+ Reply to Thread
Page 24 of 25 FirstFirst 1 14 24 25 LastLast
Results 461 to 480 of 489

Thread: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

  1. Link to Post #461
    United States Avalon Member Arcturian108's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th August 2015
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mountains
    Posts
    347
    Thanks
    3,793
    Thanked 2,238 times in 335 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Quote Posted by pueblo (here)
    Quote Posted by Arcturian108 (here)
    A friend just sent me this short, shocking video, with more evidence of the plandemic from 2018. Considering the amount of money each country spent on "Covid-19" test kits in 2018, this could be a smoking gun, and the real reason that Trump knew it was a hoax from day one:



    Mods: Please download this video for posterity before it gets erased.
    Hi Arcturian, this has been fairly well debunked by Bill in this thread http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1376224
    Not sure if Bill was right in his assessment, as I believe the original site was scrubbed after this screen shot taken in the video was saved.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Arcturian108 For This Post:

    pueblo (11th September 2020)

  3. Link to Post #462
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    470
    Thanks
    2,048
    Thanked 2,684 times in 457 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Quote Posted by Arcturian108 (here)
    Quote Posted by pueblo (here)
    Quote Posted by Arcturian108 (here)
    A friend just sent me this short, shocking video, with more evidence of the plandemic from 2018. Considering the amount of money each country spent on "Covid-19" test kits in 2018, this could be a smoking gun, and the real reason that Trump knew it was a hoax from day one:



    Mods: Please download this video for posterity before it gets erased.
    Hi Arcturian, this has been fairly well debunked by Bill in this thread http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1376224
    Not sure if Bill was right in his assessment, as I believe the original site was scrubbed after this screen shot taken in the video was saved.
    Yes, but how do you explain the large range of years (not just 2018) going back as far as 2002 IIRC?

  4. Link to Post #463
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    673
    Thanks
    3,078
    Thanked 4,579 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    If one looks somewhat attentively, one would notice that the "Product Code" is still the same: 902780

    from Jim Stone:
    BOOOM: WTA HAS A MISHAP:
    Covid 19 test kits ordered in 2018 AND THEN THEY SCREWED UP THEIR COVERUP!!! I came across this a couple days ago and it had been "debunked" as a database error.

    I posted this and removed it. But then I started thinking: No proof was offered stating that this was any sort of database error; what had in fact been done is that once this got discovered, the WTA suddenly generated an identical page for 2019 and 2017, when originally there was only a 2018 page that worked with THIS LINK, WHICH NOW GOES TO A GENERIC MEDICAL KIT. HA HA HA THOSE DUFUSES,DID THEY REALLY THINK I'D FORGET AND QUIT WATCHING???? If there was nothing to this, why did they not leave it alone? Why did they have to remove all references to Covid-19?
    Here is what obviously happened: Since they were clearly and plainly busted, they faked a database error by generating duplicate pages with one number different in the page name that made it look like whatever year you typed, this came up. I figured that if they did that, I'd bust them later, and I SUCCEEDED. THEY ARE BUSTED.
    ---------------------------------------------------------

    If this goes back to 2002, it may mean that that thing was in the works since the SARS outbreak?

  5. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Franny (13th September 2020), greybeard (11th September 2020), kfm27917 (11th September 2020), mountain_jim (11th September 2020), pueblo (11th September 2020), Sunny (12th September 2020)

  6. Link to Post #464
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    2,486
    Thanks
    20,731
    Thanked 17,359 times in 2,333 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Quote NEW: Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan, who fled to the United States after claiming Beijing covered up COVID-19, vows to publish evidence proving the virus is manmade.
    (quote above did not come with link, but found this video which was uploaded today, watching now, and yes she states the above in this video)

    Last edited by mountain_jim; 11th September 2020 at 17:31.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    greybeard (11th September 2020), pueblo (11th September 2020)

  8. Link to Post #465
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    673
    Thanks
    3,078
    Thanked 4,579 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Author of Dystopian Classics Predicted Face Masks to Enforce Conformity 70 Years Ago

    Ernst Jünger said masks would become commonplace to eradicate individuality.

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Published
    11 September, 2020


    TOLGA AKMEN/Getty Images

    Respected German author Ernst Jünger predicted the ubiquitousness of face masks to enforce conformity and uniformity in a dystopian future society in a novel called The Worker that was published nearly 90 years ago.

    With face masks now becoming a mandatory part of the “new normal,” the enforcement measures to make people wear them, by both agents of the state and members of the general public, are becoming more dehumanizing and draconian.

    This is precisely the scenario envisaged by enigmatic German author Ernst Jünger in his 1932 classic.

    As Thomas Crew details in his article The Dystopian Age of the Mask, the “eradication of all individuality” is a running theme of all dystopian literature.

    This is expressed by George Orwell in 1984 when he describes the masses as, “a nation of warriors and fanatics, marching forward in perfect unity, all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans…three hundred million people all with the same face.”

    Crew explains that this theme is dominant in Jünger’s The Worker, where, “The uniformity of the new age is symbolized…by the sudden proliferation of the mask in contemporary society.”

    “It is no coincidence,” he writes, “that the mask is again beginning to play a decisive role in public life. It is appearing in many different ways … be it as a gas mask, with which they are trying to equip entire populations; be it as a face mask for sport and high speeds, seen on every racing driver; be it as a safety mask for workplaces exposed to radiation, explosions, or narcotic substances. We can assume”, he continues, with an eerie prescience, “that the mask will come to take on functions that we can today hardly imagine.”

    Crew explains how the public has been brainwashed to believe that the continuation of life, no matter how stifled, atomized and undignified it may be, is the only consideration.
    “Given the sudden ubiquity of the face mask in 2020, across the entire globe and in an increasing number of social contexts, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that this is precisely the sort of development Jünger had in mind. Our readiness to obscure the face reflects the dehumanising tendencies that, for Jünger, underlie the modern period. It represents another stage in the degradation of the individual that became explicit in the First World War. Whether as a scrap of material on the battlefield or a cog in the machine of the wartime economy, the modern age has a habit of reducing the human being to a functional object. Everything “non-essential” – everything, that is, that makes us human – is blithely discarded.”
    As we document in the video below, the level of compliance that governments and the media have been able to indoctrinate people to embrace means there is little need for police officers and security officials to enforce mask wearing.

    A cowed public, whipped up into a frenzied lust for obedience, will do it for them.

  9. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (13th September 2020), pueblo (13th September 2020), syrwong (11th October 2020), T Smith (14th October 2020)

  10. Link to Post #466
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    673
    Thanks
    3,078
    Thanked 4,579 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Gilead Sent Death Threats To Kill HCQ As COVID-19 Cure, French Dr Testifies In Parliament

    August 2, 2020

    After it was revealed in a shocking investigation that WHO policies on Hydroxychloroquine were based on a fake study by a pornstar and a science-fiction writer, now in an ongoing investigation, a French doctor has testified in parliament that Gilead sent him death threats after he started talking about HCQ as a cure for COVID-19.


    Gilead Sent Death Threats To Kill HCQ As COVID-19 Cure, French Dr Testifies In Parliament

    In late March, a study by a French research team led by the renowned epidemiologist Dr. Didier Raoult revealed that he was able to cure his 80 patients by administering hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.
    “By administering hydroxychloroquine combined with azithromycin, we were able to observe an improvement in all cases, except in one patient who arrived with an advanced form, who was over the age of 86…,” reported Fox News.

    In late March, a study by a French research team led by the renowned epidemiologist Dr. Didier Raoult revealed that he was able to cure his 80 patients by administering hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.

    They were also able to demonstrate 91% effectiveness in more than 1,000 patients with zero side-effects.

    In his tweets Dr. Raoult explained about his results:
    New article published online by my teams: in vitro demonstration of the hydroxychloroquine / azithromycin synergy to counter SARS-COV2 replication In vitro testing of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on SARS-CoV-2 shows synergistic effect.
    New results from the IHU Méditerranée Infection: 80 patients treated with a hydroxychloroquine / azithromycin combination.

    Our two articles published this evening allow us to continue to demonstrate:
    1. The effectiveness of our protocol, on 80 patients.

    2. The relevance of the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, thanks to research carried out in our P3 containment laboratory.

    Soon, Dr. Didier Raoult started receiving death threats. He filed a complaint for “death threats” and “acts of intimidation against a public service official” following which an investigation was opened by French Judiciary.

    Now during a shocking testimony before the parliament, Dr. Raoult told lawmakers under oath that the person who sent him death threats was a top recipient of Gilead Pharmaceuticals.
    Professor Raoult testified that, shortly after he started to talk about HCQ as a treatment, in March, he received anonymous death threats. He filed a complaint with the police, and an inquiry was opened by the French judiciary.

    The medical doctor behind the threats was found and happens to be from a Nantes university hospital. It happened to be the person who received the most money from Gilead over the past 6 years.
    Professor Raoult told members of the French parliament to open an investigation into Gilead Sciences. He also mentioned the stock exchange speculation that took place in connection with information becoming available regarding Remdesivir and HCQ. You can watch the entire testimony of Dr. Didier Raoul presented to the French Parliament on Wednesday June 24, here.


    Earlier, in an investigation it was revealed that WHO policies on Hydroxychloroquine were influenced by a fake study by a pornstar and a Sci-Fi writer. An obscure US healthcare analytics company has come under sharp scrutiny for the integrity of its key studies that were published in some of the world’s most prestigious medical journals. World Health Organization and several national governments changed their COVID-19 policies and treatment based on the faulty data provided by the company with a pornstar and a sci-fi writer on their payroll.

    A report by GreatGameIndia on the history of Gilead Sciences revealed that behind the benign image of a vaccine manufacturer, Gilead Science has a dark history of allegations of bioterrorism, including having Pentagon to bomb a competitors factory under the false pretext of association with Al-Qaeda.


    Gilead’s flu drug, Tamiflu, originally manufactured by Gilead Sciences, was criticized for being ineffective and even harmful. Chairman of Gilead Sciences Donald Rumsfeld and Board Member of Gilead, Former U.S. Secretary of State, George Schultz profited heavily from a $1.5 billion stockpiling by the U.S. government on Tamiflu leading up to the 2009 H1N1 “swine flu” outbreak.

    The interesting part is, Gilead was part of the vaccine lobby at whose behest the WHO faked the H1N1 pandemic in 2009, and kept it a secret from people until committees were setup which exposed the entire racket.

  11. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (13th September 2020), Bill Ryan (13th September 2020), Franny (14th September 2020), mountain_jim (16th September 2020), pueblo (13th September 2020), Sunny (14th September 2020)

  12. Link to Post #467
    Croatia Administrator Franny's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd January 2011
    Location
    Island Time
    Posts
    1,452
    Thanks
    24,865
    Thanked 8,174 times in 1,304 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Oh my, do look at the three images in the post, the agenda could not be more clear. In your face with a slap.

    The time to abolish the family image does not seem to be government sponsored but the other two do look to be connected.

    Last edited by Franny; 15th September 2020 at 07:46.
    A million galaxies are a little foam on that shoreless sea. ~ Rumi

  13. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Franny For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (16th September 2020), araucaria (16th September 2020), ClearWater (15th September 2020), gord (15th September 2020), greybeard (15th September 2020), Gwin Ru (15th September 2020), pueblo (15th September 2020)

  14. Link to Post #468
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    673
    Thanks
    3,078
    Thanked 4,579 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?


  15. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (15th September 2020), Franny (16th September 2020), greybeard (15th September 2020), pueblo (15th September 2020), T Smith (14th October 2020)

  16. Link to Post #469
    France Avalon Member araucaria's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Posts
    5,211
    Thanks
    11,992
    Thanked 29,664 times in 4,819 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Quote Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
    Author of Dystopian Classics Predicted Face Masks to Enforce Conformity 70 Years Ago

    Ernst Jünger said masks would become commonplace to eradicate individuality.

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Published
    11 September, 2020


    TOLGA AKMEN/Getty Images

    Respected German author Ernst Jünger predicted the ubiquitousness of face masks to enforce conformity and uniformity in a dystopian future society in a novel called The Worker that was published nearly 90 years ago.

    With face masks now becoming a mandatory part of the “new normal,” the enforcement measures to make people wear them, by both agents of the state and members of the general public, are becoming more dehumanizing and draconian.

    This is precisely the scenario envisaged by enigmatic German author Ernst Jünger in his 1932 classic.

    As Thomas Crew details in his article The Dystopian Age of the Mask, the “eradication of all individuality” is a running theme of all dystopian literature.

    This is expressed by George Orwell in 1984 when he describes the masses as, “a nation of warriors and fanatics, marching forward in perfect unity, all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans…three hundred million people all with the same face.”

    Crew explains that this theme is dominant in Jünger’s The Worker, where, “The uniformity of the new age is symbolized…by the sudden proliferation of the mask in contemporary society.”

    “It is no coincidence,” he writes, “that the mask is again beginning to play a decisive role in public life. It is appearing in many different ways … be it as a gas mask, with which they are trying to equip entire populations; be it as a face mask for sport and high speeds, seen on every racing driver; be it as a safety mask for workplaces exposed to radiation, explosions, or narcotic substances. We can assume”, he continues, with an eerie prescience, “that the mask will come to take on functions that we can today hardly imagine.”

    Crew explains how the public has been brainwashed to believe that the continuation of life, no matter how stifled, atomized and undignified it may be, is the only consideration.
    “Given the sudden ubiquity of the face mask in 2020, across the entire globe and in an increasing number of social contexts, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that this is precisely the sort of development Jünger had in mind. Our readiness to obscure the face reflects the dehumanising tendencies that, for Jünger, underlie the modern period. It represents another stage in the degradation of the individual that became explicit in the First World War. Whether as a scrap of material on the battlefield or a cog in the machine of the wartime economy, the modern age has a habit of reducing the human being to a functional object. Everything “non-essential” – everything, that is, that makes us human – is blithely discarded.”
    As we document in the video below, the level of compliance that governments and the media have been able to indoctrinate people to embrace means there is little need for police officers and security officials to enforce mask wearing.

    A cowed public, whipped up into a frenzied lust for obedience, will do it for them.
    (…)
    [/CENTER]
    Only yesterday, I was quoting GK Chesterton saying very much the same thing at around the same time. See this post. Let me add the following quote from the same source:
    Quote In Manalive, the enemy of sanity is not a conspiracy without substance. It is the ‘real world’, the habitual, mundane matter-of-fact life of Dr Warner and Moses Gould. There is a very real possibility that a truly sane man runs a risk of being certified as a lunatic in a world becoming increasingly crazy. Chesterton’s political disillusionment (1906-14) has a bearing on the pursuit of sanity. In ‘The Mad Official’ published in the Daily News in 1912, he raised the connection between routine and madness in societies and individuals. There are peoples who have lost their power of astonishment at their own actions and ‘one of the countries is modern England’.
    There is something slightly reassuring in noting to what extent these issues are not new. The human disease is a chronic one, not the acute and probably terminal case many are saying. A cure may yet be found, but only if the patient is not overly attached to his condition.


  17. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to araucaria For This Post:

    Franny (16th September 2020), greybeard (16th September 2020), onawah (18th September 2020), pueblo (16th September 2020)

  18. Link to Post #470
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    673
    Thanks
    3,078
    Thanked 4,579 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    State-by-state breakdown of federal aid per COVID-19 case

    By Ayla Ellison (Twitter) -

    Tuesday, April 14th, 2020

    HHS recently began distributing the first $30 billion of emergency funding designated for hospitals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. Some of the states hit hardest by the COVID-19 pandemic will receive less funding than states touched relatively lightly, according to an analysis by Kaiser Health News.

    The first round of grants will be distributed based on historical share Medicare revenue, not based on COVID-19 burden. Therefore, hard-hit states like New York will receive far less per COVID-19 case than most other states.

    HHS said it doled out the first slice of funding based on Medicare revenue to get support to hospitals as quickly as possible. The agency said the next round of grants "will focus on providers in areas particularly impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak," rural hospitals and other healthcare providers that receive much of their revenues from Medicaid.

    Below is a breakdown of how much funding per COVID-19 case each state will receive from the first $30 billion in aid. Kaiser Health News used a state breakdown provided to the House Ways and Means Committee by HHS along with COVID-19 cases tabulated by The New York Times for its analysis.

    Alabama
    $158,000 per COVID-19 case
    Alaska
    $306,000
    Arizona
    $23,000
    Arkansas
    $285,000
    California
    $145,000
    Colorado
    $58,000
    Connecticut
    $38,000
    Delaware
    $127,000
    District of Columbia
    $56,000
    Florida
    $132,000
    Georgia
    $73,000
    Hawaii
    $301,000
    Idaho
    $100,000
    Illinois
    $73,000
    Indiana
    $105,000
    Iowa
    $235,000
    Kansas
    $291,000
    Kentucky
    $297,000
    Louisiana
    $26,000
    Maine
    $260,000
    Maryland
    $120,000
    Massachusetts
    $44,000
    Michigan
    $44,000
    Minnesota
    $380,000
    Mississippi
    $166,000
    Missouri
    $175,000
    Montana
    $315,000
    Nebraska
    $379,000
    Nevada
    $98,000
    New Hampshire
    $201,000
    New Jersey
    $18,000
    New Mexico
    $171,000
    New York
    $12,000
    North Carolina
    $252,000
    North Dakota
    $339,000
    Ohio
    $180,000
    Oklahoma
    $291,000
    Oregon
    $220,000
    Pennsylvania
    $68,000
    Rhode Island
    $52,000
    South Carolina
    $186,000
    South Dakota
    $241,000
    Tennessee
    $166,000
    Texas
    $184,000
    Utah
    $94,000
    Vermont
    $87,000
    Virginia
    $201,000
    Washington
    $58,000
    West Virginia
    $471,000
    Wisconsin
    $163,000
    Wyoming
    $278,000


    More articles on healthcare finance:

  19. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (16th September 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (17th September 2020), Franny (16th September 2020), Goba (17th September 2020), greybeard (16th September 2020), onawah (18th September 2020)

  20. Link to Post #471
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    673
    Thanks
    3,078
    Thanked 4,579 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?



    What the END GAME of this Entire “EVENT” Actually is. 1:05:44

    By wmw_admin on September 15, 2020

    Richie From Boston talks to Dr Carrie Madej about the ultimate, and very sinister objective behind the Covid-19 vaccine.

    Last edited by Gwin Ru; 17th September 2020 at 01:30.

  21. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Deborah (ahamkara) (17th September 2020), Franny (17th September 2020), greybeard (17th September 2020), Harmony (24th September 2020), mountain_jim (22nd September 2020), onawah (18th September 2020), Tintin (23rd September 2020)

  22. Link to Post #472
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    673
    Thanks
    3,078
    Thanked 4,579 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    This is getting weirder and weirder...

    Taking into account the Cs' intel, the original Covid/SARs-Cov2 started with a research on a vaccine designed to turn the vaccinated into zombies/ PLFs (Programmable Life Forms) /OPs (Organic Portals). But something went wrong and THAT vaccine had unwanted (to their expected final results) side effects and escaped into the general population:

    Quote Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
    So, it seems that the idea of manufacturing psychopaths via "medicine" was in the ether from at least the early part of the 20th century.

    If so, then, this communication from Laura Knight-Jadczyk's "Cs" makes a lot more sense:

    Session 21 March 2020

    A: The virus did not appear first in China. There were experiments at Fort Detrick regarding the creation of a vaccine that would make humans more controllable. This vaccine had unexpected effects and in some cases did the opposite of what was intended. The strain escaped into a population and further mutated. Indeed it was carried to China by US soldiers. China soon knew the type and origin and launched a massive campaign to control the situation. This was seen by Western powers as a good model to follow with additional add-on factors. In the meantime further mutations have occurred, some engineered via STO forces by virtue of the virus taking hold in certain persons whose spiritual force was able to direct the progression. At this point, there are two major strains. The elite need to stop the spread of that which they "created".

    Q: (L) So they need to stop that which they have created because in some cases, it does the opposite of what they wanted it to do?

    A: Yes and this is the interesting factor: The virus can change DNA making individuals more susceptible to cosmic information of the STO variety. It can also enhance and activate long suppressed codons of a beneficial nature. So you can see why they are so desperate to halt the spread.
    ... and now for that very weird part, from Jim Stone:
    "They have killed God. I can't feel God anymore" - Second whistleblower to Coronavirus vax

    This is from Hal Turner. And I believe it, after all these types of vaxxes have been in development for 20 years

    From Hal Turner:
    "AstraZeneca revealed details of its large coronavirus vaccine trials on Saturday, the third in a wave of rare disclosures by drug companies under pressure to be more transparent about how they are testing products that are the world's best hope for ending the pandemic.
    The release comes after a second vaccine test volunteer "Developed neurological problems."

    According to sources who claim to be familiar with the vaccine trials, the second volunteer suddenly started saying:
    "They've killed God; I can't feel God anymore - my Soul is dead"
    after the vaccine.

    Polls are finding Americans increasingly wary of accepting a coronavirus vaccine. And scientists inside and outside the government are worried that regulators, pressured by the president for results before Election Day on Nov. 3, might release an unproven or unsafe vaccine.

    Jim's comment: IF YOU SUBMIT TO THAT VAX, YOUR BRAIN IS DEAD. Obviously it is not as advertised, this does not surprise me AT ALL.
    ... artistic intuition:


    So, indeed, it is a spiritual battle that the deep state/shadow government hope to win by disconnecting the spirituo-biological radio/TV antennas embedded in humans' DNA.
    Last edited by Gwin Ru; 22nd September 2020 at 01:51.

  23. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    anandacate (23rd September 2020), fifi (23rd September 2020), Franny (22nd September 2020), greybeard (22nd September 2020), Harmony (24th September 2020), kfm27917 (22nd September 2020), Mare (22nd September 2020), Miha (22nd September 2020), mountain_jim (22nd September 2020), pueblo (23rd September 2020), Sadieblue (23rd September 2020), Tintin (23rd September 2020)

  24. Link to Post #473
    Wales Avalon Member
    Join Date
    8th October 2012
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Language
    English
    Age
    52
    Posts
    606
    Thanks
    3,169
    Thanked 3,392 times in 567 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    When it comes to Covid, common sense in the UK has gone down the toilet as ministers keep changing policy on a whim.

    Thousands of Brits were forced to leg it home from France for no apparent reason. Large swathes of France have lower infection rates than Lancashire, so why not distinguish between regions?

    Why are travellers from low-risk Bretagne threatened with quarantine when those from high-risk Catalonia are not?

    Worse of all, these panic-driven knee-jerk reactions keep hampering the economic recovery the UK desperately needs

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to happyuk For This Post:

    greybeard (1st October 2020)

  26. Link to Post #474
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Age
    74
    Posts
    11,646
    Thanks
    27,202
    Thanked 58,986 times in 10,187 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Student anger and frustration as thousands forced into university lockdown - BBC News



    The agenda is promote fear

    look at the video below --not noticed by the media of course.
    Chris


    Paul Weston - This One Covid Lie Will Bring Down The British Government


    In general what I post, is, a "IS THAT SO?" Definitely maybe.

    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  27. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    avid (1st October 2020), DaveToo (11th October 2020), onawah (1st October 2020)

  28. Link to Post #475
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,605
    Thanks
    31,153
    Thanked 60,526 times in 12,090 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Inside Scoop on COVID Pandemic
    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    September 30, 2020
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...&rid=976501988



    Quote THE JAB: Featuring GlaxoSmithKline
    48,417 views•Aug 27, 2020Children's Health Defense
    24K subscribers
    It’s deja-vu all over again with the W.H.O. declaring “pandemics” that result in gold rushes for pharmaceutical companies who swoop in with vaccines to save the day. But are they actually saving anyone? Or do serious adverse events such as the very real narcolepsy epidemic that we saw in the swine flu “pandemic” of 2009—which many researchers tie to GSK’s Pandemrix—counter any perceived benefits of these rushed vaccines? The Jab breaks down what happened in 2009 and why it’s critical that we understand this today.
    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    Children’s Health Defense (CHD), founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., created “The Jab” video, which highlights the gold rush that occurred for pharmaceutical companies when the World Health Organization declared swine flu a pandemic in 2009
    It was June 11, 2009, when WHO declared H1N1 swine flu to be a Phase 6 global influenza pandemic, even though it had caused only 144 deaths worldwide
    The pandemic declaration put previously arranged “sleeping contracts” into an active state, to the tune of $18 billion directed to the production of H1N1 vaccines, including GSK’s Pandemrix
    Pandemrix was causally linked to childhood narcolepsy but GSK didn’t face any repercussions
    Prior to the pandemic’s declaration, WHO changed their definition of “pandemic,” removing the previous requirement that it cause “enormous numbers” of deaths
    Now, in the midst of another controversial pandemic, we’re facing an eerily similar playbook — with pharmaceutical companies eager to cash in on the first COVID-19 vaccine, begging the question, “Are we are being played — again?”
    Children’s Health Defense (CHD), founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., created “The Jab” video above, which highlights the gold rush that occurred for pharmaceutical companies when the World Health Organization declared swine flu a pandemic in 2009. While Big Pharma got richer, an experimental vaccine was hastily rushed to market, and thousands suffered adverse effects as a result.

    Now, in the midst of another controversial pandemic, we’re facing an eerily similar playbook — with pharmaceutical companies eager to cash in on the first COVID-19 vaccine, begging the question, “Are we are being played — again?”1

    Pandemic Playbook: First, ‘The Trap’
    Pandemics have been coming and going around the globe for centuries, but in recent history they’ve been used as points of manipulation that have profited corporations, particularly pharmaceutical companies. In 2005, you may remember, the bird flu epidemic was predicted to kill from 2 million to 150 million people,2 but turned out to be a whole lot of hot air, and prompted me to write the book “The Great Bird Flu Hoax.”

    At the time, Nature Immunology published an editorial stating that the fear of bird flu had prompted government officials to prioritize developing plans to deal with pandemic influenza, and the WHO had named bird flu as the No. 1 health concern.

    “This heightened concern exists despite any evidence suggesting sustained human-to-human transmission of the potentially pandemic H5N1 strain of avian influenza virus,” according to the article.3 In the years that followed, WHO executed agreements — so called “sleeping contracts” — with European and African nations in the name of protecting people from a future global pandemic.

    The contracts stated that countries would buy vaccines in the event of a pandemic, but this would only be necessary if WHO declared a Phase 6 influenza pandemic.4 Both GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Baxter were named in contracts with the U.K. parliament, for instance, which stated the pharmaceutical companies would supply a pandemic influenza vaccine to the U.K. and were valued at £155.4 million (more than $206 million) over four years.5

    “Unfortunately,” CHD noted, “the government officials who signed the contracts never suspected that GSK makes multimillion-dollar donations to the WHO in return for control over decisions that result in GSK windfalls.”6

    WHO Changes Definition of Pandemic
    It was June 11, 2009, when WHO declared H1N1 swine flu to be a Phase 6 global influenza pandemic, even though it had only caused 144 deaths worldwide. That declaration put the sleeping contracts into an active state, to the tune of $18 billion directed to the production of H1N1 vaccines, including GSK’s Pandemrix.

    Prior to the pandemic’s declaration, WHO had defined a pandemic at the top of their Pandemic Preparedness website as follows:7

    “An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”

    The 144-person death toll certainly didn’t seem to fit the description of an “enormous” number of deaths, but, conveniently, it didn’t matter because WHO changed their definition of a pandemic. According to CHD in “The Jab”:8

    “Suspiciously, just 39 days before declaring the pandemic, the W.H.O. deleted the pandemic definition from their website. When confronted, they told the media that their definition ‘painted a rather bleak picture and could be very scary.’

    In the new definition, the W.H.O. no longer required that anyone die before they declare a pandemic. GSK’s Pandemrix jab was an experimental vaccine that was never tested for safety or efficacy. It was given straight to hundreds of millions of Africans and Europeans. This wasn’t the time for red tape and formalities. By any definition — rather, by the new definition, we were in a global pandemic.”

    Pandemic Expert Panel Fraught With Conflicts of Interest
    Lest anyone suggest that WHO, which received funding from GSK, wasn’t entirely unbiased in their decision to declare swine flu a pandemic, it should be noted that the opinion of an Emergency Committee from WHO’s International Health Regulations Review Committee was sought.

    The guidance of many of these leading experts benefited the pharmaceutical industry, but their identities were kept secret in order to “protect them from outside influences.”9 In 2010, however, a joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism revealed troubling conflicts of interest between key panel members and the pharmaceutical industry. According to the BMJ:10

    “The investigation by the BMJ/The Bureau reveals a system struggling to manage the inherent conflict between the pharmaceutical industry, WHO, and the global public health system, which all draw on the same pool of scientific experts.

    Our investigation has identified key scientists involved in WHO pandemic planning who had declarable interests, some of whom are or have been funded by pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were drafting.

    Yet these interests have never been publicly disclosed by WHO and, despite repeated requests from the BMJ/The Bureau, WHO has failed to provide any details about whether such conflicts were declared by the relevant experts and what, if anything, was done about them.”

    H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Caused Narcolepsy
    As is the case with all vaccines, unexpected injuries can occur, but in the case of the ASO3-adjuvanted swine flu vaccine Pandemrix, GSK continued to promote the vaccine even as cases of adverse events rose. Pandemrix was released in Europe during the swine flu pandemic of 2009 to 2010. Its approval process was accelerated, with most safety and efficacy tests bypassed.

    At the time, the WHO tried to assure the public that this was safe, but at the same time they admitted, “Further testing of safety and effectiveness will need to take place after administration of the vaccine has begun.”11

    Years later, Pandemrix (used in Europe but not in the U.S. during 2009-2010) was causally linked to childhood narcolepsy,12 a chronic neurologic condition in which your brain loses its ability to regulate sleep-wake cycles normally.

    As a result, this causes you to suddenly fall into a deep sleep at any point during the day, which is debilitating and seriously affects quality of life. Many cases of narcolepsy also involve cataplexy, which is the sudden loss of voluntary muscle control triggered by strong emotions or laughter. According to “The Jab”:13

    “GSK’s adjuvanted Pandemrix vaccine caused both [narcolepsy and cataplexy], devastating at least 1,300 children across Europe — for life. In the media, GSK’s AS03 adjuvant, added to stimulate a powerful immune response, shouldered the blame for amplifying these heinous reactions.

    Documents obtained by plaintiffs in a series of European lawsuits revealed that GSK knew about the mounting adverse events associated with Pandemrix in the winter of 2009 — including a 5.4-fold increase in death. By December 2009, an injured person filed a report with GSK for every 12,500 doses of Pandemrix administered. Yet, they continued promoting their vaccine in order to move inventory.”

    Later, in 2019, researchers described a “novel association between Pandemrix-associated narcolepsy and the non-coding RNA gene GDNF-AS1”14 — a gene thought to regulate the production of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor or GDNF, a protein that plays an important role in neuronal survival.

    According to the researchers, “Changes in regulation of GDNF have been associated with neurodegenerative diseases. This finding may increase the understanding of disease mechanisms underlying narcolepsy.”15

    Antiviral Drugs Also Fraudulently Stockpiled for Pandemics
    Pandemrix is only one example of a pandemic medication gone wrong. Antiviral drugs like Tamiflu are another, yet are still recommended by government agencies like the U.S. CDC,16 despite long-standing studies questioning their effectiveness and safety.

    At one point, WHO even classified Tamiflu as an "essential" medicine and recommended that it be used “as soon as possible” after a flu diagnosis.17 WHO’s definition of “essential” is reserved for drugs "selected with due regard to public health relevance, evidence on efficacy and safety, and comparative cost-effectiveness."18

    That status was downgraded in 2017, when the WHO moved Tamiflu from a “core” essential medicine to a “complementary” drug, which is used for those that are less cost effective.19

    In a BMJ editorial, Mark Ebell, professor of epidemiology at the University of Georgia, called the move “far too late” and described a multisystem failure that allowed Tamiflu to become a blockbuster medication,20 once again in the name of potential pandemics:21

    “Concerned about a possible outbreak of avian influenza, as well as the H1N1 pandemic in 2009, the UK government stockpiled oseltamivir at a cost of over £600m (€680m; $770m) from 2006 to 2014. Similarly, the US government has spent over $1.5bn stockpiling the drug, based on recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).”

    In 2019, a whistleblower lawsuit was filed against Tamiflu’s maker, Roche, alleging Roche duped the U.S. government into stockpiling Tamiflu while mispresenting its effectiveness. According to the suit, Roche knew Tamiflu was ineffective at fighting influenza pandemics but went ahead and “masterfully marketed this drug to fill Roche’s coffers at taxpayer expense.”22

    COVID-19 Deja-Vu
    The unsettling question now, amid the COVID-19 pandemic, is whether another experimental vaccine will make it to market, padding the drug companies’ pockets further while putting lives at risk. Asking, “Will they get away with it this time?” “The Jab” notes:23

    “Relying on the same attenuated definition of ‘pandemic,’ on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic when its partner, the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator, received 125 million-dollar commitments from the Gates Foundation and Mastercard just one day prior.

    On July 31, 2020, GSK and Sanofi scored 2.1 billion US taxpayer dollars to partner on an experimental Covid-19 vaccine. Sanofi will provide the vaccine and GSK will provide — you guessed it — hundreds of millions of doses of their AS03 adjuvant from the 2009 narcolepsy epidemic.”

    The earliest results from COVID-19 vaccine studies are starting to roll in, and they’re far from reassuring. Initially, public health officials had stated that a vaccine could be ready in an unprecedented 12 to 18 months. Now, there’s talk of accelerating vaccine delivery even further, with a target date of fall 2020.24

    However, as noted by Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), based on the historical failures of past coronavirus vaccines, a fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine could become one of the biggest public health disasters in history.

    And, no one involved is accountable or will face any repercussions, just as GSK was not held accountable for the narcolepsy cases caused by Pandemrix. Instead, they will all continue to profit."

    - Sources and References
    1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 23 Children’s Health Defense August 27, 2020
    2 ABC News September 30, 2005
    3 Nature Immunology volume 7, page115(2006)
    5 UK Parliament October 9, 2007
    10 BMJ June 12, 2010
    11 WHO August 6, 2009
    12 Eurosurveillance June 30, 2011; 16(26)
    14, 15 EBioMedicine. 2019 Feb; 40: 595–604
    16 U.S. CDC, Flu, Treatment: What You Need to Know
    17 WHO Guidelines February 2010. Page 10
    18 WHO Essential Medicines
    19 BMJ 2017;357:j2841
    20 BMJ, Who decision to downgrade Tamiflu “comes far too late” argues expert
    21 BMJ 2017;358:j3266
    22 Halunen Law January 13, 2020
    24 The Vaccine Reaction May 3, 2020
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  29. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Franny (1st October 2020), greybeard (1st October 2020), pueblo (1st October 2020), Sunny (4th October 2020)

  30. Link to Post #476
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    673
    Thanks
    3,078
    Thanked 4,579 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    [Exclusive] Final Evidence Covid-19 Is A ‘SimEx’ – Planned Simulation Exercise by WHO and World Bank

    by Silviu "Silview" Costinescu
    Sep 09 2020



    It all comes round now…

    World leaders dealt above our heads, played their games and kept the plebs in the dark using smoke-screens of technocratic lingo. The elites are resetting our lives. All about The Great Reset.

    TIMELINE
    • 2005 WHO member countries sign the new International Health Regulations (IHR) which is basically the implementation of the Health Management chapter in The Great Reset, the tactical manual for the New World Order aka New Normal. The document envisions using drills to perfect the new system.
      Download IHR in PDF
    • 2014 – The creation of The Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA), “a group of 69 countries, international organizations and non-government organizations, and private sector companies that have come together to achieve the vision of a world safe and secure from global health threats posed by infectious diseases”.
      It was launched by a group of 44 countries and organizations including WHO, as a five-year multilateral effort with the purpose to accelerate the implementation of IHR, particularly in developing countries. In 2017, GHSA was expanded to include non-state actors. It was also extended through 2024 with the release of the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) 2024 Framework (called “GHSA 2024”). The latter has the purpose to reach a standardized level of capacity to combat infectious diseases.
      All financed through the World Bank, of course. Which is controlled by the Rothschild cartel.
    • Rothschilds patent the first Covid-19 test kit in the Netherlands.
      According to Dutch Government’s website for patent registrations: “A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection, such as COVID-19. The method includes using a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage, which is transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone. To ensure that the data is accurate, an accelerometer within the smartphone is used to measure movement of the smartphone and/or the user. Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19. Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions.”
    • 2017-2018 – World Bank’s website reports massive shipments of COVID-19 medical devices (tests, mainly). See our previous reports.
    • 2019 In its first annual report, WHO and WB’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board identifies the most urgent actions required to accelerate preparedness for health emergencies. This first report focuses on epidemics and pandemics.
      The document is “co-convened by the World Health Organization and the World Bank Group”.
      Under “Progress indicator(s) by September 2020“, the report states:
    The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
    WHO develops intermediate triggers to mobilize national, international and multilateral action early in outbreaks, to complement existing mechanisms for later and more advanced stages of an outbreak under the IHR (2005).


    Global Preparedness Monitoring Board


    Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst.

    [...]

    Full (long) article: https://silview.media/2020/09/09/exc...nd-world-bank/


    Related:
    Last edited by Gwin Ru; 6th October 2020 at 16:21.

  31. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (10th October 2020), greybeard (6th October 2020), Sunny (6th October 2020), Tintin (5th October 2020)

  32. Link to Post #477
    Avalon Member T Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th January 2011
    Posts
    1,293
    Thanks
    8,529
    Thanked 6,284 times in 1,182 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    I'm not sure if this video has been posted elsewhere; this thread may be the best place. The video below contains highly recommended material regarding the who/what/ and why behind the COVID-19 crimes against humanity conspiracy, as defined in section 7 of the International Criminal Code.

    The video is likely at risk of being taken down and lays out the facts of the conspiracy by an intentional group of lawyers who have waged a class-action civil suit against specific conspirators.

    Last edited by T Smith; 7th October 2020 at 19:54.

  33. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to T Smith For This Post:

    avid (10th October 2020), greybeard (7th October 2020)

  34. Link to Post #478
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,605
    Thanks
    31,153
    Thanked 60,526 times in 12,090 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Operation Coronavirus is Working Hand-in-Hand with the Nanotech Agenda
    Published 2 days ago on October 7, 2020
    By Makia Freeman
    https://thefreedomarticles.com/opera...notech-agenda/

    AT A GLANCE...
    "THE STORY:It's an openly admitted fact the current COVID vaccines in development will be nanotech vaccines, using a variety of nanotech platforms and delivery systems.
    THE IMPLICATIONS:COVID is a pretext to push forward the sinister nanotech agenda – the infiltration of the human body with nanosensors capable of transmitting and receiving data.
    nanotech agenda
    The nanotech agenda (human microchipping) is being forwarded by Operation Coronavirus, especially with the coming COVID vaccine.


    The nanotech agenda –
    involving the placement of tiny sensors, devices and machines measured in nanometers inside the human body – is receiving a boost from the current fake pandemic which I have labeled Operation Coronavirus. My earlier article Hydrogel Biosensor: Implantable Nanotech to be Used in COVID Vaccines? discussed the possibility that the coming COVID vaccines may incorporate nanotechnology funded by DARPA called hydrogel, a biosensor which would monitor your body as well as send and receive information to the 5G Smart Grid. However there is much, much more to the story. The NWO conspirators have not only been planning this scamdemic for decades, but also have been planning the nanotech agenda for a long time too; now, with the advent of COVID, the two agendas are merging, with sinister implications for humanity. This article will take a closer look at the nanotech agenda and the current state of nanotechnology inside existing products such as vaccines. The agenda is already far more advanced than many people realize.

    2008 Paper Outlines Plan to Construct a Nanorobot Hardware Architecture
    A 2008 research paper entitled Nanorobot Hardware Architecture for Medical Defense analyzes in fine detail how nanotech devices such as nanorobots could be used to for various purposes such as “medical defense” and “epidemic control.” It states that it provides details on an “integrated platform and hardware architecture for nanorobots application in epidemic control, which should enable real time in vivo prognosis of biohazard infection.” The idea is to place nanotech inside our bodies which communicates in real time with the Smart Grid (powered by 5G) to provide intimate information to the authorities about us. Wayne from Alchemical Tech Revolution does a great commentary here. Following are some quotes from the paper:

    “Normally, for areas in public calamity or conflict zones, the absence of drinking water, any sort of fuel, electricity, and the lack of towers for network communication, including cable and wireless telephony, is a constant. In such a situation, the available infrastructure is far from ideal to enable a large scale medical laboratory with precise and fast analysis. For such aspect, nanorobots integrated with nanobiosensors can help to transmit real time information, using international mobile phones for wireless data transmission through satellite communication. In fact, nanorobots should mean an efficient and powerful clinical device to provide precious biomedical monitoring, both for soldiers as for civilian population.”

    Notice how they admit that there is dual use (for military and civilians) which usually connotes a weapons system with another use. In this case, they are disguising the deeper purpose (embedded surveillance) with the superficial purpose (a medical application):

    “Taking from the moment of infection, some contagious diseases may show the first symptoms after hours, a week, or longer time, like years or even decades. It means, for example, that when the public authorities noticed the infection from a contaminated person, showing external symptoms, a virus had enough time to spread itself through a circle of friends and workmates of the infected victim. Meantime, those mates were adversely driving the virus forward, and had started a catastrophic chain circle. The use of nanorobots with embedded nanodevices for real time epidemic control, as lab on a chip, can be useful to avoid serious contamination with large proportions.”

    The above quote hypes the danger of contagion, and specifically a virus, as a reason for you to willingly submit to the nanotech agenda and get embedded with nanotechnology. It appeals to the concepts of contagion and germ theory, however especially since the COVID scamdemic began, a number of brave independent researchers and doctors are questioning these ideas, which reinforce the current Medical Industry’s business model of petrochemical pills and vaccines.
    ..
    “We implemented a system simulation and architecture of nanorobots for sensing the bloodstream, targeting biochemical changes against pathological signals. Actual advances in wireless technologies, nanoelectronics devices, and their use in the implementation of nanorobots applied to epidemic control, illustrate what upcoming technologies can enable in terms of real time health monitoring. The approach for in vivo monitoring chemical concentrations should also apply to other.”

    As Wayne says, this stuff is next level contact tracing. Forget an app on your phone; the plan is for in vivo (taking place in a living organism) surveillance. There are many significant quotes from the paper, but here is one last one:

    “Frequencies ranging from 1 to 20MHz can be successfully used for biomedical applications without any damage.”

    Is the implication that there could be damage if frequencies are higher than 20MHz, such as in the 30-100 GHz range of 5G?

    2017 Study Shows Nanotech Contaminants Already Widely Present in Vaccines
    The nanotech invasion is already here. It’s not a question of “will they place nanotech in vaccines” since they already have. This 2017 Italian study entitled New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination details an astonishing array of nanocontaminants in vaccines, including particles made of lead, cadmium, cerium, iron, titanium, nickel, zirconium, hafnium, strontium, tungsten, gold, silver, platinum, antimony, bismuth and aluminum. The study (which analyzes 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines) states that these contaminants are “non biodegradable and non biocompatible”, that their inclusion is “not declared” and that their presence is “inexplicable.” It gives the benefit of the doubt to Big Pharma and its controllers when it concludes that “our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers. If our hypothesis is actually the case, a close inspection of the working places and the full knowledge of the whole procedure of vaccine preparation would probably allow to eliminate the problem.” Knowing the background of the human microchipping and nanotech agenda, I would suggest there is another way to see things.

    The study reveals how these nanoparticles can interact with the body in negative ways and cause harmful effects:

    “… investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction occurs and a “protein corona” is formed. The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body. Figure 5a-5f show examples of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec, of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix.”

    “After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas … But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination … As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect … due to a nano-bio-interaction … can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way … It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA … “

    “In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues … “

    So here is the question to ponder: are these so-called accidental and dangerous nanocontaminants just particles that deleteriously affect human health in numerous ways, or are they also nanosensors that can receive and transmit data to the Smart Grid?

    Nanotechnology is at the Forefront of Cutting-Edge Vaccine Research
    The nanotech agenda is closely connected to vaccines. For example, this 2019 study Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory Viruses touts the advantages of nanotech vaccines:

    “Conventional vaccines based on live-attenuated pathogens present a risk of reversion to pathogenic virulence while inactivated pathogen vaccines often lead to a weak immune response. Subunit vaccines were developed to overcome these issues. However, these vaccines may suffer from a limited immunogenicity and, in most cases, the protection induced is only partial. A new generation of vaccines based on nanoparticles has shown great potential to address most of the limitations of conventional and subunit vaccines. This is due to recent advances in chemical and biological engineering, which allow the design of nanoparticles with a precise control over the size, shape, functionality and surface properties, leading to enhanced antigen presentation and strong immunogenicity.”

    This July 2020 study COVID-19 vaccine development and a potential nanomaterial path forward explains how there are many nanotech platforms that will be included in future vaccines:

    “Nanotechnology-based approaches offer enabling solutions to the delivery challenge by trafficking the vaccine to appropriate cellular populations and subcellular locations … Moderna’s mRNA vaccine is based on a lipid nanoparticle platform, but there are many other emerging nanotechnologies for delivery of nucleic acid vaccines … Nanotechnology platforms including cationic nanoemulsions, liposomes, dendrimers or polysaccharide particles have been employed for improving the stability and delivery of mRNA based vaccines.”

    The coming Moderna COVID vaccine funded by NWO frontman and eugenicist Bill Gates is a new type of technology: an mRNA vaccine that uses nanotechnology. This goes for other COVID vaccines that are being developed. The COVID plandemic is being used as a pretext to rush forward even faster with nanotech vaccines, which ultimately accelerates the central NWO (New World Order) scheme: the human microchipping agenda. The nanotech agenda via COVID is on full display:

    “Nanomaterials play an important role in all aspects of vaccine design, delivery and administration. Nanoparticles enable multivalent antigen presentation and stabilization of antigens upon administration, they can serve as adjuvants to boost the immune response, and they can act as carriers for the targeted delivery of antigens. Indeed, an mRNA vaccine delivered by a liposomal nanoparticle is amongst the candidates currently in clinical trials against SARS-CoV-2. While it remains a fact that no mRNA or DNA vaccine is currently approved for any disease, the delivery of nucleic acids requires some form of modification or a nanodevice to prevent degradation in the body, and liposomal devices have indeed already been approved for RNA delivery, albeit not yet for vaccines.”

    Final Thoughts on the Accelerating Nanotech Agenda
    This is it! It’s game on! All the things that many alternative researchers have been writing, talking and warning about for years are arriving. Operation Coronavirus is the gateway to bring in the New World Order. COVID has been the excuse offered by tyrants for just about every draconian restriction under the sun. Now, with the coming COVID vaccine, we know it will include some kind of nanotechnology, since as I have outlined above, there are a plethora of nanotechnology platforms being developed in addition to things like hydrogel. Various studies and the pharmaceutical companies themselves are openly stating that there will be nanotech COVID vaccines. With plans to make this vaccine widepsread, administed by the military (as admitted in both the US and the UK) and “as mandatory as possible” (according to Aussie PM Scott Morrison), time is running out for people to wake up to the nanotech agenda – before it’s too late."

    *****

    Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and Parler.

    Sources:

    *https://thefreedomarticles.com/hydro...covid-vaccine/

    *https://thefreedomarticles.com/9-sim...e-coronavirus/

    *https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/8/5/2932/htm

    *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvzUtK3di0c

    *https://thefreedomarticles.com/deep-...on-everything/

    *https://thefreedomarticles.com/weste...ller-medicine/

    *https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-...amination.html

    *https://www.frontiersin.org/articles...019.00022/full

    *https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-020-0737-y

    *https://thefreedomarticles.com/bill-...lation-growth/

    *https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-020-0757-7

    *https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/19/vacc...n-pm-says.html

    *https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...covid-vaccine/
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  35. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    AlaBil (10th October 2020), avid (10th October 2020), Ba-ba-Ra (10th October 2020), greybeard (10th October 2020), pueblo (10th October 2020), Sunny (11th October 2020), T Smith (14th October 2020)

  36. Link to Post #479
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    3,585
    Thanks
    6,171
    Thanked 18,313 times in 3,241 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Humaphobia... fear of other human beings


  37. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (14th October 2020), greybeard (11th October 2020), norman (11th October 2020), T Smith (14th October 2020)

  38. Link to Post #480
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    673
    Thanks
    3,078
    Thanked 4,579 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Cui Bono? Is there an agenda?

    Coronavirus: WHO backflips on virus stance by condemning lockdowns

    Lockdowns have been used to control the coronavirus around the world, plunging millions of lives into chaos. Now the WHO has changed its mind.
    Alex Turner-Cohen

    October 11, 20204:19pm
    The World Health Organisation has controversially claimed that the world is misusing lockdowns as a way to control the virus.

    The World Health Organisation has backflipped on its original COVID-19 stance after calling for world leaders to stop locking down their countries and economies.

    Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method” of the coronavirus.

    He also claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty – with no mention of the potential lives saved.

    “Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer,” he said.


    Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method”.Source:Twitter
    “We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Dr Nabarro told The Spectator.

    “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganise, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
    Dr Nabarro’s main criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected.
    “Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean, for example, or in the Pacific because people aren’t taking their holidays,” he said.

    “Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. … Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”
    Melbourne’s lockdown has been hailed as one of the strictest and longest in the world. In Spain’s lockdown in March, people weren’t allowed to leave the house unless it was to walk their pet. In China, authorities welded doors shut to stop people from leaving their homes. The WHO thinks these steps were largely unnecessary.

    Instead, Dr Nabarro is advocating for a new approach to containing the virus.
    “And so, we really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method. Develop better systems for doing it. Work together and learn from each other.”

    The WHO’s criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected. Picture: Christopher Black/AFPSource:AFP

    His message is timely. In a world first, a number of health experts from all over the world came together calling for an end to coronavirus lockdowns earlier this week.
    They created a petition, called the Great Barrington Declaration, which said that lockdowns were doing “irreparable damage.”
    “As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection,” read the petition.

    “Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.”
    The petition has had 12,000 signatures so far.

    It was authored by Sunetra Gupta of the University of Oxford, Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, and Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University.

    When asked about the petition, Dr Nabarro had only good things to say. “Really important point by Professor Gupta,” he said.

  39. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (14th October 2020), justntime2learn (11th October 2020), norman (11th October 2020), onawah (11th October 2020)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 24 of 25 FirstFirst 1 14 24 25 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts