The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "The Shots", it's the Totalitarian Tiptoe

[onawah]

Vaccine Mandates: CHD’s Brief to the European Court of Human Rights
MARCH 19, 2020
By Mary Holland, CHD General Counsel and Vice Chair, Children's Health Defense
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...urce=mailchimp

"Relatively few Americans realize that lawsuits related to human rights in Europe can ultimately be heard in an international court, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). People must first file cases regarding their individual rights in their home countries, but if they have exhausted domestic remedies and are still dissatisfied, they can sue their country in the ECHR – and sometimes win, often changing policies across the 49 countries subject to the ECHR’s jurisdiction.

The ECHR’s Grand Chamber for especially important cases is now reviewing the issue of compulsory vaccine mandates for school attendance in member countries. The case the Court will decide arises from a vaccine mandate law in the Czech Republic. Families opposed to compulsory vaccination sued, raising several human rights concerns under the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights: Article 8, respect for family life; Article 9, freedom of conscience; and Article 2 of Protocol 1 to the Convention, the right to education. The petitioners also raise the issue of informed consent to a medical intervention, arguing that compulsory vaccination violates the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (the Oviedo Convention).

Children’s Health Defense strongly supports the rights of individuals to make voluntary choices regarding vaccines.
With the assistance of Senta Depuydt and the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance, Children’s Health Defense was able to submit a “friend of the court” brief on this matter. The Grand Chamber is scheduled to have a public hearing on the case on April 30, 2020 in Strasbourg, France, assuming that pandemic measures do not postpone it.

Children’s Health Defense strongly supports the rights of individuals to make voluntary choices regarding vaccines. The CHD brief cites the Nuremberg Code and the 2005 UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. It also touches on the lack of proven safety and efficacy, religious rights, conflicts of interest, discrimination, questionable science, censorship, risk of genomic change, risk of unintended genocide, and liability as critical concerns that strongly weigh against vaccine mandates."

Read CHD’s brief: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...with-Cover.pdf

[onawah]

Does the Coronavirus Pandemic Serve a Global Agenda?
MARCH 20, 2020
Health Authorities Remain Silent on Efficient Covid-19 Treatment
By Senta Depuydt, Editorial Guest Contributor
Children's Health Defense
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...global-agenda/

(As usual, RFKennedy Jr. gets the job done on reporting the truth. Children's Health Defense has also come out against 5G, though no mention of that is made in this article. Bold letters my emphasis)

"For those who follow the global immunization agenda and its implementation on different continents, the announcement of a new pandemic didn’t come as a surprise. “Pandemic preparedness” has been well-funded and a buzz word for a long time before becoming a priority at the last G7 summits, the Davos World Economic Forum and other meetings of global governance. The latest simulation for preparedness was Event 201,[1] a rehearsal of a coronavirus pandemic organized on October 18, 2019 in New York by Johns Hopkins University, the Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum.

The Presidential election campaign in the United States and the controversial mandatory measles vaccination law in Germany provided perfect timing. What better than viral terror to influence public opinion and health policies on vaccine battles raging on both sides of the Atlantic?

They agreed on the priority to achieve 90% measles vaccination coverage around the globe and to use arguments of “health emergencies” and “security threats” to bypass informed consent laws and constitutional rights.
To the majority who have never heard about this, one should remember that in 2014, the first Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) meeting [2] was held at the White House, a few months after the whistleblower William Thompson raised the alarm on fraud committed by the CDC in the MMR vaccine safety study. That revelation led to increasing distrust in vaccination and public health institutions. So at the GHSA meeting, the US Health and Human Services Department, the World Health Organization (WHO), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunization (GAVI) and health officials from dozens of countries decided to create a “health security” agenda for the world. Its main goal was to vaccinate the entire population of the planet and drive changes in national legislation to do so. They agreed on the priority to achieve 90% measles vaccination coverage around the globe and to use arguments of “health emergencies” and “security threats” to bypass informed consent laws and constitutional rights.

Soon after that meeting, the big “measles scare” campaign started in Disneyland in December 2014, leading to the removal of vaccine exemption rights in California. Meanwhile, Italy, which had been designated to be the forerunner of this agenda in Europe, set things in motion to mandate eight additional childhood vaccines.

The movie Vaxxed then came out in April 2016, during the Presidential campaign. Many American families voted for Donald Trump, hoping that he would create a commission to investigate vaccine safety, as he seemed to have a particular interest. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, repeated that “the science is clear, the earth is round, the sky is blue and vaccines work” throughout her campaign. A few days before the November 2016 vote,[3] President Obama signed major US funding for the GHSA, together with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Unfortunately, after the election, the vaccine safety commission that was supposed to be led by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. never came to pass. On the contrary, draconian vaccine legislation made its way to several states. California, for example, which had already abolished personal belief exemptions, stripped away almost all medical exemptions in 2019, commencing a medical inquisition against doctors who put their patients first.[4] Many Californians, realizing that their Eldorado had become a gilded cage, moved to freer states for vaccine choice, like Texas or Idaho.[5]

Sadly, informed consent and the Nuremberg Code may now exist only in the museum of democratic values.
A vaccine war
In 2020, vaccines could weigh even more heavily in US elections. In fact, one could almost say that a vaccine war is going on across the US. After California, states like New Jersey, Maine, Connecticut, Virginia, Hawaii, Colorado and many others are trying to adopt harsher vaccine laws. But vaccine freedom advocates are getting more organized, too, putting pressure on elected officials and candidates and even introducing their own legislation. For example, after the New Jersey legislature twice failed to pass a repeal of the religious exemption, even though Speaker Steven Sweeney vowed to “go to war” to get it passed, legislators proposed several vaccine safety bills.[6] The Maryland legislature refused to allow pharmacists to administer vaccines, and in South Dakota, the legislature considered, although rejected, a bill that would have completely prohibited all medical mandates of any kind.[7]

Europe too is undergoing a similar wave of coercive legislation and pushback. In Germany, compulsory measles vaccination has just come into force in early March, even though the country has one of the highest coverage rates — 97% one dose, 93% two doses — and very few cases of illness or death. This vote comes two years after Chancellor Angela Merkel announced that there would be no mandatory vaccinations in Germany,[8] as informed consent had “solid historical reasons.”

Everywhere in Europe — in Great Britain, Austria, Belgium, Romania, Slovenia, from Ukraine to Spain — mandatory vaccination bills are being introduced.
Sadly, informed consent and the Nuremberg Code may now exist only in the museum of democratic values. The new German law is particularly restrictive. There is no option for home schooling, and the measles vaccine obligation applies to adults working in the health and education sectors as well. But German citizens may be ready to fight back. Families and doctors are fighting the mandates in courts,[9] and protests were planned all over the country for March 21, including a major event in Munich with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and activists from all over Europe – until the coronavirus pandemic intervened.[10] Everywhere in Europe — in Great Britain, Austria, Belgium, Romania, Slovenia, from Ukraine to Spain — mandatory vaccination bills are being introduced. Faced with the violation of human rights that their Constitutions guarantee, people have filed complaints with the European Court of Human Rights. The Court, whose jurisdiction covers 49 countries throughout Europe and Eurasia, will hear cases on mandatory vaccination on April 30, 2020 arising from the Czech Republic.

It is undeniable that the coronavirus epidemic has come on the scene at a crucial moment, when people everywhere are in revolt against the power of international financial institutions and multinational pharmaceutical corporations, whose stranglehold on governments is no longer hidden. Many scandals have shaken confidence. The bankruptcy of an aberrant economic system is accelerating, and attempts to start a third world war are multiplying. While it is impossible to know how the “coronavirus pandemic” will influence the redistribution of power, it is certain that many are seeking to have Covid-19 serve the political interests of a global governance project.

Iran
Interestingly, the second largest outbreak started in Iran, a country which, like China, does not bend to the West’s dictates. It is also currently involved with Syria and Russia in a tug-of-war with Turkey, NATO, and its traditional allies. After having refused all outside help in the management of the pandemic, Iran made a complete about-face by inviting the WHO to its rescue. It seems that the virus had contaminated a number of high-ranking government officials, including those close to Ayatollah Khamenei, and the former Iranian ambassador to Syria, who died in the early days of the epidemic. Taking an unusual sanitary measure, the Iranian government released 85,000 “uncontaminated” prisoners to avoid contagion in prisons. At the same time, officials blamed US sanctions, which were reimposed on Tehran after Washington abandoned the Iran 2015 nuclear deal, for “hampering their efforts to fight the coronavirus.” Iran called again for lifting the ban and asked the International Monetary Fund for a $5 billion loan to fight the outbreak.[11]
Italy
In Europe, as luck would have it, the pandemic first affected northern Italy, namely Lombardy and Veneto, which have by far the largest number of vaccine hesitant people in Europe and probably the world. Veneto strongly opposed the expansion of vaccine mandates. Activists demonstrated for months, with rallies of more than 50,000 people. As a result, the regional government appealed to the Council of State, arguing that the law violated constitutional freedoms and demanded autonomy in health matters. Of note, the WHO then decided to move its European headquarters to Venice, the capital of Veneto.

At the beginning of the disease outbreak, the Italian authorities considered it unnecessary to impose a two-week school quarantine on children returning from a trip to China, in order not to “stigmatize” them. (By contrast, unvaccinated children are stigmatized and prohibited from attending school year round.) Officials disagreed on Covid-19 diagnosis and “crisis measures,” reflecting conflicts between regional parties and medical experts. But the WHO soon managed to take control of the situation[12] and appointed a special advisor, Dr. Gualtiero Ricciardi, who had been forced to resign earlier from the Italian HHS due to a long list of undeclared conflicts of interest, to steer the coronavirus crisis.

Since then, panic and alarm have escalated continuously, as have the Veneto region’s accusations of “anti-scientific”[13] management. Although the country has been in a complete lockdown for weeks, cases keep increasing and the estimated number of deaths is now nearing 3,000. This sends a frightening signal, but these numbers need to be seen with caution. First, one of the major reasons why Italy is “overwhelmed,” is because of the crisis its public hospitals were already facing before the epidemic. The number of intensive care units has dropped by half over the last 20 years, dropping from the highest to the lowest number of beds per capita in Europe to around 230 per 100,000 inhabitants. In other words, the situation was already disastrous.

Second, there is a lot of controversy about the number of deaths that can really be ascribed to the epidemic. Testing is not very reliable and suffers many biases. According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, who had chaired the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee that called an emergency debate on the influence of the pharmaceutical industry in the declaration of the H1N1 flu pandemic by WHO in 2009, “the tests are currently not measuring the incidence of coronavirus diseases, but the activity of the specialists searching for them.”[14] Many experts also disagree on the mortality rate of Covid-19. While the WHO gives estimates as high as 3.4%, renowned epidemiologists such as John Ioannidis[15] consider the risk is probably much lower, perhaps 0.125%, for which there are no reasons to take such draconian measures.

France
In France, too, declarations of the Covid-19 pandemic seemed to have a flair for strategic time and place. When Minister of Health Agnes Buzyn suddenly left office to replace a candidate who was running for mayor of Paris (he had to step down after a sex scandal), the coronavirus crisis seemed to be reasonably manageable. But the Covid-19 threat arose again at an opportune time — to ban large protests against a highly unpopular law that slashed pensions and on the eve of local March elections. After the first round of voting, a complete lockdown was announced. The former health minister, who wasn’t elected mayor, expressed her regret for leaving office during the coronavirus crisis, saying that she knew from the start that the epidemic would escalate and soon turn into a major catastrophe…

But a disaster in France is easy to predict, as the situation is very similar to Italy. 1,300 public hospital doctors have been on administrative strike for almost a year. They refused to share the responsibility and decisions of a state that no longer provides minimal funds to run public health services. In the last two decades, the available number of beds has been reduced by 100,000 and the remaining facilities are largely understaffed. Patients who died after waiting endless hours in the emergency room were already frequently reported by the media long before the coronavirus epidemic.

So the former health minister, who had received fierce criticism for her inability to solve this lingering hospital crisis, knew perfectly well that the coronavirus situation would further exacerbate the problem. Recently, when President Macron visited doctors fighting the epidemic to show his support, medical staff took the opportunity to express their anger towards his disastrous health policies in front of the camera.

… [health authorities] replied that there was not enough scientific evidence to prove efficacy and warned against potential side effects of the [Chloroquine or Plaquenil], preferring to focus their efforts to find new molecules and develop a new vaccine, with France’s Sanofi Pasteur included in the coronavirus vaccine competition.
The silent war in the treatment against Covid-19
Finally, the Coronavirus epidemic reveals the huge discrepancy between the WHO health strategies and the reality for scientists and doctors who put patients’ lives first.

The current power struggle in France about coronavirus strategies between health officials and the country’s leading expert is truly eye opening. Professor Didier Raoult, who is one of the world’s top 5 scientists on communicable diseases and leads the high tech research center on infectious diseases, IHU – mediterranée Marseilles, argued that the approach of mass quarantine is both inefficient and outdated and that large scale testing and treatment of suspected cases achieves far better results.

Early on, Dr. Raoult suggested the use of hydroxychloroquine (Chloroquine or Plaquenil), a well-known, simple, and inexpensive drug that has shown efficacy with previous coronaviruses such as SARS. By mid-February, clinical trials at his institute and in China already confirmed that the drug could reduce the viral load and bring spectacular improvement. The Chinese scientists published their first trials on more than 100 patients and announced that the Chinese National Health Commission would recommend Chloroquine in their new guidelines to treat Covid-19.[16]

…last October, the French minister of health suddenly decided to put this long used over-the-counter drug on the list of “controlled substances” and make it a prescription drug.
As a member of a similar French committee, Dr. Raoult immediately shared the great news with health authorities. But they replied that there was not enough scientific evidence to prove efficacy and warned against potential side effects of the drug, preferring to focus their efforts to find new molecules and develop a new vaccine, with France’s Sanofi Pasteur included in the coronavirus vaccine competition.

But Dr. Raoult and 600 members of his institute continued their work and confirmed similar results in a trial of 24 patients that was published March 3, 2020.[17] Dr. Raoult has recorded daily videos[18] to share his research and knowledge, sometimes reaching half a million views in a couple of days. Hospitals and general practitioners started to treat their patients with the drug until it quickly went out of stock.

In fact, for an unknown reason, last October, the French minister of health suddenly decided to put this long used over-the-counter drug on the list of “controlled substances” and make it a prescription drug.

While the WHO has repeatedly praised China and South Korea, for their “efficient response” using draconian quarantine measures, there has been no mention of the fact that those countries are using Chloroquine as an efficient Covid-19 treatment.
Now, a month later, under the growing pressure of doctors and the media, the government has finally decided to “consider more trials” of this protocol, and Sanofi Pasteur has announced that it will offer enough doses to potentially treat 300,000 patients.[19]

Although Chloroquine was cited second on the WHO’s original list of drugs to be evaluated for coronavirus treatment as a drug on its list of “essential medicines,” the WHO has not yet released any information about it and has not even mentioned the four clinical trials that received official European Union approval. While the WHO has repeatedly praised China and South Korea, for their “efficient response” using draconian quarantine measures, there has been no mention of the fact that those countries are using Chloroquine as an efficient Covid-19 treatment. But having used Chloroquine together with quarantine, China is nearing the end of its epidemic.

Interestingly, on February 26, the United Kingdom put Chloroquine on its list[120] of drugs that can no longer be exported outside the country. In the United States, a white paper,[21] published on March 13 by researchers from the National Academy of Science and Stanford Medical School, proposes that “the United States of America and other countries should immediately authorize and indemnify medical doctors for prescribing chloroquine to treat COVID-19.”

[Obviously, there is no real interest in using a generic drug that can provide immediate treatment and prevention for a price around $5.
But so far, the only words we hear from the WHO and Western health officials are “quarantine,” “fast tracking vaccines,” and “the search for new drugs.” Obviously, there is no real interest in using a generic drug that can provide immediate treatment and prevention for a price around $5. As a financial consultant recently asked in an article, “If a Covid-19 Therapy Doesn’t Benefit A Stock, Does It Even Exist?”[22] The answer, sadly, is obviously not.[/B]

It looks as if the WHO and our Western governments have decided to keep fueling the panic and raising the alert level, pushing the “Global Health Security Threat” narrative to the hilt. How much longer will we have to wait for effective treatment? How much longer with this global lockdown last? Officials say “until a new vaccine has been developed,” which will probably be in fast track mode by a well-known philanthropist after most courts in the world have ruled that mandatory vaccination does not violate human rights.

Or perhaps until the economy has completely crashed and can be rebuilt on a “healthy basis”? Here is a clue: the European Central Bank has launched a “Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program”[23] that will last until “the coronavirus Covid-19 crisis phase is over, but in any case not before the end of the year”!

Anything can happen now. No one can know for sure if we will emerge out of the coronavirus crisis as subjects of a techno-communist global government or if a new freedom virus will derail such a program. Certainly the world will not be the same.


* Senta Depuydt is a Belgian freelance journalist with a degree in communications. In 2016, she organized the first European Congress on biomedical treatments in Paris and has hosted debates on the biology of autism and vaccine safety in many French-speaking countries. She arranged for premieres of “Vaxxed” in Brussels, Paris and Cannes and an event at UNESCO. She is a board member of the French League for Free Choice in Vaccination and in the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance. She works with health freedom organizations across Europe.

REFERENCES
www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201.
https://ghsagenda.org/.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov...-achieve-world.
https://www.latimes.com/california/s...kers-agreement.
https://www.idahostatesman.com/livin...239068753.html.
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/stat...202046c77.html.
https://www.ageofautism.com/2020/02/...-mandates.html.
https://efvv.eu/content/images/event...germany-FR.pdf.
https://www.individuelle-impfentsche...Cbergeben.html.
https://efvv.eu/content/.
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavir...id-19-11958783.
http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-to...ention-efforts.
https://www.fanpage.it/attualita/cor...tiscientifica/.
W.Wodarg “Without PCR-Tests There Would Be No Reasons For Special Alarms”, 1.3.20, wodarg.com.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/...reliable-data/.
https://covid19data.com/2020/03/04/e...shanghai-2019/.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...820?via%3Dihub.
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/.
https://www.connexionfrance.com/Fren...i-malaria-drug.
https://assets.publishing.service.go...20.csv/preview.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e...VjIL-7deJ7/pub.
https://raymondjames.bluematrix.com/...ecf1b6.pdf?pdf.
The Governing Council will terminate net asset purchases under PEPP once it judges that the coronavirus Covid-19 crisis phase is over, but in any case not before the end of the year.

[onawah]

The National Plan to Vaccinate Every American
Posted: 3/21/2020
https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-Ne...m_medium=email
by Barbara Loe Fisher

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ltFJB2kEnug

Podcast Available on SoundCloud https://soundcloud.com/nvicstandup/t...every-american

"Scientists at the National Institutes of Health are working with a biotech company to quickly start clinical trials of an experimental messenger RNA vaccine and fast track it to licensure. 1 The FDA has not yet licensed messenger RNA vaccines that use part of the RNA of a virus to manipulate the body’s immune system into stimulating a potent immune response. 2 3 It looks like the coronavirus vaccine will be the first genetically engineered messenger RNA vaccine to be fast tracked to licensure, just like Gardasil was the first genetically engineered virus-like particle vaccine to be fast tracked to licensure. 4 5

There likely will be lots of questions about whether the fast tracked coronavirus vaccine was studied long enough to adequately demonstrate safety, especially for people who have trouble resolving strong inflammatory responses in their bodies and may be at greater risk for vaccine reactions.6 7 8 9 10 However, there is no question about what will happen if the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 11 12 recommends that all Americans get the newly licensed coronavirus vaccine.

The government has a National Vaccine Plan. It is a Plan designed to make sure you, your child and everyone in America gets every dose of every vaccine that government officials recommend now and in the future.1986-1996: Establishing & Creating The Plan
Established under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act during the Reagan Administration, 13 the Plan didn’t really get traction until Congress funded the Vaccines for Children program in 1993 under the Clinton Administration 14 15 and gave the Department of Health and Human Services authority to fund a network of state-based electronic vaccine tracking registries 16 that can monitor the vaccination histories of children without the informed consent of their parents.

In 1995, then Secretary of Health Donna Shalala used rule-making authority to authorize the Social Security Administration to disclose the social security number of every baby born in the country to state governments without parental consent.17 Federal officials explained that – quote - “public health program uses of the social security numbers would include, but are not limited to, establishing immunization registries” and that new routine use of social security numbers would help the government operate “a national network of coordinated statewide immunization registries.” 18

By 1996, when Congress established a national Electronic Health Records (EHR) system under HIPPA, 19 the stage had been set for a government-operated electronic surveillance system to monitor the personal medical records and vaccination status of all Americans. 20 21 22 23 The justification for this big data grab by the government, which clearly violated the privacy of Americans, was to- quote - “protect the public by reducing disease.”Nationwide Electronic Health Records & Vaccine Tracking Systems
Today, the nationwide federally funded Electronic Health Records system captures the details of every visit you make to a doctor’s office, hospital, pharmacy, laboratory or other medical facility; every medical diagnosis you get; every drug you have been prescribed and every vaccine you accept or refuse. Your Electronic Health Record can be accessed not only by government health agencies like the Social Security Administration, Medicaid and federal and state health and law enforcement agencies, 24 25 but also can be shared with authorized third parties such as doctors, health insurance companies, HMOs and other corporations, hospitals, labs, nursing homes and medical researchers. 26 27 28A new Health Information Exchange 29 30 31 initiative funded by the government will make it even easier for computerized health and vaccine records databases to tag, track down and sanction Americans who do not go along with the National Vaccine Plan in the future. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

What Happened to the Plan’s Duty to Prevent Adverse Reactions to Vaccines?
Ironically, when Congress directed the Department of Health and Human Services to create a National Vaccine Program in the 1986 Act, federal health officials were told to put together a Plan to – quote - “achieve optimal prevention of human infectious diseases through immunization and to achieve optimal prevention against adverse reactions to vaccines.” 39 The Plan was not supposed to focus solely on vaccine development and promotion but to equally focus on preventing vaccine reactions.



Yet, in the very first 1994 National Vaccine Plan only four out of 25 “objectives” and only two out of 14 anticipated “outcomes” addressed preventing vaccine reactions. 40 The 2010 version of the Plan 41 also largely ignored the legal duty of HHS to conduct vaccine safety research to fill in long standing knowledge gaps and take steps to make vaccines and vaccine policies less likely to cause harm. 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

Looking back, it appears Congress was not really committed to funding research and creating substantive initiatives to reduce vaccine risks, regardless of what was stated in the 1986 Act, or there would been congressional oversight and federal agencies would have been directed to follow the law rather than ignore it for more than 30 years. 53

Government’s Vaccine Marketing Plan for the Pharmaceutical Industry
Instead, government agencies have brazenly forged lucrative public private business partnerships with the pharmaceutical industry and the medical establishment to:
develop many new vaccines; 54 55 56 57
increase public demand for vaccines; 58
raise vaccination rates among children to nearly 100 percent; 59
create and expand electronic vaccine tracking registries; 60 61 62 63 64 and
promote global vaccination programs, 65 66 even though the primary purpose of the 1986 Act was to reduce vaccine reactions and protect the U.S. childhood vaccine supply, 67 not fund and expand global vaccination programs.
In fact, federal health officials accurately characterize the U.S. vaccination system in the 21st century as a business. A decade ago they admitted that – quote -“The 2010 National Vaccine Plan provides a vision for the U.S. vaccine and immunization enterprise for the next decade.” 68 That’s because they know the National Vaccine Plan is really a Vaccine Marketing Plan for the pharmaceutical industry. 69 70 71 72So, if you are wondering why many states are trying to pass laws eliminating all vaccine exemptions and mandate every vaccine the pharmaceutical industry produces and the CDC recommends, 73 74 75 76 you don’t have to look any further than the government’s well-financed National Vaccine Plan.

Implementation of The Plan Accelerated in 2011
Implementation of the Plan was accelerated in 2011 after the U.S. Supreme Court declared FDA licensed vaccines to be –quote - “unavoidably unsafe” for the purpose of removing almost all remaining liability from drug companies when vaccines hurt people. 77 78

Since 2011, two powerful CDC-appointed vaccine advisory committees influenced by members associated with the pharmaceutical and medical trade industries – the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 79 80 81 82 83 and the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) 84 85 86 – have been busy coming up with new ways to meet strategic goals of the National Vaccine Plan.

When highly publicized cases of measles were reported in California’s Disneyland in 2015 87 and in New York in 2019, 88 89 with military precision pursuit of the Plan was kicked into even high gear. 90 91

During the past five years, California, Vermont, New York, Maine and Hawaii have lost vaccine exemptions, even though tens of thousands of Americans rose up in protest. 92 In 2019, the people managed to hold on to exemptions in states like Oregon, Arizona and New Jersey 93 but this year, bills to force vaccine use are already threatening parental, civil and human rights in Virginia, Massachusetts, Florida, Washington, Pennsylvania and more. 94

Five Main Types of Vaccine Laws Being Proposed in States
These are the five main types of laws being proposed in the states and your state may be one of them:Number One: State laws that eliminate all personal belief vaccine exemptions allowing you to follow your conscience or religious beliefs and make it illegal for physicians to grant a medical exemption unless it strictly conforms to very narrow CDC-approved contraindications to vaccination.

National vaccine coverage rates among school children are at 95 percent for core vaccines like polio, pertussis, measles and chickenpox, yet, government health officials are not satisfied. 95 They have narrowed vaccine contraindications so that almost no medical history or health condition qualifies as a reason for a medical exemption. 96

If you or your child have had previous vaccine reactions, are vaccine injured, have a brother or sister who was injured or died after vaccination, or are suffering with a brain or immune system disorder that the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) does not consider to be a contraindication to vaccination, states like California 97 98 are denying physicians the right to exercise professional judgment and give children a medical exemption to vaccination are threatening human rights. 99

No wonder less than one percent of vaccine reactions are ever reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System 100 and doctors feel free to discriminate against and deny medical care to anyone who is not vaccinated according to CDC schedules. 101

Laws that eliminate medical, religious and conscience exemptions to vaccination and ban citizens from getting a school education – even a college education – do violate civil and human rights and so do vaccine mandates by employers who fire or refuse to hire workers based on their vaccination status. 102 103 104 The two professions being targeted first for workplace vaccine mandates are healthcare 105 106 107 and childcare workers, 108 109 but they certainly will not be the last. 110Number Two: State laws that turn unelected members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices into de facto lawmakers and automatically mandate all current and future federally recommended vaccines without any public discussion or vote by duly elected state legislators.

Under the U.S. Constitution, state legislatures hold the majority of power to pass public health laws, so vaccine laws are state laws. 111 112 If states hand that constitutional authority over to an unelected federal government committee, the people no longer can work through their elected state representatives to make sure laws do not force involuntary medical risk taking and punish citizens exercising civil and human rights. 113

It is clear that Pharma and medical trade lobbyists partnering with government officials to implement the National Vaccine Plan are unhappy they have to spend so much time and money trying to strong arm state legislators into mandating every CDC recommended vaccine. At the same time, some politicians are not happy that a growing number of Americans are showing up in state Capitols to oppose oppressive vaccine mandates.

Today, it costs a staggering $3,000 to give a child every one of the 69 doses of 16 vaccines on the federal government’s schedule. 114 In addition to coronavirus vaccine, there are more than a dozen experimental vaccines being fast tracked to market for TB, influenza, HIV/AIDS, gonorrhea, herpes simplex, strep A and B, e-coli, RSV, salmonella, and malaria, 115 with several hundred more being developed in a global vaccine market estimated to balloon to nearly $100 billion by 2026. 116 117

State laws that automatically mandate all federally recommended vaccines are handing Big Pharma a big blank check and putting an unknown number of vaccine vulnerable children and adults at risk for serious health problems if they are forced to use every one of them. 118 119 120 121 122

Number Three: State laws that allow doctors to declare minor children mentally competent to consent to vaccination so children can be vaccinated without the knowledge of their parents.

There is plenty of scientific evidence that children’s brains are not developed enough before or during teenage years to support rational benefit and risk decision-making, especially if they are subjected to pressure. 123 124 Giving doctors the legal authority to, in effect, go behind parents’ backs and persuade a minor child to get liability free vaccines violates the legal right of parents to consent to medical interventions performed on their children. 125 It also puts vaccine vulnerable children at greater risk for suffering reactions. 126Parents know their child’s personal and family medical history best and if parents are left in the dark, not only are they blocked from preventing vaccine reactions but there is no way for them to monitor a child after vaccination for signs of reactions so they can immediately take their child for treatment. 127

Number Four: State laws requiring schools to publicly post vaccine coverage rates for the purpose of shaming schools that allow students with vaccine exemptions to receive a school education.

Publicly posting school vaccination rates and numbers of students with exemptions creates a hostile community environment by targeting certain schools and families, whose children have vaccine exemptions, for discrimination and abuse. 128 129 130

It is an illusion that some schools are safer based on vaccination rates. For example, even schools with 100 percent vaccination rates and zero exemptions have had outbreaks of pertussis 131 and schools with very high vaccination rates have had outbreaks of measles and mumps. 132 133 That is because vaccinated children and adults can get infected with and transmit infectious diseases but sometimes show few or no symptoms and are never diagnosed or reported. 134 135 136 137 138 139 140

Children and teachers interact with many other vaccinated and unvaccinated people outside of the school setting. It is discriminatory to require public posting of the numbers of healthy students with vaccine exemptions, when schools are not required to publicly post the numbers of students who are infected with transmissible diseases like hepatitis B and C, HIV, streptococcal, mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus, e-coli, Fifths disease, herpes simplex and more.

Number Five: State laws that operate vaccine tracking registries and integrate them into Electronic Health Records systems without the consent of those being tracked.

The National Vaccine Information Center has a two-decade public record of opposing the creation of national or state based electronic surveillance systems that automatically enroll children and adults without their informed consent to monitor their vaccination status and health histories. 141

Not only have there been past security breaches with electronic databases dumping personally identifying information into the public domain, 142 but there is legitimate concern that the government should not be conducting electronic surveillance on citizens while pursuing a National Vaccine Plan that encourages punitive societal sanctions, such as the inability to get a school education or a job, for individuals who refuse to go along with the Plan.

Learn About Federal & State Government Police Powers to Compel Vaccine Use
For more information on the history and types of public health laws that allow the federal government and states to use police powers to compel vaccine use, go to NVIC’s website at NVIC.org. 143 144

To learn more about vaccine legislation pending in your state and talking points you can use to educate your legislators, go to NVIC Advocacy.org and become a user of NVIC’s free online Advocacy Portal. You will be put into direct contact with your own state and federal representatives and sent emails when bills that threaten or expand your freedom to make voluntary vaccine choices are moving in your state so you can make your voice heard, including showing up at scheduled public hearings.

Making Government Work for Us
In America, we are governed by laws that the representatives we elect make, so it is important to vet all candidates for positions on issues you care about before going to the polls. Good laws can be enacted and bad laws can be repealed but only if we wake up, stand up and actively participate to make our representative government work for us.

Already this year, there have been more than 50 good bills introduced in a number of states that defend voluntary vaccine choices. This is a time for positive action.

It’s your health. Your family. Your choice.

Note: This commentary provides referenced information and perspective on a topic related to vaccine science, policy, law or ethics being discussed in public forums and by U.S. lawmakers. The websites of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) provide information and perspective of federal agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation and policymaking."

Click to View and Access References:
https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-Ne...m_medium=email

[onawah]

Major Error Found in Vaccine Aluminum Safety Calculation
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
April 07, 2020
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a..._rid=845889102

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
A 2011 paper compared aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants to an Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) safety limit of oral aluminum, concluding the amount used in vaccines is safe
In an erratum published by Physicians for Informed Consent, it’s noted that the study based its calculations on 0.78% of oral aluminum being absorbed into the bloodstream instead of the value of 0.1% used by the ATSDR
The math error led the authors to incorrectly conclude that aluminum exposure from vaccines was well below the safety limit
The CDC and other health organizations have been using the flawed 2011 study as support that aluminum adjuvants in childhood vaccines are “safe”
When evaluating the safety of vaccines, adjuvants must be taken into account. The most commonly used vaccine adjuvant is aluminum,1 a demonstrated neurotoxin that is added to certain vaccines to increase your immune response and, with that, theoretically a higher response of protective antibodies.

Despite aluminum's known health risks, it's widely suggested that aluminum in vaccines is safe, including for newborn babies, but a math error in a key U.S. Food and Drug Administration study2 — revealed by scientists at Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) — raises new safety concerns.

When the aluminum adjuvant was first approved for use in vaccines more than 90 years ago, it was approved based on demonstration of efficacy — safety studies weren't performed. A 2002 document from the FDA even states:3

"Historically, the non-clinical safety assessment for preventive vaccines has often not included toxicity studies in animal models. This is because vaccines have not been viewed as inherently toxic, and vaccines are generally administered in limited dosages over months or even years."

That being said, in 2002, researchers with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) released a study on the effect of medical aluminum exposure on public health in order to estimate the infant body burden of aluminum in infants following a standard vaccination schedule during the first year of life.4

They found that, while the body burden of aluminum from vaccinations exceeded that from dietary sources, it was still below the minimal risk level established by ATSDR. In 2011, FDA scientists updated the 2002 study with a current pediatric vaccination schedule and other updated parameters,5 and that is where PIC found what is described as a "crucial math error."

Error Suggests Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines May Not Be Safe
The 2011 paper compared aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants to the ATSDR safety limit of oral aluminum. They concluded at the time:6

"Using these updated parameters we found that the body burden of aluminum from vaccines and diet throughout an infant's first year of life is significantly less than the corresponding safe body burden of aluminum modeled using the regulatory MRL.

We conclude that episodic exposures to vaccines that contain aluminum adjuvant continue to be extremely low risk to infants and that the benefits of using vaccines containing aluminum adjuvant outweigh any theoretical concerns."

In an erratum published by PIC, however, it's noted that the study based its calculations on 0.78% of oral aluminum being absorbed into the bloodstream instead of the value of 0.1% used by the ATSDR.

"As a result," PIC noted, "the FDA paper assumed that nearly 8 (0.78%/0.1%) times more aluminum can safely enter the bloodstream, and this led the authors to incorrectly conclude that aluminum exposure from vaccines was well below the safety limit."7 Christopher Shaw, a professor at the University of British Columbia who has studied the effects of injected aluminum, explained in a news release:8

"We knew that the [2011] Mitkus et al. paper modeling aluminum clearance had to be inaccurate since it was assuming that injected aluminum kinetics were the same as the kinetics of aluminum acquired through diet.

Now, in addition, we see that they did their modeling based on using the incorrect level of aluminum absorption. What is particularly striking is that despite all these errors, since 2011, Mitkus et al. is used by CDC and other entities as the basis for claiming that aluminum adjuvants are safe."

Serious Concerns Over Aluminum Adjuvants

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=HVJkzWXG6CQ

Interview Transcript:https://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/Ex...nYourBrain.pdf

In 2011, Shaw and Canadian scientist Lucija Tomljenovic published a paper in Current Medicinal Chemistry questioning whether aluminum vaccine adjuvants are safe. They cited experimental research that showed aluminum adjuvants may cause serious immunological disorders in humans and pose a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications.

"In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community," they wrote.9

In one of their studies, mice were injected with aluminum at a dose meant to correlate with that given to U.S. children through vaccines, and they spaced out the injections based on the mice's developmental stages. What they found was that once the mice reached adulthood (which occurs at the age of 6 months), the treated mice had permanent behavioral impairments.

In addition to noting that aluminum adjuvants can persist in the body long-term and penetrate the blood-brain barrier, the adjuvants were found to trigger adverse neurobehavioral outcomes in the mice at vaccine-relevant exposures. "Efforts should be made to reduce Al [aluminum] exposure from vaccines," they concluded.10

In another study, Shaw, Tomljenovic and colleagues suggested that aluminum may induce adverse neurological and immunological effects, and overstimulation of the immune system in early infancy via vaccinations could play a role in neurobehavioral disorders.11 In 2014, Tomljenovic and colleagues wrote:12

"There is now sufficient evidence from both human and animal studies showing that cumulative exposure to aluminium adjuvants is not as benign as previously assumed.

Given that vaccines are the only medical intervention that we attempt to deliver to every living human on earth and that by far the largest target population for vaccination are healthy children, a better appreciation and understanding of vaccine adjuvant risks appears warranted."

Further, in an interview I conducted with Tomljenovic in 2015, she explained:

"There is a huge body of research that shows that if you overstimulate the immune system at the periphery, especially in the critical stage of early development, you are going to influence the brain in a negative way, and by doing so, you can create irreversible damage.

Again, this is research that is rarely discussed, because it really shows that there is reason to question the safety of the burden of vaccines given to infants."

Problems Inherent to Adjuvants
Dr. Suzanne Humphries, author of "Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History," is among those who has raised concerns over the problems with not only aluminum but also adjuvants in general, since they're intended to provoke an inflammatory immune response.

As noted by Humphries, who spoke on the subject of aluminum in vaccines in Tampere, Finland, in November 2015, "babies are programmed to be anti-inflammatory," meaning the placenta and breast milk help "program" the child to maintain a noninflamed state.

In order to make these killed, subunit or toxoid vaccines work, an adjuvant must be used to sufficiently stir or aggravate the immune system into action. By so doing, vaccines "violate the natural programming of the baby's immune system."

Further, even if aluminum is removed from vaccines, the risk of immune system brain disorder remains — even if the new adjuvant is nontoxic. As explained by Tomljenovic in our interview, by overstimulating your immune system, you run the risk of breaking self-tolerance and leading to autoimmunity. Japanese researchers revealed this in a 2009 study on mice, concluding:13

"Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host's immune 'system' by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organized criticality."

What's more, without aluminum, a large number of vaccines would have to be eliminated since there are no viable alternatives. Perhaps this is why researchers looking into adverse events after immunization with an aluminum-containing vaccine wrote in 2004, "Despite a lack of good-quality evidence we do not recommend that any further research on this topic is undertaken."14

Aluminum Linked to Alzheimer's
In the 2002 ATSDR study, the researchers were clear about aluminum's distribution pattern in the body, including the fact that it "distributes widely to the various body tissues," reaching the kidneys, spleen, liver, heart, lymph and eventually the brain.15 Aluminum has a known ability to cross the blood-brain-barrier, so any aluminum in the blood can be transported into the brain.

Research has found a strong link between aluminum exposure and Alzheimer's disease. Patients with a genetic mutation that predisposes them to early onset of Alzheimer's and more aggressive disease have universally high aluminum content in their brains.16 Aluminum may damage your brain function in a number of ways, including:17

Adversely influencing neuronal function and survival
Potentiating damaging redox activity
Disrupting intracellular calcium signaling that systematically wears down cellular defenses
Worsening the adverse effects of other heavy metals
Influencing gene expression
A 2010 paper also pointed out that aluminum salts "can increase levels of glial activation, inflammatory cytokines and amyloid precursor protein within the brain," and, "Both normal brain aging and to a greater extent, Alzheimer's disease are associated with elevated basal levels of markers for inflammation."18

CDC Vaccine Schedule Leads to Greatest Aluminum Burden
Research published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology found the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule — when adjusted for bodyweight — exposes children to a level of aluminum that is 15.9 times higher than the recommended "safe" level.19,20

The researchers pointed out that previous efforts to assess the aluminum burden created by vaccines were based on "whole-body clearance rates estimated from a study involving a single human subject."

They also used an aluminum citrate solution that is not used in vaccines, which may affect the excretion rate. Further, infants have immature renal function, which will inhibit their ability to filter and excrete toxins in the first place. The researchers used three models in to estimate the expected acute and long-term whole-body accumulation of aluminum in children as follows:

The CDC's 2019 childhood vaccine schedule
The CDC's vaccine schedule modified to use low dose aluminum DTaP and aluminum-free Hib vaccines
Dr. Paul Thomas' "vaccine-friendly plan,"21 which recommends giving only one aluminum-containing vaccine per visit (max two) and delaying certain vaccinations
The CDC's standard schedule resulted in the greatest expected aluminum burden in all model assumptions, while Thomas' schedule resulted in the lowest.

Further research into these options should be a priority for vaccine research, considering the serious questions about the safety of aluminum in vaccines and the fact that considering aluminum-free vaccines or at least limiting the number of aluminum-containing vaccines received at one time may be prudent.

Increasing research is the goal PIC hopes to reach by publishing the math error in the featured 2011 study as well. In a news release, Dr. Shira Miller, president of PIC, said:

"We posted the Mitkus 2011 erratum … in hopes of bringing it to the attention of scientists and researchers who are interested in the safety of the quantities of injected aluminum found in childhood vaccines and would be in a position to further research the safety concern."22

- Sources and References
1, 9 Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(17):2630-7
2, 5, 6 Vaccine. 2011 Nov 28;29(51):9538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.124. Epub 2011 Oct 11
3 Workshop on Non-Clinical Safety Evaluation of Preventive Vaccines: Recent Advances and Regulatory Considerations
4 Vaccine. 2002 May 31;20 Suppl 3:S13-7
7, 8, 22 Physicians for Informed Consent March 6, 2020
10 Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, November 2013: 128; 237–244
11, 12 OA Autism 2014 Jun 10;2(2):11
13 PLOS One December 31, 2009
14 Lancet Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;4(2):84-90
15 Vaccine. 2002 May 31;20 Suppl 3:S13-7, distribution pattern
16 Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease January 13, 2020 [Epub ahead of print]
17 Frontiers of Neurology October 27, 2014
18 Neurotoxicology. 2010 Sep;31(5):575-81
19 The Highwire December 22, 2019
20 Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology March 2020; 58: 126444
21 Dr. Paul Approved Vaccine Plan (PDF)

[onawah]

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on Coast to Coast
"Vaccines do NOT prevent infection but DO cause disease."
Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, AHBIM
Find your local Radio Station on the Coast-to-Coast website for tonight's show at
1am EST / 10pm PST
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#in...sw?projector=1

[onawah]

Read the Fine Print: Vaccine Package Inserts Reveal Hundreds of Medical Conditions Linked to Vaccines
APRIL 14, 2020
By the Children’s Health Defense Team

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...2-0f683b97b10c

(Difficult to read the charts in this copy and paste, but it gives you an idea of how much info there is in the article. Go to the link for easier reading. )

"In March 2015, Dr. Anthony Fauci—the career National Institutes of Health official elevated by the media to the status of COVID-19 Grand Poobah—told PBS’s Frontline with a straight face that risks from vaccines are “almost nonmeasurable.” Fauci then proceeded to downplay every potential vaccine risk proposed by the interviewer, stating that each had “no basis in reality.” Having served at the helm of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, Fauci surely was aware then, and is aware now, that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program established in the late 1980s has paid out billions of dollars to the vaccine-injured: $4.3 billion as of April 1, 2020. Did Fauci feel that he could get away with making such dismissive statements because he knew about the Harvard study from 2010 showing that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events get reported—and what isn’t reported can’t be measured?

All package inserts (made available online by both the FDA and vaccine companies) contain a section on Postmarketing Experience (Section 6.2) that lists adverse events “spontaneously reported in the US and other countries” after the vaccine’s licensure.
Vaccines belong to the class of pharmaceutical products called biologics, products that allergy experts widely recognize for their “potential to cause allergic hypersensitivity reactions,” among other adverse effects. Is Dr. Fauci—director of an institution focused on allergies and immunology—unaware that the package inserts of at least 22 vaccines list allergic hypersensitivity reactions as an adverse event, and that the inserts of at least 31 vaccines list post-vaccine anaphylactic reactions?

The fact is that vaccine package inserts are one of the few available sources of detailed information that consumers can turn to when they want to sidestep official stonewalling and learn about the more than 200 adverse events reported for vaccines given to children and adolescents. All package inserts (made available online by both the FDA and vaccine companies) contain a section on Postmarketing Experience (Section 6.2) that lists adverse events “spontaneously reported in the US and other countries” after the vaccine’s licensure. Manufacturers include adverse events in the list on the basis of severity, frequency of reporting and strength of evidence for a causal relationship to the vaccine. They also include adverse events that may not have been detected during the vaccine’s clinical trials.

… vaccines—promoted for the prevention of 13 illnesses—have yielded postmarketing reports of at least 217 adverse medical outcomes, including death.
Shining a light on the fine print
To facilitate parents’ use of the information buried in small print in the package inserts, Children’s Health Defense has conducted a comprehensive review of the adverse events reported in Section 6.2 for all vaccines currently included in the U.S. childhood and adolescent vaccine schedule. The review includes 38 vaccine brands produced by 8 different manufacturers to protect against diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, influenza, meningococcal infection, pertussis, pneumococcal infection, polio, rotavirus, tetanus and varicella (Table 1). According to the information compiled from the inserts, these vaccines—promoted for the prevention of 13 illnesses—have yielded postmarketing reports of at least 217 adverse medical outcomes, including death (Table 2).

There are several things to note about the information presented in Table 2. First, while we used the verbatim insert terminology for each disorder and also largely stuck to the disease groupings in the package inserts, we added two categories—allergic and autoimmune disorders—that the inserts surprisingly omit. (The package inserts lump allergic reactions in with “immune system disorders.”) Second, there are a number of disorders that fit in more than one category; in those instances, we have included them (with an asterisk*) in both places (while counting them once). Third, the table only includes those adverse events that manufacturers decided to report in the inserts—but other adverse events are not only possible but likely, due to the widespread problem of underreporting. Notably, none of the package inserts include any mention of prevalent, childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorders like tics or autism that published, peer-reviewed studies have linked to vaccines.

…the Pentacel vaccine (which contains a Hib component) can produce “invasive Hib disease”; the RotaTeq vaccine (for rotavirus) is associated with “transmission of vaccine virus strains to the unvaccinated”; and some influenza vaccines trigger influenza.
Themes
As readers peruse Table 2, they may notice the following themes:

Every single vaccine on the childhood/adolescent vaccine schedule is responsible for at least one adverse event. For example, as already noted, roughly four out of five vaccines (82%) are associated with reports of anaphylactic reactions. The incidence of anaphylaxis has been climbing in the U.S. for several decades. Medications are the top known triggers of anaphylaxis, while another 39% of anaphylaxis cases are idiopathic, meaning that the cause is “unknown.”
Vaccines can cause the very illnesses—or adverse consequences of those illnesses—that they are supposed to prevent. In the era of measles hype and hysteria, it is particularly important to point out that both MMR vaccines—MMR-II and ProQuad—are failing to prevent “atypical measles” (both vaccines), “measles” (ProQuad), “measles-like rash” (MMR-II) and “skin infections” (ProQuad). Likewise, the package inserts report “varicella” and “varicella-like rash” in the aftermath of vaccination with Varivax and ProQuad (which combines varicella with MMR). Equally concerning, the MMR-II and ProQuad vaccines—which have shifted mumps from a noneventful childhood illness to a fertility-endangering condition afflicting adolescents and adults—have produced reports of serious testicular problems (epididymitis and orchitis). Table 2 also shows that the Pentacel vaccine (which contains a Hib component) can produce “invasive Hib disease”; the RotaTeq vaccine (for rotavirus) is associated with “transmission of vaccine virus strains to the unvaccinated”; and some influenza vaccines trigger influenza.
Vaccines can also cause other serious infections. For example, the risky MMR-II, ProQuad and Varivax trio is linked to “pneumonia” and “pulmonary congestion,” the Infanrix and Pediarix vaccines are associated with “respiratory tract infections” and seven different vaccines are associated with various forms of meningitis. Ironically (or perhaps not), pneumonia and meningitis are the targets of the pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines.
Vaccine adverse events affect numerous body systems, including the immune and nervous systems. Although the longest list of adverse impacts—41—is for effects on the nervous system, the wide-ranging list also shows effects on the blood, connective tissue, ears, eyes, gastrointestinal system, heart, liver, lymph nodes, musculoskeletal system, respiratory system, skin and more.
Dr. Fauci himself might want to take note of the fact that companies like Johnson & Johnson, one of those rushing to develop a coronavirus vaccine, have been censured by the Department of Justice for drug marketing fraud that exposed children and the elderly to serious side effects, including death.
Measurable and often unsafe
All pharmaceutical products come with potential side effects, and vaccines are no exception. For Dr. Fauci to describe the adverse events associated with vaccines as “almost nonmeasurable”—when they are not only described in package inserts but tracked in postmarketing surveillance systems such as the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the European EudraVigilance system and the World Health Organization’s VigiBase system—is not only disingenuous but unethical. Given that Dr. Fauci’s wife is a senior NIH bioethicist, the NIAID director’s ethically murky eagerness to deemphasize the prevalence and significance of vaccine adverse events is surprising.

As the COVID-19 situation has brought Fauci into the limelight as “explainer-in-chief” of the epidemic—and proponent-in-chief of patentable vaccines that will use untested technologies while leapfrogging over ordinary vaccine development protocols—we would do well to query Fauci’s five-year-old throwaway remarks about vaccine safety. Dr. Fauci himself might want to take note of the fact that companies like Johnson & Johnson, one of those rushing to develop a coronavirus vaccine, have been censured by the Department of Justice for drug marketing fraud that exposed children and the elderly to “serious side effects, including death.”

Much has been made of Fauci’s, NIAID’s and the NIH’s cozy entanglements with Bill Gates, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Gates-Foundation-created Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), particularly in light of the massive Gates Foundation and CEPI funding being directed toward coronavirus vaccines that the NIH is also supporting. Gates recently called for digital “certificates” showing who has received an eventual coronavirus vaccine and also made veiled statements that “you don’t want people moving around the world” unless they have received a vaccine. In that context, Fauci’s additional remarks in the 2015 Frontline interview take on somewhat ominous overtones. The good doctor stated that while “there’s never a situation where someone is going to tie you down and vaccinate you . . . you don’t want the respect for autonomy of people to get in the way of a public health mandate.”

Table 1. Vaccine package inserts reviewed
Type of Vaccine Brand Name Manufacturer
Vaccines containing diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis components Adacel (Tdap)
Boostrix (Tdap)
Daptacel (DTaP)
Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids Adsorbed (DT)
Infanrix (DTaP)
Kinrix (DTaP-IPV)
Pediarix (DTaP-HepB-IPV)
Pentacel (DTaP-IPV/Hib)
Quadracel (DTaP-IPV)
Tdvax (Td)
Tenivac (Td) Sanofi Pasteur
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
Sanofi
Sanofi
GSK
GSK
GSK
Sanofi
Sanofi
MassBiologics
Sanofi
Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines ActHIB (Hib)
Hiberix (Hib)
PedvaxHIB (Hib) Sanofi
GSK
Merck
Hepatitis vaccines Engerix-B (HepB)
Havrix (HepA)
Recombivax HB (HepB)
Twinrix (HepA/HepB)
Vaqta (HepA) GSK
GSK
Merck
GSK
Merck
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines Gardasil
Gardasil 9 Merck
Merck
Influenza vaccines Afluria Quadrivalent
Fluarix
Flublok Quadrivalent (age 18 and older)
Flucelvax
Flulaval Quadrivalent
FluMist
Fluzone Quadrivalent Sequirus
GSK
Protein Sciences Corporation
Sequirus
GSK
AstraZeneca
Sanofi
Meningococcal vaccines Bexero
Trumenba GSK
Pfizer
Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and MMR+varicella vaccines MMR-II (MMR)
Proquad (MMRV) Merck
Merck
Pneumococcal vaccines Prevnar-13
Pneumovax-23 Pfizer
Merck
Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) IPOL (IPV) Sanofi
Rotavirus vaccines Rotarix
RotaTeq GSK
Merck
Varicella vaccine Varivax Merck
Table 2. Adverse events reported in package inserts, by body system*
[Note: Medical conditions with asterisks appear in more than one category.]
Body System Medical Disorder Vaccines Reporting Disorder
Allergic (5) Allergic reactions/hypersensitivity* ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, FluMist, Fluzone, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Quadracel, Recombivax, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix
Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions, including shock* ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix, Varivax
Angioedema* ActHIB, Adacel, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Twinrix, Varivax
Serum sickness* Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Havrix, Pneumovax-23, Recombivax, Twinrix
Urticaria* [hives] ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, Quadracel, Recombivax, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Twinrix
Autoimmune (7) Diabetes mellitus* MMR-II
Guillain-Barré syndrome* Adacel, Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Havrix, MMR-II, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tenivac, Vaqta, Varivax
Kawasaki disease* [blood vessel disease] Rotarix, RotaTeq
Lupus-like syndrome* Recombivax
Multiple sclerosis (or MS exacerbation)* Engerix-B, Havrix, Recombivax, Twinrix
Pancreatitis* Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II
Systemic lupus erythematosus* Recombivax
Blood/lymphatic system (10) Anemia, aplasic or hemolytic Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Varivax
Epistaxis [nosebleed] FluMist, ProQuad
Extravasation [blood vessel leakage] ProQuad
Hematochezia [bloody stools] ProQuad, Rotarix, RotaTeq
Increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate Recombivax
Leukocytosis [increased white blood cells] MMR-II, Pneumovax-23
Lymphadenitis [swollen lymph nodes] Boostrix, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad
Lymphadenopathy, including regional Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, MMR-II, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Tenivac
Thrombocytopenia [low platelets] Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluzone, Havrix, Infanrix, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax
Thrombocytopenic purpura, idiopathic Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Rotarix, Twinrix, Varivax
Cardiac (6) Cyanosis* [bluish discoloration, low oxygen] Daptacel, Hiberix, Infanrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, Quadracel
Hypotension Adacel
Myocarditis [heart muscle inflammation] Adacel, Boostrix
Palpitations Engerix-B, Twinrix
Pericarditis [pericardial inflammation] FluMist
Tachycardia [abnormally high heart rate] Engerix-B, Fluarix, Recombivax, Twinrix
Congenital (1) Congenital anomaly Havrix
Death (2) Death Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II, Rotarix, RotaTeq
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) Infanrix
Ear/labyrinth (5) Ear pain Engerix-B, Infanrix, ProQuad, Twinrix
Nerve deafness MMR-II, ProQuad
Otitis media MMR-II
Tinnitis Engerix-B, Recombivax, Twinrix
Vertigo Engerix-B, Fluarix
Eye (15) Conjunctivitis Engerix-B, Fluarix, MMR-II, Recombivax, Twinrix
Eye irritation Fluarix, ProQuad
Eye pain Fluarix, Flulaval
Eye redness Fluarix
Eye swelling Bexero, Fluarix
Eyelid swelling Fluarix, ProQuad
Keratitis [corneal inflammation] Engerix-B
Ocular hyperemia [eye inflammation] Fluzone
Ocular palsies* [nerve damage] MMR-II, ProQuad
Optic neuritis/neuropathy, papillitis* [inflammation of optic nerve] Engerix-B, Fluzone, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix
Photophobia [light intolerance] Flulaval
Retinitis, necrotizing [inflammation] MMR-II, ProQuad, Varivax
Retrobulbar neuritis [nerve damage] MMR-II, ProQuad
Uveitis [eye inflammation] Recombivax
Visual disturbances Engerix-B, Recombivax, Twinrix
Gastrointestinal (13) Abdominal pain, discomfort Fluarix, ProQuad
Candidiasis* ProQuad
Constipation Recombivax
Diarrhea Daptacel, FluMist, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel
Dyspepsia [indigestion] Engerix-B, Twinrix
Dysphagia [swallowing difficulties] Flulaval
Gastroenteritis Rotarix, RotaTeq
Intussusception, including recurrent/fatal Rotarix, RotaTeq
Mouth ulcers ProQuad
Nausea Daptacel, DT, Fluarix, FluMist, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, Tdvax
Pancreatitis* Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II
Swelling of mouth, throat or tongue Fluarix
Vomiting Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Tenivac
General and injection site (20) Abnormal gait Flulaval
Apathy ProQuad
Asthenia [fatigue, weakness] Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Infanrix, Pediarix, Tenivac
Body aches Fluarix
Chest pain Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone
Chills Fluarix, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Twinrix
Decreased limb mobility Pneumovax-23
Feeling hot Fluarix
Fever MMR-II, Pneumovax-23
Injected limb—extensive swelling ActHIB, Bexero, Hiberix
Injection site abscess Adacel, Daptacel, Fluarix, Flulaval, PedvaxHIB, Pentacel, Quadracel
Injection site bruising Adacel, Flulaval
Injection site cellulitis Afluria, Daptacel, Fluarix, Flulaval, Pediarix, Quadracel, Tenivac
Injection site reactions (mass, pain, warmth) Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Tdvax, Tenivac, Twinrix
Injection site rash Daptacel, Flulaval, IPOL, Prevnar-13
Listlessness Quadracel
Malaise Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, Tdvax, Twinrix
Peripheral edema ActHIB, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Tdvax, Tenivac, Varivax
Pyrexia [fever] Tdvax
Swelling MMR-II, ProQuad
Hepatobiliary/liver (3) Elevation of liver enzymes Recombivax
Hepatitis Havrix, Twinrix
Jaundice Havrix, Twinrix
Immune system (5) Allergic reactions/hypersensitivity* ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, FluMist, Fluzone, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Quadracel, Recombivax, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix
Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions, including shock* ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix, Varivax
Angioedema,* angioneurotic edema ActHIB, Adacel, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Twinrix, Varivax
Edema Adacel
Serum sickness* Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Havrix, Pneumovax-23, Recombivax, Twinrix
Infections and infestations (29) Atypical measles MMR-II, ProQuad
Bronchitis Infanrix, ProQuad
Candidiasis* ProQuad
Cellulitis Daptacel, Infanrix, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Tdvax, Varivax
Early-onset Hib disease PedvaxHIB
Herpes simplex ProQuad
Herpes zoster [shingles] Engerix-B, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Varivax
Infection ProQuad
Influenza, influenza-like illness Afluria, Flulaval, Havrix, ProQuad
Invasive Hib disease Pentacel
Kawasaki disease* [blood vessel disease] Rotarix, RotaTeq
Laryngitis Flulaval
Measles ProQuad
Measles-like rash MMR-II
Meningitis (aseptic, eosinophilic) Engerix-B, FluMist, MMR-II, Pentacel, ProQuad, Twinrix, Varivax
Pharyngitis Fluarix, Varivax
Pneumonia, pneumonitis MMR-II, ProQuad, Varivax
Pulmonary congestion ProQuad
Respiratory tract infection Infanrix, Pediarix, ProQuad
Rhinitis Fluarix, Flulaval, Havrix, MMR-II, Pentacel, ProQuad
Secondary bacterial infections (skin, tissue) Varivax
Sinusitis ProQuad
Skin infection ProQuad
Sore throat MMR-II, ProQuad
Tonsillitis Fluarix
Transmission of vaccine virus strains RotaTeq
Varicella (vaccine strain) ProQuad, Varivax
Varicella-like rash ProQuad
Viral infection Pentacel
Investigations (2) Abnormal liver function tests Engerix-B, Twinrix
Increased serum C-reactive protein Pneumovax-23
Metabolic (3) Decreased appetite Pentacel
Diabetes mellitus* MMR-II
Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, Leigh syndrom exacerbation [neurometabolic] FluMist
Musculoskeletal/connective tissue (13) Arthralgia [joint pain] Boostrix, Engerix-B, IPOL, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tdvax, Twinrix
Arthritis Engerix-B, Flulaval, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix
Back pain Boostrix
Hypotonia [low muscle tone] Daptacel, Hiberix, Infanrix, Pediarix, Prevnar-13, Quadracel
Lupus-like syndrome* Recombivax
Muscle spasm Adacel
Muscle weakness Engerix-B, Flulaval, Recombivax, Twinrix
Musculoskeletal pain ProQuad
Musculoskeletal stiffness Havrix
Myalgia [muscle pain] Boostrix, IPOL, MMR-II, ProQuad, Tdvax, Tenivac
Myositis [muscle inflammation] Adacel
Pain in extremities Fluarix, Fluzone, Pediarix, Recombivax, Tdvax, Tenivac
Systemic lupus erythematosus* Recombivax
Nervous system (41) Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis MMR-II, ProQuad
Ataxia [nervous system dysfunction] MMR-II, ProQuad, Varivax
Bulging fontanelle Pediarix
Cerebellar ataxia Vaqta
Convulsions/seizures ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, IPOL, Kinrix, MMR-II, Quadracel, Recombivax, Tdvax, Twinrix, Varivax
Depressed level of consciousness Boostrix, Pediarix, Pentacel
Dizziness Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Havrix, MMR-II, ProQuad, Tdvax, Tenivac, Varivax
Encephalitis, vaccine-induced encephalitis [brain inflammation] Boostrix, Engerix-B, FluMist, MMR-II, Pediarix, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax
Encephalomyelitis [brain and spinal cord] Afluria, Fluarix, Fluzone
Encephalopathy [brain disease] Afluria, Engerix-B, Flulaval, Havrix, Infanrix, MMR-II, ProQuad, Twinrix
Facial palsy, Bell’s palsy Adacel, Boostrix, Engerix-B, Fluarix, FluMist, Fluzone, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Varivax
Facial (or cranial) nerve paralysis Flulaval
Facial paresis [impaired facial movement] Fluarix
Febrile convulsions/seizures Afluria, Daptacel, Fluzone, IPOL, MMR-II, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax
Guillain-Barré syndrome* Adacel, Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Havrix, MMR-II, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tenivac, Vaqta, Varivax
Headache DT, Infanrix, IPOL, MMR-II, ProQuad, Tdvax, Twinrix
Hypoesthesia [decreased tactile sensitivity] Adacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, Havrix, Recombivax, Twinrix
Hypokinesia [loss of muscle movement] Flulaval
Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode to immunization (HHE) Daptacel, Hiberix, Kinrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Quadracel
Lethargy Pediarix
Limb paralysis Flulaval
Measles inclusion body encephalitis MMR-II, ProQuad
Migraine Engerix-B, Recombivax
Multiple sclerosis (or MS exacerbation)* Engerix-B, Havrix, Recombivax, Twinrix
Myelitis [spinal cord disease] Adacel, Fluarix, Fluzone, Havrix, Recombivax, Twinrix
Neuralgia [nerve pain] Afluria
Neuritis (including brachial, polyneuritis) Adacel, Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Fluzone, MMR-II, Twinrix
Neuropathy, polyneuropathy Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Havrix, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix
Ocular palsies* [nerve damage] MMR-II, ProQuad
Optic neuritis/neuropathy, papillitis* [inflammation of optic nerve] Engerix-B, Fluzone, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix
Paralysis Engerix-B, Twinrix
Paresis [partial paralysis] Engerix-B, Twinrix
Paresthesia [abnormal skin sensations] Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Fluzone, Havrix, IPOL, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Tenivac, Varivax
Partial seizures, seizures Daptacel, Engerix-B, ProQuad
Presyncope [feeling faint] Flucelvax
Radiculopathy [“pinched nerve” in spine] Pneumovax-23, Recombivax
Somnolence Daptacel, DT, Flulaval, Havrix, Hiberix, IPOL, Pediarix, Pentacel, Quadracel, Recombivax
Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis MMR-II, ProQuad
Syncope, vasovagal syncope [fainting] Adacel, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tenivac, Trumenba
Transverse myelitis Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluzone, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Varivax
Tremors Flulaval, ProQuad
Psychiatric (8) Agitation IPOL, ProQuad, Recombivax
Crying/unusual crying Pediarix
Hypersomnia ProQuad
Insomnia Flulaval, Pediarix
Irritability MMR-II, Recombivax
Nervousness Pediarix, ProQuad
Restlessness Pediarix
Screaming Daptacel, Pediarix, Pentacel, Quadracel
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal (12) Apnea Engerix-B, Hiberix, Infanrix, Kinrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13
Asthma, asthma-like symptoms Engerix-B, Fluarix, Twinrix
Bronchospasm Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tenivac, Twinrix
Cough Fluarix, Fluzone, Infanrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel
Cyanosis* [bluish discoloration, low oxygen] Daptacel, Hiberix, Infanrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, Quadracel
Dyspnea [shortness of breath] Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Havrix, Pediarix, Quadracel, Twinrix
Dysphonia [vocal abnormalities] Flulaval
Oropharyngeal pain Fluzone
Respiratory distress Fluarix
Rhinorrhea [runny nose] Fluzone
Stridor [high-pitched wheezing] Fluarix
Throat tightness Flulaval, Fluzone
Wheezing Fluzone, ProQuad
Skin/ subcutaneous tissue (22) Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy MMR-II, ProQuad
Alopecia [hair loss] Engerix-B, Recombivax, Twinrix
Ecchymoses [subcutaneous bleeding] Engerix-B, Recombivax, Twinrix
Eczema Engerix-B, Recombivax, Twinrix
Erythema [skin redness] Fluarix, Infanrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Tdvax
Erythema multiforme [skin disorder] Engerix-B, Fluarix, Havrix, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Prevnar-13, Recombivax, Twinrix, Varivax
Erythema nodosum [nodules or lumps] Engerix-B, Recombivax, Twinrix
Exanthem [widespread rash] Boostrix
Facial swelling/edema Daptacel, Fluarix, MMR-II, ProQuad, Varivax
Hyperhydrosis [abnormal sweating] Flulaval, Havrix, Twinrix
Impetigo ProQuad, Varivax
Lichen planus [inflammatory skin rash] Engerix-B, Twinrix
Panniculitis [disease of fatty layer of skin] MMR-II, ProQuad
Parotitis [salivary gland inflammation] MMR-II, ProQuad
Pruritus [itchy skin] ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, Daptacel, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Fluzone, Infanrix, Kinrix, MMR-II, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Tdvax, Tenivac
Purpura [red/purple spots] Engerix-B, MMR-II, ProQuad
Rash ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, Quadracel, Tdvax, Tenivac
Skin discoloration Pentacel
Skin induration MMR-II, ProQuad
Stevens-Johnson syndrome [severe skin reaction] Engerix-B, Fluarix, Fluzone, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Varivax
Urticaria* [hives] ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, Quadracel, Recombivax, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Twinrix
Vesiculation MMR-II
Vascular (8) Cerebrovascular accident ProQuad, Varivax
Flushing Flulaval, Fluzone
Henoch-Schönlein purpura [blood vessel inflammation] Boostrix, Fluarix, MMR-II, ProQuad, Varivax
Pallor DT, Flulaval, Hiberix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, Quadracel
Petechiae [bleeding capillaries] Pediarix, Recombivax
Polyarteritis nodosa [damaged arteries] Recombivax
Renal vasculitis Afluria
Vasculitis Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Fluzone, Havrix, MMR-II, Recombivax, Twinrix
Urogenital (2) Epididymitis [testicular inflammation] MMR-II, ProQuad
Orchitis [inflammation of the testes] MMR-II, ProQuad
*There are several things to note about the information presented in Table 2. First, while we used the verbatim insert terminology for each disorder and also largely stuck to the disease groupings in the package inserts, we added two categories—allergic and autoimmune disorders—that the inserts surprisingly omit. (The package inserts lump allergic reactions in with “immune system disorders.”) Second, there are a number of disorders that fit in more than one category; in those instances, we have included them (with an asterisk*) in both places (while counting them once). Third, the table only includes those adverse events that manufacturers decided to report in the inserts—but other adverse events are not only possible but likely, due to the widespread problem of underreporting. Notably, none of the package inserts include any mention of prevalent, childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorders like tics or autism that published, peer-reviewed studies have linked to vaccines."

[onawah]

FREE—Truth About Vaccines 2020 Goes "Live" 4/22/20 w/ RFKJr.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | Exclusive Preview of The Truth About Vaccines 2020
Trailer
"The Truth About Vaccines
29.8K subscribers
Here is an exclusive preview of our upcoming docu-series, The Truth About Vaccines 2020.

Our very good friend & health hero, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., shares his personal story of how he became involved in the medical freedom movement. We hope it inspires you to join us in standing up for our constitutional health rights.

If you haven't signed up for our explosive, 9-part docu-series, you can register for FREE, here. ➡️ https://bit.ly/register-free-TTAV-2020

What you will learn in this educational 9-episode series:

*THE HISTORY OF VACCINES*
Vaccination programs are given credit for eradicating some of the most devastating illnesses of the past, but they’re no longer immune to controversy of their own.

*VACCINE RISKS and SAFETY CONCERNS*
Concerns about vaccine injuries, mercury toxicity, and autism have increased substantially in recent years, and public debate is once again heating up.

*FULL LIST of OPTIONS and ALTERNATIVES*
You don’t have to pro- or anti-vaccine anymore. New options are available to guard against serious illness, based on your unique situation and risk factors.

*MANDATORY/FORCED VACCINATION LEGISLATION*
Our health freedoms are being silently trampled on. We must not allow Big Pharma to take away our constitutional right to choose.

*COVID-19 IMPACT*
Is a Coronavirus vaccine coming? Is it necessary? Can we protect ourselves from it naturally? We will address all of these questions.

*...AND SO MUCH MORE*"

Register NOW to watch all 9 episodes of “The Truth About Vaccines” for FREE starting April 22. ➡️ https://bit.ly/register-free-TTAV-2020

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=M6kduo2eprA

[TomKat]

Even before the covid roll-out, anti-vaxxers were identified as a Russian-run national security threat in the event of a pandemic in the US:

https://news.yahoo.com/us-warned-thr...103041986.html

[onawah]

“The Truth About Vaccines 2020” this weekend. See the free encore presentation. Register here:
https://go2.thetruthaboutvaccines.co...=59c186eff2e34


The History of Vaccines, Smallpox, Vaccine Safety & the Current CDC Schedule

What’s in a Vaccine? Are Vaccines Effective? ... and ... What About Polio?

In Depth Analysis of the MMR and DTaP Vaccines & Vaccinating for the Greater Good

Examining Influenza, the HIB and Pneumococcal Vaccines & Herd Immunity

Considering the HPV and Hepatitis B Vaccines, SIDS & Shaken Baby Syndrome

A Closer Look at the CDC, Chicken Pox and Rotavirus Vaccines & Retroviruses

Natural Immunization, Homeoprophylaxis & Fundamental Freedom of Choice

Censorship & Suppression

W.H.O.’s Not Telling the Truth?

TTAV2020 "Vaccine Roundtable" (Part 1) - Live at NOON ET on Saturday 5/2!

TTAV2020 "Vaccine Roundtable" (Part 2) - Live at NOON ET on Sunday 5/3!

[Delight]

Brian rose interviewing RFK

He talks about how he was not keen to get involved in vaccine issue... BUT HE DID!!!!!!!!!!!!

[onawah]

RFK Jr, Buttar, Wakefield, Mikovits, Tenpenny, Bollinger, Bigtree--Truth About Vaccines II 2020—
Vaccine Roundtable Part 2, Video and Transcript
MAY 14, 2020
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...3-333dec1fd1a2
If you don't have time for anything else, tune in to RFK Jrs from 1 hour 19 minutes in. OUTSTANDING!! (Though the whole broadcast is outstanding, that is especially so.)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cV_QPwWxOX8

"Thank you to Anne Dachel and Age of Autism for transcribing this for our readers. Anne wrote:

“This was one of the most informative and empowering talks I’ve ever listened to in all the years I’ve been working as an autism advocate. Every person concerned about what the COVID 19 pandemic will do to our medical freedom needs to hear these speakers and learn the truth about what’s coming. There is no walking away from this threat to our liberties.”

May 3, 2020, Panel discussion the COVID 19 crisis and what a vaccine could mean to the American people.

TRANSCRIPT:

Panelists:

Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Dr. Judy Mikovits, Del Bigtree, Ty and Charlene Bollinger, Robert Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Rashid Buttar.

Here are excerpts from the discussion.

Charlene: “…the year 2020 was a big deal. … This is the year, if we don’t help people understand this critical issue we may loss our freedoms, and they may be able to come in and try …to force us into these vaccines. But we did not know what we were getting into….

“I was watching Tucker Carlson [Fox, Tucker Carlson Tonight]. He’s actually had Bobby Kennedy on… We couldn’t believe that mainstream media outlet was covering that. We felt like Tucker’s our friend…

“Last night…on Tucker Carlson Tonight … He had a guest and they talked about Operation Wrap Speed, the COVID vaccination where they’re literally going to pass through the trials that they should be doing. They’re going to skip all that safety measures to get to this vaccine. They’re going to have a hundred million ready to go. …

“The guest talked about this as if it’s a good thing, and Tucker Carlson who has interviewed our good friend Bobby Kennedy, …. I was really letdown by the fact that Tucker Carlson allowed that guest to say that and didn’t dig in. …”

5:42 Kennedy: “There’s now eighty separate vaccine projects. Bill Gates has eight of them. Bill Gates is now the biggest vaccine producer in the world, bigger than any other company.

“One of Gates’ vaccines is the Moderna vaccine, which is the first one out of the gate. The Moderna vaccine is a really dangerous human experiment. It’s shockingly reckless. And to particularly go forward without any kind of animal test at all, they went right to phase one human trials. …

“Tony Fauci has arranged for that company, Moderna, which has never produced a vaccine, …which was on the verge of bankruptcy, 1.5 billion dollars in debt, ….

“And Gates, who has been funding it, and Fauci rescued the company from bankruptcy by giving them the first of these projects. The project is an RNA vaccine, which has never been made before.

“What an RNA vaccine does, unlike most vaccines which are injected with an antigen which is a piece of the target virus, a disabled piece, and an adjuvant which shocks the body to increase the immune response. That’s how every other vaccine works.

“This is an experimental technology that has never been done before in history. What is does, it injects a snippet of the virus that carries a genetic code in its RNA that is designed to alter the DNA, the code in every cell in your body to get your body to naturally start producing those antigens.

“It is a form of genetic engineering. It is genetic engineering. It has been condemned by the Geneva Statement because those genetic changes will survive in your sperm and they will live in your children or in your ovaries.

“They are injecting human being with an untested gene-altering technology designed to change the human genome, without having any proof that it actually works. …

“There’s a problem with COVID vaccines that requires that they have to be tested, and that problem is called paradoxical immune enhancement. …

“Here’s what happened. After the SARS epidemic in 2002, there were three SARS epidemics. The first one was a natural one that began in China. There were two that were lab escapees. And that’s not controversial. People acknowledge that.

“After those epidemics the Chinese and western nations all get together and they said we’ve got to develop a vaccine to treat coronavirus, SARS was a kind of coronavirus.

“They got together and they developed about thirty different vaccines, and they chose the four most promising models. They tested them on ferrets which are the animal that is most analogous to human reaction to upper respiratory infection. They’re very similar to humans. They’re very predictive of what’s going to happen in human beings.

“The ferrets developed to all four vaccines an admiral immune response. The scientists thought they hit the jackpot. …

“Vaccines are never tested in the field. The FDA never gives 2,000 people a vaccine and 2,000 people a placebo and says go out in the world and see what happens. That never happens.

“The way vaccines get a license is the promoter of the vaccine, the company, injects a couple thousand people with the vaccine and then they test their blood to see of they develop an antibody response.

“The ferrets developed a picture perfect antibody response, so they all thought they hit the jackpot. Then something horrible happened.

“When those ferrets were later exposed to the wild virus, they all had body wide inflammation in all their organs, and they died.

“The scientists then remembered something. They remembered that in the 1960s, the FDA and NIH had tested an RSV vaccine which is very similar to corona virus. …They had skipped animal studies and they had gone right to humans. They had tested on 35 kids.

“The kids again developed a sterling antibody response, so they thought they hit the jackpot. But when those children were exposed to the wild virus, instead of protecting them against it, the vaccine actually enhanced the pathways of the virus. Two of those kids died. They all became horrendously sick. It became a scandal and they dropped it and never touched it again. …

“The corona virus does something interesting when it provokes the antibody response. There are two kinds of antibodies. There are neutralizing antibodies which are the kind that defend you from disease. There’s another kind of antibody called a binding antibody that actually helps the virus stick to your receptors and it makes it much, much more dangerous. That’s the kind that is produced by the coronavirus vaccines. That was in 2012 and they completely terminated the program.

“Then in 2014 Tony Fauci had developed a dengue vaccine, and in the clinic trials for the dengue vaccine they saw some of the same signals. That actually the people who got the vaccine and then later were exposed got very sick. They glossed over that.

“They gave it to the Philippines, the Philippines gave it to 100,000 kids. Many, many of those kids, when they finally encountered the wild dengue virus, became horrendously sick and 600 of them died.

“The Philippine government today is criminally prosecuting the Philippine health officials who waved that vaccine through. They should have known that Fauci in the clinical trials had seen these signals previously.

“So today, all the people on this panel …the people who’ve been our loudest critics: Peter Hotez, Paul Offit, Ian Lipkin, all of them are vaccine developers, all of them are bullhorns for the vaccine industry, the generals in the mercenary army that has been fighting us for years—All of them are saying IT IS INSANELY DANGEROUS FOR TONY FAUCI TO GO AHEAD WITH THESE TRIALS to inject human beings.

“He started on March 12th injecting human beings in Seattle, Washington, volunteers who I’m sure had no idea that their genes were being permanently altered for generations. There’s no informed consent because I guarantee you Tony Fauci didn’t tell them that.

“He’s testing his vaccine that he put almost a half a billion dollars into, authorized our taxpayer funds going into that, which gives him control of the patent, of half the patent, and Bill Gates’ vaccine. To fast track this very, very dangerous vaccine without animal studies is reckless and I would say is criminal.

14:35 Dr. Tenpenny: “During the period of time that they were doing those dengue vaccine trials, I was following that pretty closely. The thing that is even more scary than what you said, …and you from your legal perspective, I would like you to add to this, is we are now acting underneath the 2005 Prep Act ..that stand for Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act that was tacked onto the tail end of a defense appropriation bill at 11:20 at night on Friday night December 17th after everybody in the House had already signed off and gone home. The Senate never read it. They passed it. Even your uncle Ted Kennedy said afterwards, ‘We judge how well the pharmaceutical company usually wins around here, and they usually get big wins, but they’ve never gotten a win this big.’

“And you can’t find any of those documents now. I wrote my book Fowl…about the bird flu, and all of that is in my book. I’ve captured that, and if you try to go find that stuff on the Internet now, …all of it has been scrubbed.

“What does the Prep Act actually do? It gives liability immunity for any covered countermeasure that’s made while it’s in place. You can’t sue them. The only way you can sue them if a bunch of people get injured or killed is that you have to go to the U.S. Attorney General and prove willful misconduct, that they were going to intentionally going to create a product intentionally to harm you or kill you. Good luck with that.

“Alex Azar, our great HHS Secretary, instituted the Prep Act on February 4th, he put it in there, and he put it into the Federal Register on March 17th, so we are operating under that now. …”

16:43 Kennedy: “Bill Gates said from the beginning he was not going to allow any of his vaccines to be used unless he got full immunity from all from all the governments in all the countries that use his vaccine because he knows he’s going to kill a lot of people. He himself said this vaccine is only going to be tested on at most only a thousand people.”

“What if there’s an injury rate of one in 10,000? You won’t see that if you test a thousand people. You will never see it.

“Let’s say it’s a death rate of one in 10,000. Very, very possible, and you will never see it. If you give that vaccine to seven billion people, which is what he’s intending, that means the 700,000 people are going to die from it.

“Ultimately you will get to a level where with other injuries etc. that you’re causing more problems than you’re averting. It’s very, very possible.

“If you don’t test it on animals, you go right to humans and you test a thousand humans, plus there’s no placebo, but they don’t care. They’re under the Prep Act, complete, blanket immunity from liability.

“They could end up killing every person they give this to in Seattle. What do they care? It’s a gamble for them because if that Moderna vaccine works Gates is going to make a billion dollars. And if it doesn’t work, he’s got eight others in the pipeline. He’ll just say that was a bad experiment.

“The reason they’re going forward so quickly with that is because there’s no biological material. You don’t have to manufacture anything. With other vaccines you have to start a factory, you have to grow the vaccine… It’s a long process, but with the Moderna vaccine your body becomes the factory because you’re altering the human DNA so that it will produce the antibody.

“They don’t have to build any factory. They just have to take little snippets of the RNA and inject them into human beings and let you do all the work. They can fast track it overnight. They can literally get it to market within months, and that’s what they did. Within weeks, all they needed was that genetic code from the Chinese and they can make this RNA virus.

“It’s never proven in any model, and the company that’s making it has never brought a product to market. They’ve never been through phrase three trials and they were on the edge of bankruptcy.

“It is really, really, really crazy. How willing they are to play God. …Gates…believes is up there and he can experiment with lesser human beings. If there’s collateral damage, then so be it. He’s well-intentioned, and he’s going to save the world….”

20:48 Dr. Buttar:”When you introduce RNA into the body, the implications aren’t something that will be necessarily seen in a week or in a month. It could be a year or two years and then the generational component, because now it’s actually changing the genetic code, and it’s going to be something that’s going to stay consistent and continue to propagate generation to generation. …”

21:18 Bigtree; “One of the studies we were looking at, I believe it was the Moderna study, they are forbidding sexual intercourse without full protection, meaning they are so concerned. There can be no pregnancy allowed by anybody involved in this study, meaning they are so concerned that they may have a generational problem…

“I think one of my biggest concerns when I talk about this, I think Bobby, you put it perfectly, I believe this is the God vaccine. We’re talking about no longer letting the body react… We’re talking about messaging RNA. We’re talking about putting in manmade messages that go to all of your cells to make the cell think it’s getting information from the DNA…

“ Here’s my biggest concern. We do know that they are all focused on this antibody immune enhancement issue that you very well described. The animals all died in the trials and now we’re going on to human beings.

“This is what Hotez sat before Congress and talked about. Even Tony Fauci said on television there is a concern that this vaccine could make people more sick. We don’t want to do that. But the most troubling thing about it that most people don’t understand is how little these virologists know about how a vaccine works, and even more so, what Dr. Peter Hotez said. We don’t know why antibody immune enhancement happens. We don’t know what’s causing it.

“So my concern is that in these small test groups that they’re doing… what happens if let’s say … one of these vaccines gets to one of these small trials and for some reason antibody immune enhancement doesn’t happen. What I want to say is that since the beginning of mankind there’s never been a bacteria or a virus outbreak that took out the species.

“There’s something about nature and our relationship to it that we survive. We even get stronger as we go along. We’re talking about a vaccine that’s being discussed by world leaders, being driven by Bill Gates saying everyone in the world is going to get this vaccine.

“Can you imagine a vaccine that gets to the trials, looks like it’s safe…? Their dream is to vaccinate everyone in the world. And then all of a sudden, maybe the strain that they design the vaccine around avoid that problem, but all of a sudden there’s a mutation …gets out and starts triggering antibody immune enhancement.

“Now all of a sudden, we’re not watching .1 percent of the people die, .3 percent or 10 percent. You could talk about a scenario with 30 percent of those coming in contact with what would have been a cold, like those ferrets, their bodies are over reacting to this and they’re having complete organ failure and shutdown.

“You could honestly be looking at a vaccine for the first time that has the potential to eradicate our species. That is how dangerous this vaccine is.

“…I’ve been interviewed like crazy. I say of all the times we have never put two of the most dangerous words together known to man, RUSHED and SCIENCE, in the same sentence, is the most dangerous statement that could ever be made. And we’re allowing that statement to be made on one of the most dangerous approaches to vaccines there has ever been.

“This is the message that everyone really needs to share with everyone they know. This is not a joke. …This thing is coming for us. I can’t imagine anything more ridiculous than a life-threatening vaccine that has an issue that they don’t even understand why it happens for an illness that kills .1 to .3 percent of the world.”

25:43 Kennedy: “CNN did a really interesting article that appeared this morning about Moderna. …In the last couple of paragraphs they interviewed two of the former officials, people that worked at Moderna till 2018 and one of them was, I think, the CEO of the company.

“He said, I was shocked when I read that the federal government had given that company $438 million. I was shocked.

“The other guy, and he said, I don’t know what they were thinking of. That’s what he said. This is a guy who worked at the company.

“The other guy was their chief chemist, the head of all their chemistry department, …He said, there is nothing what could make me put that vaccine in my body.”

27:00 Dr. Wakefield: “There’s an extraordinary interview by Peter Aaby . Peter Aaby I’ve known for many years, a very, very good vaccinologist, works for a vaccine maker… He’s worked in West Africa for most of his professional life. He said in that interview, we think we know what our vaccines are doing, we don’t.

“He’s a very, very honest man and he went up against the system and then demonstrated looking at the non-specific effects of vaccines. The DTP vaccine had killed more children in West Africa than it had saved from the target diseases… And that is the most widely used vaccine historically in the world.

“An astonishing admission and it was completely ignored. The only response from authorities was to remove his funding. We really live in an era when we know so little and we assume so much.

“The same happened with pertussis. I remember that Salzberg [Forbes] wrote an article blaming anti-vaxxers for the outbreaks of whooping cough. There was an admission by Christopher Gill from Boston University [Dept of Global Health] saying that we’ve made assumptions upon assumptions. We didn’t understand how pertussis interacted with the human immune system. We’re in the embarrassing position of having to admit that we may have made some serious mistakes.

“That’s the truth. It’s not the anti-vaxxers. It’s the hubris as someone pointed out of the pharmaceutical industry and the vaccinologists. The idea that you can exert dominion, you can mutate, you can adapt, you can change these things… You can assume dominion over organisms…. They mutate at an extraordinary rate because they are destined to survive. They will survive….”



29:30 Dr. Tenpenny: “Andy, years ago at a conference…you said, ‘The human race has evolved because of its relationship with microbes, not in spite of it.’

“That has resonated with me and I’ve used that a lot, and I’ve always given you credit. … It’s so true. …

“Suddenly we’ve got mandatory vaccination right here in people’s faces that first of all never even heard of it, and second of all never gave it any thought. Perhaps this is going to give some clarity and some eye-opening to the whole concept of the germ theory too. That it’s really about the terrain, and vaccinating me doesn’t keep you from getting sick. So maybe there will even be some changes in that. … Maybe people will start to understand our relationship with microbes, and it’s not all bad.”

30: 50 Dr. Wakefield: “I think that the people who have been telling that story from whatever part of the spectrum of biology that they come from… Those who have been telling that story as the truth emerges are the ones that in the future are going to be trusted by the people. …”

31:42: Dr. Buttar: “What everybody is talking about, I think the most crucial component is that…it’s now being censored. …That’s the question we should be asking, why is this being censored. It was after your uncle was assassinated, Bobby, that term ‘conspiracy theory’ was coined to throw people off from asking those key questions.

“One of the questions we should be asking …is why is information regarding this and a certain type of technology being censored. That in itself sheds light on what’s going on. …To me one of the most important is, why is information being censored?…”

35:40 Dr. Wakefield: “Del gave an outstanding interview in the new movie on this issue of censorship, and it’s something that’s really perplexed us in terms of releasing the movie. …

“As all these traditional platforms are disappearing for the kind of story we’re telling, even those two doctors from mainstream medicine in southern California talking about the facts of COVID the other day, now censored, extraordinary level of censorship, is that we are going out on a new platform, a censorship free platform, SPHIR.IO which provides a specific platform for this very conversation, this growing community.

“I would strongly recommend to people that we focus on a platform such as this to regroup …to have a censorship free environment in which people can disseminate this kind of information. …



36:36 Charlene: “The biggest lobby… is not oil, it’s actually the pharmaceutical companies. They spend more money buying off our lawmakers, our politicians, than any other lobby in D.C. …

“I think that people are finding us and they’re learning how to find us. …They took us off Pinterest completely because we told the truth about vaccines and we had a pretty big presence there.

“We have close to 2,000,000 collectively on Facebook. They’ve told us we cannot even run a sponsored ad to reach new people with the opportunity to learn the truth about vaccines because what we talk about does not marry into their talking points that vaccines are safe and effective….

“We’re all having issues reaching the people of the world in the conventional ways that we have done. Google took us completely down. …”

42:50 Dr. Tenpenny: “The pro vaccine people, if they really believed what they’re talking about and they really have faith in what they’re doing and they trust their science, they’re missing a great opportunity to put all of us on the stage together somewhere.

“Wouldn’t Peter Hotez and Paul Offit just love to put the heel of their boot on the throat of Sherri Tenpenny and just crush her publicly in front of everybody?…

“Wouldn’t they love to have the opportunity to publicly embarrass us and shame us because they’re so right and we’re so wrong? It should speak volumes to people who hear that.”

43:35 Dr. Buttar: “In 2006 or 7 I was in Verona, Italy. I was invited by the government of Italy… I was one of the keynote speakers. I had the second to the last lecture as a keynote and the other person… it was Offit.

“What happened, it was beautiful actually because he started showing some of my slides and half-truths to the point that I got agitated. There were three doctors that had to come and hold me back. I was so livid. It was going to be a physical altercation.

“Some woman stood up in the audience and started yelling in Italian. …She’s screaming and Offit had this look on his face. …She was screaming at him.

“The bottom line was one of the neurologist there had started using our protocol for their child who was 12 years old at the time. After six months the child had started to speak and no longer had to wear diapers.

“She was cursing Offit and he didn’t know what was being said. He had a smile on his face until he put on headphones, …people started clapping and I realized that the truth will be known. …

“I realized they don’t want the opportunity to debate us one-on-one. …

“Vaccines are designed by the way our bodies work, to create immunity. Great concept. …But now you’ve got to start introducing things into the body under the pretense of public safety that suppressing the immune system and giving additional things that are immuno-suppressive and are irritating the immune system …it defies all logic.

“Why are we doing this? I’m not against vaccinations, if you can make something that’s not going to hurt a person. But to make something that’s going to hurt a person more than the original disease that they’re worried about? It’s just madness.”

49:24 Kennedy: “I’m all for vaccines if they can make them safe and effective. I’ve never seen it happen before. …

“Part of my job is to try and bring in people into this movement who are not part of the choir. …

“You don’t build a movement starting from a position, I hate all vaccines; all vaccines are bad. I always start by telling audiences I’m for vaccines, never for mandatory vaccines.

“If there’s a vaccine that’s good for me, it has no bad side effects, and does everything that it’s advertised to do. …I would of course take that vaccine. I just haven’t seen it happen.

“One of the primary tools of our opponents is to characterize us all as anti-vax. The mainstream of our country and of the world believes all the propaganda about vaccines.

“If the New York Times and CNN can convince someone that you’re anti-vax, they then have a license to shut you up and to marginalize you and to discredit you and to not listen to what you are saying.

“I try to open up all the opportunities and possibilities for people to listen to me. ..

“I’m against bad science. I’m for good science. I’m for robust science and for honest regulators. We don’t have any of those things.

“I’m all for good vaccines that are effective and safe, if they can ever be made. The problem is nobody’s ever done it yet.”

52:02 Bigtree: “… One of our biggest complaints is that the pro vaxxers keep saying the science is settled. …That’s the least scientific statement you can possibly make. That’s why I don’t say I’m anti vaccine. That’s the same as saying my science is settled, nothing will ever happen in the future that could change my mind. That makes you an idiot, and that makes you unscientific.

“…I’m not anti-science. I’m pro science… I think it’s perfectly noble to protect people who are at acute risk from COVID 19 with a vaccine. Here’s my problem. My problem is the vaccine should be designed for people that need it. …

“Ninety-five percent of the people will have no issue with this illness whatsoever. They’re going to have a robust immune reaction …

“Make the product for those that need it. What we cannot allow any longer is this idea that science only knows how to make a product that ninety-five percent of healthy people can take but not the immune suppressed, not those that are in danger. That is such an obvious advertising marketing scheme, you’ve got to hand it to them. …They want the rest of us …to take a product we don’t need….

“Go ahead, make the vaccine. You are capable. I am so sure that the scientists of the world and all the funding coming from Bill Gates, you are completely capable of making a product for that tiny percentage of people that really do need it….”

55:46 Dr Buttar: “I want to say one thing and that is I have publicly stated that I will go anywhere on the planet, no matter how rampant the issue is. I will shake their hand, I will hug them, and if she’s good-looking enough, I’ll even kiss her. I have no problem getting that exposure. …”

55:50 Charlene: “That’s the point of our discussion right now. We want to learn the truth about vaccines, the truth about COVID. What’s really going on. In a free society we ought to be afforded the right to speak and to be heard, to dialogue back and forth. There are talking points that keep people triggered from even listening to us because the term anti vax is somewhat like the term conspiracy theorist. …”

Next the panelists each updated what they’re currently doing.

58:49 Dr. Wakefield: “…The new film comes out in a few weeks time. …It’s called 1986 The Act, and it goes right to the core of the very problems we’ve been discussing. How did this come to pass? What was the catalyst that really drove this pro vaccine agenda worldwide and the push for mandates?

“It was in large part the 1986 act signed into law by Ronald Reagan which gave liability protection to the vaccine makers for damage done by their vaccines. At the time it was a limited liability. It since has become liability for all damage done by all vaccines. …

“What it did was give the pharmaceutical industry the perfect business model of a mandatory market and no liability and that was a profit machine. That profit machine allowed them to buy the politicians, the media, to buy public opinion, and to buy the medical profession. That has made them extremely powerful.

“What circumvents the 1986 Act is fraud. If they can be shown to have committed fraud, they deliberately put people in harm’s way, if they knew they could make vaccines safer and they chose not to and hid that fact, then they’re liable. One way of bringing this act to its knees and forcing revision or repeal is to expose that fraud.

“In my opinion, what the film reveals is premeditated, first degree murder. …

“I urge people to watch it.”

1:01:50 Dr. Mikovits: “You can find us promoting Plague of Corruption, which is what COVID 19 is and what the data in that book support, …

“The subtitle is called Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science. There is promise in science, and if we can show that many, many, many good doctors, good scientists, and it’s only the old boys’ corrupt network that has perpetrated this COVID 19, the largest fraud that is small amount that need to go.

“We can reorganize, shut down, start over again with true public health agencies to protect public health.

“We’ll be at Autism One, which this year is virtual…

Dr. Mikovits also talked about what she had gone through being a whistleblower.

“…How bad our scientific community is, not only with censorship, but with propaganda masquerading as science as they misinterpret data in order to cover up from this ‘plague of corruption.’ …

“Never again will something like William Thompson and the data burning party happen. We’ve got all the data, and the Attorney General has had it on a hard drive since 2015. So we know the FBI, the Attorney General are fully complicit. They know exactly what happened They’re part and parcel to COVID 19 and this plague of corruption. …”

1:12:15 Del Bigtree: “First of all, you can always find me at the Highwire.com of course. I’m doing a weekly talk show, my third year now. I’ve done over 160 episodes of The Highwire with Del Bigtree…

“Of course my nonprofit website is ICanDecide.org, if you want to read about the lawsuits. …I really believe that this is a time of hope. I think we really need to look at this a different way. …Fear is what they’re trying to sell us. … Know that we are powerful. Our bodies are beating this, whether it’s a manmade virus or it’s a virus out of Wuhan, it doesn’t matter. We are amazingly designed….

“The Highwire has grown 25 times, our viewership has increased in eight weeks. We’ve gone from hundreds of thousands of views to millions of views with every form of censorship taking place on our show. …“It’s one person handing it and sharing it to the next person. …

“We all have to do our part. It’s time to come together and take back the world. …”

1:19:20 Kennedy: “I want to share my gratitude …this is such an extraordinary group. I’m so glad I got to sit here with you guys because these people are my friends…

“Children’s Health Defense now is focusing on information, …getting the information, weaponizing it and handing it to our followers in a form that they can use to change the pharmaceutical paradigm.

“The pharmaceutical companies have subverted our democracy. They are victimizing our children They have captured the agencies that are supposed to protect American citizens from powerful industries. They have corrupted the political process. They have subverted the press.

“They are using this pandemic, some people call it a ‘plandemic’ because it feels so much like there was a plan behind it, to tighten the noose on us and to turn America into a surveillance state where people, because they’re scared of a virus, will accept these intrusions on their liberties, on their civil rights. …

“They’re turning us into production units and consuming entities. They can monitor us anytime. …

“5G is not about bringing you quicker downloads for your video games or for your movies. It’s about surveillance and control. It’s about taking all the data from your devices …so they know what you’re doing, what you’re buying, everything about you. That data is the new oil rush of the 21st century. …

“Gates has a chip that will turn on and off a woman’s menstrual process so she can and cannot have babies. …Every part of our lives is now going to be subject to control.

“This disease [COVID] is about engineering compliance. It’s about training us to do what we’re told, to not go to the beach unless we’re told, to not kiss our girlfriend unless we’re given permission.

“The other day in Malibu police were out on the beach giving thousand dollar tickets to surfers for using the ocean, and people are putting up with this. And when they get this 5G system in place you won’t even see that because they’ll know when you are at the beach by looking at your cell phone, by looking at your GPS, … and they’ll just withdraw one thousand dollars from your payroll account with cryto currency.

“They’re trying to get rid of all the money. That’s one of Gates’ things, to get rid of the cash economy. That way they can monitor and scrutinize every transaction that you make, and if they don’t like you, if you displease them, they can shut it all off.

“We need to understand that is what’s happening here. They are going to rob us not only of our democracy, our liberties, but they’re going to rob us of our souls.

“They’re going to inject us with the medicines that they want and they’re going to charge us for the diseases that they give us.

“They’re going to control our populations, they’re going to control our movements, control every part of our lives. If you are not part of this battle, then you are lost.

“We are the only things that are left for all the things that we value in our lives, all of the things that our country stood for. This is it. And what we’re doing at CHD is we’re suing them. We’re using the last instruments of our democracy that are left.

“…The courts are one of the few places that are left where we can still make a difference, where we can still change policy. They’ve neutralized and co-opted and infiltrated all of the other institutions of our democracy that are supposed to stand between a vulnerable little child and a greedy corporation. They’re gone …

“We have a very, very important job which is to inform our public, to organize our public to strategize with each other… and I’m so grateful that the people that I’m working with …are all the major leaders here…

“We are in the last battle. This is the apocalypse. We are fighting for the salvation of humanity. We all knew this was coming at some point. I never believed it would come in my lifetime, but here it is. We are the happy few, the band of brothers and sisters. We know what our job is in this life. We know that we’re part of this battle. We have to fight and we have to die with our boots on if necessary. Everybody here, I’m confident, knows what their duty is and is going to do that duty, and I’m going to be beside you when you do it. I know all of you are going to be beside me.”

1:31:42 Dr. Tenpenny: “When you look at this whole situation and this whole shutdown, maybe God put the entire world on stop for right now and we can take advantage of that time. …

“And thirdly and most importantly get your spiritual house in order. We’ve got some pretty big battles coming up. We can be as optimistic or as pessimistic as we want to be about what we think the next three to six years is.

“Most of us that are Christians kind of know what the end game is. We know what the end of the story is, and in between now and then, whether it’s six months, six years, sixteen years, however long it is, get your spiritual house in order. God put you in full stop so that you can get your spiritual house in order. What does that means to you? How does that really resonate with you? If you’ve never taken the time to pray, you haven’t had time to do it, now you’ve got the time….

“If people want to find out more about me personally…you can go to drtenpenny.com … and vaxxter.com …

“I’ve been doing this for twenty years and more than 40,000 hours, and I’m one of the physicians on the team that has been able to stand up and say not only no, but hell no, we’re not doing this….

1:41:48 Dr. Buttar: “Fear is an illusion. It exists only in our mind and this is one of the places where they’re trying to take humanity down is from this fear aspect. Fear is not real. Danger is real, but fear is not. …

“What they are painting now is that this COVID 19, the coronavirus is the danger and they’re trying to make you fearful of it whereas in fact the danger is not the coronavirus. The danger is exactly what Bobby talked about, what Del talked about, what Andy talked about… That’s the danger, taking away our rights, our fundamental autonomy over our own bodies, over our own children.

“It is a fight for humanity…if I don’t fight, the rest of us don’t fight, my children will not have children. That’s what motivates me. …

“I believe that we are writing history here and we will be remembered. …

“If you go to AskDrButtar.com/ttav …follow the links, you will get to the part where you can access the dashboard and you’ll be able to see all these videos and you can download them. …It’s not going to cost you a single dime. …

“The most important thing we can do is empower people with knowledge because once you’ve been empowered, nobody can victimize you. Then it doesn’t make any difference what they try to do because now you know what the facts are, you know where the real danger is, and you won’t be fearful anymore.” "

[onawah]

Fifty Years: An M.D.’s Insights on Childhood Epidemics
MAY 14, 2020
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...3-333dec1fd1a2

Guest Editorial by Michael Godfrey M.D., B.S. Tauranga, New Zealand

"I am a semi-retired 82-year-old MD having graduated at London University, England in 1963. After 7 years working in British hospitals, I took up a family medical practice in New Zealand where I met many new patients for the first time. I first began to observe a difference between the elderly and their then middle-aged children. The elderly had far fewer chronic illnesses until arthritis and cardio-vascular problems developed in their later years. Contrasting this, the next generation tended to develop chronic illnesses in their 40s. Notably, many of those elderly had had full dentures from early adulthood due to the poverty and poor nutrition in the 1920-30 decades. However, their children were exposed to the State-funded school dentistry in the 50-70 decades with extensive dental amalgam fillings. A 1968 Health Department survey indeed confirmed that at that time 21-year-olds had an average of 16 fillings with 15-year-old teenagers having 13. Remarkably, this dropped to an average of 8 within a year following a directive to dental nurses in 1976 to essentially only drill teeth showing actual decay.

Over the following 20 years, I correctly confirmed underlying chronic mercury toxicity in over 800 patients. This was subsequently confirmed by an independent randomized investigation published in 1999. I co-authored a dental mercury association with senile dementia (J. Alz. Dis. 2003).

In association with a colleague I provided a health questionnaire to several hundred mothers and confirmed a significant difference in tonsillitis, glue ear, allergies, asthma and even neurological problems between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Over the first 15 years of family medicine I also became disillusioned in the established methods of general practice. I was just fixing symptoms without doing much to prevent illness. This was most noticeable in children. I discovered the immediate benefits of homeopathy using a home kit supplied by a local manufacturer. These tended to be more effective than antibiotics for the common upper respiratory infections and discharging ears. I also started to realize by the late 1980s that these problems frequently developed within weeks of vaccinations. In association with a colleague I provided a health questionnaire to several hundred mothers and confirmed a significant difference in tonsillitis, glue ear, allergies, asthma and even neurological problems between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. By this time, I was also being approached by parents concerned at the risks of vaccination. They tended to either have seen a permanent serious adverse reaction in their first child or seen it in a friend’s child. Autistic children suddenly started to appear in the 1990s and a pediatric colleague at the Cleveland Clinic commented after he had retired 10 years ago, that he never saw a single autistic child in the 1960s but by the late 1980s he was devastated by seeing them on a daily basis.

My daughters were given the standard DPT vaccines in the 70s but following my observations, both mothers decided not to vaccinate their 5 children preferring to help them through the usual childhood infections with vitamin C and homeopathy. They had few problems, all survived and are healthy. One of my Grand-daughters now has a 5-year and a 2-year-old daughter with both appearing remarkably healthy and a joy to their Grandparents. Neither have been vaccinated.

It has been my observation that whilst we have generally been exposed to some increased microwave and other pollution, there has only been one obvious change in children’s environments during the past 40 years that could medically explain the real pandemic of their chronic multi-faceted ill-health. This has to be the inordinate increase in vaccines together with previously excessive mercury and a now aluminum adjuvants at levels that far exceed normally permitted levels."

[Bo Atkinson]

Freedom from unusual punishment (covdiot test jabs).

South Dakota Considers First State Bill To Outlaw All Vaccine AND Medical Mandates
South Dakota Migration
Will there be a medical refugee migration to South Dakota?
by Ginger Taylor

Who owns your body?

A growing number of legislators in South Dakota believe you do.

They have introduced a bill to not only end vaccine mandates in the state, but all future medical mandates that my be introduced in generations to come.

One hundred and fifteen years ago this month, the US Supreme Court made a decision that because there was a deadly smallpox epidemic, the City of Cambridge, Massachusetts was allowed to charge a pastor five dollars to opt out of a city wide vaccine mandate. The law didn't apply to children.

That precedent has been the basis for the mandate of dozens of now liability-free vaccines for children and adults, where no epidemic (or even one case) exists, at the costs of thousands, or even hundred of thousands, per year to opt out. It is even the basis on which the Supreme Court ruled that women can be force sterilized, for the good of themselves and society, of course.

Bad precedent, plus a century, has resulted in the legalization of actual war crimes.

The current vaccine mandate enforcement drive by Merck and Friends has driven our community, and those who never questioned vaccines before now, back to a basic question at hand here.

WHO OWNS YOUR BODY?

The knee jerk reaction , and normal human response for Americans is, "I do."

But that is not what most governments believes. Even under our Constitution of individual liberties, governments strive to control even your medical choices, and if they can't, they will find a reason to justify it, and the means to carry out their will.

In 21st century America, there are no deadly epidemics of communicable disease, despite the fact that we are subject to constant fear campaigns that one is coming. In fact no such event has happened in my lifetime. If the fear mongers want to scare you into fearing deadly epidemics, they have to go back more than a hundred years. So the circumstances for the justification of the government's actions in Jacobson v. Massachusetts exist only in the history books.

So in this age of medical tech, including vaccines, that most people want, why do mandates still exist? And if Jacobson can justify the sexual mutilation of women, then what else can it justify as medical technology progresses over the next century and beyond?

What new medical interventions and body tech will The Gates Foundation invent and convince (bribe) governments and NGOs to force people into utilizing? And where will the battle to end coerced "medical care" begin.

I submit to you that it has begun in South Dakota. Today.

South Dakota House Majority Leader, Representative Lee Qualm (R), has introduced HB 1235 An Act to Revise Provisions Regarding Immunizations.

The bill repeals ALL vaccine mandates in the State.

South Dakota would be the first US state to have no vaccine mandates at all, joining other governments like the UK, Japan and Canada, in uncoerced vaccine decision making.

But the bill goes even further. IT ENDS MEDICAL MANDATES ALL TOGETHER. It adds new law that reads:

"Section 5. That a NEW SECTION be added:

334-22-6.1. Discrimination-Immunization

Every person has the inalienable right to bodily integrity, free from any threat or compulsion that the person accepts any medical intervention, including immunization. No person may be discriminated against for refusal to accept an unwanted medical intervention, including immunization."

The State of South Dakota would function under the truth that YOU OWN YOUR BODY, and codifies into law that YOU make our own medical decisions. And no one can coerce your choices or discriminate against you because of them.

This is the real conversation that we should be having now. Begging the government not to take away our right to bodily integrity, or trying to claw back religious and philosophical exemptions that give us "loopholes" that "allow" us to make our own decisions about our own bodies is becoming an outdated conversation that is based on a lie. The lie that we have no right to bodily integrity in the first place, and government is doing us a favor by giving us even a medical exemption.

Cambridge, and the turn of the 20th century courts didn't care that Pastor Jacobson protested the violation of his body (and his bank account) based on his arguments that vaccines were not safe, that both he and his son had previous vaccine reactions (Jacobson himself was injured in childhood) and they violated his religious conscience. SCOTUS didn't care that Carrie Buck was a woman of sound mind who wanted to retain her ability to have children after she was raped and impregnated by a family member.

They declared her intellectually disabled, an "imbecile," even though there was never any evidence that she had any disability. They then forced her to be sterilized.

"Carrie Buck 'is the probable potential parent of socially inadequate offspring, likewise afflicted, that she may be sexually sterilized without detriment to her general health and that her welfare and that of society will be promoted by her sterilization"

The state did, of course, have a stated compelling interest, as they always do, when they seek to violate the civil rights of Americans. This was it:

"in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 , 25 S. Ct. 358, 3 Ann. Cas. 765. Three generations of imbeciles are enough."

And that justification was based on the existence of vaccine mandates.

This is dead thinking. It is unconscionable in the 21st century that such logic is allowed to stand in the law books, but Buck v. Bell is still law, as Jacobson is still law.

South Dakota will now consider the rejection of the lie that you do not own your body, the laws that can allow the state to do what it wants with your body.

It is time for America to decide who owns a person's medical choices. Is it the state, or the person in the body who must live (or die) with the consequences of those medical choices?

I urge you to change the conversation in your state. Take the SD bill to your legislators, tell them about Henning Jacobson and Carrie Buck, and ask them who they think owns your medical choices.

Because if governments have the right to coerce vaccination for Henning Jacobson, they also have the right to remove Carrie Buck's reproductive organs. And yours.

Who owns your body?

https://www.ageofautism.com/2020/02/...SWSOGD8Pw8LfP0

[norman]

Jacobson v Massachusetts

The tip toe snuck this one under the radar a very long time ago . . . . . .




Recently Jason goodman of Crowd Source The Truth interviewed Alan Dershowitz and Dershowitz made some very bold controversial statements…

Dershowitz, a high profile lawyer who has formerly represented president President Trump, OJ Simpson and even Jeffery Epstein amongst other high profile clients, stated you have no constitutional protectuon against being forcibly vaccinated for an infectious disease.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ivejYqnmJvg

[onawah]

Also see 3 posts starting here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1357567 re Dershowitz interview with Del Bigtree

Posted by norman (here)
Jacobson v Massachusetts

The tip toe snuck this one under the radar a very long time ago . . . . . .

Recently Jason goodman of Crowd Source The Truth interviewed Alan Dershowitz and Dershowitz made some very bold controversial statements…

Dershowitz, a high profile lawyer who has formerly represented president President Trump, OJ Simpson and even Jeffery Epstein amongst other high profile clients, stated you have no constitutional protectuon against being forcibly vaccinated for an infectious disease.

[

[Ernie Nemeth]

No problem with that. As soon as they have a safe and effective vaccine, that does not require a death panel to adjudicate the ethical arguments for advocating the use of force with the expectancy of 1 in 10,000 dying from it.

No one can force another to take a chance on their health for the benefit of another, especially when that chance includes death - the thing you are trying to prevent - remember? You are trying to prevent death by trading off another death - totaly not cool since the one forced to take the chance has almost nothing to fear from the illness because they are healthy.

So let's get it straight. What they are advocating is, the healthy should risk their health for the benefit of the unhealthy. Does this make the human family more resilient and healthy? Or less?

[onawah]

What about Polio?
23,717 views•Premiered May 20, 2020
The Truth About Vaccines
61.2K subscribers
Was the polio vaccine EFFECTIVE at eradicating polio? And what exactly is POLIO? Is it POSSIBLE that many cases of “POLIO” were actually DDT poisoning? Is it POSSIBLE that the decrease in DDT was a contributing factor in the reduction of polio cases? Or are there other factors as well? Is it possible that it only APPEARED that polio was eradicated because they changed the criteria for diagnosing polio? Learn the TRUTH in this eye-opening video!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=aNw5SD3txBU

[onawah]

Not Just Another Petition – Let Your Voice Be Heard Now!
From: Stand for Health Freedom <advocates@standforhealthfreedom.com
5/30/20
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/ac...virus-vaccine/

"Are you ready to give up everything over a virus?
Immense fear of the coronavirus, along with sweeping government-imposed shutdowns and stay-at-home orders, have crippled entire populations. Authorities now say the only way out is a vaccine for all along with 24/7 tracking and surveillance. Bill Gates, a tech billionaire who uses his wealth and status to influence policy, has gone on record saying that life will not return to normal until we can vaccinate the entire global population against COVID-19. Gates has also suggested that the coronavirus vaccine might become part of routine newborn immunizations. To that end, he is pushing for disease surveillance and a vaccine tracking system that might involve embedding vaccination records into our bodies through quantum dot technology.
According to Gates, “normal” may never return to those who refuse vaccination, as the digital vaccination certificate he is pushing for might ultimately be required to participate in society. This includes such things as finding or maintaining employment, renewing a driver’s license, obtaining social services, or traveling domestically or abroad. Immunity certificates, microchipping, forced vaccination and the removal of children from their homes are just a few of the draconian measures being threatened in the wake of COVID-19.

In April, the Rockefeller Foundation released a white paper, “National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan — Strategic Steps to Reopen Our Workplaces and Our Communities,” which calls for testing and tracing all Americans using a national database connected to other health records. The plan sets aside privacy concerns while requiring your immune status to be validated before entering schools, office buildings, places of work, airports, concerts, sport venues and much more. It also suggests that weekly immunity testing should be required as a requisite for entering society.

Mandatory medicine is bad policy, as it removes the right of individuals to opt out of vaccination and other medical interventions should they determine that those interventions are not in their (or their child’s) best interest. Mandating liability-free products, including the impending coronavirus vaccine that will be developed and distributed at “warp speed,” is not only bad policy, it’s reckless. Congress acknowledges that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Moreover, a fast-tracked coronavirus vaccine without any long-term safety data renders the men, women and children who receive the vaccine as a part of a mass human experiment, with the only real safety trials coming via the post-marketing surveillance of adverse effects; this goes against medical ethical principles and further demonstrates the need for full informed consent prior to vaccination. That’s the only protocol that will enable people to decide whether they want to submit to an experimental vaccine with an unknown risk profile in order to avoid a virus with an estimated 99% or higher survival rate.

As we get closer to the potential rollout of one of the dozen-plus coronavirus vaccines in development, the big question is will the vaccine that has emphasized “speed over safety” be mandatory? Moreover, will opting out restrict how you can financially provide for your family, where your children can attend school, if you can renew your driver’s license, or if you’re allowed to cross state lines to visit family?

The United States is a country that was built on principles of freedom of choice and personal responsibility: freedom of economy, freedom of education, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom to own property and freedom to vote, among other freedoms. There’s no freedom more important than the freedom to choose how you care for yourself and for your children in a manner that aligns with your personal beliefs. The ultimate authority to choose or reject any medical procedure, free from threats or compulsion, lies with the individual. Medical bullying and medical coercion have no place in a free country. The right to decline a medical intervention that can kill or injure you is a basic human right, and that right must be upheld.

As such, the government should not impose medical mandates to seek compliance. Medical mandates perpetuate the idea that individuals lack the moral or intellectual capacity to make sound decisions for themselves and their children, so the state needs to do it for them. Individuals are capable of making responsible health decisions, and those decisions must take a person’s whole health into account. The health of the individual cannot be forsaken in the name of containing a virus. After all, we can only have a healthy society when that society is made up of healthy individuals. Health is a personal right and responsibility. It is not something that we should look to the government to bestow on us or guarantee.

In addition to protecting public safety, elected officials have an obligation to uphold the civil liberties and constitutional rights of their constituents. One cannot be sacrificed or exchanged for the other. Sound public health policy is centered on (1) empowering individuals to take responsibility for their health (2) laying a foundation to make that possible through clean drinking water, clean air, a nutrient-dense food supply and health education programs and (3) ensuring that one person’s health is not sacrificed for others. No one should ever have to be collateral damage in a war against infectious disease.

We are committed to STANDING together to change history by supporting public policies that simultaneously promote individual health, public health and health freedom. Do your part to halt the rise of tyranny and stand for what is and always will be yours — governance over your body and your children."

Sign the petition: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/ac...virus-vaccine/

[greybeard]

I signed this -- it accepts signatures outwith USA.
Ive @ it on to friends and family.
I got a response immediately.
Thanks onawah
Chris

[onawah]

Dangerous nano-particles contaminating many vaccines: groundbreaking study
by Jon Rappoport
June 3, 2020
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...many-vaccines/

"“The Lung,” Second Edition, 2014: “Nanoparticles [are] comparable in size to subcellular structures…enabling their ready incorporation into biological systems.”

A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines, manufactured by leading global companies, has uncovered a very troubling and previously unreported fact:

The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.

Many of the particles are metals.

We’re talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.

To begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study:

International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Volume 4 Issue 1
January 23 2017
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:
Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari

https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-...amination.html

“The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines…”

Are the study authors leaving the door open to the possibility that the contamination is intentional?

“The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction.”

“After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas…But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination…As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due to a nano-bio-interaction…can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way…It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA…”

“In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues…”

“Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their presence in the muscles…could heavily impair the muscle functionality…”

“We come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants.”

This 2017 study opens up a whole new field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.

Such particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.

Many legal and scientific “experts” assert the State has a right to mandate vaccines and force them on the population. But these contaminating nanoparticles are not vaccines or medicines. Only a lunatic would defend the right of the State to inject them.

Here is another section from the 2017 study. Trade names of vaccines, and compositions of the nanoparticle contaminants are indicated. Take a deep breath and buckle up:

“…further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases [all 44 vaccines], whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product…”

“…single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (less than 100nm) and aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron, Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a cluster, and Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”

“…the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”

“…particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).”

“…singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).”

“Some metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction…occurs and a ‘protein corona’ is formed…The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body.”

“…examples of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec… of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel…) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix…Similar aggregates, though in different situations (patients suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already been described in literature.”

I’m sure you’ve read official assurances that vaccine-manufacturing problems are “rare.” You can file those pronouncements along with other medical lies.

“I’d like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a plate, can you inject it?”

Several vital questions demanding answers spring from the findings of this 2017 study:

Are some of these nanoparticles intentionally placed in vaccines?

Does the standard manufacturing process for traditional vaccines INEVITABLY lead to dangerous and destructive nano-contamination?

New nano-technology is already being employed to create several vaccines—supposedly “improving effectiveness.” In fact, the coming COVID-19 vaccine may be a nano-type. Does this manufacturing process carry with it the unavoidable effect of unleashing a hurricane of nanoparticle contaminants?

How many cases of childhood brain damage and autism can be laid at the door of nanoparticle contamination?

And finally, where are these contaminated vaccines manufactured? The above study did not attempt to discover this. It was outside the scope of the research. It’s common knowledge that, for example, in the case of the US, vaccines or their components, are, in many instances, not produced domestically. Where does this put control of safety? In, say, China, where there have been numerous pharmaceutical scandals connected to contamination of products?

The vaccine establishment does not show the slightest interest in answering any of these questions. They are busy pretending the questions don’t exist.

Trusting the establishment would be suicidal."