+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 17 1 11 17 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 322

Thread: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    This FIRST POST HERE contains a CONCISE SUMMARY of ALL of the hoaxes of Deborah Tavares.

    THE REMAINING POSTS BELOW contain FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATIONS of ALL of these same hoaxes WITH SUPPORTING PROOF.

    SUMMARY OF THE HOAXES OF DEBORAH TAVARES:
    (FOR ACTUAL PROOF OF THESE HOAXES, SCROLL DOWN TO THE SUBSEQUENT POSTS BELOW)

    1. "The NASA War Document Hoax". The document is REAL, but has been "modified" to fit the hoax. It now has a FAKE and misleading TITLE and COVER. But, the hoax is NOT the document anyway. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE CONSTITUTES "PROOF" that NASA is already killing us all with diabolical weapons in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. The document is actually a power point presentation that a chief NASA scientist created and used at a national convention of American DEFENSE contractors to urge them to develop countermeasures AGAINST the diabolical weapons described therein. NASA may actually be killing us all with diabolical weapons in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because it was actually created and actually used in an effort TO PREVENT such an occurrence. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #2 BELOW.

    2. "The Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Hoax". The document is REAL, but it is only POLITICAL FICTION. It has also been "modified" to fit the hoax. It now has a FAKE, recently-added paragraph at the beginning which fraudulently indicates that it is the work of "The Bilderbergs". But, the hoax is NOT the document anyway. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE CONSTITUTES "PROOF" that "The Bilderbergs" adopted a plan in 1954 to kill us all with diabolical "silent weapons" in "quiet wars" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. This tiny 44 page booklet was written in 1979 and is actually POLITICAL FICTION. It is a DISGUISED COMPLAINT about the treason and horrors suffered by U.S. soldiers when the U.S. government allegedly allowed them to be killed at Pearl Harbor in order to draw us into World War II. This tiny booklet has NOTHING to do with the Bilderbergs. The Bilderbergs may actually be killing us all with diabolical "silent weapons" in "quiet wars" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because it is actually POLITICAL FICTION. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #3 BELOW.

    3. "The Report From Iron Mountain Hoax". The document is REAL, but it is only POLITICAL SATIRE. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE CONSTITUTES "PROOF" that ALL ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES (including climate change, drought, fires, etc.) ARE "ENGINEERED" by the U.S. government and used as "WEAPONS" to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind (something not in the book). But, her claims about this document are not so. This document is actually POLITICAL SATIRE. It is a DISGUISED COMPLAINT WHICH OPENLY MOCKS U.S. policy of engaging in perpetual wars to prop up the U.S. economy. The premise of the book is that THE U.S. IS SO DEPENDENT ON MILITARY SPENDING that "IF PEACE BROKE OUT", we will be forced to create FAKE enemies (like "FAKE ALIEN LIFE FORMS" and ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES) to "justify" our perpetual wars. The author DID NOT intend for the reader of his book to believe that the U.S. government was ACTUALLY CREATING "FAKE ALIEN LIFE FORMS" or ACTUALLY CREATING "ENGINEERED" ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES. Instead, the author merely used those ABSURD examples TO MAKE A MOCKERY of the lengths that U.S. policy makers would go to in order to create "FAKE ENEMIES" to justify "FAKE WARS" against those "FAKE ENEMIES" to prop up the U.S. economy. The U.S Government may actually be killing us all with FAKE ("engineered") environmental catastrophes in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because it is actually POLITICAL SATIRE. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #4 BELOW.

    4. "The Agenda 21 Hoax". The Agenda 21 Hoax is based on TWO DOCUMENTS. The Agenda 21 document itself was a REAL United Nations document. So, the hoax is not the document itself. Agenda 21 was merely a SUGGESTION WHICH THE UNITED STATES SENATE REJECTED. So, Agenda 21 NEVER BECAME A TREATY and NEVER BECAME THE LAW. That means Agenda 21 is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States. The hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that THE AGENDA 21 DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES "PROOF" that the United Nations is using diabolical means (like fires and laser beams from satellites in space) to force us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. According to the "Agenda 21" document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim), it merely suggested that we reduce the rate at which we deplete our natural resources to the same rate at which our natural resources can recover from being depleted (called "sustainable development"). Contrary to Deborah Tavares' fraudulent claims, there is NOTHING in the Agenda 21 document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) which suggests we will be forced out of our rural or suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. NOTHING! What Deborah Tavares calls the "Agenda 21 Map" is FAKE AND HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21 in the first place. Instead, it purported to relate to the proposed "Biological Diversity Treaty" (something different from Agenda 21) WHICH THE UNITED STATES SENATE ALSO REJECTED. So, that proposed treaty (and its FAKE map) are also COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States. The hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that the "AGENDA 21 MAP" (which had NOTHING to do with Agenda 21) CONSTITUTES "PROOF" that the United Nations is using diabolical means (like fires and laser beams from space) to force us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this map are not so. What Deborah Tavares fraudulently calls the "Agenda 21 Map" is FAKE and HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21 in the first place. Instead, it was the work of a single opponent to the "Biological Diversity Treaty" (something different from Agenda 21) and was used to create opposition to that particular proposed treaty, WHICH THE UNITED STATES SENATE ALSO REJECTED. Because the United States REJECTED BOTH Agenda 21 and the "Biological Diversity Treaty" (to which the FAKE map related), BOTH ARE COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States. The United Nations may actually be forcing us out of our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THE AGENDA 21 DOCUMENT and the so-called "AGENDA 21 MAP" (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition because they were both rejected. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #5 BELOW.

    5. "The FORGED PG&E Email Hoax". THE EMAILS ARE FORGERIES AND THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THOSE FORGERIES ARE VERIFIABLY FALSE. PG&E is a California electrical utility company which collects and generates electricity in a variety of ways. But, PG&E's conventional solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during daylight hours. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future solar panels on satellites in space might collect energy from the Sun 24 hours a day, then beam it to earth in the form of lasers or radio frequencies and then convert it to electricity here on earth for its customers. When the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and this technology for starting those fires. But, the scientific literature indicated that this technology did not yet exist. SO, TO REBUT THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares, herself, FORGED a series of FAKE emails (some purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to start such fires, among other things. Thus, Deborah Tavares, herself, actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE "PROOF" that PG&E used this technology to start the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about these FORGED emails are not so. These FORGED EMAILS prove nothing except that Deborah Tavares is a fraud. PG&E may actually be using lasers or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES! SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #6 BELOW.

    6. "The Genocide Agreement Hoax". The document is REAL. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. The "Genocide Agreement" is actually the nickname of a proposed 1940's United Nations agreement BANNING GENOCIDE among signatory nations. The proposed "Genocide Agreement" BANNED"GENOCIDE" and other harmful acts against identifiable groups of people like racial and religious minorities. In 1988, the United States Senate approved the "Genocide Agreement" and President Reagan signed it into law. So, the hoax is not the document itself. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that the Genocide Agreement ONLY BANS "NATIONS" FROM COMMITTING ACTS OF GENOCIDE and that THE UNITED STATES IS "NOT A NATION", BECAUSE "IT IS A CORPORATION" (which is not governed by the agreement or the ban) which permits the United States to COMMIT GENOCIDE on a "Day-by-Day" basis, which is why "WE ARE BEING EXTERMINATED". But, the truth is that the United States is not really a "corporation" and the Genocide Agreement actually bans genocide in the United States and subjects those who commit genocide to criminal prosecution. The hoax is also Deborah Tavares' OWN (ENTIRELY INCONSISTENT and CONTRADICTORY) claims that the genocide agreement DOES APPLY IN THE UNITED STATES and that it "INVADES DOMESTIC LAWS" and "ALLOWS FOREIGNERS TO 'OVER-RIDE' U.S. laws". (Note that if the Genocide Agreement really "DID NOT APPLY" to the United States because it is a "CORPORATION", it would be impossible for the Genocide Agreement TO SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLY in the United States so as to "invade" or "over-ride" any law in the United States.). Regardless, the truth is that the Genocide Agreement applies in the United States, but only "over-rides" U.S. law as to the specific acts banned by the agreement. Nothing more. The United States may actually be killing us all in an act or acts of genocide in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind, but THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because this document applies in the United States and actually BANS GENOCIDE and subjects the violators to criminal prosecution. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #104 BELOW.

    7. "The Rothschilds Are Restructuring North America Hoax". In this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that an October, 30th 2017 press release stated that the Rothschilds were "restructuring north America" itself (as in "taking it over" and "changing it"). But, the subject press release DOES NOT say this. Instead, it merely says that a single Rothschild company was restructuring "IN" (as in "inside") north America. A full reading of the subject press release indicates that the term, "RESTRUCTURING'' as used in the press release, refers to this Rothschild company RESTRUCTURING DEBT (as in "re-financing"), NOT RESTRUCTURING ALL OF NORTH AMERICA ITSELF! See proof here. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...300545454.html. The purpose of this hoax was to create a link between the "Rothschilds" and the Agenda 21 Hoax, to make Americans think that the "Rothschilds" are "restructuring" all of north America under the Agenda 21 model of "sustainable development" which Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims will drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #18 BELOW.

    8. "The Rothschilds Own All Of The Utility Companies Hoax". In this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that she obtained a curriculum vitea (effectively a resume' for "expert witnesses") attached to the sworn testimony of a member of the Rothschild family wherein he stated that "he OWNED hundreds of utility companies". But, the subject curriculum vitea DOES NOT say this. Instead, it merely says that a "James A. Rothschild" is a financial consultant AND AN "EXPERT WITNESS" who has TESTIFIED in dozens and dozens of court cases in which utility companies were parties. Nothing more. For proof, click here and scroll down to pages 3-5 and pages 36-46.). http://www.ripuc.org/eventsactions/d...hild(3.04).pdf. In support of this same hoax, Deborah Tavares also fraudulently claims that she recently attended a PG&E stock holder's meeting wherein the PG&E Board Of Directors were allegedly seated in the front row of the audience and individually introduced to the stockholders. She fraudulently claims that a person named "Rothschild" was introduced to the stockholders as a PG&E "Board Member" (as if that would make him the "OWNER" of PG&E). See proof here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NZo...ature=youtu.be (at 3:00-3:45). But, this claim is not so. NO PG&E BOARD MEMBER HAS THE NAME, "ROTHSCHILD". See proof here. http://www.pgecorp.com/corp/about-us...ctors.page.The purpose of this hoax was to create a link between the "Rothschilds" and the Agenda 21 Hoax, to make Americans think that the Rothschilds are using "THEIR" utility company technologies as "weapons" to "target" us all and to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #18 BELOW.

    9. The "London Accounting Firms Will Bankrupt All Our Cities Hoax". In this hoax, Deborah Tavares claims that she read a December 26th, 2017 article in the "Press Democrat", a local Santa Rosa newspaper, which allegedly stated that Ernst & Young (a London-based accounting firm) will bankrupt all of our cities. She also claims that the article stated that Ernst & Young had “placed a value on the air that we breathe... the fresh water that we drink [and] on every tree in our forests". She claims that this "value" is actually a "price" that we will have to pay the global elite for our air, water, trees and other natural resources. But, the subject article DOES NOT say this. Instead, the subject article merely says that the city of Santa Rosa had hired Ernst & Young to determine the amount of fire damage the city had suffered in the recent California fires and to represent the city IN OBTAINING REIMBURSEMENT of that amount from FEMA. In order to do its job, Ernst & Young would necessarily have to place a "value" on city-owned property destroyed in the fires (ex: buildings, roads, bridges and infrastructure). Nothing in the article suggests that Ernst & Young would place a value on our air, water, trees or other natural resources. The article specifically stated that FEMA WILL REIMBURSE THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA FOR THE COSTS OF ERNST & YOUNG'S ACCOUNTING SERVICES. In fact, federal law REQUIRES that FEMA reimburse such cities for the accounting costs they incur in seeking and in obtaining reimbursement from FEMA. Thus, NO CITY IS GOING BANKRUPT as a result of hiring Ernst & Young to determine the amount of fire damage it had suffered in the recent California fires or to represent the city IN OBTAINING REIMBURSEMENT of that amount from FEMA! The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that the global elite will bankrupt all of our cities, that we will have to pay the global elite to breathe air and to drink water and to otherwise incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #48 BELOW.

    10. "The Judge DALE Hoax". ALL OF THE "JUDGE DALE" BOOKS ARE FORGERIES. Further, EVERY SINGLE CLAIM IN THE JUDGE "DALE"FORGERIES ABOUT THE LAW AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS ALSO VERIFIABLY FALSE. Deborah Tavares, Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") and amateur legal theorist, Rodney "DALE" Class (who has lost 76 cases in a row) wrote every single word of these FORGERIES (including "The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America" and "The MATRIX And The US Constitution"). But, they fraudulently told the American people these books were written by a "retired federal judge" named "Judge DALE" (which uses Rodney "DALE" Class' middle name, "DALE", as an inside joke on the American people). DEBORAH TAVARES HAS ALREADY ADMITTED THIS TO US! The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that their government and their justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to otherwise incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #58 BELOW.

    11. "The Court Registry Investment System Hoax". THE DOCUMENT IS A FORGERY. Deborah Tavares and her partners (including Al Whitney, Jeanette Triplett and Rod Class) assembled this FAKE government document from parts of REAL government documents and then ALTERED and CHANGED the WORDS to make it fit the hoax. The hoax is Deborah Tavares' fraudulently claims that her FORGED government document itself constitutes "proof" that all of the money collected by the courts in fines and penalties is forwarded on to the Federal Reserve to keep. But, this is not so. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that the courts are merely collection agents for the Federal Reserve, to make Americans think that their justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to otherwise incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #53 BELOW.

    12. "The All Governments And Government Agencies Are Private, For-Profit Corporations Hoax". This hoax involves several false documents and false videos. In this hoax, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") fraudulently claim that all governments and government agencies are actually private, for-profit corporations "posing" as governments and government agencies which "profit" by taxing, burdening and abusing the American people. To support this fraudulent claim, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney cite examples of several ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS which happen to have names that SOUND SIMILAR to the names of governments and government agencies (like "Federal Express" for example). But, contrary to their claims, NONE of the ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS that they cite in support of this hoax are really governments or government agencies. Not one! They also fraudulently CHANGED THE REAL NAME of one such ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION TO A FAKE NAME to make it fit the hoax (from "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc.", a private, for-profit corporation, to "Internal Revenue Service", a government agency). This hoax was designed to make Americans think that all governments and agencies are completely illegal, invalid, illegitimate, corrupt & diabolical and to otherwise incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POSTS #63 and #68 BELOW.

    13. "The BOMBSHELL: Rod Class Has Obtained His Forth Administrative Ruling That All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' Hoax". This hoax involves several FAKE press releases (co-authored by Deborah Tavares) and several false videos. Note that this hoax was actually created in support of the hoax above to the effect that all governments and government agencies are private, for-profit corporations (a Deborah Tavares hoax). The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that our state and local government agencies (including the DMV and local police departments) are completely illegal, invalid, illegitimate, corrupt & diabolical and to otherwise incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #100 BELOW.

    14. "The... Property Into Other Peoples' Name Hoax". This hoax involves several FAKE press releases and false videos. In this hoax, Rod Class and his partners (including Deborah Tavares) fraudulently claim that "a North Carolina judge has warned all [in-state] police officers to put their property into other peoples' names" (to make Americans think they can successfully sue police officers "personally" because they are merely "private contractors" impersonating public servants who issue traffic tickets to generate "profits" for their "corporate employers"). Note that this hoax was actually created in support of the hoax above to the effect that all governments and government agencies are private, for-profit corporations (a Deborah Tavares hoax). The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think our local government agencies are completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to otherwise incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN POST #101 BELOW.

    15. "The FAKE Jim Traficant Speech Hoax". This hoax involves a FAKE and FORGED "transcript" of a speech that a Congressman allegedly made to Congress to the effect that our federal government went bankrupt in 1933. (The REAL transcript of this speech is in the official "Congressional Record" and does NOT say this.). Deborah Tavares, herself, actually posted this FAKE and FORGED document on her own website. Deborah Tavares has also posted several videos on YouTube incorporating this hoax. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that the United States went "bankrupt" in 1933, that they themselves are "collateral" and debt slaves who exist solely to pay debts arising out of that imaginary "bankruptcy" and to make Americans think that our government is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to otherwise incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

    16. "The Sovereign Citizen Hoax". This hoax involves a FAKE and FORGED document written by Rodney "DALE" Class while pretending to be Judge "DALE" . This FAKE and FORGED document was posted on the website of Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") who, like Rod Class, is also Deborah Tavares' partner in these hoaxes. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that ONLY AN INDIVIDUAL IS "SOVEREIGN" and that "WE the PEOPLE" (plural terms) COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE (in the form of our own elected government) ARE NOT "SOVEREIGN" (exactly backwards to the truth), such that our laws do not apply to INDIVIDUALS (the pretend "sovereigns"). But, none of this is so. Under U.S. law, the word "sovereign" means "WE the PEOPLE" (plural terms) COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE in the form of "the government", not "the individual". The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that "WE the PEOPLE" (plural terms) COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE (in the form of our elected government) have no right to enforce our own laws, made by our own ELECTED lawmakers, against any INDIVIDUAL (the pretend "sovereigns") and to otherwise incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

    ACTUAL PROOF OF THE FOREGOING IS POSTED IN THE COMMENTS BELOW.

    For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS, click here.
    http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...70#post1174970

    For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER, click here.
    https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...161#post229161

    For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG, click here.
    http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...y-sheriff-hoax

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

    The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 13th September 2019 at 23:13.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    Dark_Canyon (22nd January 2019), Denise/Dizi (14th January 2019), justntime2learn (20th June 2019), Kryztian (18th January 2019), Nasu (31st January 2019), toppy (4th January 2019), xylo (25th March 2019)

  3. Link to Post #2
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    BELOW ARE FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATIONS OF THE HOAXES OF DEBORAH TAVARES WITH PROOF

    1). THE NASA WAR DOCUMENT HOAX:


    VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    (Note: Jeff Rense is not involved in this hoax.).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5vLuGPV-lU
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrzEwYlb5CU
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXSqgD1KjdY (at 43:30-44:20, 46:00-46:55);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfG9zljgFh0 (at 7:35-8:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk4hfIVIoT4

    THE DOCUMENT:
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/nas...tureof-war.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE).

    In THE NASA WAR DOCUMENT HOAX, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that she downloaded a "secret" or "leaked" government document from a "NASA" website which she claims "PROVES" that NASA ITSELF IS CURRENTLY KILLING US ALL with diabolical, horrific, futuristic high-tech weapons in furtherance of the "PLANNED" "EXTINCTION OF MANKIND". But, none of her claims about this document are so.

    What Deborah Tavares calls "The NASA War Document" was actually a POWER POINT PRESENTATION which was used as a "VISUAL AID" for an oral presentation that a NASA chief scientist (Dennis M. Bushnell) gave at an August 13th-16th, 2001 NATIONAL CONVENTION in Orlando, Florida. The convention was attended by THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN DEFENSE CONTRACTORS who develop COUNTERMEASURES (defenses) to potential, theoretical, FUTURE, high-tech weapons that OTHER NATIONS could theoretically develop to use AGAINST the American people IN THE FUTURE (AS DESCRIBED IN THE ORIGINAL POWER POINT PRESENTATION).

    That means that the horrific, potential, FUTURE, high-tech weapons described in the original "NASA War document" WERE NOT weapons that NASA itself was using "AGAINST" the American people. Instead, they were horrific, potential, theoretical, FUTURE, high-tech weapons that the NASA chief scientist WAS URGING AMERICAN DEFENSE CONTRACTORS (at the convention) TO DEVELOP COUNTERMEASURES "AGAINST".

    Archive.org (which records everything ever posted online) indicates that the original power point slide presentation WAS NEVER POSTED ON ANY NASA WEBSITE. (So, contrary to Deborah Tavares' claims, it was never "downloaded" or "leaked" from a "NASA website").

    Archive.org indicates that Bushnell’s original power point slide presentation was actually posted in the "PUBLIC DOMAIN" FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE on the "US Department of Defense’s Defense Technical INFORMATION CENTER website" (A PUBLIC WEBSITE) a month BEFORE the 2001 convention at which Bushnell was scheduled to speak. IT WAS NEVER POSTED ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE WEB!

    This means that Deborah Tavares' claim that the subject document was "discovered and downloaded from a NASA website" IS A LIE.

    ANALYSIS: Deborah Tavares had very good reason for LYING to the American people about the TRUE SOURCE of the original document. If she truthfully admitted that the original document was downloaded from the PUBLIC website of the “US Department of DEFENSE’S DEFENSE Technical INFORMATION CENTER” (a PUBLIC website), then the original document would not appear to be "secret", diabolical, nefarious or otherwise part of a "conspiracy" to kill us all. This is because the U.S. government does not usually post written proof of its own conspiracies to kill its own people on ITS OWN PUBLIC “INFORMATION CENTER” WEBSITE FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE.

    WHAT THE DOCUMENT ACTUALLY SAYS, BY PAGE NUMBER. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/nas...tureof-war.pdf

    Page 6. THE THREAT OF "Russia, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan" (ALL OF WHICH ARE OTHER NATIONS).

    Page 7. THE THREAT THAT "70% of the world's research is going on OUTSIDE THE U.S."

    Page 7. THE THREAT THAT "[The] U.S. produces... [only] 18% of the world's GDP".

    Page 32. THE THREAT THAT OTHER COUNTRIES LEAD THE U.S. in science, research, trade, economics, savings rates and math scores.

    Page 33. THE THREAT THAT according to current ECONOMINC trends, the U.S. IS FALLING BEHIND while China and other countries ARE EXCELLING.

    Page 100. THE THREAT THAT OVER "TWO-THIRDS OF ALL SATELLITES IN SPACE ARE NOW FOREIGN OWNED."

    Page 113. Reflecting that the USUAL AUDIENCE REACTIONS (responses) to the forgoing presentation are, among other things:

    a). "THEY [foreign nations] WOULD NOT DO THAT [referring to using such weapons against Americans].";

    b). "WE [Americans] have to hope THEY [foreign nations] WOULD NOT DO THAT [referring to using such weapons against Americans]";

    c). "Why go there, [WE AMERICANS] CANNOT DEFEND AGAINST IT [referring to the use of such weapons against Americans]."


    "D-E-F-E-N-D-----A-G-A-I-N-S-T-----I-T"

    Thus, the NASA document clearly states that the horrific, high-tech, future weapons described therein are weapons THAT OTHER NATIONS COULD DEVELOP FOR USE AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THE FUTURE!

    PROOF:

    ARCHIVE.ORG’S RECORDS ON THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT:
    https://archive.org/details/FutureSt...rfareCirca2025 (BE SURE TO SCROLL DOWN TO THE ARTICLE BELOW THE WINDOW).

    ONLY WEBSITE WHERE THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT WAS EVER POSTED (DTIC):
    http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/.

    TRADE ASSOCIATION THAT SPONSORED THE CONVENTION (NDIA):
    http://www.ndia.org/Pages/default.aspx

    RECORD OF THE NDIA CONVENTION:
    http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADM002244

    COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF PDF METADATA:
    (Scroll down and read the comments of senior member, “Flamesong” beginning with the comment posted on “26-06-2013, 09:02 PM” and the following comment posted on “26-06-2013, 09:39 PM”): https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...=248938&page=2.

    CONCLUSION: Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares, THE "NASA WAR DOCUMENT" DOES NOT "PROVE" THAT NASA ITSELF IS CURRENTLY KILLING US ALL WITH HORRIFIC, FUTURISTIC, HIGH-TECH WEAPONS in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. To the contrary, a careful reading of the NASA WAR DOCUMENT actually reflects that NASA is trying to protect us from such diabolical weapons (ex: page 113). The fact that NASA created and used the document to urge American defense contractors develop countermeasures against such diabolical weapons actually reflects that NASA actually seeks to prevent any planned extinction of mankind, exactly BACKWARDS to what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax.

    So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this document provides NO SUPPORT FOR THAT PROPOSITION.



    2). THE SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS HOAX:


    VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax.).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3JfZDyj0KU (at 10:50-59:50);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXSqgD1KjdY (at 13:50-19:15, 31:40-33:00, 43:00-43:20, 124:00-124:50);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfG9zljgFh0 (at 3:25-4:20);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc (at 14:05-16:50);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfG9zljgFh0 (at 9:55-10:35);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3JfZDyj0KU (at 10:50-16:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_38tsQ4p0I

    THE DOCUMENT:
    http://stopthecrime.net/docs/SILENT.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE).

    In THE SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS HOAX, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims to have discovered another "secret" or "leaked" official document which she claims constitutes "PROOF" that "The Bilderbergs" are killing us all (or "plan" to kill us all) with "SILENT WEAPONS" in "QUIET WARS" in furtherance of the "planned extinction of mankind". (Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that these "SILENT WEAPONS" are cell phones, cell towers, WIFI, smart meters, 5G, geo-engineering, PG&E DEW's in space, HAARP, etc.). But, NONE of her claims about this document are so.

    Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars ("SWFQW") is actually a short, 44 page booklet of POLITICAL FICTION written by Lyle Hartford van Dyke in 1979 which he mailed to Congress. (Van Dyke is a convicted felon who spent a decade in federal prison for fraud, for manufacturing and uttering FAKE currency and for writing checks drawn on his imaginary "trust account at the U.S. Treasury".). SWFQW is not a secret, leaked or suppressed government document. Van Dyke was not a whistle blower. He was a political commentator.

    Van Dyke believed (perhaps correctly) that the U.S. had advance knowledge of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and allowed it to happen (killing thousands of American soldiers) in order to draw the U.S. into World War II. (Van Dyke's father's uncle was directly involved in all these alleged events and Van Dyke was raised to believe that all of this was so.).

    Van Dyke was outraged by this perceived treasonous ACT OF WAR BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT UPON ITS OWN SOLDIERS and wanted to make the HORRORS of this perceived treasonous act of war "PERSONAL" to the American public. So, Van Dyke wrote SWFQW and suggested that instead of intentionally killing ITS OWN SOLDIERS in such a treasonous act of war, the U.S. government was instead killing IT OWN CIVILIAN POPULATION in such a treasonous act of war (a clever twist of the perceived facts). (Note that this claim would indeed make the HORRORS of such a "Pearl Harbor-type" war on Americans "PERSONAL" to the reader.)

    But, Van Dyke realized that the public would not actually believe his premise (of a U.S. war against the American public) without the presence of the usual weapons of war, like those that were present at Pearl Harbor (armed soldiers, trucks, tanks, planes, ships, missiles, bombs, etc.). So, in writing SWFQW, Van Dyke suggested that all of the weapons that the U.S. government was using in this FICTIONAL war against the American public were high tech weapons that COULD NOT BE SEEN OR HEARD (which Deborah Tavares has recently embellished to mean cell phones, cell towers, WIFI, microwaves, "smart meters", 5G, geo-engineering, PG&E DEWS's in space and HAARP, etc.).

    Indeed, it was precisely because such weapons could not be seen or heard that Van Dyke's claims actually appeared to be true. All of this actually made Van Dyke's claims of INVISIBLE & INAUDIBLE weapons MORE (not less) BELIEVABLE to the reader. By using this ruse, VAN DYKE ACTUALLY MADE THE ABSENCE OF WEAPONS EVEN MORE HORRIFYING TO THE READER THAN THEIR PRESENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN. It was absolutely brilliant.

    Van Dyke openly admits that SWFQW was inspired by an earlier book of POLITICAL FICTION which he greatly admired entitled, "The Report From Iron Mountain" (see below). Van Dyke also openly admits to having incorporated sections of REAL scientific and economic TECHNICAL studies of others into his work (as did "The Report From Iron Mountain" on which his work was modeled) to make his work look more realistic. Finally, Van Dyke openly admits that he created SWFQW to read like an official governmental document (as did "The Report From Iron Mountain" on which his work was modeled) in order to make the HORRORS of the U.S. government waging a covert war against its own citizens APPEAR MORE REALISTIC and therefore MORE TERRIFYING to the reader. It worked.

    FACT: According to Van Dyke himself, the ORIGINAL version of his document had no preface/forward at all and made no reference to any "elite" culprit, such as "The Bilderbergs". But, for some strange reason, the version of this document on Deborah Tavares' website contains a FAKE preface/forward indicating that SWFQW is a "PLAN" adopted by "The Bilderbergs" in 1954 at its first meeting for the planned extinction of mankind. Thus, someone (likely Deborah Tavares herself) recently added this FAKE section to SWFQW to give it global rather than merely national implications.

    PROOF:

    VAN DYKE'S OWN WORDS ABOUT SWFQW:
    http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_...ie t_Wars.html. (THIS IS A MUST READ.)

    PROOF THAT VAN DYKE'S COMPLAINT WAS THE ALLEGED U.S. BETRAYAL AT PEARL HARBOR:
    When discussing his work, Van Dyke himself said, "Also #74-1120 [a CODE Van Dyke placed into SWFQW] IS AN ANAGRAM OF THE DATE OF THE JAPANESE ATTACK ON PEARL HARBOR, 41-12-07... . My book on the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was published at the end of August 1973." (Excerpt from the link above).


    PROOF THAT VAN DYKE'S COMPLAINT WAS THE ALLEGED U.S. BETRAYAL AT PEARL HARBOR:
    http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/2016/05/skeleton-uncle-sams-closet-hartford-van-dyke-truth-pearl-harbor (THIS IS A MUST READ.)

    PROOF THAT VAN DYKE WAS THE AUTHOR, THAT IT DID NOT MENTION "THE BILDERBERGS" AND THAT HE INCORPORATED REAL SCIENTIFIC AND ECONOMIC STUDIES OF OTHERS INTO HIS WORK:
    https://henrithibodeau.wordpress.com...bal-domination (THIS IS A MUST READ.)

    CONCLUSION: Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares', SWFQW DOES NOT "PROVE" THAT "THE BILDERBERGS" PLAN TO KILL US ALL WITH "SILENT WEAPONS" IN "QUIET WARS" in furtherance of the panned extinction of mankind. To the contrary, SWFQW actually reflects an effort on the part of a single American civilian, THROUGH THE CLEVER USE OF FICTION, to call attention to U.S. war policies that he perceived as harmful to Americans.

    So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this document provides NO SUPPORT FOR THAT PROPOSITION.



    3). THE REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN HOAX:

    VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax.).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXSqgD1KjdY (at 37:50-39:30, 40:45-41:25, 42:40-43:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s (at 59:15-106:05);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4 (at 25:05-26:10)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3JfZDyj0KU (102:25-105:40).

    THE DOCUMENT:
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/Rep...n_Mountain.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE).

    THE HOAX: In THE REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN HOAX, Deborah Tavares also fraudulently claims to have discovered another "secret" and/or "leaked" and/or "suppressed" government document which she claims "proves" that ALL ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES ("global warming", "climate change", increased drought, fires, etc.) ARE "ENGINEERED" by the U.S. government to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, none of these claims about this document are so.

    The Report From Iron Mountain ON THE POSSIBILITY AND DESIRABILITY OF PEACE ("TRFIM") was a 1967 book of POLITICAL SATIRE written by Leonard C. Lewin which was SO POPULAR and SO WIDELY READ that it actually made the "New York Times Best Seller List". (So much for Deborah Tavares' "secret", "leaked" or "suppressed" document story.). It is not a "secret", "leaked" or "suppressed" government document. Lewin was not a whistle blower. He was a political commentator.

    It was 1967. It was the middle of the Vietnam War. Lewin was critical of U.S. policy because the U.S. had been in an almost perpetual state of war for decades and he believed (perhaps correctly) that the U.S. economy was too dependent upon military spending. In criticizing this U.S policy, Lewin SARCASTICALLY observed that U.S. policy makers MUST HAVE BELIEVED THAT THE U.S. COULD NOT AFFORD PEACE (meaning that if the U.S. was not actually engaged in perpetual wars, the U.S. government and the U.S. economy might actually collapse).

    Lewin sought to make a MOCKERY of this U.S. war policy and the ABSURDITY of the beliefs that apparently underlied it. Lewin wanted to publicly EMBARRASS and HUMILIATE U.S. policy makers who supported a policy of perpetual war. So, he wrote "The Report From Iron Mountain ON THE POSSIBILITY AND DESIRABILITY OF PEACE" (the book's FULL title). (Note that it is the FINAL SEVEN WORDS of this title which reveal Lewin's TRUE thesis statement.)

    So, in writing TRFIM, Lewin pretended to be an imaginary committee of the U.S. government which pretended to "report" to these very same U.S. policy makers (whom he sought to EMBARRASS and HUMILIATE) that PEACE WAS POSSIBLE, BUT NOT DESIRABLE (hence, the FULL title to Lewin's book). In writing TRFIM (and in pretending to be an imaginary committee of the U.S. government), Lewin pretended to "report" to U.S. policy makers that the U.S. economy was so dependent on perpetual war that "IF PEACE BROKE OUT", THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WOULD BE FORCED TO CREATE "FAKE ENEMIES" (called "alternative enemies") TO JUSTIFY "FAKE WARS" (called "credible substitutes" for wars) AGAINST THOSE "FAKE ENEMIES" in order to prop up the U.S. government and the U.S. economy. (Note here how Lewin OPENLY MOCKS U.S. policy of engaging perpetual wars by making it EVEN MORE ABSURD than it already was.).

    Specifically, in writing TRFIM (and in pretending to be an imaginary committee of the U.S. government), Lewin pretended to "report" to U.S. policy makers that "IF PEACE BROKE OUT", THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WOULD BE FORCED TO CREATE "FAKE ALIEN LIFE FORMS" and ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES to justify "FAKE WARS" against those "FAKE ENEMIES" to prop up the U.S. economy. (Note here how Lewin OPENLY MOCKS U.S. policy of engaging perpetual wars by making it EVEN MORE ABSURD than it already was.). It was absolutely brilliant.

    Deborah Tavares claims that the ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES in the book refer to "global warming", "climate change", increased drought, fires, etc. Deborah Tavares also fraudulently claims that the U.S. Government actually uses these "engineered" ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES (described in the book) as "weapons" to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind (SOMETHING NOT IN THE BOOK). But, this claim is not so.

    The premise of Lewin's book was that the U.S. economy is so dependent on military spending that "IF PEACED BROKE OUT", the U.S. would be forced to CREATE "FAKE ENEMIES" to "justify" "FAKE WARS" against those "FAKE ENEMIES" to prop up the U.S. economy. Lewin did not intend the readers of his book to believe that the U.S. government was ACTUALLY creating ALIEN LIFE FORMS or ACTUALLY creating ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES . Instead, Lewin merely used those two absurd examples of "FAKE enemies" TO MAKE A MOCKERY of how far the U.S. government would go TO CREATE FAKE ENEMIES TO JUSTIFY PERPETUAL WARS to prop up the U.S. economy.

    Lewin created TRFIM to read like an official U.S. government committee "REPORT" to U.S. policy makers IN ORDER TO PUBLICLY EMBARRASS AND HUMILIATE U.S. POLICY MAKERS WHO SUPPORTED PERPETUAL WAR (by making their policy of perpetual war APPEAR EVEN MORE "ABSURD" THAN IT ALREADY WAS). It worked. Lewin (like Van Dyke above) incorporated REAL scientific studies into his work to make it look more realistic.

    As if to prove that Lewin was the REAL author of TRFIM, when an unauthorized publisher later re-published his book without paying him royalties, HE SUED THE RE-PUBLISHER AND WON A LARGE SETTLEMENT, something that would have been impossible if the book had actually been written by a REAL "committee of the U. S. government" as Tavares falsely claims.

    PROOF:

    http://hoaxes.org/archive/permalink/..._iron_mountain

    https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Report_from_Iron_Mountain


    http://scua.library.umass.edu/umarmot/lewin-leonard-c/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Re..._Iron_Mountain

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_C._Lewin

    http://articles.latimes.com/1999/feb/01/news/mn-3716

    https://www.biblio.com/leonard-c-lewin/author/560147

    CONCLUSION:
    Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares', TRFIM DOES NOT "PROVE" THAT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS ACTUALLY CREATING "ENGINEERED" ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES (such as "global warming", "climate change", drought, fires, etc.) TO USE AS "WEAPONS" to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind (something not in the book). To the contrary, SWFQW actually reflects an effort on the part of a single American civilian, THROUGH THE CLEVER USE OF FICTION, to call attention to U.S. war policies that he perceived as harmful to Americans. Deborah Tavares knew the truth about the document all along, but she decided to lie to the American people about it anyway in order to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

    So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this document provides NO SUPPORT FOR THAT PROPOSITION.



    4). DEBORAH TAVARES & THE AGENDA 21 HOAX.

    VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax.).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WQfXQWHRAw at 4:40-4:50, 9:25-9:55
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeNsM0a75iE at 23:25-23:50

    THE DOCUMENTS: The Agenda 21 Hoax is based on two documents. The Agenda 21 document itself was a REAL United Nations document. So, the hoax is not the document itself. Agenda 21 was merely a SUGGESTION WHICH THE UNITED STATES SENATE REJECTED. And, under the United States Constitution, Senate approval is required for the United States to enter into a treaty. (See the 2nd paragraph here. https://www.annenbergclassroom.org/article-ii-section-2). So, Agenda 21 NEVER BECAME A TREATY and NEVER BECAME THE LAW. That means Agenda 21 is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States.

    The other document involved in this hoax is a "SIMULATED" land use map which Deborah Tavares fraudulently calls the "Agenda 21 Map". This "SIMULATED" land use map is FAKE and HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21 in the first place. Instead, it related to the proposed "Biological Diversity Treaty" (something different from Agenda 21) WHICH THE UNITED STATES SENATE ALSO REJECTED. So, that proposed treaty (and its FAKE map) are also COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States.

    Deborah Tavares knew the truth (above) all along, but nevertheless decided to lie about it anyway in order to incite fear, hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

    THE HOAX:
    In the "Agenda 21 Hoax", Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that the Agenda 21 document "CONSTITUTES PROOF" that the United Nations is using diabolical methods (like fires and laser beams from satellites in space) to force us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so.

    The Agenda 21 document was written by the world's leading environmental scientists (not by "PG&E", the "Rothschilds" or the "Rockefellers"). Agenda 21 was first presented to the public at the "EARTH SUMMIT" (an environmental conference) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil in 1992.

    The idea behind Agenda 21 was that the survival of mankind on Earth is interdependent on the survival of the environment on Earth. By saving the environment, we can save mankind. So, Agenda 21 was intended to prevent the extinction of mankind, exactly opposite to what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax to the effect that Agenda 21 is a plan to cause the extinction of mankind.

    The "Agenda 21" document suggested that we reduce the rate at which we deplete our natural resources to the same rate at which at which they can recover from being depleted (called "sustainable development"). If the United States Senate had ratified or approved Agenda 21, it would have PROTECTED MOST OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, exactly the opposite to what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax (to the effect that the United Nations intentionally burned the forests of California in furtherance of Agenda 21 WHICH WAS ACTUALLY INTENDED TO PRESERVE THOSE VERY FORESTS FROM DESTRUCTION IN THE FIRST PLACE.) If the United States Senate had ratified or approved Agenda 21, it would have also REDUCED DROUGHT AND INSURED AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER not contaminated by SEWAGE. exactly the opposite of what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax to the effect that droughts and the shortage of fresh water not contaminated by sewage are "engineered" in furtherance of Agenda 21 WHICH WAS ACTUALLY INTENDED TO PREVENT THOSE VERY HARDSHIPS IN THE FIRST PLACE.)

    AGENDA 21 IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT IN THE UNITED STATES!
    Agenda 21 was only a SUGGESTION that member nations were permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO ADOPT for themselves. While president Bush symbolically "signed" the Agenda 21 document,THE UNITED STATES SENATE REJECTED AGENDA 21, and under the United States Constitution, Senate approval is required for the United States to enter into a treaty. (See the 2nd paragraph here. https://www.annenbergclassroom.org/article-ii-section-2 ). So, Agenda 21 IS NOT A TREATY , IS NOT THE LAW and CANNOT BE (AND IS NOT) ENFORCED anywhere in the United States. So, Agenda 21 is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States. The 5th paragraph here sums it up perfectly. https://www.splcenter.org/20140331/a...spiracy-theory . But, Deborah Tavares FRAUDULENTLY CONCEALS that CRITICALLY IMPORTANT FACT from her followers.

    WHAT AGENDA 21 IS ACTUALLY ABOUT:


    BELOW IS A SECTION OF THE ACTUAL "TABLE OF CONTENTS" OF "AGENDA 21" ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF "AGENDA 21".

    SECTION II. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES FOR DEVELOPMENT
    9. Protection of the atmosphere 9.1 - 9.35
    10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources 10.1 - 10.18
    11. COMBATING DEFORESTATION 11.1 - 11.40
    12. MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING desertification and DROUGHT 12.1 - 12.63
    13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development 13.1 - 13.24
    14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development 14.1 - 14.104
    15. CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY15.1 - 15.11
    16. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY 16.1 - 16.46
    17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources 17.1 - 17.136
    18.PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES: application of integrated approaches to the development, MANAGEMENT and use OF WATER RESOURCES 18.1 - 18.90
    19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international traffic in toxic and dangerous products 19.1 - 19.76
    20. Environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes, in hazardous wastes 20.1 - 20.46
    21. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF solid wastes and SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES 21.1 - 21.49
    22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes

    AND, ALL OF THIS IS ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF AGENDA 21 HERE.
    https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf

    BELOW IS THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21.

    https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf
    (THIS IS A MUST READ.). BEGIN AT SECTION 11.1 AT ABOUT 25% THROUGH THE TEXT. THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21 READS AS FOLLOWS:

    AGENDA 21 – CHAPTER 11

    COMBATING DEFORESTATION

    PROGRAMME AREAS

    A. Sustaining the multiple roles and functions of all types of FORESTS, FOREST LANDS and WOODLANDS.
    Basis for action

    11.1. There are major weaknesses in the policies, methods and mechanisms adopted to support and develop the multiple ecological, economic, social and cultural roles of TREES, FORESTS, and FOREST LANDS. Many developed countries are confronted with the effects of air pollution and FIRE DAMAGE ON THEIR FORESTS. More effective measures and approaches are often required at the national level to improve and harmonize policy formulation, planning and programming; legislative measures and instruments; development patterns; participation of the general public, especially women and indigenous people; involvement of youth; roles of the private sector, local organizations, non-governmental organizations and cooperatives; development of technical and multidisciplinary skills and quality of human resources; FORESTRY extension and public education; research capability and support; administrative structures and mechanisms, including intersectoral coordination, decentralization and responsibility and incentive systems; and dissemination of information and public relations. This is especially important to ensure a rational and holistic approach to the sustainable and environmentally sound development of FORESTS. The need for securing the multiple roles of FORESTS and FOREST LANDS through adequate and appropriate institutional strengthening has been repeatedly emphasized in many of the reports, decisions and recommendations of FAO, ITTO, UNEP, the World Bank, IUCN and other organizations.

    Objectives
    11.2. The objectives of this programme area are as follows:
    a. To STRENGTHEN FOREST-RELATED NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, to enhance the scope and effectiveness
    of activities related to the management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of FORESTS, and to effectively ensure the sustainable utilization and production of FORESTS' goods and services in both the developed and the developing countries; by the year 2000, to strengthen the capacities and capabilities of national institutions to enable them to acquire the necessary knowledge for the PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION OF FORESTS, as well as to expand their scope and, correspondingly, enhance the effectiveness of programmes and activities related to the management and development of FORESTS;
    b. To strengthen and improve human, technical and professional skills, as well as expertise and capabilities to effectively formulate and implement policies, plans, programmes, research and projects on management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of all
    types of FORESTS and FOREST-based resources, and FOREST LANDS inclusive, as well as other areas from which FORESTS BENEFITS CAN BE DERIVED.

    AND, THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST TWO PARAGRAPHS OF SECTION 11 OF AGENDA 21!

    IMPORTANT:
    You will note from the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21 itself (above), THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR INCREMENTALLY REDUCING THE AREAS ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE (to systematically drive them from their rural and suburban homes and into increasingly smaller, densely packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind).


    THE "AGENDA 21 MAP"
    In addition to the Agenda 21 document itself (described above), Deborah Tavares also claims to have discovered a "SIMULATED" land use map which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTES PROOF that Agenda 21 is a plan which uses diabolical means (like forest fires and laser beams from satellites in space) to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, this is not so.

    To see this "SIMULATED" land use map, scroll down to about 40% through the text here. http://<br /> http://www.renegadetr...ather-warfare/.

    OTHER VERSIONS OF THIS MAP:
    https://www.google.com/search?source...30.Fm6zNgdf57I

    IMPORTANT:
    Note that this "SIMULATED" land use map makes NO REFERENCE to "Agenda 21" whatsoever and that IT REFERS INSTEAD to the "Convention On Biological Diversity" (something different from Agenda 21). Importantly, this "SIMULATED" land use map ALSO REFERS TO "The Wildlands Project" (a mere suggestion from private environmentalists which has NOTHING to do with the United Nations), "UN and US Man And Biosphere Program", various "Heritage Programs" and "NAFTA" (which ALSO has NOTHING to do with the United Nations).

    PROOF THAT "AGENDA 21" AND THE "BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY TREATY" ARE DIFFERENT FROM ONE ANOTHER.
    Scroll down to the 9th un-numbered page to the Table Of Contents here. Compare this Table Of Contents to the Table Of Contents above. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efi...LP-no.030.pdf;
    See paragraph 3 here. http://www.eniscuola.net/en/2012/01/...rio-to-rio20/;
    See paragraphs 1 & 6 here. https://www.cato.org/publications/po...-conservation;
    See paragraphs 91, 106, 107 & 108 here. http://www.fao.org/3/x5586E/x5586e06.htm;
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21 (proposed in 1992);
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conven...ical_Diversity (proposed in 1994).

    WHO CREATED THIS MAP?
    Dr. Michael S. Coffman was a prolific writer, speaker and property rights advocate. He often spoke at "liberty" conferences sponsored by the John Birch Society. He was an "environmental consultant", which is code for a lobbyist for large land owning interests, land developers (like Deborah Tavares) and large logging & mining corporations. Coffman and his clients opposed land use regulations in general and environmental regulations in particular. In 1994, when Congress was scheduled to vote on ratifying the proposed "Biological Diversity Treaty" (something different from Agenda 21), Coffman created the subject "SIMULATED" land use map to create opposition to that particular proposed treaty (not to Agenda 21). https://www.metabunk.org/explained-a...paganda.t6855/ It worked. The United States Senate ALSO REJECTED that proposed treaty. Below is a verbatim transcript of the actual Senate debate on that proposed treaty which the Senate ALSO REJECTED. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...-pt1-PgS22.htm.

    Coffman conceded that his "SIMULATED" land use map reflected what would be the resulting land use in the United States ONLY IF "ALL" OF THE PROPOSED LAND USE REGULATIONS listed at the top of his map became the law ("The Wildlands Project", "UN And US Man And Biosphere Program", various "Heritage Programs", etc.). But, Agenda 21 itself WAS NOT among those proposed land use regulations reflected by Coffman's map. This is because by the time Coffman created his "SIMULATED" land use map in 1994, THE UNITED STATES SENATE HAD ALREADY REJECTED AGENDA 21. So, Coffman relied on OTHER proposed land use regulations in creating his "SIMULATED" land use map.

    Coffman's "SIMULATED" land use map was WILDLY EXAGERATED (for propaganda purposes) both visually and verbally (note the very first word on the map, "SIMULATED"). Coffman himself coined the phrase, "LITTLE OR NO HUMAN USE" (for propaganda purposes), a phrase which does not appear in any of his alleged source material. Note also that for propaganda purposes, Coffman gave EVERY tiny wildlife refuge on his map MULTIPLE, very wide, migration routes (up to 50 miles wide) to and from neighboring wildlife refuges, rather than merely one or two narrow ones. This WILD EXAGGERATION created the illusion that there would much less land available for human use if all these OTHER land use proposals ever became law.

    FACT:
    IT WAS COFFMAN'S EXAGGERATED ("SIMULATED") LAND USE MAP (WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21) THAT BECAME THE FOUNDATION FOR THE ORIGINAL CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT AGENDA 21 WILL FORCE US OUT OF OUR RURAL AND SUBURBAN HOMES AND INTO OVERPOULATED CITIES, EVEN THOUGH THAT EXAGGERATED ("SIMULATED") LAND USE MAP ACTUALLY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AGENDA 21 IN THE FIRST PLACE!


    FACT:
    But, it was Deborah Tavares alone who came up with the new, improved and more sensational version of this hoax to the effect that Agenda 21 is a "plan" to use diabolical means (like forest fires and laser beams from satellites in space) to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the extinction of mankind. Note that this new, improved and more sensation version of this hoax allowed Deborah Tavares to incorporate some of her other hoaxes (to the effect that PG&E used directed energy weapons on satellites in space to start the recent fires in California and that PG&E will use radiation from "smart meters" to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind).

    CONCLUSION:
    The United States Senate REJECTED Agenda 21. So, Agenda 21 IS NOT A TREATY, IS NOT THE LAW, IS NOT ENFORCED AND IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States. Coffman's WILDLY EXAGGERATED ("SIMULATED") land use map had NOTHING to do with Agenda 21 in the first place. Coffman created his WILDLY EXAGGERATED "SIMULATED") land use map to generate opposition to the "Biological Diversity Treaty" (something different from Agenda 21). Coffman's WILDLY EXAGGERATED ("SIMULATED") land use map was based on ALL of the proposed land use regulations at the time EXCEPT FOR AGENDA 21("The Wildlands Project", "UN And US Man And Biosphere Program", various "Heritage Programs", etc.).

    APPLICATION TO HOAX:
    THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES DID NOT ADVANCE THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (TO PREVENT FURTHER DEFORESTATION). INDEED, THE RECENT FIRES IN CALIFORNIA ACTUALLY UNDERMINED THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (BY DESTROYING THE VERY FORESTS THAT AGENDA 21 WAS INTENDED TO PROTECT)!

    THEREFORE, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES WERE NOT "AGENDA 21 FIRES", EVEN IF THEY WERE THE RESULT OF SOME OTHER CONSPIRACY, unrelated to Agenda 21.

    So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this document provides no support for that proposition.

    APPLICATION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS:
    If I were a charlatan, and if I wanted to create a BETTER version of the Agenda 21 Hoax, this is how I would do it.

    1. I would create videos and I would show the REAL, ACTUAL "AGENDA 21" DOCUMENT (unmodified) showing the Agenda 21 "agenda" AS IT IS ACTUALLY WRITTEN in the official document (showing that its purpose is to PROTECT THE REMAINING FORESTS, PREVENT DROUGHT AND ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE (all of which is verifiably true).

    2. Then, in my videos, I would show written proof that THE UNITED STATES SENATE REJECTED AGENDA 21 AND THAT IT IS NOT A TREATY, IS NOT THE LAW, AND IS NOT ENFORCED ANYWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES (all of which is verifiably true).

    3. Then, in my videos, I would show ALL OF THE ENVIROMENTAL CATASTROPHES SUFFERED BY CALIFORNIANS SINCE 1992, when Agenda 21 was first proposed AND REJECTED BY THE UNITED STATES SENATE (DESTRUCTION OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, INCREASED DROUGHT, ABSENCE OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE, PEOPLE RENDERED HOMELESS AND DISPLACED BY FOREST FIRES, ETC.).

    4. Then, in my videos, I would claim that "THE REFUSAL" (ITSELF) of U.S. Government to adopt "Agenda 21" in I992 constitutes conclusive "PROOF" that the U.S. Government ACTUALLY SOUGHT TO PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL THE REMAINING FORESTS IN CALIFORNIA, PURPOSELY INCREASE DROUGHTS IN CALIFORNIA AND PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL SUPPLIES OF FRESH WATER IN CALIFORNIA NOT CONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE to purposely drive Californians out of their rural and suburban homes and into cities far away from the forests and wilderness areas.

    That would make a much BETTER "Agenda 21 Hoax", BECAUSE (except for the nefarious intentions of the U.S. Government part) IT IS ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, VERIFIABLY AND FACTUALLY TRUE IN EVERY SINGLE RESPECT! That would make for a much MORE LOGICAL EXPLANATION for the ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHIES SUFFERED BY CALIFORNIANS than the story that Deborah Tavares peddles now (WHICH ACTUALLY CONTRADICTS THE REAL PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 TO PROTECT THOSE VERY FORESTS FROM DESTRUCTION IN THE FIRST PLACE).


    MORE APPLICATION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS:
    FACT: When corporate interests are threatened by proposed laws that would reduce their profits, they launch a public relations campaign against those proposed laws. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose the proposed laws for reasons of their own selfish interests. Instead, they pretend that they oppose the proposed laws to protect the interests of society in general (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

    EXAMPLE: CONSIDER THIS HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE AS IT RELATES TO AGENDA 21. (NOTE: THIS MAY NOT HAVE EVER OCCURRED. IT IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE TO ILLUSTRATE THIS PRINCIPLE.).

    If made into law, Agenda 21 (a proposed law) would slow the rate at which logging & mining corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests (and thereby slow the rate at which they generate profits).

    So, these corporate interests launch a public relations campaign against Agenda 21. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose Agenda 21 to protect their own profits. Instead, they pretend to oppose Agenda 21 to protect the rest of society (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

    So, they come up with a CAREFULLY-CRAFTED LIE intended to get the rest of society to oppose Agenda 21 as much as they do. Instead of admitting that Agenda 21 would only slow down the rate at which logging & mining corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests, they falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY WORK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION! They falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY EXPAND THE FORESTS INTO AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY DEVELOPED AND ALREADY OCCUPIED BY HUMANS, thereby systematically driving homeowners out of their rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, tightly packed, over-populated cities (something that the REAL Agenda 21 would not actually do).

    This FRAUDULENT characterization of Agenda 21 would serve to make ALL THE REST OF SOCIETY join with those who profit by destroying the forests. The rest of society would OPPOSE "AGENDA 21" in the mistaken belief THAT THEY WERE SAVING THEIR OWN HOMES IN THE PROCESS. Now, THAT is a brilliant lie. But, it gets even better.

    By telling such a lie, logging & mining corporations and real estate developers, like Deborah Tavares, could continue DESTROYING THE FORESTS and continue to cash in without any opposition from the rest of society WHILE SIMULATANEOUSLY BLAMING "AGENDA 21" (WHICH NEVER BECAME LAW IN THE FIRST PLACE) FOR THE HARDSHIPS THAT THEY THEMSELVES KNOWINGLY INFLICT ON THE REST OF SOCIETY BY DESTROYING THE REMAINING FORESTS IN THE PURSUIT OF PROFITS (increased droughts and therefore increased forest fires, decreased fresh water supplies uncontaminated by sewage, etc.). Now, THAT is a TRULY brilliant lie, blaming a SUGGESTION that never became law, for the hardships suffered by Californians, when the SUGGESTION that never became law WAS ACTUALLY DESIGNED AND INTENDED TO PREVENT THOSE VERY HARDSHIPS FROM OCCURRING IN THE FIRST PLACE!

    Remember, the foregoing is only an ILLUSTRATION of how corporate interests engage in disinformation campaigns in order to get society to oppose proposed laws that would reduce their profits.

    The bottom line is that Deborah Tavares has again lied to us about what the what the Agenda 21 document actually says and has again lied to us about the FAKE "Agenda 21 Map" in the same way that she lied to us about every other document she has ever used in support of her claims about the planned extinction of mankind.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 2nd July 2019 at 20:41.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    xylo (25th March 2019)

  5. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    FULL LENGTH EXPLANATIONS OF THE HOAXES OF DEBORAH TAVARES CONTINUED

    5). DEBORAH TAVARES & THE FORGED PG&E EMAIL HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX).

    THE HOAX: In the PG&E FAKE Email Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have obtained emails which effectively prove that PG&E caused the recent fires in California by beaming directed energy beams from satellites in space at California. But, her claims about these emails are lies. They are FORGERIES.

    VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX
    (Note: Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 11:10-20:00)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fb--FC_oQ (at 1:05-3:40)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 27:20-30:10)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WQfXQWHRAw (at 9:25-9:55)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMVJpcqUNUk (at 6:05-13:55).


    Pacific Gas & Electric ("PG&E") is a California electrical utility company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has increasingly resorted to wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical power.

    But, PG&E's conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun 24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth in the form of laser beams or radio frequency beams. The power might then be received by rectennas at receptor stations on Earth and then converted to electricity for use by its customers.

    WHAT PG&E ANNOUNCED IN 2009:
    www.pge.com/en_US/small-medium-business/business-resource-center/energy-management-articles/energy-management-articles/past-articles/energy-from-outerspace.page?WT.mc_id=SMBNewsletter_email_20160 811_phase_link-energy

    Solaren is a private California company which has patented the technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with Solaren to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under the contract, Solaren would own, operate and control all its satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally, Solaren promised to provide PG&E with finished electricity by 2016. But, it ran into financial problems and still has not provided any electricity to PG&E, even at this late date. The California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") approved the contract on the condition that no money from PG&E customers ever be used to develop this technology.

    THE CONTRACT:
    http://www.nbcnews.com/id/30198977/n.../#.XJUcxVKFPIU
    (at paragraphs 1-5)

    https://www.afcea.org/content/space-...closer-reality
    (at paragraphs 8, 9 & 10)

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/
    (at the final two paragraphs)

    https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7
    (at the final two paragraphs)

    Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and has waged war against PG&E because of its "smart meters". So, when the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the technology described above for starting those fires. But, there was a problem. The scientific and economic literature indicated that this technology did not yet exist to blame.

    CURRENT SCIENTIFIC & ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON THIS TECHNOLOGY:
    (Note that the subject fires began occurring in October of 2017)

    This technology will not be in use until the end of the decade. See last 3 paragraphs & final sentence here.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7

    This technology did not exist in 2017. Beginning at the bottom of page 16 here.
    https://space.nss.org/media/NSS-JOUR...olar-Power.pdf

    This technology is not in use in 2019. See the last paragraph.
    https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower

    This technology did not exist in 2018. See the FIRST and LAST paragraph here.
    https://earthsky.org/earth/space-bas...ser-to-reality

    This technology will not be in use until at least 2019. See page 62
    http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/...e_12-14-16.pdf

    This technology did not exist in 2018. See the final paragraph.
    http://www.alternative-energy-news.i...ls-into-orbit/

    SO, TO REBUT ALL THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (some purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

    THE FORGERIES:

    1. PUBLISHED EMAIL FORGERIES:
    http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2...rn-california/

    Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares allegedly forwarded her FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares that this beam technology already existed, that it has long been in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

    2. FORGERIES THAT DEBORAH TAVARES FRAUDULENTLY ATTRIBUTES TO IMAGINARY EXPERTS TO WHOM SHE ALLEGED SENT THE FORGERIES ABOVE. AT ABOUT 20-30% THROUGH THE TEXT HERE: http://smartmetersmurder.com/ (Look for the terms, "comment ONE" and "comment TWO", etc.).

    3. THE FINAL TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 17:25-18:40)

    Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created ALL OF THE FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE "PROOF" that PG&E used this future energy beam technology to start the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.

    THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:

    THE APPEARANCE OF THE FORGERIES
    1. Each one of Deborah Tavares' FAKE emails between PG&E and CPUC contains text which consists of TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LETTER FONTS, TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LETTER SIZES, ONE OF WHICH IS IN BOLD TYPE, THE OTHER WHICH IS NOT. That means Deborah Tavares assembled each of these FAKE emails between PG&E and CPUC from two entirely different documents. Specifically, Deborah Tavares took the heading of REAL emails between PG&E and CPUC and replaced the REAL email message of those emails with a FAKE email message that she FORGED herself! Otherwise the letter font type, letter sizes and boldness of the text would be the same throughout the entire email. SEE PROOF HERE! http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2...rn-california/

    THE CONTENT OF THE FORGERIES:
    1. The subject of the of the REAL emails between PG&E and CPUC which Deborah Tavares ALTERED to fit the hoax (above) was "space weather". But, Deborah Tavares did not know what "space weather" actually was (something a REAL PG&E executive would know).

    "Solar flares" on the surface of the Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of radiation into space. This radiation is called "space weather" (like a "rain" or "storm" OF RADIATION in space). (It is the Earth's atmosphere which protects all life on Earth from this radiation.). The radiation emitted during such "space weather" is so powerful that it can damage or destroy electrical power transformers here on Earth if they are linked to earth-based solar panels. Such damage can result in power outages. That is why "space weather" would be of concern to PG&E. During "damaging space weather", PG&E has to protect its transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some such transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to hospitals which cannot afford power outages for obvious reasons.

    DEBORAH TAVARES' MISTAKE:

    But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this. She mistakenly believed that "space weather" was WEATHER HERE ON EARTH (like drought and fire) that was artificially created and controlled by lasers, radio frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from satellites IN SPACE (a stupid mistake that a REAL PG&E executive WOULD NOT MAKE).

    HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

    In FORGING the phrase "...then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS, AKA EARTHLINGS, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER]" in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring to the adverse consequences of FIRES WHICH PG&E CAN BLAME ON ITS CUSTOMERS (not realizing that "damaging space weather" is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the consequences resulting from "damaging space weather" is actually power outages, NOT FIRES! AND, PG&E CANNOT POSSIBLY BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS FOR ITS OWN POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN EVERY 11 YEARS. So, in creating this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E customers can NEVER be "blamed" for the "consequences" of "damaging space weather", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

    2. Likewise, Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E's contract with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or control any of Solaren's satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any say in how, when or where energy from Solaren's satellites in space would be directed. Instead, Solaren would be solely responsible for all of that. Under the contract, the only thing PG&E would ever do would be to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Under the contract, PG&E is simply a potential future customer of Solaren. Nothing more. But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this.

    HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

    So, in FORGING the sentence, "WE [referring to PG&E] have changed OUR receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol" in the 10:03 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she was so important to PG&E that it actually "targeted" her in Sebastopol with radio frequency waves beamed from satellites in space in retaliation for her opposition to PG&E "smart meters". See PROOF here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20). Are you kidding me?! What a narcissist!

    Regardless, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E will never have any ability to aim Solaren's energy beams or to move Solaren's receptor stations from one place to another (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

    Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren's actual rectennas or receptor site is in Fresno, California, hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert (something a REAL PG&E executive would know).

    PROOF THAT FRESNO (NOT SEBASTOPOL) IS THE REAL RECEPTOR SITE:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/id/30198977/n...XIlKNlKFPIU(at
    the 3rd paragraph)

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/
    (at end of 2nd paragraph)

    https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower
    (at the 16th paragraph)

    Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas at such receiver stations are up to six miles in diameter (which would make it obvious to every person living in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims).

    Finally, a REAL PG&E executive would not refer to Solaren's receptor site as "OUR" receptor site, would know that Solaren's receptor station was in Fresno (not in the Mojave Desert) and would know that PG&E had no power or ability to change Solaren's receptor site. The foregoing stupid mistakes prove that this email is a forgery.

    3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email above, how likely is it that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren's technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E's use of Solaren's technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its customer's money to finance the project. The CPUC did not need a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of Solaren's technology in which PG&E played no part and could claim no credit. This "reminder" serves NO PURPOSE except to defraud and to set up the sentence that follows.

    4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would refer to PG&E's customers as "EARTHLINGS" in connection with an email about a "COVER UP" of "damaging space weather" which can cause nothing but power outages? How is it even possible for PG&E to cover up a power outage? This stupid mistake proves that this email is a forgery.

    5. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS "AKA EARTHLINGS" FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF "DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES WHICH CANNOT POSSIBLY BE BLAMED ON PG&E CUSTOMERS? How is it even possible to "cover up" a power outage affecting hundreds of thousands if not millions of customers? This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

    THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE EMAILS FROM THE IMAGINARY "EXPERTS" ARE FORGERIES:

    1. The sentence, "You as a California resident have every right to know what your 'public utilities' are doing with their (sic) 'RATE DOLLARS', was not written by an expert, as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no "rate dollars" from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the research and development of Solaren's technology (which will be financed, owned and operated solely by Solaren). Under the contract, PG&E would merely be a potential future customer of Solaren and buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Again, no PG&E customer money will ever be used to develop Solaren's technology. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this when writing this FORGERY. That stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

    2. The term, "EARTH, INC." in "comment ONE:" is a "signature" term ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares.
    https://www.google.com/search?ei=4uy...60.uVtaFybaRXU.

    FACT: Note that the term, "EARTH, INC." (above) is a mere logical extension of "USA, INC" another "signature" term ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares. https://www.google.com/search?source...99.LMKUxHgpFgg.

    3. The phrase, "very disturbing" in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares phrase.
    https://www.google.com/search?ei=BO2...71.i3pL90_8tdA

    4. The term, "FOIA", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
    https://www.google.com/search?ei=eO2...99.ntDizkRvUdQ

    5. The term, "iceberg", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
    https://www.google.com/search?ei=0O2...99.RDgj6KM5rHk

    6. The term, "footprints", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
    https://www.google.com/search?ei=Du6...99.UcKcf4ptzag

    7. The term, "assessment", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
    https://www.google.com/search?ei=Se6...99.qaTj4TY5zhg

    8. BOTH "comment ONE:" and "comment TWO:" contain hyphenated terms (" - "), a writing custom rare in today's world, suggesting that BOTH comment ONE and comment TWO were written by the same person, which of course, they were.

    PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES!

    ACTUAL CAUSE OF FIRES IN SOURTHERN CALIFORNIA
    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...acy-aficionado
    https://newrepublic.com/minutes/1506...iracy-theorist
    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/calif...b0ae32af97e953
    https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/...810-story.html

    ACTUAL CAUSE OF FIRES ELSEWHERE IN THE STATE

    https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2...n-suspect-arrested-in-santa-rosa-trail-fires/
    https://www.chicoer.com/2018/09/27/2...ifornia-fires/
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1BA0VL
    https://www.kion546.com/news/2-arres...ires/799909817
    http://www.capradio.org/articles/201...lamathon-fire/
    https://www.foxnews.com/us/arson-sus...-officials-say
    https://www.foxnews.com/us/the-lates...ornia-wildfire
    https://www.redding.com/story/news/2...es/1780261002/
    https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/17/cal-...on-arrest.html
    https://www.usnews.com/news/best-sta...lifornia-fires
    https://www.sbsun.com/2017/08/24/man...o-is-arrested/
    https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/l...439032663.html
    https://wtop.com/national/2018/07/th...near-yosemite/
    https://www.ksbw.com/article/battlin...eason/22677894
    https://people.com/crime/calif-man-s...ting-wildfire/
    https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-arr...ry?id=56830037
    https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/l...490374161.html
    https://wildfiretoday.com/2019/02/18...-clayton-fire/
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/u...on-arrest.html

    OTHER FACTORS
    https://www.vox.com/energy-and-envir...co-los-angeles
    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/e...n-human-cause/
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/...r-12294852.php
    https://www.vox.com/2018/7/20/175828...guson-colorado

    FACT: Not a single arsonist above used a smart meter or directed energy beam from a satellite to start his/her fire.
    [B][I]6).


    6). DEBORAH TAVARES & THE GENOCIDE AGREEMENT HOAX:

    VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oh1RW1Bjqag
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgOtJFGAhhQ
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTdCr_9ZlIk

    AUDIOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/lb/podcas...684450025?mt=2
    https://www.iheart.com/podcast/groun...ares-28944299/
    https://soundcloud.com/groundzeromed...-8-2018/albums
    https://www.mp3ist.com/dinle-indir/t...bruary-8-2018/

    ARTICLES PEDDLING THE HOAX:
    http://cherylkicksass.blogspot.com/2...enting-un.html
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/Genocide%20Treaty.pdf

    THE TRUTH ABOUT THE "GENOCIDE AGREEMENT":
    https://www.oas.org/dil/1948_Convent...f_Genocide.pdf
    https://www.un.org/en/genocidepreven...nvention.shtml.
    https://www.un.org/en/genocidepreven...tSheet-ENG.pdf
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_Convention

    PRE-APPROVAL SENATE DEBATES FOR AND AGAINST AGREEING TO THE AGREEMENT:
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...70-pt4-1-1.pdf (Scroll down to page '4269" about 30% through the text to "Javitiz Supports U.N. Genocide Convention")
    http://www2.mnhs.org/library/findaid...97-00202-6.pdf

    THE DOCUMENT:
    The document is REAL. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. The "Genocide Agreement" is actually the NICKNAME of a proposed 1940's United Nations agreement BANNING GENOCIDE among signatory nations. https://9tube.tv/video/64507641476d6946755449. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPvAGmiFuTI. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...102-Pg3045.pdf.

    The proposed "Genocide Agreement" BANNED "GENOCIDE" of identifiable groups of people, such as national, ethnic, racial or religious groups.

    But, the proposed "Genocide Agreement" DEFINED "GENOCIDE" BROADLY and also banned causing serious bodily or mental harm, inflicting physically destructive conditions, preventing births and displacing children.

    The proposed "Genocide Agreement" MADE THE FOLLOWING ACTS PUNISHABLE: committing a forbidden act, conspiracy to commit a forbidden act, incitement to commit a forbidden act, the attempt to commit a forbidden act, and complicity in the commission of a forbidden act.

    Under the proposed "Genocide Agreement", a citizen accused of violating the agreement could tried in the state where the alleged offense occurred OR COULD BE TRIED BY AN "INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL" under certain conditions.

    Further, under the proposed "Genocide Agreement", nations would be BOUND TO EXTRADITE their own citizens to other nations for prosecution in accordance with existing extradition treaties between those nations.

    Finally, under the proposed "Genocide Agreement", any dispute arising out of the interpretation, application or fulfilment of the agreement WOULD BE DECIDED BY THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE at the request of any party to the dispute.

    CONTROVERSY:
    At the time (1940's through 1980's), Senators from southern states in particular opposed the "Genocide Treaty" because of its implications to the racial struggle between blacks and whites. They argued that under the "Genocide Agreement" white citizens could theoretically be tried and convicted for merely opposing racial integration and merely supporting segregation, for example. Other Senators opposed the "Genocide Agreement" because of its implications on state and federal sovereignty ("invades domestic law", "allows foreigners to over-ride U.S. law", etc.). Regardless, in 1988, the United States Senate approved the "Genocide Agreement" and President Reagan signed it into law. https://9tube.tv/video/637935664a446244424567.html. So, the hoax is not the document itself.

    THE HOAX I:
    Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares' OWN fraudulent claims that the Genocide Agreement ONLY BANS "NATIONS" FROM COMMITTING ACTS OF GENOCIDE and that THE UNITED STATES IS "NOT A NATION", BECAUSE "IT IS A CORPORATION" (which is not governed by the agreement or the ban) WHICH PERMITS THE UNITED STATES TO COMMIT GENOCIDE on a "Day-by-Day" basis, which is why "WE ARE BEING EXTERMINATED". But, the truth is that the United States is not really a "corporation" and the Genocide Agreement actually bans genocide in the United States and subjects those who commit genocide to criminal prosecution.

    THE HOAX II:
    The hoax is also Deborah Tavares' OWN (ENTIRELY INCONSISTENT & CONFLICTING) claims that the genocide agreement APPLIES IN THE UNITED STATES and that it "INVADES DOMESTIC LAWS" and "ALLOWS FOREIGNERS TO 'OVER-RIDE' U.S. laws". (Note that if the Genocide Agreement really "DID NOT APPLY" to the United States because it is a "CORPORATION", it would be impossible for the Genocide Agreement TO SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLY in the United States so as to "invade" or "over-ride" any law in the United States.). Regardless, the truth is that the Genocide Agreement applies in the United States, but only "over-rides" U.S. law as to the specific acts banned by the agreement. Nothing more.

    The United States may actually be killing us all in an act or acts of genocide in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind, but THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT ITSELF (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provides no support for that proposition, because this document applies in the United States and actually BANS GENOCIDE and subjects the violators to criminal prosecution.



    7). THE ROTHSCHILDS ARE RESTRUCTURING NORTH AMERICA HOAX.
    In this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that an October, 30th 2017 press release stated that the Rothschilds were "restructuring north America" itself (as in "taking it over" and "changing it"). But, the subject press release DOES NOT say this. Instead, it merely says that a single Rothschild company was restructuring "IN" (as in "inside") north America. A full reading of the subject press release indicates that the term, "restructuring'' as used in the press release, refers to this Rothschild company RESTRUCTURING DEBT (as in "re-financing"), NOT RESTRUCTURING ALL OF NORTH AMERICA ITSELF! See proof here. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...300545454.html. The purpose of this hoax was to create a link between the "Rothschilds" and Agenda 21, to make Americans think that the "Rothschilds" are "restructuring" all of north America under the Agenda 21 model of "sustainable development" which Deborah Tavares falsely claims will drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.

    8). THE ROTHSCHILDS OWN ALL OF THE UTILITY COMPANIES HOAX"
    In this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that she obtained a curriculum vitea (effectively a resume' for "expert witnesses") attached to the sworn testimony of a member of the Rothschild family wherein he stated that "he OWNED hundreds of utility companies". But, the subject curriculum vitea DOES NOT say this. Instead, it merely says that a "James A. Rothschild" is a financial consultant AND AN "EXPERT WITNESS" who has TESTIFIED in dozens and dozens of court cases in which utility companies were parties. Nothing more. For proof, click here and scroll down to pages 3-5 and pages 36-46.). http://www.ripuc.org/eventsactions/d...hild(3.04).pdf.

    FACT: So, "James A. Rothschild" has no direct or indirect involvement with any of the utility companies named in the court cases listed in the subject transcript. Otherwise, he would not have been allowed to testify as an expert witness in any of those cases.

    Illustration Of James A. Rothschild's Role In All Of These Court Cases
    A city gives an electrical utility company a monopoly on providing city residents with electrical power. In exchange, the utility company agrees that the city will determine the rates its residents will pay for electricity. The city promises the utility that it will set rates so as to allow the utility to pay is expenses and earn a small profit, but that it will not set rates so high as to be a burden on city residents.

    Years later, the city population has tripled and the utility company needs to build a larger electrical plant to meet increased demand. But, the new plant will cost millions. So, the utility company sues the city and claims that it needs a rate increase of 50% to offset its added costs of building the new plant.

    In response, the city hires James A. Rothschild as an expert witness to testify AGAINST the utility company. James A. Rothschild testifies that a 50% rate increase is excessive, because the costs of the new plant can be amortized over a twenty year period which can be absorbed by a mere 5% rate increase.

    By hiring James A. Rothschild to testify as an expert witness in the case, the city saved each city resident a small fortune. Note that in the case above (reflected in the link above containing the subject transcript), JAMES A. ROTHSCHILD WAS HIRED BY THE CITY TO TESTIFY AGAINST THE RATE INCREASE SOUGHT BY THE FERRY COMPANY. So, it is NOT the case that James A. Rothschild is only hired by utility companies to testify against the public and in favor of rate increases sought by utility companies.

    MORE FRAUD:
    In support of this same hoax, Deborah Tavares also fraudulently claims that she recently attended a PG&E stock holder's meeting wherein the PG&E Board Of Directors were allegedly seated in the front row of the audience and individually introduced to the stockholders. She fraudulently claims that a person named "Rothschild" was introduced to the stockholders as a PG&E "Board Member" (as if that would make him the "OWNER" of PG&E). See proof here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NZo...ature=youtu.be (at 3:00-3:45). But, this claim is not so. NO PG&E BOARD MEMBER HAS THE NAME, "ROTHSCHILD". See proof here. http://www.pgecorp.com/corp/about-us...directors.page. The purpose of this hoax was to fraudulently create a link between the "Rothschilds" and Agenda 21, to make Americans think that the Rothschilds are using "THEIR" utility company technologies as "weapons" to "target" us all and to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" and "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.

    THE SOLE CONNECTION:
    The sole connection that we can find between PG&E and Rothschild (person or entity) is "Roger H. Kimmel" (who is NOT a Rothschild). Kimmel was once an "independent" board member of PG&E (meaning he neither owned nor controlled any stock directly or indirectly in PG&E) at the same time he was a board member of Rothschild North America, Inc. (a bank). Kimmel resigned his position with PG&E on January 14th, 2019 when PG&E filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/corpor...rnia-utility-1. In order for the Rothschilds to be the sole "owners" of PG&E, they would have to own all of the stock in all of the following corporations which own stock in PG&E. https://stockzoa.com/ticker/pcg/. For the Rothschilds to own a controlling interest in PG&E, they would have to own at least half of the stock in all of these same corporations which own stock in PG&E. https://stockzoa.com/ticker/pcg/.

    CONCLUSION:
    The Rothschilds do not "own" PG&E, because they do not own all of the stock of all of these corporations which own stock in PG&E. https://stockzoa.com/ticker/pcg/. The Rothschilds do not own a controlling interest in PG&E, because they do not own at least half of the stock in all of these same corporations which own stock in PG&E. https://stockzoa.com/ticker/pcg/. No current officer or director of PG&E has any known connection to the Rothschilds or any Rothschild entity. Having a single friendly board member of PG&E (like "Roger H. Kimmel") does not make the Rothschilds the "owners" of PG&E.



    9). THE LONDON ACCOUNTING FIRMS WILL BANKRUPT ALL OUR CITIES HOAX
    THE HOAX: In this hoax, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that the global elite have a plan to bankrupt all of our cities by billing them excessive amounts for accounting services. She also claims that through these accounting services, the global elite have “placed a value on the air that we breathe”, "on our fresh water resources”, “on every tree in our forests” and on all of our other natural resources. Finally, she claims that this "value" is actually a "price" that we will have to pay the global elite for our air, water, trees and other natural resources. But, none of this is so.

    VIDEO OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoEn...OCTXngmcjSCCcd (at 0-11:10).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoEn...OCTXngmcjSCCcd (at 7:30-14:30).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJzt...&index=13&t=0s (at 40:00-1:00:00 and the last minute in particular).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRRk...RihzD&index=14 (at 35:20-36:15)

    Deborah Tavares says that her factual basis for making these claims (above) is a December, 26th, 2017 newspaper article in the Press Democrat, a local Santa Rosa, California newspaper. For reasons that are now clear, Deborah Tavares never posted the subject article online or provided links to it. But, she claimed it said Ernst & Young would bankrupt the City of Santa Rosa because the city had hired Ernst & Young to determine the amount that the city had lost as a result of the recent fires in northern California.

    Deborah Tavares also says another factual basis for her claims is the Ernst & Young website which indicated that it was a 200 year old, international accounting firm based in London, serving international clients.

    BACKGROUND:

    ERNST & YOUNG: Ernst & Young is a London based firm which offers a number of professional services to governments and businesses, including accounting, legal and risk assessment.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_%26_Young. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/who-we-are.

    THE LAW: When American cities, counties or states incur financial losses in a natural disaster, they may REQUEST REIMBURSEMENT from the federal government (FEMA) and any state counterpart. But, FEMA requires AUDITED accounting of all amounts sought in REIMBURSEMENT. Further, SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE and EXPERTISE is needed to prepare the federal REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS and in appealing any FEMA denials of REIMBURSEMENT.
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...l#seqnum206.15.
    https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE...eprd564251.pdf.
    https://www.fema.gov/media-library-d...160705_508.pdf.
    https://www.fema.gov/media-library-d...ent_Policy.pdf.
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/5121.

    THE SUBJECT NEWSPAPER ARTICLE:

    The Press Democrat
    WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 26, 2018. Santa Rosa, California. PRESSDEMOCRAT.COM

    [From page 1.]

    SR tapping reserves for fire consultant
    By WILL SCHMIDT
    THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

    Santa Rosa will dig further into its budget reserves to pay an additional $813,000 to the disaster recovery consultant it retained after the October 2017 fires. The extension approved by the Santa Rosa City Council last week retains London-based consulting firm Ernst & Young through May and brings the total maximum value of the contract to $2.3 million. The cost of the extension was not included in the city’s current budget forecast, which had estimated Santa Rosa would have $6.5 million in reserves.

    The cost of fire damage and the resulting recovery efforts have eaten into the city’s reserve funding and exacerbated the strain of Santa Rosa’s existing budget deficit, though the city’s funding woes were buoyed somewhat by the passage of a quarter-cent sales tax hike approved by voters in November. That tax increase will take effect in April.

    Ernst & Young, which has an office in San Francisco, was hired in December 2017 to help local officials assess damage from the 2017 wildfires, request reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and represent the city in [reimbursement] talks with FEMA and the California Office Of Emergency Services. Ernst & Young also worked with the city and another outside adviser, Hagerty Consulting, to assess the cities unmet disaster needs, a figure estimated at about $400 million.

    Much of Ernst & Young’s efforts have been behind the scenes, but the city recently revealed an online tracker developed in coordination with the consultant (http:/bit.ly/SRFEMA) reflecting the city’s disaster recovery requests [for reimbursement] to FEMA.The city has documented 32 projects with a combined estimated damage of about 66.5 million. FEMA has reimbursed about $2.8 in disaster costs so far. Ernst & Young will continue to help the city appeal four requests [for reimbursement that FEMA denied] for about $17 million that FEMA initially deemed ineligible for reimbursement.

    City Manager Sean McGlynn told the city council last week that the contract extension would be the last one between Santa Rosa and Ernst & Young for this disaster recovery [reimbursement] contract. He noted that Santa Rosa’s efforts to secure reimbursements will be far from finished once the contract is up.

    “There is going to be a huge amount of time and energy spent by staff in managing this.” McGlynn said.
    The city expects state and FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT FOR MOST OF THE COSTS of the Ernst & Young contract according to a staff report. [This means that FEMA will not reimburse the city for that TINY PORTION of Ernst & Young's fees associated with the city's reimbursement requests for lost city property that was NEVER ELIGIBLE for reimbursement by FEMA in the first place.] The report also noted that while the city’s budget reserves are depleted, there is sufficient funding to pay out the contract [WHICH WILL BE REIMBURSED ANYWAY].

    The city council is set to consider budget cuts and hold a public hearing on city spending priorities as part of its January 29th meeting
    __________________________________________________ _________________
    You can reach Staff Writer Will Schmidt at 707-521-5207 or will.schmidt@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @usreports.

    NO CITY IS GOING BANKRUPT as a result of hiring Ernst & Young to assess fire damage or to assist in obtaining reimbursement from FEMA!

    What Deborah Tavares did not know when creating this hoax is that the administrative costs that a city, county or state incurs in its efforts to obtain REIMBURSEMENT from FEMA ARE ALSO REIMBURSED BY FEMA BY LAW (not just the value of the city property destroyed in the natural disaster). https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/44/206.439; https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/44/part-207. That means under the law, the costs of Ernst & Young's accounting services ARE THEMSELVES REIMBURSED BY FEMA and ULTIMATELY COST THE CITY NOTHING WHATSOEVER! But, Deborah Tavares doesn't know enough to even realize this.

    After all, it is FEMA itself which requires the services of third-party accounting firms, like Ernst & Young, in the first place (to provide reliable, AUDITED information to FEMA to make certain that FEMA does not over-reimburse or under-reimburse cities, counties and states after disasters). https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/2/part-2600.

    That means that not only will Santa Rosa not go bankrupt by hiring Ernst & Young or similar firms. It also means that every other city, county or state in the United States who hires firms like Ernst & Young to perform AUDITED, certified accounting of disaster losses will not go bankrupt either. This is because all of those costs are reimbursed by FEMA by law.


    FACT: In order for Ernst & Young to do its job, it has to place a “value” on all damaged or destroyed publicly-owned property (infrastructure, roads, bridges, buildings, utilities, public lands).

    But, Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that Ernst & Young is acting on behalf of the global elite to “place a value on the air that we breathe”, "on our fresh water resources”, "on every tree in our forests" and on all of our other natural resources. But, nothing in the article suggests that Ernst & Young had or will place a “value” on the air, water or on every tree in the forests.

    Deborah Tavares claims that this process of Ernst & Young placing a ”value” on the air, the water and on all other natural resources is currently going on across the globe to enslave all of mankind into paying for natural resources that they already have.

    Deborah Tavares falsely claims that the “value” that Ernst & Young places on all of these natural resources is actually a “price” that all of mankind will have to pay to the global elite in exchange for these natural resources.

    Deborah Tavares falsely claims that local governments will act as “collection agents” for the global elite in this regard and levy taxes on all of mankind to collect the amount due the global elite in exchange for all of these natural resources.

    CONCLUSION:
    For reasons stated above, Deborah Tavares' claims are false.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 15th July 2019 at 18:10.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    xylo (25th March 2019)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

      FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATIONS OF THE HOAXES OF DEBORAH TAVARES CONTINUED

    10). DEBORAH TAVARES & THE JUDGE "DALE" HOAX


    VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ACTUALLY ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (AT 42:10-49:15);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (AT 7:15-7:55, 27:00-27:55, 31:15-33:10, 45:05-46:00, 52:35-53:45, 54:35-54:50);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45).

    VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES PEDDLING HER OWN FORGERY:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (AT 51:50-53:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81qlF5v3WY8 (AT 7:00-7:25);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4 (AT 2:20-2:40);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dgYbD6fcw8 (AT 34:20-36:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAryrdGenL4 (AT 1:30-1:45).

    THE JUDGE "DALE" FORGERIES (FAKE BOOKS):
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....ours-nov-2.pdf (SEE LIST OF AUTHORS AT BOTTOM OF 2ND PAGE).

    OTHER JUDGE "DALE" FORGERIES (ARTICLES):
    Note that most of the other Judge "DALE” FORGERIES posted online are mere re-prints of "section five" of “The Great American Adventure” UNDER DIFFERENT NAMES (“Retired Federal Judge Spills The Beans”, “Legal Advice From A Retired Judge Turned Whistle Blower”, etc.).

    "SPILLS THE BEANS" FORGERIES:
    https://mainerepublicemailalert.file...-the-beans.pdf (Note the TITLE);
    https://scannedretina.com/2013/05/06...lls-the-beans/(note the TITLE);
    https://mobile.twitter.com/OPPTInNow...37110874140672 (note the TILE).

    "WHISTLEBLOWER" FORGERIES:
    https://livingintheprivate.blogspot....for-court.html
    (scroll down to about 50% through the text of this page to the line immediately above the link in ALL BLUE TYPE for the term, "WHISTLEBLOWER" and "JUDGE DALE");
    https://www.educatedinlaw.org/wp-con...he-Private.pdf (scroll down to about 95% through the textof this page to the line immediately above the link in ALL BLUE TYPE for the term, "WHISTLEBLOWER" and "JUDGE DALE").

    TIME LINE:

    Deborah Tavares, Rodney "DALE" Class (as "Judge DALE" ) and Al Whitney HAVE BEEN COLLABERATING on hoaxes SINCE AT LEAST APRIL 10, 2010, the ACTUAL DATE on which Deborah Tavares, herself, POSTED THE FOLLOWING "JUDGE DALE" FORGERY ON HER OWN WEBSITE.
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf. In January 2011, Al Whitney posted the "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (EXPOSED IN POST #58) on wordpress.com. Since that date, Deborah Tavares and her partners have PUBLICLY CREDITED Rodney "DALE" Class (NOT "JUDGE DALE") with the "discovery" of that same "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY. For proof, Scroll down to just above the video here. https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-with-justice/. For proof, scroll down to just above the video here. https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/. For proof, scroll down to the first full sentence here. https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...pt-23-2013.pdf. But, a year later in 2012, Deborah Tavares, without thinking it through, incorporated that same "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (which she had publicly credited to Rod Class) into a book which she claims was written by "Judge DALE". See page 5 here. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf. Sometimes, it is hard to keep your lies straight.


    THE HOAX:
    "Judge DALE" is a hoax. This is the reason that you have never actually seen a photo, video or live appearance of "Judge DALE". He does not exist. The people pretending to be "Judge DALE" in the "Judge DALE forgeries" and online are Deborah Tavares, Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") and amateur legal theorist, Rodney DALE Class, the namesake of "Judge DALE".

    Beginning in April 10, 2010, Deborah Tavares, Anita Larin (AKA "Al Whitney") and amateur legal theorist, Rodney "DALE" Class began publishing a series of FAKE "legal" books which revealed FAKE "legal" information WHICH THEY HAD WRITTEN THEMSLEVES. But, they fraudulently told the American people that these FORGERIES were written by a FAKE "retired federal judge" named, "Judge DALE" (which uses Rodney "DALE" Class' middle name, "DALE", as an inside joke on the American people).

    The "Judge DALE Forgeries" include: "The Matrix And The US Constitution" (2010); "The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America" (2012) and "Lawfully Yours" (2014). But, excerpts of these FORGERIES are posted all over the web as articles or comments. (See links above.).

    In the "Judge DALE forgeries", Deborah Tavares, Anita Larin (AKA "Al Whitney") and Rodney "DALE" Class (all while pretending to be "Judge DALE") falsely claimed that the American legal system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt and diabolical. Specifically, Tavares and her partners claimed, among other things, that ALL GOVERNMENTS AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (including the courts) are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS" and that ALL AMERICAN LAWYERS are actually working for the international bankers, foreign traitors who have sworn an oath to the Queen, non-American citizens, double agents, communists, Satanists, imposters, unlicensed, unqualified, uneducated, self-appointed, illegal, invalid, corrupt, diabolical and THE ENEMY OF ALL MANKIND. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that the American justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against INNOCENT Americans.

    ADMISSION:
    Deborah Tavares has already privately ADMITTED this to us. So, no further evidence is necessary to establish that my claims about this hoax are true. But, I will provide that further evidence anyway.

    THE NAME:
    Rodney "DALE" Class and Judge "DALE" JUST HAPPEN TO HAVE THE VERY SAME NAME (A TRULY INCREDIBLE COINCIDENCE)!

    What are the odds of that?


    RODNEY "DALE" CLASS' INTERNET RADIO SHOW:
    Rodney "DALE" Class has his own homemade, internet radio show on AIB Talkshoe Radio (spelled correctly). The content of Class' radio show is simply A PRE-RECORDED "CONFERENCE CALL" which Class made earlier. Click here. https://www.talkshoe.com/show/aib-radio/reviews .

    Ironically, Judge "DALE" ALSO JUST HAPPENS TO HOST "CONFERENCE CALLS", A TRULY INCREDIBLE COINCIDENCE! See proof here. (Look for BOTH the terms, "JUDGE DALE" and "CONFERENCE CALL" in the 1st full paragraph in the following link.). http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....reset-and.html

    What are the odds of that?

    On his radio show and online, Rodney "DALE" Class falsely claims that all governments and government agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS". See poof here. (Look for the term, "ROD CLASS" and the term, "CORPORATION" in the TITLE of this article. https://globalfreedommovement.org/ex...ith-rod-class/. Look for the term, "ROD CLASS" and the term, "CORPORATION" in the 2nd full paragraph in this link). http://houseofpraani.com/portfolio/itnj/. On his radio show and in his videos, Rodney "DALE" Class also recommends that the public sue their ELECTED representatives and their agencies in ADMINISTRATIVE COURT using the ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. See proof here. (Read the description paragraph BELOW THE TITLE in of the following video.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdYzJBFfhqU.

    Ironically, "Judge DALE" ALSO JUST HAPPENS to falsely claim that all governments and government agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS" and ALSO JUST HAPPENS to recommend that the public sue their ELECTED representatives and their agencies in ADMINITRATIVE COURT using the "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS", an incredible coincidence! See proof here. (Look for the terms, "JUDGE DALE", "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" and "CORPORATIONS" in the first 5 full paragraphs in the following link.). http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....d-further.html. (Look for the terms, "JUDGE DALE", "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" and "CORPORATIONS" in the first 5 full paragraphs in the following link.). http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_U..._printer.shtml.

    What are the odds of that?

    ANALYSIS:
    ALL COMBINED, the text in the SEVEN immediately preceding links PROVE that not only do Rodney "DALE" Class and "Judge DALE" have the SAME NAME, BOTH Rodney "DALE" Class and "Judge DALE" JUST HAPPEN to do and say THE VERY SAME THINGS! Specifically, they BOTH JUST HAPPEN TO HOST "CONFERENCE CALLS" (A TRULY INCREDIBLE COINICDENCE!), they BOTH JUST HAPPEN to falsely claim that all governments and all government agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS" (another amazing coincidence!) and they BOTH JUST HAPPEN to recommend that the public sue their ELECTED representatives and their agencies IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT using the "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" (still yet, another amazing coincidence!).

    What are the odds of that?

    FACT
    :
    Further, Rod Class' own personal court filings JUST HAPPEN TO CONTAIN the same exact language, same exact phrases, same irrelevant case citations ("Clearfield Trust", etc.) and contain the same exact stupid mistakes that appear in the "Judge DALE" forgeries.

    What are the odds of that?

    FACT:
    Not surprisingly, BOTH Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney ALSO JUST HAPPEN to falsely claim that all governments and government agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS" (yet, another amazing coincidence!). Indeed, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney were so supportive of that single false claim that they actually created THEIR OWN SEPARATE HOAX in support of that single proposition. THE FULL EXPLANATION OF THAT HOAX APPEARS IN POST #63 below. See Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney engaged in that hoax here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-qlZCp9rdI

    What are the odds of that?

    THE "SIGNATURE" TERM "MATRIX" APPEARS IN THE TITLE OF THIS "JUDGE DALE" FORGERY:
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf. NOTE THAT DEBORAH TAVARES HERSELF POSTED THIS "MATRIX" COLLABERATION ON HER OWN PERSONAL WEBSITE ON APRIL 10, 2010.

    THE "MATRIX":

    Note that the title of the immediately preceding "Judge DALE forgery" (above) is "The 'MATRIX' And The US Constitution". This term, "MATRIX", is extremely significant because Deborah Tavares, Rodney "DALE" Class, Judge "DALE" and Al Whitney ALL JUST HAPPEN to use this "SIGNATURE" term, "MATRIX", over and over in their online hoaxes. The following links provide EXCELLENT EXAMPLES of their use of the "SIGNATURE" term, "MATRIX", in their online hoaxes.

    RODNEY "DALE" CLASS HAPPENS TO USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM "MATRIX" IN HIS PERSONAL VIDEO HOAXES. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=22s (Go to :30 - :45 and see an actual photo of Rodney "DALE" Class (the REAL "Judge DALE") actually standing inside the "MATRIX" as described in the immediately preceding forgery entitled, "The MATRIX and the US Constitution", allegedly by "Judge DALE");

    NOT SURPRISINGLY, JUDGE "DALE" ALSO JUST ALSO HAPPENS TO USE THE SIGNATURE TERM "MATRIX" IN THIS HOAXES.
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf. (NOTE "MATRIX" IN THE TITLE AND THE AUTHOR OF THIS FORGERY);
    http://howtoexitthematrix.com/2015/0...by-judge-dale/. (NOTE "MATRIX" IN THE TITLE AND THE AUTHOR OF THIS FORGERY);
    http://www.matrixfiles.com/Dale/TheG...ture-PART1.pdf. (NOTE THE "MATRIX" IN NAME OF THIS WEBSITE AND NOTE THE AUTHOR OF THIS FORGERY);
    http://mikiverselaw.blogspot.com/201...e-america.html. (SCROLL DOWN TO THE "MATRIX" AND NOTE THE AUTHOR OF THIS FORGERY);

    NOT SURPRISINGLY, DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY ALSO JUST HAPPEN TO USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM "MATRIX" IN THEIR HOAXES. Note: Due to this very post, Deborah Tavares has recently panicked and has taken down over a dozen of her YouTube videos which contained the terms, "Deborah Tavares" and "Matrix". But, evidence of her use of the term, "MATRIX" still remains.

    DEBORAH TAVARES' "MATRIX" HOAXES:
    https://www.google.com/search?source...60._V_qcybMjZs Click and SCROLL DOWN. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
    https://www.google.com/search?ei=jFc...60.tuxHvVr43HA Click and SCROLL DOWN. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX5IJMevyP8 (See TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eR...Q&index=6&t=0s (See TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (at 27:00-27:15);
    http://www.oom2.com/t34873-jeff-rens...ing-the-matrix. (SCROLL DOWN to TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ron-rec...p-the-crimenet (See the FIRST FULL SENTENCE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
    https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x33at9f (See TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );
    https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/...cument_matrix/ (See TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" ;
    https://noliesradio.org/archives/134062. (note "QUANTUM MATRIX RADIO".);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsPSju_E1k (LISTEN TO THIS VIDEO. It is a Deborah Tavares "MATRIX" video from which she has deleted her name.).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eR...Q&index=6&t=0s (LISTEN TO THIS VIDEO. It is a Deborah Tavares "MATRIX" video.).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtefEiriQVM (See DESCRIPTION below title);

    AL WHITNEY' "MATRIX" HOAXES:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyzbkN7ClHM (See the TITLE. Look for the term, "MATRIX" );


    NOTE: Note that Rodney "DALE" Class (in his "MATRIX" VIDEO above), "Judge DALE" (in the FORGERY entitled, "The MATRIX And The US Constitution" above), Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney (in their ARTICLES, WEBSITES and VIDEOS above) ALL JUST HAPPEN to use the same, shared, common, UNIQUE, "SIGNATURE" term, "MATRIX", in the wording of their online HOAXES (and elsewhere, they use the "SIGNATURE" term, "BOMBSHELL", etc.), another amazing coincidence!

    What are the odds of that?

    FACT:

    BOTH DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY JUST HAPPEN TO POST THE WORK OF BOTH ROD CLASS AND "JUDGE DALE" ON BOTH OF THEIR OWN WEBSITES. THIS PROVES THAT "BOTH" DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY JUST HAPPEN TO BE AFFILIATED WITH, APPROVE OF, SUPPORT, PUBLISH AND FEATURE THE WORK OF BOTH "JUDGE DALE" AND ROD CLASS ON THEIR OWN WEBSITES, an amazing coincidence.

    -
    WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF THAT?

    THE WEBSITE OF DEBORAH TAVARES:
    Note that Deborah Tavares posted the following "Judge DALE" forgery on her own website. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf.On page FIVE (5) of this particular "Judge DALE" forgery, you will find the "COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM" DIAGRAM (EXPOSED IN POST # 52 ABOVE). Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and Al Whitney have all publicly credited Rod Class with "discovering" that particular document, NOT "JUDGE DALE". For proof, Scroll down to just above the video here. https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-with-justice/. For proof, scroll down to just above the video here. https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/. For proof, scroll down to the first full sentence here. https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...pt-23-2013.pdf. (Deborah Tavares herself publicly credited Rod Class with discovering that particular document in her EPIC YouTube video which she has recently taken down. So, no links to that video are currently available). This means that by her own admission, the work of BOTH Rodney "DALE" Class and "Judge DALE" are published on her own website, because the work of BOTH appear in the following "Judge DALE forgery" which Deborah Tavares herself posted on her own website. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (See page 5 of this "Judge DALE forgery" for work that Deborah Tavares has publicly attributed to Rod Class).

    What are the odds of that?

    THE WEBSITE OF AL WHITNEY:
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/ta...e-dale/page/2/. (actually a Rodney "DALE" Class link);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/judge-dale-part-5/.(a Judge "DALE" link);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/rod-class/. (a Rodney "DALE" Class https://anticorruptionsociety.com/tag/judge-dale/.(a Judge "DALE" link);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/ta...ey-dale-class/ .(a Rodney "DALE" Class link);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/tag/judge-dale/.(a Judge "DALE" link);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/ta...ey-dale-class/ .(a Rodney "DALE" Class link);

    NOTE IN THE LINKS ABOVE THAT BOTH DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY JUST HAPPEN TO POST THE WORK OF BOTH ROD CLASS AND "JUDGE DALE" ON THEIR OWN WEBSITES, AN AMAZING COINCIDENCE![/COLOR]


    AND, WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF THAT?

    ANALYSIS:
    Of all of Deborah Tavares' hoaxes, the "Judge DALE" Hoax is perhaps her most diabolical. As a result of this single hoax, millions of Americans WERE INCITED TO THE POINT OF HATRED AND VIOLENCE against INNOCENT Americans. As a result of this single hoax, countless thousands of Americans have WASTED years of their lives, thousands of dollars of their own money, all of their resources and all of their energy FIGHTING AN IMAGINARY ENEMY (an imaginary Satanic and diabolical justice system described in her forgeries) which is NOT REAL, using IMAGINARY LAWS (described in her forgeries) which are NOT REAL, by employing the legal teachings of an IMAGINARY "RETIRED FEDERAL JUDGE DALE" (described in her forgeries) who is NOT REAL.

    As a result of this single hoax, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Americans
    HAVE LOST THEIR OWN COURT CASES and as a result, actually LOST their own time, LOST their own homes, LOST their own money, LOST their own property, LOST their own liberty AND PERHAPS EVEN LOST THEIR OWN LIVES IN RELIANCE UPON THE FALSE LEGAL CLAIMS IN THE "JUDGE DALE" FORGERIES.

    CONCLUSION: Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares', THE "JUDGE DALE FORGERIES" DO NOT REFLECT THE TRUTH ABOUT THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM OR ABOUT AMERICAN LAWYERS.


    11). DEBORAH TAVARES & THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM HOAX

    VIDEO OF DEBORAH TAVARES' PARTNERS ENGAGED IN THIS HOAX.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ruq2LMDCcg (Here, Al Whitney, Rod Class and a co-conspirator pretend to be "shocked" while reviewing their OWN FORGERY).

    NOTE: Because Deborah Tavares found out that I was going to expose this particular hoax, she panicked and took down her epic YouTube video wherein she spent hours engaged in this hoax and wherein she pretended to be "shocked" and "horrified" by her FAKE government document (which she herself actually created). It was absolutely priceless! It was TRULY OSCAR WORTHY!


    ARTICLES PEDDLING THE HOAX:
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-with-justice/ (A fraudulent article. Note website.)
    https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/ (Note the author of this fraudulent article.)
    https://i-uv.com/court-registry-investment-system-cris

    THE FINISHED FORGERY:
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE.).

    TIME LINE:

    Deborah Tavares, Rodney "DALE" Class (as "Judge DALE" ) and Al Whitney HAVE BEEN COLLABERATING on hoaxes SINCE AT LEAST APRIL 10, 2010, the ACTUAL DATE on which Deborah Tavares, herself, POSTED THE FOLLOWING "JUDGE DALE" FORGERY ON HER OWN WEBSITE.
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/the-matr...-bk-format.pdf. In January 2011, Al Whitney posted the "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (THE FORGERY EXPOSED HERE) on wordpress.com. Since that date, Deborah Tavares and her partners have PUBLICLY CREDITED Rodney "DALE" Class (NOT "JUDGE DALE") with the "discovery" of that "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY. For proof, Scroll down to just above the video here. https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-with-justice/. For proof, scroll down to just above the video here. https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/. For proof, scroll down to the first full sentence here. https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...pt-23-2013.pdf. But, a year later in 2012, Deborah Tavares, without thinking it through, incorporated that same "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY (which she had publicly credited to Rod Class) into a book which she claims was written by "Judge DALE". See page 5 here. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf[/URL]. Sometimes, it is hard to keep all of your lies straight.


    THE HOAX:
    In "THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM HOAX", Deborah Tavares and her partners (including Rod Class, Al Whitney and Jeanette Triplett) fraudulently claimed to have "discovered" a "secret" or "leaked" government document which she claims "PROVES" that ALL OF THE MONEY that the public ever pays to the courts in FINES and PENALTIES is forwarded on to the "Federal Reserve" to keep (in the same way the IRS collects money from income earners and allegedly forwards it to the Federal Reserve to keep). The purpose of this hoax (like the "Judge DALE Hoax") was to make Americans think that the American justice system is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against INNOCENT Americans.

    To carry out this hoax, Deborah Tavares and her partners (including Rod Class) fraudulently MANUFACTURED a FAKE document to support of their hoax (just like they did with all of the "Judge DALE FORGERIES" ) and they made their forgery LOOK like an official government document. BUT, THEY MADE SOME STUPID MISTAKES shown below!

    IMPORTANT LEGAL BACKGROUND:
    Most state and federal court houses have a "COURT REGISTRY". A court registry is a court-supervised, escrow-type account managed at an office in the court house. In extremely rare cases (when the ownership or right to money is in dispute), litigants voluntarily (and temporarily) deposit money into the court registry until their case is over at which time the judge orders the clerk to pay the money deposited to the winning side in the case. ALL OF THE MONEY THAT IS EVER DEPOSITED INTO A COURT REGISTRY GOES ONLY TO THE LITIGANTS THEMSELVES. NO OTHER PARTY OF ANY TYPE EVER KEEPS ANY OF THE MONEY THAT IS EVER DEPOSITED INTO A COURT REGISTERY. Less than one percent of all cases involve such a deposit into a "Court Registry". So, such deposits are extremely rare. (Have you ever made a deposit into a "Court Registry"?)

    ILLUSTRATION OF HOW A COURT REGISTRY ACTUALLY WORKS (a REAL case):
    A car owner obtains a written repair estimate of $1,000 from a repair shop and on that basis, puts his car into the repair shop for repairs. When the owner returns to pick up his repaired car, the repair shop refuses to release it to the owner unless the owner pays the repair shop $2,000 for the repairs.

    But, the car owner knows the law. So, he goes to the court house and deposits $2,000 into the court registry (the total amount in dispute), obtains a receipt for that deposit and obtains a court order which requires the repair shop to immediately release his repaired car to him on the grounds that all of the money sought by the repair shop (all $2,000) is safe and is on deposit in the court registry.

    A month later at the trial, the judge rules that the repair shop is bound by its written repair estimate of $1,000 and orders the clerk to pay the repair shop $1,000 (the amount of the original repair estimate) and to refund $1,000 to the car owner (the amount of the overcharge). Thus, only the litigants themselves receive money that is deposited into a court registry.

    By voluntarily (and temporarily) depositing money into the court registry BEFORE the case began, the car owner got to use his car while waiting for his court case to be resolved, 30 days. If the car owner had not voluntarily deposited money into the court registry, he would not have been able to use his car for this 30 day period. So, the purpose of a court registry is to BENEFIT and PROTECT the litigants themselves.

    THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM

    Courts are not banks. So, courts themselves must deposit money deposited into their court registries into banks or other financial institutions. In so doing, courts earn "interest" on those deposits. But, depositing court registry money into commercial banks is risky. Banks can fail and the interest rates that banks pay on deposits are very low. To remedy these two problems, Congress passed the Court Registry Investment System Act. Under this Act, federal courts now "deposit" their court registry money into the U.S. Treasury because, unlike banks, the U.S. Treasury cannot fail and because the interest rates that the U.S. Treasury pays on those “deposits” is higher than the interest rates paid by banks.

    That means the Court Registry “INVESTMENT SYSTEM” is about the courts EARNING INTEREST (ONLY) on court registry deposits. It has NOTHING to do with the PRINCIPLE amount of money deposited into a court registry, because all of that money belongs only to litigants themselves. But, Deborah Tavares and her partners do not know enough to even realize this.

    THE FORGERY:
    Deborah Tavares and her partners found a REAL government document reflecting a REAL CASH FLOW DIAGRAM accurately depicting how the "Court Registry Investment System" actually works.This diagram graphically depicted (with both DRAWINGS and WORDS): 1). a litigant depositing money into a court registry; 2). the court "depositing" that money into the U.S. Treasury (ACTUALLY SHOWING A DRAWING WHICH UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTED THE “UNITED STATES TREASURY BUILDING”); 3). the U.S. Treasury returning that money to the court; and 4). the court paying that money to the winning litigant in the case. (Obviously, Deborah Tavares and her partners overlooked this final step in the diagram, THE RETURN OF ALL OF THE MONEY DEPOSITED TO THE WINNING LITIGANT IN THE CASE.). See the current version of that diagram here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    But, this original version of the "CASH FLOW DIAGRAM" did not incite hatred or violence against innocent Americans. So, in order to incite that hatred and violence against innocent Americans, Deborah Tavares and her partners FRAUDULENTLY ALTERED the original diagram to make it look like the courts collect money from litigants AND THEN FORWARD IT TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO KEEP (to create the illusion that the courts are merely “collection agents” for the Federal Reserve). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    Specifically, Deborah Tavares and her partners fraudulently deleted the original label on the diagram which originally read, "UNITED STATES TREASURY (UST)” (UNDER THE DRAWING WHICH UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTED THE "UNITED STATE TREASURY BUILDING") and they FRAUDULENTLY replaced that ORIGINAL LABEL with a FAKE label which now reads, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)”. See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    We know the current words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” which now appear in the diagram were FORGED because of THE TINY WORDS STILL INSIDE THE ARROW ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE DIAGRAM WHICH DEBORAH TAVARES AND HER PARTNERS OBVIOUSLY OVERLOOKED. These words read, “DEPOSIT IN TREASURY” (referring to courts depositing court registry money into the U.S. Treasury, not depositing money into the Federal Reserve “BANK” as the diagram now reads). Note also that the tiny arrow on the left side of the diagram POINTS DIRECTLY TO THE DRAWING IN THE CENTER OF THE DIAGRAM WHICH UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTS THE “UNITED STATES TREASURY BUILDING” (not the Federal Reserve “BANK”). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    We also know that the current words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” now in the diagram were FORGED because they are THE ONLY WORDS ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE DIAGRAM which consist SOLELY OF ALL CAPITAL LETTERS (an inconsistency that a real government document would not contain). Not even the TITLE of the diagram appears in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    Likewise, we also know that the words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” now in the diagram were FORGED because they are THE ONLY WORDS ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE DIAGRAM which consist SOLELY OF LARGER, BOLD-FACED TYPE (an inconsistency that a real government document would not contain). Not even the TITLE of the diagram appears in LARGER, BOLD-FACED TYPE. See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    Note that it was a similar stupid mistake which led to the discovery that Deborah Tavares' emails were FORGED in the "FORGED PG&E Email Hoax" which is explained on page one of this thread. And, PATTERNS OF CONDUCT NEVER LIE!

    We also know that the words, "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (FRB)” now in the diagram were FORGED because the federal government DOES NOT refer to the "Federal Reserve SYSTEM" or the "Federal Reserve BUILDING" in Washington, D.C. as the "Federal Reserve BANK" (a stupid mistake that a real government document would not contain). https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf. There is NO SINGLE "Federal Reserve BANK". Instead, there are 12 regional "Federal Reserve Banks", none of which look anything like the "United States Treasury Building" WHICH IS UNMISTAKABLY DEPICTED IN THE DIAGRAM.

    Note that it was a similar stupid mistake which led to the discovery that Deborah Tavares' emails were FORGED in the "FORGED PG&E Email Hoax" which is explained on page one of this thread. And, PATTERNS OF CONDUCT NEVER LIE!

    Deborah Tavares and her partners used this FORGED, MISTAKE-RIDDLED diagram as the “COVER” page for the FAKE government document which they manufactured in support of this hoax. Then, they attached dozens of documents to their FORGED COVER page. These documents attached included, among other things, a series of spread sheets indicating how much money certain federal courts HAD ON DEPOSIT at the U.S. Treasury on a particular date (often millions of dollars). FOR PROOF, SCROLL DOWN HERE. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf. But, Deborah Tavares fraudulently told her video audience that all of the money appearing on the spread sheets WAS FORWARDED TO THE "FEDERAL RESERVE" to keep. But, this claim was not so. All of the principle amounts of money reflected on those spread sheets WAS RETURNED ONLY TO THE WINNING LITIGANTS THEMSELVES AT THE END OF THEIR CASE.).

    Further, Deborah Tavares and her partners ALSO failed to check the lower right hand corner of the diagram that they used for the “COVER” of their FAKE government document. The page number in the lower right hand corner of that COVER page of their FAKE government document is marked page "2". But, the very next page in their FAKE document is numbered page "1" and all of the following pages are sequentially numbered (in at least one version of this FORGERY). This means that the COVER page that Deborah Tavares and her partners used on their FAKE government document is not only RIDDLED WITH STUPID MISTAKES (described above), it also CAME FROM AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT DOCUMENT than the pages attached to it. This means that Deborah Tavares and her partners ASSEMBLED THEIR FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT FROM PARTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS (an inconsistency and a stupid mistake that a REAL government document would not contain). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    Finally, in at least one version of this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares and her partners went through EVERY SINGLE PAGE of their entire FAKE government document and fraudulently REPLACED the term, "UST" (for United States Treasury) with the term, "FRB" (for Federal Reserve BANK) to make the interior of their FAKE government document "MATCH" the exterior COVER of their FAKE government document (to the effect that all money collected by courts is forwarded to the Federal Reserve). In other versions of this same FAKE government document, almost all reference to the term, "UST" (for United States Treasury) and the term, "FRB" (for Federal Reserve BANK) HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY ERASED from the pages attached to the FORGED COVER page of their FAKE government document.

    Suffice it to say, this FAKE government document is a FORGERY and was assembled from parts of other documents with conflicting page numbers, neither of which would be the case with a REAL government document.

    PROOF:
    THE COVER OF DEBORAH TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT:
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf
    (NOTE WEBSITE). Note that this VERY SAME fake government diagram which Deborah Tavares and her partners attribute to Rodney "DALE" Class above appears INSIDE “The Great American Adventure: Secrets of America” which Deborah Tavares attributes to "Judge DALE" and which Deborah Tavares posted on her own website in 2012. See page actually numbered "5" here. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf. Remember, since early 2011, Deborah Tavares and her partners have been publicly attributing the "discovery" of the "Court Registry Investment System" FORGERY to Rod Class (not to "Judge DALE"). THIS PROVES THAT DEBORAH TAVARES IS AFFILIATED WITH AND PUBLISHES THE WORK OF BOTH ROD CLASS AND "JUDGE DALE" ON HER OWN WEBSITE, WITHIN THE SAME DOCUMENT.

    WHAT THE U.S. TREASURY BUILDING ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22United+States+Treasury+Building%22&sou rce=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiy64iqvuLiAhVLSN 8KHXfPAAYQ_AUIECgB&biw=1093&bih=518
    COMPARE THIS IMAGE TO THE DRAWING ON THE COVER OF TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT HERE. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    WHAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE BUILDING ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Federal+Reserve+Building+Washington+D. C.%22&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj_5P7I3-fZAhWS0FMKHV7-DxoQ_AUIDCgD&biw=1366&bih=651. COMPARE THIS IMAGE TO THE DRAWING ON THE COVER OF TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT HERE. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    Note here that the COVER of Deborah Tavares FAKE government document unmistakably depicts the "UNITED STATES TREASURY BUILDING" (shown directly above), but Deborah Tavares fraudulently re-labeled it the "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK" (to make it fit her hoax). Note also the PAGE NUMBER "2" in the lower right corner of the COVER page of Deborah Tavares’ FAKE government document. Finally, note that the following page is NUMBERED PAGE ONE "1" and that all subsequent pages are sequentially numbered (proving that this mistake-riddled COVER page came from an entirely different document than the rest this FAKE government document came from and that it was assembled from parts of other documents.). See proof here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf

    [/I][/U][/COLOR][/B]
    CONCLUSION: Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares, THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM DOES NOT FORWARD MONEY COLLECTED BY THE COURTS TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO KEEP. To the contrary, THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM MERELY EARNS "INTEREST" (ONLY) ON THE MONEY THAT IS TEMPORARILY DEPOSITED INTO THE COURT REGISTRY UNTIL THE CASE IS OVER, AT WHICH TIME ALL OF THAT MONEY IS AWARDED TO THE WINNING SIDE IN THE CASE.
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 19th July 2019 at 19:16. Reason: reformatted at snoop4truth's requst

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    xylo (25th March 2019)

  9. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    FULL-LENGTH EXPLANATIONS OF THE HOAXES OF DEBORAH TAVARES CONTINUED

    11). DEBORAH TAVARES & THE ALL GOVERNMENTS AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE "PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS" HOAX:


    PART I:

    THE HOAX: In this hoax, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney (real name "Anita Larin") fraudulently claim that ALL governments and government agencies are actually PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS "posing" as governments and government agencies which "profit" by taxing, burdening and abusing the American people. To support this fraudulent claim, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney cite examples of several ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS which happen to have names that SOUND SIMILAR to the names of governments or government agencies (like "Federal Express" for example). But, contrary to their claims, NONE of the ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS which they cite in support of this hoax are really governments or government agencies. Not one! This hoax was designed to make Americans think that all governments and agencies are completely illegal, invalid, illegitimate, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

    They also fraudulently "SWITCHED" THE REAL NAME of one such ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION TO A FAKE NAME to make it fit the hoax (from "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc.", a private, for-profit corporation, to "Internal Revenue Service", a government agency). See proof below.

    PROOF:
    THE "UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY" HOAX:
    In this hoax, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney fraudulently claim that the ordinary, private, for-profit corporation named the "United States Corporation Company" IS THE GOVERNMENT OF THE "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". FOR PROOF, go to 2:00-3:10 in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk. But, this claim is not so.

    The "United States Corporation Company" is actually an ordinary, private, for-profit corporation that acts as a "REGISTERED AGENT" which accepts "service of process" (civil lawsuits) on behalf of OTHER CORPORATIONS doing business in Florida. And, the "United States Corporation Company" is ACTUALLY LISTED AS SUCH by the Florida Secretary of State, Division of Corporations. http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...0Company/Page1 (BE SURE TO SCROLL THROUGH ALL OF THE PAGES IN THIS LINK.). The "United States Corporation Company" is not really the government of the United States Of America.

    SO, WHAT IS A "REGISTERED AGENT"?
    In Florida (and in most states), every corporation doing business in the state is required to have a "registered agent" inside the state to accept "service of process" (civil lawsuits) on its behalf. https://law.justia.com/codes/florida...tion607.0501/; http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/...0607.0501.html. This permits a person or entity damaged by such a corporation to "serve" that corporation with a civil lawsuit inside the state. The "United States Corporation Company" is merely an ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT COMPANY that, for a fee, provides that service to other corporations (which are often out-of-state corporations which do not have an office or employees inside the state to accept "service of process" on their behalf). That means the "United States Corporation Company" merely helps OTHER CORPORATIONS comply with Florida law which requires every corporation doing business in the state to have a "registered agent" inside the state to accept "service of process" (civil lawsuits) on its behalf.
    http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...ATES%201000090.
    (Scroll all the way down to the very bottom of this link and click on the FINAL document. Tavares refers to this document later in her FIRST video below.)


    THE "INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE, INC." HOAX:
    In this hoax, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney fraudulently claim that the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." IS A GOVERNMENT AGENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA KNOWN AS THE "THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE". But, this claim is not so. The "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." is actually an ORDINARY, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION which offers auditing and accounting services to customers for a fee. Nothing more. The "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." is not really the "Internal Revenue Service" of the United States of America.

    But, to pull this particular hoax off, Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney FRAUDULENTLY "SWITCHED" THE NAME "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." (THE REAL NAME) to the "Internal Revenue Service" (THE FAKE NAME) to make it fit the hoax. FOR PROOF, go to 4:30-4:45 in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk.

    This "SWITCH" is precisely the reason that Deborah Tavares and Al Whitney REFUSE TO SHOW AN ACTUAL PHOTO of this particular corporation's "corporate charter" in their video as they do with other "corporate charters" of the other corporations they feature in their video (BECAUSE IT WOULD SHOW THE CORPORATION'S "REAL NAME" WHICH WOULD EXPOSE THEIR INTENTIONAL FRAUD OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE). See the truth about this particular fraud here. https://www.dropbox.com/s/04tmhmd08w0m5hz/Internal%20Revenue%20Tax%20and%20Audit%20Service%2 0Inc..pdf?dl=0 (Note here that this ordinary, private, for-profit corporation, the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc.", WAS INCORPORATED IN DELAWARE.); http://www.hovindology.com/?p=80 (THIS LINK IS EXCELLENT. READ IT ALL.)

    VIDEOS BY DEBORAH TAVARES AND AL WHITNEY IN WHICH THEY FRAUDULENTLY CLAIM THAT ALL GOVERNMENTS AND AGENCIES ARE PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATIONS":

    YOU MUST SEE THIS VIDEO!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (See the WHOLE VIDEO, but be especially certain to listen at 2:00-3:10 (for the "United States Corporation Company Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:30-4:45 (for the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc. Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:45-4:55, 5:55-6:10, 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 9:05-9:45, 22:00-22:50, 24:10-24:25, 25:55-26:45.).

    RELATED VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES AND/OR AL WHITNEY ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (at 43:15-43:50, 52:30-53:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (at 42:10-42:35, 47:50--49:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (at 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45).

    CONCLUSION: No true government or true government agency is actually a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION.

    PART II:

    DEBORAH TAVARES, ROD CLASS & THE "ALL GOVERNMENTS ARE PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS HOAX".

    VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (Al Whitney & Deborah Tavares. WHOLE VIDEO)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (at 42:10-42:35, 47:50--49:00)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (at 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (at 43:15-43:50, 52:30-53:00)

    VIDEO OF ROD CLASS ENGAGED IN THE HOAX:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7DicAWY4P4 (at :1:00-1:15)

    ARTICLES REFLECTING THE HOAX:
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/usa-corp...brochure-1.pdf (NOTE THE WEBSITE);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...ate-franchise/ (an article actually written by Rodney "DALE" Class while pretending to be "Judge DALE". See paragraphs ACTUALLY NUMBERED "1, 2 & 3");
    https://globalfreedommovement.org/ex...ith-rod-class/ (Rod Class using his REAL name);
    https://www.akupressllc.com/150121Cr...ourtDenver.pdf (Rod Class at page ACTUALLY NUMBERED "3" in the 4th paragraph at about 50% through the text);
    https://scannedretina.com/2014/11/27...erican-people/ (Rod Class using his REAL name at the first BLOCK INDENTED paragraph IN ALL ITALIC TYPE)
    http://houseofpraani.com/portfolio/itnj/ (Rod Class using his REAL name at the 2nd paragraph).

    THE HOAX:
    Deborah Tavares, Rodney "DALE" Class (BOTH when using his REAL name and when pretending to be "Judge DALE") falsely claim that all governments and all government agencies are private, for-profit corporations. But, this is not so.

    THE TRUTH:
    No true government or true government agency is a private, for-profit corporation.

    U.S. v Cooper Corp., https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006 (HOLDING THAT THE UNTIED STATES IS NOT A "CORPORATION"). In this case, a private corporation sought to sue the United States under a federal statute that authorized civil lawsuits against any "person". The private corporation argued that the United States was such a "person" because it was a "corporation" (an artificial legal person). But, the court ruled otherwise and wrote, "While there may be isolated cases which hold that the different states, and even the United States, are "bodies politic and corporate", THEY DO NOT HOLD THAT THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION EXISTING BY THE LAWS OF THE UNTIED STATES [in the way that amateur legal theorists mean it]... . THE UNITED STATES CANNOT, THEREFORE, BE CLASSIFIED AS A CORPORATION EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES [in the way that amateur legal theorists mean it]... ." (in the 3rd to last paragraph of this case).

    ABOUT CORPORATIONS:
    The term, "corporation" FOOLS Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists. They mistakenly believe that there is only ONE TYPE OF CORPORATION in the whole world and that EVERY CORPORATION in the whole world IS A PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation. https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...ate-franchise/ (at the paragraph ACTUALLY NUMBERED "3"). But, this is not so.

    One loose, informal definition of a "corporation" is simply "a separate, legal entity which may enter into contracts in its own name and sue and be sued in its own name". Governments happen to have these same basic characteristics. So, in this sense, AND ONLY IN THIS SENSE, all governments are arguably "corporations" (loosely and informally speaking).

    BUT, THIS IS NOT WHAT DEBORAH TAVARES, ROD CLASS AND OTHER AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS MEAN BY CLAIMING THAT ALL GOVERNMENTS ARE "CORPORATIONS". Instead, they mean that ALL governments are corporations WHICH ARE "IN THE BUSINESS" OF STEALING MONEY FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO GENERATE "PROFITS" FOR THEIR "PRIVATE OWNERS". https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...ate-franchise/ (at the paragraph ACTUALLY NUMBERED "3"). Such IMAGINARY governmental entities would NOT merely be "corporations". Instead, such IMAGINARY governmental entities would actually be PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporations. THAT IS SOMETHING ENTIRELY DIFFERENT IN THE LAW! NO TRUE GOVERNMENT OR TRUE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY IN THE UNITED STATES IS A "CORPORATION" IN THIS SENSE OF THE WORD (in the way that amateur legal theorists mean it) and the courts have repeatedly said so.

    OTHER TYPES OF CORPORATIONS UNDER THE REAL LAW
    Remember, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that every CORPORATION in the whole world is a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation (the "bad" kind of corporation). But, this is not so.

    Unknown to Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists, there are DOZENS and DOZENS of different types of corporations. But, ONLY ONE (1) TYPE of corporation is a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS" (the "bad" kind of corporation). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists, there are COUNTLESS OTHER TYPES of NON-PROFIT corporations WHICH ARE ACTUALLY OWNED BY THE PUBLIC, OPERATED BY THE PUBLIC AND SERVE THE PUBLIC (not "private stockholders") FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD.

    For example, there are PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT corporations (like some publicly-owned hospitals, schools and universities and some electrical and water utilities, NONE of which have "stockholders" and NONE of which make "profits"). There are also PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT MUNICIPAL corporations (like cities and towns, NONE of which have "stockholders" and NONE of which make "profits" and ALL of which are controlled entirely by people ELECTED by "We the People" TO CONTROL THEM). There are countless other different types of PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT corporations which serve the public (not "private stockholders"). But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this. Click on the links below.

    OTHER TYPES OF CORPORATIONS:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonprofit_corporation
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_corporation
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-owned_enterprise
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_corporation

    ABOUT "FEDERAL CORPORATIONS"
    Our federal government has even structured seventeen of our federal government agencies as PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT "federal corporations" (NO STOCKHOLDERS, NO PROFITS, etc.). In general, all of the federal agencies that are structured this way have two things in common, they all have their own customers (or their own source of revenue) and none of them receive any money from Congress.

    Three well-known examples of such federal agencies are the United States Postal Service (The Post Office-U.S. Mail), AMTRAK (a publicly-owned, non-profit railroad) and the Tennessee Valley Authority (a publicly-owned, non-profit ELECTRICAL POWER utility). You will note that ALL THREE of these PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT "federal corporations" have their own customers and none of them receive any money from Congress.

    There are THREE MAIN REASONS why the federal government structured these federal agencies as PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT "federal corporations": 1). To force each such federal agency to work within their own budgets BY USING THEIR OWN REVENUES (received from their own customers/sources) instead of receiving money from Congress; 2). To relieve taxpayers of the burden of paying for governmental services that they might not even use (not everyone uses snail mail, rides trains or lives in the "Tennessee Valley"); and 3). To ensure that each such federal agency provide the highest possible quality of service at the lowest possible cost to the taxpayer in order to avoid their own failure and collapse (which, due to this organizational structure, would have no adverse effect on the rest of the federal government or on the taxpayer anyway). IT'S ALL ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY AND FAIRNESS TO THE TAXPAYER. For more on this subject, click here. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL30365.pdf

    FACT:
    All corporations are "ARTIFICIAL" persons (NON-human beings).

    FACT:
    No "NATURAL" person (no human being) can be a corporation.

    THE SECRET CORPORATION MYTH:
    Contrary to what Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe, there is no such thing as a "SECRET CORPORATION" of any kind (regardless of what type they are or whom they serve). All corporations (no matter what type they are or whom they serve) ARE PUBLICLY "INCORPORATED" IN A STATE OR PUBLICLY "CREATED" BY STATUTE OR ORDINANCE.

    PRIVATE CORPORATIONS:
    All "PRIVATE" corporations ARE PUBLICLY "INCORPORATED" IN A STATE AND ARE PUBLICLY "REGISTERED" IN EVERY STATE WHERE THEY DO BUSINESS. So if they exist, THERE WILL BE A "PUBLIC RECORD" OF THEM,
    their "articles of incorporation", their creation date, their purpose, their function, their powers, their scope, their addresses, their officers (and often their directors), their trade names, their fictitious names, their trademarks, their service marks, their annual reports, their registered agent for service of civil lawsuits and so forth, ALL OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC ONLINE.

    PUBLIC CORPORATIONS:
    Further, all "PUBLIC" corporations (no stockholders and no profits) ARE PUBLICLY "CREATED" BY A PUBLIC STATE OR FEDERAL "STATUTE" OR BY A PUBLIC COUNTY OR CITY "ORDINANCE". So, if they exist, THERE WILL BE A "PUBLIC RECORD" OF THEM, their creation date, their purpose, their function, their powers, their scope and so forth, ALL OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC ONLINE).

    Translation: ALL CORPORATIONS (regardless of what type they are or whom they serve) ARE PUBLICLY "CREATED" BY A DOCUMENT THAT IS ACTUALLY FILED IN THE "PUBLIC RECORD" FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE! There are NO EXCEPTIONS! NONE! Whether an entity is a "corporation" IS "ALWAYS" A MATTER OF "PUBLIC RECORD"! So, there is NO "GUESS WORK" about whether an entity is a corporation or not. If an entity is not PUBLICLY "INCORPORATED" in a state or was not PUBLICLY "CREATED" by a PUBLIC statute or PUBLIC ordinance, THEN IT IS NOT A CORPORATION! It is that simple. There are NO EXCEPTIONS! NONE! This means that there is NOTHING "SECRET" OR "MYSTERIOUS" about the existence of either PUBLIC or PRIVATE corporations. Their documents are IN THE "PUBLIC RECORD" for all the world to see. But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

    Translation: To find out if an entity is a corporation, the ONE and ONLY place to find the answer IS IN THE PUBLIC RECORD (not in Dun & Bradstreet, not on a list of entities with EIN numbers and not on amateur legal theory websites).

    All "PRIVATE" corporations can be found online at the STATE "SECRETARY OF THE STATE, DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS" or the foreign equivalent if a foreign "PRIVATE" corporation.

    All "PUBLIC" corporations can be found in STATE and FEDERAL STATUTES and in county or city ORDINANCES or the foreign equivalent if a foreign "PUBLIC" corporation.

    If an entity cannot be found in those places, IT IS NOT A CORPORATION. It is that simple. But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

    THREE SOURCES OF CONFUSION IN AMATEUR LEGAL THEORY:
    Amateur legal theorists are PATHOLOGICALLY DESPERATE to discredit and delegitimize the FEDERAL government of “We the People”. So, if any FEDERAL statute contains the terms, "corporate" or "corporation" in reference to anything FEDERAL, then amateur legal theorists will use that FEDERAL statute in support of their false claim that the FEDERAL government is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS". Two such FEDERAL statutes cited by amateur legal theorists in support of this false claim are the "Act Of 1871" and "Title 28 U.S.C. (15)(a)".

    THE ACT OF 1871:
    The Act Of 1871 reads in pertinent part, "...[We hereby create] a government by the name of [the "CITY" of] THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA [not the ”United States Of America”] by which name it is hereby constituted a BODY CORPORATE [this term is a source of the confusion] for MUNICIPAL [means "CITY"] PURPOSES [not for other purposes]... [and this body is empowered to] exercise all... powers of a MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [this term is also a source of the confusion and actually means "CITY GOVERNMENT"] not inconsistent with [means "CONSISTENT WITH"] the Constitution and the laws of the United States." http://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes.../c41s3ch62.pdf.

    Thus, the Act of 1871 simply created a "CITY" GOVERNMENT for the "CITY" of Washington, D.C., (NOT FOR THE ENTIRE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT). But, amateur legal theorists are intellectually unable to tell the difference between the two (a "CITY" GOVERNMENT on one hand and the "ENTIRE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT" on the other hand). Remember, if any FEDERAL statute contains the terms, "corporate" or "corporation" in reference to anything FEDERAL, then amateur legal theorists will use that FEDERAL statute in support of their false claim that the FEDERAL government is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS".

    But, because the "CITY" of Washington, D.C. is the seat of the FEDERAL government and because they mistakenly believe that all corporations in the world are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporations, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists falsely claim that the terms, "body corporate" and "municipal corporation" (contained in the Act Of 1871) prove that the "ENTIRE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT" (rather than merely the "CITY" GOVERNMENT of Washington, D.C.) IS ITSELF A PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS. https://www.akupressllc.com/150121Cr...ourtDenver.pdf (at page ACTUALLY NUMBERED "3" in the 4th paragraph at about 50% through the text). But, this is not so.

    FACT:
    There is NOTHING about the Act of 1871 that has any affect whatsoever on the FEDERAL government itself. Instead, The Act of 1871 only relates to the "CITY" government of Washington, D.C. Likewise, NOTHING about the Act Of 1971 makes the FEDERAL government itself (or the "CITY" of Washington, D.C. for that matter) a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION which makes "PROFITS" for its private "STOCKHOLDERS". But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

    TITLE 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)(a):
    Title 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)(a)reads in pertinent part, "DEFINITIONS... As used in THIS chapter [ONLY, and NOT for any other purpose],... United States means- ... a federal corporation [this term is a source of the confusion]... ." FACT: Title 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15) (a) merely provides the definitions (only) SOLELY FOR A SINGLE FEDERAL CHAPTER (AND THOSE DEFINITIONS DO NOT APPLY TO ANY OTHER CHAPTER AND CANNOT BE USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER PURPOSE). This is why the VERY FIRST WORDS of Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 read, “As used in THIS chapter [and NOT other chapters or for other purposes]... ." https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002 (See the VERY FIRST WORDS at the TOP of this section.). The SINGLE CHAPTER for which Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 provides definitions is the FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT (chapter 176).

    But remember, if any FEDERAL statute contains the terms, "corporate" or "corporation" in reference to anything FEDERAL, then amateur legal theorists will use that FEDERAL statute in support of their false claim that the United States is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS". So, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists falsely claim that Title 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)(a) proves that the United States is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS". But, this is not so.

    The SINGLE CHAPTER for which Title 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)(a) provides definitions (chapter 176) relates to the "PROCEDURE" ONLY that the "United States" must follow when collecting certain debts. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3001. Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (15) (a) DOES NOT actually define the "United States" as a ”federal corporation”. Instead, it actually defines a “federal corporation” (like AMTRAK) as the “United StatesSOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF THE FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT.

    APPLICATION:
    So, if AMTRAK (a "federal corporation") sought to collect on such a debt, it would have to follow the SAME "PROCEDURE" set forth in the Fair Debt Collection Procedure Act THAT ANY OTHER PART OF THE "UNITED STATES” GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW TO COLLECT SUCH A DEBT. It is that simple. But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

    FACT:
    This definition IN THE FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT does not mean that the entire “United States” is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which generates "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS".

    DUN & BRADSTREET:
    Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly conclude that all governments and governmental agencies are "corporations" because governments and government agencies ARE LISTED IN "DUN & BRADSTREET". See the bottom paragraph on page 2 of 6 here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....c-handout1.pdf. Scroll down to about 80% through the text of this article here. https://itnjcommittee.org/did-you-kn...s-governments/. But, contrary to what amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe, DUN & BRADSTREET DOES NOT REFLECT A "LIST" OR "REGISTRY" OF "CORPORATIONS".

    Instead, Dun & Bradstreet merely reflects the CREDIT WORTHINESS of ANY ORGANIZATION (corporate or otherwise) with which other organizations (corporate or otherwise) might enter into contracts.

    APPLICATION: So, if you were the CEO of a building contractor that builds highways and if you were contacted by a state government to build a highway in the state, you could look up that state government in Dun & Bradstreet to determine whether it pays its building contractors on time. It is that simple. Thus, Dun & Bradstreet likewise DOES NOT reflect that a government is a "corporation" (much less a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation). But, amateur legal theorist do not know enough to even realize this.

    THE ACTUAL REAL LAW ITSELF ON WHETHER GOVERNMENTS ARE "CORPORATIONS" FOR AMATEUR LEGAL THEORY PURPOSES:

    1). Thompson v. Scutt, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theories that the state and federal government are "CORPORATIONS"). In this case, the court wrote, "Petitioner [an amateur legal theorist] also contends that THE STATE OF MICHIGAN AND THE UNITED STATES ARE CORPORATIONS, and as such, can only "interface" with other artificial entities, not natural persons like Petitioner [a false claim that Rod Class also makes]. In support of his argument, Petitioner [an amateur legal theorist] cites the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act (FDCPA), 28 U.S.C. 3002 et seq [discussed above], and the Michigan Constitution, Article VII, section 1, NEITHER OF WHICH SUPPORTS HIS CLAIM THAT THE STATE OF MICHIGAN AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ARE CORPORATIONS [read this phrase again]. Petitioner [an amateur legal theorist] contends that, AS CORPORATIONS, the State of Michigan and the federal government cannot "concern [themselves] with anything OTHER THAN CORPORATE, ARTIFICIAL ENTITIES AND INTANGIBLE ABSTRACTIONS [a false claim that Rod Class also makes].... .’' But, the court held otherwise and wrote, “SUCH REASONING IS DEVOID OF LEGAL SUPPORT and contrary to common sense." (at paragraph 9 at about 40% through the text of the case). The court continues at footnote 2 near the end of the case as follows, "The FDCPA [discussed above] DOES NOT STATE THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS A CORPORATION [much less a private, for-profit corporation]. Article VII of the Michigan constitution merely indicates that 'each organized county shall be a BODY CORPORATE [not a private, for-profit corporation].'" (at footnote 2 near the end of the case).

    2). DuBose v. Kasich, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE PLAINTIFF'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including the amateur legal theory that the state and federal government are "CORPORATIONS"). In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued various government officials. The court wrote, "Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] sets forth his own versions of various 'sovereign citizen' [amateur legal] theories. Such [amateur legal] theories involve the alleged CORPORATE STATUS OF OHIO AND THE UNITED STATES... ." But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "... [F]ederal courts have routinely recognized that such [amateur legal] theories are MERITLESS and WORTHY OF LITTLE DISCUSSION [read that phrase again]... . " (at the 13th paragraph, just above section "IV" at about 95% through the text).

    3). Florance v. Buchmeyer, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE PLAINTIFF'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the state and federal government are federal "CORPORATIONS".). In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued various government agencies and officials. The court wrote, "Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] responds that the STATE OF TEXAS is not protected by immunity under the Eleventh Amendment because it is a 'FEDERAL CORPORATION'... ." (at section "D" at about 65% through the text of the case). Later in the text in section "k" the court held otherwise and wrote, "Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] cites 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15) [discussed above] in the paragraph pertaining to his claim against the USA... . To the extent that Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] relies on § 3002(15) [discussed above] to sue the USA, IT DOES NOT APPLY BECAUSE § 3002 [discussed above] IS SIMPLY A DEFINITIONS STATUTE IN THE CHAPTER THAT AUTHORIZES THE USA TO... [COLLECT CERTAIN DEBTS]." (in section "k" at about 85% through the text).

    4). U.S. v. Petersen, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). The court wrote, "... Defendant [an amateur legal theorist] contends that 'THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS A FEDERAL CORPORATION, and one that is 'located in the ["CITY" of the] District of Columbia'. ... [The Defendant] further claims that the 'United States Government [rather than merely the "CITY" government of Washington, D.C.] was officially [c]ommercialized in 1871,' apparently arguing that this entity's powers 'shall be limited to the ["CITY" limits of the] District of Columbia.' ... . BUT [THE] DEFENDANT'S RELIANCE ON 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15) [discussed above] IS MISPLACED [read that phrase again]. That statute is simply a definitional provision DEFINING the "United States" as, among other options, 'a federal corporation' SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF THE CHAPTER WHICH IT IS PART... . The applicability of [this] Chapter... is confined to CIVIL actions [filed] by the United States [against debtors]... to recover a judgment on a debt... . This CRIMINAL action [this case] is not [such a] a CIVIL debt collection action [so that definition is inapplicable in this case]... .In addition, [THE] DEFENDANT'S RELIANCE ON THE... [Act Of 1871 discussed above], IS LIKEWISE MISPLACED [read that phrase again] as that statute simply 'created a ["CITY"] government by the name of the District of Columbia [not "The United States Of America"],' a municipal corporation [which means a "CITY" government] with ‘jurisdiction over all the territory within the [CITY] limits of the District.’... . The present CRIMINAL prosecution of [the] Defendant [in this case] has nothing to do with the powers that Congress delegated to the ["CITY" of the ] District [Of Columbia. So, THAT DEFINITION DOES NOT APPLY IN THIS CASE]." (at the 13th, 14th and 15th paragraphs at about 35% through the text).

    5). U.S. v. Wiggins, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...en&as_sdt=4000. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). The court wrote, "Wiggins [an amateur legal theorist]... ERRONEOUSLY CITES 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15) [discussed above] to support his assertion that THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION... . [But, t]hat statute governs the collection of federal debt.... . Section 3002(15) [discussed above] merely provides that the term "United States," WHEN USED "IN THIS... [STATUTE]," refers to a federal corporation, agency, entity, or instrumentality of the United States [not a private, for-profit corporation]."(at footnote 18).

    6). Kitchens v. Becraft, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE PLAINTIFF’S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued a Texas state official]. The court wrote, "Next, Kitchens [an amateur legal theorist] contends that 'THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION' and thus has no sovereign authority." But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "[T]he Plaintiff's [Kitchen's] objections ARE WITHOUT MERIT [read that phrase again]." (at the 6th paragraph at about 50% through the case).

    7). U.S. v. Beavers, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS' AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including their amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). In this case, the court wrote, "The Defendants [both amateur legal theorists] assert that THE "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" IS A FEDERAL CORPORATION that went bankrupt in 1933 [a false claim that Rod Class also makes] and lacks jurisdiction to prosecute criminal matters... .' But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT'S [the amateur legal theorists'] ARGUMENTS TO BE MERITLESS [read this phrase again]." (at the 17th-18th paragraph at about 50% through the text). At footnote 9, the court continues, "As explained [above], the Defendants cite 28 U.S.C. § 3002 [discussed above] to support their claim that THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION. HOWEVER, A COMPLETE READING OF 28 U.S.C. § 3002 BELIES [means "REFUTES"] THIS INTERPRETATION." (at footnote 9).

    8). Kubicki v U.S., https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). In this case, a tax protester/amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued the United States. The court wrote, "Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] argues that Defendant [the United States] has no immunity [from his suit], BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES HAS IDENTIFIED ITSELF AS A FEDERAL CORPORATION for purposes of tax collection activity.' But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "To support this proposition, Plaintiff [the amateur legal theorist] cites 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15)[discussed above]. THIS SECTION, HOWEVER, DOES NOT DEFINE THE UNITED STATES AS A FEDERAL CORPORATION for purposes of tax collection. Instead, IT MERELY PROVIDES THE DEFINITION OF THE "UNITED STATES’ FOR PURPOSES OF THE [SAME] STATUTE [IN WHICH IT APPEARS] AS A ‘FEDERAL CORPORATION’ [not a private, for-profit corporation]... ." (at the 8th paragraph not including block-indented portions at about 60% through the text).

    9). U.S. v. Boyce, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE TAX PROTESTERS' AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including their amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). The court wrote, "The Boyces [both tax protesters and amateur legal theorists]... assert that the court's jurisdiction is limited to individuals residing within the ["CITY" limits of the] District of Columbia citing 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15) [discussed above], WHICH DEFINES THE "UNITED STATES" AS... A FEDERAL CORPORATION... . [T]hey contend the court's jurisdiction extends only to the section of territory occupied by 'THE ULTIMATE PARENT FEDERAL CORPORATION,' i.e. the ["CITY" of The] District of Columbia." But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "THIS ARGUMENT IS UNAVAILING [is an amateur legal theory]. Section 3002(15) [discussed above] defines 'United States ONLY for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 3001...', which governs 'federal debt collection procedure'. IT DOES NOT DEFINE THE 'UNITED STATES' AS A FEDERAL CORPORATION FOR PURPOSES OF TAX LAWS [much less as a private for-profit corporation], NOR DOES IT CIRCUMSCRIBE [means "LIMIT"] THE COURT'S JURISDICTION. [citing] Kubicki v. United States [the case directly above], ... '[the subject statute]... DOES NOT DEFINE THE UNITED STATES AS A FEDERAL CORPORATION FOR PURPOSES OF TAX COLLECTION [mush less a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation].'" (at the 15th full paragraph at about 25% through the text).

    10). U.S. v. Smith, http://www.vawd.uscourts.gov/OPINION...-10MJ00061.PDF. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION". In this case, the court wrote, [I]"... Smith [the Defendant/amateur legal theorist] stated: '... in no way, shape or form am I an employee of the Federal government or am I an employee of the FEDERAL CORPORATION under the United States Code Title 28, Section 28 Section 3002, Subsection 15, Section A [discussed above] where THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION AND IT'S A FOR PROFIT CORPORATION as spelled out there.'" (at the 1st paragraph on page 7 of this case as it appears in this link). But, the court held otherwise and called the Defendant's amateur legal theories, including this one, "OUTLANDISH" and actually required the Defendant to undergo an INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATION (a psychiatric evaluation while a patient incarcerated in a mental institution). Note: Rod Class has been forced to undergo several such psychiatric examinations for similar reasons.

    11). Joiner v. Perry, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE PRISONER'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including the amateur legal theory that the United States is a CORPORATION). In this case, a prisoner/amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued a North Carolina state official. The court wrote, "He [the prisoner/amateur legal theorist] also testified that 'THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION' to which he holds no 'allegiance', and that therefore the United States may not tax him." (at footnote 3 at the very end of the case). But, the court held otherwise and called the prisoner’s arguments "PATENTLY FRIVOLOUS" and NOT ONLY THREW THE CASE OUT OF COURT, but actually FINED THE PRISONER for making such ridiculous claims.

    12). State v. Hartsoe, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION"). In this case, the court wrote, "Hartsoe's [the Defendant's] affidavit was based upon his belief that THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, which created 'straw men,' fictitious persons separate from real individuals, for each man and woman in order TO CONTROL the people of the United States. Hartsoe [the Defendant] refused to submit to the CORPORATE government and filed his affidavit denying his [own imaginary] 'straw man' or [imaginary] CORPORATE existence." But, the court ruled otherwise.

    13). Miles v. U.S.,
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION"). In this case the Defendant filed what amounted to a Motion For Relief From Conviction. The court wrote, "The grounds [in the Defendant's motion] include... that THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION and does not have the power to prosecute individuals, and that citizens are not subject to statutory jurisdiction under the Constitution [a false claim that Rod Class also makes]." (at footnote 1). But, the court held otherwise and unceremoniously THREW THE CASE OUT OF COURT.

    14). U.S. v. Provost, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION"). In this case, the court wrote, "... Defendant [the tax protester] filed a delinquent request to answer [the complaint], claiming that he had 'a good faith belief that the UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION and that there was no parity with the FLESH AND BLOOD MAN [a false claim that Rod Class also makes].'" But, the court ruled otherwise, DENIED the tax protester's request to file a delinquent answer and UPHELD THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST HIM.

    15). Maxwell v. Snow, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL THE TAX PROTESTER'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a CORPORATION). In this case, a tax protester unsuccessfully sued a U.S. Treasury official and claimed that, "Texas is not part of the United States, and that the United States itself is unconstitutional because it is not a republican form of government", that THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS A "CORPORATION", that "the federal government’s jurisdiction is limited to [within] the ["CITY" limits of the] District of Columbia and [to within the borders of] other federally owned lands". But, the court held otherwise and held that such amateur legal theories were "WITHOUT MERIT", "PATENTLY FRIVOLOUS" and "LIKEWISE FRIVOLOUS."

    THE BOTTOM LINE:
    Note that ALL amateur legal theories (ex: "all governments are corporations") are always EXACTLY BACKWARDS AND OPPOSITE to what the REAL law actually is. There are NO EXCEPTIONS! Amateur legal theories ARE NOT REAL. They are FAKE. They are LIES. Amateur legal theories and the REAL law are the EXACT OPPOSITES of one another. Amateur legal theories are an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE to the REAL law that is actually used by the REAL legal system and the ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD. Amateur legal theories have a 100% FAILURE RATE in court BECAUSE THEY ARE FAKE. They are NOT INTENDED TO WORK and they DO NOT WORK! They never have. They never will. Their SOLE PURPOSE is to attempt to discredit and delegitimize our REPUBLICAN form of government, the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. Nothing more.

    FACT:
    Just in case you do not already know, all FUTURE DECISIONS on the subject of whether governments are corporations WILL FOLLOW THE DECISIONS SHOWN ABOVE (CALLED "PRECEDENT"). So, the law on this subject will always be the same as reflected in the cases above.

    https://definitions.uslegal.com/b/binding-precedent/.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent.
    https://dictionary.thelaw.com/binding-precedent/.

    CONCLUSION: No true government or true government agency is a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 2nd July 2019 at 21:36.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    xylo (25th March 2019)

  11. Link to Post #6
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    (WORK IN PROGRESS)


    COMMENT 5: THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM HOAX

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxCIJZI74Oo. (Here, Rod Class and two of his charlatan partners pretend to be "shocked" while reviewing their OWN FORGERY WHICH THEY THEMSELVES ACTUALLY CREATED).
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf (A fraudulent article. Note the website.).
    https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-it...stment-system/ (Note the fraudulent author of this fraudulent article.).
    https://i-uv.com/court-registry-investment-system-cris/.

    In THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM HOAX, Deborah Tavares and her partners wanted to create the illusion that all of the money that the courts collect in fines and penalties goes to the Federal Reserve. The purpose and intent of the hoax was to cause the American people to hate the courts and the justice system (exactly as it was in the "Judge DALE Hoax").

    To carry out this hoax, Deborah Tavares and her partners (including Rod Class and Jeanette Triplett) fraudulently claim to have "discovered" a "secret" or "leaked" government document which she claims "PROVES" that "ALL OF THE MONEY" that the public ever pays to the courts for FINES and PENALTIES is forwarded on to the "Federal Reserve" in the same way that she claims that the IRS collects money from the public for INCOME TAXES and forwards it on to the Federal Reserve (thereby attempting to draw a FALSE parallel between the courts and the IRS). The purpose of this hoax is to create the illusion that the courts are in bed with the Federal Reserve and act as "collection agents" for the Federal Reserve.

    In this hoax, Tavares and her partners manufactured a FAKE document to support of their hoax (just like they did with all three of the "Judge DALE Forgeries" described above in the "Judge DALE Hoax") and they made their forgery LOOK like an official government document. BUT, THEY MADE SOME STUPID MISTAKES!

    Specifically, they created a FAKE "CASH FLOW DIAGRAM" to make it look like money flowed from the courts to the "Federal Reserve BANK". But, the Tavares and her partners MISTAKENLY used a drawing OF THE "U.S. TREASURY BUILDING" in their FAKE "CASH FLOW DIAGRAM" (mistakenly believing it was a drawing of the "Federal Reserve Building") AND THEY MISTAKENLY LABELED IT THE "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK" (two stupid mistakes that a REAL government document would not contain). (See proof below.). Tavares and her partners actually used this MISTAKE-RIDDLED "CASH FLOW DIAGRAM" as the COVER of their FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT. (See proof below.).

    Tavares and her partners ALSO failed to check the lower right hand corner of the page that they used for the COVER of their FAKE government document. The page number in the lower right hand corner of that page is marked page "2". But, the very next page is numbered page "1". The following pages are sequentially numbered. This means that the COVER page that Deborah Tavares and her partners used for the COVER of their FAKE government document is not only RIDDLED WITH STUPID MISTAKES (described above), it also CAME FROM AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT DOCUMENT which means that TAVARES AND HER PARTNERS ASSEMBLED THEIR FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT FROM PARTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS (a stupid mistake that a REAL government document would not contain).

    Finally, Tavares and her partners went through their entire FAKE government document and REPLACED the term, "UST" (for United States Treasury) with the term, "FRB" (for Federal Reserve BANK) to make the interior of their FAKE government document fit the hoax and "MATCH" the FAKE cover of their FAKE government document (and thereby create the illusion that all FINES and PENALTIES collected by the courts are forwarded to the Federal Reserve to generate "profits" for its "private owners").

    This hoax also reveals that Tavares does not even know what a "Court Registry" actually is. Unknown to Tavares, a "Court Registry" is simply a court-supervised, "escrow-type" account that is typically operated out of a special office at the court house. Litigants in certain types of EXTREMELY RARE cases (when the ownership of money is disputed) VOLUNTARILY deposit money into the "court registry" until the case is over at which time THE JUDGE AWARDS ALL OF THE MONEY DEPOSITED INTO THE "COURT REGISTRY" TO THE WINNING SIDE IN THE CASE. SO, ALL OF THE MONEY THAT IS EVER DEPOSITED INTO A "COURT REGISTRY" ONLY GOES TO THE LITIGANTS THEMSELVES AT THE END OF THE CASE (DEPENDING ON WHICH SIDE WINS).

    Thus, a "Court Registry" works exactly like an "escrow account" (the winning side gets all of the money deposited). No judge, court or government agency EVER keeps ANY of the money that is ever deposited into any "Court Registry". ONLY THE LITIGANTS THEMSELVES RECEIVE MONEY THAT IS DEPOSITED INTO A "COURT REGISTRY". Less than one percent of all cases involve such a short-term deposit into a "Court Registry". So, such deposits are extremely rare. (Have you ever made such a deposit into a "Court Registry"?).

    This hoax also reveals that Deborah Tavares does not even know what a Court Registry "INVESTMENT SYSTEM" actually is. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the "Court Registry INVESTMENT SYSTEM" is a merely a system by which the court earns "INTEREST" on the money that is TEMPORARILY deposited into the "Court Registry" until the case is over. IT IS ALL ABOUT "INTEREST". NOTHING MORE. Thus, Deborah Tavares manufactured AN ENTIRE HOAX out of her OWN MISTAKEN UNDERSTANDING of the definition of the term, "COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM". (In order to manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT---AND TAVARES DOES NOT.).

    SOURCE DOCUMENTS:

    THE COVER OF DEBORAH TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT:
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-07-2003-b.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE).

    WHAT THE U.S. TREASURY BUILDING LOOKS LIKE:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22U...w=1366&bih=651. COMPARE THIS IMAGE TO THE DRAWING ON THE COVER OF TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT ABOVE.

    WHAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE BUILDING LOOKS LIKE:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22F...w=1366&bih=651. COMPARE THIS IMAGE TO THE DRAWING ON THE COVER OF TAVARES' FAKE GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT ABOVE.

    Note here that Tavares uses a drawing of the "U.S. TREASURY BUILDING" (shown above) on the COVER of her FAKE government document, but she fraudulently labels it the "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK" (to make the diagram fit her hoax). Note also the PAGE NUMBER "2" in the lower right corner of the COVER of her FAKE government document here (proving that this mistake-riddled COVER page came from an entirely different document than the one on which it now fraudulently appears).

    NOTE: Because she knew that I was going to expose this particular hoax, Tavares hastily took down her epic YouTube video wherein she spent hours peddling this hoax, pretending to review her own FAKE government document and pretending to be "shocked" by the contents of her own FAKE government document. It was absolutely priceless.

    CONCLUSION: Thus, contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares', THE COURTS ARE NOT "COLLECTION AGENTS" FOR THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND THE COURT REGISTRY IVESTMENT SYSTEM DOES NOT FORWARD MONEY DEPOSITED INTO THE COURT REGISTRY TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE. To the contrary, THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM MERELY EARNS INTEREST ON MONEY TEMPORARILY DEPOSITED INTO THE COURT REGISTRY UNTIL THAT MONEY IS AWARDED TO THE WINNING SIDE IN THE CASE. As a co-forger and editor of the "Court Registry Investment System FORGERY", Deborah Tavares actually knew the truth about the "Court Registry Investment System FORGERY", but nevertheless decided to lie to the American people about it in order to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. It is an absolute disgrace.



    ABOUT DEBORAH TAVARES:
    DEBORAH TAVARES is a well-known, PROFESSIONAL CHARLATAN, HOAXER and SELF-PROMOTER. She has long engaged in a pattern of FORGING FAKE, COUNTERFEIT documents and FRAUDULENTLY attributing those FORGERIES to others, like the federal government or its agencies. When not FORGING her own FAKE, COUNTERFEIT documents for that purpose, she takes documents written by others THAT SHE KNOWS TO BE POLITICAL "FICTION" and FRAUDULENTLY tells her gullible followers that they are "REAL GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS" written by "REAL GOVERNMENT INSIDERS". Like all of Rod Class' claims, all of DEBORAH TAVARES' claims are intended to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans.

    DEBORAH TAVARES is behind ALL THREE of the "Judge DALE forgeries" (all of which she co-wrote with Rod Class), including "The MATRIX And The US Constitution" (2010), The Great American Adventure: Secrets of America" (2012) & "Lawfully Yours" (2014), the "Judge DALE Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "BOMBSHELL: Rod Class Has Obtained his "FOURTH" Administrative Ruling That All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "A North Carolina Judge Has Warned State Police Officers To Put Their Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "Federal Government Is A Private, For-Profit Corporation Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "B.A.R. Card Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "'Esquire' Is A TITLE OF NOBILITY Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "British Accreditation Registry Hoax [B.A.R. Hoax]" (with Rod Class), the "NASA War Document Hoax" (without Rod Class), the "Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Hoax" (without Rod Class), the "Report From Iron Mountain Hoax" (without Rod Class), the "FAKE Jim Traficant Speech Hoax" (without Rod Class) and numerous other hoaxes, all of which she uses to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people for her own selfish purposes.

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares', role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 28th January 2019 at 19:08.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    xylo (25th March 2019)

  13. Link to Post #7
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    COMMENT 6: DEBORAH TAVARES, ROD CLASS & "THE "ALL GOVERNMENTS ARE PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS HOAX".

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:

    VIDEOS:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7DicAWY4P4 (at :1:00-1:15)

    YOU MUST SEE THE FOLLOWING VIDEOS!:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (at 42:10-42:35, 47:50--49:00)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (at 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (at 43:15-43:50, 52:30-53:00)

    ARTICLES:
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/usa-corp...brochure-1.pdf (NOTE THE WEBSITE).

    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...ate-franchise/ (an article actually written by Rodney "DALE" Class while pretending to be "Judge DALE". See paragraphs ACTUALLY NUMBERED "1, 2 & 3")

    https://www.akupressllc.com/150121Cr...ourtDenver.pdf (at page ACTUALLY NUMBERED "3" in the 4th paragraph at about 50% through the text)

    https://scannedretina.com/2014/11/27...erican-people/ (at the first BLOCK INDENTED paragraph IN ALL ITALIC TYPE)

    http://houseofpraani.com/portfolio/itnj/ (at the 2nd paragraph)

    https://globalfreedommovement.org/ex...ith-rod-class/


    THE HOAX:
    Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists falsely claim that all governments and all government agencies are private, for-profit corporations. But, this is not so.

    THE TRUTH:
    No government or government agency is a private, for-profit corporation.


    FACT:
    In amateur legal theory, the "law" comes ONLY from the claims of other amateur legal theorists. But, in the REAL law, the law comes ONLY from the actual WRITTEN WORDS of the REAL LAW itself. Consider the REAL law below.

    U.S. v Cooper Corp., https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006 (HOLDING THAT THE UNTIED STATES IS NOT A "CORPORATION"). In this case, a private corporation sought to sue the United States under a federal statute that authorized civil lawsuits against any "person". The private corporation argued that the United States was such a "person" because it was a "corporation" (an artificial legal person). But, the court ruled otherwise and wrote, "While there may be isolated cases which hold that the different states, and even the United States, are "bodies politic and corporate", THEY DO NOT HOLD THAT THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION EXISTING BY THE LAWS OF THE UNTIED STATES [in the way that amateur legal theorists mean it]... . THE UNITED STATES CANNOT, THEREFORE, BE CLASSIFIED AS A CORPORATION EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES [in the way that amateur legal theorists mean it]... ." (in the 3rd to last paragraph of this case).

    ABOUT CORPORATIONS:
    The term, "corporation" FOOLS Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists. They mistakenly believe that there is only ONE TYPE OF CORPORATION in the whole world and that EVERY CORPORATION in the whole world IS A PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation. https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...ate-franchise/ (at the paragraph ACTUALLY NUMBERED "3"). But, this is not so.

    One loose, informal definition of a "corporation" is simply "a separate, legal entity which may enter into contracts in its own name and sue and be sued in its own name". Governments happen to have these same basic characteristics. So, in this sense, AND ONLY IN THIS SENSE, all governments are arguably "corporations" (loosely and informally speaking).

    BUT, THIS IS NOT WHAT DEBORAH TAVARES, ROD CLASS AND OTHER AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS MEAN BY CLAIMING THAT ALL GOVERNMENTS ARE "CORPORATIONS". Instead, they mean that ALL governments are corporations WHICH ARE "IN THE BUSINESS" OF STEALING MONEY FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO GENERATE "PROFITS" FOR THEIR "PRIVATE OWNERS". https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...ate-franchise/ (at the paragraph ACTUALLY NUMBERED "3"). Such IMAGINARY governmental entities would NOT merely be "corporations". Instead, such IMAGINARY governmental entities would actually be PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporations. THAT IS SOMETHING ENTIRELY DIFFERENT IN THE LAW! NO GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY IN THE UNITED STATES IS A "CORPORATION" IN THIS SENSE OF THE WORD (in the way that amateur legal theorists mean it) and the courts have repeatedly said so.

    OTHER TYPES OF CORPORATIONS UNDER THE REAL LAW

    Remember, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that every CORPORATION in the whole world is a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation (the "bad" kind of corporation). But, this is not so.

    Unknown to Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists, there are DOZENS and DOZENS of different types of corporations. But, ONLY ONE (1) TYPE of corporation is a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS" (the "bad" kind of corporation). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists, there are COUNTLESS OTHER TYPES of NON-PROFIT corporations WHICH ARE ACTUALLY OWNED BY THE PUBLIC, OPERATED BY THE PUBLIC AND SERVE THE PUBLIC (not "private stockholders") FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD.

    For example, there are PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT corporations (like some publicly-owned hospitals, schools and universities and some electrical and water utilities, NONE of which have "stockholders" and NONE of which make "profits"). There are also PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT MUNICIPAL corporations (like cities and towns, NONE of which have "stockholders" and NONE of which make "profits" and ALL of which are controlled entirely by people ELECTED by "We the People" TO CONTROL THEM). There are countless other different types of PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT corporations which serve the public (not "private stockholders"). But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this. Click on the links below.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonprofit_corporation

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_corporation

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-owned_enterprise

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_corporation

    [https://thestartupgarage.com/corpora...ciations-llcs/

    https://thestartupgarage.com/corpora...fit-religious/

    ABOUT "FEDERAL CORPORATIONS"
    Our federal government has even structured seventeen of our federal government agencies as PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT "federal corporations" (NO STOCKHOLDERS, NO PROFITS, etc.). In general, all of the federal agencies that are structured this way have two things in common, they all have their own customers (or their own source of revenue) and none of them receive any money from Congress.

    Three well-known examples of such federal agencies are the United States Postal Service (The Post Office-U.S. Mail), AMTRAK (a publicly-owned, non-profit railroad) and the Tennessee Valley Authority (a publicly-owned, non-profit ELECTRICAL POWER utility). You will note that ALL THREE of these PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT "federal corporations" have their own customers and none of them receive any money from Congress.

    There are THREE MAIN REASONS why the federal government structured these federal agencies as PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT "federal corporations": 1). To force each such federal agency to work within their own budgets BY USING THEIR OWN REVENUES (received from their own customers/sources) instead of receiving money from Congress; 2). To relieve taxpayers of the burden of paying for governmental services that they might not even use (not everyone uses snail mail, rides trains or lives in the "Tennessee Valley"); and 3). To ensure that each such federal agency provide the highest possible quality of service at the lowest possible cost to the taxpayer in order to avoid their own failure and collapse (which, due to this organizational structure, would have no adverse effect on the rest of the federal government or on the taxpayer anyway). IT'S ALL ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY AND FAIRNESS TO THE TAXPAYER. For more on this subject, click here. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL30365.pdf

    FACT:
    All corporations are "ARTIFICIAL" persons (NON-human beings).

    FACT:
    No "NATURAL" person (no human being) can be a corporation.

    THE SECRET CORPORATION MYTH:

    Contrary to what Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe, there is no such thing as a "SECRET CORPORATION" of any kind (regardless of what type they are or whom they serve). All corporations (no matter what type they are or whom they serve) ARE PUBLICLY "INCORPORATED" IN A STATE OR PUBLICLY "CREATED" BY STATUTE OR ORDINANCE. All "PRIVATE" corporations ARE PUBLICLY "INCORPORATED" IN A STATE AND ARE PUBLICLY "REGISTERED" IN EVERY STATE WHERE THEY DO BUSINESS. So if they exist, THERE WILL BE A "PUBLIC RECORD" OF THEM, their "articles of incorporation", their creation date, their purpose, their function, their powers, their scope, their addresses, their officers (and often their directors), their trade names, their fictitious names, their trademarks, their service marks, their annual reports, their registered agent for service of civil lawsuits and so forth, ALL OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC ONLINE. Further, all "PUBLIC" corporations (no stockholders and no profits) ARE PUBLICLY "CREATED" BY A PUBLIC STATE OR FEDERAL "STATUTE" OR BY A PUBLIC COUNTY OR CITY "ORDINANCE". So, if they exist, THERE WILL BE A "PUBLIC RECORD" OF THEM, their creation date, their purpose, their function, their powers, their scope and so forth, ALL OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC ONLINE).

    Translation: ALL CORPORATIONS (regardless of what type they are or whom they serve) ARE PUBLICLY "CREATED" BY A DOCUMENT THAT IS ACTUALLY FILED IN THE "PUBLIC RECORD" FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE! There are NO EXCEPTIONS! NONE! Whether an entity is a "corporation" IS "ALWAYS" A MATTER OF "PUBLIC RECORD"! So, there is NO "GUESS WORK" about whether an entity is a corporation or not. If an entity is not PUBLICLY "INCORPORATED" in a state or was not PUBLICLY "CREATED" by a PUBLIC statute or PUBLIC ordinance, THEN IT IS NOT A CORPORATION! It is that simple. There are NO EXCEPTIONS! NONE! This means that there is NOTHING "SECRET" OR "MYSTERIOUS" about the existence of either PUBLIC or PRIVATE corporations. Their documents are IN THE "PUBLIC RECORD" for all the world to see. But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

    Translation: To find out if an entity is a corporation, the ONE and ONLY place to find the answer IS IN THE PUBLIC RECORD (not in Dun & Bradstreet, not on a list of entities with EIN numbers and not on amateur legal theory websites). All "PRIVATE" corporations can be found online at the STATE "SECRETARY OF THE STATE, DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS" or the foreign equivalent if a foreign "PRIVATE" corporation. All "PUBLIC" corporations can be found in STATE and FEDERAL STATUTES and in county or city ORDINANCES or the foreign equivalent if a foreign "PUBLIC" corporation. If an entity cannot be found in those places, IT IS NOT A CORPORATION. It is that simple. But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

    THREE SOURCES OF CONFUSION IN AMATEUR LEGAL THEORY:

    Amateur legal theorists are PATHOLOGICALLY DESPERATE to discredit and delegitimize the FEDERAL government of “We the People”. So, if any FEDERAL statute contains the terms, "corporate" or "corporation" in reference to anything FEDERAL, then amateur legal theorists will use that FEDERAL statute in support of their false claim that the FEDERAL government is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS". Two such FEDERAL statutes cited by amateur legal theorists in support of this false claim are the "Act Of 1871" and "Title 28 U.S.C. (15)(a)".

    THE ACT OF 1871:
    The Act Of 1871 reads in pertinent part, "...[We hereby create] a government by the name of [the "CITY" of] THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA [not the ”United States Of America”] by which name it is hereby constituted a BODY CORPORATE [this term is a source of the confusion] for MUNICIPAL [means "CITY"] PURPOSES [not for other purposes]... [and this body is empowered to] exercise all... powers of a MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [this term is also a source of the confusion and actually means "CITY GOVERNMENT"] not inconsistent with [means "CONSISTENT WITH"] the Constitution and the laws of the United States." http://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes.../c41s3ch62.pdf.


    Thus, the Act of 1871 simply created a "CITY" GOVERNMENT for the "CITY" of Washington, D.C., (NOT FOR THE ENTIRE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT). But, amateur legal theorists are intellectually unable to tell the difference between the two (a "CITY" GOVERNMENT on one hand and the "ENTIRE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT" on the other hand). Remember, if any FEDERAL statute contains the terms, "corporate" or "corporation" in reference to anything FEDERAL, then amateur legal theorists will use that FEDERAL statute in support of their false claim that the FEDERAL government is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS".

    But, because the "CITY" of Washington, D.C. is the seat of the FEDERAL government and because they mistakenly believe that all corporations in the world are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporations, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists falsely claim that the terms, "body corporate" and "municipal corporation" (contained in the Act Of 1871) prove that the "ENTIRE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT" (rather than merely the "CITY" GOVERNMENT of Washington, D.C.) IS ITSELF A PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS. https://www.akupressllc.com/150121Cr...ourtDenver.pdf (at page ACTUALLY NUMBERED "3" in the 4th paragraph at about 50% through the text). But, this is not so.

    FACT:
    There is NOTHING about the Act of 1871 that has any affect whatsoever on the FEDERAL government itself. Instead, The Act of 1871 only relates to the "CITY" government of Washington, D.C. Likewise, NOTHING about the Act Of 1971 makes the FEDERAL government itself (or the "CITY" of Washington, D.C. for that matter) a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION which makes "PROFITS" for its private "STOCKHOLDERS". But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

    TITLE 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)(a):
    Title 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)(a) reads in pertinent part, "DEFINITIONS... As used in THIS chapter [ONLY, and not for any other purpose],... United States means- ... a federal corporation [this term is a source of the confusion]... ." FACT: Title 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15) (a) merely provides the definitions (only) SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF A SINGLE FEDERAL CHAPTER (AND THOSE DEFINITIONS DO NOT APPLY TO ANY OTHER CHAPTER AND CANNOT BE USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER PURPOSE). This is why the VERY FIRST WORDS of Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 read, “As used in THIS chapter [and NOT other chapters or for other purposes]... ." https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002 (See the VERY FIRST WORDS at the TOP of this section.). The SINGLE CHAPTER for which Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 provides definitions is the FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT (chapter 176).

    But remember, if any FEDERAL statute contains the terms, "corporate" or "corporation" in reference to anything FEDERAL, then amateur legal theorists will use that FEDERAL statute in support of their false claim that the United States is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS". So, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists falsely claim that Title 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)(a) proves that the United States is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which makes "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS". But, this is not so.

    The SINGLE CHAPTER for which Title 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)(a) provides definitions (chapter 176) relates to the "PROCEDURE" ONLY that the "United States" must follow when collecting certain debts. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3001. Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (15) (a) DOES NOT actually define the "United States" as a ”federal corporation”. Instead, it actually defines a “federal corporation” (like AMTRAK) as the “United States” SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF THE FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT.

    APPLICATION:
    So, if AMTRAK (a "federal corporation") sought to collect on such a debt, it would have to follow the SAME "PROCEDURE" set forth in the Fair Debt Collection Procedure Act THAT ANY OTHER PART OF THE "UNITED STATES” GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW TO COLLECT SUCH A DEBT. It is that simple. But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

    FACT:
    This definition IN THE FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT does not mean that the entire “United States” is itself a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation which generates "PROFITS" for its "PRIVATE STOCKHOLDERS".


    DUN & BRADSTREET:
    Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly conclude that all governments and governmental agencies are "corporations" because governments and government agencies ARE LISTED IN "DUN & BRADSTREET". See the bottom paragraph on page 2 of 6 here. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....c-handout1.pdf. Scroll down to about 80% through the text of this article here. https://itnjcommittee.org/did-you-kn...s-governments/. But, contrary to what amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe, DUN & BRADSTREET DOES NOT REFLECT A "LIST" OR "REGISTRY" OF "CORPORATIONS".

    Instead, Dun & Bradstreet merely reflects the CREDIT WORTHINESS of ANY ORGANIZATION (corporate or otherwise) with which other organizations (corporate or otherwise) might enter into contracts. APPLICATION: So, if you were the CEO of a building contractor that builds highways and if you were contacted by a state government to build a highway in the state, you could look up that state government in Dun & Bradstreet to determine whether it pays its building contractors on time. It is that simple. Thus, Dun & Bradstreet likewise DOES NOT reflect that a government is a "corporation" (much less a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation). But, amateur legal theorist do not know enough to even realize this.


    THE ACTUAL REAL LAW ITSELF ON WHETHER GOVERNMENTS ARE "CORPORATIONS" FOR AMATEUR LEGAL THEORY PURPOSES:

    1). Thompson v. Scutt, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theories that the state and federal government are "CORPORATIONS"). In this case, the court wrote, "Petitioner [an amateur legal theorist] also contends that THE STATE OF MICHIGAN AND THE UNITED STATES ARE CORPORATIONS, and as such, can only "interface" with other artificial entities, not natural persons like Petitioner [a false claim that Rod Class also makes]. In support of his argument, Petitioner [an amateur legal theorist] cites the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act (FDCPA), 28 U.S.C. 3002 et seq [discussed above], and the Michigan Constitution, Article VII, section 1, NEITHER OF WHICH SUPPORTS HIS CLAIM THAT THE STATE OF MICHIGAN AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ARE CORPORATIONS [read this phrase again]. Petitioner [an amateur legal theorist] contends that, AS CORPORATIONS, the State of Michigan and the federal government cannot "concern [themselves] with anything OTHER THAN CORPORATE, ARTIFICIAL ENTITIES AND INTANGIBLE ABSTRACTIONS [a false claim that Rod Class also makes].... .’' But, the court held otherwise and wrote, “SUCH REASONING IS DEVOID OF LEGAL SUPPORT [Translation: are amateur legal theories] and contrary to common sense." (at paragraph 9 at about 40% through the text of the case). The court continues at footnote 2 near the end of the case as follows, "The FDCPA [discussed above] DOES NOT STATE THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS A CORPORATION [much less a private, for-profit corporation]. Article VII of the Michigan constitution merely indicates that 'each organized county shall be a BODY CORPORATE [not a private, for-profit corporation].'" (at footnote 2 near the end of the case).

    2). DuBose v. Kasich, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE PLAINTIFF'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including the amateur legal theory that the state and federal government are "CORPORATIONS"). In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued various government officials. The court wrote, "Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] sets forth his own versions of various 'sovereign citizen' [amateur legal] theories. Such [amateur legal] theories involve the alleged CORPORATE STATUS OF OHIO AND THE UNITED STATES... ." But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "... [F]ederal courts have routinely recognized that such [amateur legal] theories are MERITLESS and WORTHY OF LITTLE DISCUSSION [read that phrase again]... . " (at the 13th paragraph, just above section "IV" at about 95% through the text).

    3). Florance v. Buchmeyer, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE PLAINTIFF'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the state and federal government are federal "CORPORATIONS".). In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued various government agencies and officials. The court wrote, "Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] responds that the STATE OF TEXAS is not protected by immunity under the Eleventh Amendment because it is a 'FEDERAL CORPORATION'... ." (at section "D" at about 65% through the text of the case). Later in the text in section "k" the court held otherwise and wrote, "Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] cites 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15) [discussed above] in the paragraph pertaining to his claim against the USA... . To the extent that Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] relies on § 3002(15) [discussed above] to sue the USA, IT DOES NOT APPLY BECAUSE § 3002 [discussed above] IS SIMPLY A DEFINITIONS STATUTE IN THE CHAPTER THAT AUTHORIZES THE USA TO... [COLLECT CERTAIN DEBTS]." (in section "k" at about 85% through the text).

    4). U.S. v. Petersen, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). The court wrote, "... Defendant [an amateur legal theorist] contends that 'THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS A FEDERAL CORPORATION, and one that is 'located in the ["CITY" of the] District of Columbia'. ... [The Defendant] further claims that the 'United States Government [rather than merely the "CITY" government of Washington, D.C.] was officially [c]ommercialized in 1871,' apparently arguing that this entity's powers 'shall be limited to the ["CITY" limits of the] District of Columbia.' ... . BUT [THE] DEFENDANT'S RELIANCE ON 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15) [discussed above] IS MISPLACED [read that phrase again]. That statute is simply a definitional provision DEFINING the "United States" as, among other options, 'a federal corporation' SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF THE CHAPTER WHICH IT IS PART... . The applicability of [this] Chapter... is confined to CIVIL actions [filed] by the United States [against debtors]... to recover a judgment on a debt... . This CRIMINAL action [this case] is not [such a] a CIVIL debt collection action [so that definition is inapplicable in this case]... . In addition, [THE] DEFENDANT'S RELIANCE ON THE... [Act Of 1871 discussed above], IS LIKEWISE MISPLACED [read that phrase again] as that statute simply 'created a ["CITY"] government by the name of the District of Columbia [not "The United States Of America"],' a municipal corporation [which means a "CITY" government] with ‘jurisdiction over all the territory within the [CITY] limits of the District.’... . The present CRIMINAL prosecution of [the] Defendant [in this case] has nothing to do with the powers that Congress delegated to the ["CITY" of the ] District [Of Columbia. So, THAT DEFINITION DOES NOT APPLY IN THIS CASE]." (at the 13th, 14th and 15th paragraphs at about 35% through the text).

    5). U.S. v. Wiggins, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...en&as_sdt=4000. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). The court wrote, "Wiggins [an amateur legal theorist]... ERRONEOUSLY CITES 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15) [discussed above] to support his assertion that THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION... . [But, t]hat statute governs the collection of federal debt.... . Section 3002(15) [discussed above] merely provides that the term "United States," WHEN USED "IN THIS... [STATUTE]," refers to a federal corporation, agency, entity, or instrumentality of the United States [not a private, for-profit corporation]." (at footnote 18).

    6). Kitchens v. Becraft, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE PLAINTIFF’S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued a Texas state official]. The court wrote, "Next, Kitchens [an amateur legal theorist] contends that 'THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION' and thus has no sovereign authority." But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "[T]he Plaintiff's [Kitchen's] objections ARE WITHOUT MERIT [read that phrase again]." (at the 6th paragraph at about 50% through the case).

    7). U.S. v. Beavers, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS' AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including their amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). In this case, the court wrote, "The Defendants [both amateur legal theorists] assert that THE "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" IS A FEDERAL CORPORATION that went bankrupt in 1933 [a false claim that Rod Class also makes] and lacks jurisdiction to prosecute criminal matters... .' But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT'S [the amateur legal theorists'] ARGUMENTS TO BE MERITLESS [read this phrase again]." (at the 17th-18th paragraph at about 50% through the text). At footnote 9, the court continues, "As explained [above], the Defendants cite 28 U.S.C. § 3002 [discussed above] to support their claim that THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION. HOWEVER, A COMPLETE READING OF 28 U.S.C. § 3002 BELIES [means "REFUTES"] THIS INTERPRETATION." (at footnote 9).

    8). Kubicki v U.S., https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). In this case, a tax protester/amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued the United States. The court wrote, "Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] argues that Defendant [the United States] has no immunity [from his suit], BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES HAS IDENTIFIED ITSELF AS A FEDERAL CORPORATION for purposes of tax collection activity.' But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "To support this proposition, Plaintiff [the amateur legal theorist] cites 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15)[discussed above]. THIS SECTION, HOWEVER, DOES NOT DEFINE THE UNITED STATES AS A FEDERAL CORPORATION for purposes of tax collection. Instead, IT MERELY PROVIDES THE DEFINITION OF THE "UNITED STATES’ FOR PURPOSES OF THE [SAME] STATUTE [IN WHICH IT APPEARS] AS A ‘FEDERAL CORPORATION’ [not a private, for-profit corporation]... ." (at the 8th paragraph not including block-indented portions at about 60% through the text).

    9). U.S. v. Boyce, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE TAX PROTESTERS' AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including their amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION".). The court wrote, "The Boyces [both tax protesters and amateur legal theorists]... assert that the court's jurisdiction is limited to individuals residing within the ["CITY" limits of the] District of Columbia citing 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15) [discussed above], WHICH DEFINES THE "UNITED STATES" AS... A FEDERAL CORPORATION... . [T]hey contend the court's jurisdiction extends only to the section of territory occupied by 'THE ULTIMATE PARENT FEDERAL CORPORATION,' i.e. the ["CITY" of The] District of Columbia." But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "THIS ARGUMENT IS UNAVAILING [is an amateur legal theory]. Section 3002(15) [discussed above] defines 'United States ONLY for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 3001...', which governs 'federal debt collection procedure'. IT DOES NOT DEFINE THE 'UNITED STATES' AS A FEDERAL CORPORATION FOR PURPOSES OF TAX LAWS [much less as a private for-profit corporation], NOR DOES IT CIRCUMSCRIBE [means "LIMIT"] THE COURT'S JURISDICTION. [citing] Kubicki v. United States [the case directly above], ... '[the subject statute]... DOES NOT DEFINE THE UNITED STATES AS A FEDERAL CORPORATION FOR PURPOSES OF TAX COLLECTION [mush less a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT corporation].'" (at the 15th full paragraph at about 25% through the text).

    10). U.S. v. Smith, http://www.vawd.uscourts.gov/OPINION...-10MJ00061.PDF. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION". In this case, the court wrote, "... Smith [the Defendant/amateur legal theorist] stated: '... [I]n no way, shape or form am I an employee of the Federal government or am I an employee of the FEDERAL CORPORATION under the United States Code Title 28, Section 28 Section 3002, Subsection 15, Section A [discussed above] where THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION AND IT'S A FOR PROFIT CORPORATION as spelled out there.'" (at the 1st paragraph on page 7 of this case as it appears in this link). But, the court held otherwise and called the Defendant's amateur legal theories, including this one, "OUTLANDISH" and actually required the Defendant to undergo an INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATION (a psychiatric evaluation while a patient incarcerated in a mental institution). Note: Rod Class has been forced to undergo several such psychiatric examinations for similar reasons.

    11). Joiner v. Perry, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE PRISONER'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including the amateur legal theory that the United States is a CORPORATION). In this case, a prisoner/amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued a North Carolina state official. The court wrote, "He [the prisoner/amateur legal theorist] also testified that 'THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION' to which he holds no 'allegiance', and that therefore the United States may not tax him." (at footnote 3 at the very end of the case). But, the court held otherwise and called the prisoner’s arguments "PATENTLY FRIVOLOUS" and NOT ONLY THREW THE CASE OUT OF COURT, but actually FINED THE PRISONER for making such ridiculous claims.

    12). State v. Hartsoe, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION"). In this case, the court wrote, "Hartsoe's [the Defendant's] affidavit was based upon his belief that THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, which created 'straw men,' fictitious persons separate from real individuals, for each man and woman in order TO CONTROL the people of the United States. Hartsoe [the Defendant] refused to submit to the CORPORATE government and filed his affidavit denying his [own imaginary] 'straw man' or [imaginary] CORPORATE existence." But, the court ruled otherwise.

    13). Miles v. U.S.,
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION"). In this case the Defendant filed what amounted to a Motion For Relief From Conviction. The court wrote, "The grounds [in the Defendant's motion] include... that THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION and does not have the power to prosecute individuals, and that citizens are not subject to statutory jurisdiction under the Constitution [a false claim that Rod Class also makes]." (at footnote 1). But, the court held otherwise and unceremoniously THREW THE CASE OUT OF COURT.

    14). U.S. v. Provost, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL OF THE DEFENDANT'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a "CORPORATION"). In this case, the court wrote, "... Defendant [the tax protester] filed a request to answer [the complaint], claiming that he had 'a good faith belief that the UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION and that there was no parity with the flesh and blood man.'" But, the court ruled otherwise, DENIED the tax protester's request to file a delinquent answer and UPHELD THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST HIM.

    15). Maxwell v. Snow, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (RULING AGAINST ALL THE TAX PROTESTER'S AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, including his amateur legal theory that the United States is a CORPORATION). In this case, a tax protester unsuccessfully sued a U.S. Treasury official and claimed that, "Texas is not part of the United States, and that the United States itself is unconstitutional because it is not a republican form of government", that THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS A "CORPORATION", that "the federal government’s jurisdiction is limited to [within] the ["CITY" limits of the] District of Columbia and [to within the borders of] other federally owned lands". But, the court held otherwise and held that such amateur legal theories were "WITHOUT MERIT", "PATENTLY FRIVOLOUS" and "LIKEWISE FRIVOLOUS."

    THE BOTTOM LINE:
    Note that ALL amateur legal theories (ex: "all governments are corporations") are always EXACTLY BACKWARDS AND OPPOSITE to what the REAL law actually is. There are NO EXCEPTIONS! Amateur legal theories ARE NOT REAL. They are FAKE. They are LIES. Amateur legal theories and the REAL law are the EXACT OPPOSITES of one another. Amateur legal theories are an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE to the REAL law that is actually used by the REAL legal system and the ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD. Amateur legal theories have a 100% FAILURE RATE in court BECAUSE THEY ARE FAKE. They are NOT INTENDED TO WORK and they DO NOT WORK! They never have. They never will. Their SOLE PURPOSE is to attempt to discredit and delegitimize our REPUBLICAN form of government, the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. Nothing more.

    FACT:
    Just in case you do not already know, all FUTURE DECISIONS on the subject of whether governments are corporations WILL FOLLOW THE DECISIONS SHOWN ABOVE (CALLED "PRECEDENT"). So, the law on this subject will always be the same as reflected in the cases above.

    https://definitions.uslegal.com/b/binding-precedent/.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent.

    https://dictionary.thelaw.com/binding-precedent/.

    BONUS LAW:

    The cases linked to above did not just rule against the amateur legal theory that "all governments are corporations", the cases linked to above ALSO RULED AGAINST EVERY OTHER AMATEUR LEGAL THEORY RAISED IN THOSE CASES. These additional rulings are shown below. (The cases below appear in the same order they appear above.).

    1). Thompson v. Scutt, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case (also linked to above) ALSO RULED AGAINST ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, all of which are also peddled by Rod Class (AND ALL OF WHICH FAILED HERE): claiming to be a "sovereign" and a "citizen/member of [the]... [his home state] Republic", claiming (under the UCC) to have "superior title and claim over the judgment against... [himself]", claiming that "the court’s use of... [a person's name] in capital letters... refers to a separate or fictitious entity, and is enforceable only against that entity", claiming that "the Michigan statutes under which... [he] was convicted do not apply to... [him] because he is 'sovereign' and not a 'person' within the meaning of those statutes", claiming that the "Michigan laws supporting... [his] conviction [for DUI and DWLS-3RD OFFENSE] violate his constitutional right to travel", claiming that "the state lacked jurisdiction because... [he] has a right to removal under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act [as if he was a foreign, sovereign, nation state] and the federal removal statute'' claiming that he "is being wrongfully imprisoned on behalf of another [imaginary] entity [also] called 'CHRISTOPHER BURNELL THOMPSON' [often called the split personality defense]", claiming that his "conviction [for DUI and DWLS-3rd OFFENSE] was the result of fraud and misconduct on the part of the state, the prosecution and defense counsel [as if they forced him to drive drunk—again]", claiming that the state and federal governments are "de facto governments".

    2). DuBose v. Kasich,
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case (also linked to above) ALSO RULED AGAINST ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, all of which are also peddled by Rod Class (AND ALL OF WHICH FAILED HERE): The Plaintiff (an amateur legal theorist) raised, "the relationship between the yellow fringe on the United States flag and ADMIRALTY jurisdiction and the effect of capitalizing the letters of his name. Plaintiff [an amateur legal theorist] ultimately maintains that he does not have a contract with either Ohio or the United States and, therefore, does not have to follow government laws [as if that would make any difference]." In response, the court wrote, "... [F]ederal courts have routinely recognized that such [amateur legal] theories are MERITLESS and WORTHY OF LITTLE DISCUSSION [read that phrase again]. 'Other courts have noted the sovereign citizen theory has been CONSISTENTLY REJECTED...' . [and citing another case which] '... REJECT[ED] AS FRIVOLOUS Defendant's argument that he was a 'private natural man and real person' and therefore not subject to the laws of the United States [and citing another case which] 'REJECT[ED] [this] sovereign citizen argument as FRIVOLOUS and UNDESERVING OF 'EXTENDED ARGUMENT [and finally citing another case which] 'h[eld] that a plaintiff's 'yellow fringe flag' arguments were 'INDISPUTABLY MERITLESS' [meaning amateur legal theories]."

    3). Florance v. Buchmeyer,
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case (also linked to above) ALSO RULED AGAINST ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, all of which are also peddled by Rod Class (AND ALL OF WHICH FAILED HERE): suing a judge despite that the judge cannot be sued under "absolute judicial immunity", filing a fraudulent lien against a judge as if the judge owed money to the filer of the lien, claiming that the eleventh amendment immunizes criminals from prosecution (despite that it actually prohibits suits against states in federal court), claiming that a government officer/official can be "personally liable" for official actions taken under "color of law", suing a prosecutor despite that the prosecutor cannot be sued "absolute prosecutorial immunity", suing a government official despite that the government official cannot be sued under "absolute [government] official immunity" and claiming that a county is a "commercial entity engaged in commerce".

    4). U.S. v. Petersen, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case (also linked to above) ALSO RULED AGAINST ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, all of which are also peddled by Rod Class (AND ALL OF WHICH FAILED HERE): claiming that the entire federal government (rather than merely the CITY of Washington, D.C.) has no jurisdiction outside the borders of the CITY of Washington, D.C., claiming that the Act of 1871 (which created a CITY government for Washington, D.C.) converted the ENTIRE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (something entirely different) into a commercialized, PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, claiming that the United States is a "foreign state" inside the borders OF ITSELF, claiming that the 11th amendment (which actually prohibits lawsuits against STATES in FEDERAL court) immunizes all criminals from prosecution, claiming that the professional title, "esquire" (a servant of a knight in battle) is a title of "NOBILITY" (a HEREDITARY title for those BORN OF "NOBLE" BLOOD, like the "KING" or "QUEEN"), claiming that the use of the professional title, "esquire" converts American attorneys into "agents of a foreign government", claiming that the "bar association" (referring to the ABA) is a monopoly, claiming that certain federal statutes were never enacted into positive law and claiming that judges have a "financial interest" in their cases.

    5). U.S. v. Wiggins,
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...en&as_sdt=4000.
    This case (also linked to above) ALSO RULED AGAINST ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, all of which are also peddled by Rod Class (AND ALL OF WHICH FAILED HERE): claiming that the case is subject to "MARITIME & ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION" in a case that does not actually involve maritime or admiralty, not "consenting" to the law or to the court's jurisdiction (as if that would make any difference), refusing to "stand under" the court's questions, claiming that his name is "his government name" and not his real name, purporting to file a CIVIL "counterclaim" against the government in a CRIMINAL case (which is impossible), attempting to disqualify a judge for a "personal interest" in case and for practicing law, claiming the imaginary right to be represented by a non-lawyer and attempting to use an "attorney in fact" as a substitute for an "attorney at law".

    6). Kitchens v. Becraft,
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006.
    This case (also linked to above) ALSO RULED AGAINST ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, all of which are also peddled by Rod Class (AND ALL OF WHICH FAILED HERE): claiming that there is "no lawful money for the payment of debts" because of the "[imaginary] national bankruptcy of 1933" and because of the "abolition of the gold standard", claiming that there is a "secret state of war" that exists between THE 'FEDERAL UNITED STATES,' WHICH IS A 'FEDERAL CORPORATION', and the people of the several states, claiming that "Federal Reserve Notes are not legal tender", claiming to be a "secured creditor" in a case which has NO "CREDITORS" AT ALL ("secured" or otherwise) and which imaginary "creditor" has no collateral allegedly "securing" the imaginary debt, claiming that "the Supreme Court has determined that all codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, and not [for] human beings in accordance with God's laws", claiming that "all codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lack due process", claiming that "the supreme law of the land is the Constitution for the united States, and not the Constitution of the United States [pretending that there are two different Constitutions]", claiming that the only "lawful money of the Constitution for the united States is gold or silver coin of specific fineness and weight [a Constitutional provision actually applies ONLY TO THE STATES and not to the United States itself]", claiming that "the only lawful jurisdiction of a de jure common law court is under the American flag of peace, and not the Vice ADMIRALTY Court, military jurisdiction, which the Magistrate is treasonously imposing", claiming that "the only lawful jurisdiction is under common law, and not under vice ADMIRALTY, as signified by the U.S. battle flag with gold fringe and eagle on the flagpole currently displayed within the CORPORATE de facto court," claiming to have already "lawfully exercised his remedy" under Public Law 73-10 by "redeeming his birth certificate bond" and "captur[ing] his [imaginary] straw man", claiming "not [to be] a party or signatory to, nor being named in, any statute, code, law, or rule, nor having the provided power of attorney to any government agent or employee to enter him into such compacts” (as if that would make any difference), claiming to be exempt from all laws except those to which he voluntarily assents (as if individual "assent" is required) and claiming that a "military tribunal exercising ADMIRALTY jurisdiction, lacks jurisdiction over his claims, which jurisdiction may only be exercised by a constitutional common law court under the American flag of peace."

    7). U.S. v. Beavers, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case (also linked to above) ALSO RULED AGAINST ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, all of which are also peddled by Rod Class (AND ALL OF WHICH FAILED HERE): claiming that "CAPITAL LETTERS" refer only to CORPORATIONS and not to "flesh and blood persons", claiming that the court is just a division of THE UNITED STATES CORPORATION and therefore lacks jurisdiction, playing the "name game" as a defense ("split personality" and "corporate fiction" verses "flesh and blood" persons), claiming that the ”name game" can deprive the court of jurisdiction, doing the following in a futile effort to avoid the court's jurisdiction, denying citizenship, claiming sovereign citizenship, claiming foreign citizenship, claiming freeman status and claiming that the IRS is really a private, for-profit, Puerto Rican CORPORATION.

    8). Kubicki v U.S., https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case (also linked to above) ALSO RULED AGAINST ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, all of which are also peddled by Rod Class (AND ALL OF WHICH FAILED HERE): putting property owned by the tax protesters into the names of other people in an effort to avoid paying taxes, claiming that IRS tax laws do not apply outside the borders of Washington, D.C. and other federal territories, claiming that "wages are not income" for purposes of U.S. income tax laws, claiming sovereign and foreign state immunities as a defense and denying citizenship in an effort to avoid the jurisdiction of the court.

    CASE 9-15 (ABOVE IN THE TOP LIST OF CASES) DID NOT MAKE ADDITIONAL RULINGS OF THE TYPE LISTED IN CASE 1-8 HERE.
    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares or Rod Class. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' and Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 16th June 2019 at 18:38.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    xylo (25th March 2019)

  15. Link to Post #8
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    COMMENT 7: PART I: DEBORAH TAVARES AND THE “BOMBSHELL: ROD CLASS HAS OBTAINED HIS FOURTH ADMINISTRATIVE RULING THAT ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE ‘PRIVATE ENTITIES’ OR ‘PRIVATE CONTRACTORS’ HOAX” (A.K.A. “THE BOMBSHELL: FOURTH ADMINISTRATIVE RULING HOAX”)

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    VIDEO
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk LISTEN FOR THE FOLLOWING FRAUDULENT CLAIMS IN THIS VIDEO. (NOTE CLASS' FRAUDULENT USE OF PLURAL TERMS, SOMETHING IMPORTANT TO THIS HOAX.). "When THEY came in and THEY declared THEIRSELVES (sic) to be PRIVATE entitIES out of the administrative court [an event that NEVER occurred], and the attorney general’s office had put in (sic) that THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [an event that NEVER occurred], and the city law director [said] THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [an event that NEVER occurred], that means that these POLICE OFFICERS out here in the road ARE PRIVATE contractorS [something that is not so]. THEY are NOT classified as PUBLIC officialS when THEY drag you into THEIR standard court in your community. Because the judge will sit here [and say] this is an upstanding public office. THESE are public officialS. Well, the administrative court says, "no THEY are not." THEY are a private contractor (sic). Now, we got a conflict." (at 7:10-8:00) "The court has classified THEM as PRIVATE contractorS. THEY are NOT PART OF THE STATE. This opens up a big law suit across this country." (at 8:20-8:35) "So, you have an administrative court coming in and defining THESE PEOPLE as PRIVATE contractorS, NON-PUBLIC officialS [an event that NEVER occurred]. Now, when THEY are classifying the Department Of Transportation as a NON-PUBLIC OFFICE [an event that NEVER occurred] the tag agency as a NON-PUBLIC OFFICE, then that means THEY are running EVERY SINGLE AGENCY through that state AS A PRIVATE CONTRACT SET UP, NON-PUBLIC officialS. Some of you are not aware, back in 2006 that there was a class action lawsuit against the court system [which Class LOST and which was THROWN OUT of district court and THROWN OUT of the court of appeals]. The 10th Circuit [Court of Appeals] ruled [when THROWING the case OUT of court] that ALL OF THESE public officialS were CORPORATE APPELLEES [a ruling that NEVER occurred]. THEY belong to the CORPORATION. THEY were NOT PUBLIC officialS. Therefore, the court cannot hold THEM to [a] violation of THEIR oath of office because THEY are NOT PUBLIC OFFICIALS... . THEY are sitting here saying, ‘THESE are NOT PUBLIC officerS. THEY are NOT PUBLIC officialS. But, THEY hold positionS as PRIVATE contractorS and therefore the administrative court has no subject matter jurisdiction over private PEOPLE.' They would only have it over PUBLIC OFFICIALS." (at 9:00-10:50) "Right now, I'm sitting on three documents. I'm sitting on the 10th Circuit [dismissal THROWING the case OUT of court] that admitted that these PEOPLE are CORPORATE APPELLEES [an admission that NEVER occurred]. We're sitting on the paperwork from this administrative court from this law judge sitting here saying that THEY are PRIVATE contractorS or PRIVATE entitIES [something the law judge did not say]. We're sitting on the paperwork from the attorney general’s office and the city law director sitting here saying THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [something the paperwork does not say]. THEY are NON-PUBLIC officialS. ... . I’ve got another case where another administrative law judge has come back in and again has stated that THE POLICE DEPARTMENT- that these PEOPLE are NOT PUBLIC officialS. They are PRIVATE contractorS. THEY don’t work for the state." (at 25:00-25:35) "I got three hearings where it is confirmed [that] THEY are PRIVATE contractorS. We got three hearings. We’ve got an administrative judge saying THEY are PRIVATE entitIES. NON-PUBLIC officialS. (at 36:40-37:00) "The fact that THEY are admitting that police officers are PRIVATE contractorS [something NEVER admitted to]... . THEY are classified as PRIVATE contractorS." (at 43:00-43:25) "Your honor. It is a proven fact that that police officer is NOT A PUBLIC OFFICIAL. It is a proven fact his is a PRIVATE CONTRACTOR. And, he cannot use the state to come into this court room and, he has NO AUTHORITY. As a PRIVATE CONTRACTOR, he only has jurisdiction over those that hire him and I did not hire this man. He has NO AUTHORITY over me." (at 50:35-51:05) "We got the 10th Circuit ruling [THROWING the case OUT of court which said] that THEY are CORPORATE APPELLEES [a ruling that NEVER occurred]. We got the administrative hearing out of North Carolina that THEY are PRIVATE entitIES [a ruling that NEVER occurred]. We got the paperwork form the attorney general’s office [that] THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [something paperwork does not say]. We got the paperwork from the city law director that THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [something paperwork does not say]." (at 53:05-53-20)

    FAKE PRESS RELEASES CO-WRITTEN BY DEBORAH TAVARES:
    http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/...p?q=1350315108;
    https://sherayx.wordpress.com/2013/0...e-contractors/;
    http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.co...tractors/23602.
    http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_U...tractors.shtml;
    https://www.scribd.com/document/1828...ublic-Notice-P;
    http://www.meetup.com/fr-FR/WE-ARE-C...ages/43090012/;
    https://www.meetup.com/es-ES/StLouis...ages/25275652/;
    http://gold-silver.us/forum/archive/...p/t-64278.html;
    http://nesaranews.blogspot.ca/search...-paginate=true (scroll down to 2nd article at about 15% through the text of the page);
    https://peoplestrustmilwaukee.wordpr...013/02/03/364/ (at the 4th full paragraph);.
    https://keystoliberty.wordpress.com/...em-fraudulent/ (at the 5th full paragraph);
    https://scannedretina.com/2012/10/15...es-are-vacant/;
    https://bbsradio.com/cgi-bin/webbbs/...=read;id=27745;
    https://newearth.media/private-attor...s-on-the-itnj/ (at the 1st full sentence).

    SIDE NOTE:
    NOTE THAT THE VERY FIRST WORD IN THE TITLE OF THIS HOAX IS THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "BOMBSHELL" (SEE LINKS DIRECTLY ABOVE). THIS IS SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE DEBORAH TAVARES, JUDGE "DALE", RODNEY "DALE" CLASS AND THEIR CHARLATAN PARTNER ALL JUST HAPPEN TO ALL USE THE SAME, SHARED, COMMON, UNIQUE, "SIGNATURE" TERMS IN THE WORDING OF THEIR HOAXES, AN AMAZING COINCIDENCE. IN THIS PARTICULAR HOAX, THEY USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "BOMBSHELL". IN OTHER HOAXES, THEY USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "MATRIX" (see comment 3 above) ). BELOW ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF OTHER "BOMBSHELL" HOAXES BY ROD CLASS' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER IN THE JUDGE "DALE" HOAX AND IN THIS VERY HOAX BEING EXPOSED HERE:
    http://www.leclife.com/index.php?ale...orah%20Tavares
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIIw5xhG5Ho.
    http://legacy.staged.com/video?v=ROIh.
    http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...s-2978738.html.
    http://meetnigerians.net/members/vid...hoTszlL_G6tQ6Q.
    http://trclip.com/video/LIIw5xhG5Ho/...h-tavares.html
    http://mp3yts.com/mp3/red-pill-repor...h-tavares.html (Scroll down to the 30th video at about 60-65% down the page).
    http://www.mp3xd-com.com/bajar-mp3/b...eborah-tavares.

    SIDE NOTE:
    In the following videos, Deborah Tavares and her CHARLATAN PARTNER put their own deceptive spin on this SAME BASIC ROD CLASS HOAX (that all federal and state governments and all of their agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS). YOU MUST SEE THE VIDEOS BELOW! Note that NONE of the private, for-profit corporations referred to in any of the following videos HAVE ANY CONNECTION WHATSOEVER TO ANY FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT OR AGENCY. Instead, they are all ordinary, private, for-profit corporations with names that SOUND SIMILAR to governments or government agencies (like "Federal Express", for example). This means that contrary to the claims of Deborah Tavares and her CHARLATAN PARTNER, the ordinary, private, for-profit corporation named the "United States Corporation Company" (referred to at 2:00-3:10 in the FIRST video below) IS NOT actually the government of the "United States of America". http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...ATES%201000090 (Scroll all the way down to the very bottom of this link and click on the FINAL document. Deborah Tavares and her CHARLATAN PARTNER refer this document later in the FIRST video below.). Instead, the "United States Corporation Company" is merely a "registered agent" which accepts "service of process" (civil lawsuits) for other corporations doing business in Florida and is actually listed as such by the Florida Secretary of State, Division of Corporations. http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...0Company/Page1 (BE SURE TO SCROLL THROUGH ALL OF THE PAGES IN THIS LINK). (Note: Every corporation doing business in the state is required to have a "registered agent" inside the state to accept "service of process" (civil lawsuits) on its behalf. The "United States Corporation Company" is merely an ordinary, private, for-profit company provides that service to other such corporations (which are often out-of-state corporations that do not have an office in the state) for a fee. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/...0607.0505.html.). Further, at 4:30-4:45 in the FIRST video below, Deborah Tavares and her CHARLATAN PARTNER also FRAUDULENTLY CHANGE THE NAME of one such ordinary, private, for-profit corporation TO MAKE IT SOUND EVEN MORE LIKE A GOVERNMENT AGENCY in order to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. Specifically, they "SWITCH" the name, "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." (THE REAL NAME) with the name, "Internal Revenue Service" (THE FAKE NAME) in order to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. This is precisely the reason that they do not show an ACTUAL PHOTO of this particular corporation's "corporate charter" in their video as they do with other "corporate charters" of the other corporations referred to in their video (BECAUSE IT WOULD SHOW THE CORPORATION'S "REAL NAME" WHICH WOULD EXPOSE THEIR FRAUD). See the truth about this particular fraud here. https://www.dropbox.com/s/04tmhmd08w...0Inc..pdf?dl=0 (Note that this ordinary, private, for-profit corporation, the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc.", WAS INCORPORATED IN DELAWARE.); http://www.hovindology.com/?p=80 (THIS LINK IS EXCELLENT. READ IT ALL.).

    VIDEOS BY DEBORAH TAVARES AND HER CHARLATAN PARTNER PEDDLING THIS SAME BASIC HOAX:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (See the WHOLE VIDEO, but be especially certain to listen at 2:00-3:10 (for the "United States Corporation Company Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:30-4:45 (for the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc. Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:45-4:55, 5:55-6:10, 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 9:05-9:45, 22:00-22:50, 24:10-24:25, 25:55-26:45.);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (at 42:10-42:35, 47:50--49:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (at 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (at 43:15-43:50, 52:30-53:00).

    THE HOAX:
    Deborah Tavares and Rod Class falsely claim that Class obtained “FOUR” “administrative rulings” to the effect that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" (including all law enforcement agencies) are “private entitIES” or “private contractors”. But, this claim in not so.

    THE TRUTH:
    Rod Class NEVER obtained even one single ruling to that effect, much less “FOUR” of them.

    HOAX SIMPLIFIED:
    This HOAX arose out of TWO cases that Class LOST (and the LOSS of the appeals of BOTH of those two LOSSES). In BOTH of these two cases, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. Like all of the cases that Class files, he LOST these two cases too. In their DISMISSALS of these two cases (throwing them out of court), the judges in BOTH OF THESE TWO CASES referred to the private corporations that Class had sued and to the government agencies that Class had sued SEPARATELY (one ruling DISMISSING the government agencies that Class had sued and a different ruling DISMISSING the private corporations that Class had sued). But, in trying to explain away these two LOSSES to his followers, Tavares and Class fraudulently “SWITCHED” the judges’ words about the private corporations that Class had sued with the judges’ words about the government agencies that Class had sued. By “SWITCHING” the judges’ words about the private corporations with the judges’ words about the government agencies, Tavares and Class fraudulently created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually talking about the private corporations, they were instead talking about all of the government agencies. This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judges words (from one group of defendants TO THE OTHER group of defendants) created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually referring to THE PRIVATE CORPORATIONS that Class had sued as “corporate appellees” or as a SINGLE “private entitY” as applicable, they were instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class had sued as “corporate appelleeS” or as “private entitIES”, as applicable. But, that was not so.

    THE TRUTH IN THE FIRST CASE (The 10th Circuit LOSS):
    In this case, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. In his DISMISSAL of the first case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the term, “Corporate Appellees”, when referring BY NAME (ONLY) to a private bank and to two private insurance companies that Class had sued. But, instead of telling their followers the truth, Tavares and Class fraudulently told their followers that in his DISMISSAL of this case (throwing it out of court), the judge was instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" that Class had sued as “corporate appellees”. In the link below, scroll down to the BOLD, BLACK TYPE in the YELLOW-HIGHLIGHTED PARAGRAPH at about 35-40% through the text of this page. LOOK FOR THE TERM, "10th Circuit" IN BOLD TYPE. http://www.rayservers.com/blog/rod-c...ar-association (Remember, the BOLD, BLACK TYPE in the YELLOW-HIGHLIGHTED PARAGRAPH at about 35-40% through the text of this page and look for the term, "10th Circuit" IN BOLD TYPE). In the video below, listen to 9:35-10:50, 25:05-25:35, 43:00-44:10, 53:00-53:20. LISTEN FOR THE TERM, "10th Circuit". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk (Remember, 9:35-10:50, 25:05-25:35, 43:40-44:10, 53:00-53:20 and listen for the term, "10th Circuit"). This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s words (from one type of defendant TO THE OTHER type of defendant) is how Tavares and Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" were “corporate appellees”. Unfortunately for Tavares and Class, the truth about this 10th Circuit DISMISSAL (throwing the case out of court) can be found here. In the link below, scroll down to page 6 at lines 13-15. Look for the following phrase, "Appellees Westfield Insurance Company, CNA Surety, and First National Bank ("Corporate Appellees") have filed a separate motion... ." https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOUR...07-05026-0.pdf (Remember, page 6 at lines 13-15 and identify which defendants the court REALLY refers to as "corporate appellees"). After reading what the judge in this case actually said, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class sued as “corporate appellees” OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer BY NAME (ONLY) to the private bank and the two private insurance companies that Class used as “corporate appellees"?

    THE TRUTH IN THE SECOND CASE (The North Carolina Administrative Court LOSS):
    In this case, Class sued a STATE-WIDE government "agency", a “LOCAL unit of government” and a SINGLE “private entitY”, ALL IN THE SAME CASE. Specifically, Class filed an administrative suit against the North Carolina Department of Transportation (a STATE-WIDE government "agency" which was immune from suit by statute), against a “LOCAL” city police department (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a "LOCAL" “UNIT OF GOVERNMENT", rather than a STATE-WIDE "agency" under the Governor) and against a SINGLE private contractor that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a SINGLE “private entitY”). In his DISMISSAL of this second case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the SINGULAR term, “private entitY” when referring BY NAME (ONLY) to that SINGLE “private entitY” that Class had sued. But, instead of telling their followers the truth, Tavares and Class fraudulently told their followers that in his DISMISSAL of the case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the PLURAL term, “private entitIES” and fraudulently told their followers that the judge was instead referring to ALL THREE DEFENDANTS that Class had sued as “private entitIES” (including the LOCAL city police department). In the link below, read the 2nd, 3rd and FINAL paragraphs. LOOK FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERM, "entitIES" in that text. http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf (Remember, the 2nd, 3rd and FINAL paragraphs and LOOK FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERM, "entitIES" in that text). In the video below, listen to 9:00-9:15, 25:15-25:35, 53:05-53:20. LISTEN FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERMS, "entitIES" and "contractorS" in the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk (Remember, 9:00-9:15, 25:15-25:35, 53:05-53:20 and LISTEN FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERMS, "entitIES" and "contractorS" in the video.). This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s actual word, “entitY” (a SINGULAR term) to the FRAUDULENT word, “entitIES” (a PLURAL term) is how Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled "ALL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES" (including the LOCAL city police department) were “private entitIES” (a PLURAL term that does not appear anywhere in the DISMISSAL). Unfortunately for Tavares and Class, the truth about this North Carolina Administrative Court DISMISSAL (throwing the case out of court) can be found here. In the link below, scroll down to the document entitled “Conclusions Of Law” to the text actually numbered paragraph "4" and read the SECOND sentence of that 4th paragraph. Look for the following phrase, "[The] Respondent License Plate Agency [ONLY]... is a private entitY [A SINGULAR TERM]... [and not an agency of] state government." https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...y_complete.pdf (Remember, "Conclusions Of Law" in the text actually numbered paragraph "4" in the SECOND sentence of that 4th paragraph and look for the SINGULAR term, "entitY"). After reading what the judge in this case actually said in this case, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL THREE DEFENDANTS” (including the LOCAL city police department) as “private entitIES”, a PLURAL term OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer BY NAME (ONLY) to the SINGLE private contractor that sold license plates for the State of North Carolina as a SINGLE “private entitY”, a SINGULAR term?

    In fairness to Class, who only has a high school education and who is functionally illiterate, CLASS MISTAKENLY BELIEVED THAT HE HAD SUED THREE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES in this case. That is why he sued all three defendants in state administrative court. (He mistakenly believed that all three defendants were state-wide government "agencies" under the governor over which state administrative courts usually have jurisdiction.). But, in fact in this case, Class had actually sued ONLY TWO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (OR “UNITS”) and a SINGLE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina. Class mistakenly believed that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he had mistakenly sued in this case was a government agency because he did not know that FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA HAS USED PRIVATE CONTRACTORS TO SELL VEHICLE LICENSE PLATES TO NORTH CAROLINA VEHICLE OWNERS.

    If Class had bothered to do a little research before filing suit, he would have discovered that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) was a not a governmental agency at all. Unknown to Class, almost all of the vehicle license plate agencies in the State Of North Carolina (outside the Charlotte & Raleigh areas) are now owned and operated by private contractors of the type that he mistakenly sued in this case (in the mistaken belief that it was a government "agency"). But, despite that the State of North Carolina uses private contractors to sell its vehicle license plates, IT DOES NOT USE PRIVATE CONTRACTORS FOR ITS LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY-TYPE FUNCTION. It only uses private contractors to sell vehicle license plates (includes titling services). This has been PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE to everyone except Rod Class for over half a century.

    WHAT TAVARES AND CLASS DID NOT KNOW THEN (AND DO NOT KNOW NOW):

    http://www.ncleg.net/ped/reports/doc...ags_report.pdf (Scroll down to "BACKGROUND" on the 4th page, marked "page 2").

    http://www.wral.com/dmv-defends-syst...ices/11753455/

    http://myfox8.com/2015/01/15/dmv-see...stokes-county/

    http://www.journalnow.com/news/local...a4bcf6878.html

    https://nanopdf.com/download/isaacs-...lpa-office_pdf (Click on window and scroll down.).

    CLASS MAKES MISTAKES ON TOP OF MISTAKES: So, not knowing any better, when the judge in this case DISMISSED (threw out) Class' lawsuit against this SINGLE private contractor on the grounds that it was a SINGLE "private entitY" (and not a STATE-WIDE government "agency" over which the administrative court usually has jurisdiction), Tavares and Class mistakenly believed Class had "forced" the courts to "admit" that a SINGLE "private entitY" was a SINGLE "private entitY" (something that everybody except Tavares and Class have known for over half a century). This means that Tavares' and Class' own IGNORANCE (of the fact that North Carolina has used private contractors to sell vehicle license plates for more than half a century) led to them to each the mistaken conclusion that Class had miraculously become a "legal genius". To this very day, Tavares and Class do not know that the SINGLE “private entitY” that Class mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) had actually been a SINGLE "private entitY" all along. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.

    CLOSING NOTE:
    Remember, Tavares and Class falsely claim to have obtained “FOUR” ADMINISTRATIVE rulings to the effect that “all government agencies” (including all law enforcement agencies) are “private entitIES” or “private contractorS”. Here is how they reache the IMAGINARY total of "FOUR" such IMAGINARY ADMINISTRATIVE rulings to that effect. According to Class, his two DISMISSALS (his two LOSSES) described above (throwing his two cases out of court) constituted TWO such IMAGINARY rulings to that effect (one of which was NOT an “ADMINISTRATIVE” ruling in the first place, the 10th Circuit DISMISSAL). According to Class, the ruling AGAINST HIM in his LOSS of his APPEAL of his DISMISSAL (LOSS) of the second case (described above) constituted the THIRD such IMAGINARY ruling to that effect (which was likewise NOT an ADMINISTRATIVE ruling either, it was a JUDICIAL ruling as well). (Class' LOSS of his APPEAL of his LOSS of the second case (above) is referred to in the 3rd paragraph in this link. http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf (Remember, the 3rd paragraph here.)). Finally, according to Tavares and Class, an ordinary “MOTION To Dismiss” filed by the state Attorney General’s Office in this second case (above) constituted the “FOURTH” such IMAGINARY ADMINISTRATIVE ruling to that effect (which was NOT A RULING OF ANY KIND, ADMINISTRATIVE or JUDICIAL). (In this "MOTION to Dismiss", the Assistant Attorney General, among other things, simply reminded the judge that Class has MISTAKENLY sued a private contractor that sold license plates for North Carolina in administrative court because he MISTAKENLY believed it was a government agency. The judge agreed and DISMISSED (threw out) Class' case and that court's DISMISSAL of the case was upheld on appeal.). In the video below, listen at 53:00-53:20 for Class' "LIST" of these IMAGINARY rulings. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk (Remember, at 53:00-53:20). (Note that contrary to Class' claims in this video, the city law director never claimed that the city police department was a "private contractor". Instead, the city law director actually said that the LOCAL city police department was not STATE-WIDE "agency" under the Governor and, therefore, the administrative court had no jurisdiction over it.). This means that of these "FOUR" IMAGINARY ADMINISTRATIVE rulings (allegedly to the effect that all government agencies are "private entitIES"), CLASS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE and only ONE such LOSS (a DISMISSAL) was an "ADMINISTRATIVE" DISMISSAL (or "ruling") in the first place. This "FUZZY MATH" is how Tavares and Class reach the FRAUDULENT total of “FOUR” IMAGINARY "ADMINISTRATIVE rulings" to the effect that “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" (including all law enforcement agencies) are “private entitIES” or “private contractorS”.

    (CONTINUED BELOW)

    PART II: DEBORAH TAVARES, ROD CLASS & THE “A NORTH CAROLINA JUDGE HAS WARNED STATE POLICE OFFICERS TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES HOAX”

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    http://hiddensecretsandlies.blogspot...police-to.html
    http://www.gloucestercounty-va.com/2...iable-for.html (at the 1st full paragraph);
    https://adask.wordpress.com/2011/10/...ne-elses-name/.
    http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf
    https://www.meetup.com/es-ES/StLouis...ages/25275652/ (at the 2nd full paragraph);
    http://2013rainbowroundtable.ning.co...=06v6zf7ohrnts;
    http://landrightsnfarming-landrightn...7_archive.html;
    http://www.city-data.com/forum/north...-patrol-2.html (at comment 8 at about 65% through the text of the page);
    https://www.godlikeproductions.com/f...age1684911/pg1 (click and enter the website if necessary);
    https://videos.peacefmonline.com/tgy...Vsc2UncyBOYW1l;
    http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...170&viewfull=1 (at 1st several comments)
    http://www.medialyrics.com/Judge-War...ro-rZe9-QDsqG4 (note misspelled word in title);
    http://www.thetreeofliberty.com/vb/s...n-this-be-true (at the 1st full comment);
    http://tuzmp3.download/mp3/judge-war...se-s-name.html.


    THE HOAX:
    This hoax is unique in that Tavares and Class created it to support another hoax, the “BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”. (Read that comment DIRECTLY ABOVE in this same comment first.). In this particular hoax, Tavares and Class falsely claim that, IN DIRECT RESPONSE to Class having obtained "FOUR" “Administrative Rulings” to the effect that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” are “private entitIES" (imaginary rulings which Class NEVER obtained), a North Carolina judge “WARNED” ALL NORTH CAROLINA "POLICE OFFICERS" TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES (to protect their property from the consequences of lawsuits that the public would file against such "police officers" now that they would no longer be protected from such lawsuits by governmental immunity). http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf. But, these claims are not so.

    NOTE:
    First of all, if Tavares and Class had known ANYTHING at all about North Carolina law at the time, then they would have NEVER created the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax” in the first place, because doing so only demonstrates the extent of their own IGNORANCE of North Carolina law (explained below).

    THE TRUTH:
    1. No such “warning” was ever issued BECAUSE CLASS NEVER OBTAINED THE IMAGINARY UNDERLYING RULINGS THAT WOULD HAVE OTHERWISE NECESSITATED SUCH A “WARNING” IN THE FIRST PLACE. (See the "BOMBSHELL: Fourth Administrative Ruling Hoax" DIRCETLY ABOVE.). This is why Tavares and Class has never published a copy of this imaginary "warning" online (something that he would have certainly done if this imaginary warning had actually been real).

    2. FOR OVER A CENTURY, IT HAS BEEN AN ILLEGAL (AND A LEGALLY INEFFECTIVE) ACT IN NORTH CAROLINA FOR DEBTORS (like police officers facing future lawsuits) TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES IN AN EFFORT TO AVOID PAYING THEIR CREDITORS (like future lawsuit judgment creditors). Here's how the law actually works. In this case, the defendant lost a breach of contract lawsuit and owed the plaintiff $200,000. But, the defendant had no money, so the plaintiff could not collect it at the time. A year later, the defendant became the owner of valuable parcel of real property and, fearing the plaintiff would try to collect the debt by selling his real property, the defendant immediately PURPORTED (means "pretended") TO PUT THE REAL PROPERTY INTO THE NAME OF A TRUST (or, what Rod Class calls putting property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES"). No money changed hands. But, the plaintiff moved to have the real property sold anyway and moved to have the sale proceeds applied to what the defendant owed him anyway. The court agreed and did exactly that! http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "THE TRIAL COURT DETERMINED THAT THE [defendant's] CONVEYANCE [of the real property] TO THE TRUST WAS NOT VALID [not effective] IN THAT IT FAILED TO [legally] CONVEY TITLE [of the real property] TO THE TRUSTEE [of the trust]. THE TRIAL COURT ALSO CONCLUDED THAT EVEN IF THE CONVEYANCE WAS VALID, IT WOULD CONSTITUTE A FRAUDULENT TRANSFER [under the subject statute and under a century of case law] AND [that] IT [the transfer] COULD BE AVOIDED [means "legally undone" if it was ever done in the first place]." (The preceding text is in the 3rd full paragraph of the case.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    THIS HAS BEEN THE LAW IN NORTH CAROLINA FOR MORE THAN A CENTURY:
    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "Aman v. Wlker, 165 N.C. 224, 81 S.E. 162 [a 1914 case from the Supreme Court of North Carolina] is a 'landmark case' on FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES. It is therein stated: "... If the CONVEYANCE [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] is VOLUNTARY and the grantor [the person pretending to put the property into other peoples' names] did not retain [means "keep"] [other] property fully sufficient and available TO PAY HIS DEBTS [like future lawsuit money judgments]... , it [the conveyance] IS INVALID [means "VOID", "INEFFECTIVE" and "DID NOT WORK"] [to defeat the claims of]... CREDITORS [like future lawsuit judgment creditors];... ." (The preceding text is in the 2nd full paragraph of the case and includes the block indented, quoted section.); "A CONVEYANCE [a pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] IS VOLUNTARY when it is NOT FOR VALUE [means not "SOLD" to the transferee AT FULL PRICE]... ." (The immediately preceding text is in the 3rd full paragraph of the case, not including the block indented, quoted section.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "[Over a century ago] in Aman v. Walker, 165 N.C. 224, 81 S.E. 162 (1914), the North Carolina Supreme Court set forth the principles governing fraudulent conveyances as follows: ... ; (2) If the CONVEYANCE [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] is VOLUNTARY, and the grantor [the person pretending to put property into other peoples' names] DID NOT RETAIN [means "keep"] [other] PROPERTY [that was] FULLY SUFFICIENT AND AVAILABLE TO PAY HIS DEBTS [like future lawsuit judgments] ... IT [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] IS INVALID [means "VOID" and "DID NOT WORK" to defeat the claims of]... CREDITORS [like future lawsuit judgment creditors]. (3) If the CONVEYANCE [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] is VOLUNTARY and MADE WITH THE ACTUAL INTENT ON THE PART OF THE GRANTOR [the person pretending to put the property into other peoples' names] TO DEFRAUD CREDITORS [like future lawsuit judgment creditors], IT [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] IS VOID [means "INEFFECTIVE", "IT NEVER HAPPENED" and "IT DID NOT WORK" to defeat the claims of future lawsuit judgment creditors]... ." (The preceding test is in the 3rd full paragraph and includes the block indented quoted section.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    3. In addition to having been illegal and ineffective for more than a century under case law (above), such FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS have also been illegal and ineffective FOR TWO DECADES, BY NORTH CAROLINA STATUTE. By statute, any attempt by creditors (like police officers facing future lawsuits) to put their property into other peoples' names in an effort to avoid paying their creditors (like future lawsuit judgment creditors) HAS BEEN ILLEGAL AND INEFFECTIVE, which, of course, defeats the purpose of putting property into other peoples' names in the first place (because doing so WOULD NOT protect a debtor’s property from lawsuit judgment creditors ANYWAY). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in an effort to defeat the claims of lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    THIS IS THE CURRENT STATUTE ON THE SUBJECT IN NORTH CAROLINA:
    https://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Enacted...rticle_3A.html LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS STATUTE: "39-23.4. ... . (a) A TRANSFER [of property into other peoples' names] made ... by a DEBTOR [like a police officer facing a future lawsuit] is VOIDABLE [means can be legally "undone"] as to a CREDITOR [like a future lawsuit judgment creditor], whether the creditor's claim [the facts giving rise to the creditor's lawsuit] arose [occurred] BEFORE or AFTER the TRANSFER was made... , IF THE DEBTOR MADE THE TRANSFER... : (1) With the INTENT to HINDER, DELAY, DEFRAUD and CREDITOR of the DEBTOR; OR (2) Without RECEIVING... [FULL PRICE for the property]. (b) In determining INTENT under subdivision (a)(1) of this section [the immediately preceding section above], ... [the court may consider]... whether: (1) The TRANSFER... was made to an insider [like a friend or relative]; (2) [whether] The DEBTOR retained [means "kept"] POSSESSION or CONTROL of the property TRANSFERRED AFTER THE TRANSFER;... (4) [whether] BEFORE THE TRANSFER WAS MADE... , THE DEBTOR HAD BEEN SUED OR THREATENED WITH SUIT [read this phrase again]; (5) Whether the transfer was of SUBSTANIALLY ALL OF THE DEBTOR'S ASSETS [or only part of the debtor's assets]... ." (The preceding text is at section "39-23-4. (a) and (b) at about 45% through the text of the statute.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    In this case, the defendant was a millionaire whose most valuable asset was a parcel of real property. The defendant owned a company that borrowed money to buy an airplane and the defendant personally guaranteed repayment of the loan. But, neither the defendant or his company repaid the loan. Fearing a lawsuit, the defendant and his wife formed a new company and HE PUT HIS REAL PROPERTY INTO THE NAME OF THAT NEW COMPANY (or, what Rod Class calls putting property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES"). No money changed hands. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "...[In sorting out the case, the court wrote] [O]UR LEGISLATURE [referring to the North Carolina legislature] ENACTED THE UNIFORM FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS ACT, LATER RENAMED THE UNIFORM VOIDABLE TRANSFERS ACT ("UVTA")... NEARLY TWO DECADES GO [note how long ago North Carolina passed this statute]." (The preceding text is in the 1st paragraph below the heading entitled, "B. Interpretation of 'Transfer'", at about 34-40% through the text of the case.).

    4. Unknown to Class, FOR CENTURIES, IT HAS BEEN AN ILLEGAL ACT in North Carolina (and for decades, a violation of the Judicial Code Of Conduct) FOR A JUDGE TO ILLEGALLY “WARN”, COUNSEL, ADVISE OR RECOMMEND that anyone (including police officers facing future lawsuits) "BREAK THE LAW" by putting their property into other peoples' names in an effort to avoid paying their creditors (AN ILLEGAL ACT that would not protect the debtor's property anyway). Any REAL judge who issued such an ILLEGAL "warning" would immediately be removed from office and disbarred. But, Class does not know this.

    ANALYSIS: Thus, in manufacturing the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax”, Class was so IGNORANT of North Carolina law that he did not know then and does not know now that ALL OF THE "FACTS" that he alleges in this hoax are LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE UNDER NORTH CAROLINA LAW, which conclusively establish this lie as the hoax that it is. THIS IS BECAUSE NO REAL NORTH CAROLINA JUDGE WOULD "BREAK THE LAW" --- BY "ILLEGALLY" WARNING POLICE OFFICERS TO "BREAK THE LAW" --- BY DOING SOMETHING "ILLEGAL" (PUTTING THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES IN AN EFFORT TO AVOID PAYING LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS)--- IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY FROM LAWSUITS WHICH WILL "NEVER SUCCEED" (DUE TO IMMUNITY)--- OR FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS WHO WILL "NEVER EXIST" (DUE TO IMMUNITY) --- ESPECIALLY GIVEN THAT ANY SUCH "ILLEGAL " ACT IS "REVERSIBLE" ANYWAY AND THEREFORE WOULD NOT PROTECT THE DEBTOR'S PROPERTY FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS IN THE FIRST PLACE (MAKING SUCH AN EFFORT ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS). But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    5. If more be necessary, North Carolina law already makes the EQUITY IN A HOMESTEAD (a residential property occupied by the owners), VEHICLE AND CERTAIN OTHER PROPERTY “EXEMPT” (“protected”) from the claims of lawsuit judgment creditors up to a certain amount ANYWAY. THUS, IN MOST CASES, THIS EXEMPTION WOULD ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR POLICE OFFICERS TO "ILLEGALLY" PRETEND TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES, EVEN IF THAT "ILLEGAL" ACT WOULD PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS (AND IT WOULD NOT). But, Class does not know this. Constitution of the State Of North Carolina Art. 16 § 1C-1601. http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislat...Article_16.pdf

    For more information on the “Property In Other Peoples' Names Hoax”, see Class’ internet radio show, “Episode 966" on Talkshoe (spelled correctly) AIB radio, recorded or posted on 12-12-2015. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...=2&pageSize=15 or simply Google “Post Oak Public Relations”. https://www.linkedin.com/in/harvey-wharfield-0b56746. Further, be sure to look into William H. Gilpatric, IV of Middlesex County, Maine (address and contact information withheld). Gilpatric is aware of all the parties involved in the hoax and how it was manufactured and marketed.

    ANALYSIS:
    Suffice it to say, this is one of Tavares' and Class’ more embarrassingly-amateur hoaxes. (In order to manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT --- AND TAVARES AND CLASS DO NOT.). Tavares and Class do not lie to people for whom they have respect. They only lie to people for whom he have no respect. The PATHOLOGICAL LIES reflected in this particular hoax speak volumes about what Tavares and Class REALLY think of the American people. Tavares and Class pretend to be a humble public servants who are only revealing the "hidden truth" about the law and the legal system to the down-trodden masses. But, this is not so. They are actually calculating and manipulative charlatans with no conscience whatsoever and no moral compass whatsoever. Their two missions in life are to glorify themselves and to incite hatred and violence against INNOCENT AMERICANS. If they have to lie to the American people and commit fraud upon the American people in the process of inciting this hatred, that is perfectly fine with them. They have no intention of telling you the truth. None.

    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 76 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. For more on Rod Class, CLICK HERE. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...61#post1175261.

    Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'Certificate' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Private, For-Profit Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For-Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.). For more on Rod Class, CLICK HERE. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...61#post1175261

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares or Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' and Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 26th March 2019 at 17:48.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    xylo (25th March 2019)

  17. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    COMMENT 8: DEBORAH TAVARES, ROD CLASS & THE "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" HOAX

    FIRST SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....udge-dale.html (contains 100% FAKE case law and a series of LIES written by Rodney DALE Class while pretending to "Judge DALE").

    THE HOAX:
    DEBORAH TAVARES, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly claim that a "SOVEREIGN" is an INDIVIDUAL and that the enemy of a "SOVEREIGN" is "We the People" COLLECTIVELY in the form of the GOVERNMENT of "We the People". But, this is not so.

    THE TRUTH:
    "We the People" COLLECTIVELY in the form OF THE GOVERNMENT of "We the People" IS THE "SOVEREIGN". The INDIVIDUAL IS NOT "SOVEREIGN".

    THE ACTUAL REAL LAW ITSELF ON WHETHER INDIVIDUALS ARE "SOVEREIGN"

    1). Lozano v. Bank of America Loans, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the plaintiff (an amateur legal theorist) sued a lender and claimed to be "SOVEREIGN". But, the court ruled otherwise and held, "First, SHE [the plaintiff] IS NOT A "SOVEREIGN". A SOVEREIGN IS THE GOVERNMENT, OR THE LEADER OF A GOVERNMENT [a Monarch]. SHE [the plaintiff] IS NIETHER [a government or a leader of a government]." TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

    2). U.S. v. Crawford, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the court wrote, "Defendant [an amateur legal theorist] asserts in his motion that HE IS A... SOVEREIGN, and as such is ENTITLED TO SOVEREIGN [GOVERNMENTAL] IMMUNITY from prosecution." But, the court ruled otherwise and held, "Defendant... IS NOT A SOVEREIGN [meaning a GOVERNMENT], BUT [IS] AN INDIVIDUAL. As with ANY INDIVIUAL criminal defendant, Crawford [the INDIVIDUAL defendant] is NOT ENTITLED TO SOVEREIGN [GOVERNMENTAL] IMMUNITY despite his claims to the contrary [because he is NOT a GOVERNMENT]... ." TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

    3). Cooper v U.S., https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...2&as_sdt=40006 (HOLDING THAT ONLY THE UNTIED STATES AND THE INDIVIDUAL STATES ARE "SOVEREIGN"). In this case, the court held, "It is fundamental that THE UNITED STATES EXISTS AS A SOVEREIGN of delegated powers; DELEGATED TO IT BY THE "SOVEREIGNS" MAKING UP THE UNITED STATES, THE INDIVIDUAL STATES [not individual human beings]." (in the 3rd to last paragraph of this case). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

    4). Chisolm v. Georgia, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006 (HOLDING THAT ONLY THE STATES AND THE UNITED STATES ARE SOVEREIGN). The court wrote, "EVERY STATE IN THE UNION in every instance where ITS SOVEREIGNTY has NOT been delegated to THE UNITED STATES, [IS]... COMPLETELY SOVEREIGN, AS THE UNITED STATES ARE [SOVEREIGN] IN RESPECT TO THE POWERS SURRENDERED [TO THEM BY THE STATES]. THE UNITED STATES ARE SOVEREIGN AS TO ALL POWERS OF GOVERNMENT ACTUALLY SURRENDERED [TO THEM BY THE STATES]: EACH STATE IN THE UNION IS SOVEREIGN AS TO ALL POWERS RESERVED. " (at the 14th paragraph at about 15% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

    SIDE NOTE: Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that the STATES are franchises or subsidiaries of the FEDERAL government. https://scannedretina.com/2014/11/27...erican-people/. But, this is exactly BACKWARDS and OPPOSITE to the truth. The FEDERAL government is a franchise and subsidiary of THE STATES. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case reads, "The powers of the general [FEDERAL] Government ARE MADE UP OF CONCESSIONS [GIFTS] FROM THE STATES." (at the 24th paragraph at about 35% through the text).

    5). Parker v. Brown, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006 (HOLDING THAT STATES ARE SOVEREIGN). The court wrote, "Under the Constitution, THE STATES ARE SOVEREIGN, SAVE ONLY [means "EXCEPT"] AS CONGRESS MAY CONSTITUTIONALLY [under Article 3, Section 8] SUBTRACT FROM THEIR AUTHORITY [their SOVEREIGNTY]." (at the 16th paragraph at about 30% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

    6). Feldman v. Gardner, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (HOLDING THAT THE STATES ARE SOVEREIGN). The court wrote, "Inherent in our system of government is the concept of DUAL [meaning FEDERAL and STATE] SOVEREIGNTY; EACH STATE IS SOVEREIGN, except to the extent that ITS SOVEREIGNTY is curtailed by the [United States] Constitution or validly restricted by Congress [as set forth in Article 3, Section 8]." (at the 1st paragraph in "Section B" at about 25% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

    7). Dred Scott v. Sandford (rev'd other grounds) https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the Chief Justice of The United States Supreme Court held that the terms "SOVEREIGN" and "SOVEREIGNTY" refer ONLY to "We the People" COLLECTIVELY in the form of the GOVERNMENT and NOT TO INDIVIDUALS. He wrote, "The words 'people [a PLURAL term] of the United States' and 'citizens' [a PLURAL term] are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe THE POLITICAL BODY [a SINGULAR term] who, according to our republican institutions, FORM THE SOVEREIGN [MEANING FORM THE GOVERNMENT], and who [COLLECTIVELY] hold the power and conduct the Government THROUGH THEIR [A PLURAL TERM] [ELECTED] REPRESENTATIVES [meaning the SOVEREIGNTY of "We the People" is exercised COLLECTIVELY through our ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, not INDIVIDUALLY], They [a PLURAL term] are what we familiarly call the "SOVEREIGN PEOPLE [a PLURAL term]," and every [INDIVIDUAL] citizen is ONE of this [SOVEREIGN GROUP OF] PEOPLE [a PLURAL term], and a constituent member of this SOVEREIGNTY [the GOVERNMENT of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY]." (at the 24th paragraph at about 5% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

    8). Republic Of Panama v. BCCI Holdings, Inc. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the court wrote, "The rules of personal jurisdiction protect an INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHTS, NOT A SOVEREIGN'S RIGHTS [drawing a stark contrast between an INDIVIDUAL and a SOVEREIGN]." (in the 24th paragraph). Translation: An INDIVIDUAL has entirely DIFFERENT RIGHTS when compared to the rights of a SOVEREIGN. So, a SOVEREIGN cannot logically be an INDIVIDUAL.

    THE BOTTOM LINE: Note that ALL amateur legal theories (ex: "individuals, rather than governments, are sovereign") are always EXACTLY BACKWARDS AND OPPOSITE to what the REAL law actually is. There are NO EXCEPTIONS! Amateur legal theories ARE NOT REAL. They are FAKE. They are LIES. Amateur legal theories and the REAL law are the EXACT OPPOSITES of one another. Amateur legal theories are an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE to the REAL law that is actually used by the REAL legal system and the ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD. Amateur legal theories have a 100% FAILURE RATE in court BECAUSE THEY ARE FAKE. They are NOT INTENDED TO WORK and they DO NOT WORK! They never have. They never will. Their SOLE PURPOSE is to attempt to discredit and delegitimize our REPUBLICAN form of government, the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and intended to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. Nothing more.

    FACT: Just in case you do not already know, all FUTURE DECISIONS on the subject of whether individuals rather than governments are "sovereign" WILL FOLLOW THE DECISIONS SHOWN ABOVE (CALLED "PRECEDENT"). So, the law on this same subject will always be the same as reflected in the cases above.
    https://definitions.uslegal.com/b/binding-precedent/.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent.
    https://dictionary.thelaw.com/binding-precedent/.


    FACT: Thus, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ACTUALLY OPPOSE THE VERY "SOVEREIGN" AND THE VERY "SOVEREIGNTY" THAT THEY CLAIM TO SUPPORT. This means that Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ARE ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of the "SOVEREIGN" and ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of "SOVEREIGNTY", not their supporters. But, they do not know enough to even realize this. This is why many such amateur legal theorists (like Rod Class) find themselves on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST (because they actually oppose the "SOVEREIGN" and because they actually oppose "SOVEREIGNTY").

    This fundamental mistake (the mistaken belief that the INDIVIDUAL is "SOVEREIGN" and that the GOVERNMENT of "We the People" IS NOT "SOVEREIGN") reflects that the terms, "SOVEREIGN" and "SOVEREIGNTY" are perhaps the single most misused and misunderstood terms in all of amateur legal theory.

    ABOUT SOVEREIGNTY

    BACKGROUND: Originally in politics, a "SOVEREIGN" was a SINGLE "MONARCH" (King or Queen) GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE who GOVERNED a nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the nation state. Originally, the RIGHT of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN his/her own nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE was that MONARCH's right of "SOVEREIGNTY".

    Then and now, a "SOVEREIGN" meant/means a "GOVERNMENT" OF ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state. Then and now, "SOVEREIGNTY," meant/means that GOVERNMENT’S RIGHT TO GOVERN ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE.


    So, here in our country, THE STATE ITSELF, which consists of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) became "SOVEREIGN" (which still means THE GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). This means that in our country THE STATE ITSELF legally stands in the shoes of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear. So, in our country, THE STATE ITSELF GOVERNS the STATE and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state (instead of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear). But, the right, power and authority of THE STATE ITSELF as a "SOVEREIGN" and the right, power and authority of the MONARCH of yesteryear as a "SOVEREIGN" ARE EXACTLY THE SAME. In our country, a "SOVEREIGN" IS STILL A "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE, but a "SOVEREIGN" is no longer a SINGLE MONARCH.

    Medvedieff v. Cities Service Oil Co., CLICK HERE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...40006&as_vis=1. This case reads, "The term`citizen,' as understood in our law, is precisely analogous to the term 'subject' in the common law [when MONARCHS ruled supreme], and the change of phrase [from "subject" to "citizen"] has entirely resulted from the change [in the form] of government [from a "MONARCHY" to a "REPUBLICAN" form of government]. The SOVEREIGNTY has been transferred from one man [a "MONARCH"] to the COLLECTIVE BODY OF THE PEOPLE [CALLED THE "STATE"] —and HE WHO BEFORE WAS A 'SUBJECT' OF A KING 'IS NOW A CITIZEN OF THE STATE.'" [CLICK HERE http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictiona...overeign.aspx; https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...lish/sovereign]. TRANSLATION: SOVEREIGNTY (THE RIGHT TO RULE) HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM ONE MAN (A "MONARCH") TO THE COLLECTIVE BODY OF THE PEOPLE AS A WHOLE (CALLED THE "STATE") —AND HE WHO BEFORE WAS A "SUBJECT" OF A SOVEREIGN MONARCH IS NOW A CITIZEN OF THE SOVEREIGN "STATE.'"

    DEFINITION OF "SOVEREIGN":

    http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/S/Sovereign.aspx

    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...lish/sovereign

    THE BOTTOM LINE: Thus, In our country, the term, "SOVEREIGN" is a term THAT ONLY APPLIES TO A GOVERNMENT OF "WE THE PEOPLE" COLLECTIVELY (AS A WHOLE) AND NOT TO A SINGLE "CITIZEN", INDIVIDUAL OR PERSON INDIVIDUALLY. But, Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to even realize this.

    Here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE. So, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). As a result, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL does not GOVERN the STATE or any of the INDIVIDUALS in the state.

    THE UNITED STATES: The United States ITSELF is also a SOVEREIGN nation state consisting of a union of MEMBER SOVEREIGN STATES. So, here in the United States, THE STATES and the United States are both "SOVEREIGN" GOVERNMENTAL HEADS OF STATE (WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS AS DIFFERENTIATED BY SUBJECT MATTER IN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION).

    This means that here in the United States, THE STATE AND THE UNITED STATES OCCUPY THE SAME EXACT LEGAL POSITION (AND HAVE THE SAME LEGAL RIGHT, POWER AND AUTHORITY TO GOVERN THE STATE AND ALL OF THE INDIVIDUALS IN THE STATE) AS DID THE SINGLE MONARCH OF YESTERYEAR, except that the powers of the United States (as distinguished from the individual STATES) are limited to those powers expressly delegated to it BY THE STATES in the United States Constitution (a tiny list of subjects), whereas the powers of the individual STATES (as distinguished from the United States) have no such limitation.

    Cooper v U.S., https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...2&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the court held, "It is fundamental that THE UNITED STATES EXISTS AS A SOVEREIGN of delegated powers; delegated to it BY THE "SOVEREIGNS" MAKING UP THE UNITED STATES, THE INDIVIDUAL STATES [not individual human beings]." (in the 3rd TO LAST paragraph of this case).


    Here in the United States, "We the People" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" COLLECTIVELY (NOT INDIVIDUALLY) through our VOTES. ---Thomas Jefferson (see below). Thus, "We (a PLURAL term) the People (also a PLURAL term)" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" (COLLECTIVELY, not INDIVIDUALLY) through our ELECTIONS.

    Jenkins v. Williamson-Butler, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. The court quoted Thomas Jefferson and wrote, "IT IS BY THEIR [a PLURAL term] VOTES [also a PLURAL term] THAT THE PEOPLE [also a PLURAL term] EXERCISE THEIR [also a PLURAL term] SOVEREIGNTY [AND NOT BY ANY OTHER MEANS]. ---Thomas Jefferson." (at the 12th paragraph, not including block indented portions, at about 60% through the text). TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "WE THE PEOPLE" COLLECTIVELY IN THE FORM OF "THE GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL ACTING OUTSIDE THE GOVERMENT CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

    Note that the term "the governed' (below) IS A PLURAL TERM (not an INDIVIDUAL term).

    https://www.dictionary.com/browse/co...f-the-governed

    But, as INDIVIDUALS, none of us are “SOVEREIGN” (which still means the GOVERNMENT of a state) and as INDIVIDUALS, none of us can exercise any "SOVEREIGNTY" (which still means the right to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state). In our country, we no longer recognize a SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (or “MONARCH”) as “SOVEREIGN”. In our country, no single INDIVIDUAL is the GOVERNMENT OF A STATE. This is why, in our country, no INDIVIDUAL can be "SOVEREIGN" (WHICH STILL MEANS A GOVERNMENT OF A STATE).

    Lozano v. Bank of America Loans, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. The court held, "First, she [the plaintiff] IS NOT A "SOVEREIGN". A SOVEREIGN IS THE GOVERNMENT, OR THE LEADER OF A GOVERNMENT [such as the Queen Of England]. She [the plaintiff] is neither [a government or a leader of a government]." TRANSLATION: UNDER U.S. LAW, ONLY "A GOVERNMENT" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN". UNDER U.S. LAW, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN EVER BE "SOVEREIGN" ("A GOVERNMENT").

    APPLICATION: This is why every amateur legal theorist who claims to be "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT) ALWAYS LOSES on that issue with ALL law enforcement officers and with ALL courts. This is why ALL law enforcement officers and ALL courts ALWAYS treat such amateur legal theorists as the mere INDIVIDUALS that they really are. Amateur legal theorists who claim to be "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT) to law enforcement officers and in court do nothing but demonstrate their IGNORANCE of the law and their IGNORANCE of history--- AND THEY ALWAYS LOSE!

    WHAT YOU CAN DO: If you do not like the laws, the ELECTED legislators, the ELECTED executive officers or the ELECTED judges or the ELECTED prosecutors, then do something about it. VOTE OR RUN FOR OFFICE. Pretending to be an INDIVIDUAL, GOVERNMENT OF A STATE (a “SOVEREIGN” MONARCH) has never, and will never work for you as a “defense” to the application of any law, the jurisdiction of any law enforcement officer or court or to the consequences any arrest, charge or conviction.

    CONCLUSION: IN OUR COUNTRY, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" (OR OTHERWISE "SOVEREIGN"). HERE, AND ELSEWHERE, ONLY A GOVERNMENT CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN".

    THE ACTUAL REAL LAW ON WHETHER AN "INDIVIDUAL" CAN BE "SOVEREIGN" AND THEREFORE BE "IMMUNE" FROM PROSECUTION FOR VIOLATING STATUTES WRITTEN BY LAWMAKERS ELECTED BY "WE THE PEOPLE":

    1. U.S. v. Benabe,https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, several defendants (all of whom were amateur legal theorists) falsely claimed to be "SOVEREIGN" and therefore claimed that they were not subject to the court's jurisdiction. But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "We [the courts] have REPEATEDLY REJECTED their [referring to amateur legal theorists'] theories of INDIVIDUAL [rather than collective] SOVEREIGNTY, immunity from prosecution, and their ilk." (citations omitted). The court then cited a number of other decisions with approval which. " ... REJECT[ED] the 'shop worn' argument that a[n] [INDIVIDUAL] DEFENDANT IS A SOVEREIGN [a GOVERNMENT] and is beyond the jurisdiction bounds of the district court. (citation omitted)... [and another case] describing defendant's proposed 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN defense as having 'NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW' (citation omitted)... [and another case] DISMISSING [SOVEREIGN CITIZEN] jurisdiction arguments as FRIVOULOUS... ." In the case at bar, the court held, "Regardless of an INDIVIDUAL'S claimed status of descent, be it as a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN,' a 'secured-party creditor,' or a 'flesh-and-blood human being [rather than a corporate fiction],' THAT [INDIVIDUAL] PERSON IS NOT BEYOND THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. These [amateur legal] theories SHOULD BE REJECTED summarily [means "without any delay"], however they are presented." (at paragraph 23 at about 50% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    2. Williams v, Georgia Dept. Of Corrections, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the court wrote, "[The Plaintiff's]... claims are brought under a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' [amateur legal] theory. THIS IS A FRIVOLOUS [AMATEUR LEGAL] LEGAL THEORY THAT IS CONSISTENTLY REJECTED BY... [THE] COURTS [read this phrase again]." (citations omitted). The court went on to cite the holdings of other courts in support, "The ... [amateur legal] theories of `SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' are NOT ESTABLISHED LAW IN THIS COURT OR ANYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY'S VALID LEGAL SYSTEM (citations omitted)... [and another decision] finding the SOVEREIGN CITIZEN argument to be to 'WHOLLY INSUBSTANTIAL AND FRIVOLOUS' (citation omitted)... [and another decision which] REJECT[ED] THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN ARGUMENT as 'SHOP WORN' and FRIVOLOUS.'" In the case at bar, the court held, "The Court [referring to itself] therefore finds that [the Plaintiff's SOVEREIGN CITIZEN]... LEGAL THEORY is also 'INDISPUTABLY MERITLESS' [read this phrase again]." (at paragraph 8 in this case at about 90% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    3. Paul v. State Of New York, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. This case reads, "It is clear [that the Plaintiff]... is an adherent of the 'SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' movement (citations omitted) which the Second Circuit has described as 'a loosely affiliated group who [mistakenly] believe that the state and federal governments [of "We the People"] lack constitutional legitimacy and therefore have no authority to regulate their behavior.'" (citations THE STATES: But, here in the United States, we rejected the notion of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state. Here in our country, we adopted a republican form of government whereby "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) GOVERNED our own states and all of the INDIVIDUALS in our own state COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) through our ELECTED representatives of our own STATE.
    omitted)... . The court cited other cases with approval and continued, "So-called SOVEREIGN CITIZENS [mistakenly] believe that they are not subject to government authority [of "We the People"] and [UNSUCCESSFULLY] employ various tactics in an attempt to, among other things, avoid paying taxes, extinguish debts, and derail criminal proceedings. (citation omitted). The `SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MOVEMENT' is well documented. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has classified`SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' as domestic terror threats BECAUSE THEY ARE ANTI-GOVERNMENT [of "We the People"] EXTREMISTS... ." In the case at bar, the court wrote, "The gravamen [core of] of plaintiff's amended complaint is that as a SOVEREIGN CITIZEN, he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the ... courts... . [But] contrary to plaintiff's contentions, 'SOVEREIGN CITIZENS,' like ALL... [INDIVIDUALS in] the United States, ARE SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE JURISDICTION IN WHICH THEY [FIND THEMSELVES]... ." (citations omitted). The court cited other decisions with approval which found "similar [SOVEREIGN CITIZEN] claims by Moorish Nationals... [to the effect] that they are not subject to... state laws, to be 'MERITLESS'. Plaintiff's purported [means "pretended"] status as a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' 'does NOT enable him to violate state and federal laws [of "We the People"] without consequence.'" (citations omitted). Since... plaintiff's factual allegations in the amended complaint are CLEARLY BASELESS, and "[t]he conspiracy and legal revisionist [amateur legal] theories of 'SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' are NOT ESTABLISHED LAW IN THIS COURT OR ANYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY'S VALID LEGAL SYSTEM,"... , plaintiff's amended complaint is both FACTUALLY AND LEGALLY FRIVOLOUS. Accordingly, the amended complaint is sua sponte [means "on the court's own motion"] DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS." (at paragraph 10 at about 75% through the text of the case.). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    4. Frye v. Barbour, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued various government officials who he mistakenly blamed for his many criminal convictions and incarcerations. The court wrote, "[The]... Plaintiff [claims]... that this court lacks jurisdiction over him [because]... he is a SOVEREIGN CITIZEN, not subject to the laws of the United States of America... . However, the courts that have [already] considered such 'SOVEREIGN' CITIZEN' claims have found them to be FRIVOLOUS." The court cited other decisions is support which held, "[C]ourts ROUTINELY REJECT "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' claims as FRIVOLOUS. (citation omitted). 'Regardless of an individual's claimed status of descent, be it as a `SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' , a `secured-party creditor,' or a `flesh-and-blood human being [rather than as a corporate fiction],' that person is not beyond the jurisdiction of the courts. These [amateur legal] theories SHOULD BE REJECTED summarily, however they are presented.' (citation omitted). '[S]OVEREIGN CITIZEN claims are WHOLLY FRIVOLOUS [read that phrase again].'" (at the 12th paragraph, not including block indented portions, at about 85% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    5. Dudley v. Eggert, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, an amateur legal theorist unsuccessfully sued a government official for "seeking to incarcerate a SOVEREIGN and NATURAL FREE-MAN of the land [referring to himself] and extort [his] money without a contract threatening [his] liberty [as if a contract were necessary]." The court held that "[courts have]... "REPEATEDLY REJECTED... [such amateur legal] theories of INDIVIDUAL [rather than collective] SOVEREIGNTY, immunity from prosecution, and their ilk." (citation omitted). SOVEREIGN CITIZEN [amateur legal] theories are typically raised by defendants in criminal prosecutions or by tax protestors, but courts in this Circuit HAVE [ALSO] SUMMARILY REJECTED THEM in other contexts as well. (citation omitted). The court cited another case in support which "REJECT[ED] the plaintiff's SOVEREIGN CITIZEN challenge to state child support proceedings as "SHOP WORN" and "FRIVOLOUS." (at the 3rd to last paragraph at about 85% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    6. Hoglund v. Indiana, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, a prisoner (and amateur legal theorist) unsuccessfully sued various state agencies and officials for imaginary misconduct that he mistakenly claimed resulted in his convictions. He alleged that government officials created laws "meant to control the people a as [fictional] legal entities, but not the SOVEREIGN man [referring to himself]... ." But, the court held otherwise and wrote, "The court of appeals has "REPEATEDLY REJECTED... [amateur legal] theories of INDIVIDUAL [rather than collective] SOVEREIGNTY, immunity from prosecution, and their ilk." (citation omitted). Even if an individual claims the status of "a `SOVEREIGN CITIZEN,' a `secured-party creditor,' or a `flesh-and-blood human being,' that person is not beyond the jurisdiction of the courts. These [amateur legal] theories SHOULD BE REJECTED summarily, however they are presented." (citation omitted). The court also cited another case in support which "describe[ed] defendant's 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' defense as having "NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW.'" The court ruled, "Because all three of Plaintiff's claims rest on his [amateur legal] theories of SOVEREIGN CITIZENSHIP, this complaint must be DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS." (at the 3rd and 4th paragraph at about 85% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    7. U.S. v. Johnson, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the Defendant was charged with filing a fraudulent lien against a federal employee. The Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the charges and claimed to be "a SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" and thus [claimed] the court ha[d] no jurisdiction over him." But the court held otherwise and wrote, "[T]he Seventh Circuit HAS READILY REJECTED such arguments alleging the SOVEREIGNTY OF [INDIVIDUAL] CITIZENS, finding such arguments to be FRIVOLOUS." (citation omitted). The court also cited other cases in support, one of which, "REJECT[ED] the 'SHOP WORN' argument that a defendant is a SOVEREIGN ["a GOVERNMENT"] and is beyond the jurisdiction bounds of the district court'... [and another case which] "DISMISS[ED] [a] lack of personal jurisdiction argument as FRIVOLOUS because [federal district] COURTS HAVE JURISDICTION OVER [ALL] DEFENDANTS [charged with]... VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL LAW. A [FEDERAL] DISTRICT COURT HAS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER A DEFENDANT WHO 'IS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES.' (citation omitted). Thus [A] DEFENDANT... WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES [IS] ...SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES.' (citation omitted)... . Therefore, the Court REJECTS Defendant's argument that he is somehow a SOVEREIGN ["a GOVERNMENT"]... WHO IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THIS COURT." TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    8. U.S. v Schneider, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, the Defendant was convicted and sentenced to prison for five years for mailing a threatening letter to a judge (just like Rod Class routinely does). His sole defense to the charges was that "he is a FREE, SOVEREIGN CITIZEN and as such not subject to the jurisdiction of the federal courts." But, the court disagreed and wrote, "[T]hat defense has NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW... ." (at the 2nd paragraph at about 40% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    9. Bey v. Indiana, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, an amateur legal theorist sued the state to stop it from taxing his real property. This case reads, "Bey says he's a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' and therefore can't lawfully be taxed by Indiana or its subdivisions in the absence of a contract between them and him [as if a contract were necessary]." (citations omitted). But, the court wrote, "We have REPEATEDLY REJECTED such claims. (citations omitted). We do so [REJECT SUCH CLAIMS] in this case as well... ." (at the 2nd paragraph at about 35% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    10. Osoria v. Connecticut" https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. In this case, an amateur legal theorist who was convicted for sexually molesting a child sued the state that convicted and imprisoned him. The court wrote, "... Plaintiff's complaint MUST BE DISMISSED as... FAILING TO STATE A PLAUSIBLE CLAIM... and AS "FRIVOLOUS"... because it is based on an "INDISPUTABLY MERITLESS LEGAL THEORY [referring to SOVEREIGN CITIZEN THEORY]. (citation omitted). Given the language of Plaintiff's Complaint — declaring himself a "real flesh and blood man," "a natural born, free, living, breathing, flesh and blood human with SENTIENT [a term also used DYNAMO] and more existence... upon the soil, and "the living man,"... Plaintiff appears to consider himself a 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN'... . Numerous Circuits have ... REJECTED [the]... underlying premise [of SOVEREIGN CITIZENS to the effect] that federal courts lack jurisdiction over all 'LIVING MEN.'" (citations omitted). In support, the court cited a number of holdings from other cases as follows, "[T]o the extent that the plaintiff argues that he is a SOVEREIGN CITIZEN and not subject to... [state] laws, [such an argument is]`WHOLLY INSUBSTANTIAL AND FRIVOLOUS.' (citations omitted). Defendants claiming to be 'SOVEREIGN CITIZENS' assert that the federal government [of "We the People"] is illegitimate and insist that they are not subject to its jurisdiction. [But] [t]he [SOVEREIGN CITIZEN] defense has `NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW.'... ." The court then wrote, "[Federal and state courts]... have SIMILARLY DISMISSED "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" claims." Then, in citing those other courts, the court wrote, "...[A]rguments common to the "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" movement[]... have been CONSISTENTLY REJECTED by federal courts." (citation omitted). The court then cited another case which held, "This Court adds its voice TO THE JUDICIAL CHORUS [means hundreds of other courts] REJECTING, AS LEGALLY UNSUPPORTABLE, SOVEREIGN-CITIZEN-BASED challenges to federal law." (citation omitted). The court cited another case which held, "The`SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' BELIEF SYSTEM has been described by other courts as `COMPLETELY WITHOUT MERIT, 'PATENTLY FRIVOLOUS', and HAVING 'NO CONCEIVABLE VALIDITY IN AMERICAN LAW. (citations omitted)... ." In the case at bar, the court wrote, "[t]he crux of Osorio's Complaint is that [courts]... have no 'jurisdiction over living men.' [He argues that]... because... SOVEREIGN [CITIZENS]... are not named in the codes, [they]... are not subject to the codes... . He explicitly asserts that he, the "Secured Party/Plaintiff is not a subject of, or to . . . the United States Constitution, its Ordinances, Statutes, Codes, or Regulations... . Because Plaintiff's claims are ALL PREMISED on this "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN"... theory, THEY [ALL] FAIL TO STATE A PLAUSIBLE CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED. (citation omitted). Accordingly, they [the Plaintiff's claims] are "FRIVOLOUS" and WILL BE DISMISSED... ." (at the 25th, 26th, and 27th paragraph beginning at about 75% through the text, and at the 2nd to LAST paragraph at about 95% through the text). TRANSLATION: Claiming to be "SOVEREIGN" ("a GOVERNMENT") WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU IN ANY WAY IN ANY TYPE OF CASE. This is because under U.S. law, no INDIVIDUAL is a GOVERNMENT (a "SOVEREIGN").

    THE BOTTOM LINE: Note that ALL amateur legal theories (ex: "individuals are sovereign and exempt from the law") are always EXACTLY BACKWARDS AND OPPOSITE to what the REAL law actually is. There are NO EXCEPTIONS! Amateur legal theories ARE NOT REAL. They are FAKE. They are LIES. Amateur legal theories and the REAL law are the EXACT OPPOSITES of one another. Amateur legal theories are an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE to the REAL law that is actually used by the REAL legal system and the ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD. Amateur legal theories have a 100% FAILURE RATE in court BECAUSE THEY ARE FAKE. They are NOT INTENDED TO WORK and they DO NOT WORK! They never have. They never will. Their SOLE PURPOSE is to attempt to discredit and delegitimize our REPUBLICAN form of government, the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and intended to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. Nothing more.

    FACT: Just in case you do not already know, all FUTURE DECISIONS on the subject of whether individuals are "sovereign" an exempt from the law WILL FOLLOW THE DECISIONS SHOWN ABOVE (CALLED "PRECEDENT"). So, the law on this same subject will always be the same as reflected in the cases above. https://definitions.uslegal.com/b/binding-precedent/. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent. https://dictionary.thelaw.com/binding-precedent/.

    HOW THIS MISTAKE CAME ABOUT:

    Deborah Tavares, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists are unable to distinguish between PLURAL terms and SINGULAR terms. This inability results in much of their confusion about the law. In a republican form of government, such as ours, "WE" (a PLURAL term) the "PEOPLE" (also a PLURAL term) exercise our power and control over our own government COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY). But, as INDIVIDUALS, we exercise no such power or control. In a republican form of government, such as ours, the authority of a government depends on the COLLECTIVE (not INDIVIDUAL) "consent" of the "governed" (also a PLURAL term) COLLECTIVELY. But, as INDIVIDUALS, our "consent" to our government (contractual or otherwise), to its jurisdiction or to our laws IS NOT REQUIRED.

    7TH GRADE CIVICS: In a republican form of government such as ours, there are THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT. This prevents tyranny from any single branch of government. This legal principle is called the "SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE" which is found in the constitution of every state and in the constitution of the United States. Our three branches of government are the ELECTED LEGISLATIVE branch (the ELECTED statutory law makers), the ELECTED EXECUTIVE branch (the ELECTED law enforcement officials and their appointees) and the ELECTED JUDICIAL branch (the ELECTED judges, the ELECTED prosecutors and the ELECTED public defenders of the courts). Through the ELECTION process, "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) control ALL THREE BRANCHES of our own government. But, as INDIVIDUALS, we have no such control.

    In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our state statutes, then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT DIFFERENT ELECTED state LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVES to change or repeal the state statutes that we do not like. This ELECTION process works the same way with our nationally ELECTED LEGISLATORS (our SENATORS and CONGRESS MEN & WOMEN) as well as our locally ELECTED law/ordinance makers (county commissioners, city commissioners and city council members, etc.).

    In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our ELECTED state law enforcement officials, their appointees or their practices, then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT DIFFERENT state ELECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS to change the appointees and/or practices that we do not like (different Governor, different County Sheriffs, different City Police Chiefs, etc.). This ELECTION process works the same way with our nationally ELECTED law enforcement officer (our PRESIDENT ).

    In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our ELECTED state judges, their practices or their rulings , then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT different ELECTED state JUDGES (different Supreme Court Justices, different appellate judges, different circuit judges, different county judges, different city judges, etc.). This ELECTION process works the same way with respect to our ELECTED state prosecutors (state attorneys and district attorneys) and our ELECTED state public defenders. NOTE: In the federal courts, judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, both of which are ELECTED by "We the People". But, those ELECTED representatives of "We the People" (who do the nominating and confirming of our federal judges) can be removed from office by the ELECTION process as well. The ELECTED President also appoints the federal prosecutors. But, the President can be removed from office by the ELECTION process too. Some state jurisdictions even use a combination of BOTH systems whereby judges are first APPOINTED to the bench by ELECTED representatives of "We the People", but then must withstand a "retention" vote by "We the People" every single ELECTION cycle thereafter in order to remain on the bench.

    Regardless, EVERY single person in EVERY single branch of our STATE and FEDERAL government is put into office DIRECTLY or INDIRECTLY by "We the People" COLLECTIVELY through the ELECTION process.

    The fundamental mistake made by ALL AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS is their inability to comprehend the difference between the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (which is almost absolute) and the ABSENCE of power of the SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (which is almost nothing) when opposing the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (which is almost absolute). Every single amateur legal theory ever promoted reflects a basic misunderstanding of this simple legal principle, "THE MAJORITY RULES and the INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT." All amateur legal theorists get this simple legal principle exactly BACKWARDS (or OPPOSITE) to what the law really is (a common problem in amateur legal theory).

    It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state LAW MAKERS to pass our state statutes and to make them binding upon all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state without the INDIVIDUAL'S "consent" (“contractual” or otherwise), etc.

    It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS to ticket, arrest and charge any INDIVIDUAL in the state who violates our state statutes without the INDIVIDUAL'S "consent" (“contractual” or otherwise), etc.

    It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state JUDGES to preside over state court proceedings of such an INDIVIDUAL without that INDIVIDUAL’S "consent" (“contractual or otherwise”).

    This means that in a republican form of government such as ours, an INDIVIDUAL'S "consent” (“contractual” or otherwise) is NOT REQUIRED in such matters. Instead, in a republican form of government such as ours, "CONSENT” TO THE LAW COMES FROM “WE THE PEOPLE” COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS, NOT FROM THE SINGLE INDIVIDUAL OUTSIDE THE ELECTION PROCESS.

    THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS, OUR THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT ALREADY HAVE THE COLLECTIVE “CONSENT” OF “WE THE PEOPLE” TO MAKE OUR LAW, TO ENFORCE OUR LAW AND TO PUNISH FOR VIOLATIONS OF OUR LAW.

    Under our federal and state constitutions, OUR THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT DO NOT ALSO NEED THE INDIVIDUAL “CONSENT” OF ANY INDIVIDUAL TO CARRY OUT THOSE FUNCTIONS.

    So, every single legal burden placed on the INDIVIDUAL in a republican form of government such as ours is a legal burden that is placed upon the INDIVIDUAL directly or indirectly by the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY through the ELECTION process.

    In a republican form of government such as ours, the power of the INDIVIDUAL is limited to VOTING, RUNNING FOR OFFICE and to enforcing what few INDIVIDUAL rights and protections that "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) allow the INDIVIDUAL to have (such as those INDIVIDUAL rights and protections listed in the Bill Of Rights). In a republican form of government such as ours, these INDIVIDUAL rights and protections of the INDIVIDUAL are determined by the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (NOT BY THE INDIVIDUAL). This is why in a republican form of government, such as ours, ELECTIONS ARE SO IMPORTANT. In a republican form of government such as ours, ELECTIONS (which reflect the will of the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY) DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY CONTROL EVERYTHING ABOUT OUR OWN GOVERNMENT. THESE ELECTIONS DETERMINE WHAT OUR LAWS ARE, WHO OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS ARE, WHO OUR JUDGES ARE, WHO OUR PROSECUTORS ARE, WHO OUR PUBLIC DEFENDERS ARE AND THEY DETERMINE WHAT ANY DESIRED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS OR REPEALS MIGHT BE.

    FACT: THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR STATUTES VALID. THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS VALID. THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR COURTS VALID, OUR JUDGES VALID, OUR PROSECUTORS VALID AND OUR PUBLIC DEFENDERS VALID.

    FACT: In a republican form of government such as ours, every conviction of a single INDIVIDUAL involves the efforts of ALL THREE ELECTED BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT (the ELECTED LAW MAKERS who write the statutes, the ELECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS whose appointees make the arrests and who file the charges, the ELECTED JUDGES who preside over proceedings in court AND the ELECTED PROSECUTORS who attempt to convict the statutory violators in court). In a republican form of government such as ours, NO SINGLE ELECTED BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT CAN CONVICT AN INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT THE PARTICIPATION OF THE OTHER TWO ELECTED BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT.

    FACT: The people who oppose, defy and seek the overthrow our ELECTED government, our ELECTED legislatures, our ELECTED executive (law enforcement) officials, our ELECTED judges, our ELECTED prosecutors and our ELECTED public defenders ACTUALLY OPPOSE, DEFY AND SEEK THE OVERTHROW OF OUR REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT ITSELF and in so doing, SEEK TO OVERTHROW THE WILL OF THE MAJORITY OF "WE THE PEOPLE" OURSELVES. This desire to overthrow our ELECTED republican form of government and the will of the majority of "We the People " COLLECTIVELY, along with his long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and his MULTIPLE weapons-related FELONIES are the reasons that Rod Class, has been placed on the United States "TERRORIST WATCH LIST".

    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 76 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our ELECTED REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. For more on Rod Class, CLICK HERE. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...61#post1175261.

    More importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY
    DEFRAUD the American people. For more on Rod Class, CLICK HERE. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...61#post1175261.


    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares or Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' and Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 19th July 2019 at 23:49.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    xylo (24th August 2019)

  19. Link to Post #10
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    THE "LAWYERS HAVE NO AUTHORITY HOAX" AND RELATED HOAXES ABOUT LAWYERS:

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    ARTICLES:
    https://govbanknotes.wordpress.com/2...in-courtrooms/ (Class is the REAL author of this article and was effectively so credited in the final paragraph BEFORE THE VIDEO.);
    https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/ (same as above);
    http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/atto...in-courtrooms/ (same as above);
    https://forestqueen2020.wordpress.co...of-government/ (Class was the REAL author of this article.);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-bar-card3.pdf (Class pretending to be "Judge DALE" and describing his mistaken amateur belief system on this subject).
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (At pages 7-8 and 75-76, Class pretending to be "Judge DALE" and describing his mistaken amateur belief system on this subject).

    VIDEOS:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vieooNH-SkE (Class explaining his mistaken amateur belief system on this subject);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s (At 43:50-44:55, Deborah Tavares pretending to quote the imaginary "Judge DALE" in support of this very hoax exposed here);

    CLASS' AMATEUR MISTAKE:
    Rod Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that FEDERAL law governs EVERY legal subject. So, when he was unable to find any FEDERAL statute governing the licensing or regulation of lawyers or the practice of law, he MISTAKENLY CONCLUDED that lawyers have "NO LICENSE" and "NO LEGAL AUTHORITY" to practice law.

    THE TRUTH:
    Unknown to Rod Class, the reason that he was unable to find any FEDERAL legislation on the subject is that STATE LAW GOVERNS THE LICENSING AND REGULATION OF LAWYERS AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW. So, Class (as usual) was looking for the law IN THE WRONG PLACE! But, Class doesn't know enough to even realize this.

    THE HOAXES:
    Regardless, this MISTAKEN CONCLUSION infuriated Class. So, he created, manufactured, embellished and/or published an ENTIRE SERIES OF HOAXES to incite hatred and violence against lawyers. These hoaxes are exposed individually below.

    MISUNDERSTANDING FEDERAL LAW:
    Rod Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that FEDERAL law governs EVERY legal subject. (This is precisely why he pretended to be a "retired FEDERAL judge" in the "Judge DALE forgeries", why he only cites FEDERAL statutes in support of his false claims and why he uses the phrase, "Congressional [meaning FEDERAL] intent".). Class does not know that FEDERAL law ONLY governs that TINY LIST of legal subjects that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the U.S. Constitution AND THAT under the tenth amendment, STATE LAW GOVERNS EVERYTHING ELSE (including the licensing and regulation of lawyers, drivers licenses, etc.). http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment. This means that ALMOST ALL OF THE LAW IN OUR COUNTRY IS STATE LAW, NOT FEDERAL LAW (95-99%? MULTIPLIED BY 50 STATES). Note that if the law really was as Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVED it to be (FEDERAL law governs every legal subject), THERE WOULD BE NO NEED FOR STATE LAW IN THE FIRST PLACE AND THE TENTH AMENDMENT WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY MEANINGLESS.

    Class makes this AMATEUR mistake about FEDERAL law because he misunderstands the "supremacy clause" in the U.S. Constitution. Class MISTAKENLY believes that under the "supremacy clause", FEDERAL LAW GOVERNS EVERY LEGAL SUBJECT AND IS THEREFORE "ALWAYS SUPREME" ON EVERY LEGAL SUBJECT. But, this is not so. Unknown to Class, under the "supremacy clause", FEDERAL LAW IS ONLY "SUPREME" TO STATE LAW IF (AND ONLY IF) THERE IS A DIRECT CONFLICT BETWEEN FEDERAL LAW AND STATE LAW ON THE SAME, EXACT LEGAL SUBJECT. But, such direct conflicts between FEDERAL law and STATE law on the same legal subject are EXTREMELY RARE, because FEDERAL and STATE law govern ENTIRELY DIFFERENT ("OPPOSITE") legal subjects. So, when there is NO DIRECT CONFLICT between FEDERAL law and STATE law on the SAME, EXACT legal subject (which is almost all of the time), STATE LAW IS "SUPREME" AS TO ALL STATE LAW LEGAL SUBJECTS (such as the licensing and regulation of lawyers and driver's licenses, etc.). But, Rod Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BASICS:
    Unknown to Rod Class, the U.S. Constitution "divided the powers" (divided the JURISDICTION to regulate every legal subject) between the FEDERAL government and the STATE governments. This division of powers (division of jurisdiction) WAS BASED ON LEGAL SUBJECT MATTER. The U.S. Constitution LIMITED the FEDERAL government to regulating ONLY A TINY LIST of legal SUBJECTS that were expressly delegated to it in the U.S. Constitution. The tenth amendment reserved to the STATES the exclusive power to regulate EVERYTHING ELSE (ALL OTHER LEGAL SUBJECTS NOT DELEGATED TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, such as the licensing and regulation of lawyers and driver's licenses, etc.).

    SIMPLIFICATION:
    Under this constitutional division of powers (division of jurisdiction) between the FEDERAL and STATE governments, a legal subject must be governed EITHER by FEDERAL law OR by STATE law, BUT NOT BY BOTH. So, if a legal subject IS governed by FEDERAL law, it IS NOT governed by STATE law. Likewise, if a legal subject IS governed by STATE law, it IS NOT governed by FEDERAL law. Thus, FEDERAL law and STATE law GOVERN DIFFERENT ("OPPOSITE") LEGAL SUBJECTS.

    PURPOSE:
    The purpose of this constitutional division of powers (division of jurisdiction) between the FEDERAL and STATE governments was to actually make it "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" for the FEDERAL government to regulate ANY LEGAL SUBJECT RESERVED TO THE STATES, otherwise the STATES would not have joined the union. (Note also that this division of powers (division of jurisdiction) also prevents the FEDERAL and STATE government from "stepping on each others' toes".).

    LIMITED "SCOPE" OF FEDERAL LAW:
    NOT ONLY IS FEDERAL LAW LIMITED "BY SUBJECT" (to those subjects expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the constitution), FEDERAL LAW IS ALSO LIMITED "IN SCOPE" (to those subjects expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the constitution). STATE LAW GOVERNS EVERYTHING ELSE. Here's how it works.

    The United States Code ("U.S.C.") is a collection of all of the current FEDERAL statutes divided into separate categories, so that all of the statutes on the same subject are organized together (to make research of a particular subject easier). There are currently 54 numbered "TITLES" (or SUBJECTS) in the U.S.C. For example, Title 12 is "COMMERCE", Title 18 is "CRIMES", Title 28 is "THE JUDICIARY" and Title 49 is "TRANSPORTATION". But, the statutes in these four Titles DO NOT GOVERN "ALL COMMERCE", "ALL CRIMES", "ALL JUDICIARIES" or "ALL TRANSPORTATION" in the country. Instead, these statutes ONLY GOVERN THESE LEGAL SUBJECTS ONLY INSOFAR AS THEY RELATE DIRECTLY TO A LEGAL SUBJECT THAT WAS EXPRESSLY DELEGATED TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION (STATE LAW GOVERNS EVERYTHING ELSE).

    So, Title 12 does NOT govern "ALL COMMERCE" in the country. It only governs COMMERCE insofar as it relates directly to legal subjects that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the U.S. Constitution, like "INTERSTATE" or "INTERNATIONAL" COMMERCE (STATE law governs ALL OTHER COMMERCE in the country). (This is precisely why the Uniform Commercial Code is STATE law, NOT FEDERAL law). Likewise, Title 18 does NOT govern "ALL CRIMES" in the country. It only governs CRIMES insofar as they relate directly to legal subjects that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the FEDERAL constitution, like CRIMES involving "INTERSTATE" COMMERCE, "INTERNATIONAL" CRIME or CRIMES committed by active-duty U.S. military personnel on U.S. military bases (STATE law governs ALL OTHER CRIMES in the country). Similarly, Title 28 does NOT govern ALL "JUDICIARIES" in the country. It only governs JUDICIARIES and COURTS insofar as they as they relate directly to JUDICIARIES and COURTS that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the U.S. Constitution, THE FEDERAL COURTS (STATE law governs ALL OTHER JUDICIAL, COURT and LEGAL PROCEDURAL MATTERS in the country). Finally, Title 49 does NOT govern "ALL TRANSPORTATION" in the country. It only governs TRANSPORTATION insofar as it relates directly to legal subjects that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the FEDERAL Constitution, like "INTERSTATE" TRANSPORTATION, "INTERNATIONAL" TRANSPORTATION or "U.S. MILITARY" TRANSPORTATION (STATE law governs ALL OTHER TRANSPORTATION MATTERS in the country). But, Rod Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    HOAX CONTINUED:
    Class correctly notes that PRIVATE lawyers formed the PRIVATE American Bar Association ("ABA") in 1878. https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE (at the 1st, 2nd & 3rd paragraphs): "[A private] Connecticut Attorney... invited a group of 100 [private] attorneys from 21 states... to meet on the 21st day of August of 1878, at Saratoga Springs, New York, to organize the [private] American B.A.R. Association." (Note that Class uses the FAKE acronym, "B.A.R.", when referring to the "American B.A.R. Association".). Class also correctly notes that the PRIVATE American Bar Association ("ABA") was never created, authorized or sanctioned “BY CONGRESS” (the LEGISLATIVE branch of the FEDERAL government). https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE (at the 6th, 7th & 8th paragraphs): "The [American] B.A.R. Association HAS NO [FEDERAL] LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY to have been created. They're [sic] a private corporation... . THERE IS NO SUCH STATUTE IN THE STATUTES AT LARGE [which are "FEDERAL" statutes]!!! The [American] B.A.R. [Association] is a private industry, a private association... . WHERE IN THE STATUTES AT LARGE [which are "FEDERAL" statutes] WERE LAWYERS... EVER GIVEN THE AUTHORITY to practice law in a courtroom... . No [American] B.A.R. [Association] Attorney HAS ANY ["FEDERAL"] LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY to prosecute anyone in court."

    https://forestqueen2020.wordpress.co...of-government/. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE (at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th & 9th paragraphs): "[We must] take back our courts and judicial branch of government from the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION and getting BAR-LICENSED attorneys out of elected positions... . [O]NLY MEMBERS OF THIS POWERFUL UNION OF LAWYERS, CALLED THE ABA... [ARE ALLOWED TO] PRACTICE LAW... . THE STATE DOES NOT... HOLD BAR EXAMINATIONS, NOR ISSUE STATE LICENSES TO LAWYERS. THE ABA... HOLDS THEIR (sic) PRIVATE [BAR] EXAMINATIONS... AND ISSUES THEM SO-CALLED LICENSE[S] (sic) TO PRACTICE LAW. THE ABA IS THE ONLY... [AUTHORITY] THAT CAN PUNISH OR DISBAR A LAWYER... . Only the ABA... can remove any of these lawyers from... office... . This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union... . NO NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION, OTHER THAN THE BAR, ISSUES THEIR (sic) OWN STATE LICENSES. All [other] professional and occupational licenses are issued by the state."

    ANALYSIS:
    Class' words (quoted above) PROVE that:
    1). Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that licensing and regulation of lawyers is a legal subject that is governed by "FEDERAL" law ("CONGRESS", "STATUTES AT LARGE");
    2). Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that the branch of government with the Constitutional power to license and regulate lawyers is the "LEGISLATIVE" branch (“CONGRESS”, "LEGISLATION", "STATUTES AT LARGE");
    3. Class MISTAKENLY CONFUSES the ABA with the STATE bars. He MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that "THE ABA IS THE BAR" (which he MISTAKENLY BELIEVES is the SINGLE, NATIONAL AUTHORITY that licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice of law). Class does not know that it is the 50 STATE bars that do that.

    On the foregoing basis, Rod Class MISTAKENLY CONCLUDED that lawyers have "NO LICENSE" and "NO LEGAL AUTHORITY" to practice law.

    THE TRUTH:
    1). Under the tenth amendment, ONLY the STATES have the power to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (the FEDERAL government does not);
    2). Under the “separation of powers” doctrine, ONLY the JUDICIAL branch of government has the power to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (the LEGISLATIVE branch of government does not);
    3). The “ABA” IS NOT THE "B.A.R" OR OTHERWISE THE SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY that licenses and regulates lawyers or the practice of law. There is no single, national authority that does this. Instead, it is the 50 STATES that license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law. But, Class does not know this.

    ANALYSIS:
    This means that Rod Class is WRONG IN EVERY SINGLE WAY that a person can POSSIBLY be WRONG about this subject. Noting is left on this subject for him to be WRONG about.

    WHY THE "STATE SUPREME COURTS" HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO LICENSE AND REGULATE LAWYERS:

    Like the FEDERAL government, STATE governments also have three (3) branches of government, the ELECTED LEGISLATIVE branch (legislature), the ELECTED EXECUTIVE branch (governor) and the ELECTED JUDICIAL branch (the courts). All three branches of the ELECTED state government ARE EQUAL IN POWER to the other two ELECTED branches. But, EACH ELECTED BRANCH of state government IS INDEPENDENT from the other two branches. (The purpose of the "SEPARATION OF POWERS" doctrine is to prevent the concentration of power in any single branch of government.).

    Because EACH ELECTED BRANCH of government is INDEPENDENT of the other two branches, EACH ELECTED BRANCH of state government has the "INHERENT POWER” to manage ITS OWN INTERNAL AFFAIRS (and the HIGHEST AUTHORITY of EACH ELECTED BRANCH is generally charged with that responsibility). For example, the highest authority of the ELECTED LEGISLATIVE branch of state government (such as the speaker of the house and/or the senate majority leader) has the "INHERENT POWER" to pick who will "chair" and who will "sit" on ITS OWN state legislative and investigative committees (WITHOUT INTERFERENCE from the other two branches of state government). Similarly, the highest authority of the ELECTED EXECUTIVE branch of state government (the governor) has the "INHERENT POWER" to appoint the heads of ITS OWN state agencies (WITHOUT INTERFERENCE from the other two branches of state government). Likewise, the highest authority of the ELECTED JUDICIAL branch of state government (The Supreme Court of the state) has the "INHERENT POWER" to license and regulate who will practice law in ITS OWN courts (WITHOUT INTERFERENCE from the other two branches of state government).

    This "INHERENT POWER" of EACH INDEPENDENT branch of state government to regulate THEIR OWN internal affairs (WITHOUT INTERFERENCE from the other two branches) reflects the "SEPARATION OF POWERS” doctrine which is found in the constitution of every STATE and in the U.S. Constitution. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    This means that neither the INDEPENDENT EXECUTIVE branch nor the INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL branch of government needs "LEGISLATION" from the LEGISLATIVE branch to "AUTHORIZE" them to do what they are ALREADY AUTHORIZED TO DO under their own INDEPENDENT "INHERENT POWERS" (under the "SEPARATION OF POWERS" doctrine found in every STATE constitution and in the FEDERAL constitution). Indeed, any "LEGISLATION" from the LEGISLATIVE branch of government PURPORTING TO "LIMIT" the INHERENT POWERS of the INDEPENDENT EXECUTIVE or the INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL branches of government to regulate THEIR OWN internal affairs WOULD ACTUALLY VIOLATE THE "SEPARATION OF POWERS" doctrine which is found in every STATE constitution and in the FEDERAL constitution. (This INDEPENDENCE is precisely why the lawyers are NOT licensed by the LEGISLATIVE branch and NOT listed by the Secretary Of State of the EXECUTIVE branch.). But, Class does not know enough to even realize this. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...en&as_sdt=4,44 (An excellent explanation of the "INHERENT POWER" of JUDICIAL branch of government to license and regulate the lawyers who practice law in ITS OWN courts begins in the 5th full paragraph here, not including block indented quoted portions, at about 20% through the text.); https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...en&as_sdt=4,10[url] (For more on the "INHERENT POWER" of the INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL branch to license and regulate the lawyers who practice law in ITS OWN courts, CLICK ON THE BLUE LINKS in the 12th full paragraph here, not including block indented quoted portions, at about 15% through the text).

    SIDE NOTE:
    Rod Class also MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that "CASE LAW" ("common law") from the "JUDICIAL" branch of government is somehow "INFERIOR" to "STATUTORY LAW" ("legislation") from the "LEGISLATIVE" branch of government. He also MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that "CASE LAW" from the "JUDICIAL" branch is somehow "unconstitutional". https://forestqueen2020.wordpress.co...of-government/. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT: "Case-Law is Unconstitutional since Case-Law is enacted by the Judicial Branch of Government, not the Legislative Branch." (at the 1st sentence of the 21st paragraph here). But, this Rod Class' MISTAKEN BELIEF in this regard is not so.

    Under the FEDERAL Constitution and the Constitution of every STATE, the JUDICIAL and LEGISLATIVE branches of government are EQUAL IN POWER TO EACH OTHER AND THEIR LAWS ARE EQUAL IN FORCE TO THE LAWS OF THE OTHER. Indeed, because the JUDICIAL branch of government has the ADDITIONAL Constitutional power to declare LEGISLATIVE statutes "unconstitutional" (and strike them down), CASE LAW from the JUDICIAL branch is actually SUPERIOR to STATUTES from the LEGISLATIVE branch, not the other way around.

    POWERS OF THE STATE SUPREME COURTS (CONTINUED):

    ADDITIONAL "CONSTITUTIONAL" & "STATUTORY" POWER:
    IN ADDITION to the "INHERENT POWER” of each STATE Supreme Court to license and regulate lawyers who practice law in ITS OWN courts, some STATE "CONSTITUTIONS" ALSO expressly authorize the STATE Supreme Court to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (ex: Florida & New Jersey). http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/...ubmenu=3#A5S15 (Click on Article V and scroll down to section 15.); http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/lawscon...nstitution.asp (Scroll down to Article VI, Section 2, paragraph numbered "3", in the FINAL SENTENCE.). Likewise, some STATE "STATUTES" also expressly authorize the STATE Supreme Court to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (ex: New York, Texas, Virginia).
    http://codes.findlaw.com/ny/judiciar...-sect-460.html (at the END OF THE 1ST SENTENCE & note that New York's HIGHEST COURT is called the "Court Of Appeals".);
    http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.u.../htm/GV.81.htm (Scroll down to "Subchapter B", "Sec. 81.011", subsection "(b)" and "(c)");
    https://law.justia.com/codes/virgini...54.1-3910.html.

    Note that the foregoing CONSTITUTIONAL and LEGISLATIVE provisions (authorizing the STATE Supreme Courts to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law) DO NOT "LIMIT" the INHERENT POWERS of the JUDICIAL branch of government, THEY ACTUALLY ADD TO THOSE POWERS! Note also that EVERY STATE also has a LEGISLATIVE STATUTE making it a CRIME to practice law without a license issued by the Supreme Court of the STATE, thereby achieving (in reverse) the SAME RESULT as a STATUTE that REQUIRES a person to have a license in order to practice law. https://www.ncbar.gov/media/299201/u...w-statutes.pdf (at 84-4). Thus, it is NOT TRUE that there is "no constitutional" and/or "no legislative" authority for lawyers to practice law. But, it is also true that no "legislative" authority is required in the first place. But, Rod Class does not know this.

    ABOUT THE ABA:
    The ABA (which Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES "IS THE BAR" and the SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice of law) is actually an irrelevant, insignificant, voluntary, trade association FOR LAWYERS WHO WANT TO JOIN (and receive a monthly magazine). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Bar_Association. LAWYERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MEMBERS OF THE ABA and MORE than TWO THIRDS of the lawyers in the United States ARE NOT MEMBERS of the ABA. THE ABA HAS NO POWERS OVER LAWYERS, JUDGES, LAWS, COURTS OR THE PRACTICE OF LAW. But, Rod Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    COMPARISON TO THE "AAA":
    Class' BELIEFS (that "the ABA is the B.A.R" and the SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice law, that the ABA was never created, authorized or sanctioned by "CONGRESS" and that the ABA has a "MONOPOLY" on the practice of law) IS THE EQUIVALENT OF CLASS BELIEVING that drivers of motor vehicles have "no authority" to drive because they got their "driver's licenses" from the American Automobile Association ("AAA") which was never created, authorized or sanctioned by "CONGRESS" and which association has a "MONOPOLY" on driving of automobiles and on the entire transportation industry. But, of course, none of this is so. THE AAA, like the ABA, DOES NOT ISSUE LICENSES TO ITS MEMBERS, REGULATE DRIVERS, REGULATE DRIVING, MAKE DRIVING LAWS OR HAVE A "MONOPOLY" ON THE ENTIRE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY. The reality is that the ABA is to lawyers what the AAA is to drivers, "A CLUB" that one is permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO JOIN. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    THE ABA IS A "MONOPOLY" HOAX:
    Class falsely claims that the ABA has a "MONOPOLY" on the practice of law. This is because he MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that "the ABA IS THE BAR" (the SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice law). https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/ (Rod Class is the REAL author of this article and was effectively so credited in the final paragraph). LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE: "This type of MONOPOLY [referring to the ABA] is against the Taft-Hartley Act, The Clayton trust Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act. They're (sic) [referring to the ABA] a SELF-APPOINTED MONOPOLY." (at the end of the 8th full paragraph).

    But, Rod Class' MISTAKEN BELIEF in this regard is not so. MORE THAN TWO THIRDS OF AMERICAN LAWYERS ARE NOT EVEN MEMBERS IN THE ABA. Thus, the ABA cannot possibly constitute a SINGLE “MONOPOLY” over the practice of law. Likewise, the STATE bars in which all lawyers REALLY ARE MEMBERS are not “MONOPOLIES" either. But, even if STATE bars were "MONOPOLIES", THEN THERE WOULD BE EXACTLY FIFTY (50) SUCH "MONOPOLIES", THEREBY NOT CONSTITUTING A SINGLE "MONOPOLY", BY DEFINITION. But, Rod Class does not know any of this.

    Further, unknown to Rod Class, a "MONOPOLY" in a service industry is NOT determined by whether all members of a service occupation are licensed by the STATE. If this were the case, then ANY person employed in a service industry requiring a STATE license would be engaged in a "monopoly" profession (all hair dressers, all electricians, all dentists, etc.). INSTEAD, A REAL "MONOPOLY" in a service industry IS DETERMINED BY "HOW MANY EMPLOYERS" EMPLOY PERSONS WITH LICENSES ISSUED BY THE STATE. So, if all hairdressers worked for A SINGLE BEAUTY PARLOR, then THAT would be a REAL "monopoly". If all electricians worked for A SINGLE ELECTRICAL COMPANY, then THAT would be a REAL "monopoly". If all dentists worked for A SINGLE DENTIST’S OFFICE, then THAT would be a REAL "monopoly". If all lawyers worked for A SINGLE LAW FIRM, then THAT would be a REAL "monopoly". But, of course, none of that is the case.

    THE "BAR CARD" HOAX:
    Mistakenly believing that the "ABA IS THE BAR" (and THE SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers), Class MOCKINGLY (and misguidedly) refers to a lawyer's license to practice law as a "UNION" or "BAR CARD" (referring to a MEMBERSHIP CARD in the ABA). https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-bar-card3.pdf;https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/ (Rod Class is the REAL author of this article and was effectively so credited in the final paragraph). LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE: "[The ABA is] a private corporation, THEY (sic) ISSUE THEIR OWN UNION CARDS, WHICH THEY DECEPTIVELY CALL "LICENSES"... . THE B.A.R. [ABA] ISSUES ITS OWN B.A.R. [ABA] CARDS, NOT LICENSES... . They [referring to members in the ABA] want to prosecute people for practicing law without a license, WHEN THEY [themselves] DON'T HAVE ONE!!! ALL THEY HAVE IS A STINKING UNION CARD." (in the 8th, 20th and 24th paragraphs). Thus, Class does NOT know that "THE ABA IS NOT THE BAR", that "THE ABA DOES NOT ISSUE LICENSE TO LAWYERS" or that "THE 50 STATES actually do".

    THE "ORIGINAL 13TH AMENDMENT HOAX", "THE TITLE OF NOBILITY HOAX" AND "B.A.R. HOAX":
    BACKGROUND: Thirty-four of the fifty-five (34 of the 55) American founding fathers who actually attended the United States' constitutional convention and who actually wrote the words to the U.S. Constitution were American lawyers. https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us...inating-facts/ (Scroll down to about 80% through text of this page). So, about two out of every three authors of our Constitutional were American lawyers. At the time that the U.S. Constitution was written, our 55 founding fathers, including 34 of which were American lawyers, had two concerns that rose to the level of constitutional importance. First, was the European institution of "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"). Second, was the internal threat of European "LOYALISTS".

    At the time, Europe was divided into TWO CLASSES of people, "NOBILITY" ("ROYALS") and "COMMONERS" ("NON-ROYALS"). Under this institution, a person's station in life was determined by their birth and not determined by their individual merit. Our 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, did not want the institution of "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") to divide Americans into two classes of people as had occurred in Europe. Instead, our 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, wanted a person's station in life to be determined by individual merit (and not inherited). Also at the time, the people living in the American colonies were largely either American PATRIOTS or English LOYALISTS. Our 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, did not want persons who were LOYAL to England (or to any other FOREIGN country) to hold office in the United States. They correctly believed that persons with FOREIGN-GIVEN titles of nobility, FOREIGN offices (positions) and persons receiving FOREIGN salaries or gifts (effectively "bribes") were more likely to be European "LOYALISTS" than other Americans were.

    So, in actually writing the words to the ORIGINAL U.S. Constitution, these 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, actually made it "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" for the United States itself to grant a "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") to anyone AND made it "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" for a person with a FOREIGN "title of nobility" ("royalty"), FOREIGN office (position) or receiving FOREIGN salaries or gifts (effectively "bribes') to hold office in the United States without the consent of Congress. Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution reads as follows:

    "No TITLE OF NOBILITY ["ROYALTY"] shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding an office or trust under them [the United States], shall, without the consent of Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or TITLE, of any kind whatsoever, from any KING, PRINCE, or FOREIGN STATE."

    ANALYSIS:
    What this means is that the 34 American lawyers who actually wrote the foregoing words to the U.S. Constitution not regard "THEMSELVES" as a threat to the United States. But, above all, this means that these 34 American lawyers who actually wrote the foregoing words to the original U.S. constitution did not regard the term, "ESQUIRE" (which most of them used) to be a "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"), much less a "FOREIGN" "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"). If these 34 American lawyers who actually wrote these words to the original U.S. Constitution had actually intended to prohibit "lawyers" from holding office, then all 34 of them would have DISQUALIFIED THEMSELVES from ever holding office in their own country. Clearly, this was not their intent as many of them did go on afterwards to hold office in the United States.

    The proposed "original" 13th amendment was intended to strengthen the ORIGINAL constitutional prohibition against FOREIGN "titles of NOBILITY" (above) which was already found in Article I, section 9 of the original U.S. Constitution. It reads:

    "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any EMPEROR, KING, PRINCE or FOREIGN POWER, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

    Note that the ONLY material difference between this text and the text of in Article 1, Section 9 of the ORIGINAL U.S. Constitution is that this text deprived those with a "FOREIGN" title "NOBILITY" of their citizenship as well as the possibility of holding office in the country. Not surprisingly, American lawyers ALSO overwhelmingly supported and actually wrote the proposed "original" 13th amendment, which would have actually strengthened the prohibition against FOREIGN "titles of NOBILITY" already found in Article I, section 9 of the ORIGINAL U.S. Constitution (which was itself actually proposed, supported and written by American lawyers).

    ANALYSIS:
    What this means is that the American lawyers who actually wrote the words of the "original" 13th amendment did not regard "THEMSELVES" as a threat to the United States. But, above all, this means that these American lawyers who actually wrote these words of the "original" 13th amendment did not regard the term, "ESQUIRE" (which most of them used) to be a "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"), much less a "FOREIGN" "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"). If these American lawyers who actually wrote the words of "original" 13th amendment had actually intended to prohibit "lawyers" from holding office or retaining their citizenship, then all of them would have DISQUALIFIED THEMSELVES from ever holding office in their own country and from retaining their American citizenship. Clearly, this was not their intent as many of them wanted to hold office (or already did hold office by that time) and all of them wanted to retain their American citizenship.

    Thus, it is simply not true that Article I, section 9 of the ORIGINAL U.S. Constitution OR the proposed "original" 13th amendment somehow prohibited American lawyers from holding office or somehow deprived American lawyers of their American citizenship. Neither provision prohibited American lawyers and neither provision was ever intended to prohibit American lawyers. Both provisions (above) were proposed by American lawyers, supported by lawyers and actually written by lawyers.

    The 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, were perfectly capable of writing a constitutional prohibition that EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED "lawyers" BY NAME. But, they did not do this in either provision. This is because they DID NOT intend to prohibit "lawyers" ("THEMSELVES") by either provision. Otherwise, they would have simply said so. Instead, they actually intended to prohibit, and did actually prohibit persons with a REAL "FOREIGN" given "titles of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") from holding office. The American lawyers who proposed, supported and who actually wrote the words of the "original" 13th amendment thought that we would be intelligent enough today to understand the difference between a "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") and a title of "OCCUPATION" or "EDUCATION". Sadly, they were mistaken.

    Remember, Rod Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that the American "BAR" Association "IS THE BAR" (and is the SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY that licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice of law). So, he MISGUIDEDLY embellished and peddles an ENTIRELY SEPARATE HOAX to discredit that particular (AND COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT) "BAR". https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...3th-amendment/.

    THE HOAX:
    Class falsely claims that it is illegal for lawyers to hold public office. To reach this absurd result, Class fraudulently claims that the "ORIGINAL" or "MISSING" 13th amendment (which was never ratified) would have prohibited those with a "FOREIGN TITLE OF NOBILITY" from holding public office. So, Class fraudulently claims that the "ORIGINAL" or "MISSING" 13th amendment was ratified and that lawyers have a "FOREIGN" "TITLE OF NOBILITY". Specifically, Class fraudulently claims that the title, "ESQUIRE" which is used by some American lawyers, is bestowed on all American lawyers by the "QUEEN OF ENGLAND" (something "FOREIGN") and that the term, "ESQUIRE", is a "TITLE OF NOBILITY". But, none of this is so.

    For this hoax to work, Class had to CREATE THE ILLUSION that a "FOREIGN" POWER actually bestows a "TITLE OF NOBILITY" upon all American lawyers. So, Class FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMS that when American lawyers are “sworn-in” to the practice of law, THEY SWEAR AN "OATH OF ALLEGIANCE" TO THE "QUEEN OF ENGLAND" (representing a "FOREIGN" POWER), who, IN RETURN, bestows upon such American lawyers a "FOREIGN" "TITLE OF NOBILITY” (the title, “ESQUIRE”). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s (At 44:00-44:55, Rod Class' CHARLATAN PARTNER pretends to quote "Judge DALE" who is actually Rodney "DALE" Class). But, this claim is not so. Below is the oath that American lawyers really make.

    http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.inbar.o...tion/Oaths.pdf (THIS IS A MUST SEE!)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSDTTXjDAoc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wSFvOu4u0o

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2yfTDGv2z4

    Note that American lawyers actually make an oath to the U.S. Constitution and to the constitution of the state that issues them their license to practice law (not to any person, much less the "QUEEN").

    THE PHONY ACRONYM:
    In order to CREATE THE ILLUSION that American lawyers have a connection to some “FOREIGN” POWER (who allegedly issues them a "FOREIGN TITLE OF NOBILITY"), Class FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMS that the term, "B.A.R" (as it appears in the American B.A.R. Association"), is an "ACRONYM" which stands for "British Accreditation Registry", an IMAGINARY organization which DOES NOT NOW, and NEVER HAS EXISTED. (Google it. There is not now and has never been such an IMAGINARY organization.). Class simply "made up" these three ridiculous words in order to manufacture a FRAUDULENT connection between American lawyers and something "FOREIGN" in support of this hoax. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s (At 44:00-44:55, Rod Class' CHARLATAN PARTNER pretends to quote "Judge DALE" who is actually Rodney "DALE" Class).

    A WORD ABOUT METAPHORS:
    A metaphor is a word symbol. The most common metaphor in the law is the term, "CASE". Originally, this term meant a lawyer's "brief CASE" in which a lawyer carried legal documents reflecting his/her client's legal affairs. But later, the term "CASE" was used to refer to a client's legal affairs themselves. This is because a lawyer's brief "CASE" came to symbolize a client's legal affairs themselves. So today, the term, "CASE", symbolizes a client's legal affairs themselves. But, the term "CASE" is not really as acronym for anything (any more than the term, "bar", is an acronym for anything).

    The legal terms "BAR" and "BENCH" are also metaphors and are directly related to one another. Originally, BOTH terms referred to wooden structures in the courtroom. Originally, the "BAR" was a wooden divider that separated the business portion of the courtroom from the public portion of the courtroom. Those people with business before the court and their lawyers were admitted "through the BAR" to conduct their business before the court. Later, the term, "BAR", was used to refer to attorneys collectively. This is because the "BAR" in the courtroom came to symbolize lawyers themselves. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_(law) (Click on BOLD, BLUE TYPE that reads, "Bar (law)"). The very same thing is true with respect to the term, "BENCH". Originally, judges in the courtroom sat on a wooden "BENCH". Nobody, except judges were allowed to sit on the BENCH. Later, the term, "BENCH" was used to refer to judges collectively. This is because the "BENCH" in the courtroom came to symbolize judges themselves. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bench_(law) (Click on BOLD, BLUE TYPE that reads, "Bench (law)"). But, the term, "BENCH", is not really an acronym for anything either (any more than the term, "bar", is an acronym for anything).

    QUESTION:
    Just out of curiosity, I'd like to know what Rod Class claims the term, "B.E.N.C.H", is an acronym for. How about, "British - Esquire - Nazi - Communist - Homosexuals", perhaps? Sounds good to me. Let's use this FAKE acronym in a hoax too!

    Similar, metaphors apply to other things like, "the COURT" (when actually referring to a judge or a panel of judges collectively), "the CROWN" (when actually referring to the king and/or queen collectively), the "THRONE" (when actually referring to the king and/or queen collectively), the "WHITE HOUSE" (when actually referring to the president), the "CABINET" (when actually referring to the president's advisers collectively), the "CAPITOL" (when actually referring to Congress collectively), the "PENTAGON" (when actually referring to the Department of Defense); "SCOTLAND YARD" (when actually referring to a British intelligence agency) and the term, "DOWNING STREET" (when actually referring to the prime minister of the U.K.). But, none of these metaphors are really acronyms for anything either (any more than the term, "bar", is an acronym for anything).

    The real reason that the term, "BAR", has become so important to CHARLATANS in amateur legal theory is that by FRAUDULENTLY claiming the term, "BAR" is an "ACRONYM" for "British Accreditation Registry" (an IMAGINARY organization which does not now and never has existed), the term, "BAR" allows CHARLATANS to manufacture a FALSE connection between American lawyers and a "FOREIGN head of state" so that, when combined with the FALSE claim that term, "ESQUIRE", is a "TITLE OF NOBILITY", the combination of BOTH FALSE CLAIMS results is the FALSE CONCLUSION that American lawyers have a "FOREIGN TITLE OF NOBILITY", such that, if the "original" 13th amendment had actually been ratified, American lawyers would have been be prohibited from holding office and from holding citizenship in the United States.

    A WORD ABOUT "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"):
    At the time of the American revolution, Europe was divided into TWO CLASSES of people, "NOBLES" ("ROYALS") and "COMMONERS" ("NON-ROYALS"). NOBLES did not marry COMMONERS and COMMONERS did not marry NOBLES. "NOBILITY" WAS INHERITED. "NOBLES" were people born to "NOBLE" parents of "NOBLE" blood. "COMMONERS" were people born to "COMMON" parents of "COMMON" blood. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...lish/nobility; http://www.yourdictionary.com/nobility (scroll down to the definition ACTUALLY NUMBERED "3").

    To distinguish "NOBLES" from "COMMONERS", "NOBLES" INHERITED TITLES OF "NOBILITY", like "King", "Queen", "Prince". "Princess", "Duke" and "Duchess" (to signify their "NOBLE" BLOOD). At the time, "COMMONERS" had titles too. But, the titles of "COMMONERS" had to be EARNED (AND COULD NOT BE INHERITED). So, "COMMONERS" had EDUCATIONAL or OCCUPATIONAL titles, like "Sheriff", "Doctor", "Professor" and "Pastor", none of which were HEREDITARY TITLES OF "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") and none of which signified "NOBLE" BLOOD.

    The title "Knight" (or "Sir") was a hybrid title with characteristics of both. Knights could be born as "COMMONERS", but were granted the "NOBLE" title of, "Sir", as a reward for their service to true NOBILITY (usually valor in battle). But, unlike all other "NOBLE" titles, the title "Knight" or "Sir" could NOT BE INHERITED by the Knight's children. As a result, a Knight had the lowest "TITLE of NOBILITY" in rank (because a Knight had NO "NOBLE" BLOOD THAT COULD BE INHERITED BY THE KNIGHT'S HEIRS).

    Ranking far BELOW a Knight (and, therefore, NOT A "NOBLE" AT ALL) was an "ESQUIRE". An "ESQUIRE" was the SERVANT of a Knight in battle, often carrying or holding his SWORD and SHIELD in battle. The title "ESQUIRE" was not a "NOBLE" title at all, could not be INHERITED by the ESQUIRE'S children and did not signify "NOBLE" BLOOD. Instead, the occupational title "ESQUIRE" had to be EARNED like any other TITLE of any other "COMMONER". Thus, not every title in the world is a “FOREIGN TITLE OF NOBILITY” ("Mr." and Mrs." are examples of TITLES that ARE LIKEWISE NOT "FOREIGN TITLES OF NOBILITY" either.).

    In the Unites States, some lawyers use the professional title, "ESQUIRE". This is because lawyers are metaphorically (symbolically) the "SERVANTS" of their CLIENTS in legal "battles" and metaphorically (symbolically) carry their CLIENTS' legal "sword" and legal "shield" into legal "battles" for them. But, lawyers ARE NOT bestowed this EARNED professional title ("ESQUIRE") by any "FOREIGN" POWER, this EARNED professional title ("ESQUIRE") does not signify "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") or "NOBLE" ("ROYAL") BLOOD and cannot be inherited by the lawyer's children, like a real "TITLE OF NOBILITY" can.

    This means that the “ORIGINAL” or “MISSING” “13th AMENDMENT” (even if it had actually been ratified) would NOT have prohibited people with “EARNED”, “EDUCATIONAL” or “PROFESSIONAL” titles (including lawyers) from holding office (because such titles ARE NOT "titles of NOBILITY”, much less "FOREIGN" titles of "NOBILITY"). But, Rod Class does not know enough to even realize this. (In order to manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT---AND ROD CLASS DOES NOT.).

    THE TRUTH:
    Thus, while the term, "bar", is a metaphor (a word symbol), the term, "bar", IS NOT an acronym for anything. There is NOT NOW, and there has NEVER BEEN a "British Accreditation Registry" (Google it). American lawyers do NOT swear an oath to ANYTHING “FOREIGN”. The “QUEEN OF ENGLAND” does not bestow the title “ESQUIRE” upon any American lawyer. The term, "ESQUIRE" is NOT a “title of NOBILITY” ("ROYALTY"), much less a "FOREIGN" "title of nobility" and the “ORIGINAL” or “MISSING” “13th AMENDMENT” was NEVER ratified in the first place. Thus, for all these reasons, there is nothing unconstitutional about an American lawyer holding public office or retaining his/her American citizenship.

    CONCLUSION:
    Under the tenth amendment, ONLY the STATES have the power to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (the FEDERAL government does not). Under the “separation of powers” doctrine, ONLY the JUDICIAL branch of government has the power to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (the LEGISLATIVE branch of government does not). The “ABA” is NOT THE SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice of law. The 50 STATES that do that. The ABA has no connection whatsoever with any FEDERAL or STATE government or agency. The STATE bars ARE NOT “affiliates” or “franchises” or “subsidiaries” or otherwise "regulated" or "governed" by the ABA. The ABA has NOT "taken over the courts", "taken away the common law" or "taken away the grand jury system". It has no ability to do so.

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information SOLELY to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts on the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rodney DALE Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

    The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 28th January 2019 at 18:48.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    xylo (24th August 2019)

  21. Link to Post #11
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    (WORK IN PROGRESS)


    "The Fake Jim Traficant Speech Hoax". This hoax involves a FAKE and FORGED "transcript" of a speech that a Congressman allegedly made to Congress to the effect that our entire government is corrupt and diabolical. (The REAL transcript of this speech is in the official Congressional Record and does NOT say this.).This FAKE and FORGED document is actually posted on Deborah Tavares' own website. The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that our government is completely illegal, illegitimate, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and to incite hatred and violence against innocent Americans. http://www.stopthecrime.net/jtraficant.html. (NOTE WEBISTE).
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 28th January 2019 at 20:49.

  22. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,792 times in 9,344 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Obviously, it will takes weeks at least for most of us here to wade through all the info you are providing, Snoop4truth, but if it's all true, everyone will owe you a huge debt of gratitude for the expose.
    In the meantime, can you tell us a little bit about yourself, if you are working for or with anyone else, or if this is all your own project as a whistleblower or??
    And any insights as to why Tavares and Class would be taking such enormous risks going up against entities such as the US government, the Fed, etc.?
    Thank you.

  23. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    anandacate (19th January 2019), HaveBlue (4th February 2019), Kristin (21st March 2019), Kryztian (18th January 2019), Nasu (31st January 2019), snoop4truth (15th January 2019), Star Tsar (15th January 2019), wavydome (14th January 2019), xylo (24th August 2019)

  24. Link to Post #13
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Posts
    616
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3,170 times in 556 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Obviously, it will takes weeks at least for most of us here to wade through all the info you are providing, Snoop4truth, but if it's all true, everyone will owe you a huge debt of gratitude for the expose.
    In the meantime, can you tell us a little bit about yourself, if you are working for or with anyone else, or if this is all your own project as a whistleblower or??
    And any insights as to why Tavares and Class would be taking such enormous risks going up against entities such as the US government, the Fed, etc.?
    Thank you.
    I agree and would like to add..... snoop4truth could you also provide your summary opinion of what Deborah's purpose and/or benefit has been for doing all this? Possibly also who she may be clandestinely working for.

    I've also felt very strong red flags around her and felt like she was a duplicitous player in some way.

  25. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to waves For This Post:

    Kristin (21st March 2019), Nasu (31st January 2019), onawah (3rd January 2019), wavydome (14th January 2019), xylo (24th August 2019)

  26. Link to Post #14
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    17th September 2012
    Posts
    1,036
    Thanks
    1,705
    Thanked 4,763 times in 905 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    WTF..... I am guessing that snoop4truth has an axe to grind with Deborah personally? Or ... maybe has interest in PG&E? Aka Rothschild? Just posturing. I’ll dedicate some time to this on my next sabbatical-lmfao

  27. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,792 times in 9,344 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    My feelings about Tavares were that she is still very shell-shocked by losing her Sonoma home to fire, that she is having difficulty continuing to make her living as a real estate developer because of new laws, and in keeping her information and her website organized and her life on track, which isn't hard to believe if she is telling her story truthfully.
    So I've been giving her the benefit of the doubt, but I am certainly open to digging deeper.
    If there are other whistle blowers who can corroborate Snoop4truth's accusations, I hope he will make us aware of them.
    Because as a conspiracy theorist, I'm not all that ready to believe that someone who is going up against Agenda 21 is a hoaxer, since it's usually the other way around.
    Last edited by onawah; 4th January 2019 at 20:27.

  28. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    anandacate (19th January 2019), Franny (4th January 2019), HaveBlue (4th February 2019), Kryztian (18th January 2019), Nasu (31st January 2019), Tintin (4th January 2019)

  29. Link to Post #16
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Hello onawah,

    Thank you for your kind words, your timely comment and your inquiries.

    I will respond to them individually below.

    YOUR COMMENT: Obviously, it will take weeks at least for most of us here to wade through all the info you are providing, Snoop4truth,

    MY RESPONSE: Then, just read the "Concise Summary" in Post #1 and the "Full Length Explanations" beginning in Post #2. They contain everything you need to know. It took me years to investigate these elaborate hoaxes. So, I have some appreciation for the investment of time necessary to understand them.

    YOUR COMMENT: But if it's all true, everyone will owe you a huge debt of gratitude for the expose.

    MY RESPONSE: It is true. And, thank you for your kind words.

    YOUR COMMENT: In the meantime, can you tell us a little bit about yourself, if you are working for or with anyone else, or if this is all your own project as a whistleblower or??

    MY RESPONSE: Certainly. I am a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. I am not working for anyone. I work alone.

    I am a lawyer. Since 9/11, I have also been a conspiracy theorist. I am active in regular anti-GMO rallies in my region. I provide (and set-up) canopies, tables, chairs, microphones, loud speakers, electrical generators and I provide giant, anti-GMO posters and signs and anti-GMO T-shirts, all free of charge. In addition, I promote these anti-GMO rallies online.

    I am also a loyal financial supporter of conspiracy theory. For the last several years, I have donated thousands and thousands of dollars per year to support those in conspiracy theory who I regard as honest & ethical and whose efforts I admire.

    Years ago, an affiliate of Deborah Tavares found out that I was a lawyer and obtained my email address from an outfit in conspiracy theory to which I provide regular ongoing financial support.

    So, despite that I am a conspiracy theorist myself, despite that I am an anti-GMO activist myself and despite that I am a loyal financial supporter of conspiracy theory myself, this same affiliate of Deborah Tavares (who hates lawyers) emailed me the "Judge Dale FORGERIES", just because I ALSO happened to be a lawyer too.

    These FORGERIES were pathetically amateur and patently and verifiably false in every way. They were supposedly written by a "RETIRED FEDERAL JUDGE" who "ADMITTED" that ALL LAWYERS (including me) were actually working for the international bankers, were foreign traitors who swore an oath to the Queen, non-American citizens, double agents, communists, Satanists, imposters, unlicensed, unqualified, uneducated, self-appointed, illegal, invalid, corrupt & diabolical and THE ENEMY OF ALL MANKIND. (See Post #97 indicating that lawyers "MUST BE PUT TO DEATH".).

    The act of sending me these FORGERIES was intended to be a personal INSULT to me because I was a lawyer. The act of sending me these FORGERIES was also intended to be a personal ATTACK on me because I was a lawyer. But, most importantly, the act of sending me these FORGERIES was intended to be THREAT to me because I was a lawyer. (See Post #97 indicating that lawyers "MUST BE PUT TO DEATH".).

    As you might imagine, this made me angry (as did the fact that I soon found out THESE FORGERIES WERE POSTED ALL OVER THE WEB thereby inciting HATRED and VIOLENCE against INNOCENT Americans, including me, on a national and international scale). http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE). https://anticorruptionsociety.files....bk-format1.pdf (NOTE WEBSITE).

    So, I undertook to find out who was behind these FORGERIES and the fraudulent (and patently absurd) allegations contained in them. The rest is history.

    Afterwards, I decided to look into the OTHER DOCUMENTS peddled and pimped by this same "cast of characters" and DEBORAH TAVARES' DECADE-LONG "PATTTERN" OF INTENTIONAL FRAUD revealed itself to me like a punch in the face. Some of my findings are posted on this thread.

    While my exposing these elaborate hoaxes has the side-effect of embarrassing the charlatans behind these hoaxes, that is not my motive. (SEE FINAL SECTION OF RED TEXT IN Post #96 FOR PROOF OF THIS.). My motive is to reduce the catastrophic damage that these elaborate hoaxes inflict on the American people every single day. Stated differently, I am trying to help the victims who have been duped and defrauded by these elaborate hoaxes and I am trying to reduce the number of future victims who might be duped and defrauded by these elaborate hoaxes in the future.

    YOUR COMMENT: And any insights as to why Tavares and Class would be taking such enormous risks going up against entities such as the US government, the Fed, etc.?

    MY RESPONSE: (SEE POSTS #43 and #70 FOR THE BEST EXPLANATIONS OF "WHY" DEBORAH TAVARES DOES WHAT SHE DOES). But, I respectfully disagree with your premise that Tavares and Class are "taking risks" by doing what they do. Tavares and Class have no effect on the government whatsoever. So, from the perspective of the government, Tavares and Class are completely irrelevant. The government has no reason to take any notice of them. As to Tavares, she would only be taking a risk if she were actually telling he truth about the government, but she is not (SEE THE CONCISE SUMMARIES OF HOAXES AT THE VERY TOP OF THIS THREAD IN POSTS #1). So, the government has no reason to waste its time and resources on her. As to Class, he would only be taking a risk if he were actually telling the truth about the government, but he is not. So, the government has no reason to waste its time and resources on him either. Thus, Tavares and Class are taking no risk whatsoever in doing what they do.

    The only REAL "risk" that Deborah Tavares and Rod Class really face from the government is when their INTENTIONAL FRAUD results in VIOLENCE or DESTRUCTION or the IMMINENT THREAT of VIOLENCE or DESTRUCTION. SEE THE ILLUSTRATION OF THIS VERY REAL POSSIBILITY DESCRIBED IN POSTS #70 AND #97 ).

    Besides, Tavares and Class are not really playing to the government anyway. Instead, TAVARES AND CLASS ARE ACTUALLY PLAYING TO YOU (their audience, their victims, their followers, their supporters). It is true that Tavares and Class PASSINATELY FEAR AND HATE the government in all its forms (both real and imagined). But, their REAL target is not the government. THEIR REAL TARGET IS YOU! After all, they do not pitch their elaborate hoaxes to the government. They only pitch their elaborate hoaxes TO YOU (their audience, their victims, their followers, their supporters.).

    Tavares and Class have two missions in life. One mission is to glorify themselves as messiahs and saviors of all mankind. Their second, mission in life is to incite HATRED and VIOLENCE against innocent Americans. Sadly, they are very good AT BOTH.

    I hope this helps.

    YOUR COMMENT: Thank you.

    MY RESPONSE: No. Thank you for your timely comments.

    All The Best,

    Snoop
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 15th July 2019 at 00:28.

  30. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    Akasha (11th February 2019), Kryztian (18th January 2019), NancyV (30th August 2019), Nasu (31st January 2019), onawah (5th January 2019), wavydome (14th January 2019)

  31. Link to Post #17
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Greetings, waves.

    Thank you so much for your timely inquiries.

    I will try to respond to them individually below.

    YOUR COMMENT: I agree (referring to comments by onawah).

    MY RESPONSE: Then, please see my response to onawah (above) with whom you agree. Thanks.

    YOUR COMMENT: and would like to add..... snoop4truth could you also provide your summary opinion of what Deborah's purpose and/or benefit has been for doing all this?

    MY RESPONSE: Ultimately, it does not matter what purpose and/or benefit Deborah Tavares derives from creating and peddling elaborate hoaxes to intentionally defraud the American people. All that really matters is that she does create and peddle elaborate hoaxes to intentionally defraud the American people.

    (SEE POSTS #43 and #70 FOR THE BEST EXPLANATIONS OF "WHY" DEBORAH TAVARES DOES WHAT SHE DOES).

    But, to answer your question, Tavares' FEARS and HATES the government in all its forms (both real and imagined), all governmental regulation in all its forms (both real and imagined) and all powerful organizations in all their forms (both real and imagined). Deborah Tavares wants others to FEAR and HATE these perceived enemies (both real and imagined) as much as she does. Deborah Tavares' "PURPOSE" in creating these elaborate hoaxes is to cause others to FEAR and HATE her perceived enemies (both real and imagined) as much as she does.

    So, Deborah Tavares' "PURPOSE" in creating and peddling her hoaxes is that they help her "sell" her belief system (to the effect that all governments are diabolical, all government regulations are diabolical and all powerful organizations are diabolical).

    QUESTION: Have you ever met a three-generation LAND RAPIST (AKA "land developer") who loved the ELECTED government of "We the People" (building permits, zoning boards, environmental impact studies, The Endangered Species Act, impact fees, building codes, building inspections, fire codes, electrical codes, federal income taxes, state income taxes, OSHA, worker's compensation, unemployment compensation, etc.)?

    Deborah Tavares "BENEFITS" from creating and peddling these elaborate hoaxes because she enjoys the notoriety, adulation, adoration and admiration she receives from her audience. Deborah Tavares "BENEFITS" from being perceived as a celebrity, guru, champion, defender, messiah and savior of the world and of all mankind.

    While I do not believe money is her primary motivating factor, Deborah Tavares also BENEFITS FINANCIALLY from what she does. Deborah Tavares and her associates (under several different names) have posted HUNDREDS, IF NOT THOUSANDS OF VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES MAKING SHOCKING, HORRIFYING AND SENSATIONAL CLAIMS ON YOUTUBE.COM.

    YouTube sells ads to commercial advertisers, posts those ads on videos uploaded to YouTube and splits the advertising dollars with the party who uploaded the video on which the ad appears. https://influencermarketinghub.com/y...ey-calculator/.

    This is generating A LOT OF ADVERTISING DOLLARS in connection with those videos. And you will note, the more HORRIBLE, SHOCKING and SENSATIONAL Deborah Tavares' claims are, the more hits that video will receive. Before she took it down, her SHOCKING, HORRIFYING and SENSATIONAL "NASA War Document HOAX" video had over FOUR MILLION HITS! So, pocketing advertising dollars is another way for Deborah Tavares to "BENEFIT" from what she does. NOTE THE ADVERTISEMENT THAT APPEARS AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS VIDEO FOR EXAMPLE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k.

    Further, for a period of time, Deborah Tavares also owned a commercial venture called PureMomentum.net. It worked like this. First, Deborah Tavares would post a video on YouTube.com depicting one-half of a radio show. In this first half of the show, Deborah Tavares would make an number of SHOCKING, HORRIFYING and SENSATIONAL claims and she would make a number of "teasers" advertising the second half of the show. At the end of the video (at the end of the first half of the show), Deborah Tavares would "urge" or "encourage" the audience to go to PureMomentum.net and "subscribe" (a recurring charge) in order to hear second half of the show for which the first half served as an "infomercial". FOR PROOF OF THIS, GO TO 102:15 HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOOv_IGOvRA. This PureMomentum.net commercial venture has since been abandoned. But, it nevertheless reflects that Deborah Tavares seeks to profit by making her SHOCKING, HORRIFYING and SENSATIONAL claims.

    Finally, at present, Deborah Tavares has a "DONATION" button as the ONLY FEATURE on the home page of her website. http://www.stopthecrime.net/ This is also a way for Deborah Tavares to "BENEFIT" FINANCIALLY from what she does. And, you will note, Deborah Tavares NEVER makes a claim, a live appearance, a radio appearance or a video appearance without REPEATEDLY "urging" and "highly encouraging" the audience to go to StopTheCrime.net.


    YOUR COMMENT: ... Possibly also who she may be clandestinely working for.

    MY RESPONSE: Tavares is not clandestinely working for anyone, but herself. She is not qualified enough to be of value to any sophisticated employer. Otherwise, she would not have gotten caught created and peddling elaborate hoaxes to intentionally defraud the American people. (In order to create and manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT, AND TAVARES DOES NOT.).

    YOUR COMMENT: I've also felt very strong red flags around her and felt like she was a duplicitous player in some way.

    MY RESPONSE: Well, as it turns out, your instincts have proven to be dead right.

    Great comment.

    Best Regards,

    Snoop
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 23rd March 2019 at 15:26.

  32. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    Akasha (11th February 2019), Kryztian (18th January 2019), NancyV (30th August 2019), Nasu (31st January 2019), onawah (5th January 2019), wavydome (14th January 2019), xylo (24th August 2019)

  33. Link to Post #18
    Great Britain Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd May 2014
    Posts
    976
    Thanks
    4,095
    Thanked 4,233 times in 888 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    too much information !!!!

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to yelik For This Post:

    CurEus (14th January 2019), Star Tsar (15th January 2019)

  35. Link to Post #19
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th July 2018
    Age
    45
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 141 times in 19 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    Thank you for posting, Mr Truth. That's quite an overwhelming bit of examples you provided.

    Yeah, I do find Tavares is somewhat in the sky-is-falling-Steve-Quayle flavor of 'we are all doomed' personalities...
    I have always felt her tone to be grim. We are all dead slaves, like yesterday. That does not mean she does not have some valid info.
    She does seem to be well organized in her presentations though.

    I find it hard to believe you, Mr Truthsnooper, did all this work and fact-checking out of the goodness of your heart and pure care for the truth and the people... That always stinks immediately to me. If you undertake to expose frauds like you say you like to do, you need to first establish exactly who you are, your biography, where you work(ed) in the past. etc etc. The more detail, the better. It needs to be shown you don't have any ties to any specific agencies, organizations or corporations.

    Look forward to learning more about you and your work.

  36. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rick For This Post:

    anandacate (19th January 2019), onawah (5th January 2019)

  37. Link to Post #20
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 359 times in 142 posts

    Default Re: The Hoaxes of Deborah Tavares

    onawah,

    Thank you so much for you comments.

    My individual responses are below.

    YOUR COMMENT: My feelings about Tavares were that she is still very shell-shocked by losing her Sonoma home to fire, that she is having difficulty continuing to make her living as a real estate developer because of new laws, and in keeping her information and her website organized and her life on track, which isn't hard to believe if she is telling her story truthfully.

    MY RESPONSE: I take no pleasure in knowing Deborah Tavares lost her home and may be having financial problems. But, my primary concern with Deborah Tavares is her pattern of intentional fraud upon the American people, not her personal life.

    YOUR COMMENT: So I've been giving her the benefit of the doubt, but I am certainly open to digging deeper.

    MY RESPONSE: This is a wise and mature position to take. I once gave Deborah Tavares the benefit of the doubt too. (SEE FINAL SECTION OF POST #80 FOR A FULL EXPLANATION OF THIS). It wasn't until I found out about the "Judge DALE Hoax" that I began taking a closer look at her claims. And then, the entire pattern of fraud revealed itself to me like a punch in the face.

    I had to press the "RE-SET BUTTON"

    I had to START OVER.

    YOUR COMMENT: If there are other whistle blowers who can corroborate Snoop4truth's accusations, I hope he will make us aware of them.

    MY RESPONSE: That would be nice, but that is unlikely to happen. Most of the people who know the truth about Deborah Tavares and her hoaxes are people involved in helping her create and market them (Al Whitney/Anita Larin, Rodney DALE Class, Jeanette Tripplet, etc.). These people are very unlikely to "out" themselves as co-conspirators just to substantiate the facts that I have revealed above.

    YOUR COMMENT: Because as a conspiracy theorist, I'm not all that ready to believe that someone who is going up against Agenda 21 is a hoaxer, since it's usually the other way around.

    MY RESPONSE: Deborah Tavares's "OPPOSITION" to agenda 21 is not relevant to the "DOCUMENTS" I am talking about in this thread. Specifically, Deborah Tavares' "OPPOSITION" to agenda 21 is not relevant to whether or not she has ALSO faked, forged, altered, changed or mischaracterized the "DOCUMENTS which she says form the basis of her conclusions (regardless of what those conclusions happen to be). Deborah Tavares's "OPPOSITION" to agenda 21 does not make it IMPOSSIBLE for her to ALSO be a faker and forger of "DOCUMENTS" and a calculating and manipulative charlatan. A person can oppose agenda 21 and STILL be a fraud. Being one does not exclude the other.

    THESE TWO SUBJECTS ARE NOT THE SAME. THEY ARE ENTIRELY DIFFERENT. DO NOT GET THEM CONFUSED.


    You may find this hard to believe, but I am a conspiracy theorist too. That is how I came across Deborah Tavares and her claims in the first place. (SEE FINAL SECTION OF POST #80 FOR A FULL EXPLANATION OF THIS). I study everything I can find on 9/11, false flag operations, staged events, war geo-politics, globalism, money creation, issuing national currency, fractional reserve (and no reserve) lending, usury, HAARP, DARPA, the corporate corruption of our republican form of government, GMO's, environmental degradation, the contamination of our food, water and soil and all of the rest of it.

    In the process, I have learned this. There are conspiracies out there that are real. Those real conspiracies make things bad enough. There is no reason for Deborah Tavares to spend her entire career creating and peddling FAKE conspiracies to mislead, shock and frighten the American people. Indeed, by creating and peddling FAKE conspiracies, Deborah Tavares takes the collective eye of the American people off of the REAL conspiracies that they should be focusing their attention on. As a result of charlatans like Deborah Tavares, the American people spend much of their time, energy, money and resources fighting FAKE conspiracies and fighting FAKE enemies THAT ARE NOT EVEN REAL. This is part of what upsets me about what Deborah Tavares does.

    But, there is more. By creating and peddling such obviously FAKE conspiracies, Deborah Tavares only serves to discredit and delegitimize the entire Truth Movement in general. The elaborate hoaxes of Deborah Tavares only serve to destroy the credibility of others who expose conspiracies that are actually real. The elaborate hoaxes of Deborah Tavares only serve to cast doubt upon every conspiratorial claim and upon every other person involved in the Truth Movement. While I do not believe Deborah Tavares is a "double agent", those who really do exploit and abuse the people could not have concocted a better "agent provocateur" inside the Truth Movement than Deborah Tavares to destroy its credibility from within.

    I hope this helps.


    Best Regards,

    Snoop
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 23rd March 2019 at 15:24.

  38. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to snoop4truth For This Post:

    Akasha (11th February 2019), Kristin (21st March 2019), Kryztian (18th January 2019), NancyV (30th August 2019), Nasu (31st January 2019), Star Tsar (15th January 2019)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 17 1 11 17 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts