+ Reply to Thread
Page 16 of 20 FirstFirst 1 6 16 20 LastLast
Results 301 to 320 of 392

Thread: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

  1. Link to Post #301
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Thanked 1,529 times in 240 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Bizarre EU Funded Comic Book Predicted Pandemic, With Globalists As Saviours

    Eerie 2012 document painted eurocrats as saving the planet from a killer virus and draconian lockdowns

    Steve Watson | Infowars.com - May 15, 2020

    Image Credits: Screenshot.

    A strange comic book that was commissioned for publication by the European Union in 2012 eerily predicted almost exactly what has unfolded with the Covid-19 global pandemic. However, in this propaganda laced presentation of the outbreak, unelected globalist bureaucrats save the planet.

    The comic book, titled ‘Infected’, was a production of the European Commission’s international cooperation and development arm. It was not intended for widespread public consumption, but instead to be distributed inside EU institutions. Only a few hundred of the comic books were made.

    The EU’s description of the strange publication states that “While the story may be fictional, it is nevertheless intertwined with some factual information.”

    The graphic novel depicts scientists inside a lab in China experimenting with deadly pathogens:

    A wannabe hero time travels from the future, alerting authorities to the coming pandemic, and presents an antidote, before quickly becoming the target of opportunists who want to steal the cure and sell it to drug companies:

    The story features the transmission of a novel virus from animals to humans in a crowded wet market:

    “Indeed, imagine if you were infected in this market by a new contagious agent.” says the UN’s chief advisor on contagious diseases, adding “You probably wouldn’t even realise it until the end of the incubation period.”

    The publication suggests that air travel would exacerbate the spread of the disease, with the character adding that “You’d have headed back to Europe, the US, Latin America, or Australia as planned via an international airport.”

    The cartoon depicts the failure of a global health organisation to act quickly enough to stop a pandemic:

    It also predicts draconian safety measures, including social distancing, which make everyday life “totally unbearable”:

    The piece concludes with an EU Parliament hearing, in which Brussels pushes for more integrated European cooperation on global health matters, mirroring a real life initiative known as ‘One health’.

    The globalists are lauded for helping develop and distribute a vaccine to the world:

    Was this predictive programming or just a bizarre coincidence?

    In 2020, in reality, the EU has pandered to China, and bowed to censorship regarding the virus outbreak.

    The EU has also been heavily criticised by member states and insiders for monumental failings owing to internal bureaucracy. The EU’s science chief even resigned due to the inept coronavirus response from the institution.

    In the Eurocrats’ own fiction, globalism saves the planet. In reality, it ends in mass death and global tyranny.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bullseye (16th May 2020), Denise/Dizi (20th May 2020), Elainie (15th May 2020), Franny (17th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020)

  3. Link to Post #302
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Trowbridge/Bath - UK
    Thanked 13,628 times in 2,043 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    UPDATE in red - thanks Tintin

    Dr. Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID-19 Vaccine
    45,510 views•May 10, 2020
    Spiro Skouras
    61.9K subscribers

    "In this powerful interview Spiro is joined with Doctor Andrew Kaufman. Spiro and Dr. Kaufman discuss the expanding curtailment of basic civil liberties being normalized under the false pretext of a global health emergency.

    Doctor Kaufman lays his reputation and his career on the line as he blows the whistle, on what he describes as a manufactured crisis to carry out a preplanned agenda to facilitate global governance and population control.

    Doctor Kaufman is a well educated medical professional who convincingly illustrates, using the CDC's own technical data, how the public has been manipulated on the grandest scale.
    Moderator Note from Tintin @19:09GMT May 15th 2020: not for the first time Youtube has removed the video attached to the original link, that I have now replaced with this one - below - from altcensored.com. A gentle reminder to everyone when it comes to posting links to videos on Youtube: download them wherever possible and wetransfer them to us if you can't otherwise provide links to them, or find alternative other sites to link to. There is, and has been for a while, as you must all surely know by now, a major purge going on. I'll get this into the Avalon Library just as soon as that's back up and running. In the meantime this is downloadable by clicking on the 'three dots' set to right bottom on the frame via the below link, or via the embedded film. Kia ora, Tintin.
    Dr Andrew Kaufman joins Spiro Skouras

    Dr Andrew Kaufman: They Want To Genetically Modify Us With The COVID 19 Vaccine


    ************************************************** *********************************************
    Last edited by Tintin; 15th May 2020 at 18:30.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bullseye (16th May 2020), Franny (17th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020), Sunny (16th May 2020), wondering (15th May 2020)

  5. Link to Post #303
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Trowbridge/Bath - UK
    Thanked 13,628 times in 2,043 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    The following posts were made on the 'statistics' thread and do overlap more than sufficiently with this thread.

    Reposted from here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1355515
    Reposted from here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1355875
    Reposted from here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1355991
    Reposted from here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1356008


    "Global vaccination market revenue worldwide is projected to reach $59.2 billion by 2020; this number may well increase with the arrival of Covid–19.

    The British Government’s investment in GAVI alongside vaccine promoter Bill Gates must, again, raise the issue of conflicts of interest. To what extent is the British Government protecting its own assets in forcing the lockdown upon its population? Vaccines are set to be a major source of income for the world’s largest pharmaceutical corporations, and the British Government is invested in that lucrative future."


    Who controls the British Government response to Covid–19?

    Vanessa Beeley for Off Guardian May 9th, 2020

    "The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants” - Albert Camus

    As Britain hurtles headlong towards neo-feudalist governance with heightened surveillance, micro-management of society and an uptick in fascistic policing of the draconian measures imposed to combat the “threat” of Covid–19, it is perhaps time to analyse the real forces behind this “new normal”.

    There is now serious doubt over the correlation between lockdown and saving lives. Reality is creeping into the Covid–19 dialogue.

    It is becoming apparent that people are getting sick because they are being isolated and effectively living under house arrest, condemned as “murderers” if they so much as think about breaking curfew, being snitched on by neighbours for “gathering” more than two people together in their back gardens.

    The following graph was produced by UK Column and demonstrates the lack of correlation between lockdown and “saving lives”:

    The numbers game is acting in many instances as a smokescreen. It is impossible to rely upon “official” statistics, that vary wildly from one website to another: statistics that rely upon unreliable and sporadic testing procedures. and based upon death certificates that misrepresent the actual cause of death as Covid–19, regardless of pre-existing medical conditions.

    Statistics, too, that were set in stone very early on in the development stages, when the perspective was limited and compressed, before a true picture could be seen. The newly emerging statistics are now increasingly undermining initial conclusions and pointing to the futility and negative consequences of lockdown.

    It is now accepted that there is a high mortality rate among the elderly in care homes in the UK and globally — among the same elderly civilians who are being “asked” to sign DNRs (Do Not Resuscitate) forms.

    This amounts to signing their own death warrant, should they present any of the Covid–19 symptoms. They will be neglected, isolated from their families when at their most vulnerable and left alone to die, even though it is possible that they have not contracted the virus.

    Instead of offering proactive and positive suggestions that will enable our immune systems to combat the disease, the British Government is ensuring conditions that will suppress immune systems to dangerous levels and create the perfect environment for Covid–19 to flourish.

    Britain has now received an estimated 1.4 million new benefit claims for welfare payments, “about seven times the normal level”. The government has pledged to bail out “80% of pay of workers who are temporarily laid off” but I have personally spoken to self-employed individuals who find themselves falling between the cracks that qualify them for financial support and now face an indefinite period of time without income.

    These measures are being imposed in a country that, since 2012, has seen an exponential growth in child poverty to potentially sub-Victorian levels.

    In March 2019, the number of children living in “absolute poverty” grew by a staggering 200,000 in a twelve-month period, to a total of 3.7 million. How will this number be further impacted by lockdown?

    How did we arrive at this point? Who steered the UK Government towards this questionable and alarmist lockdown policy?

    The unexamined assumption is that conclusions were formed on the basis of sound epidemiological analysis and research by doctors and scientists who care about our welfare.

    The reality is what we will examine in this article. Neil Ferguson, a professor at Imperial College, was responsible for the modelling of a response to Covid–19. His virtual model was recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and it passed through into policy with virtually no scrutiny.

    Ferguson’s dramatic prediction of 500,000 deaths in the UK became the foundation of Boris Johnson’s U-turn from herd immunity to collective quarantine.

    While some understood that Ferguson later reduced his mortality calculations, he actually doubled down on his projections on Twitter, insisting that without drastic lockdown measures being taken, the numbers would be even higher.

    Who is Neil Ferguson?

    Ferguson is acting director of the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC), which is based at Imperial College in London. According to Ferguson’s biography on the website, “much of [his] work is applied, informing disease control policy-making by public and global health institutions.”

    The professor who derailed Johnson’s semblance of “herd immunity” strategy is no stranger to controversy and is described as having a “patchy” record of modelling pandemics by one of his academic peers, Professor Michael Thrusfield of Edinburgh University, an expert in animal diseases.

    Ferguson was instrumental in the modelling of the British Government’s response to Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) in 2001, which Thrusfield describes as “not fit for purpose” (2006) and “seriously flawed” (2012).

    Thrusfield has highlighted the limitations of Ferguson’s mathematical modelling methods, and applied the doubts he expressed over FMD to the current Covid–19 “crisis” response.

    An estimated twelve million animals were slaughtered as a result of Ferguson’s 2001 initiative. The farming community was devastated by suicides and bankruptcies that irretrievably altered the landscape of British agriculture — forcing healthy smallholdings into agri-corporate mergers and empowering the EU central governance in the agricultural sector.

    Insight: Slaughtered on Suspicion, a documentary made by UK Column in 2015, provides a shocking insight into the suffering precipitated by Ferguson’s model and the “new normal” imposed upon Britain’s farming community. The following is a statement made by one of the contributors to the programme:

    "12,000,000 animals [Meat & Livestock Commission statistic] were slaughtered but that did not include lambs at foot, aborted lambs, calves or piglets. Further, tens of thousands of chickens were slaughtered in the early months — on welfare grounds, apparently. 88% of all animals slaughtered had not contracted FMD
    [source: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs].

    Great Orton airfield was used to slaughter sheep under the “voluntary” cull: that was anything but voluntary, and farmers not participating were ruthlessly threatened. There was only one mild case of FMD recorded from the thousands of blood tests done at Great Orton
    [source: DEFRA].

    There was a travelator that ran from the slaughter tent at Great Orton to the graves. This ran 16 hours a day, transporting “dead” young lambs. Slaughtermen working there told me that many of the lambs were buried alive.

    The man that advised Blair during this fiasco was, as many will know, Prof. Ferguson of Imperial College. He was [reportedly] sacked by DEFRA late on during the epidemic, but the damage had been done! Prof Ferguson was awarded an OBE in 2002 for his work during FMD 2001.”
    [Emphasis added]

    In 2002, Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would die from variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, better known as “mad cow disease”, increasing to 150,000 if the epidemic expanded to include sheep.

    The reality is:
    Since 1990, 178 people in the United Kingdom have died from vCJD, according to the National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit at the University of Edinburgh.” [2017]
    In 2005, Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people would be killed by bird-flu or H5N1.

    By early 2006, the WHO had only linked 78 deaths to the virus, out of 147 reported cases.

    In 2009, Ferguson and his team at Imperial College advised the government that swine flu or H1N1 would probably ]kill 65,000 people in the UK

    In the end, swine flu claimed the lives of 457 people in the UK.

    Now, in 2020, Ferguson and Imperial College have released a report which claims that half a million Britons and 2.2 million Americans may be killed by Covid–19.

    The report has still not been peer-reviewed; despite this and Ferguson’s glaring record of mathematical sensationalism, the British Government has adopted the devastating socio-economic lockdown that Ferguson has proposed.


    1. GAVI and Imperial College
    The VIMC is hosted by the Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at Imperial College. VIMC is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and by “GAVI, the vaccine alliance” (GAVI’s own title for itself).

    Bill and Melinda Gates began funding Imperial College in 2006, four years before the Gates Foundation launched the Global Health Leaders Launch Decade of Vaccines Collaboration (GHLLDVC) and one year after Ferguson had demonstrated his penchant for overblown projections on mortality numbers from H5N1.

    Up to the end of 2018, the Gates Foundation has sponsored Imperial College with a whopping $185 million.

    That makes Gates the second-largest sponsor, beaten to the top spot on the podium by the Wellcome Trust, a British research charity which began funding Imperial College prior to Ferguson’s FMD débâcle and which, by the end of 2018, had already provided Imperial with over $400 million in funding. I will examine the Wellcome Trust’s connections in part two of this series.

    Wellcome trust also has a focus on global immunization programmes

    The Gates Foundation established the GHLLDVC in collaboration with the WHO, UNICEF and the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The following is taken from the Gates Foundation website:
    The Global Vaccine Action Plan will enable greater coordination across all stakeholder groups – national governments, multilateral organizations, civil society, the private sector and philanthropic organizations — and will identify critical policy, resource, and other gaps that must be addressed to realize the life-saving potential of vaccines.
    The Collaboration’s leadership council at the time included the Director-General of the WHO, the Director of NIAID, the Director of UNICEF, the President of Gates Foundation Global Health, and the Chair of the African Malaria Alliance.

    The steering committee included the Director of Immunisation, the UK Department of Health, and many other representatives from the WHO, UNICEF and associated organisations. It is a cluster of immunisation-focused individuals controlling the policy of world health governing bodies, who claim to be neutral.

    The WHO was nominated as the “directing and coordinating authority on international health within the United Nations system” and was set up to be responsible for “shaping the health research agenda”, among other tasks linked to the policy of global immunisation.

    UNICEF, the “world’s largest provider of vaccines for developing countries” has on-the-ground access to children in over 150 territories and countries (2010).

    We are already seeing the potential for some serious conflict of interest behind the Ferguson model on Covid–19, and this will become even more apparent as the connections are now made to an entire pharmaceutical complex potentially protecting its own interests over any genuine concerns for the health and welfare of global populations.

    GAVI is funded and partnered by the same network that forms the GHLLDVC, with some noticeable additions: the World Bank and donor/implementing country governments. The Gates Foundation is a primary sponsor, but is topped by the British Government, which was instrumental in creating GAVI and is its largest donor.

    While many sectors of British society have seen their living standards plummet, with the elderly severely neglected, a National Health Service in decline and homelessness on the increase, the British Government, via UKAID, has pledged Ł1.44 billion to GAVI for 2016–2020 and will be hosting the 2020 GAVI pledging conference, which is due to take place in June 2020 to [emphasis added]:

    "...mobilise at least US$ 7.4 billion in additional resources to protect the next generation with vaccines, reduce disease inequality and create a healthier, safer and more prosperous world.”

    The conference promises to bring together political leaders, civil society, public and private donors, vaccine manufacturers and governments to support GAVI, the vaccine alliance — which boasts that it has “helped vaccinate almost half the world’s children against deadly and debilitating infectious diseases”.

    This claim will be met with praise from the pro-vaccine lobby but concerns over the efficacy and safety of these mass vaccination programmes must be taken into account, particularly when being tested in poorer, developing countries.

    Global vaccination market revenue worldwide is projected to reach $59.2 billion by 2020; this number may well increase with the arrival of Covid–19.

    The British Government’s investment in GAVI alongside vaccine promoter Bill Gates must, again, raise the issue of conflicts of interest. To what extent is the British Government protecting its own assets in forcing the lockdown upon its population? Vaccines are set to be a major source of income for the world’s largest pharmaceutical corporations, and the British Government is invested in that lucrative future.

    The GAVI replenishment conference is to be hosted by a British Government whose lockdown policy is effectively shattering the domestic economy and is collectively punishing the most vulnerable in British society.

    When Bill Gates partnered with GAVI twenty years ago, he had been considering where next to focus his philanthropy and was “increasingly focusing on the power and potential of vaccines”.

    It was Gates’ substantial sponsorship that launched GAVI, and ten years later Gates launched his own “vaccine decade” plan for the 2010s.

    The Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) 2012–2020, endorsed by the 194 member states participating in the World Health Assembly (2012), is led by the same members of the Gates “vaccine decade” consortium, promoted by the WHO, and brings together governments, elected officials, health professionals, academia, manufacturers, global agencies, research and development, civil society, media and the private sector — to promote global immunisation.

    This is a profit-driven corporate complex harnessing the “humanitarian” sector to lend credence to the claims of philanthropy, or more realistically, philanthrocapitalism.



    ¤=[Post Update]=¤

    Who controls the British Government response to Covid–19?
    Vanessa Beeley for Off Guardian May 9th, 2020

    [continued from this post]


    2. GAVI and ID2020

    A glance at the partner page of the GAVI website reveals that not only is GAVI heavily invested in immunisation campaigns, it is also closely connected to the Gates, Microsoft and Rockefeller Foundation seed-funded ID2020 project (Digital Identity Alliance), which incorporates Accenture, Microsoft (Gates), Ideo-Org and Rockefeller Foundation into the GAVI alliance, all with ties to the ID2020 initiative.

    ID2020 is promoting the concept that there is a need for universal biometric verification, because “to prove who you are is a fundamental and universal human right,” as asserted on the ID2020 website.

    An article by journalist Kurt Nimmo for Global Research dismantles the “humanitarian” alibi for tyranny.

    OffGrid Healthcare explains:

    What they really want is a fully standardized data collection and retrieval format, and cross-border sharing of identities of the entire population of the planet, in order for the stand-alone AI-powered command center to work without a hitch, and for purposes of calculating everyone’s potential contribution, and threat to the system.

    Nimmo describes the potential for Covid–19 to be used as cover for mandatory biometric ID. An April article carried by Reuters confirms the suspicion that biometric ID might soon be introduced, ostensibly to “help verify those who already had the infection and ensure the vulnerable get the vaccine when it is launched”. This may sound perfectly sensible to those who are buying the government strap-lines on Covid–19 but — as Nimmo warns us — “COVID–19 is the perfect Trojan horse for a control freak state itching to not only micromanage the lives of ordinary citizens but also ferret out critics and potential adversaries and punish them as enemies of the state.”

    Prashant Yadav, senior fellow at the US-based Center for Global Development, has said [Emphasis added]:

    "Biometric IDs can be a gamechanger. They can help governments target population segments e.g healthcare professionals or the elderly population, verify people who have received vaccination, and have a clear record."

    Such statements can easily be interpreted as the harbingers of mandatory vaccination and the inclusion of biometric ID in the “humanitarian” package.

    Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Technologies introduces an even more sinister projection into the mix.

    Armstrong talks about a digital certificate that verifies you have been vaccinated, developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Microsoft, which will merge with ID2020. Covid–19 will be exploited to encourage us to accept digital implants and tracking devices that will enable authorities to keep an eye on us.

    Armstrong argues that just as 9/11 conditioned us to accept X-ray booths at airports, now we will be chipped alongside our dogs and cats.

    At this point, it is worth remembering that UKAID is heavily involved in GAVI, and one presumes they are on board with the digital ID2020 project.

    Rob Laurence, director at UK-based Innovate Identity, presented proposals for the future of digital identity back in June 2019. The UK Government Verify scheme was identified as a fledgling version of the future of digital ID.

    Laurence describes the digital ID “ecosystem” that is emerging: Oliver Dowden, Minister for Implementation at the Cabinet Office (the British Government’s co-ordinating department), will form a new Digital ID Unit to “pave the way for the government to consume digital identities from the private sector”.

    Laurence describes 2020 as the “now-or-never year for government and industry to collaborate” in the creation of an “interoperable digital identity market”.

    Covid19 provides the opportunity that might just fulfil these predictions.

    It is no coincidence that a British start-up — Microsoft-funded Onfido — has recently raised $100 million to “boost its ID technology” to enable the creation of “immunity passports” for governments “battling coronavirus”.

    In December 2019, researchers at MIT created a: microneedle platform using fluorescent microparticles called quantum dots (QD) which can deliver vaccines and at the same time, invisibly encode vaccination history in the skin”: the QDs can be detected by specially adapted smartphones.

    The “new normal” will mean we are tracked and monitored by our own communication systems to an even greater and more intrusive extent.

    In part one of this two=part series, my intention has been to raise questions over who is driving the British Government response to Covid–19. Those who have influenced the lockdown policy have very clear conflict of interest question marks over their agenda.

    The scientific clique influencing government decisions is one that is incorporated into a for-profit Big Pharma industrial network which will, undeniably, benefit from the measures being taken by the British Government — a government that is financially embedded in the same complex.

    Why are the views of epidemiologists, doctors, scientists, analysts and health advisors who challenge the lockdown being ignored or censored by the media and by government? Why is the government not widening the circle of advisors to take into account these opposing perspectives that might bring an end to the misery that is a consequence of enforced quarantine?

    Off-Guardian has recorded these views here, here and here. It is also worth following Swiss Propaganda Research for regular updates on emerging analysis and statistics that you will not always find in the mainstream media.

    World Economic Forum report on the psychological experiment that is the Covid19 lockdown.

    Instead, the British Government is effectively endorsing the breeding of distrust in society, the erosion of public assembly, the isolation and state-sanctioned euthanasia of the elderly, the emerging police state, snitch lines, loss of dignity and livelihoods, greater dependency upon the state for survival, depression, suicide and voluntary incarceration.

    An article in New York Times reports on the death toll in care homes which “reflect a global phenomenon” in a world under lockdown.

    The UN has issued a warning that the economic downturn could “kill hundreds of thousands of children in 2020”.

    Gates, the WHO, the British Government and UNICEF are focused on global immunisation for a “pandemic” that is not living up to the alarmist virtual projections sponsored by Gates and the Big Pharma complex, while children really will start to die from malnutrition, neglect and a myriad of consequence of extreme poverty generated by the “steepest downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s” (IMF).

    In part two, I will delve deeper into the interlocking interests of state and private corporate sectors that should not be interfering in policies which affect the welfare of British citizens.

    I will reveal how the same players are influencing the media response and ensuring that their interests are given the most powerful platforms to promote their agenda.

    The questions must be asked: Who is really in charge of the Covid–19 response? Who benefits most? Who will suffer most from the long term consequences?

    And who will provide respite from those consequences when the “pandemic” has disappeared from view?

    Originally published by UK Column. This is part one of a two-part article. We’ll be running the second part tomorrow, or you can read it here already.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bullseye (16th May 2020), Franny (17th May 2020), onawah (16th May 2020), wondering (15th May 2020)

  7. Link to Post #304
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Trowbridge/Bath - UK
    Thanked 13,628 times in 2,043 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    COVID–19: The Big Pharma players behind UK Government lockdown
    By Vanessa Beeley
    Source: UK Column - May 11th 2020
    Also published in Off-Guardian: https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/10/...ment-lockdown/

    (Continued from this Post #280 and Post #281, and Post #290)

    Just as Sir Patrick Vallance was linked to GSK, so Chris Whitty, the UK Government's Chief Medical Advisor, was on the interim board of CEPI until the permanent board [34] was announced in 2018. Should we be surprised that the UK Government has invested Ł50 million in CEPI while being advised by Whitty?

    Whitty also received [36] Gates funding in 2008: $40m for malaria research in Africa. The fact that Whitty was involved in the kick-start of CEPI, Gates' immunisation monopoly project, should therefore not come as a huge surprise.

    CEPI and Imperial College partnership

    Ferguson’s model was generated under the auspices of the Vaccine Modelling Impact Consortium [2], hosted by Imperial College — both effectively funded by Bill Gates and Britain's Wellcome Trust (primarily).

    In December 2018, [37] CEPI went into partnership with Imperial College, London. CEPI provided funding of US$8.4 million for Imperial College to work on a vaccine platform that can be used to “rapidly develop vaccines against pathogens — even unknown ones”. The platform was appropriately named RapidVac and was focused on producing vaccines for H1N1, rabies and Marburg virus as “proof of concept”. The next step would be to develop vaccines rapidly in responses to “new and unknown pathogens, known as ‘Disease X’”. So, one year before the Covid–19 outbreak, Imperial College was working on a vaccine for “Disease X”.

    An Imperial College statement [38] claimed that the partnership of CEPI and IC aimed to develop vaccines “against new and unknown pathogens within 16 weeks from identification of antigen to product release for trials” (emphasis added). This is an extraordinary claim, when vaccines have a typical R&D gestation period of up to fifteen years before being safely approved for public consumption. In addition, we must also always consider that there is a very strong argument [39] against the use of vaccines altogether; perhaps a subject for another article.

    Development of Covid–19 vaccines

    The genome sequence [40] of Covid–19 was published online in mid-January and researchers reportedly sprang into action. The global quest for a vaccine excompasses some ten to fifteen serious programmes. CEPI is reportedly funding six of these programmes: CureVac, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Moderna, and the Universities of Oxford, Imperial College and Queensland in Australia. We can also now add GSK to the list of participants partnered with the UK Government-assisted CEPI.

    GAVI and CEPI partnership, December 2018

    In Part One, I discussed GAVI, the self-proclaimed vaccine alliance. GAVI was established twenty years ago and incorporates the members of the Gates Foundation “Global Health Leaders Launch Decade of Vaccines Collaboration” consortium: those include, once again, the WHO, the World Bank, UNICEF and governments. The UK Government is GAVI’s top sponsor [2]. In turn, GAVI sponsors the VIMC, where Ferguson models his response to Covid–19 — hosted by Imperial College.

    In December 2018 [41], the same month that CEPI went into partnership with Imperial College, the board of GAVI approved a proposal for the Kingdom of Norway to support CEPI through a bond scheme backed by a new Norwegian “pledge to the International Finance Facility for Immunisation [42]” (IFFIm).

    Utilising the bond scheme, Norway funded CEPI to the sum of US$58.1 million. Gates-funded, Gates-established GAVI was the broker for this sponsorship deal, which funnelled money to the Gates-funded, Gates-established CEPI. Other sponsors are clearly involved, but I am just making the point of the revolving-door policy in relation to these consortiums that bring together private, public and global health sectors to further vaccine promotion globally. As Gavi’s website proudly states [43], the alliance now vaccinates almost half of the world’s children.

    The UK Government blurring the lines between private and public sector when it comes to vaccines

    The UK Government not only funds Gates-generated projects indirectly through CEPI and GAVI; there is also a direct collaboration that is off the radar of most reporting on the government’s response to Covid–19. If you enter the search term “Bill Gates” as an implementing partner into the UKAID development tracker [45], a number of vaccine-related projects are revealed.

    This week, the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, co-hosted the virtual Coronavirus Global Response International Pledging Conference — to “drive forward the global race for coronavirus vaccines, treatments and tests” (emphasis added).

    According to information published [46], the UK has already provided Ł744 million of UKAID for the global response to Covid–19. That includes Ł388 million in support for new vaccines, tests and treatments. The UK has pledged Ł250 million to CEPI (the biggest contribution of any country).

    Ł40 million has gone to support rapid development of Covid–19 treatments; Ł23 million to develop rapid tests for the virus; and Ł75 million to the WHO critical health systems response. The UK has also pledged the equivalent of Ł330 million per year for five years to GAVI, the self-proclaimed vaccine alliance.

    The UK Government is effectively focusing on the market sector it has most heavily invested in — global immunisation — at a time when the British domestic economy is being forced to its knees by the government response to Covid–19. [my emphasis - Tintin]

    Perhaps at this stage, one might still argue that the UK Government has the welfare of its citizens at the forefront of its agenda; but delving a little deeper makes it much harder to draw that conclusion.

    The UK Vaccine Network

    Not only was Chris Whitty previously sponsored by Bill Gates and on the interim board of CEPI; he now chairs the UK Vaccine Network [47] (UK VN). The UK VN brings together “industry, academia and relevant funding bodies to make targeted investments in specific vaccines and vaccine technology for infectious diseases with the potential to cause an epidemic”.

    The UK Vaccine Network provides funding for vaccine development programmes. Projects supported by the DHSC through the UK Vaccine Network are listed here [48].
    Last edited by Tintin; 15th May 2020 at 19:15.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bullseye (16th May 2020), onawah (16th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020), wavydome (17th May 2020), wondering (15th May 2020)

  9. Link to Post #305
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Trowbridge/Bath - UK
    Thanked 13,628 times in 2,043 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    COVID–19: The Big Pharma players behind UK Government lockdown
    By Vanessa Beeley
    Source: UK Column - May 11th 2020
    Also published in Off-Guardian: https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/10/...ment-lockdown/

    The UK vaccine network - cont.

    Under Chris Whitty’s administration — Whitty is co-lead for the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) — the NIHR and UK Research and Innovation are giving another Ł20 million [49] to CEPI for Covid–19 vaccine development. This is in addition to the Ł50 million already given by the UK Government to CEPI.

    “It’s Humanity versus the virus” follows World Immunisation Week (April 26th–30th)
    The timing of Boris Johnson’s “humanity versus virus” conference is unlikely to be coincidental, following as it does hot on the heels of World Immunisation Week [50].

    A document produced by Public Health England [51] (PHE) provides a greater insight into how hard the UK Government is promoting vaccines during the Covid–19 “crisis”. The 2020 theme is “Vaccines work for all” — coinciding with the last year of the Gates “vaccine decade” of the 2010s.

    Hashtags like #CarryOnVaccinating [52] are being deployed, and the “vaccines work for all” campaign will focus on “how vaccines — and the people who develop, deliver and receive them — are heroes by working to protect the health of everyone, everywhere”.

    The WHO has designated 2020 the International Year of the Nurse and the Midwife. Why? Because of those professions' “crucial role as early vaccine champions for new parents and parents-to-be and life course vaccination, making sure older adults have their routine protection”. What a clever way to harness the genuinely dedicated nursing staff to promote vaccines to a huge market sector.

    The outsourcing of vaccine promotion continues. There are social media memes prepared earlier that can be uploaded and shared to Facebook, Instagram and Twitter by an unsuspecting public, who will thus advertise global immunity for free.

    The language of the report is sinister in its behavioural nudging: [my emphasis - Tintin]

    “Last year, WHO declared vaccine hesitancy among the top ten threats to global health”.

    A civilian population in lockdown — desperate to stimulate the economy, to return to work and to avoid being infected with “Pandemic 1” — will be easily gaslighted by such a lexicon into accepting anything that will address the concerns that have been imprinted into their subconscious.

    The document details the need to “counter the infodemic”, i.e. expert opinion that does not comply with the Big Pharma/WHO diktats:

    If you are looking for information about vaccines, be sure to consult trusted and credible sources, like your health worker, local health authorities, health institutions like NHS.UK, Public Health England, WHO or the members of the Vaccine Safety Net.

    [Sub-editorial: Charles Shoebridge (@ShoebridgeC) is as per his Twitter profile a former army officer, Scotland Yard detective and counter terrorism intelligence officer, international politics graduate, lawyer, broadcaster, writer. - Tintin Q]

    We are, of course, already seeing this infodemic warfare in action: the YouTube CEO recently announced that YouTube would remove any video deemed to be in contravention of advice being given by the WHO. A recent statement from the Secretary-General of the UN, Antonio Guterres, reinforces the WHO recommendations. Guterres condemns what he claims to be “a dangerous epidemic of misinformation”. Journalist and researcher Michael Swifte described the vaccine agenda as follows:

    "The loving embrace of a vaccine administered by the biggest public-private partnership in history. This is what the Secretary General of the UN is promoting."

    Reading through this PHE document is a veritable exercise in Behavioural Insights methodology: again, no coincidence, when one considers British expertise in “nudging” the public towards any given pre-determined agendas or decisions that benefit the ruling classes. This excellent article at UK Column provides a comprehensive analysis of the role played in the Covid–19 response by Behavioural Insights.

    Public Health England — who are they, and how are they linked to Porton Biopharma?

    According to one report, PHE exists to “protect and improve the nation’s health and wellbeing, and reduce health inequalities”. PHE is an “operationally autonomous executive agency, sponsored by the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC)".

    In June 2018, PHE transferred its drug development to a new state-owned company, Porton Biopharma Ltd (PBL), which is wholly owned by Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Health (currently Matt Hancock). Perhaps unsurprisingly, PBL has the only UK-licensed anthrax vaccine among its portfolio. We are told that “the future success and revenue growth of PBL will provide PHE with an income dividend which will be ploughed back into the delivery of its priorities”. Once again, we see the revolving door between government agencies and private, for-profit sectors with a focus on vaccines.

    Matt Hancock and UK Government commercial interests in Covid–19

    The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Matt Hancock, is also owner of Porton Biopharma during his tenure; but that is not the only tie that Hancock appears to have to for-profit entities that stand to benefit from Covid–19 response strategies.

    A recent report in the Byline Times detailed “highly controversial contracts” which will enable British ministers and senior health officials to “mine confidential data from tens of thousands of Covid–19 hospital patients”. These contracts have allegedly been awarded to technology companies “without being put out to competitive tender, NHS has disclosed”. Microsoft is included in those companies; that is, Bill Gates is present.

    Babylon Health — the NHS is not for sale (!)

    Both Hancock and Dominic Cummings, chief adviser to the Prime Minister, have questionable ties to Babylon Health, a prominent health tech firm implementing AI. Cummings held an undisclosed consultancy job at this healthcare venture: a firm endorsed by the government and at the top of the list to receive a National Health Service (NHS) Fund cash injection of Ł250 million.

    According to an article in The Bureau Investigates, during 2018, Cummings “advised Babylon Health on its communications strategy and senior recruitment just months before its GP at Hand app was publicly backed by Matt Hancock.”

    Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary (British opposition spokesman on health), condemned the Cummings/Hancock connection to Babylon:
    "The links between Dominic Cummings in the heart of Downing Street, the health secretary and this AI health firm are increasingly murky and highly irresponsible."

    In case anyone is in doubt over Hancock’s enthusiasm for the Babylon GP at Hand app, it is highly advisable to read this article published at the British Medical Journal (BMJ), written by Rachel Clark, a doctor specialising in palliative medicine:

    Quote Matt Hancock loves Babylon so much he doesn’t merely use its smartphone app, GP at Hand, he gushes enthusiasm for the product at every opportunity. First, at Expo, he name-checked Babylon, among others, as one of the “world’s best HealthTech companies.” Then he gave a speech eulogising the company while literally standing beneath its logos inside its London HQ. Then in comments to The Telegraph he declared a breathless vision for the “revolutionary” app to be “available for all"

    And, last week he featured in a double-page, Babylon-sponsored puff piece in the Evening Standard entitled “Technology can be a great fixer for the NHS.” Its centrepiece was an interview proclaiming Hancock’s ringing endorsement of Babylon: he declared GP at Hand to be “a force for good within the NHS”.

    Although this detail may appear to be an excursus away from the involvement of the UK Government Covid–19 health advisory board in the promotion of global vaccine programmes, it serves as a further demonstration of the blurring of lines between commercial interests and the welfare of citizens. [my emphasis - Tintin)

    This relationship is highlighted in legendary journalist John Pilger’s latest documentary The Dirty War on the NHS, a film I cannot recommend highly enough for its stark portrayal of the stealth privatisation of the NHS. Babylon Health was founded by former Goldman Sachs banker Ali Parsa, who also co-founded and acted as CEO of a private healthcare company, Circle — the first private business to operate an NHS hospital. That hospital was Hinchingbrooke, which proved to be a disastrous enterprise.

    Babylon and Bill Gates
    Yes, Bill Gates has a connection to Babylon, too. In March 2020, Babylon’s Rwanda-focused virtual care subsidiary, Babyl, signed a ten-year partnership with the Rwandan government giving every citizen over the age of 12 access to digital health consultations. The project is heavily subsidised by the Rwandan government and the Bill Gates Foundation and promises (!) to “make health care affordable” for even the poorest communities. Again, we must ask to what degree these apps are serving as surveillance instruments for government agencies.

    The alleged war criminal and President of Rwanda, Paul Kagame, and Bill Gates proclaim: “Every vaccine is a shot of adrenaline into the heart of the African economy.”

    Babylon and Covid–19

    Cue the Babylon Covid–19 Care Assistant app. The app provides a four step care programme to subscribers: information, symptom checker and live chat with healthcare experts, a care plan, and video consultation with a healthcare professional.

    We are informed: “The app is free to download. Using the service is free in Birmingham and London through the NHS. However, users located elsewhere will have to sign up for pay-as-you-go or annual subscriptions to the service. Annual plans start from Ł149. One-off consultations can cost as much as Ł49 each time.”

    Cummings and Hancock — tag team that pushed for lockdown while promoting vaccines

    Cummings is accused of pressuring Boris Johnson’s advisers to adopt a draconian lockdown policy to combat Covid–19. If this is true, it must raise the question, yet again, of how much the UK Government's policy is influenced by genuine medical expert opinion and how much by commercial, Big Pharma, interests and agendas — interests and agendas which are demonstrably also those of the UK Government.

    Certainly, members of the scientific advisory committee “were shocked, concerned and worried for the impartiality of advice” after Cummings effectively gatecrashed the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergency (SAGE) meetings.

    Just this week, Hancock warned that there has been "no greater demonstration in modern history" of a need for a vaccine. Previously, in September 2019, Hancock had stated that the government was looking seriously at mandatory vaccines for state school pupils. Falling vaccination rates for children in the UK prompted Hancock to consider prohibiting self-determination among parents who do not agree with vaccination regimes.

    The fact that Cummings used his influence to politicise the SAGE meetings, and that Hancock is not averse to using his influence to promote private sector businesses with links to the NHS, should alert us to the possibility that both individuals are exploiting Covid–19 to further the aims of those whom they are connected to and potentially profit from. Bill Gates takes pride of place at the heart of the advisory network that has introduced and maintained lockdown in the UK — a lockdown not to be relaxed “until a vaccine is available”.

    Covid–19 is pushing us towards global health fascism

    "One of the questions I get asked the most these days is when the world will be able to go back to the way things were in December before the coronavirus pandemic. My answer is always the same: when we have an almost perfect drug to treat COVID–19, or when almost every person on the planet has been vaccinated against coronavirus." (Bill Gates — Gates Notes)

    Covid–19 threatens an imminent “new normal” of global health tyranny and unprecedented government control and surveillance. The SAGE team was very likely derailed by Cummings’ political agenda and undue influence that he brought to bear upon the committee, which should have remained impartial and science-focused.

    The most influential members of the UK Government advisory team have demonstrated a blatant conflict of interest through their connections to the Bill Gates empire, but the British Government itself has invested heavily in the global immunisation concept that Gates is engineering through all manner of public and private sector initiatives.

    The WHO is the global health governing body and is heavily influenced and financed by Bill Gates. In January 2020, the WHO published its R&D blueprint prioritising novel Coronavirus vaccine clinical trials. The WHO's Working Group for Vaccine Prioritisation aimed in that blueprint to provide guidance and recommendations to vaccine developers and to identify candidates who could be considered for further development and evaluation.

    The WHO is effectively a self-regulatory entity in charge of world health but with little public accountability, particularly where vaccines are concerned. The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) was established by the WHO in 1999 to respond to vaccine safety issues of “potential global importance”.

    Bill Gates is demanding indemnity against lawsuits before he agrees to distribute vaccines. We are all being fast-tracked into a future where our medical self-determination is in serious jeopardy and where those who decide for us will, potentially, not be held accountable for any health-endangering side effects.

    We have already seen the devastating consequences of mass immunisation during the H1N1 epidemic, with questionable Big Pharma transparency regarding risk, as found by those who were given a vaccination that left them brain damaged for life.

    Experts in the field have warned against rushing through a Covid–19 vaccine, bearing in mind it can usually take up to fifteen years of rigorous testing prior to approval. Any attempt to compress this process must carry risks. Dr Peter Hotez, Dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told Reuters:

    "I understand the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general […] there is a risk of immune enhancement."

    In 2009, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg initiated the Committee of Inquiry into the WHO's role in H1N1 ('swine flu') held by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg. In this recent interview, Wodarg describes Bill Gates as “crazy” to be attempting to shortcut research and development. Wodarg also talks about the “secret contracts” between states and Big Pharma that perhaps determine the trajectory of vaccine development.

    The H1N1 vaccine travesty must serve as a warning against precipitous vaccine development motivated by lockdown cabin fever, when the lockdown itself is looking more and more likely to be orchestrated to achieve precisely this outcome.

    At the same time, as the possibility of compulsory vaccination is under discussion, the government intends to roll out a surveillance apparatus that will ensure forever-control over an already politically weakened workforce pushed ever deeper into financial insecurity, first by austerity measures and now by Covid–19.

    It is very important to push back against the emotional triggering that is being generated by the state-aligned media and agencies. The behavioural insight experts are working hard to nudge us towards dependency on the state — but we must not surrender our individual and collective independence. We must determine the drivers behind this “crisis”, identify the causes, and deal with the symptoms without succumbing to fear or panic. It is not easy; but our futures depend upon our ability to see what is really going on and to respond accordingly.


    References used in both articles:

    Source URL: https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/cov...nment-lockdown
    Links [1] https://www.ukcolumn.org/coronavirus
    [2] https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/who...vid19-part-one
    [3] https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...to-coronavirus
    [4] https://www.businessinsider.com/coro...ssports-2020-4
    [5] https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3021415934619066
    [6] https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/15/on...0m-led-by-tpg/
    [7] https://www.biometricupdate.com/2020...al-recognition
    [8] https://www.biometricupdate.com/companies/onfido
    [9] https://www.biometricupdate.com/companies/yoti
    [10] https://www.biometricupdate.com/companies/idnow
    [11] https://www.biometricupdate.com/companies/idenfy
    [12] http://www.ox.ac.uk/research/researc...sai-and-onfido
    [13] https://onfido.com/us/
    [14] https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ible-in-months
    [15] https://www.biometricupdate.com/2020...utive-director
    [16] https://www.globalresearch.ca/corona...id2020/5706153
    [17] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9iaDoXJF8
    [18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cYj...ature=youtu.be
    [19] https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/brain-dama...sation-1438572
    20] https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccine...nal-bmj-report
    [21] https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/c...nt_Jul2011/en/
    [22] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/h...-a9470306.html
    [23] https://twitter.com/uksciencechief/s...28316096991232 [24] https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotec...cine-taskforce
    [25] https://www.genengnews.com/news/astr...id-19-vaccine/
    [26] https://www.thepharmaletter.com/arti...019-ncov-virus
    [27] https://cepi.net/news_cepi/2-billion...ovid-19-virus/
    [28] https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/pres...l-healthneeds/
    [29] https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/ret...down-democracy
    [30] https://www.aier.org/article/stand-u...-m-wittkowski/
    [31] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0Q4naYOYDw
    [32] https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2...x-in-history/? utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&a mp;utm_source=socialnetwork&fbclid=IwAR3S79hdI jN4mrU3i71O0VGsyDngksPPGx664CzctEAJa1znf3WAC25OOVc
    [33] https://flat.bio/story/154247/cepi-l...evelopment-pr/
    [34] https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-anno...rmanent-board/ [35] https://www.globalresearch.ca/after-...rogram/5706547
    [36] https://www.theguardian.com/society/...navirus-crisis
    [37] https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccine...ight-disease-x
    [38] https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/1894...llion-project/
    [39] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8HfTo5ofYY&t=62s
    [40] https://sciencebusiness.net/news/goo...response-group
    [41] https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room...te-funding-new
    [42] https://www.gavi.org/investing/innov...nancing/iffim/
    [43] https://www.gavi.org/our-alliance/about
    [44] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ29vgOpTQQ&t=1205s [45] https://devtracker.dfid.gov.uk/searc...ncludeClosed=0
    [46] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/p...inst-the-virus
    [47] https://www.gov.uk/government/groups...ccines-network
    [48] https://assets.publishing.service.go...ed-by-ukvn.pdf
    [49] https://www.ukri.org/news/20-million...irus-research/
    [50] https://www.gov.uk/government/public...unization-week
    [51] https://assets.publishing.service.go...April_2020.pdf
    [52] https://twitter.com/hashtag/carryonvaccinating
    [53] https://twitter.com/VanessaBeeley/st...08325906173953 [54] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tX7...ature=youtu.be
    [55] https://twitter.com/ShoebridgeC/stat...64437982699523
    [56] https://youtu.be/1_d8sNJ4o1g
    [57] https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/beh...id-19-response
    [58] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/p...-owned-company
    [59] http://www.portonbiopharma.com/
    [60] https://twitter.com/MattHancock/stat...90904858202112
    [61] https://bylinetimes.com/2020/04/22/p...titive-tender/
    [62] https://www.babylonhealth.com/
    [63] https://www.thebureauinvestigates.co...h-firm-babylon [64] https://www.theguardian.com/politics...pp-endorsement
    [65] https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/12/04...rries-doctors/
    [66] https://www.gov.uk/government/speech...ech-driven-nhs
    [67] https://www.gponline.com/health-secr...rticle/1492843
    [68] http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/co...sement_1252569
    [69] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...s-should-able/
    [70] https://www.standard.co.uk/futurelon...-a3998006.html
    [71] https://twitter.com/johnpilger/statu...37596342325248
    [72] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHZcXrc9_wk
    [73] https://www.theguardian.com/society/...eam-impossible
    [74] https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/...dan-government
    [75] https://bereanresearch.org/the-year-...n-of-citizens/
    [76] https://www.globalresearch.ca/rwanda...-state/5500388
    [77] https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/22/opini...tes/index.html
    [78] https://www.express.co.uk/life-style...Android-App-UK [79] https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...minic-cummings
    [80] https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/12...st-news-update
    [81] https://www.theguardian.com/society/...s-matt-hancock
    [82] https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/Wh...inkId=87665522
    [83] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XON2XeGDE6A&t=19m38s [84] https://multipolar-magazin.de/artike...ation-activism
    [85] https://www.who.int/publications-det...linical-trials
    [86] https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/i...ork/_gacvs/en/
    [87] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...take-the-risk/
    [88] https://www.politico.eu/article/coro...ke-to-develop/
    [89] https://www.businessinsider.com/coro...testing-2020-4
    [90] https://www.pnas.org/content/117/15/8218
    [91] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrBu...ature=youtu.be
    [92] https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=COVID–19: The Big Pharma players behind UK Government lockdown http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covi...p;via=ukcolumn
    [93] https://www.facebook.com/sharer/shar...nment-lockdown
    [94] https://www.ukcolumn.org/print/artic...nment-lockdown
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  10. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bullseye (16th May 2020), Franny (17th May 2020), greybeard (15th May 2020), kfm27917 (19th May 2020), onawah (16th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020), shaberon (16th May 2020), wavydome (15th May 2020), wondering (15th May 2020)

  11. Link to Post #306
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Thanked 55,717 times in 9,520 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    You have researched very well --this is a professional job
    Thanks Chris
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    Ernie Nemeth (15th May 2020), Franny (17th May 2020), shaberon (16th May 2020), Tintin (15th May 2020), wondering (15th May 2020)

  13. Link to Post #307
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Thanked 6,829 times in 1,738 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    So let me get this right: the UK, which is supposed to be the worst-off in all of Europe, and the US, which is blatantly the worst off as is the case with most everything else, are progressing to Move 739 of the Opium War, since, if we are unfamiliar with Wellcome Trust, go back through it and there you are. This is very un-new except for the Silicon Valley stuff; the medications being a horrendous mix of opium, oil, and snake oil, a la John D. Rockefeller, or the first Rockefeller to start getting big by generic medical swindles right before oil started replacing everything and gasoline was a waste product until General Motors demolished the American trolley system.

    The UK is a lot like the US, except they speak English there. Both have this bizarre habit of competing about how large a chunk of public resources can be squandered on things that a sane person would discard expediently. It's done with facades and silhouettes so that one does not initially believe one's public resources are simply being handed to someone who has received them before, but, if this does not stop, that is because it is an addiction.

    I do not know if, in the UK, this is happening while your snake oil peddlers are facing massive lawsuits over opium and synthetic opium, but here, New York refuses to settle out of court. Why they would be embroiled in such regretful litigation at the same time as being, perhaps, the actual world origin of what turns out to be a true pestilence, almost entirely for them, is just because New York is so much more important than the rest of us, I am so lucky to be able to use it freely as a name, instead of Old York, like they have to say in English now, so everyone on the island will known this is new, it must be improved, you should really just buy ours instead of making your own, but you won't know that until throwing away eighteen million quadrillion quid and your entire great-great-great-great grandchildren's future on your own trial runs, which may score a whopping .74 on the new "I would like to scare you into buying this, please" scale, and when that American comes in at .77, you will know that Wellcome just has lots of money and an office.

    This life has been an almost entire waste of time, except for what we have managed to contribute to important players.

    Sadly, I would have to inform them that I do not know anybody who gives a toss about this virus. The only way I can really do that is if time rolls by and if we can produce evidence of healthy people who have not received any drugs that have not been invented yet. In the long run, it will have to be shown that you don't need that stuff in a way that a judge will listen to. A judge would be best, since addressing anything through legislature is a lot more people and room for objections, and, well, several of these laws are already passed and money spent.

  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    Ernie Nemeth (16th May 2020), greybeard (16th May 2020), Gwin Ru (16th May 2020), justntime2learn (16th May 2020), pueblo (16th May 2020), Tintin (16th May 2020), wavydome (16th May 2020)

  15. Link to Post #308
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Thanked 55,815 times in 11,197 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    (Dr. Kaufman's credentials haven't been posted on the forum as yet that I am aware of, and imho should be included, as they are most impressive, though not as impressive as his willingness to speak truth in spite of the consequences to him personally.
    I hope he joins up with RFK Jr. and friends, as they would no doubt be able to offer him support.
    The video accompanying this article is posted here by Tintin: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1356261)

    From: Censored Dr. Kaufman: “They Want To Genetically Modify Us With COVID-19 Vaccine” – Loses his Job and Willing to go to Jail to Resist

    "Dr. Andrew Kaufman may be the most censored doctor in the U.S. right now. His videos are removed and censored from YouTube very quickly.

    Dr. Kaufman is so intelligent, and so articulate, that the “mainstream” media and medical authorities obviously fear him and his message, and they are doing everything in their power to suppress him.

    This video (below) he did with Spiro Skouras, for example, was immediately removed from YouTube, although Spiro’s other videos remain for the most part (for now).

    Andrew Kaufman is a medical doctor. Here is his full bio from his website:

    Andy Kaufman, M.D. is a natural healing consultant, inventor, public speaker, forensic psychiatrist, and expert witness. He completed his psychiatric training at Duke University Medical Center after graduating from the Medical University of South Carolina, and has a B.S. from M.I.T. in Molecular Biology.

    He has conducted and published original research and lectured, supervised, and mentored medical students, residents, and fellows in all psychiatric specialties. He has been qualified as an expert witness in local, state, and federal courts. He has held leadership positions in academic medicine and professional organizations. He ran a start-up company to develop a medical device he invented and patented.

    Faculty Positions
    Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University
    Vice President, Psychiatry Faculty Practice Corporation, SUNY Upstate Medical University
    Medical Director of Faculty Practice, SUNY Upstate Medical University
    Assistant Director, Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship, SUNY Upstate Medical University
    Consulting Expert Witness, Syracuse University Law School
    Medical University of South Carolina, Doctor of Medicine
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, BS in Biology
    American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Board Certification in Psychiatry and Forensic Psychiatry (2011)
    SUNY Upstate Medical University, Fellowship in Forensic Psychiatry
    Duke University School of Medicine, Resident in Psychiatry
    Knoll JL and Kaufman AR. Suicide in Correctional Settings: Epidemiology, Risk Assessment, and Prevention. Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry edited by Richard Rosner, 3rd edition, 2017.
    Way BB, Kaufman AR, Knoll JL, Chlebowski, S: Suicidal Ideation among Inmate-Patients in State Prison: Prevalence, Reluctance to Report, and Treatment Preferences. Behavioral Science and the Law, 31(2): 230-8, 2013.
    Kaufman AR, Way BB, Suardi E: Forty Years after Jackson v. Indiana. States’ Compliance with “Reasonable Period of Time” Ruling. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40:261-5, 2012.
    Kaufman AR, Knoll JL, Way BB, Leonard C, Widroff J: Survey of Forensic Mental Health Experts on Pro Se Competence After Indiana v. Edwards: Towards an Evidence-Based Pro Se Competency Standard. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39:565-70, 2011.
    Knoll JL, Leonard C, Kaufman AR, Way BB: A Pilot Survey of Trial Court Judges’ Opinions on Pro Se Competence after Indiana v. Edwards. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38:536-9, 2010.
    Kaufman AR, Way B: North Carolina Resident Psychiatrists Knowledge of the Commitment Statutes: Do They Stray from the Legal Standard in the Hypothetical Application of Involuntary Commitment Criteria? Psychiatric Quarterly, 2010; 81(4): p.363.
    Kaufman, AR: More on DSM-5: Will “Cross-Cutting” Butcher Clinical Psychiatry. Correctional Mental Health Report, 2010; 12(2): p. 21.
    Kaufman AR: Are Psychiatrists Lexa-Professionals? Correctional Mental Health Report, 2010; 11(5): p. 71
    Kaufman AR: Should We Use Law Enforcement for Emergency Transportation of People With Mental Illness? American Journal of Psychiatry 2007; 164(3): Residents’ Journal p. 3
    In this interview with Spiro Skouras, you will most likely learn things you have never heard before about the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Kaufman will explain why this is all planned, and is not really about a dangerous virus at all, but a way to control people’s lives.

    He will explain things about the new type of vaccine they are rushing so fast to develop, and what he believes is the real objective for this vaccine.

    Dr. Kaufman has already paid a steep price to be a whistle blower, and he only expects it to get worse. He states:

    This is the only important thing for me to do now, is to get this information out, so that we can prevent ourselves from living in a horrible, horrible future.

    I have two young children, and they are my main motivating factor, that I don’t want them to live in a world where they have no freedom. And that’s where we’re heading right now.

    And so whatever risks there are, they’re risks that I simply have to take. That’s why I am doing what I am doing.

    There have been things that have occurred. I have had consequences. I was let go from my regular psychiatry job because I refused to wear a mask.

    I have had several friends who are doctors or other health care professionals who have been very upset with me. (They’re) disappointed and won’t talk to me anymore.

    I knew that those risks were part of this. But that’s not what’s important.

    I’ll tell you that I would be happy to risk being taken to jail as well, because I’m not going to participate in any of these measures.

    I don’t wear a mask. I don’t stay at home.

    I respect other people’s rights to make their own choices. So I don’t go and get in people’s faces.

    But if anyone is willing to make eye contact and interact with me, I don’t observe any social distancing, (and so) any opportunity to hug someone, especially in public, I always take advantage of that, because I want to show people that actually all of these measures are really voluntary.

    Even Governor Cuomo has made a public statement that there’s nothing that they can do to enforce any of these measures and that they are voluntary.

    And I would like to encourage other people to make that decision, because if we rely on the authority to give us approval of how to exercise our freedom, they’re going to take more freedoms away, as they’ve been doing.

    So while I respect people that to go and protest at the City Hall or State Capital, they are coming from the right point of view, they’re just asking the authority figures, the government, to give them permission, when they don’t need permission from the government.

    They already have permission because they have inalienable rights.

    It’s not really a decision for me. It’s just what I feel that I have to do to preserve the way of life that I want to live for me and my children.

    At the time of this publication, this interview has been viewed just over 15,000 times.

    It needs to be MILLIONS! Please watch and share this information that they are trying so hard to censor."
    Last edited by Tintin; 17th May 2020 at 23:46. Reason: Fixed Kaufman image embed
    Each breath a gift...

  16. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ernie Nemeth (17th May 2020), Franny (17th May 2020), greybeard (16th May 2020), justntime2learn (17th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020), shaberon (17th May 2020), Sunny (17th May 2020), Tintin (17th May 2020), wavydome (17th May 2020), wondering (18th May 2020)

  17. Link to Post #309
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Thanked 55,717 times in 9,520 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    im normally middle of the road-- certainly not an out and out conspiracy theorist
    Like to think Im level headed
    The penny dropped big time today
    This is World War 3
    The enemy of freedom is so clever -- attention to small detail.

    For example Boris Johnston was pushing internet for everyone in his election speeches -- I did not really get the need for that till I realised my new laptop has no Ethernet plug input -- My pc has but now I am on fast fibre broad band I cant use Ethernet without switching the modem on.
    Talktalk say leave it ion 24/7 other wise it will slow down oh Yeah.
    Its much larger in size than the last one i tried that just now and ofc ourse it wont wok any longer now Ive got fibre broad band.
    So is it a 5G one --I dont know -- have my suspicions though.

    Bits in the media-- paper money dangerous --the next episode of the virus will be more deadly -- how can they say that?
    Dont use public transport -- keep two meter distance and on it goes.

    Not saying im right in any of my assumptions -- Id rather be wrong but dont think so.

    So many dots to join,

    Think David Icke made a good job of it

    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  18. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    ClearWater (17th May 2020), Ernie Nemeth (17th May 2020), Icare (17th May 2020), kfm27917 (19th May 2020), pueblo (17th May 2020), shaberon (17th May 2020), Tintin (17th May 2020), wavydome (17th May 2020), wondering (18th May 2020)

  19. Link to Post #310
    Avalon Member Kryztian's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2012
    New Jersey USA
    Thanked 11,343 times in 1,574 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    From Bilderberger and former Google President Eric Scmidt. He clearly stepped out of the same evil clown car that Fauci and Gates are riding in.
    In a nutshell: Quickly made and "safety" approved vaccines and 5G are what we need.

    A Real Digital Infrastructure at Last
    American innovation can bring us tools and solutions that will outlast today’s crisis

    By Eric Schmidt
    March 27, 2020 8:57 am ET


    Like other Americans, technologists are trying to do their part to support the front-line pandemic response. They are creating virus data sets, focusing computing resources on the search for vaccines, tracking the virus’s spread, improving the distribution of critical health care supplies and facilitating online educational tools—work for which my philanthropy, Schmidt Futures, is providing support. This effort reflects the entrepreneurial, results-driven ethos of today’s tech sector.
    But every American should be asking where we want the nation to be when the Covid-19 pandemic is over. How could the emerging technologies being deployed in the current crisis propel us into a better future?

    Consider big data and novel manufacturing. The government lacks a strong grasp of complex supply and distribution chains for life-critical medical equipment and other goods. Specialists in big data analytics should now turn to modeling these networks to develop real-time tracking and data visualization platforms to better inform policy decisions. The predictive maintenance and additive manufacturing that are gaining traction in the military should become more prominent in health care. Some hospitals are already using 3-D printers to fabricate respirator valves, and it’s saving lives. Companies like Amazon know how to supply and distribute efficiently. They will need to provide services and advice to government officials who lack the computing systems and expertise.

    We should also accelerate the trend toward remote learning, which is being tested today as never before. Online, there is no requirement of proximity, which allows students to get instruction from the best teachers, no matter what school district they reside in. There are already useful online learning tools, but they need to be more equitably distributed. Struggling school districts, community colleges and career technical training institutes could benefit if network connectivity becomes more affordable and applications become accessible to a wider range of learners. Science and engineering labs will also be prompted to think of new ways to integrate young talent; there will be experiments in remote internships and apprenticeships.

    The need for fast, large-scale experimentation will also accelerate the biotech revolution. Synthetic biology and AI-enabled computer modeling will help us to discover and test more new drugs. Companies and research centers are putting algorithms to work on large data sets to find correlations that would take human researchers years of painstaking laboratory work. As researchers show more results, government agencies like the FDA will face pressure to quicken the trial and vetting process for new drugs, and funding agencies will need to give researchers more flexibility to follow the discoveries wherever they lead.

    Finally, the country is long overdue for a real digital infrastructure. Government at every level should move to cloud, mobile and web-based software and start treating data as a strategic asset. It’s now painfully obvious that these tools are essential for effective action. Moreover, the American people will need that infrastructure for their daily lives. If we are to build a future economy and education system based on tele-everything, we need a fully connected population and ultrafast infrastructure. The government must make a massive investment—perhaps as part of a stimulus package—to convert the nation’s digital infrastructure to cloud-based platforms and link them with a 5G network.
    The American people are problem-solvers and innovators, and we have the opportunity today for farsighted action. If we invest strategically and mobilize our society, we can build the digital infrastructure necessary to enjoy a higher and healthier standard of living and to solve complex modern problems like today’s pandemic.

  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Kryztian For This Post:

    Elainie (17th May 2020), Harmony (17th May 2020), kfm27917 (19th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020), Tintin (17th May 2020), wavydome (17th May 2020)

  21. Link to Post #311
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Thanked 23,347 times in 3,732 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    There is no arguing it, we need this tech to advance. However, big tech has demonstrated that they are not responsible enough to run it, only engineer it.

    It is time to have ordinary citizens over-seeing our leaders because they cannot be trusted to do the right thing.

    Not only that, but speaking about government in general, if national governments want to give authority away to international bodies like WHO then we should get a cut in our tax rates, since our medical establishment is now just following orders. Not to mention that if a sovereign nation decides to follow the dictates of a foreign agency - is that nation really sovereign?

  22. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    greybeard (17th May 2020), justntime2learn (17th May 2020), kfm27917 (19th May 2020), Tintin (18th May 2020), wavydome (17th May 2020)

  23. Link to Post #312
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th September 2016
    Thanked 3,922 times in 554 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Quote Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
    There is no arguing it, we need this tech to advance. However, big tech has demonstrated that they are not responsible enough to run it, only engineer it.

    It is time to have ordinary citizens over-seeing our leaders because they cannot be trusted to do the right thing.

    Not only that, but speaking about government in general, if national governments want to give authority away to international bodies like WHO then we should get a cut in our tax rates, since our medical establishment is now just following orders. Not to mention that if a sovereign nation decides to follow the dictates of a foreign agency - is that nation really sovereign?
    Maybe we need to look at what is powering the agenda? Of course money, but maybe it is time for people to start thinking completely "out of the box" for a way to really dismantle this corrupt group(s) and re-establish a better system altogether.

    The idea of a "One World Government" has always been looked at as an easier way for the corrupt to control everything. Maybe it can be used to get the world back into the hands of the people? Of course this is easier said than done, and there are many many pieces to this machine, etc. But something drastic, something big that comes directly from the people needs to occur.

    Most people are just trying to wait it out and are looking to the day when things go back to normal - but I think that more and more people are realizing that there is no going back. Unfortunately, many still are thinking that a vaccine and keeping social distancing in place is the answer.

    Many of the politicians of many countries seem to be quarantined themselves - and by this I mean that they are sitting and waiting to be told what to do from organizations like the WHO and whatever shadow group and contacts that push the buttons.

    However, I was excited to see Madagascar's president Andry Rajoelina speak up about what they found worked to help cure covid-19 infections. (an herbal drink containing hydroxychloroquine - although only the first article I read about it contained the word "hydroxychloroquine" and the press has been careful not to mention it in continuing articles.)

    The people of the world need to stand up and support a leader like Andry Rajoelina and start our own agenda.

    When we see a prime minister like what we have here in Canada (Justin Trudeau) who is handing over millions of Canada's money to the WHO, the Clintons and who knows where else he has stashed away money for his future.

    When we hear him say, quote ""Over the last two months, a lot of Canadians have faced very challenging situations and very difficult choices. Just take workers in the fisheries industry. You can't harvest lobster from inside your house," said Trudeau.

    "So that leaves you trying to figure out how to either space people out on a fishing boat, or cancel your operations. It's not an easy call to make."

    ?? He is saying that fishermen have to figure out how to keep social distancing measures in place while working on a fishing boat!

    He has to be one of the best examples of a representative of the shady shadow world government.

    This thread title is asking us "Is there an agenda?" Again I say that it is about time that the people of the world stand together and create one to fix this mess.

  24. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Patient For This Post:

    Franny (18th May 2020), kfm27917 (19th May 2020), pueblo (17th May 2020), Sunny (18th May 2020), Tintin (18th May 2020), wavydome (17th May 2020)

  25. Link to Post #313
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Thanked 1,529 times in 240 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    With respect to blood clots and oxygen desaturation, here is something that may be a precursor to this phenomenon:

    "Suicided" Neurologist Andrew Moulden Exposed Vaccine Fraud

    May 17, 2020

    (Canadian neurologist Andrew Moulden, PhD. MD 1964-2013 explains it all here in 20 six-minute segments. He was told to play ball or have the ball taken away.)

    Often a comet will streak
    across the night sky
    and we will miss it.
    So our true champions
    are murdered and flushed down
    the memory hole while
    charlatans and traitors get Nobel Prizes.
    The healthcare industry cannot leave sickness to chance. It is a bigger business than war.
    from April 2, 2019
    by Henry Makow PhD

    Andrew Moulden should have been awarded a Nobel Prize for showing how the "healthcare industry" is poisoning the general population with vaccines. He showed how vaccines were responsible for causing "microscopic strokes" by limiting the flow of oxygen in the bloodstream reaching capillaries.

    In his 2009 interview on vactruth.com, Moulden stated:
    "I have now conclusively shown that ALL vaccines, from infancy to geriatric, are causing the exact same brain damages irrespective of what disease or disorder comes out. The damages are specific to end vascular "mini-strokes"ť that are beneath the resolution of our neuro-imaging, but measurable in a before/after vaccination protocol. They are also directly measurable in real time - however, this involves techniques and technology I have not disclosed to the public as yet."
    "The evidence is now self-evident. All you have to do now is receive the education you need to appreciate and see what is before your very eyes - layperson and Doctor."
    "It is no longer an opinion as I now have conclusive evidence to show that ALL vaccines are causing the exact same damages for us all in the exact same manner that wild poliovirus caused paralysis, respiratory failure, death, bleeding into the brain, and more."

    For revealing the truth and trying to save innocent millions from sickness and death, which enrich the health care industry and their accomplices in government and media, Moulden, left, died prematurely in 2013 supposedly of suicide. They claimed he was bipolar but the videos show a very competent and credible young neurologist. He joins the scores of holistic doctors reported murdered in recent years.

    A colleague of Dr. Moulden who wishes to remain anonymous reported to Health Impact News that he/she had contact with him two weeks before he died in 2013. Dr. Moulden told our source and a small number of trusted colleagues in October of 2013 that he was about to break his silence and would be releasing new information which could have destroyed the vaccine model of disease management, destroyed a major source of funding for the pharmaceutical industry, and at the same time seriously damaged the foundation of the germ theory of disease. He was ready to come back. Even though he had been silenced, he had never stopped his research.

    Then, two weeks later, Dr. Moulden suddenly died.

    I know Moulden represented a real challenge because of the unforgivable smear in this rationalwiki article:
    Andrew Moulden (c. 1964-2013) was a Canadian quack who pushed an extreme form of anti-vaccine woo, claiming that vaccines are the causes of most illnesses and diseases, including autism. In addition to his anti-vaccine ideology (which is frequently too extreme even for other anti-vaxers) Andrew Moulden was a germ theory denialist, a conspiracy crank, a 9/11 truther, a failed politician, and a snake oil salesman offering an Internet-based magical procedure that will uncover the true causes of everything from shaken baby syndrome and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) to dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Moulden claimed several academic degrees, including a medical degree, but he was not licensed to practice medicine anywhere. In fact, there were apparently restraining orders to keep him out of major medical conferences -- according to him, anyway.
    Moulden didn't practise medicine because he was a neurologist. The article challenges his credentials but they are all authentic. He held a PhD and an MD and had studied the effect of vaccines on the brain in a clinical setting for 20 years.

    He wrote:
    As many know, I officially quit my medical career in 2007. I did this in order to travel around North America to do research into vaccine safety and to present my research on vaccine safety across Canada and the United States. I only spoke the truth. I was not well received. I only tried to help you save yourselves from where you are right now...Harm's way, you ARE in it. It IS in ALL of you. Like a ticking bomb, it is about to go off.

    Where have I been? In 2010-11 I returned to my PhD training to complete a full year accredited Clinical Neuropsychology internship at the Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care in Toronto. During this time I also taught a University course on Health Medicine at York University in Toronto. I stopped talking about my research and vaccines...

    The Public Health Department advocated that I NOT be allowed to return to clinical medicine as they were incensed by the message (truth) of my lectures and teaching prior to 'disappearing.' The only way I was allowed to return to organized medicine to work with medical patients was if I signed a contract drawn up by the public health department which states:
    1) I am mentally ill and therefore my research and teachings on vaccine safety were delusional.

    2) I am not allowed, whatsoever, to speak or present my research or views on vaccine safety, in public, at all, as a condition of being allowed to return to clinical medicine, receiving a medical license, and for maintaining that license.
    At this junction, the contract the Public Health Department has me shackled to (it is like my mind and freedom of will and thought and speech is in prison) states that they can take my medical license away and expel me from the University of College of Medicine for which I am employed by. I am about to break my silence. In order to bring my truth forward, for you, I am once again, taking a firm stand. I will ONLY stand for Truth and speak the Truth, so help me God.
    Rationalwiki claims Moulden presented no proof when in fact he released a six-hour presentation.

    He writes:
    "The end-result of my focused, and dogged investigations, born only of a mind that "enjoys figuring neurobiological enigmas out", has been the discovery not only of the cause of vaccine-induced autism and other medical morbidities but the means to demonstrate this to everyone on a case by case basis. Moreover, the answers that have emerged have also solved several other medical enigmas and has culminated in a re-write of Louis Pasteur's, and contemporary Western style allopathic medicines', entire medical model - "The Germ Theory" of human disease. As it turns out, the reason we have made a "mess of it" with one size fits all vaccines specifically, and antibiotics and pharmaceutical counter-attack measures, in general, is that the Germ Theory was just that - a theory, which has turned out to be wrong, in very fundamental ways. I look forward to sharing what I have discovered with the world.

    "The medical establishment is very protective of "core dogma" and reluctant and slow to accept change. Recognizing this, I have elected to release what I have discovered, to the lay and the scientific communities, as well as the criminal justice system, in short succession - beginning August of 2008. THE WORLD IS NOT FLAT!

    "The tide of acceptance and change may be slow. However, with the confidence of Columbus, I can now definitively say "the world of human disease is "round" not flat, and it is not so much the substance placed in the body that causes disease. Remarkably, irrespective of the triggering "substance", toxin, metal, particulate, living or dead "bug", or portions thereof, the response of the body is the same across many disease categories, and ultimately medical diagnoses, and remarkably from infancy to adulthood -the pathophysiological mechanism is the same.

    "Having solved this medical mystery, has resulted in the solution not only for cause of autism, by for many other mammalian ailments, "diseases" , and the mechanism by which many infectious diseases, including tetanus, smallpox, Spanish flu, rubella, measles, and others, have been causing damage and disease to the human body. As it turns out, it is not the Germs that have been the foe, for which we "attack" with vaccines and drugs, it is something in the bodies' defence systems itself. I look forward to revealing this medical mystery, which has been shrouded in darkness, to the world. I see the truth. Come see for yourself - I have made it that simple for you
    I urge you to also watch this video because it demonstrates Moulden's awareness of the New World Order. He knew that the central banking fraud begets all other frauds, including war and healthcare. They have to sicken and enslave us to protect this credit monopoly. Moulden was active in a number of political parties attempting banking reform.

    The takeaway is that the world is divided between a relatively small number of people who profit from the central banking fraud and the sheeple who are exploited by it. The former include our traitorous political, cultural and business leaders. Whether it is migration, sugar, chemtrails, gender dysphoria or vaccines, we are being poisoned. A satanic cult such as Western society controls and exploits its members by perverting, corrupting and making them sick.

    Moulden reminds me of Larry McDonald, the dynamic leader of the John Birch society who died when a Korean Air flight was shot down by Russians in 1983. When they are not killing them in gratuitous wars, this is what they do to real patriots who are potential leaders.


    First Comment from Dawn
    THANK YOU, thank you, thank you for posting this article!!! My husband is a retired infectious disease doctor who was a medical director for infection control at a large regional hospital in Northwest Ohio for 25 years. He was required to have annual flu shots,etc. He now suffers from Parkinson's Disease and I am convinced that it is mainly due to his exposure to many neurotoxins that lodged in his brain tissue over the years.

    You won't be surprised when I tell you that, while at a world Parkinson's conference in Toronto several years ago, I waited for the appropriate forum to ask about the correlation of vaccines to PD. One would think that if it were not true, that there would be plenty of factually documented articles on the topic, which would end the controversy. However, when I asked the question, I was IMMEDIATELY dismissed. As I recall, the speaker replied, "There is no correlation! Next question!" He had something to hide.

  26. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Elainie (19th May 2020), Franny (18th May 2020), greybeard (17th May 2020), Harmony (18th May 2020), kfm27917 (19th May 2020), Patient (17th May 2020), pueblo (17th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020), Sunny (18th May 2020), wavydome (17th May 2020), wondering (18th May 2020)

  27. Link to Post #314
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Thanked 16,392 times in 2,962 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Apparently, China has infiltrated our institutions for years and the plan to shut down our economic system and control us is moving right along....

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    greybeard (17th May 2020), pueblo (17th May 2020)

  29. Link to Post #315
    Avalon Member Hughe's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Thanked 2,810 times in 653 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?


    In epic speech, Italian member of Parliament demands arrest of Bill Gates as a “vaccine criminal” for pursuing crimes against humanity

    Sunday, May 17, 2020 by: Mike Adams
    Tags: badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, bill gates, coronavirus, covid-19, crimes against humanity, medical experiments, Traitor, treason, vaccines
    Quote (Natural News) In a bombshell story out of Rome, a member of the Italian Parliament named Sara Cunial has called for Bill Gates to be arrested as a “vaccine criminal” and charged with crimes against humanity.

    The story is best covered by GreatGameIndia.com, and we republish most of their story here because of its comprehensive links and coverage, which is among the best in independent media.
    Italian Politician Demand Bill Gates Arrest For Crimes Against Humanity

    by GreatGameIndia

    Days after it was revealed in an intercepted human intelligence report that Bill Gates offered $10 million bribe for a forced Coronavirus vaccination program in Nigeria, now an Italian politician has demanded the arrest of Bill Gates in the Italian parliament. Sara Cunial, the Member of Parliament for Rome denounced Bill Gates as a “vaccine criminal” and urged the Italian President to hand him over to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity. She also exposed Bill Gates’ agenda in India and Africa, along with the plans to chip the human race through the digital identification program ID2020.

    As reported by GreatGameIndia earlier, in 2015 it were the Italians who exposed secret Chinese biological experiments with Coronavirus. The video, which was broadcast in November, 2015, showed how Chinese scientists were doing biological experiments on a SARS connected virus believed to be Coronavirus, derived from bats and mice, asking whether it was worth the risk in order to be able to modify the virus for compatibility with human organisms.

    In an extraordinary seven-minute speech met with wide applause, Sara Cunial, the Member of Parliament for Rome said that Italy had been subjected to a “Holy Inquisition of false science.”
    For free society!

  30. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hughe For This Post:

    Franny (18th May 2020), greybeard (18th May 2020), Gwin Ru (18th May 2020), Harmony (18th May 2020), justntime2learn (18th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020), Sunny (18th May 2020), wondering (18th May 2020)

  31. Link to Post #316
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Thanked 1,529 times in 240 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Italian Leader Slams ‘False Coronavirus Numbers: 25,000 Did Not Die, it’s a way to Impose a Dictatorship’ (Watch)
    • Posted by Amy Mek
    • On May 4, 2020
    On Friday, April 24, 2020, Vittorio Sgarbi, a member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, denounced what he claims are false coronavirus death statistics. Sgarbi feels that fake statistics are being propagated by the government and the media to terrorize the citizens of Italy and establish a dictatorship.

    The member of the Forza Italia party slammed the closure of 60% of Italian businesses for 25,000 Chinese-Coronavirus deaths from the floor of the legislature. “It’s not true,” he said. “Don’t use the deaths for rhetoric and terrorism.” According to the National Institute of Health, 96.3% did not die of coronavirus, but of other pathologies stated Sgarbi – which means that only 925 have died from the virus and 24,075 have died of other things claimed Sgarbi, “….the virus was little more than an influenza. Don’t lie! Tell the truth!”

    Sgarbi’s controversial speech was delivered during ‘Cura Italia’ decree law discussions. The proposal intends to develop measures to strengthen the national health service based on what he claims is false data. Sgarbi challenged his colleagues to investigate the real numbers themselves and be united in the reporting the truth:
    Let us be united in liberation against hypocrisy and lies, against falsifications, against the false numbers that are given to terrorize Italians. The 25,000 dead, as Professor Bassetti said, died of heart attacks, cancer and other…Let’s not use them to humiliate Italy. Let’s not use them to give citizens false news. Give the numbers, check them out, and I challenge you before a jury of honor, Trizzino, to look at the numbers…
    Watch the exclusively translated RAIR Foundation USA video of Vittorio Sgarbi’s speech:

    Sgarbi has been a member of the Italian Parliament several times and also served also in Milan’s municipal government. Sgarbi is also a famous art critic, historian, cultural commentator and television personality.

    Transcript: many thanks to Fousesquawk for the translation:
    We are on the eve of April 25, and it is necessary to be united against dictatorships and united in the truth. Let’s not make this the chamber of lies.

    Not the 26th of February, but the 9th of March, the science, the science evoked here said that the virus was little more than an influenza. That science is what inspired this government, it is said, it was said, and documented, it was said…

    Don’t lie! Tell the truth! Don’t make this the chamber of lies. At least the principle of Giambattista Vico is applied, Vico: “verum ipsum factum” [we only know what we make]. So you have heard and you have given the numbers. I want to give them too. No, D’Attis, no, Pagani.

    Don’t also say here 25,000 deaths. It’s not true. Don’t use the deaths for rhetoric and terrorism. The numbers from the Higher Institute of Health say that 96.3% died from other diseases. Exactly the data, the numbers… the numbers. Say this, and it is the truth! It is the truth! Read it! Read it!

    Colleagues…Colleague. —[Unintelligible] I have read them all. Sixty per cent died from other diseases, according to the Higher Institute of Health. If you don’t know it, study it!

    Speech interrupted and Sgarbi is instructed to turn toward the President:
    Colleague Sgarbi, turn… —Colleague Sgarbi… Colleague Trizzino… Colleague Trizzino… Colleague Sgarbi, turn to the president. …[Unintelligible]

    Vittorio Sgarbi begins speaking again:
    While Italy was a red zone, everyone here was without masks. Today, Basini is accused because he has to wear it. You are ridiculous! You didn’t wear it until the day before yesterday! That is exactly how it is.

    In Germany, the economy, health care, and schools will work perfectly on May 4. We are a state with the fewest rights in Europe. Germany has shown proof of strength and the correct response. We here are once more humiliated by Germany even in illness. We have closed 60% of businesses.

    I have given data, Dear Trizzino. Go check it out. No, it is clear that I was first to call for the closure of Parliament. Today, here we are, everybody in masks, while the other time, there was only [unintelligible]. There were very few — Dall’Osso. There were few who were wearing the mask, and today you are pointed at if you don’t wear it. Well, precisely because truth is the most important thing, let’s give the actual numbers; let us not continue to lie.

    This is certainly strong data. I read it here too, Trizzino 56% in Lombardy, 14% in Emilia, 8% in Piedmont, 5% in Veneto. We cannot imagine applying uniform rules with such disparate zones of the epidemic. And so, I say, at least here we speak the truth. Measure ourselves against Germany.

    Let us be united in liberation against hypocrisy and lies, against falsifications, against the false numbers that are given to terrorize Italians. The 25,000 dead, as Professor Bassetti [infectious disease specialiat] said, died of heart attacks, cancer and other… Let’s not use them to humiliate Italy. Let’s not use them to give citizens false news. Give the numbers, check them out, and I challenge you before a jury of honor, Trizzino, to look at the numbers…

    Speech interrupted and Sgarbi is instructed to turn toward the President:
    Colleague Sgarbi, turn to the president.

    Vittorio Sgarbi begins speaking again:
    I simply said, they all give numbers but not false numbers. Twenty-five thousand people did not die of the coronavirus in Italy. It’s not true. It’s a way to terrorize Italians and impose a dictatorship of consent. It’s ridiculous!

  32. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Franny (18th May 2020), greybeard (18th May 2020), justntime2learn (18th May 2020), kfm27917 (19th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020), Sunny (18th May 2020), wondering (18th May 2020)

  33. Link to Post #317
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Thanked 1,529 times in 240 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    “Speaking reason to insanity – Sara Cunial speech on COVID-19 in the Italian Parliament”

    Fabrice May 17, 2020 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Italian politician Sara Cunial expressed her stance in Parliament in a speech on the corona virus. In short, it would be summarized: “We were spied on, played down, treated like criminals by our Government, which destroyed our basic, human and natural rights in two months.”

    Here is her whole speech translated to English captions published by “BitChute”
    May 10, 2020
    Enjoy the video!

    Brief notes on Sara Cunial.
    Sara Cunial was born in Rome ( July 1979 ) , she is of Venetian origins, residing in Bassano del Grappa, degree in Industrial Chemistry at the University of Padua, in the political elections of March 4, 2018 she was elected to the Chamber of Deputies for the 5 Star Movement as leader in the Veneto region.

    On April 17, 2019, accused of supporting positions contrary to her party, she is expelled from the parliamentary group of the 5 Star Movement and goes to the mixed group.

    5 Star Movement is the main party which supports the actual Italian goverment.
    Best regards.

    Fabrice, greetings from Italy.

  34. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Elainie (19th May 2020), Franny (19th May 2020), greybeard (18th May 2020), justntime2learn (19th May 2020), pueblo (19th May 2020), Reinhard (18th May 2020), Sunny (18th May 2020), wondering (18th May 2020)

  35. Link to Post #318
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Thanked 26,344 times in 4,686 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Re: Is There an Agenda

    This video is not for News Junkies

    The Purpose of Disruption

    .................................................. my first language is TYPO..............................................

  36. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    justntime2learn (19th May 2020), pueblo (19th May 2020)

  37. Link to Post #319
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Thanked 13,915 times in 2,024 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?


    Quote Whitney: In The Race For Immunity, Sweden Leads The Pack

    In a pandemic, there is no substitute for immunity, because immunity provides the best protection against reinfection. That’s why Sweden set its sights on immunity from the very beginning. They crafted a policy that was designed to protect the old and vulnerable, prevent the public health system from being overwhelmed, and, most important, allow younger, low-risk people to interact freely so they’d contract the virus and develop the antibodies they’d need to fight future infections. That was the plan and it worked like a charm. Now Sweden is just weeks away from achieving herd immunity (which means that future outbreaks will not be nearly as severe) while the lockdown nations– that are just now easing restrictions– face an excruciating uphill slog that may or may not succeed. Bottom line: Sweden analyzed the problem, figured out what to do, and did it. That’s why they are closing in on the finish line while most of the lockdown states are still stuck at Square 1.

    As of this writing, none of the other nations have identified immunity as their primary objective which is why their orientation has been wrong from the get-go. You cannot achieve a goal that you have not identified. The current US strategy focuses on stringent containment procedures (shelter-in-place, self-isolation) most of which have little historical or scientific basis. The truth is, the Trump administration responded precipitously when the number of Covid-positive cases began to increase exponentially in the US. That paved the way for a lockdown policy that’s more the result of groupthink and flawed computer models than data-based analysis and nimble strategic planning. And the results speak for themselves. The 8-week lockdown is probably the biggest policy disaster in US history. Millions of jobs have been lost, thousands of small and mid-sized businesses will now face bankruptcy, and the future prospects for an entire generation of young people have been obliterated. The administration could have detonated multiple nuclear bombs in the country and done less damage than they have with their lunatic lockdown policy.

    At present, 24 states have begun the process of reopening their economies. There is no uniform criteria for lifting restrictions, no standardized approach to opening one sector over the other, and no plan for dealing with the inevitable surge of new cases and deaths. It all looks like another disaster in the making but we’ll reserve judgement until the results are in. What we know for certain is that no one in the Trump administration gave the slightest thought to the problems that might arise from eventually lifting the restrictions. We know that because we know that there was no “exit strategy”, just make-it-up-on-the-fly and hope for the best.

    In contrast, Sweden won’t need an exit strategy because it never shut down its economy or quarantined its people to begin with. So the transition to normal life and stepped-up economic activity is not going to be as difficult.
    That’s the benefit of strategic planning, it anticipates the problems one might encounter on the path one’s goal. Here’s a clip from an interview with Swedish an infectious disease clinician, Johan Giesecke, , who served as state epidemiologist of Sweden as well as Chief Scientist at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Giesecke helps explain why the Swedish approach is different. It’s a matter of perception as well as analysis:

    “What we are seeing is a rather mild infection spreading around the globe. I think there is relatively little chance of stopping this whatever measures we take. Most people will become infected by this and most people won’t even notice. We have data now from Sweden that between 98 and 99% of the cases have had a very mild infection or didn’t even realize they were infected. So we have the spread of this mild disease around the globe and most of it is happening where we don’t see it because it happens among people who don’t get very sick and , spread it to someone else who doesn’t get very sick… What we looking at (with the official number of cases and deaths) is a thin layer at the top of people who do develop the disease and an even thinner layer of people who go into intensive care and an even thinner layer of people who die. But the real outbreak is happening where we don’t see it.” (“Swedish scientist Johan Giesecke asks Australia how it plans to lift its lockdown without deaths”, you tube…52 second mark to 1:48)

    Giesecke’s analysis veers from the conventional view of the virus which explains why the Swedish response has been so different. For example, he says: “I think there is relatively little chance of stopping this whatever measures we take.”

    This gets to the root of the Swedish approach. Sweden is not trying to suppress the infection which they see as a force of nature (like a tsunami) that cannot be contained but only mitigated. From the beginning, the Swedish approach has been to “control the spread of the virus”, not to suppress it through containment strategies. There’s a fundamental difference here, and that difference is expressed in the policy.

    Second, “We have data now from Sweden that between 98 and 99% of the cases have had a very mild infection or didn’t even realize they were infected.” In other words, this is highly-contagious infection that poses little or no threat to most people. That suggests the economy can be kept open without endangering the lives of low-risk groups. The added benefit of allowing certain businesses to remain open, is that it creates a controlled environment in which the infection can spread rapidly through the healthy population who, in turn, develop the antibodies they need for future outbreaks. This all fits within Sweden’s plan for managing, rather than avoiding, the virus.

    Finally, “What we looking at is a thin layer at the top of people who do develop the disease and an even thinner layer of people who go into intensive care and an even thinner layer of people who die.” The vast majority of people who die from Covid are over 65 with multiple underlying conditions. It’s a terrible tragedy that they should die, but destroying the lives and livelihoods of millions of working people in a futile attempt to stop an unstoppable force like Covid, is foolish and unforgivable. The appropriate response is to protect the old and infirm as much as possible, carefully monitor the rise in cases to prevent the public health system from cratering, and keep the economy operating at a lower level. And that’s exactly what Sweden has done.

    FAUCI vs. PAUL: Operation “Obfuscate Immunity”
    Not surprisingly, the issue of immunity came up during Dr Anthony Fauci’s testimony on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. There was a heated exchange between Fauci and Senator Rand Paul who challenged the infectious disease expert on the misleading information that the WHO has been spreading in the media. Here’s an excerpt from the transcript:

    Senator Rand Paul: “Dr. Fauci, Studies show that the recovering COVID-19 patients from the asymptomatic to the very sick are showing significant antibody response. Studies show that SARS and MERS, also coronaviruses, induce immunity for at least 2 to 3 years, and yet the media continues to report that we have no evidence that patients who survive coronavirus have immunity. I think actually the truth is the opposite. We have no evidence that survivors of coronavirus don’t have immunity and a great deal of evidence to suggest that they do….

    You’ve stated publicly that you’d bet it at all that survivors of coronavirus have some form of immunity. Can you help set the record straight that the scientific record, as it is being accumulated, is supportive that infection with coronavirus likely leads to some form of immunity, Dr. Fauci?”

    Dr. Anthony Fauci: “Thank you for the question, Senator Paul. Yes, you’re correct that I have said that, given what we know about the recovery from viruses such as coronaviruses in general, or even any infectious disease with very few exceptions, that when you have antibody present it very likely indicates a degree of protection.

    I think it’s in the semantics of how this is expressed. When you say has it been formally proven by long-term natural history studies, which is the only way that you can prove, one, is it protective, which I said and will repeat, it’s likely that it is, but also what is the degree or titer of antibody that gives you that critical level of protection and what is the durability. As I’ve often said and again repeat, you can make a reasonable assumption that it would be protective, but natural history studies over a period of months to years will then tell you definitively if that’s the case.” (Real Clear Politics)

    This is a critical exchange that helps to underscore what an elusive and calculating political character Fauci really is. You will notice that his answer is completely scripted, completely circuitous and carefully avoids any mention of the word “immunity”.

    Rand Paul’s question couldn’t be more straightforward: Do Covid survivors have immunity or not? Yes or no?

    And, the answer is: “Yes, they do. Covid survivors do have immunity.”

    But Fauci doesn’t deliver that answer, after a long-winded rumination, Fauci finally offers the most opaque response he can conjure up, he says, “you can make a reasonable assumption that it would be protective.” In other words, he carefully avoids a definitive answer. But, of course, that’s understandable since the WHO has been spreading false rumors about herd immunity trying to muddy the science since it doesn’t jibe with their pro-vaccine agenda. That’s what this is all about, bashing natural immunity to clear the way for a vaccine. Check out this clip from an article at Business Insider:

    “…leaders at the World Health Organization Monday expressed outrage at the idea that some people might have to die in pursuit of a far-fetched virus-fighting strategy called herd immunity.

    “This idea that, ‘well, maybe countries who had lax measures and haven’t done anything will all of a sudden magically reach some herd immunity, and so what if we lose a few old people along the way?’ This is a really dangerous, dangerous calculation,” the WHO’s Executive Director of Health Emergencies Mike Ryan said on a call with reporters.

    Ryan didn’t mention any specific countries by name, but it was hard not to think about the high death rate in Swedish nursing homes as he mentioned that “in some countries, over half of the cases have occurred in longterm care facilities,” where people haven’t been “properly shielded.”…

    “Humans are not herds,” Ryan said. “I think we need to be really careful when we use terms in this way around natural infections in humans, because it can lead to a very brutal arithmetic which does not put people, and life, and suffering at the center of that equation.”

    Ryan was audibly troubled by the idea that the world would accept an infection spreading through a population, and even killing some people, to provide a kind of herd protection, especially one which scientists don’t even know exists. He said that’s not a calculus that any “responsible” country should be willing to take.” (“Humans are not Herds”, Business Insider)

    Your email...
    As you can see, the Gates Vaccine Gestapo has launched a propaganda campaign aimed at discrediting, obfuscating and ridiculing other methods for achieving immunity that don’t coincide with their grandiose ambitions to use vaccines as an entry-point for enhanced global tracking, surveillance and social control. Is anyone surprised by this?

    But the fact remains that–as Paul says, “recovering COVID-19 patients …show significant antibody response (and will likely have) immunity for at least 2 to 3 years.” Here’s more from Sweden’s chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell who made this comment in an interview last week:

    “It is quite certain that immunity does exist…. For all the cases we have had in Sweden, there has not been one single person who had this disease twice. And we have a very strict identification system. So there is no way we would miss a person who had it twice. I haven’t heard any reports from any countries where there has been a certified case who has actually had this twice. There’s been rumors about it. But in the end, they have been disclaimed.” (“Key quotes: Sweden’s top epidemiologist challenges conventional wisdom on COVID-19” ijnet)

    Repeat: “there has not been one single person who had this disease twice.”

    The science is clear, immunity is real and Sweden is on its way to achieving herd immunity within the month.

    Sweden’s public health experts have loosened the grip of a vicious pandemic and delivered the Swedish people to a place of safety and security where they can get on with their lives without fear of contracting a lethal infection.

    Hurrah for Sweden!
    Last edited by mountain_jim; 19th May 2020 at 12:57.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.) :)

  38. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    avid (19th May 2020), Elainie (19th May 2020), Ernie Nemeth (19th May 2020), greybeard (19th May 2020), pueblo (19th May 2020), Sunny (19th May 2020)

  39. Link to Post #320
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Thanked 23,347 times in 3,732 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    The virus scare is just a vessel for the agenda that was always in place. It is their modus operandi.

    It was not hard to predict in the early eighties that the multi-national corporations were imminently poised to move operations over-seas to cheaper labor markets. Multi-nationals have no allegiance to any country or peoples. They follow the bottom line wherever it leads.

    North America was systematically gutted during the eighties and nineties. By then the writing was on the wall. Under free trade deals foreign nationals began the buy up of the continent's hard assets. 9/11 was the symbolic act revealing the take-over of America that had begun two decades before. The day after it was a done deal. There were then only t's to cross and i's to dot.

    The transfer of wealth was finalized in the 2008 debacle that handed world dominance into the hands of the ChiComs and the globalist cabal that is the UN.

    Now all that's left is the final demoralization of the people by unreasonable decrees. Start by saturating the west with foreign nationals under the guise of refugee and immigrant catastrophes. Create much unrest, create discord, create inequality.

    Then introduce unprecedented and draconian measures in response to what amounts to nothing more than a mild flu.

    Destroy what's left of the American continent after the economy has constricted to a point where civil society implodes.

    Take possession of American forces and assets in exchange for food and debt relief for the people. Relegate American forces to the UN for enforcement of world order under the new normal of the Chinese controlled UN.

  40. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (19th May 2020), greybeard (19th May 2020), kfm27917 (19th May 2020), mountain_jim (19th May 2020), shaberon (20th May 2020)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 16 of 20 FirstFirst 1 6 16 20 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts