Posted by Wade Frazier
(here)
More choir Q&A.
Q: Could you write more on the limits of today's science?
A: OK. I have done plenty of writing on the
limits of mainstream science and
orthodoxy in general. The biggest limitations that I see in mainstream science and orthodoxy are the
materialistic assumptions of scientists (Hawking and
Sagan are great examples of that), the political-economic naïveté of scientists, as
Fuller noted, and the limits of scientific inquiry when it comes up against the barriers erected by political-economic interests, and especially the
cartels that run the world economy. The science of energy, for instance, is still largely stuck in the 19th century, as is
economic theory. In fact, the same
man is
partly responsible for the arrested development of those disciplines, although the
game today is played at far higher levels than back then. The
greatest physicists were keenly aware of the limits of science, and they can be likened to the prophets of religions, and their enlightened messages were
corrupted by the priest class, which was solely concerned with wealth, power, and social control. When scientists such as
Brian O had their mystical awakenings, their days as mainstream scientists were usually numbered. The enemy is always dogma, whether it is on the mystical or scientific end of the game. I
first heard that from Seth, who was one of my earliest mystical mentors, and my experiences since then only reinforced that notion.
When people submit to dogma of any kind, they abdicate their sentience, and as I have written, my fellow American are subjected to
several dogmatic faiths, they are
fed them almost from the cradle, and almost ever nobody mustered the integrity to break out and think for themselves. That sentience-deficit is the bane of humanity and might
lead to our demise by our own hand. If that comes to pass, the question of whether humanity was really a sentient species will be open for debate, if there is anybody left to debate it (maybe other ET species or other planes of existence, but it will be "game over" on Earth).
Of course, I am doing what I can to prevent those events from happening, and better still, something that
looks like heaven on Earth is easily attained if a
tiny fraction of humanity mustered just a little integrity and sentience. And if that tiny fraction cannot be mustered by me or somebody else, then I think that the sentience question will likely be answered in the negative. Our epitaph might read: "Humanity had the potential for sentience, but did not quite reach it."
I am seeking a different outcome, and we will see how it goes.
Best,
Wade