David Wilcock – proof of a con-artist extraordinaire

[Gemma13]

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myIJHFGwMFY

PROOF DAVID WILCOCK IS A FRAUD ~ a con artist using the classic marketing mind control tool of “but wait . . . there’s more”!

To those who know –14 mins worth spending. The plagiarism detailing alone is worth it.

To those who don’t – be brave, invest 14 mins of your time and then really consider whether you should invest another minute, or dollar, on David Wilcock’s sophisticated snake oil. Or, dig a little deeper, there is plenty of proof if you really start looking.

There is no shame in being duped by con artists – they’re everywhere. Innocence and trusting others is an organic purity that comes from the heart. But it quickly turns sour if we don’t stop feeding the deceivers when the writing is on the wall!


Mods, please change Title into capitals as it always defaults to lowercase for me. Thank you.

[conk]

Wilcock has borrowed or stolen enough credible information that he seems to make a good case for himself in general. Thanks for showing giving us a deeper view.

[Agape]

The video made me laugh, honestly, it’s hilarious don’t think it proves or harms David.

I’ve lived through the end of last century as spiritual entity and do quite recall the 90s were time of big spiritual awakening, globally.
They were not easy years and yes, many people on spiritual path wanted to believe that some kind of instantaneous ascension of humanity of starry magnitude is possible.
I’ve advised people back then and always do that nothing of such proportion can possibly happen overnight.

Humanity still lives in deep dreaming state, at least part time but the “global dream” phenomenon ( or group consciousness) can be explaining co-factor of why some believes outlast is even though they conventionally defy our own best common sense.


On the other hand and in long term forecast, I firmly believe that future mankind -or one of its offshoots to be precise- will live in their light bodies on Earth, in peace and harmony and make the best use of their spiritual and technical abilities ..

I believe this may be in the last stages of human destiny on this planet and before we leave here.


It does not seem to be on plan for next couple of thousand years .


Evolution can be accelerated technologically and cosmologically
but it’s still a process.


It’s when we( human cultures) learn of importance of patience and cultivating arts and gardens.

Everything living takes time to grow and flap of second to damage.

That’s why wise ancestors cultivated careful approach to the ecosystem.


It’s a strange( funny) thought that just occurred to me but I think that even if everyone had the option of attaining enlightenment at the end of any particular year,
very few people would sign up for it. That’s to say ..ascension/evolution is always a possibility but nature itself does not like big changes.

[Mike]

What Wilcock does is make his predictions just nebulous enough so that they can be twisted to fit any narrative.

He's clearly nailed on many of them: Cabal arrests, 2012 etc. But the rest of the time he strongly hints at stuff, so that he can take credit if it comes true or wriggle out of it if it doesn't.

Anyone with half a brain knows he's full of sh!t. The problem is, the vast majority of people following things like "ascension" don't have half a brain...they have maybe an 8th. Wilcock isn't the problem, he's easily exposable; it's the audience that's the problem.

[Jad]

Posted by Mike (here)
What Wilcock does is make his predictions just nebulous enough so that they can be twisted to fit any narrative.

He's clearly nailed on many of them: Cabal arrests, 2012 etc. But the rest of the time he strongly hints at stuff, so that he can take credit if it comes true or wriggle out of it if it doesn't.

Anyone with half a brain knows he's full of sh!t. The problem is, the vast majority of people following things like "ascension" don't have half a brain...they have maybe an 8th. Wilcock isn't the problem, he's easily exposable; it's the audience that's the problem.

I agree with you on the audience. So where that would leave the folks who believe mainstream media to be true? 😉

[Bill Ryan]

I think what's interesting about this is that David Wilcock isn't learning. That's the key thing here.

Also, researchers do note: the interesting online tool for measuring the % of plagiarism in a book or article. Fascinating and useful. I can think of one or two others to whom we might apply this to to see what happens.

Interestingly, a quick check reveals a number of these tools online. I'd not known about any of them. The one used in this video is http://duplichecker.com.

David's Ascension 2000 website is archived here:

• http://web.archive.org/web/199905081...ension2000.com

[Clear Light]

Oh, a couple of interesting quotes from David's interview in "The Spectrum" [1] (September 1999, PDF here) :

Page 29 : As time progressed I was living with someone who was intensely dedicated to the Cayce readings [and] has been a friend of Gladys Davis Turner for a long time. Gladys was Cayce's stenographer. And, also, the readings indicated that she was Cayce's twin soul. So, she was very important in this saga. This person knew well all the ins-and-outs of the Cayce readings. He was very well educated about it. And as I lived at his house with him, after moving from the house I lived at in the beginning he became convinced that I was the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce.

I still wasn't.

So, the next significant event was that I finally got so fed-up with wondering whether it was true or not, that I went into a deep state of trance, and before going into trance I asked the reading "you have to tell me if this is true. You have to tell me if I am the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce".

The answer that I got was as follows: "Understand that we may indeed give you the answer, but with the answer comes great responsibility. You will need to go back through your life and see all the parallels. In short, the answer is yes. We had to wait until the proper time to tell you this, and that proper time has arrived.

So, I was just totally amazed. I couldn't even believe it. I resisted it very strongly. I was almost bitter about it, because now I felt all of a sudden that this work I had been doing psychically for the last year took on a much higher level of importance.

Page 39 : It was finally revealed in January of 1999 that David has secured his own unique form of conscious channelling contact with the Ra group. The only reason why he was able to do this was that he had "fully assimilated" the teachings of Ra from the five books "to an acceptable degree of distortion". Therefore, since he already knew Ra's teachings on a conscious level, they were able to come in and refine many concepts without having their results distorted.

Well, I suppose it explains a lot with regards to his affiliation with the "Law of One" material and his Trance "ability" back in the early days of his Career eh ?



. : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : .

[1] As shown in the Video (above) at around the 3 minute mark

[ichingcarpenter]

The Youtube video is worth giving it a thumbs up (being a member of the dark alliance it is your duty). That plagiarism program is worth the video itself let alone all the 'bull****' David has exposed to exposing over the years.
This video should be worth more that 3,000 views and more like 30,000. I doubt if 'dredge of wonder'' has seen it?

[Did You See Them]

I was going to comment but David says it best at 11.43 in - "Ohmmm" - or should that be "Errrmmm" for 2 minutes !

[Agape]

Is every one of us a dream of Nature, ommm ..dreaming of Perfection ?

Think of all the great dreams shared by big undefined human groups, dreams so old they can’t be controlled easily like no one can control deep sea currents,
dreams navigating and leading us forwards..

The shared dream of Christmas we try to reexperience every year now n then that really is of the birth of Christ within us.

Amongst all cultures we share dreams of beings we call sometimes divinities , of all kinds . We share dreams of return to primordial state.


That’s why prophets can talk all life speaking of all the things we share,


The next evolution leap can logically only happen for individual to get over the chat and endless parallel . If people can stop talking at that stage and internalise the gist of all information they’ve absorbed ( in case of someone like David it’s loads of data I suggest) they can eventually arrive at better defined point of information field.


Generally, researching any difficult topics I think that some form of unplug and meditation retreat is compulsory to do
times to times.

[Akasha]

One should never rule out Seb Pearce's site as a possible source of some of David's material.

Unfortunately I can't link to it directly because of Avalon's built-in profanity blocker.
However you can use your imagination and change the offending letters in the url in order to visit the site.

https://sebpearce.com/bull****/

I would recommend anyone else peddling woo to visit the site too. There, they are guaranteed to find a never-ending supply of material for their "mission".

[Ernie Nemeth]

I do not endorse this sentiment about David.

He has been instrumental in bringing awareness to this feild.

We have all veered far astray since 2012...

[Nasu]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
I do not endorse this sentiment about David.

He has been instrumental in bringing awareness to this feild.

We have all veered far astray since 2012...

Respectfully I disagree. Even if you are completely right, awareness of what exactly and what measurable actions has that awareness truly translated into?

His endless quest to bring forth new material for his conference circuit or for GIA's echo chamber or for his brand across social media has not moved the needle on disclosure one point.

As for his endorsement and promotion of Corey GoodeTM, the awareness of that BS that he was instrumental in bringing to the field has completely muddied the waters and added a far higher noise to message ratio than before.

Who can now think of secret space programs without CGTM's name being thrown in, never-mind time travel, galactic diplomacy or avian evolution.

David is first and foremost a showman IMHO. When taken from that perspective his behavior and activities can be forgiven and understood more easily I feel. As a showman I think he has done well to create this myth that he is somehow connected to underground networks who are in the know on the real stories that circle around our lives via the fake msn and clever government propaganda.

This hype lets him present to his following anything that is edgy, conspiratorial, cosmological, mythical or mystical, just as long as he keeps right along with a steady stream of new topics after a new topics for the short attention spans of today.

As for what his instrumental awareness has actually achieved beyond his own reward in Dollars for his watch counts, his hits, his likes and his subs, I just don't see it.

Again, with the greatest of respect..x.... N

[Rawhide68]

To be honest, I liked him back in the days with Project Camelot, intervews for hours with Pete Peterson, Camelot was still Ryan and Cassy.

In my opinion something happened slowly over time that for him wasn't good, and it wasn't God , but it was Corey Goode that made me turn my back on him.

[Chip]

David is talented
I’ve read as much from him as everyone else throughout my own personal research.
But something happened and he crossed the line. He’s exposed himself in such a hypocritical manner that is saddening.
He had potential and lost it!
Today his only talent is in the detriment of UFOlogy- with a very gifted and articulate manner in doing so.
He’s let us all down.

[Ernie Nemeth]

My first encounter with David was the Bill and Kerry interview.

My immediate assessment was that this person is an intelligent ego-maniac with a sincere and positive agenda. That assessment still stands. What others decide that means in regard to his effect on his audience says more about themselves than Wilcock. He let us down? He didn't let me down. I expected no less from the start. Has he made mistakes? Yup. So have I. Does he have more responsibility as a celebrity of sorts? Yes. But his agenda, his ego-maniacal steadfast need to dominate the discussion and to ensure he gets credit for his 'tying the threads together', sometimes leads him to bad decisions and over-reaching assumptions. That is for the discerning to determine while separating the chaff from the wheat, so to speak. David's main fault is not his ego, it is his naivete...

[Frenchy]

Editted :

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
My immediate assessment was that this person is an intelligent ego-maniac with a sincere and positive agenda. That assessment still stands. What others decide that means in regard to his effect on his audience says more about themselves than Wilcock. He let us down? He didn't let me down. I expected no less from the start. Has he made mistakes? Yup. So have I. Does he have more responsibility as a celebrity of sorts? Yes. ...
That is for the discerning to determine while separating the chaff from the wheat, so to speak. David's main fault is not his ego, it is his naivete...

Thank you Eric, for a balanced opinion; a little like Agape's, where she does not judge one way or t'other. I differ slightly,in only that I believe his Ego, is certainly a 'Ball-chain', dragging his naivety down and down. But, I too have my faults, and can only observe, offer opinions, without deluding myself that I am wholly correct !

I have mentioned elsewhere, I was verrry sceptical of this over-confident, rather brash young man. Still, I listened to his scarce items ' from the White Hats ', and in particular, his telling of " not earthquakes, but D.U.M.B.'s being nuked ", some three [?] years ago, I also ' put to one side ', { or as David Icke would say : " on the Back-burner ! "... However, The Kursk went down [?] before his revelation, and I had already doubted the official line on this, so D.W.'s claim the D.U.M.B.'s
[ Lower levels ] were destroyed seems to me to have been truthful.

Finally, I suggest that each of us who have some 'insight' or even unknown
' 'history ', have the potential to keep an open mind, while little-by-little, facts are exposed to the light...

Rawhide, You've picked up on a ' Personality or Style change ', point accepted, yet, blame not the Man, he might very well have been a ' useful-tool', to get some god stuff out. Detracters, [ shills ? ], now even cast aspersions upon Phil Scheider's veracity !
I think this thread will become even more relevant this year !

[Bill Ryan]

Ernie, respect as always.

I think the key thing is, as I mentioned above, he's not learning.

Nor — importantly, I'd suggest — has he ever once to my knowledge corrected, retracted, or apologized for any misleading errors. That says a lot.

I know (from his private correspondence with me) that his strategy is and always has been to ignore all criticism and not respond with any comments at all.

But he makes a grave error in confusing 'criticism' with slam-dunk in-your-face proof that he was flat-out wrong.

That extends to what can only also be called financial impropriety, as when Avalon member Soda reported here how she had invested $10,000 in a project of his that never got off the ground — and after that he kept the money and never even answered her e-mails.

• An Open Letter to Mr. David Wilcock

I'll say it simply here. David, that's shameful.

[TomKat]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
David's main fault is not his ego, it is his naivete...

His main problem is the conflict between making a living and seeking the truth. If he had a day job, he'd have the luxury of discernment. But when you have to sing for your supper, you have to constantly come up with new material, and not look too hard at veracity.

[Gemma13]

David had a day job working for Gaia. He gave that up as he is now producing fictional sci-fi movies and comics, (claiming they are non-fiction), with merchandize sales.

He also has his “school”, lecture revenue, donations, book sales, internet click sales, etc . . . and that’s only what is publicly viewable as income.

The man needs an income. And what he is doing is no different to marketing entrepreneurs promoting and selling the next useless gadget to the public. What is offensive is the exploitation of innocent, vulnerable people trying to make sense of our world.

But hey, I’m sure David sleeps well . . . after all, exploiting the innocent and vulnerable is just business as usual in our world . . . so if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em.