The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "The Shots", it's the Totalitarian Tiptoe

[Delight]

TRUTH WARS

Zantac Pulled Over Cancer Fears; BBC’s Flimsy Vaccine Debate; The Tragic Saga of the Stephan Family

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VQ12IXVK-Lw

This episode reviews the recent BBC "Conspiracy Files" show about vaccine controversies. This was mentioned in the program....

[Delight]

HORRIFIC, Terrifying!

HPV vaccines tested on 4-6 year-olds
October 3, 2019

I have often feared that in the end babies and young children would be given the dangerous and increasingly unpopular HPV vaccines.

I suspect that time is fast approaching.

GlaxoSmithLine (GSK) the manufacturer of Cervarix has recently conducted a trial of its two valent HPV vaccine on healthy 4-6 year old female children in Latin America.
The study involving girls from Colombia, Panama and Mexico was published in the current edition of the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal.

Here is the stated rationale for injecting such young children with HPV vaccines:

The burden of human papillomavirus (HPV) diseases is high in Latin America. HPV vaccines licensed from 2006 onwards offer protection against most HPV-related cancers, especially when introduced into national immunization programs.

Barriers to optimal vaccine uptake are, however, lowering the impact of adolescent HPV vaccination programs. Immunization of children might overcome these barriers and be a strategy of choice for some countries.

Where have I heard this rationale before? Oh yes, I remember. The same excuse was used for the introduction of the hepatitis B vaccine for babies and young children.

According to the National Vaccine Information Center

The primary reason that the CDC recommended hepatitis B vaccination for all newborns in the United States in 1991 is because public health officials and doctors could not persuade adults in high risk groups (primarily IV drug users and persons with multiple sexual partners) to get the vaccine.

Rates of HPV vaccination
Similarly the rates of the uptake of HPV vaccines are not as good as the manufacturers of Cervarix and Gardasil would want with the US experiencing low rates as reported by ScienceDaily

Only about 16 percent of U.S. adolescents have been fully vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) by the time they turn 13, despite national recommendations that call for vaccination at 11 to 12 years of age.

And in Japan coverage rates for the HPV vaccine have plummeted from 70 percent in 2013 to less than 1 percent today. They are also lower than desired in Ireland where health authorities have expressed alarm at the falling rates of vaccination estimated as a 50% uptake for the first dose in 2016–17.

Expansion of the customer base
On October 5 2018 the FDA approved Gardasil 9 for use in women and men aged 27 through 45 years. The fact is there is a declining US market for Gardasil. Increasingly people are learning about the real adverse effects and long term injury resulting from this vaccine program. According to Vaers, the Vaccine adverse event recording system there have been 510 reported deaths following HPV vaccines and over 62,000 reported adverse events. But expansion of the HPV vaccination program seems on the cards again as witnessed by the recent study done on very young girls.

There were 148 girls in the study. 74 received 2 doses of Cervarix vaccine at Day 0 and Month 6. The control group were given 1 dose of Priorix vaccine at Day 0 and 1 dose of Infanrix vaccine at Month 6.

There was no inert placebo. The control group were given Priorix (MMR) and Infanrix (DTPa). It is common for vaccine manufacturers not to use saline placebos in their safety and efficacy studies. By comparing one vaccine to another vaccine and in this case with Infanrix which contains 500 mcgs of aluminium, chances are the vaccine being trialed does not look as bad as it really is. On the other hand if a normal saline placebo was used then we would really see a much higher rate of adverse events in the vaccine than in the control group. But then this is the way the manufacturers have set it up. It is corrupt.

There are no laws governing the contents of placebos.

The World Health Organization states that using a vaccine (rather than an inert substance) as a placebo creates a “methodological disadvantage” and also notes that it may be “difficult or impossible” to assess vaccine safety properly without a true placebo.

And yet this is how they conduct vaccine trials. They do not use true placebos and in the original Gardasil trials the participants in the control arm were given the aluminium adjuvent (amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulphate) that is used in the vaccine.

As it turned out more than half of the very young girls in the Cervarix group got a medically significant condition not related to common ailments. That is 38 out of 74 girls.
MSCs include AEs prompting emergency room or physician visits that are not related to common diseases or routine visits for physical examination or vaccination, or serious adverse events (SAEs) that are not related to common diseases.

See: ClinicalTrial

[Cara]

This also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1316856

~~~


Plans and implementation underway to develop a digital, biometric ID in tandem with vaccination programmes.

ID2020 and partners launch program to provide digital ID with vaccines
Sep 20, 2019 | Chris Burt



The ID2020 Alliance has launched a new digital identity program at its annual summit in New York, in collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh, vaccine alliance Gavi, and new partners in government, academia, and humanitarian relief.

The program to leverage immunization as an opportunity to establish digital identity was unveiled by ID2020 in partnership with the Bangladesh Government’s Access to Information (a2i) Program, the Directorate General of Health Services, and Gavi, according to the announcement.

“We are implementing a forward-looking approach to digital identity that gives individuals control over their own personal information, while still building off existing systems and programs,” says Anir Chowdhury, policy advisor at a2i. “The Government of Bangladesh recognizes that the design of digital identity systems carries far-reaching implications for individuals’ access to services and livelihoods, and we are eager to pioneer this approach.”

Gavi CEO Seth Berkley says that 89 percent of children and adolescents who do not have identification live in countries where the organization is active. “We are enthusiastic about the potential impact of this program not just in Bangladesh, but as something we can replicate across Gavi-eligible countries, providing a viable route to closing the identity gap,” he says.

A partnership was also formed earlier this year between Gavi, NEC, and Simprints to use biometrics to improve vaccine coverage in developing nations.

“Digital ID is being defined and implemented today, and we recognize the importance of swift action to close the identity gap,” comments ID2020 Executive Director Dakota Gruener. “Now is the time for bold commitments to ensure that we respond both quickly and responsibly. We and our ID2020 Alliance partners, both present and future, are committed to rising to this challenge.”

ID2020 also announced new partnerships and provided progress reports on initiatives launched last year. Since last year’s summit, the ID2020 Alliance has been joined by the City of Austin, UC Berkeley’s CITRIS Policy Lab and Care USA.

The City of Austin, ID2020, and several other partners are working together with homeless people and the service providers who engage with them to develop a blockchain-enabled digital identity platform called MyPass to empower homeless people with their own identity data.

A pair of inaugural pilot programs launched last year in partnership with iRespond and Everest have each made progress, ID2020 says. The iRespond program has improved continuity of care for more than 3,000 refugees receiving treatment for chronic conditions from the International Rescue Committee in Thailand, according to the announcement, while Everest has assisted with the provision of access to critical energy subsidies and a range of additional services with secure and user-centric digital identities without relying on a smartphone.

From: https://www.biometricupdate.com/2019...-with-vaccines

[Delight]

I saw this is from Israel.

OPINION: Vaccine debate is not about the good many and selfish few
By JEMMA WAYNE
October 3, 2019,

After the Health Secretary said he is 'looking very seriously' at making vaccinations compulsory, Jemma Wayne says people should not allow whipped up fear to cloud the facts

Health Secretary Matt Hancock said this week that he is “looking very seriously” at making vaccinations compulsory for all UK school pupils. In the furore of measles ‘outbreaks’, it is a common cry, and in both Israel and the Diaspora, Jewish communities have come under fire for blame. While Facebook, Amazon and the like have begun censoring ‘antivax’ content, religious motivations to decline vaccination have been treated as backward and dangerous, and across all media, anybody wary of immunisation is treated now as a pariah, or a loon.

But it is all a distraction, because questioning vaccine safety is not even the point. With so much blame, we barely seem to have noticed that compelling parents to inject any foreign substances (safe or otherwise) into their healthy child, is a fundamental challenge not only to religious freedom, but to the most intimate principles of liberty and consent.

Yet it is necessary to at least touch on those issues of safety, because while anybody questioning it is now labelled as a peddler of misinformation (or a religious nutter), we have seen countless cases of medical authorities getting their ‘facts’ wrong.

As just one example, a recent BBC story detailed the terrible dangers of the acne drug Roaccutane, a medicine that has been widely prescribed on the NHS for decades. Was this sole drug prescribed with a unique carelessness? Need we mention Thalidomide? I ask this not to mistrust the good intentions of good doctors, only to illustrate that they are not gods. Sometimes, their information is flawed. And over four billion dollars of US government money distributed in vaccine injury compensation would suggest that this is true even when it comes to vaccines.

Vaccine damage payment exists in the UK too. And the briefest glance at many vaccine inserts will show everything from seizures to SIDS listed as possible side effects. This is not to imply that such outcomes are common, or that vaccines are uniformly dangerous, or without benefit.

In developing countries especially, they have been vital in the fight against deadly disease. It is also important to note that even when a vaccine contains potentially harmful ingredients, while some children will be predisposed to react badly, many will be OK. But we are lead to believe there is no risk, that the science is settled. This is simply not the case.

So should vaccines be mandatory? Both the UK and Israel have seen a rise in measles cases, and the understandable goal of authorities is to increase vaccination rates to achieve ‘herd immunity’. In the name of that, the issue has been effectively framed as a battle between the selfish few, and the good many.

In some places, unvaccinated children have already been excluded from public spaces, as was felt by Chasidic communities in New York. They have been denied access to education, and now their parents are on the cusp of being compelled to act against their beliefs.

Again, compulsion is the point. But we should perhaps point out here another red herring. That is, that a genuine attempt at herd immunity would not stop at children. It would require the (assumedly mandatory) immunisation of all adults too. A detail often forgotten in the infamous case of the Israeli flight attendant who died from measles, is that she had had her childhood vaccinations.

But a new study has suggested that unlike the lifelong immunity gained from wild measles, vaccine acquired immunity decreases so much with age that we would all need frequent boosters for there to be even a chance of lasting protection. So the ‘facts’ about unvaccinated children being the ones to put society at risk, are less fact and more faith.

It may be beneficial to pause for just a moment to ask when else we have targeted people on such a basis of faith? When else we have excluded them, or censored their ideas, or forced them to submit their bodies.

Never again, and all that.

Yet we are told that now, this time, it is necessary to protect the herd from the dangerous few. So long as we identify ourselves within ‘the herd’, there is an instinctual appeal to this. Because what we are really saying is that we don’t care if some children are left with allergies, or arthritis, or brain damage, or dead, so long as most children, our children, are protected. The many are simply more important than the few. This is what Matt Hancock means, one supposes, when he speaks of ‘responsibility’.

Unpicked in this way, it is an uncomfortable line of argument, but it is philosophically defensible.

Of course, even back in 1962, the year before the first UK measles vaccine was introduced, only 0.00007% of the population died from measles. You were, and are, far more likely to be killed by alcohol, or, if you live in the US, by a kid with a gun. But alcohol remains legal, and we all know about US gun control. We have not, in any of these cases, placed the good of the whole above the freedom of the individual.

So that clever philosophical argument about the self versus society, turns out, after all, not to hold up.

Why then, are we so willing to throw away not only our religious freedoms, but our personal right to choose?

Some might argue that by demanding the right to decline vaccination, we are removing the equal right of others to be protected from disease. To those who are happy to vaccinate, we must ask don’t your own vaccinations protect you? To those immuno-compromised or too young who wish to, but cannot, vaccinate, we must ask are your children’s lives more important than those predisposed to lethal vaccine reaction? Even if, somehow, the answer is yes, this is not like asking somebody not to smoke near you.

What we are asking is for healthy individuals to alter the natural state of their human body in an irreversible and potentially harmful way. Do we really want that to be mandatory?

Needless to say, there are mountains of scientific evidence that question not only vaccine safety, but also the very concept of vaccine acquired herd immunity, and even suggest that those carrying a live, shedding virus, via vaccination, can themselves be a danger.

Regarding measles, questions have also been posed about how the vaccine itself has shifted the goalposts. Pre-vaccine, we had achieved an almost symbiotic relationship with the disease whereby those under one were largely protected by their mother’s naturally acquired immunity, and most people caught the disease in childhood, the safest time. While there was a high incidence of measles, there was an increasingly low incidence of mortality. It is only now that we have eroded natural immunity, and through the vaccine shifted it out of childhood, that we are seeing it again in babies and adults, when it is far more dangerous.

There needs to be some frank discussion about this, about all vaccine science, because more transparency and safer vaccines would be far the best way to increase uptake. There needs too to be a removal of the astounding US liability exemption afforded to vaccine manufacturers.

And some scrutiny of political funding. But see, we are distracted again, because for now, this is not even the point. The point is choice. Religious and personal. The point is ownership of the most fundamental thing that any of us possess – our bodies.

So let us not allow whipped up fear to cloud this. Let us not stay silent as that bandwagon rolls by. Because we all know what it is, and we all know how it ends.

First they came for the socialists…

[Hervé]

Jim Stone's Italian findings revisited:

Remember early this year when I mentioned Italy analyzed vaccines and found they were fraudulent? It's worse than I stated

Today Infowars posted that when the Italians discovered the MMR shot was completely fraudulent, they did gene sequencing and found the entire male human genome (with modifications) in the vaccine.

That's HUGE folks.

Here is what this means (more completely than you'll find elsewhere) It means that if the kid the genes were taken from was autistic, that the vaccines would pass on the autism to the recipients at very high rates. It also means that anyone who received it would have an immune response where the immune system attacked the body on top of it all.

If you want a full explanation of how "vaccines cause autism" HERE YOU HAVE IT, they most likely found an autistic child and as an act of war, used that kid's genes to wreck everyone via the shots.

YOU KNOW. GENE THERAPY. EVER HEARD OF THAT? EVERY DAMN MMR SHOT IS EXACTLY THAT, AND THE INTENDED OUTCOME WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE GOOD. THIS IS IN PART WHY AUTISM HAS EXPLODED, NO QUESTIONS ASKED.

They are CLEARLY and WITHOUT QUESTION making vaccines mandatory because they are not vaccines, they are "gene therapy shots" that are giving us all a downgrade. That way a far less capable group that claims neanderthal Khazar roots can once again be on top! Their damn failed moon lander PROVES IT, even the CHICOMS out did them!

Don't worry, after the despised white male is done away with via "vaccination" they can claim to be the highest intelligence on earth, -er, - after they do the same to China.

I have said repeatedly the vaccines were not vaccines at all, which is why they are for diseases that have always been regarded as harmless - if they are for diseases that don't have a history of killing people they can be totally fraudulent and it won't matter because the disease does not need to be treated anyway. Instead, the shots are now clearly for the sole purpose of changing the child,

Folks, if you can sequence the entire human genome from these vaccines, there's more than something "amiss", this is intentional, it is not contamination, it is not a "bad batch" or whatever hoo ha kikedom states, there's a DAMN GOOD REASON why the Jews just said no to this vaccine in New York, we have our answer:

If you can sequence the entire male human genome from ANY vaccine, it's purpose is modification of an individual's potential, NOT DISEASE PREVENTION.

If you can sequence the entire human genome from a vaccine, IT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT. IT IS NOT A TAINTED BATCH. IT IS INTENTIONAL, folks we just got irrefutable proof of the fact that the vaccines are for the sole purpose of modifying the recipient, and VERY EVIL PEOPLE DECIDED WHAT THOSE MODIFICATIONS WERE TO BE AND IT SHOWS IN THE APOCALYPTIC RATES OF TOTALLY F***ED UP KIDS.

We have been maimed beyond belief. But IDIOT PARENTS just got a new Google Pixel and are surfing snapchat, while 7 year old bobby spins in the background blowing spit balls. THEY KNOW the vaccines did not do it, because Google said anyone who thinks the vaccines wrecked Bobby is an anti-science conspiracy nut!

[Delight]

Another important article!!!

Beware of Medicine Marching in Lockstep With Government, Personal Reflections From a Holocaust Survivor
VERA SHARAV | Monday, September 30, 2019

The following are my personal reflections about the profound threat posed by government-dictated mandatory childhood vaccination schedules. I submit these comments at the invitation of the President of the Network Impfentscheid Deutschland (Network for Vaccine Choice Germany) for their Protest Against Forced Vaccination in Berlin, Sept. 14, 2019.

Video Presentation German Translation

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fVoTt7x-l98

Beware of Medicine Marching in Lockstep with Government

As a child survivor of the Holocaust I learned indelible lessons about the nature of evil. I was 31/2 years old when my family was uprooted & chased out of our home in Romania. We were herded into a concentration camp, where my father died. My experience as a child has sensitized me to the threat posed by government dictates that sever parents’ right to protect their children. Not only is protecting one’s child a parental human right; it is a primal instinct.

My perspective is informed by those painful personal memories, by the historical record, and the magnitude of the evidence in human terms. For me, it is always about the plight of children. I relate to the trauma that children suffer when they are forcibly separated from their parents, because I was once, such a child myself.

The very first medical victims of the Holocaust were children. They were German children who were disabled, mentally or physically. Medical doctors declared these children “unfit” for life.
These children were taken away from their families and placed in medical institutions. The parents were told that the children would receive “special treatment”. The parents were deceived.

Doctors in white coats selected the children for gruesome experiments such as calibrated starvation and murder by lethal injection or Zyklon B — the poison gas that was later used in the gas chambers.
The children’s parents were given fake death certificates signed by medical doctors, stating that the children died of natural causes.
What makes the Holocaust unique is that at every step of the murderous process medical doctors & medical institutions endorsed and lent the veneer of legitimacy to mass murder of millions of civilians.

Doctors in white coats selected who was assigned for slave labor, who was assigned for medical experiments, and who was murdered immediately.
The stark lesson to be learned is that medicine can be weaponized when doctors join forces with government & deviate from their personal and professional ethical commitment under the Hippocratic Oath – “First, do no harm”.

The judges in the Doctors’ Trial at Nuremberg set forth the foundational legal code of medical ethics, the Nuremberg Code (1947). The first principle is unequivocal: “the voluntary, informed consent of the human subject is absolutely essential”.

By the mid-1950s, the pharmaceutical industry was a global business whose singular objective was profits without regard for the harm caused by a defective drug or vaccine. A prime example of this culture of greed is the irresponsible, criminal marketing of the drug, Thalidomide to pregnant women. The scale of catastrophic harm caused by the manufacturer of that drug, Chemie Grünenthal, was staggering: 100,000 babies were either born dead or severely deformed. The survivors were condemned to lifelong suffering. For almost 50 years the company denied its culpability; protected by the German government, it refused to compensate the victims.

Thalidomide encapsulates the immoral, ruthless culture that continues to define the pharmaceutical industry whose marketing tactics have been compared to Organized Crime syndicates[1] which have perverted the ethos of medicine. Indeed, the American public now ranks Big Pharma lowest of all industries.[2]
So why is the pharmaceutical industry so powerful?
The answer is collusion by the medical establishment, by government, and Big Pharma. This unholy alliance works in tandem to promote widespread uptake of new drugs and vaccines – disregarding the harm caused in pursuit of profits. When signs of serious risks of harm are detected, this triad follows the Grünenthal strategy of denial and cover-up of evidence.[3] The journal Science reported that in April 2017, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control removed public access to vaccine injury data.[4] Furthermore, parents are not told the facts about the short span of time that most vaccines are effective at all.[5]

The integrity of medicine and public health policy has been undermined so that you cannot trust official assurances that government-licensed pharmaceutical products are “safe and effective”.
Examples abound:

The OxyContin opioid crisis is the result of collusion between Purdue, Johnson & Johnson (the leading supplier of raw opioids),[6] physicians, and government.[7] The estimated death toll in the U.S. from is 50,000[8] each year.
Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Talcum Powder is linked to ovarian cancer and its psychiatric drug, Risperdal causes diabetes.
Merck’s aggressive marketing of Vioxx, garnered $2.55 billion in sales; it killed an estimated 38,000 people. Merck’s aggressive marketing of the HPV vaccine, Gardasil garnered $3 billion annually in the U.S; the vaccine is linked to long-lasting debilitating pain.[9] Thanks to the measles outbreak this year, sales of Merck’s MMR vaccine increased 58%.[10] These vaccines are Merck’s 3d and 4th largest sellers.
GlaxoSmithKline’s Pandemrix, the Swine flu vaccine caused 1,300 cases of severe narcolepsy (sleeping sickness);[11] Infanrix hexa (7-viruses in one) vaccine is linked to sudden infant deaths;[12] and Cervarix, GSK’s HPV Vaccine causes disabling fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia pain.[13]
Sanofi’s vaccine, Dengvaxia is shown to pose a high risk of lethal dengue for children.[14]
Companies that manufacture government-mandated childhood vaccines are shielded from lawsuits by the U.S. and UK governments.
I shudder that once again the medical establishment has aligned itself with government casting aside bedrock ethical standards, and endorsing coercive medical policies to override parental objections.

Doctors have become state enforcers of mandatory childhood vaccination schedules violating the un-equivocal human right to voluntary informed consent to medical interventions. Schools are also complicit state agents enforcing government requirements. This is a chilling throwback to the STASI reign in East Germany.
Vaccines are legally recognized in the U.S as “unavoidably unsafe” – that is why the U.S. Vaccine Injury Act was passed in 1986, and why legal exemptions for medical, religious, and moral /philosophical beliefs, were provided by state governments. Public health officials argue that there is no “statistically significant” evidence of harm, disregarding the evidence of risk posed for some children.
A child’s only defense against exposure to serious risks of harm from admittedly unavoidably unsafe vaccines is parents who are willing to go to battle.
Unvaccinated or partially vaccinated children – who have no communicable disease – pose no risk to others, including to children who are immune compromised.
Measles, mumps, whooping cough (pertussis), rubella, and the flu occur in both vaccinated and unvaccinated children – because the vaccines are neither not as effective nor as safe as is claimed. Measles does not in fact pose a serious threat to public health, and neither do unvaccinated children. As has been carefully documented by Meryl Nass, MD:[15]
“There is no evidence that in recent years unvaccinated US children have caused a single death from measles, mumps and rubella. Yet how many column inches, how many hours of TV news have been devoted to scaring the American public about the dire threat of measles? Fear of measles has been the major driver of the campaigns to eliminate vaccine exemptions.”

But these vaccines pose serious risks of harm for some children as is documented in government database.
“During the past 30 years, approximately 89,000 adverse reactions, including about 450 deaths, have been reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for measles vaccines.”15

The current measles hysteria is fomented by a continuous stream of fear-mongering propaganda, resorting to the Goebbels opinion molding method for controlling the message to a single dogma by censoring contrary information. The (no longer honest) media has obliged by transmitting fictitious scenarios of dire public health consequences from unvaccinated children.[16] The media fails to report the findings of scientific reports that raise serious safety concerns, nor has the media reported about mass protests.
Unvaccinated children are being stigmatized, shunned, and banned from schools and public places as if they were lepers. Their parents are disparaged and treated like criminals; they are threatened with loss of parental custody.
In February 2019, a SWAT team in Arizona broke down the door to a home in the middle of the night with guns drawn. They arrested the parents and abducted three unvaccinated young children.
The plight of thousands of real children, who have suffered irreversible neurological harm following the administration of multiple vaccinations simultaneously, is willfully ignored by the medical establishment – as if vaccine-injured children are somehow irrelevant – mere “collateral damage”.
Physicians in clinical practice are under extreme pressure to disregard parents’ legitimate safety concerns and objections. Many doctors, who are opposed to the “one-size-fits-all” government-dictated vaccination schedule, are intimidated. Doctors who sign exemption certificates are at risk of losing their medical license – even as the number of children who suffer serious harm following vaccination increases.
Scientists in academia who raise questions about the evidence of vaccine safety are disparaged and attacked as “quacks”; their research studies are dismissed as “pseudoscience”, and they risk losing their faculty position.
California eliminated the right to vaccination exemptions for personal belief of conscience and religion in 2015, leaving only a medical exemption. During the past four years, conscientious physicians have been under intense intimidation. Ron Kennedy, MD, a practicing clinician for close to 50-years, filed a lawsuit charging that the California Medical Board, in its zeal to identify physicians who wrote medical exemptions for vaccines, has gone from school to school demanding children’s medical records, without any permission from the parents.[17]This is a gross violation of medical privacy; a major step on the “slippery slope”.
2019 is the year in which the line in the sand has been drawn. We either preserve medical free choice, or the pharmaceutical-state coalition succeeds in enforcing its agenda backed by state police.
California passed SB276, a bill that strips medical doctors of their professional authority to make medical decisions based on their clinical judgement for children in their care; children who require a medical exemption from vaccines to protect them from risks of serious harm. This legislation empowers the Department of Public Health to dictate medical exemption standards that doctors must follow.
This draconian law forces doctors to vaccinate a child who they have reason to believe will be seriously harmed. Doctors who comply with the state law will be violating their moral and professional Oath to “do no harm”. To ensure compliance, California Public health officials will be authorized to review doctors’ exemptions if they have issued more than five in a year – without regard for children’s fragility, or how many children they treat.[18]
Medical doctors practicing in California will be subjected to monitoring by state officials, much like prisoners on parole.
New York State Public Health Law (1973) gave licensed medical physicians the authority to determine and to certify what vaccine may be harmful to a child:

“If any physician licensed to practice medicine in this state certifies that such immunization may be detrimental to a child’s health, the requirements of this section shall be inapplicable until such immunization is found no longer to be detrimental to the child’s health.”[19]

This summer, NYS effectively took away both religious and medical exemptions, sweeping aside the legitimate1973 Public Health Law.

On June 13, 2019, the legal status of religious exemptions in NY was eliminated without a single public hearing or public debate.
On August 16th, the Department of Health issued “emergency regulations”[20] effective immediately; the regulations made NYS law “consistent with national immunization recommendations and guidelines.”[21]
The new federal guidelines, as of August 20, 2019,[22] remove almost ALL discretion from both physicians and parents alike.
The only medical exemption recognized by these new federal guidelines is for a vaccine that had caused a child anaphylaxis – near death – following an earlier dose of the same vaccine.These radical NYS legislative actions exclude 26,000 unvaccinated developmentally disabled children and healthy, unvaccinated children – under 2 months of age to 18 years – from all public and private nurseries and schools.
These radical NYS legislative actions exclude 26,000 unvaccinated developmentally disabled children and healthy, unvaccinated children – under 2 months of age to 18 years – from all public and private nurseries and schools. The discriminatory exclusion of unvaccinated children by the NYS legislative and enforcement process effectively targets mostly children with disabilities and Orthodox Jewish children whose legal rights to education have been eliminated.

The situation is eerily reminiscent of the infamous 1935 Nuremberg racial Laws that eliminated the rights of citizenship from Jews.
According to the CDC, the percentage of children who are unvaccinated has quadrupled since 2001, even though the overall number of vaccinated children remains high. More than 100,000 American infants and toddlers are unvaccinated; millions more received only some vaccines.[23]

Clearly, these unvaccinated and partially vaccinated children pose no risk to others; as there have been no serious life-threatening outbreaks from any of the childhood infectious diseases. What the vaccine lobby isn’t telling you are evidence-based facts such as the findings of the Mayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group headed by Dr. Gregory Poland, Chair of Merck’s Safety Evaluation Committee, and a consultant to the major vaccine manufacturers:

The Mayo Clinic findings confirm that the one-size-fits-all government-dictated vaccination schedule is contrary to children’s best interest. Human antibody response to measles vaccine is highly variable. Gender, race, and heredity influence response to vaccines, and girls have greater adverse reactions than boys.[24]
The problem of vaccine failure: Measles outbreaks result from both failure to vaccinate and vaccine failure.[25]
Vaccine effectiveness failure is responsible for mumps and whooping cough outbreaks; more than 80% of whooping cough cases are in fully vaccinated children.
Vaccines containing live viruses, such as the MMR, Varicella, and oral polio can infect, harm and very rarely kill, especially if the child has an unknown immune deficiency.
The much publicized Disneyland measles outbreak occurred in recently vaccinated children; in 73 of those cases, the vaccine strain of measles was identified,[26] not wild measles.
Pharmaceutical companies are colluding with governments to expand on their legislative victories in the U.S.

They are using the media, the political party leadership, and professional organizations that have benefitted from industry largesse,[27] to gain support for vaccination mandates. Parents, who resist, are those who have informed themselves about the evidence of harm and the reality of “unavoidably unsafe” vaccines. Some parents have witnessed the tragedy that befell a neighbor’s child following vaccination with multiple-vaccines in one session.

We are at this moment at a crossroad in history:
Governments that have lost public trust are initiating measures to take our freedom of choice away while silencing us. Continue here

[Hervé]

Here is the fleshing out of Jim Stone's summary:

MEDICAL HORROR: Genetic sequencing of common vaccine finds entire male human genome from aborted human baby… “a complete individual genome” with abnormal, modified genes… 560 genes linked to cancer

by: Mike Adams
Friday, October 04, 2019

(Natural News) Vaccines are routinely formulated with aborted human fetal cells known as MRC-5 and WI-38. The CDC openly lists some of the vaccines that use these “human diploid” cells, including Twinrix (Hep A / Hep B), ProQuad (MMRV) and Varivax (Varicella / chicken pox). FDA-published vaccine insert sheets such as this one for Varivax also openly admit to the use of aborted human fetal cell lines such as MRC-5:

The product also contains residual components of MRC-5 cells including DNA and protein and trace quantities of neomycin and bovine calf serum from MRC-5 culture media.

Even this GlaxoSmithKline vaccine insert sheet openly discusses the use of aborted human fetal cells in its Priorix-Tetra vaccine (MMRV):

Each virus strain is separately produced in either chick embryo cells (mumps and measles) or MRC5 human diploid cells (rubella and varicella).

Yet, amazingly, almost no member of the public is aware that aborted human fetal cells are routinely used in vaccines. The lying fake news media insists such talk is a “conspiracy theory,” even as the CDC, FDA and vaccine manufacturers openly declare the ingredient is being used in numerous vaccines. (See Vaccines.news for daily coverage of breaking news on vaccines.)

Now, a laboratory in Italy has carried out a complete genome sequencing of this MRC-5 cell line that’s deliberately inserted into multiple vaccines. What they’ve found in beyond shocking… it’s horrifying.

As explained by Children’s Health Defense:

The Corvelva team summarized their findings as follows:

1- The fetal cell line was found to belong to a male fetus.

2- The cell line presents itself in such a way that it is likely to be very old, thus consistent with the declared line of the 1960s.

3- The fetal human DNA represented in this vaccine is a complete individual genome, that is, the genomic DNA of all the chromosomes of an individual is present in the vaccine.

4- The human genomic DNA contained in this vaccine is clearly, undoubtedly abnormal, presenting important inconsistencies with a typical human genome, that is, with that of a healthy individual.

5- 560 genes known to be associated with forms of cancer were tested and all underwent major modifications.

6- There are variations whose consequences are not even known, not yet appearing in the literature, but which still affect genes involved in the induction of human cancer.

7- What is also clearly abnormal is the genome excess showing changes in the number of copies and structural variants.

560 cancer genes, abnormal DNA, genetic “modification” of potentially hazardous genes, yet mandated to be injected into every child

What’s clear from this genetic sequencing is that the vaccine industry is inoculating children with engineered cancer. As CHD explains, the vaccines are deliberately formulated with cancer-causing genes which have been specifically modified to promote cancer tumors:

[I[nside the vaccines that have been administered for decades is the presence of a progressively more genetically modified DNA and uncontrolled quantities has been allowed…

…[T]he DNA contained in these vaccines is potentially TUMORIGENIC and that the guidelines to which the supervisory bodies are appealing are NOT ADEQUATE. Moreover, we are publicly denouncing a SERIOUS OMISSION in taking those PRECAUTIONAL measures which, on the other hand, are urgently requested for antacid drugs.

Not only is this cancer-ridden genetic code inserted into all these vaccines given to children, but the dose of the cancer-infected DNA is dangerously high. As CHD explains:

…[T]he contaminant fetal DNA present in all samples analyzed in varying quantities (thus uncontrolled) is up to 300 times higher than the limit imposed by the EMA for carcinogenic DNA (10 ng/dose, corresponding to DNA contained in approximately 1000 tumor cells, derived from a statistical calculation, while the precautionary limit is 10 pg/dose), a limit that must also be applied to MRC-5 fetal DNA which inevitably contaminates Priorix tetra.

“Modifications” of genes associated with cancer tumors
The genome sequencing also found that hundreds of genes linked to cancer tumors have been modified. As explained by the study authors:

[I]…mportant modifications of genes known to be associated with various tumor forms have been identified, for all the 560 verified genes; furthermore, there are variants whose consequences are not known, but which, however, affects genes involved in the induction of human cancer.

This indicates that the MRC-5 aborted human fetal cells appear to have been deliberately modified to make them more tumorigenic… i.e. more likely to cause cancer tumors in human recipients of the vaccine injections.

This would, of course, ensure long-term revenues from the cancer drugs that are also manufactured and sold by the same pharmaceutical giants that manufacture and market vaccines. Repeat business, after all, is a very lucrative business model, and if you can lace vaccines with the genetic blueprints for long-term cancer, you can make sure that a very high percentage of today’s children are eventually diagnosed with cancer, after which they become lucrative customers for Big Pharma’s cancer drugs.

The genome sequencing of the MRC-5 “human diploid” cells used in vaccines is even described by researchers as, “anomalous” when compared to a healthy human being.

From the study’s conclusion:

The human genomic DNA contained in the Priorix lot vaccine. n. A71CB256A is evidently anomalous, presenting important inconsistencies if compared to a typical human genome, i.e. the one of a healthy human being. There are several unknown variants (not noted in public databases) and some of them are located in genes involved in cancer. What is also apparently anomalous, is the excess of genome that shows changes in the number of copies (CNV) and structural variants (SV), such as translocations, insertions, deletions, duplications and inversions, many of which involve genes.

This conclusion appears to confirm that MRC-5 cell lines used in vaccines have been genetically modified to make them more likely to cause cancer in vaccine recipients. Subsequently, vaccine mandates are actually forcing children to be injected with cancer genes so that they become future customers of Big Pharma’s for-profit cancer treatment “solutions” which are incredibly toxic to human health.

Human children, in other words, are being injected with the genetically modified DNA of another aborted human child in order to cause cancer on a nationwide scale, all to benefit the bottom line of the pharmaceutical industry that pushes total censorship about any criticism of vaccines or vaccine ingredients.

“Defective” vaccines that are “potentially dangerous to human health”
The upshot is that these vaccines which are deliberately contaminated with abnormal, cancer-infested human genes are “defective,” according to an analysis by CHD:

As a consequence, this vaccine should be considered defective and potentially dangerous to human health, in particular to the pediatric population which is much more vulnerable to genetic and autoimmune damage.

Watch this shocking video summary… a more detailed long-form video is coming next week

Here’s a summary of these findings, in a short video that will be expanded next week into a full lecture.

https://www.brighteon.com/034ebfcb-5...2-ee106a2eecba

[Delight]

If anyone ever insists that vaccines are not related in any way to fetus harvesting:

Fetal Tissue in Vaccines, Studies on Orphans - Confirmed By Stanley Plotkin Under Oath

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=N16LWcGGm7I

[Delight]

How many people are able to connect the dots between low level chronic illness and vaccination? Even those reading this testimony may be tempted to think "It is just coincidence". IMO the most triggering and possible empowering experience will be to KNOW that these experiences are not random coincidence but causative. This knowing galvinizes people to action. As Bill has paraphrased elsewhere, the truth will set us free but will probably make us feel betrayal and anger first.

A mass of people who are convinced there is a SIGNIFICANT threat is necessary to challenge this calamity. If people doubt there is a problem, they will be passive. The threats to the status quo will cow silence their voices. It has been "normalized" to expect illness and people do not seem to have a high expectation of the body's ability to be fully healthy. If they cannot see that vaccination injuries have already been wide spread and mount daily in the general decline of health of our children, they can comfortably stand by.

Pro-Vaxxer Goes Ex-Vaxxer When “I realized that healthy babies don’t just die.”
Melissa Curtin October 4, 2019]

Erin Witt, an Air Force veteran and former CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), now an ex-vaxxer, reflects on her health and work history and her process of waking up about the truth and risks of vaccines. Erin reveals how she connected the dots surrounding her health issues and how the influence of others’ personal vaccine injury and death accounts, like Catie Clobes’ story about Evee, have impacted Erin’s decision to stop vaccinating and experience a healthier existence.

Erin was open-minded enough to examine the research and critically think about vaccines based on the new information she discovered – even though her former career and military background held a drastically different vaccine perspective. Read about Erin’s journey below from how she transitioned from being staunchly pro-vaccination to an ex-vaxxer, followed by an interview with more details.

Erin: As I kid, I remember getting shots and screaming for hours after. I was terrified of going to the doc when it was time to get shots. I was always sick, horrible ear infections to the point of scarring on my eardrums. Horrible seasonal allergies came next and I received allergy shots for five years for grass, ragweed, trees, and another I can’t remember. I had colds constantly and had it in my brain that “I was just a sick kid.”

I received all childhood vaccines, including Hepatitis b, meningococcal, military vaccines (TDaP, MMR, Penicillin), and 2/3 of the HPV (Gardasil) vaccine series. (I know there were others in the Air Force I got too, but I don’t have a copy of my immunization record, unfortunately.) I spent 15 years of working as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) with all age groups, mostly Pediatrics and Geriatrics, both “high risk” for illness. In a nursing home, after the “mandatory” flu shot, there would always be an “outbreak” which was attributed to the “wrong strain” argument.

In the military, I didn’t understand why I was given “preventative” penicillin, but now I realize it was to help the effects of the mass amount of vaccines we received all at the same time. They had us stand in a line like cattle and administered multiple shots at a time. I got very sick and penicillin site that was on my glute hurt for days, way worse than my arms.

Right now is currently the longest I’ve gone without vaccinations and I’ve done a heavy metal detox called Advanced TRS which uses Nano-zeolites to withdraw toxins from the body, helping to restore it to its natural function. I eat healthy, real, whole foods, and exercise 5-7 days a week. Used to have 15+ migraines a month. Now only 0-2, if that. I 100% attribute it to stopping vaccinations and stopping yearly flu shots.

When I worked in a pediatric unit at a hospital, I started to see sick babies come in after shots and it was always “a coincidence” or very much downplayed. “Normal” reactions. Because of my history working in healthcare, I was brainwashed into the “pro-vax” mindset and would bully people who didn’t vaccinate. I watched doctors bully moms who wouldn’t vaccinate, telling them to stop getting their information from Facebook.

As I’ve gotten older, I’ve started questioning and listening to stories of other people instead of being close-minded and trusting that vaccines are “safe & effective.” I’ve had firsthand experiences of how they aren’t. I got Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) after the meningococcal vaccine. I miscarried after a flu shot. I started to realize that things aren’t a coincidence. I’ve been researching for about the past year, and for a long time I told myself I wasn’t anti-vax, I was just trying to learn more. It was when I saw Catie Clobes’ story about her daughter Evee that I woke up. I realized that healthy babies don’t just die. I’ve ALWAYS questioned SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). How can a baby just die?! I’ve never understood. The proof from Evee’s death was it for me as I now consider myself an ex-vaxxer who is pro-medical freedom. My body, my choice! My husband feels the same way.



We are people who want optimum health, naturally. We eat only real, whole foods, we exercise daily, and we use holistic medicine as often as possible over any pharmaceuticals. We beat colds with bone broth, garlic, elderberry, honey, lemon, and zinc. We question everything and trust nothing. This has led us to our healthiest we’ve ever been, in our 30’s. When I finally read a vaccine insert and looked up the ingredients, that was it for me. Nothing natural about them! We are being injected with things that make us sick and keep us sick. It’s time for everyone to wake up to the facts, enough is enough.

Q&A with Erin:

Q: Do they do titer testing first before giving you additional shots in the military?

Erin: They do not do titers before shots.

Q: Did the military doctors or whoever administered the vaccines give you any informed consent about the risks/side effects/symptoms, etc. or just inject the vaccines?

Erin: Zero risk or side effects. Zero talk about them, zero informed consent. They line us up like cattle, tell us to roll down our sleeve and unbutton our pants, and herd us through as we get them in our arm and buttocks. They barely even tell us what’s happening. They tell us what to do, and we listen, or there are consequences. It’s not a choice.

Q: You mentioned you are in the longest stretch for not having vaccines, but I am curious how long that is in months or years?

Erin: I received my last flu shot in November 2017. No other vaccines since 2012 besides flu shots.

Q: Were there specific vaccines you noticed infants at your work having reactions from? What kinds of reactions would you notice or witness during this time working in pediatrics?

Erin: I was not privy to that information. They would come in with rashes, high fevers, and seizures.

Q: What was it about Catie’s story about Evee that woke you up?

Erin: The tests that came back from the neuropathologist, which showed damage to the medulla that would have slowed Evee’s breathing, killing her.

Q: If you could go into more details about how you always questioned SIDS that would be helpful. Was this while you worked in pediatrics? Were there particular cases of SIDS you’re referring to, or do you mean generally speaking?

Q: I mean generally speaking. Ever since I first heard “Sudden Infant Death Syndrome” my thought process was “how is an infant suddenly dying for literally no known reason, a syndrome?” This never made sense to me. Healthy babies don’t just die. In pediatrics, I convinced myself that it was real – that they would breathe in their own carbon dioxide and poison themselves, or get smothered by blankets, or co-sleeping… because that’s the crap lies I was fed. It still never made sense to me, but I trusted the medical professionals I worked with at the time.

Q: In any of your CNA nursing training, did you ever learn about the risks of vaccines (including death and vaccine injury), vaccine adverse reactions, VAERS, the ingredients, etc.? If not, what did you learn about regarding vaccines?

Erin: Zero training. We just learn they are “safe and effective” and we all need them to achieve herd immunity to protect “at risk populations”.

Q: If you have children, are they vaccinated? If you’re planning on having children, what will be your approach to health/wellness?

Erin: I have not had children. I miscarried after a flu shot six years ago (didn’t connect that dot until recently) and we’ve been waiting for another baby since, with no luck yet. It ended up being a blessing because if we already had kids, they would have been vaccinated. At this point, we prefer a natural, holistic approach by building their immune systems with good food and natural supplements like we have done for ourselves.

At this point, until there are placebo studies done and actual proof they can create safe vaccinations, we will be choosing to decline them. We are also very spiritual, and there are many bible verses that support declining them for many reasons – injecting foreign substances, aborted fetal cells, etc.

Q: What do you feel is the biggest problem/issue regarding vaccines at this time?

Erin: Taking away our choice.

Q: What do you recommend to those who are questioning vaccines or who are interested in learning more?

Erin: Read Catie’s story and watch her interview on The HighWire.

[Delight]

We COULD all agree that no matter what is thought, we all want to protect the human right to exercise informed consent....
That is unless people think that for the good of the whole, we all must agree to give up our rights.

That belief is what frightens me most. It is so manipulate- able. It can be used against every sort of population.

NVIC’s 2019 Annual Report on U.S. State Vaccine Legislation
By NVIC Advocacy Team

Citizen involvement in the legislative process to protect the human right to exercise informed consent to vaccination increased to unprecedented levels in 2019 to meet the most aggressive and unwarranted attack on vaccine exemptions in U.S. history.

In a 2019 Annual Report on U.S. State Vaccine Legislation, the non-profit educational charity National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) reports that during the 2019 legislative session, 22 bills across 17 states were filed to attempt to eliminate vaccine exemptions. Three bills passed, 12 died, and seven bills are still pending in California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at the time of writing. Status on all bills in this report reflect their positions on September 9, 2019.

Working to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education since 1982, NVIC is the largest and oldest U.S. charity disseminating information about diseases, vaccines and informed consent to vaccination. NVIC provides well-referenced, accurate information to the public about vaccine science, policy and law but does not make vaccine use recommendations. In 2010, NVIC launched the NVIC Advocacy Portal (NVICAP), a free online vaccine choice advocacy network, for the purpose of securing and defending informed consent protections in vaccine policies and laws.

NVIC works alongside and shares legislative information with many health freedom groups that support NVIC’s more than three-decade call for the protection of vaccine informed consent rights in America. The NVIC Advocacy Portal team, including key NVIC Advocacy directors in many states, works with families and enlightened health care professionals to educate legislators and protect vaccine informed consent rights.

During the 2019 legislative session, NVIC analyzed, tracked and issued positions on an unrivaled 221 vaccine related bills and 5 sets of rules in the following 40 states and the District of Columbia through the NVICAP: Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.

42 vaccine-related bills are still pending in California, District of Columbia, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and action to support the good bills and fight against the bad bills is still needed. Bills referenced in this report are published on the NVICAP and registered users can obtain a more detailed bill analysis, including current status, NVIC’s position on the bill, and recommended action.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL REPORT AND SEE THE HIGHLIGHTS FROM 2019

[raregem]

John B. Wells on YT, ep. 1200, speaks with guest Ty Bollinger. They talk about cancer, currently allowed treatment, vaccine problems and his upcoming conference teaching people the truth and how to heal themselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgdDDPs_fvE (59:15)

Attend the Truth About Cancer Live 2019 Conference in Anaheim CA. or sign up for FREE- 3 day streaming online (with replays) at

http://www.ttaclive.com/
Seems like it will be very informative.

[Delight]

Posted by raregem (here)
John B. Wells on YT, ep. 1200, speaks with guest Ty Bollinger. They talk about cancer, currently allowed treatment, vaccine problems and his upcoming conference teaching people the truth and how to heal themselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgdDDPs_fvE (59:15)

Attend the Truth About Cancer Live 2019 Conference in Anaheim CA. or sign up for FREE- 3 day streaming online (with replays) at

http://www.ttaclive.com/
Seems like it will be very informative.

Thanks! Yes, is very informative.
Sign up for the conference and it is free plus they replay the talks so anyone in any time zone could hear.....
Click below to sign up.



Also, I recommend the Robert Scott Bell show which is an ongoing source for up to date natural health info....

The RSB Show 10/6/19 - Jon Rappoport, Prozac truth, Opioid crisis revealed

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zqCZ8gYs414

[Delight]

America’s Crazy, Wild and Deadly Vaccination Experiment

Richard Gale and Gary Null, PhD Progressive Radio Network, September 25, 2009

Richard Gale and Gary Null, PhD Progressive Radio Network, September 25, 2009

September 20th may be recognized as a day when the 16 year old Swedish activist Greta Thunberg led the world’s youth to protest en masse against the failures of our governments to tackle the existential threats from climate change. Now tens of millions of youth globally are not only speaking out against those in power but also challenging them. A few days earlier, Greta confronted and provoked the US Congress to listen to the climate scientists. On the 23rd, addressing the United Nations she released her outrage towards the world’s leaders and adults who have been complicit in robbing the younger generations of their innocence and future. Aside from its frequent hubris, platitudes and indifference towards meaningful climate policies, for its part the New York Times provided in depth coverage and analysis of Greta’s American visit. However, shame on the Times for recently ignoring completely the medical science that confirms vaccines are likewise robbing many of our youth’s future. Over the years, on too many topics to list, the Times has become a new media face for 21st century fascism. It has increasingly become a soulless, ideologically driven mouthpiece for the corporate elite, notably the pharmaceutical industry. On the one hand the newspaper celebrates the marching of youth against global warming; with the other hand it mocks and disparages the hundreds of thousands of parents with children injured or killed by vaccines.

And yet all of these parents were once willing supplicants and true believers in vaccines’ benefits. The fact they submitted their infants and toddlers to the care of their pediatricians is enough evidence to state these parents were all pro-vaccination advocates. By doing so, they innocently and likely unintentionally turned their trust over to the CDC and private vaccine makers with a false belief that these biologically active drugs were effective and safe. Only afterwards, with neurologically and permanently damaged children or an unexpected funeral bill, did they regret their faith in a system that values profit higher than health.

Over the years, we have gotten to know many of these parents. To understand the horrible ordeals they undergo with children who may never be normal again, they have educated themselves about vaccines far better than any pediatrician we have interviewed. If you want to win a sure bet, place your money on any of these moms in a debate with the vaccine industry’s leading pundit Dr Paul Offit. While preparing this article, we have had conversations and email exchanges with legal experts in international declarations that condemn medical experimentation without an individual’s consent and Constitutional law.

One is with Danny Sheehan, arguably one of America’s finest and most ethical Constitutional attorneys. It was Danny’s insights that led to the New York Times’ upper management to publish the Pentagon Papers. But today, Danny, like ourselves, is deeply disappointed in the rapid degeneration of American journalism, notably the New York Times. Over the years we have written approximately fifty articles, with full citation of scientific studies, to expose the myths, facade and misinformation being disseminated by our federal health agencies and the vaccine industrial complex. It would take any journalist only a couple days to undertake a sufficient amount of in-depth research to discover the prima facie evidence that the CDC is a serial liar and has been actively engaged in obstruction of justice, perjury before Congress and massive cover ups to conceal the dangers of specific vaccines and vaccine ingredients and their contribution epidemic of injuries being inflicted upon America’s infants, children and youth.

The same can be said for the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Each aligns itself with vaccine policies that favor corporate financial interests at the expense of public health. During those couple of days of research, journalists would find dozens of board-certified physicians who have spent individually thousands of hours delving into the more scientifically arcane literature in peer-reviewed journals to uncover a litany of scientific reasons to challenge our vaccine policies and the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule. However, to do so, mainstream journalists would be turning against their handlers, the doctors-for-hire, corporate advertisers and drug lobbyists who have captured the Times and almost every other major newspapers and media network to circulate deceitful narratives that vaccines are effective and safe.

Their message, therefore, is for every child and adult to bow in obeisance to the needle. At this moment, a concerted effort is underway across the US to introduce legislature that will mandate vaccines for all children before attending school, and now in California for adults as well. Constitutional religious and philosophical rights for vaccine exemption are being rescinded. In the case of California, even pediatricians’ expertise and knowledge of their patients are being questioned in order reduce medical exemptions. Senator Richard Pan’s and California law professor Dorit Reiss’ vision is to create an overarching medical police network run by bureaucrats to enforce vaccination and be the final decision makers on whether a child can be medically exempt or not.

In effect, the private physician-patient or pediatrician-child relationship would be obsolete with respect to vaccination laws. The question before us is whether or not vaccine mandates and abolishing religious and philosophical exemptions are Constitutional and in violation of international declarations that protect citizens from medical experimentation that places them at risk of serious injury and death. Law professor Mary Holland, speaking before the United Nations about the protection of human rights from “the grave dangers of involuntary scientific and medical experimentation on human subjects,” presented her legal case that “vaccines must be recommended and not coerced” by governing bodies of authority. “Compulsion on its face,” Holland stated, “undermines the fundamental rights to life, liberty and bodily integrity of informed consent, privacy and parental decision-making.”

She invoked Dr. Leo Alexander’s warning during the Nuremberg Doctor Trials, which tried 23 Nazi physicians on criminal counts for murdering, injuring and torturing non-consenting Jews and other victims under the auspices of medical experimentation. Dr. Alexander warned that it is from small beginnings that the values of an entire society may be subverted. Injuries and deaths of innocents were collateral damage for the Reich’s imperial aims. The medical experiments conducted by the Nazis should continue to serve as a harsh lesson and an admonition to government health institutions and policy makers about the potential evils medicine can inflict upon society when medical authorities become divorced from a moral base and serve a totalitarian regime rather than the public good. In his opening remarks at the start of Nuremberg Doctor hearings, General Telford Taylor who presided over the trials stated “I do not think the German people have as yet any conception of how deeply the criminal folly that was Nazism bit into every phase of German life, or of how utterly ravaging the consequences were. It will be our task to make these things clear.”

Today one could replace German people for Americans and point fingers of criminal folly at California Senator Pan, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, our entire federal health establishment and vaccine makers such as Merck for violating ethical principles established at Nuremberg. General Taylor went on to state that “a nation which deliberately infects itself with poison will inevitably sicken and die.” The conclusions of the Nuremberg Tribunal unequivocally states that “voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” and individuals should “be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress or other ulterior forms of constraint or coercion.” Moreover, people must be provided with “sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable them to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”(Nuremberg Tribunal 1949, pp 181)

Based upon the wording of the Tribunal’s medical ethics, and the subsequent Helsinki Declaration, our federal health agencies and state legislatures that are now ramming through draconian vaccine mandates, can technically be accused of similar but lesser crimes. Unfortunately, such international accords and declarations are not legally binding. Following a conversation with Kevin Barry, a former federal civil law attorney who is launching a State Constitutional legal challenge against the state of New York to repeal the stripping away of residents’ right to vaccine religious exemption, noted that such declarations serve as guidelines and anyone can file human rights violations citing the UN’s Universal Declaration for Bio Ethics and Human Rights.

However, this is a tricky slope. Constitutional attorney and founder of the Rutherford Institute, John Whitehead, told us that “the US Constitution cannot be overridden by international law.” Such laws are only binding if ratified in treaty and are superior to state laws — however “not equivalent to the US Constitution” — and the US has never ratified any of these international declarations that can have an impact upon the human rights violations charged in coercive vaccine mandates. If international laws are to have any affect,” Whitehead continues, it would be “on state and local laws since that is where the vaccination requirements would be imposed.”

The edifice upon which our modern vaccination regime is built relies on the hypothesis of herd immunity. Absent a belief in the plausibility of herd immunity, there is no scientifically sound basis whatsoever for enforcing vaccination mandates. Ultimately, it is a dishonest marketing stunt of garbage in, garbage out. Theoretically, scientists who have faith in herd immunity argue that 95% of the population must be vaccinated in order to protect the smaller percentage who are not immunized and to eventually eradicate an infectious disease. But for this theory to have any viability, vaccines must be perfectly effective and provide long-term immunity. None are.

Since the recent measles outbreaks have been the primary engine behind state governments’ vaccine hysteria, we can take the MMR vaccine as an example that should put the credibility of herd immunity to rest. For the measles vaccine, according to a CDC study, the population at any given time can have less than 70% immunity. This is despite the fact that MMR compliance in the US has reached 98%. One of the most damning incidences of measles outbreaks took place at Boston University a month after a campus blood drive. As a result, health officials had access to a large selection of blood samples of students both infected and measles-free.

Laboratory analysis found that eight out of nine students with full blown measles had been vaccinated. We may also take a look at China, which is believed to have the highest vaccination compliance rate in the world. The measles vaccine is mandatory on the Chinese mainland. So, why were there over 700 measles outbreaks in a three-year period between 2009 and 2012? Obviously, the vaccine is not effective. Another medical discovery that debunks the herd immunity theory behind the MMR is that live virus vaccines shed; this means that a vaccine’s viral component can be transmitted and infect persons that a vaccinated person comes in contact with.

The best documented case occurred in New York City in 2011 when an adult woman received two MMR shots and subsequently infected four others in her workplace. Two of those infected were immunized with two MMR doses. All patients involved in this incident were confirmed by laboratory testing that the outbreak was due to a failure in the MMR vaccine. It was the vaccine that infected others. If a vaccinated person can infect others then this destroys the argument behind vaccination mandates that raises fear to a myth that an unvaccinated child is a danger to everyone, especially to children and the elderly who are immuno-compromised with serious illnesses such as cancer or an autoimmune disease. This is a lie. Attorney Kevin Barry calls this propaganda strategy “effective brainwashing.” The facts are quite the opposite given the live MMR cases mentioned above. Rather it is the vaccinated person who poses the real threat to an immuno-compromised person.

Finally, aside from these contradictory findings that discredit herd immunity, measles outbreaks are financial boons for drug makers. Following the Disneyland outbreak, Bloomberg Business News reported that Merck’s quarterly MMR sales increased by 24 percent, proving that fearmongering is also equally profitable. If the herd immunity rationale for mandating vaccines is a fallacy, then are the nation’s vaccination policies, requirements and regimens actually an unfounded medical experiment being forced upon children and adults? Health officials make every effort to convince us that the debate over vaccine safety is settled. It is as if we are told that the medical establishment already knows everything necessary about vaccines’ effects on the human organism.

Therefore, it is irrational to believe that vaccination can be perceived as an ongoing experiment being waged upon infants, children and adults alike. However, the science is far from settled. There are gaping holes in all of the government’s arguments. There are many reasons on scientific and methodological grounds to conclude medicine knows far less about vaccine efficacy and safety than it believes, and the current vaccination schedule is in fact a massive experiment legislatively enforced upon the nation’s population. Large swathes of clinical and laboratory research identifying the mechanisms by which vaccines cause injury and death are cast aside and more often categorically denied.

States now mandating vaccinations, and in the case of California rewriting medical exemption definitions to put the decision-making in the hands of bureaucrats, are acting in direct violation of every precautionary principle. And the fact remains that vaccines have not been tested properly to establish any conclusion for their safety. Worse, vaccination policies are being adopted on a sloppy and unfounded one-size-fits-all model contrary to the principles of “precision medicine.” Dr. Alvin Moss is a section chief in the Department of Medicine at a large state university. He has also been a practicing physician for over four decades and is a critic of our current federal vaccination policies and the vaccine misinformation being disseminated by the CDC. He has generated a list of the 20 most worrisome failures in the current vaccines on the market.

Among some of the more disquieting failures that reinforce our argument that mass vaccination is a medical experiment associated with a high toll of casualties:
1) Aside from the human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil, no other vaccine has been tested under proper inert placebo-controlled studies. Every vaccine is categorically a pharmaceutical drug; however, unlike common over the counter and prescription medications, vaccines have not been tested against an inert placebo such as a saline solution. In the absence of such safety, it is virtually impossible to make any scientific conclusion about what vaccines’ real adverse reaction rate is.

During a recent radio broadcast, Dr Moss reviewed the trial data of a new MMR vaccine developed by Glaxo. Glaxo is now seeking its approval for the US market to complete with Merck’s MMR monopoly. The company’s human trial only compared one vaccinated group against another vaccinated group. As with all vaccine trials, volunteers are duly screened in order to enroll only the healthiest participants. Persons with even mild but chronic health conditions are immediately excluded. Dr. Moss noted that ten percent of these healthy children in both groups had to be rushed to the emergency room for adverse events. Over three percent developed chronic disorders including autoimmune diseases, asthma, type 1 diabetes, vasculitis, celiac disease, thrombocytopenia, and allergies.

Earlier Gardasil trials were more frightening. Seventeen of the girls enrolled in the Garadsil trial died (10 from the actual vaccine and seven in the pseudo-placebo control that contained all the vaccine’s ingredients minus the HPV virus). The vaccine was fast tracked regardless of this tragic trial and the FDA claims Gardasil was not a causative agent for these girls’ deaths. For every pharmaceutical drug the FDA approves, there must be a double-blind placebo-controlled study. So why are vaccines unofficially exempt from this basic requirement that has been at the bedrock of all evidence-based medicine during the history of modern medicine? In the absence of the drug makers conducting proper vaccine safety clinical trials, the CDC continues its charade to endorse vaccines as completely safe. And bought-off state legislatures are parroting the CDC’s deceptions.

2) According to the CDC’s 2019 Vaccine Excipient and Media Summary report of vaccine ingredients, 23 of the approved vaccines currently on the US market contain an aluminum compound (e.g., aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate or amorphous aluminum hydroxoyphosphate sulfate). It is the most common adjuvant used to boost and prolong the body’s immune reaction following a vaccination.

Aluminum is well-known to be a highly toxic metal to all forms of life and neurotoxic to animals and humans. The metal has been repeatedly proven in the laboratory to trigger immuno-inflammatory and oxidative cascades with serious detrimental effects. It has also been shown to act as an endocrine disruptor and can depress cellular metabolic processes. No clinical trials on subcutaneous or intramuscular injection of aluminum has been performed to determine toxic risks for injecting the same into infants and children. In more recent years nano-aluminum is being used. Although aluminum injected as a nanoparticle has been poorly studied, studies so far are not promising because they can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause brain inflammation.

3) Safety levels for vaccine ingredients are set for adults. Levels for children, and particularly infants or an unborn fetus don’t exist. Therefore, vaccine administration does not conform to the principles of precision medicine. Vaccine ingredients are administered as a one-size-fits-all model regardless whether it is a 1-year old infant or an obese 65 year old senior citizen. An infant receives the same level of aluminum as does an adult. Infants under the age of 2 years only have 20 percent of their kidney function and therefore far less ability to expel toxic chemicals such as aluminum and mercury.

4) Aside from the influenza shot, children receive 23 required vaccinations before their first 16 months of life. No safety studies have been conducted to determine the overall safety record of the entire vaccine schedule. In the meantime, more vaccines are going to be added to the vaccination schedule as there are now almost 300 new vaccines in the drug industry’s pipeline.

5) The CDC refuses to fund or conduct vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies to determine the quality of health and rate of infectious disease susceptibility between these two populations.

6) There is a growing body of medical literature identifying preexisting susceptibilities that people may have that increase the likelihood of serious vaccine adverse effects. No government funding is being awarded to further identify these preexisting conditions. Nor are doctors educated about such conditions. For example, genetic pathway mechanisms and single nucleotide polymorphisms (mutations) have been identified that increase the changes for adverse drug and vaccine reactions. Persons carrying the MTHFR mutation are unable to synthesize glutathione efficiently. Therefore, vaccine toxic ingredients such as adjuvant aluminum compounds, mercury, formaldehyde, etc. are less detoxified and excreted from the body. The European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance has noted that most autistic children have this genetic anomaly.

7) Based upon the CDC’s passive adverse reaction reporting system, which is voluntary and passive, and with possibly only 1 percent of adverse events being reported (federally funded Harvard study in 2010), it is impossible to determine vaccine benefits versus risks for making any accurate public health policy decision.

8) Vaccines are not tested for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity (i.e., a chemical’s ability to damage DNA or cause a genetic mutation) or vaccines’ effects on fertility.

9) Federal health propaganda to deny vaccinations as a causative factor for the rise in severe neurological disorders in children, including autism, are solely based upon observational retrospective studies. Such studies categorically fail to meet any gold standard and are often criticized for being overly vulnerable to researcher bias and the use of confounding variables to intentionally skew results. Every major study cited by pro-vaccine advocates to argue against an autism-vaccine relationship is an observational or cohort study.

10) There are no gold standard safety studies for any vaccine or vaccine ingredient administered to pregnant women. Nevertheless, the CDC recommends these vaccines to pregnant women. This list can be greatly expanded upon. Nevertheless, it provides an overview to substantiate charges against our federal health agencies for gross negligence to properly review vaccine submissions for regulatory approval. It also clearly reveals the current state of accepted vaccine science as an enormous medical experiment. If so, then compulsory vaccination can theoretically be understood as an international crime in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code, the Helsinki Declaration and other international laws. Sadly, there may be no effective remedy. And there is absolutely no indication that our federal agencies have any intention to correct this situation. Physicians are direly uneducated about adverse vaccine risks. They are not required to conduct examinations or prescribe tests to determine whether a child is at a higher risk for vaccine injury, although certain biomarkers are known and well founded in the peer-reviewed literature. Since physicians are grossly misinformed due to CDC orchestrated propaganda, parents and patients likewise cannot be consulted accurately about potential vaccine risks. Moreover, very few physicians have been properly instructed on reporting injuries. Consequently, the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is horribly under-represented. The CDC admits that only about 10% of vaccine injuries are actually reported; and a government-funded Harvard study concluded that only 1-2% are accounted for. This is perhaps one of the easiest problems to solve: instruct all physicians, clinics and hospitals on the use of VAERS and make the reporting of all vaccine adverse effects mandatory. However, the CDC intentionally, and very likely with malice of forethought to protect its financial interests with the pharmaceutical industry, has made no effort to make the actual national vaccine injury and death statistics available to the public. If it were to do so, the public would more readily come to the realization about our health agencies’ vaccination lies.

Finally, we should weigh on the relevance of another one of General Taylor’s observations: “it is a fundamental and inescapable obligation of every physician under any known system of law not to perform a dangerous experiment without the subject’s consent. In the tyranny that was Nazi Germany, no one could give such a consent to the medical agents of the State; everyone lived in fear and acted under duress.” As we write, our health officials, state legislators who support mandatory vaccination and our entire corporate mainstream media are complicit in generating unwarranted fear in the public and even medical clinicians who remain ignorant about the scientific literature and simply receive their marching orders from the CDC and the professional medical associations who speak on behalf of the pharmaceutical giants.

Despite the Nazis’ abhorrent medical experiments, did they perhaps display more empathy towards animals than our media shows towards the parents of vaccine-damaged children? General Taylor noted that “the Nazis themselves passed [a law] on the 24th of November 1933 for the protection of animals. This law states explicitly that it is designed to prevent cruelty and indifference of man towards animals and to awaken and develop sympathy and understanding for animals as one of the highest moral values of a people.” He continued by saying that “the law states further that all operations or treatments which are associated with pain or injury, especially experiments involving the use of cold, heat, or infection, are prohibited.”

In essence, Nazi doctors valued animals over the lives of humans. Nuremberg is a dark reminder of a heinous period in the history medicine and criminal medical experimentation. We must now each ask ourselves whether the removal of “informed consent” in recent state vaccine mandate that may eventually lead to much larger crimes against humanity on the behest of corporate interests and the pleasures of the ruling elite? In an exchange with attorney Scott Tips, president of the Health Freedom Federation and a civil rights expert on the Codex Alimentarius Commission — an international organization overseen by the World Health Organization and the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization to set global and government standards for food safety, food contaminants, pesticides, vitamins, etc — he wrote, “Mandatory vaccine laws are not only unlawful and immoral but by their very nature they violate international laws that were carefully put in place after the Second World War to prevent the gross excesses of that time.” But even before then, Tips shares a little unknown fact.

As early as 1891, a Prussian Minister issued a directive to all prisons that tuberculin for the treatment of tuberculosis “must in no case be used against the patient’s will.” And this decree was made for prisoners no less!!! Now our health officials and paid off politicians, notably in California and New York, want to deny the same rights to infants, children, parents and eventually the elderly. What would General Taylor say today if he were to witness how our nation is deliberately infecting itself with the poisons in vaccines?

The Gary Null Show - America's Crazy, Wild and Deadly Vaccination Experiment - 09.25.19
Sep 25, 2019

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eoYxdsz93mg

[Delight]

I find myself feeling specially triggered by certain people (do you know what I mean?). I feel certain that Pan is an agent of a nefarious plot to overthrow America. Pan is an exemplar to me of a social danger that needs to be stopped. These are my emotions and they may be irrational. The negative response is deep and though based on fact, now is just because I see his face. I know that this could be a problem if I do not use reason to balance my emotions. He is just the poster child for the REAL issue.

I am rational about one thing that is independent of all emotion....the only choice that matters is the one we make for ourselves and our families that is arising from knowledge and self empowerment.



I guess he means that IF I had a child who was gravely injured and THEN decided to never risk a repeat, saying "No Thanks", I would be rationally selfish.

OR WHEN I saw the same kinds of injuries repeated over and over to so many children and to so many adults and said "No thanks".

OR IF I weighed the advantages of boosting my immunity (and also TRUSTED that my body has an innate ability to be in a symbiotic relationship to other earth organisms if given a chance) and said "No Thanks".

YES. I am rational concerning the issues. I am SELF interested in the face of forces that see me just as a interchangeable cog in its wheel of fortune.

I AM CERTAIN that this is where all rational humans will be when they know what is true about HEALTH.

I ain't afraid of no ghosts and the ghosts are the indoctrinated fears that certain people spread. These Fear mongers are seriously INFECTED by an irrational love of domination over others (and they also enjoy the money and control they can accrue).

[Delight]

Just to review

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=FprO0hvXpeQ

[Delight]

In the US, VAERS is the only mechanism for officially monitoring vaccine injury. Because MDs typically do not identify the adverse event, a correlation between adverse effects and vaccines will be not be identified. This OF COURSE supports the mythology that vaccines are safe. This also ripples out in many ways including the denial of compensation in vaccine court.

WE must overturn the mandatory statutes.
Liability needs to be restored to the vaccine manufacturers.
People need to be awakened to the reality that vaccines are deadly.

I am really glad to see an article by an RN. I also know that nurses have absolutely no authority in the system even when they know what is occurring to patients. This social/ medical travesty breaks my heart. Yes, there are many serious threats but requiring vaccination to live in society seems almost the worst of all.

Why are Vaccine Adverse Events Not Acknowledged or Reported by Medical Professionals?
SB 276 puts these vulnerable children at higher risk for repeat vaccine adverse events
Leah Balecha, RN, CCRN, is a pediatric intensive care nurse in Southern California, and can be reached at leahkalma@yahoo.com
California Globe, August 31, 2019

Physicians are bound to their Hippocratic Oath to “First, do no harm,” but government officials do not carry any liability for injury or harm, nor do pharmaceutical companies since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccination Injury Act protects them.
Legislators have the professional and moral obligation to protect children and support equality, but Senate Bill 276 by Sen. Richard Pan, which would eliminate almost all vaccine medical exemptions, aims to segregate a minority of children from their right to an education. And even worse, for families who can’t afford homeschooling, SB 276 puts these vulnerable children at higher risk for repeat vaccine adverse events. As a pediatric intensive care nurse for 13 years, I believe in vaccinations and understand the desire for community immunity, but I have also observed many vaccine adverse events that shouldn’t be ignored any longer.

I administered vaccines without hesitation until a previously healthy teen came into our unit with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) – brain swelling – after receiving the meningococcal vaccine earlier that week. The teen was paralyzed, in a coma, and had to be placed on a ventilator in the ICU for weeks. When I shared with the treating physician that ADEM was listed as a possible reaction to the meningococcal vaccine and asked whether we should report this to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), I was told a firm “NO” without further discussion. Three weeks later, the teen left our unit still unable to walk or talk, and there was no discussion of the possible cause or the recent vaccination.

After that, I began to notice that most doctors never asked if a new patient was recently vaccinated, despite the child’s diagnosis being listed as a possible adverse event on the vaccine insert. And if I informed the doctor that a parent mentioned their child was recently vaccinated, it was most often ignored. I have seen dozens of cases of seizures, SIDS, paralysis, diabetes, or immune system dysfunction following vaccination, yet I have only seen one report made to VAERS. It begs the question: why are these vaccine adverse events not being acknowledged or reported?

California has immunization rates above 96% for its school children – one of the highest rates in the nation
SB 276 will herd children who were unlucky enough to suffer a vaccine reaction, but lucky enough to have a doctor acknowledge it, into a database where the state will be able to track them, freely violate their rights, and kick them out of school.

Medical professionals agree that all pharmaceuticals carry potential risks. Just as there is a small percentage of children who are allergic to penicillin, there is a percentage of children who have serious reactions after vaccination. SB 276 proponents claim only “1 in a million” reactions, but that’s referring to anaphylactic reactions, not reactions like seizures and paralysis.

Currently, in California, only less than 1% of children have vaccine medical exemptions because of a previous adverse event or family history which puts the child or sibling at risk. Under SB 276, as it’s currently written, there would be a narrow scope of “approved” reactions – anaphylaxis and encephalopathy – and even if a child experienced those, there is no clause for family history so siblings would have to be vaccinated as well. I can’t imagine the decision these parents will have to make, being coerced into risking repeat injury or death, just to keep their children in school.

Physicians are bound to their Hippocratic Oath to “First, do no harm,” but government officials do not carry any liability for injury or harm, nor do pharmaceutical companies since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccination Injury Act protects them. SB 276 would be a liability-free, government-mandated system that harms these vulnerable children again.


Hippocratic Oath
As a nurse, I understand the desire to maintain community immunity. In 2018, the CDC reported that California has immunization rates above 96% for its school children, one of the highest rates in the nation. The California Department of Public Health reported 15 pediatric measles cases this year, not one related to school children with medical exemptions.

Yet SB 276 would systematically discriminate against these children with special needs, their rights to privacy, and their free and equal education would be eliminated.

Is this discrimination of less than 1% of children with medical exemptions really a public health crisis and worth the $40 million it will cost taxpayers? The government should be focused on legitimate public health issues, like the Typhus, Typhoid Fever and TB outbreaks among our growing homeless population, rather than this minority of injured children.

[Delight]

Posted by Delight (here)
HORRIFIC, Terrifying!

HPV vaccines tested on 4-6 year-olds
October 3, 2019

I have often feared that in the end babies and young children would be given the dangerous and increasingly unpopular HPV vaccines.

I suspect that time is fast approaching.

GlaxoSmithLine (GSK) the manufacturer of Cervarix has recently conducted a trial of its two valent HPV vaccine on healthy 4-6 year old female children in Latin America.
The study involving girls from Colombia, Panama and Mexico was published in the current edition of the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal.

Here is the stated rationale for injecting such young children with HPV vaccines:

The burden of human papillomavirus (HPV) diseases is high in Latin America. HPV vaccines licensed from 2006 onwards offer protection against most HPV-related cancers, especially when introduced into national immunization programs.

Barriers to optimal vaccine uptake are, however, lowering the impact of adolescent HPV vaccination programs. Immunization of children might overcome these barriers and be a strategy of choice for some countries.

Where have I heard this rationale before? Oh yes, I remember. The same excuse was used for the introduction of the hepatitis B vaccine for babies and young children.

According to the National Vaccine Information Center

The primary reason that the CDC recommended hepatitis B vaccination for all newborns in the United States in 1991 is because public health officials and doctors could not persuade adults in high risk groups (primarily IV drug users and persons with multiple sexual partners) to get the vaccine.

Rates of HPV vaccination
Similarly the rates of the uptake of HPV vaccines are not as good as the manufacturers of Cervarix and Gardasil would want with the US experiencing low rates as reported by ScienceDaily

Only about 16 percent of U.S. adolescents have been fully vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) by the time they turn 13, despite national recommendations that call for vaccination at 11 to 12 years of age.

And in Japan coverage rates for the HPV vaccine have plummeted from 70 percent in 2013 to less than 1 percent today. They are also lower than desired in Ireland where health authorities have expressed alarm at the falling rates of vaccination estimated as a 50% uptake for the first dose in 2016–17.

Expansion of the customer base
On October 5 2018 the FDA approved Gardasil 9 for use in women and men aged 27 through 45 years. The fact is there is a declining US market for Gardasil. Increasingly people are learning about the real adverse effects and long term injury resulting from this vaccine program. According to Vaers, the Vaccine adverse event recording system there have been 510 reported deaths following HPV vaccines and over 62,000 reported adverse events. But expansion of the HPV vaccination program seems on the cards again as witnessed by the recent study done on very young girls.

There were 148 girls in the study. 74 received 2 doses of Cervarix vaccine at Day 0 and Month 6. The control group were given 1 dose of Priorix vaccine at Day 0 and 1 dose of Infanrix vaccine at Month 6.

There was no inert placebo. The control group were given Priorix (MMR) and Infanrix (DTPa). It is common for vaccine manufacturers not to use saline placebos in their safety and efficacy studies. By comparing one vaccine to another vaccine and in this case with Infanrix which contains 500 mcgs of aluminium, chances are the vaccine being trialed does not look as bad as it really is. On the other hand if a normal saline placebo was used then we would really see a much higher rate of adverse events in the vaccine than in the control group. But then this is the way the manufacturers have set it up. It is corrupt.

There are no laws governing the contents of placebos.

The World Health Organization states that using a vaccine (rather than an inert substance) as a placebo creates a “methodological disadvantage” and also notes that it may be “difficult or impossible” to assess vaccine safety properly without a true placebo.

And yet this is how they conduct vaccine trials. They do not use true placebos and in the original Gardasil trials the participants in the control arm were given the aluminium adjuvent (amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulphate) that is used in the vaccine.

As it turned out more than half of the very young girls in the Cervarix group got a medically significant condition not related to common ailments. That is 38 out of 74 girls.
MSCs include AEs prompting emergency room or physician visits that are not related to common diseases or routine visits for physical examination or vaccination, or serious adverse events (SAEs) that are not related to common diseases.

See: ClinicalTrial

And then there is this assault on elders brewing

October 8, 2019
Christina England
Health Impact News
Why Are UK Experts Recommending the HPV Vaccine for Seniors Over 60 Years Old?

On September 28, 2019, The Daily Mail published an article titled Now give every ADULT the cancer-fighting HPV vaccination and save ‘thousands of lives’, experts demand as evidence shows the jab can slash the cancer risk for grown-ups too.

The article claimed that world renowned medical experts were recommending that EVERY person in Britain, young and old, should be given the cancer-fighting human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to prevent them from developing a range of deadly tumours.

Author David Rose wrote:

Until now, most discussion of the vaccine has focused on youngsters, as giving it at an early age offers life-long protection.

But according to the world’s leading HPV researchers, there is now evidence that giving the jab to adults from their 20s into middle age would also bring dramatic health benefits.

However, it appears that these experts not only believe that it is a good idea to vaccinate young and middle-aged adults with the HPV vaccine, but they also think that it is a good idea to vaccinate the elderly with the HPV vaccine.

Rose continued his report by stating that leading HPV expert and president of the International Papillomavirus Society, Professor Margaret Stanley, OBE, told reporters that there was a spike in the incidence of HPV cancers when people entered their 60s because their immune systems became weaker over time.

She stated:

HPV breaks the usual rules of vaccination. Vaccinating older, infected people will make it less likely that cancers will develop.

However, Health Impact News found no evidence to support her claim.

In fact, according to our information, if a person is already infected with the HPV virus, getting vaccinated could, in fact, increase, not decrease their chances of getting cancer.

To learn more about the risks, read our article titled FDA Decision to Approve Gardasil Vaccine for Adults Will Likely Increase Cervical Cancer Rates.

Furthermore, in 2018, we reported that according to the research of French oncologist Dr. Gérard Delépine, the HPV vaccine Gardasil was actually associated with an increased rate of cervical cancer among patients.

If Delépine’s research is correct, then if everyone in Britain were to be vaccinated with the HPV vaccine, there is an extremely high possibility that the rates for cervical cancer in Britain could increase.

Despite this evidence, however, The Daily Mail stated:

But new research suggests the jab can prevent patients who have been infected with the virus from going on to develop cancer. It produces an immune system response so powerful it stops the virus from spreading inside the body.

Unlike our reports here at Health Impact News, The Daily Mail offered no factual evidence to support their claims. The only information that they supplied came from experts whom we believe would benefit financially from the whole of the country being vaccinated with this vaccine.

Daily Mail Experts Have Conflicts of Interest
According to our research, Professor Stanley has an extremely good reason to want the whole of Britain to be vaccinated with this particular vaccine, because she is a consultant for three of the companies that manufacture and market the HPV vaccine, MSD, SPMSD and GSK.

And if this information is not worrying enough, she is also the HPV expert for the HPV subcommittee of the Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunisation (JCVI) in the UK, a committee who has been put in place to advise the UK government on vaccination policies.

These very interesting facts were reported by the International Papilloma Society.

If every single person in Britain were to receive the HPV vaccine, Stanley could become a very rich person indeed and it appears that she is not the only one of the so-called experts used by The Daily Mail, who has conflicts of interest.

During our research, we discovered that oncologist Xavier Bosch, who was also contacted by The Daily Mail to provide evidence, also has conflicts of interests with the pharmaceutical industry.

According to The Daily Mail, not only was he the scientist who first demonstrated that HPV causes cancer, but according to our research, he has also consulted for the MSD International Steering Committee, provided expert testimony for GlaxoSmithKline at the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency (EMA) hearings, and is a member of the GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi Pasteur MSD speakers’ bureaus.

Throughout their report, The Daily Mail reported that the HPV vaccine can protect against cervical cancer and that since the vaccine was introduced in 2008, the rates of cervical cancer have decreased.

However, we have discovered that, according to a study that was published in 2017, the data used by the government to determine HPV cancer deaths was inaccurate because of faulty data. The data included women who had hysterectomies, and therefore had ZERO risk of developing cervical cancer.

What is even more disturbing is the fact that this study, conducted by Dr. Anna L. Beavis, et al., also uncovered that the actual death rate for black women dying from cervical cancer, since the vaccine was introduced, was nearly double than those that were reported.

For further information, read Study: Government HPV Cancer Death Rates Found to be False – Higher Death Rate Among Black Women.

According to Daily Mail Experts, There Are No Evidence of Adverse Reactions
Interestingly, the experts quoted by The Daily Mail completely and utterly denied the fact that Gardasil can cause serious adverse reactions. Yet, as of October 6, 2019, the World Health Organization’s (WHO), VigiAccess database had listed a total of 95,010 adverse reactions related to Gardasil, including a total of 495 deaths. The Daily Mail reported:

Anti-vaccine campaigners have claimed that the vaccine can cause serious side effects, such as chronic fatigue syndrome.

… the experts who spoke to this newspaper say there is no scientific evidence that this or other adverse conditions are more common in people who have had the vaccine – a conclusion that’s backed by the World Health Organization.

We believe that these experts should read some of our articles relating to the tragic victims of this vaccine, which we have reported over the years, and speak to some of their parents. These victims include:

Jesse Questel
Christina Tarsell
Katy, who developed terminal cervical cancer after the vaccine
Asha, who developed leukemia
Colton Berrett
However, we have information to suggest that the experts quoted by The Daily Mail are simply not interested in facing the facts about the HPV vaccine.

Amanda Dew, the mother of a girl who was injured by the HPV vaccine in 2015, approached Professor Stanley at a conference titled Human Papilloma Viruses and the Public’s Health: An Unfolding Story, held in London on July 10, 2018.

When Dew asked her about the Gardasil vaccine and adverse reactions, Stanley appeared to be less than knowledgeable on the subject.

We spoke to Ms. Dew about her encounter with Professor Stanley and she told us:

“When I explained to Professor Stanley that over 8000 adverse reactions had been reported to MHRA, she said, ‘Isn’t that the worldwide figures?’ I said no, UK only.”

Dew told us:

“I said, if the vaccine was effective, we would start to see a drop in cervical cancer rates. She said it will take years to see a drop. I said if it worked we would see it now in the earliest group whom were vaccinated. She said she was expecting to hear news of a fall in incidence ‘any day now,’ i.e. there was no drop.

I then asked her whether she thought the neurotoxin aluminium could be a problem and she likened it to using aluminium foil. She didn’t seem to understand the consequences of injecting it and bypassing the first line of the immune system (mouth/gut).”

Dew told us that she questioned Stanley on whether or not she was aware of the flawed trials; however, it appeared that she either had no idea at all about the flawed trials and the fact that the manufacturers used no inert placebos or she was unwilling to comment on the subject.

Dew told us that Stanley just kept repeating that there was “no proof of causation” linking the vaccine to adverse events.

Dew said that as there were no tests to find out, how would Stanley know one way or another?

She told us:

“It’s like seeing a dead person at the bottom of a broken ladder. Then saying it couldn’t be the ladder that caused his death, because there was no proof. Yet no one looked at the ladder to see. Same argument.”

Claims by The Mail That the HPV Vaccine Offers Lifelong Immunity
The Daily Mail also claimed that if you give the HPV vaccination to young children as early as possible, it could offer them lifelong protection against the virus.

However, we found no evidence to support their claim.

In fact, according to Dr. Diane Harper, a professor at the University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, who worked on the original HPV vaccine studies to get the vaccine approved, the vaccine is being way oversold.

In an article published by NPR news, she told reporters:

“… vaccinating an 11-year-old girl might not protect her when she needs it most — in her most sexually active years.”

Furthermore, in another interview, conducted by The Huffington Post, she stated:

“Gardasil only maintains antibody titers for HPV 16 (not 18, not 11, not 6) at five years, making the true long lasting (five years) coverage of Gardasil only for one type of cancer causing HPV.”

She continued:

“Duration of efficacy is key to the entire question. If duration is at least fifteen years, then vaccinating 11-year-old girls will protect them until they are 26 and will prevent some precancers, but postpone most cancers. If duration of efficacy is less than fifteen years, then no cancers are prevented, only postponed.”

These comments, given to The Huffington Post in a statement written by Dr. Diane Harper, the principal investigator for clinical vaccine trials for Merck (Gardasil) and GlaxoSmithKline (Cervarix), are in complete contrast to those published by The Daily Mail.

It appears that Harper is correct, because a recent article published by RSVP live stated that, despite the fact that one mother had received her HPV vaccine at school, she had just received the results of a positive smear test. The report stated:

“A young Cork mother has been left shocked and angry after the results of her first smear test showed up positive for the HPV virus and abnormal cells, despite the fact that she received the HPV vaccine in school nearly eight years ago.”

The mother told reporters:

“I had my daughter at Christmas and things weren’t right.”

She stated:

“I wasn’t due my first smear until July but my doctor said she would do it early, so she smeared me in June. I got the results in August and they showed I have the HPV virus and abnormal cells. Tomorrow I go to the hospital for a colposcopy.

I hadn’t been well since Christmas with heavy bleeding, tiredness and pain. I had been to see my gynaecologist in CUMH but they believed it was just my hormones after having a baby but it kept going on and on and eventually I got a smear.”

RSVP live reported:

“*Claire went on to explain that having ‘abnormal’ cells means they are precancerous, so there is an increased risk of her developing cancer. There is no treatment for the HPV virus, so she will have to be closely monitored.”

‘Claire’ told reporters that in the past she had always been an advocate of vaccines and that she’d had both of her children vaccinated, but that due to her experiences, she has decided to not let them get this particular vaccine when it is their time.

She stated:

“I don’t think I would let my children get this particular vaccine when it is their time, because I would be putting a vaccine into their body and it may not cover them.

Also, a lot of girls who got the vaccination in my year were very sick after it I don’t think there is enough research about it.” [sic]

However, it appears that experts like Professor Stanley and the UK government continue to dismiss evidence of harm, even when it is presented to them over and over again.

In this podcast, the evidence of harm and the corruption that is going on behind closed doors to protect the HPV vaccination could not be spelled out more graphically.

In a shocking statement about the HPV vaccine, news presenter George Hook made his feelings perfectly clear. In an angry outburst, he stated that:

“Well, I’ve been on this radio station now for just over fifteen years. Never in that time have I been more angry, more emotional or, indeed, more sad.

Imagine a mother watching her child’s life disappear, or her education destroyed, her possibility of future employment lessened. At night she hears her child cry in pain and there’s no help. The children are dismissed as hysterical girls, invariably.

And then the vaccine. The suggestion is, and I don’t know, but I have to ask the question. There is the suggestion from these mothers damaged as they watch their children that there may be something to do with the HPV vaccine. Consequently, the take up has dropped to 50%.

Now, the HSE, this huge organization of thousands of employees with budgets running into millions and billions, are being apparently defeated by a bunch of Irish mothers, so the vaccine take up has dropped.

Am I happy that the vaccine take up has dropped? No, I am not, but then I hear that the failed executive of the failed HSE, Tony O’Brien, on the radio described these mothers as emotional terrorists.

How dare he! How absolutely dare he call mothers who care for their children, who watched them in agony and pain, how dare he call them terrorists!

If we had a minister of health in Simon Harris who wasn’t in political nappies and in a job way above his talents, if he had a shred of courage, which the great party Fine Gael seem singularly lacking in, O’Brien wouldn’t have a job today. O’Brien would be sacked. He would be taking his belongings home in a cardboard box, for calling mothers of Ireland emotional terrorists.

So if the HSE wants to get vaccination rates up, they give the people the right information, not smart alec scientists on radio programmes. They answer people’s queries and they put together something to help people, for whatever reason, who are ill. I am done.”

As harsh and as angry as Hook’s comments may be, he could be justified in what he had to say, because this is not the first time that mothers of children injured by this vaccine have been attacked by organizations such as the HSE.

Daily Mail States that HPV is Known to Cause Cervical Cancer
Despite the mounting evidence to the contrary, The Daily Mail has stated that there are more than 4,000 new UK cases of these types of cancer each year and, according to them, this figure is rising rapidly. However, they made absolutely no attempt to offer any kind of evidence to support this claim, or any of their other claims.

In fact, the only evidence offered throughout their somewhat flawed report appeared to be obtained from experts who work for the manufacturers of the vaccine.

More information about Gardasil here

[Delight]

The UK already includes the meningitis vaccine for 8 week old children. The complete schedule for UK vaccinations here. In the US, it is under trial

You know the dangerous, highly reactive meningitis B vaccine that no one wants to give their college students, because the rate of reactions is far greater than the number of infections caused by men B?

Our friends at Kaiser are currently testing it on infants, along with routine vaccines at the same time.

Who signs their infants up to be a lab rat?Hear This Well

This is a presentation by a victim of chronic Lyme Disease who was activated to become an expert on the subject. She recognized something very concerning about the constituents of the meningitis vaccine. Read her blog for a wealth of information.

The Vaccine Ides of March
BY BEAUX RELIOSIS on MARCH 16, 2017

On Wednesday, March 15, 2017, I testified to the Public Health & Welfare Committee of the Kansas State Senate. Which is lucky for the makers (Pfizer & GSK) of the fake meningitis serogroup B vaccines, Trumenba & Bexsero, because I had been pursuing legal action against them for their False Claims that these toxic potions are actually vaccines.

At issue was HB 2205, a requirement for Kansas 11-year-olds to be stuck with meningitis vaccines. As written, the bill did not specify which vaccines would be required–there are separate vaccines for serogroups A/C/W/Y and serogroup B.

First of all, I will point out that nobody on this committee, which includes at least one physician and one pharmacist, nor the bill’s sponsor, another MD/Senator, bothered to make that distinction. Did they even know this little fact? Do they care? We shall see. The bottom line is that I, a private citizen and non-scientist, non-physician, non-chemist, non-pharmacist, non-medical professional of any kind, should not have to show up at their hearing to tell them to WAKE THE F UP, do a little background research, understand basic science, and get their grubby hands off our kids.
Here is video of my testimony:

Text:
"I’m here to oppose HB 2205. In my spare time I read science, and I say, HOW DARE YOU try to push through this bill without asking the question, what’s in these vaccines?
The meningitis serogroup B vaccines are the opposite of vaccines. All you need to do is look at Pfizer’s own published research to know that they’ve used what are called tri-acylated lipoproteins, which are fungal type toxins that are used to induce experimental septic shock. What happens after sepsis is the real problem. It’s a state of permanent immunosuppression in which herpesviruses become chronically reactivated, causing fatigue, neurological problems and severe disability.
There have been other fungal vaccines that failed for the same reason. In fact, the failed Lyme vaccine, LYMErix, is the reason I have this background knowledge and can stand here and testify to you today. I read Pfizer’s Trumenba report, saw their drawing, and said, “Oh, that’s a tri-acylated lipoprotein just like LYMErix.” And we have millions of walking dead in this country because the people who pushed LYMErix threw out the post-sepsis adverse events from the trials by changing the very case definition of the disease. The CDC says you can only have a disease if you produce abundant antibodies. If you are immune deficient, forget it. And we can expect the same thing to happen with the victims of these meningitis vaccines.

And this, it seems, is the dirty little secret that public health officials don’t want getting out.
You see, live virus vaccines are contraindicated for those with immunosuppression, for the very reason that the LIVE, ATTENUATED VIRUSES can be reactivated in an immunosuppressed host. Measles. Mumps. Rubella. Varicella. All are highly neurotropic, and the congenital brain damage from rubella is the reason we have a rubella vaccine in the first place. This is all well documented in the literature. Nobody is checking kids’ immune status before injecting a cocktail of brain damaging live viruses. And the CDC refuses to admit that there is an epidemic of non-HIV AIDS going on, for the simple reason that the disease mechanism betrays the source of the autism explosion.

And here we are debating whether the state of Kansas should mandate an immune-suppressing, chronic fatiguing fungal toxin to be injected into our children.
READ THE SCIENCE. Lawmakers, public health officials, physicians, DO YOUR JOB. Frankly, I’m offended that I had to use a vacation day to come here and say what the MDs should have said. I’m offended that there is such a lack of critical thought on a topic where children’s lives are at stake. Thank you." more science here

[Delight]

It is just IMPOSSIBLE to try to manipulate nature with such insane programs which inject foreign molecules without unintended consequences. This documentary may be posted elsewhere but should be seen by all. There is no less than genocide involved but no one is held accountable.

The Origin of HIV Aids The best documentary Channel 4

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mzwTb5E8JtU

This film doesn't so much delve into the 'origin' of HIV / Aids but it very effectively explains a widely accepted and logical theory of how the virus spread through polio vaccination programs. Reviews below

Sundance
The Origins of AIDS probes one of the most vexing, highly charged areas of AIDS research: how and when the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was introduced to humans. Research has shown that chimpanzees carry simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), a close relative of HIV. Science knows that AIDS originated in Africa, and has concluded that at some point SIV crossed over into humans and became HIV. It has been argued that the lethal contact could have come through the food supply, but there is another theory: that SIV was introduced to humans via mass polio immunization programs carried out in Africa the late 1950s. Beginning with a history of the mid-century polio eradication crusade, directors Chappell and Peix (a former biology teacher) take an in-depth look at the polio hypothesis and the furious response it has provoked in the scientific community. Their investigation ultimately leads them to modern-day Congo, site of the polio research camp set up in 1957 by the revered scientist Hilary Koprowski, inventor of an oral polio vaccine.

The Origins of AIDS has received the following awards: Best Direction, 2004 Hot Docs Festival; the Silver Hugo for Documentary: Science/Nature at the 2004 Chicago International Television Awards; and the Rockie Award for Best Popular Science and Natural History Program at the 2004 Banff Television Festival.

Prix Europa Television Programme of the Year 2004
For all the professionals sitting on the panel this film was a revelation of sorts reaffirming their belief in the power and in the meaning of television at the beginning of a new millennium. A sensational 90 minutes long film - without even the traces of chasing sensation. Instead: we get facts. Well researched facts. Opinions. Well founded opinions. And questions - very well thought out questions, pushing the story to its limits. And not only the story: the viewers as well. Because this film takes us along and makes us think about how little we know about our "current affairs" and how deeply we trust in what science and scientists tell us. For all jury members this was the first television program about AIDS that did not mention homosexuality, drugs or prostitution. Instead: a film about "The Origins of AIDS", entered by France 2, produced by Multimedia France.

http://www.prix-europa.de/publish/n_...=GB&recStart=0

Village Voice (New York, NY), May 4, 2004

The Origins of AIDS. By now it seems clear that AIDS was born from contact between humans and chimpanzees infected by the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus. Peter Chappell and Catherine Peix's highly disquieting doc explores the possibility that the devastating transfer was inadvertently caused by scientists. Witnesses recount how chimps were used in the manufacture of virologist Hilary Koprowski's experimental polio vaccine in Africa; he denies all knowledge of the matter. Elliott Stein

[Delight]

Evidence that measles outbreaks are spread by vaccinated persons....

Measles outbreak from Hong Kong International Airport to the hospital due to secondary vaccine failure in healthcare workers
Vincent C.C. Cheng (a1) (a2), Shuk-Ching Wong (a2), Sally C.Y. Wong (a1), Siddharth Sridhar (a3) ...
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2019.278Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 October 2019

Abstract
Objective:
To report an outbreak of measles with epidemiological link between Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) and a hospital.

Methods:
Epidemiological investigations, patients’ measles serology, and phylogenetic analysis of the hemagglutinin (H) and nucleoprotein (N) genes of measles virus isolates were conducted.

Results:
In total, 29 HKIA staff of diverse ranks and working locations were infected with measles within 1 month. Significantly fewer affected staff had history of travel than non–HKIA-related measles patients [10 of 29 (34.5%) vs 28 of 35 (80%); P < .01]. Of 9 airport staff who could recall detailed exposure history, 6 (66.7%) had visited self-service food premises at HKIA during the incubation period, where food trays, as observed during the epidemiological field investigation, were not washed after use. Furthermore, 1 airport baggage handler who was admitted to hospital A before rash onset infected 2 healthcare workers (HCWs) known to have 2 doses of MMR vaccination with positive measles IgG and lower viral loads in respiratory specimens. Infections in these 2 HCWs warranted contact tracing of another 168 persons (97 patients and 71 HCWs). Phylogenetic comparison of H and N gene sequences confirmed the clonality of outbreak strains.

Conclusion:
Despite good herd immunity with overall seroprevalence of >95% against measles, major outbreaks of measles occurred among HKIA staff having daily contact with many international pssengers. Lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and measles outbreaks suggested that an airport can be a strategic epidemic center. Pre-exanthem transmission of measles from airport staff to HCWs with secondary vaccine failure poses a grave challenge to hospital infection control.