Linda Moulton Howe calls out David Wilcock for Copyright Infringement

[abmqa]

On her latest podcast Linda discusses how she has filed a willful copyright complaint against David Wilcock. Apparently YouTube agreed with her and took down the offending videos. Interesting stuff. Starts around 9 minute mark.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9cpvZHVlxz4

[Bill Ryan]

And here's what Corey Goode had to say about it.

[Luke Holiday]

Wow!!! - Once again based on the current information presented - I am amazingly disappointed at the dichotomy between what DW preaches and his actions!!

[Valerie Villars]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
And here's what Corey Goode had to say about it.

Yes. Because Corey is such a paragon of integrity. Rolling eyes.

[Luke Holiday]

I sure hope someone is able to fact check CG's allegations that the information in question was presented in the Above majestic movie - I personally have not seen the movie...

[CurEus]

Corey and DW did not interview the Whistleblowers, nor did David have permission to use her interviews and copy written documents...very very bad from.

[scotslad]

Over a wee coffee in the middle of the night, I penned a wee poem and it is my copyright....

ODE TO THE WHISTLEBLOWER

There once was a whistleblower whose ravings people thought were so true
They shared info about aliens who were green, grey and also a blue
Some thought the ramblings were exaggerated, made up and plainly just ****e
But others in the fraternity were claiming they owned the copyright.

Watch as they blow their whistles onto everyone's networks, devices & feeds
Using Youtube and Gaia, Vbulletin & Facebook to get more likes & widen their reach
Misinform, Disinform, both black lies and bright white
All of this amazing earth shattering info must be somebody's copyright

The Andromedans? The short greys?, The Nordics, pleidians or mantas?
Was the info just channelled or delivered by Santa?
No-one knows for quite sure the source from where it all came
But the integrity of the speakers appears to start becoming lame

The cracks are appearing & the pandoras box lid cannot be closed
For the court papers have been filed and the real facts now disclosed
The filed evidence more amazing than the claims which have been portrayed
Somebody's speakers fee for their disclosures alas may just remain unpaid

You cannot suppress what is in the public domain
But telling the truth will help you keep sane.
Oh, to lie, and to cheat and steal for your 5 minutes of fame
Watch out for the spotlight seekers and their own counterclaims

All these dark secrets maybe should just be concealed
and not borrowed or shared or channeled or revealed
Whether its nonsense, fact or just plain piffle....
Make sure its your own "content & info" if you're blowing a whistle.

[Praxis]

I just watched a wee bit and I wanted to jump in and say this is a mostly automated process and if you look there are many of video about people abusing copyright strikes on Youtube.

Is this what Linda is doing? Definitely not in this case. But when she makes it sound like there is a human at youtube agreeing with the copyright strike, it is probably not and is an automated thing. Again, this is a common refrain from content creators on youtube as companies routinely abuse this to their gain.

Just copy right strike and move on. If you are giving brain space and time to CG and DW, then they are winning. As long as you are engaging with them, they are winning.

[Flash]

Posted by Praxis (here)
I just watched a wee bit and I wanted to jump in and say this is a mostly automated process and if you look there are many of video about people abusing copyright strikes on Youtube.







Is this what Linda is doing? No clue. But when she makes it sound like there is a human at youtube agreeing with the copyright strike, it is probably not and is an automated thing. Again, this is a common refrain from content creators on youtube as companies routinely abuse this to their gain.

Just copy right strike and move on. If you are giving brain space and time to CG and DW, then they are winning. As long as you are engaging with them, they are winning.

You may be right in some situation, but not in this one in my views.

She took this opportunity to tell us how disgusted she was by their behavior and that she had no links with them at all, that whatever they say would be coming from her, it is not approved by her. And worst if they are stealing her work.

Yes, many companies profit from that opportunity of stealing other's work, and I do not like this one iota either. Linda does not either. At least, she made herself clear to all of us and she does have credibility in the field.

[ichingcarpenter]

Interesting that at the Couscous life Expo 2019 David who was on the Ancient Alien TV show was not invited or chose not to participate in the Ancient Alien round table talk. I think they shut him out considering who else was on the panel and had to plan the panel way before the event. see panel: https://expo.consciouslifeexpo.com/a...-aliens-panel/.

Interesting that there are no YT videos of David's speech by the participates on YT at the CLE.

A couple of twitter comments

Dark Journalist on twitter
The Legendary Linda Moulton Howe Calls Out New Age Marketeer David Wilcock for Unethical Plagiarism of her work on Antarctica in this Refreshingly Honest Clip.

CatherineAustinFitts on twitter
‏

@TheSolariReport
21h21 hours ago
More
Linda Moulton Howe of http://Earthfiles.com is the real deal - she demonstrates another reason to follow and support Linda and other great researchers and have absolutely nothing to do with people who have low or no integrity

Why doesn't the UFO community have comedians instead of clowns? I would love to see a program with puppets representing all the players

[Cardillac]

I listened to the interview before it was posted on this website;

I still think David Wilcock has a lot of good info to share but does he have to infringe on copyrights and not give credit where credit is due just to boost his own ego?

Larry

[Flash]

Posted by Cardillac (here)
I listened to the interview before it was posted on this website;

I still think David Wilcock has a lot of good info to share but does he have to infringe on copyrights and not give credit where credit is due just to boost his own ego?

Larry

Yes he had in the past, but he has no filters, everything goes. He is bright but greed and narcissism seems to have taken over.

When he will by dying, like my ex - who had 1% chance of survival last summer said to me, he did survive, - I am not greedy anymore! It took near death for him to realize how greedy he was. And... I did not believe him that he was not anymore.

[Sandy123]

I do think that RH negative is a clue to the genetic tampering by "them" and I would bet certain gov't agency's know the codes. The AB blood type is more rare than RH negative and I think that blood type comes from the mixing of RH- and other blood types. I'm sure they would know this too.

[Denise/Dizi]

The "TRUTH" is that NONE of them "OWNED" that material, it came from a whistleblower who wanted us all to know it.. FREELY.. I DOUBT they felt that someone would COPYRIGHT THEIR TRUTH.. Yet they ALL do it. Then fight over it. It's really embarrassing for those in the field that DO have some integrity left. Sad actually..

[Gemma13]

I think the primary point Linda Moulton Howe is trying to make is actually on behalf of her whistleblowers to protect their choice about who they freely give their information to. A genuine whistleblower would know the “lay of the land” and would seek a journalist/reporter they believe has integrity and seriousness about the topic rather than one who will turn their information into a sensationalist money making sideshow and potential comic.

In other words the copyright issue isn’t really about ownership, it’s about protecting a whistleblowers choice for who disseminates their information so that it doesn’t get tarnished/discredited and/or lost amongst the BS coming from charlatans.

[Debra]

Linda Moulton Howe I believe is in her absolute rights as a researcher (she’s not just a journalist) to protect her work from these circus performers.

There is a VAST difference between what LMH does compared with what Wilcock has been parading. Let’s not forget that she has done a lot of paintstaking work to interview and analyse primary sources for this particular field of enquiry - she has not just done a literature review of available published information as Wilcock has done,
many times over and called it his own! Oooof. I have no time for plagiarists.

A bit of respect needs to be given.

[Denise/Dizi]

Posted by Gemma13 (here)
I think the primary point Linda Moulton Howe is trying to make is actually on behalf of her whistleblowers to protect their choice about who they freely give their information to. A genuine whistleblower would know the “lay of the land” and would seek a journalist/reporter they believe has integrity and seriousness about the topic rather than one who will turn their information into a sensationalist money making sideshow and potential comic.

In other words the copyright issue isn’t really about ownership, it’s about protecting a whistleblowers choice for who disseminates their information so that it doesn’t get tarnished/discredited and/or lost amongst the BS coming from charlatans.

You make a very good point.... Thank you for the insight.. I hadn't looked at the topic from that perspective..

[Ratszinger]

Posted by Sandy123 (here)
I do think that RH negative is a clue to the genetic tampering by "them" and I would bet certain gov't agency's know the codes. The AB blood type is more rare than RH negative and I think that blood type comes from the mixing of RH- and other blood types. I'm sure they would know this too.

In the creation stories and composites of stories like the Book of Enoch and the Book of Revelation a good summary goes like this for RH negative blood type.

The fallen angels violated the garden bylaws and did the unthinkable! They interfered by living with and co-creating life with the experiments, (human beings) and then kept the acts and the offspring they brought into the world a secret until those offspring became such a problem that it became impossible to hide them any longer!

The creators of this garden disagreed with this act of the fallen ones making unsanctioned children with the worker/slaves they were making. However they could not violate their own policies of life just because some among them did this, so the wise among the leaders knew that thought of destroying the offspring was out of the question as they were innocent and to destroy them would make the creators no better than those they condemned..

The Book of Enoch tells us, "Some of the sons created in this mating of the fallen with the humans did survive", and these are the fallen hybrids of 'human/Annunaki hybrids and were given their own designated areas. The royal peoples or blue bloods with RH negative blood type today are said to be royals simply due to this relationship which they are fully aware. Today it's mostly royals that mate among their own and these were provided wives by the creator so they would not want! As we know though the royals could not keep their winky in their pants and spread their seeds even further among the populace infiltrating all races at this writing. But make note! There were none saved for the fallen for the angels that fell were left to want and were punished.

These same fallen were the ones reported to have taught man all the things we take for granted and that many say sprouted out of Sumeria. Another story for another thread there though. Alien watchers or 'angels' of the lord were written about thousands of years before Wilcock or LMH don't ya think?

[scotslad]

Let's face it, many content producers, expo speakers, conspiracy broadcasters, ufologists, youtube channel owners, facebook group owners and website owners are curating news and rss feeds from all over the globe with subscriptions to competitor's feeds, subscriber lists and online communities to keep their finger on their pulse, then often dice, slice or spin the content and republish often without naming the original source.

Even staunch collaborators, teams, and partnerships fail when one ego wants the spot light or lies, steals or cheats on others for that extra 1000 views, hits, clicks or 5 more minutes of fame.

I suspect it will get worse with lots of backstabbing and people claiming they heard about certain topics first from their insider source (a cop out) and they claim to have shared with their audience, members or private subscriber list first. So many topics, so many sources, so many personalities, and in light of the other post about sponsors of Joe Rogan, many people could appear to be incentivised and have good motive to share, shock and find new ways to find and create click bait to pull in the hungry audience which also means baying critics.

[Andrew_K]

Linda has apparently lost the copyright dispute, and David's video has been reinstated onto his channel, despite YouTube previously agreeing with Linda's copyright claim.

Corey Goode: Google re-pub-ed the vid to DWs channel after LMH lost the CR dispute. DW was totally vindicated! Here is the original video 4 all 2 see for themselves. Gotta keep an eye on Rockefeller Initiative/TTSA/CIA types. IMHO.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ez72JoCDeKg