Hi Banshee, I’ve also read Kerry’s post, but I don’t see why you say she is “maintaining the party line”. I’m not sure I understand what you are referring to…??? Are you perhaps saying Bill’s point of view is more correct than Kerry’s one?Posted by Banshee (here)
I just read Kerry's post. Kerry has a vested interest in maintaining the party line that has served a select few but disinformed so many.…
Please, could you elaborate on that and give some specific examples of what things you think Kerry might be wrong or disinformed about, and what things Bill might be correct about?
P.S. I am simply curious about it, I have my own view point, I am not sure if I am more or less correct and I am trying to learn and have a clearer view of the big picture. In summary, my view point is that the Anglo Saxon Mission is pretty much correct (*1), perhaps not 100%, but close. But I may be wrong, I don’t know.
(*1) Including the possible 2012 cataclsym but not necessarily exactly on 2012, it could be plus or minus X number or years (2013, 15, 50… etc.).
I’ve explained my view point with more detail in this post:
Post 151, pag. 16. Does “The Anglo Saxon Mission” version of 2012 make more sense than Charles’ version?