+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

  1. Link to Post #1
    France Avalon Member Flowerpunkchip's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th February 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    276
    Thanks
    3,183
    Thanked 1,227 times in 247 posts

    Default A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7



    SHOW NOTES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=32709

    So when is the news not the news? When it's simply ignored by the mockingbird media, of course. Join James for today's exploration of yet another tool in the propagandists' toolbox in this week's edition of #PropagandaWatch.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Project Summary
    This is a study of the collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7) at 5:20 P.M. on September 11, 2001.
    The objective of the study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.
    The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.
    The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
    The research team is currently organizing and uploading all of its data into a format that can be readily downloaded and used. We expect to post the data sometime between September 16 and September 30, 2019.
    There will be a two-month public comment period from September 3 to November 1, 2019, with the final report will be released later this year. During this period, we welcome any and all members of the public to submit constructive comments intended to further the analyses and presentation of findings contained in the report. Designated reviewers external to UAF and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth will also review the report during this period. Commenters are asked to send their comments in an attached PDF or Word document to publiccomment@AE911Truth.org.

  2. The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to Flowerpunkchip For This Post:

    Baby Steps (4th September 2019), Ben Macdonald (21st November 2019), christian (5th September 2019), earthdreamer (5th September 2019), enigma3 (4th September 2019), Franny (4th September 2019), Gracy May (13th September 2019), ichingcarpenter (5th September 2019), Ioneo (4th September 2019), Krist (6th September 2019), MinImLi (8th September 2019), mountain_jim (5th September 2019), mpennery (4th September 2019), Nasu (4th September 2019), onevoice (8th September 2019), Richard S. (4th September 2019), RingoRon (25th November 2019), ronny (6th September 2019), silvanelf (4th September 2019), Sir Eltor (6th September 2019), Soda (6th September 2019), Star Mariner (4th September 2019), toppy (4th September 2019)

  3. Link to Post #2
    France Avalon Member Flowerpunkchip's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th February 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    276
    Thanks
    3,183
    Thanked 1,227 times in 247 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    I forgot to highlight this....

    "The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse."

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Flowerpunkchip For This Post:

    Baby Steps (21st November 2019), enigma3 (4th September 2019), Franny (4th September 2019), Krist (6th September 2019), mpennery (4th September 2019), Nasu (4th September 2019), silvanelf (4th September 2019), toppy (4th September 2019)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Bhutan Avalon Member enigma3's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st July 2016
    Posts
    369
    Thanks
    3,292
    Thanked 2,345 times in 356 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    The simutaneous collapse of all the columns obviously points to the building being pre-wired with explosives. Pre-wired. Hmmm.

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to enigma3 For This Post:

    Flowerpunkchip (4th September 2019), Franny (4th September 2019), Krist (6th September 2019), mpennery (4th September 2019), Nasu (4th September 2019), toppy (4th September 2019)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member Satori's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,132
    Thanks
    4,581
    Thanked 7,321 times in 1,100 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    Quote Posted by Flowerpunkchip (here)
    I forgot to highlight this....

    "The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse."
    For more information re the science, or not, behind the destruction of WTC 7 and WTC 1 and 2 see:

    http://www.journalof911studies.com/t...harmaceutical/
    Last edited by Satori; 5th September 2019 at 19:21.

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    Flowerpunkchip (4th September 2019), Franny (4th September 2019), Krist (6th September 2019), toppy (4th September 2019)

  9. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th April 2018
    Age
    68
    Posts
    535
    Thanks
    1,808
    Thanked 3,983 times in 520 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    ''PULL IT'' : Larry Silverstein


  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ichingcarpenter For This Post:

    enigma3 (8th September 2019), gs_powered (6th September 2019), Krist (6th September 2019), Satori (5th September 2019)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    1,800
    Thanks
    15,782
    Thanked 10,264 times in 1,649 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...wn-tower-7-911

    Quote Major University Study Finds "Fire Did Not Bring Down Tower 7 On 9/11"



    This week, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced their partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing a draft report of an in depth four-year study on what actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, the release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year.

    According to the study’s authors:

    The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.



    < more at link, including content related to this other recent thread>

    http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1307212


    Last edited by mountain_jim; 6th September 2019 at 11:42.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.) :)

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Flowerpunkchip (6th September 2019), Krist (6th September 2019), T Smith (7th September 2019)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Germany Avalon Member
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    SW Germany
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,718
    Thanks
    2,294
    Thanked 8,682 times in 1,615 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    I just think if one is open to/wants more info on 9/11 one needs to read Dr. Judy Wood's book "Where Did the Towers Go?" not to mention Dr. Joseph P. Farrell's book "Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks and Secret Sorcery"-

    both books are truly revealing- the collapse of tower nr. 7 is irrelevant to the demise of the twin towers-

    please stay well all-

    Larry

  14. Link to Post #8
    Avalon Member T Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th January 2011
    Posts
    1,108
    Thanks
    5,986
    Thanked 4,660 times in 999 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    Quote Posted by mountain_jim (here)
    \

    Quote Major University Study Finds "Fire Did Not Bring Down Tower 7 On 9/11"


    I find it fascinating that we need to commission an official study to determine whether or not a fire fueled by hydrocarbons is sufficient to take down a skyscraper. I am not a scientist, nor a chemist, nor a physicist, but I do know the melting point of steel is 1,500 degrees Celcius. There is no camp fire of which I'm aware that can generate that kind of heat--especially one generated by hydrocarbon explosions a quarter mile away; in my way of thinking, the idea of a spontaneous fire erupting with enough heat to collapse a skyscraper is kind of like the Big Bad Wolf huffing and puffing to blow down a building made of brick.... I didn't believe it when I was three years old, why would I believe it as a critical thinking adult?

    Of course I'm open to being ignorant and misinformed in my preconceived ideas of things. But please, give me something founded on sense and reason.
    Last edited by T Smith; 7th September 2019 at 19:51.

  15. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to T Smith For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (7th September 2019), Krist (7th September 2019), Michi (7th September 2019), mountain_jim (9th September 2019)

  16. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member mgray's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    NYC suburb
    Age
    58
    Posts
    1,208
    Thanks
    2,595
    Thanked 9,975 times in 1,147 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    WTC7 did not collapse due to fire: new university report
    When in doubt, do the next right thing.
    My blog: http://grayseconomy.com

  17. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mgray For This Post:

    enigma3 (8th September 2019), Krist (7th September 2019), onevoice (8th September 2019), T Smith (7th September 2019)

  18. Link to Post #10
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    1,508
    Thanks
    2,099
    Thanked 4,856 times in 1,278 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    It is blatantly obvious that most of the "events of the day" were totally stupid and unrealistic.

    The real response that is needed is loads of criminal charges and lawsuits, and, unfortunately, my personal conviction that it was stupid and unrealistic is not something a court can enforce. Maybe a report like this can show that someone perjured themself. Although I get the sense that the only thing that might ever be done are RICO type cases or something similar about the insider trading insurance swindle, not Silverstein's, but about the airiines and security services. Plus the ones against various Saudis.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    T Smith (9th September 2019)

  20. Link to Post #11
    France Avalon Member Flowerpunkchip's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th February 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    276
    Thanks
    3,183
    Thanked 1,227 times in 247 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    Ben Swann video


    "What really happened to World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11th, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District Commissioners’ historic resolution calling for a new investigation, University of Alaska Fairbanks' bombshell multi-year, $300K study of WTC 7 and how it collapsed, and an interview with Richard Gage of AE911 in episode #2 of Truth in Media with Ben Swann. "

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flowerpunkchip For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (11th September 2019), Satori (10th September 2019)

  22. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th April 2018
    Age
    68
    Posts
    535
    Thanks
    1,808
    Thanked 3,983 times in 520 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    Meet Lucky Larry.... Mr. Pull it on building 7




  23. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ichingcarpenter For This Post:

    Ben Macdonald (21st November 2019), Bill Ryan (14th September 2019), Flowerpunkchip (11th September 2019), T Smith (15th September 2019)

  24. Link to Post #13
    Avalon Member East Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2010
    Location
    Cape Cod MA USA
    Posts
    1,404
    Thanks
    2,834
    Thanked 4,037 times in 1,046 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    Yah, bastard is right, it's obvious, of course ,

    we know that so pull the other one...………...
    Question Everything, twice or maybe trice..........

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to East Sun For This Post:

    Flowerpunkchip (11th September 2019)

  26. Link to Post #14
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    1,800
    Thanks
    15,782
    Thanked 10,264 times in 1,649 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT








    Last edited by mountain_jim; 10th September 2019 at 23:13.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.) :)

  27. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (10th September 2019), Bill Ryan (14th September 2019), earthdreamer (12th September 2019), Flowerpunkchip (11th September 2019), ichingcarpenter (11th September 2019), Satori (11th September 2019), T Smith (15th September 2019)

  28. Link to Post #15
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,036 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    ...

    On the 9/11 False Flag and who did it... excellent condensed summary!


    David Icke - "The Trigger" Book Launch Live From Derby (2 hours 31 mn)

    David Icke

    LIVE from Derby - the book launch event for David Icke's EXPLOSIVE new book - The Trigger!


    Quote
    Henry Makow‏ @HenryMakow

    David Icke...on the "Sabbatean-Frank" evildoers who infiltrated everything. It's long but covers nearly everything people need to know. He correctly points out that these bad people are turning the real Hebrews into victims.
    PS:

    David Icke
    1 day ago

    Thanks to everybody who tuned in to the live stream tonight! We apologise for the lack of audio around the 37:00 mark - this was due to the microphone running out of battery.





    Last edited by Hervé; 13th September 2019 at 17:01.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  29. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (14th September 2019), I should cocoa (21st November 2019), mountain_jim (24th November 2019)

  30. Link to Post #16
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    2,736
    Thanks
    5,028
    Thanked 11,913 times in 2,406 posts

    Default Re: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 CORBERT REPORT

    Has this been posted?


  31. The Following User Says Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    mountain_jim (24th November 2019)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts