The question is, in the minds of the masses who would make or tolerate moves made by the given players...WHO PUT THEM THERE?Posted by 5th (here)
Posted by Flash (here)
Justlistened again t Edward Snowden movie.
Perolator and others, maybe listening to that movie would help understanding the USA and its tentacles. It is on Netflix
We fully understand (and deplore) US overseas policy and don't doubt that they are playing a hand in Venezuela right now. The point we are trying to make is that Maduro needs to be removed because he is destroying the country and its people. Often, using propaganda lies, the US engineers regime change when the leader is doing something good but is anti US or has an independent banking system but in this case, ANY change is better than carrying on with Maduro.
As I said before, sometimes there really is an evil dictator who needs to be removed. Even if Venezuela ends up fully in the hands of the US (which is actually still in doubt) it will be better for the Venezuelan people. At the present time, death is a daily possibility.
Who and what exactly, put Venezuela in the condition it is in right now?
How, exactly and specifically, in fine detail, in the hidden aspects, the not obvious aspects....how did Venezuela arrive in the condition it is in right now?
THAT is the most critical thing to know, as that needed, powerfully needed detail work...that all points at the direction which is correct to go in.
Saying that Venezuela would be better of right now, with US interference and involvement, can be a lot like some hidden aspects of Stockholm syndrome, -- a case of identifying with dark forces from one's own jailers and killers.
Almost like saying "I know this guy shot and killed some of my relatives... and my kids and family are starving to death and some are going to die because of him and his actions, but he's our best hope for now and the future."
So when I see what is said in the post I'm quoting, I think to what I know of the US behaviour in the Latin and southern sphere and their history in such matters says my crazy sounding stuff is very likely quite true.
As that the the US history in all these things. Across the globe. A dozen times over. And actually far more than a dozen times. The record is one of fascist insanity inflicted on other countries, via clandestine means and clandestine channels. More times than anyone can count or find record of.
So what, exactly, would suddenly, out of the blue, prove that analysis wrong, when dealing with the most important country in the world right now, regarding global balance and US dark forces desperation - and in their at least 100 year record of involvement, in such noted ways.... in this exact area of the world??