+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Paul Craig Roberts reports on the recent Building 7 report

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member thepainterdoug's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th November 2013
    Age
    66
    Posts
    766
    Thanks
    1,850
    Thanked 5,465 times in 721 posts

    Default Paul Craig Roberts reports on the recent Building 7 report

    jeez what a shocker.

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/201...lies-in-ruins/

    “The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”

  2. The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to thepainterdoug For This Post:

    Alan (8th September 2019), bennycog (6th September 2019), CarnageCandy (5th September 2019), christian (4th September 2019), East Sun (5th September 2019), enigma3 (5th September 2019), Franny (6th September 2019), ichingcarpenter (4th September 2019), Intranuclear (5th September 2019), JRS (5th September 2019), mpennery (5th September 2019), Philippe (4th September 2019), Ron Mauer Sr (5th September 2019), Sadieblue (5th September 2019), silvanelf (4th September 2019), Star Mariner (5th September 2019), T Smith (4th September 2019), TomKat (4th September 2019), toppy (5th September 2019), wondering (4th September 2019), yelik (5th September 2019)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member Satori's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,109
    Thanks
    4,466
    Thanked 7,147 times in 1,077 posts

    Default Re: Paul Craig Roberts reports on the recent Building 7 report

    Quote Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
    jeez what a shocker.

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/201...lies-in-ruins/

    “The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
    http://www.journalof911studies.com/t...harmaceutical/
    Last edited by Satori; 4th September 2019 at 20:29.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    toppy (5th September 2019), yelik (5th September 2019)

  5. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member thepainterdoug's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th November 2013
    Age
    66
    Posts
    766
    Thanks
    1,850
    Thanked 5,465 times in 721 posts

    Default Re: Paul Craig Roberts reports on the recent Building 7 report

    satori, usually many pages reduces itself down to the simple essence. can you share with us what that is? a summary.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to thepainterdoug For This Post:

    bennycog (6th September 2019), enigma3 (5th September 2019), toppy (5th September 2019)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member Satori's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,109
    Thanks
    4,466
    Thanked 7,147 times in 1,077 posts

    Default Re: Paul Craig Roberts reports on the recent Building 7 report

    Quote Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
    satori, usually many pages reduces itself down to the simple essence. can you share with us what that is? a summary.
    The quote in my post above the link to the article actually summarizes the article, albeit broadly.

    The abstract in the beginning of the article, which is two paragraphs, provides a more detailed summary.

    In short, the article states that the official explanation of the cause(s) of the destruction of not only WTC 7, but WTC 1 and 2, is, as a matter of law, scientifically unreliable given the generally accepted scientific understanding of the laws of physics. Consequently, an impartial judge in a criminal or civil trial which was being held to decide what caused the destruction of these buildings would not allow expert testimony in support of the official explanation of the cause of the destruction of these buildings, i.e., plane impact and contents fire, into evidence. Rather, an impartial judge would exclude from evidence any such expert evidence because it is scientifically unreliable. Thus, a jury would never see or hear such evidence and would, therefore, not find that the official explanation is accurate or truthful.

    Conversely, expert testimony and evidence offered to establish that the buildings were destroyed by means of explosive of various forms and technical characteristics that had been planted in the buildings prior to 9/11 and then detonated on that day, would be admitted into evidence. Such expert evidence would be admitted because it is scientifically reliable, for the simple reason that such evidence comports with the known laws of physics. Thus, an impartial judge would admit such evidence and allow a jury to consider it.

    Consequently, a jury's findings regarding the cause(s) of the destruction of these buildings would be based upon one or more scientifically reliable demolition hypotheses and not the official fairytale in which, among other things, the known laws of physics were suspended in certain areas of New York City on September 11, 2001.

  8. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    bennycog (6th September 2019), East Sun (5th September 2019), Intranuclear (5th September 2019), Justplain (5th September 2019), mpennery (5th September 2019), thepainterdoug (5th September 2019), toppy (5th September 2019)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Great Britain Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd May 2014
    Language
    English
    Posts
    993
    Thanks
    4,245
    Thanked 4,292 times in 904 posts

    Default Re: Paul Craig Roberts reports on the recent Building 7 report

    As I understand Governments can instigate a number of different types of investigation.

    Was 911 a politically motivated terrorist act or organised crime which have different procedures and responsibilities.

    Until it is seen as organised crime we have a problem. Even Trump said at the time it looked like a controlled demolition but he's likely afraid to challenge those controlling the establishment - The Elites rarely leave any forensic evidence

    .................."The National Construction Safety Team Act (NCST Act), signed into law on October 1, 2002 by President George W. Bush, mandated the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to establish the likely technical cause or causes of the three building failures that occurred on September 11, 2001 at the World Trade Center as a result of a terrorist attack.[1] NIST issued its final report on the collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers in September 2005. It issued its final report on 7 World Trade Center in November 2008."

    NIST concluded that the collapse of each tower resulted from the combined effects of airplane impact damage, widespread fireproofing dislodgment, and the fires that ensued. The sequence of failures that NIST concluded initiated the collapse of both towers involved the heat-induced sagging of floor trusses pulling some of the exterior columns on one side of each tower inward until they buckled, after which instability rapidly spread and the upper sections then fell onto the floors below.[2] World Trade Center Building 7 (7WTC), which was never directly hit by an airplane, collapsed as a result of thermal expansion of steel beams and girders that were heated by uncontrolled fires caused by the collapse of the North Tower and failure of the fire-resistive material.[3]"

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to yelik For This Post:

    thepainterdoug (5th September 2019)

  11. Link to Post #6
    United States Avalon Member thepainterdoug's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th November 2013
    Age
    66
    Posts
    766
    Thanks
    1,850
    Thanked 5,465 times in 721 posts

    Default Re: Paul Craig Roberts reports on the recent Building 7 report

    so any fire from here on, in a modern steel structure high riser , should warrant immediate evacuation for fear of imminent collapse. and based on the many catastrophic fires in huge skyscrapers in other countries and around the world that burned for days at even a more constant heat without collapse, this is specifically a NYCity Physics Phenomena .

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to thepainterdoug For This Post:

    Blacklight43 (5th September 2019), Bruno (5th September 2019), mpennery (5th September 2019), yelik (6th September 2019)

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts