+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 17 FirstFirst 1 5 15 17 LastLast
Results 281 to 300 of 324

Thread: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

  1. Link to Post #281
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Quote Posted by frankstien (here)
    Just bumping this one back up-------------See post above

    Calling all Canadians, calling all Canadians---
    There is a significant threat to the rights and freedoms of the citizens of New Brunswick.

    Mandatory Vaccines For Children. It is being voted on soon!
    Bump Bump

    Mike Adams interviewed today. There is such a significant relationship between the gut Biome and the brain's health.

    Quote CENSORSHIP, STEM CELLS, & POTTY SCIENCE

    Censorship Spreads Like Wildfire; ASU Professor Reversing Autism with Poop, While Lab Mice “Given” Autism; Stem Cell Pioneer Breaks Down FDA Ruling.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Constance (15th June 2019), Franny (17th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019)

  3. Link to Post #282
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    I feel very sad today at this development.

    Quote HEALTH
    New York Ends Religious Exemptions For Required Vaccines
    June 13, 20195:26 PM ET
    New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed a bill Thursday ending vaccination exemptions based on religious beliefs, the latest attempt to address the growing measles outbreak, the worst the U.S. has experienced in decades.

    Cuomo said plugging the loophole should help contain the spike in measles cases in New York, the state the hardest hit by the uptick in the contagious virus due to low vaccination rates in ultra-Orthodox communities.

    "The science is crystal clear: Vaccines are safe, effective and the best way to keep our children safe," Cuomo said after signing the bill. "While I understand and respect freedom of religion, our first job is to protect the public health and by signing this measure into law, we will help prevent further transmissions and stop this outbreak right in its tracks."

    The Democratic-controlled Legislature approved the measure, which also eliminates other nonmedical exemptions for schoolchildren across the state.

    "We are facing an unprecedented public health crisis," said Sen. Brad Hoylman, the legislation's sponsor. "The atrocious peddlers of junk science and fraudulent medicine who we know as anti-vaxxers have spent years sowing unwarranted doubt and fear, but it is time for legislators to confront them head-on."

    The exemption, which exists in some form in most states, allows parents of schoolchildren to cite their religious beliefs in opting their kids out of required vaccines. Supporters of keeping the religious exemptions say religious freedom should not be overpowered by state laws.

    After the final vote tally was announced in the assembly, howling protesters, including the parents of unvaccinated children, filled the chamber, chanting "shame on you," until lawmakers moved to recess.

    New U.S. Measles Cases Break 25-Year-Old Record, Health Officials Say
    HEALTH
    New U.S. Measles Cases Break 25-Year-Old Record, Health Officials Say
    Assembly member Patricia Fahy echoed Cuomo's stance before casting a vote in support of the measure. "When we put the rest of the public at risk," she said, individual choices to not vaccinate children become "another matter."

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported last week that the number of new measles cases this year has exceeded 1,000, the highest count in 27 years.

    Most of those new measles cases have been concentrated in ultra-Orthodox areas of New York, including Rockland County and parts of Brooklyn, adding urgency to the statewide debate around religious exemptions to vaccines.

    The New York Assembly narrowly passed the bill by a 77-53 vote. It needed 76 votes for passage. Lawmakers in the state Senate advanced the measure by a tally of 36-26.

    A small number of other states including California, Mississippi and Arizona have already passed laws banning vaccine exemptions on religious grounds.

    In New York, about 96% of students have been immunized against measles, mumps and rubella, yet "a measles outbreak continues to affect communities in several parts of the state where the rate is lower," according to state health officials.

    In the 2017-2018 school year, 26,217 students in New York, including those in public and private schools and children in day care and prekindergarten, had religious exemptions from vaccinations, officials said.

    "Although the state can claim high immunization rates overall, preventable diseases like measles remain a public health threat when administrative loopholes allow children to go unvaccinated, carrying the potential to harm communities — and especially our most vulnerable residents," said Dr. Howard Zucker, the commissioner of the state Department of Health.

    New York state Sen. John Liu, who represents Queens, said while he thinks removing the religious exemption is the right move, he has heard from constituents who hold "deep and sincere" religious beliefs who would be "absolutely outraged that anyone would suggest that they don't care about the health of their children." Liu suggested that the tenor of the debate on both sides could be more civil.

    "We can respectfully disagree," Liu said.

    The law eliminating religious exemptions takes effect immediately.

    Unvaccinated students will have up to 30 days to show school officials they have received their first dose of each required immunization.

    In April, New York City health officials declared a public health emergency because of the measles outbreak. Parents of unvaccinated children could be fined $1,000 for not complying with the order.

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Constance (15th June 2019), Franny (17th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019), T Smith (16th June 2019)

  5. Link to Post #283
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    I am sure that others who are looking at this thread may have something to contribute? I am very sad today about the collusion between government and big business. Trump recently signed an executive order concerning GMOs that is very distressing. The evidence in New York suspiciously ties the legislation removing religious exemption with investment in Albany.

    BUT what is absolutely infuriating is that people have bought into a basic belief in their own illness and dependency on pharmaceuticals. People actually believe in the primacy of vaccination over the right to speak and the right to determine the bodily experiences we KNOW we have the right to maintain. IMO the audience that I would like to see feel passionate here is missing. I do not grok how this issue is not galvanizing people?

    All the material needed to self educate and understand is available for the moment. The way to "web browse" sources will not be found on the internet soon.

    WE are basically being divorced from NATURE (within and outside us) and turned into sickly creatures. I agree with RSB's perspective on our relationship to Creator.
    RSB is IMO worth viewing every day to center in the power we have to heal, to stand up for liberty and the stakes that exist politically biophysically and socially in ignoring the present developments. Know and use the truth or not, the truth IS truth.


  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Constance (15th June 2019), Franny (17th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019), T Smith (16th June 2019)

  7. Link to Post #284
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Thecontrolgroup.org is attempting to gather surveys of the health status of 40,000 unvaccinated children. The assumption is that even if all other variables are different, vaccines are associated with definite health issues. The health surveys are confidential and subjectively filled out by parents. There are no scientifically double blind studies where some children received vaccines and others a real placebo. This kind of study is considered unethical.

    Those who have read the available research will discover that the "gold standard" of safety studies have not been done, because vaccines are categorized as "biologics" where the FDA does not require the safety studies of other pharmaceuticals.


    Website for the control group

    Interview with Joy Garner about the project on lost Arts Radio
    Quote 6/15/2019 The Control Group Project - Real Science On Vaccines With Joy Garner (on Brighteon)

    For many years, we have been told by the medical industry and their government agency business partners that it would be immoral to do any real testing on the health of vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children. Why? Of course, because not vaccinating the control group is blatantly unfair and hurtful to them. We all know everyone needs as many vaccines as possible, and withholding any of them as an experiment would be abusive. Just total common sense, right?Joy Garner Vaccines Poster

    It's much like the argument of the vaccine companies, when they came to Congress and explained they were losing so much money in their business because parents of maimed and killed children damaged by their products (vaccines), as well as family members of maimed and killed adults, kept suing them which was ruining their profits. How inconsiderate of them! Without legal immunity, allowing vaccine companies to kill your children or you with no consequences, they would be forced out of business. And since everyone knows vaccines are the greatest medical breakthrough in 200 years, that they are safe and effective, that they eradicated polio, smallpox and many other terrible diseases, it only made sense for Congress to pass a law so you could not sue doctors or vaccine makers when their products killed your family members. Totally reasonable.

    So Congress said 'great, where do we sign up?', and the vaccine makers and lobbyists for the vaccine industry gladly showed them. They have had no legal or financial liability ever since. Reagan was the president who signed the immunity into law. The crimes against humanity that this immunity allows, continue to this day.

    But greatness lies in "ordinary" people, like for example, all of us. Like you. Like Joy Garner (www.thecontrolgroup.org). Joy decided, 'wait a minute!' (or translated into Canadian, 'hold the phone!'), we already have the control group. No need to deprive a single child of any vaccine to do the experiment, let's just check on the detailed health status of already non-vaccinated kids and compare what we find with national health statistics. Once that data is in the open for all to see, all kinds of new possibilities emerge that could save the kids of the future, and maybe even some alive right now. Want to see what Joy's project is uncovering?
    Last edited by Delight; 16th June 2019 at 06:47.

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Franny (17th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019), T Smith (16th June 2019)

  9. Link to Post #285
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Robert Scott Bell has a program that will update people on the medical industrial/government crack down. He was on youtube but today the video was made unavailable due to SME copyright violation. There is something VERY sinister happening fast and furious.

    I am personally not too worried as I am now at an age where I enjoyed all the food, had all the sex, enjoyed all the stuff and etc to make me replete with material life. Honestly, when my body goes dead, I will enjoy experiencing a new realm that I am certain exists. This makes me feel for me all really is well. I love what I love here but it won't ever call me back.

    When people have youth, unfulfilled dreams and children with a hope for life ahead, THIS crunch is a beginning oppression and possibly a deliberate kill switch slowly turned. The heel if ignored will just ground harder and given the silencing and EVEN here the willingness to argue over RIDICULOUS memes and shut down speech, well, the trend bodes ill.

    It disappoints me for humanity that in the case of this issue, people will act like they are not a potential target of coercion and agree to rabid hate and fear of trite issues while silencing others. Maybe this IS the end of the human line and IMO we have our own inability to think straight about priorities to blame.

    RSB is online here and here in case people listen to him with interest.

    Talk Stream Live

    Robert Scott Bell

    And if Constance looks on, IMO don't agree to the thought forms aimed at you ... they lie.
    Last edited by Delight; 16th June 2019 at 22:01.

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    ahamkara (23rd June 2019), Bubu (3rd July 2019), Franny (17th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019), T Smith (30th June 2019)

  11. Link to Post #286
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Vaccine hesitancy is based on experiences like this one:

    Quote CBS ” 60 MINUTES” documentary on the swine flu epidemic of 1976 in the U.S. It went on air only once and was never shown again. Watch this video documentary and listen to testimony of people who caught Gullian-Barre paralysis because of the swine flu vaccine. They sued the US government for damages.

    500 cases of Gullian-Barre paralysis, including 25 deaths—not due to the swine flu itself, but as a direct result of the vaccine. At the time President Gerald Ford, on advice from the CDC, called for vaccination of the ENTIRE population of the United States.


    Quote Retrospective: What Happened With Swine Flu in 1976
    By Jennifer Couzin-FrankelApr. 25, 2009


    Infectious disease specialist Edwin D. Kilbourne, now 88 and retired, was at the center of the last swine flu scare in the U.S. In 1976, a swine flu strain swept through Fort Dix, a military base in New Jersey. The virus infected about 500 soldiers, though not all got sick; one died. Kilbourne, then at Mount Sinai Medical School in New York City, specialized in developing vaccines to specific flu strains and was quickly recruited to help combat a feared swine flu epidemic. Forty million Americans were subsequently vaccinated against the virus, and several hundred developed a neurological condition, Guillain-Barré syndrome, fanning controversy about whether such extensive vaccination was necessary. Kilbourne spoke with ScienceInsider from his home in Connecticut earlier today. Parts of the interview were edited for clarity.

    Q&A after the jump.

    Q: What are your memories of that time?

    I’d been recombining, or resorting, influenza viruses for several years before that, to produce high-yielding influenza viruses [that could be developed into vaccines]. David Sencer, the director of the CDC who later had to resign [as a result of swine flu], was a friend of mine and put me on the advisory committee having to do with the Fort Dix situation. [Virus samples were] sent to me at my lab in Mount Sinai School of Medicine, where I was chair of microbiology. Within several weeks, we had a high-yielding virus [and] I had the vaccine virus made. … There was reason to be scared—we knew that a virus very similar to the swine flu had been present in 1918. That gave cause for great concern to those of us who knew something about the situation.

    Q: You believed it was important to have this vaccine?

    I believed it was important—this could have been the putative virus of 1918 for all we knew. [But] there were those violently opposed to the situation. I call it my 15 minutes of infamy. It got to be a bad word, swine flu. On the other hand, had we not had the vaccine and something had happened, who would be blamed? The entire medical profession.

    Q: What about adverse reactions to the vaccine?

    This was the largest field trial of a vaccine in history, carried out in 1976. There was no baseline for comparison of what is the normal occurrence of Guillain-Barré syndrome. People are arguing to this day whether [the vaccine] really had any effect on the incidence. There are a lot of things that cause Guillain-Barré.

    Q: Were you criticized for developing the vaccine?

    With cartoons, on news programs. … It was an interesting ride.

    Q: If you were advising those who are tackling the current swine flu, what would you tell them?

    The only thing I would have done differently in 1976, retrospectively, is to make the vaccine, promote the vaccine, but not give the vaccine until the last moment—but the problem with that is that you may be too late. By all means, find the prevalent strain, make a vaccine that can be used, and grow it in eggs, and then go with it. [But] I think it’s premature to do it [vaccinate] now.

    Q: Did you continue working on swine flu after 1976?

    Oh, sure. We used it in animal studies, it was used by people in other countries as a rapidly growing vaccine virus. It was an interesting virus.
    Last edited by Delight; 17th June 2019 at 06:03.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), T Smith (30th June 2019)

  13. Link to Post #287
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    NO OTHER COUNTRY HAS AS MANY VACCINES AS THE US.


  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Deux Corbeaux (17th June 2019), Franny (17th June 2019), Merry Mom (18th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019), T Smith (18th June 2019)

  15. Link to Post #288
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    I have liked this channel's discussions.... talking here about NY mandatory vaccine policy and the way that this connects with other issues aimed at trespass by the government into personal property (including the body) at 8:21:

    Last edited by Delight; 17th June 2019 at 06:18.

  16. Link to Post #289
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Children's Health Defense is challenging the NY law removing religious exemptions

    Quote Children's Health Defense
    Rita Palma
    June 15 2019

    UPDATE!!!!! To be clear with this message, Children's Health Defense will be filing five law suits to address EVERY problem with the repeal law. Successful outcomes will benefit all New Yorkers. it is my suggestion CHD be the ONLY firm we support.
    SHARE LIKE OUR FREEDOM DEPENDS ON IT- BECAUSE IT DOES!
    Message from Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

    Dear Friends Outraged by New York’s Repeal of the Religious Exemption Right:

    On Thursday, June 13, without even a hearing, the New York State legislature repealed the right to religious exemption from vaccination, and Governor Cuomo signed the measure into law, calling the situation “a public health emergency.” In thirty days, all partially and unvaccinated children will be official second-class citizens, unable to attend any school, public or private, or any camp.

    This extraordinary, unprecedented action is a gross violation of children’s and families’ rights to religion, an education, parenting according to one’s conscience, and informed and voluntary consent to medical procedures. While New York State has an unquestionable interest in public health, that interest may not overwhelm all other fundamental rights. Legislation affecting constitutional rights must be carefully and thoughtfully balanced, something that was impossible in the legislature’s and Governor’s rush to ram through the repeal.

    Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has been a leading advocate for children’s health and welfare for some time. It has devoted significant attention to the need for safer vaccines, as Congress called for in 1986 when it granted the pharmaceutical industry virtually blanket liability protection from vaccine injury. CHD supported intensive work to educate New York legislators on the need to preserve the religious exemption. Together with Robert Krakow and Patricia Finn, I represented plaintiffs in Brooklyn to challenge a mandate overriding lawful religious exemptions.

    I will challenge this repeal legislation in court. I am assembling a team of top flight attorneys to challenge this ill-conceived law on multiple grounds. While it is premature to spell out the CHD plan of attack, please know that I will help to bring the best legal talent available anywhere to overturn this unjust law.

    You can help. Please donate money to CHD to challenge the NYS repeal. Doing so is not only essential for the 26,000 children in New York affected by this draconian measure, it is critical for the country. With California and New York having enacted harsh, discriminatory and punitive laws, it is truly just a question of time before other states take a page out of New York’s book to ram through rights-stripping laws. We can fight this and win, but we need your help.

    Thank you for your generosity.
    HOW TO DONATE:

    Thank you for your interest in donating to Children’s Health Defense, a 501(c) (3) charitable,

    non-profit organization. Our tax ID is 26-0388604.

    1.Donate online at https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/donate/ with Paypal or credit card.

    2. Mail a check to:

    Children’s Health Defense

    1227 N Peachtree Pkwy, Suite #202

    Peachtree City, GA 30269

    3. Open a Donor Advised Fund.

    Suggested Companies to call:

    Fidelity Charitable: (800) 262-6039

    National Philanthropic Trust: (888) 878-7900

    Both companies assure privacy and anonymity for clients.
    Quote HEALTH
    New York Ends Religious Exemptions For Required Vaccines
    June 13, 20195:26 PM ET
    New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed a bill Thursday ending vaccination exemptions based on religious beliefs, the latest attempt to address the growing measles outbreak, the worst the U.S. has experienced in decades.

    Cuomo said plugging the loophole should help contain the spike in measles cases in New York, the state the hardest hit by the uptick in the contagious virus due to low vaccination rates in ultra-Orthodox communities.

    "The science is crystal clear: Vaccines are safe, effective and the best way to keep our children safe," Cuomo said after signing the bill. "While I understand and respect freedom of religion, our first job is to protect the public health and by signing this measure into law, we will help prevent further transmissions and stop this outbreak right in its tracks."

    The Democratic-controlled Legislature approved the measure, which also eliminates other nonmedical exemptions for schoolchildren across the state.

    "We are facing an unprecedented public health crisis," said Sen. Brad Hoylman, the legislation's sponsor. "The atrocious peddlers of junk science and fraudulent medicine who we know as anti-vaxxers have spent years sowing unwarranted doubt and fear, but it is time for legislators to confront them head-on."

    The exemption, which exists in some form in most states, allows parents of schoolchildren to cite their religious beliefs in opting their kids out of required vaccines. Supporters of keeping the religious exemptions say religious freedom should not be overpowered by state laws.

    After the final vote tally was announced in the assembly, howling protesters, including the parents of unvaccinated children, filled the chamber, chanting "shame on you," until lawmakers moved to recess.

    New U.S. Measles Cases Break 25-Year-Old Record, Health Officials Say
    HEALTH
    New U.S. Measles Cases Break 25-Year-Old Record, Health Officials Say
    Assembly member Patricia Fahy echoed Cuomo's stance before casting a vote in support of the measure. "When we put the rest of the public at risk," she said, individual choices to not vaccinate children become "another matter."

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported last week that the number of new measles cases this year has exceeded 1,000, the highest count in 27 years.

    Most of those new measles cases have been concentrated in ultra-Orthodox areas of New York, including Rockland County and parts of Brooklyn, adding urgency to the statewide debate around religious exemptions to vaccines.

    The New York Assembly narrowly passed the bill by a 77-53 vote. It needed 76 votes for passage. Lawmakers in the state Senate advanced the measure by a tally of 36-26.

    A small number of other states including California, Mississippi and Arizona have already passed laws banning vaccine exemptions on religious grounds.

    In New York, about 96% of students have been immunized against measles, mumps and rubella, yet "a measles outbreak continues to affect communities in several parts of the state where the rate is lower," according to state health officials.

    In the 2017-2018 school year, 26,217 students in New York, including those in public and private schools and children in day care and prekindergarten, had religious exemptions from vaccinations, officials said.

    "Although the state can claim high immunization rates overall, preventable diseases like measles remain a public health threat when administrative loopholes allow children to go unvaccinated, carrying the potential to harm communities — and especially our most vulnerable residents," said Dr. Howard Zucker, the commissioner of the state Department of Health.

    New York state Sen. John Liu, who represents Queens, said while he thinks removing the religious exemption is the right move, he has heard from constituents who hold "deep and sincere" religious beliefs who would be "absolutely outraged that anyone would suggest that they don't care about the health of their children." Liu suggested that the tenor of the debate on both sides could be more civil.

    "We can respectfully disagree," Liu said.

    The law eliminating religious exemptions takes effect immediately.

    Unvaccinated students will have up to 30 days to show school officials they have received their first dose of each required immunization.

    In April, New York City health officials declared a public health emergency because of the measles outbreak. Parents of unvaccinated children could be fined $1,000 for not complying with the order.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Merry Mom (18th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019), T Smith (18th June 2019)

  18. Link to Post #290
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th August 2013
    Location
    United States of America
    Posts
    296
    Thanks
    1,536
    Thanked 1,612 times in 284 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    It’s bizarre how many people are being convinced to become shrill advocates of the government forcing medical procedures on people. My friends were recently denied emergency room care for their child because they don’t vaccinate. Some health care workers are hysterical on this point, while others take a more balanced, intelligent view.
    There's no time like the present.

  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Merry Mom For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Delight (18th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019), T Smith (18th June 2019)

  20. Link to Post #291
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Quote Posted by Merry Mom (here)
    It’s bizarre how many people are being convinced to become shrill advocates of the government forcing medical procedures on people. My friends were recently denied emergency room care for their child because they don’t vaccinate. Some health care workers are hysterical on this point, while others take a more balanced, intelligent view.
    IMO the situation is quite unbelievable, ominous and insufferable. To deny a person health care over the issue is also a portent of the severity of the situation we face here. For the providers to withhold care is unethical and completely inexcusable. What is wrong with these people that they are agreeing to be agents of a system run amok? Facts (and lack of facts) make no difference. I feel quite like I am in a Kafka-esque reality.

    The main thing is that for decades and decades, none of this hysteria about vaccination was present and NOW it is happening and WHY?

    Quote Facebook “Fact-Checker” Misinforms Users about Vaccine Safety
    by Jeremy R. Hammond | Jun 17, 2019


    Facebook has unveiled a new “Fact-Checker” feature­ that’s now being used to supposedly combat misinformation about vaccines, but which is actually being used to propagandize. A “Fact-Checker” showing up on a popular video by Del Bigtree, host of the show The HighWire, claims that the video is presenting false information. However, Facebook itself in this case is guilty of misinforming its users about vaccine safety.

    Those in the mainstream discourse calling for efforts to combat misinformation about vaccines actually have no problem at all with misinformation. Transparently, what they instead have a problem with is any information that might lead parents to conclude that strictly complying with the routine childhood vaccine schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) might not be in the best interests of their child. They have no problem with lies about vaccine safety and effectiveness as long as it’s intended to persuade parents to vaccinate their children.

    This is evident in the case of the aforementioned Facebook “Fact-Checker”. In the HighWire video, published on May 4, 2017, Bigtree states that ingredients used in vaccines include aluminum and mercury, which are both known neurotoxins, and that vaccines can cause encephalopathy, which is a term encompassing any type of brain damage, disorder, or disease. This includes encephalitis, which refers to inflammation of the brain. On the screen, he shows the product package insert for Merck’s measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, which lists encephalitis and encephalopathy among the possible adverse consequences of getting an MMR shot.

    Facebook’s “Fact-Checker” that now appears with the video states that this is “False”, adding that “Current data shows that vaccines are safe and do not cause toxicity or encephalopathy”. This links to an article on the website of the organization Health Feedback titled “Contrary to popular video claim, vaccine ingredients are safe, not linked to encephalopathy”.

    Facebook fact-checker on vaccines
    A screenshot of Facebook’s “Fact-Checker” on a HighWire video

    The Health Feedback article presents a fabricated quote, attributing to Bigtree the words “Toxic vaccine ingredients in the MMR vaccine cause encephalopathy”. While Bigtree does suggest this, those words do not appear in the video and so should be presented as a paraphrase, not as a direct quote. The whole context of Bigtree’s video is omitted, which is that it was a response to a video by Bill Nye (“The Science Guy”) in which Nye misleadingly implies that the viral or bacterial antigens are the only components of vaccines. Bigtree was educating his viewers that, to the contrary, vaccines also contain numerous other ingredients, including, depending on the vaccine, known neurotoxins aluminum and mercury.

    Neither Facebook nor Health Feedback express any objection to Bill Nye misleading his viewers into the false belief that vaccines contain a viral or bacterial antigen component and nothing else.

    Continuing in his video, Bigtree asks what happens if you inject aluminum into a baby. “Has there ever been a safety test on it?” he rhetorically inquires, then answers the question: “Never.”

    He points out that mercury is the most toxic non-radioactive substance known to man and is included in flu shots being given to pregnant women. (Multi-dose vials of inactivated influenza vaccines contain the mercury-based preservative thimerosal.) Other ingredients Bigtree claims are in vaccines are formaldehyde and anti-freeze (propylene-glycol). Then he states that aluminum and mercury from vaccines end up in the brain. After rhetorically asking what happens when these neurotoxic substances reach the brain, Bigtree suggests that one consequence can be encephalopathy. It is at this point that he shows encephalopathy listed as a possible adverse event on the MMR vaccine package insert.

    Here, Bigtree does mislead his viewers by implying that the MMR vaccine contains either aluminum or mercury, or both. In fact, it contains neither. Moreover, while formaldehyde is used in vaccines, propylene-glycol is not; although another chemical used to make anti-freeze, polyethylene glycol, has been. Had Facebook’s “Fact-Checker” taken an objective approach, they would have pointed out that Bigtree was right to criticize Nye for misleading his viewers, but wrong to suggest that either of these ingredients are in the MMR vaccine and wrong to say that anti-freeze is an ingredient in vaccines. Instead, they hypocritically singled out Bigtree for criticism.

    Furthermore, Health Feedback itself hypocritically misinforms its readers, stating falsely that “No scientific evidence supports a causal association between vaccines or its ingredients (thimerosal, aluminum adjuvants, propylene glycol) and encephalopathy.”

    “The claim that the MMR vaccine causes encephalopathy”, the Health Feedback article continues, “is based on a misinterpretation of the vaccine package insert information.”

    The article acknowledges that multi-dose vials of the flu shot do contain thimerosal, which is about half ethylmercury by weight. But it claims that ethylmercury is “eliminated by the body quickly, unlike methylmercury, meaning that it does not accumulate in the body.”

    Likewise, the article acknowledges that vaccines can contain aluminum salts, which are used as an adjuvant, meaning a substance included in a vaccine to elicit a stronger immune response. But, the article adds, “the levels in vaccines are low and safe”.

    Also acknowledged is the fact that encephalopathy appears on the MMR package insert under the heading “Adverse Reactions”. The article argues, however, that the insert explicitly lists these “without regard to causality”, and that it is “therefore erroneous to assert a causal relationship between vaccines and encephalopathy on the basis of the package insert information.”

    Health Feedback further argues: “The claim that vaccine safety is completely unknown is false. The Institute of Medicine—part of the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine—reviewed childhood immunization schedules and found them to be safe.”

    The truth is, however, that on every single one of these points, it is Facebook and its “Fact-Checker” partner who are misinforming the public.

    Aluminum Is Neurotoxic and Does Accumulate in the Brain
    Just as Del Bigtree stated, there has never been a study of the effects of injecting aluminum into human babies. The counterclaim that this has been studied is a flat-out lie. The study that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the CDC chiefly rely on to support their claim that the aluminum in vaccines is safe, by Robert Mitkus et al., was done in rodents.

    While the government claims that this study shows that it’s safe to inject aluminum into infants in the doses contained in vaccines, it actually doesn’t. For one, as already noted, it was a study in rodents and therefore can’t logically be used to make conclusive judgments about the safety of this practice in humans.

    Moreover, the study relied on a “minimal risk level” that other rodent studies had shown to be more than seven times higher than quantities of aluminum that had been observed to cause adverse effects.

    Furthermore, the aluminum was administered to the rodents in the Mitkus et al. study by ingestion, not injection, and the FDA knows perfectly well that this is scientifically invalid because, whereas nor more than about 1 percent of ingested aluminum is absorbed into the body, injecting it bypasses the body’s innate immune system—of which the protective gut lining is a part—and deposits the aluminum directly into the tissue.

    Mitkus, et al, also only considered the amount of aluminum that wound up in the blood, totally ignoring the amount of aluminum remaining elsewhere in the body. They did so even while acknowledging that aluminum particles from vaccinations are taken up by immune cells known as macrophages, which can transport the aluminum elsewhere; that “aluminum accumulates in the brain”; and that “only a fraction” of aluminum injected into the body from vaccines is absorbed into the blood within 28 days of vaccination.

    So the truth is just as Del Bigtree stated: we really have no idea what the effects are of injecting aluminum into human babies and what the long-term adverse consequences of this practice might be because there’s never been a study properly designed to answer that question. The FDA allows vaccine manufacturers to include aluminum in vaccines even though there has never been a randomized, placebo-controlled study in humans to determine the safety of injecting aluminum adjuvants into infants.

    Ethylmercury, Too, Is Neurotoxic and Accumulates in the Brain
    Similarly, the claim propagated by Facebook and Health Feedback that ethylmercury, unlike methylmercury, doesn’t accumulate in the body is false.

    It is true that the CDC itself makes that claim on its website in similar wording as the Health Feedback article. However, to support this claim, the CDC cites a 2004 report by the Institute of Medicine that actually acknowledged the fact that no randomized placebo-controlled trials had ever been done to determine the safety of injecting ethylmercury into infants (or pregnant women); all the studies the CDC was relying upon to support its claim that this practice was safe were retrospective observational studies suffering from methodological limitations that prevented scientists from being able to draw conclusive judgments.

    Furthermore, the IOM report explicitly acknowledged that thimerosal is a “known neurotoxin”; that some of the mercury from thimerosal exposure “accumulates in the brain”; and that “heavy metals, including thimerosal, can injure the nervous system.”

    The FDA’s own scientists have also acknowledged in the peer-reviewed medical literature that “similar toxicological profiles between ethylmercury and methylmercury suggest that neurotoxicity may also occur at low doses of thimerosal”. Furthermore, “no controlled studies have been conducted to examine low-dose thimerosal toxicity in humans”.

    Another study the CDC relies upon to support its claim about ethylmercury’s safety has been described by FDA researchers as “the most relevant study on which to base a comparative assessment of infant mercury exposure or risk from thimerosal [ethylmercury] relative to MeHg [methylmercury].”

    But this study, too, does not actually support the CDC’s claim. The study, by Thomas M. Burbacher et al. and published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives in 2005, in fact contradicts the CDC’s claim, having shown that, while more readily eliminated from the blood than methylmercury, ethylmercury is more persistent in the brain, where it accumulates.

    The study observed that once in the brain, ethylmercury breaks down into inorganic mercury (meaning that the mercury molecules are no longer attached to carbon molecules), that inorganic mercury in the brain has been associated with brain inflammation, and that brain inflammation has been demonstrated in the brains of autistic patients.

    Far from concluding that it is safe to inject ethylmercury into infants and pregnant women, the study actually expressed concern that scientists have “limited knowledge of the toxicokinetics and developmental neurotoxicity of thimerosal” and emphasized that studies to determine this were “urgently needed” to be able to draw any meaningful conclusions about “the potential developmental effects of immunization with thimerosal-containing vaccines in newborns and infants.”

    In other words, the CDC’s own source contradicts the CDC’s claim and supports what Del Bigtree says in his video, which is that there has never been a safety study designed to determine the effects of injecting this substance into human babies.

    In sum, the assertion propagated by Facebook and Health Feedback that aluminum and mercury in vaccines are “safe” substances that are readily eliminated from and don’t accumulate in the body is false. On the contrary, it is completely uncontroversial in the scientific literature that both of these substances are neurotoxic, pass through the placental and blood-brain barriers, and accumulate in the brain and other organs. And it is true that there has never been a safety study to determine the risks of injecting these substances into human subjects at the levels children are exposed to by the CDC’s schedule.

    The misinformation propagated by Facebook and its “Fact-Checker” partner to persuade the public that the mercury and aluminum in vaccines are non-toxic doesn’t end there, though. Whereas they claim that the entire CDC childhood vaccine schedule has been studied and found that it is “safe”, the 2013 IOM report they rely upon to support this assertion actually admitted that “existing research has not been designed to test the entire immunization schedule”. Far from affirming that science has proven that it is safe to administer vaccines to children according to the CDC’s schedule, the IOM report acknowledged that “studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted.”

    So on this count, too, it is Facebook and its partner who are lying to Facebook users.

    The MMR Vaccine Can Cause Encephalopathy
    Finally, whereas Facebook and Health Feedback claim that there is no scientific evidence to support the conclusion that the MMR vaccine can cause encephalopathy, in fact, that it can is not even controversial. Merck itself acknowledges this as a proven fact.

    It is true that just because an adverse event is listed in a vaccine package insert doesn’t necessarily mean that it has been scientifically demonstrated that adverse events reported following the administration of vaccines were caused by the vaccinations. It is true that Merck states explicitly that the adverse events listed on its MMR package insert are listed “without regard to causality”.

    Evidently, however, Facebook’s “fact-checkers” couldn’t be bothered to read the whole insert. If they had, they would have noticed that two pages prior, under the heading “Contraindications”, Merck acknowledges that “Measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE), pneumonitis and death as a direct consequence of disseminated measles vaccine virus infection have been reported in immunocompromised individuals inadvertently vaccinated with measles-containing vaccine.”

    Again, just because an adverse event is reported following vaccination doesn’t mean the vaccine caused it; however, the measles virus itself is a known cause of encephalitis, the MMR is a weakened live virus vaccine, and Merck’s insert cites a 1999 case report published in Clinical Infectious Disease that documented encephalitis in a previously healthy patient that was associated with the vaccine strain of measles, which was found in the deceased patient’s brain. “Unless he was infected with an as-yet-undescribed wild-type genotype A virus,” the study concluded, “the vaccine strain was indeed the causative agent in this case.” They described their case report as “the first to clearly demonstrate that severe neurological disease can be caused by the vaccine strain of measles virus.”

    The MMR manufacturer’s own Merck Manual, the self-described “best first place to go for medical information”, states explicitly that “Encephalitis can occur as a secondary immunologic complication of certain viral infections or vaccinations.” (Emphasis added.)

    The summary presented on the version of its entry for “Encephalitis” intended for consumers, rather than physicians, likewise acknowledges that “Encephalitis is inflammation of the brain that occurs when a virus directly infects the brain or when a virus, vaccine, or something else triggers inflammation.” (Emphasis added.)

    That page goes on to say that encephalitis “can occur” when a “virus or vaccine triggers a reaction that makes the immune system attack brain tissue (an autoimmune reaction).” (Emphasis added.)

    The 1999 case report in Clinical Infectious Disease is of course not the only scientific evidence that vaccines can cause encephalopathy. The prior year, a study was published in Pediatrics—the journal of the industry-funded American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)—that reviewed claims submitted to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) to determine whether there is evidence for a causal relationship between measles vaccination and encephalopathy.

    The VICP was established under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which granted broad legal immunity to manufacturers of vaccines recommended by the CDC for routine use in children. The compensation program is funded by an excise tax on every vaccine dose administered and effectively shifts the financial burden for vaccine injuries away from the pharmaceutical corporations and onto the taxpaying consumers.

    As Del Bigtree pointed out in his HighWire video, the VICP has paid out billions of dollars in compensation. To date, the amount that taxpaying consumers have paid in order to fund this compensation is approximately $4.1 billion.

    The Pediatrics study found that there was a statistically significant clustering of cases in which onset of neurological signs or symptoms occurred on the eighth or ninth day post-vaccination. The study’s authors concluded that this clustering “suggests that a causal relationship between measles vaccine and encephalopathy may exist as a rare complication of measles immunization.”

    A commentary on that 1998 review in the journal Pediatric Neurology Briefs stated that “A causal relationship between measles vaccination and severe and sometimes fatal encephalopathy, although rare, is cause for concern.” While measles vaccine had been responsible for greatly reducing incidence of measles in the US, “the need for safer vaccines is also apparent.”

    A study published in Pediatrics in 2004 states, “Measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE) is a disease of the immunocompromised host and typically occurs within 1 year of acute measles infection or vaccination.” (Emphasis added.)

    So, as you can see, the manufacturer of the MMR vaccine itself acknowledges that it can cause encephalopathy, and that it can do so is characterized as a demonstrated fact by the journal of the AAP.

    Similarly, the US government itself has acknowledged that vaccines can cause encephalopathy.

    One well-known VICP case was that of Hannah Poling, who developmentally regressed into diagnosed autism after receiving nine vaccine doses at once at 19 months of age. There are others. According to a 2011 study published in Pace Environmental Law Review, “the VICP has been compensating cases of vaccine-induced encephalopathy and residual seizure disorder associated with autism since the inception of the program.” The authors found “eighty-three cases of autism among those compensated for vaccine-induced brain damage.”

    With respect to young Hannah, the government conceded that “the facts of this case meet the statutory criteria for demonstrating that the vaccinations CHILD received on July 19, 2000, significantly aggravated an underlying mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with features of autism spectrum disorder.”

    In the Poling case, the US Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the VICP, “conceded that petitioners are entitled to compensation based on a determination that she suffered an injury identified on the Vaccine Injury Table, specifically, a presumptive MMR vaccine-related injury of an encephalopathy. Hannah’s encephalopathy eventually manifested as a chronic encephalopathy with features of autism spectrum disorder and a complex partial seizure disorder as a sequela.”

    The Vaccine Injury Table lists adverse events that are recognized to be caused by vaccines. With respect to encephalopathy, it states that “A vaccine recipient shall be considered to have suffered an encephalopathy if an injury meeting the description . . . of an acute encephalopathy occurs within the applicable time period [post-vaccination] and results in a chronic encephalopathy . . . .” It states the same thing with respect to encephalitis.

    Under the VICP, if the onset of encephalopathy or encephalitis is temporally associated with vaccination, absent some other more likely explanation, it is assumed to have been caused by the vaccination.

    The table lists “Encephalopathy or encephalitis” as a covered injury for both of the triple combination vaccines on the CDC’s childhood schedule: the diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTP) vaccine and the MMR.

    How Facebook Is Helping the Government Censor Factual Information about Vaccines
    Facebook’s “Fact-Checker” feature is purportedly intended to address the problem of “false news”. To this end, Facebook works “with third-party fact-checkers who are certified through the non-partisan International Fact-Checking Network to help identify and review false news.” Facebook asserts that “Third-party fact-checkers investigate stories in a journalistic process meant to result in establishing the truth or falsity of the story.”

    But as you’ve just seen, in this case, Facebook’s “fact-checker”, instead of doing journalism, instead simply regurgitates false claims made by the government—most specifically, lies told to the public by the CDC in pursuit of its goal of attaining increased demand for the pharmaceutical industry’s vaccine products.

    At the foot of the Health Feedback article, there’s a prominent green “International Fact-Checking Network” seal, as though this affiliation lent authority to what is predominantly a misinformative piece of content that outright lies to its readers about vaccine safety.

    This International Fact-Checking Network is a project of the Poynter Institute. It’s launch was funded by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, an organization dedicated to the goal of increasing vaccination coverage globally. In his 2011 annual letter, Bill Gates wrote, “In the same way that during my Microsoft career I talked about the magic of software, I now spend my time talking about the magic of vaccines.” One goal of the Gates Foundation is to accelerate “the development and commercialization of novel vaccines and the sustainable manufacture of existing vaccines”. To that end, the organization invests “in expertise and platform technologies that help us make vaccines faster, better, and cheaper.”

    Note that the adjective “safer” isn’t included there. It is also obvious that the distribution of any factual information that might lead people to the conclusion that the risks of vaccination outweigh the potential benefits would pose an obstacle standing in the way of the Gates Foundation achieving its goal of higher vaccination rates.

    In addition to partnering with a “fact-checking” organization funded by the Gates Foundation, Facebook has faced governmental pressure to engage in outright censorship of any information contrary to that propagated by the CDC. In February 2019, Congressman Adam B. Schiff sent Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg a letter essentially calling on the company to help the government censor any information about vaccines that might lead parents to conclude that strictly complying with the CDC’s schedule would not be in their child’s best interests. (Schiff sent similar letters to the CEOs of Google and Amazon.)

    Ostensibly, Schiff’s purpose was to combat “misinformation” about vaccines, but his criteria only applied to what he termed “anti-vaccine” information and were inclusive of any information, however factual, that might lead parents to what Schiff personally believes is a wrong conclusion. As Schiff explained, “if a concerned parent consistently sees information in their Newsfeed that casts doubt on the safety or efficacy of vaccines, it could cause them to disregard the advice of their children’s physicians and public health experts and decline to follow recommended vaccination schedule.”

    That Schiff was applying this euphemistic definition of “misinformation” is further evident in the fact that Schiff himself blatantly lied in his letter that there is “no evidence to suggest that vaccines cause life-threatening or disabling diseases”—a statement that, if true, would obviate the government’s perceived need for administering the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in order to shift the financial burden for vaccine injuries away from the pharmaceutical industry, which was done to preserve public vaccine policy by ensuring a stable supply of vaccines in the face of lawsuits that were literally putting vaccine manufacturers out of business.

    Conclusion
    We are supposed to believe that “anti-vaccine” activists are spreading misinformation about vaccines around the internet, including via social media platforms like Facebook, and that we can rely upon the CDC for reliable and accurate information. The truth is that it is the government itself that is the greatest purveyor of misinformation about vaccines, and efforts presently underway to either prevent people from seeing certain information or to prejudice their view of it have nothing to do with ensuring that people are getting the information they need to be able to make an informed choice about whether to vaccinate. Instead, the government issues vaccine propaganda intended to deceive people into complying with public vaccine policy.

    The corporate mainstream media, for their part, are engaged in public policy advocacy rather than doing any kind of real journalism. And now Facebook, too, rather than serving its users and the interests of public health, is acting in service to the state by actively misinforming people about what science tells us about vaccine safety. This includes propagating the falsehood that mercury and aluminum from vaccines are non-toxic and do not accumulate in bodily tissues or organs like the brain, as well as the falsehood that there is no scientific evidence that vaccines can cause brain damage.

    As a consequence of the incessant pro-vaccine propaganda the public is bombarded with by the government and major media, informed consent is simply not happening—except among those parents who are doing their own research and drawing their own conclusions about whether to vaccinate their children rather than blindly following the CDC’s schedule.

    It is preventing parents from considering certain factual information that is available on the internet—including at the government’s database of the published medical literature PubMed.gov—that the government, the corporate news media, and now companies like Facebook, Google, Amazon, and MailChimp, are primarily concerning themselves with. That Facebook and its “Fact-Checker”­ partner have no problem with misinformation being spread so long as it favors public policy is evident in the fact that they are themselves guilty of propagating falsehoods about vaccines.
    Last edited by Delight; 18th June 2019 at 22:47.

  21. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    avid (19th June 2019), Merry Mom (19th June 2019), onawah (19th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019)

  22. Link to Post #292
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Frenzy, fear and emotions will stimulate callous disregard of free speech, create a mob mentality and facilitate people disregarding their own rights and freedom. Discrimination is being encouraged by mainstream propagandists.The ultimate "20/20 is hindsight" experience, once one realizes it will not only be "someone else" affected, will be bitter.

    This program is an ongoing great source for excellent discussion of constitutional crisis in the guise of "public health" and the threat to medical freedom issues.


  23. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    avid (19th June 2019), Franny (21st June 2019), Merry Mom (19th June 2019), onawah (19th June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019)

  24. Link to Post #293
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    I wonder if this is a viable challenge?

    Quote Are Lawsuits Coming for Legislators Practicing Medicine Without A License?
    June 3, 2019Teresa Reile
    By Teresa Reile


    Legislators across the country are jumping on the bandwagon of Big Pharma’s push to inject everyone with carcinogens under the clichéd and hackneyed mantra of, “For the Safety of the Children”.

    Feckless Senator Richard Pan in California has been at the forefront of this godless assault against humanity and has positioned himself as an authority. Perhaps it is because he himself has harmed countless numbers of children with inoculations.

    Could his specious fight to ‘protect all children’ by injecting them with cancer causing toxins be simply his way of making himself ‘right’ for the irreparable harm that he has leveled against children while being a ‘practicing’ pediatrician?

    He ‘practiced’ on his patients and when the guilt got too much to bear, he became a politician so that now he can legally justify and supposedly rectify his actions through legislation – as if that, somehow will exonerate him or free him from guilt.

    Sometimes people will admit to the most egregious of acts but have no responsibility for them. Such is the case with Pan.

    What have innocent little children ever done to him? Why is he on a mission to injure them?

    Our sources tell us that it all about the money.

    People across America are demanding that Richard Pan step down from office and that his medical license be revoked.

    You can file a complaint against Richard Pan here:

    https://thefullertoninformer.com/cal...dical-license/

    Legislators in States across the country are following his lead, but without the moniker of “Doctor” beside their name are crossing a very fine line of appearing to be practicing medicine without a license.

    Why would someone put their career in jeopardy like this?

    The fact that legislators are doing this raises a very interesting question as to who they work for. The Vaccine Lobby is the largest lobby in Washington, DC with an endless supply of money behind them from Big Pharma.

    Elected officials work for the people who voted them into office. Big Pharma did not vote them into office.

    You did.

    Millions of parents across America are joining together and organizing across the US to vote out of office legislators who go against their wishes.

    Why are they sacrificing their careers for Big Pharma?

    THIS raises the question as to how much they are getting paid from Big Pharma.

    It must be quite a sum.

    How many readers know that Vaccine manufacturers are not held liable for ANY injury that may be caused from a vaccine? They are not held accountable at all.

    This is because of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. It completely exonerates the vaccine manufacturers. The only recourse that parents have is a secret court called Vaccine Court. Most people don’t even know about it.

    One devastated parent who sued in vaccine court and won said,

    “My son’s life is ruined as well are our marriage. Both of our families have been affected terribly. Our lives are ruined, and our son was given a Death Sentence and we watch him die daily. He suffers badly. What the families have to endure is horrible. The settlement doesn’t come close to account for the suffering.”

    There is SO much money involved and the vaccine manufacturers have nothing to lose so they feel that they can run roughshod over all the people in America and USE the politicians to do it.

    Legislators who allow themselves to fall victim to Big Pharma are putting their careers in jeopardy as people across the country are availing themselves of the ability to file complaints against elected officials.

    In NYS, for instance, one can file here:

    https://jcope.ny.gov/report-misconduct

    Just pick the legislator that is in violation and file your complaint.

    Our sources tell us that people in NYS are filing complaints against Assemblyman Jeff Dinowitz and Senator Brad Hoylman and Senator David Carlucci – legislators who walk the precarious line of practicing medicine without a license through the co-authoring of a bill which would force a parent to put their child at risk without a choice.

  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Franny (21st June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019)

  26. Link to Post #294
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Theresa Deisher also was the person who revealed that IF cord blood given back to a child with autistic symptoms relieved the symptoms, then autism cannot just be written off as an unavoidable genetic condition. It would be a condition that was induced by an environmental condition.

    Quote GENETIC ROULETTE - Vaccines Causing Outbreaks? | Del Bigtree - HighWireTalk

    We interview Stem Cell Pioneer Theresa Deisher PhD who has a PhD on Fetal DNA Fragments contaminants and retroviruses in vaccines.The research Theresa focuses on is the health risks residual human fetal DNA found in pharmaceutical products. These include vaccines and how the contaminants could have affects on autism, autoimmune disease and cancer.

    Is the Pertussis Vaccine causing outbreaks? We are told vaccines are meant to protect us from disease so why are the stats showing that "research looked at nearly half a million children born between 1999 and 2016, and found that most whopping cough cases (82%) occurred in children who were fully vaccinated or over-vaccinated" - CNN. Watch for more facts!


    Just want to add this commenter Dr. Mark Sibley. He has been commenting for a couple of years because he experienced first hand with child and brother that one cannot depend on vaccines to be safe and effective.

    Quote Mark Sibley, M.D.
    Mark Sibley, M.D.
    2 hours ago
    Don’t be me..... I am an M.D. but let me tell you what parents, politicians, teachers, neighbors, the media, and even doctors didn’t know..... I did not know that Vaccines had not been tested.... I did not know the ingredients of vaccines..... I did not know enough to research vaccines before vaccinating my own children..... I did not know that vaccines were given a blanket indemnity from liability in 1986 (they cannot be sued)...... I did not know that we gave more vaccines than any other country.....I did not know that we are the only country that gives newborn babies Hepatitis B vaccines ( against a sexually transmitted disease) on the 1st day of life...I did not know that the US has the highest rate of SIDS in the industrialized world on the 2nd day of life... I did not know that we had more autism than any other country..... I did not know that Vaccines could injure an infants brain (encephalitis) ..... I did not know that vaccines can result in autoimmunity and neurological damage...... I did not know that the much-ballyhooed fallacy of ''herd immunity'' does NOT apply to vaccines and is a myth created by the CDC and by Merck Vaccine Company for the media to tell us is the reason to get vaccines....... I did not know that Vaccines have almost NO effect after about four years....I did not know that more college students are getting mumps and measles because they have no protection from these childhood illnesses from their vaccines....I did not know that the measles vaccine only comes in the MMR now but the single version of just measles vaccine was safer and not causing autism...I did not know that Dr.Wakefield was proven to be right...I did not know that when adults get their DPT vaccines to visit their grandchildren that the "P" pertussis=whooping cough infection is actually still alive in them then and they are then contagious like "Typhoid Mary'', and these adults are actually carrying the infection and then spreading pertussis=whooping cough...I did not know how emotional the topic would be and how angry people would be at me for just asking questions about Vaccine Safety....I did not know that pediatricians do not even know the vaccine ingredients, like mercury, aluminum, and Human DNA and neurotoxic aluminum molecules and glyphosate..... I did not know that pediatricians were paid a ''kick-back'' to give vaccines....I did not know there was a law to report vaccine reactions but almost zero pediatricians know that and about zero vaccine reactions are ever reported...I did not know it was called VAERS (look it up)...I did not know that there is a "Vaccine court" that doles out money to vaccine victims...I did not know that it has already paid out over $$$ 4 Billion dollars .... I did not know that the CDC owned the Patents on vaccines and earned billions of dollars a year selling vaccines world-wide...I did not know that the US government promised countries financial aid only if they ordered their people to take the CDC's vaccines and the US CDC now controls the W.H.O. and the vaccine makers now control the CDC...WTH!!........ I did not know how angry at myself I would be for not knowing......I did not know that the CDC committed fraud...I did not know that it would take a CDC whistleblower to discover the CDC fraud... I did not know that Merck committed fraud repeatedly..... I did not know that aluminum is connected to brain inflammation and brain inflammation is connected to autism and connected to my mother's Alzheimer's (everyone's Alzheimer's) ... I did not know that a flu vaccine could kill you like it killed my brother by causing Guillain-Barre Paralysis....... I did not know how much mainstream media would censor the independent research..... I did not know it would take me so many years to wake up...I did not know how fast and furious the vaccine makers would be to smear excellent doctors and researchers that showed unsafe side-effects, just like what happened when Vioxx and Thalidomide and DDT and cigarettes were questioned...I did not know that the CDC has never studied a group that is divided into a ''vaccinated group'' and compared them to an ''unvaccinated group''...I did not know that every other independent researcher who has done the comparison between those 2 groups has shown that the UN-vaccinated group is healthier and the VAXinated group has many times more asthma, SIDS, auto-immune diseases, ADD, ADHD, autism, chronic rashes, deadly allergic reactions to peanuts, milk, beef, latex, etc. and their parents need to carry Epi-Pens...I did not know that the Vaccine researchers studied African children and found that the children there who GOT vaccinated, especially with the CDC's DPT vaccine were 5 times (Yes, five times) more likely to die before the age of 5..I did not know that the doctors on every news show who are the vaccine maker's mouthpieces were actually getting millions from the vaccine profits...
    Last edited by Delight; 21st June 2019 at 05:15.

  27. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Franny (21st June 2019), Sstarss (22nd June 2019), T Smith (30th June 2019)

  28. Link to Post #295
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    This is information from bEFORE 2006 when Jon Rappoport published the interview with an insider from the pharma industry. It is almost unthinkable but the fact is.... one can see how this is playing out now.

    Quote Jon Rappoport Interviews a Retired Vaccine Researcher
    Posted by Dr. Ben Kim on May 24, 2006


    Preface:

    One of our newsletter subscribers sent me the following interview that a journalist named Jon Rappoport did with a retired vaccine researcher a few years ago. Many thanks to Jon for giving us permission to share this interview with our subscribers.

    - Ben Kim

    ***

    Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.

    A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.

    Q: Why not?

    A: I want to preserve my privacy.

    Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?

    A: I believe I could lose my pension.

    Q: On what grounds?

    A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.

    Q: Harassed by whom?

    A: The FBI.

    Q: Really?

    A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.

    Q: So much for free speech.

    A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.

    Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?

    A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.

    Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?

    A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.

    Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

    A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

    Q: Why?

    A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

    Q: And then?

    A: I did my own investigation.

    Q: What conclusions did you come to?

    A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.

    Q: What conditions?

    A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.

    Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?

    A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.

    Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

    A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

    Q: Why?

    A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

    Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?

    A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

    Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

    A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

    Q: Which is?

    A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.

    Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.

    A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.

    Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.

    A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.

    Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.

    A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.

    Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?

    A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.

    Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.

    Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.

    A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.

    Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.

    A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.

    Note from Ben Kim: Please don't overlook this point: when you inject any substance into your circulation via muscle tissue or blood vessel, your body's primary defense mechanisms are bypassed. These mechanisms include your skin, hair in your nasal passageway, adenoid tissues that line your pharynx (tonsils), and specialized membranes that line your nose, digestive tract (including your mouth and anal region), genitourinary tract, and vaginal canal.

    All of these mechanisms exist to protect you against harmful substances and pathogens. This is why it's not wise to remove tonsils without first looking to address the food and lifestyle choices that contribute to a chronic cough and sore throat. This is why you should not dry out the mucosal linings of the vaginal tract or anal region with soap - plain water is adequate. And this is why you must do everything that you can to promote a healthy digestive system if you want to have a strong first line of defense against harmful substances and pathogens.

    Q: How were your findings received?

    A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.

    Q: This information is pretty staggering.

    A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.

    Q: And beyond the purity issue?

    A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."

    Q: The immune system is?

    A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.

    Q: So the level of general health is important.

    A: More than important. Vital.

    Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?

    A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.

    Q: And that happens?

    A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the disease.

    Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?

    A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.

    Q: What was the turning point for you?

    A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.

    Q: Did you investigate?

    A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.

    Q: What do you mean?

    A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.

    Q: Why doesn't it make sense?

    A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?

    Q: And that is what you found?

    A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time.Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.

    Q: Has it been enough?

    A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.

    Q: Which is?

    A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.

    Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.

    A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.

    Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?

    A: Yes I did.

    Q: What happened?

    A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by association." All in all, though, I behaved myself.I made sure I didn't create problems for myself.

    Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

    A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

    Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?

    A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.

    Note from Ben Kim: if you would like to read my take on HIV and AIDS, view the following article: AIDS: The Biggest Medical Mistake of All Time?

    Q: This network you speak of.

    A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.

    Q: And in the industrialized nations?

    A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.

    Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.

    A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles -- is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.

    Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.

    A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.

    Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.

    A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.

    Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.

    A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.

    Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.

    A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.

    Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?

    A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers -- a few -- might start leaking information.

    Q: A good idea.

    A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.

    Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?

    A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.

    Q: Then we have the fall flu season.

    A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.

    Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?

    A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.

    Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?

    A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.

    Q: The things that are not there.

    A: Yes.

    Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.

    A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.

    Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?

    A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe.In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings.They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.

    Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?

    A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.

    Q: How long did you work with vaccines?

    A: A long time. Longer than ten years.

    Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?

    A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.

    Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.

    A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.

    Q: So we come to the level playing field.

    A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.

    Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.

    A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.

    Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.

    Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."

    As you know, since the beginning of nomorefakenews, I have been launching an attack against non-scientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

    Mark has been one of my sources.

    He is a little reluctant to speak out, even under the cover of anonymity, but with the current push to make vaccines mandatory -- with penalties like quarantine lurking in the wings -- he has decided to break his silence.

    He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my long-time sources, he has developed a conscience about his former work. Mark is well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation of populations.

    To learn more about Jon Rappoport and his work as a journalist, you can visit his site here: NoMoreFakeNews.com. Thank you once again to Jon for giving us permission to share this interview on our website.
    Quote June 21, 2019
    Dem candidate backpedal, NY teachers pension fund, Processed food autism, Wisconsin slows mandates, Congress cannabis, Dr. James Gerni, France vaccine trust, Autism MMJ, Leaky gut, Fluoride and MORE! http://www.robertscottbell.com/natura..
    Last edited by Delight; 21st June 2019 at 22:05.

  29. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Franny (22nd June 2019)

  30. Link to Post #296
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Today’s biggest organized crime operation: Big Pharma.

    Quote JUNE 20, 2019
    The Normalization of Corruption—Big Pharma Takes “Tobacco Tactics” to a New Level
    By Kristina Kristen


    The 21st century organized crime lords—the pharmaceutical industry—archetypal la cosa nostra mafia-like cartels, have risen to unprecedented dominion over humanity. These renegade modern-day, too-big-to-fail outlaws have mastered and expanded the industry corruption playbook to levels that make the tobacco industry seem relatively tame and honest in comparison. Big Pharma has methodically choreographed a stealthy take-over of our most fundamental democratic institutions necessary to maintain industry in check: the regulatory institutions, the legislatures, politicians, free press/media, academia and objective science.

    Big Pharma today not only influences legislation for drugs, but the vaccine producers are also guaranteed a self-serving, automatically-captured consumer market in the form of 74 million children to whom the government mandates their limited-liability vaccine products in unprecedented numbers.
    Following the money
    Americans spend the highest amount on health care in the world at $3.65 trillion, which represents 18% of the GDP. Big Pharma today not only influences legislation for drugs, but the vaccine producers are also guaranteed a self-serving, automatically-captured consumer market in the form of 74 million children to whom the government mandates their limited-liability vaccine products in unprecedented numbers. Today’s bloated childhood vaccine schedule is a direct result of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), a law passed by congress at the time, to keep the vaccine producers from going bankrupt from lawsuits brought forth by families with vaccine-injured children. This law, in effect, unfastened the free-market incentives to make safe products from the vaccine producers, unleashing increasingly more and more inadequately tested and monitored products on to the market.

    The pharmaceutical industry spends a combined $26 billion annually to influence doctors to sell their drugs and to entice consumers to purchase their drugs. Pharma strikes a one-two knockout punch in drug sales by investing an average of $6 billion annually in direct to consumer advertisement, followed by an even larger $20 billion investment to persuade doctors to sell their drugs to consumers who are herded to their offices to obtain the direct to consumer (DTC) advertised drugs.

    Financial incentives and conflicts abound in pediatrics as well. Major streams of income come from “wellness” visits, a euphemism for infants and children being brought into the pediatrician’s office, in order to receive the closely followed CDC mandated childhood vaccine schedule. In addition to the steady foot traffic generated by the vaccine schedule, pediatricians are rewarded financial incentives per fully vaccinated child in their practice by insurance companies.

    … drug companies and allied advocates have an army of lobbyists in all 50 states and have spent more than $880 million on lobbying and political contributions at the state and federal level over the past decade.
    Neutering the regulatory bodies
    Equally disturbing, pharma has strategically and systematically neutered regulatory bodies such as the CDC and FDA, through a constant cross-pollination of industry and government heads. This revolving door has expressly created ever deeper conflicts of interest and blurred lines of duty. For example, Julie Gerberding, the former director of the CDC (2002-2009), joined Merck in January 2010 as the president of Merck’s vaccines department. In fact, this revolving door appears to be quite a prevalent phenomenon. Dr. Presad, an oncologist from Oregon Health and Science University discovered: “a quarter of the Food and Drug Administration employees who approved cancer and hematology drugs from 2001 through 2010 left the agency and now work or consult for pharmaceutical companies”.

    In addition, the Associated Press and Center for Public Integrity, show drug companies and allied advocates have an army of lobbyists in all 50 states and have spent more than $880 million on lobbying and political contributions at the state and federal level over the past decade. The opioid lobby, for example, contributed to 7,100 candidates for state level offices.

    These unorthodox, forged relationships, all together, serve as a secure and impervious interconnected web for pharma to wield more influence and power as it creates an ever more captive audience for its products.
    Extended reach
    Pharma’s reach also extends into media and science garnered through strategic financial entanglements. The U.S. and New Zealand are two of the only countries that permit drug makers to advertise their products directly to consumers, a practice that is illegal or frowned upon in the rest of the globe. As previously discussed a large portion of the revenue for the mainstream media, (up to 70%) in the U.S. comes from pharmaceutical advertisement: “Just considering television, 187 commercials for about 70 prescription medications have collectively aired almost half a million times since the start of 2018, and to do that, drug companies shelled out $2.8 billion”.

    Lastly, most of the clinical safety trials performed on vaccines and drugs is performed by institutionalized scientists who are on the industry payroll, and the FDA is increasingly approving and fast-tracking drugs despite dangerous or inconclusive evidence that they are either safe or effective. These unorthodox, forged relationships, all together, serve as a secure and impervious interconnected web for pharma to wield more influence and power as it creates an ever more captive audience for its products. This behemoth power’s next move is the fierce state-by-state push to remove exemptions and the basic human right to informed consent. The last barrier to pharma’s complete unadulterated power is removing human autonomy and the ability to decide for one’s self and family what medical interventions are beneficial and which ones may be rife with potential risk and little benefit. Any rudimentary perusal of the main vaccine makers’ track record, Merck, GSK, Pfizer and Sanofi (The BIG 4), will illuminate a sordid history of criminal behavior with $billions paid for fines, otherwise known “as the cost of doing business”.

  31. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Franny (22nd June 2019)

  32. Link to Post #297
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Students in the Ukraine must have immunizations, so a medical student would be fully vaccinated. This is a headline today:The medical student who died of measles that is promoting the danger of measles. He actually died of pneumonia and we are being given a human face to the propaganda to make us beg for measles shots. Trying to stop an infection as a child with a vaccine that never will give a person a lifetime immunity is actually more of a public health danger. The vaccines are also becoming less effective. Vaccination PROGRAMS are what is threatened by vaccine resistors.

    Richard Pan is a poster child for the BIG LIE that is rolling over common sense and is threatening the public health. This is not just my opinion. It is based on facts that will NOT be shared by the Vaccine Mobsters and their henchmen.

    Last edited by Delight; 22nd June 2019 at 17:09.

  33. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    avid (22nd June 2019), Bubu (3rd July 2019)

  34. Link to Post #298
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Dr. Bob Sears is a target of the witch hunt against MDs who are willing to help parents and children whose health might be adversely affected by vaccines. ONLY because of the lies about how dangerous a world without vaccines must be would any human be willing to force vaccination. The fact is that the world is dangerous because there is an idea that the public and social good is DIFFERENT from the individual good.

    This same idea justified all purges of any people seen to be aberrant and threatening to the social order. This willingness to go after others is frightening and yet many would agree to shun and even see a purge if NECESSARY of unvaccinated people (for the sake of the public health) along with the MDs who try to help.

    Quote Jun 21, 2019
    'Dr. Bob' Sears Accused Of Issuing Invalid Vaccine Medical Exemptions--Again


    Bob Sears, a pediatrician from Orange County, right, testifies against a measure by state Sen. Dr. Richard Pan, D-Sacramento, left, who is also a pediatrician, that would give public health officials oversight of doctors that may be giving fraudulent medical expeditions from vaccinations during a hearing of the Assembly Health Committee at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif., Thursday, June 20, 2019. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)
    Bob Sears, a pediatrician from Orange County, right, testifies against a measure by state Sen. Dr. Richard Pan, D-Sacramento, left, who is also a pediatrician, that would give public health officials oversight of doctors that may be giving fraudulent medical expeditions from vaccinations during a hearing of the Assembly Health Committee at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif., Thursday, June 20, 2019. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli) ASSOCIATED PRESS
    “Dr. Bob” Sears, MD, the controversial California physician known for his Godwin-esque advocacy against vaccination requirements and a vaccine book filled with misinformation, is facing another accusation from the Medical Board of California, less than a year after he was placed on probation for medically negligent practices. Ironically, the complaint was filed just two days before Sears testified at a California legislative committee hearing against SB 276, a bill that aims to prevent exactly the behavior that led to his previous censure and this complaint.

    “I find it astonishing that a person who is on probation with the medical board is going to be the main spokesperson to say the bill is bad, the person the bill is designed to protect against,” California State Senator Richard Pan, MD, FAAP, (D – Sacramento) told me after the bill he’s sponsoring passed out of the Assembly Health Committee 9-2 yesterday.

    What Happened?

    The complaint, brought by Kimberly Kirchmeyer, executive director of the Medical Board of California, alleges that Sears filed medical vaccination exemptions for a pair of siblings who did not have medically recognized contraindications for any vaccines, based on what he recorded in their medical records.


    Medical exemptions allow children to attend California schools without having received immunizations required by the state for school attendance. Following SB 277 in 2015, California became the third state to only allow medical exemptions. Similar bills have since become law in Maine this May and in New York last week.

    The patients are a 7-year-old unvaccinated boy with psoriasis and his sister, whose only medical history is a bee sting allergy. Both saw Sears on May 4, 2016 for a complaint of “vaccine exemption appt.”

    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Sears recorded the children’s family medical history as “autoimmune disorders, lupus, psoriasis (in Dad), inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome (in Dad), gluten sensitivity severe in Mom and Aunt, suspect CD [celiac disease] in aunt, neurodevelopmental disorders, ADD/ADHD (in Dad), psychiatric disorders, schizophrenia (Dad), bipolar, and depression.”

    The boy’s exam included “psoriatic plaques on scalp, back of neck and ears,” and the girl’s exam was normal, though Sears documented no vital signs for her (blood pressure and temperature). Both children were diagnosed with “viral infection, unspecified” and “feeding difficulties” despite the purpose of the appointments being solely recorded as “vaccine exemption” visits.

    Sears determined that the boy “qualified for medical exemption from vaccines for family history of autoimmune disorders (Dad and others), inflammatory bowel disease (Dad), neurodevelopmental disorders (Dad), psychiatric disorders (Dad), and the child’s own autoimmune disorder.” Sears determined the girl qualified “based on review of her past medical history, family history, and current state of health.” He filed letters for both children “exempting [them] from all vaccines for the rest of [their] childhood.”

    None of the conditions or family history, as noted in the children’s records, meet the criteria for contraindications to any CDC-recommended childhood vaccines, according to the CDC. The complaint notes for the boy that a “childhood long medical vaccine exemption… based on diagnosis of psoriasis, without immunosuppressive medication, is a simple departure from standard of care.”

    Immunosuppressive medication, including that used to treat autoimmune disease such as psoriasis, is a contraindication for live vaccines, such as the MMR and chickenpox vaccines, explained Jaime Friedman, MD, FAAP from Children’s Primary Care Medical Group in San Diego. The complaint goes on to say the boy’s diagnosis and both children’s family history “are not a known contraindication or precaution to routine childhood vaccination.”

    The father of the children appeared to agree. Seven months later, on January 25, 2017, the children’s mother called to tell Sears’ office that the children’s father “retract his consent regarding the medical exemption letter.” Since exemptions require consent from both custodial parents, Sears told her the exemption letter was no longer valid. To get another letter, both parents would need to come in and bring the children’s past medical records, he said. Both children’s records “contain an amended copy of the medical exemption letter dated May 4, 2017, stating the original exemption letter is no longer valid and should be disregarded due to a change in family circumstances and consent.”

    The Medical Board accusation includes “failure to maintain adequate records” as a second cause for discipline because Sears “failed to obtain and document an appropriate and accurate past medical history, physical exam and family/social history” for the children. This charge was also in the previous accusation that led to Sears’ 35-month probation in July 2018. Sears did not return my emailed request for comment.

    UPDATE: Sears has addressed the complaint on Facebook here. He defends his decision to issue a medical exemption for the child with psoriasis on the basis of eight studies he links:

    One study involves 43 patients who received the 2009-2010 flu vaccine; patients' ages are not noted. Patients with psoriasis are actually at higher risk for some infectious diseases since psoriasis is an autoimmune disorder. Interestingly, another study Sears linked reports “recent infectious disease” as a risk factor “for a first episode of acute guttate psoriasis.”
    Two are single case studies—a 26-year-old woman in Korea after the H1N1 vaccine and a 50-year-old in Portugal after the tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccine—which cannot be used as evidence of causation.
    Another uses a national survey to identify 10 adult patients with psoriasis onset or flares after the 2009-2010 H1N1 vaccine in France—a different vaccine than that given in the US. The authors conclude “the likely very low incidence of psoriasis following vaccination emphasizes the safe profile and the relevance of vaccination strategies in psoriasis patients.”
    He mentions two studies, here and here, related to the BCG (tuberculosis) vaccine, which is not a routine childhood immunization in the US. BCG vaccinations in the US are rare, particularly for children.
    And finally, Sears lists a case study of two patients after the BCG vaccine and one for the flu vaccine — published in 1955.
    Medical Exemptions Appear Inappropriate

    “Without being able to review the child’s medical chart and assuming the child was not on immunosuppressive medication, I don’t see a reason for the child to have a vaccine exemption,” Friedman told me. With the “viral infection, unspecified” in the chart, Friedman said that “could be a contraindication to giving the vaccine that day but not to giving it in the future.”

    Friedman, who has written three medical exemptions for her patients, said contraindications certainly exist for certain vaccines but are rare. “These are the patients you want to protect, so these are the kids you want to surround with vaccinated people, like their classmates and their siblings,” she said. If she had a patient on immunosuppressive medication for an autoimmune disease, she said she would work with the child’s specialist, such as a dermatologist or rheumatologist, to determine if and when it was safe for the child to receive vaccines.

    Pan agreed that if children “had a skin rash so severe that they would need immunosuppression significantly enough that they can’t be vaccinated, probably a specialist is involved, especially for something like psoriasis.” He also noted the unusual decision to provide an exemption until “the end of childhood.” “Unless you have proof that this condition suddenly terminates at the end of childhood,” Pan said, a doctor would issue either a permanent exemption for a chronic, permanent contraindicated condition or a temporary exemption until the contraindicated condition or medication resolves.

    The complaint contains other “much more fundamental issues,” said Sonia Khan, MD, FAAP, director of Pediatric Crisis Solutions, a consulting firm, and medical director of the Team Substance Use Disorder Program at City of Fremont in California. Khan testified for SB 276 at the California Assembly.

    “He didn’t even do vital signs on these kids. If you don’t do vital signs on the kids, right off the bat, the medical exam isn’t complete,” Khan told me. “If these do prove to be valid accusations, then there are some pretty flagrant violations.”

    She said this complaint reveals the need for the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to be able to track down medical exemptions and determine the exams and exemptions were done properly.

    What SB 276 Would Do

    SB 276 bill requires guardians whose children receive a medical vaccine exemption to sign a form that releases the medical records to CDPH and the Medical Board of California for review. The current incarnation of the bill includes two potential triggers for review: if the child attends a school with an immunization rate below 95% or if the physician who wrote the exemption has issued more than five medical exemptions in the previous year.

    The second requirement is not a cap, Pan said. A pediatric oncologist, for example, may need to write many more than five exemptions in a year. It simply means the CDPH can review the exemptions. If multiple exemptions appear invalid, the CDPH can refer the case to the medical board, the disciplinary agency. Currently, both the CDPH and medical board have difficulty reviewing exemptions because they lack access to the medical records of children with exemptions.

    “The difficulty up until now in chasing down potentially fraudulent exemptions is that the families are complicit,” Khan said. “When a doctor gets reported, the family or someone else is triggering an investigation. In a fraudulent exemptions, the families aren’t going to cooperate.”

    “HIPAA [Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996] has a specific exception for public health agencies engaged in ‘public health surveillance, public health investigations, and public health investigations,’ that covers SB276 and board investigations,” said Dorit Reiss, a professor of law at the University of California Hastings College of Law who specializes in vaccine policy. Reiss, who formally entered her name in support of SB 276, wrote a backgrounder about the bill here.

    But that doesn’t mean the records are easy to get. Another ongoing case illustrates this problem: The Medical Board of California sued Bay Area pediatrician Ron Kennedy, MD, to compel him to produce patient records “of three minors for whom Dr. Kennedy provided vaccination exemptions.” Kennedy refused, and the San Francisco city and count court compelled him to provide the records. Kennedy filed an appeal, and this most recent filing denied his request to stay the court’s demand that he turn over the medical records.

    Sears’ complaint does not note who reported him or provided the medical records. His previous accusation arose from a parent who provided the records, according to an unnamed, verified source.

    Parents are typically not the ones who trigger medical exemptions, Pan explained. In fact, pediatricians do not have “medical exemption appts” at all. Appointments are typically well visits, acute care visits, chronic care visits or follow-ups.

    “A medical exemption should usually result from the pediatrician or a specialist seeing them saying ‘given the condition or situation you have, I would recommend we either don’t vaccinate or hold off on these vaccines,’” Pan said. “It’s odd for parents to ask for a medical exemption.”

    Increased Medical Exemptions Triggered SB 276

    Yet that appears to have become a trend after SB 277 eliminated personal belief exemptions. In late 2018, a study in Pediatrics found problems that had emerged from implementation of the law, including confusion and frustration over which medical exemptions were valid, how schools and health departments should track them, high fees doctors were charging for them and concerns that medical exemptions were increasing.

    Indeed, just this month, some of the same researchers found California medical exemptions had increased despite an overall decline in unvaccinated children entering school in California. A year after the bill took effect, 4.4% of kindergartens entered school without all required vaccinations, down from 7.2% the previous year. But medical exemptions quadrupled from 0.6% to 2.4%. The following year, non-up-to-date kindergartners ticked up slightly, by 0.5%. In a state of nearly 40 million people, that’s a couple hundred thousand additional children not fully vaccinated in a year with the most measles cases since the disease was eliminated from the US.

    Another study in the American Journal of Public Health found that SB 277 was interpreted and implemented unevenly in school districts and local health departments throughout California due to “vague legislative and regulatory language.” The researchers also found “lack of centralized review of medical exemptions allowed medical exemptions that are not consistent with valid contraindications for immunizations to be accepted.” Among the uncertainties were what kinds of physicians can write vaccine medical exemptions, which health conditions qualify for one and how to report dubious or suspicious ones.

    Those are precisely the issues that SB 276 aims to address.

    “The major purpose of SB276 is to prevent unscrupulous doctors from selling unnecessary exemptions so we can restore community immunity,” said Leah Russin, executive director of Vaccinate California, who is co-sponsoring SB 276 with the California Medical Association and the California chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

    She noted that 835 schools in California—with nearly 400,000 students—have kindergarten MMR immunization rates under 95%, according to CDPH data.

    “If true, the new complaint against Dr. Bob Sears demonstrates exactly why SB276 is needed. Currently no entity in state or local government, including the schools, have the authority to reject an exemption letter signed by a doctor,” she said. “The exemptions described in the complaint do not follow the standard of care, and if issued after implementation of SB276 and subject to the triggers specified in it, they would likely be flagged as unjustified.”

    Sears’ History May Prevent Leniency

    Some observers believe the medical board’s previous ruling on Sears’ misconduct was forgiving but hope that won’t be the case again, especially since his case could be an example to other physicians writing spurious medical exemptions.

    “I certainly hope that as the medical board is looking at these issues and investigating and evaluating them, they recognize his previous history, that he’s already on probation, that he hasn’t expressed remorse for what happened and acknowledged the error of his ways,” Pan said. “He has continued to proclaim he did nothing wrong, which I find very disturbing. You’re put on probation for acts of negligence, and you go on Facebook and say you’re not in the wrong.”

    Even if the board does not fully revoke Sears’ medical license—which is one potential outcome of the complaint—Pan hopes the consequences will ensure he cannot continue to issue medical exemptions.

    “If that’s the issue he’s being cited for, then certainly whatever sanction he receives needs to stop him from continuing that behavior,” Pan said. “Otherwise, one could argue that’s sending the signal to other people that the consequences aren’t very serious.”
    Quote Dr. Bob Sears
    Yesterday at 4:48 PM ·
    My Next Medical Board Case

    So, as expected, the CA Medical Board just sent me the paperwork about the first vaccine medical exemption accusation they are making against me. The packet was waiting for me when I got home from the hearing last night.

    The case involves two siblings, one who has chronic psoriasis and the other who does not. The dad also has psoriasis. I saw them about three years ago for a VME appointment and determined that the risk of lifelong psoriasis, which has been reported numerous times in the medical literature as an adverse event following vaccines, is significant enough in these kids to warrant an exemption. As per SB 277 law, and as per the directions of the medical board itself, I am supposed to consider family medical history in determining an exemption. Knowing that vaccines can trigger psoriasis or make existing psoriasis worse, based on the research studies below, and knowing how severe and debilitating lifelong psoriasis can be, an exemption is appropriate for these kids. This family, however, is no longer together and has since moved out of the state.

    I expect the next step in this case — a hearing before a judge — will happen in about a year or so. Maybe sooner. I will keep you all in the loop as always. Thank you for your support and for the outpouring of encouragement I’ve received.

    Studies:

    CA Medical Board newsletter - Winter 2016. See page 10 for directive on using family history in medical exemptions: http://www.mbc.ca.gov/Pu…/Newsletter...er_2016_01.pdf

    Possible triggering effect of influenza vaccination on psoriasis - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…

    Psoriasis triggered by tetanus-diphtheria vaccination - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…

    Psoriatic skin lesions induced by BCG vaccination - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…

    Guttate psoriasis-like lesions following BCG vaccination - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…

    New onset guttate psoriasis following pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…

    National survey of psoriasis flares after 2009 monovalent H1N1/seasonal vaccines - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…

    Psoriasis vaccinalis: report of two cases, one following BCG vaccination and one following vaccination against influenza - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…

    Family history of psoriasis, stressful life events, and recent infectious disease are risk factors for a first episode of acute guttate psoriasis - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…

    Genetic background of psoriasis - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…

  35. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    avid (22nd June 2019), Bubu (23rd June 2019), Franny (23rd June 2019)

  36. Link to Post #299
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,404
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 10,419 times in 2,085 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe




    YES, I agree with Paul Offit

    Last edited by Delight; 23rd June 2019 at 04:02.

  37. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bubu (23rd June 2019), Constance (23rd June 2019), Hym (23rd June 2019), Ron Mauer Sr (23rd June 2019)

  38. Link to Post #300
    United States Avalon Greeter: Here to help
     
    Ron Mauer Sr's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th January 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    76
    Posts
    1,831
    Thanks
    12,294
    Thanked 14,367 times in 1,769 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    I suspect that vaccinations are only one of many tools being used to herd us into the tyranny of global government, modern day feudalism, by parasitic control freaks.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Not safe.png
Views:	3
Size:	247.1 KB
ID:	40928

  39. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ron Mauer Sr For This Post:

    Bubu (3rd July 2019), Delight (24th June 2019), wondering (24th June 2019)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 17 FirstFirst 1 5 15 17 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts