-
7th January 2011 13:57
Link to Post #1
Avalon Member
Bill Ryan
I have been following Bill Ryan for a couple of years since I first happened upon the Project Camelot videos on Youtube. I had no intention of ever registering on the forum until I read a couple of threads the other day where Bill came under personal attack, with certain individuals demonising him for his passionate defence of some of his good friends.
Bill is a man of great integrity, intelligence and loyalty. Nobody should ever question that.
Many people, including some members of this site, believe themselves to be spiritual people, talking a load of mumbo-jumbo trying to sound enlightened. All this, 'turn the other cheek', 'be passive' nonsense will not get you anywhere in life. The people who believe in these mantras are total walkovers. Sheep, for want of a better word. Destined for mediocrity.
The posters attacking Bill for his outburst are living in a dreamworld; they are emotionally weak. It is totally dishonorable for any person to stand by and let people they care about be defamed, especially in public on something as far-reaching as the Internet. Anyone this weak of mind will not survive.
Bill has achieved what he has because, in addition to having the 'positive' traits of being a nice guy, articulate, honorable, knowledgeable, seeking the truth, he also displays what we consider some of the 'negative' traits such as anger and the ability to use cutting words. Far from detracting from his character, it makes him a very well-rounded individual. Balanced, because he has his positively oriented goals but he is no walkover. If he was weak, he wouldn't have got anywhere near as close to the truth as he has done, so you should all be grateful for him.
Many of you need to understand that positive and negative, good and bad are at opposite poles along a continuum. The balance is between the two. Everything in the universe is of the positive and the negative: birth of stars, death of stars; love and hate; happy and sad. Without the dark there can be no light. This is basic. Don't crumble when you see people display 'negative' traits ('positive' and 'negative' are subject to individual interpretation): understand why they are doing it.
To post this defence of Bill was the only reason I joined the forum and if this is the last post I am allowed to write, then I am happy with that. His treatment has been appalling and committed by people who, I am sure, consider themselves 'spiritually evolved' or at least on the way towards it. You should realise that you have a long way to go.
My last words are to Bill: you are doing a fantastic job and I will continue to watch you with a great deal of interest from the shadows.
-
The Following 58 Users Say Thank You to darkstar For This Post:
000 (7th January 2011), 42 (7th January 2011), ace (28th January 2011), Adaiahsshadow (28th January 2011), Arrowwind (7th January 2011), ArtyCarl (7th January 2011), ASIA (15th January 2011), Atticus (24th January 2011), bashi (7th January 2011), bennycog (15th January 2011), Bill Ryan (7th January 2011), Bright Garlick (14th January 2011), Caterpillars Lens (28th January 2011), Corncrake (7th January 2011), CyRus (24th January 2011), Dream (7th January 2011), Enquiring1 (14th January 2011), Equinox (24th January 2011), EsmaEverheart (14th January 2011), Ethereal Blue Being (23rd January 2011), Fred259 (28th January 2011), Gajanana (28th January 2011), Garry Irwin (14th January 2011), Generous (7th January 2011), Globetrotter (8th January 2011), grannyfranny100 (8th January 2011), Heart-2-Heart (14th January 2011), Icecold (14th January 2011), Isthatso (7th January 2011), John Parslow (7th January 2011), JohnBlues (8th January 2011), jorr lundstrom (2nd February 2011), kari (15th January 2011), ketikoti (29th January 2011), KosmicKat (7th January 2011), LiveFree (24th January 2011), Mandala (9th January 2011), meeradas (14th January 2011), MorningSong (7th January 2011), NancyV (7th January 2011), noxon medem (4th February 2011), paul1972 (9th January 2011), Sebastion (7th January 2011), selaviv (7th January 2011), Shikasta (7th January 2011), SKIBADABOMSKI (14th January 2011), slipknotted (24th January 2011), Sol Va (7th January 2011), StephenW11UK (7th January 2011), str8thinker (8th January 2011), Terra (15th January 2011), tgn333 (25th January 2011), theguardian (8th January 2011), vericocha (7th January 2011), yaksuit (8th January 2011), Zook (7th January 2011)
-
7th January 2011 14:11
Link to Post #2
Re: Bill Ryan
While I agree with what Darkstar says, I would recommend not limiting yourself to the nuggets of information that Bill digs up. His work with Kerry in giving whistleblowers a chance to get their messages out, letting the audience assess the validity or otherwise of the messages should be a model of information dissemination for the internet age. But at the same time it is up to every one of us to do our own research, compare and contrast. Verify whatever you can. As Richard Hoagland says, "the lie is different at every level". I suggest that the corollary is that "the truth is different at every level". Not meaning to suggest that the truth changes, but what we see of a larger truth certainly varies depending on where we happen to be when we see it.
-
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to KosmicKat For This Post:
ASIA (15th January 2011), Ba-ba-Ra (7th January 2011), Holly Lindin (14th January 2011), irishspirit (7th January 2011), Mike (28th January 2011), ponda (14th January 2011), Sebastion (7th January 2011), StephenW11UK (14th January 2011), tgn333 (25th January 2011), truthseekerdan (7th January 2011), Zook (7th January 2011)
-
7th January 2011 14:13
Link to Post #3