+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The Tavistock Insttute

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,681
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default The Tavistock Insttute

    THE TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RELATIONS--PROUDLY SERVING A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT
    Feb 8, 2019

    Quote Newsbud
    63.9K subscribers
    For over a century The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in England has worked behind the scenes to lay the groundwork for a one world government. It has relentlessly pushed propaganda that predicts the end of Western civilization, adopted from the work of German philosopher Oswald Spengler. Under this secretive institute’s direction, the British elite and their American counterparts perfected the art of propaganda and successfully used this to get America involved in a war her people opposed. Tavistock is all about shaping opinion, culture, and gaining political consensus for a one world government and total domination.

    Transcription from Alexandra Bruce of Forbidden Knowledge
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/pro...uman+Relations

    "Newsbud’s Kurt Nimmo created this video report, which I’ve transcribed below about how the shadowy Tavistock Institute in London has been instrumental in causing the US to enter World War I, the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank, the “free trade” agreements that intentionally decimated the Middle Class, Fake News and MKULTRA.

    He says, Tavistock’s “legacy of lies and manipulation in the name of war and a totalitarian world government is alive and well today. Every day, we are slammed with fake news, guiding us along a pre-arranged path, toward our ultimate enslavement and the prospect of never-ending war and conflict.”

    The global elite rely on a number of organizations to push their agenda. Many of us know about the work of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission the Bilderberg Group and a handful of others.

    The Tavistock Institute for Human Relations is included and instrumental in this collection of subversive organizations, however we rarely, if ever hear about its role in mass-brainwashing and shaping of public opinion.

    As I covered in a previous episode, the elite are active on several fronts to reduce world population and basically turn the planet into a lockdown, high-tech prison, where a demoralized and reduced population is completely under the iron-fisted rule of a world government. This long-term agenda would not be possible without first conditioning and brainwashing populations into accepting and even celebrating their loss of freedom and servitude.

    The control agenda of the Tavistock Institute was first exposed in 1969 by author and researcher, John Coleman. His monograph, ‘The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations: Shaping the Moral, Cultural, Political and Economic Decline of the United States of America’ revealed deep connections between this organization and the ruling elite.

    Tavistock emerged in 1921 at the Wellington House in England. This seemingly innocuous name served as a cover for Britain’s War Propaganda Bureau. David Lloyd George, the Chancellor of the Exchequer was given the task of setting up the British War Propaganda Bureau. George appointed the writer and fellow Liberal, MP Charles Masterman to head the organization. Members included HG Wells and Rudyard Kipling. A number of writers were put to work, cranking out pro-war propaganda to promote and demand participation in the so-called “Great War”, now known as the First World War.

    According to Coleman, the Tavistock Institute at Sussex University in London is owned and controlled by the Royal Institute for International Affairs, also known as the Chatham House. This is the epicenter of the British establishment. Its meetings are secret, like those held by the Bilderberg Group. The Royal Institute for International Affairs is said to be based on the King Arthur myths. Financial backers of this organization included the Astor family. Its American equivalent, the Council on Foreign Relations was funded by JP Morgan, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, John D Rockefeller and others.

    The Wellington House role in the effort to manipulate both British and American citizens and demand their unwavering support for mass murder and sacrifice was headed up by the Viscount Baron Rothermere and Alfred Charles William Harmsworth, the first Viscount of Northcliffe.

    Northcliffe was essential to the brainwashing project. He owned the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror newspapers. Rothermere was the chairman of the Daily Mail and General Trust. According to Coleman’s research, Tavistock received its funding from the British Royal Family and later the Rothschilds, to whom Lord Northcliffe was related through marriage. It also received funding from the Rockefeller family trusts and the Milner Group.

    The Royal Family played an instrumental role in guiding the agenda, according to Coleman’s research. At least two Americans were involved in this project of mass-manipulation of the public, Walter Lippmann and Edward Bernays.

    Lippmann, who would later introduce the concept of “Cold War” was a notable member of a Council on Foreign Relations, established in 1921. He played a significant role in the Woodrow Wilson decision to get the United States involved in the war in Europe, despite having promised not to. Edward Bernays, known as the “Father of Spin” was a master propagandist and public relations wizard. He was the nephew of Sigmund Freud. Bernays called the effort to brainwash the public “psychological warfare”.

    In 1937, Tavistock based its operations on German philosopher Oswald Spengler’s book, ‘The Decline of the West’. Spengler argued the West is in rapid decline and ruled by what he called “Caesarism”, the state’s prerogative of violence. Spengler said humanity would ultimately return to a more animalistic state; a sort of advanced primitivism.

    Spengler’s analysis is hardly a match for the Tavistock agenda implemented by the elite, the British royal family and Globalist one-world organizations. Tavistock took what it wanted from Spengler, the theory that civilization is doomed and must be replaced with a different system – not the primitivist social utopia imagined by Spengler but rather, a one-world, Globalist, totalitarian government, set on reducing population and controlling all aspects of society.

    At its core, Spengler’s thesis holds that alien hordes will arrive in America in increasing numbers, thus leading to a fall of Western civilization and its culture, law and ethics. This legacy is linked to the Roman Empire and Medieval Western Christendom, that emerged from the Middle Ages to experience a number of transformative episodes such as the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution and the advancement of scientific knowledge.

    In Europe, large numbers of Africans, Arabs and others are flooding the continent, resulting in social and political chaos, as two widely different cultures clash. This highly-disruptive force has resulted in severe political polarization and the rise of nationalist groups, opposed to continued immigration and asylum status.

    Wellington House board members Rothermere, Northcliffe, Lippmann and Bernays also praised a book by Correa Moylan Walsh ‘The Climax of Civilization’, published in 1917. Walsh argues civilization has reached the end of its centuries-long use of natural resources and is plagued by irreversible social and moral decline. The author discusses topics that would later be taken up by the Club of Rome.

    The massive propaganda effort undertaken by Tavistock during the First World War went into overdrive in the United States. By far, most Americans opposed entering the war and Tavistock and others work to change this.

    In Britain, it only took a couple of years of relentless media propaganda to turn the British people from opponents of the war into enthusiastic advocates and participants. The same model was used to get the United States into the war.

    Propaganda warps perception and introduces new terms to demonize a shifting array of opponents. For instance in America, the Tavistock propaganda effort labeled war opponents as “isolationists”, a term that would later be used by Roosevelt to manipulate the nation into fighting the Second World War.

    Propaganda portrayed isolationism, which is in actuality peaceful and mutually-beneficial relations and aversion to becoming entangled in the affairs of other nations as nothing short of treason.

    At the time, President Wilson preached the idea of a one-world government. He managed to lower, if not destroy tariffs that protected the American economy and worker. This so-called “free trade” now centered to the Globalist ideology resulted in American workers and companies being displaced and ruined by foreign trade. Most notably, British products that were made in India by cheap labor and exported to the United States.

    In order to make up for this lost tariff income, the US passed the Federal Income Tax Law in 1913, thus passing the responsibility to pay for the lavish spending habits of professional politicians and their benefactors, that is to say corporations and banks. As Coleman notes, this mandatory taxation is a Marxist concept, not included in the Constitution.

    Wilson’s lowering and removal of tariffs eventually resulted in the creation of globalist trade agreements under NAFTA, GATT and the World Trade Organization. These trade agreements between governments and transnational corporations have resulted in dismantling the Middle Class, a key objective of Tavistock and its Globalist supporters.

    Ushered in by Bill Clinton and his wife, not only displaced and impoverished American workers, it also produced a destructive effect on Mexican agricultural and small business operations, which in turn helped produce a surge of illegal aliens crossing the border in search of work and handouts by the state.

    In addition, this supposed “free trade agreement” provided a mechanism for large corporations to invest in China’s growing economy. In return, China was allowed to access American markets. This further displaced workers who were unable to compete with what amounts to slave labor in China.

    Tavistock and the Wellington House also pushed for the passage of the Federal Reserve Act. The same year, an income tax was forced on the American people. The destruction of the US economy and the gradual impoverishment of the American Middle Class would not have been possible without the creation of the Federal Reserve, which controls and manipulates the money supply to benefit the 0.1% through ongoing upward distribution of wealth.

    Both Lippmann and Bernays were involved in this banker cartel consolidation of wealth and assets. They established the National Citizens League, a rather transparent oxymoron under the direction of Samuel Untermyer, a prominent New York lawyer will push the Federal Reserve Act and associated legislation, including the Clayton Bill, before the Federal Reserve Act could be signed by Wilson.

    It was gone over with a fine-tooth comb by Colonel Edward Mandell House and the British oligarchy represented by the banker, JP Morgan. In 1957, Dr William Sargant of the Tavistock Institute, who reportedly worked in tandem with the CIA on its MKULTRA brainwashing experiments at the time, wrote a book with an improbable title: ‘Battle for the Mind: A Physiology of Conversion and Brainwashing – How Evangelists, Psychiatrists, Politicians and Medicine Men Can Change your Beliefs and Behavior’.

    Sargant explains how alien beliefs can be implanted in the human brain through induced fear, anger and excitement. He writes that of the results caused by such disturbances, the most common is temporarily-impaired judgment and heightened suggestibility. This results in what psychologists call “herd instinct” and it is most prevalent during war, epidemics and all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and opens up the individual to mass suggestibility.

    Jim Keith, the author of ‘Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness’ describes Tavistock as a collaborative effort of British Military Intelligence and the psychiatric establishment. Keith writes that Tavistock’s influence reaches the mass corporate media, corporations, governments and the psychiatric establishment. Coleman has said the moral, spiritual, racial, economic, cultural and intellectual bankruptcy we are now in the midst of today is the product of a carefully-planned Tavistock program.

    In 1928, Bernays wrote in his book, ‘Propaganda’ that the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power of the country.

    This legacy of lies and manipulation in the name of war and a totalitarian world government is alive and well today. Every day, we are slammed with fake news, guiding us along a pre-arranged path, toward our ultimate enslavement and the prospect of never-ending war and conflict.

    I believe we are heading into a new war, the ultimate conflict; the final push to have us accept either through directed propaganda or physical violence by the state, a suicidal showdown between the US, Russia and China. If we survive this engineered war, we will all be swept into bondage, for as Henry Kissinger so aptly noted, “If the orchestrated crisis or a number of them piled one upon the other are effective, the American people will run to the state and beg for protection.” "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alecs (31st December 2019), AndrejPeĉënkin (30th December 2019), Arcturian108 (29th December 2019), avid (29th December 2019), Bill Ryan (30th December 2019), christian (30th December 2019), East Sun (29th December 2019), Ernie Nemeth (29th December 2019), ExomatrixTV (29th December 2019), Icare (1st October 2023), Melinda (30th December 2019), Mercedes (30th December 2019), mountain_jim (29th December 2019), Pam (30th December 2019), Sue (Ayt) (29th December 2019), toppy (31st December 2019), Valle (27th October 2022), Victoria (30th December 2019)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,727
    Thanks
    30,823
    Thanked 125,700 times in 20,824 posts

    Default Re: The Tavistock Insttute

    Tavistock Institute - The Deep State's Engineers



    By Jamie Busby - Staff Author

    "The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations is a British not-for-profit organisation which applies social science to contemporary issues and problems. It was initiated in 1946, when it developed from the Tavistock Clinic, and was formally established as a separate entity in September 1947."

    The above is straight from Wikipedia, a basic overview of what the Tavistock Institute claims to be. It's also what Wikipedia allow it to be known as on their platform.

    Personally, I only became aware of this place recently. They have been covered by this site before but it's been a while. So with that in mind, I thought I'd shine some much needed light on this lot again. We should never take the light off the ****e in my opinion.

    The two most well-known books written about this most dubious of Institutes are "The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations: Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural and Political" by John Coleman in 2006 and "Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses" by Daniel Estulin in 2015.
    I reckon the titles of these books somewhat giveaway what we're dealing with here. I won't be writing any novels about this but we can take a good look. I'd always recommend further reading and viewing for those who wish to dig further. PLEASE dig further...

    http://www.tavinstitute.org/

    Above is the link to their website. Isn't it lovely? Vibrant colours and lots of pretty circles.

    "We are a not-for-profit organisation which applies social science to contemporary issues and problems" it says on the homepage as you'll see. And they've gone balls-out for that "non-profit, we're here to help people and fluffy bunny rabbits" vibe that a lot of other legitimately benevolent organisations go for. But don't fall for it, they're not what they appear. No shocks there, some of the most evil groups on earth pass themselves off every day as benign. Just like cancer.

    So who the hell are they?

    As Wikipedia states, they were formed in 1947, though they'd been operating as the "Tavistock Clinic" in London since 1920. They've had secret connections with Freemasonry since their inception. Their goals are social and informational control. As part of the Deep State's toolkit, they're used to mold public opinion on all things political, social, economic and educational in America.

    They're also involved in the Eugenics "movement", a fancy word for what Hitler and the Nazis were guilty of and vilified for. Namely the creation of a master race. They urge the young to rebel against their parents via the utilisation of music, drugs, film and video games. Parents are relegated to nothing more than a pain in the arse. The youth will be brainwashed to place war and "the system" above the family unit. Have we not already seen this happening for some years now? Social media and Universities nowadays are no replacement for a family, but people are drifting away from each other rapidly.

    The Tavistock Institute pools information from psychology, sociology and other social sciences. No big deal huh? Well it is when you're in a position to CONTROL this information and what's put out to the masses with regards to it. That word "Control" again, the ultimate tool of the Deep State. Once the origins of what we're being told are disguised, "THEY" can tell us anything they like and it tends to be taken as Gospel.

    Tavistock is funded by a $16+ BILLION a year budget, obtained from a network of "foundations" in America. A British think-tank being funded by America... Their generous benefactors include the CIA, the Military Industrial Complex and Big Pharma to name just a few. A rather influential few to put it mildly.

    They were originally funded by the British Royal Family but it wasn't long before members of the Rothschild and Rockefeller families got their dirty snouts in on the action. When that lot get involved in anything you KNOW that something big and most likely treacherous is going down.

    Aims and Goals

    The conclusions Tavistock arrive at that give rise to the techniques to be used by the Deep State have one basic premise. That is to destroy a person's sense of individuality in order to create a person who tolerates those in control. In fact, it doesn't stop at mere toleration, the end game is to make us all dependent and so very, very grateful for our global elite puppet masters. **** that.

    Their agenda can be broken down simply into the following objectives;

    - Demoralisation of the population

    - Destruction of the family unit

    - Create conflict between religions, turning them all against each other

    - Make being "Patriotic" a terrible thing

    - Create and propagate conflict between all races

    - Create and propagate conflict between the sexes

    All of the above and more are methods of what the Deep State refers to as "Crowd Control". We are all part of the crowd without exception. And I suspect that we have all seen the bullet points above in action to some degree.
    Below I will list further parts of their agenda that we have seen come to light more and more in recent years;

    - To corrupt morality and promote hedonistic behaviour e.g. Sex, booze, drugs and rock 'n' roll...

    - Split social groups further, creating as many as possible; So much easier to create conflict that way

    - Attempt to eliminate any sense of male or female identity

    We've seen all these in recent years, particularly the last one. Gender politics has never been so trendy, the same goes for Gender studies degrees. The days of people insisting on a personal pronoun and identifying as whatever the **** they feel like have slowly crept up on us and are here. Whether they stay is up to our collective power versus the power of the Deep State and the likes of Tavistock who have identified this as a wonderful means of further societal division.

    DIVISION; An essential precursor and additive when you won't settle for anything less than total control... If I was selling "Division", that's how I'd market it.

    Western culture has also been the scene of a huge dumbing-down process. If you've ever seen the satirical movie "Idiocracy" you'll recognise what's being portrayed.
    "Private Joe Bauers, the definition of [the] 'average American', is selected by the Pentagon to be the guinea pig for a top-secret hibernation program. Forgotten, he awakes five centuries in the future. He discovers a society so incredibly dumbed down that he's easily the most intelligent person alive." - IMDB on "Idiocracy". Five centuries in the future?! It's here NOW.

    Look at the world now based on religious divides. Ever since the 9/11 sham, Islam has become the scapegoat and alleged reason for every war and conflict America and friends have got involved in. So many non-Muslims have become amateur experts in their own minds on the Koran and the Hadiths. This vilification of Muslims has spread worldwide and some think with good reason because of terrorist atrocities committed globally. I must remind them that these attacks were all inspired by ISIS propaganda and ISIS are an American creation. Direct your anger there, I do.

    This use of a religious group was by design of course. A Bogeyman from a certain part of the world that just happens to be drowning in oil was needed. Islam was obvious and perfect. "Let's say a few Arabs crashed some planes into the twin towers,etc... then we'll hit the Middle East HARD, taking all the oil, with full public support."
    That whole basis is slowly crumbling and people are realising what really happened, due to mass exposure. It's almost common knowledge now that 9/11 was an inside job.

    "All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." - David Rockefeller.

    Crises don't get more major or "right" than 9/11. But I'm sorry to tell you DAVE that not everybody has rolled over and took it up the arse just yet. That doesn't apply to your puppets of course.
    Rockefeller said this in a time when the public didn't have access to the information they did nowadays via the Internet. That very same Internet may well be the Deep State's most valuable tool but it could also be their undoing. People are getting woke at an alarming rate, alarming if you're part of the Elite that is.

    Techniques

    There's already evidence all around us showing the effects of the Deep State on the world, much of it developed by Tavistock.

    A specific brainwashing method linked to Tavistock is the CIA's very own MKUltra program. This is no conspiracy theory, MKUltra happened and still goes on to this day. The methods may have been refined but it endures. The CIA were known to use psychedelic drugs such as LSD and psychological brainwashing procedures to turn a subject into what were effectively slaves. Slaves willing to do whatever they were told, even murder. Ultimate power; when they weren't accidentally killing said subjects.

    There is evidence that Modern Art of all things has been used as a "weapon" and also music bands such as The Beatles and The Rolling Stones. Are any musical or other stars still involved today? Many of them like to insinuate they are, making strange hand symbols in reference to the Illuminati for example. If so, they can only be described as sleeper agents, selling their soul for fame and money.

    In 1938, certain Intelligence Agents from America were chosen to be sent across the pond to be brainwashed by the Tavistock Institute. What did they do with these participants? Not much is known but we can form a good idea by working backwards from the present day.

    Tavistock has been linked directly with the increase in secret society membership. There are also links with these societies and people from the highest levels of the Intelligence community and the political elite.
    Existing societies have been used to place specific people, they're then indoctrinated within that society. I'v got 2 words as a great example of this; Bohemian Grove.

    Several authorities on the subject have stated that Tavistock trained many crucial branches of the American military in World War 2. An example is the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) which was to eventually become the CIA. Tavistock also joined forces with the Rockefeller foundation during WW2 to experiment with LSD and other mind-altering drugs, something of a forerunner to MKUltra. America's current pervasive drug culture can be seen as emerging from all of this. And it would've been intentional, it always is.

    As I said at the beginning, the Tavistock Institute appear to have been involved in so much that I can barely scratch the surface within the confines of this article.

    The good old Deep State eh? So secretive with so many fingers in an unimaginable number of mucky pies. Not so secretive that we can't shed some light on them though. With the sheer amount of people involved, things get leaked. Imagine if we knew it all?...

    Control, Power and Money. The be all and end all, at all costs, for the Deep State; our mortal enemy.

    Sources:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tavistock_Institute

    http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/...w-world-order/
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 29th December 2019 at 21:35.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  4. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (1st January 2020), avid (29th December 2019), Bill Ryan (30th December 2019), christian (30th December 2019), Icare (1st October 2023), Mercedes (30th December 2019), mountain_jim (29th December 2019), onawah (30th December 2019), onevoice (30th December 2019), Sue (Ayt) (29th December 2019), Victoria (30th December 2019)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,727
    Thanks
    30,823
    Thanked 125,700 times in 20,824 posts

    Default Re: The Tavistock Insttute

    Dethrone the Queen and Shut Down Her Tavistock Surveillance and Propaganda Operations
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (1st January 2020), AndrejPeĉënkin (30th December 2019), Bill Ryan (30th December 2019), Mercedes (30th December 2019), onawah (30th December 2019), onevoice (30th December 2019)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    8,898
    Thanks
    9,943
    Thanked 55,058 times in 8,171 posts

    Default Re: The Tavistock Insttute

    The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations - Dr John Coleman ~ PDF

    download





    Last edited by norman; 13th October 2022 at 21:45.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  8. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (1st October 2023), Brigantia (13th October 2022), Harmony (14th October 2022), Icare (1st October 2023), mountain_jim (27th October 2022), palehorse (1st October 2023)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    8,898
    Thanks
    9,943
    Thanked 55,058 times in 8,171 posts

    Default Re: The Tavistock Insttute

    Age of Muses


    The Fall of the Tavistockians: Defeating the "Mother" of All Brainwashing
    David Gosselin Oct 12 2022






    The recent explosion of scandals involving the London Tavistock Clinic’s radical gender reassignment experiments on children and young adults have revealed one of the dark sides of modern psychiatry, particularly, British psychiatry. However, these scandals have only begun lifting the veil on an even darker history, one that gave birth to modern Anglo-American psy-ops.

    After a lengthy inquiry, the Tavistock Clinic was found to have egregiously violated basic standards of care through a systemic practice of giving psychologically vulnerable individuals the “suggestion” and affirmation that they were in the wrong body, and then proceeding to rush them into medical gender reassignment. However, rather than being an exception to the rule, Tavistock’s radical experimentation on psychologically vulnerable groups and trauma victims has been the norm since its very beginning. Guided by a belief in the endless possibility of remolding human personality and “the images of man,” Tavistockians and their progeny have for over a century functioned as premier social engineers for an Anglo-American financial establishment committed to “re-imagining” humanity à la Brave New World.

    For modern Tavistockians and the City of London-Wall Street “gods” whom they serve, human beings are nothing more than blank slates to be written on, individuals with personalities that can be shaped and remolded into whatever image these social engineers deem fit. There is no innate divine spark of creative reason; there exists no deeper science of the human soul—only the conditioning of reflexes and thought patterns in talking animals. In a word: humanity is but a collection of slightly more complicated Pavlovian dogs, or more complex worms, but ultimately made up of the same matter—and nothing more.

    In the eyes of the Tavistockians and modern behavioral “scientists,” the same “shock doctrines,” strategies of terror, and reflex conditioning applied to beasts are equally applicable to humanity. A human being’s ability to unearth the natural laws of the universe and generate fundamentally new conceptions in art and science, leading to qualitatively new ideas that transform humanity’s ability to act and thrive in the universe, is nothing more than the by-product of sublimated neurosis and irrational, albeit statistically mappable behaviors.

    Even the quality of human genius embodied by the greatest minds across history is ultimately dismissed as nothing more than a special kind of madness—or epiphenomenon—which however impressive, remains unintelligible, and certainly not learnable.

    Tavistock Revisited

    Despite these irrational behaviorist theories, a closer examination reveals what these various ideas overlook about the deeper nature of human beings, the mind, and how the natural spark of creative reason found in each human individual is ultimately something that can be either brought forth or suppressed. More importantly, an honest and open exploration of these practices today can provide us with a deeper appreciation of how the latest attempts to create a Brave New World may not only be opposed but defeated at their very core.

    One way of situating the broader strategic picture is by considering what Plato identified as the problem of “imitation” in his Republic. Plato developed his conception of imitation after witnessing the Athenian Republic being destroyed by an overwhelming number of clever politicians and smooth talkers—none of which possessed, or desired to possess, the wisdom necessary to rule either themselves or a state. Whether it be the representation of human nature in a drama or song, or the presentation of some new policy or idea in a speech by a rhetorician, these “imitations” were characterized by Plato as the artful mimicry of certain outward or formalized characteristics of human nature and experience, which however close in their appearance to truth, were not “the real thing.” Since that time, the most dangerous ideas have always been those most capable of artfully wearing the guise of truth. Indeed, virtually all modern psy-ops are premised on this idea. For, the closer they sound and appear like the Good and True, the more effective they become at convincing large swaths of citizens that they are indeed “the real thing.”

    From an enlightened humanity delivered in the form of psychedelic trips of creative “consciousness” and “flow states” to sensual pleasure substituted for genuine creative human joy, intimacy, and spiritual development, our modern world has no shortage of “imitations.” Then as today, what these various imitations and false theories of human nature share in common is that they effectively divert people from “the real thing”—one which any genuinely sovereign creative individual possesses the capacity to discover and bring forth within themselves, if they can only succeed in remembering what the many imitations made them forget.

    Perhaps one of the most famous and perverse examples of “imitations” in the twentieth century is Aldous Huxley’s famous novel, Brave New World. Huxley envisioned a world in which human beings became so depraved and enslaved by their own desire for momentary pleasure and happiness that they lost interest in any and all forms of Beauty, Truth, and Goodness. Huxley’s novel ultimately posited the cynical view that such a world was possible, implying that the innate spark of creative reason and the desire for eternal things seated within each human individual—whether they be aware of it or not—could ultimately be trained out of everyone. In this dystopian world, creativity would ultimately be reserved for those willing to use their own powers of insight and creativity for the purposes of understanding how to better control this spark in others.

    In reality, Huxley’s novel was nothing more than a Malthusian and eugenicist rip-off of Shakespeare’s final drama, The Tempest. In the case of the latter, Shakespeare composed his drama as a playful exploration of the then-contemporary theme of establishing a “New World”—one situated far away from the oligarchical trappings that have cursed Europe since nearly its birth.

    What happens to the best of Western civilization and its greatest traditions today remains to be seen. However, our ability to understand the deeper nature and history of the intellectual and spiritual disease that has rotted out much of the Western world may very well decide whether our civilization succeeds in removing the cancer, whether the disease consumes the entire body, or if we simply end up chopping off the wrong parts.

    The history is clear; the future is still unwritten.

    The Shaping of Psychiatry by War

    “War is a valuable testing ground for the most of us, and certainly this is true of psychiatrists”
    —Brigadier John Rawlings Rees – The Shaping of Psychiatry by War

    Understanding our deeper human drama means going back to the 1920s where we find waves of shell-shock victims flooding the psychiatric world in the wake of WWI. Tucked away in a discrete London suburb, under the direction of Brigadier John Rawlings Rees, Tavistock would quickly become the mother of modern psychological warfare, thanks to its many experiments on war-time trauma victims. Indeed, much of what we know as modern psychiatry is an outgrowth of these wartime experiments.

    Take for instance the case of hypnosis and psychosurgery evangelist and Tavistock-related Maudsley Military Hospital resident, Dr. William Sargant. A resident of the British military hospital turned civilian psychiatric ward, Sargant described the history of hypnosis and research into altered-states through the study of WWI “shell-shock” victims in his 1972 book, The Mind Possessed: A Physiology of Possession, Mysticism, and Faith:
    “The origin of this book dates back to the Second World War and the treatment of battle neuroses—psychological disorders stemming from horrifying and mentally overwhelming experiences of war. Soldiers who had broken down, in combat or afterwards, sometimes became totally preoccupied by their memories of what had happened to them. In other cases, these memories had been repressed into the subconscious mind but were causing feelings of depression, fatigue, irritability, irrational fears or nightmares.” (p. 3)
    These trauma victims became the subjects for experimenting with various “altered-states” of emotion. These “researchers” found that hypnotic or altered-states, which fall under a more general category of “trance,” could be induced by various methods, including drugs, torcher, and even simply language. These techniques were found to be innovative ways of steering and directing people’s emotions—and consequently, their thoughts—without the need of conscious decision-making processes. Commenting on this research, Sargant wrote:
    “A state of heightened suggestibility, intense sensitivity to one’s surroundings and a readiness to obey commands even when they go against the grain, is one of the most striking characteristics of hypnotized behavior, and hypnosis has given its name to the ‘hypnoid’ phase of brain activity. […] this phase can be caused by stress and creates a state of greatly increased suggestibility in which a human being uncritically adopts ideas to which they would not normally be open. Breuer was interested in this phenomenon at the end of the last century and his findings, reported in a masterly chapter which he contributed to a joint book with Freud, were repeatedly confirmed in our experience with drug abreactions during the war. Breuer begins by quoting Moebius as saying, in 1890: ‘The necessary condition for the (pathogenic) operation of ideas is, on the one hand, an innate—that is, hysterical—disposition and, on the other, a special frame of mind… It must resemble a state of hypnosis: it must correspond to some kind of consciousness in which an emerging idea meets with no resistance from any other—in which, so to speak, the field is clear for the first comer. We know that a state of this kind can be brought about not only by hypnotism but by emotional shock (fight, anger, etc.) and by exhausting factors (sleeplessness, hunger, and so on).’” (Id., p. 32)
    Offering a particularly revealing example, in chapter six of his book, Sargant writes:
    “An actor, who had what he himself described as a ‘histrionic’ temperament, told me after the last war how, as a prisoner of the Japanese, he had to go each day to receive orders from the local Japanese camp commandment. He never knew whether he was going to be beaten up or praised or just ignored. When he was beaten up, which happened frequently, he found that if he could succeed in fixing his thoughts on a certain mountain in Wales, and keep his mind completely concentrated on it, he could often inhibit much of the physical pain of the beating. Pain and other strong sensory impressions can sometimes be completely inhibited in a moment of great crisis, with its heightened state of nervous excitement, and also in states of hypnosis. With the mind entirely focused on some present danger, it is possible to remain unaware that you have been seriously hurt at the time; you only realize it afterwards.” (Id., p. 72-73)
    On the American side, Kurt Lewin—known as the father of “social psychology”—would be recruited by Tavistock’s Eric Trist—the first director of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations. It would be tasked with shaping modern organizational structures, bureaucracies, and what we today know as modern “office culture.” As the founder of the MIT Center for Group Dynamics and founder of the National Training Laboratories for Applied Behavioral Science, Lewin would become one of the chief minds spearheading this new age of social engineering in the USA—the chief target of this new invisible empire. These ends would be pursued by pioneering the fields of “Group Dynamics” and “Topological Psychology.” Lewin’s work would ultimately define the broader field of applied behavioural science, which now shapes public messaging and MSM propaganda across virtually all spheres of the Western “Five Eyes” system.

    Building on the early wartime research into mass psychology and group psychology, Lewin wrote:
    “One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a `strategy of terror' consists in exactly this tactic—keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect. If in addition frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promises of good treatment together with spreading of contradictory news, make the ‘cognitive structure’ of this situation utterly unclear, then the individual may cease to even know when a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions even those who have definite goals and are ready to take risks, will be paralyzed by severe inner conflicts in regard to what to do.”

    Kurt Lewin – “Time Perspective and Morale" (1942)
    Notably, the first issue of Tavistock’s journal, Human Relations, featured two papers on Lewin’s “group dynamics.” These seminal works would go on to shape the approach of Tavistock and its Anglo-American nodes on both sides of the Atlantic.

    Of interest is that Lewin, as a premier social engineer in America, approached the engineering of society and the various relations among the many moving parts from the top down. Whereas modern academia is structured in a manner that emphasizes specialization and compartmentalization across vast systems of categories, essentially forcing people to think from the bottom up, and largely only in respect to their own fields of specialization, the literature and research of social engineers and behavioral scientists was from its very beginning approached holistically. It would be concerned with shaping macro processes in culture, science, and philosophy, which over longer intervals of time were understood to translate into qualitatively new systems—new “images of man.”

    From the practice of taking groups, groups of groups, or entire societies as the basic units by which to formulate practical theories for behavior change, modern social engineering would be birthed by a few maverick “researchers.” With his holistic approaches in “Field Theory”—adapted from the field of Gestalt psychology—the various pairwise interaction and dynamics among the many individual parts would be diligently mapped out, always with an eye to seeing how the structure of the whole could shape and influence interactions among the various and seemingly independent parts.

    Lewin’s ideas were complemented by theories like Melanie Klein’s “Object Relations,” which viewed the relationships between an infant and the various objects and environment as the primary causal feature shaping early human psyche formation. These ideas were then adapted for molding and reshaping human personality as a whole, which were seen as especially effective when the initial dynamics of earlier childhood psyche formation could be accessed and altered using cues and changes in environment.

    Tasked with applying these various models of behavior change and group dynamics to corporate culture and the organizational structure of governmental bureaucracies, the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations would play no small role in shaping what we today know as modern “office culture.”

    Human Relations and Cybernetics

    Building on Tavistock’s work, as the director of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, Kurt Lewin recruiter Eric Trist would pioneer a sociotechnical systems approach to shaping organizational structures top-down, which in broader terms fell under the category of “General Systems Theory” and “Cybernetics.” These theories would be used as a means of shaping modern organizational structures on all levels of society. Ultimately, the result would take the form of sophisticated bureaucratic systems designed with specifically structured and compartmentalized management tiers. These new “cybernetic” systems essentially ensured that the right hand never fully knew what the left hand was doing, with only a few within the upper echelons of the managerial structures positioned high enough over the vast system of information feedback loops to see the “bigger picture,” or know exactly where the ship was headed. One can imagine an ancient ship with myriad rowers and workers occupied by their immediate exertions, with only a few “helmsmen” at the top actually possessing knowledge of the stars or navigational skills, and but small portions of that information being translated to the laborers in the form short signals and commands.

    Alas, contrary to the Hollywood “Fight Club” variety of conspiracy theories, much of the control of our modern society depends on individuals being too “zoomed-in” to visualize the bigger picture, with others who might attempt to think in those terms lacking knowledge of the basic frameworks and organizational models which would, if understood even in rudimentary terms, make transparent the seemingly invisible empire and its modern “governance” structures.

    To shepherd this new era, social engineers took particular interest in the field of Cybernetics. Commenting on the developments and promises of Cybernetics applications for society at large, one of the leading members of the Cybernetics Macy Conference, anthropologist and long-time CIA-associated mind-control operative of MK-Ultra notoriety, Gregory Bateson, said the following:
    “The growing together of a number of ideas which had developed in different places during World War II ... the aggregate of these ideas [being called] cybernetics, or communication theory, or information theory, or systems theory. The ideas were generated in many places: in Vienna by Bertalanffy, in Harvard by Wiener, in Princeton by von Neumann, in Bell Telephone labs by Shannon, in Cambridge by Craik, and so on. All these separate developments in different intellectual centers dealt with ... the problem of what sort of a thing is an organized system ... I think that cybernetics is the biggest bite out of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge that mankind has taken in the last 2000years.” (1972, pp. 482-484)
    A theory developed for the purposes of creating sophisticated systems of information feedback loops for military radar technology, these wartime developments would lead to an era of “General Systems Theory”—a roadmap for molding new “images of man.”

    The Changing Images of Man

    Perhaps one of the most telling documents explicitly concerning itself with “the bigger picture” is the Tavistock-related Stanford Research Institute (SRI) “Changing Images of Man” report. In it, the authors describe what they view as the obsolete “rationalist” Renaissance Judeo-Christian image of humanity, one in which the mind of man—the microcosm—is understood to be organized in a manner coherent with the natural principles organizing the universe as a whole—the macrocosm. This “rationalist” view made new fundamental discoveries in both art and science the basis for human progress and the cultivation of the creative spark of reason found in each individual. Instead, they looked to an earlier pagan Greek “image of man” as more adaptive:
    “In contrast to the Greek notion of "man," the Judeo-Christian view holds that "man" is essentially separate from the rightful master over nature. This view inspired a sharp rate of increase in technological advances in Western Europe throughout the Medieval period. On the other hand, the severe limitations of scholastic methodology, and the restrictive views of the Church, prevented the formulation of an adequate scientific paradigm. It was not until the Renaissance brought a new climate of individualism and free inquiry that the necessary conditions for a new paradigm were provided. Interestingly, the Renaissance scholars turned to the Greeks to rediscover the empirical method. The Greeks possessed an objective science of things "out there," which D. Campbell (1959) terms the "epistemology of the other." This was the basic notion that nature was governed by laws and principles which could be discovered, and it was this that the Renaissance scholars then developed into science as we have come to know it.” (p. 104)
    Here, the children of Tavistock make themselves quite clear. The notion that the human mind and the ordering of the universe at large are coherent, and that the investigation of one is ultimately an investigation of the other—making man a co-creator capable of acting as imago viva dei and capax dei—must be rejected. In Greek terms, the Promethean image of man—which the authors mistakenly cast as a strictly formalist Apollonian “rationalist” unfeeling man—would have to be overtaken by the Erotic and the Dionysian.

    A civilization based on feeling and emotion—and devoid of reason—was seen as the more adaptive mode of being. Rather than “progress,” individuals could busy themselves with the pursuit of an ever-expanding array of mystical experiences—largely through drugs and sex cults—and increasing levels of “consciousness”—including parapsychology. This new vision was deemed to be the most promising means of diverting the seemingly inextinguishable interest with unearthing the eternal laws of the universe and using them to better the conditions for all life on Earth and beyond. Instead, the “unsustainable” Renaissance image of man would have to be recast into the gnostic pagan shadows of earlier more “sustainable” times i.e., pre-Renaissance times
    .

    So we find in the 1960s a pivotal moment in the West’s shift towards a new post-industrial utopia. There, we find Aldous Huxley and Dr. Timothy Leary musing about a “coming revolution.” Not only did Huxley explore the possibilities in his famous dystopian novel Brave New World, but also in his later works, including his final utopian novel, The Island. The invariant in both novels was a culture of eugenics, sex cults, and mass drug use. While in a Brave New World these drugs were used to dull the pain, in The Island, they became the means of expanding one’s “spiritual” consciousness.

    In his autobiographical account, Flashback, Dr. Leary recounted some of the exchanges he had with Aldous about what they viewed as obstacles to any kind of “new paradigm.” Huxley first told Leary:
    “These brain drugs, mass produced in the laboratories, will bring about vast changes in society. This will happen with or without you or me. All we can do is spread the word. The obstacle to this evolution, Timothy, is the Bible.”
    Leary reflected on the obstacles they encountered as they sought to develop and flesh out their vision of a new enlightened society:
    “We had run up against the Judeo-Christian commitment to one God, one religion, one reality, that has cursed Europe for centuries and America since our founding days. Drugs that open the mind to multiple realities inevitably lead to a polytheistic view of the universe. We sensed that the time for a new humanist religion based on intelligence, good-natured pluralism and scientific paganism had arrived.”
    Of note is that the “new paradigm” would have its own particular set of rules and boundaries conditions, which the authors of the “Changing Images” of Man called the ecological ethic of “New Scarcity” (p. 114). This new scarcity would serve as the impetus for getting human beings to change their basic modes of behavior, ultimately under the threat of famine, biblical floods, and apocalyptic fires, all of which would be framed as the consequences of humanity’s hubris i.e., its continuous attempts to wield and discover new forms of Promethean “fire.”

    Regardless of one’s religious views, or lack-thereof, on an epistemological level, one can understand that a Judeo-Christian view of man and the universe, centered on the sacredness of the individual, has and always was understood to be incompatible with the kind of neo-pagan Malthusian or Gaia-centric order, which the old imperial houses of Europe have yearned to regain since the “aberration” of the Golden Renaissance.

    The conversations between Huxley and Leary reflect discussions that were being had by many of the chief visionaries of a dystopian “brave new world.” It was a world in which genuine spiritual and epistemological development of the individual would be replaced with drugs, psychedelic experiences, and the constant stumbling in and out of trances of every kind. These experiences would “feel” like a philosophical and spiritual development, and share many of the outward characteristics, but ultimately be yet another “imitation.”

    For, the Gaia-centric pagan view has always emphasized the sacredness and “equality” of all life forms, with an abstracted “Mother Nature” i.e. Gaia ruling as the supreme “mother” over humanity. Despite human beings being the only creatures endowed with a unique spark of creative reason, this uniquely human quality—the principle that defines man as imago viva dei—was essentially dismissed and reduced to a sensual pseudo-mystical gnosticism. Unlike the Renaissance conception of every human individual being a living image of God, one in which man could directly know his Creator by virtue of his ability to discover and cultivate his own innate powers of creative reason, creative thought would remain essentially irrational and unintelligible, and only accessible as a kind of “feeling” or mystical quality aided by drugs and other means of inducing heightened emotional states i.e. “altered-states.”

    On the other hand, the Promethean and Christian Renaissance conception treated man as the only creature capable of self-consciously discovering and striving towards “the Good,” or the “Logos.” The oligarchical view, whether embodied in its ancient forms by the priests of Marduk in ancient Babylon or in the modern radical Mathlusian post-industrial utopians, knowledge and creativity would remain essentially unknowable, and only accessible by virtue of pseudo-mystical experiences, or super computers programmed by the technetronic Gods over at Facebook and Google.

    Defeating the “Mother”

    Rather than being new, these ideas belong to a very old tradition, one typified by the philosopher Aristotle and his epistemologically backward view of a human being as essentially a blank slate, “a tabula rasa,” which could be written on and re-written, thereby generating the “phantasma” of the mind i.e. “the pictures inside the heads of human beings.” By denying the essential spark inside each human being, which a classical education is designed to prompt in order to cause the “light to turn on,” the Aristotelian and Tavistockian varieties of education and conditioning consist in manipulating and redrawing the “images” inside the heads of human beings. So, for Aristotle, learning is reduced to a series of logical deductive steps equivalent to a dog going place A and getting punished, then going place B and being rewarded, and therefore coming to the deductive conclusion that place A is bad and place B is good. However complex, whether in the form of super computers programmed with a dizzying number of 1s and 0s, or brute force classical conditioning, there is never any notion of a light turning on, there is no genuine soul, only a collection of “phantasma” or 1s and 0s, which can be reprogrammed ad infinitum.

    Thus, rather than coming up with something fundamentally new, modern social engineers simply did what oligarchies have always done: rehash attempts at shaping the imagination of the masses through imagery, language, and spectacle. Thus, early Freud collaborator and mass psychology enthusiast, Walter Lippman, described the essential approach of this not-so-new new paradigm as one of manipulating “Public Opinion”:
    “The pictures inside the heads of human beings, the pictures of themselves, of others, of their needs and purposes, and relationship, are their public opinions. Those pictures which are acted upon by groups of people, or by individuals acting in the name of groups, are Public Opinion, with capital letters.”

    Walter Lippman – Public Opinion (1923)
    Describing who controlled this “Popular Opinion,” in the same book Lippman wrote that it was a:
    “Powerful, socially superior, successful, rich urban social set [which] is fundamentally international throughout the Western Hemisphere and in many ways, London is its center. It counts among its membership the most influential people in the world, containing as it does the diplomatic sets, high finance, the upper circles of the army and navy, some princes of the church, the great newspaper proprietors, their wives, mothers, and daughters who wield the scepter of invitation. It is at once a great circle of talk and a real social set.”
    At the core of the problem lies a fundamental question: what image of man is the right one? Are human beings simply more complex animals who must be trained and conditioned like dogs? Are education and morality merely a system of reward and punishment—of pleasure and pain—which can be refashioned and remolded to fit the desires of a reigning “Elect”? Or is the purpose of education a system in which ideas and knowledge are presented in the form of new questions and fundamental paradoxes that cause the “light to turn on”?

    The former Aristotelian system of education produces the slave morality that we see populating virtually all systems of higher learning in the Western world (with only a few exceptions). The latter outlook ignites the original spark, which may for many exist only in the form of a faint glimmer from childhood, but which however faint, is always there. In the case of the latter, it is perhaps best typified by Plato’s famous example from the Meno dialogue where a young uneducated slave boy is led to discovering the solution to the geometric problem of doubling the square using nothing but a series of questions.

    While the Tavistockians and their psychological shock troops have come very far, the religious belief in their own twisted theories of human nature may very well be the thing that leads to their downfall. For, as much as they may try to change “the images of man” and mold people according to their own utopian ideas, human nature remains unchanged. While the Tavistockians advance in their designs with the belief that they are writing on tabula rasas, whether viewed as programmable bio-computers or conditioned dogs, they deny that fundamental creative spark of reason which, while immaterial—and because it is immaterial—remains indestructible and ignitable at any moment.

    Conclusion

    One meaningful dialogue with one’s own inner voice has the potential to erase thousands upon thousands of hours of brainwashing and “images.” For this reason, the invisible empire invests billions upon billions in its narrative matrix—its entertainment industries—and its 24/7 MSM “journalism.” All these channels of “communication” and “entertainment” ultimately perform one task: getting people to forget.

    As much as they may attempt to “model” human behavior, and very nearly approximate it, these models remain as Plato observed, “imitations.” Some imitations and models may mimic reality more closely. However, the deeper nature of the soul and the immutable quality of mind which allows for the “light to turn on,” which may have escaped us for many years—even generations—perseveres. So, the story of man is a story filled with times where the truth, like some great flood or light, suddenly comes crashing in.

    We need only remember.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (1st October 2023), Harmony (27th October 2022), Icare (1st October 2023), kudzy (27th October 2022), mountain_jim (27th October 2022), palehorse (1st October 2023), Satori (27th October 2022)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    8,898
    Thanks
    9,943
    Thanked 55,058 times in 8,171 posts

    Default Re: The Tavistock Insttute

    This conversation is very long and roams the full gamut sociologically, philosophically and critically. If you have the opportunity and are in the right mood for it you'll come out the other side of it with a fully refresh briefed mind on the whole grand topic.

    Courtenay's 'show note' paragraph doesn't begin to do it justice.

    The Courtenay Turner Podcast - 245 - The Genesis of Social Science & Tavistock w/ Tony Myers
    4 hours 19 minutes Posted Apr 7, 2023


    SHOW NOTES
    In this episode Courtenay invites co-host of Grand Theft World and Trivium Method logic professor, Tony Myers, back to the show for a conversation on the origins of social science, psychology, and psychiatry in relation to Tavistock. This discussion brings awareness to New Age symbolism and its love for the God of Science as well as the context of philosophical concepts and interpretations across cultures and eras.

    Connect with Tony:

    Website:

    https://grandtheftworld.com/

    https://marketplace.autonomyagora.com/
    Last edited by norman; 10th April 2023 at 06:01.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (1st October 2023), DNA (10th April 2023), Harmony (10th April 2023), Icare (1st October 2023), Tintin (11th April 2023)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    8,898
    Thanks
    9,943
    Thanked 55,058 times in 8,171 posts

    Default Re: The Tavistock Insttute




    Courtenay Turner AGAIN, this time with Monica Perez of the Propaganda Report.






    The Propaganda Report - Courtenay Turner - Tavistock 101, part 1
    1 hour 11 minutes - Posted Sep 27, 2023



    The Propaganda Report - Courtenay Turner - Tavistock 101, part 2
    1 hour 12 minutes - Posted Sep 29, 2023




    Shownotes:

    The Prometheus Project: Mankind's Search for Long-range Goals

    https://books.google.com/books/about...d=RDxDAAAAIAAJ

    Illuminati Provincial Report of Utica

    ...cannot find link

    The Humanist Manifesto

    https://americanhumanist.org/what-is...sm/manifesto1/

    The Limits to Growth

    https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/Boo...SED-_-keyword=

    Rockefeller Medicine Men

    https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/Boo...SED-_-keyword=

    Rhythm, Riots and Revolution

    https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/Boo...-srp1-_-title1

    Makers of the Modern Mind

    https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/Boo...-srp1-_-title1

    The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations

    https://cognitive-liberty.online/wp-...Relations1.pdf

    Report from Iron Mountain

    https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/Boo...SED-_-keyword=

    Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

    https://www.amazon.com/Tavistock-Ins.../dp/163424043X
    Last edited by norman; 1st October 2023 at 17:44.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (1st October 2023), Harmony (1st October 2023), Icare (1st October 2023)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts