+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The New "Green" Deal

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,791 times in 9,344 posts

    Default The New "Green" Deal

    OCASIO-CORTEZ’ GREENNEWDEAL ASTONISHES: VAST $$ FOR GEOENGINEERING, NO OVERSIGHT
    1/14/19
    From Alexandra Bruce, Forbidden Knowledge:
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/oca...-no-oversight/
    "Bestselling Third Wave Feminist, author and journalist, Naomi Wolf has spent most of her professional life as a darling of the Liberal establishment but she is its rare denizen who is more committed to the truth than to the approval of her peers.

    Wolf’s latest venture is called the Daily Clout, which makes tabled legislation easier to understand for the average citizen. In this video, she breaks down the Green New Deal, promoted by Freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and so far supported by Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker an Beto O’Rourke.

    Wolf gives us an excellent analysis of the Green New Deal, which she suspects might be a dialectical setup where “You get the same old power elites owning everything,” complaining that some of its ideas are gifts to “private sector hyper-elite stakeholders, without any kind of oversight from the people of the nation.”

    Reading the language of the 11-page Googledocs document, entitled, “DRAFT TEXT FOR PROPOSED ADDENDUM TO HOUSE RULES FOR 116TH CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES”, she tells us, “This is not legislation…this is not delivering a bill to you or a new law. It is delivering a new form of power…It sets the stage for draft legislation to be written by people who weren’t elected to do it.” In other words, the committee of appointees that this proposal forms will entirely circumvent the will of the American people.

    The language of this proposal seeks to take over the entire economy and a specific statement, “To draw down greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and oceans,” refers to patented, experimental, carbon sequestration geoengineering technologies owned by venture capitalists in Silicon Valley.

    Wolf has been reporting on “SCoPEx”, the geoengineeringmonitor.org/2017/11/scopex/">Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment and she says the proposal’s language represents a gigantic allocation of the nation’s resources to these new, experimental technologies that are owned by non-transparent Silicon Valley companies like Intellectual Ventures.

    “I’m very familiar with this because of the reporting I’ve done on the influence of Silicon Valley and their owning of the tech and IP for geoengineering and their pushing of a similar bill, which passed by Zoe Lofgren’s (D-CA) sponsorship, that created a kind of private weather industry.”

    She adds that this language: “To promote economic and environmental justice and equality,” indicates that, “It’s not just about saving the planet, it folds in very intensive proposals and programs in the name of economic equality. I like economic equality. I think our country needs more of it…but it hands over the resources, the allocations, the execution of ending those income disparities to this committee of these 15 people, who are not elected by you for this committee.

    “What worries me about this, as an American,” Wolf says, “is that we have that language. It’s called the Constitution of the United States. It guarantees equality for all. So, Paragraph 6 basically re-writes the Constitution…I’m a feminist and I’m anti-racist but…it worries me that these 15 people are deciding what is ‘racial justice’, what is ‘gender justice’, what is ‘regional justice’, what is ‘economic justice’, what is ‘social justice’ – that’s not what we elected them for and that’s not the way our government is supposed to work.”

    Wolf says she wants some kind of Green New Deal “yesterday” but at the outset, she sees a great deal of problems with this proposal. What it looks like to me is that some Silicon Valley geoengineering firms want Ocasio-Cortez to tax the American people at up to 70% to pay them to spray us with chemtrails and to re-write the Constitution. No, thanks!"
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/oca...-no-oversight/


    Daily Clout
    Published on Jan 9, 2019
    Here's the link to the Green New Deal document:

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j...

    "We actually READ the #GreenNewDeal. It's NOT a draft bill -- it's 11 pages of a Google doc with shocking surprises. It assigns a vast "wartime footing" level amount of taxpayer money to private entities -- VCs, the private Federal Reserve, "new banks" and any "financial instrument" the 15 members of the committee decide 'appropriate." It creates a national SMART GRID -- which is terrible for human health and great for telecoms and surveillance. It gives the 15 committee members the right to not hold any public hearings about the "green new deal," if they so choose. It creates loopholes that leave them free to not have normal term limits. It hands vast sums to air and ocean carbon capture, which is an experimental geoengineering tech for which silicon valley investors own IP. It states that the "green new deal" will be released on a website and a publication -- not on govtrack, where public transparency is assured (and where we at DailyClout get our API). It transfers "unlimited" resources at the will of the 15 and their chosen partners in business, industry etc to groups defined by race, gender and rural-ness, thus violating the equal protections in our Constitution. It's a shocking document."

  2. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Caliban (15th January 2019), ExomatrixTV (15th January 2019), Franny (14th January 2019), Hym (16th January 2019), Joe Akulis (14th January 2019), mpennery (14th January 2019), ramus (14th January 2019), Satori (15th January 2019), william r sanford72 (14th January 2019)

  3. Link to Post #2
    England Unsubscribed ripple's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th December 2018
    Location
    south of England
    Posts
    295
    Thanks
    109
    Thanked 687 times in 212 posts

    Default Re: The New "Green" Deal

    This movement has a recent history stretching back to 2007--8 . It is very easy to be bamboozled by verbiage and unnecessary report complexity .
    But the fact is that these are the types of measures that are being promoted :-

    Government-led investment in energy and resource efficiency, as well as reusable energies and microgeneration;
    Low-carbon infrastructure redevelopment in order to create jobs;
    A directed tax on the profits of oil and gas companies with proceeds being invested in renewable energy and energy efficiency;
    Financial incentives for green investment and reduced energy usage, including low interest rates for green investment;
    Re-regulation of international finance, including capital controls, and increased scrutiny of financial derivatives - likely along the lines of Basel II;
    Curbing corporate tax evasion through compulsory financial reporting and by clamping down on tax havens. ( See Wiki mission statement examples ).

    Who wants to sensibly oppose such pragmatic goals ?
    As long as these measures are not weaponised to conceal a hidden globalist agenda , we should applaud .Of course we do not want this movement hijacked by those who wish to monopolise national resources , ' for the good of everybody '. But if we work to enforce transparency , there is no reason to be paranoid . imho .

  4. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member Joe Akulis's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd July 2012
    Posts
    555
    Thanks
    954
    Thanked 2,314 times in 497 posts

    Default Re: The New "Green" Deal

    Maybe I need you to connect some dots for me, ripple.

    How does an 11-page addendum to this year's House Rules have a "history" or be part of a "movement"?
    The measures that you listed are in that 11-page addendum?

  5. Link to Post #4
    England Unsubscribed ripple's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th December 2018
    Location
    south of England
    Posts
    295
    Thanks
    109
    Thanked 687 times in 212 posts

    Default Re: The New "Green" Deal

    Quote Posted by Joe Akulis (here)
    Maybe I need you to connect some dots for me, ripple.

    How does an 11-page addendum to this year's House Rules have a "history" or be part of a "movement"?
    The measures that you listed are in that 11-page addendum?


    QUOTE
    -------- Green New Deal Group, which published its report on July 21, 2008 . The concept was further popularized and put on a wider footing when the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) began to promote it. On October 22, 2008 UNEP's Executive Director Achim Steiner unveiled the Global Green New Deal initiative that aims to create jobs in "green" industries, thus boosting the world economy and curbing climate change at the same time.
    Broadly, the proposals for a Green New Deal echo the recommendations of United Nations organizations such as ICLEI or the TEEB, of global NGOs, and of the Basel II and related monetary accords, especially as these relate to reforms to measurement of fundamental ecosystem risk and financial liabilities. The reinsurance industry has also expressed support for the general principles of global carbon and emissions charges, for metrics of ecosystem destabilization risk, and for raising the price companies and individuals have to pay when using nature's services and natural resources. QUOTE

    And the measures I previously mentioned flow from that history . Hope that helps .

  6. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,791 times in 9,344 posts

    Default Re: The New "Green" Deal

    An ex-Liberal Progressive, now with NO political affiliations or leanings, I am wondering now if the new Left is being taken over by aliens as in Invasion of the Body Snatchers


    ...more prophetic than we knew, and the first version of the movie aired in 1956!
    Last edited by onawah; 16th January 2019 at 01:49.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Hym (16th January 2019)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts