The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "The Shots", it's the Totalitarian Tiptoe

[onawah]

RFKennedy Jr. in "Vaccines Revealed" brand new 2 part interview, Part 1 showing free online now
I watched it and here are some of my notes:

ON MASKS: Children's Health Defense (RFKJr's team) did a research project and they found that of the 80 studies on Pub Med, almost all said masks don't work. They work for bacterial infections, but viruses are too small and they pass right through masks.
They are unhealthy because bacteria grows on them and they prevent the flow of oxygen.

HCQ: Fauci's team published a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine and Lancet on HCQ saying it doesn't work for Covid. One week later it was withdrawn for FRAUD.

The Moderna vaccine trial: It was conducted on 45 people who were in such robust health Kennedy said they were like "The Avengers". Of the high dose group, 3 people (20%) got seriously ill. Of the low dose group 1 person (6%) named Ian Haydon had to be hospitalized after bouts of chills, uncontrollable trembling, sweating, vomiting, and finally losing consciousness. He said it was the sickest he had ever been.

Ian Haydon: Was then guest on Sanje Gupts's TV show. Before the show, Gupta asked him how he did in the trial, and when Ian told him, Gupta urged him not to talk about how sick he got. Haydon complied (no reason was given) and said on the show that he did fine in the trial. But he later told the truth on Facebook and Twitter.

The Vaccine: Fauci admitted recently that the vaccine might only produce antibodies for 3 months, in which case to work "as advertised", it would have to be repeated every 3 moths. Kennedy pointed out that with no testing on animals, there is no way to know what short or long term damages it could cause, and that inasmuch as the flu shot actually makes the recipients contagious, it's likely the Covid vaccine would do the same. Because it will change the RNA, an entirely new and untested feature, there is no knowing what kind of unprecedented side effects it might cause. .

Fauci: Has only ever supported patented medicines from which pharmaceutical companies can make big profits. Never vitamins or drugs like HCQ, even though they are effective. From his position of great power, he awarded Moderna (with which he has had a long association) nearly half a billion dollars to develop the vaccine (even though they have never produced a vaccine before.

And more...
See more details about the documentary and sign up for all the upcoming free episodes here: https://vrevealed.com/trailer/ Each one will be shown free online for 24 hours.

[onawah]

Episode 2 now online free for about 6 more hours. See post above for more details. Episode 2 features Dr. Suzanne Humphries, Sayer Ji, Mary Holland.

[onawah]

Episode 3 available free for registrants for 22 more hours this one featuring part 2 of the interview RFK Jr., (EXPLOSIVE REVEAL by RFK !!), & Scott & Melissa Miller, filmmakers of "Vaccine Syndrome" and part of the film "Vaxxed". Register here: https://vrevealed.com/trailer/?eType...affiliate=3566
This direct link might work:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bXbmff7LnsY

[greybeard]

I watched this all the way through.(Episode 3)
I suspect that anyone who watches this will perhaps have thoughts about how Autism came about resolved.
Its not in the genes and not contagious.
RFKJnr very articulate --focused --he is not Anti vax he had vaccines himself and his kids were vaccinated.
Its full of facts about vaccine companies and mercury in injections.
An amazing interview and more to come.
Chris

[onawah]

Anyone who missed that youtube in post #865 that was first posted and is no longer available, there's another one now that should be good for awhile at least. Posted there now and here as well, it's a ground-breaking new interview with RFK Jr. that is going to be a minefield for vaccine proponents.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bXbmff7LnsY

Good for about 3 hours 15 minutes from the time this was posted.
Actually, Chris, RFK Jr. has said elsewhere that he is not anti-vaccine, he's in favor of vaccines that are safe and actually do what they are supposed to do, but none of them do or ever have.
His recounting of the number of vacccines he got as a child as opposed to how many his children got was meant to demonstrate the huge increase in the number of vaccines given now especially to children, and he goes on to explain why that is so dangerous and is putting the health of today's children at severe risk.

Posted by greybeard (here)
I watched this all the way through.(Episode 3)
I suspect that anyone who watches this will perhaps have thoughts about how Autism came about resolved.
Its not in the genes and not contagious.
RFKJnr very articulate --focused --he is not Anti vax he had vaccines himself and his kids were vaccinated.
Its full of facts about vaccine companies and mercury in injections.
An amazing interview and more to come.
Chris

[onawah]

From RFK Jr's Children's Health Defense Update today
9/11/20

COVID-19 Vaccine Participant Develops Neurological Symptoms, AstraZeneca Pauses Trial
By Jeremy Loffredo
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...5-3ff16de1f106

"On Tuesday, AstraZeneca announced a pause on its experimental COVID-19 vaccine trial after a woman in the UK developed a “suspected serious reaction.” The company is also conducting trials in the U.S., South Africa and Brazil, with enrollment in all these countries on hold for now.

AstraZeneca is partnering with researchers at Oxford University to develop this vaccine, and is testing it on children as young as 5 years old. The World Health Organization’s Chief Scientist Soumya Swaminathan called the project a COVID-19 vaccine race “frontrunner” earlier this year.

The company asserts that a panel of independent experts will review the adverse reaction and decide whether or not AstraZeneca should lift the pause.

While AstraZeneca says the woman has not been officially diagnosed, an anonymous source told the New York Times that the woman’s symptoms were consistent with transverse myelitis (TM).

TM is a neurological disorder characterized by inflammation of the spinal cord, a major element of the central nervous system. It often results in weakness of the limbs, problems emptying the bladder and paralysis. Patients can become severely disabled and there is currently no effective cure.

Concerns over associations between TM and vaccines are well known. A review of published case studies in 2009 documented 37 cases of transverse myelitis associated with vaccines, including Hepatitis B, measles-mumps-rubella, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus and others in infants, children and adults. The researchers in Israel noted “the associations of different vaccines with a single autoimmune phenomenon allude to the idea that a common denominator of these vaccines, such as an adjuvant, might trigger this syndrome.” Even the New York Times piece on the recent AstraZeneca trial pause notes past “speculation” that vaccines might be able to trigger TM.

Perhaps the most infamous example of this phenomenon is the case of Colton Berrett. Berrett received Merck’s HPV vaccine at age 13 after doctors advised his mother it would help prevent cervical cancer in his hypothetical wife down the line. After the vaccine, doctors diagnosed Berrett with TM, and the boy became increasingly paralyzed as his spine became increasingly inflamed. Doctors said he’d eventually lose the ability to breathe and the family chose to intubate him. After years of living with this disability, and needing someone to carry a breathing apparatus for him at all times, Berrett took his own life.

Even if AstraZeneca’s vaccine is found responsible for the trial participant’s TM symptoms, that may not become the official conclusion. In July, another participant developed symptoms of TM, and the vaccine trial was paused. But an “independent panel” concluded the illness was unrelated to the vaccine, and the trial continued.

As Nikolai Petrovsky from Flinders University told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, these panels are “typically made up of doctors, a biostatistician and a medical representative of the sponsor company running the trial.”

As Nikolai Petrovsky from Flinders University told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, these panels are “typically made up of doctors, a biostatistician and a medical representative of the sponsor company running the trial.”

It’s unclear if the panel that reviewed the first case of TM will be the same group of experts to decide if the second case of TM was caused by the vaccine, but the Oxford team seems to be laying the groundwork for another such conclusion.

“This may be due to an issue related to the vaccine. It also may not,” a spokesperson from Oxford University told ABC News Thursday.

Also of significance is the fact that researchers have yet to produce a safe and effective vaccine against any coronavirus. When researchers were experimenting on vaccines against SARS (similar to COVID-19 in that it infects the lungs), trials were halted completely, after the vaccinated animals developed even more severe (and sometimes fatal) versions of SARS than the unvaccinated animals.

But while AstraZeneca informs volunteers about the results of animal trials with experimental SARS and MERS vaccines, it leaves out the results of its own animal trials, which suggest ineffectiveness at stopping the spread of the virus.



Screenshot from information sheet given to AstraZeneca’s vaccine trial volunteers.

As Forbes reported in May, all six monkeys injected with AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine became infected with COVID-19 after being inoculated. Then, all the monkeys were put to death, meaning the public won’t know if other issues were to have developed.

Adding obscurity to the AstraZeneca trial results is the fact that control groups are given Pfizer’s Nimenrix, a meningitis and pneumonia vaccine.

In a tweet, Oxford University’s Oxford Vaccine Group explained the decision, while seemingly indicating that it doesn’t expect its own vaccine to be safe at all since adverse reactions to Nimenrix and the new COVID-19 vaccine are expected.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chief legal counsel and chairman of Children’s Health Defense, explains, “Since none of these companies have ever had to test their products for safety against a true inert placebo, they have always been able to dismiss these sort of tragic outcomes as sad ‘coincidence.'”

Furthermore, AstraZeneca is no stranger to hiding negative trial data from the public eye. DrugWatch.com has documented this pattern at length. For example, the company knowingly and systematically hid results showing that its antipsychotic drug Seroquel was either ineffective or harmful, which is revealed in company emails. (AstraZeneca had to pay $520 million to the U.S. Department of Justice and $647 million in settlements after covering up Seroquel’s side effects.)

Not to mention, in March 2020, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a declaration under the PREP Act (retroactive to February), providing liability immunity “against any claim of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the manufacture, distribution, administration, or use of medical countermeasures,” including vaccines. This means that AstraZeneca is indemnified against lawsuits, regardless of whether or not its new vaccine produces harmful effects.

AstraZeneca calls its recent decision to halt the trial a “routine action,” and some experts have chimed in with similar takes. Cambridge University lecturer Dr. Charlotte Summers contends the pause is a sign of the “rigorousness of the safety monitoring regime,” while Florian Krammer, a Virologist at the Icahn School of Medicine, similarly argues the move to pause proves that “only safe and effective therapies make it to the market.”

But, as Kennedy points out, this move to investigate adverse reactions is anything but routine. “The vaccine industry is unaccustomed to this level of scrutiny,” he says. He suggests that most vaccine approval processes are not subject to such investigation by the global public eye, and that “if the 72 doses now mandated for children [such as measles-mumps-rubella] had endured critical appraisal by so many eyeballs, not one of them could have gotten close to an FDA license.”
"
Tech Titans and Censorship—The Same People Profiting From The Quarantine Are Censoring Criticisms of It
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense

"The same bloated Tech/Data and Telecom Titans now gorging themselves on the corpses of our obliterated middle class are rapidly transforming America’s once proud democracy into a censorship and surveillance police state. As Naomi Klein chronicled in her classic, Disaster Capitalism, totalitarian elements and ruling elites have, throughout history, reflexively used crisis as opportunities to shift wealth upward. “You never,” Rahm Emmanuel counseled, “want a serious crisis to go to waste.” The tread worn strategy is to inflame public fears to justify the imposition of authoritarian controls and censorship thereby allowing oligarchs to silence protest against their power-grabs and their wholesale privatization of the commons.

Permanently bankrupted over 100,000 small businesses including 41,000 Black-owned businesses some of which took three generations of investment to build.
Led by Bill Gates, Silicon Valley applauded from the sidelines as medical charlatans fanned pandemic panic, confined the world population under house arrest, and shattered the global economy. Silicon Valley fattened as masked and isolated families turned to social media and Amazon. In five months, their quarantine put 58 million Americans out of work, permanently bankrupted over 100,000 small businesses including 41,000 Black-owned businesses some of which took three generations of investment to build. These policies have also set into motion the inevitable dismantling of the social safety net that nurtured middle-class prosperity. Government officials have already begun liquidating the 100-year legacies of the New Deal, New Frontier, the Great Society, and Obamacare to pay the accumulated quarantine debts. Say goodbye to school lunches, healthcare, WICS, Medicaid, Medicare, University scholarships, etc., etc., etc.

The Tech Barons used the lockdown to accelerate construction of their 5G network of satellites, antennae, biometric facial recognition, and “track and trace” infrastructure that they will use to compel obedience, suppress dissent, and to manage the rage when Americans finally wake up to the fact that they have stolen our democracy, our civil rights, our country, and way of life while we huddled in orchestrated fear from a flu-like illness."

COVID-19 an Early Warning for Vaccine Mandates


By Davis Taylor, Tenth Amendment Center
https://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.co...5-3ff16de1f106

"The history of totalitarian regimes has shown that those who voice dissent early on are often viewed as loons or trouble makers and that, generally, it’s not until the regimes are at their worst that those early dissenters enjoy some restoration of their reputations. It’s ironic, of course, that it takes “things getting bad” for the mocking and loathing of those early dissenters to stop—with increased oppression serving as a silver lining of sorts for them.

A scenario along these lines is unfolding for those in the informed consent movement, who oppose vaccine mandates. For years, they’ve endured their share of mocking and loathing. However, recently, their concerns are receiving greater consideration by the public. This is happening because “things are getting bad” with regard to rights being stripped under the pretext of protecting us from infectious disease. Meanwhile, the path society has been on with regard to childhood vaccine mandates has taken a wider and deeper turn.

That turn was the arrival of COVID-19 along with the scientific shenanigans and repression of rights that have accompanied it. Below are three ways that the informed consent movement’s warnings are being validated by the manner in which “the powers that be” are responding to COVID-19.

1. The risks from COVID-19 are being exaggerated, like those of other infectious diseases.

Opponents of vaccine mandates have argued for years that the risks posed by many infectious diseases have been exaggerated in order to garner support for mandates. This argument has fallen on mostly disinterested ears.

This is because, for the most part, people can’t be reasoned out of beliefs they weren’t reasoned into. The beliefs held by most Americans about the risks posed by infectious diseases, and the track record of vaccines, were not reached through reason or research. They were drilled into them as purported historical fact while school children and the beliefs are deeply ingrained. The narrative is that the diseases the U.S. vaccinates against pose grave danger to us and that they were only controlled through the use of vaccines. (Contrary to popular belief, death rates from infectious diseases plummeted in the U.S. before the widespread use of vaccines.) The public has had very little interest in learning information that conflicts with this narrative.

However, Big Pharma and the powers that be have a big problem with regard to COVID-19. The COVID-19 story is unfolding live, not pre-recorded, before the public. It’s not being delivered to us as school children, as a fully honed tale. And, the story is not one likely to instill confidence in the state’s decision-making ability regarding infectious disease.

Almost every aspect of “the official response” to COVID-19 has been the subject of reversal and inconsistency. Examples of this are the shifting official positions regarding mask-wearing, and the reversals regarding reliance upon two disastrously wrong disease models (Imperial College and the IHME). Another example is the confusion in statements regarding whether asymptomatic carriers can spread COVID-19.

The scientific twists and turns, contradictions and inconsistencies, and overall uncertainty lying beneath the official COVID-19 risk narrative have made for a very messy story. The public is seeing the shaky, fragile pillars upon which the narrative rests. And yet, in the midst of this scientific uncertainty, the public is witnessing the state forging ahead with mandates (e.g., lockdowns, mask requirements, and the likely imminent vaccine requirement).

This has presented the public with a striking example, occurring right before its eyes, of the state imposing infectious disease mandates in the clear absence of a well-researched body of science showing that they’re necessary, safe, or effective. This blows wide open the myth that the state only imposes mandates based upon a solid bedrock of settled science.

In fact, even the issue of whether COVID-19 constitutes a new virus is unsettled. Some well-credentialled members of the scientific community have questioned this. For example, Dr. Beda M. Stadler, a Swiss biologist, emeritus professor, and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern wrote in June of 2020 that it was wrong to claim that COVID-19 is a novel virus.

Witnessing the uncertain, circus-like atmosphere in which bureaucrats have imposed COVID-19 mandates may make the more inquisitive among us question what scientific record actually lies beneath the vaccine mandates already in place for children. (Links to resources on that subject are located at the end of this article.)

Further, even the least intellectually curious among us, who never stray from the mainstream media, have surely picked up on the fact that information is being gathered and presented in a manner to exaggerate the risks from COVID-19.

60 Minutes recently reported that flawed COVID-19 tests have been widely used, resulting in many false positives. And, even the CDC has acknowledged that a positive result from the antibody test, which is one of two types of tests available for the virus that purportedly causes COVID-19, may be an indication of having had an infection caused by another coronavirus. Also, it’s been reported that multiple labs have submitted only positive results and that there have been instances where multiple positive test results from the same person have been recorded as multiple cases. Reports of overcounting of cases are common. (Recent examples are here and here.) Additionally, the media has routinely conflated having a positive test result with having the COVID-19 illness when in fact, testing positive does not equate to having the illness. Perhaps most troubling of all is the fact that deaths of those who died with COVID-19, but not from it, are being included in the COVID-19 death count.

This COVID-19 landscape gives the vaccine freedom movement an excellent, recent point of comparison to use when discussing the exaggerated risk levels of other infectious diseases, including measles.

The CDC now recommends approximately 70 doses of 16 vaccines for children by age 18. This schedule has rapidly expanded since liability was removed for the manufacturers of most vaccines in the 1980s. Most informed consent advocates oppose the mandating of any vaccines. However, because Big Pharma has especially pushed the narrative that vaccination is necessary with regard to measles, the mandate debate has particularly focused on that virus.

Like COVID-19, the mortality rate from the measles virus has been exaggerated. Prior to the use of vaccines, the risk of death from measles in the U.S. was low, at approximately 1 in 10,000 of those infected. Of course, not every American was infected with measles each year, so the overall annual mortality rate among the entire U.S. population from the virus was far lower than that. Big Pharma, the state and the media often provide an estimate of the U.S. pre-vaccine era annual measles death rate which is an order of magnitude higher than cited above, i.e., 1 in 1,000. This calculation is generally based upon the use of reported cases as the denominator rather than overall cases. This method is deceptive because measles was generally viewed as a benign childhood illness in the pre-vaccine era and most measles cases were not reported back then.

The measles virus is just one of many infectious diseases for which the public holds an erroneous, inflated perception of risk. Prior to COVID-19, it was nearly impossible to interest the public in the issue of Big Pharma and its cronies exaggerating the risks from infectious diseases. However, now, informed consent advocates can start the conversation with, “Did you know that the risks posed by measles has been exaggerated, like the risks from COVID-19?”

In light of the recent, widely-known puffery regarding the risks from COVID-19, this opening is likely to pique interest.

2. Vaccines safety testing is inadequate.

Those opposed to vaccine mandates would love nothing more than a public interested in learning about vaccine safety testing. We believe that, upon full investigation, the public will find it to be shockingly lax. However, until recently, most Americans seemed to assume that they’d learned all they’ll ever need to know about this topic in 8th grade. Strategically speaking, Big Pharma and its state allies should probably have left well enough alone and avoided any steps that would stir up interest in the topic of vaccine safety. But, they didn’t. Instead, they’ve handed the public “Operation Warp Speed” to ponder.

Operation Warp Speed will allow for the accelerated development, testing and licensure of experimental COVID-19 vaccines. Researchers will be permitted to deviate from normal animal study procedures. This is despite the fact that some animal studies conducted in connection with vaccines under development for other coronaviruses (which were never licensed) have had concerning safety results. (Episode 177 of the HighWire, beginning at 25 minutes, features discussion of “immune enhancement,” a dangerous condition that’s been found during these animal studies.) Some of the COVID-19 vaccines being fast-tracked will use entirely new technologies (e.g., manufacturing methods using mRNA, DNA and nanoparticle genetic engineering technology; a delivery method using a microneedle array equipped with fluorescent quantum dot tags, rather than a conventional injection). Further, there are concerns that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may alter human RNA and DNA.

To date, vaccine manufacturers have received billions from the state for the development of a COVID-19 vaccine. The manufacturers of such vaccines, like the manufacturers of most vaccines, will have no liability.

In light of the skipped steps, minimal time spent researching adverse reactions and lack of manufacturers’ liability, members of the public who learn the details of Operation Warp Speed likely will not conclude that their safety is at the forefront of the minds of those racing to develop a vaccine. It will be unfortunate for the vaccine industry if this prompts the public to look into the safety testing of the other vaccines licensed pre-COVID-19. Below is just some of what they’ll find.

Lack of inert, placebo-controlled studies. The FDA classifies vaccines as “biologics” rather than “drugs,” thereby allowing vaccine manufacturers to forego the multi-year, double-blind, inert placebo-controlled studies required for drug approval. Almost all vaccine safety studies are conducted without a control group of unvaccinated individuals receiving nothing but an inert placebo. Generally, if a “control group” is used during a vaccine safety study, the group receives a substance which is not inert, such as another vaccine or an adjuvant such as aluminum (e.g., when Merck conducted clinical studies for the Gardasil 9 vaccine, it used the original Gardasil vaccine as the “placebo” in the control groups, and both vaccines contain an aluminum adjuvant).
Lack of studies comparing children vaccinated in accordance with the CDC schedule with those who are unvaccinated. In a July 29, 2020 response to a FOIA request, the CDC acknowledged that it lacked any documents comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated children with those who have never been vaccinated. In its response, it stated, in part, that “The CDC has not conducted a study of health outcomes of vaccinated v unvaccinated populations.”
Very short periods of monitoring for adverse events. Most vaccines are subject to very short periods of monitoring for adverse reactions, often of 14 days or less.
Vaccine manufacturers design and conduct safety studies. Vaccine safety trials are generally designed and conducted by the vaccine manufacturers themselves, causing concerns over conflicts of interest.
Lack of studies showing that vaccines do not play a role in the development of autism. The CDC has presented no studies showing that vaccines do not play a role in the development of autism. In fact, in early 2020, after litigation arising in connection with a FOIA request asking the CDC to identify all studies it has relied upon to claim that the vaccines it recommends for the first six months of life do not, alone or cumulatively, cause autism, the CDC entered into a stipulation responding to the request. In its response, the CDC identified studies, but, none of them demonstrated that the aforesaid vaccines, alone or cumulatively, do not cause autism. Contrary to the assertions of the mainstream media, the science is not settled regarding the issue of whether vaccines play a role in the development of autism.
3. Adult vaccine mandates will be ushered in, as well as surveillance, tracking and other forms of repression.

It’s common to hear the expression that people “don’t dream big enough.” COVID-19 has taught those in the informed consent movement that we didn’t have nightmares big enough. Below is a list of repressive measures that the informed consent movement warned were coming prior to COVID-19, and the manner in which those warnings have been met (and in some instances exceeded) since its arrival.

Adult vaccine mandates are arriving. Vaccine freedom advocates have warned of impending adult mandates. The CDC has both a childhood vaccine schedule along with an adult schedule. A person receiving all of the doses on both schedules will receive nearly 150 lifetime doses. The goal of vaccinating members of the population throughout their entire lives is set forth in the National Vaccine Plan, the National Adult Immunization Plan and the Global Vaccine Action Plan. In December of 2018, Argentina enacted a law mandating its entire vaccine schedule for both children and adults. Many pointed to this as a bellwether for what is coming for other countries. In March of 2020, Denmark passed legislation (in effect through March of 2021) authorizing forced vaccination against COVID-19. On August 21, 2020, Virginia’s Health Commissioner Dr. Norman Oliver stated that he plans to mandate a coronavirus vaccine for all Virginians once one is publicly available. On July 31, 2020, the President of the University of California issued an executive order requiring all students, faculty and staff who will be present on campus to receive influenza immunizations before Nov. 1, 2020. This is despite the fact that some research indicates that those receiving an annual influenza vaccine may be at increased risk of infection from coronaviruses.
The tracking that was warned about is coming to fruition. Prior to COVID-19, members of the informed consent movement warned that mass tracking and restrictions on movement would be imposed as purported protection from infectious diseases. The technology for these measures is quickly being implemented. CoviPass, a downloadable application which contains the users’ COVID-19 test histories and other health information, and uses surveillance technology to trace people, is one example. It’s reportedly being rolled out in fifteen countries and it’s anticipated that it will serve the basis for immunity passports required to travel and move about. Further, there is at least one recent example of a U.S. college requiring its students to submit to contract-tracing. Albion College, located in Michigan, is reportedly requiring students for the fall semester to download an application that will constantly track their locations and label them based upon COVID-19 test results. The college has also reportedly asked students to remain on campus throughout the semester, with revocation of the right to access campus as a possible penalty for not doing so.
Lockdowns and mask orders have exceeded even the vaccine freedom movement’s predictions. Simply put, the lockdowns and mask mandates have exceeded the nightmares of most in the informed consent movement. This author didn’t see those coming. Hopefully, at this point, most of the public is aware that significant scientific concerns exist in connection with both of these mandates. Some of those concerns are discussed here.
Below are resources for those who are interested in more information about infectious diseases and vaccines."

Children’s Health Defense
The HighWire with Del Bigtree
Informed Consent Action Network
National Vaccine Information Center
Vaxxter
The website of author/journalist Jeremy R. Hammond
The website of author/journalist Bretigne Shaffer
Article Central Planning of Your Immune System is Dangerous by Davis Taylor
Book Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchersby Neil Z. Miller
Book Vaccines – A Reappraisal by Dr. Richard Moskowitz
Book How to End the Autism Epidemic by J.B. Handley
Book Dissolving Illusions – Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History by Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk
Book Vaccines, Autoimmunity, and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illnesses by Dr. Thomas Cowan

continued

[onawah]

Take Action Now—Tell Congress to Urge FDA to Take Action on Improperly Tested Hepatitis B Vaccines!
By Children's Health Defense Team

Attorneys for Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) have filed a petition with the FDA demanding that the licensure for Hepatitis B vaccines be revoked or suspended until legally required safety is proven in a “properly designed clinical trial of sufficient duration.” In the clinical trials of the two Hepatitis B vaccines available for use in the U.S., Engerix-B and Recombivax HB, subjects were followed up for four days and five days respectively. According to the FDA, clinical trials typically take between one and four years to complete.

Children’s Health Defense suggests sending a letter to your lawmakers to urge them to contact the FDA in support of ICAN’s petition to the agency. You can do so easily using our click-to-action system!
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/a...5-3ff16de1f106

A Dangerous Inactive Ingredient
Editorial by Harold R. Gielow, LtCol USMC (Ret.)
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...5-3ff16de1f106

"Consumers often have the need to check a product’s ingredients and this is especially true for those with allergies to certain substances. Such access to product information is essential for individuals to protect themselves from harm by exposure to ingredients to which they have known sensitivities. For the most part, such labeling is sufficient for those impacted; however, when the vast majority of the population has a preexisting immune response to an ingredient classified as biologically inert/inactive by our government, that should raise concerns. This is because an immune response or allergic reaction is a major cause of adverse medical events, some of which can be life-threatening (such as in the case of anaphylactic shock).

When this same substance is a key component of a vaccine (a potentially mandated vaccine to combat a worldwide pandemic) our concern should be commensurately raised. When the vast majority of those who have an immune response to the substance do not realize what they are allergic to and therefore cannot reasonably be expected to avoid it, we have the potential for a medical crisis within a medical crisis.

Scientific studies to quantify the seriousness of the problem estimate that approximately 72% of the US population has acquired anti PEG antibodies.
Just what is this dangerous inactive ingredient?
Polyethylene Glycol, otherwise known as PEG, Macrogol, Carbowax and many other names when combined with other substances, is not a household word unless your house holds biochemists. It is classified as biologically inert by our FDA. It is the “Gold Standard” for use in many medications to increase the blood clearance time, or in other words, the time it remains in one’s system, thereby enhancing drug effect. It is also used in drug manufacturing as an excipient for long term stabilization, bulking, and other therapeutic enhancements. It is used as a coating to prevent bacterial adhesion on orthopedic screws and sutures. In addition to medical uses, PEG is also used in cosmetics, foods, industrial applications, and other health and beauty products such as soaps, shampoos, toothpastes. It is also used as an e-cigarette liquid. PEG is everywhere in our environment, which is what many have surmised has led to a high percentage of the US population developing anti-PEG antibodies. This, of course, presents a significant challenge to those who rely on this substance in their manufacturing.

Scientific studies to quantify the seriousness of the problem estimate that approximately 72% of the US population has acquired anti PEG antibodies. The referenced study used blood samples taken from 1990-1999 and earlier, showing a steady increase over time in the percentage of those with antibodies to PEG, making it conservative to estimate, after two decades, that the incidence is closer to 80% today. This circumstance has concerned the medical and pharmaceutical communities as an equally effective alternative has escaped identification, although several have been suggested, and because the great cost of shifting to such an alternative.

Not only is PEG a “stealth” medicinal additive, delaying blood clearance due to its properties, but it is a stealth allergen, the vast majority of the population never having heard of it and many in the healthcare industry being unaware of its antigenic properties. A physician survey found:

“Although 91% of respondents were aware of antidrug antibodies in general, only 22% were aware of APA (Anti-PEG Antibody) responses. Further, there was limited awareness (35%) of PEG’s inclusion in prescribed PEGylated therapeutics.”

The lack of awareness of this issue in the general population and in the health care provider population present unique challenges, one of which we are facing with today’s Covid-19 pandemic.

PEG and Covid-19 Vaccines
There are at least three fast-tracked vaccines being produced and tested at this time, obviously meant for widespread use, some even arguing mandatory use, which contain PEG: Moderna’s mRNA1273, and BioNTech/Pfizer’s BNT162b1 and b2. These mRNA vaccines trick your cells into producing Covid-19 proteins—pieces of the virus which are non-infectious. These proteins then elicit an immune response to fight the real virus. They use a pegylated Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) as the delivery mechanism for the mRNA. Think of the LNP as a miniscule (less than 100 billionth of a meter) bubble containing the mRNA. This “bubble” is coated with PEG (DSPE MPEG2000 in Moderna’s case) to stabilize the carrier and assist it in getting to and into the target cells. PEG assists with the “getting to” portion of the journey by preventing the bubble from breaking down before it reaches its target. That is what some call PEG’s stealth properties—its ability to mask and protect the carrier from the body’s normal defenses against foreign substances.

Safety and Efficacy
Two obvious issues are presented by the high percentage of our population having pre-existing antibodies to PEG: safety and efficacy. While it is true that not everyone with pre-existing PEG antibodies will have a severe reaction to a vaccine containing PEG, there is a significant danger that many will. Ideally, the safety and efficacy effects on those with pre-existing antibodies to PEG would be determined in the clinical trials. However, as Moderna’s trial is not pre-screening participants for anti-PEG antibodies they cannot, therefore, characterize the risk. They are flying blind.

Multiple previous studies regarding the prevalence of anti-PEG antibodies in the population have stated that prescreening for these antibodies should be done prior to administration of any PEG containing medication. This is obvious for safety reasons. It is especially important in the case of a desire to vaccinate as many people as possible with a vaccine containing a substance to which the vast majority of the population may unknowingly have antibodies. Also important in this regard, is that it matters, in terms of immunogenicity, what PEG is bound to, the manner in which it is applied to the carrier, its concentration, its molecular weight, etc. Not characterizing trial participants adverse reactions in relation to Anti-PEG Antibody presence and levels forfeits gaining insight into these factors. After all, since taxpayers have paid almost one billion dollars to assist Moderna in getting this vaccine tested and produced the glaring safety risks should at least be evaluated.

As Moderna has stated the proven fact that a high percentage of the population having anti PEG antibodies is “hypothetical,” and they are not screening for it …
Efficacy is also at stake. Accounting for different levels of preexisting anti-PEG antibodies should influence trial procedures. Safety considerations are obvious, but efficacy could be enhanced by slightly altering the protocols for participants with anti-PEG antibodies. The main efficacy concern is accelerated blood clearance due to the body’s defenses recognizing the PEG antigen. It would be helpful to quantify at what titers, or levels, of Anti-PEG Antibody accelerated blood clearance becomes a problem. As Moderna has stated the proven fact that a high percentage of the population having anti PEG antibodies is “hypothetical,” and they are not screening for it, this is another missed opportunity. It was certainly taken into account during the trial of another vaccine that used an Adenovirus as the carrier, so such trial procedures are not unusual.

I am not anti-vaccine. I am pro safe, effective vaccines. It seems some basic safety and efficacy risk mitigation procedures are being ignored. This oversight appears to be intentional as Moderna’s own scientists have made note of the problem. I have a severe anaphylactic response to PEG. Luckily, I identified it and had it confirmed by Johns Hopkins. I am forewarned. But the vast majority of potentially billions of citizens fated to receive the Moderna vaccine are not forewarned. How many will be injured because Moderna failed to investigate a dangerous “inactive” ingredient?"

Despite numerous scientific studies, Moderna has stated the high percentage of the population having anti PEG antibodies is “hypothetical,” and they are not screening for it. How many will be injured because Moderna failed to investigate a dangerous “inactive” ingredient in their COVID-19 vaccine?

Zuckerberg says Facebook won't remove anti-vaccine posts amid coronavirus pandemic
By Alexandra Kelley, The Hill

https://thehill.com/changing-america...5-3ff16de1f106

https://thehill.com/changing-america...ti?jwsource=cl

https://thehill.com/changing-america...ti?jwsource=cl

[GOOGLE]https://thehill.com/changing-america...ti?jwsource=cl[/GOOGLE]

"Story at a glance

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that the online platform will not censor anti-vaccination posts or content.
This follows a lawsuit filed against the social media titan by the Children’s Health Defense, a leading anti-vaccination group.
Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg says in a new interview that the social media giant has no intention of removing anti-vaccination posts.

Zuckerberg's remarks come as several companies, such as Moderna, AstraZeneca and Pfizer, are in the late stages of clinical trials for their COVID-19 vaccine candidates.

Social media platforms like Facebook have worked to limit the spread of misinformation about COVID-19, though critics warn that inaccurate information spread about a potential future coronavirus vaccine could undermine efforts to build immunity against the disease.

“We work with the [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and we work with the [World Health Organization] and trusted health organizations to remove clear misinformation about health-related issues that could cause an imminent risk of harm,” Zuckerberg said in an interview on "Axios on HBO."

"If someone is pointing out a case where a vaccine caused harm or that they're worried about it — you know, that's a difficult thing to say from my perspective that you shouldn't be allowed to express at all," he added later.

Facebook has been under fire recently for its content policies, especially among lawmakers who advocate better content regulation on the site during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The company has also faced scrutiny over its handling of political ads with false information, with Facebook recently announcing it will ban new political ads related to the presidential election within seven days of the Nov. 3 vote to reduce the spread of misinformation.

“During a global pandemic, Facebook is looking the other way while disinformation about the coronavirus goes viral on its platform — a direct threat to the health and safety of millions of people," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said to The Hill. "No company should be too big to be held accountable for distorting facts and spreading falsehoods, especially during a public health crisis.”

In August, a leading anti-vaccination advocacy group called the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) sued Facebook and its fact-checking network, alleging that Facebook illegally suppressed and censored its content by implementing warning labels that work to flag disinformation on CHD’s official Facebook page. The plaintiff says that these actions are in violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. constitution that guarantees the freedom of speech.

Zuckerberg has defended the use of fact-checking companies, like Politifact and Science Feedback, as mitigating third parties to evaluate the potential spread of misinformation on the platform.

“What we try to say is if people are overgeneralizing things, if they're spreading misinformation and we can defer to a third party fact checker or an organization like the CDC or WHO on kind of clear health guidelines on things that could lead to imminent harm, if people don't follow them, then we will we will try to take action against those,” he told Axios."

continued

[onawah]

What Really Happened in Berlin? CHD’s Senta Depuydt Was There
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/a...5-3ff16de1f106

"By Senta Depuydt, President, Children’s Health Defense Europe



The German media are reporting 38,000 people in attendance on August 29 in Berlin while YouTubers claim one million or more. Not a word is being mentioned about Robert Kennedy’s presence at the event on official networks even as the historic speech of the former U.S. president’s nephew floods social media. Never has the gap between the institutional press and the alternative media been so wide. What really happened on August 29th in Berlin?

Germany experienced one of the biggest demonstrations in its history on August 29, despite repeated attempts by the Berlin authorities to ban the event. The announcement of the participation of attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. as a last-minute guest reinforced the public’s mobilization and determination to turn out and defend their freedoms being threatened by the health agendas related to the response to the “pandemic.”



"The will to express oneself
Caught between the imperatives of international strategy and the growing discontent within the population, the German government seems to be losing its footing since the demonstration on August 1st, which brought together more than 800,000 people, many chanting “Angela, dein Volk ist da,” which translates, “your people are there.” Indeed, in the face of the “deaf ear” of politics, many members of the movement are now calling for the establishment of a new national assembly to guarantee the rights of the constitution. Inspired in part by yellow vests in France, workshops were born throughout Germany, witnessing the emergence of a popular will in search of sovereignty.

It is not surprising that the government sought to downplay the success of the first demonstration on1 August 1st, stating figures of 17,000 participants, while the images of the large rally in the main aisle “Unter den Linden’ clearly showed hundreds of thousands. It is also not surprising that the media sought to tarnish the reputations of the organizers who were accused of being Nazis.

Legal battles
As expected, the Berlin authorities tried to ban the August 29 demonstration just before the event. However, as Germany has been scarcely affected by the epidemic, it is becoming increasingly difficult to impose a general health emergency. Unable to “ban” any demonstration, they withdrew the specific authorization for that event. The response from the organizers was swift. Always anxious to respect the rule of law, they asked their members to make new requests for demonstrations individually. Within hours, more than 6,000 people filled out and submitted the necessary documents. Police stations were flooded with requests from the legal team, while YouTubers relayed the maneuver live to hundreds of thousands of amused spectators. At the same time, the movement was appealing the decision to a federal court. Excitement was high when an influencer dropped the scoop of Kennedy’s arrival on social media. The next morning, it was announced that the federal court had ruled in favour of the protesters and that the event would move forward.

The magic of circumstances

Children’s Health Defense Europe Inaugural Meeting
In reality, Kennedy’s presence at the protest had not been scheduled. Kennedy, the board chair of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a nonprofit organization in the U.S dedicated to the protection of children’s health, was scheduled to attend the inaugural meeting of the CHD European branch, Children’s Health Defense Europe. It was a bit of a coincidence of the calendar that led to his participation in the event as he was travelling to Europe anyway to meet with the Board of Directors to discuss different strategic directions for the new chapter. The message from the organizers then reached him, with a video showing a public invitation at the August 1st demonstration. The travel of members of an international organization to attend a joint meeting is not subject to COVID travel restrictions, so Kennedy’s visit to Berlin was perfectly legitimate. A speech by the famous lawyer was obviously a perfect opportunity to both announce the launch of the association and to convey a strong message of freedom and democracy to the German public.

Querdenken: a movement to defend democracy
Querdenken or “think differently” is the name of the organization behind the protest. It’s a non-partisan movement that brings together citizens shocked by the deprivations of freedoms imposed on German citizens with the onset of the coronavirus crisis. The movement challenges the legitimacy of containment and the imposition of mask-wearing, as well as the testing or tracking measures associated with the pandemic agenda, believing that these are disproportionate and do not justify the infringement of individual freedoms. It also contests the way in which these regulations are made, their lack of transparency, the lack of respect for the debate, and the absence of a vote.

Markus Hainz, a lawyer firmly committed to defending the rule of the law
Created on the initiative of Michael Ballweg, a computer scientist from Stuttgart, the Querdenken initiative quickly spread to many cities, leading to the development of a resistance network across Germany, with demonstrations in several major cities. The association was organized in a partnership between some fifty lawyers, several hundred doctors led by Dr. Heiko Schoning and the network “ACU2020,” which demands independence from the medical and scientific communities and independent media and influencers of social networks. Coming from all social and political backgrounds, their common goal is to provide a strong, reasoned, but also resolutely peaceful and democratic response by using all legitimate means under the law, which they feel is threatened.

An innumerable crowd

Hundreds of Polish protesters had to sit for hours on the same street.
As soon as Berlin’s ban on the demonstration was announced, the media attempted to dissuade the public from reaching the capital. Many buses planned from abroad cancelled scheduled trips. But the announcement of Kennedy’s arrival reinforced more than ever the will of the German public to join an event that promised to be historic. Protesters poured in early in the day and more than 3,000 police were deployed in the city. They carried out numerous roadblocks and pushed back several dozen buses arriving in the city to prevent the various processions from making it to the protest. In several streets, protesters were surrounded and “confined” for hours without being allowed to move.

Fortunately, things remained peaceful, and many attendees, including some of Ghandi’s followers, began to sing ‘Liebe polizei macht die strasse frei’ or “dear policemen free the street,” and some began to meditate while patiently accepting the situation.

The crowd in the ‘Unter den Linden’ alley…and well beyond


How many people were actually there? According to the official press, 38,000. But everyone who was in Berlin that day knows that hundreds of thousands of people populated the capital to take part in the event. As the police prevented some of the processions from joining the crowd at the victory column, the participants couldn’t be counted as a single, compact mass. But the journey of the crowd gathered around forty podiums and rebroadcast screens, as well as in dozens of alleys and nearby streets suggests that there were certainly more than a million people in Berlin that day.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. the new ‘Berliner’
Could one find a stronger symbol than the presence of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to defend fundamental freedoms in the face of a new totalitarian agenda? In June 1963, two years after the construction of the Berlin Wall, Kennedy’s uncle, President John F. Kennedy, had come to reaffirm American support in response to the Communist threat. In his very memorable speech, he said, “There are many people in the world who do not understand or claim to not understand what is the great difference between the free world and the Communist world. Let them come to Berlin!” The President concluded his speech with these words: “All free men, wherever they live, are citizens of Berlin and therefore, as a free man, I am proud to utter these words ‘Ich bin ein Berliner.”

Decades later, we could almost have repeated the same discourse. Although Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. did not use the term “communism,” it was an authoritarian, totalitarian and Orwellian society that he condemned. Corruption, censorship, oppression, collusion, deprivation of liberty—he did not mince his words in describing the international agenda that is being put in place in response to the pandemic, evoking mandatory vaccination, the establishment of 5G, and the transition to a digital currency and surveillance society.

The crowd was enthusiastic and appreciative of this historic moment. For those in Berlin and for millions of Internet users around the world, Kennedy raised awareness and uttered the words of courage and hope that millions of people had been waiting to hear.

Media attacks

Love, peace, freedom. The hundreds of invisible ‘extremists’ emblems.
Dream or reality? None of this has appeared in the German or international mainstream media! One is simply stunned by the fact that the media and the authorities dared to put forward a figure as ridiculous as 38,000 people in attendance, while there are millions sharing images testifying to the gigantic scale of this gathering. It is even more so, when we see that they have tried to make a peaceful crowd of a million people look like “extremists” and “opponents of democracy.” Daily Kos, an American web newspaper, one of the few to mention Kennedy’s presence, even headlined “The anti-vaccine Robert Kennedy, Jr. joined the neo-Nazis in Berlin,” claiming that he had joined an event organized by far-right organizations and anti-Semitic groups.

Kennedy immediately reacted with a letter demanding a retraction of the article and a public apology for the damages incurred. The letter reminds us that you only have to listen to his speech and look at the images of the crowd with portraits of Ghandi, flags for peace, love and democracy to know that the protest was quite the opposite of the publication’s portrayal.

A staged assault
Government officials and mainstream media revelled in an “unacceptable incident” described as a violent assault on the Reichstag (parliament). It shows only a few dozen activists rushing up the steps of the building and waving flags, but the images show no form of violence. And keen observers have detailed the incident which appears to have been set up to obtain “scandalous” images in order to harshly condemn the protesters.

What actually happened? Some witnesses reported seeing teams of journalists coming straight out of police stations, while acolytes placed on nearby rooftops orchestrated the maneuver. A few minutes earlier, several sovereignist activists had excited the crowd and urged the public to occupy the steps of parliament by shouting in megaphones phrases including: “Trump is here!” “He has just signed an end-of-occupation treaty.” “The police took off their helmets, they stopped guarding the parliament.” “Let’s sit on the steps of parliament to celebrate and show Trump that our people are finally free.” This false news then provoked a brief crowd movement on the steps of the Reichstag, which reflected a demonstration of joy (unjustified), not an attack from neo-Nazi groups.

Trump was not in Berlin that day and the incident was pure invention. To understand the context of this scene, which may seem surreal, it is necessary to know that Germany is officially still under the control of the Allies, and especially the Americans, and that many German citizens feel that it is time to get rid of this arrangement. According to them, the German constitution would not be legitimate, since it is not the result of the will of the people, but the result of an external authority, that of the Allies. This reflection, which is not only symbolic, arises in particular in the context of a legal controversy between Germany and Europe over the role of central banks and the independence of nations in the European institutional framework.

Unfortunately, this claim, which seems legitimate to a non-partisan popular citizen movement, is also echoed by far-right parties. Therefore, it is understandable that the organizers of these events start each by clearly distinguishing themselves from any political movement, any form of extremism or any racist ideology. This is why the government and the international alliance that supports it are all the more determined to make citizens’ movements look like those of Nazis.

Investigating the staging of Reichstag assault
Unfortunately, images are enough to embroider a scenario that serves the interests of the political class and diverts the public’s attention from the fact that one million people came to protest against the liberticidal measures of the pandemic. The only thing being reported on all the television channels is that “the demonstration ended in violence and the security forces had to intervene to disperse the extremists who stormed the Reichstag.” Who knows, this umpteenth betrayal of the media may end up opening the eyes of many people.

Protection or repression?
While the organizers took the trouble to publicly thank the police services with whom they had painstakingly prepared a security plan, much of the public refused to applaud them. It later became known that numerous police violence incidents took place against peaceful men and women who had shown no aggression or resistance. Filmed by the crowd, more than a dozen videos show similar scenes where three to four GIGN-style robocops pushed people to the ground and some people were beaten as well. These images, which also evoke police violence against yellow vests in France and around the world, were a shock to many German citizens and some of the police. More and more, military and police officers are choosing to publicly express their disagreement with the policies being imposed by authorities.

History has given Berliners the ability to distinguish truth from propaganda and freedom from dictatorship. All the people we met expressed their suffering at growing up with the weight of the shame of Nazism and the fear of Communism. Accepting freedom-killing measures again and the imposition of a totalitarian regime, whatever the reason, are simply not conceivable. Millions of Germans want to defend their rights and freedoms peacefully and in accordance with democratic rules. The Berlin demonstration could be a key moment, a moment of awakening consciences around the world. Berliners put forth a strong message: The time has come to show that it is possible to abandon governance based on fear, control and discrimination, and that we can all move forward together in a free and open world, a world that is above all, human."


continued

[onawah]

The Pharma Loaded U.S. Soldier Part 1: Taking Inventory of Risks
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...5-3ff16de1f106


By Pam Long

"Since 2001, the modern combatant has endured numerous deployments overseas to Afghanistan and Iraq after a decade of relative peace following the Persian Gulf War in 1990. Across all services, members have engaged in traumatic combat situations with enemy, friendly, and civilian casualties resulting in 13% of veterans diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). [Citations referenced in this article are contained in the full report.]

Military personnel have returned from dangerous deployments to face both public scrutiny about disputed wars and personal struggles with recollections of harrowing ordeals. Military encounter barriers to therapeutic interventions, with a priority given to drug therapy. US military members are routinely taking up to 19 prescription medications to enhance performance and reduce stress.The collateral damage is that, when current active duty, reserve members, and the National Guard are included, 20 veterans die by suicide every day in the US.

Suicide Stats
The 2018 Department of Defense Suicide Report (DoDSER 2018) details 325 active duty suicides with an additional 1,375 suicide attempts by 1,219 unique individuals. The reserve component reported 81 suicides and the National Guard reported 135 suicides. The 2019 National Veterans Suicide Prevention Annual Report summarizes 6,139 veteran suicides in 2019. Veteran suicides have been increasing annually since 2006. The number of veteran suicides has exceeded 6,000 annually from 2008 to 2017. Military members and veterans have a higher risk of suicide than their civilian counterparts. Veterans ages 18-34 having the highest suicide rate among all military subgroups with an increase of 76% from 2005 to 2017.

The two aforementioned reports have detailed the frequency, demographics, event characteristics, basic health information, contextual factors or stressors with each military suicide. These reports are intended for surveillance only and do not provide any analysis of causation.

Table 1. Population by Rate of Suicide
Population Rate of Suicide
US Active Duty Military 24.8 per 100,000 (2018)
US Reserve Military 22.9 per 100,000 (2018)
US National Guard 30.6 per 100,000 (2018)
US Civilians age 17-59 18.2 per 100,000 (2018)
US Veterans 27.7 per 100,000 (2017)
US Veterans age 18-34 44.5 per 100,000 (2017)
Behind the Numbers
Surprisingly, DoDSER 2018 reports that 47% of active duty suicides had zero deployments. The 2019 Veterans Suicide Prevention Annual Report indicates that 919 suicides were from never federally activated reserve units and National Guard. Hazardous duty is a co-factor in PTSD and suicides, but this high rate of military members who have never deployed indicates other potentially non-trauma factors are contributing to the suicide rate. What else is going on behind the numbers?

The goal, a participant in crafting the policy said, was to give SSRIs a ‘green light’ without saying so.
Age Risk & Suspect SSRIs
Veterans age 18-34 have the highest suicide rates at 45 per 100,000, while veterans age 55-74 had the lowest suicide rate at 27 per 100,000. Because younger veterans have a greater risk, other exposures should be investigated that older veterans do not have. One possibility is the increasing trend of military suicides in the US began in 2006 and is temporally correlated with the Pentagon’s 2006 policy that permitted and encouraged SSRI medications, discussed in America’s Medicated Army:

It wasn’t until November 2006 that the Pentagon set a uniform policy for all the services. But the curious thing about it was that it didn’t mention the new antidepressants. Instead, it simply barred troops from taking older drugs, including ‘lithium, anticonvulsants and antipsychotics.’ The goal, a participant in crafting the policy said, was to give SSRIs a ‘green light’ without saying so. Last July, a paper published by three military psychiatrists in Military Medicine, the independent journal of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States, urged military doctors headed for Afghanistan and Iraq to ‘request a considerable quantity of the SSRI they are most comfortable prescribing’ for the ‘treatment of new-onset depressive disorders’ once in the war zones. The medications, the doctors concluded, help to ‘conserve the fighting strength,’ the motto of the Army Medical Corps.

Total Load of Prescription Drugs
A Veteran Affairs study of 157 veterans with PTSD reported an average use of 6.4 ± 3.8 prescribed drugs with a maximum of 19 prescribed drugs. These drugs were from the following 17 categories: anti-depressants, anti-psychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, mood stabilizers, stimulants, anti-cholinergics, anti-convulsants, anti-hypertensives, diuretics, cardiovascular drugs, diabetes drugs, dyslipidemia drugs, analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, gastrointestinal drugs, and narcotics.

Military members are at risk of cascading prescriptions due to treatment from numerous doctors over their careers. They are not likely to have one primary doctor reviewing their medical file for drug interaction or cumulative effect. Veterans are especially at risk of cascading prescriptions because as people get older, they become more sensitive to drugs. This is because medications stay in the body longer due to less muscle tissue and the liver and kidney do not process medications as effectively so medications become more concentrated.

Our findings suggest that stimulants may be a contributing factor for incident PTSD.
Risks of Stimulants in PTSD
Prescription Stimulants and PTSD Among U.S. Military Service Members reported the risk of PTSD was significantly higher in military personnel who were prescribed stimulants than those who did not. The risk of PTSD was significantly higher as the number of prescription stimulants increased and the cumulative days of use increased. Among 25,971 military personnel, with ‘incident PTSD’ defined as those who did not have a history of PTSD at baseline and developed new-onset PTSD, stimulants contribute to new-onset PTSD:

We found an association between prescription stimulant use and incident PTSD. Even though only a small percentage of our sample were prescribed stimulants, our findings suggest that stimulants may be a contributing factor for incident PTSD. The use of stimulants is known to increase norepinephrine levels in the brain and previous research has demonstrated that increased noradrenergic levels at the time of a traumatic event create more vivid, long-lasting memories and fear of the event, which increase the risk of developing PTSD (Debiec et al., 2011).

Mulitiple Meds & Suicide Risks
Blanchfield Army Community Hospital (BACH) Polypharmacy Clinic reports: “The increased use of central nervous system depressants (CNSD) and psychotropics are one of the many factors that contribute to suicidal behavior in soldiers.” Fort Campbell reported polypharmacy (chronic use of 5 or more drugs) ranged from 2.2% to 7.6% of soldiers for each brigade, after screening out soldiers using polypharmacy short-term for surgery medications:

A pharmacy-led team established the Polypharmacy Clinic (PC) at Blanchfield Army Community Hospital. Of the 3,999 soldiers assigned, 540 (13.5%) met the initial screening criteria. Success of the pilot program led to the mandatory screening of all other Fort Campbell, Kentucky, brigades. During the first 12 months, 895 soldiers were seen by a clinical pharmacist, and 1,574 interventions were documented. Significant interventions included medication added (121), medication changed (258), medication stopped (164), lab monitoring recommended (172), adverse reaction mitigated (41), therapeutic duplication prevented (61), and drug-drug interaction identified (93). Additionally, 55 soldiers were recommended for temporary duty profiles based on their adverse drug effects. Ten soldiers were recommended for enhanced controlled substance monitoring.

895 soldiers were potentially saved from polypharmacy adverse reactions. Despite the Office of the Surgeon General directing this unprecedented polypharmacy screening pilot program at Fort Campbell, the extent to which this successful program was adopted by all military duty stations or continued beyond 2013 is unknown. The 2018 VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Guidebook does not list polypharmacy screening as an intervention. The VA only targets one prescription drug, opioids, in the Substance Abuse Disorder program. The VA assisted 10,500 veterans in 2017 with opioid substitution.

Pain Meds & PTSD Risk
The Army’s Health Promotion, Risk Reduction, and Suicide Prevention Report (2010) reports that 14% of the force is taking an opiate medication, often in addition to prescriptions for depression and anxiety. Research of pain medication and PTSD has found “Those with PTSD had significantly higher use of analgesic medication (both opiate and non-opiate), as compared with non-PTSD patients. PTSD symptoms, as measured by the Posttraumatic Symptom Scale, were significantly higher in subjects who were prescribed analgesics.” Among veterans, suicide rates were highest in VHA patients diagnosed with opioid use disorder.

Physical Health as a Signal
48% of active duty soldiers had visited a Medical Treatment Facility in the 90 days prior to death for general health, not mental health and not substance abuse. Physical health deteriorates with PTSD and should be included as a signal for suicide risk screening. [Link to PDF -See the full report for research details.]

In conclusion, Military personnel are routinely prescribed numerous medications with Black Box warnings for suicidal ideation, mania, psychosis, violent behavior, delusions, hallucinations, and psychotic behaviors. Many of these drugs are addictive and prescribed without a plan to wean off dependency. Instead the needed therapeutic dose will increase over time. New soldiers anecdotally report being prescribed medications for the expected stress of Basic Training, which will begin the cascading prescriptions for deployment induced trauma and pain from injuries, and will cumulate with additional prescriptions later, for deteriorating physical health associated with unresolved PTSD symptoms. The total pharmaceutical load on the modern US soldier will continue to result in over 6,000 veteran suicides per year until polypharmacy screening and mitigation is implemented and prioritized at every Veterans Health Administration program."

[CHD Note: In Part 2 of this series, Pam Long will detail various treatments for PTSD, both how current treatments are working and risks of service inherent in the current medication-heavy approach. View the full report with citations and research details.]

Pam Long is a graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, a US Army Veteran of the Medical Service Corps, and a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

continued

[onawah]

Landmark FDA Paper On Aluminum Safety In Vaccines Found To Have A Critical Math Error
By Arjun Walia
https://www.collective-evolution.com...5-3ff16de1f106

"The Facts:A group of scientists and physicians known as The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) have discovered a crucial math error in a FDA paper regarding the safety of aluminum in vaccines.
Reflect On:Why have there been no studies by regulatory agencies in conjunction with independent scientists to see where vaccine ingredients travel to in the body after the are injected? Why no appropriate safety testing for the aluminum vaccine adjuvant?
What Happened: The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) outline that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), which is a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have already raised concerns about the negative effects of aluminum exposure in humans.

They state the following:
Because some vaccines contain aluminum, the FDA published a paper in 2011 (Mitkus et al.) to address concerns about aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants. The paper compared the aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants to a safety limit of oral aluminum determined by the ATSDR. However, this study incorrectly based its calculations on 0.78% of oral aluminum being absorbed into the bloodstream rather than the value of 0.1% used by the ATSDR in its computations. As a result, the FDA paper assumed that nearly 8 (0.78%/0.1%) times more aluminum can safely enter the bloodstream, and this led the authors to incorrectly conclude that aluminum exposure from vaccines was well below the safety limit.

You can read their “Erratum in “Updated aluminum pharmacokinetics following infant exposures through diet and vaccination” here: https://physiciansforinformedconsent...-2011-erratum/

The Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) are a group of doctors and scientists from around the world who have come together to support informed consent when it comes to mandatory vaccine measures. Their information is based on science. Their mission is to deliver data on infectious diseases and vaccines, and to unite doctors, scientists, healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families who support voluntary vaccinations. Their vision is that doctors and the public are able to evaluate the data on infectious diseases and vaccines objectively and voluntarily engage in informed decision-making about vaccination.

According to Dr, Christopher Shaw, a member of PIC and a professor at the University of British Columbia who has performed numerous studies on the effects of injected aluminum,“We knew that the Mitkus et al. paper modeling aluminum clearance had to be inaccurate since it was assuming that injected aluminum kinetics were the same as the kinetics of aluminum acquired through diet. Now, in addition, we see that they did their modeling based on using the incorrect level of aluminum absorption. What is particularly striking is that despite all these errors, since 2011, Mitkus et al. is used by CDC and other entities as the basis for claiming that aluminum adjuvants are safe.”

Dr. Shira Miller, president of PIC, said, “We posted the Mitkus 2011 erratum on ResearchGate in hopes of bringing it to the attention of scientists and researchers who are interested in the safety of the quantities of injected aluminum found in childhood vaccines and would be in a position to further research the safety concern.”

When you inject aluminum, it goes into a different compartment of your body. It doesn’t come into that same mechanism of excretion. So, and of course it can’t because that’s the whole idea of aluminum adjuvants, aluminum adjuvants are meant to stick around and allow that antigen to be presented over and over and over again persistently, otherwise you wouldn’t put an adjuvant in in the first place. It can’t be inert, because if it were inert it couldn’t do the things it does. It can’t be excreted because again it couldn’t provide that prolonged exposure of the antigen to your immune system.- Shaw

The PIC has released a PDF called Aluminum Vaccine Risk Statement with a lot more information. You can access it here:
https://physiciansforinformedconsent...uminum-VRS.pdf

Why This Is Important: The idea that it’s safe to inject children with aluminum containing vaccines is based on presumption. No appropriate safety studies exist to show this is the case, which is why A group of scientists from multiple countries recently published a paper in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology titled “The role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science” state the following,

“The safety of aluminium-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further delay, particularly at a time when the CDC is announcing a still increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders, of 1 child in 54 in the USA.”

The publication goes on to address concerns it has with another paper that was published a year prior, emphasizing that the authors of that specific publication, JP Goullé & L Grangeot-Keros,

Described general knowledge on aluminum (Al) exposure, kinetics and toxicity but made very little effort to delineate the scientific questions specifically related to Al adjuvants in vaccines. Instead of representing the bulk of their review, the subject of Al adjuvants covered no more than one third of the 3 page-text. Numerous important papers on the topic were omitted, i.e. 20 years of scientific publications in clinical, post-mortem, in vitro and in vivo experimental studies published by independent research teams, worldwide experts in this topic, were simply omitted.

In 2018, shaw published a paper in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry that found almost 100 percent of the intramuscularly injected aluminum in mice as vaccine adjuvants was absorbed into the systemic circulation and traveled to different sites in the body such as the brain, the joints, and the spleen where it accumulated and was retained for years post-vaccination. (source)

A study published in BioMed Central (also cited in the study above) in 2013 found more cause for concern:

Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection. Both fluorescent materials injected into muscle translocated to draining lymph nodes (DLNs) and thereafter were detected associated with phagocytes in blood and spleen. Particles linearly accumulated in the brain up to the six-month endpoint; they were first found in perivascular CD11b+ cells and then in microglia and other neural cells. DLN ablation dramatically reduced the biodistribution. Cerebral translocation was not observed after direct intravenous injection, but significantly increased in mice with chronically altered blood-brain-barrier. Loss/gain-of-function experiments consistently implicated CCL2 in systemic diffusion of Al-Rho particles captured by monocyte-lineage cells and in their subsequent neurodelivery. Stereotactic particle injection pointed out brain retention as a factor of progressive particle accumulation…

The study went on to conclude that “continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe.”

These authors followed up and published a study in 2015 that emphasized:

Evidence that aluminum-coated particles phagocytozed in the injected muscle and its draining lymph nodes can disseminate within phagocytes throughout the body and slowly accumulate in the brain further suggests that alum safety should be evaluated in the long term.

A paper published in 2018 discovered high amounts of aluminum in the brain tissue of people with autism. That particular paper has now been downloaded more than 1 million times.

The particular paper cited above was published by Dr. Christopher Exley.

Exley was also one of the authors on the main paper cited at the beginning of this article. Here is a very interesting interview with him if you’re interested. He’s considered to be one of the world’s leading experts in aluminum toxicology, if not the world’s leading expert. You can find out more about his research and what he’s up to by visiting his Instagram page.

The point is, this topic is hot right now, as it should be, and it seems that our federal health regulatory agencies continue to ignore the concerns being made and the studies being published.

Here is an important clip from Dr. Larry Palevsky, a board-certified Paediatrician currently practicing in New York talking about aluminum and how it differs in adjuvant form.

According to a study published as far back as 2011 in Current Medical Chemistry

Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. (source)

The Takeaway: When it comes to vaccine safety, why does mainstream media constantly point fingers and call those who have concerns “anti-vax conspiracy theorists?” Why don’t they ever address the science and concerns being raised that paint vaccines in a light that they’ve never been painted in? What’s going on here? Why are the safety concerns addressed by many scientists and doctors always ignored and never addressed/countered? Would more rigorous safety testing of our vaccines not be in the best interests of everybody? Who would ever oppose that and why?"

[Delight]

Posted by onawah (here)
Adult vaccine mandates are arriving.

Vaccine freedom advocates have warned of impending adult mandates.

The CDC has both a childhood vaccine schedule along with an adult schedule.

A person receiving all of the doses on both schedules will receive nearly 150 lifetime doses.

The goal of vaccinating members of the population throughout their entire lives is set forth in the National Vaccine Plan, the National Adult Immunization Plan and the Global Vaccine Action Plan.

In December of 2018, Argentina enacted a law mandating its entire vaccine schedule for both children and adults. Many pointed to this as a bellwether for what is coming for other countries.

In March of 2020, Denmark passed legislation (in effect through March of 2021) authorizing forced vaccination against COVID-19. On August 21, 2020, Virginia’s Health Commissioner Dr. Norman Oliver stated that he plans to mandate a coronavirus vaccine for all Virginians once one is publicly available.

On July 31, 2020, the President of the University of California issued an executive order requiring all students, faculty and staff who will be present on campus to receive influenza immunizations before Nov. 1, 2020. This is despite the fact that some research indicates that those receiving an annual influenza vaccine may be at increased risk of infection from coronaviruses.

The tracking that was warned about is coming to fruition. Prior to COVID-19, members of the informed consent movement warned that mass tracking and restrictions on movement would be imposed as purported protection from infectious diseases. The technology for these measures is quickly being implemented. CoviPass, a downloadable application which contains the users’ COVID-19 test histories and other health information, and uses surveillance technology to trace people, is one example.

It’s reportedly being rolled out in fifteen countries and it’s anticipated that it will serve the basis for immunity passports required to travel and move about. Further, there is at least one recent example of a U.S. college requiring its students to submit to contract-tracing. Albion College, located in Michigan, is reportedly requiring students for the fall semester to download an application that will constantly track their locations and label them based upon COVID-19 test results.

The college has also reportedly asked students to remain on campus throughout the semester, with revocation of the right to access campus as a possible penalty for not doing so.

Lockdowns and mask orders have exceeded even the vaccine freedom movement’s predictions. Simply put, the lockdowns and mask mandates have exceeded the nightmares of most in the informed consent movement. This author didn’t see those coming.

Hopefully, at this point, most of the public is aware that significant scientific concerns exist in connection with both of these mandates. Some of those concerns are discussed here.

I started this thread and the concerns I had, along with quite a few, HAVE seemed to be more than REALISTIC. It looks pretty scary "out there"

It helps to reiterate what we want to self program. I intend to self program power, self authority, resilient body and FAITH that there is a larger purpose of GOOD in all earthly trials.

YES, those beginning their journies into (a possibly painful) AH HA about the intentions of our leaders will find just about every conceivable resource on PA, including this thread.

I think it is time to become active, vocal, local, physical and assertive. I am not sure what will happen but I feel guided and beloved and have every intention of supporting the channels that want us to thrive.

I support The Highwire, Children's Health Defense and others. I spend vacation money there and will spend more. They have legal expertise and IMO we benefit from legal intervention most at the moment.

[onawah]

Vaccines Revealed, Episode 4 Free online to view for the next 23 hours.
(Here's the NEWEST link for that amazing RFK JR. PART 2! - current pandemic info.
NOT to be missed! It looks like they are keeping this one online, hopfully during the entire docuseries.
See post #861 above for more details about this series.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wQ-6GgJiuvA

HERE'S YOUR LINK TO EPISODE 4
*******************************************

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=N2hdSaiNGHQ

Tonight we expose the lies…

Meet Brian Hooker:
He’s a Ph.D. in biochemical engineering and has been conducting biotechnology research for over 25 years, and teaches biology at Simpson University.
Prior to that...

He worked in environmental restoration and plant genetic engineering (while a senior research scientist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory).

And MOST IMPORTANT….

Brian is the father of an 18-year-old autistic son who was damaged by his infant “**Health Shots.” (**we can’t use the “v” word here or our emails will be blocked)

Meet Dawn Loughborough:

She was an Executive Senior Consultant with Price Waterhouse, and she obtained her master’s degree in Law from the University of Baltimore.

AND….

Dawn is the mother of a child who was damaged by her MMR Shot at 15 months of age.

Meet Sarah Bridges:

She’s a Ph.D. Neuropsychologist.

Was a Senior Executive for a $1.7 billion fortune 1000 company, and an innovator in the psychology and organizational consulting field.

And….

Sarah is Porter’s mom.

Porter’s diagnosis is “Brain Injury from the Pertussis **Shot” (**another “v” word)

Your views on this whole issue will transform in a single night.
… In fact; YOU will be transformed when you hear their stories in tonight’s informative and touching episode of V-Revealed.

Enjoy and watch it all you want for the next 24 hours"

Sincerely,
Patrick Gentempo

[amor]

All the revelations above are wonderful. The CDC, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and their Rockefeller genocidal plotters, along with their agricultural contingent, need to be closed and their agents imprisoned or worse. Three hundred and thirty five million humans are being commanded to ingest death because the above are using the power of money and greed to bring about our demise. At the head of this snake also is the Nazi contingent, plotting to empty Earth and occupy it solely. Don't laugh, keep connecting the dots while you read widely.

[onawah]

"Vaccines Revealed" episode 5 starting with Dr. Rashid Buttar and 5 other speakers including Stephanie Seneff, a Ph.D. Senior Scientist at MIT who says, “It’s very disturbing where we are headed right now, and I see no end in sight.”
Also Sayer Ji; Gary Goldman, PhD former CDC research scientist; James Chestnut, D.C., B.E.D.M, M.S.C., C.C.W.P. and Kelly Brogan, M.D. Psychiatrist.
Available for 19 more hours from the time of this posting.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rc0F-J8efBw

(Dr. Buttar says that there IS still thimerosol mercury in vaccines today, even though they are labeled "thimerosal-free". The head of the FDA testified that now thimerosal is used in the manufacturing of vaccines, though it is not added to the vial once the vaccine is made, and so they don't have to label it as containing thimerosal, according to FDA rules. That was in 2004, and is the Congressional Record.
Buttar goes on to say there is NOTHING in vaccines that is good for us. )

[spade]

Having success with friend's kid with autism at this very moment, taking pure gum spirits in small doses (according tobody weight) aids the body in getting rid of mercury and parasites. Huge improvements in cognitive function. There was a video out there awhile back where doctors in Mexico were using it successfully. It was still up on bitchute before the plandemic. Its now completely missing - what's left is generally an attack on pure gum spirits because it could potentially fight the plandemic as well.

[Maia Gabrial]

The threat of Vaccines is coming .... And it's not going to be just for the children...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=t1RPTzFyDbg

[onawah]

"Vaccines Revealed" episode 6 will be free online for the next 17 &1/2 hours from the time of this posting.
From the email update today:

"The weight on his shoulders was immense….
… That’s Brian Hooker. — see part 2 tonight.
What would you do?
You see…
He had PROOF that 5 scientists at the CDC knew that there was a link between the MMR [Shot] and Autism.
… And they colluded to cover up the results of the tests, while children continued to be injured.
Watch the details unfold

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cA8fGSjk5Z0

Worldwide Premier of VACCINE SYNDROME
When I watched this for the first time, I was stunned to silence. Our soldiers... facing an order determined both illegal and immoral.
Witness the horror of human experimentation, all the while repeating; “This Shot [“V”] is Safe” and
“If we ignore this, perhaps we are all guilty of terrorism”
HERE IS YOUR LINK TO EPISODE 6 AND VACCCINE SYNDROME! "

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lJN_hQ405D8

[onawah]

"Vaccines Revealed" Episode 7 free online for 23 &1/2 hours from the time of this post.
"In today’s “pandemic” world, will you be able to make a choice about what happens to YOUR body (or your child’s body)
Or…
Are you going to be forced against your will?
And... what if you do it unwittingly because the true side-effects are not disclosed?
This is about personal space - this is about Human Rights.
This is about some of the most fundamental issues that affect human beings.
To compel shots against one’s will is against individual rights and your health freedom.

“I believe in individual rights.”

-Dr. Patrick Gentempo

TONIGHT:
Front and center: Current, up-to-the-minute interview with Dr. Zach Bush.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vyQXhaivwt0

Zach is one of the very few Triple Board Certified doctors in the United States.
What he knows about viruses, the immune system, and how that all fits into our current 2020 “pandemic” is life-changing.
*************
“I began looking into Vaccine safety when I realized that my two daughters were injured by these shots”
-Gayle Delong Ph.D.
I looked and realized that every time they got one of “these shots” it got worse...
*******************
“If you asked your doctor, ‘Name 3 ingredients in that syringe,’ most doctors wouldn’t be able to tell you.”

-Sherri Tenpenny, D.O.
Both here in this interview with Dr. Toni Bark, plus an interview with Patrick Gentempo:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ji-xSDyLNVo

This is a must-see night.
Patrick Gentempo"

[onawah]

Wow, does the following ever belong in this thread!
Did the Federal Government Just Secretly Take Over Vaccine Policy Usurping the Authority of the States?
9/15/20
https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/did-t...of-the-states/

Connecting the Dots
by Wayne Rohde
Health Impact News

"Over the course of the last several months there have been a few developments, when looked at individually, that do not create much of a response or concern to the masses.

Yet when you zoom out a bit, these events, scattered about and seemingly not connected, start to fit together into a pattern.

Chaos theory can be defined as “within the apparent randomness of chaotic complex systems, there are underlying patterns, interconnectedness, constant feedback loops, repetition, self-similarity, fractals, and self-organization.”

The events I refer to are:

1) The enactment of The PREP Act by the Secretary of HHS.

2) The Secretary of HHS actions to remove shoulder injury and syncope from the NVICP.

3) The Secretary of HHS amending the PREP Act to allow pharmacists to administer childhood vaccines to our kids ages 3-18.

4) The Secretary of HHS issuing guidance allowing pharmacists to administer an approved COVID vaccine to kids ages 3-18.

First big dot to connect
The enactment of The PREP Act (Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness 2005) was declared by the Secretary of HHS on March 10, 2020.

This allowed our nation to address the COVID “pandemic” by extending legal protections to manufacturers of medical supplies and equipment, plus allowing our federal government to harness the resources necessary to combat this virus.

This also extended to the states for them to enact Emergency Powers that restricted businesses, social gatherings, focusing medical responses to COVID only.

At the same time, the Secretary of HHS forwarded his intentions via a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to remove shoulder injury (SIRVA) and syncope (fainting) from the NVICP, thus any claims for injuries resulting in shoulder injuries or the result of injured incurred after falling because of fainting.

Shoulder injury is the #1 claim for injury in the Vaccine Court. By far outdistancing GBS, yet combined, nearly 64% of all petitions filed in the NVICP allege these two injury types.

Outside of those who follow the NVICP closely or attorneys who practice in the Program, there was not as much interest from the general public.

The advisory committee to the Secretary of HHS for these matters voted unanimously to keep shoulder injury and syncope as a stated injury. The committee sent a letter to the Secretary to inform him of their action.

That did not stop the Secretary. Later in the summer, the Secretary moved “all in” with a new NPRM.

Several theories started to emerge as to why the Secretary is pushing so aggressively and what will happen when those injuries are removed from the Program.

Most of these claims for shoulder injuries are derived from poor administration of a vaccine at a retail pharmacy. Going forward after the removal of SIRVA, can pharmacists be sued for negligence because of poor administration?

The answer is yes. But that is not the end of this story.

Just another dot to connect
In August of this year, the Secretary of HHS issued declaration to amend the PREP Act to allow pharmacists to administer vaccines approved for the schedule to children ages 3-18. With so many adults having problems from vaccinations at retail pharmacies, why allow children? Read my recent article about all the details:

PREP Act Secretly Amended this Week to Allow Pharmacists to Vaccinate Children Ages 3-18
Another dot
Then on Sept 3, 2020, the Secretary of HHS issued guidance to allow pharmacists to administer the COVID vaccine (yet to be approved) to children as young as three years of age.

Keep in mind, clinical trials are ongoing and no children are included in the trials this young. This action preempts any state law or statute regarding the administration of a COVID vaccine.

And another dot to connect
Buried in the recent guidance announcement by the Secretary is the statement that pharmacists now will be considered “covered persons” under the PREP Act. They will not incur any liability for their licensed actions to administer vaccinations.

This removes any liability to sue for an injury and goes against the NPRM issued back in March by removing these injuries and asserts that such claims should be filed in civil court.

Yet another dot to connect
During my sophomore year in college, my statistics professor talked about chaos theory by illustrating the use of jumping jacks, throwing them up in the air, watching them fall to the ground, and the pattern they left after they settled.

To me, it looked like a mess that someone would have to clean up. But after looking at the floor, stepping back a bit, I could see a pattern emerge.

So what do we make of all this mess of The PREP Act, and the Secretary of HHS’ actions?

Let’s connect the dots
If you look at this from a distance, you will notice a pattern appearing.

And it hit me like a ton of bricks.

By connecting the actions of the Secretary of HHS and those dots (actions), it does give the appearance of:

A complete federalization of our nation’s vaccine policy traditionally conducted and carried out by the states.

Using the PREP Act, without consultation by Congress, circumventing state legislatures, our federal government is now creating vaccine standards and policy.

So what is next for the Secretary of HHS?

Exemptions perhaps.

Or maybe closing down the NVICP and rolling whatever is left of very limited vaccine injury into the CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program.

Wayne Rohde is the author of The Vaccine Court. He has an upcoming Podcast of NVICP, The PREP Act, CounterMeasures Injury Comp Program and COVID vaccine legal issues starting Mid-October."

[onawah]

"Vaccines Revealed" [Ep. #8] Premiere of "Trace Amounts" (the entire movie
9/16/20
"Trace Amounts" Free online for the next 20 hours from the time of this posting
AND:
More from Dr. Zach Bush

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_R7xFogWDG8

“The more I researched, the more I couldn’t believe my eyes, and the more I knew there was no way I could just sit back and not do anything about this.

I quit my career, moved into an RV, hired a production crew, and hit the road for years attending Autism conferences, filming Autism rallies, performing experiments with scientists, interviewing everyone and anyone who would talk to us, and so much more.

When the tour was over, I spent the next two years sifting through almost 300 hours of video footage, thousands of leaked documents, closed-door meeting transcripts, and countless scientific studies.

It then took me another 3 years working with my post-production team to piece everything together into what has become the feature documentary film you’re about to see.”

Filmmaker: Eric Gladen

This movie is the true story of the mercury poisoning of Eric Gladen - and his painful journey.

Follow his quest for the scientific truth about the role of mercury poisoning in the current Autism Epidemic

Mercury is a known toxin that causes debilitating neurological and physical damage…

So why and how did it end up in our childhood shots?

Click here to enjoy tonight’s Worldwide Free Premiere of TRACE AMOUNTS.

AND...

Part 3 of our shocking interview with Brian Hooker. - This one’s a head shaker.

He tells of his encounters with Dr. Thompson.

Thompson’s study showed a significant statistical correlation between thimerosal/mercury in these shots and neurological tics in boys.

And instead of investigating this, a chief CDC official came down on Thompson and said “You will not publish this result…”

“The CDC site states that thimerosal is safe and exposure has no risk.

… Nothing could be further from the truth”

Wow,

Patrick Gentempo "