+ Reply to Thread
Page 29 of 29 FirstFirst 1 19 29
Results 561 to 578 of 578

Thread: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

  1. Link to Post #561
    United States Avalon Member James Newell's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th July 2016
    Posts
    272
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 1,277 times in 258 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Mike Adams gives new research on the effects of 5G and insanity. It could well be an explanation of one of the reasons the world (especially in cities) is acting so crazy. Just one reason out of many. I posted this on the 5G blog but one thing that doesn't seem to be mentioned much on this thread is that the vaccine people programmed the vaccines to go off years later after the vaccines were given. Now 5G is a perfect way to activate these designer vaccines. It is very difficult to get a cause effect relationship, but it is there. He explains the science behind this theory.

    https://banned.video/watch?id=5dc35fb632efc80019b49d8d

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to James Newell For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (7th November 2019), mountain_jim (7th November 2019), onawah (7th November 2019)

  3. Link to Post #562
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,964
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 46,847 times in 9,548 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    It looks like there is a lot of good info on this site, but is it all in the form of talking heads, or are there transcripts?
    Not everyone has time to listen, but might have time to skim written info.
    Quote Posted by James Newell (here)
    Mike Adams gives new research on the effects of 5G and insanity. It could well be an explanation of one of the reasons the world (especially in cities) is acting so crazy. Just one reason out of many. I posted this on the 5G blog but one thing that doesn't seem to be mentioned much on this thread is that the vaccine people programmed the vaccines to go off years later after the vaccines were given. Now 5G is a perfect way to activate these designer vaccines. It is very difficult to get a cause effect relationship, but it is there. He explains the science behind this theory.

    https://banned.video/watch?id=5dc35fb632efc80019b49d8d
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (7th November 2019), Delight (7th November 2019), mountain_jim (7th November 2019)

  5. Link to Post #563
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,687
    Thanks
    4,971
    Thanked 11,660 times in 2,362 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Austin VaxxedII Q&A. 11//2019
    Has suggestions of what we can do in our communities.


  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (7th November 2019), James Newell (7th November 2019), mountain_jim (8th November 2019), onawah (8th November 2019)

  7. Link to Post #564
    United States Avalon Member James Newell's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th July 2016
    Posts
    272
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 1,277 times in 258 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    It looks like there is a lot of good info on this site, but is it all in the form of talking heads, or are there transcripts?
    Not everyone has time to listen, but might have time to skim written info.
    Quote Posted by James Newell (here)
    Mike Adams gives new research on the effects of 5G and insanity. It could well be an explanation of one of the reasons the world (especially in cities) is acting so crazy. Just one reason out of many. I posted this on the 5G blog but one thing that doesn't seem to be mentioned much on this thread is that the vaccine people programmed the vaccines to go off years later after the vaccines were given. Now 5G is a perfect way to activate these designer vaccines. It is very difficult to get a cause effect relationship, but it is there. He explains the science behind this theory.

    https://banned.video/watch?id=5dc35fb632efc80019b49d8d
    Naturalnews.com is one of Mike Adams sites where he has videos and written reports on these subjects that you can skim over.
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 7th November 2019 at 21:05. Reason: fixed up the quote formatting for easy reading

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to James Newell For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (7th November 2019), mountain_jim (8th November 2019)

  9. Link to Post #565
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,687
    Thanks
    4,971
    Thanked 11,660 times in 2,362 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    I read the two articles and thought that the conclusion in the second article is absurd. Vaccinate more because the Whooping cough vaccine is less effective because the bacteria is mutating?

    Quote Vaccines Are Pushing Pathogens to Evolve
    Just as antibiotics breed resistance in bacteria, vaccines can incite changes that enable diseases to escape their control. Researchers are working to head off the evolution of new threats.
    Melinda Wenner Moyer
    May 10, 2018



    Matthew J. Jones, a research assistant at Pennsylvania State University, takes a sample of dust collected from a chicken farm to test it for signs of the virus that causes Marek’s disease, an infection common among poultry. Some evidence suggests that the virus that causes the disease is becoming immune to yet another version of the vaccine that controls it.

    Sasha Maslov for Quanta Magazine
    Melinda Wenner Moyer
    Contributing Writer

    May 10, 2018

    VIEW PDF/PRINT MODE
    BiologyEvolutionImmunologyInfectious DiseaseMicrobes

    Andrew Read became a scientist so he could spend more time in nature, but he never imagined that would mean a commercial chicken farm. Read, a disease ecologist who directs the Pennsylvania State University Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, and his research assistant Chris Cairns meandered their way through a hot, humid, pungent-smelling barn teeming with 30,000 young broiler chickens deep in the Pennsylvania countryside. Covered head to toe in white coveralls, the two men periodically stopped and crouched, collecting dust from the ground with gloved hands. Birds squawked and scuttered away. The men transferred the dust into small plastic tubes, which they capped and placed in plastic bags to bring back to the laboratory. “Funny where science leads you,” Read said.

    Read and his colleagues are studying how the herpesvirus that causes Marek’s disease — a highly contagious, paralyzing and ultimately deadly ailment that costs the chicken industry more than $2 billion a year — might be evolving in response to its vaccine. Its latest vaccine, that is. Marek’s disease has been sickening chickens globally for over a century; birds catch it by inhaling dust laden with viral particles shed in other birds’ feathers. The first vaccine was introduced in 1970, when the disease was killing entire flocks. It worked well, but within a decade, the vaccine mysteriously began to fail; outbreaks of Marek’s began erupting in flocks of inoculated chickens. A second vaccine was licensed in 1983 in the hopes of solving the problem, yet it, too, gradually stopped working. Today, the poultry industry is on its third vaccine. It still works, but Read and others are concerned it might one day fail, too — and no fourth-line vaccine is waiting. Worse, in recent decades, the virus has become more deadly.

    If you don’t have these pathogens evolving in response to vaccines, then we really don’t understand natural selection.

    Paul Ewald

    Read and others, including researchers at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, posit that the virus that causes Marek’s has been changing over time in ways that helped it evade its previous vaccines. The big question is whether the vaccines directly incited these changes or the evolution happened, coincidentally, for other reasons, but Read is pretty sure the vaccines have played a role. In a 2015 paper in PLOS Biology, Read and his colleagues vaccinated 100 chickens, leaving 100 others unvaccinated. They then infected all the birds with strains of Marek’s that varied in how virulent — as in how dangerous and infectious — they were. The team found that, over the course of their lives, the unvaccinated birds shed far more of the least virulent strains into the environment, whereas the vaccinated birds shed far more of the most virulent strains. The findings suggest that the Marek’s vaccine encourages more dangerous viruses to proliferate. This increased virulence might then give the viruses the means to overcome birds’ vaccine-primed immune responses and sicken vaccinated flocks.

    Most people have heard of antibiotic resistance. Vaccine resistance, not so much. That’s because drug resistance is a huge global problem that annually kills nearly 25,000 people in the United States and in Europe, and more than twice that many in India. Microbes resistant to vaccines, on the other hand, aren’t a major menace. Perhaps they never will be: Vaccine programs around the globe have been and continue to be immensely successful at preventing infections and saving lives.

    Recent research suggests, however, that some pathogen populations are adapting in ways that help them survive in a vaccinated world, and that these changes come about in a variety of ways. Just as the mammal population exploded after dinosaurs went extinct because a big niche opened up for them, some microbes have swept in to take the place of competitors eliminated by vaccines.

    Immunization is also making once-rare or nonexistent genetic variants of pathogens more prevalent, presumably because vaccine-primed antibodies can’t as easily recognize and attack shape-shifters that look different from vaccine strains. And vaccines being developed against some of the world’s wilier pathogens — malaria, HIV, anthrax — are based on strategies that could, according to evolutionary models and lab experiments, encourage pathogens to become even more dangerous.

    Photo of Andrew Read and Chris Gaines
    The disease ecologist Andrew Read (at right) and his research assistant Chris Cairns, both of the Pennsylvania State University Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, inspect chicken farms to track the emergence of a vaccine-resistant form of a poultry disease.

    Courtesy of A. Chan
    Evolutionary biologists aren’t surprised that this is happening. A vaccine is a novel selection pressure placed on a pathogen, and if the vaccine does not eradicate its target completely, then the remaining pathogens with the greatest fitness — those able to survive, somehow, in an immunized world — will become more common. “If you don’t have these pathogens evolving in response to vaccines,” said Paul Ewald, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Louisville, “then we really don’t understand natural selection.”

    Yet don’t mistake these findings as evidence that vaccines are dangerous or that they are bound to fail — because undesirable outcomes can be thwarted by using our knowledge of natural selection, too. Evolution might be inevitable, but it can be coaxed in the right direction.

    Quick-Change Artists
    Vaccine science is brow-furrowingly complicated, but the underlying mechanism is simple. A vaccine exposes your body to either live but weakened or killed pathogens, or even just to certain bits of them. This exposure incites your immune system to create armies of immune cells, some of which secrete antibody proteins to recognize and fight off the pathogens if they ever invade again.

    That said, many vaccines don’t provide lifelong immunity, for a variety of reasons. A new flu vaccine is developed every year because influenza viruses naturally mutate quickly. Vaccine-induced immunity can also wane over time. After being inoculated with the shot for typhoid, for instance, a person’s levels of protective antibodies drop over several years, which is why public health agencies recommend regular boosters for those living in or visiting regions where typhoid is endemic. Research suggests a similar drop in protection over time occurs with the mumps vaccine, too.

    Vaccine failures caused by vaccine-induced evolution are different. These drops in vaccine effectiveness are incited by changes in pathogen populations that the vaccines themselves directly cause. Scientists have recently started studying the phenomenon in part because they finally can: Advances in genetic sequencing have made it easier to see how microbes change over time. And many such findings have reinforced just how quickly pathogens mutate and evolve in response to environmental cues.

    Graphic illustration: Vaccines stimulate the immune system to make antibodies that attack features on a pathogen. Because pathogens naturally mutate, random changes in a pathogen’s features can make a vaccine ineffective over time. But scientists are now seeing signs that, in some cases, the vaccines themselves can drive pathogen populations to become resistant.



    Viruses and bacteria change quickly in part because they replicate like mad. Three days after a bird is bitten by a mosquito carrying West Nile virus, one milliliter of its blood contains 100 billion viral particles, roughly the number of stars in the Milky Way. And with each replication comes the opportunity for genetic change. When an RNA virus replicates, the copying process generates one new error, or mutation, per 10,000 nucleotides, a mutation rate as much as 100,000 times greater than that found in human DNA. Viruses and bacteria also recombine, or share genetic material, with similar strains, giving them another way to change their genomes rapidly. Just as people — with the exception of identical twins — all have distinctive genomes, pathogen populations tend to be composed of myriad genetic variants, some of which fare better than others during battles with vaccine-trained antibodies. The victors seed the pathogen population of the future.

    The bacteria that cause pertussis, better known as whooping cough, illustrate how this can happen. In 1992, recommendations from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began promoting a new vaccine to prevent the infection, which is caused by bacteria called Bordetella pertussis. The old vaccine was made using whole killed bacteria, which incited an effective immune response but also caused rare side effects, such as seizures. The new version, known as the “acellular” vaccine, contained just two to five outer membrane proteins isolated from the pathogen.

    A 2017 paper in Pediatrics compared the situation to a high-stakes game of whack-a-mole. In essence, vaccination has completely restructured the pathogen population, twice.

    The unwanted side effects disappeared but were replaced by new, unexpected problems. First, for unclear reasons, protection conferred by the acellular vaccine waned over time. Epidemics began to erupt around the world. In 2001, scientists in the Netherlands proposed an additional reason for the resurgence: Perhaps vaccination was inciting evolution, causing strains of the bacteria that lacked the targeted proteins, or had different versions of them, to survive preferentially.

    Studies have since backed up this idea. In a 2014 paper published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, researchers in Australia, led by the medical microbiologist Ruiting Lan at the University of New South Wales, collected and sequenced B. pertussis samples from 320 patients between 2008 and 2012. The percentage of bacteria that did not express pertactin, a protein targeted by the acellular vaccine, leapt from 5 percent in 2008 to 78 percent in 2012, which suggests that selection pressure from the vaccine was enabling pertactin-free strains to become more common. In the U.S., nearly all circulating viruses lack pertactin, according to a 2017 CDC paper. “I think pretty much everyone agrees pertussis strain variation is shaped by vaccination,” Lan said.

    Hepatitis B, a virus that causes liver damage, tells a similar story. The current vaccine, which principally targets a portion of the virus known as the hepatitis B surface antigen, was introduced in the U.S. in 1989. A year later, in a paper published in the Lancet, researchers described odd results from a vaccine trial in Italy. They had detected circulating hepatitis B viruses in 44 vaccinated subjects, but in some of them, the virus was missing part of that targeted antigen. Then, in a series of studies conducted in Taiwan, researchers sequenced the viruses that infected children who had tested positive for hepatitis B. They reported that the prevalence of these viral “escape mutants,” as they called them, that lacked the surface antigen had increased from 7.8 percent in 1984 to 23.1 percent in 1999.

    Some research suggests, however, that these mutant strains aren’t stable and that they may not pose much of a risk. Indeed, fewer and fewer people catch hepatitis B every year worldwide. As physicians at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York summarized in a 2016 paper, “the clinical significance of hepatitis B surface antigen escape mutations remains controversial.”

    Empty Niche
    Scientists usually have to design their own experiments. But in 2000 or so, it dawned on Bill Hanage that society was designing one for him. Hanage, who had just completed his Ph.D. in pathology, had always been fascinated by bacteria and evolutionary biology. And something evolutionarily profound was about to happen to bacteria in America.

    A new vaccine called Prevnar 7 was soon to be recommended for all U.S. children to prevent infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, bacteria responsible for many cases of pneumonia, ear infections, meningitis and other illnesses among the elderly and young children. To date, scientists have discovered more than 90 distinct S. pneumoniae serotypes — groups that share distinctive immunological features on their cell surface — and Prevnar 7 targeted the seven serotypes that caused the brunt of serious infections. But Hanage, along with researchers, wondered what was going to happen to the more than 80 others. “It struck me, with my almost complete lack of formal training in evolutionary biology, that this was an extraordinary evolutionary experiment,” he said.

    Measurements of how much virus is in samples of dust from a chicken farm appear on screen. The sample was tested by a process called real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Real-Time qPCR). Each curve represents one sample; the more of a curve that is above the red horizontal line, the more virus that sample contained.

    Hanage teamed up with Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist and microbiologist who had recently left Emory University for Harvard, and together the scientists — now both at Harvard — have been watching the pneumococcal population adapt to this new selection pressure. They and others have reported that while Prevnar 7 almost completely eliminated infections with the seven targeted serotypes, the other, rarer serotypes quickly swept in to take their place, including a serotype called 19A, which began causing a large proportion of serious pneumococcal infections. In response, in 2010, the U.S. introduced a new vaccine, Prevnar 13, which targets 19A and five additional serotypes. Previously unseen serotypes have again flourished in response. A 2017 paper in Pediatrics compared the situation to a high-stakes game of whack-a-mole. In essence, vaccination has completely restructured the pathogen population, twice.

    I think pretty much everyone agrees pertussis strain variation is shaped by vaccination.

    Overall, the incidence of invasive pneumococcal infections in the U.S. has dropped dramatically among children and adults as a result of Prevnar 13. It is saving many American lives, presumably because it targets the subset of serotypes most likely to cause infections. But data from England and Wales are not so rosy. Although infections in kids there have dropped, invasive pneumococcal infections have been steadily increasing in older adults and are much higher now than they were before Prevnar 7 was introduced. As for why this is happening, “I don’t think we know,” Hanage said. “But I do think that we might somewhat reasonably suggest that the serotypes that are now being carried by children are inadvertently better able to cause disease in adults, which is something we would not have known before, because they were comparatively rare.”

    One can think about vaccination as a kind of sieve, argues Troy Day, a mathematical evolutionary biologist at Queen’s University in Ontario, Canada. This sieve prevents many pathogens from passing through and surviving, but if a few squeeze by, those in that nonrandom sample will preferentially survive, replicate and ultimately shift the composition of the pathogen population. The ones squeezing through might be escape mutants with genetic differences that allow them to shrug off or hide from vaccine-primed antibodies, or they may simply be serotypes that weren’t targeted by the vaccine in the first place, like lucky criminals whose drug dens were overlooked during a night of citywide police raids. Either way, the vaccine quietly alters the genetic profile of the pathogen population.

    Tipping the Scales
    Just as pathogens have different ways of infecting and affecting us, the vaccines that scientists develop employ different immunological strategies. Most of the vaccines we get in childhood prevent pathogens from replicating inside us and thereby also prevent us from transmitting the infections to others. But scientists have so far been unable to make these kinds of sterilizing vaccines for complicated pathogens like HIV, anthrax and malaria. To conquer these diseases, some researchers have been developing immunizations that prevent disease without actually preventing infections — what are called “leaky” vaccines. And these new vaccines may incite a different, and potentially scarier, kind of microbial evolution.

    I think the scientific community is becoming increasingly aware that vaccine resistance is a real risk.

    David Kennedy

    Virulence, as a trait, is directly related to replication: The more pathogens that a person’s body houses, the sicker that person generally becomes. A high replication rate has evolutionary advantages — more microbes in the body lead to more microbes in snot or blood or stool, which gives the microbes more chances to infect others — but it also has costs, as it can kill hosts before they have the chance to pass on their infection. The problem with leaky vaccines, Read says, is that they enable pathogens to replicate unchecked while also protecting hosts from illness and death, thereby removing the costs associated with increased virulence. Over time, then, in a world of leaky vaccinations, a pathogen might evolve to become deadlier to unvaccinated hosts because it can reap the benefits of virulence without the costs — much as Marek’s disease has slowly become more lethal to unvaccinated chickens. This virulence can also cause the vaccine to start failing by causing illness in vaccinated hosts.

    In addition to Marek’s disease, Read has been studying malaria, which is the target of several leaky vaccines currently in development. In a 2012 paper published in PLOS Biology, Read and Vicki Barclay, his postdoc at the time, inoculated mice with a component of several leaky malaria vaccines currently being tested in clinical trials. They then used these infected-but-not-sick mice to infect other vaccinated mice. After the parasites circulated through 21 rounds of vaccinated mice, Barclay and Read studied them and compared them to malaria parasites that had circulated through 21 rounds of unvaccinated mice. The strains from the vaccinated mice, they found, had grown far more virulent, in that they replicated faster and killed more red blood cells. At the end of 21 rounds of infection, these more quickly growing, deadly parasites were the only ones left.

    Evolutionary Engineering
    If this all sounds terribly scary, keep a few things in mind. Many pathogens, including measles, do not seem to be evolving as a population in response to their vaccines. Second, experimental data from a lab, such as the malaria study described above, don’t necessarily predict what will happen in the much more complex landscape of the real world. And third, researchers concerned with vaccine-driven evolution stress that the phenomenon is not in any way an argument against vaccination or its value; it’s just a consequence that needs to be considered, and one that can potentially be avoided. By thinking through how a pathogen population might respond to a vaccine, scientists can potentially make tweaks before it happens. They might even be able to design vaccines that encourage pathogens to become less dangerous over time.

    When an RNA virus replicates, the copying process generates one new error, or mutation, per 10,000 nucleotides, a mutation rate as much as 100,000 times greater than that found in human DNA.

    In March 2017, Read and his Penn State colleague David Kennedy published a paper in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B in which they outlined several strategies that vaccine developers could use to ensure that future vaccines don’t get punked by evolutionary forces. One overarching recommendation is that vaccines should induce immune responses against multiple targets. A number of successful, seemingly evolution-proof vaccines already work this way: After people get inoculated with a tetanus shot, for example, their blood contains 100 types of unique antibodies, all of which fight the bacteria in different ways. In such a situation, it becomes much harder for a pathogen to accumulate all the changes needed to survive. It also helps if vaccines target all the known subpopulations of a particular pathogen, not just the most common or dangerous ones. Richard Malley and other researchers at Boston Children’s Hospital are, for instance, trying to develop a universal pneumococcal vaccine that is not serotype-specific.

    Vaccines should also bar pathogens from replicating and transmitting inside inoculated hosts. One of the reasons that vaccine resistance is less of a problem than antibiotic resistance, Read and Kennedy posit, is that antibiotics tend to be given after an infection has already taken hold — when the pathogen population inside the host is already large and genetically diverse and might include mutants that can resist the drug’s effects. Most vaccines, on the other hand, are administered before infection and limit replication, which minimizes evolutionary opportunities.

    But the most crucial need right now is for vaccine scientists to recognize the relevance of evolutionary biology to their field. Last month, when more than 1,000 vaccine scientists gathered in Washington, D.C., at the World Vaccine Congress, the issue of vaccine-induced evolution was not the focus of any scientific sessions. Part of the problem, Read says, is that researchers are afraid: They’re nervous to talk about and call attention to potential evolutionary effects because they fear that doing so might fuel more fear and distrust of vaccines by the public — even though the goal is, of course, to ensure long-term vaccine success. Still, he and Kennedy feel researchers are starting to recognize the need to include evolution in the conversation. “I think the scientific community is becoming increasingly aware that vaccine resistance is a real risk,” Kennedy said.

    “I think so too,” Read agreed, “but there is a long way to go.”
    Quote Whooping cough evolving to beat antibiotics and possibly vaccine
    05 APR 2019 LACHLAN GILBERT


    A new UNSW Sydney study shows antibiotics and vaccines may be less effective against whooping cough as a new strain appears in China.

    Whooping cough is caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis getting in to human airways. A new strain of Bordetella pertussis – the bacterium that causes whooping cough – has become resistant to antibiotic treatment and may also be resistant to the vaccine used in China. A UNSW Sydney academic says the growing threat of it spreading to Australia should be taken seriously.

    A joint study led by PhD student Zheng Xu, between UNSW Sydney and Xi’an Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, China examined 167 pertussis samples from China. They found that 98% of pertussis bacteria isolated were resistant to erythromycin, the main antibiotic used to treat whooping cough. The study also found that the new strain has a mutation in one of the vaccine antigen genes, which may help the bacteria evade the two-component acellular vaccine used in China.

    In the paper published in the journal Emerging Microbes & Infections, co-author Professor Ruiting Lan, of UNSW School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, said the pertussis strains appear to be adapting to the acellular vaccine used in China, as well as developing resistance to the antibiotic most commonly used to treat the disease.

    “This has rendered the antibiotic ineffective for treatment and prophylaxis,” Professor Lan said.

    “Our findings suggest that treatment with erythromycin and prevention with vaccination with the acellular vaccine used may be less effective in China. We hope that therapies and prevention strategies will adapt to these findings to reduce the public health burden of pertussis.”

    Professor Lan said that looking ahead, the Chinese pertussis strain needed to be watched closely from within and outside China. He stressed that the potential threat of the new variant spreading globally was real.

    “But exactly how high the threat is, we don’t know at this stage,” Professor Lan said.

    “In Australia we use azithromycin, which is the same type but a newer drug than erythromycin, but the Chinese variants have also shown resistance to this antibiotic. The treatment and prophylaxis have an important role in curtailing the spread of pertussis, so if the strains are resistant to and not curtailed by the antibiotic used, there is definitely a potential to cause an epidemic in Australia.”

    “We really need to find out how competitive the Chinese strains are in Australia with a different vaccine – the one used in Australia has one more antigen component. And we also need to understand the organism better.”

    “We want to know how likely it is that these strains spread globally, and how we can curtail the spread of such strains. And further ahead, we need to design more effective vaccines to control these new variants,” he says.

    Professor Lan stressed the need to maintain our own high vaccination coverage to prevent this new strain from gaining a foothold.

    According to NSW Health, babies need to be immunised at six weeks of age, four months, six months and 18 months. Boosters are needed at age four and again in high school. It is important that pregnant woman get vaccinated in the third trimester of each pregnancy to protect the infant before receiving their own vaccine.

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th November 2019), Franny (8th November 2019), mountain_jim (8th November 2019), onawah (9th November 2019)

  11. Link to Post #566
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    23rd September 2017
    Posts
    681
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 2,372 times in 576 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    This may already be on the thread, but here's a 2012 article showing that the CDC knew the link between mercury and autism:

    https://healthimpactnews.com/2014/cd...ked-to-autism/

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TomKat For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th November 2019), Blacklight43 (8th November 2019), Delight (8th November 2019), Franny (12th November 2019), onawah (9th November 2019)

  13. Link to Post #567
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,687
    Thanks
    4,971
    Thanked 11,660 times in 2,362 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    This does not surprise but dismays in the extreme. I think we need to recognize that autism is NOT a "disease" but the result of poisoning.

    Quote Deception: The Vaccine-Autism Link Dates to Leo Kanner in 1943, Not Wakefield in 1998
    November 8, 2019


    “The story of how vaccines came to be questioned as a cause of autism dates back to the 1990s. In 1995, a group of British researchers published a cohort study in the Lancet showing that individuals who had been vaccinated with the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) were more likely to have bowel disease than individuals who had not received MMR. One of these researchers was gastroenterologist Andrew Wakefield, MD, who went on to further study a possible link between the vaccine and bowel disease by speculating that persistent infection with vaccine virus caused disruption of the intestinal tissue that in turn led to bowel disease and neuropsychiatric disease (specifically, autism).”

    The History of Vaccines, The College of Physicians of Philadelphia.
    This is the story that the public has been told of how vaccines came to be questioned as a cause of autism, and it is wrong.

    The story of how vaccines came to be questioned as a cause of autism dates back to the first paper describing autism in 1943.

    1943
    In his disorder defining paper “Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact,” published in Nervous Child in 1943, Leo Kanner of Johns Hopkins University included the first report of vaccine induced autistic regression. In Kanner’s case series describing the first 11 children documented to have the disorder, case number 3, “Richard M.” is reported by his mother to have begun his developmental regression following a smallpox vaccination. From the paper:

    “Case 3. Richard M. was referred to the Johns Hopkins Hospital on February 5, 1941, at 3 years, 3 months of age, with the complaint of deafness because he did not talk and did not respond to questions.” “Following smallpox vaccination at 12 months, he had an attack of diarrhea and fever, from which he recovered in somewhat less than a week.” “In September, 1940, the mother, in commenting on Richard’s failure to talk, remarked in her notes: I can’t be sure just when he stopped the imitation of words sounds. It seems that he has gone backward mentally gradually for the last two years.”

    The timeline of Richard M, according to Kanner, is as follows:

    November 1937 – Richard is born.
    November 1938 – Richard is vaccinated with the Smallpox vaccine.
    September 1940 – Richard’s mother reports that his developmental regression began approximately two years previous, the autumn of 1938 around age 1.
    February 1941 – Richard is referred to Johns Hopkins for evaluation, and in 1943, becomes the third child to be diagnosed as “autistic” by Leo Kanner. Kanner publishes Richard’s medical history in his disorder defining paper, the first paper published on autism, 55 years before Wakefield and his team.
    Yet Wakefield et. al. included parental reports of vaccine induced regression in their 1998 paper, “Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children” in the Lancet in 1998, and are credited (or blamed) with originating the discussion on vaccine induced autism.

    Despite the fact that the 55 year old discussion had been developed, published on, and the subject of official HHS inquiries, before anyone ever knew the name Wakefield.

    In the 40s and 50s, the Freudians were in command of the narrative on childhood mental health, and maternal rejection of the child was asserted as the source of the rare disorder. This was the case until Bernard Rimland, Ph. D. ended the supremacy of the unfounded and misogynistic theory, launching the era of medical investigation into the origins of autism in the 1960s.

    1976
    In March of 1976, in Germany, Eggers published, “Autistic Syndrome (Kanner) and Vaccination Against Smallpox” wherein he described that:

    “3-4 weeks following an otherwise uncomplicated first vaccination against smallpox a boy, then aged 15 months and last seen at the age of 5 1/2 years, gradually developed a complete Kanner syndrome. The question whether vaccination and early infantile autism might be connected is being discussed. A causal relationship is considered extremely unlikely. But vaccination is recognized as having a starter function for the onset of autism.”

    Klin Padiatr. 1976 Mar;188(2):172-80
    1991
    By the opening of the 1990s the vaccine-autism causation discussion was so widespread that the Institute of Medicine was including it in their reports on vaccine safety funded by the National Institutes of Health, published by the National Academy of Sciences and edited by none other than Harvard’s Harvey Fineberg:

    “Parents have come to depend on vaccines to protect their children from a variety of diseases. Some evidence suggests, however, that vaccination against pertussis (whooping cough) and rubella (German measles) is, in a small number of cases, associated with increased risk of serious illness. This book examines the controversy over the evidence and offers a comprehensively documented assessment of the risk of illness following immunization with vaccines against pertussis and rubella. Based on extensive review of the evidence from epidemiologic studies, case histories, studies in animals, and other sources of information, the book examines: The relation of pertussis vaccines to a number of serious adverse events, including encephalopathy and other central nervous system disorders, sudden infant death syndrome, autism, Guillain-Barre syndrome, learning disabilities, and Reye syndrome. The relation of rubella vaccines to arthritis, various neuropathies, and thrombocytopenic purpura. The volume, which includes a description of the committee’s methods for evaluating evidence and directions for future research, will be important reading for public health officials, pediatricians, researchers, and concerned parents.”

    Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines: A Report of the Committee to Review the Adverse Consequences of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines.

    Editors
    Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Review the Adverse Consequences of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines; Howson CP, Howe CJ, Fineberg HV, editors.

    Source
    Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1991.
    The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health.

    The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health.
    1998
    Andrew Wakefield, according to the current false narrative and revisionist history pushed by mainstream medicine and their media partners, magically erases 55 years of medical literature and discovers the vaccine-autism causation theory for the first time, in much the same way that Christopher Columbus “discovered” the Americas, half a millennium or so after the Vikings had become regular visitors to the shores of New England and Nova Scotia.

    Wakefield simply did what Kanner did in 1943. Took patient histories, and included parental reports in a paper.


    CURRENT YEAR
    The scientific record on vaccine autism causation began with the scientific record on autism, and extends to today. The vaccine industry narrative that Wakefield was the beginning and end of the plausibility of vaccine induced autism theory is deception. There are more than 150 papers connecting vaccines and autism via epidemiology and describing the mechanisms by which vaccines can cause autism via bench science:

    “Mainstream research has found that vaccines and their ingredients can cause the underlying medical conditions that committed physicians and researchers are commonly finding in children who have been given an autism diagnosis. These conditions include gastrointestinal damage, immune system impairment, chronic infections, mitochondrial disorders, autoimmune conditions, neurological regression, glial cell activation, interleukin-6 secretion dysregulation, brain inflammation, damage to the blood–brain barrier, seizures, synaptic dysfunction, dendritic cell dysfunction, mercury poisoning, aluminum toxicity, gene activation and alteration, glutathione depletion, impaired methylation, oxidative stress, impaired thioredoxin regulation, mineral deficiencies, impairment of the opioid system, endocrine dysfunction, cellular apoptosis, and other disorders.”

    157 Research Papers Supporting Vaccine/Autism Causation
    Ginger Taylor, MS
    The deception in the vaccine industry is so deep, that it has rewritten history. Few in the medical field have ever seen or heard this information. Do not be fooled.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Franny (9th November 2019), Houman (10th November 2019), onawah (9th November 2019)

  15. Link to Post #568
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,964
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 46,847 times in 9,548 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    CDC Paid Maryland $123 Million to Promote Gardasil Vaccine as Requirement for School Attendance
    November 9, 2019
    https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/cdc-p...ol-attendance/

    by Josh Mazer
    Eye on Annapolis

    "Excerpts:

    The Maryland Prevention and Health Promotion Agency (PHPA) has received millions — $123 million just between 2012–2017 — as part of an effort to require public schools to force children to get the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination. Those funds came in the form of grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    The CDC maintains a nonprofit foundation that gets enormous amounts of money from Big Pharma — including Merck, the company that produces Gardasil, the HPV vaccine. At the very least, Maryland’s acceptance of those funds has the appearance of impropriety.

    During a PHPA-hosted “HPV symposium” attended by state pediatric practices and Maryland Department of Health staffers in March 2018 at Ten Oaks, Maryland, the featured speaker — Dr. Alix Casler — encouraged attendees to offer free dinners, bottles of wine, and “Quality Doctor Incentives $” sales bonuses to get Maryland physicians on board with the HPV vaccine-pushing program. Dr. Casler offered a $5,000 cash payment to pediatric practices that achieve targeted HPV vaccine sales goals.

    Dr. Casler is a paid spokesperson for Merck — to the tune of more than $59,000 just between 2013 and 2016, according to data compiled by ProPublica.

    In 2016, the Maryland Partnership for Prevention — which lists the Maryland Department of Health as its top member — accepted $70,000 from the Association of Immunization Managers (AIM). AIM’s top “Corporate Alliance Members” are Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur and Seqirus. That same year, legislation was introduced in Maryland to mandate the shot.

    In the U.S., only three jurisdictions have made HPV vaccination mandatory: Rhode Island, Virginia and the District of Columbia. Clearly, based on the money and other incentives being injected into our public-health policy system, Big Pharma would love to see Maryland become the fourth to do so.

    At the Maryland conference, then Delegate Lam promised the industry insiders that he was working with the Department of Health to mandate HPV vaccination as a “back to school” shot in Maryland. When queried, he denied it. Why is Senator Lam working in secret to advance a pharma product- and what constituency is he representing when he does so?

    Money should not trump science 1,2,3. We need to be able to trust our government. Maryland’s leaders should stop the Merck money train and focus on proven public-health strategies to help prevent HPV cancers, such as screening and avoiding risky behaviors. No amount of money should persuade our government to allow it to be pushed in our schools.

    Maryland public health bureaucrats have no scientific rationale for this illogical, dangerous program. There are 250 cases of cervical cancer in our state per year, with about 60 deaths. Injecting 1.5 million young people between the ages of 9 and 29 with two doses of this shot will not change anything with regards to cervical cancer prevalence in Maryland. It will, however, provide a $750 million gravy train to Merck, the department of health, and pediatric practices in our state.

    When your pediatrician earnestly pitches this shot for your healthy child, ask whether your kid is the one that tips the medical practice into the $5000 bonus pool. Ask what evidence there is that the shot prevents cancer, and why cervical cancers are surging in countries that aggressively pushed the shot. Ask why your healthy child should take the risk of becoming another Maryland HPV vaccine statistic, to be ignored, denied, and covered up. Just like the HPV vaccine caused death of Baltimore County resident Christina Tarsell.

    To read the full research, a PDF is included by clicking here:
    https://www.eyeonannapolis.net/wp-co...rabs-10-19.pdf

    Read the full article at Eye on Annapolis: https://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2019/...-need-to-stop/
    More links in the article for the following articles:
    Illinois Teen Dies Three Weeks After Being Injected with HPV Gardasil Vaccine
    California Nurse Gives Gardasil Vaccine to Own Daughter who Develops Leukemia and Dies
    Infant Accidentally Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mother Blamed for Vaccine Injuries and Baby Medically Kidnapped
    The Happy-go-Lucky Girl I had Pre-HPV Vaccine is Gone Forever
    Iowa Girl Faces Death: Life Destroyed by Gardasil Vaccine
    Gardasil Vaccine Given without Consent and Ruins Life of 14 Year Old Girl
    After 3 Years of Suffering 19 Year Old Girl Dies from Gardasil Vaccine Injuries
    Gardasil: The Decision We Will Always Regret
    15 Year Old French Girl’s “Descent into Hell” After Gardasil Vaccine – Wheelchair Bound and Paralyzed
    The Gardasil Vaccine After-Life: My Daughter is a Shadow of Her Former Self
    Gardasil: An Experience no Child Should Have to Go Through
    I Want my Daughter’s Life Back the Way it was Before Gardasil
    Gardasil Vaccine: Destroyed and Abandoned
    15-Year-Old Vaccinated by Force with Gardasil now Suffers from Paralysis and Pain
    Recovering from my Gardasil Vaccine Nightmare
    Gardasil: We Thought It Was The Right Choice
    “HPV Vaccine Has Done This to My Child”
    13 Year Old World Championship Karate Student Forced to Quit After Gardasil Vaccine
    If I Could Turn Back Time, Korey Would not Have Received any Gardasil Shots
    What Doctors Don’t Tell You: Our Gardasil Horror Story
    Family Fights U.S. Government over Compensation for Gardasil Vaccine Injuries
    Gardasil: When Will our Nightmare End?
    HPV Vaccine Injuries: “I Cannot Begin to Describe What it is Like to Watch your Daughter Live in Such Agony”
    Gardasil: Don’t Let Your Child Become “One Less”
    The Gardasil Vaccine Changed Our Definition of “Normal”
    Gardasil: I Should Have Researched First
    “They’ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood” – Local Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Injuries
    Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed
    Gardasil: The Decision I will Always Regret
    Gardasil Vaccine: One More Girl Dead
    Gardasil: A Parent’s Worst Nightmare
    After Gardasil: I Simply Want my Healthy Daughter Back
    Gardasil: My Family Suffers with Me
    Gardasil Changed my Health, my Life, and Family’s Lives Forever
    Gardasil: Ashlie’s Near-Death Experience
    Gardasil: My Daughter’s Worst Nightmare
    My Personal Battle After the Gardasil Vaccine
    Gardasil: The Worst Thing That Ever Happened to Me
    A Ruined Life from Gardasil
    HPV Vaccines: My Journey Through Gardasil Injuries
    The Dark Side of Gardasil – A Nightmare that Became Real
    Toddler Wrongly Injected with Gardasil Vaccine Develops Rare Form of Leukaemia
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Delight (15th November 2019), Franny (12th November 2019), Houman (10th November 2019), mountain_jim (10th November 2019)

  17. Link to Post #569
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,964
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 46,847 times in 9,548 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    "Get the tissues ready"
    Watch free online limited time
    One of those new documentary series, this one called "The Gut Solution".
    You sign up to watch the series free online for a limited time, then you have to buy it. (But they usually offer it free more than once, so if you sign up, you will get alerts via email.)
    They are very "chatty", but usually have some gems of info.
    This was in their email update today:
    "Get the tissues ready!

    There won’t be a dry eye in the room when you hear the first thing this precious autistic child said to his mom after a revolutionary treatment gave him the ability to speak—literally overnight.

    >>Episode 6 will be available here at 8pm Eastern tonight: https://gutsolutionseries.com/episode6/

    Did you know that autism is the fastest-growing developmental disability?

    In the US alone, more than 3.5 million people are living with autism spectrum disorders.

    People with autism are often gifted with extraordinary intellectual abilities. But they do suffer from an impaired ability to communicate and form connections with other people.

    This can lead to social isolation, difficulty making and keeping friends, low self-esteem, and depression.

    Does this sound like your child? Or grandchild? Trapped in their body, unable to express emotion, communicate their ideas or form meaningful relationships?

    A fascinating new therapy is showing some incredible results in children that suffer from autism. And it’s getting some rapid scientific attention!
    Would you like to know what this new therapy is?

    Make sure you tune in tonight as we air the sixth episode in our series.

    It’s called "Restoring Balance: Probiotics, Poop Pills, Kimchi and the Autism Connection."

    If you’re taking care of someone with autism, or you know someone who is, it’s not yet too late to share this information with them. Simply give them our link: https://gutsolutionseries.com/

    Tonight, you’ll get to hear the words that melted one mom’s heart when her son woke up the very day after receiving a new treatment and spoke to her for the very first time...

    The sixth episode airs tonight at 8pm Eastern on this page.

    As is our drill — this will only be available for the next 24 hours.


    With love,

    Sarah Otto
    Host, The Gut Solution "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Delight (11th November 2019), Franny (12th November 2019), Houman (10th November 2019)

  19. Link to Post #570
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,687
    Thanks
    4,971
    Thanked 11,660 times in 2,362 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    "How do we fight and how do we win?"


  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    mountain_jim (11th November 2019), onawah (12th November 2019)

  21. Link to Post #571
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,687
    Thanks
    4,971
    Thanked 11,660 times in 2,362 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    The Dad is careful to say he is not an anti-vaxxer. That is almost worse than anything else now. Too bad that even after injury by the vaccine and not being given help and also being censored he is a little apologetic. I embrace being anti-vaxx even more today than yesterday.

    Quote The HPV Vaccination can cause very serious Side Effects!
    Published on November 9, 2019




    I'm writing this post as the dad of a young 12 year old tennis player. My son, Quentin, was ranked Top 5 in Florida and was doing pretty well.

    In April, May and June of 2019 he played good tennis, but was certainly not winning all the time. It’s also healthier for young tennis players, if they do not win more than 60 to 70% of their matches.

    Quentin was normally practicing twice a day. Two hours with his coach and most of the time another 2 to 3 hours with other tennis players. Once a week he was doing match play in a very good group with some other very good kids from Florida, often several other Florida Top 10 players.

    One evening in April while participating in the above mentioned match play, Quentin was complaining about his legs getting weak and heavy. I did not take this seriously, because he already played 4.5 hours when it happened. So I told him, that it’s okay to be exhausted after so much tennis. He actually didn’t want to go home anyway.

    In the next two months he was complaining about the same symptoms maybe 4 more times. He was also visibly growing. So I thought, nothing to be concerned about.

    In July of 2019 he played the National Clay Court Championships and did well. When we came back home from the tournament, he did his regular practice with his coach and also played matches with other kids.

    Suddenly and without any obvious warning signs he developed severe knee pain, but unfortunately this can happen when you practice that much.

    Then something occurred which had never happened before!

    Quentin is playing tennis almost since he was 3 years old. He never ever didn’t want to practice. I never ever had to push him in any way. Sounds unbelievable, but is 100% true.

    His coach, Marin, who is now with him for more than 4 years and is like a family member, called me that he has to bring him home. Marin said that he is so exhausted, like he has never seen him before. Quentin didn’t want to go home, but the coach said that there is no chance to practice.

    The next day Quentin said he is fine again – and practiced again.

    Two or three days later Quentin almost fainted at home, right after practice. Now we were really concerned. We went to a pediatrician and a cardiologist. We did blood work and EKG and found almost nothing, except that his inflammation markers (A/G ratio) were high, but the pediatrician told us, that this can be just a regular infection and will likely be better soon.

    We let him stay home for some days and he actually got better again.

    Also his knee pain was improving. After a few days of restarted practice, he begged me desperately to go to the National Hard Court Championships.

    We drove to the tournament, which was an 11 hour ride. Unfortunately he could only and barely finish one match against one player, who later reached the semi finals. Because of severe knee pain Quentin actually had to forfeit and we drove 11 hours back home…

    We decided that it would better for him to stay home and rest for a few more days.

    At the end of the week he got a HEP A vaccination.

    He was still resting at home, but wanted to practice badly. So on a Monday I’ll let him do serves – and he looked like a very old man in the body of a 12 year old!
    He could not even toss a ball and was devastated about it. He didn’t understand how he could be so exhausted. Quentin is normally a kid who would never give up, but he just couldn’t toss a really not that heavy tennis ball.

    His symptoms got more severe over the next two months – and the doctors could not find anything.

    Quentin developed pain all over his body. Knee, shoulder, joints, legs, chest, muscles – everything was hurting. He also was so exhausted, he could sometimes not do more than a few steps on the tennis court – while he wanted to play no matter what.

    We did a lot of blood work and also went to a neurologist, but so far we just found nothing. My wife and I had many, many sleepless nights because I had no clue of what was going on. It could be cancer or a brain tumor or an unheard virus… As a parent you know those thoughts, especially when your kid is suddenly behaving like a switched off robot.

    Before his illness started, he was a very fit young athlete and in a matter of weeks he turned into a very weak, easily exhausted, fatigued kid with pain all over his body. He himself still wanted to play tennis every day, but it wasn’t tennis anymore. I’ll let him still practice, sometimes only for a few minutes.

    He was then standing (without moving) on the court and Marin was just feeding him balls, so that he could hit a little.

    His upper body was still doing okay, while his lower body was not usable.

    For me it was almost impossible to watch, because it was so sad to see him like this!!

    A kid, who loves tennis so much, that he even wanted to play tennis with a lot of pain in his body, was standing still on the court, trying so hard to still hit, with completely exhausted legs and a lot of pain.

    I know that you can argue, why we didn’t tell him to stay home more and possibly recover.

    I decided to do otherwise, because I felt that staying at home for weeks and months, without even having the opportunity to do something he loves the most, would not have been a good remedy or medicine – especially for him.

    During this painful time I’ve also noticed another strange occurrence. Quentin is wearing a FitBit all the time, and one day I saw that his resting pulse was now at around 85, on average over 80! Before all this happened it was at around 60…

    I told the doctors but they had no good explanation for it.

    The whole story was now going on for almost three months!

    Quentin started to play and practice again, also with other kids. Slowly he was getting better, but was still far away from good or lightyears away from doing great.

    He also had two severe relapses, which forced him both times to rest again for several days. Once I had him even registered for a low level tournament, because he again begged me that he wanted to compete. We had to cancel it.

    The pain was also not going away and mostly his shoulder was hurting, sometimes his wrists, sometimes some muscles, even his lungs, but the pain was never predictable.

    One day my wife looked into the calendar and saw an appointment coming up: The third HPV vaccination!

    I said, wait a minute, and yes, we found out that everything that happened to our son was aligned to the first and second HPV vaccination!!!

    I tried to google side effects and did not find many in the US. Just a few weak hints on side effects on a governmental web site.

    Then I found a post of a guy who was working for the German Athletic Sports Association. He was claiming that 12 of their athletes got the HPV vaccination and all of them had similar symptoms as Quentin. All of them had severe fatigue symptoms, all of them had a lot of pain and all of them had a serious decline in their performance.

    Then I googled more and more, and found so many stories about similar symptoms, even deaths caused by cardiac arrest after the HPV vaccination. Remember, Quentin’s heart rate was going up dramatically!

    I’ve posted a carefully written story about the possible link of the HPV vaccination and chronic fatigue symptoms, and posted it on the Tennis Warehouse Forum. I did not condemn every kind of vaccination, because I’m not an anti-vaxxer, but wrote that parents should be careful about it. Some other users reacted, and then after three days, my post got suddenly deleted, while it was even posted in the correct category – “Tennis and Health”.

    I got no explanation or whatsoever why they deleted it, even though I’ve asked them via email.

    There are actually whole countries, like Japan and others, that banned the HPV vaccination, but the pharmaceutical industry is trying hard to distract any fears and is refusing to see any link to many cases of seriously sick children.

    Now Quentin is actually slowly doing better and we hope that he will be symptom free anytime soon, but I’ve also found many cases where this has never happened.

    Two months into the illness I’ve started to give him some dietary supplements that seemed to help. Of course I’m not sure if this is the real cause why he is getting better, or if it’s just a coincidence.

    Therefore… PLEASE have a serious look before you take the HPV vaccination. Educate yourself and don’t just do it because a Billion Dollar industry is broadcasting nice ads on TV!

    (If you have questions about this story, please don’t hesitate to ask. I will for sure also answer critical questions.)

    Please find below two links of very poor girls with very severe symptoms, now ongoing for years:

    https://www.facebook.com/ChloesVaccineInjuryJourney

    https://www.facebook.com/Hollysgardasiljourney

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Franny (12th November 2019), James Newell (12th November 2019), mountain_jim (11th November 2019), onawah (12th November 2019)

  23. Link to Post #572
    United States Avalon Member James Newell's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th July 2016
    Posts
    272
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 1,277 times in 258 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Quote The HPV Vaccination can cause very serious Side Effects!
    Published on November 9, 2019

    One can only say if the people that make these vaccines actually know what they can do to children and adults they would be the absolute worst cold blooded people on Earth. If they are merely ignorant, why do they Force the vaccines on people? They got liability protection from the gov't under Reagan. That was a very bad law. Is big pharma simply in this for the bucks? Or is it to do in the populace?

    I remember in Asia I got a Cholera shot once and it put me down for a week. That was when the vaccines, I believe, were much cleaner, but who knows.

    Even one Percent reaction is too much. Getting the measles etc rarely produce such bad effects.

    I believe I read that the swine flu vaccine death toll was much higher ratio than the actual swine flu.

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to James Newell For This Post:

    Delight (15th November 2019), Franny (12th November 2019), mountain_jim (12th November 2019), onawah (12th November 2019)

  25. Link to Post #573
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,964
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 46,847 times in 9,548 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Drilling down into flu deceptions and mind-boggling lies
    11/11/19
    by Jon Rappoport

    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2019...boggling-lies/

    "Not every mainstream medical professional is trying to lie about the flu.

    Most of these people, as a result of their indoctrination, simply assume conventional wisdom is true.

    But as you move toward the top of the ladder—for example, public health agencies like the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC)—there are definitely some first-class liars on board.

    The information I’m about to spring on you—and I’ve posted this before—is in the category of: HOW CAN THAT BE TRUE? IF THAT WERE TRUE, THEN EVERYTHING I’VE BEEN TOLD AND EVERYTHING I’VE BELIEVED IS INCREDIBLY FALSE.

    And that’s a problem for many people. They would rather hold on to a falsehood than shift allegiance to the truth, when the truth makes them view authority figures in a whole new light.

    So…buckle up. Here we go.

    The first issue is: how many people in the US die every year from the flu?

    The CDC used to issue the same figure every year; 36,000. Then they modified that rote estimate, when it was finally challenged. They equivocated: “Flu seasons are unpredictable and can be severe. Over a period of 30 years, between 1976 and 2006, estimates of flu-associated deaths in the United States range from a low of about 3,000 to a high of about 49,000 people.”

    In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi, which created tremors through the halls of the CDC.

    Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):

    “[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”

    Boom.

    You see, the CDC created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.

    This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.

    But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

    Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.

    Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.

    This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.

    However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths would plummet even further.

    In other words, it’s promotion, hype, and uncertainty.

    “Well, uh, we’ve said that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in the US. But actually, it’s probably closer to 20. Who knows? However, we can’t admit that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows…and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.”

    [Note: Prior to Doshi publishing the above piece about flu deaths, I engaged in a series of emails with him about that issue, and independent researcher, Martin Maloney, made a major contribution to uncovering the CDC deception.]

    The second big issue is: how many people diagnosed with the flu really have the flu?

    Peter Doshi again, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals another monstrosity.

    As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.

    This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.

    So they don’t have the flu.

    Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.

    The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.

    The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.

    Here’s the exact quote from Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):

    “…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.

    “…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”

    Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.

    So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off.

    Let me give you a gigantic example of this massive flu-case-counting deception. It involved a flu “epidemic” you might remember called Swine Flu.

    In the late summer of 2009, the Swine Flu epidemic was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine.

    The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.

    At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting US cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.

    Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.

    What was the Agency up to?

    Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:

    Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

    Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It [Attkisson’s article] was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

    —end of interview excerpt—

    It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.

    That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

    But it gets even worse.

    Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

    Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

    Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

    In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

    There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

    Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

    So…the premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters like, oh, a vaccine causing autism…you can lay that one to rest. (archive here)

    The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.

    It will completely ignore its mandate to care about human health, and it will get away with it—as long as people are willing to accept falsehoods instead of the truth, as long as people would rather cling to what authority figures tell them."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Delight (15th November 2019), Franny (12th November 2019), mountain_jim (12th November 2019)

  27. Link to Post #574
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,964
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 46,847 times in 9,548 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Facebook's Prejudice Against Truthful Vaccine Info
    From Jeremy Hammon's email update today
    11/11/19


    "Last Friday, I visited my Facebook page and was treated to this notice:



    In case that's a bit hard to read off the image, the notice from Facebook now appearing to readers at the top of my page states:
    This Page posts about vaccines
    When it comes to health, everyone wants reliable, up-to-date information. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has information that can help answer questions you may have about vaccines.
    Then there's a link for readers to go to the CDC's website.

    I have documented how Facebook is helping the government to keep people in the dark about vaccine science by actively censoring information that doesn't accord with the public policy goal of ensuring strict compliance among the population with the CDC's routine childhood vaccine schedule.

    This summer, I published an article showing how a Facebook "Fact-Checker" article that appears on a video post by Del Bigtree, host of the show The HighWire, blatantly lies to users that there's no scientific evidence that vaccines can cause encephalopathy, or brain damage, even though the government and Merck itself admit that they can:

    Facebook "Fact-Checker" Misinforms Users about Vaccine Safety:
    https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2019/...l+Vaccine+Info

    Facebook began actively helping the government misinform the public and censor truthful information about vaccines after Congressman Adam Schiff sent CEO Mark Zuckerberg a letter demanding that he do so, which was followed by additional Congressional pressure on the company to serve the government's agenda.

    I wrote an open letter on behalf of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s organization Children's Health Defense to Zuckerberg documenting how Schiff blatantly lied in his letter and how the criterion for censorship that Schiff was using -- and which has since been adopted by Facebook -- was not whether the vaccine information is truthful, but whether it serves the CDC in its policy aims:

    CHD's letter to Mark Zuckerberg:
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...l+Vaccine+Info

    As you can imagine, seeing Facebook's prejudicial warning on my page -- which it does not place on pages that advocate public vaccine policy (such as the American Academy of Pediatrics or Gates Foundation pages) -- was a bit infuriating.

    So I figuratively gave Facebook the finger by calling the company out in a post that reads as follows:
    Dear Facebook,

    If my readers want truthful and scientifically accurate information about vaccines, they can stay on my Facebook page and click through to read my articles meticulously documenting how the CDC blatantly lies to the public about the science, including by grossly misrepresenting its own cited sources from the medical literature.

    Please stop insulting our intelligence. We do not appreciate you condescending to us by telling us what information we should or should not take into consideration.

    We also do not appreciate you actively censoring information on behalf of the government, which euphemistically defines "misinformation" about vaccines as any information, no matter how well supported by scientific research, that would not be pursuant to the CDC's goal of sustaining or increasing vaccination rates.

    And, Mr. Zuckerberg, we saw you embarrass yourself before the Congress and the world recently by clearly elucidating how, when you manipulate your algorithms to prevent people from seeing information that your algorithms say they want to know, you are doing so on the basis of having adopted the government's (e.g., Congressman Adam Schiff's) euphemistic and dangerous definition of "misinformation" (e.g., you acknowledged that your manipulate your algorithms to reduce the chances of people seeing information contrary to the opinion that "people should get their shots").

    You should be ashamed, and not for the reason most of those clueless Congressman want you to be ashamed for. You have no need to be ashamed for providing the public with a tool by which they can circumvent the propaganda filters of the corporate media and judge for themselves what information they think others should be made aware of. What you truly should be ashamed of is cowardly bowing to the government's demand that you act contrary to the interests of us, your users, by manipulating your algorithms to prevent Facebook users from seeing information your algorithms otherwise would say Facebook users want to see.

    Incidentally, Mr. Zuckerberg, Adam Schiff blatantly lied to you in his letter to you dated February 14, 2019. Contrary to his false claims, the fact that vaccines can cause permanent harm and even death isn't even the least bit controversial. We notice that Schiff omitted from his letter the fact that the government has granted legal immunity to vaccine manufacturers against injury lawsuits and instead administers the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to shift the financial burden for vaccine injuries away from the pharmaceutical industry and onto the taxpaying consumers.

    Mr. Zuckerberg, you could redeem yourself easily in our eyes by simply standing up and telling those ignorant and autocratic bureaucrats where they can stick their demands that you actively censor information that they don't want us to know.

    Or you can go down on the wrong side of history. The choice, of course, is yours. We would prefer that Facebook be a tool for the betterment of society rather than yet another means for the government to indoctrinate the public with propaganda. We'd prefer to get the truth out with Facebook, but if you persist down the wrong path, we will still get the truth out without you.

    Sincerely,

    Jeremy R. Hammond

    P.S. -- Dear reader, if you want to help push back against Facebook's manipulation of their algorithms, give this post tons of engagement by loving, commenting, and sharing it!

    We're not going down without a fight. We didn't start this information war, but we will finish it. 😀
    In just 3 hours, that post reached over 3,400 people and got over 1,200 engagements. As I'm writing this, it's got a reach of over 16,755 people and 3,579 engagements, including 551 likes, 123 comments, and 244 shares.

    If you're on Facebook, please help keep this going!"
    https://www.facebook.com/Jeremy.R.Ha...l+Vaccine+Info
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Delight (13th November 2019), Franny (12th November 2019), James Newell (12th November 2019), mountain_jim (12th November 2019)

  29. Link to Post #575
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,964
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 46,847 times in 9,548 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    The Vaccine Deep State: Controlling the Media and Government to Suppress Vaccine Facts
    11/12/19
    https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/the-v...vaccine-facts/
    The Vaccine Deep State – Part 1
    by Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD
    Progressive Radio Network

    "Who coined the term anti-vaccine or anti-vaxx?

    The derogatory term “anti-vaxxer,” which has been championed by the media and the medical industry’s experts who function as the media’s talking heads, are merely people who question the efficacy and safety of a heavy-loaded vaccination schedule for children.

    And this does not represent a small group of dissident individuals and parents. Rather it represents hundreds of thousands, or perhaps millions, of people in the US alone.

    We might consider mainstream news sources, such as the New York Times, once a highly respected newspaper, now becoming a propaganda vehicle for “manufacturing consent.”

    In his book Public Opinion, political journalist Walter Lippmann, coined the expression “the manufacture of consent,” which was later further elaborated upon by Noam Chomsky in his critically acclaimed book Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media published in 1988. Chomsky defines the mass corporate media as

    “effective and powerful ideological institutions that carry out a system-supportive propaganda function, by reliance on market forces, internalized assumptions and self-censorship, and without overt coercion.”

    The media refuses to accept that those who have been vaccine damaged, or who have children who will suffer for the remainder of their lives from adverse vaccine events, have a legitimate right to speak their truth rather than being labeled as hysterical or crazy.

    All of these individuals and parents were pro-vaccine until they or their child became vaccine-injured.

    Can you imagine that if you were a victim in the covert Tuskegee experiment carried out by the CDC, and you were one of the people who had syphilis who could have been easily treated but weren’t because you were a guinea pig and the federal agencies wanted to track how the infection would spread, and if you question the CDC’s wisdom, then you are therefore an anti-government subversive.

    You would be judged as anti-authority and therefore a delusional person.

    Similarly the CDC and the media, which has drunk the vaccine regime’s Kool Aid, is attempting to cast a net around those who oppose their authority by labeling them anti-vaxxers.

    There is perhaps no other area of so-called scientific progress that has relied upon more deceptive and misleading research and a distortion of facts and statistics than in modern medicine’s religious belief in vaccines as a miracle to protect the world’s population from infectious diseases.

    The distortion and exclusion of scientific evidence, the reliance upon cherry-picked studies and blatant corruption behind the vaccine research to further vaccination campaigns and compliance inquisitorial assaults on the medical voices of reason who demand honest and open dialogue about vaccine safety and efficacy has turned into a media war.

    Popular scientific consensus has yet to tackle the growing uncertainty gap to identify the most probable causes of childhood neurological disorders and increasing rates in asthma, allergies and autoimmune conditions, including the role that toxic vaccine ingredients such as adjuvant aluminum compounds may play in these epidemics.

    According to Dr. Stephanie Seneff at MIT, the autism rate can be projected to reach 1 in 2 boys in the next five years.http://anh-usa.org/half-of-all-child...entist-at-mit/

    Unfortunately the Vaccine Deep State is silent over this urgent debate. And even with all the scientific evidence, the mass media continues to parrot the CDC’s mantra that there is no further debate to be pursued as to whether vaccines contribute to neuro-developmental disorders.

    Doctors and Scientists Who Question Vaccines are Silenced


    If you have read the opinion pieces in the New York Times, Washington Post or listen to television commentators, you will be left with the impression that there are no evidence-based facts to offer a legitimate challenge to the assumption that all vaccines are effective and safe.

    Nevertheless there is a large group of board certified pediatricians, immunologists, toxicologists and research scientists who have reviewed volumes of peer-reviewed literature to support their criticisms of what the media wants us to believe.

    But you will never see anyone from this group cited in mainstream publications or invited on multimedia. Rather, the media has created the illusion that only a small group of activist parents and renegade physicians oppose vaccines. In turn, they are attacked with the unfounded charge that they put society’s health at risk.

    One recent example occurred in Israel.

    Prof. Yehuda Shoenfeld is one of the most respected immunologists in Israel who now heads a center for autoimmune diseases at Sheba Medical Center, Israel’s largest hospital. He is also a member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities and serves on the editorial board of dozens of medical journals.

    Some regard him as “one of the most prominent world experts in autoimmunity.”

    But now he is being viciously attacked by a group of Israeli doctors who accuse him of being a danger to public health because he has questioned vaccine safety. This group wants Dr. Shoenfeld silenced because he has written extensively on the role of aluminum adjuvants leading to a condition he has called “autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants” or ASIA.

    Not surprisingly, much of the assault against Dr. Shoenfeld is being fueled by the Vaccine Deep State in the US, primarily by two of the media’s pro-vaccine poster children, Dr. Paul Offit at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and his partner in vaccine propaganda law professor Dorit Reiss at the University of California.

    Reiss also blogs her opinions to discredit anti-vaccine voices for the Times of Israel and has contributed to fomenting opposition to Dr. Shoenfeld. She is also one of the leading legal supporters for California’s regressive vaccine mandates. Both Offit and Reiss are advocating for Dr. Shoenfeld’s removal from his hospital position and his sitting on medical journal boards.

    Dr. Shoenfeld is an example of what happens to any scientist, physician and even journalist who questions vaccination. Therefore, how can we trust anything written about vaccines in the mainstream media? That is the conundrum.

    Where is Journalistic Integrity?
    We can ask journalists six basic questions to determine their journalist integrity and honesty.

    Have you interviewed the leading vaccines critics within the medical community?
    Have you honestly investigated the scientific literature to review the toxicological evidence about vaccines’ harmful effects?
    Have you reviewed the actual transcripts of the CDC’s senior immunologist Dr. William Thompson who provided evidence that the MMR is associated with autism yet this was systematically covered up by the agency?
    Have you reviewed Robert Kennedy Jr’s release of the Simpsonwood meeting transcripts that provided conclusive evidence that the CDC’s own research showed a vaccine mercury-autism connection and this too was intentionally concealed from Congress and the public?
    Have you reviewed the politics behind the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and the subsequent Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to understand how the pharmaceutical industry received a pass to avoid being held legally accountable for vaccine injuries?
    Have you interviewed and sought documentation from any of the following medical doctors and researchers Drs. Suzanne Humphries, Nancy Banks, Brian Hooker, Lucija Tomljenovic, Lawrence Palevsky, Christopher Exley, Tetyana Obukhanych, among many others Each of these individuals were pro-vaccine before that found reason to explore the actual published science?
    This is only the beginning of what needs to be done before citing or interviewing any the most ardent pro-vaccine advocates such as Paul Offit, Senator Richard Pen or Dorit Reiss. And we have yet to find any mainstream journalist whatsoever who has made an effort to investigate any of the above.

    The CDC’s Public Relations Marketing Efforts Funded by Taxpayers Which Educates Journalists
    To sustain the nation’s vaccination rates, to preserve corporate profits, and to keep Americans convinced that vaccines will protect their children from infectious illnesses, the CDC requires a dynamic marketing and public relations apparatus.

    The tentacles of the government’s health agencies are not only wrapped around the mainstream media but also the entertainment industry.

    Unknown to the general public and many in the medical profession is the existence of the CDC’s sophisticated public relations operations. Tax dollars are spent to train journalists to defend the federal agencies’ and pharmaceutical industry’s national and state vaccine agendas.

    This broad network of journalists are employed by mainstream media companies, magazines and newspapers, and freelancers and provide the CDC with a virtual army of publicists to propagandize its message.

    Threats, fear mongering, and outright hatred written towards vaccine opponents are commonplace in the mainstream journalism’s narratives. What they all share in common is a glaring ignorance or denial of an enormous body of scientific literature that calls the CDC’s lies and deception about vaccine safety into question.

    One vehicle for manufacturing consent is the CDC-Association of Health Care Journalists (AHCJ) joint fellowship program.

    Scores of health editors, writers and reporters throughout the nation’s leading media corporations and publications—MSNBC, NPR, New York Times, Reuters, the Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle to name a few on the fellowship’s webpage—have passed through the CDC’s Atlanta campus for a week’s worth of intense instruction in national public health policy.

    According to the AHCJ’s fellowship information, journalists are indoctrinated in conventional federal health policies regarding epidemiology, global disease prevention, pandemic flu preparedness, vaccine safety and autism.

    They also receive training in “navigating databases such as the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey and CDC publications” to assist their research and writing.

    Afterwards journalists return to their publications to propagandize the CDC’s ideological talking points to increase vaccination compliance and receive notices and pre-written scripts about stories to report for their news outlets.

    The CDC’s close relationship with the media has been in place for at least two decades.

    For example, during the 2004 National Influenza Vaccine Summit, then director of Media Relations at the CDC and spokesperson for the National Immunization Program, Glen Nowak, presented the agency’s “Seven Step Recipe for Generating Interest In and Demand for Flu Vaccination.”

    His Powerpoint presentation outlines a concise public relations campaign, along a timeline covering the flu season, for journalists and media agencies to follow for the sole purpose of increasing flu vaccination rates.

    The outline includes specific periods during the flu season when the media is recommended to induce and increase public fears about the pending dangers of influenza and even possible death.

    In defense of the CDC’s PR efforts, Nowak publicly stated on National Public Radio that the vaccine

    “manufacturers were telling us [CDC] that they weren’t receiving a lot of orders of vaccine for use… It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot.”

    Five years later, during the H1N1 swine flu non-epidemic, we observed and reported how the CDC’s flu propaganda storyline recommendations continue to be put into practice to the letter by the New York Times, Washington Post and almost every large television news network.[1]

    The Complicit Entertainment Industry
    These operations are not limited to news firms.

    There is another organization that has remained relatively hidden from the public’s eye that targets the entertainment world: Hollywood Health and Society (HHS).

    HHS is headquartered at the Norman Lear Center at the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School of Communications.

    According to its website, HHS “provides entertainment industry professionals with accurate timely information on health storylines.” It delivers consultation, writers and scripts for television, Hollywood films and documentaries.

    And who offers this expert consultation? HHS’ top funders, including the CDC, the National Cancer Institute, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, and the world’s largest private financial source for vaccine development and propaganda the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

    HHS’s mission states:

    In partnership with our funding agencies, we offer several resources, including quick facts, briefings and consultations with experts, case examples, panel discussions about timely health issues, a quarterly newsletter with health updates called “Real to Reel,” and an expanding list of tip sheets written specifically for writers and producers.

    Tip sheets are available on the CDC website, as well as the NCI website. The broad range of topics includes influenza, toxic mold, smallpox, cancer, autism, motor vehicle crashes, obesity, adolescent health issues, antibiotic resistance, clinical trials and much more.

    Council of Foreign Relations Participating in the Vaccine Deep State
    Unbeknownst to many, even the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) has publicly come to the defense of the vaccine manufacturers and continues to publish articles that denigrate vaccine hesitancy.

    During the misperceived Swine Flu threat in 2009, the Council took an active role to breed public fear about the epidemic that never happened in order to push more flu vaccines.

    The organization’s Global Health program has worked closely with Bill Gates’ Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI).

    More recently CFR member Claire Felter has taken the World Health Organization’s talking points to charge the “anti-vaccination movement” with “threaten[ing] to undo years of progress made against a range of preventable diseases.”

    As with the major players in any Deep State, hypocrisy often runs rampant. Embracing a strong anti-China position regarding that nation’s Communist government, the CFR has challenged the Chinese government’s legitimacy after riots over the administration of “substandard” vaccines that turned violent.

    Yet, at no time do we find the CFR raising questions about the exponential rise in autism and childhood neurological disorders in the US and our government’s utter neglect and failure to honestly investigate the causes behind this epidemic that is destroying more families than recent measles outbreaks ever could.

    This undoubtedly raises the question, why in the world is the CFR involved in the vaccine business?

    Besides the CFR’s commitment to the WHO’s global health agenda, among the Council’s corporate members are three of the five largest pharmaceutical companies, each a major force in the vaccine industry: Glaxo, Merck and Pfizer.

    Each of these firms have stacked up many years of civil lawsuits, medical cover-ups on adverse drug effects, falsification of medical data, and a trail of pseudo-scientific nonsense to expedite their revenues from drug and vaccine sales.

    Over the years, the CFR has functioned as an effective incubator for forging alliances between large multinational corporations and governmental and multilateral agencies. Obama’s cabinet, for example, was packed with CFR members, who contributed to the signing of the DARK Act to squash states’ efforts to label Genetically Modified foods.

    The Vaccine Deep State’s Influence Over Government
    For those who are vaccine-hesitant, one of the most frustrating concerns is legislative complacency at every level of the government — the White House, Congress, and throughout the nation’s federal health agencies — to make concerted efforts to invest in the most serious questions of the vaccine safety debate.

    Although many Trump supporters believed that once president he would address the plight of parents with vaccine-injured children, it came as no surprise that he would back-peddle 180 degrees. In the aftermath of the measles outbreak, Trump adopted the Vaccine Deep State’s agenda when he told CNN,

    “They [children] have to get the shots. The vaccinations are so important. This is really going around now. They have to get their shots.”

    There is utter silence in Washington about the long-term consequences of where the American population is headed as more and more vaccines get added to the CDC’s vaccine schedule.

    Read the full article at PRN.FM : http://prn.fm/vaccine-deep-state/

    The Vaccine Deep State – Part 2: Scientific Denialism: https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/vacci...-real-science/
    References
    [1] Richard Gale and Gary Null. “The Public Relations Machine for the Vaccine Complex.” Progressive Radio Network, October 7, 2009

    [2] see Gale R, Null G “Vaccination: Federal Health Agencies Continue to Deceive Americans” Global Research. November 13, 2009 "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Delight (15th November 2019), Franny (15th November 2019), mountain_jim (13th November 2019), RunningDeer (14th November 2019)

  31. Link to Post #576
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,964
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 46,847 times in 9,548 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Why Are 10-Year-Olds Killing Themselves?
    NOVEMBER 14, 2019
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...ng-themselves/

    By the Children’s Health Defense Team

    "The general consensus among developmental experts is that suicide risks increase after puberty. However, this perspective fails to explain the “alarming trend for more suicides in children aged 14 and younger,” a trend just reconfirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In a terse data brief dated October 2019, two CDC researchers report a near tripling in the suicide rate for 10-14 year-olds from 2007 to 2017. According to one of the authors, not only is suicide now the second leading cause of death for that age group, but “the pace of increase is actually accelerating.”

    Preadolescents are not the only young people affected by the upward trend. The fact is that suicide has become the second leading cause of death across the entire 10-24 age group. Since 2007, according to the CDC report, suicides among 15-19 year-olds have increased by 76%; rates are also accelerating among 20-24 year-olds. For these two age groups, the suicide rate now exceeds the homicide rate. Nonetheless, while suicide at any age is tragic, a psychologist at Emory University (CDC’s neighbor) told NPR that she was particularly disturbed “to see a significant increase in very young people as young as age 10.” What is equally disturbing is that experts are at a loss to explain the suicide spike in the very youngest.

    … an estimated 15% to 20% of U.S. adolescents (mostly girls) now engage in non-suicidal self-injury; this behavior, which often starts before age 10, is a strong predictor of eventual suicide attempts and suicide.

    Physical and mental health challenges
    In light of the observed trends among preadolescents, investigators have lamented the “relative paucity of research on the prevalence of suicidal ideation and intent in children younger than 12 years of age.” Even in the absence of such research, however, it is not difficult to see that America’s children are plagued by a complex array of chronic illnesses and mental health challenges that may be contributing to suicidality. In slightly older adolescents and young adults, studies have shown that suicidal thoughts and behaviors are common among those with chronic illness, and “particularly among those with comorbid mood disorders.” Confirming this, a study of younger adolescents (ages 13-17) with type 1 diabetes found that 27% “exhibited moderate to high risk for depression” and 8% endorsed suicidal ideation. Noting “the potential lethality of insulin when taken in intentional overdose,” the researchers cautioned that there is a need to screen for depression and suicidality among young diabetics.

    Recent studies have identified other telling indicators of distress in the very young, linked to subsequent suicide risks. For example, an estimated 15% to 20% of U.S. adolescents (mostly girls) now engage in non-suicidal self-injury; this behavior, which often starts before age 10, “is a strong predictor of eventual suicide attempts and suicide.” A study that followed self-harm patients (ages 12-24) for one year found that adolescents were at “markedly elevated risk of suicide” compared to young adults.

    In 2016, the Nordic Cochrane Centre linked psychiatric drugs to a doubling in the risk of suicidality (and aggression) in children and adolescents and suggested that these risks were underreported.

    Possible culprits
    Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has written extensively about the mental health challenges besetting American youth and about young people’s ensuing overmedication. In 2016, the Nordic Cochrane Centre linked psychiatric drugs to a doubling in the risk of suicidality (and aggression) in children and adolescents and suggested that these risks were underreported. Thus, while experts may claim that the causes of young suicide remain murky, the risks associated with these commonly prescribed medications require serious attention. In addition, the overvaccination of America’s children also needs to be considered. Studies have pointed to a complex interplay between the gut microbiome, the immune response and vaccination, for example, and researchers also have reported on the association between vaccines, vaccine adjuvants and mental health symptoms. In all likelihood, there is synergy among these and other contributors. The bottom line, however, is that 10-year-olds should not be killing themselves. We cannot allow ourselves to become complacent about the fact that more and more preadolescents believe that they have no other option."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Delight (15th November 2019), Franny (15th November 2019), RunningDeer (14th November 2019)

  33. Link to Post #577
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,687
    Thanks
    4,971
    Thanked 11,660 times in 2,362 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe





    Last edited by Delight; 15th November 2019 at 03:08.

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Franny (15th November 2019), onawah (15th November 2019)

  35. Link to Post #578
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,964
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 46,847 times in 9,548 posts

    Default Re: The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "the Shots", it is about totalitarian tiptoe

    Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Speaking at Vaccine Injury Epidemic (VIE) Rally
    NOVEMBER 15, 2019

    "On November 14th, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. enthralled thousands with his inspirational speech at the Vaccine Injury Epidemic event in Washington, DC.
    'We are going to get stronger and stronger. Every time they beat us we double in size. Every victory they have brings us more recruits” … “We are going to get bigger and bigger and they are going to get weaker and weaker. We are going to win this battle and beat them.' "

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Delight (Yesterday)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 29 of 29 FirstFirst 1 19 29

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts