+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member Lefty Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th June 2010
    Age
    69
    Posts
    558
    Thanks
    6,929
    Thanked 2,554 times in 450 posts

    Default Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

    http://www.dieholdfoundation.com/

    Greetings Avalonians...

    Spent a few weeks studying this information ....can't make up my mind on whether it is valid or not...though Dr Douglas Vogt seems to have documented his research quite well...and brought the science and the theology together to show that pole shifts and ice ages seem to correlate ...
    If you click the books highlighted there are videos of Dr Vogts' lectures ...and many many more available on you tube...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZWMWtwZ9MI

    If this sort of research interests you, I'd be grateful for your input...Blessings
    end of line.
    Last edited by Lefty Dave; 26th January 2019 at 18:03.
    If people can be made to believe absurdities, then they can be made to accept atrocities."

    “Just look at us. Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, major media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.”

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Lefty Dave For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (24th January 2019), Chip (25th January 2019), jjjones (25th January 2019), Nasu (24th January 2019), Sunny-side-up (25th January 2019), waree (24th January 2019), what is a name? (25th January 2019)

  3. Link to Post #2
    England Unsubscribed ripple's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th December 2018
    Location
    south of England
    Posts
    295
    Thanks
    109
    Thanked 687 times in 212 posts

    Default Re: Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

    Dave , I suggest , in the strongest possible terms , that you look at the work carried out at Northumbria University in Newcastle Upon Tyne , here in England . And specifically at the team work headed by Valentina Zharkova .
    It is of mind blowing significance and overturns almost everything that rests in current status quo thinking within the field of warming / climate change .Her work is peer reviewed to the highest standards the only problem is that it effectively shreds everything that political institutions like the bogus and pseudo scientific IPCC have served up .
    .https://youtu.be/SHGbri7gWWw
    The best way to introduce the work is to watch this referenced video . Even if the pseudo IPCC temperature increase forecasts were scientifically supportable --- from man made activities , Z's work shows that they must be offset by a temperature fall some six times greater than that, and starting now but in full flow by next year ( 2020).Due to a Grand Solar Minimum with the four magnetic fields in the sun out of phase ( not two fields as previously conjectured ) plus the sun being much further away from us during the following three 11 year cycles , we will move into a mini ice age .
    The research model has performed at 97% accuracy and can be compared to 150 other different models variously used which range from poor to rubbish in terms of prediction accuracy -- a bit like successive IPCC figures and updates .
    I have no way of usefully commenting on Vogts work linking events to a code contained in the Hebrew alphabet and sacred writings and I am not personally interested in that aspect .
    Be aware that though the Newcastle findings have been available for some time , a formal presentation of key findings was held back until very recently . Simply because VZ was not prepared to open up her work to criticism from political / globalist interests and those scientists whose whole world view will be changed forever .However much they scream and struggle and probably resort to personal attacks and ridicule .
    Last edited by ripple; 24th January 2019 at 16:43.

  4. Link to Post #3
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    21,327
    Thanks
    73,674
    Thanked 268,508 times in 19,811 posts

    Default Re: Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

    The Diehold Foundation website (which please do note: is amateurish, with a number of minor uncorrected typos in a presentation that tries to be professional) contains this interesting statement:
    We believe we can determine what side of the earth will be facing the sun when it novas during the next geomagnetic reversal (polar reversal).
    That's hard to credit, as of course the Earth is spinning like a top (period: 24 hours ), and so anything generated by the sun to affect the surface of the planet is always hitting quite a rapidly moving target.

    And a nova? That's definitely not the right term to use. If the sun went into 'nova', we'd all be fried (or grilled). As best I know, there's no evidence this has ever happened before.

    Of course, there may be a correlation between magnetic reversals and major climate change: one theory being considered at the moment is that a weakening magnetic field (preceding a reversal, probable timescale unknown) allows more cosmic rays to impact the atmosphere, thickening cloud layers and thereby increasing the albedo (reflectivity) of the planet.

    What that means in simple terms is that more of the sun's heat gets reflected back off the cloud layers, resulting in cooling. That's just one of several solar-connected factors that might be affecting us all quite soon. (But a 'nova'... No.)

  5. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Chip (25th January 2019), enigma3 (24th January 2019), jjjones (25th January 2019), Lefty Dave (25th January 2019), mountain_jim (8th February 2019), Nasu (24th January 2019), onawah (27th January 2019), Reinhard (25th January 2019), waree (24th January 2019), Watching from Cyprus (25th January 2019), Yoda (26th January 2019)

  6. Link to Post #4
    Spain Deactivated
    Join Date
    8th August 2018
    Location
    Canary Islands overlooking a beach with forest covered mountains behind.
    Age
    70
    Posts
    214
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 884 times in 168 posts

    Default Re: Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

    If a grand solar minimum comes (more likely than a pole shift) and we have serious food shortages, now is the time to consider becoming breatharian. That's ultimate self-sufficiency.

    Much better solution than being scared and stock piling food...

  7. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 5th For This Post:

    Chip (25th January 2019), ripple (25th January 2019), Sunny-side-up (25th January 2019), waree (24th January 2019)

  8. Link to Post #5
    England Unsubscribed ripple's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th December 2018
    Location
    south of England
    Posts
    295
    Thanks
    109
    Thanked 687 times in 212 posts

    Default Re: Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

    Quote Posted by 5th (here)
    we have serious food shortages, now is the time to consider becoming breatharian. That's ultimate self-sufficiency.

    Much better solution than being scared and stock piling food...

    Exactly .

    Billions could/will die .

    Perhaps a very good reason to deflect and lie if you are the top of the food/power/ wealth chain .
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 25th January 2019 at 11:23. Reason: fixed quote formatting

  9. Link to Post #6
    Scotland Avalon Member what is a name?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd March 2018
    Age
    54
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    1,510
    Thanked 394 times in 72 posts

    Default Re: Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

    At the bottom of the opening page of the dieholdfoundation.com site they have a countdown clock of the number of days to when (they say) the next Polar Shift will occur.

    10126 days which is approx. 27 years

    I suppose the procession of our planet, solar system and galaxy through the universe can be likened to a big spiral clock and what Mr Vogt brings to the table for evidence of a polar shift happening at regular set intervals is compelling.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to what is a name? For This Post:

    Lefty Dave (25th January 2019)

  11. Link to Post #7
    United States Avalon Member Savannah's Avatar
    Join Date
    10th May 2015
    Location
    California
    Age
    63
    Posts
    213
    Thanks
    639
    Thanked 1,340 times in 198 posts

    Default Re: Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

    See the thread -Causes of the Ice Age and Nova, the Greatest Secret of the United States. Important Info

    http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...mportant-Info-

    Suspicious Observer quotes his work. He is self taught but uses grounded research. He does reference the Torah and ahs some very intriguing ideas regarding how to interpret it. Some of his books are free if you have Amazon Kindle yearly membership.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Savannah For This Post:

    Bhusunda (4th February 2019), Lefty Dave (26th January 2019)

  13. Link to Post #8
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    23rd September 2017
    Posts
    685
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 2,386 times in 580 posts

    Default Re: Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

    Quote Posted by 5th (here)
    If a grand solar minimum comes (more likely than a pole shift) and we have serious food shortages, now is the time to consider becoming breatharian. That's ultimate self-sufficiency.

    Much better solution than being scared and stock piling food...
    Back in the 80s the founder of the movement was exposed by his assistant as someone who ate all the time. Have they found an ACTUAL breatharian yet?

  14. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member Savannah's Avatar
    Join Date
    10th May 2015
    Location
    California
    Age
    63
    Posts
    213
    Thanks
    639
    Thanked 1,340 times in 198 posts

    Default Re: Looking for opinions on Diehold Foundation validity

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    The Diehold Foundation website (which please do note: is amateurish, with a number of minor uncorrected typos in a presentation that tries to be professional) contains this interesting statement:
    We believe we can determine what side of the earth will be facing the sun when it novas during the next geomagnetic reversal (polar reversal).
    That's hard to credit, as of course the Earth is spinning like a top (period: 24 hours ), and so anything generated by the sun to affect the surface of the planet is always hitting quite a rapidly moving target.

    And a nova? That's definitely not the right term to use. If the sun went into 'nova', we'd all be fried (or grilled).
    As best I know, there's no evidence this has ever happened before.

    Of course, there may be a correlation between magnetic reversals and major climate change: one theory being considered at the moment is that a weakening magnetic field (preceding a reversal, probable timescale unknown) allows more cosmic rays to impact the atmosphere, thickening cloud layers and thereby increasing the albedo (reflectivity) of the planet.

    What that means in simple terms is that more of the sun's heat gets reflected back off the cloud layers, resulting in cooling. That's just one of several solar-connected factors that might be affecting us all quite soon. (But a 'nova'... No.)




    Suspicious Observer again discusses some of the Voght material and addresses the Nova question and states it may be better to described it as a Micro Nova (5:50) and could be survivable.

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Savannah For This Post:

    Bhusunda (4th February 2019), Lefty Dave (2nd February 2019)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts