You mean LGBTQUWIOPXZERYASDFKJHMNVCism, right? (Oh, damn. I ran out of letters).Posted by Justplain (here)
One limit is when LGBT-ism is being promoted to children in schools, especially without a counter viewpoint being permitted.
Well at least if we're going to run with identity politics we may have some limitation to only 26 special groups
To be clear, and all joking aside, every single individual regardless of identity affiliation should be afforded the same inalienable rights and freedoms and opportunities as any other individual. Individualism, by definition, encompasses diversity. So I support breaking this down to individual rights -- as in capital "I", I-ism, if you will, where the individual supersedes the State, and any individual can celebrate her or his or their or hirs or zirs or zies individual uniqueness accordingly.
How about this. Let's have an Individual's Parade, where all celebrate their individuality together. Imagine that. Gays, Straights, and peoples of all creeds and colors waiving their flag in unity.
In the United States we already have a constitution in place that legally allows for and celebrates this concept among We the People.
Of course our constitution is merely a document in theory. It grants and protects the rights and liberties of all on paper, but it is blatantly violated and has admittedly been co-opted by the State and the powerful.
I say we have the framework already in place. Let's renovate the blueprint, update the foundation and bones, if necessary, and put that "theory" into practice.