The RSB Show LIVE 7/11/19 - Jonathan Emord, Fake News, Drug Prices, Sherri Tenpenny, vScience Bites
The RSB Show LIVE 7/11/19 - Jonathan Emord, Fake News, Drug Prices, Sherri Tenpenny, vScience Bites
Very concise presentations by Luke Yamaguchi
Gut Resolution
Published on Sep 23, 2018
Vaccine safety and vaccine injury are topics of obvious concern for any parent making a decision about their child's health and well-being. This video takes a closer look at vaccine safety by first looking back at history, to see how it is that we got to where we are today.
For more information check out the free online course "The Dark Side of Vaccines: The Less Publicized Story of Vaccine Safety and Efficacy." www.DarkSideVaccines.com
Course Content:
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Historical Vaccine Safety Issues
Chapter 3: Other Vaccine Safety Concerns
Chapter 4: Evidence of Harm
Chapter 5: Vaccine Efficacy
Chapter 6: Manufactured Science
Chapter 7: Toxic Metals in Vaccines
Chapter 8: Herd Immunity
Chapter 9: The Profit Motive
Chapter 10: Time for Real Science
Your Instructor Luke Yamaguchi
Luke is a health educator and wellness consultant dedicated to creating greater well-being in our world through education and empowerment. He is the founder of GutResolution.com where he works with clients to unearth the root causes of their health challenges. Before becoming a nutritionist, he taught at several colleges in the Pacific Northwest. Luke has a Master of Arts degree in Japanese pedagogy.
Pharmaceutical Fraud
Gut Resolution
Published on Jul 12, 2019
A case study in corporate malfeasance.
References available at: tinyurl.com/y3mrknxq
"Less than 1% of schoolchildren have obtained medical exemptions in California, after their doctor determined that their risk of vaccine injury exceeds the benefit of a vaccine(s)—but there are only a small number of physicians who are skilled at meeting this public healthcare need. “If SB 276 passes, the California families who need them most will no longer be able to effectively access the doctors who are best able to protect them from vaccine injuries-”Dr. Shira Miller PIC
Physicians for Informed Consent Sends Letter to Medical Board of California Regarding Science and SB 276 (Limiting Medical Exemptions to Vaccination)
Doctors Ask Directors of Medical Board to Investigate Scientific Data and Oppose Any Legislation That Limits the Ability of Physicians to Issue Medical Exemptions
July 9, 2019
Newport Beach, CA – Today, Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) sent a letter to the Medical Board of California on behalf of hundreds of its doctor and scientist members out of concern that some legislators, without robust scientific justification, are singling out medical doctors who recommend medical exemptions to vaccination and labeling them as “fraudulent.”
The letter explains how the data currently available shows that increasing vaccination rates or limiting medical exemptions will not eliminate measles outbreaks. “…about half of all California schoolchildren, who are fully vaccinated with the MMR vaccine, can still be infected with and spread measles, irrespective of the medical exemption rate,” wrote Dr. Shira Miller, founder and president of PIC.
In the United Kingdom, the chickenpox vaccine is not routinely recommended because chickenpox is considered a mild illness in healthy children and vaccination is thought to increase the risk of herpes zoster in adults—that doesn’t mean British doctors are “fraudulent.” In Denmark, the hepatitis B vaccine is not routinely recommended—that doesn’t mean that Danish doctors are “fraudulent.” And in nearly all U.S. states there is either a personal belief or religious exemption to vaccination for school attendance, so doctors in those states don’t need to recommend medical exemptions for children to attend school if their vaccine recommendations are not in sync with the average doctor’s recommendations—those doctors are not “fraudulent” and neither are California doctors who, due to current law, are obligated to put their medical opinion regarding vaccination in writing, for the purpose of school attendance.
Physicians for Informed Consent is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization focused on science and statistics. PIC delivers data on infectious diseases and vaccines, and unites doctors, scientists, healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families that support voluntary vaccination.
View PDF of the letter here.
The full text of the letter is below:
July 9, 2019
Medical Board of California
2005 Evergreen Street, Suite 1200
Sacramento, CA 95815
RE: Science and SB 276 (limiting medical exemptions to vaccination)
Dear Directors of the Medical Board of California,
It is important that the Medical Board of California (MBC) explore the scientific basis and medical legitimacy of laws like SB 276,[1] as they directly impact the health and safety of millions of healthcare consumers in California. On behalf of hundreds of doctor and scientist members of Physicians for Informed Consent, I am writing out of our concern that some legislators, without robust scientific justification, are singling out medical doctors who recommend medical exemptions to vaccination and labeling them as “fraudulent.”[2]
The data currently available shows that increasing vaccination rates or limiting medical exemptions will not eliminate measles outbreaks. For example, in 2007, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted a study on waning immunity after two doses of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine.[3] The results, published in Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, showed that:
About 35% of vaccinated 7-year-olds are susceptible to subclinical measles.
About 60% of vaccinated 15-year-olds are susceptible to subclinical measles.
By age 24–26, a projected 33% of vaccinated adults are susceptible to clinical measles.
This means that about half of all California schoolchildren, who are fully vaccinated with the MMR vaccine, can still be infected with and spread measles, irrespective of the medical exemption rate.[4],[5],[6]
The CDC conducted another study in 2016, published in The Journal of Infectious Diseases, which concluded that a third dose (booster shot) of the MMR vaccine is short-lived, lasts only one year, and would not solve the problem of waning immunity.[7]
In addition, there are other infectious diseases where a child’s vaccination status does not significantly affect the safety of other students at school.[8]
Tetanus is not contagious, so being vaccinated for it or not doesn’t prevent others from getting it.[9]
Hepatitis B is spread through sex and intravenous drug use in the United States, so being vaccinated for it or not doesn’t prevent others from getting it in schools.[10]
The whooping cough vaccine doesn’t prevent the spread of whooping cough, so being vaccinated for it or not doesn’t prevent one from spreading whooping cough or others from getting it.[11]
The diphtheria vaccine does not prevent the spread of diphtheria, so being vaccinated for it or not doesn’t prevent one from spreading diphtheria or others from getting it.[12]
The polio vaccine used in the United States does not prevent the spread of polio, so being vaccinated for it or not doesn’t prevent one from spreading polio or others from getting it.[13],[14]
It’s also important to measure the threat of infectious diseases. For example, before the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963 there was a 1 in 10,000 (0.01%) chance of dying from measles[15] (that’s about the same as one’s lifetime chance of being struck by lightning). In addition, three treatments are available for rare severe complications from measles: vitamin A, immune globulin, and the antiviral medication, ribavirin.[16],[17],[18],[19]
By comparison, the chance of a child dying in his or her first year of life (the infant mortality rate) is currently 1 in 170[20] in the U.S. overall (0.6%)—which is 60 times greater than the risk of a child dying from measles in 1962, a time period when almost every child had measles by age 15 and 99.99% fully recovered.[21]
Infant mortality rate (IMR) is a recognized major indicator of the health of a population, not the number of measles cases nor the number of medical exemptions.[22] West Virginia and Mississippi, which only allow state public health officers to approve medical exemptions to vaccination (like SB 276 would do) have about double the infant mortality rate of California. And Massachusetts and Washington have a lower infant mortality than California, even while allowing non-medical exemptions.[23] This means that laws limiting medical exemptions are unlikely to improve public health—and may worsen it.
Additionally, it’s important to remember that since the enactment of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986,[24] which has shielded both vaccine manufacturers and physicians from vaccine injury lawsuits, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has awarded over $4 billion to families who incurred vaccine injuries and deaths.[25] These families are our canaries in a coal mine, and the physicians that care for them have a heightened awareness of their risk of vaccine injury and how to prevent further harm. For example, the risk of seizure after the MMR vaccine occurs in about 1 in 50 children with a history of seizures, and 1 in 250 in siblings of children with a history of febrile seizures (and 5% of those would develop epilepsy).[26],[27] The average doctor is not yet familiar with these research findings (even though they were published 15 years ago) and wouldn’t consider recommending a medical exemption to vaccination on such a basis—but there are many doctors experienced in this arena who are knowledgeable and adept in protecting such families.
Finally, in the United Kingdom, the chickenpox vaccine is not routinely recommended because chickenpox is considered a mild illness in healthy children and vaccination is thought to increase the risk of herpes zoster in adults—that doesn’t mean British doctors are “fraudulent.”[28] In Denmark, the hepatitis B vaccine is not routinely recommended—that doesn’t mean that Danish doctors are “fraudulent.”[29] And in nearly all U.S. states there is either a personal belief or religious exemption to vaccination for school attendance, so doctors in those states don’t need to recommend medical exemptions for children to attend school if their vaccine recommendations are not in sync with the average doctor’s recommendations—those doctors are not “fraudulent” and neither are California doctors who, due to current law, are obligated to put their medical opinion regarding vaccination in writing, for the purpose of school attendance.[30]
Will each of you, as a director of the MBC, investigate the scientific data for yourself? Or will you rely only on the interpretations of these data given to you by others? As scientific truths are verifiable, and the health of California’s children is at stake, we urge you to be sure of your decision.
We request that you oppose any legislation that limits the ability of physicians to issue medical exemptions to vaccination.
Respectfully,
Shira Miller, M.D.
Founder and President
Physicians for Informed Consent
View PDF of the letter here.
Physicians for Informed Consent is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization focused on science and statistics. PIC delivers data on infectious diseases and vaccines, and unites doctors, scientists, healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families that support voluntary vaccination.
Visit physiciansforinformedconsent.org for more information.
[1] https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...201920200SB276
[2] https://sd06.senate.ca.gov/news/2019...-granting-fake
[3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17339511
[4] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2815970
[5] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2230231
[6] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29921344
[7] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597262
[8] https://physiciansforinformedconsent...choolchildren/
[9] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/index.html
[10] Ibid.
[11] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24277828
[12] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5026197
[13] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17429085
[14] http://polioeradication.org/polio-to...-vaccines/ipv/
[15] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1522578/
[16] https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/measles/dis/
[17] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23629813
[18] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22480102
[19] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7008941
[20] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db293.htm
[21] https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/measles/dis/
[22] https://www.cdc.gov/reproductiveheal...tmortality.htm
[23] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/s..._mortality.htm
[24] https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-c...ouse-bill/5546
[25] https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/f...-june-2019.pdf
[26] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15265850
[27] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17267419
[28] https://www.nhs.uk/common-health-que...st-chickenpox/
[29] https://vaccine-schedule.ecdc.europa...AgeGroup=false
[30] http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/...tate-laws.aspx
People are waking up to the truth. The media is even stating "fully vaccinated" measle cases.
I got measles? But I got vaccinated. Oh hell.
July 15, 2019
The “theory” of herd immunity does not apply to a vaccinated population. It was conceived based on observations of measles outbreaks in non-vaccinated populations in the United States during the 1930s and how those communities, as a whole, were protected from becoming infected after about 55% (or slightly more) of the people came down with the disease and developed “natural immunity” to it.
There can be no such thing as herd immunity in vaccinated populations because vaccines do not confer immunity. You know, the kind that lasts a lifetime. The real immunity. Not this temporary stuff that requires people to keep getting these silly “booster shots” forever and ever. And even then they never achieve immunity, just a lot of shots.
Amazingly, in some measles outbreaks, 20 to 40 percent of the people infected had been fully vaccinated with two doses of the MMR vaccine. Don’t believe me? Check out the study by Gregory A. Poland, MD and Robert M. Jacobson, MD titled “The Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries: Time to Develop the Next-Generation Measles Vaccines?” published in the journal Vaccine on January 5, 2012. They call it “primary vaccine failure.” Nice.
Even worse, though, is the fact that in the current measles outbreak in the US, for example, some, if not many, of the children who have been diagnosed with measles actually got the measles virus from the MMR vaccine itself. They call it “vaccine strain” measles and, unless you test everyone who has come down with measles, there is no way to know for sure how many of those cases are vaccine strain measles and how many are “wild-type” measles.
They’re not testing widely. There is no mass surveillance system of this kind in place, So it is possible, even likely, that a large percentage of the measles cases being reported have occurred as a direct result of MMR vaccinations. I suspect no one at the CDC is too keen on knowing how many of cases of vaccine strain measles there are out there. Imagine the kind of damper that would put on their efforts to encourage people to get vaccinated and get their kids vaccinated.
So, not only do people who have been vaccinated with the MMR vaccine not provide herd immunity for the population as whole, they have actually placed themselves at risk for contracting measles by the very thing they believed was going to protect them. One hell of a bubble I just burst for you, huh?Seattle Children’s nurse diagnosed with measles
POSTED 2:27 PM, JULY 15, 2019 SEATTLE --
Another person was diagnosed with measles in King County, county officials said Monday. This comes less than a week after a teen and a young child were reported with the disease.
Seattle Children's Hospital says the patient was one of its nurses who was working with a child who had contracted measles. They say she was fully vaccinated and was wearing protective equipment but still contracted the disease anyway.
The hospital says "We are in the process of notifying patients, families and staff who may have been exposed, providing information about exposure dates, disease symptoms and offering preventative treatment if necessary. "
This brings the total number of cases in the county in just a few months to 10.
avid (16th July 2019), Constance (16th July 2019), RunningDeer (16th July 2019), T Smith (29th July 2019)
Mike Adams states his views on the end game. The consequences of complete legal immunity of the vaccine manufacturers and the shut down of speech concerning vaccine safety achieves a dangerous precedent. Now anything could be added to vaccines and no one could sue them and no one would be allowed to talk about it.
ALERT for humanity: The “perfect storm” for a vaccine HOLOCAUST is now here
Thursday, July 18, 2019 by: Mike Adams
(Natural News) The Holocaust of history saw the coordinated, government-run murder of six million Jews, capping off one of the most horrifying chapters of human history. Yet another holocaust is being repeated right now by the vaccine industry, also run by fascist government much like the Third Reich. Except this holocaust’s impact goes far beyond six million people; it involves the maiming, injury and deaths of hundreds of millions of people around the world, spanning at least three decades.
Just like Adolf Hitler criminalized anyone criticizing his authoritarian regime, the vaccine deep state in America — led by the criminal CDC — has achieved the coordinated censorship of all criticism of vaccines across every tech platform of today: Google, Facebook, YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter and others. All channels containing content or videos that dare point out the government-admitted statistics of children being killed by vaccines — quarterly stats are readily available via VAERS.HHS.gov — are systematically de-platformed and censored.
At the same time, the vaccine industry continues to enjoy a “special deal” of legal immunity, thanks to the corrupt U.S. government and its complicity with the pharma cartels. No person harmed by a vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule can sue the manufacturer of that faulty product. This means vaccine manufacturers have zero motivation for quality control and can technically put literally any chemical they want into vaccines… including chemicals that cause autism, neurological damage and death.
ebook Discover how to prevent and reverse heart disease (and other cardio related events) with this free ebook: Written by popular Natural News writer Vicki Batt, this book includes everything you need to know about preventing heart disease, reversing hypertension, and nurturing your cardiac health without medication. Learn More.
These two factors — the coordinated censorship of all whistleblowers and the “special deal” legal immunity for vaccine manufacturers — add up to a perfect storm for a global vaccine holocaust that can never be stopped, since no whistleblowers are allowed to be heard.
Vaccine pushers have become crazed, cult-like fanatics
Defenders of the scientific static quo claim that science is “self correcting.” But there can be no self correction when no voices of dissent are allowed to be heard. Vaccines have become a cult-like “faith” matter across the scientific community, where total belief in vaccines is required at all times, or you will be fired from your job, stripped of your medical license, isolated from research funding, denounced by the medical establishment and censored by the tech giants. No dissent is allowed to be voiced, which means vaccines aren’t “scientific” at all. They represent an absolutist, cult-like fanaticism that smacks of deep intellectual corruption, not rational thought.
No one is allowed to criticize vaccines. No whistleblowers are covered in the media. No investigative findings can be shared on social media. The cover-up is now complete, and the vaccine industry answers to no one, but hopes to violate everyone.
Mass death has now descended upon us, and it’s all being carried out in the name of “science.”
Watch my stunning mini-documentary video to learn more, and share everywhere. This video is available exclusively on Brighteon.com, since Vimeo, Facebook and YouTube have all banned Natural News content for the reasons noted above.
ALERT for humanity: The “perfect storm” for a vaccine HOLOCAUST is now here
Thursday, July 18, 2019 by: Mike Adams
"Prior to 2013, fewer than 1,000 elderly Americans died from the flu in all but one year. But in the most recent five years available, the average jumped to over 3,000 per year, exceeding 5,000 in the most recent year (2017). The 2013-2017 flu death rate among Americans over 65 jumped 328.6%, or more than four times than it was in the period 2006-2012.
The influenza death rate did not change among Americans age under 35, while it rose 132.4% (more than doubled) among those age 35-64."
Soaring Elderly Flu Death: What Role Did the Stronger New Flu Vaccine Play?
July 19, 2019
by Health Impact News Staff
Flu shots have been offered to Americans for years. A major target from drug companies who make vaccines and physicians who administer them has been the elderly, who are more likely to develop the flu due to their declining health.
In addition, Medicare covers the cost of flu shots, making them more accessible to seniors.
On December 23, 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved use of Fluzone High-Dose flu vaccine for the elderly. This new product is four times more powerful, that is, it contains four times the amount of flu virus antigen per dose as the product used previously (Fluzone). The vaccine is given as a single injection.
FDA approval was given even though its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices made no indication it was better than the previously-used Fluzone after reviewing studies of safety and effectiveness. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stated,
“Data demonstrating greater protection against influenza illness after vaccination with Fluzone High-Dose are needed to evaluate whether Fluzone High-Dose is a more effective vaccine for patients age > 65 years.”
The largest study reviewed by the FDA committee showed that the new high-dose vaccine had a 50% higher rate of side effects within the first week after the injection, and four times the chance that patients would develop fever after the shot.
The approval was given even though a large three-year study of effectiveness and safety had just begun (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010).
Almost immediately after FDA approval, questions were raised about serious side effects of the more potent new vaccine.
One of the first skeptics of Fluzone High-Dose was Dr. Joseph Mercola, who presented evidence that it increases side effects.
He referred to the manufacturer’s safety study that found a higher rate of serious adverse effects among elderly taking the high-dose flu shot (7.4%) than those who took the earlier flu shot (6.1%). The package insert lists these severe conditions (see Appendix).
In addition, Mercola cited a series of five recent analyses, called Cochrane reviews, on effects of the flu vaccine.
Each Cochrane review is not a single study but consists of multiple studies on the same topic.
One Cochrane review concluded there was no strong evidence that flu shots improved the health of the elderly, making higher-dose vaccinations a greater threat for a product that doesn’t work (Mercola, 2011):
“The available evidence is of poor quality and provides no guidance regarding the safety, efficacy or effectiveness of influenza vaccines for people aged 65 years or older.”
A 2012 article in Consumer Reports reported on whether the magazine’s panel of medical advisors advocate using high-dose Fluzone for the elderly, instead of the less potent vaccination.
The response was that the more potent Fluzone was NOT advised at any time, until proof of greater effectiveness was developed (Mitchell, 2012).
“Initially we hoped this high-dose vaccine might particularly help seniors who are very ill or have compromised immune systems, but given the lack of clinical trial data, and that there is a risk of making sick people even sicker, our medical consultants don’t advise it for anyone at this time. Until more is known about how protective the high-dose shot is for all seniors, the regular flu vaccine remains the best option.”
Also in 2012, a Scientific American article cast doubt on whether the new, strengthened flu vaccine could protect the elderly.
It cited a 2006 journal article by the Group Health Research Institute in Seattle that showed vaccinated seniors were 44% less likely to die than unvaccinated seniors were during flu season, but 61% less likely to die before flu season even started.
This raises the question of whether healthier elderly people are more likely to elect to have a flu shot.
Furthermore, the fact that vaccinated elderly persons are 61% less likely to die from flu in the non-flu season (compared to just 44% less during flu season) raises the possibility that taking the vaccine may worsen an elderly person’s chance of surviving flu season (Moyer, 2012).
A study of nearly 32,000 nursing home patients showed that fewer elderly persons taking the high-dose flu shot developed the flu than did those taking standard doses (1.4% vs. 1.9%).
Those in the high-dose group also had a lower rate of serious side effects (8.3% vs. 9.0%). All six persons who died within 30 days of taking the vaccine were given high doses, but authors believe that these deaths had nothing to do with the flu shots (DiazGranados, 2014).
After FDA approval of the high-dose flu shot for the elderly, use of the new vaccine began slowly. In the period 2010-2012, the first three years after approval, just 18.4% of elderly Americans receiving flu shots received the high-dose version (McGrath, 2015). The numbers of 25% and 32% in 2011 and 2012 likely means a much larger percent in years after.
One important way to test for any effect that High-Dose Fluzone had on elderly Americans is to review death rates in the periods before and after it was introduced. The CDC maintains a database of all deaths of U.S. residents; in mid-2019, the database covered all years from 1968-2017.
Table 1 is a comparison of influenza deaths for the periods 2006-2012, when less than 10% of elderly Americans vaccinated for the flu had High-Dose Fluzone, and 2013-2017, when a much larger (but unknown) percent of those vaccinated were given High-Dose Fluzone (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019).
Prior to 2013, fewer than 1,000 elderly Americans died from the flu in all but one year. But in the most recent five years available, the average jumped to over 3,000 per year, exceeding 5,000 in the most recent year (2017). The 2013-2017 flu death rate among Americans over 65 jumped 328.6%, or more than four times than it was in the period 2006-2012.
The influenza death rate did not change among Americans age under 35, while it rose 132.4% (more than doubled) among those age 35-64.
Additional information may be pertinent to this unusual trend:
Large increases in elderly flu death rates occurred among all major racial and ethnic groups (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian).
Large increases occurred for both elderly males and females.
Increases occurred for elderly in all but two small states (Delaware and Nevada). The highest increase was reported in Oregon, where the 2013-2017 rate was nine times greater than earlier.
Possible causes for this increase, each of which do not explain the recent trend, are listed:
“The flu was stronger” in the past five years. False. Younger age groups were not affected, and other periods of high flu deaths (1968-1969, 1980-1981, and 2006-2007) affected all age groups, not just the elderly.
“It’s a coding change” starting in 2013. False. No such federal rules affecting coding of flu deaths were issued.
“The elderly had to die of something.” False. The death rate for all causes among U.S. elderly declined 5% from 2006-2012 to 2013-2017, compared to the 328.6% rise for the flu.
“Fewer people were immunized.” False. Roughly 40% of Americans over six months receive the (recommended) flu vaccine annually, a number that does not vary much year by year.
“Not that many people were affected.” False. The total number of flu deaths among U.S. elderly in the past five years (16,613) is large, and trends are statistically significant.
One suggestion that greater use of High-Dose Fluzone is associated with this large jump is by comparing elderly flu death rates for 2006-2010 (when it was not used), and in 2011-2012 (when it was used in 25% – 32% of elderly receiving flu shots). The rate increased 24%, from 1.542 to 1.912 deaths per million persons, during this time. Presumably, the proportion of elderly flu shots using High-Dose Fluzone rose after 2012, as the flu death rate from soared to 6.977.
Some experts participating in the dialogue on vaccine safety contend that flu shots cannot give someone the flu, or cause anything more than minor side effects.
In 1986, federal legislation enacted the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, giving families of immunized children a means of compensation for the harm caused by vaccines, while absolving drug companies from any fault.
A total of 6,358 claims have been compensated at a total of $4 billion. Two-thirds of these claims involved flu vaccines (Health Resources and Services Administration, 2019).
The new High-Dose Fluzone is made of inactivated influenza virus, and thus cannot “give” vaccinated persons any of the three types of flu virus that the product protects against. But types of flu are difficult to predict before the season starts, as manufacturers prepare millions of doses of vaccine, and flu shots in a given year often do not protect against the actual strain or strains (Janjua, 2010).
When a flu shot is given, the antigens it contains generate antibodies against disease. These antibodies are “fighters” the body uses against multiple diseases, even though it protects only against the types of flu it is made to prevent.
Antibody attacks could reduce the body’s immune system strength, which is already lowered in elderly persons. Thus, a flu shot four times more powerful than the one it replaced could, theoretically, cause higher rates of disease (Angelantoni, 2017).
The recent mortality rise in elderly flu deaths should be taken seriously, and future trends should be monitored by health officials. More studies are needed comparing rates of flu deaths among those who have been vaccinated with High-Dose Fluzone, vaccinated with normal dose Fluzone, those immunized using flu mist, and those who are not vaccinated, to better explore ways to provide maximum safety for elderly persons.
About the Author
The author is a freelance writer for Health Impact News who is an epidemiologist and has published over 30 articles in medical journals. Due to the risks involved in today’s climate for anyone who dares to publish anything questioning vaccines, this person wishes to remain anonymous to protect their family and career.
Constance (22nd July 2019), East Sun (21st July 2019), T Smith (29th July 2019), Valerie Villars (29th July 2019)
Almost no one I know thinks Big Pharma is a benevolent and protective force for human health. However, most people with whom I speak still turn towards allopathic medicine. They still feel shocked when a medication has terrible side effects or when conditions escalate. Almost EVERY person I know who is vaccine informed started because a person in their life who is important (self included) had unmistakable signs of a vaccination related problem.
Severe disappointment and harm make people loathe to trust what we are being told. When we investigate and discover the lies we have been told and hear them repeated with a straight face as if we are stupid, blind and deaf, we get angry. That makes us anti- establishment.
People REALLY turn away from the system when an opportunity arises at the end of all help from traditional sources. An alternative works. When our seemingly hopeless cases are seen to be amenable to healing, we will invest our confidence in skillful means. That will make us advocates for real medicine.
Analysis – The GOOD And The BAD of Today’s “Anti-Vax” Movement…
Despite Well Funded Constant Assaults By Big Pharma, And Their Sleazy Minions, The Worldwide “Anti-Vax” Movement Gets Smarter, Tougher, And Stronger – And Far More Knowledgeable, And Sophisticated, EVERY Day...
Opinion by “Deplorable” Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
There are ONLY three viewpoints about the Vaccine Programs on Planet Earth…
(1) The huge, and ever growing, “Anti-Vax” Movement – is made up of people who think about things and make up their minds about issues based on facts and reality. They are people who have done their homework. They are people who look their Pediatrician, or their politician, in the eye and say “YOU are beginning to piss me off, buster…” They sound, and act, like angry Americans.
(2) The “Pro-Vax” Mercenaries – Those who’s very financial existence depends upon them promoting the great vaccine lie: like Pediatricians, “Public Health” workers, and “Astro-Turf” organizations.
These are people that connect themselves to the “Progressive” wing of the Democratic Party. They are very often government employees who have no morality what-so-ever. They are almost never family members. Few, if any, have children of their own. Secular Humanism will be their guidance mechanism. Several of their leaders have recently been connected to child pornography. Some of those are people who get government, or Big Pharma Grants, to argue the pro-vax position.
(3) The biggest group – Normal, non-involved people who mistakenly believe that their government, their “Public Health,” and their scientific/academic community have their best interests at heart.
These are the people who, almost suddenly, become part of the “Anti-Vax” Community after their beloved child gets a nine vaccine combo from their white-coated-Mercedes-driving Pediatrician. Their beloved child turns into a screaming, high-fevered, clearly suffering, defenseless little one who will, from that pediatric moment on, need constant 24 hour-per-day care.
It is a simple situation…
It is the classic battle between Good and Evil.
What Has Changed To Make The “Anti-Vax” Movement So Powerful?
It was one simple thing – a change in “positioning.” Prior to the passing of SB 277 in California (Mandatory Vaccines for children) the movement that was then called “Autism,“ had the attitude that they should plead their case POLITELY to the very people that were causing the problem to start with. “Autism” leadership, at the time, BLOCKED anyone from pointing out that vaccines were dangerous. Their agreed upon “positioning” was:
“We know that vaccines are safe and effective (sniff, sniff), but we just want personal choice (whimper, whimper)…
California was a battleground – and not just over the SB 277 legislation. Internally, what was becoming the “Anti-Vax” Movement was involved in humongous infighting. A huge counter movement, within the “Autism” world, was telling those that insisted that their argument “We know that vaccines are safe and effective (sniff, sniff), but we just want personal choice (whimper, whimper)… was a non-starter.
A huge fight ensued between the “personal choice” contingent and the “vaccines are neither safe nor effective” activists. We lost the SB 277 fight, but the “personal choice” people were forced out of a leadership role.
Once the “vaccines are neither safe nor effective” partisans began to punch their way through the “Autism” structure, everything changed. Now there was a “positioning” that made sense, and provided a common banner, From there, from that point, an easily usable strategy began to unfold. The whole movement dropped the “Autism” movement designation and went full-on “Anti-Vax.”
And THAT was the Good part…
All across America “Anti-Vax” activists dropped the polite obsequious (whimpering) approach and not only went nose-to nose with their former detractors, like the internet trolls, and the Paul Offits of the world, but they battered those former tormentors, like “Orac,“ into the internet equivalent of “road kill.” The organized “skeptics” became a common “chew toy” for angered “Anti-Vax” operators. The “Anti-Vax” activists had found out how to make activism fun.
With the newer, and better message, “Anti-Vax” stuff began to happen at every level. So much so that Big Pharma, in desperation contacted the World Health Organization (WHO) for help against us. Then they (laugh here) got Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff to write a letter to Google, FaceBook, etc., trying to block our ability to communicate,
At that point Big Pharma was ADMITTING that the “Anti-Vax” Movement was, and is, ALL POWERFUL. (stand up and pound your chest…)
Now – Over To The BAD Part…
The “position” switch from “We know that vaccines are safe and effective (sniff, sniff), but we just want personal choice (whimper, whimper)… to the new “vaccines are neither safe nor effective” argument was EVERYTHING.
It enabled, literally, millions of activists to turn loose their anger and frustration over the vaccine issue – and it worked – scaring Big Pharma, and their minions into desperate action.
So, what is so bad about that?
The massive movement STOPPED at that point, and did not move up to the next logical step – the realization that the “vaccines” themselves were NOT the problem.
Too many “Anti-Vax” activists focused only on the problems of the vaccines themselves. They did not, and do not, realize that there is more to this argument than just those little “Made-in-China” scum tubes. The fact is that the vaccines, themselves, are the MINOR part of the problem. We are NOT going to solve “the vaccine issue” without acknowledging the bigger problems, and dealing with them.
What is “the bigger problem?” Vaccines are NOT the problem. The REAL problem is those groups of people, and entities, who are constantly coming at all of us with a loaded syringe in their hands.
Let me use an analogy here – suppose we were in a literal war situation where the enemy is shooting bullets (vaccines) at us, and we are hiding behind a protective wall. We are NOT going to win this conflict by avoiding bullets (vaccines). Sooner, than later, the enemy will win. We have to do something about those people shooting those bullets (vaccines) at us.
Now in a real war, we would have some counter options. We could activate our mortar teams, lobbing mini-bombs (mortar rounds) into the shooters positions. Or, we could call in for an artillery barrage, pinpointing the enemy’s position. If we can identify their Command Post location, even better.
The whole idea is to stop the enemy from continuing their aggressive behavior by sending bullets (vaccines) our way. When you think of the problem in those terms solutions almost provide for themselves. If you want to win the war you have to kill those shooting at you, destroy their Command Posts, destroy their supply lines, and start bombing their capital cities. THEN you start to get their attention.
So, who are these people shooting bullets (vaccines) our way?
That’s an easy answer…
There are three groups – easy to identify, and even easier to strategize against.
Let’s look at them:
(1) The vaccine manufacturers are a very profitable arm of Big Pharma. As we know, even from the liberal news, Big Pharma constantly violates the law, and our government constantly fines then for their actions. Attorney groups, except for vaccines, constantly sue Big Pharma to stop their evil ways. Why do I mention these facts? Because I want to emphasize that these people are not out of reach. In fact, they are VERY vulnerable to the right kind of attack.
(2) US Public Health – The original intent of “Public Health” is to act as a structure for the public good. It is made up of an arrangement between Federal, State and Local agencies. Although it is sort of a “Communism 101″ solution, there COULD BE some good in it – if it were tightly controlled.
But, “Public Health” is NOT tightly controlled, at least not by “We the People.” They, virtually, operate on their own – and their funding comes directly, and indirectly, from Big Pharma. Guess what THAT leads to…
The Public Law & Health Center says of them:
“The public health system in the U.S. is a complex network of people and organizations in both public and private sectors that collaborate in various ways at national, state and local levels to promote and protect public health.
The governmental public health system is made up of public health agencies from the federal government, 51 states (including the District of Columbia), 2,794 local governments, and 565 federally recognized tribal agencies.7
Because of the broad flexibility states have in defining their public health role, the governmental public health infrastructure throughout the U.S. is extremely varied.”
“Both state and local health departments serve critical roles in promoting and protecting the health of residents in their jurisdictions. State health departments provide many population-based public health services related to primary prevention, screening and treatment of diseases and conditions. Duties of a state health department often include (1) disease surveillance, epidemiology, and data collection; (2) state laboratory services; (3) preparedness and response to public health emergencies; (4) population-based primary prevention; (5) health care services; (6) regulation of health care providers and other licensed professions; (7) environmental health; and (8) technical assistance and training. According to a recent study, their most common prevention services include tobacco (87%), HIV/AIDS (85%), sexually transmitted disease counseling and partner notification (85%), nutrition (79%), and physical activity (77%).
All Sound good? It is not. Once “vaccines” entered the picture everything changed. The entire “Public Health” structure has become just one more sales force for Big Pharma.
“Public Health” is so arrogant that they don’t really hide this fact. The more vaccines they push on Americans the better pay this bag of scum gets. These people deceive the American Public by telling us all that they are here to protect us. THAT is a lie. They are here to vaccinate us.
“In addition, more than 90 percent of all state health departments perform vaccine order management and inventory distribution for childhood immunizations, and over 80 percent for adult immunizations.”
(3) The “Astro-Turf” forces funded by Big Pharma – like the “skeptics” , and even sleazier groups like Every Child by Two (ECBT). J.B. Handley wrote a superb article about this situation called:
“How The CDC and Big Pharma use Non-profit Front Groups to Advance Extremist Mandatory Vaccination Policy Restricting Religious Freedoms”
In his article J.B says:
“Like many organizations that abuse the 501(c)(3) rules of the Internal Revenue Service, Every Child By Two (“ECBT”) puts on a front to the world that they are an independent, compassionate organization of parents — originally founded by Rosalynn Carter no less — dedicated to the important work of getting every child vaccinated.
In fact, the organization is really a sock-puppet mouthpiece for two masters: 1) the Centers for Disease Control and, 2) vaccine makers, their two primary sources of funding.”
And J.B also points out:
“Have you ever heard of a “Special Interest Dot-Org”?
It’s a front group for a special interest masquerading as a non-profit organization, and ECBT is one of the more notorious “SIDs” in existence — at least to parents of vaccine-injured children like me.
I first wrote about ECBT back in 2008, when nearly half of their annual funding came from the vaccine maker Wyeth.
Just a few months ago in late 2017, the British Medical Journal published their own scathing critique of non-profit, pro-vaccine front groups funded by both the CDC and vaccine makers, and specifically mentioned ECBT:
“IAC, ECBT, and AAP have a few things in common. They are all non-profit organizations with large online presences that promote themselves as sources of reliable information on vaccines.
They also receive funding from both vaccine manufacturers and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And, in their advocacy for compulsory vaccination, they all have in common a goal that pushes beyond official governmental policy and, in the case of influenza vaccines, the evidence.”
Above are our REAL Targets…
We are in a war people…
We need to, figuratively speaking, focus our energies on DESTROYING anyone, and everyone, coming at us with a loaded gun (syringe). No mercy. No prisoners. No settlements. Public hangings, so to speak. The “Anti-Vax” movement is strong enough, and mean enough, to get this done. We just have to focus on specific targets, and begin the destruction process…
And, when we shift gears, you will find that we have even more allies than you can imagine…
I am a semi-retired Crisis Management Consultant in Health Care. My specialty was/is the protection of cutting-edge (Alternative Medicine) health practitioners, and their innovative non-drug offerings. I have always had to design campaigns to defend against, and attack, what seems like an overwhelming behemoth coming after my clients. Victory was always easy once we changed the game.
Change the game? Yes. NEVER fight on the enemy’s battlefield. Lure the dumb bastards onto a killing ground of your own choice. Prepare well – and watch the enemy walk into the trap. Then press the button and watch their so-called “overwhelming force” die.
Am I joking? Nope. Every “overwhelming force” has a soft underbelly. Find it. Exploit it. Cut it wide open so their entrails are in the dirt. Then attack relentlessly. Don’t let it get back up. The “Anti-Vax” movement is PERFECT for this kind of campaign for the massive number of activists cannot be “overwhelmed.”
Remember the Lilliputians in the “Gulliver’s Travels” story? They had a very good way to subdue a big threat…
There is REALLY only one target – Big Pharma…
Want to win the vaccine battle? Kill Big Pharma.
Everything else will fall into place.
More, Big Pharma has irritated way more than just the big, and powerful “Anti-Vax” movement. Big Pharma is screwing, virtually, every American there is. And, America is waking up pissed off.
Do you realize that BOTH political parties in the 2020 Presidential race want Big Pharma reined in? Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump SOUND JUST ALIKE when they talk about Big Pharma ripping off Americans.
The “Vaccine Solution” is simple…
If we can help Bernie and Donald to cut Big Pharma’s income by a significant percentage, they, Big Pharma, will NOT be able to fund their “Astro-Turf” organizations. Nor will they be able to pour money into the CDC, which goes on to the State and local “Public Health” groups.
Nor will they control our federal and State legislators any more. They simply will NOT have the money to buy them.
In essence, we are at the point where, as I showed in the war analogy above, we can completely destroy those shooting at us with bullets (vaccines). We gave these Big Pharma assholes enough warning – let’s go get them.
Stay tuned…
Opinion by “Deplorable” Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
slow boil continues
Constance (27th July 2019), James Newell (26th July 2019)
Chinese parents demand answers over ‘dangerous vaccines’
Families unite online in a shared belief that their children have been sickened – and even killed – by injections
For new mother Wang Shixia, there was nothing remotely alarming about getting a compulsory DPT shot for her seven-month-old son at a well-established hospital in China’s coastal province of Shandong.
But little did she realise, the state-sponsored injection three years ago – given yearly to millions of newborns nationwide to prevent diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus – would nearly claim the life of her son and plunge her family into a nightmare that still haunts them.
As new vaccine scandal grips China, parents say they’ve lost faith in the system
Wang’s child developed a high temperature hours after the jab and his condition soon worsened. Within a fortnight, the infant was in an intensive care unit fighting a persistent high fever, a festering rash, a bone marrow infection and meningitis.
The child survived but continued to need medical treatment every few months in Beijing. The health authorities confirmed that the child’s condition was a result of the vaccine.
Now, with China confronting its worst public health crisis in years, Wang and hundreds of other parents who say their children have been sickened, disabled or killed by vaccinations in years past are demanding answers from the government.
The crisis erupted when the drug authorities announced that Changchun Changsheng Bio-technology, one of the country’s biggest vaccine makers, made about 252,600 substandard DPT vaccines that were given to hundreds of thousands of babies – some as young as three months old.
The company also forged data in the production of about 113,000 rabies vaccines, state drug regulators said.
Vaccine scandal: the Chinese officials who defy disgrace to rise from the ashes of public crises
So far, the listed company has been given a small fine – just 0.6 per cent of its 2017 net profit. Fifteen people, including its chairwoman, have also been arrested, and China’s top leaders have pledged to have a thorough investigation into the “appalling” incident.
But for many parents, this is not enough.
“The bad guys of course should be punished, but what about the children and families who have already been inflicted with so much pain and suffering [by the vaccines]? Don’t we deserve answers and compensation?” Wang said.
The DPT shot given to Wang’s child was made by Changsheng Bio-tech, but was not among the batch of faulty vaccines found by the state drug regulator. According to the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, any vaccine can cause side effects, and there is risk – albeit extremely small – of a vaccine causing severe harm and even death.
However, having lost faith in China’s scandal-plagued pharmaceutical industry and the government’s lax regulation on food and drug safety, Wang and others suspect there are more problematic vaccines made by Changsheng Bio-tech and other companies, presenting dangers to their children.
“For us, the most important thing is that such tragedies do not happen again,” said Li Baosheng, a Shandong father who said his son died after a vaccination.
Li’s then eight-year-old son came home with a high fever in 2010 after getting a Changsheng H1N1 flu shot at school. He fell into a coma two days later and stopped breathing. After a fortnight on a respirator followed by two months of treatment at a Beijing hospital, the boy remained in a vegetative state until he died in August, Li said.
“We cannot allow the latest scandal to just fade away after a few days. Similar problems and scandals have occurred again and again in the past few years. It means the government has done nothing to improve regulation and safety control,” he said.
The Changsheng Bio-tech revelations come just two years after health authorities announced that 2 million improperly stored vaccines were sold around the country from an overheated, dilapidated storeroom. A year before that, hundreds of infants in central Henan province were reportedly given expired vaccines, causing two deaths.
As China's vaccine scandal unfolds, anxious parents turn to Hong Kong to get children vaccinated
In 2013, health authorities investigated a vaccine maker after eight infants died in two months following injections of hepatitis B vaccines. And in 2010, journalist Wang Keqin reported claims that unrefrigerated vaccines in Shanxi province killed four children and sickened more than 70 others.
“There are so many victims throughout the country. I’ve been calling for legislation on vaccines since 2010, but to no avail,” Li said.
In the aftermath, nearly 400 parents who say their children are victims of faulty vaccines have formed a group chat in popular messaging app WeChat.
Some urge each other to submit petitions to the State Council via a website set up to collect public feedback until September, while others consider legal action and petitioning Beijing in person.
But Beijing has taken a very hard line against rights activism and dissent in the past few years. In 2008, a group of parents whose children fell ill from milk formula contaminated with melamine were detained by police as they tried to hold a news conference.
Nevertheless, some parents are undeterred.
“There is no use in worrying about that. The knife is already over our neck and we have to speak out, otherwise it only gets worse,” said Shawn, a Chinese father in the southern city of Guangzhou who suspects his son developed epilepsy after a DPT vaccination in 2013.
Shawn said his four-month-old began having seizures after the injection and had to spend more than a week in intensive care.
The cases of Shawn and Li could not be independently verified.
China censors social media posts about vaccine scandal, monitor says
He said he was “pessimistic” that the government would hear their calls to help treat the affected children, given that most Chinese media would not cover their plight.
Censors have also been on the move. As word of the scandal spread online on Sunday and Monday, the Chinese word for “vaccine” became one of the most censored words on Weibo, China’s Twitter-like service. A Shenzhen Media Group reporter said the authorities had issued an order banning coverage of the scandal from Tuesday.
“Let’s be honest, the government hasn’t changed – there is no press freedom, no judicial fairness ... If these [fundamental] rights granted by the constitution can’t even be guaranteed, relying on government-initiated investigations won’t make much of a difference,” Shawn said.
Last edited by Delight; 27th July 2019 at 01:52.
Nurses have a trusted reputation and many will realize when they have a need: no one can beat a great nurse who is intelligent, skilled and assertive in the interests of her patients.
I gave up my license in 2014 but I will always love the principles I cherish of nursing: synthetic capacity to take information and put together relationships, using science to create practical applications, client advocacy, hygiene and support for those who need care. I feel really glad when I see other nurses stand up. Nurses could be one of the most powerful voices of reason for human concerns. That is if we stop being willing to fear for our "jobs" and therefore become just pawns of the sickcare industry and handmaids of big pharma.
From Nurses for Vaccine Safety Alliance, Inc.
“For the first time, the number of children paralyzed by mutant strains of the polio vaccine are greater than the number of children paralyzed by polio itself.
There have been 21 cases of vaccine-derived polio this year. These cases look remarkably similar to regular polio. But laboratory tests show they're caused by remnants of the oral polio vaccine that have gotten loose in the environment, mutated and regained their ability to paralyze unvaccinated children.”
Link:
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsan...han-wild-polio
#Polio History:
A little factual history, because most people really don't realize the true history of Polio. We all just think of paralyzed children in iron lung who later died.
The Merck manual says that more than 90% of polio cases simply resembled the stomach flu, another 5% had abortive polio which included a sore throat, and another 3% had non-paralytic polio which includes some limb weakness and numbness. This 98% of people infected with polio had a complete recovery (and have life long immunity) and the symptoms resolved within 10-14 days. About 2% (slightly less) had paralytic polio. Of this 2% it is divided into 3 subcategories, but among the 3 more than 50% had a complete recovery rate, and in the other 50% some had a longer recovery and some did not fully recover - having some paralysis and some died. Of that 2%, 2% had bulbar polio, which was the horrific kind shown on TV (that is less than .04% of the people that contracted polio).
Charts show a decline from the peak of polio in 1954, before vaccine trials began on April 12, 1955. After the vaccine trials started, an increase in Polio cases was reported in Vermont (up 266%), Rhode Island (up 454%) and Massachusetts (up 643%). Idaho and Utah even banned the vaccine because prior to the vaccine trials there had never been a case reported in those states and once they started vaccinating, people were getting infected.
In June of 1955, just weeks after massive vaccination started, 2 of 8 lots of vaccines were administered which released live virus, infecting 40,000 people with polio, 164 were permanently paralyzed and 10 died."
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/21149823/n...e-experts-say/
http://www.vaclib.org/sites/debate/polio.html
http://reducetheburden.org/polio-a-shot-in-the-dark/
This study shows those vaccinated are able to spread polio. For 2 months polio was running through their community, via VDPV, and only 1 child, immunocompromised, had any issue!
Polio is not the "killer/iron lung-er it's portrayed to be. 95% of polio that contract polio never even know they have it.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19090774
http://m.chicagoreader.com/chicago/t...ent?oid=870701
https://youtu.be/LR7FRVSb1So
http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=10091
Prior to 1954, the following undoubtedly hid behind the name “poliomyelitis”: Transverse Myelitis, viral or “aseptic” meningitis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)- (what Franklin Delano Roosevelt had), Chinese Paralytic syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, spinal meningitis, spinal apoplexy, inhibitory palsy, intermittent fever, famine fever, worm fever, bilious remittent fever, ergotism, post-polio syndrome, acute flaccid paralysis(AFP).
Included under the umbrella term “Acute Flaccid Paralysis” are Poliomyelitis, Transverse Myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, enteroviral encephalopathy, traumatic neuritis, Reye’s syndrome etc.
See more at: http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/20...f-polio/#.dpuf
India and the vaccine causing polio:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/.../hv.6.12.13354
The Cutter Incident:
“The contaminated vaccine was directly responsible for five deaths and 51 cases of permanent paralysis among those who were vaccinated by the Cutter product. The vaccine also triggered a small epidemic among family members and others who had close contact with the children whod fallen ill. This resulted in five more deaths, and 113 more cases of paralysis.”
“In addition, about 40,000 children mostly in California, Idaho, New Mexico and Arizona developed the stiff neck, headache, fever and muscle weakness of abortive polio, a short-lived and milder form of the disease that leaves no lasting damage.”
When polio vaccine backfired / Tainted batches killed 10 and paralyzed 164.
http://www.sfgate.com/health/article...es-2677525.php
Vaccine induced polio
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC110068/
Polio caused by the vaccine. Very good article in The Lancet.
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/la...lltext?rss=yes
Read Dr. Suzanne Humphries chapter on polio for free!
http://jeffreydachmd.com/wp-content/...ance_polio.pdf
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rZMn7oapJD4
https://www.facebook.com/MyIncredibl...6632224660551/
https://www.facebook.com/brandy.vaug...54293744201397
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10472327/
http://jeffreydachmd.com/wp-content/...ance_polio.pdf
http://www.ageofautism.com/2014/04/p...-of-polio.html
Salk polio vaccine video:
In case you didn't know, vaccines were spreading polio. "On September 24, 1976, the Washington Post reported Dr. Salk's assertion that the Sabin live oral virus vaccine had been the "principal if not sole cause" of every reported polio case in the United States since 1961. Salk repeated this accusation July 6, 1977, when he was interviewed on CBC television, saying: "We have known now since 1961 in the United States, and prior to that in other countries, that the live virus vaccine for polio does cause the disease itself."
This is where he said that in 1977 on television. Proof."
http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1814511606
The chances of getting polio worldwide are over 1 in 19 million according to data from 2014. Most cases are asymptomatic, meaning you have no symptoms. High doses of vitamin C can prevent complications. See info on Pentacel and pediarix. They are polio combo vaccines.
Poliomyelitis = 72% of infections cause no symptoms; 25% flu-like symptoms that last 2-5 days; 0.5% leads to more severe symptoms such as paralytic polio; only people with the paralytic infection are considered to have the disease.
Treatment:
Polio - High doses of Vitamin C
http://www.doctoryourself.com/klennerbio.html
The true history:
"Dissolving Illusions" By Dr. Suzanne Humphries MD
(It's a Best Seller on Amazon)
Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History https://www.amazon.com/dp/1480216895..._ApZ9ybKK7ZS13
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsan...han-wild-polio
CDC admitted the cancer causing SV40 was in the polio vaccine then tried to erase this:
http://preventdisease.com/images13/CDC_Polio.png
13 Things You Don't Know About Polio
1. A pesticide common in the 1800's was called Paris Green. A green liquid because it was a combination of copper and arsenic or lead and arsenic. Some of the most toxic substances known to humankind.
2. This pesticide worked by causing neurological damage in the bugs, causing organ failure.
3. Polio consists of symptoms synonymous with neurological damage, causing organ failure.
4. Heavy metal poisoning from lead, mercury and other similar heavy metals manifest lesions on neurological tissues, meaning the toxin destroys the nerve/communication pathways connecting the brain to the organs in the body. http://bit.ly/1OLcFgG
5. Polio victims present lesions on neurological tissue, that cause the organs to malfunction all around the body. (lungs, heart, nerves that control walking etc)
6. Polio outbreaks hit throughout the summer, only during pesticide spraying times. (not the sunless and damp winter/spring seasons regarding other disease outbreaks)
7. Polio had NO ability to spread from infected victims to the uninfected. Polio infected clusters of people in the exact same areas, suddenly and swiftly. http://bit.ly/1P6zShV
8. Parents report finding their children paralyzed in and around apple orchards. One of the most heavily pesticide sprayed crops of the time (with lead arsenate or copper arsenate) were apple orchards.
9. President Roosevelt became paralyzed over night while on his farm in the summer, which contained many crops, including apple orchards. He also swam the day prior in a bay that was heavily polluted by industrial agricultural run off.
10. Dr. Ralph Scobey and Dr. Mortind Biskind testified in front of the U.S Congress in 1951 that the paralysis around the country known as polio was being caused by industrial poisons and that a virus theory was purposely fabricated by the chemical industry and the government to deflect litigation away from both parties. http://bit.ly/1DKDb3v
11. In 1956 the AMA (The American Medical Association) instructed each licensed medical doctor that they could no longer classify polio as polio, or their license to practice would be terminated. Any paralysis was now to be diagnosed as AFP (acute flaccid paralysis) MS, MD, Bell's Palsy, cerebral palsy, ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease), Guillian-Barre, meningitis etc etc. http://bit.ly/1Ml3rpX This was orchestrated purposely to make the public believe polio was eradicated by the polio vaccine campaign but because the polio vaccine contained toxic ingredients directly linked to paralysis, polio cases (not identified as polio) were skyrocketing...but only in vaccinated areas. http://bit.ly/1WEHYzR
12. The first polio vaccine was worked on by Dr. Jonas Salk and human experiments using this vaccine were conducted purposely on orphans in government/church run institutions because they were vulnerable and didn't require any parental consent signatures, as they had no parents. The vaccine was "declared safe" by "medicine" (as they always are even though that vaccine was killing and paralyzing monkeys in test trials) and that vaccine gave 40,000 orphans polio, permanently paralyzed hundreds and killed at least 10 children. All injuries and deaths under reported of course by the same authorities who orchestrated the atrocity. This was called The Cutter Incident. Have you noticed the medical industry's obsession with poisoning children? http://1.usa.gov/1mEozNJ
13. The next "improved" polio vaccine, given to hundreds of millions, carried both the SV 40 cancer virus as well as the AIDS virus. Every step of the way, medicine declaring they know for sure, that this time, they have everything straightened out. Same story then, same story now. The only thing larger than the pile of broken medical and government promises, is the pile of broken and dead bodies. http://bit.ly/1HfHR7W Cancerous tumors, still being pulled out of people today, are riddled with SV40 cancer viruses from the government's "safe and effective" and "approved" polio vaccine. http://bit.ly/1jGvysV
When someone talks of any disease, in this day and age, they're often just repeating what they were told by the government. When someone today repeats anything about polio and polio elimination based on vaccination, they're repeating known lies, told by known liars. Repeating what you're told and intelligence aren't the same thing. Repeating or intelligence. The choice is yours. Research the hidden history of polio, the disease that never was."
https://vactruth.com/2015/07/05/cdc-...lio-disappear/
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/polio-vaccine-cancer/
#nfvsa #nursesforvaccinesafetyalliance
Constance (28th July 2019), T Smith (29th July 2019), Valerie Villars (29th July 2019)
I thought this was a great protest!
Constance (29th July 2019), T Smith (29th July 2019), Valerie Villars (29th July 2019)