I really didn't think it was going that far off topic, though yes it seemed like it at times. I think the contentious issues that can't be disconnected from censorship/boundaries issues just can't be avoided in ways.... but it doesn't seem like there's anything more convincing either side can add in terms of why one side feels censored in the most egregious and undignified way.... and why some don't think there was any egregious censorship at all as it's being so harshly taken... by only the most militant Q Believers, is there? Now what?
My question is still, isn't 'censorship' really better defined as boundaries - which any forum must make a decision on for good reasons, right? Are the mods discussing what could be improved in any specific ways in terms of boundaries at all?