts, is she being compensated from somewhere else?

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to waves For This Post:

    peterpam (29th March 2019), xylo (23rd March 2019)

  3. Link to Post #182
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Quote Posted by waves (here)
    Re DT, she seems very busy in non-money making efforts, is she being compensated from somewhere else?

    Dear Waves,

    I'm not so sure that Debora Tavares would need compensation from somewhere else to supplement her income from promoting hoaxes. She is doing just fine peddling hoaxes. Here's how.

    Deborah Tavares and her associates (under several different names) have posted HUNDREDS, IF NOT THOUSANDS OF VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES MAKING SHOCKING, HORRIFYING AND SENSATIONAL CLAIMS ON YOUTUBE.COM.

    This is a profitable enterprise.

    YouTube sells ads to commercial advertisers, posts those ads on videos uploaded to YouTube and splits the advertising dollars with the party who uploaded the video on which the ad appears. https://influencermarketinghub.com/y...ey-calculator/.

    This generates A LOT OF ADVERTISING DOLLARS in connection with all of these HUNDREDS if not THOUSANDS of videos. And you will note, the more HORRIBLE, SHOCKING and SENSATIONAL Deborah Tavares' claims are, the more hits that video receives, and the more advertising dollars she receives. Thus, Deborah Tavares has a financial incentive to make especially HORRIFYING and SHOCKING claims (regardless of whether those claims are true).

    Before she took it down, her SHOCKING, HORRIFYING and SENSATIONAL "NASA War Document HOAX" video had over FOUR MILLION HITS! So, Deborah Tavares is pocketing a lot of advertising dollars by peddling her hoaxes. NOTE THE ADVERTISEMENT THAT APPEARS AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS VIDEO FOR EXAMPLE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k.

    And, consider this. Every radio show on which she appears as a guest results in yet another video on YouTube.com documenting that show and results in endless plugs for StopTheCrime.net on both the radio show and the resulting YouTube.com video.

    Further, Deborah Tavares NEVER engages in any "selfless" act of "activism" THAT IS NOT RECORDED ON VIDEO. So, every "selfless" act of "activism" (appearances at Bohemian Grove & smart meter protests, speaking at townhall meetings, interviewing others and being interviewed) ALWAYS RESULTS IN EVEN MORE VIDEOS on YouTube.com, MORE ADVERTISING DOLLARS and more plugs for StopTheCrime.net.

    So, seemingly everything she does has a commercial purpose and EVERYTHING SHE DOES IS SOME FORM OF SELF-PROMOTION WHICH INCREASES HER STAR POWER, THE NUMBER OF VIDEOS POSTED ON YOUTUBE.COM, THE NUMBER OF HITS THOSE VIDEOS RECEIVE AND THE NUMBER OF ADVERTISING DOLLARS SHE RECIEVES.

    Further, for a period of time, Deborah Tavares also owned a commercial venture called PureMomentum.net. It worked like this. First, Deborah Tavares would post a video on YouTube.com depicting one-half of a radio show. In this first half of the show, Deborah Tavares would make an number of SHOCKING, HORRIFYING and SENSATIONAL claims and she would make a number of "teasers" advertising the second half of the show. At the end of the video (at the end of the first half of the show), Deborah Tavares would "urge" or "encourage" the audience to go to PureMomentum.net and "subscribe" (a recurring charge) in order to hear second half of the show for which the first half served as an "infomercial". FOR PROOF OF THIS, GO TO 102:15 HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOOv_IGOvRA.

    Deborah Tavares has since abandoned this PureMomentum.net commercial venture. But, it nevertheless reflects that Deborah Tavares seeks to profit by making her SHOCKING, HORRIFYING and SENSATIONAL claims.

    Finally, at present, Deborah Tavares has a "DONATION" button as the ONLY FEATURE on the home page of her website. http://www.stopthecrime.net/ This is also a way for Deborah Tavares to "BENEFIT" FINANCIALLY from what she does. And, you will note, Deborah Tavares NEVER makes a claim, a live appearance, a radio appearance or a video appearance without REPEATEDLY "urging" and "highly encouraging" the audience to go to StopTheCrime.net.

    It appears that Deborah Tavares has abandoned her struggling real estate development business TO BE A SUCCESSFUL YOUTUBE ENTREPRENEUR. After all, she spends all of her time now in pursuit of that endeavor.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 23rd March 2019 at 15:26.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    peterpam (29th March 2019), xylo (23rd March 2019)

  5. Link to Post #183
    Avalon Member xylo's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2019
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 284 times in 104 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Snoop,

    From my device I can’t see ads because I have a paid “no-ads” subscription to YouTube. If you or others to not have subscriptions, can you verify for me that Tavares videos have YouTube inserted ads? If so, that should tell us everything we need to know. Many “truther” channels such as SGT Report have been de-monetized which seems the trend these days. The reason given by youtube is “material not suitable for advertising”. If Deborahs Stop The Crime has not been de-montetized that speaks volumes and explains why she never gives her listeners the real truth. For example she never ever mentions the Vatican or Jesuits, Skull and Bones, etc. I read in one of your posts where you said she’s not targeted, because she never gets close to the target thus she’s not on their radar as a threat. Of course part of her spiel is that she’s a targeted individual, has escaped assasination attempts, and was taken out of action for a period of time to seek medical help for the effects of being targeted by microwave weapons. Actually I noticed that she came back from that time out having a significant amount of plastic surgery done. If I am to believe the truther claim that the conspirators will always telegraph us who they are in a coded way, Deborah constantly cites herself as a “builder by trade.” Builder is synonymous with Mason. She usually wears Masonic colors, black and white. And I’ve mentioned the Stop The Crime website adds satanic red to that scheme. I can see how disinformation campaigns serve to cause a distrust of everyone including those who may be genuine. You are right about the fact that she does nothing which is not recorded. She has her husband Lou follow her everywhere with a video camera. Poor guy, I’ve seen a few photos. This is a man who appears to be beaten down.

    Thanks I look forward to your response.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to xylo For This Post:

    peterpam (29th March 2019)

  7. Link to Post #184
    Avalon Member xylo's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2019
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 284 times in 104 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Ok folks well...

    To close off or continue my portion of this discussion, I presume Deborah Tavares’ youtube channel to be de-monetized. I went to her presentations using a browser where I was not logged in, and I see no ads. I do not know about the past however and I do know this de-monetization of truther channels is a recent trend. However, I do find it stange that (apparently) her channel is never threatened by “community guidelines “ or “copyright” strikes, which is the terminology YouTube uses against channels that speak the truth. Also Tavares has no backup channel which (again) all the channels (which I feel to be targeting the truth) do. Recently one of those primary channels was brought down by YouTube, and now their backup channel is all that’s left.

    I’ve heard Tavares speak to the issue of money several times, and each time her response makes it clear that she has money. She’s mentioned she employs a “research team”. If she’s a paid shill, maybe her money comes from those whom she shills for. My perception has always been that she comes from family money. Raised in Malibu, and according to her she abandoned her “building business” without giving it much thought. She’s said (in essence) that the increasing paperwork and decreasing profit margins that came with residence building caused her to decide she and her husband would simply travel the world instead of building. BTW the only built residences I’ve heard her refer to are multi-family dwellings I.e. stackem packem, the same as she complains about now. I’ve heard her mention she owns this type of residences in Southern California.

    There’s no crime in being wealthy or owning apartment buildings. However, in my view it is a moral crime to fear-monger, and that’s the reason why I speak out against Deborah Tavares. Her mission is to create fear, not awareness. The headlines to her presentations are outrageous and shocking, aka “click-bait.” She assembles sets of shocking b.s. talking points which she bounces between very quickly as conjecture in an overly emotional, fear-inducing tone, and that method appears to work based of comments I see her listeners leaving. It’s normal to see listeners comment that they should just kill themselves or others now.

    I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers. However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    So.....listener beware and question everything. If it doesn’t survive your own critical thinking, there’s probably something wrong.

    Best to us all in these challenging times.

    -xylo

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to xylo For This Post:

    peterpam (29th March 2019)

  9. Link to Post #185
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Ok folks well...

    To close off or continue my portion of this discussion, I presume Deborah Tavares’ youtube channel to be de-monetized. I went to her presentations using a browser where I was not logged in, and I see no ads. I do not know about the past however and I do know this de-monetization of truther channels is a recent trend. However, I do find it stange that (apparently) her channel is never threatened by “community guidelines “ or “copyright” strikes, which is the terminology YouTube uses against channels that speak the truth. Also Tavares has no backup channel which (again) all the channels (which I feel to be targeting the truth) do. Recently one of those primary channels was brought down by YouTube, and now their backup channel is all that’s left.

    I’ve heard Tavares speak to the issue of money several times, and each time her response makes it clear that she has money. She’s mentioned she employs a “research team”. If she’s a paid shill, maybe her money comes from those whom she shills for. My perception has always been that she comes from family money. Raised in Malibu, and according to her she abandoned her “building business” without giving it much thought. She’s said (in essence) that the increasing paperwork and decreasing profit margins that came with residence building caused her to decide she and her husband would simply travel the world instead of building. BTW the only built residences I’ve heard her refer to are multi-family dwellings I.e. stackem packem, the same as she complains about now. I’ve heard her mention she owns this type of residences in Southern California.

    There’s no crime in being wealthy or owning apartment buildings. However, in my view it is a moral crime to fear-monger, and that’s the reason why I speak out against Deborah Tavares. Her mission is to create fear, not awareness. The headlines to her presentations are outrageous and shocking, aka “click-bait.” She assembles sets of shocking b.s. talking points which she bounces between very quickly as conjecture in an overly emotional, fear-inducing tone, and that method appears to work based of comments I see her listeners leaving. It’s normal to see listeners comment that they should just kill themselves or others now.

    I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers. However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    So.....listener beware and question everything. If it doesn’t survive your own critical thinking, there’s probably something wrong.

    Best to us all in these challenging times.

    -xylo
    Hello xylo,

    Great comment.

    YouTube.com has recently changed how it displays its ads on videos.

    I have recently learned that when scrolling quickly from video to video (remaining on each video for only a few seconds to see if an ad comes up) the adds do not comes up. I have also recently learned that when an ad does come up, if I watch the entire ad before clicking off to the next video, ads come up more frequently in the subsequent videos. So, the more video ads I watch, the more they come up. The less video ads I watch, the less they come up.

    I have also recently learned that clicking on the same video (on which I have already previously seen an ad) does not always result in an ad coming up, much less the same video ad that I previously saw. When ads do come up in the same video on which I have previously seen an ad, the ad is often different from the ad I have already seen there before.

    Yesterday when scrolling through YouTube videos, ads came up on the following Deborah Tavares videos below. (Obviously, I did not scroll through them all. There are simply too many.). Today, when clicking on these same videos below, ads only came up on a few of them.

    Go figure. I'm sure YouTube has a reason for what they are doing. I just don't know what it is.

    This does not mean that Deborah Tavares no longer receives advertising money from YouTube for ads posted on her videos. I'm sure she does.

    It just looks like YouTube is targeting the ads differently to different viewers at different times depending on the viewers ad watching habits.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLoNwUs6zNc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9TtukbSe_0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI-3CTeOi0M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6vsj5vr9JY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsnVzaa1ksU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ai3vxywkC4M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm9-...&index=12&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW9U...U&index=2&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb0r...GtJ1Nrm3y&t=0s

    YOUR COMMENTS: I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers.

    MY RESPONSE: Two questions! 1). Who, in particular shares her conclusions? and 2). What documents (or other evidence) do they support their own conclusions with?

    YOUR COMMENTS: However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    MY RESPONSE: Your writing is so insightful, so introspective and so true. All of this is precisely what makes Deborah Tavares so dangerous to society. She masquerades as a messiah trying to save all of mankind while she is actually (and simultaneously) inciting hatred and violence against innocent Americans. This makes her diabolical.

    But, more than any thing else, what bothers me the most about Deborah Tavares is that she is a pathological liar. A fraud. A charlatan. All while pretending to be a savior and messiah figure.

    Simply put, Deborah Tavares sells hate by using lies. That sums up Deborah Tavares in one sentence.

    Thank you for joining us.

    We have all benefitted greatly by your story, your insight and your superb communication skills.

    All The Best,

    Snoop,
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 28th March 2019 at 22:07.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    peterpam (29th March 2019), xylo (30th March 2019)

  11. Link to Post #186
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Please disregard. Posted unintentionally.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 15th July 2019 at 02:59.

  12. Link to Post #187
    Avalon Member xylo's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2019
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 284 times in 104 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Quote Posted by snoop4truth (here)
    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Ok folks well...

    To close off or continue my portion of this discussion, I presume Deborah Tavares’ youtube channel to be de-monetized. I went to her presentations using a browser where I was not logged in, and I see no ads. I do not know about the past however and I do know this de-monetization of truther channels is a recent trend. However, I do find it stange that (apparently) her channel is never threatened by “community guidelines “ or “copyright” strikes, which is the terminology YouTube uses against channels that speak the truth. Also Tavares has no backup channel which (again) all the channels (which I feel to be targeting the truth) do. Recently one of those primary channels was brought down by YouTube, and now their backup channel is all that’s left.

    I’ve heard Tavares speak to the issue of money several times, and each time her response makes it clear that she has money. She’s mentioned she employs a “research team”. If she’s a paid shill, maybe her money comes from those whom she shills for. My perception has always been that she comes from family money. Raised in Malibu, and according to her she abandoned her “building business” without giving it much thought. She’s said (in essence) that the increasing paperwork and decreasing profit margins that came with residence building caused her to decide she and her husband would simply travel the world instead of building. BTW the only built residences I’ve heard her refer to are multi-family dwellings I.e. stackem packem, the same as she complains about now. I’ve heard her mention she owns this type of residences in Southern California.

    There’s no crime in being wealthy or owning apartment buildings. However, in my view it is a moral crime to fear-monger, and that’s the reason why I speak out against Deborah Tavares. Her mission is to create fear, not awareness. The headlines to her presentations are outrageous and shocking, aka “click-bait.” She assembles sets of shocking b.s. talking points which she bounces between very quickly as conjecture in an overly emotional, fear-inducing tone, and that method appears to work based of comments I see her listeners leaving. It’s normal to see listeners comment that they should just kill themselves or others now.

    I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers. However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    So.....listener beware and question everything. If it doesn’t survive your own critical thinking, there’s probably something wrong.

    Best to us all in these challenging times.

    -xylo
    Hello xylo,

    Great comment.

    YouTube.com has recently changed how it displays its ads on videos.

    I have recently learned that when scrolling quickly from video to video (remaining on each video for only a few seconds to see if an ad comes up) the adds do not comes up. I have also recently learned that when an ad does come up, if I watch the entire ad before clicking off to the next video, ads come up more frequently in the subsequent videos. So, the more video ads I watch, the more they come up. The less video ads I watch, the less they come up.

    I have also recently learned that clicking on the same video (on which I have already previously seen an ad) does not always result in an ad coming up, much less the same video ad that I previously saw. When ads do come up in the same video on which I have previously seen an ad, the ad is often different from the ad I have already seen there before.

    Yesterday when scrolling through YouTube videos, ads came up on the following Deborah Tavares videos below. (Obviously, I did not scroll through them all. There are simply too many.). Today, when clicking on these same videos below, ads only came up on a few of them.

    Go figure. I'm sure YouTube has a reason for what they are doing. I just don't know what it is.

    This does not mean that Deborah Tavares no longer receives advertising money from YouTube for ads posted on her videos. I'm sure she does.

    It just looks like YouTube is targeting the ads differently to different viewers at different times depending on the viewers ad watching habits.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc[/url]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLoNwUs6zNc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9TtukbSe_0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI-3CTeOi0M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6vsj5vr9JY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsnVzaa1ksU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ai3vxywkC4M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm9-...&index=12&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW9U...U&index=2&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb0r...GtJ1Nrm3y&t=0s

    YOUR COMMENTS: I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers.

    MY RESPONSE: Two questions! 1). Who, in particular shares her conclusions? and 2). What documents (or other evidence) do they support their own conclusions with?

    YOUR COMMENTS: However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    MY RESPONSE: Your writing is so insightful, so introspective and so true. All of this is precisely what makes Deborah Tavares so dangerous to society. She masquerades as a messiah trying to save all of mankind while she is actually (and simultaneously) inciting hatred and violence against innocent Americans. This makes her diabolical.

    But, more than any thing else, what bothers me the most about Deborah Tavares is that she is a pathological liar. A fraud. A charlatan. All while pretending to be a savior and messiah figure.

    Simply put, Deborah Tavares sells hate by using lies. That sums up Deborah Tavares in one sentence.

    Thank you for joining us.

    We have all benefitted greatly by your story, your insight and your superb communication skills.

    All The Best,

    Snoop,
    Greetings Snoop,

    Thanks for your response. I’m a novice at response quoting. I just spent 30 minutes attempting to do that then pushed the wrong button or something and lost all of it, so here goes, once again, in a simpler way.

    If Tavares videos still contain YouTube ads, that says to me that her content is nowhere close to being aimed at the truth. I do know the The SGT Report channel has been coompletely de-monetized, because host Sean has spoken about it in his recent postings, and they now embed their ads within the production. SGT generally features educated, known analysts, researchers and whistleblowers who present material in a focused, grounded way. It’s a place to learn. Sean mentiones other channels whom youtube deems not suitable for advertising and I believe him. He did have Tavares on several times in the past and the comments sections reflect the same escalated fear/hate/call to murder, and, tellingly, reduced Sean himself (who is normally soft-spoken and logically methodical) into a host who was fearfully excited. I’ve gotten on his case about that and pointed out the change in his own tone, and haven’t seen Tavares there since. Sean is Christian and while he does not emphasize that angle he does mention that true Christianity does not endorse the foaming at the mouth mob of torch bearing fanatics solution such as Tavares brings out in her listeners.

    My comment “Tavares solutions generally shared by other credible researchers” is sloppy and inaccurate. Better stated is that several researchers whom I deem to be credible on the the subject of agenda 21, and those researchers are Rosa Koire and Elana Freeman. Rosa illstrustates how she became aware of agenda 21 through her work as for the state of California. Her tone is clear, grounded and educational, she’s gone on to write on the subject. I do not have information on hand regarding her documentation. It’s her calm state of authority and reference to events and circumstances within her work as a professional that leaves me feeling I’ve just heard the truth. Similar with Elana Freeland. Notably, neither one of these women try to sell the listener on unique documents which only they have access to, such as Tavares does. Also, it’s obvious at first glance that Tavares’ “documents” are not documents at all, and it’s obvious they are created by 3rd parties just from the language, format, wording and LACK of information when compared to her over the top statements.

    I will say again, some of what Tavares unleashes on the public has no documentation at all, notabley one her her recent rant -themes “ Accounting Firms hired to bankrupt all US Cities” she harps on and in about the accounting firm Ernst and Young and there is absolutely no documentation to back up her claims. I’ve gone through all or most of the documents on her website, which she cites as the foundation for prooving her allegations, and those “documents” are laughable. Even to someone like me who has no legal training or professional experience in these areas. I am amazed that people believe these documents are real or original.

    I’ll see if I can edit this as I build my response quoting skills but in the meantime I hope this clarifies my statements a bit.

    Thanks

    xylo

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to xylo For This Post:

    peterpam (29th March 2019), snoop4truth (28th March 2019)

  14. Link to Post #188
    Avalon Member xylo's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2019
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 284 times in 104 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Other subjects where Deborah’s conclusions match generally respected voices include 5G and the CA fires, maybe including her “plan to burn down N CA” I have not looked into that but obviously it’s happening. Whether she predicted the events or has simply reiterated known information (to keep herself in the limelight) after the fact is debatable, all I’ve seen is the latter. Her reporting of the events is pathetic. If Tavares is simply showing the effects of emotional trauma, I hope she gets help. Maybe she doesn’t intend to scare people to death. Her fans love it. I’m glad Snoop has revealed the forged documents however, and I am of the belief that one can learn what’s needed from other sources without the layers of manic fear and hate that she transmits. If one listens to her for extended periods they can be affected by her vibrational consistency so I personally do not recommend listening to Deborah Tavares.
    Last edited by xylo; 1st April 2019 at 04:43.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to xylo For This Post:

    peterpam (29th March 2019)

  16. Link to Post #189
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Quote Posted by snoop4truth (here)
    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Ok folks well...

    To close off or continue my portion of this discussion, I presume Deborah Tavares’ youtube channel to be de-monetized. I went to her presentations using a browser where I was not logged in, and I see no ads. I do not know about the past however and I do know this de-monetization of truther channels is a recent trend. However, I do find it stange that (apparently) her channel is never threatened by “community guidelines “ or “copyright” strikes, which is the terminology YouTube uses against channels that speak the truth. Also Tavares has no backup channel which (again) all the channels (which I feel to be targeting the truth) do. Recently one of those primary channels was brought down by YouTube, and now their backup channel is all that’s left.

    I’ve heard Tavares speak to the issue of money several times, and each time her response makes it clear that she has money. She’s mentioned she employs a “research team”. If she’s a paid shill, maybe her money comes from those whom she shills for. My perception has always been that she comes from family money. Raised in Malibu, and according to her she abandoned her “building business” without giving it much thought. She’s said (in essence) that the increasing paperwork and decreasing profit margins that came with residence building caused her to decide she and her husband would simply travel the world instead of building. BTW the only built residences I’ve heard her refer to are multi-family dwellings I.e. stackem packem, the same as she complains about now. I’ve heard her mention she owns this type of residences in Southern California.

    There’s no crime in being wealthy or owning apartment buildings. However, in my view it is a moral crime to fear-monger, and that’s the reason why I speak out against Deborah Tavares. Her mission is to create fear, not awareness. The headlines to her presentations are outrageous and shocking, aka “click-bait.” She assembles sets of shocking b.s. talking points which she bounces between very quickly as conjecture in an overly emotional, fear-inducing tone, and that method appears to work based of comments I see her listeners leaving. It’s normal to see listeners comment that they should just kill themselves or others now.

    I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers. However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    So.....listener beware and question everything. If it doesn’t survive your own critical thinking, there’s probably something wrong.

    Best to us all in these challenging times.

    -xylo
    Hello xylo,

    Great comment.

    YouTube.com has recently changed how it displays its ads on videos.

    I have recently learned that when scrolling quickly from video to video (remaining on each video for only a few seconds to see if an ad comes up) the adds do not comes up. I have also recently learned that when an ad does come up, if I watch the entire ad before clicking off to the next video, ads come up more frequently in the subsequent videos. So, the more video ads I watch, the more they come up. The less video ads I watch, the less they come up.

    I have also recently learned that clicking on the same video (on which I have already previously seen an ad) does not always result in an ad coming up, much less the same video ad that I previously saw. When ads do come up in the same video on which I have previously seen an ad, the ad is often different from the ad I have already seen there before.

    Yesterday when scrolling through YouTube videos, ads came up on the following Deborah Tavares videos below. (Obviously, I did not scroll through them all. There are simply too many.). Today, when clicking on these same videos below, ads only came up on a few of them.

    Go figure. I'm sure YouTube has a reason for what they are doing. I just don't know what it is.

    This does not mean that Deborah Tavares no longer receives advertising money from YouTube for ads posted on her videos. I'm sure she does.

    It just looks like YouTube is targeting the ads differently to different viewers at different times depending on the viewers ad watching habits.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc[/url]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLoNwUs6zNc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9TtukbSe_0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI-3CTeOi0M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6vsj5vr9JY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsnVzaa1ksU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ai3vxywkC4M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm9-...&index=12&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW9U...U&index=2&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb0r...GtJ1Nrm3y&t=0s

    YOUR COMMENTS: I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers.

    MY RESPONSE: Two questions! 1). Who, in particular shares her conclusions? and 2). What documents (or other evidence) do they support their own conclusions with?

    YOUR COMMENTS: However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    MY RESPONSE: Your writing is so insightful, so introspective and so true. All of this is precisely what makes Deborah Tavares so dangerous to society. She masquerades as a messiah trying to save all of mankind while she is actually (and simultaneously) inciting hatred and violence against innocent Americans. This makes her diabolical.

    But, more than any thing else, what bothers me the most about Deborah Tavares is that she is a pathological liar. A fraud. A charlatan. All while pretending to be a savior and messiah figure.

    Simply put, Deborah Tavares sells hate by using lies. That sums up Deborah Tavares in one sentence.

    Thank you for joining us.

    We have all benefitted greatly by your story, your insight and your superb communication skills.

    All The Best,

    Snoop,
    Greetings Snoop,

    Thanks for your response. I’m a novice at response quoting. I just spent 30 minutes attempting to do that then pushed the wrong button or something and lost all of it, so here goes, once again, in a simpler way.

    If Tavares videos still contain YouTube ads, that says to me that her content is nowhere close to being aimed at the truth. I do know the The SGT Report channel has been coompletely de-monetized, because host Sean has spoken about it in his recent postings, and they now embed their ads within the production. SGT generally features educated, known analysts, researchers and whistleblowers who present material in a focused, grounded way. It’s a place to learn. Sean mentiones other channels whom youtube deems not suitable for advertising and I believe him. He did have Tavares on several times in the past and the comments sections reflect the same escalated fear/hate/call to murder, and, tellingly, reduced Sean himself (who is normally soft-spoken and logically methodical) into a host who was fearfully excited. I’ve gotten on his case about that and pointed out the change in his own tone, and haven’t seen Tavares there since. Sean is Christian and while he does not emphasize that angle he does mention that true Christianity does not endorse the foaming at the mouth mob of torch bearing fanatics solution such as Tavares brings out in her listeners.

    My comment “Tavares solutions generally shared by other credible researchers” is sloppy and inaccurate. Better stated is that several researchers whom I deem to be credible on the the subject of agenda 21, and those researchers are Rosa Koire and Elana Freeman. Rosa illstrustates how she became aware of agenda 21 through her work as for the state of California. Her tone is clear, grounded and educational, she’s gone on to write on the subject. I do not have information on hand regarding her documentation. It’s her calm state of authority and reference to events and circumstances within her work as a professional that leaves me feeling I’ve just heard the truth. Similar with Elana Freeland. Notably, neither one of these women try to sell the listener on unique documents which only they have access to, such as Tavares does. Also, it’s obvious at first glance that Tavares’ “documents” are not documents at all, and it’s obvious they are created by 3rd parties just from the language, format, wording and LACK of information when compared to her over the top statements.

    I will say again, some of what Tavares unleashes on the public has no documentation at all, notabley one her her recent rant -themes “ Accounting Firms hired to bankrupt all US Cities” she harps on and in about the accounting firm Ernst and Young and there is absolutely no documentation to back up her claims. I’ve gone through all or most of the documents on her website, which she cites as the foundation for prooving her allegations, and those “documents” are laughable. Even to someone like me who has no legal training or professional experience in these areas. I am amazed that people believe these documents are real or original.

    I’ll see if I can edit this as I build my response quoting skills but in the meantime I hope this clarifies my statements a bit.

    Thanks

    xylo

    Hello xylo,

    Sorry for the delay. I wrote a detailed response to this post days ago. When I was finished and attempted to post it, I apparently pressed the wrong button and my response appeared on some projectavalon.net page where it did not belong, among several boxed quotes. When I pressed the back button to get back to the previous page, my response vanished into cyberspace. So, I'll try again now.

    YOUR COMMENT: If Tavares videos still contain YouTube ads,...

    MY RESPONSE: They do. Last week, ads appeared on the Deborah Tavares videos to which I provided links above. I did not click on all of Deborah Tavares' videos. There are simply too many of them. The ads in the links above came up during my clicking on ads for about one and a half hours. I did not count the total number of videos I clicked on looking for ads.

    But, when I clicked on those same links today, ads did not appear on all of them. YouTube may have developed a program for placing ads based on each particular user's click patterns and viewing habits that varies day to day. I don't know. Regardless, there are still ads on Deborah Tavares' YouTube videos.

    YOUR COMMENT: ...that says to me that her content is nowhere close to being aimed at the truth.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. Telling the truth is not as sensational, horrifying and does not result in as many viewer clicks (or advertising dollars). Note that the titles of many of Deborah Tavares' videos are pure "click bait" ("Extinction", "Extermination", Reduce The Population To "Zero", Satanic Fires, "Kill Cities", Culling of mankind, etc.).

    YOUR COMMENT: I do know The SGT Report channel has been completely de-monetized, because host Sean has spoken about it in his recent postings, and they now embed their ads within the production.

    MY RESPONSE: De-monetized? If The SGT Report is embedding ads within the content of its videos, then The SGT Report is receiving all of the advertising dollars generated by those ads (effectively cutting YouTube out of the deal). That is not de-monetized as I define it. What exactly does Sean say about being demonetized? Does he mean that YouTube is not posting ads on SGT's videos anymore? Other conspiratorial video uploaders?


    YOUR COMMENT: SGT generally features educated, known analysts, researchers and whistleblowers who present material in a focused, grounded way. It’s a place to learn. Sean mentions other channels whom YouTube deems not suitable for advertising and I believe him. He did have Tavares on several times in the past and the comments sections reflect the same escalated fear/hate/call to murder, and, tellingly, reduced Sean himself (who is normally soft-spoken and logically methodical) into a host who was fearfully excited. I’ve gotten on his case about that and pointed out the change in his own tone, and haven’t seen Tavares there since. Sean is Christian and while he does not emphasize that angle he does mention that true Christianity does not endorse the foaming at the mouth mob of torch bearing fanatics solution such as Tavares brings out in her listeners.

    MY RESPONSE: Deborah Tavares' hoaxes are intentionally designed and intended to incite hatred and violence of innocent Americans. They are a call to war against the innocent (Dennis M. Bushnell of NASA, etc.). Mark my words. Sooner or later, she will have Americans killing Americans (assassinations, riots, burning cities, terrorist explosions). And, it will all be the result of a Deborah Tavares hoax. And, those who continue to support, enable and provide cover for her will be complicit in that result.

    YOUR COMMENT: My comment “Tavares solutions generally shared by other credible researchers” is sloppy and inaccurate. Better stated is that several researchers whom I deem to be credible on the subject of agenda 21, and those researchers are Rosa Koire and Elana Freeman. Rosa illstrustates how she became aware of agenda 21 through her work as for the state of California. Her tone is clear, grounded and educational, she’s gone on to write on the subject. I do not have information on hand regarding her documentation. It’s her calm state of authority and reference to events and circumstances within her work as a professional that leaves me feeling I’ve just heard the truth. Similar with Elana Freeland. Notably, neither one of these women try to sell the listener on unique documents which only they have access to, such as Tavares does. Also, it’s obvious at first glance that Tavares’ “documents” are not documents at all, and it’s obvious they are created by 3rd parties just from the language, format, wording and LACK of information when compared to her over the top statements.

    MY RESPONSE: Rosa Koire and Deborah Tavares have something in common that you should know about. They both make much of their money from continued deforestation and continued destruction of the environment, something Agenda 21 would have prevented if it had become law (but it did not). Deborah Tavares makes money real estate "development" (environmental destruction) and Rosa Koire makes money from appraising such "development" properties. If Agenda 21 had become law (and it did not), it would reduced the income of both Deborah Tavares and Rosa Koire. I have not done any research on Alana Freeman's background.

    YOUR COMMENT: I will say again, some of what Tavares unleashes on the public has no documentation at all, notably one her recent rant -themes “ Accounting Firms hired to bankrupt all US Cities” she harps on and in about the accounting firm Ernst and Young and there is absolutely no documentation to back up her claims.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. Many of the conclusions she reaches are without any documentation at all. But, my beef with Deborah Tavares is that many of the documents that she uses in "support" of her claims ACTUALLY CONTRADICT HER CLAIMS (NASA War Document, Agenda 21, Genocide Agreement, Rothschild To Restructure North America, etc.).


    YOUR COMMENT: I’ve gone through all or most of the documents on her website, which she cites as the foundation for proving her allegations, and those “documents” are laughable. Even to someone like me who has no legal training or professional experience in these areas. I am amazed that people believe these documents are real or original.

    MY RESPONSE: You are preaching to the choir. LOL! I have been saying this for years. But, nobody would listen.

    YOUR COMMENT: I’ll see if I can edit this as I build my response quoting skills but in the meantime I hope this clarifies my statements a bit.

    Thanks

    xylo

    MY RESPONSE: You are crystal clear already.

    All The Best, Snoop

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    peterpam (21st May 2019), xylo (3rd April 2019)

  18. Link to Post #190
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Other subjects where Deborah’s conclusions match generally respected voices include 5G and the CA fires, maybe including her “plan to burn down N CA” I have not looked into that but obviously it’s happening. Whether she predicted the events or has simply reiterated known information (to keep herself in the limelight) after the fact is debatable, all I’ve seen is the latter. Her reporting of the events is pathetic. If Tavares is simply showing the effects of emotional trauma, I hope she gets help. Maybe she doesn’t intend to scare people to death. Her fans love it. I’m glad Snoop has revealed the forged documents however, and I am of the belief that one can learn what’s needed from other sources without the layers of manic fear and hate that she transmits. If one listens to her for extended periods they can be affected by her vibrational consistency so I personally do not recommend listening to Deborah Tavares.
    Hello Again xylo,

    YOUR COMMENT: Other subjects where Deborah’s conclusions match generally respected voices include 5G and the CA fires, maybe including her “plan to burn down N CA” I have not looked into that but obviously it’s happening.


    MY RESPONSE: While I agree that Deborah Tavares' claims about 5G are consistent with what some scientist and experts claim, Deborah Tavares claims about the California fires are different from what many others claim. While everyone agrees that the fires occurred and that they were terrible and anomalous, Deborah Tavares is the only one who manufactured evidence (FORGERIES) to prove that PG&E intentionally caused those fires by using DEW beams from satellites in space aimed at her personally. Other times, Deborah Tavares claimed that PG&E intentionally caused those fires using "smart meters". Other times, she claims that metallic (aluminum and silver based) compounds used in cloud seeding (to make it rain during droughts so to prevent forest fires) are "accelerants" (like gasoline) to cause forest fires and to make them worse. Other times, she claims that the U.S. government was responsible for the weather (droughts) leading to those fires because one of the FAKE enemies in Leonard C. Lewin's 1968 political satire masterpiece, "The Report From Iron Mountain", was FAKE environmental calamities (as well as alien life forms). Other times, she claims that the UN is responsible for the fires because the UN SUGGESTED Agenda 21 (despite that Agenda 21 NEVER became law in the United States and despite that Agenda 21 was actually designed and intended to prevent the destruction of those very forests). Still other times, Deborah Tavares claims that the Bilderbergs caused those fires because Lyle Hartford Van Dykes 1979 political fiction masterpiece was entitled "Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars" like silent laser beams on satellites if they were used to start those fires. The point is that Deborah Tavares is literally all over the map as to the cause of those fires. Basically she blames every one of her enemies (both real and imagined) for those fires.

    YOUR COMMENT: Whether she predicted the events or has simply reiterated known information (to keep herself in the limelight) after the fact is debatable, all I’ve seen is the latter. Her reporting of the events is pathetic. If Tavares is simply showing the effects of emotional trauma, I hope she gets help. Maybe she doesn’t intend to scare people to death. Her fans love it. I’m glad Snoop has revealed the forged documents however, and I am of the belief that one can learn what’s needed from other sources without the layers of manic fear and hate that she transmits. If one listens to her for extended periods they can be affected by her vibrational consistency so I personally do not recommend listening to Deborah Tavares.

    MY RESPONSE: I couldn't agree more. Well said.

    All The Best,

    Snoop

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    peterpam (24th April 2019), xylo (3rd April 2019)

  20. Link to Post #191
    Avalon Member xylo's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2019
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 284 times in 104 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavare

    Quote Posted by snoop4truth (here)
    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Quote Posted by snoop4truth (here)
    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Ok folks well...

    To close off or continue my portion of this discussion, I presume Deborah Tavares’ youtube channel to be de-monetized. I went to her presentations using a browser where I was not logged in, and I see no ads. I do not know about the past however and I do know this de-monetization of truther channels is a recent trend. However, I do find it stange that (apparently) her channel is never threatened by “community guidelines “ or “copyright” strikes, which is the terminology YouTube uses against channels that speak the truth. Also Tavares has no backup channel which (again) all the channels (which I feel to be targeting the truth) do. Recently one of those primary channels was brought down by YouTube, and now their backup channel is all that’s left.

    I’ve heard Tavares speak to the issue of money several times, and each time her response makes it clear that she has money. She’s mentioned she employs a “research team”. If she’s a paid shill, maybe her money comes from those whom she shills for. My perception has always been that she comes from family money. Raised in Malibu, and according to her she abandoned her “building business” without giving it much thought. She’s said (in essence) that the increasing paperwork and decreasing profit margins that came with residence building caused her to decide she and her husband would simply travel the world instead of building. BTW the only built residences I’ve heard her refer to are multi-family dwellings I.e. stackem packem, the same as she complains about now. I’ve heard her mention she owns this type of residences in Southern California.

    There’s no crime in being wealthy or owning apartment buildings. However, in my view it is a moral crime to fear-monger, and that’s the reason why I speak out against Deborah Tavares. Her mission is to create fear, not awareness. The headlines to her presentations are outrageous and shocking, aka “click-bait.” She assembles sets of shocking b.s. talking points which she bounces between very quickly as conjecture in an overly emotional, fear-inducing tone, and that method appears to work based of comments I see her listeners leaving. It’s normal to see listeners comment that they should just kill themselves or others now.

    I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers. However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    So.....listener beware and question everything. If it doesn’t survive your own critical thinking, there’s probably something wrong.

    Best to us all in these challenging times.

    -xylo
    Hello xylo,

    Great comment.

    YouTube.com has recently changed how it displays its ads on videos.

    I have recently learned that when scrolling quickly from video to video (remaining on each video for only a few seconds to see if an ad comes up) the adds do not comes up. I have also recently learned that when an ad does come up, if I watch the entire ad before clicking off to the next video, ads come up more frequently in the subsequent videos. So, the more video ads I watch, the more they come up. The less video ads I watch, the less they come up.

    I have also recently learned that clicking on the same video (on which I have already previously seen an ad) does not always result in an ad coming up, much less the same video ad that I previously saw. When ads do come up in the same video on which I have previously seen an ad, the ad is often different from the ad I have already seen there before.

    Yesterday when scrolling through YouTube videos, ads came up on the following Deborah Tavares videos below. (Obviously, I did not scroll through them all. There are simply too many.). Today, when clicking on these same videos below, ads only came up on a few of them.

    Go figure. I'm sure YouTube has a reason for what they are doing. I just don't know what it is.

    This does not mean that Deborah Tavares no longer receives advertising money from YouTube for ads posted on her videos. I'm sure she does.

    It just looks like YouTube is targeting the ads differently to different viewers at different times depending on the viewers ad watching habits.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc[/url]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLoNwUs6zNc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9TtukbSe_0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI-3CTeOi0M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6vsj5vr9JY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsnVzaa1ksU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ai3vxywkC4M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm9-...&index=12&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW9U...U&index=2&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb0r...GtJ1Nrm3y&t=0s

    YOUR COMMENTS: I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers.

    MY RESPONSE: Two questions! 1). Who, in particular shares her conclusions? and 2). What documents (or other evidence) do they support their own conclusions with?

    YOUR COMMENTS: However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    MY RESPONSE: Your writing is so insightful, so introspective and so true. All of this is precisely what makes Deborah Tavares so dangerous to society. She masquerades as a messiah trying to save all of mankind while she is actually (and simultaneously) inciting hatred and violence against innocent Americans. This makes her diabolical.

    But, more than any thing else, what bothers me the most about Deborah Tavares is that she is a pathological liar. A fraud. A charlatan. All while pretending to be a savior and messiah figure.

    Simply put, Deborah Tavares sells hate by using lies. That sums up Deborah Tavares in one sentence.

    Thank you for joining us.

    We have all benefitted greatly by your story, your insight and your superb communication skills.

    All The Best,

    Snoop,
    Greetings Snoop,

    Thanks for your response. I’m a novice at response quoting. I just spent 30 minutes attempting to do that then pushed the wrong button or something and lost all of it, so here goes, once again, in a simpler way.

    If Tavares videos still contain YouTube ads, that says to me that her content is nowhere close to being aimed at the truth. I do know the The SGT Report channel has been coompletely de-monetized, because host Sean has spoken about it in his recent postings, and they now embed their ads within the production. SGT generally features educated, known analysts, researchers and whistleblowers who present material in a focused, grounded way. It’s a place to learn. Sean mentiones other channels whom youtube deems not suitable for advertising and I believe him. He did have Tavares on several times in the past and the comments sections reflect the same escalated fear/hate/call to murder, and, tellingly, reduced Sean himself (who is normally soft-spoken and logically methodical) into a host who was fearfully excited. I’ve gotten on his case about that and pointed out the change in his own tone, and haven’t seen Tavares there since. Sean is Christian and while he does not emphasize that angle he does mention that true Christianity does not endorse the foaming at the mouth mob of torch bearing fanatics solution such as Tavares brings out in her listeners.

    My comment “Tavares solutions generally shared by other credible researchers” is sloppy and inaccurate. Better stated is that several researchers whom I deem to be credible on the the subject of agenda 21, and those researchers are Rosa Koire and Elana Freeman. Rosa illstrustates how she became aware of agenda 21 through her work as for the state of California. Her tone is clear, grounded and educational, she’s gone on to write on the subject. I do not have information on hand regarding her documentation. It’s her calm state of authority and reference to events and circumstances within her work as a professional that leaves me feeling I’ve just heard the truth. Similar with Elana Freeland. Notably, neither one of these women try to sell the listener on unique documents which only they have access to, such as Tavares does. Also, it’s obvious at first glance that Tavares’ “documents” are not documents at all, and it’s obvious they are created by 3rd parties just from the language, format, wording and LACK of information when compared to her over the top statements.

    I will say again, some of what Tavares unleashes on the public has no documentation at all, notabley one her her recent rant -themes “ Accounting Firms hired to bankrupt all US Cities” she harps on and in about the accounting firm Ernst and Young and there is absolutely no documentation to back up her claims. I’ve gone through all or most of the documents on her website, which she cites as the foundation for prooving her allegations, and those “documents” are laughable. Even to someone like me who has no legal training or professional experience in these areas. I am amazed that people believe these documents are real or original.

    I’ll see if I can edit this as I build my response quoting skills but in the meantime I hope this clarifies my statements a bit.

    Thanks

    xylo

    Hello xylo,

    Sorry for the delay. I wrote a detailed response to this post days ago. When I was finished and attempted to post it, I apparently pressed the wrong button and my response appeared on some projectavalon.net page where it did not belong, among several boxed quotes. When I pressed the back button to get back to the previous page, my response vanished into cyberspace. So, I'll try again now.

    YOUR COMMENT: If Tavares videos still contain YouTube ads,...

    MY RESPONSE: They do. Last week, ads appeared on the Deborah Tavares videos to which I provided links above. I did not click on all of Deborah Tavares' videos. There are simply too many of them. The ads in the links above came up during my clicking on ads for about one and a half hours. I did not count the total number of videos I clicked on looking for ads.

    But, when I clicked on those same links today, ads did not appear on all of them. YouTube may have developed a program for placing ads based on each particular user's click patterns and viewing habits that varies day to day. I don't know. Regardless, there are still ads on Deborah Tavares' YouTube videos.

    YOUR COMMENT: ...that says to me that her content is nowhere close to being aimed at the truth.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. Telling the truth is not as sensational, horrifying and does not result in as many viewer clicks (or advertising dollars). Note that the titles of many of Deborah Tavares' videos are pure "click bait" ("Extinction", "Extermination", Reduce The Population To "Zero", Satanic Fires, "Kill Cities", Culling of mankind, etc.).

    YOUR COMMENT: I do know The SGT Report channel has been completely de-monetized, because host Sean has spoken about it in his recent postings, and they now embed their ads within the production.

    MY RESPONSE: De-monetized? If The SGT Report is embedding ads within the content of its videos, then The SGT Report is receiving all of the advertising dollars generated by those ads (effectively cutting YouTube out of the deal). That is not de-monetized as I define it. What exactly does Sean say about being demonetized? Does he mean that YouTube is not posting ads on SGT's videos anymore? Other conspiratorial video uploaders?


    YOUR COMMENT: SGT generally features educated, known analysts, researchers and whistleblowers who present material in a focused, grounded way. It’s a place to learn. Sean mentions other channels whom YouTube deems not suitable for advertising and I believe him. He did have Tavares on several times in the past and the comments sections reflect the same escalated fear/hate/call to murder, and, tellingly, reduced Sean himself (who is normally soft-spoken and logically methodical) into a host who was fearfully excited. I’ve gotten on his case about that and pointed out the change in his own tone, and haven’t seen Tavares there since. Sean is Christian and while he does not emphasize that angle he does mention that true Christianity does not endorse the foaming at the mouth mob of torch bearing fanatics solution such as Tavares brings out in her listeners.

    MY RESPONSE: Deborah Tavares' hoaxes are intentionally designed and intended to incite hatred and violence of innocent Americans. They are a call to war against the innocent (Dennis M. Bushnell of NASA, etc.). Mark my words. Sooner or later, she will have Americans killing Americans (assassinations, riots, burning cities, terrorist explosions). And, it will all be the result of a Deborah Tavares hoax. And, those who continue to support, enable and provide cover for her will be complicit in that result.

    YOUR COMMENT: My comment “Tavares solutions generally shared by other credible researchers” is sloppy and inaccurate. Better stated is that several researchers whom I deem to be credible on the subject of agenda 21, and those researchers are Rosa Koire and Elana Freeman. Rosa illstrustates how she became aware of agenda 21 through her work as for the state of California. Her tone is clear, grounded and educational, she’s gone on to write on the subject. I do not have information on hand regarding her documentation. It’s her calm state of authority and reference to events and circumstances within her work as a professional that leaves me feeling I’ve just heard the truth. Similar with Elana Freeland. Notably, neither one of these women try to sell the listener on unique documents which only they have access to, such as Tavares does. Also, it’s obvious at first glance that Tavares’ “documents” are not documents at all, and it’s obvious they are created by 3rd parties just from the language, format, wording and LACK of information when compared to her over the top statements.

    MY RESPONSE: Rosa Koire and Deborah Tavares have something in common that you should know about. They both make much of their money from continued deforestation and continued destruction of the environment, something Agenda 21 would have prevented if it had become law (but it did not). Deborah Tavares makes money real estate "development" (environmental destruction) and Rosa Koire makes money from appraising such "development" properties. If Agenda 21 had become law (and it did not), it would reduced the income of both Deborah Tavares and Rosa Koire. I have not done any research on Alana Freeman's background.

    YOUR COMMENT: I will say again, some of what Tavares unleashes on the public has no documentation at all, notably one her recent rant -themes “ Accounting Firms hired to bankrupt all US Cities” she harps on and in about the accounting firm Ernst and Young and there is absolutely no documentation to back up her claims.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. Many of the conclusions she reaches are without any documentation at all. But, my beef with Deborah Tavares is that many of the documents that she uses in "support" of her claims ACTUALLY CONTRADICT HER CLAIMS (NASA War Document, Agenda 21, Genocide Agreement, Rothschild To Restructure North America, etc.).


    YOUR COMMENT: I’ve gone through all or most of the documents on her website, which she cites as the foundation for proving her allegations, and those “documents” are laughable. Even to someone like me who has no legal training or professional experience in these areas. I am amazed that people believe these documents are real or original.

    MY RESPONSE: You are preaching to the choir. LOL! I have been saying this for years. But, nobody would listen.

    YOUR COMMENT: I’ll see if I can edit this as I build my response quoting skills but in the meantime I hope this clarifies my statements a bit.

    Thanks

    xylo

    MY RESPONSE: You are crystal clear already.

    All The Best, Snoop
    Hello Snoop

    We agree on the Tavares items.

    SGT Report uses YouTube’s term ‘demonetized” which means “not of interest to most advertisers” and my impression is that YouTube makes SGT Report one where YouTube themselves insert no ads. To counter SGT now sells their own ad time, which is part of the production and keeps them in business. My understanding is that the YouTube algorhythms are changing a lot every week

    My impression is that Tavares’ business of land development is long since out of business. I’m looking to completely forget Deborah Tavares and her insane world. Thanks for sharing your research.
    Last edited by xylo; 7th April 2019 at 01:12. Reason: being nice

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to xylo For This Post:

    peterpam (18th April 2019)

  22. Link to Post #192
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavare

    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Quote Posted by snoop4truth (here)
    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Quote Posted by snoop4truth (here)
    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Ok folks well...

    To close off or continue my portion of this discussion, I presume Deborah Tavares’ youtube channel to be de-monetized. I went to her presentations using a browser where I was not logged in, and I see no ads. I do not know about the past however and I do know this de-monetization of truther channels is a recent trend. However, I do find it stange that (apparently) her channel is never threatened by “community guidelines “ or “copyright” strikes, which is the terminology YouTube uses against channels that speak the truth. Also Tavares has no backup channel which (again) all the channels (which I feel to be targeting the truth) do. Recently one of those primary channels was brought down by YouTube, and now their backup channel is all that’s left.

    I’ve heard Tavares speak to the issue of money several times, and each time her response makes it clear that she has money. She’s mentioned she employs a “research team”. If she’s a paid shill, maybe her money comes from those whom she shills for. My perception has always been that she comes from family money. Raised in Malibu, and according to her she abandoned her “building business” without giving it much thought. She’s said (in essence) that the increasing paperwork and decreasing profit margins that came with residence building caused her to decide she and her husband would simply travel the world instead of building. BTW the only built residences I’ve heard her refer to are multi-family dwellings I.e. stackem packem, the same as she complains about now. I’ve heard her mention she owns this type of residences in Southern California.

    There’s no crime in being wealthy or owning apartment buildings. However, in my view it is a moral crime to fear-monger, and that’s the reason why I speak out against Deborah Tavares. Her mission is to create fear, not awareness. The headlines to her presentations are outrageous and shocking, aka “click-bait.” She assembles sets of shocking b.s. talking points which she bounces between very quickly as conjecture in an overly emotional, fear-inducing tone, and that method appears to work based of comments I see her listeners leaving. It’s normal to see listeners comment that they should just kill themselves or others now.

    I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers. However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    So.....listener beware and question everything. If it doesn’t survive your own critical thinking, there’s probably something wrong.

    Best to us all in these challenging times.

    -xylo
    Hello xylo,

    Great comment.

    YouTube.com has recently changed how it displays its ads on videos.

    I have recently learned that when scrolling quickly from video to video (remaining on each video for only a few seconds to see if an ad comes up) the adds do not comes up. I have also recently learned that when an ad does come up, if I watch the entire ad before clicking off to the next video, ads come up more frequently in the subsequent videos. So, the more video ads I watch, the more they come up. The less video ads I watch, the less they come up.

    I have also recently learned that clicking on the same video (on which I have already previously seen an ad) does not always result in an ad coming up, much less the same video ad that I previously saw. When ads do come up in the same video on which I have previously seen an ad, the ad is often different from the ad I have already seen there before.

    Yesterday when scrolling through YouTube videos, ads came up on the following Deborah Tavares videos below. (Obviously, I did not scroll through them all. There are simply too many.). Today, when clicking on these same videos below, ads only came up on a few of them.

    Go figure. I'm sure YouTube has a reason for what they are doing. I just don't know what it is.

    This does not mean that Deborah Tavares no longer receives advertising money from YouTube for ads posted on her videos. I'm sure she does.

    It just looks like YouTube is targeting the ads differently to different viewers at different times depending on the viewers ad watching habits.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc[/url]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLoNwUs6zNc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9TtukbSe_0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI-3CTeOi0M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKf7fTBbcsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6vsj5vr9JY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsnVzaa1ksU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH942Ksrw28

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ai3vxywkC4M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm9-...&index=12&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW9U...U&index=2&t=0s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb0r...GtJ1Nrm3y&t=0s

    YOUR COMMENTS: I agree with Snoop, in general, her conclusions are shared by credible researchers.

    MY RESPONSE: Two questions! 1). Who, in particular shares her conclusions? and 2). What documents (or other evidence) do they support their own conclusions with?

    YOUR COMMENTS: However, her methods are pure Machiavellian. Listeners who become fans do appear to be controlled as a result of her conditioning, and control is one of the goals of nefarious entities at this time in the world. Deborah is really good at what she does, and even I found myself to be under her control, without realizing, for a few weeks even though I simultaneously knew something wasn’t right and while I was influenced and controlled as a result of my own vulnerability, I was also beginning to seriously resent her and her methods, and see her as the narcissistic and cruel person I believe her to be.

    MY RESPONSE: Your writing is so insightful, so introspective and so true. All of this is precisely what makes Deborah Tavares so dangerous to society. She masquerades as a messiah trying to save all of mankind while she is actually (and simultaneously) inciting hatred and violence against innocent Americans. This makes her diabolical.

    But, more than any thing else, what bothers me the most about Deborah Tavares is that she is a pathological liar. A fraud. A charlatan. All while pretending to be a savior and messiah figure.

    Simply put, Deborah Tavares sells hate by using lies. That sums up Deborah Tavares in one sentence.

    Thank you for joining us.

    We have all benefitted greatly by your story, your insight and your superb communication skills.

    All The Best,

    Snoop,
    Greetings Snoop,

    Thanks for your response. I’m a novice at response quoting. I just spent 30 minutes attempting to do that then pushed the wrong button or something and lost all of it, so here goes, once again, in a simpler way.

    If Tavares videos still contain YouTube ads, that says to me that her content is nowhere close to being aimed at the truth. I do know the The SGT Report channel has been coompletely de-monetized, because host Sean has spoken about it in his recent postings, and they now embed their ads within the production. SGT generally features educated, known analysts, researchers and whistleblowers who present material in a focused, grounded way. It’s a place to learn. Sean mentiones other channels whom youtube deems not suitable for advertising and I believe him. He did have Tavares on several times in the past and the comments sections reflect the same escalated fear/hate/call to murder, and, tellingly, reduced Sean himself (who is normally soft-spoken and logically methodical) into a host who was fearfully excited. I’ve gotten on his case about that and pointed out the change in his own tone, and haven’t seen Tavares there since. Sean is Christian and while he does not emphasize that angle he does mention that true Christianity does not endorse the foaming at the mouth mob of torch bearing fanatics solution such as Tavares brings out in her listeners.

    My comment “Tavares solutions generally shared by other credible researchers” is sloppy and inaccurate. Better stated is that several researchers whom I deem to be credible on the the subject of agenda 21, and those researchers are Rosa Koire and Elana Freeman. Rosa illstrustates how she became aware of agenda 21 through her work as for the state of California. Her tone is clear, grounded and educational, she’s gone on to write on the subject. I do not have information on hand regarding her documentation. It’s her calm state of authority and reference to events and circumstances within her work as a professional that leaves me feeling I’ve just heard the truth. Similar with Elana Freeland. Notably, neither one of these women try to sell the listener on unique documents which only they have access to, such as Tavares does. Also, it’s obvious at first glance that Tavares’ “documents” are not documents at all, and it’s obvious they are created by 3rd parties just from the language, format, wording and LACK of information when compared to her over the top statements.

    I will say again, some of what Tavares unleashes on the public has no documentation at all, notabley one her her recent rant -themes “ Accounting Firms hired to bankrupt all US Cities” she harps on and in about the accounting firm Ernst and Young and there is absolutely no documentation to back up her claims. I’ve gone through all or most of the documents on her website, which she cites as the foundation for prooving her allegations, and those “documents” are laughable. Even to someone like me who has no legal training or professional experience in these areas. I am amazed that people believe these documents are real or original.

    I’ll see if I can edit this as I build my response quoting skills but in the meantime I hope this clarifies my statements a bit.

    Thanks

    xylo

    Hello xylo,

    Sorry for the delay. I wrote a detailed response to this post days ago. When I was finished and attempted to post it, I apparently pressed the wrong button and my response appeared on some projectavalon.net page where it did not belong, among several boxed quotes. When I pressed the back button to get back to the previous page, my response vanished into cyberspace. So, I'll try again now.

    YOUR COMMENT: If Tavares videos still contain YouTube ads,...

    MY RESPONSE: They do. Last week, ads appeared on the Deborah Tavares videos to which I provided links above. I did not click on all of Deborah Tavares' videos. There are simply too many of them. The ads in the links above came up during my clicking on ads for about one and a half hours. I did not count the total number of videos I clicked on looking for ads.

    But, when I clicked on those same links today, ads did not appear on all of them. YouTube may have developed a program for placing ads based on each particular user's click patterns and viewing habits that varies day to day. I don't know. Regardless, there are still ads on Deborah Tavares' YouTube videos.

    YOUR COMMENT: ...that says to me that her content is nowhere close to being aimed at the truth.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. Telling the truth is not as sensational, horrifying and does not result in as many viewer clicks (or advertising dollars). Note that the titles of many of Deborah Tavares' videos are pure "click bait" ("Extinction", "Extermination", Reduce The Population To "Zero", Satanic Fires, "Kill Cities", Culling of mankind, etc.).

    YOUR COMMENT: I do know The SGT Report channel has been completely de-monetized, because host Sean has spoken about it in his recent postings, and they now embed their ads within the production.

    MY RESPONSE: De-monetized? If The SGT Report is embedding ads within the content of its videos, then The SGT Report is receiving all of the advertising dollars generated by those ads (effectively cutting YouTube out of the deal). That is not de-monetized as I define it. What exactly does Sean say about being demonetized? Does he mean that YouTube is not posting ads on SGT's videos anymore? Other conspiratorial video uploaders?


    YOUR COMMENT: SGT generally features educated, known analysts, researchers and whistleblowers who present material in a focused, grounded way. It’s a place to learn. Sean mentions other channels whom YouTube deems not suitable for advertising and I believe him. He did have Tavares on several times in the past and the comments sections reflect the same escalated fear/hate/call to murder, and, tellingly, reduced Sean himself (who is normally soft-spoken and logically methodical) into a host who was fearfully excited. I’ve gotten on his case about that and pointed out the change in his own tone, and haven’t seen Tavares there since. Sean is Christian and while he does not emphasize that angle he does mention that true Christianity does not endorse the foaming at the mouth mob of torch bearing fanatics solution such as Tavares brings out in her listeners.

    MY RESPONSE: Deborah Tavares' hoaxes are intentionally designed and intended to incite hatred and violence of innocent Americans. They are a call to war against the innocent (Dennis M. Bushnell of NASA, etc.). Mark my words. Sooner or later, she will have Americans killing Americans (assassinations, riots, burning cities, terrorist explosions). And, it will all be the result of a Deborah Tavares hoax. And, those who continue to support, enable and provide cover for her will be complicit in that result.

    YOUR COMMENT: My comment “Tavares solutions generally shared by other credible researchers” is sloppy and inaccurate. Better stated is that several researchers whom I deem to be credible on the subject of agenda 21, and those researchers are Rosa Koire and Elana Freeman. Rosa illstrustates how she became aware of agenda 21 through her work as for the state of California. Her tone is clear, grounded and educational, she’s gone on to write on the subject. I do not have information on hand regarding her documentation. It’s her calm state of authority and reference to events and circumstances within her work as a professional that leaves me feeling I’ve just heard the truth. Similar with Elana Freeland. Notably, neither one of these women try to sell the listener on unique documents which only they have access to, such as Tavares does. Also, it’s obvious at first glance that Tavares’ “documents” are not documents at all, and it’s obvious they are created by 3rd parties just from the language, format, wording and LACK of information when compared to her over the top statements.

    MY RESPONSE: Rosa Koire and Deborah Tavares have something in common that you should know about. They both make much of their money from continued deforestation and continued destruction of the environment, something Agenda 21 would have prevented if it had become law (but it did not). Deborah Tavares makes money real estate "development" (environmental destruction) and Rosa Koire makes money from appraising such "development" properties. If Agenda 21 had become law (and it did not), it would reduced the income of both Deborah Tavares and Rosa Koire. I have not done any research on Alana Freeman's background.

    YOUR COMMENT: I will say again, some of what Tavares unleashes on the public has no documentation at all, notably one her recent rant -themes “ Accounting Firms hired to bankrupt all US Cities” she harps on and in about the accounting firm Ernst and Young and there is absolutely no documentation to back up her claims.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. Many of the conclusions she reaches are without any documentation at all. But, my beef with Deborah Tavares is that many of the documents that she uses in "support" of her claims ACTUALLY CONTRADICT HER CLAIMS (NASA War Document, Agenda 21, Genocide Agreement, Rothschild To Restructure North America, etc.).


    YOUR COMMENT: I’ve gone through all or most of the documents on her website, which she cites as the foundation for proving her allegations, and those “documents” are laughable. Even to someone like me who has no legal training or professional experience in these areas. I am amazed that people believe these documents are real or original.

    MY RESPONSE: You are preaching to the choir. LOL! I have been saying this for years. But, nobody would listen.

    YOUR COMMENT: I’ll see if I can edit this as I build my response quoting skills but in the meantime I hope this clarifies my statements a bit.

    Thanks

    xylo

    MY RESPONSE: You are crystal clear already.

    All The Best, Snoop
    Hello Snoop

    We agree on the Tavares items.

    SGT Report uses YouTube’s term ‘demonetized” which means “not of interest to most advertisers” and my impression is that YouTube makes SGT Report one where YouTube themselves insert no ads. To counter SGT now sells their own ad time, which is part of the production and keeps them in business. My understanding is that the YouTube algorhythms are changing a lot every week

    My impression is that Tavares’ business of land development is long since out of business. I’m looking to completely forget Deborah Tavares and her insane world. Thanks for sharing your research.
    Hello xylo,

    I realize that this is going to sound like a fib, but I already read and responded to this comment of yours days ago. But, when I pressed the "Post Quick Reply" button (or whatever it was that I pressed), my response was not on the screen below your comment (above) and I could not find it anywhere. So, it appears that I nuked my response to you again. I was so frustrated and disgusted with the whole thing that I am just getting back around to it now.

    YOUR COMMENT: Hello Snoop. We agree on the Tavares items.

    MY RESPONSE: Yes. We certainly do.

    YOUR COMMENT: SGT Report uses YouTube’s term "demonetized” which means “not of interest to most advertisers” and my impression is that YouTube makes SGT Report one where YouTube themselves insert no ads. To counter, SGT Report now sells their own ad time, which is part of the production and keeps them in business. My understanding is that the YouTube algorhythms are changing a lot every week

    MY RESPONSE: Makes sense. YouTube may be doing this, in part, in response to the massacre in New Zealand. That is, YouTube may consider SGT Report a kind of "Hate Speech" that might lead to more violence. Who knows?

    What is Sean's full name? Is he a genuinely honest person? What would he think if he found out that Deborah Tavares is a serial hoaxer? Would he even care?

    YOUR COMMENT: My impression is that Tavares’ business of land development is long since out of business.

    MY RESPONSE: Perhaps. But, my source tells me that she may own and collect rent from apartment complexes. Deborah Tavares talks about her frustration with the residential building business here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 2:00-6:00, 11:15-16:00). Pay special attention to 15:20-16:00 in this video. I thought I was going to throw up listening to this load of B.S. ).

    YOUR COMMENT: I’m looking to completely forget Deborah Tavares and her insane world.

    MY RESPONSE: I am unable to forget her and her world of lies. I hope to reach out to other Deborah Tavares victims and share the truth with them so that they can forget about Deborah Tavares and her world of lies.

    YOUR COMMENT: Thanks for sharing your research.

    MY RESPONSE: Thank you for your kind words. It's people like you make all my work worth while.

    And, just to prove to you that I really did already read and respond to this comment of yours (above) last week (before you revised it), I want you to know that he "Zsa Zsa Gabor" reference WAS PRICELESS! I was howling out loud when I read your comment. Your perception is amazing.

    Also, just to prove to you that I really did already read and respond to this comment of yours (above) last week, I also saw the Sasha Stone 5G video to which you referred in the first version of your comment above.

    I agree that, on the whole, it was a very good video because it featured the findings of scientists and medical doctors. Although Deborah Tavares' voice-over words are briefly featured in the into to the video (Sasha Stone did not know she is a serial hoaxer), Deborah Tavares is not the source of a single fact depicted in the movie. Thank God. That means the video is likely to have some credibility. Otherwise it would not.

    Thank you again for your insight and for your contribution to this forum.

    You are a breath of fresh air.

    All The Best,

    Snoop
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 8th April 2019 at 22:55.

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    peterpam (18th April 2019), xylo (13th April 2019)

  24. Link to Post #193
    Avalon Member xylo's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2019
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 284 times in 104 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavare

    Thank you Snoop. I understand losing a response that’s been crafted over time with care. Same happened to me. Thanks for your compliments, I edited that response because I realized I was having too much fun roasting Tavares but I’m glad it brought you some levity.

    I agree, Tavares says she and her poor beaten down husband have some apartment buildings. From other stories she’s told (living for a year on the family yacht in Holland as a youth, growing up in Malibu) I think she has family money. No crime in that and it does explain her elitist tone and sense of entitlement.

    Sean from SGT: I think his intentions are good and he’s a bit naďve. He let go with some mild anti-semetic stuff a while back. Once. I jumped on him about that, and he began having guests who are Jewish truthers (there’s only a few of us) so I think he’s reflected and corrected. He had Tavares on twice. Each time he lost his usually balanced tone and started frothing, and the comments sections were predictably filled with calls to make and murder. I pointed this out in an email to him and questioned the wisdom of giving her any airtime. She hasn’t been on since. As a side note, I believe Tavares to be an anti-Semite as a result of pounding in to her listener’s heads that all if the evil in the world starts and stops with the Rothschilds. Listeners comment all kinds of “kill the Jews” stuff and she never steps in to use her influence as a corrective measure. All of which is to say that I agree with whomever called her demented within this thread.

    Keep up the good work Snoop and I thank you. Until I found this thread I thought I was losing my mind because I seemed to be the only one who noticed and objected to all the vanity-activist nonsense that Deborah Tavares is. Since you still have energy for shining a light on her, I would be very interested to hear your take on her recent presentations. The titles are click-bait and sometimes she doesn’t even include that bait in her tirade. One in particular that I’m interested in is entitled something to the effect if “Accounting Firms Bankrupting U.S. cities”. She goes on and on about how she discovered that London based accounting firm Ernst and Young has been contracted by the US government to bankrupt Santa Rosa and other cities in the USA. She cites her sources as an article she read the her local paper and study of the firm’s website. I immediately began to ask for links to the article and sections of the website which verify her allegation. I’ve asked more than 5 times, in comments and thru the “digigod” contact form on her website. Of course I’ve never received a response, however this theory remains one of the things she mentions as she bounces between lies and fantasy in her regular spiel. There are many similar insane allegations in her talks but for some reason this one really sticks with me. It seems to me that her method has gone past using even self created documents as a foundation for her presentations now. So again, I’d be very interested in your take on this new phase, if she even warrants the time. No credible truthers invite her onto programs or symposiums anymore. The only radio show who will have her is Dr. Bill Deagle, who’s show is decidedly low or no profile, so maybe her era is fading. She only repeats herself at this point. Her titles are hilarious. “Earthquakes purposefully caused by reservoirs and dams” (I always knew those damn dams couldn’t be trusted), “The Plan to NUKE California!!” (Wherin she claims to have discovered that the poorly planned placement of the El Diablo nuclear (which she pronounces nuqueler” reactor is actually an age old plan to nuke the state., etc. Ok, I gotta stop I’m having too much fun and I don’t want to be cruel. I just want her shown to be the hoaxter that she is, and you’ve done that quite well. Thanks again Snoop!
    All the best
    xylo

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to xylo For This Post:

    peterpam (18th April 2019)

  26. Link to Post #194
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavare

    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Thank you Snoop. I understand losing a response that’s been crafted over time with care. Same happened to me. Thanks for your compliments, I edited that response because I realized I was having too much fun roasting Tavares but I’m glad it brought you some levity.

    I agree, Tavares says she and her poor beaten down husband have some apartment buildings. From other stories she’s told (living for a year on the family yacht in Holland as a youth, growing up in Malibu) I think she has family money. No crime in that and it does explain her elitist tone and sense of entitlement.

    Sean from SGT: I think his intentions are good and he’s a bit naďve. He let go with some mild anti-semetic stuff a while back. Once. I jumped on him about that, and he began having guests who are Jewish truthers (there’s only a few of us) so I think he’s reflected and corrected. He had Tavares on twice. Each time he lost his usually balanced tone and started frothing, and the comments sections were predictably filled with calls to make and murder. I pointed this out in an email to him and questioned the wisdom of giving her any airtime. She hasn’t been on since. As a side note, I believe Tavares to be an anti-Semite as a result of pounding in to her listener’s heads that all if the evil in the world starts and stops with the Rothschilds. Listeners comment all kinds of “kill the Jews” stuff and she never steps in to use her influence as a corrective measure. All of which is to say that I agree with whomever called her demented within this thread.

    Keep up the good work Snoop and I thank you. Until I found this thread I thought I was losing my mind because I seemed to be the only one who noticed and objected to all the vanity-activist nonsense that Deborah Tavares is. Since you still have energy for shining a light on her, I would be very interested to hear your take on her recent presentations. The titles are click-bait and sometimes she doesn’t even include that bait in her tirade. One in particular that I’m interested in is entitled something to the effect if “Accounting Firms Bankrupting U.S. cities”. She goes on and on about how she discovered that London based accounting firm Ernst and Young has been contracted by the US government to bankrupt Santa Rosa and other cities in the USA. She cites her sources as an article she read the her local paper and study of the firm’s website. I immediately began to ask for links to the article and sections of the website which verify her allegation. I’ve asked more than 5 times, in comments and thru the “digigod” contact form on her website. Of course I’ve never received a response, however this theory remains one of the things she mentions as she bounces between lies and fantasy in her regular spiel. There are many similar insane allegations in her talks but for some reason this one really sticks with me. It seems to me that her method has gone past using even self created documents as a foundation for her presentations now. So again, I’d be very interested in your take on this new phase, if she even warrants the time. No credible truthers invite her onto programs or symposiums anymore. The only radio show who will have her is Dr. Bill Deagle, who’s show is decidedly low or no profile, so maybe her era is fading. She only repeats herself at this point. Her titles are hilarious. “Earthquakes purposefully caused by reservoirs and dams” (I always knew those damn dams couldn’t be trusted), “The Plan to NUKE California!!” (Wherin she claims to have discovered that the poorly planned placement of the El Diablo nuclear (which she pronounces nuqueler” reactor is actually an age old plan to nuke the state., etc. Ok, I gotta stop I’m having too much fun and I don’t want to be cruel. I just want her shown to be the hoaxter that she is, and you’ve done that quite well. Thanks again Snoop!
    All the best
    xylo
    Hello xylo,

    You aren’t going to believe it, but it happened again. I could not post my response to your comment after spending hours on it. So, I contacted Bill Ryan.
    Bill said that projectavalon.net has a “time out” (deadline) feature built into its program. So, if you exceed the amount of time allowed writing your comment, you will be unable to post it. He recommended always clicking on the “remember me” button when writing comment. He said this overrides the “time out” feature. He also recommending writing the comment off-line and simply posting the completed comment on projectavalon.net. So, there you have it.

    YOUR COMMENT: Thank you Snoop. I understand losing a response that’s been crafted over time with care. Same happened to me. Thanks for your compliments, I edited that response because I realized I was having too much fun roasting Tavares but I’m glad it brought you some levity.

    MY RESPONSE: Oh, it did.

    YOUR COMMENT: I agree, Tavares says she and her poor beaten down husband have some apartment buildings. From other stories she’s told (living for a year on the family yacht in Holland as a youth, growing up in Malibu) I think she has family money. No crime in that and it does explain her elitist tone and sense of entitlement.

    MY RESPONSE: If Google.maps.com is any indicator, her home in Sebastopol is beautiful. It is situated in a tiny, lush, green, mini-forest and is surrounded on all sides by miles of beautiful cultivated farm land. Sebastopol itself is just south the great forests of northern California.

    YOUR COMMENT: Sean from SGT: I think his intentions are good and he’s a bit naďve. He let go with some mild anti-Semitic stuff a while back. Once. I jumped on him about that, and he began having guests who are Jewish truthers (there’s only a few of us) so I think he’s reflected and corrected.

    MY RESPONSE: Dr. Leonard Horowitz and his partner, Sherri Kane are also among the few Jewish truthers out there. http://drlenhorowitz.com/.

    YOUR COMMENT: He had Tavares on twice. Each time he lost his usually balanced tone and started frothing, and the comments sections were predictably filled with calls to make and murder.

    MY RESPONSE: This is precisely why Deborah Tavares is such a threat to humanity (not its messiah or savior figure). She incites fear and hatred using her elaborate HOAXES. Her videos and radio appearances amount to a call to murder and war. She will have innocent Americans killing innocent Americans. And, it will all be the result of a Deborah Tavares hoax. She is diabolical.

    YOUR COMMENT. I pointed this out in an email to him and questioned the wisdom of giving her any airtime. She hasn’t been on since. As a side note, I believe Tavares to be an anti-Semite as a result of pounding in to her listener’s heads that all if the evil in the world starts and stops with the Rothschilds. Listeners comment all kinds of “kill the Jews” stuff and she never steps in to use her influence as a corrective measure. All of which is to say that I agree with whomever called her demented within this thread.

    MY RESPONSE: Then, you know what it feels like to be in her cross-hairs. As a lawyer, I have been in her (and her group’s) cross-hairs too. The following is a call for murder and war issued by her group against lawyers like me. The BLUE words below are my words.

    (BEGIN QUOTE)

    MOST LAWYERS are OUR ENEMY:

    The small handful that are good must get on the right side and help us win OUR WAR , or they are not on our side. THERE CAN BE NO MORE STTING ON THE FENCE, PEOPLE MUST DECIDE WHICH SIDE THEY ARE ON AND FIGHT.

    Lawyers that claim to be on our side and are later found out to be traitors, MUST BE PUT TO DEATH as this is just what they have planned for all Americans, who do not abide by their rules and regulations. Americans cannot win THE WAR if they allow traitors to infiltrate our ranks and get away with it. THE ENEMY Americans ARE FIGHTING is a DEADLY ENEMY, who care nothing for anyone out of their own ranks, and if you turn your back on them, you could be their next victim.

    […]
    WALK SOFTLY AMERICANS AND CARRY A BIG STICK

    MOST IMPORTANTLY DON'T BE AFRAID TO USE IT. We are under vicious assault and we must make use of every resource we have, or give into their slavery.

    COPY AND SPREAD WIDELY, SEND COPIES TO THE CRIMINAL LAWYERS AND LAWYER-JUDGES.

    Luke 11: 52 “Woe unto you lawyers”

    [...]

    […]

    The first part of this Article is written by
    CW
    [means, "Carl Weston", Rodney Dale Class’ partner]
    Private Attorney General

    privateattorneygeneral.spruz.com an associate of herein author, EACH AUTHOR IS ALSO AN ASSOCIATE OF RODNEY DALE CLASS [who is Deborah Tavares’ partner in legal hoaxes], all of whom are researchers gathering the necessary evidence to make the claims as stated herein, but by no means limited to... .

    (END QUOTE)

    YOUR COMMENT: Keep up the good work Snoop and I thank you. Until I found this thread I thought I was losing my mind because I seemed to be the only one who noticed and objected to all the vanity-activist nonsense that Deborah Tavares is.

    MY RESPONSE: I do not oppose her because she is vain and a narcissist. I oppose her because SHE IS A BOLD-FACED LIAR who is going to get innocent people killed!

    YOUR COMMENT: Since you still have energy for shining a light on her, I would be very interested to hear your take on her recent presentations. The titles are click-bait and sometimes she doesn’t even include that bait in her tirade. One in particular that I’m interested in is entitled something to the effect if “Accounting Firms Bankrupting U.S. cities”. She goes on and on about how she discovered that London based accounting firm Ernst and Young has been contracted by the US government to bankrupt Santa Rosa and other cities in the USA. She cites her sources as an article she read the her local paper and study of the firm’s website. I immediately began to ask for links to the article and sections of the website which verify her allegation. I’ve asked more than 5 times, in comments and thru the “digigod” contact form on her website. Of course I’ve never received a response, however this theory remains one of the things she mentions as she bounces between lies and fantasy in her regular spiel. There are many similar insane allegations in her talks but for some reason this one really sticks with me. It seems to me that her method has gone past using even self-created documents as a foundation for her presentations now. So again, I’d be very interested in your take on this new phase, if she even warrants the time.

    MY RESPONSE: OK. While I am not ready to write a full expose’ on this particular hoax, I am already familiar with it. This is I have learned so far.

    THE "ERNST & YOUNG'S ACCOUNTING WILL BANKRUPT OUR CITIES HOAX"

    BACKGROUND:

    ERNST & YOUNG: Ernst & Young is firm that offers a number of professional services to governments and businesses, including accounting, legal, risk assessment and insurance-related services. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_%26_Young. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/who-we-are.

    THE LAW: When cities suffer damage by fires, the federal government (FEMA) and state governments REIMBURSE cities for the fire damage they have incurred. But, SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE and EXPERTISE is needed to prepare the federal REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS and to otherwise navigate through the federal REIMBURSEMENT PROCESS which is extremely complicated. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...l#seqnum206.15. https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE...eprd564251.pdf. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-d...160705_508.pdf. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-d...ent_Policy.pdf. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/5121.

    THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLE: The subject article appeared on the first page of “The Press Democrat”, a Santa Rosa local newspaper on Wednesday, December 26th, 2018. LINK TO ORIGINAL COMING SOON!

    SUMMARY OF ARTICLE:
    1. In December, 2017, the City of Santa Rosa hired Ernst & Young to determine the amount of damage caused by the recent wildfires and to represent the city in obtaining REIMBURSEMENT of that entire amount from FEMA and from its California state equivalent. (So ultimately, the City Of Santa Rosa will not suffer any of the costs of the recent fires.).

    2. Ernst & Young will also appeal four earlier FEMA denials of REIMBURSEMENT for smaller individual claims of the city.

    3. Under the law, FEMA (not Santa Rosa) will pay almost all of Ernst & Young’s professional fees. So, Ernst & Young’s services to the city were effectively FREE of charge.

    FACT: In order for Ernst & Young to do its job, it had to place a “value” on all damaged or destroyed publicly-owned property (infrastructure, roads, bridges, buildings, utilities, public lands). Nothing in the article suggests that Ernst & Young had or will place a “value” on the air, water or on every tree in the forests.

    But, Deborah Tavares falsely claims that Ernst & Young is acting on behalf of the global elite to “place a value on the air that we breathe” (something not in the article), “place a value on our fresh water resources” (something not in the article), “place a value on every tree in our forests” (something not in the article) and on all other natural resources (something not in the article), etc.

    Deborah Tavares claims that this process of Ernst & Young placing a ”value” on the air, the water and on all other natural resources is currently going on across the globe including Greece and elsewhere.

    Deborah Tavares falsely claims that the “value” that Ernst & Young places on all of these natural resources is actually a “price” that all of mankind will have to pay to the global elite in exchange for these natural resources.

    Deborah Tavares falsely claims that local governments will act as “collection agents” for the global elite in this regard and levy taxes on all of mankind to collect the amount due the global elite in exchange for all of these natural resources.

    So, Deborah Tavares falsely claims that the amount due the global elite in exchange for these natural resources will “bankrupt” our cities. (Remember, the article says that Ernst & Young’s fees will be paid by FEMA, not by the City of Santa Rosa. So, the fees that Ernst & Young earns cannot possibly be the cause of the cities going “bankrupt”.).

    This is how Deborah Tavares reaches the conclusion that Ernst & Young’s diabolical “accounting” will cause our cities to become “bankrupt” (by which she apparently means that the “value” that Ernst & Young places on the natural resources which have been damaged or destroyed by fires is actually a “price” that the cities must pay the global elite in exchange for those natural resources and that the amount of this debt will be so great that it will actually “bankrupt” our cities).

    Hence, Deborah Tavares’ delusional claim, “Ernst & Young’s ‘accounting’ [its evaluation] will ‘bankrupt our cities’.”

    YOUR COMMENT: No credible truthers invite her onto programs or symposiums anymore. The only radio show who will have her is Dr. Bill Deagle, who’s show is decidedly low or no profile, so maybe her era is fading.

    MY RESPONSE: She is also on “The Power Hour” radio network now and Project Camelot frequently interviews her on its own radio broadcasts and otherwise peddles and pimps her hoaxes. Regardless, I hope that her star is fading too. She has done enough damage to the American already.

    YOUR COMMENTS: She only repeats herself at this point. Her titles are hilarious. “Earthquakes purposefully caused by reservoirs and dams” (I always knew those damn dams couldn’t be trusted), “The Plan to NUKE California!!” (Wherein she claims to have discovered that the poorly planned placement of the El Diablo nuclear (which she pronounces nuqueler” reactor is actually an age old plan to nuke the state., etc.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. Her titles are nothing but click bait. “Extermination!!!”, “Extinct!!”, “Extinction Plan For Mankind Deployed!!!”, “Genocide Agreement!!!”, “Reduce The Population To Zero!!!”, “Kill Cities!!!”, “End Of Mankind!!!”, “Depopulation!!!”, etc.

    YOUR COMMENT: Ok, I gotta stop I’m having too much fun and I don’t want to be cruel. I just want her shown to be the hoaxter that she is, and you’ve done that quite well. Thanks again Snoop! All the best, xylo.

    MY RESPONSE: If you really want Deborah Tavares outed as the serial hoaxer that she really is, then post several links to this thread in the comments of her most viewed YouTube videos wherein she make these fraudulent claims.

    And, thank you for your kind words. It is people like you, peterpam, gemma13 and others that make all my time and effort worthwhile.

    All My Very Best,

    Snoop
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 5th June 2019 at 21:57.

  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    peterpam (18th April 2019), xylo (22nd April 2019)

  28. Link to Post #195
    Avalon Member xylo's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2019
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 284 times in 104 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavare

    Greetings Snoop,

    I have posted links to this thread in in more Tavares comments than I can remember at this point. I be only see her subscribership continue to increase and also come to see her loyal fans do not think critically when It comes to her. They take it in like gospel. If she says it, it’s true for them.

    Another channel, Grindall61, has just been fully demonitized be youtube. The content on this channel is certainly less controversial than that in Tavares’ StopTheCrime. You can here the owner explain more, here: https://youtu.be/ajXJqvcHZU8

    No posting from Tavares in the past few weeks, just some reposts of other people’s work, most of it fairly begin. However now that YouTube is eliminating add revenue to channels like SGT Report and Grindall61, I think we can learn something vital about Deborah Tavares. If they do not demonetize her, I say that indicates she’s wither an official shill, or she’s so far away from the truth that they regard her content as fantasy. She and Grindall61 used to be supportive of each other and they address many issues in common. Sometime in the past year or 2 Grindall61 broke ties with Tavares and for a while was public in his denouncement of her.

    I cannot tell who is monetized and not without going through a signing out process which I don’t want to do right now while I am traveling, but I would recommend that you check again to see if Tavares videos contain ads. If they still do, I think that adds to evidence that she is a hoax. If they demonetize her, I would expect a new presentation from her on the subject.

    Yours,

    xylo
    Last edited by xylo; 22nd April 2019 at 01:54.

  29. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to xylo For This Post:

    Gemma13 (24th April 2019), peterpam (21st May 2019), snoop4truth (23rd April 2019)

  30. Link to Post #196
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavare

    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Greetings Snoop,

    I have posted links to this thread in in more Tavares comments than I can remember at this point. I be only see her subscribership continue to increase and also come to see her loyal fans do not think critically when It comes to her. They take it in like gospel. If she says it, it’s true for them.

    Another channel, Grindall61, has just been fully demonitized be youtube. The content on this channel is certainly less controversial than that in Tavares’ StopTheCrime. You can here the owner explain more, here: https://youtu.be/ajXJqvcHZU8

    No posting from Tavares in the past few weeks, just some reposts of other people’s work, most of it fairly begin. However now that YouTube is eliminating add revenue to channels like SGT Report and Grindall61, I think we can learn something vital about Deborah Tavares. If they do not demonetize her, I say that indicates she’s wither an official shill, or she’s so far away from the truth that they regard her content as fantasy. She and Grindall61 used to be supportive of each other and they address many issues in common. Sometime in the past year or 2 Grindall61 broke ties with Tavares and for a while was public in his denouncement of her.

    I cannot tell who is monetized and not without going through a signing out process which I don’t want to do right now while I am traveling, but I would recommend that you check again to see if Tavares videos contain ads. If they still do, I think that adds to evidence that she is a hoax. If they demonetize her, I would expect a new presentation from her on the subject.

    Yours,

    xylo
    Hello xylo,

    It’s great to hear from you again.

    YOUR COMMENT: Greetings Snoop.

    MY RESPONSE: And, greetings to you, my friend.

    YOUR COMMENT: I have posted links to this thread in in more Tavares comments than I can remember at this point.

    MY RESPONSE: Excellent! The more the better. Truth deserves equal editorial space to lies.

    YOU COMMENT: But, I only see her subscribership continue to increase

    MY RESPONSE: Yep. In conspiracy theory, sensationalism sells. Honesty does not.

    YOUR COMMENT: I have also come to see her loyal fans do not think critically when it comes to her.

    MY RESPONSE: Yep. They completely turn their critical thinking skills off and develop a form of “Battered Wife Syndrome” or “Stockholm Syndrome”. They have become so accustomed to being abused that they actually welcome more abuse and consider the abuse a form of love from their misunderstood abuser. When a third party intervenes and tries to protect them from further abuse, they will take the side of their own abuser, vigorously defend their abuser’s “right” to continue their own abuse and viciously attack the third party who intervened to protect them. It is sick. It is perverse. It is mental.

    YOUR COMMENT: They take it in like gospel. If she says it, it’s true for them.

    MY RESPONSE: Oh, it’s much worse than that. The followers of Deborah Tavares do not care whether she is telling the truth or not. The truth is not the point. Fear and hatred is the point. And, her sensational claims incite both.

    One Deborah Tavares follower on this very thread correctly recognized that she is a liar and STILL defended her and attacked me for telling the truth about her (“Stockholm Syndrome”). It is very much like a mass "co-dependency" relationship. It is so twisted and demented. I can't warp my head around it. It makes no sense.

    YOUR COMMENT: Another channel, Grindall61, has just been fully demonetized by youtube. The content on this channel is certainly less controversial than that in Tavares’ StopTheCrime. You can hear the owner explain more, here: https://youtu.be/ajXJqvcHZU8

    MY RESPONSE: I’ll check it out.

    YOUR COMMENT: No posting from Tavares in the past few weeks, just some reposts of other people’s work, most of it fairly benign.

    MY RESPONSE: I have noticed that. Perhaps she realizes that the truth about her is already out of the bag and she is planning her next move (hopefully "retirement" from the hoax industry).

    OUR COMMENT: now that YouTube is eliminating add revenue to channels like SGT Report and Grindall61, I think we can learn something vital about Deborah Tavares. If they do not demonetize her, I say that indicates she’s wither an official shill, or she’s so far away from the truth that they regard her content as fantasy.

    MY RESPONSE: I do not believe Deborah Tavares is a plant or shill. But, the PTB could not have come up with a better agent provocateur than Deborah Tavares to destroy the credibility of the truth movement from within.

    YOUR COMMENT: She and Grindall61 used to be supportive of each other and they address many issues in common. Sometime in the past year or 2 Grindall61 broke ties with Tavares and for a while was public in his denouncement of her.

    MY RESPONSE: What did Grindall61 say was his reason for his parting company with Deborah Tavares? Was it her hoaxes? Dishonesty? Fraud? Other?

    Dr. Leonard Horowitz and Sherri Kane were also once colleagues of Deborah Tavares, but they had a nasty falling out with her too. Horowitz and Kane actually sued Deborah Tavares for allegedly defaming them and damaging their careers. But, they wrote the lawsuit themselves and it was dismissed because of technical, legal errors and omissions. They should have hired a lawyer.

    YOUR COMMENT: I cannot tell who is monetized and not without going through a signing out process which I don’t want to do right now while I am traveling, but I would recommend that you check again to see if Tavares videos contain ads.

    MY RESPONSE: They did up until a couple of days ago. But, I will check again.

    YOUR COMMENT: If they still do, I think that adds to evidence that she is a hoax.

    MY RESPONSE: That is possible. But, YouTube may also be leaving her alone because collectively her videos (posted under several different names) generate millions and millions of hits. That is, YouTube may a financial interest in leaving her “click bait” alone for now.

    YOUR RESPONSE: If they demonetize her, I would expect a new presentation from her on the subject.

    MY RESPONSE: No doubt. She will portray herself as a holy “martyr” who was demonetized because she was “exposing” the “truth” about the PTB, when in reality she is a calculating and manipulative charlatan who creates elaborate hoaxes to fraudulently incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

    YOUR COMMENT: Yours, xylo

    MY RESPONSE: On a different subject, I have continued my investigation into Deborah Tavares' claims to the effect that Ernst & Young's "accounting" will "bankrupt our cities".

    Based on my new research, it appears that Deborah Tavares is trying (inarticulately) to say that "THE ACCOUNTING FEES" that Ernst & Young charges cities for their accounting will bankrupt our cities.

    Thus, Deborah Tavares either failed to realize that her source article specifically states that the fees the city pays Ernst & Young ARE REIMBURSED by FEMA and its California state equivalent or she is intentionally concealing that truth from her followers so as to make Ernst & Young look sinister and diabolical. Either way, Ernst & Young will not bankrupt anything. Deborah Tavares is a liar.

    I hope this helps.

    Keep up the good work in posting links to this thread in the comments under Deborah Tavares' videos on YouTube.

    Thanks and all the best,

    Snoop
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 24th April 2019 at 18:34.

  31. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    Gemma13 (24th April 2019), peterpam (24th April 2019), xylo (20th May 2019)

  32. Link to Post #197
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavare

    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Thank you Snoop. I understand losing a response that’s been crafted over time with care. Same happened to me. Thanks for your compliments, I edited that response because I realized I was having too much fun roasting Tavares but I’m glad it brought you some levity.

    I agree, Tavares says she and her poor beaten down husband have some apartment buildings. From other stories she’s told (living for a year on the family yacht in Holland as a youth, growing up in Malibu) I think she has family money. No crime in that and it does explain her elitist tone and sense of entitlement.

    Sean from SGT: I think his intentions are good and he’s a bit naďve. He let go with some mild anti-semetic stuff a while back. Once. I jumped on him about that, and he began having guests who are Jewish truthers (there’s only a few of us) so I think he’s reflected and corrected. He had Tavares on twice. Each time he lost his usually balanced tone and started frothing, and the comments sections were predictably filled with calls to make and murder. I pointed this out in an email to him and questioned the wisdom of giving her any airtime. She hasn’t been on since. As a side note, I believe Tavares to be an anti-Semite as a result of pounding in to her listener’s heads that all if the evil in the world starts and stops with the Rothschilds. Listeners comment all kinds of “kill the Jews” stuff and she never steps in to use her influence as a corrective measure. All of which is to say that I agree with whomever called her demented within this thread.

    Keep up the good work Snoop and I thank you. Until I found this thread I thought I was losing my mind because I seemed to be the only one who noticed and objected to all the vanity-activist nonsense that Deborah Tavares is. Since you still have energy for shining a light on her, I would be very interested to hear your take on her recent presentations. The titles are click-bait and sometimes she doesn’t even include that bait in her tirade. One in particular that I’m interested in is entitled something to the effect if “Accounting Firms Bankrupting U.S. cities”. She goes on and on about how she discovered that London based accounting firm Ernst and Young has been contracted by the US government to bankrupt Santa Rosa and other cities in the USA. She cites her sources as an article she read the her local paper and study of the firm’s website. I immediately began to ask for links to the article and sections of the website which verify her allegation. I’ve asked more than 5 times, in comments and thru the “digigod” contact form on her website. Of course I’ve never received a response, however this theory remains one of the things she mentions as she bounces between lies and fantasy in her regular spiel. There are many similar insane allegations in her talks but for some reason this one really sticks with me. It seems to me that her method has gone past using even self created documents as a foundation for her presentations now. So again, I’d be very interested in your take on this new phase, if she even warrants the time. No credible truthers invite her onto programs or symposiums anymore. The only radio show who will have her is Dr. Bill Deagle, who’s show is decidedly low or no profile, so maybe her era is fading. She only repeats herself at this point. Her titles are hilarious. “Earthquakes purposefully caused by reservoirs and dams” (I always knew those damn dams couldn’t be trusted), “The Plan to NUKE California!!” (Wherin she claims to have discovered that the poorly planned placement of the El Diablo nuclear (which she pronounces nuqueler” reactor is actually an age old plan to nuke the state., etc. Ok, I gotta stop I’m having too much fun and I don’t want to be cruel. I just want her shown to be the hoaxter that she is, and you’ve done that quite well. Thanks again Snoop!
    All the best
    xylo
    xylo,


    The Press Democrat
    WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 26, 2018. Santa Rosa, California. PRESSDEMOCRAT.COM
    [From page 1.]

    SR tapping reserves for fire consultant
    By WILL SCHMIDT
    THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

    Santa Rosa will dig further into its budget reserves to pay an additional $813,000 to the disaster recovery consultant it retained after the October 2017 fires.

    The extension approved by the Santa Rosa City Council last week retains London-based consulting firm Ernst & Young through May and brings the total maximum value of the contract to $2.3 million. The cost of the extension was not included in the city’s current budget forecast, which had estimated Santa Rosa would have $6.5 million in reserves.

    The cost of fire damage and the resulting recovery efforts have eaten into the city’s reserve funding and exacerbated the strain of Santa Rosa’s existing budget deficit, though the city’s funding woes were buoyed somewhat by the passage of a quarter-cent sales tax hike approved by voters in November. That tax increase will take effect in April.

    Ernst & Young, which has an office in San Francisco, was hired in December 2017 to help local officials assess damage from the 2017 wildfires, request reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and represent the city in [reimbursement] talks with FEMA and the California Office Of Emergency Services. Ernst & Young also worked with the city and another outside adviser, Hagerty Consulting, to assess the cities unmet disaster needs, a figure estimated at about $400 million.

    Much of Ernst & Young’s efforts have been behind the scenes, but the city recently revealed an online tracker developed in coordination with the consultant (http:/bit.ly/SRFEMA) reflecting the city’s disaster recovery requests [for reimbursement] to FEMA.

    The city has documented 32 projects with a combined estimated damage of about 66.5 million. FEMA has reimbursed about $2.8 in disaster costs so far. Ernst & Young will continue to help the city appeal four requests [for reimbursement] for about $17 million that FEMA initially deemed ineligible for reimbursement.

    City Manager Sean McGlynn told the city council last week that the contract extension would be the last one between Santa Rosa and Ernst & Young for this disaster recovery [reimbursement] contract. He noted that Santa Rosa’s efforts to secure reimbursements will be far from finished once the contract is up.

    “There is going to be a huge amount of time and energy spent by staff in managing this.” McGlynn said.

    The city expects state and federal reimbursement for most of the costs of the Ernst & Young contract according to a staff report . The report also noted that while the city’s budget reserves are depleted, there is sufficient funding to pay out the contract.

    The city council is set to consider budget cuts and hold a public hearing on city spending priorities as part of its January 29th meeting
    __________________________________________________ _________________

    You can reach Staff Writer Will Schmidt at 707-521-5207 or will.schmidt@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @usreports.

    NOBODY IS GOING BANKRUPT!
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 24th April 2019 at 18:39.

  33. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    Gemma13 (24th April 2019), peterpam (24th April 2019), xylo (20th May 2019)

  34. Link to Post #198
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Dear Truthers,

    Yesterday, someone sent me the video below. It was uploaded to YouTube.com by "VirgoTriad". I had never heard of her before. She exposes only legal hoaxes (not extinction hoaxes). But, she quoted me from an ancient, private email that I wrote to the webmaster of a website who once featured all of the "Judge DALE" forgeries. To my surprise, the webmaster actually posted my private email to him/her on his/her website as if it was an article on the subject. In the video below, VirgoTriad read that private email and quoted it in support of her own take on the Judge DALE Hoax.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az9TUYIdqfw

    I was flattered. So, I decided to look her up and found her on GoFundMe.com. Since then, we have become friends and I have sent her a donation or two. (She is building a website to continue her work of exposing legal hoaxes.).

    If you would like to lend her your support, you may do so by clicking on the link below.

    https://www.gofundme.com/help-virgo-...ead-real-facts.

    Thanks.

    All The Best,

    Snoop
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 3rd May 2019 at 20:19.

  35. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    peterpam (21st May 2019), xylo (20th May 2019)

  36. Link to Post #199
    Avalon Member xylo's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2019
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 284 times in 104 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Greetings Snoop and all readers. I’ve been travelling for work the past few months, this absent in late in responding. Snoop, thank you once again. The Ernst and Young information is the first and only snooping for truth on that Tavares hoax. I appreciate your work and insights on this and every other Tavares con. I’ve learned a lot more about the what and why her fanbase as a result of your observations. The whole thing is mind boggling and cultish. I have noticed more people taking exception to her asserions in comments to her presentations. I agree it doesn’t quite a make sense that she would be shilling for anyone, she’s too nuts. However you a right, her activities have done nothing to help anyone and she’s done a lot of harm. The call to put lawyers to death is insane, and dangerous. There are crazies who get triggered by this kind of stuff. She’s thoughtless and self absorbed and a blight on humanity. It’s sick and also fascinating study in psychopathy. I hope this thread and Snoop’s hard work help people to be more discerning in who they allow into their heads. While I do not know of any presenters who are as crazy dangerous as Tavares is, they are out there. Disinformation agents, controlled opposition or simply individuals who are emotionally disturbed. Often these types a great actors and have a magnetic quality that draws others into their thought matrix which is essentially a form of mind control.
    Tske care all and thanks, much gratitude
    xylo

  37. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to xylo For This Post:

    Gemma13 (21st May 2019), peterpam (21st May 2019), snoop4truth (21st May 2019)

  38. Link to Post #200
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    207
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 403 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Quote Posted by xylo (here)
    Greetings Snoop and all readers. I’ve been travelling for work the past few months, this absent in late in responding. Snoop, thank you once again. The Ernst and Young information is the first and only snooping for truth on that Tavares hoax. I appreciate your work and insights on this and every other Tavares con. I’ve learned a lot more about the what and why her fanbase as a result of your observations. The whole thing is mind boggling and cultish. I have noticed more people taking exception to her asserions in comments to her presentations. I agree it doesn’t quite a make sense that she would be shilling for anyone, she’s too nuts. However you a right, her activities have done nothing to help anyone and she’s done a lot of harm. The call to put lawyers to death is insane, and dangerous. There are crazies who get triggered by this kind of stuff. She’s thoughtless and self absorbed and a blight on humanity. It’s sick and also fascinating study in psychopathy. I hope this thread and Snoop’s hard work help people to be more discerning in who they allow into their heads. While I do not know of any presenters who are as crazy dangerous as Tavares is, they are out there. Disinformation agents, controlled opposition or simply individuals who are emotionally disturbed. Often these types a great actors and have a magnetic quality that draws others into their thought matrix which is essentially a form of mind control.
    Tske care all and thanks, much gratitude
    xylo
    Hello xylo,

    Welcome back from your travels.

    I, for one, have missed you.

    YOUR COMMENT: Snoop, thank you once again. The Ernst and Young information is the first and only snooping for truth on that Tavares hoax.

    MY RESPONSE: Thank you for your kind words. I will be ready to do a full expose' on the "Accounting Will Bankrupt Our Cities Hoax" soon. That was an excellent suggestion. Thank you for recommending it. I had no idea it would so easy to debunk.

    What Deborah Tavares did not know when making this false claim about Ernst & Young is that the administrative costs that a city, county or state incurs in its efforts to obtain reimbursement from FEMA are also reimbursed by law (not just the value of the property destroyed in the disaster, as explained in the newspaper article above). https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/44/206.439; https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/44/part-207. That means under the law, the costs of Ernst & Young's accounting are reimbursed by FEMA and ultimately cost the city nothing. But, Deborah Tavares doesn't know enough to even realize this.

    After all, it is FEMA itself which requires the services of third-party accounting firms, like Ernst & Young, in the first place (to provide reliable, audited information to FEMA to make certain that FEMA does not over-reimburse or under-reimburse cities, counties and states after disasters). https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/2/part-2600. That means that not only will Santa Rosa not go bankrupt by hiring Ernst & Young or similar firms. It also means that every city, county or state in the United States who hires firms like Ernst & Young to perform audited, certified accounting of disaster losses will not go bankrupt either. This is because all of those costs are reimbursed by law.

    The services that firms like Ernst & Young perform are so complex and the subject matter is so vast that no ordinary city accountant could possibly be expected perform them. What's more, Ernst & Young certifies (means "swears" to the accuracy of their work under oath, in writing) their results and carries malpractice insurance in the event they make a mistake.

    YOUR COMMENT: I appreciate your work and insights on this and every other Tavares con.

    MY RESPONSE: Thank you so much. Its people like you, Peterpam and Gemma13 that make all my work worth while. You guys are awesome. Just keep posting links to this thread in the comments below her videos on YouTube. Nobody needs the truth as much as her own followers do.

    YOUR COMMENT: I’ve learned a lot more about the what and why her fan base as a result of your observations. The whole thing is mind boggling and cultish.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. Jim Jones (religious cult leader who poisoned the Kool-Aid and killed his entire flock) and Deborah Tavares have much in common. Both are charismatic. Both portray themselves as messiah and savior figures. And, both hurt their own followers/disciples the most.

    YOUR COMMENT: I have noticed more people taking exception to her assertions in comments to her presentations.

    MY RESPONSE: Good. Maybe our efforts are having some positive effect. Let's hope that more people start using their critical thinking skills and take exception to her false claims more often.

    YOUR COMMENT: I agree it doesn’t quite a make sense that she would be shilling for anyone, she’s too nuts.

    MY RESPONSE: Yep. If the powers that be were hiring a shill to mislead all of mankind, they would hire someone more competent than Deborah Tavares. But, if they were hiring a shill to discredit legitimate conspiracy theory, then they could not have picked a better person than Deborah Tavares to do it. Regardless, I do not believe Deborah Tavares is a shill or double agent. I just believe she is delusional and incredibly dishonest. And, it is her dishonesty that I take exception to.

    YOUR COMMENT: However, you are right, her activities have done nothing to help anyone and she’s done a lot of harm. The call to put lawyers to death is insane, and dangerous. There are crazies who get triggered by this kind of stuff. She’s thoughtless and self absorbed and a blight on humanity.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. She is going to get innocent people killed. And, it will all be for nothing but a pathetic Deborah Tavares hoax.

    YOUR COMMENT: It’s sick and also fascinating study in psychopathy.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. Psychiatrists and Psychologists would have a "field day" getting her on their couch. Can you imagine?

    YOUR COMMENT: I hope this thread and Snoop’s hard work help people to be more discerning in who they allow into their heads.

    MY RESPONSE: That's kind of the idea. HAHAHA.

    YOUR COMMENT: While I do not know of any presenters who are as crazy dangerous as Tavares is, they are out there. Disinformation agents, controlled opposition or simply individuals who are emotionally disturbed. Often these types a great actors and have a magnetic quality that draws others into their thought matrix which is essentially a form of mind control.

    MY RESPONSE: Agreed. It is all of the above. They have used hoaxes and ignorance to create a new belief system, a new false religion and it is going to get innocent people killed.

    YOUR COMMENT: Take care all and thanks, much gratitude. xylo

    MY RESPONSE: You have my thanks and gratitude too.

    All The Best,

    Snoop
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 25th May 2019 at 22:34.

  39. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    Gemma13 (25th May 2019), peterpam (21st May 2019), xylo (22nd May 2019)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 19 FirstFirst 1 10 19 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts