+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst 1 7 9 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 177

Thread: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

  1. Link to Post #121
    Avalon Member Hughe's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    966
    Thanks
    1,129
    Thanked 4,103 times in 806 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    If it was a real accident, why the governments are trying so hard to remove the shooter video on Internet?

    http://support.brighteon.com/Brighte...y-Message.html
    For free society!

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hughe For This Post:

    BMJ (26th March 2019), Pam (27th March 2019), Zanshin (26th March 2019)

  3. Link to Post #122
    Avalon Member sms's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th May 2012
    Posts
    170
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 1,077 times in 163 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Jim Stone might be spot on with the "missing shoes". If you go to a mosque where a prayer takes a place, the first thing you would see, it would be a lot of shoes at the entry doors. When I was a kid, living in Bosnia, we used to make a fun by mixing up the shoes people left outside a mosque. Later, after the end of the prayer, we would watch all the confusion from a safe distance and laugh, when people were trying to find and match their shoes. I have not watched the whole video, just some fragments, however, if the shoes were really missing, then it would be a fake. The people escaping the shooting, would be barefoot, as well, as they would not think about collecting their shoes, on such an instance.

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sms For This Post:

    BMJ (26th March 2019), Franny (28th March 2019), Hervé (26th March 2019), KiwiElf (26th March 2019), Pam (27th March 2019), Zanshin (26th March 2019)

  5. Link to Post #123
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,637
    Thanks
    38,027
    Thanked 53,692 times in 8,940 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    One thing nobody has brought up yet is that showing pictures or drawings of human beings is strictly forbidden in Islam. Most Muslim will not obey this on a daily basis, but they will definitely obey it in a burial or death time.

    Even in parties not that many pictures are taken - just tells you. They are taken for weddings on average, and kept. Other pics would not be kept. For example, I do not remember seeing a photo album in a Muslim home.

    Once again this is not respected usually, but definitely is for burials.

    So all Imams on the planet will have asked the videos to be removed from the internet - mostly if any pictures are taken from the videos.

    ---------------

    now, we understand that when ISIS is beheading someone and film it and send pic of it all over the world, in the Muslim world it is an unimaginable insult to the dead and to the western world. But it does not matter hey, this is jihad and the enemy does not deserve any respect.

    Same every time a pic is taken from an Islam foreigner in 'compromising' situations and is published.

    ---------------

    Now, American army did the same, and they knew very well what they were doing, by burying Ben Laden in the sea. Burying someone in the sea is one of the greatest sin and insult a Muslim or non Muslim can do. This was noticed by all the Muslim world throughout the planet. We call that putting oil on the fire.

    --------------

    Children playing war. On both side. This leads you to get in complete despair about the faith of humanity.
    Last edited by Flash; 26th March 2019 at 12:01.
    How to let the desire of your mind become the desire of your heart - Gurdjieff

  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    BMJ (26th March 2019), Hervé (26th March 2019), KiwiElf (26th March 2019), Philippe (27th March 2019), ThePythonicCow (26th March 2019), Valerie Villars (26th March 2019), Zanshin (27th March 2019)

  7. Link to Post #124
    Australia Avalon Member BMJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th May 2010
    Posts
    1,866
    Thanks
    47,641
    Thanked 11,349 times in 1,707 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Whilst across the pond the ripples are being felt, as the take down of opposition to the two big political parties begins.

    Watch out Clive Palmer and United Australia Party your sure to be on the short list.

    Key points:
    One Nation staffers were secretly recorded seeking foreign political donations
    Politicians are demanding answers from One Nation leader Pauline Hanson
    They also want Ms Hanson to state her position on weakening gun laws

    (Australian) Pauline Hanson and One Nation slammed over talks with NRA, James Ashby and Steve Dickson claim they were set up

    Senior One Nation officials are in damage control after the release of footage showing them soliciting political donations from powerful American gun lobbyists.

    Fronting a media scrum in Brisbane today, James Ashby and Steve Dickson said they had "had a few drinks" and claimed they were set up by a "secret agent" from the Middle East.

    The secret recordings of the pair reveal they wanted millions of dollars in political donations from America's National Rifle Association (NRA) and discussed softening One Nation policies on gun ownership as they tried to secure the funding.

    The vision was broadcast as part of an undercover Al Jazeera investigation which involved setting up a fake gun lobby group called Gun Rights Australia headed by a fake gun rights advocate, Rodger Muller.

    "Rodger Muller had organised these meetings. This was a deliberate set-up by the Qatari government under Al Jazeera," Mr Ashby said.

    "He set these meetings up. This is skulduggery at its worst. This is the very first time Australia has witnessed political interference from a foreign government."

    Mr Dickson added: "I never, ever, ever suspected in my wildest dreams that this guy was employed by a Middle Eastern country, by Al Jazeera, as an Australian spy to interfere in Australian politics."


    Mr Ashby said party leader Pauline Hanson was unwell and unable to respond to media inquiries, despite calls from politicians for her to reveal what she knew about the meetings.

    In one of the recordings, Mr Dickson was recorded telling representatives of Koch Industries that One Nation could "change the voting system" if the party had more funding.

    In a separate recording, Mr Ashby and Mr Dickson discussed wanting up to $20 million from the US lobby groups.

    "The conversations that have been recorded where there is a talk of $10-20 million, I will be the first to admit, we'd arrived in America, we got on the sauce, we'd had a few drinks and that's where those discussions took place, not with any potential donors, no-one but Rodger Muller, Steve Dickson and myself," Mr Ashby said.

    Link: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-...tions/10939140


    One Nation staffers say they're the victims of a Qatari spy plot


    One Nation officials James Ashby and Steve Dickson say they were set up by a "secret agent" from the Middle East after recordings emerged of them soliciting donations from the US gun lobby.

    Link: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-...i-spy/10942388

    Pauline Hanson's One Nation in damage control over talks with US gun lobbyists | ABC News


    ABC News (Australia)
    Published on Mar 26, 2019
    One Nation's image is taking a battering after undercover video aired showing senior party figures seeking millions of dollars in funding from US gun lobby groups to help loosen Australia's tough firearms laws.
    The meetings took place just weeks before the Australian parliament voted to ban foreign donations to political parties.
    The revelations and footage are part of a three year sting by the Al Jazeera investigative unit.
    Last edited by BMJ; 26th March 2019 at 11:54.
    In hoc signo vinces / In this sign thou shalt conquer

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to BMJ For This Post:

    avid (26th March 2019), Hervé (26th March 2019), KiwiElf (26th March 2019), Pam (27th March 2019), Zanshin (26th March 2019)

  9. Link to Post #125
    Australia Avalon Member BMJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th May 2010
    Posts
    1,866
    Thanks
    47,641
    Thanked 11,349 times in 1,707 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Quote Posted by Hughe (here)
    If it was a real accident, why the governments are trying so hard to remove the shooter video on Internet?

    http://support.brighteon.com/Brighte...y-Message.html
    It may have been a real event, but according to all the analyse so far the 17 minute video has more holes than swiss cheese, for example:
    - the disappearing spent brass shell casings (Post 94);
    - the hallway socks on socks off incident (Post 118), and
    - according to AVFTM crisis actors picking them self up and walking around after being shot at the scene(Post 120).

    After the expected public emotional high and expected government quick reaction to ban semi automatic rifles, now the rush is on to get ride of all the evidence hence banning all copies of the video and manifesto.

    For the tptw problem solved.

    Similarly to Australia at the Port Arthur massacre and it's aftermath, we now have tighter gun control in New Zealand.
    Last edited by BMJ; 27th March 2019 at 01:07.
    In hoc signo vinces / In this sign thou shalt conquer

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to BMJ For This Post:

    Hervé (26th March 2019), KiwiElf (26th March 2019), mountain_jim (26th March 2019), Pam (27th March 2019), ThePythonicCow (26th March 2019), Valerie Villars (26th March 2019), Zanshin (26th March 2019)

  11. Link to Post #126
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,637
    Thanks
    38,027
    Thanked 53,692 times in 8,940 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Quote Posted by BMJ (here)
    Quote Posted by Hughe (here)
    If it was a real accident, why the governments are trying so hard to remove the shooter video on Internet?

    http://support.brighteon.com/Brighte...y-Message.html
    It may have been a real event, but according to all the analyse so far the 17 minute video has more holes than swiss cheese, for example:
    - the disappearing spent brass shell casings;
    - the hallway socks on socks off incident, and
    - according to AVFTM crisis actors picking them self up and walking around after being shot at the scene.

    After the expected emotional high and expected quick reaction to ban semi automatic now the rush is on to get ride of all the evidence, hence banning all copies of the video and manifesto.

    For the tptw problem solved.

    Similarly to Australia at the Port Arthur massacre and it's aftermath we now have tighter gun control in New Zealand.
    Three things are sure:

    1. the internet is being heavily censored all around with all the possible means governing bodies have - Muslim or not, pics taken or not.

    2. the anti arm campaigns beat all records.

    3. the internet is actually sooooo polluted by stupid people willfully creating all kinds of wrong stories (forget the planted ones which exist, the amount of ordinary people doing the same by stupidity or malice is astonishing) that we do not know what to believe anymore. Confusion is king, and the masters knew it, they could rely on ordinary human beings to do their job.
    How to let the desire of your mind become the desire of your heart - Gurdjieff

  12. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    BMJ (26th March 2019), Hervé (26th March 2019), KiwiElf (26th March 2019), mountain_jim (26th March 2019), Pam (27th March 2019), Philippe (27th March 2019), ThePythonicCow (26th March 2019), Zanshin (26th March 2019)

  13. Link to Post #127
    Australia Avalon Member Zanshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th November 2013
    Age
    53
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    4,668
    Thanked 1,522 times in 268 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Almost 23yrs since the Port Arthur massacre - arguably one of the first of the current swathe of
    gun-stripping false-flag events.

    An article here implicating mossad involvement (I read Joe Vialls book amongst other publications back then,
    unaware of his 'spook' connections) -

    http://thedarktruth.org/2016/03/09/p...sad-operation/

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Zanshin For This Post:

    BMJ (26th March 2019), DaveToo (18th April 2019), Hervé (26th March 2019), KiwiElf (26th March 2019), Pam (27th March 2019)

  15. Link to Post #128
    Australia Avalon Member Zanshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th November 2013
    Age
    53
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    4,668
    Thanked 1,522 times in 268 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Another article by Joe Vialls (now deceased) about the Bali Bombing.

    http://abundanthope.net/pages/Politi...-on-Iraq.shtml

    At a time when The U.S. under Bush junior was pressuring Australia to commit troops to the post 911 invasion of the middle east,
    Australia's prime minister was a sawn-off, deep-state vassal named John Howard who was vacillating over committing Aussie troops
    to the cause amid public concern that the nation had no cause to go beating on innocent arabs on the far side of the globe.

    The mossad/cia/asio have also been implicated in the Bali bombing which, conveniently for little Johnny and George, swayed the
    opinion of the nation, aided by copious doses of nationalistic media propoganda.
    The first 'official' troop deployments to the middle east occurred soon after (no doubt the special forces teams were already there)

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Zanshin For This Post:

    BMJ (26th March 2019), KiwiElf (26th March 2019), Pam (27th March 2019)

  17. Link to Post #129
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    21st July 2010
    Age
    38
    Posts
    715
    Thanks
    326
    Thanked 3,312 times in 617 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    One thing nobody has brought up yet is that showing pictures or drawings of human beings is strictly forbidden in Islam. Most Muslim will not obey this on a daily basis, but they will definitely obey it in a burial or death time.

    Even in parties not that many pictures are taken - just tells you. They are taken for weddings on average, and kept. Other pics would not be kept. For example, I do not remember seeing a photo album in a Muslim home.

    Once again this is not respected usually, but definitely is for burials.

    So all Imams on the planet will have asked the videos to be removed from the internet - mostly if any pictures are taken from the videos.

    ---------------

    now, we understand that when ISIS is beheading someone and film it and send pic of it all over the world, in the Muslim world it is an unimaginable insult to the dead and to the western world. But it does not matter hey, this is jihad and the enemy does not deserve any respect.

    Same every time a pic is taken from an Islam foreigner in 'compromising' situations and is published.

    ---------------

    Now, American army did the same, and they knew very well what they were doing, by burying Ben Laden in the sea. Burying someone in the sea is one of the greatest sin and insult a Muslim or non Muslim can do. This was noticed by all the Muslim world throughout the planet. We call that putting oil on the fire.

    --------------

    Children playing war. On both side. This leads you to get in complete despair about the faith of humanity.
    So if I recall correctly, it is actually only technically the Prophet Mohammad that is the one that is not supposed to be depicted lest it become a false idol.

    And in fact, it is not Quranic that this prohibition is made but rather is Haditha( meaning it came from Mohammed or his actions and not given from God as the Qu ran was, accordingly to muslim Theology).

    As you can actually find pictures of him:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhamm...el_Gabriel.jpg

    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhamm...File:Maome.jpg


    But most of the time they started to do things like this

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhamm...Nebi,_1595.jpg



    Yes, there are hardcore( like orthodox Christian and jews do the same) muslims( Salafist, Wahhabi) that do not allow pictures of all humans, and actually playing music is haram for some of these people as well( this is why muslim music is sometimes only voices because the instruments and music they produce are sinful, from their point of view of course).

    You can see an example of what I am talking about here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nl1ETcUw-Q0 Which really is a shame because they should focus on just making music cause they clearly have talent in music. Very gregorian chantish. Their message is repulsive and they are horrible people but they can compose music, so they are basically the katy perry of ultra conservative muslims.


    Now, lets talk about Muslims burial procedure.

    As far as I am aware, the Army followed all proper protocol for when "they buried Bin laden". First, I am of the opinion that Bin laden was not killed in Pakistan by seal team 6 under an Operation under the Obama admin. So with that out of the way, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_funeral.

    Whoever they buried at sea, I believe they filmed them doing what is necessary. Now first it should be noted that these are general guidelines and not strict hardfast rules and they do vary by custom and culture. You may or may not be aware that Indonesian muslims and Saudi muslims have a great deal of difference between them in how they practice. These are small and outsiders who are not versed in islam may not notice(much like how protestants may not understand when the when there are quarrels between Eastern Orthodox Christians and Oriental Orthodox Christians).


    So as long as they: Cleaned the body, wrapped it in a white linen cloth, said a prayer, buried the body(facing Mecca as much as possible), then they did what was required.

    That wiki is quite informative about circumstances in which proper protocol was broken: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Uhud


    Also, for the ultra conservative muslims, killing kafir(an infidel)

    Which I will quote at more length :

    "The distinction between those who believe in Islam and those who do not is an essential one in the Quran. Kafir, and its plural kuffaar, is used directly 134 times in Quran, its verbal noun "kufr" is used 37 times, and the verbal cognates of kafir are used about 250 times.[24]

    By extension of the basic meaning of the root, "to cover", the term is used in the Quran in the senses of ignore/fail to acknowledge and to spurn/be ungrateful.[25] The meaning of "disbelief", which has come to be regarded as primary, retains all of these connotations in the Quranic usage.[25] In the Quranic discourse, the term typifies all things that are unacceptable and offensive to God.[7] The most fundamental sense of kufr in the Quran is "ingratitude", the willful refusal to acknowledge or appreciate the benefits that God bestows on humankind, including clear signs and revealed scriptures.[7]

    According to the E. J. Brill's First Encyclopaedia of Islam, 1913–1936, Volume 4, the term first applied in the Quran to unbelieving Meccans, who endeavoured "to refute and revile the Prophet". A waiting attitude towards the kafir was recommended at first for Muslims; later, Muslims were ordered to keep apart from unbelievers and defend themselves against their attacks and even take the offensive.[14] Most passages in the Quran referring to unbelievers in general talk about their fate on the day of judgement and destination in hell.[14]

    According to scholar Marilyn Waldman, as the Quran "progresses" (as the reader goes from the verses revealed first to later ones), the meaning behind the term kafir does not change but "progresses", i.e. "accumulates meaning over time". As the Islamic Prophet Muhammad's views of his opponents change, his use of kafir "undergoes a development". Kafir moves from being one description of Muhammad's opponents to the primary one. Later in the Quran, kafir becomes more and more connected with shirk. Finally, towards the end of the Quran, kafir begins to also signify the group of people to be fought by the mu'minīn (believers).[26]
    "


    So you will note that generally it is a wait for god to judge them when that day comes type of attitude(see. holier than thou) but, and here is the critical part, "defend themselves against their attacks and even take the offensive".

    The ISIS member would make long eloquent arguments about western imperialism, the sykes picot agreement, crusades, and finish with Israel. They would be generally correct in there representation of history and therefore find themselves justified as they are being attacked. The beheading of kafir is not offensive to the ummah(muslim community) that is under siege(from their point of view see. Palestinian Occupation), it is celebrated.

    Again, this is from their point of view which I personally find repugnant and infantile. I believe if someone kills someone over religious belief then they do not understand god.
    If the god wants someone to do so, then it is not really god but something pretending to be.



    The final thought I want to put here is in regards to "all imams".

    Sunni and Shia is a thing, as you are probably aware. But there is also Sufi, and other subclasses of Sunni, of which I have mentioned, but also Shia( Twelver, Isma'ilism ). And while One branch of Shia does the self flagellation thing on a certain holiday, not all of them do(just as not all catholics are like the Opus dei.

    In Oman they have their own version of islam called Ibadism . There are also Alevism and Alawites(which you have probably heard because Bashar Al Assad, the Syrian dude, is one of them.


    So saying all imams is like saying all Priests and thinking that Catholics and southern baptists are singing the same tune.
    Last edited by Praxis; 26th March 2019 at 15:06.

  18. Link to Post #130
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,637
    Thanks
    38,027
    Thanked 53,692 times in 8,940 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Praxis, you are absolutely right in your specifications. Except for the fact that I have seen very few photo albums in Muslim houses, having lived in a Muslim country.

    I went superficially because most people here in America do not know anything about Islam, fundamentalist or not.

    To thanks for the additions or / and specifications.

    However, for burial at sea, it is usually the American who say bin laden burial was follwoing Muslim customs,not the Muslims

    Quote But some Islamic scholars and clerics were divided Monday over whether the sea burial was appropriate or an insult to Muslims. Several said Bin Laden should have been buried on land in a simple grave. The sea burial, off an American aircraft carrier in the North Arabian Sea, added an ambiguous coda to a life that had been clouded in secrecy over the past decade.https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/w.../03burial.html
    Usually Muslim should be buried in the ground with many specified ways of doing it, if the body can be brought back on the ground before rotting.

    But it does not truly matter, suffice is to say that the way the American did it insulted the Muslim world.

    To me, those are children games, revenge included .

    Quote Mohammed al-Qubaisi, Dubai's grand mufti, said of Bin Laden's burial: "They can say they buried him at sea, but they cannot say they did it according to Islam. Sea burials are permissible for Muslims in extraordinary circumstances. This is not one of them."

    Abdul-Sattar al-Janabi, who preaches at Baghdad's Abu Hanifa mosque, said: "What was done by the Americans is forbidden by Islam and might provoke some Muslims.

    "It is not acceptable and it is almost a crime to throw the body of a Muslim man into the sea. The body of Bin Laden should have been handed over to his family to look for a country to bury him."https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...sama-bin-laden
    Last edited by Flash; 26th March 2019 at 22:45.
    How to let the desire of your mind become the desire of your heart - Gurdjieff

  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    BMJ (27th March 2019), KiwiElf (26th March 2019), Pam (27th March 2019), Zanshin (27th March 2019)

  20. Link to Post #131
    Australia Avalon Member BMJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th May 2010
    Posts
    1,866
    Thanks
    47,641
    Thanked 11,349 times in 1,707 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Thanks to the X22 Report for this find see Episode 1825B. It seems that maybe the outcome of the New Zealand false flag was part of the preparation for the cabals move to their Alamo.

    Hopefully New Zealand will send them back to the US on the GITMO express for a well deserved R&R in the Cuban resort of the same name.

    Ruth Bader Ginsburg: If Trump wins, time to move to New Zealand
    Quote:
    In an interview with The New York Times published Sunday, the Supreme Court justice said her husband, who died in 2010, would have said, “‘Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand.’”

    Link: https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...to-move-to-new

    P.S. Unfortunately no matter where the cabal hide they still will not be able to move far enough away from the hand of justice.
    Last edited by BMJ; 27th March 2019 at 02:57.
    In hoc signo vinces / In this sign thou shalt conquer

  21. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to BMJ For This Post:

    Flash (27th March 2019), Franny (28th March 2019), KiwiElf (27th March 2019), Pam (27th March 2019), Zanshin (27th March 2019)

  22. Link to Post #132
    Australia Avalon Member BMJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th May 2010
    Posts
    1,866
    Thanks
    47,641
    Thanked 11,349 times in 1,707 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    This video by thecrowhouse suggests the gunman was not alone and provides evidence to back his position.


    What They Don't Want You to See in the NZ Mosque Shooting Video

    The real reason the Christchurch Shooting video is banned is that it clearly shows that the Christchurch Massacre was a Black Op The shooter was not alone…

    He had help And you can see them…

    This completely destroys their official “Lone Wolf Terrible Racist White Man” Narrative And THIS is what they do NOT want you to see…

    3:06 minutes in… he pulls over, kills audio and says something to the camera. He then waits roadside one full minute and then..

    4:08 minutes in… The person in red walks past… He then switches on the strobe light on the gun

    Handler?

    5:00 minutes in… Man in red at the driveway entrance

    8:48 minutes in… He leaves the Mosque for the first time. Car… man inside? He aims but doesn’t shoot…

    Handler?

    8:54 minutes in… Traffic cone in the driveway

    Runs to the front takes out an escapee down the footpath, runs back to his car to get another gun. Runs to end driveway to take out a second escapee… returns to Mosque

    The car is gone … ??? 11:48 minutes in… leaving mosque for the second time… shoots woman escapee… Note empty yard wall on left

    11:50 minutes in… Cone has been knocked over by exiting the vehicle

    11:54 minutes in… Man in red against yard wall How did he get here so quickly?

    Question… Who owns this car?

    4:34 and this frame right here… is why they do not want you to see this video Do you know this license plate? Seems to read FOH 875.

    This is why people in New Zealand can get 10 years jail for even watching it.



    thecrowhouse

    Published on Mar 24, 2019
    No further explanation Required.


    P.S. THE VIDEO HAS BEEN REMOVED BY YOUTUBE.
    Last edited by BMJ; 30th March 2019 at 02:34.
    In hoc signo vinces / In this sign thou shalt conquer

  23. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to BMJ For This Post:

    Flash (27th March 2019), Hervé (27th March 2019), KiwiElf (27th March 2019), mountain_jim (27th March 2019), Pam (28th March 2019), Rosemarie (28th March 2019), Zanshin (27th March 2019)

  24. Link to Post #133
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    21st July 2010
    Age
    38
    Posts
    715
    Thanks
    326
    Thanked 3,312 times in 617 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Flash,

    I am glad you pointed out that there was discussion about whether the sea burial was ok or not, as it shows that Muslims are not a monolith just as christians are not(can you imagine being a christian and then being judged based on the action and members of the catholic church? or someone how worse the WestBoro Baptist church?)

    For me, the burial at sea was solving the practical matter of the fact that it wasnt actually Osama Bin Laden that they killed and dumped in the ocean.

    The sea burial was a solution to that problem. You cant claim to kill the most wanted person on the planet, say you have his body, then refuse to show people it. It wouldnt have worked.

    Childrens games are supporting Wahabbi fanatics in crushing people they view as Kafir, Yemen,(if you think Wahabbi do not like non muslims, they like the wrong kind of muslim worse) because we like their oil and tactical position in the region and we like that they hate someone we happen to hate(Iran) because Iran stopped the colonization of their country. (Btw **** the government of Iran, I am not a supporter of theirs in the slightest)

  25. Link to Post #134
    Australia Avalon Member BMJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th May 2010
    Posts
    1,866
    Thanks
    47,641
    Thanked 11,349 times in 1,707 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Regarding the question of whether or not the video was in part CGI.

    Dr. Eowyn, How we know New Zealand mosque shooting video is a CGI fake

    Quote:
    (1) When shot, people don’t just fall like inert sacks of potatoes
    In an audio interview and on James Fetzer’s blog, Dr. Scott Bennett, former U.S. Army psychological operations officer and State Department counterterrorism contractor, points out that in a real shooting with real bullets, especially when civilians are shot, they would be in a state of hysterical, emotional shock. Panic-stricken, their bodies flooded with adrenalin, they would violently flail, run or crawl away. They do not simply fold up and fall to the ground like sacks of potatoes.

    (2) Shell Casings vanish into thin air
    At the 8:56 mark in the video, the gunman is outside the mosque’s front gate and begins shooting down the street. At the 9:06 mark, the gunman turns around and shoots down the street in the other direction.

    Curiously, the video shows shell casings being ejected from the semi-automatic, but the casings then disappear into thin air. No shell casings are on the ground because this footage was actually taken not on the street but before a “green screen”, which explains why we see shell casings being ejected but no casing actually falls to the ground.

    (3) Bullets hit victims leaving no marks
    He then inexplicably returns to the “crime scene” to shoot again and again at the crumpled bodies in the mosque. Strangely, the “bullets” leave no marks on the victims’ clothes or bodies. Upon impact, we see only a puff of air on the victim’s clothes, which suggests the gun was a toy gun that blasts air instead of solid projectiles.

    It is a fake gun
    Indeed, in a comment, Kevin J. Lankford, a reader of FOTM, observed that the shooter’s guns “looked like nothing I could identify,” and that the reason why the guns are painted with white symbols all over is precisely “to disguise the fact they are fake.”

    (4) Bullets fired at car windshield leave no marks
    After the gunman finally leaves the mosque, he gets back into his car. While driving away, he shoots at the car’s windshield three times. Strangely, the bullets leavet no marks on the windshield — no bullet holes, no smashed glass

    Link: https://jamesfetzer.org/2019/03/dr-e...is-a-cgi-fake/

    Warning link has images and video.
    Last edited by BMJ; 27th March 2019 at 14:21.
    In hoc signo vinces / In this sign thou shalt conquer

  26. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to BMJ For This Post:

    KiwiElf (27th March 2019), mountain_jim (27th March 2019), Pam (28th March 2019), Zanshin (27th March 2019)

  27. Link to Post #135
    Avalon Member sms's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th May 2012
    Posts
    170
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 1,077 times in 163 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    The mosque leader blames Mossad for the attack – LINK

    ?!?

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sms For This Post:

    BMJ (28th March 2019), KiwiElf (28th March 2019), mountain_jim (28th March 2019), Pam (28th March 2019)

  29. Link to Post #136
    New Zealand Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    1st September 2011
    Posts
    5,984
    Thanks
    34,888
    Thanked 38,520 times in 5,690 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Quote Posted by sms (here)
    The mosque leader blames Mossad for the attack – LINK

    ?!?
    Mossad has a long history of "nefarious activities" in NZ - I wouldn't be surprised ...

  30. Link to Post #137
    Avalon Member sms's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th May 2012
    Posts
    170
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 1,077 times in 163 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Quote Posted by KiwiElf (here)
    Quote Posted by sms (here)
    The mosque leader blames Mossad for the attack – LINK

    ?!?
    Mossad has a long history of "nefarious activities" in NZ - I wouldn't be surprised ...
    I would not be surprised, as well. It seems that the killing was real, but the associated video material was fake. At the same time, the NZ pathocracy was trying to block circulation of any footages of the event, made by other people, which may jeopardize the integrity of the official story.

  31. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sms For This Post:

    BMJ (28th March 2019), KiwiElf (28th March 2019), mountain_jim (28th March 2019), Pam (28th March 2019)

  32. Link to Post #138
    Australia Avalon Member BMJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th May 2010
    Posts
    1,866
    Thanks
    47,641
    Thanked 11,349 times in 1,707 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    From SerialBrain2.

    Trump Taking Down the Cabal and Securing our Children: It’s Happening.

    Quote:
    "By the way, you caught the NZ false flag was a cover to exchange intel in plain sight about Q through the manifesto right? The whole manifesto is coded. Everything you need to know about this false flag is in the Q board. Everything."

    Link: https://www.reddit.com/user/SerialBr..._securing_our/
    In hoc signo vinces / In this sign thou shalt conquer

  33. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to BMJ For This Post:

    KiwiElf (28th March 2019), mountain_jim (28th March 2019), Pam (28th March 2019), Valerie Villars (28th March 2019)

  34. Link to Post #139
    New Zealand Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    1st September 2011
    Posts
    5,984
    Thanks
    34,888
    Thanked 38,520 times in 5,690 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Quote Posted by sms (here)
    Quote Posted by KiwiElf (here)
    Quote Posted by sms (here)
    The mosque leader blames Mossad for the attack – LINK

    ?!?
    Mossad has a long history of "nefarious activities" in NZ - I wouldn't be surprised ...
    I would not be surprised, as well. It seems that the killing was real, but the associated video material was fake. At the same time, the NZ pathocracy was trying to block circulation of any footages of the event, made by other people, which may jeopardize the integrity of the official story.
    "You are over the target"

  35. Link to Post #140
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

    Let's think this through logically, because to date, I have not seen anyone attempt this.

    The event was either:

    1. Authentic
    2. Authentic + fake/manipulated video
    3. Hoax/staged
    4. False flag


    1. Authentic

    If the event was authentic why are there so many problems with the 'live video' that was supposedly released by Tarrant?
    Disappearing bullet casings, bullets striking victims with no visible effects on them etc..

    2. Authentic + fake/manipulated video

    What would the reason be for introducing a fake video for an authentic mass murder event?

    3. Hoax/staged

    If the event was a hoax, why jeopardize it by releasing a 'live stream' video? Just announce murders like Sandy Hook and be done with it!

    4. False flag

    If someone other than Tarrant actually murdered all the named victims, why was Tarrant brought into the picture and what was the purpose again of releasing a video of the event?

  36. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    BMJ (28th March 2019), Hervé (28th March 2019), mountain_jim (28th March 2019), Pam (28th March 2019), Valerie Villars (28th March 2019)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst 1 7 9 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts