View Poll Results: What’s your opinion ofthe Charles Material-CM? Multiple choice.Instructions in Post#1

Voters
146. You may not vote on this poll
  • 1a- The first Poll said Charles must disclose full details, so I’d expect him to do so

    57 39.04%
  • 1b- The first Poll said Charles must disclose full details, but I don’t mind if he doesn’t

    37 25.34%
  • 2a- Unless further key info is provided by Charles, the CM isn’t reliable enough so far

    77 52.74%
  • 2b- Based on the info provided by Charles so far, the CM is reliable enough already

    15 10.27%
  • 3a- If the CM turns out incorrect, the credibility of Bill-Avalon could be deteriorated

    45 30.82%
  • 3b- Even if CM turns out incorrect, credibility of Bill-Avalon couldn’t be deteriorated

    41 28.08%
  • 4a- I think Internet forums (Avalon included) can be infiltrated or manipulated

    108 73.97%
  • 4b- I think Internet forums (Avalon included) cannot be infiltrated or manipulated

    5 3.42%
  • 5a- I’d like Bill and other experts to debate publicly the validity of the CM

    72 49.32%
  • 5b- I don’t want Bill and other experts to debate publicly the validity of the CM

    19 13.01%
Multiple Choice Poll.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 6 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 119

Thread: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon forum?

  1. Link to Post #21
    Belgium Avalon Member Jean-Luc's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    near Brussels
    Age
    62
    Posts
    628
    Thanks
    5,382
    Thanked 5,177 times in 591 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Dear qbeac

    You might like to read this post from Charles relating to the healing experience that took place a few days ago with 100+ Avalonians or so, with apparently quite a positive outcome for two people concerned.

    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post148711

    Skeptics might think this is yet another trick to fool people.
    Everyone's choice but it's not mine.

    I'd obviously be happy to get more questions answered.
    Lets' just be patient a little bit.
    This is all food for thought and things probably just need to mature.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Jean-Luc For This Post:

    magicmanx (21st February 2011)

  3. Link to Post #22
    Deactivated
    Join Date
    29th March 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,503
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked 1,456 times in 404 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Dear qbeac,
    Congratulation for this well crafted opinion making piece.

    But it seems that unfortunately an agenda is shining through it very clearly.
    Let me just highlight this:

    Quote Posted by qbeac (here)
    Will Charles honour his word of telling us the full details of his plan (option 3 of the poll)?
    What kind of "word" or promise has he given in regards of the poll?

    Please post that quote together with a valid link to it !
    I could not find it, and do you know why? I think because there is no promise, but you know that, isn't it?

    The real questions are:

    Why are you trying to put the fake-blame of a broken promise on somebody?

    Are you instigating a "poll" with loaded blame-questions? If so, why?

    This is now the second thread regarding the same subject by the same member. Why?

    Are you having a hidden agenda?
    Please prove me wrong by posting the demanded link.


    I hope these questions are not having any effect on the credibility of your motives.

    Until then, i will follow your advice:

    Quote Posted by qbeac (here)

    Therefore, please, spread the word so that everybody in the Avalon forum knows about it

  4. Link to Post #23
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Posts
    1,347
    Thanks
    253
    Thanked 742 times in 349 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo


    i think the poll is very detailed offering multiple options rightly so... in my opinion the only question missing is whether according to some the credibility of the forum is eroded beyond repair already..i happen to have friends who never wanted to become members and were nevertheless avid regular readers...i get questions like "what has gone on" from them and i do not know what to say really ...so that possibility i feel would need to be addressed...sorry qbeck, that bit i think is missing... other than that, this is a good result of your fine endeavour so we can get a more rounded picture among membership here..

    i don't think you have an agenda..if you do, yours must be the same as mine and many people's here which is - wanting to get to the bottom of this all - THE TRUTH that is...

    my best wishes to you... l


    .

  5. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to lightblue For This Post:

    Ahkenaten (22nd February 2011), aikya (21st February 2011), Hypothetical (21st February 2011), InCiDeR (28th February 2011), qbeac (21st February 2011)

  6. Link to Post #24
    Australia Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    6th January 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,370
    Thanks
    4,213
    Thanked 4,990 times in 1,091 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    4a- I think Internet forums (Avalon included) can be infiltrated or manipulated 4080.00%

    4b- I think Internet forums (Avalon included) cannot be infiltrated or manipulated 00%

    Infiltrated:

    To pass (troops, for example) surreptitiously into enemy-held territory.

    To penetrate with hostile intent

    To enter or take up positions in gradually or surreptitiously, as for purposes of espionage or takeover

    To gain entrance gradually or surreptitiously

    Infiltration is a result of OUTSIDE INTERESTS gaining egress.

    Outside interests are any interest external to Avalon......in this case.

    Members need to realise that as members of this forum, they have an obligation and duty of care to this forum. Mixed loyalties may cause tension.
    Last edited by Icecold; 21st February 2011 at 14:26.

  7. Link to Post #25
    Deactivated
    Join Date
    29th March 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,503
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked 1,456 times in 404 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Sigh...
    another Fear-porn post....

  8. Link to Post #26
    Avalon Member Carmody's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th August 2010
    Location
    Winning The Galactic Lottery
    Posts
    11,389
    Thanks
    17,597
    Thanked 82,321 times in 10,234 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    The expression of Democratic ideals requires constant guard. Even when the contrary will is sublimated, the position of constant vigilance must not erode.

    That is the hardest part of all, as it requires being in a constant state of awareness.
    Last edited by Carmody; 21st February 2011 at 14:33.
    Interdimensional Civil Servant

  9. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Carmody For This Post:

    aikya (21st February 2011), bashi (21st February 2011), InCiDeR (28th February 2011), modwiz (21st February 2011), ViralSpiral (21st February 2011)

  10. Link to Post #27
    Avalon Member ViralSpiral's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th January 2011
    Posts
    2,355
    Thanks
    13,979
    Thanked 17,613 times in 2,179 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Quote Posted by Carmody (here)
    The expression of Democratic ideals requires constant guard. Even when the contrary will is sublimated, the position of constant vigilance must not erode.

    That is the hardest part of all, as it requires being in a constant state of awareness.
    100%. Vigilance is our most useful "weapon"

    I equate this thread to an atheist/creationist debate. One requiring proof, the other "knowing".
    Neither is right.......... nor wrong. Remember that beliefs are self-perpetuating and self-reinforcing, whichever side of the fence you are on.

    I choose not to particpate in the poll.
    .... be gentle with your anger. Sixto Rodriguez, Cape Town 20.02.2013

  11. Link to Post #28
    Deactivated
    Join Date
    29th March 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,503
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked 1,456 times in 404 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Quote Posted by ViralSpiral (here)

    I choose not to particpate in the poll.
    Same for me.
    I think it is fundametally flawed.

  12. Link to Post #29
    Norway Avalon Member chelmostef's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2010
    Location
    Im an english man in norge!
    Age
    44
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    814
    Thanked 1,098 times in 292 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    So far out of the poles I have seen conducted on/or for Avalon I can only draw the conculsion that the majority of Avalonians dont really like polls..... And I would be one of them (Sorry)

  13. Link to Post #30
    Avalon Member aikya's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd January 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    557
    Thanks
    1,337
    Thanked 1,606 times in 426 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Quote Posted by Icecold (here)

    Mixed loyalties may cause tension.
    And differences of opinion enhance creative dialogue.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to aikya For This Post:

    anikohu (21st February 2011), Icecold (22nd February 2011), lightblue (22nd February 2011)

  15. Link to Post #31
    Norway Avalon Member chelmostef's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2010
    Location
    Im an english man in norge!
    Age
    44
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    814
    Thanked 1,098 times in 292 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    I just did it I voted!!!! Damm! I voted 4B..... And that is becouse no else voted for that option..... I do think forums can be infultrated though...

  16. Link to Post #32
    Deactivated
    Join Date
    29th March 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,503
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked 1,456 times in 404 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Quote Posted by chelmostef (here)
    I just did it I voted!!!! Damm! I voted 4B..... And that is becouse no else voted for that option..... I do think forums can be infultrated though...
    You made me change my mind.
    Now we are 2 !

  17. Link to Post #33
    Avalon Member SKAWF's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th January 2011
    Location
    london
    Posts
    732
    Thanks
    2,928
    Thanked 3,384 times in 633 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    ultimately it doesnt matter on a personal level. nobody is in any physical danger.
    on a strange level, if it has been a con,
    then its been a pleasure to have been done up like a kipper by a pro.
    it exposed a few weaknesses i had, and sparked a bit of life into some other things.

    as for the forums credibility
    that depends on how people deal with things.
    if after having invested so much time and energy in something,
    it turns out that thing was folly,
    its whether you can disengage from it, put it down,
    and focus your attention and energy into something else

    whatever doesnt kill you makes you stronger......... or

    'life has a habit of dressing up its greatest gifts, in the form of your worst nightmare'

    steve
    when i went there nothing happened!, i was bored out of my mind..................in the Twilight Zone.

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SKAWF For This Post:

    Bollinger (28th February 2011), chelmostef (21st February 2011), NancyV (22nd February 2011)

  19. Link to Post #34
    Norway Avalon Member chelmostef's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2010
    Location
    Im an english man in norge!
    Age
    44
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    814
    Thanked 1,098 times in 292 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Quote Posted by bashi (here)
    Quote Posted by chelmostef (here)
    I just did it I voted!!!! Damm! I voted 4B..... And that is becouse no else voted for that option..... I do think forums can be infultrated though...
    You made me change my mind.
    Now we are 2 !
    Damm it! I thought no one eles in there right mind would vote for that and I could be the 1 voter.... I am the one and only!!!

    Not any more though

  20. Link to Post #35
    France Deactivated
    Join Date
    21st January 2011
    Location
    Paris
    Age
    61
    Posts
    359
    Thanks
    1,134
    Thanked 1,430 times in 288 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Quote Posted by Bollinger (here)
    Quote Posted by ace (here)
    Would rather go sit in the sun, on my hill and play with my dog.

    Haven't you noticed

    things have moved on.

    Ace
    Well of course things have moved on. What other alternative is there BUT to move on? The kind of questions people should be asking themselves are:

    Have I learned anything useful from it?
    Has it made me a better soul?
    Have I managed to drink a little from the cup of wisdom?
    Did it bring clarity to my view and thinking?
    Has it made me a better or worse person?
    Does it have any consequence on how I would treat information of the same kind in the future?
    How will I react to the next character that turns up with "information" and no proof?

    Simply to say, time to move on, is tantamount to saying: oh well, never mind, it was good while it lasted, can we have some more please. Even if it is proven beyond all doubt that the Charles material was fake and completely without substance, you should still have learned something from it by enquiring of yourself the above questions, otherwise, it truly was a complete waste of time.
    Please, do enlighten us, with your response to your seven questions.

    Ace

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to ace For This Post:

    Icecold (22nd February 2011)

  22. Link to Post #36
    England Avalon Member K626's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,377
    Thanks
    2,463
    Thanked 3,112 times in 828 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    A serious poll at last.

    Well done Qbacca.

    cheers

    K
    In all ages, in all lands, there have been those who seek truth. This seeking is an individual's search for something more than self, and much more than the confines of this worldly system. It is the seeker, who understands there is more than what meets the eye, who is not afraid and makes the choice to go into the unknown. The process of awaking has begun, the discovery is underway.
    Alan Watt

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to K626 For This Post:

    Bollinger (28th February 2011)

  24. Link to Post #37
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Posts
    1,347
    Thanks
    253
    Thanked 742 times in 349 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    bashi
    Quote Sigh...
    another Fear-porn post..
    ..
    see what are you advocating this time around...

    we saw you already in the roles of:

    pseudo scientist, pseudo spiritualist, pseudo spiritual adviser, pseudo prophet, pseudo alchemist, devils advocate (from either side and from any point to view); you've been something of a bully lately chasing some of the members around issuing threats, posting horrifying images (you probably would argue this was not meant to intimidate/scare but to enlighten; i saved the pages with your original quotes so no need to go back and edit out..too late, it's all kept in the edits archive anyway)...then: recently not so successful healing medium (suffered not very pleasant side effects, i am sorry you did); also been banned for 7 days for breaching forum guidelines - got re-vamped in less than 36 hours though for an unknown reason...

    and now i see you relentlessly advocating blind faith...you imply there's need no need for further info... no clarification according to you is necessary as, according to you - we already have a clear instruction on how to "save" a "deserving" fraction of humanity.. what you seem to be advocating these days is an outright obedience of, for the most part, unwilling membership...see how you go...

    according to me though you need to lower your voice so to be heard in the first place... l

    .

  25. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lightblue For This Post:

    Bollinger (28th February 2011), Icecold (22nd February 2011), qbeac (21st February 2011)

  26. Link to Post #38
    France Avalon Member kouby's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th December 2010
    Posts
    58
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 64 times in 26 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    I'm sorry to say that I believe Avalon's credibility has already been quite injured by material like Charles, Hoagland, Icke and Maxwell. Icke does put out good points, but his attitude towards "non-believers" is just a dead give-away.
    Insulting non-believers is just a way of blowing up the ego of the believers, and if you really want fear-porn Icke is the way to go.
    Hoagland has been so discredited it's not even worth speaking about.
    Maxwell's scaremongering is so blatant it's not worth going into.

    Note that I'm not saying that all their information is junk, but that's how disinformation and scaremongering works: 80% valid info just to sell off the disinfo.

    The fact that so much time has been awarded to the "Charles material" when all he is saying is rehashing already mainstream information for a couple of hours for me is an example of how Avalon has been damaged recently.

    When first coming across the Avalon material I new that a certain amount would be junk, that's how the search for truth works, you can't help but cross the odd disinfo artist, conman and the likes.

    But I really find it saddening how so much of Bill's time has been wasted on this stuff. There's LOTS going around in the world at the moment. The place to get info now is the middle east, with the recent changes in Egypt I would have thought Bill would have been all over the place. The whole of the middle east is moving, this is the time to get some people talking about what they know about ancient history, government-CIA connections, maybe get a little look into some museum back-rooms, get some names to investigate, some industry insiders to spill a few beans, etc etc.

    Anyway sorry for the negative connotation of this post, but the amount of energy spent on this material is really getting to me ='(
    I think it's time for me to go for a walk in the mountains.

  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kouby For This Post:

    bodixa (21st February 2011), Bollinger (28th February 2011)

  28. Link to Post #39
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    15th March 2010
    Posts
    10,068
    Thanks
    12,891
    Thanked 32,308 times in 7,756 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    who cares, you all got what you wanted...

    tared and feathered and thrown unceremoniously out the door...

    some of us knew from the beginning and are ashamed at how Charles was treated...

  29. Link to Post #40
    Deactivated
    Join Date
    29th March 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,503
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked 1,456 times in 404 posts

    Default Re: Is Charles Material correct or incorrect? Could that affect credibility Avalon fo

    Quote Posted by lightblue (here)
    bashi
    Quote Sigh...
    another Fear-porn post..
    ..
    see what are you advocating this time around...

    we saw you already in the roles of:

    pseudo scientist, pseudo spiritualist, pseudo spiritual adviser, pseudo prophet, pseudo alchemist, devils advocate (from either side and from any point to view); you've been something of a bully lately chasing some of the members around issuing threats, posting horrifying images (you probably would argue this was not meant to intimidate/scare but to enlighten; i saved the pages with your original quotes so no need to go back and edit out..too late, it's all kept in the edits archive anyway)...then: recently not so successful healing medium (suffered not very pleasant side effects, i am sorry you did); also been banned for 7 days for breaching forum guidelines - got re-vamped in less than 36 hours though for an unknown reason...

    and now i see you relentlessly advocating blind faith...you imply there's need no need for further info... no clarification according to you is necessary as, according to you - we already have a clear instruction on how to "save" a "deserving" fraction of humanity.. what you seem to be advocating these days is an outright obedience of, for the most part, unwilling membership...see how you go...

    according to me though you need to lower your voice so to be heard in the first place... l

    .
    i would be happy to see my quotes again. POST THE QUOTES WITH LINKS!
    No vague smearing as in the past!
    Prove to be a lion and not a puppy!


    ¤=[Post Update]=¤

    Quote Posted by chelmostef (here)

    Damm it! I thought no one eles in there right mind would vote for that and I could be the 1 voter.... I am the one and only!!!

    Not any more though
    sorry can`t withdraw my vote from this "serious" poll

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 6 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts