+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 6 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 106

Thread: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

  1. Link to Post #21
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    Quote Posted by Luke Holiday (here)
    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    The stats from Sweden, Brazil and Belarus will tell their own clear story (whatever that might be) in a week or two.
    … I don't follow - could you elaborate?
    Sweden, Brazil and Belarus are the three countries which are blatantly doing things very differently from all others. The results of their strategies will show up in their numbers, one way or another, soon.
    And so the "results of their strategies" have shown up in their numbers, for these naughty, non-complying (gasp) non-lockdown countries.

    Less than two weeks from your post we can see clear trends have developed with these three countries: Belarus, Brazil and Sweden.

    Belarus likely peaked already, a nothing burger here.
    With a population of 9.5 million and a whopping total of 8022 cases and 60 deaths.

    That is not a spike in the case/death rate in the Belarus chart a few days ago. They simply didn’t include the tallies from the two previous days and lumped them all together for one day (three in one day).



    Brazil likely peaked, certainly nothing extraordinary happening there.
    With a population of 212 million the number of cases and deaths are like a drop in a bucket.; 50,036 cases and 3,331 deaths.



    Sweden is likely close to peaking.
    With a population of 10 million it has 16,755 cases and 2,021 deaths. Certainly nothing
    to write home about.



    Considering the sizes of these countries, the number of cases and deaths in each is laughable really as far as fear and contagion goes.
    And they’ve accomplished this all by bucking the trend and not locking down.

    If you click on each chart you can see a bigger version.
    This is the ‘key’ for the charts:
    series 2 = cases
    series 1 = deaths

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    Basho (24th April 2020), ClearWater (24th April 2020), Eric J (Viking) (2nd June 2020), gini (24th April 2020), Luke Holiday (24th April 2020), Philippe (25th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  3. Link to Post #22
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    15th January 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Language
    English
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    911
    Thanked 2,145 times in 461 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by DaveToo (here)
    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    Quote Posted by Luke Holiday (here)
    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    The stats from Sweden, Brazil and Belarus will tell their own clear story (whatever that might be) in a week or two.
    … I don't follow - could you elaborate?
    Sweden, Brazil and Belarus are the three countries which are blatantly doing things very differently from all others. The results of their strategies will show up in their numbers, one way or another, soon.
    And so the "results of their strategies" have shown up in their numbers, for these naughty, non-complying (gasp) non-lockdown countries.

    Less than two weeks from your post we can see clear trends have developed with these three countries: Belarus, Brazil and Sweden.

    Belarus likely peaked already, a nothing burger here.
    With a population of 9.5 million and a whopping total of 8022 cases and 60 deaths.

    That is not a spike in the case/death rate in the Belarus chart a few days ago. They simply didn’t include the tallies from the two previous days and lumped them all together for one day (three in one day).



    Brazil likely peaked, certainly nothing extraordinary happening there.
    With a population of 212 million the number of cases and deaths are like a drop in a bucket.; 50,036 cases and 3,331 deaths.



    Sweden is likely close to peaking.
    With a population of 10 million it has 16,755 cases and 2,021 deaths. Certainly nothing
    to write home about.



    Considering the sizes of these countries, the number of cases and deaths in each is laughable really as far as fear and contagion goes.
    And they’ve accomplished this all by bucking the trend and not locking down.

    If you click on each chart you can see a bigger version.
    This is the ‘key’ for the charts:
    series 2 = cases
    series 1 = deaths
    … well done!!! - where did you get your graphs and stats? for the last 2 weeks - did you have to do the laborious plug and chug?

    Be well

    Luke

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Luke Holiday For This Post:

    graciousb (24th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  5. Link to Post #23
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by Luke Holiday (here)
    … well done!!! - where did you get your graphs and stats? for the last 2 weeks - did you have to do the laborious plug and chug?

    Be well

    Luke
    Thanks Luke!

    I have been keeping track of 60+ countries for the past few weeks.
    I create graphs daily, using the data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).
    I wrote macros in Excel to simplify the graph creations.

    A picture is worth a thousand words as they say, and these graphs are how I start each day.

    I can quickly zero in on the 'hot spot' countries at just a glance.

    The daily fear-porn that the MSM produces is totally useless.
    Each day you see headlines of 2,725,920 Covid-19 CASES and 191,061 DEATHS etc.
    and the big numbers are in red and seem really scary to the public.

    But what good are they if you have no point of reference?

    If the MSM had any guts, each and every day they would publish the following numbers in their headlines:

    Total worldwide Covid-19 cases 'a'
    Total worldwide Seasonal flu cases 'b'

    Total worldwide Covid-19 deaths 'c'
    Total worldwide Seasonal flu deaths 'd'

    Then people with half a brain would begin to say to themselves... "Gee, what's the big deal with this Covid-19 virus?
    I can clearly see that it's not nearly as dangerous as the seasonal flu!"
    Last edited by DaveToo; 24th April 2020 at 05:22. Reason: Was missing a 'worldwide'.

  6. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    Basho (24th April 2020), chrifri (24th April 2020), Eric J (Viking) (2nd June 2020), leavesoftrees (24th April 2020), Luke Holiday (24th April 2020), Michi (24th April 2020), onawah (24th April 2020), Philippe (24th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  7. Link to Post #24
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,262
    Thanks
    47,756
    Thanked 116,557 times in 20,694 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Millions Are Being Murdered | The Killer Cure
    Apr 23, 2020
    Suspicious0bservers
    462K subscribers

    "Antibody tests worldwide confirm VAST exposure to coronavirus, which means the real kill rate is exceptionally low. They shut down the world over a flu-level kill rate. The real harm is caused by the halt of society, which supports the existence of 7 billion people. They have sentenced millions to death with their 'cure' because of the poverty and hunger it has created.

    Before working in physics, Ben Davidson worked with the Ceragenin compound group, discovering the membrane depolarization mechanism of action involving cationic attachment and deconstruction via hydrophobic tail activity. The compounds are well-understood to be anti-viral and mimic the activity of the human body's own immune system. None of this is relevant in this discussion of the statistics, but some people demand to know why you deserve the microphone on a given topic."

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Basho (24th April 2020), Constance (24th April 2020), DaveToo (24th April 2020), DeDukshyn (24th April 2020), George (24th April 2020), graciousb (24th April 2020), greybeard (24th April 2020), Philippe (24th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  9. Link to Post #25
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    13,356
    Thanks
    32,618
    Thanked 68,863 times in 11,839 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    onawah I am surprised at the number of Avalon members who dont seem to get that the "virus" is mainly a hyped event.
    The fear story seems to be bought into.
    I really wish people would look into the aftermath of lockdown -- the heart break suffering that this is causing instead of being stuck in -- is this a flu or a virus should we wear the mask? leading to inoculation no doubt.
    People dont seem aware to the degree they are being brain washed.
    Tell the same lie over and over and it becomes believed.
    Your posts, onawah, are a welcome pointer to the truth.
    Chris
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  10. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    Basho (24th April 2020), DaveToo (24th April 2020), Ernie Nemeth (24th April 2020), gord (25th April 2020), graciousb (24th April 2020), Luke Holiday (24th April 2020), onawah (25th April 2020), Philippe (24th April 2020), pueblo (24th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020), XelNaga (28th May 2020)

  11. Link to Post #26
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    15th January 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Language
    English
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    911
    Thanked 2,145 times in 461 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Here is Tucker reporting on the states in the US that are not on lockdown and of course we have the same story... part begins at 30 sec


    enjoy


    … I don't know about you but I'm gettin a little peeved - I want retribution! … Or at least let me go to the GD beach and the gym!!!

    Blessings luke
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	NEWS-4.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	139.9 KB
ID:	43399  
    Last edited by Luke Holiday; 24th April 2020 at 14:58.

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Luke Holiday For This Post:

    DaveToo (24th April 2020), graciousb (24th April 2020), onawah (25th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  13. Link to Post #27
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    15th January 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Language
    English
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    911
    Thanked 2,145 times in 461 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by DaveToo (here)
    Quote Posted by Luke Holiday (here)
    … well done!!! - where did you get your graphs and stats? for the last 2 weeks - did you have to do the laborious plug and chug?

    Be well

    Luke
    Thanks Luke!

    I have been keeping track of 60+ countries for the past few weeks.
    I create graphs daily, using the data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).
    I wrote macros in Excel to simplify the graph creations.

    A picture is worth a thousand words as they say, and these graphs are how I start each day.

    I can quickly zero in on the 'hot spot' countries at just a glance.

    The daily fear-porn that the MSM produces is totally useless.
    Each day you see headlines of 2,725,920 Covid-19 CASES and 191,061 DEATHS etc.
    and the big numbers are in red and seem really scary to the public.

    But what good are they if you have no point of reference?

    If the MSM had any guts, each and every day they would publish the following numbers in their headlines:

    Total worldwide Covid-19 cases 'a'
    Total worldwide Seasonal flu cases 'b'

    Total worldwide Covid-19 deaths 'c'
    Total worldwide Seasonal flu deaths 'd'

    Then people with half a brain would begin to say to themselves... "Gee, what's the big deal with this Covid-19 virus?
    I can clearly see that it's not nearly as dangerous as the seasonal flu!"
    Agreed... and that's is why we have to do it here Thanks again - that is truly stellar work!!!

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Luke Holiday For This Post:

    onawah (25th April 2020), pueblo (24th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  15. Link to Post #28
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    2,242
    Thanks
    9,923
    Thanked 18,574 times in 2,218 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by graciousb (here)
    Quote Posted by shaberon (here)
    I don't think we can match Sweden step for step.

    In ten days they went from 4 to 10 thousand cases (and are noticeably beyond that now). Here, it went from 4 to maybe 6,500, out of over 70,000 tests. The hospitalizations are actually decreasing.

    Even if the tests and large pile of information are not very accurate, the number of people who are sick enough to be incapacitated is very tangible--it just is not very large. If we were not mostly kicked out of public and that number doubled, would it be a strain? Maybe. But we do not really know that normal function would double it.

    Even though it looks worse than here, Sweden considers themselves not as bad off as the hot spots, UK, Italy, etc.
    But the 'cases' in the stats includes people testing positive who are not sick or have mild symptoms. I'm in California, we've been on strict lockdown for many weeks, yet mass testing (I spoke to a nurse yesterday in Orange County where I was getting tested myself, she tested a company of 400 and had 50 positives, 30 were positive for antibodies, and 20 had active infection but no one extremely sick, I don't know demographics of the employees) , showing the thing is transmitting anyway. The lockdown is just prolonging the misery really.
    Dr. Erickson from Bakersfield, CA agress with you..

    The chance of dying from Covid-19 in California? 0.03%


  16. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to pueblo For This Post:

    ClearWater (25th April 2020), DaveToo (24th April 2020), Ernie Nemeth (25th April 2020), graciousb (25th April 2020), greybeard (24th April 2020), onawah (25th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  17. Link to Post #29
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    15th January 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Language
    English
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    911
    Thanked 2,145 times in 461 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Millions Are Being Murdered | The Killer Cure
    Apr 23, 2020
    Suspicious0bservers
    462K subscribers

    "Antibody tests worldwide confirm VAST exposure to coronavirus, which means the real kill rate is exceptionally low. They shut down the world over a flu-level kill rate. The real harm is caused by the halt of society, which supports the existence of 7 billion people. They have sentenced millions to death with their 'cure' because of the poverty and hunger it has created.

    Before working in physics, Ben Davidson worked with the Ceragenin compound group, discovering the membrane depolarization mechanism of action involving cationic attachment and deconstruction via hydrophobic tail activity. The compounds are well-understood to be anti-viral and mimic the activity of the human body's own immune system. None of this is relevant in this discussion of the statistics, but some people demand to know why you deserve the microphone on a given topic."

    Onawah,

    I was confused by this post, do you agree or disagree, were you addressing myself of anyone else on the thread? If you have the time could you clarify.


    Thanks


    luke

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Luke Holiday For This Post:

    greybeard (24th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  19. Link to Post #30
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,262
    Thanks
    47,756
    Thanked 116,557 times in 20,694 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    From all that I've read, I think Davidson is right, and that the virus is causing no more deaths than seasonal flu, but that the lockdown is going to cause millions of deaths, mostly of those people all over the world who are living from hand to mouth.
    (And he's generally a good source of info, though his usual focus is investigating solar activity, earthquakes, astrophysics and weather.)
    And I agree that the vaccine for it will do more harm than good.
    I think the elite's de-population agenda is what is behind this whole scenario.
    That was my only reason for posting that info.

    Quote Posted by Luke Holiday (here)

    Onawah,

    I was confused by this post, do you agree or disagree, were you addressing myself of anyone else on the thread? If you have the time could you clarify.


    Thanks


    luke
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  20. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Chester (24th April 2020), ClearWater (24th April 2020), DaveToo (24th April 2020), greybeard (24th April 2020), Luke Holiday (24th April 2020), pueblo (24th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020), XelNaga (28th May 2020)

  21. Link to Post #31
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    15th January 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Language
    English
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    911
    Thanked 2,145 times in 461 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    From all that I've read, I think Davidson is right, and that the virus is causing no more deaths than seasonal flu, but that the lockdown is going to cause millions of deaths, mostly of those people all over the world who are living from hand to mouth.
    (And he's generally a good source of info, though his usual focus is investigating solar activity, earthquakes, astrophysics and weather.)
    And I agree that the vaccine for it will do more harm than good.
    I think the elite's de-population agenda is what is behind this whole scenario.
    That was my only reason for posting that info.

    Quote Posted by Luke Holiday (here)

    Onawah,

    I was confused by this post, do you agree or disagree, were you addressing myself of anyone else on the thread? If you have the time could you clarify.


    Thanks


    luke
    From all that I've read, I think Davidson is right, and that the virus is causing no more deaths than seasonal flu

    Thank you for responding back
    ...hard to say - even if you trust the stats.. so many reports of inflated numbers coming from a variety of sources, huge financial incentives being offered for the Covid 19 death certificate diagnosis.

    Certainly the MSM is giving that impression

    Does anyone have the current number comparisons, CV 19 vs influenza even the stats - my guess you are right CV19 will be higher.

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Luke Holiday For This Post:

    greybeard (24th April 2020), onawah (24th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  23. Link to Post #32
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Thank the Lord for controls!
    Anyone who comes from a scientific background knows just how important controls are in experiments.

    Thankfully we have many countries and states that can be used as controls
    to see how effective or non-effective lockdowns have been.

    This is VITALLY IMPORTANT because no MSM outlet nor government will be able to say when this is over, "You see it was our strict lockdown measures that saved lives. We had no other choice but to ruin economies".


    I will add a few more non-lockdown countries that are doing very well thank you very much.

    Japan pop. 126 million
    12,368 cases
    328 deaths
    likely peaked already

    Iceland pop. 341 K
    1,789 cases
    10 deaths
    Peaked three weeks ago

    Taiwan pop. 23 Mill
    428 cases
    6 deaths
    Peaked over a month ago
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/ta...d-by-covid-19/

    South Korea pop. 51 Mill
    10,708 cases
    240 deaths
    Peaked over a month ago

    If anyone wants any graphs of these countries let me know and I'll post them.
    Last edited by DaveToo; 24th April 2020 at 22:32. Reason: Changed link color

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    gini (24th April 2020), Luke Holiday (24th April 2020), Philippe (25th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  25. Link to Post #33
    United States Avalon Member graciousb's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th August 2018
    Location
    Southern California
    Age
    64
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    2,143
    Thanked 1,390 times in 149 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by greybeard (here)
    onawah I am surprised at the number of Avalon members who dont seem to get that the "virus" is mainly a hyped event.
    The fear story seems to be bought into.
    I really wish people would look into the aftermath of lockdown -- the heart break suffering that this is causing instead of being stuck in -- is this a flu or a virus should we wear the mask? leading to inoculation no doubt.
    People dont seem aware to the degree they are being brain washed.
    Tell the same lie over and over and it becomes believed.
    Your posts, onawah, are a welcome pointer to the truth.
    Chris
    It's feeling to me like some kind of religion or ideology, a litmus test of good character a la 1950s ''red scare'' in the US where your willingless to believe was a sign of good citizen, or the witch scares of late middle ages where there was a witch or devil behind every door, and rooting them out signaled your virtue. So nonbelievers in Church of Covid are blasphemers and bad actors willing to harm the vulnerable and thus worthy of being dragged in the press and social media. Haven't we been through this rodeo before? When will we wake up.

  26. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to graciousb For This Post:

    gini (24th April 2020), Luke Holiday (24th April 2020), onawah (25th April 2020), Philippe (25th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020), T Smith (4th May 2020), XelNaga (28th May 2020)

  27. Link to Post #34
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    15th January 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Language
    English
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    911
    Thanked 2,145 times in 461 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by DaveToo (here)
    Thank the Lord for controls!
    Anyone who comes from a scientific background knows just how important controls are in experiments.

    Thankfully we have many countries and states that can be used as controls
    to see how effective or non-effective lockdowns have been.

    This is VITALLY IMPORTANT because no MSM outlet nor government will be able to say when this is over, "You see it was our strict lockdown measures that saved lives. We had no other choice but to ruin economies".


    I will add a few more non-lockdown countries that are doing very well thank you very much.

    Japan pop. 126 million
    12,368 cases
    328 deaths
    likely peaked already

    Iceland pop. 341 K
    1,789 cases
    10 deaths
    Peaked three weeks ago

    Taiwan pop. 23 Mill
    428 cases
    6 deaths
    Peaked over a month ago
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/ta...d-by-covid-19/

    South Korea pop. 51 Mill
    10,708 cases
    240 deaths
    Peaked over a month ago

    If anyone wants any graphs of these countries let me know and I'll post them.
    Yes please … and thanks again for doing the leg work OH just to be clear the numbers in red are just for this week?

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to Luke Holiday For This Post:

    shaberon (24th April 2020)

  29. Link to Post #35
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    15th January 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Language
    English
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    911
    Thanked 2,145 times in 461 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by graciousb (here)
    Quote Posted by greybeard (here)
    onawah I am surprised at the number of Avalon members who dont seem to get that the "virus" is mainly a hyped event.
    The fear story seems to be bought into.
    I really wish people would look into the aftermath of lockdown -- the heart break suffering that this is causing instead of being stuck in -- is this a flu or a virus should we wear the mask? leading to inoculation no doubt.
    People dont seem aware to the degree they are being brain washed.
    Tell the same lie over and over and it becomes believed.
    Your posts, onawah, are a welcome pointer to the truth.
    Chris
    It's feeling to me like some kind of religion or ideology, a litmus test of good character a la 1950s ''red scare'' in the US where your willingless to believe was a sign of good citizen, or the witch scares of late middle ages where there was a witch or devil behind every door, and rooting them out signaled your virtue. So nonbelievers in Church of Covid are blasphemers and bad actors willing to harm the vulnerable and thus worthy of being dragged in the press and social media. Haven't we been through this rodeo before? When will we wake up.
    I agree and I think this is why stories of death number manipulation c/b with statistics where people can look at the numbers (of likely inflated numbers) can be a powerful tool to change minds and in the long run - save lives

    Luke

  30. The Following User Says Thank You to Luke Holiday For This Post:

    shaberon (24th April 2020)

  31. Link to Post #36
    United States Avalon Member Chester's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th December 2011
    Location
    into my third life within this one
    Language
    English
    Age
    66
    Posts
    6,069
    Thanks
    34,011
    Thanked 33,206 times in 5,691 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    http://merlynagain.blogspot.com/2020...-that-has.html

    Enjoy

    Posted February 26, 2020 here -

    Quote Today is prediction day for me. You can slam me later on when (if) I am proven wrong.

    I believe the freakout about COVID-19 will be looked upon as "way overblown."

    Those who have allowed themselves to be "self-educated" by observing the dynamics of "public perception manipulation" (especially by taking the advanced, accelerated "courses" in such... those that have been so prevalent the last several years) have learned to observe "what they are telling us" and then "gauge the degree of fear" these efforts are attempting to achieve... then analyze these two within the framework of what "they" wish to achieve, and then...

    ...conclude quite the opposite!

    Since I have begun to employ, with discipline and consistency, this very approach, I have found my accuracy rate of my conclusions which inform my predictions has been raised exponentially.

    This COVID-19 will prove to be so.
    Last edited by Chester; 24th April 2020 at 23:10.
    All the above is all and only my opinion - all subject to change and not meant to be true for anyone else regardless of how I phrase it.

  32. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Chester For This Post:

    Ernie Nemeth (25th April 2020), gini (24th April 2020), shaberon (24th April 2020)

  33. Link to Post #37
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    15th January 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Language
    English
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    911
    Thanked 2,145 times in 461 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Here is a link I think everyone in the US may be interested in:

    https://bestlifeonline.com/when-will...-lockdown-end/

    1more week for me


    Be well and when this is over - may we all dance like no one is watching!!!

    … be sure to tap on Ms Bennes

    Luke
    Attached Images  
    Last edited by Luke Holiday; 25th April 2020 at 01:08.

  34. The Following User Says Thank You to Luke Holiday For This Post:

    shaberon (24th April 2020)

  35. Link to Post #38
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by Luke Holiday (here)

    Does anyone have the current number comparisons, CV 19 vs influenza even the stats - my guess you are right CV19 will be higher.
    Best to get stats straight from the horse's mouth.

    The U.S. CDC estimates that, from October 1, 2019, through April 4, 2020, there have been:

    24,000 – 62,000 flu deaths

    If we take the middle of the estimate, we get 43,000 flu deaths.

    Remember that is as of April 4, 2020

    As of today, April 24, 2020 we have 52,092 Covid-19 deaths.

    So if we add the flu deaths from Apr 4 to Apr 24, we will come up with roughly the same number of deaths.

    But I have come up with a much bigger discovery today.
    More to follow soon!

  36. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    gini (25th April 2020), Luke Holiday (25th April 2020)

  37. Link to Post #39
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by Luke Holiday (here)

    Yes please … and thanks again for doing the leg work OH just to be clear the numbers in red are just for this week?
    NO !!!!
    Those numbers are the TOTAL deaths!!!


    Here are the charts you asked for:

    Japan:


    Iceland:


    Taiwan:


    That spike you see in this Taiwan graph is not for one day!
    Data was not provided for three straight days, as you can see in the graph.
    So the spike is FOUR day's worth of data!

    South Korea:
    Last edited by DaveToo; 25th April 2020 at 03:57. Reason: spelling correction

  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    gini (25th April 2020), happyuk (12th May 2020), Luke Holiday (25th April 2020), pueblo (25th April 2020)

  39. Link to Post #40
    United States Avalon Member graciousb's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th August 2018
    Location
    Southern California
    Age
    64
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    2,143
    Thanked 1,390 times in 149 posts

    Default Re: Lockdown vs Non-lockdown: A statistical perspective

    Quote Posted by greybeard (here)
    onawah I am surprised at the number of Avalon members who dont seem to get that the "virus" is mainly a hyped event.
    The fear story seems to be bought into.
    I really wish people would look into the aftermath of lockdown -- the heart break suffering that this is causing instead of being stuck in -- is this a flu or a virus should we wear the mask? leading to inoculation no doubt.
    People dont seem aware to the degree they are being brain washed.
    Tell the same lie over and over and it becomes believed.
    Your posts, onawah, are a welcome pointer to the truth.
    Chris
    Quote Posted by pueblo (here)
    Quote Posted by graciousb (here)
    Quote Posted by shaberon (here)
    I don't think we can match Sweden step for step.

    In ten days they went from 4 to 10 thousand cases (and are noticeably beyond that now). Here, it went from 4 to maybe 6,500, out of over 70,000 tests. The hospitalizations are actually decreasing.

    Even if the tests and large pile of information are not very accurate, the number of people who are sick enough to be incapacitated is very tangible--it just is not very large. If we were not mostly kicked out of public and that number doubled, would it be a strain? Maybe. But we do not really know that normal function would double it.

    Even though it looks worse than here, Sweden considers themselves not as bad off as the hot spots, UK, Italy, etc.
    But the 'cases' in the stats includes people testing positive who are not sick or have mild symptoms. I'm in California, we've been on strict lockdown for many weeks, yet mass testing (I spoke to a nurse yesterday in Orange County where I was getting tested myself, she tested a company of 400 and had 50 positives, 30 were positive for antibodies, and 20 had active infection but no one extremely sick, I don't know demographics of the employees) , showing the thing is transmitting anyway. The lockdown is just prolonging the misery really.
    Dr. Erickson from Bakersfield, CA agress with you..

    The chance of dying from Covid-19 in California? 0.03%

    Thank you SO MUCH for posting that! Their calm, measured, factual, on the ground science based information presented so powerfully, even staying gracious with the reporters ignorant questions and lack of listening, made me actually choke up in sheer relief.

  40. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to graciousb For This Post:

    Chester (25th April 2020), greybeard (25th April 2020), pueblo (25th April 2020)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 6 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts