The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "The Shots", it's the Totalitarian Tiptoe

[onawah]

Dr. Meryl Nass: Why Is Protecting COVID-19's Origin so Important?
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
June 14, 2020
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a..._rid=893976435

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8p0XZLOJYuc

Transcript: https://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/Ex...ofSARSCoV2.pdf

(Many hyperlinks in the article)
"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The manufactured anthrax crisis of 2001 initiated the PATRIOT Act, one of the most severe compromises of our personal freedoms up to that point. Now, the COVID-19 pandemic is being used to take away even more freedoms
It appears influential virologists are protecting the narrative that SARS-CoV-2 arose naturally, and did not originate from a lab in China or elsewhere, even though their scientific justification for that conclusion is faulty
Strong evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 cannot be the result of a natural mutation
The National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), under Dr. Anthony Fauci’s leadership, has funded gain-of-function research on coronaviruses for about two decades
Efforts to develop coronavirus vaccines have failed for two decades, as the vaccines tend to cause paradoxical immune enhancement resulting in damaging and lethal cytokine storms

Dr. Meryl Nass is a physician in Ellsworth, Maine, who in previous interviews has helped us understand the unforeseen consequences of mass vaccination — consequences that could end up impacting public health in a very negative way. Here, she discusses what she's been working on for decades, and how it relates to this current pandemic.

An outspoken supporter of health freedom, Nass provided scientifically referenced testimony to the Massachusetts legislature, December 3, 2019, when it was considering legislation to eliminate the religious vaccine exemption. This is now more relevant than ever, considering there is talk, worldwide, about implementing more or less mandatory vaccination against COVID-19. In her December 2019 testimony, Nass pointed out that:1

“There is no crisis (no epidemic of deaths or disabilities) from infectious diseases caused by lack of vaccinations … The elephant in the auditorium today is Pharma profits …

The pharmaceutical industry has undertaken a very ambitious campaign to legislate away vaccine exemptions in the United States and Canada. France, Italy and Germany have rescinded vaccine exemptions too, suggesting the campaign is worldwide …

It has been claimed that vaccines are, by nature, extremely safe. Yet vaccines are usually injected, bypassing all the body’s natural barriers. Even minute contamination or inadequate microbial inactivation can maim or kill … Vaccines have caused many autoimmune disorders, from Guillain-Barre syndrome to narcolepsy …

Vaccines appear safe because the immediate side effects are usually mild and temporary. Serious vaccine side effects often take weeks or months to surface, and by then it is difficult to know what caused them ...

A 2009 European swine flu vaccine (GSK’s Pandemrix) caused over 1,300 cases of severe narcolepsy, mostly in adolescents. This vaccine was linked to narcolepsy because 15 times the usual number of narcolepsy cases suddenly appeared in clinics ...

It should be apparent, but isn’t: Government waivers of vaccine liability discourage manufacturers from ensuring that the vaccines they sell are as safe and effective as possible.

The removal of vaccine exemptions, combined with liability waivers for vaccine side effects and recently loosened standards for licensing vaccines, create a highly toxic mix.”

Nass goes on to cite statistics showing why the claim that draconian laws are required to control the “crisis” of vaccine-preventable diseases is false. She also points out that:

“The bedrock expectation of medical ethics is that patients must give informed consent2 for all medical procedures, including vaccines. Informed consent means that patients must be informed about the procedure, have the right to refuse, and may not be coerced to accept it.

Isn’t withholding an education an extreme form of coercion? Without any discussion of its moral or ethical dimensions by media, medical societies or government officials, the requirement for informed consent for medical procedures, including vaccinations, vanishes in the blink of an eye when patients are not allowed the right to refuse.”Anthrax
In 1992, Nass published a paper3 identifying the 1978-1980 Zimbabwe anthrax outbreak as a case of biological warfare. In 2011, I also interviewed her about the 2001 false flag anthrax attack in the U.S., on the heels of 9/11, and the dangers of the anthrax vaccine.

That manufactured crisis initiated the PATRIOT Act, one of the most severe compromises of our personal freedoms up to that point. Now, it appears they’re using the COVID-19 pandemic to take away even more freedoms.

There's strong evidence that this is precisely what's going on. Early in the interview, Nass summarizes our earlier discussion about the anthrax attack, so for a refresher, listen to the interview or read through the transcript. That attack, however, is also what allowed government funds to be allocated toward even more biological warfare research. She explains:

“Congress appropriated a lot of money for bio-terrorism, which is conjoined with pandemic planning. So, the same pot of money that goes into pandemics goes into Biological Defense. Much of it is duly used for research performed in high containment, BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs.

We don't call it biological warfare, but when you're designing pathogens to be more virulent than the originals in nature … essentially biological warfare research gets done. Things are called biological warfare if the intent is to create a weapon. It’s called biological defense if the intent is to design a bad bug so you can come up with defenses against that bug.

What has happened is that a lot of money was spent to develop new high containment labs — many, many more high containment labs … about $6.5 billion a year since 2001 has been designated for this biodefense. So, what we wound up with is hundreds of biodefense labs that have to be used and thousands, possibly 15,000, newly trained bio-defense researchers.

So, now we have cadres of people who are experts in coronaviruses or avian flu viruses, Ebola, Lassa, et cetera. And what most of that money … has been spent on, has been researching these pathogens. Even though the money was supposed to be spent on developing countermeasures and stockpiling countermeasures, to a great extent that did not happen …

As a result, we know a lot about highly virulent coronaviruses that have been created in labs around the world as well as in the U.S. and China, and we have absolutely no countermeasures that have been developed for coronavirus.”

Where Did SARS-CoV-2 Originate?
“Like everybody else, I wondered whether this was a natural jump from a bat or some other animal to humans and scratched my head about it,” Nass says. While she’s not a virologist, she does have a three-decade background in biological warfare and is aware of what’s been created in the past, what it takes, where they may be made, and how it has been done.

“So, I remained curious. Then on February 19 online, and in the March 7 print edition, a group of scientists had a "Correspondence" published in The Lancet, and it was a very curious piece to me. It didn't make sense.

And these were very prominent signatories, including the former head of the National Science Foundation, one of the former top people at CDC, the director of the Wellcome Trust, coronavirus researchers and funders, and other prominent people.

What they said is, ‘We need to quash the rumors that this came from a lab. That is a conspiracy theory and we need to get rid of it. They wrote:

‘The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.’ 4

So, what this group was doing, in a very short, less than a page-long letter, was calling the possibility that SARS-2 might have come from a lab a conspiracy theory, and conflating any consideration of this possibility with threatening "transparent sharing of data" with China. And we couldn't interfere with that because we need to work with China to fight the coronavirus …

A couple of weeks later, an article came out in Nature Medicine, which said, ‘Here we have the scientific proof that this did not come from a lab’ …

And this second paper talked about the two things that have been identified by others as the most problematic new genetic segments on SARS-CoV-2 — two sites on the spike RNA, which seem to enhance the tropism and the binding/entry, so it makes it easier for the virus to get into human cells and expands the range of cell types the virus can enter.

And the Nature Medicine authors took these two regions and said: ‘Look, these mutations that are found in the new CoV-2 virus, which are not seen in any of the other coronaviruses anywhere near it genetically, must have come from the wild because these weren't created in the ways that we virologists would have chosen to create them.'

They said, 'We already have ways to create these mutations that would leave a lab signature, but there is no lab signature. And furthermore, we decided that based on computer modeling, the receptor binding domain did not use the ideal formulation we predicted. If a geneticist, a virologist, was doing this, they would have used our computer model. They didn't, and therefore this must have come from the wild.’

Well, that was a really odd argument because it didn't make any scientific sense. The authors did a lot of hand-waving, but failed to consider that other techniques could have been used to create this virus. Nor did the authors explain how such a virus, so ideally adapted to humans, could have developed in wildlife.

We should understand that those were two highly virulent and surprising mutations that could well have been added to a preexisting coronavirus, by a variety of techniques, including the old passage technique, still used today, which is what Louis Pasteur used to create the first live, attenuated rabies vaccine in 1885.

If you passage a virus through multiple human tissue cultures, or mice that contain, for example, humanized lung tissue, you force the virus to develop mutations that adapt it better and better to the new tissue. If the current coronavirus, as claimed by some scientists and seems borne out clinically, is better adapted to binding to the human ACE-2 receptor than to all known animal ACE-2 receptors, then it either:

1) mutated that way by jumping from wildlife to humans long ago, subsequently optimizing its ACE-2 receptor for humans over a prolonged period of time, or

2) was genetically engineered in a lab to do so, or

3) was passaged through cells with human ACE-2 receptors in order to accumulate the mutations that made it most virulent to humans.

I believe the same argument holds for the second unique coronavirus mutation, the addition of four amino acids to form a furin (polybasic) cleavage site. This site takes advantage of the human furin enzyme present intra- and extracellularly, which enhances viral entry into human cells and might convey other advantages to the virus.

There is absolutely no evidence to support the first hypothesis, that this virus has been circulating in humans for years. Thus, we are left with hypotheses 2 and 3: Each requires the human hand, only differing by the technique used. In my opinion, it is likely that both techniques (genetic engineering and serial passage) were used to produce the SARS-2 coronavirus, or its laboratory progenitors.”

We Absolutely Have the Know-How to Create SARS-CoV-2
Nass countered Nature Medicine’s narrative in a March 26, 2020, blog post,5 and again in an April 2, 2020, post, in which she wrote:6

“Why are some of the U.S.’ top scientists making a specious argument about the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2? … Prior to genetic engineering techniques being developed (1973) and widely used (since late 1970s), more ‘primitive’ means of causing mutations, with the intention of developing biological weapons, were employed …

They resulted in biological weapons that were tested, well-described, and in some cases, used … These methods can result in biowarfare agents that lack the identifiable signature of a microbial agent constructed in a lab from known RNA or DNA sequences.

In fact, it would be desirable to produce such agents, since it would be difficult to prove they were deliberately constructed in a lab. Here are just a few possibilities for how one might create new, virulent mutants:

Exposing microorganisms to chemical or radiological agents that cause high mutation rates and selecting for desired characteristics
Passaging virus through a number of lab animals or tissue cultures
Mixing viruses together and seeking recombinants with a new mix of virulence factors”
Why Is Protecting the Narrative so Important?
Nass believes the old technique of passage is a likely candidate here. According to Nass, if you take viruses that are ill adapted to the human ACE-2 receptor but are adapted to another animal’s ACE-2 inhibitor, and then passage them in human tissue culture with the human ACE-2 receptor, over time, the viruses will develop improved receptor binding.

“It’s a likely way that this coronavirus might have been produced,” she says. “Anyway, I read that article and I said, ‘This is complete nonsense. I can't believe Nature Medicine published it.’ And the two groups of authors, the group from The Lancet and the group from Nature Medicine, have consistently referred to each other as they've been interviewed since.

Science Magazine did a short piece on The Lancet article. USA Today did a piece on the Nature of Medicine article. And then the head of the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Francis Collins, Tony Fauci's boss, wrote a blog post (or somebody wrote it for him) about the spurious Nature Medicine article.

He stated, ‘Now we have the scientific answer. This article in Nature Medicine has put to rest any thoughts that this could be a lab construct. That's a conspiracy theory. We have no room for conspiracy theories. This is the end of the discussion’ …

Now, the first thing I thought about the Nature Medicine article was, ‘Did these authors actually write it?’ Because it's such a piece of scientific nonsense than any real scientist reading it, if you can read the language, would not accept it, would dismiss it out of hand. Many other scientists have said exactly this, subsequently.

So, were the Nature Medicine authors asked to place their names on a piece of junk science in order to get it into a high impact journal and create this smoke screen — that "the science proves" (but only to the scientifically illiterate) this is a naturally occurring coronavirus?

There were five authors. I know of a couple of them. One was a virologist named Robert Garry, who I have had some interactions with over the last 22 years, another one was Ian Lipkin. Garry and coauthor Kristian Andersen both worked in Sierra Leone during the Ebola epidemic.

Garry was principal investigator for a project in Kenema, Sierra Leone before the outbreak started. Ian Lipkin's group at Columbia University claimed, just last year, to have finally found a bat in west Africa carrying Ebola virus; in other words, this Nature Medicine coauthor's group produced the long-sought evidence for a natural origin of west Africa's Ebola epidemic.7

I happened to show the Nature Medicine article to a friend of mine, Ed Hooper, who wrote a well-known book called, ‘The River,’ about the origin of AIDS: How did AIDS jump from monkeys into the human population?

Although many claim that it's due to Africans eating bush meat (from monkeys), Ed makes a very strong case that HIV made the species jump via oral polio vaccines that were prepared locally, in the Belgian Congo, from the kidneys of various types of monkeys that were locally caught. The vaccine was designed by Hilary Koprowski in the U.S., and given to millions of Africans.

Ed Hooper has put out additional evidence in the intervening 20-plus years since he wrote ‘The River,’ that it's much more likely that the jump into humans occurred because the oral polio vaccine grown on monkey kidneys was contaminated by monkey viruses, and that those monkey kidneys probably contained the precursor to HIV.

Interestingly, three of these Nature Medicine authors had challenged him on his AIDS origin theory about two decades ago, and now they're challenging the coronavirus origin theory, which made me wonder, ‘Are these five Nature Medicine authors … repeatedly trotted out by the political medical establishment to try to push false narratives that are politically desirable?"

Compelling Evidence SARS-CoV-2 Is a Lab Creation
May 19, 2020, I reviewed evidence presented in a Medium article8 written by Yuri Deigin, as well as a video presentation of this evidence done by Chris Martenson, Ph.D. If you missed “The Smoking Gun Proving SARS-CoV-2 Is an Engineered Virus,” you may want to review it after you’re done with Nass’ interview.

Both sources go into great scientific depth, explaining why SARS-CoV-2 cannot be the result of a natural mutation. Deigin doesn’t actually suggest that it is manmade, but provides strong evidence that one needs to consider before coming to the conclusion that it’s of natural origin. Nass comments on Deigin’s work:

“[Deigin] did his own research and published a massive discussion of all the coronavirus research that has gone on since 1999 that is relevant to SARS-CoV-2, and he particularly discusses these two mutations: One, the furin cleavage site and the other is the receptor binding area.

He talks about all the research that's been done on coronaviruses, the different ways you can make these changes, and how changes like what we're seeing now have in fact been created by coronavirus researchers over the past 20 years. And he analyzes everything very, very finely. It's like Ed Hooper's book. He goes in and out and around and discusses every aspect.

When you finish reading that article, you are convinced that it's almost certain that these two mutations were put there deliberately.

Whether they were done by passage, whether they were done by CRISPR or whether another method was used, scientists did know the implications, in terms of increasing virulence, of both of these mutations. So, I invite you to read that piece.”

Many Nations Funded 'Gain of Function' Coronavirus Research
We now know that the National Institutes of Health, under Fauci’s leadership, funded gain-of-function research, or research on how to increase the virulence of pathogens, with coronaviruses for about two decades.

When the White House temporarily suspended U.S. government funding for that kind of research for MERS, SARS and avian flu in 2014, some work may have shifted over to the Wuhan Virology Institute in China and continued anyway. Other similar research, such as Ralph Baric's at UNC, was given special permission to continue despite the temporary suspension. The funding ban was lifted in 2017. Nass weighs in:

“Coronavirus research, including gain-of-function research over the last 20 years, has been done in many countries in Europe, in many labs in the U.S., in Japan, Singapore, China, Australia and probably other places. And it has often been funded by multiple countries.

So, funders have included the Australian government, different branches of NIH, but primarily Fauci's NIAID, the National Science Foundation and USAID — surprising because you would think USAID is an aid agency.

There have also been organizations like the EcoHealth Alliance, which have served as pass-throughs for the funding. The NIAID or USAID would give money to the EcoHealth Alliance and then EcoHealth Alliance would dole it out to the BSL-4 lab in Wuhan and other places and would participate with them in research.

Most of the most prominent researchers have worked in multiple countries' labs, along with foreign colleagues. It's very complicated. There's a lot of back and forth. Europe has funded this research too.

So, Dr. Zhengli Shi has worked in the United States and our researchers have worked in China. Nature Medicine coauthor Ian Lipkin has a post in China, and he was an expert who advised the Saudis on MERS, which is a cousin of SARS, and advised the Chinese on the 2003 SARS. He is affiliated with EcoHealth Alliance too.

He was over in China at the beginning of this SARS-2 pandemic. Ed Holmes, a coauthor of the Nature Medicine article, is an evolutionary biologist at Sydney University who also holds a position in China. So, these people work together, and … the Chinese, the Australians, the Europeans and the Americans fund all this work … Some of this research is funded by five different institutes from three or four different countries.

Gain-of-function research has been controversial since it started being openly discussed. In 2014, in the United States, there was a pause on U.S. government funding of gain-of-function research, but only for three organisms: MERS, SARS and avian flu.

Probably this occurred because researchers announced success in creating lethal avian flu viruses that had gained the ability to spread via aerosol. And because, at the same time, there was widespread media reporting on lab accidents in the U.S., especially at CDC's, NIH's and the Army's high containment labs. These accidents had exposed workers at CDC and over 100 other labs to live anthrax spores and live avian flu.

There was a lot of controversy in the scientific literature over gain-of-function. However, even though about 20 research projects were initially paused in 2014, seven were given special permission to continue. Here is what U.S. government scientists wrote about this in 2015:

‘The recent safety lapses at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the NIH that could have resulted in exposure to anthrax and smallpox, respectively, have diminished public confidence in the ability of even high-containment laboratories to mitigate the risk of accidental release of pathogens of potential harm ... public tolerance of that risk may be the ultimate determinant of what types of research are allowed to proceed.

… ‘As recent lapses at high profile laboratories have illustrated, there remains the potential that bacterial and viral strains can escape even the most secure environments.’9

At the end of 2017, the pause was removed, new guidelines were issued but not made mandatory, and everybody was allowed to go back and do whatever gain-of-function research they wanted.”

Nass on Mikovits Retrovirus Hypothesis
I recently interviewed Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., a cellular and molecular biologist who suspects SARS-CoV-2 isn’t the actual or sole cause of COVID-19. Rather, she believes the illness is a coinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with a preexisting XMRV gamma retrovirus infection.

One possibility she has raised is that SARS-CoV-2 activates this underlying, latent infection. She supports this thesis with the fact that the cytokine storm signature of COVID-19 is inconsistent with coronavirus, but very consistent with the gamma retrovirus infections she studied.

“What she says is very interesting,” Nass says. “Some of it I think is incorrect and some of it is correct, and there's so much of it that it's very hard to separate … Even though she says coronaviruses don't do X, Y and Z, this is a very new coronavirus. It has some unique features.

What we've talked about so far is only relevant to the spike protein, which is only 13% of the genome. We haven't even begun to explore changes that may have occurred in the rest of the genome. So, I don't think we have the evidence yet to say that this coronavirus alone can't do what it seems to be doing …

Some people are saying there are two, three or four small, six to 10 amino acid segments that look like bits of HIV, and they're inserted in different places. They may have effects on the immune response. I don't know. I think that information will gradually appear … I think I've got to read her book [‘Plague of Corruption’] … and see what the data show …

In my own research, I have found Anthony Fauci to be a hypocritical fraud, who pretends he knows nothing about coronaviruses, [yet] he's funded over $100 million of coronavirus research out of NIAID. He looks so gentle and he doesn't give you any details about anything, but he knows a lot of details. So, I hope she confirms my suspicions about Fauci.”

Potential COVID-19 Vaccine Dangers
As discussed in “Fast-Tracked COVID-19 Vaccine — What Could Go Wrong?” COVID-19 vaccines are being fast-tracked, eliminating animal trials and going straight to human trials.

Speaking of Fauci, Moderna was granted a fast-track designation for its mRNA-1273 vaccine by the FDA on May 12, 2020.10,11 This vaccine is sponsored by Fauci’s NIAID, who, echoing Bill Gates’ edicts, has been calling for social distancing and other lockdown measures until a vaccine becomes available. Moderna is currently preparing to enter Phase 2 trials. No results from Phase 1 have been published as of this writing.

“They're doing human trials of at least two vaccines in the U.S. now. So, I'll tell you what I know. First of all, the Moderna is an mRNA vaccine. We haven't had an mRNA vaccine before, so we don't know what that's going to do in people.

Therefore, it seems unconscionable to give it to people before you test it in animals, so that you can at least have some idea what the side effects might be …

There [have also been] many [experimental coronavirus vaccines in the past], not just the trials at Galveston with Peter Hotez, where four different types of vaccines against coronaviruses all failed. There have been other vaccine platforms attempted for coronaviruses that also failed.”

In one such study, discussed in my recent interview above with Robert Kennedy Jr., ferrets showed an extraordinary good serological antibody response to the vaccine, but when the animals were then exposed to the wild virus, they were overtaken by a cytokine storm response, now known as “paradoxical immune enhancement.” In at least one trial, all the ferrets died.

“Hotez [has stated that] in their animal experiments, the vaccinated animals fared worse when they were exposed to the disease than if they had not gotten the vaccine,” Nass says.

“[In] experiments done in the 1960s, an RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) vaccine [Editor’s note: RSV is similar to coronavirus] … was given to children. Several of the children died — again, with this same cytokine storm problem arising. So, I think this is a vaccine you should tread very lightly with, and it should never have been given to people before it was given to animals.”

COVID-19 Vaccine — Global Experiment Without Precedent
Nass also addresses the issue of how human trials are done, and warns people about joining them without being fully informed about the potential risks. This is particularly pertinent for COVID-19 vaccine trials, considering the lethal failures of such vaccines in the past.

You also need to understand that when you participate in a trial, you are not eligible to receive compensation for any injuries you sustain. As for taking the vaccine once it becomes publicly available, Nass says:

“I'll just point out that Ralph Baric, the top coronavirus researcher in the United States, at the University of North Carolina, said himself in an interview a couple months ago that vaccines aren't going to work in the older population for which this disease is most risky …

Having dealt with many people who've died or developed chronic illnesses, all sorts of terrible complications from anthrax vaccine and smallpox vaccine, and sometimes other vaccines, I try to do a careful risk-benefit analysis before recommending a vaccine to any patient.

Sometimes I think it makes sense for people to be vaccinated, but their own situation, where they live, their age group, who they're exposed to, where they're traveling to are all important factors that would help you to formulate that risk-benefit assessment. And I don't think vaccines should be looked on as risk-free. They're clearly not risk-free. Medical interventions should be done thoughtfully …

Another problem … on the FDA website,12,13 there is a page that talks about the problem of growing vaccines in cells14 that may have oncogenes or cancer causing viruses in them, and what research FDA is trying to do to deal with this. So, the FDA acknowledges this serious potential risk from some vaccines… on the FDA website.”

Level 3 and 4 Biosafety Labs Pose Severe Risk to Human Health
The map below was published in the journal Science15 in 2007 and reprinted in Asia Times16 April 6, 2020, showing the proliferation of high-containment labs in the U.S. A USA Today investigation published in 2015 put the number of BSL 3 and 4 labs in the U.S. around 200,17 and Boyle estimates there are about 400 worldwide.18



In closing, Nass points out there have been many accidental leaks from BSL 3 and 4 labs, causing many deaths. Improperly inactivated vaccines have also claimed many lives.

“Thirty years ago when I was writing papers about the potential risks of biological defense research we had a lot less biological defense research going on. And the risks were significant. Everybody agrees that these labs leak.

I told you there were maybe 600 or more BSL-3s in the United States19 and hundreds of others around the world. There are about 200 reports of lab accidents, mostly exposures of lab personnel to pathogens, in the high-containment labs in the U.S., yearly.20

So, let me actually give you a few examples from a paper by Martin Furmanski, a physician who wrote about lab escapes.21

He pointed out a lab in England. There were several smallpox escapes from that lab to a room below. Two people died. After the second escape happened, I think it was around 1980, the lab director killed himself.

There were huge outbreaks of Venezuelan equine encephalitis. Thousands and thousands of animals and people [were affected] in Latin America, and it turned out to be due to improperly inactivated vaccines. So, the disease they were vaccinating all these livestock for was actually giving them the disease and giving it to humans also. You don't hear about that.

He points out that the worldwide 1977 H1N1 outbreak … started in China or Russia, probably from long-frozen virus that had been thawed, because that particular strain, H1N1, had not circulated in the world for 21 years, and genetically it looked almost identical to the strains that were around in the late '40s and 1950s, early '50s. So that worldwide 1977 flu pandemic was due to a lab escape.

And Furmanski postulates that the reason the virus was thawed was to do vaccine research because of the fear, in the U.S. in 1976-77, that a deadly swine influenza pandemic might occur … leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy. But fortunately, the virus that circulated was much less deadly than the feared 1918 strain.

[The U.S. government] began a swine flu vaccine program in 1976 after one soldier died at Fort Dix in 1976 of a unique swine flu strain. Frightened that a scenario like the 1918 flu pandemic might emerge, the United States public health agencies got together with the U.S. vaccine manufacturers to create, very rapidly, a swine flu vaccine to save the United States. It was an abysmal failure.

As things progressed, the manufacturers refused to produce vaccine unless the government gave them a waiver of liability for possible vaccine injuries. This they received.

First of all, there was no outbreak. The virus had stopped circulating and disappeared. Had the people at the CDC and HHS been honest with the American public, they would have told them, ‘Hey, there's no outbreak. We're just going to cancel the vaccine program. We don't need it.’ But the vaccine program had developed a life of its own.

Harvey Fineberg co-authored a wonderful book [‘The Swine Flu Affair: Decision-Making on a Slippery Slope’22,23] about the vaccine program, for the National Academy of Sciences, which the subsequent DHHS (then HEW) Secretary, Joseph Califano, had requested.

I recommend it. It’s a fabulous read because Fineberg was working under the Secretary of Health and Human Services, so he was able to interview everybody involved in government who had been part of the program.

He tells you the inside story of what went on during that year. All the infighting, all the different reasons why a vaccine was made for a disease that didn't exist. And then, [after the vaccine was] given to 45 million Americans, [it was] found to cause Guillain-Barre syndrome, about 30 people died and 4,000 people applied for damages from the federal government.

This was the first time the government gave a liability waiver to vaccine manufacturers. And I think it was what gave them the idea that in the future they could get liability waivers for all their vaccines.” "

You can download a free PDF copy of “The Swine Flu Affair” on The National Academies of Sciences website.24 You can also learn more about the failed 1977 swine flu vaccination campaign in “How Does COVID-19 Compare to Spanish Flu?"Sources and References
1 Health Impact News January 17, 2020
2 Medline Plus, Informed Consent
3 Anthrax Epizootic in Zimbabwe, 1978-1980: Due to Deliberate Spread? Meryl Nass, MD (PDF)
4 The Lancet March 7, 2020; 395(10226): E42-E43
5 Anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com March 26, 2020
6 Anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com April 2, 2020
7 Washington Post January 24, 2019
8 Medium April 22, 2020
9 The Journal of Infectious Diseases May 1, 2016; 213(9): 1364-1369
10 Moderna Press Release May 12, 2020
11 MedCityNews May 12, 2020
12 FDA.gov Investigating Viruses in Cells Used to Make Vaccines
13 FDA.gov Investigating Viruses in Cells Used to Make Vaccines (Archived)
14 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010, Guidance for Industry
15 Science September 28, 2007; 317(5846): 1852-1854
16 Asia Times April 6, 2020
17 USA Today May 28, 2015
18 Scoop February 26, 2020
19 Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 Feb 1; 12(1): 1–7
20 CDC, 2018 Annual Report of the Federal Select Agent Program
21 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists March 31, 2014
22 Amazon, The Swine Flu Affair
23, 24 The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine, The Swine Flu Affair (Free PDF Download)

[onawah]

Forced covid 19 shots- We're not gonna take it-new video
From Autism Action Network's email update
6/18/20

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=x3wac_tlezM

Mandatory Covid Vaccines - Protest and Rally. Albany NY - June 13, 2020
2,171 views•Jun 17, 2020
FAIR Autism Media
142 subscribers
On June 13, 2020 advocates and dozens of organizations held a rally and protested the position of New York States largest legal organization, the New York State Bar Association, and their position supporting mandatory covid vaccines, regardless of objections. Advocates and organizations included constitutional and medical freedom organizations, religoius leaders, scientists and medical doctors. Advocates started at the New York State Bar Association and marched past the New York State Court of Appeals, Albany City Hall, Vaccine maker Merck and arrived at the Governors Mansion and home of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo.

"Early on in the covid 19 follies New York Governor, and Presidential wannabe, Andrew Cuomo volunteered the population of New York as guinea pigs for any vaccine slapped together by the power-that-be. He wants to force the whole population to get it. But like all autocrats, he wants the law on his side, so his buddies at the New York State Bar Association cooked up a report that claims the Governor has the legal authority to order everybody in the state to undergo an experimental medical procedure.

And many Governor's across the US will try the exact same thing in your state. They have received their marching orders and they are expected to deliver.

But the people of New York wouldn't have it. We fought. We called. We protested in front of the Bar Association headquarters, and they backed off.

Michael Smith of FAIR Autism Media made a video of our protest last Saturday that you can see here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3wac_tlezM

Get ready, this is coming your way.

With Kevin Barry, Rev. David Camp, Jr., Cara Castronuova, Jina Gentry, John Gilmore, Mary Holland, Rev. Dr. Aaron Lewis, Brooke Jordan, Rita Palma, Dr. Larry Palevsky, Dr. Greg Wollen.

Please share this message with friends and family, and share on social media while we still can."

[onawah]

SETTING THE BAR ON MANDATORY VACCINATION
Jun 21, 2020
The HighWire with Del Bigtree
185K subscribers

"Last month the NY State Bar Association released a report which included a recommendation to mandate the COVID-19 vaccine for all New Yorkers. Last weekend, delegates from NYSBA held a meeting to vote on endorsing the report that would help Gov. Cuomo push a mandate on a vaccine that isn’t even on the market yet. Hundreds of New Yorkers, including many doctors & lawyers, took to the streets and rallied from the Governor's mansion to the Bar Association. The HighWire was there."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=g7eABaXrSMM

[onawah]

Let’s fact-check Reuters: they say DNA vaccines don’t change your genetic makeup—true or false?
by Jon Rappoport
June 23, 2020
(UNDERLINED TEXT MY EMPHASIS)
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...ge-your-genes/

"As my readers know, I’ve been reporting on new types of technology that could be used in a coming COVID-19 vaccine—and warning about the consequences.

One such technology is: DNA vaccines. They would alter recipients’ genetic makeup permanently.

But Reuters has seen fit to claim: “A future COVID-19 [DNA] vaccine will not genetically modify humans.” This comes from their “fact-check team” — May 18, 2020: “False claim: A COVID-19 vaccine will genetically modify humans.”

To reach this conclusion, Reuters cites two people: “Mark Lynas, a visiting fellow at Cornell University’s Alliance for Science group”, and “Dr. Paul McCray, Professor of Pediatrics, Microbiology, and Internal Medicine at the University of Iowa.”

I have cited the New York Times, March 10, 2015, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” Here are quotes from the Times article:

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was five years ago.]

“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

[Here is the punch line] “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

So it’s a battle of the experts. The two men Reuters cited, versus the Times’ David Baltimore.

I don’t hold up the scientific work of any of these men for great acclaim. I’m only interested in which man knows whether a DNA vaccine would permanently alter the genetic makeup of every recipient’s DNA.

David Baltimore is a Nobel Laureate (1975, in Physiology/Medicine), and the past president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (1997-2006). He’s one of the most famous scientists in the world.

I’m betting Reuters would happily trade their unknown experts for Baltimore, if he would side with their claim. Perhaps they’ll now approach him, and perhaps he’ll change his mind. But the NY Times has him on the record, in 2015, admitting that DNA vaccines do alter genetic makeup.

World famous mainstream experts don’t readily admit this sort of thing out in the open, unless they’re stating the obvious.

The verdict on the Reuters fact-check team? Fact-checkers checked the wrong box.

Final point for the moment: Researchers are fond of saying their genetic technologies are quite safe. This a bald-faced lie. Claiming, for example, that a DNA COVID vaccine would alter humans’ genetic makeup in entirely predictable and harmless ways is like saying a car without brakes, doing a hundred miles an hour, set loose on a highway during rush hour, would create no damage whatsoever.

SOURCES:

reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-covid-19-vaccine-modify/false-claim-a-covid-19-vaccine-will-genetically-modify-humans-idUSKBN22U2BZ

nytimes.com/2015/03/10/health/protection-without-a-vaccine.html

blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/dna/ "

[onawah]

The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine
6/25/20
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...not-a-vaccine/
Guest Commentary by Catherine Austin Fitts, Solari Report

(MANY HYPERLINKS IN THIS AWESOME ARTICLE FROM C.A. FITTS. ALSO POSTED HERE: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1362842 )

"I am not a scientist. I am not a doctor. I am not a biotech engineer. I am not an attorney. However, I read, listen, appreciate, and try to understand those who are.

I was an investment banker until politics made it impossible to continue to practice my art. I was trained as a portfolio strategist—so I map my world by watching the financial flows and allocation of resources. I was also trained as a conspiracy generator and foot soldier—conspiracies being the fundamental organizing principle of how things get done in our world. It was not until I left the establishment that I learned that those not in the club had been trained to disparage and avoid conspiracies—a clever trick that sabotages their efforts to gather power.

My response to living at war with agencies of the U.S. government for a time was to answer the questions of people who were sufficiently courageous and curious to solicit my opinion. Over many years, that response transformed into two businesses. One was The Solari Report, which continues to grow as a global intelligence network—we seek to help each other understand and navigate what is happening and contribute to positive outcomes. The other was serving as an investment advisor to individuals and families through Solari Investment Advisory Services. After ten years, I converted that business to doing an ESG screen. What those who use it want—that is not otherwise readily available in the retail market—is a screen that reflects knowledge of financial and political corruption. Tracking the metastasizing corruption is an art, not a science.

Many of my clients and their children had been devastated and drained by health care failures and corruption—and the most common catalyst for this devastation was vaccine death and injury.
When you help a family with their finances, it is imperative to understand all their risk issues. Their financial success depends on successful mitigation of all the risks—whether financial or non-financial—that they encounter in their daily lives. Non-financial risks can have a major impact on the allocation of family resources, including attention, time, assets, and money.

Many of my clients and their children had been devastated and drained by health care failures and corruption—and the most common catalyst for this devastation was vaccine death and injury. After their lengthy and horrendous experiences with the health care establishment, they would invariably ask, “If the corruption is this bad in medicine, food, and health, what is going on in the financial world?” Chilled by the thought, they would search out a financial professional who was schooled in U.S. government and financial corruption. And they would find me.

The result of this flow of bright, educated people blessed with the resources to pay for my time was that, for ten years, I got quite an education about the disabilities and death inflicted on our children by what I now call “the great poisoning.” I had the opportunity to repeatedly price out the human damage to all concerned—not just the affected children but their parents, siblings, and future generations—mapping the financial costs of vaccine injury again and again and again. These cases were not as unusual as you might expect. Studies indicate that 54% of American children have one or more chronic diseases. Doctors who I trust tell me that number is actually much higher, as many children and their families cannot afford the care and testing necessary to properly diagnose what ails them.

One of the mothers featured in VAXXED—a must-watch documentary for any awake citizen, as is its sequel VAXXED II: The People’s Truth—estimated that a heavily autistic child would cost present value $5MM to raise and care for over a lifetime. When my clients who were grandparents insisted that they would not interfere with their children’s vaccine choices because it was “none of their business,” I would say, “Really? Who has the $5MM? You or your kids? When your kids need the $5MM to raise their vaccine-injured child, are you going to refuse them? You are the banker, and it is your money that is at risk here, so it is your business. Do you want to spend that $5MM on growing a strong family through the generations or on managing a disabled child who did not have to be disabled?” Often, that $5MM in expenditures also translates into divorce, depression, and lost opportunities for siblings.

My clients helped me find the best resources—books, documentaries, articles—on vaccines. You will find many of them linked or reviewed at The Solari Report, including in our Library.

Why . . .
Of all the questions that I had, the one that I spent the most time researching and thinking about was why. Why was the medical establishment intentionally poisoning generations of children? Many of the writers who researched and wrote about vaccine injury and death assumed it was an aberration—resulting from the orthodoxy of a medical establishment that could not face or deal with its mistakes and liabilities. That never made sense to me. Writings by Forrest Maready, Jon Rappoport, Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Arthur Firstenberg have helped me understand the role of vaccines in the con man trick of saving money for insurance companies and the legally liable.

Here is one example of how the trick may play out. A toxin creates a disease. The toxin might be pesticides or industrial pollution or wireless technology radiation. The toxin damages millions of people and their communities. Companies or their insurance provider may be liable for civil or criminal violations. Then a virus is blamed. A “cure” is found in a “vaccine.” The pesticide or other toxic exposure is halted just as the vaccine is introduced, and presto, the sickness goes away. The vaccine is declared a success, and the inventor is declared a hero. A potential financial catastrophe has been converted to a profit, including for investors and pension funds. As a portfolio strategist, I admit it has been a brilliant trick and likely has protected the insurance industry from the bankrupting losses it would experience if it had to fairly compensate the people and families destroyed.

Thanks to the work of Robert Kennedy and Mary Holland of Children’s Health Defense, I now understand the enormous profits generated by so-called “vaccines” subsequent to the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the creation of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program—a federal no-fault mechanism for compensating vaccine-related injuries or deaths by establishing a claim procedure involving the United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters. Call a drug or biotech cocktail a “vaccine,” and pharmaceutical and biotech companies are free from any liabilities—the taxpayer pays. Unfortunately, this system has become an open invitation to make billions from “injectibles,” particularly where government regulations and laws can be used to create a guaranteed market through mandates. As government agencies and legislators as well as the corporate media have developed various schemes to participate in the billions of profits, significant conflicts of interest have resulted.

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA or the PREP Act) became law in 2005, adding to corporate freedoms from liability. The Act “is a controversial tort liability shield intended to protect vaccine manufacturers from financial risk in the event of a declared public health emergency. The act specifically affords to drug makers immunity from potential financial liability for clinical trials of . . . vaccine at the discretion of the Executive branch of government. PREPA strengthens and consolidates the oversight of litigation against pharmaceutical companies under the purview of the secretary of Health and Human Services.” (~ Wikipedia)

The engineering of epidemics
Over time, this has evolved to the engineering of epidemics—the medical version of false flags. In theory, these can be “psyops” or events engineered with chemical warfare, biowarfare, or wireless technology. If this sounds strange, dive into all the writings of the “Targeted Individuals.”

I learned about this first-hand when I was litigating with the Department of Justice and was experiencing significant physical harassment. I tried to hire several security firms; they would check my references and then decline the work, saying it was too dangerous. The last one took pity and warned me not to worry about electronic weaponry, letting me know that my main problem would be low-grade biowarfare. This biowarfare expert predicted that the opposing team would drill holes in the wall of my house and inject the “invisible enemy.” Sure enough, that is exactly what happened. I sold my house and left town. That journey began a long process of learning how poisoning and nonlethal weapons are used—whether to move people out of rent-controlled apartments, sicken the elderly to move them to more expensive government-subsidized housing, gangstalk political or business targets, or weaken or kill litigants—and the list goes on. Poisoning turned out to be a much more common tactic in the game of political and economic warfare in America than I had previously understood.

Americans increasingly looked like a people struggling with high loads of heavy metals toxicity.
After I finished my litigation, I spent several years detoxing from heavy metal toxicity—including from lead, arsenic, and aluminum. As I drove around America, I realized it was not just me. Americans increasingly looked like a people struggling with high loads of heavy metals toxicity. In the process of significantly decreasing my unusually high levels of heavy metals, I learned what a difference the toxic load had made to my outlook, my energy, and my ability to handle complex information.

This brings me to the question of what exactly a vaccine is and what exactly is in the concoctions being injected into people today as well as the witches’ brews currently under development.

Aborted fetal tissue, animal tissue, aluminum, mercury, genetically altered materials—and what else?
What, exactly, is a vaccine?
In 2017, Italian researchers reviewed the ingredients of 44 types of so-called “vaccines.” They discovered heavy metal debris and biological contamination in every human vaccine they tested. The researchers stated, “The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us.” They then drew the obvious conclusion, namely, that because the micro- and nanocontaminants were “neither biocompatible nor biodegradable,” they were “biopersistent” and could cause inflammatory effects right away—or later.

Aborted fetal tissue, animal tissue, aluminum, mercury, genetically altered materials—and what else?

Whatever the ingredients of vaccines have been to date, nothing is more bizarre and unsettling than the proposals of what might be included in them in the future. Strategies—already well-funded and well on the way—include brain-machine interface nanotechnology, digital identity tracking devices, and technology with an expiration date that can be managed and turned off remotely. One report indicates that the Danish government and U.S. Navy had been paying a tech company in Denmark to make an injectible chip that would be compatible with one of the leading cryptocurrencies.

I was recently reading Mary Holland’s excellent 2012 review of U.S. vaccine court decisions (“Compulsory vaccination, the Constitution, and the hepatitis B mandate for infants and young children,” Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics) and I froze and thought, “Why are we calling the injectibles that Bill Gates and his colleagues are promoting ‘vaccines’? Are they really vaccines?”

Surveillance capitalism is underway
Most people are familiar with how Bill Gates made and kept his fortune. He acquired an operating system that was loaded into your computer. It was widely rumored that the U.S. intelligence agencies had a back door. The simultaneous and sudden explosion of computer viruses then made it necessary to regularly update your operating system, allowing Gates and his associates to regularly add whatever they wanted into your software. One of my more knowledgeable software developers once said to me in the 1990s—when Microsoft really took off—”Microsoft makes really sh***y software.” But of course, the software was not really their business. Their business was accessing and aggregating all of your data. Surveillance capitalism was underway.

The Department of Justice launched an antitrust case against Microsoft in 1998, just as the $21 trillion started to disappear from the U.S. government—no doubt with the help of specially designed software and IT systems. During the settlement negotiations that permitted Gates to keep his fortune, he started the Gates Foundation and his new philanthropy career. I laughed the other day when my tweet of one of Robert Kennedy Jr.’s articles from Children’s Health Defense—describing the gruesome technology Gates is hoping to roll out through “injectibles”—inspired a response: “Well, I guess he is finally fulfilling his side of his antitrust settlement.”

If you look at what is being created and proposed in the way of injectibles, it looks to me like these technological developments are organized around several potential goals.

The first and most important goal is the replacement of the existing U.S. dollar currency system used by the general population with a digital transaction system that can be combined with digital identification and tracking. The goal is to end currencies as we know them and replace them with an embedded credit card system that can be integrated with various forms of control, potentially including mind control. “De-dollarization” is threatening the dollar global reserve system. The M1 and M2 money supply have increased in the double digits over the last year as a result of a new round of quantitative easing by the Fed. The reason we have not entered into hyperinflation is because of the dramatic drop in money velocity occasioned by converting Covid-19 into an engineered shutdown of significant economic activity and the bankrupting of millions of small and medium-sized businesses. The managers of the dollar system are under urgent pressure to use new technology to centralize economic flows and preserve their control of the financial system.

Just as Gates installed an operating system in our computers, now the vision is to install an operating system in our bodies and use “viruses” to mandate an initial installation followed by regular updates.

A colleague once told me how Webster’s Dictionary came about. Webster said that the way the evildoers would change the Constitution was not by amending it but by changing the definitions.
A legal sneak attack
Now I appreciate why Gates and his colleagues want to call these technologies “vaccines.” If they can persuade the body politic that injectible credit cards or injectible surveillance trackers or injectable brain-machine interface nanotechnologies are “vaccines,” then they can enjoy the protection of a century or more of legal decisions and laws that support their efforts to mandate what they want to do. As well, they can insist that U.S. taxpayers fund, through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the damages for which they would otherwise be liable as a result of their experiments—and violations of the Nuremberg Code and numerous civil and criminal laws—on the general population. The scheme is quite clever. Get the general population to go along with defining their new injectible high-tech concoctions as “vaccines,” and they can slip them right into the vaccine pipeline. No need to worry about the disease and death that will result from something this unnatural delivered this quickly. The freedom from liability guaranteed by the PREP Act through the declaration of an emergency—and the ability to keep the emergency going through contact tracing—can protect them from liability for thousands if not millions of deaths and disabilities likely to follow such human experimentation. Ideally, they can just blame the deaths on a virus.

A colleague once told me how Webster’s Dictionary came about. Webster said that the way the evildoers would change the Constitution was not by amending it but by changing the definitions—a legal sneak attack.

I believe that Gates and the pharma and biotech industries are literally reaching to create a global control grid by installing digital interface components and hooking us up to Microsoft’s new $10 billion JEDI cloud at the Department of Defense as well as Amazon’s multibillion cloud contract for the CIA that is shared with all U.S. intelligence agencies. Why do you think President Trump has the military organizing to stockpile syringes for vaccines? It is likely because the military is installing the roaming operating system for integration into their cloud. Remember—the winner in the AI superpower race is the AI system with access to the most data. Accessing your body and my body on a 24/7 basis generates a lot of data. If the Chinese do it, the Americans will want to do it, too. In fact, the rollout of human “operating systems” may be one of the reasons why the competition around Huawei and 5G telecommunications has become so fractious. As Frank Clegg, former President of Microsoft Canada has warned us, 5G was developed by the Israelis for crowd control.

In the face of global “de-dollarization,” this is how the dollar syndicate can assert the central control it needs to maintain and extend its global reserve currency financial power. This includes protecting its leadership from the civil and criminal liability related to explosive levels of financial and health care fraud in recent decades.

We need to stop allowing these concoctions to be referred to by a word that the courts and the general population define and treat as medicine and protect from legal and financial liability.
Which brings me back to you and me. Why are we calling these formulations “vaccines”? If I understand the history of case law, vaccines, in legal terms, are medicine. Intentional heavy metal poisoning is not medicine. Injectible surveillance components are not medicine. Injectible credit cards are not medicine. An injectible brain-machine interface is not a medicine. Legal and financial immunity for insurance companies does not create human immunity from disease.

We need to stop allowing these concoctions to be referred to by a word that the courts and the general population define and treat as medicine and protect from legal and financial liability.

The perpetrators of this fraud are trying a very neat trick—one that will help them go much faster and cancel out a lot of risk—at our expense. I understand why they are doing it.

What I don’t understand is why we are helping them. Why are we acquiescing in calling these bizarre and deeply dangerous concoctions “vaccines”? Whatever they are, they are not medicine.

So, what shall our naming convention be? What name shall we give to the relevant poisons, neurologically damaging metals, and digital shackles?

Whatever we call them, I know one thing. THEY ARE NOT MEDICINE, WHICH MEANS THEY SURE ARE NOT VACCINES."



Solari Report Interviews:
Central Bank Stimulus: Quantitative Easing 5.0 with John Titus
Deep State Tactics 101 Part III

Solari Special Reports:
VAXXED II: The People’s Truth with Polly Tommey
Special Solari Report: Vaccine Mandates with Mary Holland, J.D

Solari Book Reviews:
The Autism Vaccine by Forrest Maready
unvaccinated by Forrest Maready
Crooked: Man-Made Disease Explained by Forrest Maready

Great Articles & Videos:
Childrens Health Defense: COVID-19: The Spearpoint for Rolling Out a “New Era” of High-Risk, Genetically Engineered Vaccines
Compulsory Vaccination, the Constitution, and the Hepatitis B Mandate for Infants and Young Children by Mary Holland
Hero of the Week: March 12, 2020 – Former President Of Microsoft Canada, Frank Clegg
Corbett Report: Bill Gates x 5
Collection Cup: Building a List of Best Sources on Vaccine Risks

Related reading:
Children’s Health Defense
VAXXED
VAXXED II: The People’s Truth
Jon Rappoport at nomorefakenews.com

[onawah]

1986: The Act premiers today
Children's Health Defense Announcing the movie you won’t want to miss!
<team@childrenshealthdefense.org> via salsalabs.org
Children's Health Defense <team@childrenshealthdefense.org>
!

"For thousands of parents with vaccine-injured children, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) conjures up sadness, betrayal of trust, disappointment and anger. But what does the rest of the public think? Most people don’t even realize the NCVIA exists! They are still under the rosy misconception that vaccines are safe and effective and that our legislators and public health officials would never do anything that would knowingly hurt America’s children.

We need to educate them. That is where 1986: The Act comes in.

Dr. Andy Wakefield, the filmmaker who brought us Vaxxed, now brings us 1986: The Act, a story of how the powerful force of a mother's intuition leads down the rabbit hole of lies and corruption surrounding the NCVIA. 1986: The Act forges head on into the important conversation and controversy surrounding this one-sided health policy that gave vaccine makers a multi-billion-dollar gift (so far) and immunity from prosecution.

Viewers will learn how “The Act” turned fairness and the US court system on its head. Touted at the time as a helpful, non-adversarial alternative to long, protracted court battles, it actually turned into anything but; where the vaccine- injured linger without help, parents rack up medical bills and wait years for monetary relief which seldom comes, and government lawyers take home fat paychecks for their efforts against families. This corrupt system ensures that consumers pay the tab and vaccine manufacturers laugh all the way to the bank.

If you are vaccine-injured, share the film with your friends and family.
If you have a vaccine-injured child, share it with other young parents who don’t know the dire, unintended consequences of vaccination.
If you care about humanity and justice, share it with your local, state and federal representatives, many of whom, incredibly enough, don’t know about “The Act” either and will be shocked to find out!
As advocates, we find ourselves at a crucial time for health freedom. We must use all the tools we have to educate others in our communities, including our lawmakers. The change starts with us.

Watch 1986: The Act now! Buy tickets and share with those you love. The film is available to stream on demand. http://1986theact.com/?eType=EmailBl...9-184677460144

Sincerely,

The Children’s Health Defense Team"

P.S. Don’t miss today’s Instagram interview as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. talks with Dr. Andy Wakefield about his new film. https://www.instagram.com/robertfkennedyjr/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a1270632-2016-42d1-bbe9-184677460144"

Trailer here: https://7thchakrafilms.com/watch-soon

[onawah]

Del Bigtree giving all the relevant facts about the relation of the US rate of declining health to vaccines, which have never been tested or proven safe, in a nutshell.
(Not sure where this is taking place, but I will post it if I find out.)

https://www.facebook.com/jamie.m.jua...336379219/?t=9

[onawah]

Another Doctor Exposed Bill Gates Wicked Agenda On Depopulation of the World
262,919 views•Jul 16, 2020
Viable Tv

(This doctor from Atlanta gets very passionate and enthused about news from Del Bigtree, RFKennedy Jr. and Dr. Andrew Wakefield and their case against the WHO and Bill Gates Fdn.)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ka5wWJwIJ10

[onawah]

Kennedy & Dershowitz—Great Vaccine Debate
(Watch the debate premiere on Valuetainment Thursday 7/23/2020 at 7:45am CT / 8:45am ET. Go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfnJ...d-047f49637f01 to register)


"Don’t miss this historic debate between Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.

With the current COVID crisis dominating headlines at national and local levels, the topic of vaccines is now front and center. The two attorneys will debate a range of issues including:

Vaccine mandates;
The PREP Act;
The lack of vaccine safety studies;
Jacobson vs. Massachusetts;
HHS’s failure to act on provisions of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act;
Are compulsory vaccines even legal?
Should any government be able to force medical procedures on families?
Tune in tomorrow July 23, 2020 8:45 a.m. EST / 7:45 a.m. CST / 5:45 a.m. PST for insightful discussions on these questions and more."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=IfnJi7yLKgE

Valuetainment
2.43M subscribers

Heated vaccine debate between Robert Kennedy Jr. and Alan Dershowitz moderated by Patrick Bet-David. Watch the debate premiere on Valuetainment Thursday 7/23/2020 at 7:45am CT / 8:45am ET.

About the Guests:

(Anti Vaccine) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. serves as President of Waterkeeper Alliance, as well as Founder, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Legal Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and of counsel to Morgan & Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice.

Mr. Kennedy is an esteemed author, with a long list of published books including the New York Times’ bestseller, “Crimes Against Nature.” Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment and children’s health stems from a litany of successful legal actions. He received recognition for his role in the landmark victory against Monsanto last year, as well as in the DuPont Case that inspired the movie "Dark Waters" (2019).

Order his latest book: American Values https://amzn.to/3f9fdL7
- - - - -
(Pro Vaccine) Professor Alan M. Dershowitz is Brooklyn native who has been called “the nation’s most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer” and one of its “most distinguished defenders of individual rights,” “the best-known criminal lawyer in the world,” “the top lawyer of last resort,” “America’s most public Jewish defender” and “Israel’s single most visible defender – the Jewish state’s lead attorney in the court of public opinion.” He is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Dershowitz, a graduate of Brooklyn College and Yale Law School, joined the Harvard Law School faculty at age 25 after clerking for Judge David Bazelon and Justice Arthur Goldberg.

Order his Latest Book: Guilt by Accusation https://amzn.to/2ZNAUKX
- - - - -
(Moderator) Patrick Bet-David - During the Iranian Revolution of 1978, Patrick's family had to escape to survive and ended up living at a refugee camp in Erlangen, Germany. At 12 years old Patrick found himself collecting cans & beer bottles to raise money that could help his family and get him a Nintendo. These childhood experiences had a major impact on his perspective of freedom, hard work and entrepreneurship. Today, he is CEO of PHP Agency, Inc. a financial services company with over 15,000 agents in 49 states and Puerto Rico and an active YouTube creator commonly known for his investigative journalistic approach to interviews and unorthodox business teachings.
- - - -
(Channel) Valuetainment is an emerging media network for entrepreneurs and people from all walks of life created by Serial Entrepreneur, Patrick Bet-David. Valuetainment is referred to as the best channel for entrepreneurs with weekly How To's, Motivation, current events and interviews consisting of unique individuals from all walks of life.

Subscribe to the channel for weekly videos" http://bit.ly/2aPEwD4

[greybeard]

onawah I forward quite a few of your posts on to friends and relatives.
The bold print helps me to read these.
Many thanks
Chris

[Delight]

"What I don’t understand is why we are helping them. Why are we acquiescing in calling these bizarre and deeply dangerous concoctions “vaccines”? Whatever they are, they are not medicine.

So, what shall our naming convention be? What name shall we give to the relevant poisons, neurological damaging metals and digital shackles?"
Catherine Austin Fitts

The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine
Catherine Austin Fitts, The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine
July 29, 2020

I am not a scientist. I am not a doctor. I am not a biotech engineer. I am not an attorney. However, I read, listen, appreciate and try to understand those who are.

I was an investment banker until politics made it impossible to continue to practice my art. I was trained as a portfolio strategist—so I map my world by watching the financial flows and allocation of resources. I was also trained as a conspiracy generator and foot soldier—conspiracies being the fundamental organizing principle of how things get done in our world. It was not until I left the establishment that I learned that those not in the club had been trained to disparage and avoid conspiracies—a clever trick that sabotages their efforts to gather power.

My response to living at war with agencies of the U.S. government for a time was to answer the questions of people who were sufficiently courageous and curious to solicit my opinion. Over many years, that response transformed into two businesses. One was The Solari Report, which continues to grow as a global intelligence network – we seek to help each other understand what is happening, to navigate and contribute to positive outcomes. The other was serving as an investment advisor to individuals and families through Solari Investment Advisory Services. After ten years, I converted that business to doing an ESG screen. What those who use it want—that is not otherwise readily available in the retail market—is a screen that reflects knowledge of financial and political corruption. Tracking the metastasizing corruption, it’s an art, not a science.

When you help a family with their finances, it is imperative to understand all their risk issues. Their financial success depends on successful mitigation of all risk – whether financial or non-financial – they encounter in their daily lives. All non-financial risks impact the allocation of family resources – attention, time, assets and money.

Many of my clients and their children had been devastated and drained by health care failures and corruption–and the most common catalyst for this devastation was vaccine death and injury. After their lengthy and horrendous experiences with the health care establishment, they would invariably ask, “If the corruption is this bad in medicine, food and health, what is going on in the financial world?” Chilled by the thought, they would search out a financial professional who was schooled in U.S. government and financial corruption. And they would find me.

The result of this flow of bright, educated people blessed with the resources to pay for my time was that, for ten years, I got quite an education about the disabilities and death inflicted on our children by what I now call “the great poisoning.” As a result, I had the opportunity to repeatedly price out the human damage to all concerned–not just the affected children but their parents, siblings and future generations—mapping the financial costs of vaccine injury again and again and again. These cases were not as unusual as you might expect. Currently 54% of American children have one or more chronic diseases. Doctors that I trust assure me the number is much higher as many children and their families can not afford the care and testing necessary to properly diagnose what ails them.

One of the mothers featured in VAXXED—a must-watch documentary for any awake citizen, as is its sequel VAXXED II: The People’s Truth—estimated that a heavily autistic child would cost present value $5MM to raise and care for over a lifetime. When my clients who were grandparents insisted that they would not interfere with their children’s vaccine choices because it was “none of their business,” I would say, “Really? Who has the $5MM? You or your kids? When your kids need the $5MM to raise their vaccine-injured child, are you going to refuse them? You are the banker, and it is your money that is at risk here, so it is your business. Do you want to spend that $5MM on growing a strong family through the generations or on managing a disabled child who did not have to be disabled?” Often, that $5MM in expenditures also translates into divorce, depression and lost opportunities for siblings.

My clients helped me find the best resources—books, documentaries, articles—on vaccines. You will find many of them linked or reviewed at The Solari Report, including in our Library.

Of all the questions that I had, the one that I spent the most time researching and thinking about was why. Why was the medical establishment intentionally poisoning generations of children? Many of the writers who researched and wrote about vaccine injury and death assumed it was a mistake—resulting from the orthodoxy of a medical establishment that could not face or deal with its mistakes and liabilities. That never made sense to me. Writings by Forrest Maready, Jon Rappoport, Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Arthur Firstenberg have helped me understand the role of vaccines in the con man trick of saving money for insurance companies and the legally liable.

Here is one example of how the trick may play out. A toxin creates a disease. The toxin might be pesticides or industrial pollution or wireless technology radiation. The toxin damages millions of people and their communities. Companies or their insurance provider may be liable for civil or criminal violations. A virus is blamed. A “cure” is found in a “vaccine.” The pesticide or other toxic exposure is halted just as the vaccine is introduced, and presto, the sickness goes away. The vaccine is declared a success, and the inventor is declared a hero. A potential financial catastrophe has been converted to a profit, including for investors and pension funds. As a portfolio strategist, I admit it has been a brilliant trick and likely has protected the insurance industry from the bankrupting losses it would experience if it had to fairly compensate the people and families destroyed.

Thanks to the work of Robert Kennedy and Mary Holland of Childrens Health Defense, I now understand the enormous profits generated by so-called “vaccines” subsequent to the passage of The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the creation of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program – a federal no-fault mechanism for compensating vaccine-related injuries or death by establishing a claim procedure involving the United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters. Call a drug or biotech cocktail a “vaccine” and pharmecutical and biotech companies are free from any liabilities – the taxpayer pays. Unfortunately, this system has become an open invitation to make billions from “injectibles” particularly where government regulations and laws can be used to create a market through mandates. Unfortunately, various schemes have developed for government agencies and legislators as well as corporate media to participate in the billions of profits – resulting in significant conflicts of interest.

Facts Vs. Fake. A Worldwide Lockdown of Everything
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act became law in 2005, adding to corporate freedoms from liability. The Act “is a controversial tort liability shield intended to protect vaccine manufacturers from financial risk in the event of a declared public health emergency. The act specifically affords to drug makers immunity from potential financial liability for clinical trials of avian influenza vaccine at the discretion of the Executive branch of government. PREPA strengthens and consolidates the oversight of litigation against pharmaceutical companies under the purview of the secretary of Health and Human Services (~ Wikipedia.)”

Over time, this has evolved to the engineering of epidemics—the medical version of false flags. In theory, these can be “psyops” or events engineered with chemical warfare, biowarfare, or wireless technology. If this sounds bizarre, dive into all the writings of the “Targeted Individuals.”

I learned about this first-hand when I was litigating with the Department of Justice and was experiencing significant physical harassment. I tried to hire several security firms; they would check my references and then decline the work, saying it was too dangerous. The last one took pity and warned me not to worry about electronic weaponry, letting me know that my main problem would be low-grade biowarfare. This biowarfare expert predicted that the opposing team would drill holes in the wall of my house and inject the “invisible enemy.” Sure enough, that is exactly what happened. I sold my house and left town. That journey began a long process of learning how poisoning and nonlethal weapons are used—whether to move people out of rent-controlled apartments, sicken the elderly to move them to more expensive government subsidized housing, gangstalk political or business targets, or weaken or kill litigants—and the list goes on. Poisoning turned out to be a much more common tactic in the game of political and economic warfare in America than I had previously understood.

After I finished my litigation, I spent several years detoxing from heavy metal toxicity – including of lead, arsenic, and aluminum. As I drove around America, I realized it was not just me. Americans increasingly looked like a people struggling with high loads of heavy metals toxicity. In the process of significantly decreasing my unusually high levels of heavy metals, I learned what a difference the toxic load had made to my outlook, my energy, and my ability to handle complex information.

This brings me to the question of what exactly a vaccine is and what exactly is in the concoctions being injected into people today as well as the witches brews currently under development.

In 2017, Italian researchers reviewed the ingredients of 44 types of so-called “vaccines.” They discovered heavy metal debris and biological contamination in every human vaccine they tested. The researchers stated, “The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us.” They then drew the obvious conclusion, namely, that because the micro- and nanocontaminants were “neither biocompatible nor biodegradable,” they were “biopersistent” and could cause inflammatory effects right away—or later (see this)

Aborted fetal tissue, animal tissue, aluminum, mercury, genetically altered materials—and what else?

Whatever the ingredients of vaccines have been to date, nothing is more bizarre than the proposals of what might be included in them in the future. Strategies—already well-funded and well on the way—include brain-machine interface nanotechnology, digital identity tracking devices, and technology with an expiration date that can be managed and turned off remotely. One report indicated that the Danish government and US Navy had been paying one tech company in Denmark to make an injectible chip that would be compatible with one of the leading cryptocurrencies.

I was recently reading Mary Holland’s excellent 2012 review of U.S. vaccine court decisions (”Compulsory vaccination, the Constitution, and the hepatitis B mandate for infants and young children,” Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics) and I froze and thought, “Why are we calling the injectibles that Bill Gates and his colleagues are promoting ‘vaccines’? Are they really vaccines?”

Most people are familiar with how Bill Gates made and kept his fortune. He acquired an operating system that was loaded into your computer. It was widely rumored that the U.S. intelligence agencies had a back door. The simultaneous and sudden explosion of computer viruses then made it necessary to regularly update your operating system, allowing Gates and his associates to regularly add whatever they wanted into your software. One of my more knowledgeable software developers once said to me in the 1990s—when Microsoft really took off—”Microsoft makes really sh***y software.” But of course, the software was not really their business. Their business was accessing and aggregating all of your data. Surveillance capitalism was underway.

The Department of Justice launched an antitrust case against Microsoft in 1998, just as the $21 trillion started to disappear from the U.S. government—no doubt with the help of specially designed software and IT systems. During the settlement negotiations that permitted Gates to keep his fortune, he started the Gates Foundation and his new philanthropy career. I laughed the other day when my tweet of one of Robert Kennedy Jr.’s articles from Children’s Health Defense—describing the gruesome technology Gates is hoping to roll out through “injectibles” –inspired a response: “Well, I guess he is finally fulfilling his side of his antitrust settlement.”

If you look at what is being created and proposed in the way of injectibles, it looks to me like these technological developments are organized around several potential goals.

The first and most important goal is the replacement of the existing U.S. dollar currency system used by the general population with a digital transaction system that can be combined with digital identification and tracking. The goal is to end currencies as we know them and replace them with an embedded credit card system that can be integrated with various forms of control, potentially including mind control. “De-dollarization” is threating the dollar global reserve system. The M1 and M2 money supply have increased in the double digits over the last year as a result of a new round of quantitative easing by the Fed. The reason we have not entered into hyper-inflation is because of the dramatic drop in money velocity occasioned by converting Covid-19 into an engineered shut down of significant economic activity and the banruptcy of millions of small and medium sized businesses. The managers of the dollar system are under urgent pressure to use new technology to centralize economic flows and preserve their control of the financial system.

Just as Gates installed an operating system in our computers, now the vision is to install an operating system in our bodies and use “viruses” to mandate an initial installation followed by regular updates.

Now I appreciate why Gates and his colleagues want to call these technologies “vaccines.” If they can persuade the body politic that injectible credit cards or injectible surveillance trackers or injectable brain-macine interface nanotechnologies are “vaccines,” then they can enjoy the protection of a century or more of legal decisions and laws that support their efforts to mandate what they want to do. As well, they can insist that U.S. taxpayers fund—through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program–the damages for which they would otherwise be liable as a result of their experiments – and violations of the Nuremberg Code and numerous civil and criminal laws – on the general population. The scheme is quite clever. Get the general population to go along with defining their new injectible high-tech concoctions as “vaccines” and they can slip them right into the vaccine pipeline. No need to worry about the disease and death that results from something this unnatural delivered quickly. The notion of an emergency along with contact tracing and freedom from liability can protect you from the millions of likely deaths from such human experimentation. Ideally, you can blame the deaths on a virus.

A colleague once told me how Websters Dictionary came about. Webster said that the way the evildoers would change the Constitution was not by amending it but by changing the definitions—a legal sneak attack.

I believe that Gates and the pharma and biotech industries are literally reaching to create a global control grid by installing digital interface components and hooking us up to Microsoft’s new $10 billion JEDI cloud at the Department of Defense as well as Amazon’s multi-billion cloud contract for the CIA that is shared with all US intelligence agencies. Why do you think President Trump has the military organizing to stockpile syringes for vaccines? It is likely because the military is installing the roaming operating system for integration into their cloud. Remember—the winner in the AI superpower race is the AI system with access to the most data. Accessing your body and my body on a 24/7 basis generates a lot of data. If the Chinese do it, the Americans will want to do it too. The role out of human “operating systems” may be one of the reasons why the competition of Huawei and 5G telecommunications has become so fractious. As Frank Clegg, former President of Microsoft Canada has warned us, 5G was developed by the Israelis for crowd control.

In the face of global “de-dollarization,” this is how the dollar syndicate can assert the central control it needs to maintain and extend its global reserve currency financial power. This includes protecting its leadership from the civil and criminal liabiility related to explosive levels of financial and health care fraud in recent decades.

Which brings me back to you and me. Why are we calling these formulations “vaccines”? If I understand the history of case law, vaccines, in legal terms, are medicine. Intentional heavy metal poisoning is not medicine. Injectible surveillance components are not medicine. Injectible credit cards are not medicine. Injectible brain-machine interface is not a medicine. Immunity for insurance companies is not the creation of human immunity.

We need to stop allowing these concoctions to be referred to by a word that the courts and the general population define and treat as medicine and protect from legal and financial liability.

The perpetrators of this fraud are trying a very neat trick–one that will help them go much faster and cancel out a lot of risk at our death, disease and expense. I understand why they are doing it.

What I don’t understand is why we are helping them. Why are we acquiescing in calling these bizarre and deeply dangerous concoctions “vaccines”? Whatever they are, they are not medicine.

So, what shall our naming convention be? What name shall we give to the relevant poisons, neurological damaging metals and digital shackles?

Whatever we call them, I know one thing. THEY ARE NOT MEDICINE, WHICH MEANS THEY SURE ARE NOT VACCINES.

[East Sun]

Thank you onawa.

I'm passing this along to my friend who will appreciate it immensely...

[onawah]

'Do Not Trust The Medical Or The National Security Establishment!' With Guest Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
19,090 views•Aug 14, 2020
RonPaulLibertyReport
239K subscribers


"Nephew of President John F. Kennedy, son of Robert F. Kennedy, and tireless crusader against the tyranny of the mainstream medical establishment, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. joins today's Liberty Report to discuss his startling discoveries about who really killed his father and uncle...and why. Plus, Mr. Kennedy, an environmental lawyer, has been among the most vocal and most successful opponents of the mainstream medical establishment, driven by big Pharma to inoculate and medicate everything that moves. He tells the Liberty Report how he very reluctantly decided to dedicate his career to fighting the mandatory vaccines that have resulted in so many documented injuries to the recipients. "

Mr. Kennedy's Children's Health Defense can be found at http://www.childrenshealthdefense.org
He can also be found on Instagram: @robertfkennedyjr

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_kJdOtnBUcw

[onawah]

Read the Fine Print, Part Two—Nearly 400 Adverse Reactions Listed in Vaccine Package Inserts
AUGUST 14, 2020
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...9-2d6ae56cb8dc
By the Children’s Health Defense Team

(Go to the link for easier viewing of the charts, which are copied here just to give an idea of how extensive they are)

"Package inserts are available online for all vaccines licensed in the U.S. In addition to containing bits of practical information for the clinicians who administer the vaccines, the inserts provide members of the public with one of their only opportunities to learn about a vaccine’s contraindications, warnings, precautions and—perhaps most importantly—potential adverse reactions.

The inserts communicate the information about adverse reactions in two distinct sections: “Clinical trials experience” (Section 6.1) and “Data from postmarketing experience” from the U.S. or other countries (Section 6.2). In April, 2020, Children’s Health Defense summarized the postmarketing data for over three dozen vaccines given routinely to American infants, children and adolescents. That tally showed that vaccines touted for the prevention of 13 illnesses (Table 1) have been linked to at least 217 adverse medical outcomes reported post-licensure, including serious infections, autoimmune conditions, life-threatening allergies and death.

As noted in April, the postmarketing list is far from exhaustive, because manufacturers have the latitude to decide which outcomes to list in the inserts—using loose criteria determined by severity, frequency of reporting and “strength of evidence for a causal relationship.” In addition, vaccine adverse events are notoriously underreported, not least because medical schools do not teach doctors to recognize vaccine injuries. But what would the picture look like if the adverse reactions observed during clinical trials were also added to the list?

This combination of clinical trial and postmarketing data presents a dramatic picture, with almost double the total number of undesirable post-vaccination outcomes …
Double trouble
Children’s Health Defense can now answer that question. The revised chart (Table 2) includes the adverse reactions reported in the clinical trial sections of 41 vaccine brands covering diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, influenza, meningococcal infection, pertussis, pneumococcal infection, polio, rotavirus, tetanus and varicella. This combination of clinical trial and postmarketing data presents a dramatic picture, with almost double the total number of undesirable post-vaccination outcomes—397 different types of reactions reported pre- and post-licensure.

Although roughly 400 adverse events is a sobering number, again, it is probably an underestimate. This is because most clinical trials follow participants for an absurdly short period of time—three days here, seven days there—and do not capture problems that arise beyond that brief window, even though clinicians recognize (and the scientific literature confirms) that vaccine reactions are not always immediate or acute. Moreover, even for those few days of monitoring, the inserts are often short on details, citing only a smattering of adverse events collected from a predetermined list of “solicited” reactions and only sometimes accepting “unsolicited” feedback. In addition, the fact that vaccine clinical trials typically compare vaccine against vaccine rather than vaccine against inert placebo makes it easy to divert attention from specific adverse reactions by simply citing “similar rates” of adverse reactions in both groups.

… and that vaccines can cause the very illnesses—or adverse consequences of those illnesses—that they are supposed to prevent.
Clinical trial themes
The April discussion of postmarketing adverse events noted several themes, including the facts that all vaccines are capable of producing adverse reactions (though Gardasil and Gardasil 9 are macabre standouts) and that vaccines can cause the very illnesses—or adverse consequences of those illnesses—that they are supposed to prevent. The clinical trial data reinforce these points and also highlight some new themes:

The adverse reactions reported following clinical trials do not necessarily match up to the adverse reactions reported post-licensure. This is particularly the case for vaccine-associated deaths; whereas the April postmarketing-only list included just two categories of death associated with six vaccines, the addition of clinical trial data brings the total up to 40 types of death associated with 13 vaccines.
Sizeable proportions of participants in vaccine clinical trials experience unpleasant reactions, including fever, chills, pain, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, headache, rash, loss of appetite and irritability. For example, in clinical trials for the five-pronged Pentacel vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type b and polio)—given as a four-dose series beginning at six weeks of age—almost half of the young children (48%) experienced injection-site “tenderness” after the first dose (defined as “whimpering” or crying when the arm or leg was touched or moved); about the same percentage (46%) experienced “lethargy,” 59% cried “inconsolably” and 77% were “fussy” or “irritable.” In adolescents, the Adacel vaccine given as a booster for tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) produced injection-site pain in almost eight in ten teens (78%), and one in five (20%) study participants experienced pain rated as “moderate to severe.” More than two-fifths (44%) suffered from headaches.
Clinical trials also document more serious reactions with the potential to cause longer-term problems. Adverse reactions of particular concern—especially in the young—include asthma, seizures, heart problems, sleep problems and joint and muscle pain. Nine vaccines list anorexia as a clinical trial reaction. Surprisingly, while numerous package inserts mention serious and potentially lifelong conditions like transverse myelitis (11 vaccines) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (20 vaccines) in their postmarketing section, only a few list them as a clinical trial outcome despite hundreds of published studies pointing to post-vaccination onset.
Intentional and unintentional injuries are more prominent in the clinical trial data than in the postmarketing reports, particularly in association with Gardasil and certain meningococcal vaccines (abbreviated as MenACWY). These events include alcohol intoxication and drug overdose; suicidal thoughts or attempts; head and limb injuries; and falls resulting in injuries. Noting that syncope (fainting) is a common post-vaccination reaction in adolescents and young adults, the CDC states, “In 2005, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) began detecting a trend of increasing syncope reports that coincided with the licensure of 3 vaccines for adolescents: human papillomavirus (HPV), MenACWY, and Tdap. Of particular concern among adolescents has been the risk for serious secondary injuries, including skull fracture and cerebral hemorrhage.” (One of the robustly healthy volunteers in the current clinical trials for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine illustrated this very point, narrowly escaping injury when his girlfriend caught him in the midst of a fainting episode.)
Illustrating how vaccines can cause what they are supposed to prevent, the clinical trials for the ProQuad measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine—intended to prevent infections associated with rashes—highlighted an astounding array of rashes. The ProQuad insert lists seven different types of rash-related adverse reactions: “rash,” “injection-site rash,” “measles-like rash,” “rubella-like rash,” “varicella-like rash,” “vesicular rash” and “viral exanthema” (an eruptive rash associated with viral infections). Across both the clinical trial and postmarketing data, ProQuad injection also appears to precede numerous infections, including “atypical measles” and measles, varicella (chickenpox), bronchitis, cellulitis and other skin infections, herpes simplex (cold sores), herpes zoster (shingles), influenza or “influenza-like illness,” meningitis, pneumonia, respiratory tract infections, sinusitis, sore throats and other viral infections.
Researchers interested in solutions rather than convenient coronavirus cover stories would do well to review the information contained in vaccine package inserts.
Mysteries explained?
One of the autoimmune conditions encountered during the clinical trials for meningococcal and rotavirus vaccines (and also reported post-licensure) is a condition called Kawasaki disease (KD). Diagnosed solely on the basis of symptoms (high fever plus symptoms such as rash, redness and lymph node swelling), KD came out of nowhere in the 1960s and 1970s when childhood vaccine programs were starting to gear up. The published literature confirms Bexero meningococcal B and rotavirus vaccination as likely triggers for KD and, in addition, points to numerous other vaccines as possible culprits, including those for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, Prevnar-13 and multiple vaccines administered in a single health care visit. Canadian researchers have identified KD as a “condition of interest” for pediatric vaccine safety surveillance.

Ordinarily fairly obscure, KD made headlines this year when researchers started speculating that it might be one of the apparently myriad faces of SARS-CoV-2. In the UK—the first country in the world to start administering (in 2015) three doses of Bexero to infants—researchers were also the first to suggest that KD might be Covid-19-related. This week, a different group of researchers raised the same question about another low-profile autoimmune condition, myasthenia gravis, asking whether it, too, could be connected to SARS-CoV-2. Researchers interested in solutions rather than convenient coronavirus cover stories would do well to review the information contained in vaccine package inserts. This information clearly points the way to a different set of questions and answers, pertaining not only to autoimmunity but also to the many other health problems besieging American children.

Table 1. Vaccine package inserts reviewed

Type
of Vaccine
Brand Name
Manufacturer
Vaccines containing
diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis components Adacel (Tdap) Sanofi Pasteur
Boostrix (Tdap) GlaxoSmithKline
(GSK)
Daptacel (DTaP) Sanofi
Diphtheria
and Tetanus Toxoids Adsorbed (DT) Sanofi
Infanrix (DTaP) GSK
Kinrix (DTaP-IPV) GSK
Pediarix (DTaP-HepB-IPV) GSK
Pentacel (DTaP-IPV/Hib) Sanofi
Quadracel (DTaP-IPV) Sanofi
Tdvax (Td) MassBiologics
Tenivac (Td) Sanofi
Haemophilus
influenzae type b (Hib) ActHIB Sanofi
Hiberix GSK
PedvaxHIB Merck
Hepatitis A and/or B Engerix-B (HepB) GSK
Havrix (HepA) GSK
Recombivax HB (HepB) Merck
Twinrix (HepA/HepB) GSK
Vaqta (HepA) Merck
Human papillomavirus (HPV) Gardasil Merck
Gardasil 9 Merck
Influenza Afluria Quadrivalent Sequirus
Fluarix GSK
Flublok
Quadrivalent (age 18 and older) Protein Sciences
Corporation
Flucelvax Sequirus
Flulaval Quadrivalent GSK
FluMist AstraZeneca
Fluzone Quadrivalent Sanofi
Meningococcal A, C, W and/or Y Menactra Sanofi
Menomune Sanofi
Menveo GSK
Meningococcal B Bexero GSK
Trumenba Pfizer
Measles-mumps-rubella
(MMR) and MMR+varicella (MMRV) MMR-II Merck
Proquad Merck
Pneumococcal Prevnar-13 Pfizer
Pneumovax-23 Merck
Inactivated polio (IPV) IPOL Sanofi
Rotavirus vaccines Rotarix GSK
RotaTeq Merck
Varicella Varivax Merck


Table 2. Clinical trial and post-marketing adverse events reported in vaccine package inserts, by body system
Body System
Medical Disorder
Reported in Clinical
Trials
Reported Post-marketing
Allergic (6) Allergic reactions/
hypersensitivity Varivax ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menveo, Pediarix, Pentacel, Quadracel, Recombivax, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix
Allergy to vaccine Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Anaphylaxis and
anaphylactoid reactions, including shock Bexero, Fluarix, MMR-II ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menactra, Menveo, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix, Varivax
Angioedema,
angioneurotic edema Menveo, MMR-II, Recombivax ActHIB, Adacel, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, Kinrix, Menactra, Menomune, MMR-II, Pediarix, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Twinrix, Varivax
Serum sickness Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Havrix, Pneumovax-23, Recombivax, Twinrix
Urticaria [hives] Engerix-B, Havrix,
MMR-II, PedVaxHIB, Prevnar-13, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menactra, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, Quadracel, Recombivax, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Twinrix
Autoimmune (15) Autoimmune diseases Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Autoimmune thyroiditis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Celiac disease Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Cutaneous lupus
erythematosus Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Diabetes mellitus
(insulin-dependent) Boostrix,
Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Pediarix, Pneumovax-23 MMR-II
Graves’/Basedow’s
disease Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Guillain-Barré syndrome
(GBS) IPOL, MMR-II, PedVaxHIB Adacel, Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Menactra, Menomune, MMR-II, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tenivac, Vaqta, Varivax
Kawasaki disease Menveo, Rotarix,
RotaTeq Rotarix, RotaTeq
Lupus-like syndrome Recombivax
Multiple sclerosis (or
exacerbation) Gardasil/Gardasil 9 Engerix-B, Havrix,
Recombivax, Twinrix
Pancreatitis MMR-II, Pneumovax-23 Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II
Rheumatoid arthritis/juvenile
rheumatoid arthritis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Scleroderma Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Systemic lupus
erythematosus Gardasil/Gardasil 9 Recombivax
Thrombocytopenia/idiopathic
thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) [low platelets] Daptacel, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II, PedVaxHIB Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Infanrix, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Rotarix, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax
Blood/lymphatic system
(11) Anemia (aplasic or
hemolytic) Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Varivax
Epistaxis [nosebleed] FluMist, ProQuad
Extravasation [blood
vessel leakage] ProQuad
Hematochezia [bloody
stools] RotaTeq ProQuad, Rotarix,
RotaTeq
Hemorrhage Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Increased erythrocyte
sedimentation rate Recombivax
Leukocytosis [increased
white blood cells] MMR-II MMR-II, Pneumovax-23
Lymphadenitis/swollen
lymph nodes Adacel Boostrix, Pneumovax-23,
ProQuad
Lymphadenopathy,
including regional Engerix-B, Havrix, MMR-II, Recombivax, Varivax Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menactra, Menveo, MMR-II, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Tenivac
Neutropenia, chronic Pediarix
Thrombocytopenia/idiopathic
thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) [low platelets]* Daptacel,
Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II, PedVaxHIB Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Infanrix, Kinrix, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Rotarix, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax
Cardiac (10) Angina pectoris Pneumovax-23, Tenivac
Cyanosis* [bluish,
low oxygen] Daptacel, Hiberix, Infanrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, Quadracel
Heart failure Pneumovax-23
Hypotension Engerix-B, Recombivax Adacel, Menactra
Myocardial infarction Pneumovax-23
Myocarditis [heart
muscle inflammation] Gardasil/Gardasil 9 Adacel, Boostrix
Palpitations Engerix-B, Twinrix
Pericarditis [pericardial
inflammation] FluMist
Pleuropericarditis Flublok (> age 50)
Tachycardia [abnormally
high heart rate] Engerix-B, Fluarix,
Recombivax, Twinrix
Congenital (1) Congenital anomaly Havrix
Death, by cause (40) Unspecified Flublok, IPOL,
Prevnar-13, Tenivac Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Acute lymphocytic
leukemia Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Acute renal failure Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Arrhythmia Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Asphyxia Pentacel
Aspiration Daptacel
Autoimmune disease Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Breast cancer Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Cardiopulmonary arrest Tenivac
Cardiovascular Prevnar-13,
Pneumovax-23
Cerebral hemorrhage Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Cerebrovascular
accident Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Congenital
immunodeficiency and sepsis Pediarix
Convulsive disorder Pediarix
Drug overdose Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Fetal MMR-II
Gunshot wound Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Head trauma Pentacel
Homicide Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Hyperthyroidism Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Hypovolemic septic
shock Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Infectious disease Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Intussusception RotaTeq Rotarix, RotaTeq
Motor vehicle accident Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Myocardial infarction Tenivac
Nasopharyngeal cancer Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Neoplasm Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
Prevnar-13
Neuroblastoma Pediarix, Pentacel
Pancreatic cancer Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Peritonitis Prevnar-13
Pneumonia Rotarix
Pulmonary embolism Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Pulmonary infection Prevnar-13
Pulmonary tuberculosis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Sepsis, septic shock Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
Menveo, Prevnar-13
Stomach adenocarcinoma Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Sudden infant death
syndrome (SIDS) Menveo, Pediarix,
Pentacel, Prevnar-13, RotaTeq Infanrix
Suicide Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Traumatic brain
injury/cardiac arrest Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Unexplained sudden
death Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Ear/labyrinth (8) Earache Recombivax
Ear pain Engerix-B, Infanrix,
Menveo, ProQuad, Twinrix
Hearing impaired Menveo
Nerve deafness MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Otitis media/ear
infection Afluria, Fluarix,
PedVaxHIB, RotaTeq, Vaqta, Varivax MMR-II
Tinnitis Engerix-B, Recombivax,
Twinrix
Vertigo Havrix, Recombivax,
Twinrix Engerix-B, Fluarix,
Menveo
Vestibular/balance
disorder Menveo
Endocrine (6) Cushing’s syndrome Menveo
Goiter Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Hyperthyroidism Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Hypothyroidism Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Thyroiditis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Toxic nodular goiter Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Eye (17) Conjunctivitis Vaqta
Eye complaints Varivax
Eye irritation/itching Vaqta
Eye pain Fluarix, Flulaval
Eye redness Fluarix
Eye swelling Bexero, Fluarix
Eyelid ptosis [drooping] Menveo
Eyelid swelling Fluarix, ProQuad
Keratitis [corneal
inflammation] Engerix-B
Ocular hyperemia [eye
inflammation] Fluzone
Ocular palsies [nerve
damage] MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Optic
neuritis/neuropathy, papillitis [optic nerve inflammation] Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
MMR-II Engerix-B, Fluzone,
MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix
Photophobia [light
intolerance] Havrix Flulaval
Retinitis, necrotizing
[inflammation] MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad,
Varivax
Retrobulbar neuritis [nerve
damage] MMR-II, ProQuad
Uveitis [eye
inflammation] Gardasil/Gardasil 9 Recombivax
Visual disturbances Engerix-B, Recombivax,
Twinrix
Gastrointestinal (21) Abdominal pain,
discomfort Boostrix, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Menomune, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax Fluarix, ProQuad
Candidiasis ProQuad
Colonic polyp Tenivac
Constipation Engerix-B, Infanrix,
Vaqta, Varivax Recombivax
Crohn’s disease Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Diarrhea Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Hiberix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, PedVaxHIB, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Recombivax, Rotarix, RotaTeq, Trumenba, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax Daptacel, FluMist, Menomune,
MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel
Dysgeusia [altered
sense of taste] Havrix
Dyspepsia [indigestion] Pneumovax-23,
Recombivax Engerix-B, Twinrix
Dysphagia [swallowing
difficulties] Flulaval
Gastroenteritis Flulaval, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Kinrix, Menveo, Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, Rotarix, RotaTeq, Vaqta Rotarix, RotaTeq
Gastrointestinal
infection FluMist
Inflammatory bowel
disease Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Inguinal hernia Menactra
Intussusception,
including recurrent Rotarix, RotaTeq Rotarix, RotaTeq
Mouth ulcers ProQuad
Nausea Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flulaval, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Menveo, MMR-II, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax Daptacel, DT, Fluarix, FluMist, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Menomune, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, Tdvax
Swelling of mouth,
throat or tongue Fluarix
Teething Afluria, Vaqta, Varivax
Ulcerative colitis Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
Pneumovax-23
Vitello-intestinal duct
remnant Menveo
Vomiting ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Hiberix, IPOL, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, PedVaxHIB, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Recombivax, Rotarix, RotaTeq,
Trumenba, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Menomune, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23,
Tenivac
General and injection
site (35) Abnormal gait Flulaval
Apathy ProQuad
Asthenia [fatigue,
weakness] Hiberix, Pneumovax-23,
Vaqta Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Infanrix, Menomune, Pediarix, Tenivac
Body aches Adacel, Recombivax Fluarix
Chest pain Pneumovax-23, Tenivac Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone
Chills/shivering Adacel, Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Menactra, , Menveo, Prevnar-13, Recombivax, Trumenba, Vaqta, Varivax Fluarix, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Menomune, Twinrix
Decreased limb mobility Pneumovax-23
Dehydration Kinrix, Menveo,
Pentacel, Rotarix, Vaqta
Drowsiness/sleepiness ActHIB, Daptacel, Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, Pediarix, PedvaxHIB
Ecchymosis [bruising] Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta Engerix-B, Recombivax,
Twinrix
Edema Vaqta Adacel
Fatigue Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Havrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, Prevnar-13, Recombivax, Trumenba, Twinrix, Varivax Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Menomune, Menveo
Feeling hot Fluarix
Fever/pyrexia ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, Pediarix, PedVaxHIB, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax, Rotarix, RotaTeq, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, Tdvax
Hematoma Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Varivax
Hypernatremia [excess
sodium] Kinrix
Increased arm
circumference Adacel, Boostrix, Daptacel, Infanrix, Kinrix, Pentacel, Quadracel
Increased thigh
circumference Infanrix
Injected limb—extensive
swelling Boostrix, Daptacel, Infanrix, Quadracel ActHIB, Bexero, Hiberix, Menactra, Menveo
Injection-site abscess Adacel, Daptacel, Fluarix, Flulaval, PedvaxHIB, Pentacel, Quadracel
Injection-site bruising Afluria, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, ProQuad, Vaqta Adacel, Flulaval
Injection-site
cellulitis Afluria, Daptacel, Fluarix, Flulaval, Menveo, Pediarix, Quadracel, Tenivac
Injection-site pain and
other reactions (induration, warmth) ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, Pediarix, PedvaxHIB, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Tdvax, Tenivac, Twinrix
Injection-site rash ProQuad, Vaqta, Varivax Daptacel, Flulaval,
IPOL, Prevnar-13
Interference with normal
activity of arm Daptacel, DT,
Prevnar-13
Itching Afluria, Varivax
Lightheadedness Recombivax
Listlessness Quadracel
Malaise Adacel, Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, Quadracel, Recombivax, Tenivac, Varivax Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, Tdvax, Twinrix
Medical attention
sought Pediarix
Pain in extremity Fluarix
Peripheral edema ActHIB, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Tdvax, Tenivac, Varivax
Severe pain Bexero
Swelling Afluria, Adacel, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Fluzone, Infanrix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menactra, Menomune, Pediarix, PedVaxHIB, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax Menveo, MMR-II, ProQuad
Tiredness Adacel, FluMist, IPOL
Hepatobiliary/liver (3) Elevation of liver
enzymes Recombivax
Hepatitis Menveo Havrix, Twinrix
Jaundice Havrix, Twinrix
Infections and
infestations (51) Appendicitis Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
Menveo
Atypical measles MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Bronchiolitis Daptacel, Pediarix,
Pentacel, Prevnar-13, RotaTeq
Bronchitis Flulaval Infanrix, ProQuad
Cellulitis Daptacel, Infanrix,
Tenivac, Vaqta Daptacel, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Infanrix, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Tdvax, Varivax
Cellulitis-like
reaction Afluria
Chlamydia Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Cholecystitis Tenivac
Croup Afluria, Fluzone, Vaqta
Early-onset Hib disease PedVaxHIB PedvaxHIB
Glomerulonephritis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Herpes simplex/cold
sore Varivax ProQuad
Herpes zoster [shingles] ProQuad, Menactra Engerix-B, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Varivax
Infection ProQuad
Influenza,
influenza-like illness Engerix-B, Fluarix, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Recombivax, Twinrix Afluria, Flulaval,Havrix, ProQuad
Invasive Hib disease Pentacel
Laryngitis Menveo Flulaval
Laryngotracheo-bronchitis Vaqta
Localized infection Tenivac
Measles ProQuad
Measles-like rash MMR-II, ProQuad, Vaqta MMR-II
Meningitis (aseptic,
eosinophilic) Daptacel Engerix-B, FluMist, MMR-II, Pentacel, ProQuad, Twinrix, Varivax
Nasal congestion Afluria, Fluarix,
Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Vaqta
Pelvic inflammatory
disease Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
Menveo
Pharyngitis/
nasopharyngitis Afluria, Bexero, Fluarix, Flulaval, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax,
RotaTeq, Vaqta Fluarix, Varivax
Pharyngitis
streptococcal Vaqta
Pharyngolaryngeal pain Fluarix
Pneumonia, pneumonitis,
lobar pneumonia, bilateral pneumonia Daptacel, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Hiberix, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, RotaTeq, Varivax MMR-II, ProQuad,
Varivax
Pulmonary congestion ProQuad
Pulmonary embolism Gardasil/Gardasil 9 Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Nephritis/pyelonephritis
[kidney infection] Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Pertussis Daptacel
Respiratory congestion Fluarix, Vaqta
Respiratory tract
infection (upper or lower) Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, PedVaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax Infanrix, Pediarix, ProQuad
Rhinitis Fluarix, Flucelvax,
MMR-II, Recombivax, Vaqta Fluarix, Flulaval,
Havrix, MMR-II, Pentacel, ProQuad
Roseola Vaqta
Rubella-like rash ProQuad, Vaqta
Secondary bacterial
infection (skin, tissue) Varivax
Sepsis Daptacel, Pediarix
Sinusitis FluMist ProQuad
Skin infection ProQuad
Sore throat FluMist, MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Sneezing FluMist
Staph infection Menveo
Tonsillitis Fluarix
Tracheitis PedVaxHIB
Transmission of vaccine
virus strains RotaTeq
Varicella Flulaval, Menveo
Varicella (vaccine
strain) ProQuad, Varivax
Varicella-like rash ProQuad, Vaqta, Varivax ProQuad
Viral infection ProQuad, Vaqta Pentacel
Injury (intentional
and unintentional) (10) Accidental drug ingestion Hiberix
Alcohol intoxication Pneumovax-23
Fall Menactra Menveo
Falling with injury Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Head injury Menveo
Intentional
multiple-drug overdose Menveo
Limb injury Menveo
Road accident Menveo
Suicidal depression Menveo
Suicide attempt Menveo
Investigations (6) Abnormal liver function
tests Engerix-B, Twinrix
Alanine
aminotransferase increased Menveo
Body temperature
increased Menveo
Creatine phosphokinase
increased Havrix
Diagnostic studies Pediarix
Increased serum
C-reactive protein Pneumovax-23
Metabolic (3) Change in eating habits Menveo
Loss of appetite,
decreased appetite Afluria, DT, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, Kinrix, Menactra, Pediarix, Prevnar-13, Recombivax, Rotarix, Varivax Pentacel
Mitochondrial
encephalomyopathy, Leigh syndrome exacerbation [neurometabolic] FluMist
Musculoskeletal and
connective tissue (24) Ankylosing spondylitis
[rare arthritis] Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Arm pain Engerix-B, Vaqta
Arthralgia [joint
pain] Adacel, Bexero, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, MMR-II, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, Prevnar-13, Recombivax, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix, Varivax Boostrix, Engerix-B, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, IPOL, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tdvax, Twinrix
Arthritis Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
MMR-II Engerix-B, Flulaval,
MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix
Arthropathy Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Back pain Engerix-B, Fluarix, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Pneumovax-23, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta Boostrix
Bone pain Menveo
Cramps Engerix-B, Recombivax
Hip and wrist fracture Tenivac
Hypotonia [low
muscle tone] Pentacel Daptacel, Hiberix,
Infanrix, Pediarix, Prevnar-13, Quadracel
Invertebral disc
protrusion Menactra
Muscle spasm Adacel
Muscle
weakness/weakness Adacel, Engerix-B, Recombivax, Tenivac, Twinrix Engerix-B, Flulaval, Recombivax, Twinrix
Musculoskeletal pain Fluarix ProQuad
Musculoskeletal
stiffness Havrix
Myalgia [muscle pain] Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Daptacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Menactra, Menveo, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, Quadracel, Recombivax, Trumenba, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax Boostrix, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, IPOL, Menactra, Menomune, MMR-II, ProQuad, Tdvax, Tenivac
Myositis [muscle
inflammation] Adacel
Neck pain Engerix-B, Fluarix,
Pneumovax-23, Recombivax
Pain in extremities Fluarix, Fluzone,
Pediarix, Recombivax, Tdvax, Tenivac
Psoriatic arthropathy Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Reactive arthritis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Shoulder pain Engerix-B, Recombivax
Stiff neck Recombivax, Varivax
Stiffness Pneumovax-23, Vaqta,
Varivax
Nervous system (45) Acute disseminated
encephalomyelitis (ADEM) Menveo, MMR-II Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
Menactra, MMR-II, ProQuad
Ataxia [nervous
system dysfunction] MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad,
Varivax
Bulging fontanelle Pediarix
Cerebellar ataxia Vaqta
Convulsions/seizures ActHIB, Daptacel, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, Pediarix, PedVaxHIB, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, RotaTeq ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Hiberix, IPOL, Kinrix, Menactra, MMR-II, Quadracel, Recombivax, Tdvax, Twinrix, Varivax
Depressed level of
consciousness Boostrix, Pediarix,
Pentacel
Dizziness Engerix-B,
Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II, Recombivax, Twinrix Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, ProQuad, Tdvax, Tenivac, Varivax
Encephalitis,
vaccine-induced encephalitis [brain inflammation] MMR-II Boostrix, Engerix-B, FluMist, MMR-II, Pediarix, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax
Encephalomyelitis [brain
and spinal cord] Afluria, Fluarix,
Fluzone
Encephalopathy [brain
disease] MMR-II, Pentacel Afluria, Engerix-B, Flulaval, Havrix, Infanrix, MMR-II, ProQuad, Twinrix
Facial palsy, Bell’s
palsy Adacel, Boostrix, Engerix-B, Fluarix, FluMist, Fluzone, Menactra, Menveo, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Varivax
Facial (or cranial)
nerve paralysis Adacel Flulaval
Facial paresis [impaired
facial movement] Fluarix, Menveo
Febrile
convulsions/seizures Afluria, Daptacel, Fluzone, Infanrix, Hiberix, Menveo, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, RotaTeq, Vaqta, Varivax Afluria, Daptacel, Fluzone, IPOL, MMR-II, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax
Headache Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flublok, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax, Tenivac, Trumenba, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax DT, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Infanrix, IPOL, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, ProQuad, Tdvax, Twinrix
Hypoesthesia [decreased
tactile sensitivity] Adacel, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, Havrix, Recombivax, Twinrix
Hypokinesia [loss of
muscle movement] Flulaval
Hypotonic-hyporesponsive
episode (HHE) Daptacel, Infanrix, Prevnar-13 Daptacel, Hiberix,
Kinrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Quadracel
Hypertonia Havrix
Infantile spasms Daptacel, Pediarix
Lethargy ActHIB, Daptacel,
FluMist, Pentacel Pediarix
Limb paralysis Flulaval
Measles inclusion body
encephalitis (MIBE) MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Migraine Adacel, Fluarix,
Twinrix Engerix-B, Recombivax
Motor neuron disease Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Myelitis [spinal
cord disease] Adacel, Fluarix,
Fluzone, Havrix, Recombivax, Twinrix
Nerve compression Adacel
Neuralgia [nerve
pain] Afluria
Neuritis (including
brachial, polyneuritis) MMR-II Adacel, Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Fluzone, MMR-II, Twinrix
Neuropathy,
polyneuropathy MMR-II Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Havrix, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix
Numbness Varivax
Paralysis Engerix-B,
Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Twinrix
Paresis [partial
paralysis] Engerix-B, Twinrix
Paresthesia [abnormal
skin sensations] MMR-II, Recombivax,
Twinrix Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Fluzone, Havrix, IPOL, Menactra, Menomune, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Tenivac, Varivax
Partial seizures,
seizures Menveo Daptacel, Engerix-B,
ProQuad
Presyncope [feeling
faint] Flucelvax
Radiculopathy [“pinched
nerve” in spine] Pneumovax-23 Pneumovax-23, Recombivax
Somnolence Engerix-B, ProQuad,
Twinrix Daptacel, DT, Flulaval,
Havrix, Hiberix, IPOL, Pediarix, Pentacel, Quadracel, Recombivax
Subacute sclerosing
panencephalitis (SSPE) MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Syncope, vasovagal
syncope [fainting] Flublok, MMR-II,
Twinrix Adacel, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, Kinrix, Menactra, Menomune,
Menveo, MMR-II, Pediarix, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tenivac, Trumenba
Tingling Engerix-B
Tonic convulsions Menveo Menveo
Transverse myelitis MMR-II Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Menactra, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Varivax
Tremors Pneumovax-23 Flulaval, ProQuad
Unresponsiveness Daptacel
Psychiatric (15) Agitation Engerix-B, Twinrix IPOL, ProQuad,
Recombivax
Anorexia ActHIB, Daptacel,
Havrix, Engerix-B, IPOL, Menactra, Menomune, Twinrix, Vaqta
Crying (abnormal,
unusual, persistent or inconsolable) ActHIB, Daptacel, DT, Flulaval, Fluzone, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Menactra, Menveo, PedVaxHIB, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, Vaqta Pediarix
Decreased sleep Prevnar-13
Depression Pneumovax-23
Disturbed sleep Recombivax, Varivax
Fretfulness Daptacel
Fussiness ActHIB, Daptacel,
Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Pediarix, Pentacel
Hypersomnia ProQuad
Increased sleep Prevnar-13
Insomnia Engerix-B, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta Flulaval, Pediarix
Irritability ActHIB, Afluria, , Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Havrix, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, Pediarix, PedVaxHIB, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Recombivax, Rotarix, RotaTeq, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax MMR-II, Recombivax
Nervousness Varivax Pediarix, ProQuad
Restlessness Hiberix Pediarix
Screaming Daptacel, Pediarix,
Pentacel, Quadracel
Reproductive (2) Dysmenorrhea Fluarix
Menstruation disorders Vaqta
Respiratory, thoracic
and mediastinal (19) Apnea ActHIB, Daptacel Engerix-B, Hiberix, Infanrix, Kinrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13
Asthma, asthma-like
symptoms Daptacel, FluMist, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Pediarix, Pentacel, Tenivac, Vaqta Engerix-B, Fluarix,
Twinrix
Asthmatic crisis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Bronchial constriction Vaqta
Bronchial
hyperreactivity Havrix
Bronchospasm, bronchial
spasm Daptacel,
Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II, Prevnar-13, RotaTeq Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tenivac, Twinrix
Cough Afluria, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, FluMist, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Rotarix, Vaqta, Varivax Fluarix, Fluzone,
Infanrix, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel
Cyanosis* [bluish
discoloration, low oxygen] Daptacel, Hiberix,
Infanrix, Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, Quadracel
Difficulty breathing Menactra
Dyspnea [shortness
of breath] Prevnar-13 Fluarix, Flulaval, Fluzone, Havrix, Menomune, Pediarix, Quadracel, Twinrix
Dysphonia [vocal
abnormalities] Flulaval
Hypoxia Daptacel, FluMist
Oropharyngeal pain Afluria, Flucelvax,
Flulaval, Gardasil/Gardasil 9 Fluzone, Menveo
Respiratory distress Havrix Fluarix
Rhinorrhea [runny
nose] Afluria, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, HepB, MMR-II, ProQuad, Rotarix, Vaqta, Varivax Fluzone
Stridor [high-pitched
wheezing] Fluarix
Throat tightness Flulaval, Fluzone
Upper airway swelling Menactra
Wheezing FluMist, Menveo, Vaqta Fluzone, Menactra,
ProQuad
Skin/ subcutaneous
tissue (33) Acute hemorrhagic edema
of infancy MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Alopecia [hair loss] Gardasil/Gardasil 9 Engerix-B, Recombivax, Twinrix
Contact rash Varivax
Dermatitis Vaqta, Varivax
Diaper rash Varivax
Dry skin Varivax
Eczema Varivax Engerix-B, Recombivax,
Twinrix
Erythema [skin
redness] ActHIB, Adacel,Afluria, Bexero, Engerix-B, Flucelvax, Fluzone, IPOL, Menactra, Menveo, PedVaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Quadracel, Recombivax, Twinrix,
Vaqta, Varivax Fluarix, Infanrix, Menactra, Menveo, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Tdvax
Erythema multiforme [skin
disorder] Flucelvax, MMR-II, Prevnar-13 Engerix-B, Fluarix, Havrix, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Prevnar-13, Recombivax, Twinrix, Varivax
Erythema nodosum [nodules
or lumps] Gardasil/Gardasil 9 Engerix-B, Recombivax,
Twinrix
Exanthem/viral
exanthema [widespread rash] ProQuad, Vaqta Boostrix
Facial swelling/edema Prevnar-13 Daptacel, Fluarix, MMR-II, ProQuad, Varivax
Heat rash Varivax
Hyperhydrosis [abnormal
sweating] Flulaval, Havrix, Twinrix
Impetigo ProQuad, Varivax
Lichen planus [inflammatory
skin rash] Engerix-B, Twinrix
Panniculitis [disease
of fatty layer of skin] MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Parotitis [salivary
gland inflammation] MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Pigmentation disorder Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Pruritus [itchy skin] Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Havrix, MMR-II, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Boostrix, Daptacel, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, Fluzone, Infanrix, Kinrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Tdvax, Tenivac
Psoriasis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Purpura [red/purple
spots] MMR-II Engerix-B, MMR-II,
ProQuad
Pustular psoriasis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Rash Adacel, Afluria, Engerix-B, Flublok, Flulaval, Havrix, Menactra, Menomune, Menveo, MMR-II, PedVaxHIB, Prevnar-13, ProQuad, Recombivax, Twinrix, Vaqta, Varivax ActHIB, Adacel, Afluria, Bexero, Boostrix, Daptacel, DT, Fluarix, Flucelvax, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Hiberix, Infanrix, IPOL, Menomune, MMR-II, Pediarix, Pentacel, Pneumovax-23, Prevnar-13, Quadracel, Tdvax, Tenivac
Rash morbilliform Vaqta
Rash vesicular ProQuad, Vaqta
Skin discoloration Pentacel
Skin exfoliation Menveo
Skin induration MMR-II, ProQuad
Stevens-Johnson
syndrome [severe skin reaction] Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
MMR-II Engerix-B, Fluarix, Fluzone, MMR-II, ProQuad, Recombivax, Varivax
Sweating Engerix-B, Fluarix,
Flucelvax, Pneumovax-23, Recombivax, Twinrix
Vesiculation MMR-II
Vitiligo Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Vascular (10) Cerebrovascular
accident Kinrix, Pneumovax-23,
Tenivac ProQuad, Varivax
Deep venous thrombosis Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Flushing Engerix-B, Recombivax,
Twinrix Flulaval, Fluzone
Henoch-Schönlein
purpura [blood vessel inflammation] MMR-II Boostrix, Fluarix,
MMR-II, ProQuad, Varivax
Pallor DT, Flulaval, Hiberix,
Pediarix, Pentacel, Prevnar-13, Quadracel
Petechiae [bleeding
capillaries] Engerix-B, Twinrix Pediarix, Recombivax
Polyarteritis nodosa [damaged
arteries] Recombivax
Raynaud’s phenomenon Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Renal vasculitis Afluria
Vasculitis MMR-II Afluria, Engerix-B,
Fluarix, Fluzone, Havrix, MMR-II, Recombivax, Twinrix
Urogenital (6) Dysuria [difficult
urination] Recombivax
Epididymitis [testicular
inflammation] MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Orchitis [inflammation
of the testes] MMR-II MMR-II, ProQuad
Proteinuria Gardasil/Gardasil 9
Urinary retention Pneumovax-23
Urinary tract infection Gardasil/Gardasil 9,
RotaTeq "

[Delight]

As those who follow this thread know.... despite the lies told barefaced by people like Dr. Hotez, a vaccine does not just contain a bit of a germ in saline. A vaccine uses adjuvants to trigger an immune response. These adjuvants are considered to be capable of harm even by the WHO but "necessary evils" for the choir of the church which considers vaccination a sacrament.

[Gwin Ru]

Gates' Vaccine will Create GMO Humans

August 19, 2020

A retired attorney considers the legality of mandatory vaccines which change our DNA

Do they seriously expect the public to accept vaccines from manufacturers who are protected from liability? You trust Bill Gates, don't you?


IMPENDING COVID-19 VACCINATIONS: A BRIEF ON SAFETY AND CHOICE

By Andrew
henrymakow.com

The impending arrival of many different COVID-19 vaccine offerings raises two extremely important questions:

(1) Will one of these new vaccines be safe enough to warrant the risk of being vaccinated?

(2) Given our government's current mandated lockdown mentality, might you be forced to take one of these vaccines?

On the subject of all things coronavirus, unfortunately, both conservative and liberal MSM have agreed to hype the need for an immediate vaccination as the way back to a productive, normal America. Likewise, most all of our politicians, including President Trump, are touting the need for immediate vaccinations - though their only real expertise seems to be how to get elected.

Consumers seem to naively think taking a new vaccine is no riskier than experimenting with Beta software. Fortunately, there are some who begun to speak out on the possible issues of a rushed vaccine ...One of the most prominent of those who question vaccines is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a serious and thoughtful activist in many areas, including health and the environment.

He writes:

"Almost no one understands what's at stake: Pharma has 80 COVID vaccines in development, but Gates & Fauci pushed Moderna's "Frankenstein jab" to the front of the line. Scientists & ethicists are sounding alarms. The vaccine uses a new, untested, and very controversial experimental RNA technology that Gates has backed for over a decade. Instead of injecting an antigen & adjuvant as with traditional vaccines, Moderna plugs a small piece of coronavirus genetic code into human cells, altering DNA throughout the human body and reprograming our cells to produce antibodies to fight the virus. MRNA vaccines are a form of genetic engineering called 'germline gene editing.' Moderna's genetic alterations are passed down to future generations."

Dr Suhab Siddiqi, Moderna's Ex-Director of Chemistry, told CNN, "I would not let the [vaccine] be injected in my body. I would demand: Where is the toxicity data?"

Former NIH Scientist Dr. Judy Mikovits says its criminal to test MRNA vaccines on humans. "MRNA can cause cancers and other dire harms that don't surface for years."

"UNINTENDED" CONSEQUENCES FROM FAULTY VACCINES

(A) What can result from unintended consequences of an ill-conceived vaccination campaign?

The following failed vaccination campaign was developed in an election year. Sound familiar?

"Some of the American public's hesitance to embrace vaccines -- the flu vaccine in particular -- 'can be attributed to the long-lasting effects of a failed 1976 campaign to mass-vaccinate the public against a strain of the swine flu virus,' writes Rebecca Kreston for Discover.

"This government-led campaign was widely viewed as a debacle and put an irreparable dent in future public health initiative, as well as negatively influenced the public's perception of both the flu and the flu shot in this country. To avoid an epidemic, the CDC believed, at least 80 percent of the United States population would need to be vaccinated. When they asked Congress for the money to do it, politicians jumped on the potential good press of saving their constituents from the plague."

"The real victims of this pandemic were likely the 450-odd people who came down with Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare neurological disorder, after getting the 1976 flu shot. On its website, the CDC notes that people who got the vaccination did have an increased risk of approximately one additional case of GBS for every 100,000 people who got the swine flu vaccine."

I personally know the Guillain-Barre side effect to be true because of a very close family friend was one of those who were so affected. Unlike many, he was fortunate enough to fully recover.

(B) In the U.S., some infants developed intussusception-a rare type of bowel obstruction-soon after RotaShield® was licensed in August 1998.

At first, it was not clear if the vaccine or some other factor was causing the bowel obstructions. The U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted on October 22, 1999, to no longer recommend the use of the RotaShield® vaccine for infants because of an association between the vaccine and intussusception (bowel folding). https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/rotavirus/vac-rotashield-historical.htm

(C) The date was 23 November 2009 and thousands of NHS staff were vaccinated with Pandemrix, a vaccine made by pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

Dozens of NHS workers are fighting for compensation after developing narcolepsy from a swine flu vaccine that was rushed into service without the usual testing when the disease spread across the globe in 2009. They say it has destroyed their careers and their health. https://www.buzzfeed.com/shaunlinter...ccine-was-safe


LEGISLATIVE CONCERNS

(A) Can the state force its citizens to take a vaccine? While one may be tempted to disregard a 115-year-old SCOTUS decision, don't be surprised if this decision allows some states to impose mandatory vacations on its citizens.

Not convinced? Remember that General Flynn was first investigated for possible violations of the 1799 Logan Act.

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.

(B) Whether forced to take a vaccination or not, an October 2010 SCOTUS ruling reinforces 1986 law preventing injured parties or surviving families from having reasonable remedies due to the negative effects of vaccinations.

The United States Supreme Court reached a decision recently, concluding that federal law protects vaccine makers from product-liability lawsuits that are filed in state courts and seek damages for injuries or death attributed to a vaccine.

The Supreme Court explained that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 preempts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for injury or death caused by a vaccine's side effects. The Court reasoned that "a vaccine side effect could always have been avoidable by use of a different vaccine not containing the harmful element. The language of the act suggests the design is not subject to question in a tort action.

The statute establishes as a complete defense must be unavoidability (given safe manufacture and warning) with respect to the particular design.

CONCLUSION
This brings us to the present. Rightly or wrongly, the nation is in a panic over what the establishment has been calling the most dangerous pandemic since the Spanish Flu of 1918.

Smarting from the effects of lockdowns, the media, politicians, bureaucrats, and doctors all are looking for the silver bullet ... and we, the people, want it now!

The success that politicians have had with our lockdown compliance might give them the courage to look to the old law in order to make a coronavirus vaccine mandatory.

On the other hand, many believe this whole pandemic has been planned. The push for vaccines that promise huge profits is a part of a darker initiative. I will dive into this subject in Part II.

In closing, I hope you will think about a vaccination that employs a technique that will affect future generations ... that's right, the future generations of your family. What might these consequences, planned or unintended, be?

If nothing else, consider the plight of the juicy, tasty tomato ... a tomato too perishable to effectively transport to the market. After years of genetic engineering to cure the perishability during shipment, tomatoes now travel well.

The unintended consequence is a GMO tomato that could now double as a reddish-pink handball.

Considering the unknowns, I've made my decision. I don't want the coming generations of my family or me to be GMO humans.

What will you decide?

----

Related - Must watch Plandemic I Interview with Judy Mikovits (Bottom left)

Note- In order to see the complexities of getting a vaccine to market, please follow the links to two tables.

Table 1: Vaccine Life Cycle
shows the CDC's take on the intricate steps of a vaccine's life cycle.

Table 2: Timelines and Competitors"
compares the typical timeline for bringing a vaccine to market to an impossibly quick solution demanded by the media and promised by the government. In addition, Table 2 shows the variety of companies racing to come up with a vaccine solution.


First Comment from Tony B
Unfortunately, articles like this, common in the "alternative" media, give the Satanists weaponry they may have overlooked and lead the average, non-truth-seeker further down the road to despair and helplessness.

Added to such warning revelations must be some of the possible actions by the people themselves as no government can stand against a massive refusal to obey an unjust statute. Especially one which is obviously unconstitutional (read "unlawful") to begin with. When the government becomes a criminal cabal, like that of the U.S. has been at the top for at least more than a century, it must be held to pay for that criminality by the people themselves, using whatever means necessary. The choice is that or abject slavery for all.

[O Donna]

Couldn't help myself

[onawah]

"Vaccines Revealed" new 9 part Docu-Series
9/2/20
(From non-profit GMOs Revealed email update today: support@gmosrevealed.com )

"Right now, as I write this, there is a fierce battle going on that the public doesn’t even know about…

And if Big Pharma and Big Media have their way, information will be deleted, decisions will be made, and laws will be passed without your knowledge or consent.

We’ll lose the right to speak up, the right to choose what’s best for ourselves and for our children.

We need advocates, and we need them today…

You helped raise the alarm about GMOs, and Monsanto finally had to face its victims in court.

We can do it again… with your help!

Make sure you are registered to watch the exclusive screening of the docu-series, “V-Revealed,” FREE and online HERE for VIP access viewing.

For decades, Big Pharma has controlled and manipulated the media to keep certain truths hidden.

For example:

-Robert Kennedy Jr. released a book about mercury and “the shots we require all kids to get,” all science-based.

He’s dear friends with Arianna Huffington and many in the media and still….he can’t get anyone to promote it.

-An actual whistleblower within the CDC came out less than a year ago and said he was “ordered to doctor” the results of the 2004 study that said autism wasn’t related to the MMR vaccine.

It’s been covered up!

And…

The media won’t cover the story.

Enough is enough.

What do you do?

Watch and share the FREE online docu-series, “V-Revealed” with a new episode every day for 9 days:
https://www.vrevealed.com/trailer/?c...affiliate=3450

Real change only comes if we band together as concerned parents, health advocates, and everyday heroes who are committed to exposing the truth and spreading the word.

We traveled the world with an award-winning documentary team and put together a magnificent Hollywood-quality documentary series that will blow your socks off!

You don’t want to miss a single riveting episode."

Register HERE Now! (It’s FREE):
https://www.vrevealed.com/trailer/?c...affiliate=3450

Sincerely,
The GMOs Revealed Team

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hgt_B4twCg4

[onawah]

VACCINES REVEALED new documtary 1st episode free online for 24 hours starting tonight
See post #861 above for more details
https://www.vrevealed.com/referral/

[onawah]

New interview with RFKennedy Jr,. on "Vaccines Revealed"

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...b-cf84941660dc
Register here: https://vrevealed.com/trailer/?eType...affiliate=3566
"For decades, Big Pharma has controlled and manipulated the media to keep certain truths hidden, but enough is enough.

We traveled the world with an award-winning documentary team, got exclusive access to whistleblowers, former drug reps, and university scientists and put together a magnificent Hollywood-quality documentary series that will blow your socks off!

Beginning Tuesday, September 8th, Vaccines Revealed 2020 reveal facts about:

• Drug and vaccine companies blatantly falsifying documents
• Whistleblowers getting completely BURIED
• Our Government looking the other way
• Bribery

With an all-new interview with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., you won’t want to miss a single riveting episode of Vaccines Revealed 2020!"