+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 4
Results 61 to 71 of 71

Thread: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

  1. Link to Post #61
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    64
    Posts
    5,924
    Thanks
    8,363
    Thanked 31,090 times in 5,232 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    I'll admit that one dynamic that springs to mind from the creation of patents all around the "virus" is that of protected scam status.


    They can use patent law or the threat of it to shooo away any attempt to turn that stone over and see what's under it.
    .................................................. my first language is TYPO..............................................

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    greybeard (21st October 2020), Gwin Ru (21st October 2020), onawah (21st October 2020)

  3. Link to Post #62
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Age
    75
    Posts
    11,896
    Thanks
    27,974
    Thanked 60,658 times in 10,429 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Crimes against Humanity




    Re the above video -- can I suggest that all of it is viewed as it is a landmark video.
    The perpetrators of this crime against humanity are going to be taken to court -- Nuremberg style
    Also in context the link below well worth looking at

    Worldwide Doctors and Lawyers are investigating the Pandemic

    The COVID-19 Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee

    https://acu2020.org/english-versions/
    Last edited by greybeard; 21st October 2020 at 06:56.
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    Gwin Ru (21st October 2020), onawah (21st October 2020), wondering (21st October 2020)

  5. Link to Post #63
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,792
    Thanks
    31,564
    Thanked 61,909 times in 12,299 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    COVID is a fraud; so is Trump, so is Biden
    Oct 21 2020
    by Jon Rappoport
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...p-so-is-biden/

    "COVID: Invasion of the Body Snatchers

    In my last article, I explained why the only thing worse than Trump is Biden, and therefore Trump needs to win the election.

    Face it. Both men, in their own ways, are fronting for massive COVID crimes. Biden hopes to front for even greater tyranny if he can gain the presidency.

    To excuse the two of them, on the basis that they’re blind to the fake science, doesn’t cut it. They’re willing to assault the Constitutional and natural freedoms of every American.

    They’re willing to go where NO emergency is permitted to go.

    Natural disaster, health disaster, political violence, war—there is NO situation that excuses past, present, or future lockdowns.

    The miles of fake science that have been launched to explain, justify, and make sense of the “COVID containment measures” are a farce; but beyond that, they’re irrelevant—because freedom and liberty are the enduring foundations of life. No matter what. They are not subject to “adjustment.” They’re not “relative” qualities, subject to “circumstances.”

    Once, this would have been obvious to the majority of Americans. Now, further pacified, further weakened, the majority are deep in hypnotic trance.

    Exchanging freedom for chains is a titanic proposition. Trump presided over it and did nothing. Since then, he’s refused to confess to the amount of economic devastation that has occurred. Biden wants to double down and make the slavery more complete.

    No American political leader with high visibility has the balls to call what has happened a COUP—call it a coup not once, but over and over, until more people wake up.

    In the several versions of the film, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, the characters continue to look the same, but they’ve been taken over by an evil force. They’re now robotic. An updated incarnation of the film could be shot at a large Whole Foods, showing shoppers trudging along aisles pushing their carts, wearing their masks, avoiding eye contact. Liberty and freedom have been washed from their minds.

    They are now “products of circumstances.”

    They can no longer think for themselves.

    I would have a character dressed as Thomas Paine enter the store, unmasked. He would walk among the shoppers, reciting his immortal words from The Crisis, Number 1:

    “THESE are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated…”

    He would brush away the store clerks who approach him and tell him he must put on a mask. He would ignore the masked shoppers who give him hostile looks. He would keep reciting his long-forgotten words, until…gradually the shoppers begin to awake from their induced trance.

    One, two, three of them take off their masks. They BREATHE…

    And why not have Trump enter the scene? He talks out of both sides of his mouth. He attacks Fauci. He praises the vaccine. He hails the rebirth of the economy. He says the virus is dangerous. He puts on a mask. He takes it off. He puts it back on again…

    Tom Paine approaches him and says, “When are you going to admit you were the central character in shutting down the American economy? When are you going to tell the people how great the economic and human wreckage is?”

    Trump spouts out blame against various persons and governments, but will not take responsibility…

    He says to Paine, “Watch out for Biden. If he comes in here with his troops, they’ll shoot you.”

    Paine laughs. “Dummy, I’m a SPIRIT. Bullets can’t affect me. I patrol the border between your side and mine. What I say is buried in the hearts of many people on your side. They turned into robots, but they never agreed completely with the change. They still yearn for the freedom we won a long time ago. They still know what it means. FREEDOM is what rips this whole insanity apart. Stop bull****ting like a real estate operator. Talk FREEDOM. Go to the core. You’re the PRESIDENT…”

    Trump looks baffled. “You mean the freedom to prosper, economically?”

    “NO, YOU IDIOT. THE FREEDOM TO BE FREE. FREE FROM CRIMINAL RESTRAINTS. DON’T YOU KNOW WHY WE FOUNDED THIS NATION?”

    Well, does he? Does Trump know? If he loses this election, it will be on him. He doesn’t know. He can’t go to the core. His mind and soul stop at building golf courses and re-energizing Kodak so it can manufacture pharmaceuticals."


    **************************************

    (Whether or not Rappoport's conclusion that the virus does not exist is correct, his information surrounding the plandemic is still important and worth considering, imho.)

    Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
    Oct19
    by Jon Rappoport
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...heer-nonsense/

    "Cowan analyzes yet another key document posted by the CDC, in their journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States"

    The hits keep coming. The CDC used an arbitrary computer “tinker-toy” process to invent a description of the virus. The virus that no one has proven exists. This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan.

    The CDC article was discovered by Sally Fallon Morrell. Her co-author, Dr. Cowan, fleshes out the fraud. Cowan’s article is titled, “Only Poisoned Monkey Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’.”

    Dr. Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.”

    “First, in the section titled ‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.”

    In other words, the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by assumption and arbitrary inference. If this is science, a penguin is a spaceship.

    Cowan: “To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.”

    “The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”

    As I’ve been stating, the “discovery” of the “new virus” was actually the foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. Nothing real or believable about it.

    But once the official pattern is laid down, others follow it dutifully.

    Dr. Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article. Using the ASSUMED new virus, in an UN-ISOLATED STATE, the researchers try to prove it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in the lab:

    Cowan: “The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:”

    “’Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [monkey cells]. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [monkey] cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.”

    “What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test…”

    “The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.”

    “The shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.”

    “My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.”

    So first…use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting, out of an arbitrary computer program…

    The existence and structure of the “new virus”…

    And then, taking a soup that the researchers claim contains the virus, in an un-isolated state, inject the soup into several types of cells in the lab…

    And discover the prime target—human cells—are not infected by the imaginary virus.

    And after this good day’s work, walk away and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened.

    And oh yes, lock down the planet based on this “science.”

    Naturally, we MUST take a toxic vaccine that prevents non-infection by the non-virus."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    greybeard (21st October 2020), kfm27917 (3rd November 2020)

  7. Link to Post #64
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,792
    Thanks
    31,564
    Thanked 61,909 times in 12,299 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    The missing COVID virus—answering critics’ objections
    by Jon Rappoport
    October 26, 2020
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...cs-objections/

    "For months, I’ve been providing evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been proven to exist.

    Several recent objections to my analysis have been brought forward.

    I’m not interested in mentioning names or getting into disputes with people who might otherwise be doing important work.

    One objection that’s been raised: a key CDC document [1] I quoted [2], which openly admitted that the virus was “not available,” was not really published in July of this year. It was reprinted or updated in July; it was originally published in February, when presumably, the CDC might have had a problem obtaining isolated virus.

    Really? The “pandemic” was already underway in February. The CDC, one of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world, couldn’t get isolated virus then—couldn’t get it anywhere. In other words, there was a declared pandemic without a proven virus.

    That is a damning fact. I don’t care whether it was February or July. If the CDC couldn’t get the virus, no one had it.

    No one had it, because no one had isolated it. Researchers simply assumed it existed.

    Not only that, the CDC document [1] [2] in which the agency admitted the virus was “not available” was a long article describing how to perform the PCR test for the virus. What virus? The one that wasn’t there?

    You put together a test procedure that will change the fate of humanity, but you don’t have the item the procedure is supposed to detect. This is permissible? This is excusable? Not unless science is fairy tales.

    A few superficial critics of my work should also realize this CDC document is far from my only evidence showing the virus hasn’t been isolated. They should read all my articles on the subject.

    Another objection to my analysis: labs do, in fact, have isolated virus in the form of “viral stocks.”

    But what does that phrase mean? It means SOUP. In dishes, in labs, researchers assume they have virus mixed with cells, mixed with chemicals and drugs and who knows what else. If this is “isolation,” a rabbit is a spaceship.

    Further, it is claimed, because some of those cells—monkey cells—die in the dish in the lab, this means the virus is there and is doing the killing.

    Nonsense. First of all, the cells are being starved of nutrients. Second, they’re open to being poisoned by the drugs and chemicals in the soup. The presumption of the virus doing the killing is unwarranted and absurd. [3] [4] [5]

    The third objection to my analysis: researchers can assemble the PCR test without actually having the virus. They can substitute “synthetic RNA” which is a close match to the virus.

    I see. And they know the synthetic RNA is a close match to the missing virus exactly how? Answer: they don’t know. They assume. They pretend. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

    This would be like saying: “Ahem. There is an unknown planet in our solar system. We haven’t seen it, we don’t know where it is, we don’t know what it looks like, but we do know the moon is a very close version of the unknown planet. Therefore, we can use everything we know about the moon to infer a precise description of the unknown planet.”

    This kind of tap-dancing might win you a prize at a junior high school variety show, but it has nothing to do with science.

    For those who want to further explore the core issue of the existence of the virus—e.g., medical professionals, who have large gaps and blind sports in their understanding—I STRONGLY suggest accessing the work of Dr. Andrew Kaufman [12] and Dr. Tom Cowan [13].

    I understand that some people who are very much opposed to the lockdowns and the economic destruction want to keep the argument along the channels of: the deceptive PCR test; the false case and death numbers; the dangerous vaccine; the ripping away of Constitutional and natural freedoms.

    Anyone who has been reading my more than 200 articles about COVID [14] knows I’ve been tackling those issues since the beginning. But the existence of the virus is not merely a distraction. It’s at the starting gate of the whole effort to initiate new levels of enslavement for all humans. It can’t be brushed aside.

    It would be foolish of me to criticize people who are otherwise doing very important work to stem the tide of the technocratic takeover of Earth, simply because they aren’t addressing the existence of the virus.

    If a few of them want to criticize me, fine. I’ve been around the block more times than I can count. It’s not a problem. I’d suggest, though, they do more than a dip a toe into the water of the stupendous virus-fraud.

    And don’t try the tactic of accusing me of “confusing people about the pandemic.” That is not a standard for measuring veracity. It’s actually a low-level con. When two sides disagree, proponents of one side assert the other side is sowing confusion. Baloney. The confusion, in this case, is inherent in the conventional view of virus-isolation and proof of discovery.

    One disease one germ, a thousand diseases a thousand germs—this lock-step ironclad pharmaceutical propaganda of more than a century has caused monstrous harm. It’s time to end the madness.

    We don’t need unanimity on every issue. But we do need a measure of good will and decency. I’m glad to report that, with only a few exceptions, this is what I find.

    Coda: Blithely accepting the existence of the virus puts people on a slippery slope. From that point on, they may accept at least partial anti-human “containment measures.” Lockdowns under certain circumstances, some mask wearing, some distancing, some restrictions on the size and nature of gatherings, some isolation from loved ones, some tracing, some testing. Before they know it, they’re dealing from a position of weakness and compromise: “I agree that a certain amount of destruction is necessary, but not as much destruction as Fauci wants…” On moral, spiritual, strategic, political, economic, and scientific grounds, that’s disastrous.

    Now, as a backgrounder, here is my article about Dr. Tom Cowan’s recent exploration of the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense: [5]

    Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense

    —Dr. Cowan analyzes yet another key document posted by the CDC, in their journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States”—

    by Jon Rappoport

    October 19, 2020

    The hits keep coming. The CDC used an arbitrary computer “tinker-toy” process to invent a description of the virus. The virus that no one has proven exists. This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan.

    The CDC article [3] was discovered by Sally Fallon Morrell. Her co-author, Dr. Cowan, fleshes out the fraud. Cowan’s article is titled, “Only Poisoned Monkey Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’.” [4] [5]

    Dr. Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.”

    “First, in the section titled ‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.”

    In other words, the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by assumption and arbitrary inference. If this is science, a penguin is a spaceship.

    Cowan: “To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.”

    “The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”

    As I’ve been stating [10], the “discovery” of the “new virus” was actually the foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. Nothing real or believable about it.

    But once the official pattern is laid down, others follow it dutifully.

    Dr. Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article. Using the ASSUMED new virus, in an UN-ISOLATED STATE, the researchers try to prove it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in the lab:

    Cowan: “The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:”

    “’Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [monkey cells]. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [monkey] cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.”

    “What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test…”

    “The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.”

    “The shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.”

    “My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.”

    So first…use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting, out of an arbitrary computer program…

    The existence and structure of the “new virus”…

    And then, taking a soup that the researchers claim contains the virus, in an un-isolated state, inject the soup into several types of cells in the lab…

    And discover the prime target—human cells—are not infected by the imaginary virus.

    And after this good day’s work, walk away and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened.

    And oh yes, lock down the planet based on this “science.”

    Naturally, we MUST take a toxic vaccine that prevents non-infection by the non-virus."

    (See the article by Dr. Tom Cowan here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1385867
    And articles by Dr. Andrew Kaufman here: https://thebigvirushoax.com/dr-andrew-kaufman and here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1385410 and here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1379093 )
    SOURCES:

    [1] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

    [2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...snt-available/

    [3] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

    [4] https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned...rew-the-virus/

    [5] http://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/...heer-nonsense/

    [6] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...snt-available/

    [7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...fraud-exposed/

    [8] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...n-plain-sight/

    [9] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...own-the-world/

    [10] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...believe-it-is/

    [11] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...e-magic-trick/

    [12] https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/

    [13] https://drtomcowan.com

    [14] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    greybeard (27th October 2020), kfm27917 (3rd November 2020), mountain_jim (27th October 2020)

  9. Link to Post #65
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,792
    Thanks
    31,564
    Thanked 61,909 times in 12,299 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    The missing coronavirus: why I’m not surprised
    by Jon Rappoport
    October 27, 2020
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...not-surprised/

    "As my readers know, I’ve been exposing the fact that no one has proved the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. I’ve been exposing the fact in a number of articles, coming at the issue from multiple angles. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

    I’m not surprised at what I’ve found. I could offer MANY reasons for my lack of surprise. In this article, I’ll just cite one reason. A prior case with similar features.

    That case is astonishing because: it was exposed in the mainstream press; many alternative news outlets failed to recognize the implications; most independent reporters have rarely, if ever, mentioned the scandal.

    It’s as if there is a fear of facing up to fraud beyond a certain level of “acceptability.”

    “Yes, we can expose this fraud and that one, but the other one over THERE…don’t touch it. It’s too hot, it’s too big. Let’s pretend it didn’t happen. Let’s gloss over it and move on to other things…”

    And with that, I take you back to the summer of 2009. The world was agog with a pandemic called Swine Flu, caused by the H1N1 virus.

    The CDC was reporting thousands of cases in America. A new vaccine had been rushed into production.

    But behind the curtain, something was wrong. Actually, the CDC had STOPPED counting cases. How could that be? The agency’s main task was reporting illness and death numbers. And in the wake of their stoppage, how could the CDC claim to know there were thousands of Swine Flu cases in the US?

    These questions intrigued a star investigative reporter at CBS, Sharyl Attkisson. She dug in and found out why the CDC had stopped counting cases.

    Here, from an interview I conducted with her, several years ago, is her explanation:

    Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

    Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website [9]] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

    —end of interview excerpt—

    The routine lab testing of tissue samples from the most likely Swine Flu patients was coming back, in the overwhelming percentage of cases, with: NO SIGN OF SWINE FLU OR ANY OTHER KIND OF FLU.

    Attkisson’s article about this scandal, published on the CBS News website, languished there. The next, bigger step—putting out the story on CBS television news—was waylaid. No deal. And CBS shut down any future investigation on the subject. Attkisson’s article died on the vine. No other major news outlet in the world picked up her article and ran with it deeper into the rabbit hole.

    Those test samples from “Swine Flu patients” were being analyzed at state labs all over the country. The analysis was looking for the H1N1 virus, the purported cause of Swine Flu. Whatever the types of lab tests being done, they were coming back negative.

    In other words, the virus wasn’t there. It was missing.

    The whole pandemic, in the US, was resting on a virus that was absent.

    There are important differences between the Swine Flu and COVID debacles. But you get the idea. Where is the virus?

    There are punch lines to the Swine Flu story. One of them is: mainstream molecular biologists, geneticists, infectious disease specialists, and public health experts were not deterred in the slightest by Sharyl Attkisson’s revelations. These professionals did not go back to the drawing board. They did not question their own methods. They never questioned their ability to discover or isolate a new virus. They remained unshakable in their biases.

    That’s called a clue.

    Here’s another clue. About three weeks after Attkisson’s article was published by CBS, the CDC—the agency Attkisson had exposed—decided to double down and tell a new fantastic lie.

    On November 12, 2009, WebMD published that CDC lie: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” [10] by Daniel J. DeNoon).

    22 MILLION cases. Based on nothing. Based on a virus that wasn’t there."

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...snt-available/

    [2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...fraud-exposed/

    [3] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...n-plain-sight/

    [4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...own-the-world/

    [5] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...believe-it-is/

    [6] http://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/...heer-nonsense/

    [7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...e-magic-trick/

    [8] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...cs-objections/

    [9] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/swine-f...overestimated/

    [10] https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/n...n1-swine-flu#1
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (28th October 2020), greybeard (27th October 2020), kfm27917 (3rd November 2020)

  11. Link to Post #66
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Age
    75
    Posts
    11,896
    Thanks
    27,974
    Thanked 60,658 times in 10,429 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    I find Jon Rappoport very credible.
    His knowledge on how various epidemics came to an end well researched.
    Cant find that info on a thread now
    Chris
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    East Sun (30th October 2020), kfm27917 (3rd November 2020), onawah (2nd November 2020)

  13. Link to Post #67
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,792
    Thanks
    31,564
    Thanked 61,909 times in 12,299 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    CDC PLANS COVID CONCENTRATION CAMPS
    by Jon Rappoport
    November 2, 2020
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...tration-camps/

    "A call to sheriffs, police officers, military, attorneys, and any honest politicians in America: WILL YOU DEFEND FREEDOM IN THIS COUNTRY?

    (Thanks to journalists Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree for exposing this nightmare.)

    The CDC document is titled: “Interim operational considerations for implementing the shielding approach to prevent COVID-19 infections in humanitarian settings,” updated July 26, 2020. Here are key quotes.

    As you read them, and realize the horrific plan, keep in mind that this system can be manipulated to order ANYONE into these camps.

    This is America??

    “The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.”

    “…the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.”

    “A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together. One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.”

    “Consideration: Plan for an extended duration of implementation time, at least 6 months. Explanation: The shielding approach proposes that green zones be maintained until one of the following circumstances arises: (i) sufficient hospitalization capacity is established; (ii) effective vaccine or therapeutic options become widely available; or (iii) the COVID-19 epidemic affecting the population subsides.”

    How would you like to be imprisoned in one of these camps?

    IS THIS THE AMERICA YOU WANT?
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alecs (3rd November 2020), greybeard (3rd November 2020), Hym (7th November 2020), kfm27917 (3rd November 2020), mountain_jim (4th November 2020)

  15. Link to Post #68
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,792
    Thanks
    31,564
    Thanked 61,909 times in 12,299 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Criminal NY governor declares new fascist COVID rules
    by Jon Rappoport
    November 3, 2020
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...t-covid-rules/

    "Face it, if the NY governor hadn’t been born into the family of Cuomo, if his father hadn’t been the governor of NY, he’d have emigrated to China where he’d be sweeping streets for a living. In Beijing, he’d be under 24-hour surveillance as a crazy man who might go off and do something bizarre and harmful.

    Chinese security man staring at a screen: “Who’s that idiot on the corner poking people with his broom?’

    Colleague: “Oh, that’s Cuomo, the American. He loves our system. He moved here a few years ago. We’ll leave him alone for now. He’s good press for us. We can say, ‘See, that’s what Americans are like.’”

    NY Governor Andrew Cuomo is presiding over the lockdown death of his state, and of NY City. Many of his rich citizens are bailing out of NY with their tax money and moving to Montana and other points west and south. Soon, NY, minus billions in tourist dollars, will be collecting so few taxes they wouldn’t fill a single garbage pail on a desolate boarded-up city street.

    NY, another Democrat share-and-care-and-love state, is hitting new highs on boot-clicking and saluting and fascist clampdowns.

    The NY Post has the story:

    “Most people who visit New York will have to quarantine for three days and then prove they are negative for COVID-19 before they are ‘free to go about their business,’ Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced Saturday.”

    “Now, travelers must show proof of a negative test taken within three days of arriving in the Empire State, and must also quarantine for three more days — and get a new COVID-19 test on the fourth.”

    “If that’s positive, they must isolate for two weeks, the governor said at an Albany press briefing.”

    “’Four days plus three days is seven days, and that’s basically, by all probability, the incubation period,’ Cuomo said, as he announced 2,049 new cases across the state and 8 deaths reported yesterday.”

    “Anyone who refuses to be tested must quarantine for 14 days.”

    “New Yorkers who return home within a day of leaving must take a test within four days of their arrival, Cuomo said. But if they are gone longer for 24 hours, then the new rules apply.”

    “Those who commute to New York between bordering states are not required to be tested each trip, he noted.”

    He noted, he declared, he announced, he ordered. Achtung!

    What if my first two tests are indeterminate and the third test is negative but the fourth test is weakly positive and the fifth test is definitely negative but the sixth test is positive? Do I stay in quarantine in a fleabag hotel for three weeks or six weeks or a year? What if I start seeing cockroaches from the sixth dimension invading my baloney sandwich? Who do I call? Ghostbusters? I thought I was just taking a cheap flight to the City to see the Empire State Building and Central Park. I didn’t realize I’d be marked as a political prisoner. Do I get one call to a lawyer?

    Damn, the Democrats missed their golden chance. They should have run Cuomo for president instead of old crazy Joe. Cuomo would show the country what law and order really looks like.

    Within 24 hours of taking over the White House, he’d have checkpoints on every interstate highway in the land. He’d bring in Chinese and Australian and UK cops to man them.

    “Sir, get out of the car and show us your proof of a negative PCR test taken within the past 48 hours. Open your trunk. Empty your pockets. Are you carrying cash? We’ll take it. We have to test it for the virus. You’ll get it back within two weeks. Where’s your cell phone? We need to transfer all the data to our center in Utah. Write down a list of your 50 closest contacts. Lying is a federal offense. Look straight at me. I’m taking your photo…”

    Congratulations, New York. You elected an empty name, Cuomo, as your governor, in your Billy Joel New York State of Mind.

    Wake up and smell the slavery. Suck it in through your masks."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. Link to Post #69
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,792
    Thanks
    31,564
    Thanked 61,909 times in 12,299 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts
    by Jon Rappoport
    November 6, 2020
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...as-fatal-flaw/

    "The COVID delusion is finished, blown apart.

    OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

    Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

    Well, how about THIS?

    July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

    Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at about the 4-minute mark [1]):

    “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

    Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

    Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

    That’s called a false positive.

    What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

    Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…

    Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…

    The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.

    The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.

    Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.

    If anyone in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together, pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people.

    “Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”

    If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the US economy and its citizens.

    All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled [2]: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See page 35. This document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”

    FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles (< 40.00 Ct).”

    Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”

    Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [3] Here are money quotes:

    “Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”

    “Set the limit” would usually mean, “We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.”

    The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients…”

    Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.

    Get the picture?

    I hope so.

    If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow."

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=260

    [2] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

    [3] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  17. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    greybeard (6th November 2020), Gwin Ru (7th November 2020), mountain_jim (8th November 2020), wondering (7th November 2020)

  18. Link to Post #70
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,792
    Thanks
    31,564
    Thanked 61,909 times in 12,299 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Catherine Austin Fitts in the latest Dark Journalist show talks about her long (20 year) association with Jon Rappoport during which she watched Jon and his allies map out fake epidemics, and says if she hadn't, she never would have been able to fathom how nuts the globalist COVID agenda is. Starting at about 52 minutes in.
    Inasmuch as Catherine has such a high opinion of Rappoport, I feel validated for having the same myself.
    .
    Last edited by onawah; 14th November 2020 at 08:36.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th November 2020), gord (14th November 2020), greybeard (14th November 2020), Gwin Ru (14th November 2020)

  20. Link to Post #71
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,792
    Thanks
    31,564
    Thanked 61,909 times in 12,299 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Don’t believe the COVID case numbers; it’s a scam
    by Jon Rappoport
    November 17, 2020
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...rs-its-a-scam/

    I’ve been saying this for 9 months. Don’t believe the COVID case numbers. It’s a wall-to-wall scam.

    The situation we’re facing is urgent right now. Red flags. Alarm bells.

    Politicians all over the US and the world are using “rising case numbers” to drive people back into lockdowns.

    The news media are trumpeting these reports of case numbers.

    THE CASE NUMBERS COME FROM THE TESTS. AND FROM EYEBALL DIAGNOSIS.

    Eyeball diagnosis can mean a doctor observes the patient has a cough, or chills and fever. That’s all. That’s all a doctor needs to make a diagnosis of COVID. That’s a case number. Ridiculous? Of course it’s ridiculous. It’s a con. Brought to you by the CDC.

    The PCR test, as I’ve explained dozens of times, spits out false-positives like waterfalls. It’s set up to do exactly that.

    Increase testing and you automatically get rising case numbers. That’s the real reason for pushing expanded testing.

    And there you have the scam in a nutshell.

    The fascist public health agencies and the politicians WANT lockdowns. They know the only way to justify the lockdowns is to claim rising case numbers.

    There’s another wrinkle you should be aware of. You’re seeing reports of “rising numbers of hospitalizations.” Wherever this is true (and not an outright lie), people could be coming to the hospital for any reason under the sun—including fear that they might “have the virus.” In the US, state hospitals receive federal money for every diagnosed COVID case. These hospitals need money. Simply and arbitrarily writing “COVID-19” on patient files becomes a way to get that money.

    Occasionally, I receive reports from people who work at hospitals or know people who work at hospitals. The reports usually go this way: “We’re seeing very serious cases here. People are arriving with unusual symptoms…”

    First of all, this is what hospitals are built for: people who are seriously ill. Some weeks are busier than others. Second, all over the world, there are always people who have unusual symptoms, resulting from a variety of causes. No virus required.

    I recently published a smoking-gun article on the PCR test. This was during the initial furor of the election (another example of fake numbers). For those who missed reading the article, and for new readers, here it is:

    Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts [1]

    The COVID delusion is finished, blown apart.

    OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

    Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

    Well, how about THIS?

    July 16, 2020, podcast [2], “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

    Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at about the 4-minute mark): “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

    Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

    Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

    That’s called a false positive.

    What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

    Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…

    Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…

    The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.

    The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.

    Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.

    If anyone in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together, pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people.

    “Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”

    If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul stench-ridden assault on the US economy and its citizens.

    All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled [3]: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See page 35. This document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”

    FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold [Ct] growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ( [less than] 40.00 Ct ).”

    Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”

    Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [4] Here are money quotes:

    “Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”

    “Set the limit” would usually mean, “We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.”

    The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients…”

    Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.

    Get the picture?

    I hope so.

    If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...as-fatal-flaw/

    [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE

    [3] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

    [4] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
    Last edited by onawah; 18th November 2020 at 00:30.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    greybeard (18th November 2020)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts