+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: UFOs exist and everyone needs to adjust to that fact

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member rgray222's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th September 2010
    Posts
    1,087
    Thanks
    3,023
    Thanked 7,671 times in 984 posts

    Default UFOs exist and everyone needs to adjust to that fact

    The slow but steady drip of UFO disclosure has been turning into a slow but steady stream, it is by no means a gushing torrent but it is picking up speed in quantity and substance. This article appeared in the Washington Post a few months ago (my apologies if you have already seen it). The way the system has worked for years is that UFO researchers and the mainstream media report on one realistic UFO sighting or one UFO event. From that one event, they want the reader to deduce that all UFOs are real. Some singular UFOs sighting can shape public opinions such as the Roswell, Phoenix Lights, Lebanon IL, Belgium Wave, Rendlesham Forest and many more. These important UFOs sightings certainly have a place but for the most part, a singular UFO sighting is clickbait or simply entertainment.  These singular events are never really going to change the tide of public opinion. In the last few years, there has been a systemic change in the way 'mainstream media' informs the public about UFOs.  We now see articles and headlines such as this one in the Washington Post that are telling people that the entire UFO phenomena is not a conspiracy theory. 

    These articles seem to be saying...........stay tuned more to come. 




    Washington Post Article

    UFOs exist and everyone needs to adjust to that fact

    The term “UFO” automatically triggers derision in most quarters of polite society. One of Christopher Buckley’s better satires, “Little Green Men,” is premised on a George F. Will-type pundit thinking that he has been abducted by aliens, with amusing results. UFOs have historically been associated with crackpot ideas like Big Foot or conspiracy theories involving crop circles.

    The obvious reason for this is that the term “UFO” is usually assumed to be a synonym for “extraterrestrial life.” If you think about it, this is odd. UFO literally stands for “unidentified flying object.” A UFO is not necessarily an alien from another planet. It is simply a flying object that cannot be explained away through conventional means. Because UFOs are usually brought up only to crack jokes, however, they have been dismissed for decades.

    In recent years, however, there has been a subtle shift that poses some interesting questions for their argument. For one thing, discussion of actual UFOs has been the topic of some serious mainstream media coverage. There was the December 2017 New York Times story by Helene Cooper, Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean about the Defense Department’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, which was tasked with cataloguing UFOs recorded by military pilots. DoD officials confirmed its existence. Though this story generated some justified skepticism, it represented the first time the U.S. government acknowledged the existence of such a program.

    Then, there were the reports last November about Oumuamua, “a mysterious, cigar-shaped interstellar object [that] fell through our solar system at an extraordinary speed,” according to New York’s Eric Levits. Oumuamua’s shape and trajectory were unusual enough for some genuine astrophysicists to publish a paper suggesting the possibility that it was an artificial construction relying on a solar sail. Again, this prompted skeptical reactions, but even those skeptics could not completely rule out the possibility that extraterrestrial activity was involved.

    Quote The strange objects, one of them like a spinning top moving against the wind, appeared almost daily from the summer of 2014 to March 2015, high in the skies over the East Coast. Navy pilots reported to their superiors that the objects had no visible engine or infrared exhaust plumes, but that they could reach 30,000 feet and hypersonic speeds.
    “These things would be out there all day,” said Lt. Ryan Graves, an F/A-18 Super Hornet pilot who has been with the Navy for 10 years, and who reported his sightings to the Pentagon and Congress. “Keeping an aircraft in the air requires a significant amount of energy. With the speeds we observed, 12 hours in the air is 11 hours longer than we’d expect.”....
    No one in the Defense Department is saying that the objects were extraterrestrial, and experts emphasize that earthly explanations can generally be found for such incidents. Lieutenant Graves and four other Navy pilots, who said in interviews with The New York Times that they saw the objects in 2014 and 2015 in training maneuvers from Virginia to Florida off the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, make no assertions of their provenance.
    The Times reporters broke new ground by getting pilots on record. What is interesting about this latest news cycle, however, is that DoD officials are not behaving as Wendt and Duvall would predict. Indeed, Politico’s Bryan Bender reported last month that, “The U.S. Navy is drafting new guidelines for pilots and other personnel to report encounters with ‘unidentified aircraft,’ a significant new step in creating a formal process to collect and analyze the unexplained sightings — and destigmatize them.” My Post colleague Deanna Paul followed up by reporting that “Luis Elizondo, a former senior intelligence officer, told The Post that the new Navy guidelines formalized the reporting process, facilitating data-driven analysis while removing the stigma from talking about UFOs, calling it ‘the single greatest decision the Navy has made in decades.’ ”

    What appears to be happening is that official organs of the state are now acknowledging that UFOs exist, even if they are not literally using the term. They are doing so because enough pilots are reporting UFOs and near-air collisions so as to warrant better record-keeping. They are not saying that these UFOs are extraterrestrials, but they are trying to destigmatize the reporting of a UFO.

    Still, the very fact that this step has been taken somewhat weakens the Wendt and Duvall thesis. This was always a two-step process: (a) Acknowledge that UFOs exist; and (b) Consider that the UFOs might be ETs.

    In recent years, the U.S. national security bureaucracy has met the first criterion. What happens to our understanding of the universe if great powers meet that second one?

    One of the gutsiest working paper presentations I have witnessed was Alexander Wendt and Raymond Duvall presenting a draft version of “Sovereignty and the UFO.” In that paper, eventually published in the journal Political Theory, Wendt and Duvall argued that state sovereignty as we understand it is anthropocentric, or “constituted and organized by reference to human beings alone.” They argued that the real reason UFOs have been dismissed is because of the existential challenge that they pose for a worldview in which human beings are the most technologically advanced life-forms:

    Quote UFOs have never been systematically investigated by science or the state, because it is assumed to be known that none are extraterrestrial. Yet in fact this is not known, which makes the UFO taboo puzzling given the ET possibility.... The puzzle is explained by the functional imperatives of anthropocentric sovereignty, which cannot decide a UFO exception to anthropocentrism while preserving the ability to make such a decision. The UFO can be “known” only by not asking what it is.
    When Wendt and Duvall made this argument, there were a lot of titters in the audience. I chuckled, too. Nonetheless, their paper makes a persuasive case that UFOs certainly exist, even if they are not necessarily ETs. For them, the key is that no official authority takes seriously the idea that UFOs can be extraterrestrials. As they note, “considerable work goes into ignoring UFOs, constituting them as objects only of ridicule and scorn.”

    Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlo...outputType=amp
    Last edited by rgray222; 18th October 2019 at 02:53.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to rgray222 For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (18th October 2019), Iyakum (19th October 2019), justntime2learn (18th October 2019), Lyran.Sun (18th October 2019), mpennery (18th October 2019), rogparan (18th October 2019), william r sanford72 (18th October 2019)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member T Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th January 2011
    Posts
    1,108
    Thanks
    5,985
    Thanked 4,655 times in 999 posts

    Default Re: UFOs exist and everyone needs to adjust to that fact

    Quote Posted by rgray222 (here)
    UFOs exist and everyone needs to adjust to that fact
    I am not aware of the statistics on this issue, but I will say with some degree of confidence that anyone who does not understand or subscribe to the reality of UFOs is utterly unconscious. Is this really a majority of the population? Or just a small sect on the south end of the IQ spectrum? I'm a little confused what needs adjusting; UFOs and the varying implications of what this phenomenon is relative to our own understanding of reality just is. I'm not saying we, or even some of us, have the answers, but to pretend it isn't real just isn't credible if one has more than a couple set of neurons firing....

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to T Smith For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (18th October 2019), arborealis (18th October 2019), boja (18th October 2019), justntime2learn (18th October 2019), Lyran.Sun (18th October 2019), mpennery (18th October 2019), rgray222 (18th October 2019), william r sanford72 (18th October 2019)

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts