+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: Fauci

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,885
    Thanks
    31,716
    Thanked 62,498 times in 12,395 posts

    Default Fauci

    We've got threads with "Gates" in the title, and I think we should have one focused on Fauci too.
    Though he's not as wealthy as Gates, he's certainly influential and needs just as much close monitoring.
    This is the Story of Dr. Anthony Fauci and …
    by Maureen McDonnel | Sep 2, 2020
    From: Millions Against Medical Mandates
    https://mamm.org/fauci-connections/



    "We are asking everyone to review the message below, extract what is relevant for your specific audience or use the message in its entirety and send it out to your members, family, friends, followers, etc. Please help us push these messages out to the “movable middle” (people who have not yet made up their mind) so they can wake up to the deeper issues and rise up in solidarity against oppressive and unhealthy directives. Please promote this link or download the article and share it.

    Many thanks from the Members of MAMM’s Collaborative Communication Committee.

    It’s creepy and it’s kooky, mysterious and spooky. It’s altogether ooky, The Fauci Family.

    Above all, Dr. Anthony Fauci is a family man. It is a wonderful thing when you are in charge of potentially questionable research, and the person you are sleeping with (Dr. Christine Grady) is the one who signs off on the bioethics of your research. Score!!!

    https://clinicalcenter.nih.gov/meet-...rs/cgrady.html

    Dr. Fauci also believes in close ties, generosity and financial largess for his extended professional family. As a career government employee, he has forged intimate ties with GAVI, an organization that delivers vaccines.

    https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room...oser-ties-gavi

    Back in 2005, the Wall Street Journal noticed how Dr. Fauci embraced a number of biotech companies with newly bestowed NIH funding of $US1.7B, although he is not a venture capitalist.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB113383825463714813

    Fauci is generous to a fault. Look at the gift he has bestowed upon the company (Moderna – a top contender for a Coronavirus vaccine) that has never put out a single product into the marketplace. Look at the gift to Fauci’s own co-workers, as noted by Mary Holland, General Counsel, Children’s Health Defense: “It’s completely correct to say that NIAID will reap a profit on the Moderna/NIAID vaccine. There are 6 NIAID scientists who work for Dr. Fauci, each of whom would get $150,000/year indefinitely as their reward. So that’s $900,000 to his subordinates every year in perpetuity.”

    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...ind-of-lunacy/

    Did you know that his family even extends all the way to…Bill Gates…with a multi-million dollar relationship?

    https://nationalfile.com/exposed-tru...-gates-elites/

    For genealogy lovers, this next article covers some of the family trees between Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates. Isn’t it interesting that Bill Gates is connected to the same ‘FAUCI FAMILY’ members?

    https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/...melinda_gates/

    We all know that it is not what you know, it is W.H.O. you know.The China Syndrome* = Dr. Fauci’s international family

    *(The China Syndrome, a 1979 American movie that tells the story of safety cover-ups at a nuclear power plant).

    (Insert Fauci Wuhan meme here)

    Dr. Fauci clearly goes all the way for his Chinese family, crossing international borders and perhaps legal boundaries. Despite the fact that we nixed the Coronavirus gain of function research in the U.S., Dr. Fauci was the one who funded the Wuhan bat virus work and kept it going.
    https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-ba...search-1500741

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...on-wuhan-labo/

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...anned-us-2014/

    Sometimes, families become dysfunctional. Fortunately, NIH (Fauci’s employer) is rooting out scientists who are misbehaving with Fauci’s Chinese family. Do you wonder if there is a connection?

    1.https://www.npr.org/2020/02/14/80612...tific-openness
    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020...e-foreign-ties
    More Fauci Family Ties – How Fauci Fits in the Gates Plan


    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...nder-his-watch

    Fauci unfamiliar with SARS-CoV-2?

    How is that possible? For a half-century, his career focused on infectious diseases and the pursuit of vaccines to prevent them. More specifically, why doesn’t Fauci know more – a lot more – about this particular outbreak?

    He predicted it.
    He funded research into Bat-SARs viruses.
    He was involved in the 2003 SARS outbreak. Ditto the MERS epidemic in the Middle-East in 2012.
    He sat at the decision-making table on how to “plan and prepare” for coronavirus. He was there for the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa.
    And in 2016, he famously shilled the Zika threat in a nauseating roadshow with then CDC Director Tom Frieden, of #MeToo fame, that ran from March to the November Sunday before the presidential election. That evening, 60 Minutes featured Fauci and Frieden pitching the fear of a Zika pandemic. At the same time, the CDC director showed the CBS journalists a tour of a pandemic preparedness warehouse in case the “big one” hit.
    We’re six months into this pandemic and we have only witnessed gross incompetence by the CDC, corruption with coronavirus data and testing, and a deliberate effort to ban all natural remedies that would boost people’s immune systems, such as exercise, high dose vitamin C, oxygen therapies such as HBOT and ozone, vitamin D and sunshine and more. Isn’t that what the CDC, Fauci and Bill Gates have been trying to sell with vaccines?

    Never doubt that Dr. Fauci comes as a politically machined scientist who protects U.S. health agencies over the well-being of the American people and even over the office of the president. Be not deceived: There is no one more informed about coronavirus and epidemics than Dr. Anthony Fauci. He even states as much with a smug know-it-all smirk.

    The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board

    The GPMB board of directors is a Who’s Who of international socialist politicians and leaders. The former prime minister of Norway, Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland of Agenda 21 fame, is co-chair alongside many players responsible for the current global catastrophe.

    Three of the six GPMB board members include Dr. Anthony Fauci; Dr. Chris Elias, president of the Global Development Program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; and Dr. George Fu Gao, the director-general at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Gao is a member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

    Given just those three board members, many questions arise:

    Should the United States be sharing virus intelligence with the CCP while in the middle of a new economic cold war?
    Should we be collaborating with a communist-led country that has trampled human rights, has broken its 50-year treaty with Hong Kong three decades early and has updated its 1999 “Unrestricted Warfare” doctrine, in which riots, pandemics, and economic warfare are fair game?
    Has the U.S. offshored its national security policymaking regarding biothreats and foreign powers to organizations such as the Gates Foundation?
    What is a director of any U.S. health agency sitting on a global pandemic planning board at the World Health Organization?
    Why is Dr. Fauci allowed to share state, perhaps classified, information with an executive at the Gates Foundation and the director of the Chinese CDC?
    Two other sticky issues are known facts: Fauci was part of the leadership council to the Gates Foundation, from 2003–2010 and he provided funding to the Wuhan Lab for “gain-of-function” research and development last decade.

    What we don’t know is what did Fauci knows, and when.

    Since board members at a company, non-profit, NGO, or government agency would be aware of the contents of their entity’s annual report, it’s safe to say that Dr. Fauci knew about the UN’s deliberate release of a “lethal respiratory pathogen.

    The next question becomes: Did the WHO-GPMB already participate in the live virus release? If so, would Dr. Fauci be exposed to liability? And was he involved in the planning stages of a pathogen release leading to COVID19?

    Three salient facts are clear about Fauci and the WHO’s involvement with COVID19:

    Dr. Anthony Fauci sat on the board of GPMB.
    He was knowledgeable of the contents of its first annual report, “A World at Risk.”
    The UN-WHO planned to release a live pathogen for a drill and participated in Event 201 simulation exercise, along with China’s Dr. Gao, Rear Admiral Stephen Redd of the CDC, among other international preparedness experts.
    A full probe into the COVID-19 outbreak must be ordered immediately by the Trump Administration. It must include an in-depth look into the WHO’s GPMB. It must interview Dr. Elias from the Gates Foundation. It must learn what information Dr. Fauci shared or gave to the CCP beyond grant money for virus research. The investigation must also determine whether the UN and WHO’s new pandemic spearpoint in the GPMB plans to release another virus—for a second outbreak—this fall as its annual report states on pages 10 and 39.

    When these answers and more information into the planning of this pandemic can be ascertained, we will know whether Anthony Fauci is a Nostradamus junior or a science fraud, and much worse."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 36 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (2nd October 2020), Baby Steps (8th November 2020), Ben Macdonald (31st October 2020), Bill Ryan (2nd October 2020), Blacklight43 (2nd October 2020), ClearWater (2nd October 2020), DaveToo (15th November 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (24th October 2020), Denise/Dizi (3rd October 2020), Deux Corbeaux (8th October 2020), Dreamer148 (25th October 2020), East Sun (24th October 2020), ExomatrixTV (2nd October 2020), fifi (2nd October 2020), Franny (2nd October 2020), Gemma13 (3rd October 2020), greybeard (2nd October 2020), Gwin Ru (2nd October 2020), Harmony (2nd October 2020), Ioneo (2nd October 2020), Kryztian (2nd October 2020), Miha (2nd October 2020), Plissken Boon (24th October 2020), pueblo (2nd October 2020), Rawhide68 (3rd October 2020), Sadieblue (2nd October 2020), Satori (2nd October 2020), selinam (2nd October 2020), Stephanie (2nd October 2020), Sunny-side-up (8th October 2020), TargeT (24th October 2020), tessie999 (2nd October 2020), TomKat (4th October 2020), toppy (2nd October 2020), wondering (2nd October 2020), Zanshin (2nd October 2020)

  3. Link to Post #2
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    25,027
    Thanks
    102,522
    Thanked 317,441 times in 23,518 posts

  4. The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (2nd October 2020), Ba-ba-Ra (2nd October 2020), Ben Macdonald (31st October 2020), bojancan (3rd October 2020), ClearWater (2nd October 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (24th October 2020), Denise/Dizi (3rd October 2020), Elainie (2nd October 2020), ExomatrixTV (2nd October 2020), Franny (2nd October 2020), Gemma13 (25th October 2020), greybeard (2nd October 2020), Gwin Ru (2nd October 2020), Harmony (2nd October 2020), Ioneo (2nd October 2020), Kryztian (2nd October 2020), Miha (2nd October 2020), onawah (2nd October 2020), pueblo (2nd October 2020), Sadieblue (2nd October 2020), Satori (2nd October 2020), Stephanie (2nd October 2020), tessie999 (2nd October 2020), wondering (2nd October 2020), Yoda (2nd October 2020), Zanshin (2nd October 2020)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,635
    Thanks
    4,620
    Thanked 28,595 times in 4,884 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Fauci (Moderna) + Gates + China + Soros + Rockefellers and the WHO CDC "New Medical World Order" Tyranny

    So when you combine:

    01. Rockefeller PDF Document Lockstep 2010
    02. Rockefeller Foundation PDF ID2020
    03. World Economic Forum #Agenda2030
    04. Bill Gates and his "Event 201" exercise in Fall 2019
    05. "The Great Reset"
    06. Club of Rome "Planetary Emergency Plan"
    07. "Global Governance" run by unelected (psychopathic) Technocrats using advanced A.I. Algorithms!
    08. 5G - Mass A.I. Surveillance Smart Grid (The Big Elephant in The Room!).
    09. Supreme Court Defeats George Soros and his Overseas Groups

    All in plain sight ... meanwhile almost all Mainstream Media refuses to ask the hard questions!

    cheers,
    John Kuhles aka ExomatrixTV


    Selling The Second Wave to Extend (Keep) the Lockdowns:


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/embed/5qLuz_yr23w


    Source
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 2nd October 2020 at 10:57.
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  6. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (2nd October 2020), Ben Macdonald (31st October 2020), Blacklight43 (8th November 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (24th October 2020), Denise/Dizi (3rd October 2020), fifi (2nd October 2020), Gemma13 (25th October 2020), onawah (2nd October 2020), selinam (2nd October 2020), T Smith (25th October 2020), TargeT (24th October 2020)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,635
    Thanks
    4,620
    Thanked 28,595 times in 4,884 posts
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 2nd October 2020 at 12:01.
    ~no need2follow anyone only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~new: Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  8. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (2nd October 2020), ClearWater (2nd October 2020), Denise/Dizi (3rd October 2020), Gemma13 (25th October 2020), justntime2learn (2nd October 2020), onawah (2nd October 2020), Rawhide68 (3rd October 2020), selinam (2nd October 2020), wondering (2nd October 2020)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member Kryztian's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2012
    Location
    New Jersey USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,777
    Thanks
    10,951
    Thanked 13,126 times in 1,722 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    I am surprised that no one has been talking about this book, which came out just before COVID-19 became an international disaster.



    Fauci: The Bernie Madoff of Science and the HIV Ponzi Scheme that Concealed the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Epidemic by Charles Ortleb


    Quote November 2, 1984 was an especially tragic day in the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/AIDS epidemic. That was the day Anthony Fauci became the Director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. (NIAID). (Good Intentions p.128) It was the day a thin-skinned, physically ultra-diminutive man with a legendary Napoleonic attitude was positioned by destiny to become the de facto AIDS Czar. In the fog of culpability that constitutes what could be called "Holocaust II" one thing is clear: the buck, on its way to the very top of the government, at least pauses at the megalomaniac desk of Anthony Fauci.”
    Charles Ortleb was the publisher of the New York Native, a bi-weekly Gay newspaper which chronicled the the AIDS crisis and criticized both the lack of political attention it got and the mishandling of medical research by Anthony Fauci and others.

    I have not read the book, but I believe it collaborates much of what Judy Mikovits has written.

  10. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Kryztian For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (2nd October 2020), ClearWater (2nd October 2020), Denise/Dizi (3rd October 2020), ExomatrixTV (2nd October 2020), fifi (2nd October 2020), Franny (4th October 2020), Gemma13 (25th October 2020), Ioneo (2nd October 2020), Jayke (2nd October 2020), justntime2learn (2nd October 2020), onawah (2nd October 2020), Rawhide68 (3rd October 2020), selinam (2nd October 2020), wondering (2nd October 2020)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Indonesia Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th June 2018
    Age
    43
    Posts
    307
    Thanks
    700
    Thanked 1,580 times in 273 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Fauxci Fraudci

    works for Gates - that's all we need to know. The rest is hubris.

  12. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to spade For This Post:

    Denise/Dizi (3rd October 2020), East Sun (27th October 2020), ExomatrixTV (3rd October 2020), Gemma13 (25th October 2020), justntime2learn (3rd October 2020), onawah (3rd October 2020), pueblo (3rd October 2020), selinam (8th October 2020), wondering (8th October 2020)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Sweden Avalon Member Rawhide68's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th May 2017
    Age
    52
    Posts
    430
    Thanks
    1,184
    Thanked 2,312 times in 393 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Only 2 persons I have experienced this phenomena of that give me the creeps by just watching a photo of them.

    It's like a geneticaly built in warning sensor in me.
    Nr 1 is Larry Silverstein (owner of the NY towers), and this guy Dr. (Mengele) Anthony Fauci.

  14. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Rawhide68 For This Post:

    Denise/Dizi (3rd October 2020), East Sun (24th October 2020), Franny (4th October 2020), Gemma13 (25th October 2020), onawah (3rd October 2020), Plissken Boon (24th October 2020), Sarah Rainsong (4th October 2020), selinam (8th October 2020), spade (4th October 2020), wondering (8th October 2020)

  15. Link to Post #8
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,885
    Thanks
    31,716
    Thanked 62,498 times in 12,395 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    NEW: Deep State COVERUP & STONEWALLING of Dr. Fauci's Emails on #COVID19
    19,914 views•Premiered Oct 5, 2020
    Judicial Watch
    414K subscribers
    "The Deep State has been circling the wagons around Dr. Fauci, but that’s coming to an end – after an unnecessary delay. A federal judge has ordered the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to begin producing communications and other records of National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci and Deputy Director H. Clifford Lane about the World Health Organization (WHO), China, and the coronavirus."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ben Macdonald (31st October 2020), Bill Ryan (27th October 2020), Franny (8th October 2020), Gemma13 (25th October 2020), Plissken Boon (24th October 2020), Sadieblue (8th October 2020), selinam (8th October 2020), spade (8th October 2020), wondering (8th October 2020)

  17. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,885
    Thanks
    31,716
    Thanked 62,498 times in 12,395 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Fauci Emails Show WHO Entity Pushing for a Press Release ‘Especially’ Supporting China’s Response to the Coronavirus
    JUDICIAL WATCH
    OCTOBER 23, 2020
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...=press_release

    "(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it and the Daily Caller News Foundation (DCNF) received from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 300 pages of emails of Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, including his approval of a press release supportive of China’s response to the 2019 novel coronavirus.

    On January 27, 2020, the World Health Organization/World Bank convened the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB). The following day, the GPMB Secretariat writes an email with the subject line “TIME SENSITIVE Message from GPMB Co-Chairs: review of draft GPMB Statement on 2019-novel coronavirus:”

    There was consensus for the GPMB to issue a statement supportive of countries’ (especially China) and WHO response efforts, and to call for urgent actions to further strengthen global preparedness and response to this outbreak.

    Please find attached a draft GPMB Statement.

    On January 29, Fauci responds:

    Looks fine. Please see my comments in attached document.
    Thanks,
    Tony

    The emails were produced in response to a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed May 4, 2020, on behalf of the DCNF in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Daily Caller News Foundation v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:20-cv-01149)). The lawsuit was filed after HHS failed to respond to an April 1, 2020, FOIA request from the DCNF asking for:

    Communications between Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane and World Health Organization officials concerning the novel coronavirus.
    Communications of Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane concerning WHO, WHO official Bruce Aylward, WHO Director General Tedros Anhanom, and China.
    The time period for the request is January 1, 2020 to April 1, 2020.

    Many of the emails consist of missives to large groups of recipients, including Fauci, from Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which describes itself as “an independent monitoring and accountability body to ensure preparedness for global health crises” convened by the World Health Organization and the World Bank

    · On January 28, 2020, in an effort to organize a joint statement among international organizations on “sharing research data and findings relevant to the novel coronavirus (nCoV),” GPMB’s Jeremy Farrar emails upwards of three dozen, mostly redacted recipients, including the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Francis Collins, and cc’ing Fauci, sending them all a proposed joint statement, which is completely redacted in the documents provided by HHS, for their review and approval. Shortly thereafter, Collins responds: “NIH is happy to endorse the joint statement.” That same day, Professor Stewart Cole, President of the Institut Pasteur emails Farrar: “Thanks for the initiative. Pasteur is on board and fully supportive.” A subsequent statement, which was published two days later on January 30, says:

    The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) convened on 27 January 2020 to discuss the current outbreak of 2019-nCoV which was first detected in Wuhan, China and is now quickly spreading internationally. The Board commends the speed of the response so far by countries and the World Health Organization (WHO), the transparency of China in sharing information and the genome sequence of the virus, and the strong collaboration between China and affected countries and with WHO.

    · On February 1, 2020, the chief scientist at the WHO emailed Fauci to let him know the WHO was organizing a global research partners forum on February 11 and to ask him to attend, also suggesting he might think about funding and/or undertaking research on this “new viral outbreak:”

    As the head of an agency that would play an important role in addressing this new viral outbreak, either by undertaking or funding research, or both, I take great pleasure in inviting you to this meeting.

    · On February 4, Hilary Marston from NIH replied to the WHO’s invitation to a coronavirus forum, begging off on behalf of Fauci: “First, as to your kind invitation to have him join the meeting, unfortunately his time is entirely consumed as central member of the US government response team and he will be unable to travel.” She went on to recommend several individuals Fauci wanted to attend the meeting in his stead.

    · On February 13, 2020, it appears that National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Deputy Director for Clinical Research and Special Projects Dr. Cliff Lane was en route to Japan to “assist with rapid implementation of a study of the drug remdesivir as a therapeutic intervention for COVID-19, within the context of the current cases in that country.” It appears that WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros invited him instead to come to China to participate in the WHO Mission there. Fauci’s Associate Director for International Research Affairs, Gray Handley, replied to a redacted recipient at WHO that Lane was unable to accept the WHO’s invitation to come to China: “Due to the importance of this study, Dr. Lane may not be available to participate in the WHO mission to be undertaken in China next week.”

    It appears that when Fauci discovered what Handley had done, he countermanded his decision by having HHS Director of the Office of Global Affairs Garrett Grigbsy send an email informing two individuals, apparently at WHO, that Lane would be coming to China:

    I just talked to Dr. Fauci and there must have been some communication mix up about Cliff.

    Cliff Lane is absolutely going to China as part of the WHO team (if invited). [Emphasis in original]

    · In one fundraising campaign, Ilona Kickbusch of GPMB sent an email to Victor Dzau on March 3, 2020 and cc’ed Anthony Fauci along with more than two dozen other, mostly redacted recipients under the Subject Line: “Re: GPMG: COVID-19 FUNDING NOTE,” Kickbusch says

    Ahead of the GPMB Board call on Wednesday, I’m pleased to attach a note (on behalf of Jeremy Farrar, Victor Dzau and a small working group) setting out the urgent need for new funding for the global COVID-19 response.

    You will have seen the strong announcement today from the World Bank of up to $12 bn to support country response, which we warmly welcome. We are asking for your feedback on the call and consideration for the GPMB to launch an “ask” this week regarding needs not likely to be covered by the World Bank announcement – this would target the leaders and policy makers of other financing institutions and G7/G20 nations…The aim of the note is to encourage an immediate and full response to the needs of the world, recognizing that many countries are not well prepared and could be left behind.

    · On March 4, the GPMB group held a conference call with its board in preparation for making another $8 billion request to a group of international financial institutions. On March 5, Alex Harris, head of global policy and advocacy at Wellcome – a global charitable foundation, funded by a £26.8 billion investment portfolio that does grant funding, advocacy campaigns and partnerships to raise money for select clients (founded by the pharmaceutical entrepreneur, Sir Henry Wellcome) – emailed GPMB board members, including Dr. Fauci and included a lengthy list of “G7 leaders and Sherpas” and “International financial institutions:”

    Thank you for your input on the call yesterday regarding the COVID-19 funding request that the GPMB will be making to multilateral financing institutions and G7/G20 nations.

    In this regard I attach:

    An updated background note revising the ask to $8bn as a result of removing the [redacted] we had previously included for strengthening country preparedness, given the World Bank announcement

    “The government is now ever so slowly complying with the law and letting the American people know how they did business with the WHO and China at the outset of this pandemic,” said Daily Caller News Foundation President Neil Patel. “We are grateful to Judicial Watch for helping us force the government to do its job.”

    “These Fauci emails show how praising China was the odd priority of the WHO in the face of a novel and dangerous coronavirus,” said Judicial Watch Tom Fitton. “That the NIH tried to slow-roll the release of these emails and is still sitting on thousands more is a scandal.”

    On September 22, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney L. Friedrich ordered HHS to begin processing 300 pages of emails per month beginning on October 21. In a September 21 court filing, HHS said the agency could begin producing 300 pages of responsive records to the Daily Caller News Foundation beginning on November 30, eight months after receiving the Daily Caller’s request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The total number of responsive records is approximately 4,200, which would have pushed off the full release of the records until at least 2022. HHS also alleged that Fauci must personally review each one of his emails before they are released."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (27th October 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (24th October 2020), Gemma13 (25th October 2020), greybeard (24th October 2020), Plissken Boon (24th October 2020), wondering (24th October 2020)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Age
    75
    Posts
    11,971
    Thanks
    28,305
    Thanked 61,372 times in 10,504 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Its all a question of timing.
    So much is coming to the surface just now.
    Chris
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    Gemma13 (25th October 2020)

  21. Link to Post #11
    Avalon Member East Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2010
    Location
    USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,665
    Thanks
    4,250
    Thanked 5,457 times in 1,281 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    We've got threads with "Gates" in the title, and I think we should have one focused on Fauci too.
    Though he's not as wealthy as Gates, he's certainly influential and needs just as much close monitoring.
    This is the Story of Dr. Anthony Fauci and …
    by Maureen McDonnel | Sep 2, 2020
    From: Millions Against Medical Mandates
    https://mamm.org/fauci-connections/



    "We are asking everyone to review the message below, extract what is relevant for your specific audience or use the message in its entirety and send it out to your members, family, friends, followers, etc. Please help us push these messages out to the “movable middle” (people who have not yet made up their mind) so they can wake up to the deeper issues and rise up in solidarity against oppressive and unhealthy directives. Please promote this link or download the article and share it.

    Many thanks from the Members of MAMM’s Collaborative Communication Committee.

    It’s creepy and it’s kooky, mysterious and spooky. It’s altogether ooky, The Fauci Family.

    Above all, Dr. Anthony Fauci is a family man. It is a wonderful thing when you are in charge of potentially questionable research, and the person you are sleeping with (Dr. Christine Grady) is the one who signs off on the bioethics of your research. Score!!!

    https://clinicalcenter.nih.gov/meet-...rs/cgrady.html

    Dr. Fauci also believes in close ties, generosity and financial largess for his extended professional family. As a career government employee, he has forged intimate ties with GAVI, an organization that delivers vaccines.

    https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room...oser-ties-gavi

    Back in 2005, the Wall Street Journal noticed how Dr. Fauci embraced a number of biotech companies with newly bestowed NIH funding of $US1.7B, although he is not a venture capitalist.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB113383825463714813

    Fauci is generous to a fault. Look at the gift he has bestowed upon the company (Moderna – a top contender for a Coronavirus vaccine) that has never put out a single product into the marketplace. Look at the gift to Fauci’s own co-workers, as noted by Mary Holland, General Counsel, Children’s Health Defense: “It’s completely correct to say that NIAID will reap a profit on the Moderna/NIAID vaccine. There are 6 NIAID scientists who work for Dr. Fauci, each of whom would get $150,000/year indefinitely as their reward. So that’s $900,000 to his subordinates every year in perpetuity.”

    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...ind-of-lunacy/

    Did you know that his family even extends all the way to…Bill Gates…with a multi-million dollar relationship?

    https://nationalfile.com/exposed-tru...-gates-elites/

    For genealogy lovers, this next article covers some of the family trees between Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates. Isn’t it interesting that Bill Gates is connected to the same ‘FAUCI FAMILY’ members?

    https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/...melinda_gates/

    We all know that it is not what you know, it is W.H.O. you know.The China Syndrome* = Dr. Fauci’s international family

    *(The China Syndrome, a 1979 American movie that tells the story of safety cover-ups at a nuclear power plant).

    (Insert Fauci Wuhan meme here)

    Dr. Fauci clearly goes all the way for his Chinese family, crossing international borders and perhaps legal boundaries. Despite the fact that we nixed the Coronavirus gain of function research in the U.S., Dr. Fauci was the one who funded the Wuhan bat virus work and kept it going.
    https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-ba...search-1500741

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...on-wuhan-labo/

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...anned-us-2014/

    Sometimes, families become dysfunctional. Fortunately, NIH (Fauci’s employer) is rooting out scientists who are misbehaving with Fauci’s Chinese family. Do you wonder if there is a connection?

    1.https://www.npr.org/2020/02/14/80612...tific-openness
    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020...e-foreign-ties
    More Fauci Family Ties – How Fauci Fits in the Gates Plan


    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...nder-his-watch

    Fauci unfamiliar with SARS-CoV-2?

    How is that possible? For a half-century, his career focused on infectious diseases and the pursuit of vaccines to prevent them. More specifically, why doesn’t Fauci know more – a lot more – about this particular outbreak?

    He predicted it.
    He funded research into Bat-SARs viruses.
    He was involved in the 2003 SARS outbreak. Ditto the MERS epidemic in the Middle-East in 2012.
    He sat at the decision-making table on how to “plan and prepare” for coronavirus. He was there for the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa.
    And in 2016, he famously shilled the Zika threat in a nauseating roadshow with then CDC Director Tom Frieden, of #MeToo fame, that ran from March to the November Sunday before the presidential election. That evening, 60 Minutes featured Fauci and Frieden pitching the fear of a Zika pandemic. At the same time, the CDC director showed the CBS journalists a tour of a pandemic preparedness warehouse in case the “big one” hit.
    We’re six months into this pandemic and we have only witnessed gross incompetence by the CDC, corruption with coronavirus data and testing, and a deliberate effort to ban all natural remedies that would boost people’s immune systems, such as exercise, high dose vitamin C, oxygen therapies such as HBOT and ozone, vitamin D and sunshine and more. Isn’t that what the CDC, Fauci and Bill Gates have been trying to sell with vaccines?

    Never doubt that Dr. Fauci comes as a politically machined scientist who protects U.S. health agencies over the well-being of the American people and even over the office of the president. Be not deceived: There is no one more informed about coronavirus and epidemics than Dr. Anthony Fauci. He even states as much with a smug know-it-all smirk.

    The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board

    The GPMB board of directors is a Who’s Who of international socialist politicians and leaders. The former prime minister of Norway, Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland of Agenda 21 fame, is co-chair alongside many players responsible for the current global catastrophe.

    Three of the six GPMB board members include Dr. Anthony Fauci; Dr. Chris Elias, president of the Global Development Program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; and Dr. George Fu Gao, the director-general at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Gao is a member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

    Given just those three board members, many questions arise:

    Should the United States be sharing virus intelligence with the CCP while in the middle of a new economic cold war?
    Should we be collaborating with a communist-led country that has trampled human rights, has broken its 50-year treaty with Hong Kong three decades early and has updated its 1999 “Unrestricted Warfare” doctrine, in which riots, pandemics, and economic warfare are fair game?
    Has the U.S. offshored its national security policymaking regarding biothreats and foreign powers to organizations such as the Gates Foundation?
    What is a director of any U.S. health agency sitting on a global pandemic planning board at the World Health Organization?
    Why is Dr. Fauci allowed to share state, perhaps classified, information with an executive at the Gates Foundation and the director of the Chinese CDC?
    Two other sticky issues are known facts: Fauci was part of the leadership council to the Gates Foundation, from 2003–2010 and he provided funding to the Wuhan Lab for “gain-of-function” research and development last decade.

    What we don’t know is what did Fauci knows, and when.

    Since board members at a company, non-profit, NGO, or government agency would be aware of the contents of their entity’s annual report, it’s safe to say that Dr. Fauci knew about the UN’s deliberate release of a “lethal respiratory pathogen.

    The next question becomes: Did the WHO-GPMB already participate in the live virus release? If so, would Dr. Fauci be exposed to liability? And was he involved in the planning stages of a pathogen release leading to COVID19?

    Three salient facts are clear about Fauci and the WHO’s involvement with COVID19:

    Dr. Anthony Fauci sat on the board of GPMB.
    He was knowledgeable of the contents of its first annual report, “A World at Risk.”
    The UN-WHO planned to release a live pathogen for a drill and participated in Event 201 simulation exercise, along with China’s Dr. Gao, Rear Admiral Stephen Redd of the CDC, among other international preparedness experts.
    A full probe into the COVID-19 outbreak must be ordered immediately by the Trump Administration. It must include an in-depth look into the WHO’s GPMB. It must interview Dr. Elias from the Gates Foundation. It must learn what information Dr. Fauci shared or gave to the CCP beyond grant money for virus research. The investigation must also determine whether the UN and WHO’s new pandemic spearpoint in the GPMB plans to release another virus—for a second outbreak—this fall as its annual report states on pages 10 and 39.

    When these answers and more information into the planning of this pandemic can be ascertained, we will know whether Anthony Fauci is a Nostradamus junior or a science fraud, and much worse."
    Fauci, is obviously evil, period.
    Question Everything, always speak truth...

  22. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to East Sun For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (27th October 2020), Gemma13 (25th October 2020), Gwin Ru (27th October 2020), onawah (25th October 2020), TargeT (24th October 2020)

  23. Link to Post #12
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    851
    Thanks
    4,214
    Thanked 6,089 times in 837 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Anthony Fauci's Bio-War on Humanity

    henrymakow.com
    October 26, 2020


    Fauci-Funded Chinese/US Research Led to COVID-19

    The man charged with fighting the pandemic is responsible for inventing the virus and spreading it in the first place.

    When there's no doubt of a "surprise" outbreak, it means you're responsible for it.,

    All Suspicions Confirmed. The Chinese government now has the unlimited ability to keep manufacturing pandemic viruses


    Fauci-Funded Chinese/US Research Led to COVID-19

    By Peter R. Breggin MD and Ginger Breggin
    (henrymakow.com)

    Four scientists, led by Li-Meng Yan (MD, Ph.D.), who recently escaped from Communist China, have released a pre-publication paper (follow the paper's progress here) in which they confirm the direct relationship between the Fauci-funded research and China's ability to create SARS-CoV-2.

    Although the scientists do not name him, their work shows that research funded and politically supported by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Director of NIH's Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, led directly to the ability of the Chinese to engineer SARS-CoV-2 and to causing the COVID-19 pandemic.

    For many years, Fauci paid for and encouraged multiple research projects, at least two involving US researchers collaborating in making deadly viruses with China's notoriously insecure Communist-run biowarfare facility in Wuhan.

    They also confirm that the military-controlled Wuhan Institute now has the world's largest collection of coronaviruses extracted from bats--which constitutes a threat of further accidental releases and/or outright biological warfare. By supporting Wuhan and its researchers, Fauci helped put the entire world at risk for the current pandemic and for future ones.

    We first published about Fauci's dangerous activities on April 15, 2020, when we issued a report and released our video confirming that he and his institute were funding collaborative research between Chinese and US scientists on manipulating SARS coronaviruses. We suggested that this work potentially led to the laboratory creation of SARS-CoV-2 and the pandemic. Please see our Coronavirus Resource Center for additional analyses and background material.



    Within 48 hours of our report about Fauci's funding joint American/Chinese projects to create epidemic viruses, President Donald Trump cancelled funding for the heinous project. Unfortunately, Fauci remains Director of the Institute, despite being a Chinese collaborator and now scientific leader of pro-lockdown political forces that are dismantling our economy and suppressing our individual lives.

    UNDERSTANDING DR. YAN'S NEW SCIENTIFIC PAPER
    The term RBM refers to receptor-binding motif--the part of the virus that hooks to a receptor in human cells to allow the virus to enter the cell to cause disease. RBM is the part of SARS-CoV-2 that makes it so infectious and potentially deadly to humans. The first paragraph in the quote from Dr. Yan's scientific article (below) summarizes the basic finding of their research paper that the RBM of SARS-CoV-2 did not originate in nature. The paragraph then cites research (their citations 44-47, see details in the Additional Notes below) to indicate that this Spike protein (the RBM) has "repeatedly" been used in laboratories to create "human-infecting" coronaviruses of non-human origin.

    Two papers (citations 45 and 46; Menarchery et al., 2015 and Menarchery et al, 2016) involve direct Chinese/American collaborations on building epidemic viruses. Those two papers involved US/Wuhan Institute collaborations with acknowledgements that funding for the research was provided by Fauci's Institute.

    The second paragraph in the quote from Dr. Yan's scientific article (below) states that the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been working on studies to make these "human-infecting viruses" and specifically cites the paper that originally disclosed to us this tragic Fauci-funded US/China collaboration that led to COVID-19 (Menachery et al., 2015).

    The Yan et al. paper then warns that the Wuhan Institute possesses "the world's largest collection of coronaviruses." It follows this with a chilling observation that there is no longer any "technical barrier" to the Chinese altering these viruses into infectious ones through "engineering" the virus to give it "gain-of-function," that is, the ability to infect humans. This means that the Chinese have at their scientific fingertips the unlimited ability to keep manufacturing pandemic viruses.

    Here are the paragraphs from the Yan et al. scientific publication that we have been interpreting:
    While the above evidence and analyses together appear to disapprove a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2's RBM, abundant literature shows that gain-of-function research, where the Spike protein of a coronavirus was specifically engineered, has repeatedly led to the successful generation of human-­infecting coronaviruses from coronaviruses of non-human origin.44-47

    Record also shows that research laboratories, for example, the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), have successfully carried out such studies working with US researchers45 and also working alone47. In addition, the WIV has engaged in decades-long coronavirus surveillance studies and therefore owns the world's largest collection of coronaviruses. Evidently, the technical barrier is non-existent for the WIV and other related laboratories to carry out and succeed in such Spike/REM engineering and gain-of-­function research. P. 10
    FAUCI'S SELF-SERVING MISDIRECTION ON THE CAUSE OF COVID 19
    In a recent "scientific" article in Cell authored with one of his assistants, Fauci directly lied, claiming that the COVID-19 emerged from nature on its own and not from laboratory tinkering.

    Then he did more than ignore his own role in funding the engineering of coronaviruses with China, he blamed us--you and me, humanity--for causing the virus by disrupting nature:
    Infectious diseases prevalent in humans and animals are caused by pathogens that once emerged from other animal hosts. In addition to these established infections, new infectious diseases periodically emerge. In extreme cases, they may cause pandemics such as COVID-19... Disease emergence reflects dynamic balances and imbalances, within complex globally distributed ecosystems comprising humans, animals, pathogens, and the environment. Understanding these variables is a necessary step in controlling future devastating disease emergencies.
    This may be one of the most colossal misrepresentations in the history of the human race--the man most responsible for enabling the Chinese to engineer SARS-Cov-2 in their Wuhan Institute is blaming COVID-19 on humanity's indiscretions in nature instead of his own nefarious activities in the laboratory. Working with China, Fauci himself has funded and promoted taking viruses out of nature and engineering them to become pandemic viruses; but now he wants us to take his advice on transforming human activity in nature to make it less disruptive! Fauci is the Great Disruptor, whose work enabled China to unleash COVID-19 on the world.

    TIME FOR US TO ACT
    President Trump and the US Congress, as well as the American people, need to know that Anthony Fauci funded research that unleashed COVID-19 upon the world. In addition, this Fauci-funding has enabled China to possess the largest store of coronaviruses in the world, along with the technology to continue turning them into human-infecting agents. It is time to fire Fauci, to investigate this entire disaster, and to consider what needs to be done to protect the US and the world from future Communist Chinese pandemics, whether accidental or intentional.

    --

    Additional Notes on the four articles cited by Yan et al. (references 44-47) as key to China's coronavirus research can be found at the source.

    Related:

  24. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (27th October 2020), Bill Ryan (27th October 2020), ClearWater (27th October 2020), East Sun (27th October 2020), Gemma13 (29th October 2020), onawah (27th October 2020), wondering (27th October 2020)

  25. Link to Post #13
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,885
    Thanks
    31,716
    Thanked 62,498 times in 12,395 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Anthony Fauci: 40 Years of Lies From AZT to Remdesivir
    October 29, 2020
    https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/antho...to-remdesivir/

    by Torsten Engelbrecht & Konstantin Demeter
    Off-Guardian.org

    "As the planet’s “Virus Tsar” since 1984, he has spread misinformation and ignored critical questions. The consequences could hardly be more fatal.

    Last week, US president Donald Trump committed a kind of blasphemy by attacking Anthony Fauci, his pandemic consultant and practically the spokesperson for the White House regarding COVID-19, saying that:

    People are tired of hearing Fauci and all these idiots. He’s been here for 500 years.  Fauci is a disaster. If I listened to him, we’d have 500,000 deaths.

    A remarkable statement of historical dimension, since Trump is the first American head of state to cast doubt on Fauci, who has acted as the virus tsar for no less than six presidencies: Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush Jr., Obama and Trump.

    To make it clear, the logic behind Trump’s attack is scientifically unfounded. He refers to a statement of Fauci he made some months ago, according to which people should “not wear face masks.”. But even if all Americans had followed this advice, it would not have lead to a single extra death.

    The simple reason is that the COVID-19 death rate data show unambiguously that a viral cause for the excess mortality seen in some countries, including the US, is virtually impossible — and that instead the massive experimental use of highly toxic drugs is the key factor in this context, as I recently outlined together with Claus Köhnlein MD, in an in-depth analysis for Real News Australia.

    But on one point Trump hits the nail on the head: Fauci is simply a disaster, because he has been telling the world one lie after another for decades, while his presence actually feels almost as if he has been there for 500 years. And tragically, the mass media sell them to their audience of billions as a kind of gospel.

    An example is — there’s no other way to put it — the downright shameful four page interview with Anthony Fauci in Germany’s best-known news magazine, Der Spiegel, published recently.

    Shameful because Fauci here, too, is doing what he is a master at, namely, hoaxing the world — and Der Spiegel has been hoodwinked by him and, in admiration for the man dubbed by The New Yorker as “America’s Doctor,” which is a euphemism of the highest order, has forgotten to do its job: to ask critical questions.

    The initial question alone is unworthy of a journalistic medium:

    Dr. Fauci, you once said of yourself that you had‚ a reputation of speaking the truth at all times and not sugarcoating things. Can we hope to get a few samples of previously unspoken truths from you today?”

    And Fauci answers:

    Of course! I will always give you truth. Just ask the question and I’ll give you the truth. At least to the extent, that I think it is, right [laughs].”

    Fauci: 36 years as the Modern Munchausen
    What a farce. What Fauci thinks is right may be true for himself. But his statements do not stand up to an objective examination of scientific evidence.

    Therefore he is not only “Dr. Wrong”, as he has been called recently by the conservative economist Stephen Moore, but actually “Dr. Baron of Lies”, because he must be aware that he is telling the untruth or that there are well-supported doubts about his theses. Especially because, since the beginning of his “reign” as global virus tsar in 1984, he has been repeatedly confronted with critical questions by many people (including me).

    And what was his reaction over and over again? He just silenced and ignored the inquirers.

    This is why his answer to Der Spiegel, “Just ask the question and I’ll give you the truth” is also a downright Fauci lie.

    Unfortunately, he gets away with it not least because even world-famous personalities like Brad Pitt buy his lies and sell him to the world public as thoroughly sincere.

    This is what happened on April 25, when the Hollywood star portrayed Fauci on Saturday Night Live. With a Fauci wig on his head and with the virus tsar’s typical raspy voice Brad Pitt spoke: “Until [I am getting fired by Trump], I am gonna be there puttin’ out the facts to whoever is listening.”

    And at the end of the performance the actor took off the wig and said in his own voice: “To the real Dr. Fauci. Thank you for your calm, and your clarity in this unnverving time.”ix

    But the only truth in these statements by Brad Pitt is that we live in “unnerving times.”

    In fact, not outlining the facts, but saying the untruth and not answering is a characteristic behaviour that runs through Fauci’s entire 36 years in which the now 79-year-old has been director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). And this has very serious consequences.

    Because with a current annual budget of almost six billion dollars, Fauci’s institute is a giant in AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and autoimmune research — while he himself is perhaps the most powerful man in the global virus circus.

    The abundance of lies Fauci puts into the world is so great that you don’t even know where to start to enumerate them all. One of the many topic fields he is sending out factually untenable statements to the whole world is without question COVID-19. In order to become aware of this, one has to realize that:

    a) the RT-PCR tests are scientifically meaningless in detecting so-called SARS-CoV-2 infections,
    b) even according to orthodox researchers so-called SARS-CoV-2 is not excessively dangerous
    c) people, referred to as COVID-19 victims, probably did not die of so-called SARS-CoV-2 but of non-viral factors such as cancer and other serious underlying diseases, the experimental administration of highly toxic drugs and/or invasive ventilation.
    Thus, Fauci‘s narratives about the alleged novel coronavirus become downright a fairy tale. And a fairy tale teller, a modern-day Munchausen “Baron of Lies”, Fauci has been since he became the director of the NIAID in 1984 — the year Ronald Reagan was US president and AIDS was put on the world stage.

    This was a turning point in modern world history. Since then the virus hunters enjoy god-like status, and this was accomplished by lies and deceit. Fauci played a decisive role in its creation, and the parallels to the “installation” of COVID-19 are striking.

    How Fauci’s Falsehoods turned AZT into a “magic bullet”
    How could this happen? Not least due to the swine flu disaster in 1976 in which 50 million US citizens were persuaded to get vaccinated, resulting in side effects in 20 percent to 40 percent of recipients, including paralysis and even death, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) came into unsettled political waters at the end of the 1970s.

    As a result, the great contemplation began at these two most powerful organizations related to health politics and biomedical science.

    In fact, Red Cross officer Paul Cumming told the San Francisco Chronicle in 1994 that “the CDC increasingly needed a major epidemic” at the beginning of the 1980s “to justify its existence.” And the HIV/AIDS theory was a salvation for American epidemic authorities.

    As a result, “All the old virus hunters from the National Cancer Institute put new signs on their doors and became AIDS researchers. [US President Ronald] Reagan sent up about a billion dollars just for starters,” noted Kary Mullis who received the Nobel Prize for his invention of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) which plays a central role in the context of COVID-19. “And suddenly everybody who could claim to be any kind of medical scientist and who hadn’t had anything much to do lately was fully employed.“

    Among those who jumped over from cancer research to AIDS research, the best known is Robert Gallo. “HIV didn’t suddenly pop out of the rain forest or Haiti. It just popped into Bob Gallo’s hands at a time when he needed a new career,” as Mullis, who unfortunately died last year, noted with a wink.

    And it started with big lies. The most important one was announced in April 1984 by Gallo, working under Fauci, when he claimed in a press conference that gained worldwide attention that „the probable cause of AIDS has been found.“

    NB. Gallo’s papers were printed in the journal Science over one week after his press conference and also after he had filed a patent application for an antibody test later misleadingly named “HIV test”. Thus, nobody was able to review his work prior to his spectacular TV appearance, and for some days afterwards.

    This presented a severe breach of professional scientific etiquette. And as review later showed Gallo’s studies did not deliver any proof for the virus thesis.[1]

    Mullis confirmed it as well:

    People keep asking me, ‘You mean you don’t believe that HIV causes AIDS?’ And I say, ‘Whether I believe it or not is irrelevant! I have no scientific evidence for it!’ I might believe in God, and He could have told me in a dream that HIV causes AIDS. But I wouldn’t stand up in front of scientists and say, ‘I believe HIV causes AIDS because God told me.’ I’d say, ‘I have papers here in hand and experiments that have been done that can be demonstrated to others.’ It’s not what somebody believes, it’s experimental proof that counts. And neither Montagnier, Gallo, nor anyone else had published papers describing experiments which led to the conclusion that HIV probably caused AIDS.”

    Mullis even had the opportunity do ask Montagnier personally about a reference proving that HIV causes AIDS. But he couldn’t name one. “It was damned irritating,“ as Mullis reported. “If Montagnier didn’t know the answer, who the hell did?“

    Of course, whoever is in possession of a solid peer-reviewed study that proves that HIV causes AIDS may please present it to me or my co-author!

    I have searched for such a study by myself, but haven’t found it, either. I have also approached Anthony Fauci and his NIAID several times asking them, among other things, to send me such a study showing that HIV is a retrovirus that causes a deadly infection. Finally, I was told by Hillary Hoffman from the NIAID’s News and Science Writing Branch that:

    Dr. Fauci respectfully declines to respond to the questions that you emailed.”[2]

    About this practice of refusing to answer questions Horace F. Judson, historian of molecular biology, wrote in his book The Great Betrayal: Fraud in Science:

    Central to the problem of misconduct is the response of institutions when charges erupt. Again and again the actions of senior scientists and administrators have been the very model of how not to respond. They have tried to smother the fire. Such flawed responses are altogether typical of misconduct cases.”

    Calling AZT trials “scientifically controlled” is like referring to garbage as “haute cuisine”
    Such behavior, which smells of misconduct, runs like a golden thread through Fauci‘s 36-year history as director of the NIAID.

    A particularly blatant example is the approval of azidothymidine – commonly known as AZT – that became the first authorized AIDS medication. The basis for this was the so-called Fischl study which was published in July 1987 in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) — and already then Fauci was in charge of federal AIDS funding.

    John Lauritsen, journalist, Harvard analyst and active in the Gay Rights Movement since the 1970s, had viewed the FDA documents on the Fischl study and came to the conclusion that the study was “fraud”; the Swiss newspaper Weltwoche termed the experiment a “gigantic botch-up” and NBC News in New York branded the experiments, conducted across the US, as “seriously flawed.“

    Even the FDA toxicology analyst Harvey I. Chernov concluded — months before publication of the mentioned pivotal AZT study – in an FDA document obtained under the Freedom Of Information Act by John Lauritsten that:

    The available data are insufficient to support FDA approval [of AZT].”

    The Fischl experiments were, in fact, stopped after only four months, after 19 trial subjects in the placebo group (those who did not receive AZT, but rather an inactive placebo) and only one participant from the so-called verum group (those who were officially taking AZT) had died. Through this, according to the AIDS establishment, the efficacy of AZT appeared to be proven.

    But the Fischl study was not even worth the paper it was printed on. Not only was it financed by AZT manufacturer Wellcome (today GlaxoSmithKline), which is clearly a conflict of interest, but it was “clear that Fauci‘s NIH and the FDA had far too ‘cozy’ a relationship with Burroughs-Wellcome,”as Lauritsen writes.

    Apart from that, the study was stopped after only four months. A clinical trial observation period of only four months is much too short to be informative, considering the usual practice of administering AIDS medications over years, or even a lifetime.

    Moreover, the Fischl study had been conducted in a downright fraudulent manner. “It is almost beyond the bounds of probability that the mortality data could be correct,” as Lauritsen states. “There are many ways that errors can occur in research. But in this particular study the most parsimonious explanation would be deliberate fraud.”[3]

    For example, the double-blind conditions of the study (according to which neither the researchers nor patients should have known who was taking AZT and who was taking placebos) were no longer existent after a short time. NBC lead reporter Perri Peltz stated in 1988, that almost immediately everyone knew who was getting what. Patients told how they can distinguish AZT from placebo by the taste.

    Furthermore, the FDA documents show that the study results were distorted. For example, sicker patients were placed in the placebo group or because the group that swallowed AZT (and therefore had to cope with the severe side effects) received more supportive medical services than the placebo subjects.

    NBC reported that there was widespread tampering with the rules of the Fischl trial. The rules had been violated coast to coast, and if all patients with protocol violations were dropped, there wouldn’t be enough to be able to continue the study.

    Fauci’s History of Ignoring Critical Questions
    On 27 January 1988, NBC News (Channel 4) broadcasted the first of Peltz‘ three-part exposés on AZT.

    When preparing this report, we repeatedly tried to interview Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes of Health. But both Dr. Fauci and Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Frank Young declined our request for interviews.”

    “Welcome to the club, Perri!” wrote John Lauritsen in his book The AIDS War: Propaganda, Profeteering and Genocide from the Medical-Industrial Complex.

    When it comes to questions of HIV or AZT, the Public Health Service bureaucrats and “scientists” won’t speak to me either; they have also refused to speak to the BBC, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Radio, Channel 4 (London) television, Italian television, The New Scientist, and Jack Anderson.“

    The same happened to me recently when I sent Fauci, and his NIAID, questions regarding the Fischl study — to this day I have not received any answer.[4]

    Of course, Fauci was willing to talk…in media that did not ask critical questions and only let him pray down his advertising messages.

    On February 19, 1988, Fauci appeared on the televisioin program Good Morning America, as Lauritsen writes in his book. And he was asked why only one drug, AZT, had been made available. He replied:

    The reason why only one drug has been made available — AZT — is because it’s the only drug that has been shown in scientifically controlled trials to be safe and effective.“

    But “this brief statement contains several outstanding falsehoods,” as Lauritsen points out.

    First, there have been no “scientifically controlled trials” of AZT; to refer to the FDA-conducted AZT trials as ‘scientifically controlled’ is equivalent to referring to garbage as la haute cuisine. Second, AZT is not ‘safe’: it is a highly toxic drug — the FDA analyst who reviewed the toxicology data on AZT recommended that it should not be approved. Third, AZT is not known objectively to be ‘effective’ for anything, except perhaps for destroying bone marrow.” [5]

    Nevertheless, Fauci did not get tired of spreading factually unsubstantiated statements about AZT throughout the world. Even this year, at the end of April, Fauci was not afraid of promulgating the untruth about AZT during a White House meeting about Gilead’s drug remdesivir, by saying “the first randomized placebo-controlled trial with AZT… turned out to give an effect that was modest” (more on remdesivir below).

    By the way, the inventor of AZT himself, Jerome Horwitz, said he was so cloyed with the drug that he “dumped it on the junk pile,” he “didn’t [even] keep the notebooks.“

    His invention AZT was a chemotherapy-like drug of extreme, not to say fatal, toxicity and “so worthless” to him that he “didn’t think it was worth patenting,” as former BusinessWeek journalist Bruce Nussbaum writes in his book Good Intentions: How Big Business and the Medical Establishment are Corrupting the Fight against AIDS, Alzheimer’s, Cancer and More.

    In the mid 1980s Fauci promised the world they would “develop a vaccine for AIDS” rapidly. But even 35 years later such a vaccine is not yet in sight — and this despite the fact that, according to calculations since the 1980s governments alone have funded HIV research with well over half a trillion US dollars so far, with annual US Federal budgets that are now around 35 billion dollars, compared to 0.9 billion in 1987.

    Is the Watergate phenomenon — follow the money — also evident here? To this Charles Thomas, molecular biologist and former professor of biochemistry at Harvard and John Hopkins Universities, said:

    Too many people are making too much money out of it. And money is stronger than truth.”

    Same Old Scam: From AZT to “swine flu” vaccines, PrEP & remdesivir
    The list of Fauci‘s assertions, which he must know he cannot substantiate scientifically, is almost endless. This cannot be stressed often enough.

    In the context of so-called “bird flu” (H5N1) which was exaggerated to a world threat by the WHO, politicians, scientists and the mainstream media between 2003 and 2005, Fauci predicted that “even in the best-case scenarios” it would “cause 2 to 7 million deaths” worldwide. As the journalist Michael Fumento writes in his article:

    Dr. Fauci’s recurring disease ‘nightmares’ often don’t materialize.”

    In fact, even the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that by May 16, 2006, H5N1 had killed “only” 100 people.

    Equally unsubstantiated was Fauci’s aggressive promotion of H1N1 influenza (“swine flu”) vaccine in 2009. Back then he was reassuring that serious adverse events were “very, very, very rare”. Unfortunately, this statement was also irresponsibly unfounded, because the underlying studies were fast-tracked ones and lacked solid double-blind placebo-controls. There were also heavy conflicts of interests.

    To make matters worse, only one year later, in 2010, the Swedish Agency for the Regulation of Prescription Drugs reported cases of children and adolescents suffering from narcolepsy after a swine flu vaccination — a neurological disorder that leads to a disturbance of the circadian rhythm (the biological clock that regulates the sleep-wake cycle).

    Further analysis confirmed that the Pandemrix vaccine also caused the disease in vaccinated people in other countries. That the swine flu vaccine causes narcolepsy has been confirmed by the courts.

    Nevertheless, Fauci did not let himself be put off.

    In December 2015, for instance, the NEJM published his article Ending the HIV–AIDS Pandemic: Follow the Science. In this piece he made a case for “dramatically scale up HIV testing and treatment around the world” — including preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), i.e. “using ART [antiretroviral therapy] for HIV prevention in HIV negative persons.”

    That is to say, healthy people should take highly toxic drugs. But here again: As self-assured as he presents his statements, he was not prepared to substantiate them factually.

    In my mentioned request to the NIAID, in relation to his 2015 article about PrEP I asked:

    In your NEJM article you write that the IPERGAY study showed that ‘persons who took PrEP… were 86% less likely to acquire HIV infection than those taking placebo.’ But in which study it has been shown that HIV is a very special retrovirus that causes a deadly infection?
    Or in other words: If even Luc Montagnier admits, that on the images done by electron microscopy of the cell culture that he used he “saw some particles but they did not have the morphology typical of retroviruses”xxxii — in which study it has been proven that HIV, which is said to be a retrovirus, is a deadly retrovirus?
    In your article you are making a case for “dramatically scale up HIV testing”—but in which study it has been proven that so-called HIV tests are in fact HIV tests?
    Do you agree that:
    so-called HIV tests respond “positive” to a wide range of physiological conditions
    HIV test kits were approved only for blood screening
    these tests do not claim to diagnose infection
    proteins such as p18 or p24 are not specific for HIV, and that
    there is no gold standard for an HIV test?
    If not, which of these statements is wrong, and why is it wrong? If yes, why should we “dramatically scale up HIV testing”?

    You say in your article that “the early promise of durable effects from combination therapy has been realized for many patients.” But how can we conclude that ART being introduced in 1995/1996 is life-prolonging and responsible for having decreased the number of AIDS deaths in industrialized countries if:
    in 1995/1996 only a fraction of patients received ART
    statistics from the CDC and the RKI clearly show that the number of AIDS deaths actually reached the peak (mortality summit) as early as 1991,
    no reliable statements can be made as to whether a single drug and ART are life-prolonging, since the basic prerequisite for this is lacking: a solid placebo-controlled study that has demonstrated the superiority of the drug/ART?
    Unfortunately, as mentioned, Hillary Hoffman from NIAID just let me know that:

    Dr. Fauci respectfully declines to respond to the questions that you emailed.”[6]

    Another example of a Fauci farce is Gilead Sciences’ rapid-release drug remdesivir, which was approved on May 2, 2020 in the context of COVID-19 for emergency use only. A few days before, the NIAID director claimed that a study found remdesivir would reduce recovery time and reduce mortality.

    This can only be described as another scandal in which Fauci plays a central role—especially when you look at the fraudulent way in which the drug was approved and which is very similar to the way AZT was authorized in 1987.

    An article from the Alliance for Human Research and Protection (AHRP) — Fauci’s Promotional Hype Catapults Gilead’s remdesivir — brought up the following painful subject:

    Fauci has a vested interest in remdesivir. He sponsored the clinical trial whose detailed results have not been peer-reviewed. Furthermore, he declared the tenuous results to be ‘highly significant,’ and pronounced remdesivir to be the new ‘standard of care.’ Fauci made the promotional pronouncement while sitting on a couch in the White House, without providing a detailed news release; without a briefing at a medical meeting or in a scientific journal — as is the norm and practice, to allow scientists and researchers to review the data.

    When he was asked about a recently published Chinese study on remdesivir, in The Lancet (April 29th , 2020); a trial that was stopped because of serious adverse events in 16 (12%) of the patients compared to four (5%) of patients in the placebo group, Dr. Fauci dismissed the study as ‘not adequate.’

    But while the Chinese study that Fauci denigrated, was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center peer-reviewed, published study in a premier journal, The Lancet, with all data available, the NIAID-Gilead study results the remdesivir approval is based on have not been published in peer-reviewed literature — nor have details of the findings been disclosed.

    “However, they were publicly promoted by the head of the federal agency that conducted the study, from the White House,” as the AHRP underlined. “What better free advertisement?”

    By the way, regarding Fauci’s financial relations with Gilead, there is a petition that requests that he discloses them, since he hasn’t done it yet.

    What the virus tsar also failed to disclose to the public in his promotional pronouncement of remdesivir was that the primary outcomes of the study that led to its emergency use approval were changed on April 16, 2020. Changes in the primary outcome are posted on clinicaltrials.gov.

    Where previously there was an 8-point scale, which also included the deceased patients, from then on there has been only a 3-point scale, which leaves the deceased patient out of the equation and which at the same time only measures the time until recovery or being released from the hospital.

    “Changing primary outcomes after a study has commenced is considered dubious and suspicious,” as the AHRP pointed out. And Reuters News reported that respected prominent leaders in the medical community — such as Steven Nissen MD, the chief academic officer at the Cleveland Clinic and Eric Topol MD, director and founder of the Scripps Research Translational Institute in California — were unimpressed by remdesivir’s tentative, modest benefit at best.

    Referring to the Lancet report, Topol stated:

    That’s the only thing I’ll hang my hat on, and that was negative.”

    As for the NIAID modest results, Dr Topol was unimpressed:

    It was expected to be a whopping effect. It clearly does not have that.”

    The change in primary outcome measures raised serious red flags for scientists; but was largely ignored by the mainstream media which mostly repeated Fauci’s promotional script.

    Steve Nissen told The Washington Post:

    I think that they thought they weren’t going to win, and they wanted to change it to something they could win on. I prefer the original outcome. It’s harder. It’s a more meaningful endpoint. Getting out of the hospital early is useful, but it’s not a game-changer.”

    As you can guess, all the questions I have asked the NIAID regarding remdesivir have remained unanswered as well…[7]

    How toxic remdesivir is, is also shown by the fact that just recently, on October 2, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the regulator of medicinal products of the European Union, started a safety review of remdesivir. Reason: Some patients taking the drug reported serious kidney problems.

    About two weeks later, on October 15, the WHO reported that in its own trial named “Solidarity” which started in March this year remdesivir not only failed to produce any measurable benefit in terms of mortality reduction, but that it also didn’t reduce the need for ventilators, or the length of hospital stays.

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s organization Children’s Health Defense pointed this out on October 23 on its website. Fauci, by contrast, again remained silent about this study.

    But Gilead shot ahead and commented in all seriousness “it is unclear if any conclusive findings can be drawn from the [Solidarity] study results,” because the trial hadn’t been peer reviewed or published in a scholarly journal.

    But this comment is downright ridiculous.

    On the one hand, it was no less a figure than Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO, who initiated this multi-center, global Solidarity trial (more than 11,300 adults with Covid-19 in 405 hospitals in 30 countries) for the very reason that:

    Multiple small trials with different methodologies may not give us the clear, strong evidence we need about which treatments help to save lives. This large, international study is designed to generate the robust data we need, to show which treatments are the most effective.”

    Moreover, Gilead forgot to mention in its statement that the pivotal trial of remdesivir leading to its emergency use approval, as outlined, had not been peer reviewed and published in a solid journal on the day of its approval (May 2nd), either, and that it was seriously flawed.

    Nevertheless, the study funded by Fauci’s NIAID has been finally published on October 8 in the New England Journal of Medicine (ie in the same journals as the fraudulent pivotal trial of AZT). The only alleged benefit reported was a shorter recovery time for patients receiving remdesivir compared to those in the placebo group.

    But this result has no validity, not only because of the seriously flawed underlying data. The way in which this drug got its approval is very reminiscent of the outlined fraudulent way in which AZT received its approval in 1987 in an alleged placebo trial. But in reality, almost from the beginning, everyone knew who was getting what (AZT or placebo) and patients even had their pills analyzed in the craving for the alleged miracle drug.

    Who wants to rule out that this did not happen with remdesivir as well?

    Especially since the placebo subjects in the remdesivir study did not receive a real placebo. Instead, the bulk of the patients got a “placebo” containing the same ingredients as remdesivir except the agent, for example sulfobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin, which can cause serious damage.

    hydroxychloroquine illustrates Fauci’s mendacity
    The story of the drug hydroxychloroquine also illustrates Fauci’s phoniness. At the end of March, US president Trump called this agent “a gift from God”, while Fauci warned against jumping on conclusions.

    On May 27, Fauci even stated on CNN about hydroxychloroquine, “The scientific data is really quite evident now about the lack of efficacy.”

    And his comments came days after the Lancet published a 96,000-patient observational study that concluded that hydroxychloroquine had no effect on Covid-19 and may have even caused some harm.

    Too bad that shortly after, this Lancet study was retracted, because:

    several concerns were raised with respect to the veracity of the data and analyses conducted by Surgisphere Corporation and its founder and our co-author, Sapan Desai.”

    Hence, Fauci’s assertion on May 27, “The scientific data [about hydroxychloroquine] is really quite evident now about the lack of efficacy,” was definitely a voluntary false statement, simply because at that date Fauci must have known that scientific data backing his claim did not exist.

    Or as Politico put it on May 27:

    There is no data yet from randomized, controlled clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine—the gold standard for evaluating potential treatments.”

    In fact, in 2005 the Virology Journal published an article concluding that chloroquine (of which hydroxychloroquine is a slightly milder derivative) is a “potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus” dubbed SARS-CoV-1, as health care expert Kevin Corbett points out in a Twitter post on October 26. And so-called SARS-CoV-2 is claimed to be genetically related to so-called SARS-CoV-1.

    Of course, the Virology Journal study lacks validity because the science behind SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 is totally unfounded, and not least also because the study was just a cell culture and not a patient trial.

    But Fauci is the world’s number one herald of the official corona narrative, and the study has been conducted by CDC scientists. So he should actually be totally convinced that chloroquine (and thus also hydroxychloroquine) is helpful in the context of corona.

    Nevertheless, Fauci was unequivocal on Wednesday May 27, saying that “the data are clear right now” that hydroxychloroquine is not effective against the coronavirus.

    This is why I asked Fauci’s NIAID, “How did Anthony Fauci come to his conclusion on May 27?”[8]. But I have not received an answer to this question, either.

    Conversely, this does not mean that the effectiveness of the drug has been properly proven. Let’s not forget that hydroxychloroquine is far from a candy, it can have many serious side effects and even be fatal by causing cardiac arrhythmias, for example. Especially if it is given in higher doses, which is what happened in the treatment of so-called COVID-19 patients.

    As mentioned, the experimental administration of high doses of potentially lethal drugs such as hydroxychloroquine is the major factor for the excess mortality observed in some (but not all!) countries. “I agree about hydroxychloroquine overdosing, both from a reduced function point of view and toxicity,” writes me Yale epidemiologist Harvey Risch by e-mail.[9]

    Risch belongs to the best-known researchers who see a potential curative effect in the drug. The relevant studies with COVID-19 patients “all showed significant benefit for high-risk outpatients,” says Risch.[10]

    A view that is also expressed, for example, in the almost 40-page inquiry of Paul V. Sheridan to Fauci with copies sent to President Trump and others.

    But even if we assume that administering hydroxychloroquine in lower doses alone, or in combination with an antibiotic and possibly zinc, to so-called COVID-19 patients may help decreasing the hospitalization and mortality risk, for instance, there is definitely no solid proof that this is due to an antiviral/anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect, as claimed. So the only conclusion would be that the positive effect is due to hydroxychloroquine having an anti-inflammatory effect, antibiotics clearing pathogenic bacteria and zinc boosting the immune system and metabolism function.

    Furthermore, it must be considered in this context that administering hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with an antibiotic and maybe zinc cannot be at all a sustainable long-term therapy nor does it represent a real causal therapy.

    This approach also just follows “modern biomedicine’s basic formula with its monocausal-microbial starting-point and its search for magic bullets: one disease, one cause, one cure,“ as American sociology professor, Steven Epstein, writes in his book Impure Science — AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. An approach that finally is just escapist.

    This was expressed by Allan Brandt, a medical historian at Harvard Medical School, stating in his book No Magic Bullet: The promise of the magic bullet has never been fulfilled.

    Apart from that, there is only one way to prove that a drug or a combination of agents help reducing mortality or hospitalization or is effective in relation to any other clinical endpoint, that is if you do compare it with a real placebo.

    As Marcia Angell, former Editor in Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, states quite rightly in her book The Truth About the Drug Companies:

    If there is really doubt about whether a standard treatment is effective, the FDA should require that clinical trials of new treatments have three comparison groups—new drug, old drug, and placebo.”

    Unfortunately, there is no such placebo-study for hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 showing that this drug is superior compared to doing nothing.

    In this context, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote on August 2 on Instagram, Fauci “insists he will not approve HCQ [hydroxychloroquine] for COVID until its efficacy is proven in ‘randomized, double blind placebo studies.’”

    On this point one can indeed only agree with the virus tsar. And at the beginning of June, researchers reported the results of the first gold-standard clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine in Covid-19, concluding that it did not perform any better than placebo.

    But here as well Fauci’s hypocrisy shows up in the end. Not only did the results of the said “first gold-standard” placebo study become known only at the beginning of June — thus a couple of days after Fauci made his unfounded claim that “The scientific data [about hydroxychloroquine] is really quite evident now about the lack of efficacy.”

    Also, “to date, Dr Fauci has never advocated such [placebo] studies for any of the 72 vaccine doses added to the mandatory childhood schedule since he took over NIAID in 1984,” as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also notes in his Instagram post. “Nor is he requiring them for the COVID vaccines currently racing for approval. Why should chloroquine be the only remedy required to cross this high hurdle?”

    Fauci follows Big Pharma’s track
    Additionally, the following question must be asked: Why do Fauci and his compliant companions focus on a “magic bullet” oriented symptom treatment medicine and not on causal therapies that take lifestyle factors such as nutrition, industrial toxins, exercise and psyche into account?

    That can only be because people who occupy the highest positions of power such as Fauci obviously are on the side of pharmaceutical companies.

    “Dr Fauci’s peculiar hostility towards HCQ is consistent with his half-century bias favoring vaccines and patent medicines,” as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. states. “Dr. Fauci’s double standards create confusion, mistrust and polarization.”

    In this context, Kennedy Jr. points out that:

    HCQ’s patents are long expired; pills cost 30¢. [And] HCQ might compete with Dr Fauci’s vaccines including the Moderna vaccine for which his agency owns half the patent and Dr Fauci has invested $500 million in taxpayer dollar.”

    The emperor of worldwide virus research also has ties with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who in turn is associated with Big Pharma and other powerful industries, and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) that is associated with powerful industries as well.

    In 2012 Fauci was named one of the five Leadership Council of the Gates Foundation-created Global Vaccine Action Plan.

    The Gates Foundation also invests directly in Fauci’s NIAID (around $1.5 million in 2020 and around $7.5 million in 2019). And not least through Fauci’s vested interest in remdesivir, the circle closes when one realizes that the Gates Foundation owns more than $1.3 million in Gilead stock and more than $3.2 million in Gilead bonds.

    So it is just jaw-dropping how Fauci can bloviate in the interview with German news magazine Der Spiegel mentioned at the beginning of this article:

    I stay completely apolitical. I never, ever, get involved in politics… I have been neutral throughout the six presidents that I have served.”

    With this assertion Fauci conveys a completely unrealistic picture of the reality which resembles a Fata Morgana in which politicians rule, companies keep the economy going and science tracks down the facts in completely independent manner — without getting significantly in each other’s way or even corrupting each other.

    Besides, scientists are in no way immune to careerism, greed, and thirst for glory. Even though they are often perceived as such, scientists are not saints, they are humans with virtues and faults. Even Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur whose claims laid the foundation for the whole virus mania, were demonstrably career-obsessed science fraudsters.

    No doubt, we are living in times in which politicians are less and less in control of politics and in which the influence of powerful industries is so great that the independence of research is no longer guaranteed in many areas.

    As a 2004 Lancet review of Judson’s aforementioned book The Great Betrayal: Fraud in Science points out:

    Judson paints a dark picture of [biomedical] science today, but we may see far darker days ahead as proof and profit become inextricably mixed.”

    Fauci himself is the personified expression of this alarming development and thus far from being “completely apolitical,” in fact the opposite. Against this background, it seems just comprehensible that there is even a petition titled “#Fire Fauci.” "

    About the authors
    Torsten Engelbrecht is an award-winning journalist and author from Hamburg, Germany. In 2006 he co-authored Virus-Mania with Dr Klaus Kohnlein, and in 2009 he won the German Alternate Media Award. He has also written for Rubikon, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Financial Times Deutschland and many others.

    Konstantin Demeter is a freelance photographer and an independent researcher. Together with the journalist Torsten Engelbrecht he has published articles on the “COVID-19” crisis in the online magazine Rubikon, as well as contributions on the monetary system, geopolitics, and the media in Swiss Italian newspapers.

    Read the full article at Off-Guardian.org https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/27/...to-remdesivir/

    NOTES:
    [1] Steven Epstein. Impure Science—AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge (University of California Press, 1996, p. 73)
    [2] Author’s email communication with the NIAID media team (among them Hillary Hoffman) between January 9 and 30, 2018
    [3] John Lauritsen. The AIDS War. Propaganda, Profeteering and Genocide from the Medical-Industrial Complex (Asklepios, 1993, p. 77)
    [4] Author’s emails to the NIAID on August 24 and 27, 2020
    [5] John Lauritsen. The AIDS War. Propaganda, Profeteering and Genocide from the Medical-Industrial Complex (Asklepios, 1993, pp. 71-79)
    [6] Author’s email communication with the NIAID media team (among them Hillary Hoffman) between January 9 and 30, 2018
    [7] Author’s email to the NIAID on August 27, 2020
    [8] Personal email from September 11, 2020
    [9] Personal email from September 9, 2020
    [10] ibid.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (29th October 2020), Gemma13 (29th October 2020)

  27. Link to Post #14
    UK Avalon Member Mike Gorman's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Language
    English
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,149
    Thanks
    2,829
    Thanked 5,677 times in 1,029 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    The impression I get concerning Fauci is that Trump is being a wise ruler, keeping his enemies close, plus he has to build credibility with the intelligence community (AKA mainstream media) by having Fauci as a member of the White House Covid team he offers a balanced team of advisors, and he can mitigate any negative moves at source. This is what I would do in Trump's position, if you only present one face to the world, it weakens your position.

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mike Gorman For This Post:

    avid (29th October 2020), Gemma13 (29th October 2020)

  29. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,885
    Thanks
    31,716
    Thanked 62,498 times in 12,395 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    I really can't see that Trump has "mitigated" much that Fauci and the WHO have done so far (though at the same time, I'm sure that he has done more than HRC would have, and more than Biden would do.)
    That said, his actions have not exactly demonstrated strength.
    JFK demonstrated strength going up against the Deep State and of course, we all know the price he paid for that, but he set the standard, and perhaps nothing more could have been done at that juncture.
    But when you compare the two...the differences are vast.
    If he is really being wise, I certainly hope it pays off, because we certainly do need a wise ruler at this time.
    It seems to me he acts more instinctively than from wisdom, but perhaps he is learning with experience.
    Hope springs eternal....

    Quote Posted by Mike Gorman (here)
    The impression I get concerning Fauci is that Trump is being a wise ruler, keeping his enemies close, plus he has to build credibility with the intelligence community (AKA mainstream media) by having Fauci as a member of the White House Covid team he offers a balanced team of advisors, and he can mitigate any negative moves at source. This is what I would do in Trump's position, if you only present one face to the world, it weakens your position.
    Last edited by onawah; 29th October 2020 at 06:11.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (29th October 2020), Gemma13 (29th October 2020), greybeard (29th October 2020)

  31. Link to Post #16
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Age
    75
    Posts
    11,971
    Thanks
    28,305
    Thanked 61,372 times in 10,504 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Think its a question of timing onawah
    Chris
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    Gemma13 (29th October 2020), onawah (30th October 2020)

  33. Link to Post #17
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,885
    Thanks
    31,716
    Thanked 62,498 times in 12,395 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Fauci's Treacherous Ties to China and Globalists
    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    October 30, 2020
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...&rid=999498810



    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    A report by Dr. Peter Breggin reveals Dr. Anthony Fauci’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and globalists who have profited from the pandemic measures promoted by him as the leader of the U.S. Coronavirus Task Force
    Fauci has been the major force behind research activities that enabled the Chinese Communist Party to manufacture lethal SARS coronaviruses, which in turn led to the release — whether accidental or not — of SARS-CoV-2 from the Wuhan Institute of Virology
    In collaboration with the CCP and the World Health Organization, Fauci initially suppressed the truth about the origins and dangers of the pandemic, thereby enabling the spread of the virus from China to the rest of the world
    Fauci has supported and praised Director-General of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a member of a Marxist-Leninist Ethiopian political party with a corrupt past and terrorist ties who has also been accused of covering up cholera outbreaks in Ethiopia
    Fauci recently published a paper in which he dismisses the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 was created in and released from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, arguing instead for natural mutation. He also uses the pandemic to justify the “green new deal” and the globalist movement known as “the Great Reset”
    Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, this year rose to national prominence as the leader of the White House Coronavirus Task Force. By the time everything is said and done, he may end up wishing he’d gained less public exposure.

    In the October 19, 2020, report1 “Dr. Fauci’s COVID-19 Treachery,” Dr. Peter Breggin reveals Fauci’s “chilling ties” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its military.

    A second, legal, report2 by Breggin titled “COVID-19 & Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Effects on Individuals, Institutions and Society,” was filed in a federal court in Ohio, August 31, 2020, as part of a lawsuit and injunction to put an end to the state’s pandemic measures.

    According to Breggin, Fauci “has been the major force” behind research activities that enabled the CCP to manufacture lethal SARS coronaviruses, which in turn led to the release — whether accidental or not — of SARS-CoV-2 from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan, China.

    Breggin claims Fauci has helped the CCP obtain “valuable U.S. patents,” and that he, in collaboration with the CCP and the World Health Organization, initially suppressed the truth about the origins and dangers of the pandemic, thereby enabling the spread of the virus from China to the rest of the world.

    Fauci has, and continues to, shield the CCP and himself, Breggin says, by “denying the origin of SARS-CoV-2” and “delaying and thwarting worldwide attempts to deal rationally with the pandemic.”

    Gain-of-Function Research Supported by Fauci
    In the executive summary of the report, Breggin documents 15 questionable activities that Fauci has been engaged in, starting with the fact that he funded dangerous gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses, both by individual Chinese researchers and the WIV in collaboration with American researchers. This research, Breggin says, allowed the CCP and its military to create their own bioweapons, including SARS-CoV-2.

    He points out that the American-Chinese collaboration was initially detailed in a paper written by two Chinese researchers, Botao Xiao (trained at Northwestern University and Harvard Medical School) and Lei Xiao back in February 2020. According to Breggin, the CCP forced them to recant and the paper was withdrawn.

    “The stated purpose [of gain-of-function research] is to learn to prevent and treat future outbreaks; but research labs are the most common source of outbreaks from dangerous pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, as well as two earlier accidental escapes by SARS viruses in 2004 from a research facility in Beijing,” Breggin writes.3

    As previously reported by Newsweek,4 the NIAID-funded gain-of-function research into bat coronaviruses was conducted in two parts. The first, which began in 2014 and ended in 2019,5 focused on “understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.” Initial findings6 were published in Nature Medicine in 2015.

    The program, which had a budget of $3.7 million, was led by Wuhan virologist Shi Zheng-Li and sought to catalogue wild bat coronaviruses. It also involved U.S. scientists such as Ralph Barric from the University of North Carolina and Charles Lieber from Harvard.7

    The second phase that began in 2019 included additional surveillance of coronaviruses along with gain-of-function research to investigate how bat coronaviruses might mutate to affect humans. This second phase was run by the EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit research group led by Peter Daszak, an expert on disease ecology. According to Newsweek, the project proposal explained the research to be conducted as follows:8

    “’We will use S protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in S protein sequences predict spillover potential.’

    In layman's terms, ‘spillover potential’ refers to the ability of a virus to jump from animals to humans, which requires that the virus be able to attach to receptors in the cells of humans. SARS-CoV-2, for instance, is adept at binding to the ACE2 receptor in human lungs and other organs.

    According to Richard Ebright, an infectious disease expert at Rutgers University, the project description refers to experiments that would enhance the ability of bat coronavirus to infect human cells and laboratory animals using techniques of genetic engineering. In the wake of the pandemic, that is a noteworthy detail.”

    Why Did Fauci Continue Gain-of-Function Research?
    While President Trump canceled funding for dangerous gain-of-function research on viruses in April 2020 after the Chinese-American collaborations became publicly known, Fauci has since “unleashed a deluge of new funding that will almost certainly” benefit Chinese scientists with CCP ties who are still working in various U.S. universities and other research facilities.

    Part of the funding is again directed to the EcoHealth Alliance, which for years has outsourced its research projects to WIV and other Chinese researchers. That said, recent reports indicate the NIH is now demanding the organization produce records detailing its work with the Wuhan lab before the funding is released.9

    Fauci also continued outsourcing gain-of-function research to the WIV back in 2014, after then-President Obama ordered a stop to such research. At the time, he also continued to fund collaborations between U.S. and WIV researchers, led by Vineet Menachery, Ph.D., at the University of North Carolina.

    “In order to outsource dangerous viral research from the U.S. to China during the Obama moratorium, Fauci prematurely approved the Wuhan Institute as a highest level containment facility (known as BSL-4) capable of safely working with lethal viruses,” Breggin writes.10

    “He did this while knowing the Institute had a very poor safety record and while also knowing that all such facilities in China are overseen by the military as part of its biowarfare program. Thus, Fauci created two grave worldwide threats, the accidental release of a deadly coronavirus and/or its use as a military weapon.”

    Interestingly, while the original moratorium on gain-of-function research was a direct order by the President, when the moratorium was lifted at the end of 2017, it was done so by the National Institutes of Health and the NIAID.

    Fauci holds himself out as the ultimate source of objective scientific information and science-based conclusions. In reality, he works with and empowers globalist pharmaceutical firms and globalist organizations … These globalists gained power and influence as their policies and practices, including the shutdowns, continue to worsen conditions throughout the world. ~ Dr. Peter Breggin
    Fauci also defended and promoted gain-of-function research on bird flu viruses a decade ago, saying such research was worth the risk because it allows scientists to prepare for pandemics.11 However, as noted by Breggin, this kind of research does not appear to have improved governments’ pandemic responses one whit.

    Downplaying COVID-19 Risks
    Next, Breggin points out Fauci’s connections to and support of Director-General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a member of a Marxist-Leninist Ethiopian political party whose corrupt past and terrorist ties have been highlighted ever since his controversial nomination.12,13,14 Incidentally, Tedros has also been accused of covering up cholera outbreaks in Ethiopia.

    “Together, they initially minimized the dangers of COVID-19. Fauci and Tedros also delayed worldwide preparations for the pandemic while allowing the Chinese to spread the virus with thousands of international passenger flights,” Breggin writes, adding:

    “Fauci publicly undermined the President’s criticism of Director-General Tedros and China. Instead, Fauci reassured the world that Tedros was a trustworthy and ‘outstanding’ man — implying that Tedros’s connections in China were similarly reliable and could be trusted.”

    Fauci’s Globalist Ties
    Interestingly, Fauci recently published a paper in which he again dismisses the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 was created in and released from the WIV, arguing instead for a natural mutation.

    “By persistently and unequivocally claiming that SARS-CoV-2 emerged from nature untouched by lab manipulations, Fauci continues to protect himself and China, and their relationship, to the endangerment of America and the rest of the world,” Breggin writes.

    “Fauci holds himself out as the ultimate source of objective scientific information and science-based conclusions. In reality, he works with and empowers globalist pharmaceutical firms and globalist organizations such as WHO and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation … These globalists gained power and influence as their policies and practices, including the shutdowns, continue to worsen conditions throughout the world.”

    The globalist, technocratic agenda also shines through Fauci’s call for a political agenda that protects the population from pathogens by limiting or eliminating “aggressive” and manmade interventions into nature. Fauci’s paper, published in the journal Cell in September 2020, reads in part:15

    “The COVID-19 pandemic is yet another reminder … that in a human-dominated world, in which our human activities represent aggressive, damaging, and unbalanced interactions with nature, we will increasingly provoke new disease emergences.

    We remain at risk for the foreseeable future. COVID-19 is among the most vivid wake-up calls in over a century. It should force us to begin to think in earnest and collectively about living in more thoughtful and creative harmony with nature …”

    Indeed, this language is straight out of the technocratic handbook, now rebranded as “the Great Reset.” As noted by Breggin:

    “Fauci’s utopian scheme, which overlaps with the Green New Deal, would permanently suppress and disrupt the activities and lives of the 7.8 billion people on Earth in the vain hope of reducing future pandemics.

    Thus the American official most responsible for the creation of SARS-CoV-2 in a Chinese lab instead blames its origins on human interventions into the environment and nature, thereby completely exonerating himself while holding humanity responsible.

    Simultaneously, he is using the pretext of protecting us from viruses to impose a radical totalitarian agenda upon humanity. Indeed, the largest, most aggressive, and most dangerous human interventions into nature must include Fauci-funded gain-of-function research in which viruses are taken out of nature and engineered into pathogens.”

    Fauci Continues to Hype COVID-19 Risks
    In the main body of the report (Page 7 onward), Breggin goes on to detail Fauci’s role in the media fearmongering that has allowed pandemic measures to stretch from an initial call for a two-week lockdown to eight months and counting. “Most people have very unrealistic fears about the risk of dying from COVID-19,” Breggin notes, and “This is due in part to the CDC and to Dr. Anthony Fauci who inflate the risk of COVID-19 deaths.”

    According to data16 released by the CDC August 26, 2020, only 6% of the total COVID-19-related deaths in the U.S. had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death on the death certificate. The remaining 94% had an average of 2.6 health conditions that contributed to their deaths.

    “Most people who die while being positive for SARS-CoV-2 are near to or past their average longevity. In addition to being old, the great majority are already ill with heart disease, cancer, or some other chronic illnesses that may in fact have caused them to die.

    But even using the CDC’s biased data, the risk of death for most people is too small to require them to sacrifice the quality of their lives as the government demands under the threat of catching COVID-19,” Breggin writes.

    COVID-19 Is Less Lethal Than the Flu for Most
    According to a September 2, 2020, article17 in Annals of Internal Medicine, the infection fatality ratio has been overestimated due to the fact that many who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 remain asymptomatic, which makes it difficult to estimate the true infection rate.

    The researchers found that, when excluding those residing in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities, the infection fatality rate for the average person is as follows:

    Overall (all ages) — 0.26%
    People younger than 40 — 0.01%
    People aged 60 or older — 1.71%
    The estimated infection fatality rate for seasonal influenza listed in this paper is 0.8%. Other sources put it a little higher. In either case, this means that if you’re under the age of 60, your chance of dying from the flu is greater than your chance of dying from COVID-19.

    Breggin cites CDC data, noting that the CDC is using inflated numbers, but even at that, the risk of death for people under the age of 70 is lower than that of the flu. According to CDC estimates, the infection fatality ratios are as follows:18

    0-19 years — 0.003% (3 in 100,000)
    20-49 years — 0.02%
    50-69 years — 0.5%
    70+ years — 5%
    As noted by Breggin, the risk to children and youths is exceedingly small, “Yet Dr. Fauci and other public health officials continue to act as if there is a grave risk of exposing children and young adults to SARS-CoV-2, when there is not,” Breggin writes.

    Breggin’s 55-page report19 is well worth reading in its entirety. It contains far more details than I’ve been able to provide in this overview, and is fully referenced.

    Fauci Continues to Dismiss Hydroxychloroquine
    Breggin’s legal report,20 “COVID-19 & Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Effects on Individuals, Institutions and Society,” is also worth reading. It addresses the totalitarian threat posed by the global response to the pandemic, and details the psychological operations behind the fearmongering and the underhanded methods used to discredit hydroxychloroquine, among other things.

    Included is an open letter to Fauci about his dismissal of hydroxychloroquine, signed by Drs. George C. Fareed, Michael M. Jacobs and Donald C. Pompan, which reads, in part:21

    “Dear Dr. Fauci:

    You were placed into the most high-profile role regarding America’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. Americans have relied on your medical expertise concerning the wearing of masks, resuming employment, returning to school, and of course medical treatment.

    You are largely unchallenged in terms of your medical opinions … This is unusual in the medical profession in which doctors’ opinions are challenged by other physicians in the form of exchanges between doctors at hospitals, medical conferences, as well as debate in medical journals.

    You render your opinions unchallenged, without formal public opposition from physicians who passionately disagree with you. It is incontestable that the public is best served when opinions and policy are based on the prevailing evidence and science, and able to withstand the scrutiny of medical professionals.

    As experience accrued in treating COVID-19 infections, physicians worldwide discovered that high-risk patients can be treated successfully as an outpatient, within the first five to seven days of the onset of symptoms, with a ‘cocktail’ consisting of hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin (or doxycycline). Multiple scholarly contributions to the literature detail the efficacy of the hydroxychloroquine-based combination treatment.

    Dr. Harvey Risch, the renowned Yale epidemiologist, published an article in May 2020 in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled ‘Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to Pandemic Crisis’ …

    Dr. Risch is an expert at evaluating research data and study designs, publishing over 300 articles. Dr. Risch’s assessment is that there is unequivocal evidence for the early and safe use of the ‘HCQ cocktail’ …

    Yet, you continue to reject the use of hydroxychloroquine, except in a hospital setting in the form of clinical trials, repeatedly emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting its use. Hydroxychloroquine, despite 65 years of use for malaria, and over 40 years for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, with a well-established safety profile, has been deemed by you and the FDA as unsafe for use in the treatment of symptomatic COVID-19 infections.

    Your opinions have influenced the thinking of physicians and their patients, medical boards, state and federal agencies, pharmacists, hospitals, and just about everyone involved in medical decision making.

    Indeed, your opinions impacted the health of Americans, and many aspects of our day-to-day lives including employment and school. Those of us who prescribe hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin/doxycycline believe fervently that early outpatient use would save tens of thousands of lives and enable our country to dramatically alter the response to COVID-19.

    We advocate for an approach that will reduce fear and allow Americans to get their lives back. We hope that our questions compel you to reconsider your current approach to COVID-19 infection.”

    Fauci — ‘An Extraordinarily Destructive Force’
    In Breggin’s estimation, Fauci “has been and continues to be an extraordinarily destructive force in the world.” Not only did he play a role in China’s ability to create SARS-CoV-2 and other potential biological weapons, he’s also covering up its origin, and initially tried to downplay the threat of the novel virus.

    To top it off, “he became the go-to scientist and management czar for the very pandemic that he helped to create, enormously increasing his power and influence, and the wealth of his institute and his global collaborators, including Bill Gates and the international pharmaceutical industry,” Breggin writes, adding, in conclusion:

    “In his rise to power, Fauci has done a great deal of additional damage … for example, by suppressing the most effective, safest, and least expensive medication treatment (hydroxychloroquine in varied combinations), while manipulating his clinical research to promote an ineffective, dangerous, and highly expensive drug (remdesivir).

    Fauci has also been supporting inflated COVID-19 case counts and reported deaths from the CDC, then using the inflated estimates to justify oppressive public health measures that have no precedent and little or no scientific basis, but add to his influence and power and to the wealth of his globalist associates …

    It is time to fire Fauci, to investigate this entire disaster, and to consider what needs to be done to protect the US and the world from future lab-generated pandemic disasters, whether accidental or intentional.”

    + Sources and References
    1, 3, 10, 19 Dr. Fauci’s COVID-19 Treachery October 19, 2020 (PDF)
    2, 20 COVID-19 & Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Effects on Individuals, Institutions and Society August 30, 2020 (PDF)
    4, 8, 11 Newsweek April 28, 2020
    5 NIH Project Information, Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence
    6 Nature Medicine 2015; 21: 1508-1513
    7 Salon April 24, 2020
    9 The Wall Street Journal August 19, 2020
    12 Somebitchtoldme.com Chapter 1: The Corruption of Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
    13 Breitbart April 10, 2020
    14 Fox News March 27, 2020
    15 Cell September 3, 2020; 182: 1077-1092 (PDF)
    16 CDC.gov August 26, 2020, Comorbidities Table 3, updated October 14, 2020
    17 Annals of Internal Medicine September 2, 2020 DOI: 10.7326/M20-5352
    18 Dr. Fauci’s COVID-19 Treachery October 19, 2020 (PDF), pages 7 and 8
    21 COVID-19 & Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Effects on Individuals, Institutions and Society August 30, 2020 (PDF), pages 36-37
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (30th October 2020), Chester (30th October 2020), Franny (30th October 2020), greybeard (30th October 2020)

  35. Link to Post #18
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,885
    Thanks
    31,716
    Thanked 62,498 times in 12,395 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts
    by Jon Rappoport
    November 6, 2020
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...as-fatal-flaw/

    "The COVID delusion is finished, blown apart.

    OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

    Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

    Well, how about THIS?

    July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

    Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at about the 4-minute mark [1]):

    “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

    Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

    Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

    That’s called a false positive.

    What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

    Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…

    Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…

    The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.

    The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.

    Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.

    If anyone in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together, pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people.

    “Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”

    If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the US economy and its citizens.

    All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled [2]: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See page 35. This document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”

    FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles (< 40.00 Ct).”

    Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”

    Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [3] Here are money quotes:

    “Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”

    “Set the limit” would usually mean, “We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.”

    The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients…”

    Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.

    Get the picture?

    I hope so.

    If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow."

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=260

    [2] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

    [3] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

    Also posted here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1388108
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Baby Steps (7th November 2020), East Sun (7th November 2020), greybeard (8th November 2020), Gwin Ru (7th November 2020), Sadieblue (8th November 2020), sunflower (8th November 2020), Sunny-side-up (7th November 2020)

  37. Link to Post #19
    Avalon Member East Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2010
    Location
    USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,665
    Thanks
    4,250
    Thanked 5,457 times in 1,281 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Fauci, Gates and their ilk are worse than Hitler, Stalin and Mao all rolled in together.
    To have plans to eliminate over seven billion people, (humans) from this Earth is totally insane.

    And by the use of vaccines.

    Talk about playing god, this is the epitome of people being controlled by the Globalists, who ? are
    not totally human.
    In the words of Jim Marrs, the famous Texas journalist, "They want us dead!"
    And soon he was dead.

    And soon we may be dead.

    Hoping to reincarnate into a higher realm of existence.

    We'll meet again and not recognize each other except as being
    kindred spirits.
    Question Everything, always speak truth...

  38. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to East Sun For This Post:

    ClearWater (8th November 2020), Elainie (8th November 2020), greybeard (8th November 2020), onawah (8th November 2020), Sadieblue (8th November 2020)

  39. Link to Post #20
    Indonesia Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th June 2018
    Age
    43
    Posts
    307
    Thanks
    700
    Thanked 1,580 times in 273 posts

    Default Re: Fauci

    Quote Posted by East Sun (here)
    Fauci, Gates and their ilk are worse than Hitler, Stalin and Mao all rolled in together.
    To have plans to eliminate over seven billion people, (humans) from this Earth is totally insane.
    They're all Biden supporters. Just be aware...

  40. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to spade For This Post:

    Elainie (8th November 2020), onawah (8th November 2020), Philippe (15th November 2020)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts