-
8th January 2011 04:29
Link to Post #521
Re: THE RULERS OF THE WORLD: a new Project Avalon video interview
First I would like to say that i have really been enjoying the dialogue here in the last couple pages.
Some very salient ideas have been approached and expressed.
I am particularly fond of Chuck's observations, musings, and line of reasoning.
Let's play imagination for a second and pretend that we are all "roles" on a stage.
The divine consciousness of eternity is playing each part so well that it "forgets" that it is really unified awareness playing "opposite" itself.
Then for a moment recall that indeed, we are reflections of the "33" or whomever, just as they are reflections of us. It is my experience that we must embrace our similarities without judgment, and also accept our own complicity in this whole adventure.
As I tried to illustrate in one of my previous posts, we are all "thoughts" on this organism we call Earth. In your brain thoughts come and go, ideally without your judgment of them, and yet they are vital for your unique expression.
Some "thoughts" stay as patterns and change as our understanding of our experience grows, just as some generations of our "egoic controlling thoughts" (read Bloodlines) change and adapt though their function remains the same.
A well trained mind will observe and let go of all thoughts without an emotional reaction to them.
It might behoove us as individuals and as a group to still the ocean of the mind within ourselves, and accept "our" own egoic, controlling, fearful, thoughts and emotions.
Let go of your judgment and emotional response to the "thoughts."
You cant "go to war" with anyone outwardly and truly win in the highest sense of the term.
However, personally I went so far as to "go to war" with my self, rooting out all "thought programs" that were counter productive for my personal life mission.
Follow me for a second....Could this not be viewed as "mass genocide" of unhealthy thoughts and patterns in the microcosm of my "body?"
It was easy to be rid of and manage what i judged to be limiting patterns in my own development....especially when the life form of a thought is so infinitesimal to my own experience, so removed from my daily experience and understanding of what it means to be a "human" at this level of expression.
Lets say instead I chose to accept these "thoughts," lets call em the "controllers," as much as I accepted my love filled, tender, warm thoughts. Personally, this was NOT easy. In order to do so i had to accept my own "darkness" and still love myself.
Now i can more easily love and appreciate the "33" or whomever people choose to demonize outwardly for their own lack of responsibility for their own situation.
After all, i know that these people have people they love. They DO love. They are not beasts, or demons, or vile creatures.
Let it also be stated for the record that i am by no means a paragon of virtue, selflessness, and non-judgment.
But, stilling my reactionary mind to these would be "controllers" allows me to work WITH their energies rather than against them.
AH, but here's the rub...what if THEY dont want to work with my/our own energies?
Then are WE manipulating them as we become more powerful in our realization of our true nature? if you were them wouldn't you be afraid?
Here in lay's the true dilemma at this level as i see it.
Where is the distinction drawn between "our" vision of how hings "should" be and "theirs?"
Who is to say what the "thought" is that stays on the radio receiver that is our brain? you? who are you ....really?
Who is to say what the "thought" is that keeps playing louder and more frequently than the others on the radio receiver that is our planet?
Just playing devils advocate for a moment, but who are YOU to say what the best course of humanity's development is?
If you were the egoic "thought" whose job it was was to protect, defend, and reach the genetic objective of the planet wouldn't you be threatened with the unfocused, undisciplined, often times chaotic nature of the masses...even the "enlightened ones" here?
Where does "our" manifestation/influence/etc step on "theirs?"
How do you resolve potential cross viewpoints?
Is it as simple as....
"The ball is not in "their" court. The ball is in "our" court ?"
Isn't that the same as them saying its "their" responsibility to shape creation since "they" are aware of "their" ability?
Who's the wolf now? Who are the sheep? Do we become what we have judged in our self righteous cause to "balance" the equation as our understanding must be right since it is more "loving?" Is it?
Truth is...this is our collective holographic experience on a macrocosmic whole AND fractally as individuals, both sides of the force if you really want to call it that...
It's easier to manage what you have immediate control over...your reactions, than to try to control the larger fractal game, ive found out.
But, in controlling my personal framework and experience i have found, without effort, the larger experience also comes within a resonant measure of my desired outcome.
Everyone came here for a reason, at this time, to learn the things specific to now.
I wonder if it is indeed going to be thousands of years before humanity as a whole reaches maturity in its spiritual development, and that if this be the case then would people be willing to actually go through a seemingly negative (from our immediate personal experience) shift in order to realize the grander story?
....Forgo the immediate "victory" as it were to realize a bigger "win?"
Is it that necessary?
I dont have the answer to that one im afraid, but i have a sneaking suspicion we all do. I also tend to think we will all collectively make that decision either consciously or unconsciously very soon (if we haven't already).
I would like to ask a seemingly off topic question whose resolution I believe, ties directly into some of the deeper meat and potatoes of this discussion as i see it.
Here is the question:
Why is it that when a person is well aware of his or her talents, skills, intellect, advanced attributes, etc. are they often times judged as vain, arrogant, etc?
Who is committing the judgment here?
Is it the talented person who recognizes their abilities as being more proficient than those around him/her?
Or is it the person who knows this to be the case and cant stand it?
How many times have you personally thought...."man that guys so full of himself?"
Why? What part of you cant stand to see a powerful self realized individual? Is it the part that knows you can be the same? Or, the part that is afraid of being the same?
Ive dished out as well as having been on the receiving end of that unfortunate exchange.
I think it needs to be reiterated that:
these "controllers" accept their divinity (aren't we all?), recognize that they have the ability to shape collective reality to a degree, and are actively doing so in the best way they know how (as limited as we may judge it to be).
I dont mean this to be pejorative, but
again...what's your excuse?
Love y'all.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Thunderbird
-
8th January 2011 06:19
Link to Post #522