+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: How many Mainstream Media (forced) Retractions Do You Need to Prove THEY are Fake News ... To make a valid point?

  1. Link to Post #1
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,341
    Thanks
    4,350
    Thanked 26,858 times in 4,600 posts

    Exclamation How many Mainstream Media (forced) Retractions Do You Need to Prove THEY are Fake News ... To make a valid point?

    How many Mainstream Media (forced) Retractions Do You Need to Prove THEY are Fake News ... To make a valid point?

    RETRACTION #321: Business Insider's Sonam Sheth Updates Defamatory Article About Project Veritas:

    RETRACTION #320: "Independent Journalist" Wendy Siegelman forced to DELETE tweet!:

    RETRACTION #319: Daily Mail's Megan Sheets DELETES multiple paragraphs in libelous article:

    • 318+ other MSM retractions (attacking alternative media) here
    • They all probably used Wikipedia as "trusted source" ... hey James O'Keefe when do you sue Wikipedia?
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 23rd September 2020 at 21:32.
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  2. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (23rd September 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (3rd October 2020), DeDukshyn (23rd September 2020), Ewan (27th September 2020), greybeard (23rd September 2020), Jayke (24th September 2020), O Donna (24th September 2020), onawah (23rd September 2020), rgray222 (23rd September 2020), selinam (23rd September 2020), Sunny-side-up (24th September 2020), Universoul (23rd September 2020)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    23rd October 2016
    Posts
    43
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 260 times in 43 posts

    Default Re: How many Mainstream Media (forced) Retractions Do You Need to Prove THEY are Fake News ... To make a valid point?

    I wonder if these mistakes are cynically planned. Meaning, they know what they are putting out there is false and will have to retract it. At that point it doesn't matter. Once the inflammatory article is out there people will read the headline, the information will be absorbed, regardless of whether it was true or not.

    The supposed "unbiased" press using these tactics against what and who they don't like will only invite increased government oversight and control in the future. So as always evil destroys itself.

    I wonder how many in the press actually want that outcome though. Perhaps they are knowingly self destructive. Perhaps they don't like the idea of a free press and want to undermine it.

    Never underestimate the self serving regressive impulse in humanity and its ability to cause people to want to destroy themselves, whatever their industry.

    *Self serving meaning an increasingly limited/regressed/superficially disconnected from the soul and higher Self version of the "self". Narcissism perfected and self nullification sought, is what we are seeing too much these days. It is tragic yet we all have the free will choice to reduce our consciousness and light if we want to. Of course we can also choose to expand it.

    The destruction on the outside is reflecting the struggles taking place within the collective psyche. I don't know if "we" will prevail-those who seek alignment with the soul or whatnot, the expansion of consciousness. I know that individually it is a good idea to wake up. To be conscious of this struggle so that one's stance and choice in it isn't made for them, rather of their own conscious will.
    Last edited by Universoul; 23rd September 2020 at 17:23.

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Universoul For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (23rd September 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (3rd October 2020), DeDukshyn (23rd September 2020), ExomatrixTV (23rd September 2020), onawah (23rd September 2020), Sunny-side-up (24th September 2020)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Canada Avalon Member DeDukshyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd January 2011
    Location
    From 100 Mile House ;-)
    Language
    English
    Age
    46
    Posts
    8,191
    Thanks
    26,273
    Thanked 35,193 times in 7,363 posts

    Default Re: How many Mainstream Media (forced) Retractions Do You Need to Prove THEY are Fake News ... To make a valid point?

    Quote Posted by Universoul (here)
    I wonder if these mistakes are cynically planned. Meaning, they know what they are putting out there is false and will have to retract it ...
    It been this way pretty much since media was invented, its just now we (the masses) have ways to verify and have the abilities to see the lies greater than we ever had in the past. (Internet)

    1) Its a numbers game ... if you put out 50% lies and only get called out on 1% of that 50% you still have a good record of 99.5% "accuracy"

    2) The way advertising works is the effect in the subconscious mind. The subconscious mind has no judgement abilities and sees everything as the truth. That is why the only thing that really matters is the exposure. The quality of a tv commercial is almost irrelevant respective to the overall exposure.

    There used to be these ads on the TV back in the 90s for "Canada Computers" - the absolute worst cringeworthy low budget commercials you ever saw - enough to make you hate the company, and they just kept making them the same way again and again.

    Why? Because only the exposure matters, and they knew that and had fun with the concept and managed to grow their business a massive amount in that timeframe -- it works, even if you walk away hating the commercial, you have a greater chance of buying a computer from them after that whether you like it or not. People need to be very careful about what they expose themselves to. Putting down the phone, turning off the TV, etc. is vital to not get caught in these manipulations.

    “If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.” - Adolph Hitler

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie
    Last edited by DeDukshyn; 25th September 2020 at 17:38. Reason: fixed a reversed number - but I take it you all knew what I meant ;)
    When you are one step ahead of the crowd, you are a genius.
    Two steps ahead, and you are deemed a crackpot.

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to DeDukshyn For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (23rd September 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (3rd October 2020), ExomatrixTV (23rd September 2020), greybeard (23rd September 2020), onawah (23rd September 2020), scotslad (24th September 2020), Sunny-side-up (24th September 2020), Universoul (23rd September 2020)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Wales Avalon Member
    Join Date
    8th October 2012
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Language
    English
    Age
    52
    Posts
    606
    Thanks
    3,172
    Thanked 3,403 times in 567 posts

    Default Re: How many Mainstream Media (forced) Retractions Do You Need to Prove THEY are Fake News ... To make a valid point?

    Very often mainstream outlets like Twitter, the Guardian etc will say these transgressions and retractions were down to "mistakes" but they're not mistakes these people are liars.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to happyuk For This Post:

    Deborah (ahamkara) (3rd October 2020), ExomatrixTV (24th September 2020), Sunny-side-up (24th September 2020)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,341
    Thanks
    4,350
    Thanked 26,858 times in 4,600 posts

    Thumbs up Re: How many Mainstream Media (forced) Retractions Do You Need to Prove THEY are Fake News ... To make a valid point?

    DRUDGE: Libs Fear O'Keefe Election Sting:
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    spade (27th September 2020)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,341
    Thanks
    4,350
    Thanked 26,858 times in 4,600 posts

    Default Re: How many Mainstream Media (forced) Retractions Do You Need to Prove THEY are Fake News ... To make a valid point?

    James O’Keefe labels New York Times “Propaganda Vortex”
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Deborah (ahamkara) (3rd October 2020)

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts