Those dodgy youtube videos managed to get our attention right off the initial event and on to the secondary event brilliantly.
Those dodgy youtube videos managed to get our attention right off the initial event and on to the secondary event brilliantly.
..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................
Hi Cosmored, not to tell you what to do, but had you paid some attention to the thread you would have noticed post # 82 as well as post # 93 which explained how real footages were "videoshoped".Posted by Cosmored (here)
Greetings Gwin Ru
This is from your post.
What to you think of the explanation for the smoke mushroom given at the 3:06 time mark of this video?The smoke mushroom observed in Beirut has nothing to do with what would have been caused by a conventional explosive.
BIGGEST EXPLOSIONS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdHRX7iIAQs
At first I was pretty sure the missile was real but now I'm kind of leaning toward the idea that it was photoshopped. I'm still not one hundred percent sure though.
As for the video you posted, this is what I tried to explain in my posts # 97 and # 110 regarding "areas of high pressure (push = condensation = liquefied gas) and low pressure (vacuum = pull)" (starting at the 02:44 time stamp). In the Beirut explosion, the pressure wave generated a subspherical condensed water bubble/cloud which was preceded by the blast wave which in turn carried the blast sound right behind it.
If it were the fertilizer that exploded, it would have needed to be detonated all at once as with controlled demolition type of technology in order to generate such a huge blast wave.
This video at the 08:06 mark shows another example of that push-pull effect: