+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

  1. Link to Post #1
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,358
    Thanks
    4,370
    Thanked 26,942 times in 4,616 posts

    Exclamation Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9:11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    University of Alaska Study Proves Gov. Wrong on 9/11 and WTC- 7, Third Building Collapse- originally aired 2019
    A group of engineers and architects is demanding the American National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) retract and correct a 2008 report that concluded one of three World Trade Center buildings collapsed because fire weakened the steel supporting it in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

    The Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911T) has formally filed a Request for Correction with the NIST following a new and detailed four-year analysis by a team at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF).

    It says the World Trade Center (WTC) building 7 collapse was a “near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building” and dismissed the NIST finding that heat from the fire caused beams to “walk off” their moorings.

    Sept. 11, 2001 is the tragedy of when two hijacked planes hit the WTC 1 and WTC 2 towers sending debris tumbling onto WTC 7. The NIST claimed that embers ignited a fire which then caused the 47-storey building to collapse on itself at 5:20 p.m., hours after the initial incident that morning.

    “We have filed a request for correction because the NIST report is wrong,” says Ted Walter, spokesperson for AE911T, which is a group of 3,000 engineers, scientists and architects, including more than a dozen Canadians ones, that paid US$316,000 for the study.

    “From an engineering perspective it is imperative to understand how and why this building came down under design load conditions,” said Walter.

    The study says NIST made some fundamental errors in how engineers estimated the rigidity of the outside building frame and that the heat generated by the fire did not trigger “thermal movements” at a critical base plate support.

    Further, the group, which includes families of those killed, asserts that the investigation is flawed and that the conclusions as to what happened must be based on “science and engineering” and accept that controlled demolition is a plausible cause.

    For expediency and because it was not hit by a plane, the study looked only at WTC 7 not the other two but AE911T has long claimed all three were subject to something beyond heat induced failure.

    “The report notes that the outside frame was more flexible than the inside framing which is where the elevator shafts were,” says McMaster University professor emeritus of civil engineering, Robert Korol, a fellow of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering who is also one of two peers who reviewed the UAF study.

    “Under the conditions described, the displacement of the outside steel would have been only one inch, not the 6.25 NIST claimed and not enough to cause failure.”

    Further, he says, the debris from WTC 1 which fell 943 feet to WTC 7 did not attain sufficient mass to cause structural damage to the steel in that building.

    The bottom line, he says, is that the NIST report is flawed and of no value to future engineering or architectural learning.

    The Alaska report adds new momentum to long standing claims by the AE911T that all three of the buildings should not have collapsed in the spectacular and deadly manner they did. Further, and Korol underlines this, there was nothing in the offices beyond basic desks, chairs, computers and paper that would be of such a combustible nature so as to feed a fire and raise the temperature to above 1,400 degrees Celsius and melt the steel structure.

    “We don’t even know if the steel was fireproofed,” says Korol.

    The group makes no assertion as to why it may have been a “controlled demolition” and says its only interest is in ensuring that there’s no need to rethink the structural steel design of highrises because the design was not at fault.

    UAF civil engineering professor Leroy Hulsey, principal investigator, his research assistants, Feng Xiao, now an associate professor at Nanjing University of Science and Technology and Zhili Quan, now a bridge engineer for the South Carolina Department of Transportation, found that the design standard of the building was not exceeded by the fire and that simultaneous and controlled demolition caused the structural steel to fail.

    “Fires could not have caused weakening of displacement of structural members capable of initiating any of the hypothetical local failures alleged to have triggered the total collapse of the building,” the report states. “Nor could any local failures, even if they had occurred, have triggered a sequence of failures that would have resulted in the observed total collapse.”

    The NIST report held that lateral support beams buckled because of thermal expansion from the fire and because they had “nowhere to go” and thus deformed and weakened the structural integrity. Other failures were triggered when joists and beams “walked off” their connections, NIST found.

    It was also the first NIST finding of a highrise collapse from thermal deformation caused by fire which the 125-page Alaska report disputes.

    It presents arguments showing it was a simultaneous global failure not a localized failure causing a domino effect.

    Hulsey et al argue that the collapse was straight down in a pancake fashion with about 2.25 to 2.5 seconds for free fall acceleration.

    “In a typical building collapse (given a localized structural steel failure) WTC 7 would be expected to experience a combination of axial rotation and bending of members, resulting in a disjointed, asymmetrical collapse at less than free-fall acceleration,” the report states.

    The study team undertook extensive computer and physical modelling, paying particular attention to the area around Column 79 which had been identified as the critical juncture of failure.

    Their conclusion is that Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building and were not subjected to heat above floor 30 because there were no fires there.

    Even if they did, they would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures and the team was unable to find any other plausible cause for the progressive sequence of failures.

    Source

    911-Conspiracy Finally Solved?: Names, Connections, Motives, 911Matrix of Details Exposed!
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 11th September 2020 at 19:39.
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  2. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    ChristianSky (11th September 2020), earthdreamer (22nd September 2020), Happyjak (13th September 2020), Kryztian (12th September 2020), Mercedes (11th September 2020), mountain_jim (17th September 2020), onawah (12th September 2020), Sarah Rainsong (11th September 2020), selinam (11th September 2020), Star Mariner (12th September 2020), Sunny (12th September 2020), Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020), TargeT (21st September 2020), thepainterdoug (12th September 2020), TomKat (22nd September 2020), toppy (12th September 2020)

  3. Link to Post #2
    United States Moderator Sarah Rainsong's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd January 2020
    Location
    Hi y'all!
    Language
    English
    Posts
    469
    Thanks
    8,146
    Thanked 4,021 times in 467 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    Appropriate post for today.
    The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air...
    Much that once was is lost, for none now live who remember it.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sarah Rainsong For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (11th September 2020), Mercedes (11th September 2020)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,188
    Thanks
    17,356
    Thanked 24,617 times in 3,934 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    So frustrating isn't it? That it takes hundreds of thousands of dollars and twenty years to determine what is only simple and common sense.

    And because it is so simple, let me just explain it.

    A building 50 stories high is very heavy. The earth pulls on the building and the building's columns support that weight and distributes it down into the foundation below the building. The building sits on the earth and if its supports shift, the massive height and weight of the building will shift as well.

    This initial shift determines for the duration which way a building will fall.

    In a demolition, the entire idea is to begin the initial shift straight downward. That is why the basement support structure is the primary focus. By removing the underpinnings of the building, the initial shift of support is downwards into the building's own footprint.

    Additional timed detonations then direct the bulk of the building into the center so the mass finds its way by gravity into the collapsed foundation.

    It is the initial shift that we are concerned with.

    If one or a few columns on floors above the ground were to give way, regardless of which ones, the initial shift will be at an angle to the ground - the building will lean into a collapse. As the other columns then fail, it will accelerate and amplify the intial angle of collapse, and there is no way in the universe that such an angled collapse can in any way suddenly right itself and fall into its own footprint.

    Instead it would fall sideways into other structures nearby.

    And since common sense has long since been abolished in our world, and we cannot trust our own intelligence, and will not accept the experts who do this sort of work for a living and who long ago insisted that this was a controlled demolition, we are left at the mercy of time and the tenacity of a few who will not let this thing go.

    Thanks to the bull dog tenacity of these few investigators maybe, what should be common sense, will finally be accepted by all - even if it is far too late to mean much, it does vindicate the whole concept of common sense.

    In a decent and normal world, common sense would not require experts to rubber stamp it.
    Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend. Bruce Lee

  6. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (11th September 2020), Delight (11th September 2020), earthdreamer (22nd September 2020), ExomatrixTV (11th September 2020), Mercedes (11th September 2020), onevoice (12th September 2020), Sunny (12th September 2020), Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020), T Smith (12th September 2020), TargeT (21st September 2020), thepainterdoug (12th September 2020), TomKat (22nd September 2020), toppy (12th September 2020)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member East Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2010
    Location
    USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,622
    Thanks
    4,004
    Thanked 5,171 times in 1,239 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    A lot of people knew it but could not do anything about it. Talk about deception.
    And the deception continues today in so many ways.

    I have come to believe that the people who have been gotten at can not see,
    they are conditioned to not see.

    We need to contact the new, young people in our society before they are
    indoctrinated by the "bastards".

    New defination of BASTARDS. Nothing to do with the original (the lowest type of
    self centered greedy pigs in human form). My interpretation.
    Question Everything, always speak truth...

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to East Sun For This Post:

    Blacklight43 (12th September 2020), ExomatrixTV (11th September 2020), Sarah Rainsong (12th September 2020)

  9. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,657
    Thanks
    31,223
    Thanked 60,920 times in 12,163 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    Sometimes a simple demonstration is worth a thousand words, though even then, denial may prove the stronger.
    "None so blind as those who will not see..."

    9/11 Scene from 'One by One' Rik Mayall's last film release before his sudden death
    90,146 views•Feb 20, 2017
    Neil Jones
    250 subscribers
    "I decided to share this on YouTube as it appears the films no longer 'officially' available to view or purchase anywhere; People need to see this clip before it shares a similar fate!
    09/06/2017 Update: Great news, this film is now available on eBay!
    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/One-by-On...YAAOSwIQdZNTKJ "
    Last edited by onawah; 11th September 2020 at 23:28.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  10. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (11th September 2020), Ernie Nemeth (12th September 2020), ExomatrixTV (12th September 2020), GMB1961 (12th September 2020), mountain_jim (17th September 2020), onevoice (12th September 2020), Sarah Rainsong (12th September 2020), Star Mariner (12th September 2020), Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020), toppy (12th September 2020)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,358
    Thanks
    4,370
    Thanked 26,942 times in 4,616 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    Israel & Mossad Links! // The BANNED FOX News 9-11 Report:


    Source
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    mountain_jim (17th September 2020), onawah (12th September 2020)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,358
    Thanks
    4,370
    Thanked 26,942 times in 4,616 posts

    Exclamation Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    9/11 Conspiracy Theories Thrive 19 Years Later...

    In April 2001 just a few months before 9/11 an X-Files spin off TV Series called The Lone Gunman ran its pilot episode in which a group of computer hackers get themselves into a Pentagon Think Tank Upload Directory

    Later in the episode the hackers were tricked into boarding one of the planes, which was then hijacked by an onboard computer autopilot which locked out the cockpit controls and began piloting it directly towards the WTC, until the hackers found a way to manually override the auto-pilot regaining control of the plane just in time to miss a collision with the WTC.

    Now… If Hollywood script writers could think this stuff up before 9/11, then how the heck was the Government so incompetent “(no warnings comp) NOT to have seen this coming?”
    The X-Files script writers certainly didn’t just make up the idea of Government think tanks and disaster scenario planning … Surely it was someone’s job within the Government to think up scenarios like 9/11 and plan how the Government would respond??

    Well, it turns out that there WERE people who held this exact job.. And the Pentagon Program which housed these think tanks is still Classified Above Top Secret and is called The Continuity Of Government Program, or COG for short. And it’s only because of evidence presented at the House Select Committe on Assassinations that we know anything about it at all.
    This is getting to the CORE of what we call the “Deep State”.

    Using scenarios like the Dawson Field Hijackings, and the B-52 which struck the Empire State during WW2, these Military Strategic Geniuses undoubtedly would have dreamt up a 9/11 style attack or something incredibly similar, and then carefully investigated each different scenario making carefully prepared plans for how the Government and Military would respond to such events.

    Back in the Ford and Nixon Administrations.. Three men were hand-picked to join this Shadow Government Network by none other than Deep State Grandmaster Henry Kissinger himself. These 3 men would go on to become KEY members of this Elite Team.

    Their names were Ricahrd B. Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and L. Paul Bremer.

    Oddly enough 30 years later in the year 2000 all 3 of these same Gentlemen would hold positions working for companies that were KEY occupants of the 3 WTCs that collapsed on 9/11...

    Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld both sat atop the Foreign Policy Advisory Board for Solomon Smith Barney, the primary tenant in WTC 7 which occupied 37 out of 47 floors including offices on the 28th floor where Rudy Giualini’s OEM bunker was located.

    The Rumsfeld Resume

    Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush's nominee for secretary of defense was appointed assistant to the president by…

    Many conspiracy theorists believe the “Inside Job” was actually partly conducted from this HQs (which had it’s own independent air and water supply)

    While Dick and Don were directing this group of international investment bankers on foriegn policy, later quitting their jobs to assume high ranking positions in the Bush Administration, their old pal Paul Bremer was working as the CEO of a company which just so happened to be the main Tenant inside of WTCs 1 & 2!
    An insurance company and “risk Management firm” called Marsh and McLennan.

    While his co-workers burned to death inside the Twin Towers, Paul Bremer miraculously survived showing little to no emotion when appearing on MSNBC to give the world it’s first taste of the Official Deep State Version of the Events of 9/11.

    He was the first person on Mainstream Media to finger Osama bin Laden as well as Iraq.. Odd that he would be so quick to blame Iraq for 9/11 on International Television that morning, seeing as he would later leave his job at the WTC to become the Occupation Governor for the entire Iraq War!

    These Revelations about this Continuity Of Government group are actually not new. This article came out in 2004, but no one really put all the connections together until now:
    Why was it never investigated that these same 3 men who sat on the Government Think Tanks that planned for things like multiple simultaneous hijackings of aircraft 30 years ago, and the fact that Dick Cheney was actually running DRILLS for these exact kinds of scenarios the day of 9/11 which resulted in confusing United States Aerospace Defense, which would have otherwise shot the planes out of the sky and prevented 9/11 from ever happening:
    Any forensics crime scene investigator with any common sense should have looked deeper into these connections and their very unusual convergence on the WTC 30 years later…

    Securacom Stratesec was a Bush-Connected CIA Front Company which actually oversaw the electronic security systems at the WTCs on 9/11.

    And you don’t need to look very deep or have degrees in Structural Engineering to see that the Official Story (which Paul Bremer actually gave to us on the day of 9/11) might not be the whole story…
    Securacom Stratesec also had contracts at Dulles International Airport where Flight 77 into the Pentagon was hijacked out of, and they also had contracts with United Airlines and Los Alamos Laboratories which developed the nanothermite that independent scientists and researchers discovered in dust samples and published several peer reviewed studies on.
    But to top that off, Securacom Stratesec also held its annual meetings in offices owned by the Saudi Arabian Government!
    Which as we now know has been intimately tied to 9/11 after those 28 pages were declassified from the 9/11 Commission Report revealing Saudi ties to 9/11 that were hidden from the American Public by the “investigators” who published the initial 9/11 “omission” report which didn’t even MENTION WTC 7…
    Source
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 12th September 2020 at 13:47.
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    earthdreamer (22nd September 2020), mountain_jim (17th September 2020), onawah (12th September 2020), Star Mariner (12th September 2020), Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020)

  15. Link to Post #8
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,358
    Thanks
    4,370
    Thanked 26,942 times in 4,616 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    Students can't answer basic questions about 9/11:
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    onawah (12th September 2020), onevoice (12th September 2020), Star Mariner (12th September 2020)

  17. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member thepainterdoug's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th November 2013
    Age
    67
    Posts
    1,097
    Thanks
    2,968
    Thanked 8,983 times in 1,045 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    Hard to believe I watched it all from the waters edge. Saw the second plane hit, remember it as grey, with no markings, but thats just me. Then later in the day they went down. This is a pic from a day or two later.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	911: after.jpg
Views:	9
Size:	94.7 KB
ID:	44292

  18. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to thepainterdoug For This Post:

    Gracy May (12th September 2020), onevoice (12th September 2020), Satori (12th September 2020), Star Mariner (12th September 2020), Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020), T Smith (12th September 2020)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Avalon Member Star Mariner's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th November 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,423
    Thanks
    13,431
    Thanked 18,280 times in 2,344 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    Quote Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
    Students can't answer basic questions about 9/11:
    Even though 9/11 happened before most of them were born, it's slightly shocking they know so little of an era-defining event that occurred in their own country. And at the same time remaining largely indifferent to it.

    Putting on my cynical hat, I suspect these students could however spell out precisely what LGBTTIQQ2SA stands for and what they all mean... Not their fault, that lies with the schools.

    If only they were shown this is class. Still the best 9/11 red pill there is (should be in Avalon library imo)



    *

    Click image for larger version

Name:	911_meme_2feecf5aa01b87016a1a9c3d.jpeg
Views:	9
Size:	58.5 KB
ID:	44294
    "When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace."
    ~ Jimi Hendrix

  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Star Mariner For This Post:

    Hym (12th September 2020), onawah (12th September 2020), Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020), toppy (12th September 2020)

  21. Link to Post #11
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,358
    Thanks
    4,370
    Thanked 26,942 times in 4,616 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    Dr. Steve Pieczenik Exposes Who Was Really Behind 9-11

    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020)

  23. Link to Post #12
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,188
    Thanks
    17,356
    Thanked 24,617 times in 3,934 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    The pan cake theory almost had me. Except that the pan cake theory relies on overcoming the resistance of each floor, as it is crushed by the floors above. And resistance takes time to over come. But the towers fell at free fall speed, proving there was little to no resistance at all. And again, if the pylons in the basement are not first removed by explosion, how can the building have all fallen into the basement?

    This is the world we live in.

    And now we have their next hoax, part real as the towers were, but just as much 'a new pearl harbor'. This time not just for America, but for the entire world, as they usher in the next set of even more draconian laws and severe austerity measures like lock downs, mandatory masks, and selectively euthanizing and sterilizing the world's population.

    It all starts by removing the ability of the individual to think for themselves. Commonsense and decency is the first causality of any conflict.

    Since we have been exposed to a lifetime of propaganda, it is a fair bet that we have been in a secret war for a very long time, maybe for centuries or even millennia.

    And whenever they need to move us quickly in a direction we would otherwise resist they devise another false flag to scare the beejeebees out of us so we will beg them to implement their next drastic measure.

    It is sort of how a herd of sheep or cattle are controlled. Lead the leaders and dissuade the stragglers...the rest will follow. It is what sheep dogs and cowboys do for a living. Which means of course that we have in our experiential repertoire the commonsense means to comprehend the way they herd us humans, too. It is just that that commonsense has been trained out of us in school and by life in the modern world.
    Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend. Bruce Lee

  24. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    earthdreamer (22nd September 2020), ExomatrixTV (13th September 2020), mountain_jim (17th September 2020), Star Mariner (13th September 2020), Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020), TargeT (21st September 2020)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,358
    Thanks
    4,370
    Thanked 26,942 times in 4,616 posts

    Exclamation Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    Why Aren't Insurers 9/11 Truthers? - Questions For Corbett:

    911 Trillions Follow The Money Documentary HD:
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020)

  27. Link to Post #14
    Germany Avalon Member
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    SW Germany
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,763
    Thanks
    2,371
    Thanked 9,083 times in 1,657 posts

    Default Re: Study Proves Gov Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

    two good sources for investigating 9/11 are firstly:

    Dr. Judy Woods' "Where Did the Towers Go?" and secondly Joseph Farrell's book:

    "Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks and Secret Sorcery"-

    Farrell takes the whole scenario farther than Dr. Judy Wood does; both books are very revealing and shed a lot of light on this heinous event-

    stay well all-

    Larry

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cardillac For This Post:

    mountain_jim (22nd September 2020), Sunny-side-up (22nd September 2020)

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts