CUT TO THE CHASE: NASA's Culture of Cover-ups and Planet X

[viking]

Is PX getting closer???

A common rebuke to the topic of Planet X is that with something this big, the government must be forthcoming. Sounds logical but yet, this knee-jerk rejection presumes that at some point, an honesty threshold comes into play. One where news of such magnitude would necessarily compel honesty. But is this how it really works? To help us explore that knee-jerk assumption, Nick Redfern, author of The NASA Conspiracies: The Truth Behind the Moon Landings, Censored Photos, and The Face on Mars, weighs in with examples of how the truth and the fiction of how NASA is linked to high-level cover-ups

CUT TO THE CHASE: NASA's Culture of Cover-ups and Planet X with Nick Redfern and Marshall Masters.

listen here... lots of info.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/yowradi...ver-ups-and-pl

viking

[the_flyingboy]

NASA stands for Never A Straight Answer

[str8thinker]

Thanks for the link but it took me a long time to figure out how to download it.

Finally (with Firefox as my browser) I discovered I had to click the "f" to open the audio player:

Then I was able to save it using the DownloadHelper plugin.

Listening to it now...

[Terra]

Nice one Viking. Forgot about Marshall Masters and Yowusa, will try to catch up on his shows, it's been a long time.

[ArtyCarl]

If Planet X is the binary companion of our own sun but on a wide elliptical orbit then presumably to have any impact on the earth it must come much much closer.

Whereas at the moment it may only be visible to the best observatories and therefore possibly easier to keep under wraps, sooner or later it will have to come into view of a multitude of amateur astronomers, many of which would like nothing more than to make a new discovery.

So I say, when it is visible and can no longer be denied, then that is the time to worry about it.